• When you think about horror films, what comes to mind? Creepy monsters? Jump scares? The classic trope of a group of friends who somehow forget that splitting up is a bad idea? Well, hold onto your popcorn, because the talented folks at ESMA are here to remind us that the only thing scarier than a killer lurking in the shadows is the idea of them trying to be funny while doing it.

    Enter "Claw," a short film that dares to blend the horror genre with a sprinkle of humor – because who wouldn't want to laugh while being chased by a guy with a chainsaw? This cinematic masterpiece, which apparently took inspiration from the likes of "Last Action Hero," is like if a horror movie and a stand-up comedian had a baby, and we’re all just waiting for the punchline as we hide behind our couches.

    Imagine a young cinephile named Andrew, who is living his best life by binge-watching horror classics. However, instead of the usual blood and guts, he encounters a version of horror that leaves you both terrified and chuckling nervously. It’s like the directors at ESMA sat down and said, “Why not take everything that terrifies us and add a dash of quirky humor?” Honestly, it’s a wonder they didn’t throw in a musical number.

    Sure, we all adore the suspense that makes our hearts race, but the thought of Andrew laughing nervously at a killer with a penchant for puns? Now that’s a new level of fear. Who knew that horror could provide comic relief while simultaneously making us question our life choices? Forget battling your demons; let’s just joke about them instead! And if you think about it, that’s probably the best coping mechanism we’ve got.

    But beware! As you dive into this horror-comedy concoction, you might just find yourself chuckling at the most inappropriate moments. Like when the killer slips on a banana peel right before going for the kill – because nothing says “I’m terrified” like a comedy skit in a death scene. After all, isn’t that the essence of horror? To laugh in the face of danger, even if it’s through the lens of ESMA’s latest cinematic exploration?

    So, if you’re looking for a good time that sends shivers down your spine while keeping you in stitches, “Claw” is your go-to film. Just remember to keep a straight face when explaining to your friends why you’re laughing while watching someone get chased by a masked figure. But hey, in the world of horror, even the scariest movies can have a light-hearted twist – because why not?

    Embrace the terror, welcome the humor, and prepare yourself for a rollercoaster of emotions with "Claw." After all, if we can’t laugh at our fears, what’s the point?

    #ClawFilm #HorrorComedy #ESMA #CinematicHumor #HorrorMovies
    When you think about horror films, what comes to mind? Creepy monsters? Jump scares? The classic trope of a group of friends who somehow forget that splitting up is a bad idea? Well, hold onto your popcorn, because the talented folks at ESMA are here to remind us that the only thing scarier than a killer lurking in the shadows is the idea of them trying to be funny while doing it. Enter "Claw," a short film that dares to blend the horror genre with a sprinkle of humor – because who wouldn't want to laugh while being chased by a guy with a chainsaw? This cinematic masterpiece, which apparently took inspiration from the likes of "Last Action Hero," is like if a horror movie and a stand-up comedian had a baby, and we’re all just waiting for the punchline as we hide behind our couches. Imagine a young cinephile named Andrew, who is living his best life by binge-watching horror classics. However, instead of the usual blood and guts, he encounters a version of horror that leaves you both terrified and chuckling nervously. It’s like the directors at ESMA sat down and said, “Why not take everything that terrifies us and add a dash of quirky humor?” Honestly, it’s a wonder they didn’t throw in a musical number. Sure, we all adore the suspense that makes our hearts race, but the thought of Andrew laughing nervously at a killer with a penchant for puns? Now that’s a new level of fear. Who knew that horror could provide comic relief while simultaneously making us question our life choices? Forget battling your demons; let’s just joke about them instead! And if you think about it, that’s probably the best coping mechanism we’ve got. But beware! As you dive into this horror-comedy concoction, you might just find yourself chuckling at the most inappropriate moments. Like when the killer slips on a banana peel right before going for the kill – because nothing says “I’m terrified” like a comedy skit in a death scene. After all, isn’t that the essence of horror? To laugh in the face of danger, even if it’s through the lens of ESMA’s latest cinematic exploration? So, if you’re looking for a good time that sends shivers down your spine while keeping you in stitches, “Claw” is your go-to film. Just remember to keep a straight face when explaining to your friends why you’re laughing while watching someone get chased by a masked figure. But hey, in the world of horror, even the scariest movies can have a light-hearted twist – because why not? Embrace the terror, welcome the humor, and prepare yourself for a rollercoaster of emotions with "Claw." After all, if we can’t laugh at our fears, what’s the point? #ClawFilm #HorrorComedy #ESMA #CinematicHumor #HorrorMovies
    L’ESMA détourne les clichés des films d’horreurs : tremblez !
    Découvrez Claw, un court de fin d’études de l’ESMA qui s’inspire des codes des films d’horreur pour en proposer une version revisitée. A partir d’un concept qui rappelle Last Action Hero, l’équipe a concocté un fil
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    636
    1 Kommentare 0 Anteile
  • Shutterstock’s so-called ‘safe’ rebrand is nothing but a bland attempt to mask the mediocrity that has been plaguing this company for years. Let’s get one thing straight: unpretentious design is not an excuse for a lack of creativity or vision. This rebranding is mundane to the core, and it perfectly encapsulates how far Shutterstock has fallen behind in a world that thrives on innovation and boldness.

    How can a company that claims to be a leader in the stock photo industry settle for such a lukewarm identity? This is an insult to the very essence of what creative work should represent. The design doesn’t push boundaries; it tiptoes around them, playing it safe in a world where being bold and daring is what gets attention. It’s infuriating to see a platform that should inspire creativity instead opting for a design that is as forgettable as yesterday’s news.

    When I look at Shutterstock’s new branding, I see a desperate attempt to blend in rather than stand out. The phrase “serves its purpose” is the biggest red flag. What purpose, exactly? To ensure that no one remembers you? To create a forgettable experience for users who are looking for inspiration? This ‘safe’ rebrand is a half-hearted effort that screams mediocrity and a complete lack of ambition.

    Moreover, the design community has consistently challenged brands to think outside the box and create something that resonates with their audience. But what does Shutterstock do? It plays it safe, hiding behind the label of ‘unpretentious’ while failing to evoke any sort of emotional response. This is not just a failure of design; it’s a failure of leadership. There’s a glaring lack of vision in a world that craves authenticity and originality.

    Let’s talk about the missed opportunities here. Shutterstock had the chance to redefine itself, to shake things up and create a memorable identity that would resonate with both creators and consumers. Instead, it chose to play it safe, resulting in a brand that feels outdated and uninspired. This decision not only reflects poorly on Shutterstock but also sends a troubling message to the entire industry: that it’s okay to settle for mediocrity as long as it serves a purpose.

    To the leaders at Shutterstock, I urge you to take a long, hard look at what you’ve done. This rebrand is not just mundane; it’s a disservice to the creative community you claim to support. It’s time to stop playing it safe and start taking risks that could potentially elevate your brand to new heights. Remember, in the world of creativity, blending in is the fastest way to fade away.

