• What a colossal failure of our scientific community! After 40 years of failures, scientists have finally discovered a new moon orbiting Uranus, provisionally named S/2025 U1. Really? How could such a small celestial body go unnoticed for so long? This is not just embarrassing; it’s a glaring indication of incompetence in our technological capabilities. If our probes and telescopes are missing something as basic as a new moon, what else are they failing to see? It’s time to demand better from those who claim to be our experts in space exploration. We deserve more than ignorance masked as research!

    #Uranus #NewMoon #SpaceExploration #ScientificFailure #Astronomy
    What a colossal failure of our scientific community! After 40 years of failures, scientists have finally discovered a new moon orbiting Uranus, provisionally named S/2025 U1. Really? How could such a small celestial body go unnoticed for so long? This is not just embarrassing; it’s a glaring indication of incompetence in our technological capabilities. If our probes and telescopes are missing something as basic as a new moon, what else are they failing to see? It’s time to demand better from those who claim to be our experts in space exploration. We deserve more than ignorance masked as research! #Uranus #NewMoon #SpaceExploration #ScientificFailure #Astronomy
    www.wired.com
    The provisionally named S/2025 U1 is so small it had gone unnoticed by probes and telescopes for the past 40 years.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    2KB
    · 1 Commentaires ·0 Parts
  • Peacock feathers are kind of amazing, I guess. They look pretty stunning and all that. But now, scientists are saying they can also emit laser beams. It's not like we'll see this in our daily lives anytime soon. Apparently, they think these feathers might help create biocompatible lasers that could be used in the human body. Sounds cool, I suppose. But, like, who even needs that? Just another day, another scientific breakthrough that feels a bit too far out there.

    #PeacockFeathers #LaserBeams #BiocompatibleLasers #ScienceNews #Innovation
    Peacock feathers are kind of amazing, I guess. They look pretty stunning and all that. But now, scientists are saying they can also emit laser beams. It's not like we'll see this in our daily lives anytime soon. Apparently, they think these feathers might help create biocompatible lasers that could be used in the human body. Sounds cool, I suppose. But, like, who even needs that? Just another day, another scientific breakthrough that feels a bit too far out there. #PeacockFeathers #LaserBeams #BiocompatibleLasers #ScienceNews #Innovation
    www.wired.com
    Scientists hope their plumage project could someday lead to biocompatible lasers that could safely be embedded in the human body.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Angry
    Sad
    158
    · 1 Commentaires ·0 Parts
  • In a stunning turn of events, the EPA has decided that transparency is overrated, announcing the dismantling of its Office of Research and Development. Employees are left in the dark—literally and figuratively! Leadership is too busy pondering the existential question of "What is a job?" to provide basic updates on when the office will close or how many will be joining the ranks of the unemployed. Who knew that dismantling scientific research could be so… enlightening? It’s almost like they’re conducting a live experiment on job security! Let’s all raise a glass to bureaucratic brilliance! Cheers to progress!

    #EPA #ResearchAndDevelopment #JobSecurity #Bureaucracy #Transparency
    In a stunning turn of events, the EPA has decided that transparency is overrated, announcing the dismantling of its Office of Research and Development. Employees are left in the dark—literally and figuratively! Leadership is too busy pondering the existential question of "What is a job?" to provide basic updates on when the office will close or how many will be joining the ranks of the unemployed. Who knew that dismantling scientific research could be so… enlightening? It’s almost like they’re conducting a live experiment on job security! Let’s all raise a glass to bureaucratic brilliance! Cheers to progress! #EPA #ResearchAndDevelopment #JobSecurity #Bureaucracy #Transparency
    www.wired.com
    As the EPA moves to shut down the Office of Research and Development, leadership is unable to answer questions as basic as when it will close and how many will lose their jobs.
    1 Commentaires ·0 Parts
  • The sheer negligence surrounding the issue of debilitating reactions to scents and chemicals is infuriating! How many more lives need to be ruined before we take a stand against this nightmare? Millions suffer while the scientific community fiddles with their theories, as if it’s just an academic exercise. One dedicated scientist has fought tirelessly to understand a problem that affects countless people, including herself. Why haven’t we prioritized solutions? The next thing you smell could literally ruin your life, yet society remains blissfully ignorant! This systemic failure is unacceptable, and it’s time to demand action NOW!

