Can it handle metaphors? Meta takes us a step closer to Star Treks universal translator The computer science behind translating speech from 100 source languages. Jacek Krywko Jan 15, 2025 11:00 am | 64 Interpreters work during the 76th Session of the United Nations General Assembly on September 21, 2021 in New York, United States. Credit: Liao Pan/China News Service via Getty Images Interpreters work during the 76th Session of the United Nations General Assembly on September 21, 2021 in New York, United States. Credit: Liao Pan/China News Service via Getty Images Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreIn 2023, AI researchers at Meta interviewed 34 native Spanish and Mandarin speakers who lived in the US but didnt speak English. The goal was to find out what people who constantly rely on translation in their day-to-day activities expect from an AI translation tool. What those participants wanted was basically a Star Trek universal translator or the Babel Fish from the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy: an AI that could not only translate speech to speech in real time across multiple languages, but also preserve their voice, tone, mannerisms, and emotions. So, Meta assembled a team of over 50 people and got busy building it.What this team came up with was a next-gen translation system called Seamless. The first building block of this system is described in Wednesdays issue of Nature; it can translate speech among 36differentlanguages.Language data problemsAI translation systems today are mostly focused on text, because huge amounts of text are available in a wide range of languages thanks to digitization and the Internet. Institutions like the United Nations or European Parliament routinely translate all their proceedings into the languages of all their member states, which means there are enormous databases comprising aligned documents prepared by professional human translators. You just needed to feed those huge, aligned text corpora into neural nets (or hidden Markov models before neural nets became all the rage) and you ended up with a reasonably good machine translation system. But there were two problems with that.The first issue was those databases comprised formal documents, which made the AI translators default to the same boring legalese in the target language even if you tried to translate comedy. The second problem was speechnone of this included audio data.The problem of language formality was mostly solved by including less formal sources like books, Wikipedia, and similar material in AI training databases. The scarcity of aligned audio data, however, remained. Both issues were at least theoretically manageable in high-resource languages like English or Spanish, but they got dramatically worse in low-resource languages like Icelandic or Zulu.As a result, the AI translators we have today support an impressive number of languages in text, but things are complicated when it comes to translating speech. There are cascading systems that simply do this trick in stages. An utterance is first converted to text just as it would be in any dictation service. Then comes text-to-text translation, and finally the resulting text in the target language is synthesized into speech. Because errors accumulate at each of those stages, the performance you get this way is usually poor, and it doesnt work in real time.A few systems that can translate speech-to-speech directly do exist, but in most cases they only translate into English and not in the opposite way. Your foreign language interlocutor can say something to you in one of the languages supported by tools like Googles AudioPaLM, and they will translate that to English speech, but you cant have a conversation going both ways.So, to pull off the Star Trek universal translator thing Metas interviewees dreamt about, the Seamless team started with sorting out the data scarcity problem. And they did it in a quite creative way.Building a universal languageWarren Weaver, a mathematician and pioneer of machine translation, argued in 1949 that there might be a yet undiscovered universal language working as a common base of human communication. This common base of all our communication was exactly what the Seamless team went for in its search for data more than 70 years later. Weavers universal language turned out to be mathmore precisely, multidimensional vectors.Machines do not understand words as humans do. To make sense of them, they need to first turn them into sequences of numbers that represent their meaning. Those sequences of numbers are numerical vectors that are termed word embeddings. When you vectorize tens of millions of documents this way, youll end up with a huge multidimensional space where words with similar meaning that often go together, like tea and coffee, are placed close to each other. When you vectorize aligned text in two languages like those European Parliament proceedings, you end up with two separate vector spaces, and then you can run a neural net to learn how those two spaces map onto each other.But the Meta team didnt have those nicely aligned texts for all the languages they wanted to cover. So, they vectorized all texts in all languages as if they were just a single language and dumped them into one embedding space called SONAR (Sentence-level Multimodal and Language-Agnostic Representations). Once the text part was done, they went to speech data, which was vectorized using a popular W2v (word to vector) tool and added it to the same massive multilingual, multimodal space. Of course, each embedding carried metadata identifying its source language and whether it was text or speech before vectorization.The team just used huge amounts of raw datano fancy human labeling, no human-aligned translations. And then, the data mining magic happened.SONAR embeddings represented entire sentences instead of single words. Part of the reason behind that was to control for differences between morphologically rich languages, where a single word may correspond to multiple words in morphologically simple languages. But the most important thing was that it ensured that sentences with similar meaning in multiple languages ended up close to each other in the vector space.It was the same story with speech, tooa spoken sentence in one language was close to spoken sentences in other languages with similar meaning. It even worked between text and speech. So, the team simply assumed that embeddings in two different languages or two different modalities (speech or text) that are at a sufficiently close distance to each other are equivalent to the manually aligned texts of translated documents.This produced huge amounts of automatically aligned data. The Seamless team suddenly got access to millions of aligned texts, even in low-resource languages, along with thousands of hours of transcribed audio. And they used all this data to train their next-gen translator.Seamless translationThe automatically generated data set was augmented with human-curated texts and speech samples where possible and used to train multiple AI translation models. The largest one was called SEAMLESSM4T v2. It could translate speech to speech from 101 source languages into any of 36 output languages, and translate text to text. It would also work as an automatic speech recognition system in 96 languages, translate speech to text from 101 into 96 languages, and translate text to speech from 96 into 36 languagesall from a single unified model. It also outperformed state-of-the-art cascading systems by 8 percent in a speech-to-text and by 23 percent in a speech-to-speech translations based on the scores in Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (an algorithm commonly used to evaluate the quality of machine translation).But it can now do even more than that. The Nature paper published by Metas Seamless ends at the SEAMLESSM4T models, but Nature has a long editorial process to ensure scientific accuracy. The paper published on January 15, 2025, was submitted in late November 2023. But in a quick search of the arXiv.org, a repository of not-yet-peer-reviewed papers, you can find the details of two other models that the Seamless team has already integrated on top of the SEAMLESSM4T: SeamlessStreaming and SeamlessExpressive, which take this AI even closer to making a Star Trek universal translator a reality.SeamlessStreaming is meant to solve the translation latency problem. The baseline SEAMLESSM4T, despite all the bells and whistles, worked as a standard AI translation tool. You had to say what you wanted to say, push translate, and it spat out the translation. SeamlessStreaming was designed to take this experience a bit closer to what human simultaneous translator doit translates what youre saying as you speak in a streaming fashion. SeamlessExpressive, on the other hand, is aimed at preserving the way you express yourself in translations. When you whisper or say something in a cheerful manner or shout out with anger, SeamlessExpressive will encode the features of your voice, like tone, prosody, volume, tempo, and so on, and transfer those into the output speech in the target language.Sadly, it still cant do both at the same time; you can only choose to go for either streaming or expressivity, at least at the moment. Also, the expressivity variant is very limited in supported languagesit only works in English, Spanish, French, and German. But at least its online so you can go ahead and give it a spin.Nature, 2025. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08359-zJacek KrywkoAssociate WriterJacek KrywkoAssociate Writer Jacek Krywko is a freelance science and technology writer who covers space exploration, artificial intelligence research, computer science, and all sorts of engineering wizardry. 64 Comments