    #Shutterstock #Rebrand #DesignCritique #Mediocrity #CreativityMatters
    Shutterstock’s so-called ‘safe’ rebrand is nothing but a bland attempt to mask the mediocrity that has been plaguing this company for years. Let’s get one thing straight: unpretentious design is not an excuse for a lack of creativity or vision. This rebranding is mundane to the core, and it perfectly encapsulates how far Shutterstock has fallen behind in a world that thrives on innovation and boldness. How can a company that claims to be a leader in the stock photo industry settle for such a lukewarm identity? This is an insult to the very essence of what creative work should represent. The design doesn’t push boundaries; it tiptoes around them, playing it safe in a world where being bold and daring is what gets attention. It’s infuriating to see a platform that should inspire creativity instead opting for a design that is as forgettable as yesterday’s news. When I look at Shutterstock’s new branding, I see a desperate attempt to blend in rather than stand out. The phrase “serves its purpose” is the biggest red flag. What purpose, exactly? To ensure that no one remembers you? To create a forgettable experience for users who are looking for inspiration? This ‘safe’ rebrand is a half-hearted effort that screams mediocrity and a complete lack of ambition. Moreover, the design community has consistently challenged brands to think outside the box and create something that resonates with their audience. But what does Shutterstock do? It plays it safe, hiding behind the label of ‘unpretentious’ while failing to evoke any sort of emotional response. This is not just a failure of design; it’s a failure of leadership. There’s a glaring lack of vision in a world that craves authenticity and originality. Let’s talk about the missed opportunities here. Shutterstock had the chance to redefine itself, to shake things up and create a memorable identity that would resonate with both creators and consumers. Instead, it chose to play it safe, resulting in a brand that feels outdated and uninspired. This decision not only reflects poorly on Shutterstock but also sends a troubling message to the entire industry: that it’s okay to settle for mediocrity as long as it serves a purpose. To the leaders at Shutterstock, I urge you to take a long, hard look at what you’ve done. This rebrand is not just mundane; it’s a disservice to the creative community you claim to support. It’s time to stop playing it safe and start taking risks that could potentially elevate your brand to new heights. Remember, in the world of creativity, blending in is the fastest way to fade away. #Shutterstock #Rebrand #DesignCritique #Mediocrity #CreativityMatters
    Shutterstock’s ‘safe’ rebrand is mundane, but perfect
    It’s unpretentious design that serves its purpose.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    584
    1 Kommentare 0 Anteile
  • Hey, beautiful souls! Today, I want to shine a light on a topic that brings us hope and reminds us of the strength of justice. Recently, NSO Group, the infamous Israeli company known for its spyware Pegasus, faced a monumental verdict! They have been ordered to pay over $167 million in punitive damages to Meta for their unethical hacking campaign against WhatsApp users. Can you believe it? This is a HUGE win for all of us who value privacy and security!

    For five long years, this legal battle unfolded, shedding light on the dark practices of this tech giant. It’s a reminder that no matter how big the challenge, truth and justice will always prevail in the end. This ruling not only holds NSO Group accountable for their actions but also sends a powerful message to others in the tech industry. We must prioritize ethical practices and protect the rights of users around the globe!

    Let’s take a moment to celebrate the tireless efforts of those who fought for this victory! Every single person involved in this battle, from the lawyers to the advocates, showed that perseverance and belief in justice can lead to monumental change. Their dedication inspires us all to stand up for what is right, no matter how daunting the challenge may seem.

    This ruling is not just about money; it's about restoring faith in our digital world. It reminds us that we have the power to demand accountability from those who misuse technology. We can create a safer and more secure environment for everyone, where our privacy is respected, and our voices are heard!

    Let's keep that optimism alive! Use this moment as motivation to advocate for ethical tech practices, support companies that prioritize user security, and raise awareness about digital rights. Together, we can build a brighter future, where technology serves humanity positively and constructively!

    In conclusion, let’s celebrate this victory and continue to push for a world where every individual can feel safe in their digital interactions. Remember, every challenge is an opportunity for growth! Keep shining, keep fighting, and let your voice be heard! The future is bright, and it’s in our hands!

    #JusticeForUsers #EthicalTech #PrivacyMatters #DigitalRights #NSOGroup #Inspiration
    🌟✨ Hey, beautiful souls! 🌈💖 Today, I want to shine a light on a topic that brings us hope and reminds us of the strength of justice. Recently, NSO Group, the infamous Israeli company known for its spyware Pegasus, faced a monumental verdict! 🎉 They have been ordered to pay over $167 million in punitive damages to Meta for their unethical hacking campaign against WhatsApp users. Can you believe it? This is a HUGE win for all of us who value privacy and security! 🙌💪 For five long years, this legal battle unfolded, shedding light on the dark practices of this tech giant. It’s a reminder that no matter how big the challenge, truth and justice will always prevail in the end. 🌍💖 This ruling not only holds NSO Group accountable for their actions but also sends a powerful message to others in the tech industry. We must prioritize ethical practices and protect the rights of users around the globe! 🛡️✨ Let’s take a moment to celebrate the tireless efforts of those who fought for this victory! Every single person involved in this battle, from the lawyers to the advocates, showed that perseverance and belief in justice can lead to monumental change. 🙏🌟 Their dedication inspires us all to stand up for what is right, no matter how daunting the challenge may seem. This ruling is not just about money; it's about restoring faith in our digital world. It reminds us that we have the power to demand accountability from those who misuse technology. 📲💥 We can create a safer and more secure environment for everyone, where our privacy is respected, and our voices are heard! 🗣️❤️ Let's keep that optimism alive! Use this moment as motivation to advocate for ethical tech practices, support companies that prioritize user security, and raise awareness about digital rights. Together, we can build a brighter future, where technology serves humanity positively and constructively! 🌈🌟 In conclusion, let’s celebrate this victory and continue to push for a world where every individual can feel safe in their digital interactions. Remember, every challenge is an opportunity for growth! Keep shining, keep fighting, and let your voice be heard! The future is bright, and it’s in our hands! 💖💪✨ #JusticeForUsers #EthicalTech #PrivacyMatters #DigitalRights #NSOGroup #Inspiration
    Condenan a NSO Group a pagar un multa millonaria por el spyware Pegasus
    NSO Group, compañía israelita conocida por el software espía Pegasus, deberá pagar más de 167 millones de dólares en daños punitivos a Meta por una campaña de piratería informática y difusión de malware contra usuarios de WhatsApp. Así lo ha estimad
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    573
    1 Kommentare 0 Anteile
  • Studio Egret West sends in plans for Albert Bridge House redevelopment in Manchester

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    1/5
    show caption

    Plans for a revised mixed-use scheme in Manchester have been sent in to local planners.
    The original scheme for the redevelopment of Albert Bridge House, drawn up by Studio Egret West and which was given a resolution to grant planning two years ago, had proposed development of just over 1 million sq ft of commercial space along with just over 350 build-to-rent homes.
    But developer Oval Real Estate has since had a rethink because “the financial landscape has shifted significantly”. It added: “As such, our new proposals have been developed in response to this challenge and to better align with current market needs and community priorities.”
    In a LinkedIn post, Studio Egret West added: “Whilst the earlier design featured a single residential tower and an expansive commercial office block, changing economic conditions have necessitated a rethinking of its scale and delivery strategy.”
    The new plan has more than doubled the number of build-to-rent homes to around 800 across two blocks of 49 and 37 storeys.
    The commercial space has been pared back to around 250,000 sq ft across a 17-storey block.