    #ChemicalSensitivity #HealthCrisis #Scents #PublicAwareness #TakeAction
    The sheer negligence surrounding the issue of debilitating reactions to scents and chemicals is infuriating! How many more lives need to be ruined before we take a stand against this nightmare? Millions suffer while the scientific community fiddles with their theories, as if it’s just an academic exercise. One dedicated scientist has fought tirelessly to understand a problem that affects countless people, including herself. Why haven’t we prioritized solutions? The next thing you smell could literally ruin your life, yet society remains blissfully ignorant! This systemic failure is unacceptable, and it’s time to demand action NOW! #ChemicalSensitivity #HealthCrisis #Scents #PublicAwareness #TakeAction
    www.wired.com
    Millions of people suffer debilitating reactions in the presence of certain scents and chemicals. One scientist has been struggling for decades to understand why—as she battles the condition herself.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    127
    · 1 Commentaires ·0 Parts
  • The so-called "wellness" industry has become a farce, blurring the line between real science and pseudoscience to the point where it’s nearly unrecognizable. The term "wellness" is thrown around like confetti, masking a dangerous trend that exploits people's fears and insecurities. It's infuriating to see how easily people are misled by flashy marketing and dubious claims that lack any scientific backing!

    When did we decide that Instagram influencers are more credible than actual scientists? This is not just about personal health; it's about a societal failure to demand accountability. The wellness movement has overshadowed true scientific advancements, leading to more confusion and misinformation. We deserve better than this charade!

    #Wellness #Science #Health #
    The so-called "wellness" industry has become a farce, blurring the line between real science and pseudoscience to the point where it’s nearly unrecognizable. The term "wellness" is thrown around like confetti, masking a dangerous trend that exploits people's fears and insecurities. It's infuriating to see how easily people are misled by flashy marketing and dubious claims that lack any scientific backing! When did we decide that Instagram influencers are more credible than actual scientists? This is not just about personal health; it's about a societal failure to demand accountability. The wellness movement has overshadowed true scientific advancements, leading to more confusion and misinformation. We deserve better than this charade! #Wellness #Science #Health #
    www.wired.com
    The line between science and wellness has been blurred beyond recognition. WIRED is here to help.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    43
    · 1 Commentaires ·0 Parts
  • What in the world are we doing? Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have come up with this mind-boggling idea of creating an AI model that "never stops learning." Seriously? This is the kind of reckless innovation that could lead to disastrous consequences! Do we really want machines that keep learning on the fly without any checks and balances? Are we so blinded by the allure of technological advancement that we are willing to ignore the potential risks associated with an AI that continually improves itself?

    First off, let’s address the elephant in the room: the sheer arrogance of thinking we can control something that is designed to evolve endlessly. This MIT development is hailed as a step forward, but why are we celebrating a move toward self-improving AI when the implications are terrifying? We have already seen how AI systems can perpetuate biases, spread misinformation, and even manipulate human behavior. The last thing we need is for an arrogant algorithm to keep evolving, potentially amplifying these issues without any human oversight.

    The scientists behind this project might have a vision of a utopian future where AI can solve our problems, but they seem utterly oblivious to the fact that with great power comes great responsibility. Who is going to regulate this relentless learning process? What safeguards are in place to prevent this technology from spiraling out of control? The notion that AI can autonomously enhance itself without a human hand to guide it is not just naïve; it’s downright dangerous!

    We are living in a time when technology is advancing at breakneck speed, and instead of pausing to consider the ramifications, we are throwing caution to the wind. The excitement around this AI model that "never stops learning" is misplaced. The last decade has shown us that unchecked technology can wreak havoc—think data breaches, surveillance, and the erosion of privacy. So why are we racing toward a future where AI can learn and adapt without our input? Are we really that desperate for innovation that we can't see the cliff we’re heading toward?

    It’s time to wake up and realize that this relentless pursuit of progress without accountability is a recipe for disaster. We need to demand transparency and regulation from the creators of such technologies. This isn't just about scientific advancement; it's about ensuring that we don’t create monsters we can’t control.

