30 years ago, Star Trek Generations captured crucial moment in sci-fi franchise
Table of ContentsTable of ContentsPoor timingPairing Kirk and PicardEverything but the food replicatorMore KlingonsGenerations is visually unappealingThe film is not in the same F/X league as previous Trek featuresStar Trek Generations was released in November 1994 at a moment of peak popularity for the franchise. Star Trek: The Next Generation had aired its series finale six months earlier while still a huge ratings success, and it could easily have kept going for more seasons. But with Deep Space Nine recently launched and Voyager in the offing, the collective wisdom deemed that it was time for The Next Generation to beam to the big screen after 178 episodes.By teaming up Captains Kirk (William Shatner) and Picard (Patrick Stewart), Generations would mark the official transition from the cinematic adventures of the original crew to the new one. Unfortunately, the entire, um, enterprise was a miscalculation, driven by Paramounts desire to capitalize off fan enthusiasm at a time when there wasnt much franchise entertainment in cinemas, and virtually no space operas. The marketplace was ripe, in other words, and the movie was a solid box office success generating about $75 million at the domestic box office and $118 million total.Recommended VideosBut in terms of quality and fan reception, Generations represented another blight on the legacy of big screen Trek, which had already survived two of them across just six movies in The Motion Picture and the William Shatner-directed The Final Frontier. And the movie would introduce issues that plagued all four Next Generation feature films.RelatedParamountPart of the problem with Generations was timing. TNG had not only just gone off the air earlier that year but it had done so in an acclaimed two-part episode, All Good Things, which remains one of the shows best. The 60s-series crew, meanwhile, had bowed out just three years earlier in the classy Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. At the conclusion of that movie, Kirk had unambiguously handed over the franchise to The Next Generation, intoning in his final captains log: This ship and her history will shortly become under the care of another crew. To them and their posterity will we commit our future.In other words, the ending of both iterations of Trek had impressively stuck the landing. If Paramount execs couldnt leave well enough alone for a while, they needed to come up with a good story and put the movie in the hands of a better filmmaker than David Carson, who had directed television, including episodes of TNG, but never a feature film.Captains Picard and Kirk in Star Trek: Generations ParamountThe ideato put the two beloved captains in action together for the first time wasnt a bad one. The Next Generation had already featured Spock (Leonard Nimoy), Scotty (James Doohan), and McCoy (DeForest Kelley), with the episodes featuring Spock and Scotty being especially well-received.Kirk had yet to make his entrance into the 24th-century version of the universe, and so the writers came up with the idea of him and Picard meeting up in the Nexus, an extra-dimensional heaven-like realm in which ones thoughts and desires shaped realityand time and space had no meaning, allowing one to visit any point in time and any place that one could imagine. (Im quoting directly from the fan page here because I never did quite get a handle on it.)Soran regards the Nexus in Star Trek: Generations Parmount PicturesThe kicker is that the only way to enter the Nexus is through a violent ribbon of energy that destroys everything that comes near it. If part of the motivation for Shatners appearance was that he wanted a good onscreen death for Kirk (after Spock got one of the most famous deaths in movie history), he got a decent one in the opening sequence when he saves the Enterprise B from the Nexus before being sucked into space. How Chekov (Walter Koenig) and Scotty arent also vacuumed into the cosmic maw as they stand gawking out of the huge hole remains a mystery. But never mind, its one of the few impressive shots in the movie.The opening sequence also introduces the films villain, Dr. Soran, played by Malcolm McDowell, his hair looking like albino corn stalks. Soran has been inside the Nexus and is desperate to get back to it so that he can forget the horrors of his world being assimilated by the Borg. To achieve this, he will have to run the ribbon through a planet, thereby causing the death of hundreds of millions. Picard must enlist Kirk who we discover has not died (!), but entered the Nexus to help defeat Soran and save the planet.Kirk expires in Star Trek: Generations Paramount PicturesUnfortunately, Kirk got a second death scene at the films climax that is infamous for being poorly staged and acted and generally just embarrassing (Shatner himself didnt like it). The fact that Paramount added $10 million to the initially underfunded budget of $25 million just so they could film this scene after the first tested poorly is confounding.Data with Spot in Star Trek: Generations Paramount PicturesThe idea of a character so devastated by grief that hes willing to commit genocide to not have to face it is an interesting one, but it would have been better served as the driving idea of a single episode, not given short shrift in a movie that crams in as many classic Trek elements as possible.For example, the TNG cast make their first appearance in a Holodeck scenario, which was a popular feature on the show. In this one, they conjure up the deck of a 19th-century sailing ship to stage a promotion ceremony for Worf (Michel Dorn). Why hes only now being promoted from lieutenant to lieutenant commander after seven years of helping save the galaxy from every possible threat is just one more of the indignities famously heaped on his character, and true to form he gets little do to thereafter.Worf gets promoted in Star Trek: Generations Paramount PicturesThe movie tries