    Source: Studio Egret WestThe previously consented scheme
    The 1.2 ha site includes a vacant 1950s office building formerly occupied by HMRC, a surface-level car park and the adjacent Albert Bridge Gardens
    Across the site, new public realm is proposed, including an expanded riverside walk, new play areas and an “urban arboretum” that incorporates existing mature trees on the plot.
    Studio Egret West is acting as architect, landscape architect and principal designer for the scheme, with others working on the scheme include planning consultant Deloitte, QS Cumming Group, structural and civil engineer AKT II and M&E engineer Hoare Lea.
    #studio #egret #west #sends #plans
    Studio Egret West sends in plans for Albert Bridge House redevelopment in Manchester
    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West 1/5 show caption Plans for a revised mixed-use scheme in Manchester have been sent in to local planners. The original scheme for the redevelopment of Albert Bridge House, drawn up by Studio Egret West and which was given a resolution to grant planning two years ago, had proposed development of just over 1 million sq ft of commercial space along with just over 350 build-to-rent homes. But developer Oval Real Estate has since had a rethink because “the financial landscape has shifted significantly”. It added: “As such, our new proposals have been developed in response to this challenge and to better align with current market needs and community priorities.” In a LinkedIn post, Studio Egret West added: “Whilst the earlier design featured a single residential tower and an expansive commercial office block, changing economic conditions have necessitated a rethinking of its scale and delivery strategy.” The new plan has more than doubled the number of build-to-rent homes to around 800 across two blocks of 49 and 37 storeys. The commercial space has been pared back to around 250,000 sq ft across a 17-storey block. Source: Studio Egret WestThe previously consented scheme The 1.2 ha site includes a vacant 1950s office building formerly occupied by HMRC, a surface-level car park and the adjacent Albert Bridge Gardens Across the site, new public realm is proposed, including an expanded riverside walk, new play areas and an “urban arboretum” that incorporates existing mature trees on the plot. Studio Egret West is acting as architect, landscape architect and principal designer for the scheme, with others working on the scheme include planning consultant Deloitte, QS Cumming Group, structural and civil engineer AKT II and M&E engineer Hoare Lea. #studio #egret #west #sends #plans
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Studio Egret West sends in plans for Albert Bridge House redevelopment in Manchester
    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West 1/5 show caption Plans for a revised mixed-use scheme in Manchester have been sent in to local planners. The original scheme for the redevelopment of Albert Bridge House, drawn up by Studio Egret West and which was given a resolution to grant planning two years ago, had proposed development of just over 1 million sq ft of commercial space along with just over 350 build-to-rent homes. But developer Oval Real Estate has since had a rethink because “the financial landscape has shifted significantly”. It added: “As such, our new proposals have been developed in response to this challenge and to better align with current market needs and community priorities.” In a LinkedIn post, Studio Egret West added: “Whilst the earlier design featured a single residential tower and an expansive commercial office block, changing economic conditions have necessitated a rethinking of its scale and delivery strategy.” The new plan has more than doubled the number of build-to-rent homes to around 800 across two blocks of 49 and 37 storeys. The commercial space has been pared back to around 250,000 sq ft across a 17-storey block. Source: Studio Egret WestThe previously consented scheme The 1.2 ha site includes a vacant 1950s office building formerly occupied by HMRC, a surface-level car park and the adjacent Albert Bridge Gardens Across the site, new public realm is proposed, including an expanded riverside walk, new play areas and an “urban arboretum” that incorporates existing mature trees on the plot. Studio Egret West is acting as architect, landscape architect and principal designer for the scheme, with others working on the scheme include planning consultant Deloitte, QS Cumming Group, structural and civil engineer AKT II and M&E engineer Hoare Lea.
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile
  • Understanding the Relationship Between Security Gateways and DMARC

    Email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC play a critical role in protecting domains from spoofing and phishing. However, when SEGs are introduced into the email path, the interaction with these protocols becomes more complex.
    Security gatewaysare a core part of many organizations’ email infrastructure. They act as intermediaries between the public internet and internal mail systems, inspecting, filtering, and routing messages.
    This blog examines how security gateways handle SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, with real-world examples from popular gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, and Avanan. We’ll also cover best practices for maintaining authentication integrity and avoiding misconfigurations that can compromise email authentication or lead to false DMARC failures.
    Security gateways often sit at the boundary between your organization and the internet, managing both inbound and outbound email traffic. Their role affects how email authentication protocols behave.
    An inbound SEG examines emails coming into your organization. It checks SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to determine if the message is authentic and safe before passing it to your internal mail servers.
    An outbound SEG handles emails sent from your domain. It may modify headers, rewrite envelope addresses, or even apply DKIM signing. All of these can impact SPF,  DKIM, or DMARC validation on the recipient’s side.

    Understanding how SEGs influence these flows is crucial to maintaining proper authentication and avoiding unexpected DMARC failures.
    Inbound Handling of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC by Common Security Gateways
    When an email comes into your organization, your security gateway is the first to inspect it. It checks whether the message is real, trustworthy, and properly authenticated. Let’s look at how different SEGs handle these checks.
    AvananSPF: Avanan verifies whether the sending server is authorized to send emails for the domain by checking the SPF record.
    DKIM: It verifies if the message was signed by the sending domain and if that signature is valid.
    DMARC: It uses the results of the SPF and DKIM check to evaluate DMARC. However, final enforcement usually depends on how DMARC is handled by Microsoft 365 or Gmail, as Avanan integrates directly with them.

    Avanan offers two methods of integration:1. API integration: Avanan connects via APIs, no change in MX, usually Monitor or Detect modes.2. Inline integration: Avanan is placed inline in the mail flow, actively blocking or remediating threats.
    Proofpoint Email Protection

    SPF: Proofpoint checks SPF to confirm the sender’s IP is authorized to send on behalf of the domain. You can set custom rules.
    DKIM: It verifies DKIM signatures and shows clear pass/fail results in logs.
    DMARC: It fully evaluates DMARC by combining SPF and DKIM results with alignment checks. Administrators can configure how to handle messages that fail DMARC, such as rejecting, quarantining, or delivering them. Additionally, Proofpoint allows whitelisting specific senders you trust, even if their emails fail authentication checks.

    Integration Methods

    Inline Mode: In this traditional deployment, Proofpoint is positioned directly in the email flow by modifying MX records. Emails are routed through Proofpoint’s infrastructure, allowing it to inspect and filter messages before they reach the recipient’s inbox. This mode provides pre-delivery protection and is commonly used in on-premises or hybrid environments.
    API-BasedMode: Proofpoint offers API-based integration, particularly with cloud email platforms like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. In this mode, Proofpoint connects to the email platform via APIs, enabling it to monitor and remediate threats post-delivery without altering the email flow. This approach allows for rapid deployment and seamless integration with existing cloud email services.

    Mimecast

    SPF: Mimecast performs SPF checks to verify whether the sending server is authorized by the domain’s SPF record. Administrators can configure actions for SPF failures, including block, quarantine, permit, or tag with a warning. This gives flexibility in balancing security with business needs.
    DKIM: It validates DKIM signatures by checking that the message was correctly signed by the sending domain and that the content hasn’t been tampered with. If the signature fails, Mimecast can take actions based on your configured policies.
    DMARC: It fully evaluates DMARC by combining the results of SPF and DKIM with domain alignment checks. You can choose to honor the sending domain’s DMARC policyor apply custom rules, for example, quarantining or tagging messages that fail DMARC regardless of the published policy. This allows more granular control for businesses that want to override external domain policies based on specific contexts.

    Integration Methods

    Inline Deployment: Mimecast is typically deployed as a cloud-based secure email gateway. Organizations update their domain’s MX records to point to Mimecast, so all inboundemails pass through it first. This allows Mimecast to inspect, filter, and process emails before delivery, providing robust protection.
    API Integrations: Mimecast also offers API-based services through its Mimecast API platform, primarily for management, archival, continuity, and threat intelligence purposes. However, API-only email protection is not Mimecast’s core model. Instead, the APIs are used to enhance the inline deployment, not replace it.