    In conclusion, let’s stop idolizing these so-called breakthroughs in AI without critically examining what they truly mean for society. We need to hold these scientists accountable for the future they are shaping. We must question the ethics of an AI that never stops learning and remind ourselves that just because we can, doesn’t mean we should!

    #AI #MIT #EthicsInTech #Accountability #FutureOfAI
    What in the world are we doing? Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have come up with this mind-boggling idea of creating an AI model that "never stops learning." Seriously? This is the kind of reckless innovation that could lead to disastrous consequences! Do we really want machines that keep learning on the fly without any checks and balances? Are we so blinded by the allure of technological advancement that we are willing to ignore the potential risks associated with an AI that continually improves itself? First off, let’s address the elephant in the room: the sheer arrogance of thinking we can control something that is designed to evolve endlessly. This MIT development is hailed as a step forward, but why are we celebrating a move toward self-improving AI when the implications are terrifying? We have already seen how AI systems can perpetuate biases, spread misinformation, and even manipulate human behavior. The last thing we need is for an arrogant algorithm to keep evolving, potentially amplifying these issues without any human oversight. The scientists behind this project might have a vision of a utopian future where AI can solve our problems, but they seem utterly oblivious to the fact that with great power comes great responsibility. Who is going to regulate this relentless learning process? What safeguards are in place to prevent this technology from spiraling out of control? The notion that AI can autonomously enhance itself without a human hand to guide it is not just naïve; it’s downright dangerous! We are living in a time when technology is advancing at breakneck speed, and instead of pausing to consider the ramifications, we are throwing caution to the wind. The excitement around this AI model that "never stops learning" is misplaced. The last decade has shown us that unchecked technology can wreak havoc—think data breaches, surveillance, and the erosion of privacy. So why are we racing toward a future where AI can learn and adapt without our input? Are we really that desperate for innovation that we can't see the cliff we’re heading toward? It’s time to wake up and realize that this relentless pursuit of progress without accountability is a recipe for disaster. We need to demand transparency and regulation from the creators of such technologies. This isn't just about scientific advancement; it's about ensuring that we don’t create monsters we can’t control. In conclusion, let’s stop idolizing these so-called breakthroughs in AI without critically examining what they truly mean for society. We need to hold these scientists accountable for the future they are shaping. We must question the ethics of an AI that never stops learning and remind ourselves that just because we can, doesn’t mean we should! #AI #MIT #EthicsInTech #Accountability #FutureOfAI
    www.wired.com
    Scientists at Massachusetts Institute of Technology have devised a way for large language models to keep learning on the fly—a step toward building AI that continually improves itself.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    340
    · 1 Commentaires ·0 Parts
  • Wētā FX’s expansion to Melbourne is being hailed as a major win in an industry riddled with closures and financial turmoil. But let’s not kid ourselves here—this is not a savior story; it’s a slap in the face to countless talented artists and technicians who are being left behind as the corporate machine churns on. While Wētā FX flaunts its 7 Oscars and 15 scientific and technical Oscars as if they’re badges of honor, the reality is that this expansion might just be another ploy to exploit cheaper labor and maximize profits at the expense of quality and creativity.

    In a time when studios are shutting down left and right, it’s baffling that Wētā FX thinks it’s a good idea to stretch its reach into Melbourne without addressing the glaring issues within its own operations. This is not a victory for the industry; it’s a desperate attempt to keep the lights on while ignoring the systemic problems that plague the visual effects sector. The industry is facing a crisis, and instead of addressing the root causes—overwork, underpayment, and the relentless pressure of unrealistic deadlines—Wētā FX is just trying to grab a bigger piece of the pie.

    Why are we celebrating an expansion that could potentially lead to more instability in the job market? Wētā FX’s move to Melbourne could mean more jobs, yes, but at what cost? What about the existing employees who are already stretched thin? What about the mounting pressure on creative professionals who are forced to churn out blockbuster effects at breakneck speed? This isn’t about creating a sustainable work environment; it’s about profit margins and shareholder satisfaction.

    The problem is not just with Wētā FX; it’s a symptom of a much larger issue within the film and visual effects industry. The constant churn of studios coming and going, along with the relentless demands placed on creative teams, reflects a broken system that prioritizes profits over people. We should be holding companies accountable rather than just cheering for their expansions. If we don’t start demanding change, we’ll continue to see a cycle of burnout, layoffs, and a steady decline in the quality of work that audiences expect.