to do more with Data (Brent Spiner), given that he was arguably TNGs most beloved character. As with Spock before him, many of Datas storylines focused on his evolution toward humanity. But Generations takes this almost to parody by having Data install an emotion chip and then acting out comedy so broadly, with such lame punchlines, that its cringeworthy.While Spiner hams it up, Shatner phones it in, with Carson making no real effort to even hide his stunt doubles. The stunt work in general features a ridiculous number of shots of Enterprise crew members getting thrown around during explosions and crashes as if the filmmakers had no knowledge that similar shots throughout franchise history were famous for being unintentionally hilarious.Finally, much of the climactic action takes place on a planet that is no more than a rock formation shot in Valley of Fire State Park in Nevada, reminiscent of so many of the underwhelming planetary locations from both The Original Series and TNG. In terms of both the rocky location and the quality of special effects, this one evokes the original series episode, Arena, in which Shatner tussles with a guy in a rubber lizard suit.Malcolm McDowell as Soran and Gwynyth Walsh as BEtor ParamountAs I wrote previously, after introducing the popular Klingon Bird of Prey ship in Star Trek III, the franchise got as much mileage out of it as possible. Despite being 100 years later in the Trek timeline, it is featured in Generations as well. The ship had been brilliantly used in The Undiscovered Countryalongside the classic Klingon D-7 cruiser. Generations lazily duplicates the ships final moments from that far superior movie, with the final explosion obviously reusing the same footage.The one new conceit here is that the Klingon commanders are women, Lursa and BEtor Duras, gamely played by Barbara March and Gwynyth Walsh, who had also appeared in the show. Unfortunately, any hint of progress in terms of gender representation is undercut by the fact that they sport plunging cleavage. At least Counselor Troi (Marina Sirtis) got to put on a regular uniform by this point. I guess the savage Klingons hadnt evolved that far.The Enterprise Crashes in Star Trek: Generations Paramount PicturesApart from story issues, the movie is a visual mess. A cinematic TNG adventure was always going to look different from the show, because early 90s movies were both shot and projected in 35mm film, as opposed to series episodes, which were shot in 35mm, but transferred to tape for editing. This resulted in a significant loss of resolution, making it look as though it was shot on video. The quality was further diminished by the televisions of the era.The 35mm of Generations is clear and crisp enough and the movie looks sharp in 4K. The problem is that Carson and his team chose a visual design for the film that jarringly contrasts the show, mostly because the action inside the Enterprise-D and other spaceships is so dark. TNG was a brightly lit show; more specifically, it was very evenly lit, which makes sense given that a ships lighting is artificial.Troi and Picard dimly lit in Star Trek: Generations ParamountBut Carson shoots the interiors with chiaroscuro lighting, so that some scenes evoke Caravaggio and others film noir not ideal unless the characters are acting out Double Indemnity in the Holodeck. Not surprisingly, the director of photography was John A. Alonzo, who had shot classic crime films such as Chinatown and Scarface. The look he achieves simply doesnt feel like TNG, a problem the movie series never solved, even in the much better First Contact two years later.Neither does Carson display any gift for cinematic composition. Movie screens are rectangles, but in those days, television was shot to be broadcast from square sets. The result is that Generations is awkwardly staged and framed as if Carson thought he was still working in TV. Overall, the mise-en-scne is jumbled and ugly, with goofy props sticking out at odd angles. The less said about the garish costumes, the better.The Enterprise crew in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Paramount PicturesContrast this with the, ahem, stellar cinematic work that Nicholas Meyer did for with ship interiors in The Undiscovered Country. His lighting is also dim, but its much more muted, with subtle contrast and softer colors that evoke the subdued lighting of a submarine.The look of the 60s series was reinvented for the movies a decade after the show ended and in a new era of special effects (and bigger budgets) for space movies. Audiences expected it to look both different and better. As such, major special effects artists were recruited for the gigs. Douglas Trumbull, who had done FX for 2001, worked on Star Trek: The Motion Picture, and it remains an impressive visual achievement.George Lucas Industrial Light and Magic then took over for Star Trek II during a revolutionary era of FX. That summer alone, Wrath of Khan shared theaters with E.T., Blade Runner, Tron, and The Thing, all FX classics.The Enterprise docked in Star Trek: The Motion Picture Parmount PicturesGenerations came in the shadow of that era, as well as amid the CGI revolution that had already produced Terminator 2 and Jurassic Park. It couldnt compete on the budget that Paramount allotted for it. And anyway, TNG had always been more beloved for its stories and characters than its visuals.Even though the next movie in the series, First Contact, was much better in terms of both story and special effects, the Next Generation crew had peaked in pop culture, which was borne out by the lame final two movies, Insurrection and Nemesis. That three recent seasons of Picard did little to burnish the shows sterling legacy is yet another reminder that wed all be happier if corporations let their franchise entertainment die a good death and unlike Kirk never be revived.Star Trek Generations is streaming on Paramount+.Editors Recommendations
English
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Greek