    Barracuda Email Security Gateway
    SPF: Barracuda checks the sender’s IP against the domain’s published SPF record. If the check fails, you can configure the system to block, quarantine, tag, or allow the message, depending on your policy preferences.
    DKIM: It validates whether the incoming message includes a valid DKIM signature. The outcome is logged and used to inform further policy decisions or DMARC evaluations.
    DMARC: It combines SPF and DKIM results, checks for domain alignment, and applies the DMARC policy defined by the sender. Administrators can also choose to override the DMARC policy, allowing messages to pass or be treated differently based on organizational needs.
    Integration Methods

    Inline mode: Barracuda Email Security Gateway is commonly deployed inline by updating your domain’s MX records to point to Barracuda’s cloud or on-premises gateway. This ensures that all inbound emails pass through Barracuda first for filtering and SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation before being delivered to your mail servers.
    Deployment Behind the Corporate Firewall: Alternatively, Barracuda can be deployed in transparent or bridge mode without modifying MX records. In this setup, the gateway is placed inline at the network level, such as behind a firewall, and intercepts mail traffic transparently. This method is typically used in complex on-premises environments where changing DNS records is not feasible.

    Cisco Secure EmailCisco Secure Email acts as an inline gateway for inbound email, usually requiring your domain’s MX records to point to the Cisco Email Security Appliance or cloud service.
    SPF: Cisco Secure Email verifies whether the sending server is authorized in the sender domain’s SPF record. Administrators can set detailed policies on how to handle SPF failures.
    DKIM: It validates the DKIM signature on incoming emails and logs whether the signature is valid or has failed.
    DMARC: It evaluates DMARC by combining SPF and DKIM results along with domain alignment checks. Admins can configure specific actions, such as quarantine, reject, or tag, based on different failure scenarios or trusted sender exceptions.
    Integration methods

    On-premises Email Security Appliance: You deploy Cisco’s hardware or virtual appliance inline, updating MX records to route mail through it for filtering.
    Cisco Cloud Email Security: Cisco offers a cloud-based email security service where MX records are pointed to Cisco’s cloud infrastructure, which filters and processes inbound mail.

    Cisco Secure Email also offers advanced, rule-based filtering capabilities and integrates with Cisco’s broader threat protection ecosystem, enabling comprehensive inbound email security.
    Outbound Handling of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC by Common Security Gateways
    When your organization sends emails, security gateways can play an active role in processing and authenticating those messages. Depending on the configuration, a gateway might rewrite headers, re-sign messages, or route them through different IPs – all actions that can help or hurt the authentication process. Let’s look at how major SEGs handle outbound email flow.
    Avanan – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods
    Outbound Logic
    Avanan analyzes outbound emails primarily to detect data loss, malware, and policy violations. In API-based integration, emails are sent directly by the original mail server, so SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact. Avanan does not alter the message or reroute traffic, which helps maintain full DMARC alignment and domain reputation.
    Integration Methods
    1. API Integration: Connects to Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace via API. No MX changes are needed. Emails are scanned after they are sent, with no modification to SPF, DKIM, or the delivery path. 

    How it works: Microsoft Graph API or Google Workspace APIs are used to monitor and intervene in outbound emails.
    Protection level: Despite no MX changes, it can offer inline-like protection, meaning it can block, quarantine, or encrypt emails before they are delivered externally.
    SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Preserves original headers and signatures since mail is sent directly from Microsoft/Google servers.

    2. Inline Integration: Requires changing MX records to route email through Avanan. In this mode, Avanan can intercept and inspect outbound emails before delivery. Depending on the configuration, this may affect SPF or DKIM if not properly handled.

    How it works: Requires adding Avanan’s
    Protection level: Traditional inline security with full visibility and control, including encryption, DLP, policy enforcement, and advanced threat protection.
    SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: SPF configuration is needed by adding Avanan’s include mechanism to the sending domain’s SPF record. The DKIM record of the original sending source is preserved.

    For configurations, you can refer to the steps in this blog.
    Proofpoint – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods
    Outbound Logic
    Proofpoint analyzes outbound emails to detect and prevent data loss, to identify advanced threatsoriginating from compromised internal accounts, and to ensure compliance. Their API integration provides crucial visibility and powerful remediation capabilities, while their traditional gatewaydeployment delivers true inline, pre-delivery blocking for outbound traffic.
    Integration methods
    1. API Integration: No MX record changes are required for this deployment method. Integration is done with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace.

    How it works: Through its API integration, Proofpoint gains deep visibility into outbound emails and provides layered security and response features, including:

    Detect and alert: Identifies sensitive content, malicious attachments, or suspicious links in outbound emails.
    Post-delivery remediation: A key capability of the API model is Threat Response Auto-Pull, which enables Proofpoint to automatically recall, quarantine, or delete emails after delivery. This is particularly useful for internally sent messages or those forwarded to other users.
    Enhanced visibility: Aggregates message metadata and logs into Proofpoint’s threat intelligence platform, giving security teams a centralized view of outbound risks and user behavior.

    Protection level: API-based integration provides strong post-delivery detection and response, as well as visibility into DLP incidents and suspicious behavior. 
    SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Proofpoint does not alter SPF, DKIM, or DMARC because emails are sent directly through Microsoft or Google servers. Since Proofpoint’s servers are not involved in the actual sending process, the original authentication headers remain intact.

    2. Gateway Integration: This method requires updating MX records or routing outbound mail through Proofpoint via a smart host.

    How it works: Proofpoint acts as an inline gateway, inspecting emails before delivery. Inbound mail is filtered via MX changes; outbound mail is relayed through Proofpoint’s servers.
    Threat and DLP filtering: Scans outbound messages for sensitive content, malware, and policy violations.
    Real-time enforcement: Blocks, encrypts, or quarantines emails before they’re delivered.
    Policy controls: Applies rules based on content, recipient, or behavior.
    Protection level: Provides strong, real-time protection for outbound traffic with pre-delivery enforcement, DLP, and encryption.
    SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Proofpoint becomes the sending server:

    SPF: You need to configure ProofPoint’s SPF.
    DKIM: Can sign messages; requires DKIM setup.
    DMARC: DMARC passes if SPF and DKIM are set up properly.

    Please refer to this article to configure SPF and DKIM for ProofPoint.
    Mimecast – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods
    Outbound Logic
    Mimecast inspects outbound emails to prevent data loss, detect internal threats such as malware and impersonation, and ensure regulatory compliance. It primarily functions as a Secure Email Gateway, meaning it sits directly in the outbound email flow. While Mimecast offers APIs, its core outbound protection is built around this inline gateway model.
    Integration Methods
    1. Gateway IntegrationThis is Mimecast’s primary method for outbound email protection. Organizations route their outbound traffic through Mimecast by configuring their email serverto use Mimecast as a smart host. This enables Mimecast to inspect and enforce policies on all outgoing emails in real time.

    How it works:
    Updating outbound routing in your email system, or
    Using Mimecast SMTP relay to direct messages through their infrastructure.
    Mimecast then scans, filters, and applies policies before the email reaches the final recipient.

    Protection level:
    Advanced DLP: Identifies and prevents sensitive data leaks.
    Impersonation and Threat Protection: Blocks malware, phishing, and abuse from compromised internal accounts.
    Email Encryption and Secure Messaging: Applies encryption policies or routes messages via secure portals.

    Regulatory Compliance: Enforces outbound compliance rules based on content, recipient, or metadata.
    SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact:

    SPF: Your SPF record must include Mimecast’s SPF mechanism based on your region to avoid SPF failures.
    DKIM: A new DKIM record should be configured to make sure your emails are DKIM signed when routing through Mimecast.
    DMARC: With correct SPF and DKIM setup, Mimecast ensures DMARC alignment, maintaining your domain’s sending reputation. Please refer to the steps in this detailed article to set up SPF and DKIM for Mimecast.