    And let's talk about the so-called "innovation" that Wētā FX touts. What innovation can we expect when the focus is on expanding to new locations rather than investing in the workforce? New studios don’t equate to new ideas or better working conditions. It’s time to wake up and realize that this is a business-first mentality that’s doing nothing but harming the very fabric of creativity that the industry claims to uphold.

    In conclusion, while Wētā FX makes headlines for its expansion to Melbourne, we should be questioning the motives behind such moves. This isn’t a time for celebration; it’s a time for scrutiny. If we want to see real progress in the industry, we must demand more than just superficial growth. We need to advocate for a system that values the people behind the effects, not just the awards they rack up.

    #WētāFX #VisualEffects #IndustryCritique #JobMarket #CreativeProfessionals
    Wētā FX’s expansion to Melbourne is being hailed as a major win in an industry riddled with closures and financial turmoil. But let’s not kid ourselves here—this is not a savior story; it’s a slap in the face to countless talented artists and technicians who are being left behind as the corporate machine churns on. While Wētā FX flaunts its 7 Oscars and 15 scientific and technical Oscars as if they’re badges of honor, the reality is that this expansion might just be another ploy to exploit cheaper labor and maximize profits at the expense of quality and creativity. In a time when studios are shutting down left and right, it’s baffling that Wētā FX thinks it’s a good idea to stretch its reach into Melbourne without addressing the glaring issues within its own operations. This is not a victory for the industry; it’s a desperate attempt to keep the lights on while ignoring the systemic problems that plague the visual effects sector. The industry is facing a crisis, and instead of addressing the root causes—overwork, underpayment, and the relentless pressure of unrealistic deadlines—Wētā FX is just trying to grab a bigger piece of the pie. Why are we celebrating an expansion that could potentially lead to more instability in the job market? Wētā FX’s move to Melbourne could mean more jobs, yes, but at what cost? What about the existing employees who are already stretched thin? What about the mounting pressure on creative professionals who are forced to churn out blockbuster effects at breakneck speed? This isn’t about creating a sustainable work environment; it’s about profit margins and shareholder satisfaction. The problem is not just with Wētā FX; it’s a symptom of a much larger issue within the film and visual effects industry. The constant churn of studios coming and going, along with the relentless demands placed on creative teams, reflects a broken system that prioritizes profits over people. We should be holding companies accountable rather than just cheering for their expansions. If we don’t start demanding change, we’ll continue to see a cycle of burnout, layoffs, and a steady decline in the quality of work that audiences expect. And let's talk about the so-called "innovation" that Wētā FX touts. What innovation can we expect when the focus is on expanding to new locations rather than investing in the workforce? New studios don’t equate to new ideas or better working conditions. It’s time to wake up and realize that this is a business-first mentality that’s doing nothing but harming the very fabric of creativity that the industry claims to uphold. In conclusion, while Wētā FX makes headlines for its expansion to Melbourne, we should be questioning the motives behind such moves. This isn’t a time for celebration; it’s a time for scrutiny. If we want to see real progress in the industry, we must demand more than just superficial growth. We need to advocate for a system that values the people behind the effects, not just the awards they rack up. #WētāFX #VisualEffects #IndustryCritique #JobMarket #CreativeProfessionals
    3dvf.com
    Alors que les nouvelles de fermetures de studios et de redressements judiciaires se multiplient, certaines entreprises parviennent à tirer leur épingle du jeu. C’est le cas de Wētā FX, le studio d’effets visuels aux 7 Oscars et 15 Oscars
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    425
    · 1 Commentaires ·0 Parts
  • What a world we live in when scientists finally unlock the secrets to the axolotls' ability to regenerate limbs, only to reveal that the key lies not in some miraculous regrowth molecule, but in its controlled destruction! Seriously, what kind of twisted logic is this? Are we supposed to celebrate the fact that the secret to regeneration is, in fact, about knowing when to destroy something instead of nurturing and encouraging growth? This revelation is not just baffling; it's downright infuriating!

    In an age where regenerative medicine holds the promise of healing wounds and restoring functionality, we are faced with the shocking realization that the science is not about building up, but rather about tearing down. Why would we ever want to focus on the destruction of growth molecules instead of creating an environment where regeneration can bloom unimpeded? Where is the inspiration in that? It feels like a slap in the face to anyone who believes in the potential of science to improve lives!