    2. API IntegrationMimecast’s APIs complement the main gateway by providing automation, reporting, and management tools rather than handling live outbound mail flow. They allow you to manage policies, export logs, search archived emails, and sync users.
    APIs enhance visibility and operational tasks but do not provide real-time filtering or blocking of outbound messages. Since APIs don’t process live mail, they have no direct effect on SPF, DKIM, or DMARC; those depend on your gatewaysetup.
    Barracuda – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods
    Outbound Logic
    Barracuda analyzes outbound emails to prevent data loss, block malware, stop phishing/impersonation attempts from compromised internal accounts, and ensure compliance. Barracuda offers flexible deployment options, including both traditional gatewayand API-based integrations. While both contribute to outbound security, their roles are distinct.
    Integration Methods
    1. Gateway Integration— Primary Inline Security

    How it works: All outbound emails pass through Barracuda’s security stack for real-time inspection, threat blocking, and policy enforcement before delivery.
    Protection level:

    Comprehensive DLP 
    Outbound spam and virus filtering 
    Enforcement of compliance and content policies

    This approach offers a high level of control and immediate threat mitigation on outbound mail flow.

    SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact:

    SPF: Update SPF records to include Barracuda’s sending IPs or SPF include mechanism.
    DKIM: Currently, no explicit setup is needed; DKIM of the main sending source is preserved.

    Refer to this article for more comprehensive guidance on Barracuda SEG configuration.
    2. API IntegrationHow it works: The API accesses cloud email environments to analyze historical and real-time data, learning normal communication patterns to detect anomalies in outbound emails. It also supports post-delivery remediation, enabling the removal of malicious emails from internal mailboxes after sending.
    Protection level: Advanced AI-driven detection and near real-time blocking of outbound threats, plus strong post-delivery cleanup capabilities.
    SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Since mail is sent directly by the original mail server, SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact, preserving DMARC alignment and domain reputation.

    Cisco Secure Email– Outbound Handling and Integration Methods
    Outbound Logic
    Cisco Secure Email protects outbound email by preventing data loss, blocking spam and malware from internal accounts, stopping business email compromiseand impersonation attacks, and ensuring compliance. Cisco provides both traditional gateway appliances/cloud gateways and modern API-based solutions for layered outbound security.
    Integration Methods
    1. Gateway Integration– Cisco Secure Email GatewayHow it works: Organizations update MX records to route mail through the Cisco Secure Email Gateway or configure their mail serverto smart host outbound email via the gateway. All outbound mail is inspected and policies enforced before delivery.
    Protection level:

    Granular DLPOutbound spam and malware filtering to protect IP reputation
    Email encryption for sensitive outbound messages
    Comprehensive content and attachment policy enforcement

    SPF: Check this article for comprehensive guidance on Cisco SPF settings.
    DKIM: Refer to this article for detailed guidance on Cisco DKIM settings.

    2. API Integration – Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense

    How it works: Integrates directly via API with Microsoft 365, continuously monitoring email metadata, content, and user behavior across inbound, outbound, and internal messages. Leverages Cisco’s threat intelligence and AI to detect anomalous outbound activity linked to BEC, account takeover, and phishing.
    Post-Delivery Remediation: Automates the removal or quarantine of malicious or policy-violating emails from mailboxes even after sending.
    Protection level: Advanced, AI-driven detection of sophisticated outbound threats with real-time monitoring and automated remediation. Complements gateway filtering by adding cloud-native visibility and swift post-send action.
    SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Since emails are sent directly by the original mail server, SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact, preserving DMARC alignment and domain reputation.