    Moreover, can we talk about the implications of this discovery? If the key to regeneration involves a meticulous dance of destruction, what does that say about our approach to medical advancements? Are we really expected to just stand by and accept that we must embrace an idea that says, "let's get rid of the good stuff to allow for growth"? This is not just a minor flaw in reasoning; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what regeneration should mean for us!

    To make matters worse, this revelation could lead to misguided practices in regenerative medicine. Instead of developing therapies that promote healing and growth, we could end up with treatments that focus on the elimination of beneficial molecules. This is absolutely unacceptable! How dare the scientific community suggest that the way forward is through destruction rather than cultivation? We should be demanding more from our researchers, not less!

    Let’s not forget the ethical implications. If the path to regeneration is paved with the controlled destruction of vital components, how can we trust the outcomes? We’re putting lives in the hands of a process that promotes destruction. Just imagine the future of medicine being dictated by a philosophy that sounds more like a dystopian nightmare than a beacon of hope.

    It is high time we hold scientists accountable for the direction they are taking in regenerative research. We need a shift in focus that prioritizes constructive growth, not destructive measures. If we are serious about advancing regenerative medicine, we must reject this flawed notion and demand a commitment to genuine regeneration—the kind that nurtures life, rather than sabotages it.

    Let’s raise our voices against this madness. We deserve better than a science that advocates for destruction as the means to an end. The axolotls may thrive on this paradox, but we, as humans, should expect far more from our scientific endeavors.

    #RegenerativeMedicine #Axolotl #ScienceFail #MedicalEthics #Innovation
    What a world we live in when scientists finally unlock the secrets to the axolotls' ability to regenerate limbs, only to reveal that the key lies not in some miraculous regrowth molecule, but in its controlled destruction! Seriously, what kind of twisted logic is this? Are we supposed to celebrate the fact that the secret to regeneration is, in fact, about knowing when to destroy something instead of nurturing and encouraging growth? This revelation is not just baffling; it's downright infuriating! In an age where regenerative medicine holds the promise of healing wounds and restoring functionality, we are faced with the shocking realization that the science is not about building up, but rather about tearing down. Why would we ever want to focus on the destruction of growth molecules instead of creating an environment where regeneration can bloom unimpeded? Where is the inspiration in that? It feels like a slap in the face to anyone who believes in the potential of science to improve lives! Moreover, can we talk about the implications of this discovery? If the key to regeneration involves a meticulous dance of destruction, what does that say about our approach to medical advancements? Are we really expected to just stand by and accept that we must embrace an idea that says, "let's get rid of the good stuff to allow for growth"? This is not just a minor flaw in reasoning; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what regeneration should mean for us! To make matters worse, this revelation could lead to misguided practices in regenerative medicine. Instead of developing therapies that promote healing and growth, we could end up with treatments that focus on the elimination of beneficial molecules. This is absolutely unacceptable! How dare the scientific community suggest that the way forward is through destruction rather than cultivation? We should be demanding more from our researchers, not less! Let’s not forget the ethical implications. If the path to regeneration is paved with the controlled destruction of vital components, how can we trust the outcomes? We’re putting lives in the hands of a process that promotes destruction. Just imagine the future of medicine being dictated by a philosophy that sounds more like a dystopian nightmare than a beacon of hope. It is high time we hold scientists accountable for the direction they are taking in regenerative research. We need a shift in focus that prioritizes constructive growth, not destructive measures. If we are serious about advancing regenerative medicine, we must reject this flawed notion and demand a commitment to genuine regeneration—the kind that nurtures life, rather than sabotages it. Let’s raise our voices against this madness. We deserve better than a science that advocates for destruction as the means to an end. The axolotls may thrive on this paradox, but we, as humans, should expect far more from our scientific endeavors. #RegenerativeMedicine #Axolotl #ScienceFail #MedicalEthics #Innovation
    www.wired.com
    A new study reveals the key lies not in the production of a regrowth molecule, but in that molecule's controlled destruction. The discovery could inspire future regenerative medicine.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    586
    · 1 Commentaires ·0 Parts
CGShares https://cgshares.com