    If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to reach out to EasyDMARC technical support.
    #understanding #relationship #between #security #gateways
    Understanding the Relationship Between Security Gateways and DMARC
    Email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC play a critical role in protecting domains from spoofing and phishing. However, when SEGs are introduced into the email path, the interaction with these protocols becomes more complex. Security gatewaysare a core part of many organizations’ email infrastructure. They act as intermediaries between the public internet and internal mail systems, inspecting, filtering, and routing messages. This blog examines how security gateways handle SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, with real-world examples from popular gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, and Avanan. We’ll also cover best practices for maintaining authentication integrity and avoiding misconfigurations that can compromise email authentication or lead to false DMARC failures. Security gateways often sit at the boundary between your organization and the internet, managing both inbound and outbound email traffic. Their role affects how email authentication protocols behave. An inbound SEG examines emails coming into your organization. It checks SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to determine if the message is authentic and safe before passing it to your internal mail servers. An outbound SEG handles emails sent from your domain. It may modify headers, rewrite envelope addresses, or even apply DKIM signing. All of these can impact SPF,  DKIM, or DMARC validation on the recipient’s side. Understanding how SEGs influence these flows is crucial to maintaining proper authentication and avoiding unexpected DMARC failures. Inbound Handling of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC by Common Security Gateways When an email comes into your organization, your security gateway is the first to inspect it. It checks whether the message is real, trustworthy, and properly authenticated. Let’s look at how different SEGs handle these checks. AvananSPF: Avanan verifies whether the sending server is authorized to send emails for the domain by checking the SPF record. DKIM: It verifies if the message was signed by the sending domain and if that signature is valid. DMARC: It uses the results of the SPF and DKIM check to evaluate DMARC. However, final enforcement usually depends on how DMARC is handled by Microsoft 365 or Gmail, as Avanan integrates directly with them. Avanan offers two methods of integration:1. API integration: Avanan connects via APIs, no change in MX, usually Monitor or Detect modes.2. Inline integration: Avanan is placed inline in the mail flow, actively blocking or remediating threats. Proofpoint Email Protection SPF: Proofpoint checks SPF to confirm the sender’s IP is authorized to send on behalf of the domain. You can set custom rules. DKIM: It verifies DKIM signatures and shows clear pass/fail results in logs. DMARC: It fully evaluates DMARC by combining SPF and DKIM results with alignment checks. Administrators can configure how to handle messages that fail DMARC, such as rejecting, quarantining, or delivering them. Additionally, Proofpoint allows whitelisting specific senders you trust, even if their emails fail authentication checks. Integration Methods Inline Mode: In this traditional deployment, Proofpoint is positioned directly in the email flow by modifying MX records. Emails are routed through Proofpoint’s infrastructure, allowing it to inspect and filter messages before they reach the recipient’s inbox. This mode provides pre-delivery protection and is commonly used in on-premises or hybrid environments. API-BasedMode: Proofpoint offers API-based integration, particularly with cloud email platforms like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. In this mode, Proofpoint connects to the email platform via APIs, enabling it to monitor and remediate threats post-delivery without altering the email flow. This approach allows for rapid deployment and seamless integration with existing cloud email services. Mimecast SPF: Mimecast performs SPF checks to verify whether the sending server is authorized by the domain’s SPF record. Administrators can configure actions for SPF failures, including block, quarantine, permit, or tag with a warning. This gives flexibility in balancing security with business needs. DKIM: It validates DKIM signatures by checking that the message was correctly signed by the sending domain and that the content hasn’t been tampered with. If the signature fails, Mimecast can take actions based on your configured policies. DMARC: It fully evaluates DMARC by combining the results of SPF and DKIM with domain alignment checks. You can choose to honor the sending domain’s DMARC policyor apply custom rules, for example, quarantining or tagging messages that fail DMARC regardless of the published policy. This allows more granular control for businesses that want to override external domain policies based on specific contexts. Integration Methods Inline Deployment: Mimecast is typically deployed as a cloud-based secure email gateway. Organizations update their domain’s MX records to point to Mimecast, so all inboundemails pass through it first. This allows Mimecast to inspect, filter, and process emails before delivery, providing robust protection. API Integrations: Mimecast also offers API-based services through its Mimecast API platform, primarily for management, archival, continuity, and threat intelligence purposes. However, API-only email protection is not Mimecast’s core model. Instead, the APIs are used to enhance the inline deployment, not replace it. Barracuda Email Security Gateway SPF: Barracuda checks the sender’s IP against the domain’s published SPF record. If the check fails, you can configure the system to block, quarantine, tag, or allow the message, depending on your policy preferences. DKIM: It validates whether the incoming message includes a valid DKIM signature. The outcome is logged and used to inform further policy decisions or DMARC evaluations. DMARC: It combines SPF and DKIM results, checks for domain alignment, and applies the DMARC policy defined by the sender. Administrators can also choose to override the DMARC policy, allowing messages to pass or be treated differently based on organizational needs. Integration Methods Inline mode: Barracuda Email Security Gateway is commonly deployed inline by updating your domain’s MX records to point to Barracuda’s cloud or on-premises gateway. This ensures that all inbound emails pass through Barracuda first for filtering and SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation before being delivered to your mail servers. Deployment Behind the Corporate Firewall: Alternatively, Barracuda can be deployed in transparent or bridge mode without modifying MX records. In this setup, the gateway is placed inline at the network level, such as behind a firewall, and intercepts mail traffic transparently. This method is typically used in complex on-premises environments where changing DNS records is not feasible. Cisco Secure EmailCisco Secure Email acts as an inline gateway for inbound email, usually requiring your domain’s MX records to point to the Cisco Email Security Appliance or cloud service. SPF: Cisco Secure Email verifies whether the sending server is authorized in the sender domain’s SPF record. Administrators can set detailed policies on how to handle SPF failures. DKIM: It validates the DKIM signature on incoming emails and logs whether the signature is valid or has failed. DMARC: It evaluates DMARC by combining SPF and DKIM results along with domain alignment checks. Admins can configure specific actions, such as quarantine, reject, or tag, based on different failure scenarios or trusted sender exceptions. Integration methods On-premises Email Security Appliance: You deploy Cisco’s hardware or virtual appliance inline, updating MX records to route mail through it for filtering. Cisco Cloud Email Security: Cisco offers a cloud-based email security service where MX records are pointed to Cisco’s cloud infrastructure, which filters and processes inbound mail. Cisco Secure Email also offers advanced, rule-based filtering capabilities and integrates with Cisco’s broader threat protection ecosystem, enabling comprehensive inbound email security. Outbound Handling of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC by Common Security Gateways When your organization sends emails, security gateways can play an active role in processing and authenticating those messages. Depending on the configuration, a gateway might rewrite headers, re-sign messages, or route them through different IPs – all actions that can help or hurt the authentication process. Let’s look at how major SEGs handle outbound email flow. Avanan – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Avanan analyzes outbound emails primarily to detect data loss, malware, and policy violations. In API-based integration, emails are sent directly by the original mail server, so SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact. Avanan does not alter the message or reroute traffic, which helps maintain full DMARC alignment and domain reputation. Integration Methods 1. API Integration: Connects to Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace via API. No MX changes are needed. Emails are scanned after they are sent, with no modification to SPF, DKIM, or the delivery path.  How it works: Microsoft Graph API or Google Workspace APIs are used to monitor and intervene in outbound emails. Protection level: Despite no MX changes, it can offer inline-like protection, meaning it can block, quarantine, or encrypt emails before they are delivered externally. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Preserves original headers and signatures since mail is sent directly from Microsoft/Google servers. 2. Inline Integration: Requires changing MX records to route email through Avanan. In this mode, Avanan can intercept and inspect outbound emails before delivery. Depending on the configuration, this may affect SPF or DKIM if not properly handled. How it works: Requires adding Avanan’s Protection level: Traditional inline security with full visibility and control, including encryption, DLP, policy enforcement, and advanced threat protection. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: SPF configuration is needed by adding Avanan’s include mechanism to the sending domain’s SPF record. The DKIM record of the original sending source is preserved. For configurations, you can refer to the steps in this blog. Proofpoint – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Proofpoint analyzes outbound emails to detect and prevent data loss, to identify advanced threatsoriginating from compromised internal accounts, and to ensure compliance. Their API integration provides crucial visibility and powerful remediation capabilities, while their traditional gatewaydeployment delivers true inline, pre-delivery blocking for outbound traffic. Integration methods 1. API Integration: No MX record changes are required for this deployment method. Integration is done with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace. How it works: Through its API integration, Proofpoint gains deep visibility into outbound emails and provides layered security and response features, including: Detect and alert: Identifies sensitive content, malicious attachments, or suspicious links in outbound emails. Post-delivery remediation: A key capability of the API model is Threat Response Auto-Pull, which enables Proofpoint to automatically recall, quarantine, or delete emails after delivery. This is particularly useful for internally sent messages or those forwarded to other users. Enhanced visibility: Aggregates message metadata and logs into Proofpoint’s threat intelligence platform, giving security teams a centralized view of outbound risks and user behavior. Protection level: API-based integration provides strong post-delivery detection and response, as well as visibility into DLP incidents and suspicious behavior.  SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Proofpoint does not alter SPF, DKIM, or DMARC because emails are sent directly through Microsoft or Google servers. Since Proofpoint’s servers are not involved in the actual sending process, the original authentication headers remain intact. 2. Gateway Integration: This method requires updating MX records or routing outbound mail through Proofpoint via a smart host. How it works: Proofpoint acts as an inline gateway, inspecting emails before delivery. Inbound mail is filtered via MX changes; outbound mail is relayed through Proofpoint’s servers. Threat and DLP filtering: Scans outbound messages for sensitive content, malware, and policy violations. Real-time enforcement: Blocks, encrypts, or quarantines emails before they’re delivered. Policy controls: Applies rules based on content, recipient, or behavior. Protection level: Provides strong, real-time protection for outbound traffic with pre-delivery enforcement, DLP, and encryption. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Proofpoint becomes the sending server: SPF: You need to configure ProofPoint’s SPF. DKIM: Can sign messages; requires DKIM setup. DMARC: DMARC passes if SPF and DKIM are set up properly. Please refer to this article to configure SPF and DKIM for ProofPoint. Mimecast – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Mimecast inspects outbound emails to prevent data loss, detect internal threats such as malware and impersonation, and ensure regulatory compliance. It primarily functions as a Secure Email Gateway, meaning it sits directly in the outbound email flow. While Mimecast offers APIs, its core outbound protection is built around this inline gateway model. Integration Methods 1. Gateway IntegrationThis is Mimecast’s primary method for outbound email protection. Organizations route their outbound traffic through Mimecast by configuring their email serverto use Mimecast as a smart host. This enables Mimecast to inspect and enforce policies on all outgoing emails in real time. How it works: Updating outbound routing in your email system, or Using Mimecast SMTP relay to direct messages through their infrastructure. Mimecast then scans, filters, and applies policies before the email reaches the final recipient. Protection level: Advanced DLP: Identifies and prevents sensitive data leaks. Impersonation and Threat Protection: Blocks malware, phishing, and abuse from compromised internal accounts. Email Encryption and Secure Messaging: Applies encryption policies or routes messages via secure portals. Regulatory Compliance: Enforces outbound compliance rules based on content, recipient, or metadata. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: SPF: Your SPF record must include Mimecast’s SPF mechanism based on your region to avoid SPF failures. DKIM: A new DKIM record should be configured to make sure your emails are DKIM signed when routing through Mimecast. DMARC: With correct SPF and DKIM setup, Mimecast ensures DMARC alignment, maintaining your domain’s sending reputation. Please refer to the steps in this detailed article to set up SPF and DKIM for Mimecast. 2. API IntegrationMimecast’s APIs complement the main gateway by providing automation, reporting, and management tools rather than handling live outbound mail flow. They allow you to manage policies, export logs, search archived emails, and sync users. APIs enhance visibility and operational tasks but do not provide real-time filtering or blocking of outbound messages. Since APIs don’t process live mail, they have no direct effect on SPF, DKIM, or DMARC; those depend on your gatewaysetup. Barracuda – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Barracuda analyzes outbound emails to prevent data loss, block malware, stop phishing/impersonation attempts from compromised internal accounts, and ensure compliance. Barracuda offers flexible deployment options, including both traditional gatewayand API-based integrations. While both contribute to outbound security, their roles are distinct. Integration Methods 1. Gateway Integration— Primary Inline Security How it works: All outbound emails pass through Barracuda’s security stack for real-time inspection, threat blocking, and policy enforcement before delivery. Protection level: Comprehensive DLP  Outbound spam and virus filtering  Enforcement of compliance and content policies This approach offers a high level of control and immediate threat mitigation on outbound mail flow. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: SPF: Update SPF records to include Barracuda’s sending IPs or SPF include mechanism. DKIM: Currently, no explicit setup is needed; DKIM of the main sending source is preserved. Refer to this article for more comprehensive guidance on Barracuda SEG configuration. 2. API IntegrationHow it works: The API accesses cloud email environments to analyze historical and real-time data, learning normal communication patterns to detect anomalies in outbound emails. It also supports post-delivery remediation, enabling the removal of malicious emails from internal mailboxes after sending. Protection level: Advanced AI-driven detection and near real-time blocking of outbound threats, plus strong post-delivery cleanup capabilities. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Since mail is sent directly by the original mail server, SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact, preserving DMARC alignment and domain reputation. Cisco Secure Email– Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Cisco Secure Email protects outbound email by preventing data loss, blocking spam and malware from internal accounts, stopping business email compromiseand impersonation attacks, and ensuring compliance. Cisco provides both traditional gateway appliances/cloud gateways and modern API-based solutions for layered outbound security. Integration Methods 1. Gateway Integration– Cisco Secure Email GatewayHow it works: Organizations update MX records to route mail through the Cisco Secure Email Gateway or configure their mail serverto smart host outbound email via the gateway. All outbound mail is inspected and policies enforced before delivery. Protection level: Granular DLPOutbound spam and malware filtering to protect IP reputation Email encryption for sensitive outbound messages Comprehensive content and attachment policy enforcement SPF: Check this article for comprehensive guidance on Cisco SPF settings. DKIM: Refer to this article for detailed guidance on Cisco DKIM settings. 2. API Integration – Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense How it works: Integrates directly via API with Microsoft 365, continuously monitoring email metadata, content, and user behavior across inbound, outbound, and internal messages. Leverages Cisco’s threat intelligence and AI to detect anomalous outbound activity linked to BEC, account takeover, and phishing. Post-Delivery Remediation: Automates the removal or quarantine of malicious or policy-violating emails from mailboxes even after sending. Protection level: Advanced, AI-driven detection of sophisticated outbound threats with real-time monitoring and automated remediation. Complements gateway filtering by adding cloud-native visibility and swift post-send action. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Since emails are sent directly by the original mail server, SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact, preserving DMARC alignment and domain reputation. If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to reach out to EasyDMARC technical support. #understanding #relationship #between #security #gateways
    EASYDMARC.COM
    Understanding the Relationship Between Security Gateways and DMARC
    Email authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC play a critical role in protecting domains from spoofing and phishing. However, when SEGs are introduced into the email path, the interaction with these protocols becomes more complex. Security gateways(SEGs) are a core part of many organizations’ email infrastructure. They act as intermediaries between the public internet and internal mail systems, inspecting, filtering, and routing messages. This blog examines how security gateways handle SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, with real-world examples from popular gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, and Avanan. We’ll also cover best practices for maintaining authentication integrity and avoiding misconfigurations that can compromise email authentication or lead to false DMARC failures. Security gateways often sit at the boundary between your organization and the internet, managing both inbound and outbound email traffic. Their role affects how email authentication protocols behave. An inbound SEG examines emails coming into your organization. It checks SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to determine if the message is authentic and safe before passing it to your internal mail servers. An outbound SEG handles emails sent from your domain. It may modify headers, rewrite envelope addresses, or even apply DKIM signing. All of these can impact SPF,  DKIM, or DMARC validation on the recipient’s side. Understanding how SEGs influence these flows is crucial to maintaining proper authentication and avoiding unexpected DMARC failures. Inbound Handling of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC by Common Security Gateways When an email comes into your organization, your security gateway is the first to inspect it. It checks whether the message is real, trustworthy, and properly authenticated. Let’s look at how different SEGs handle these checks. Avanan (by Check Point) SPF: Avanan verifies whether the sending server is authorized to send emails for the domain by checking the SPF record. DKIM: It verifies if the message was signed by the sending domain and if that signature is valid. DMARC: It uses the results of the SPF and DKIM check to evaluate DMARC. However, final enforcement usually depends on how DMARC is handled by Microsoft 365 or Gmail, as Avanan integrates directly with them. Avanan offers two methods of integration:1. API integration: Avanan connects via APIs, no change in MX, usually Monitor or Detect modes.2. Inline integration: Avanan is placed inline in the mail flow (MX records changed), actively blocking or remediating threats. Proofpoint Email Protection SPF: Proofpoint checks SPF to confirm the sender’s IP is authorized to send on behalf of the domain. You can set custom rules (e.g. treat “softfail” as “fail”). DKIM: It verifies DKIM signatures and shows clear pass/fail results in logs. DMARC: It fully evaluates DMARC by combining SPF and DKIM results with alignment checks. Administrators can configure how to handle messages that fail DMARC, such as rejecting, quarantining, or delivering them. Additionally, Proofpoint allows whitelisting specific senders you trust, even if their emails fail authentication checks. Integration Methods Inline Mode: In this traditional deployment, Proofpoint is positioned directly in the email flow by modifying MX records. Emails are routed through Proofpoint’s infrastructure, allowing it to inspect and filter messages before they reach the recipient’s inbox. This mode provides pre-delivery protection and is commonly used in on-premises or hybrid environments. API-Based (Integrated Cloud Email Security – ICES) Mode: Proofpoint offers API-based integration, particularly with cloud email platforms like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. In this mode, Proofpoint connects to the email platform via APIs, enabling it to monitor and remediate threats post-delivery without altering the email flow. This approach allows for rapid deployment and seamless integration with existing cloud email services. Mimecast SPF: Mimecast performs SPF checks to verify whether the sending server is authorized by the domain’s SPF record. Administrators can configure actions for SPF failures, including block, quarantine, permit, or tag with a warning. This gives flexibility in balancing security with business needs. DKIM: It validates DKIM signatures by checking that the message was correctly signed by the sending domain and that the content hasn’t been tampered with. If the signature fails, Mimecast can take actions based on your configured policies. DMARC: It fully evaluates DMARC by combining the results of SPF and DKIM with domain alignment checks. You can choose to honor the sending domain’s DMARC policy (none, quarantine, reject) or apply custom rules, for example, quarantining or tagging messages that fail DMARC regardless of the published policy. This allows more granular control for businesses that want to override external domain policies based on specific contexts. Integration Methods Inline Deployment: Mimecast is typically deployed as a cloud-based secure email gateway. Organizations update their domain’s MX records to point to Mimecast, so all inbound (and optionally outbound) emails pass through it first. This allows Mimecast to inspect, filter, and process emails before delivery, providing robust protection. API Integrations: Mimecast also offers API-based services through its Mimecast API platform, primarily for management, archival, continuity, and threat intelligence purposes. However, API-only email protection is not Mimecast’s core model. Instead, the APIs are used to enhance the inline deployment, not replace it. Barracuda Email Security Gateway SPF: Barracuda checks the sender’s IP against the domain’s published SPF record. If the check fails, you can configure the system to block, quarantine, tag, or allow the message, depending on your policy preferences. DKIM: It validates whether the incoming message includes a valid DKIM signature. The outcome is logged and used to inform further policy decisions or DMARC evaluations. DMARC: It combines SPF and DKIM results, checks for domain alignment, and applies the DMARC policy defined by the sender. Administrators can also choose to override the DMARC policy, allowing messages to pass or be treated differently based on organizational needs (e.g., trusted senders or internal exceptions). Integration Methods Inline mode (more common and straightforward): Barracuda Email Security Gateway is commonly deployed inline by updating your domain’s MX records to point to Barracuda’s cloud or on-premises gateway. This ensures that all inbound emails pass through Barracuda first for filtering and SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation before being delivered to your mail servers. Deployment Behind the Corporate Firewall: Alternatively, Barracuda can be deployed in transparent or bridge mode without modifying MX records. In this setup, the gateway is placed inline at the network level, such as behind a firewall, and intercepts mail traffic transparently. This method is typically used in complex on-premises environments where changing DNS records is not feasible. Cisco Secure Email (formerly IronPort) Cisco Secure Email acts as an inline gateway for inbound email, usually requiring your domain’s MX records to point to the Cisco Email Security Appliance or cloud service. SPF: Cisco Secure Email verifies whether the sending server is authorized in the sender domain’s SPF record. Administrators can set detailed policies on how to handle SPF failures. DKIM: It validates the DKIM signature on incoming emails and logs whether the signature is valid or has failed. DMARC: It evaluates DMARC by combining SPF and DKIM results along with domain alignment checks. Admins can configure specific actions, such as quarantine, reject, or tag, based on different failure scenarios or trusted sender exceptions. Integration methods On-premises Email Security Appliance (ESA): You deploy Cisco’s hardware or virtual appliance inline, updating MX records to route mail through it for filtering. Cisco Cloud Email Security: Cisco offers a cloud-based email security service where MX records are pointed to Cisco’s cloud infrastructure, which filters and processes inbound mail. Cisco Secure Email also offers advanced, rule-based filtering capabilities and integrates with Cisco’s broader threat protection ecosystem, enabling comprehensive inbound email security. Outbound Handling of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC by Common Security Gateways When your organization sends emails, security gateways can play an active role in processing and authenticating those messages. Depending on the configuration, a gateway might rewrite headers, re-sign messages, or route them through different IPs – all actions that can help or hurt the authentication process. Let’s look at how major SEGs handle outbound email flow. Avanan – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Avanan analyzes outbound emails primarily to detect data loss, malware, and policy violations. In API-based integration, emails are sent directly by the original mail server (e.g., Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace), so SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact. Avanan does not alter the message or reroute traffic, which helps maintain full DMARC alignment and domain reputation. Integration Methods 1. API Integration: Connects to Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace via API. No MX changes are needed. Emails are scanned after they are sent, with no modification to SPF, DKIM, or the delivery path.  How it works: Microsoft Graph API or Google Workspace APIs are used to monitor and intervene in outbound emails. Protection level: Despite no MX changes, it can offer inline-like protection, meaning it can block, quarantine, or encrypt emails before they are delivered externally. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Preserves original headers and signatures since mail is sent directly from Microsoft/Google servers. 2. Inline Integration: Requires changing MX records to route email through Avanan. In this mode, Avanan can intercept and inspect outbound emails before delivery. Depending on the configuration, this may affect SPF or DKIM if not properly handled. How it works: Requires adding Avanan’s Protection level: Traditional inline security with full visibility and control, including encryption, DLP, policy enforcement, and advanced threat protection. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: SPF configuration is needed by adding Avanan’s include mechanism to the sending domain’s SPF record. The DKIM record of the original sending source is preserved. For configurations, you can refer to the steps in this blog. Proofpoint – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Proofpoint analyzes outbound emails to detect and prevent data loss (DLP), to identify advanced threats (malware, phishing, BEC) originating from compromised internal accounts, and to ensure compliance. Their API integration provides crucial visibility and powerful remediation capabilities, while their traditional gateway (MX record) deployment delivers true inline, pre-delivery blocking for outbound traffic. Integration methods 1. API Integration: No MX record changes are required for this deployment method. Integration is done with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace. How it works: Through its API integration, Proofpoint gains deep visibility into outbound emails and provides layered security and response features, including: Detect and alert: Identifies sensitive content (Data Loss Prevention violations), malicious attachments, or suspicious links in outbound emails. Post-delivery remediation (TRAP): A key capability of the API model is Threat Response Auto-Pull (TRAP), which enables Proofpoint to automatically recall, quarantine, or delete emails after delivery. This is particularly useful for internally sent messages or those forwarded to other users. Enhanced visibility: Aggregates message metadata and logs into Proofpoint’s threat intelligence platform, giving security teams a centralized view of outbound risks and user behavior. Protection level: API-based integration provides strong post-delivery detection and response, as well as visibility into DLP incidents and suspicious behavior.  SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Proofpoint does not alter SPF, DKIM, or DMARC because emails are sent directly through Microsoft or Google servers. Since Proofpoint’s servers are not involved in the actual sending process, the original authentication headers remain intact. 2. Gateway Integration (MX Record/Smart Host): This method requires updating MX records or routing outbound mail through Proofpoint via a smart host. How it works: Proofpoint acts as an inline gateway, inspecting emails before delivery. Inbound mail is filtered via MX changes; outbound mail is relayed through Proofpoint’s servers. Threat and DLP filtering: Scans outbound messages for sensitive content, malware, and policy violations. Real-time enforcement: Blocks, encrypts, or quarantines emails before they’re delivered. Policy controls: Applies rules based on content, recipient, or behavior. Protection level: Provides strong, real-time protection for outbound traffic with pre-delivery enforcement, DLP, and encryption. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Proofpoint becomes the sending server: SPF: You need to configure ProofPoint’s SPF. DKIM: Can sign messages; requires DKIM setup. DMARC: DMARC passes if SPF and DKIM are set up properly. Please refer to this article to configure SPF and DKIM for ProofPoint. Mimecast – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Mimecast inspects outbound emails to prevent data loss (DLP), detect internal threats such as malware and impersonation, and ensure regulatory compliance. It primarily functions as a Secure Email Gateway (SEG), meaning it sits directly in the outbound email flow. While Mimecast offers APIs, its core outbound protection is built around this inline gateway model. Integration Methods 1. Gateway Integration (MX Record change required) This is Mimecast’s primary method for outbound email protection. Organizations route their outbound traffic through Mimecast by configuring their email server (e.g., Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, etc.) to use Mimecast as a smart host. This enables Mimecast to inspect and enforce policies on all outgoing emails in real time. How it works: Updating outbound routing in your email system (smart host settings), or Using Mimecast SMTP relay to direct messages through their infrastructure. Mimecast then scans, filters, and applies policies before the email reaches the final recipient. Protection level: Advanced DLP: Identifies and prevents sensitive data leaks. Impersonation and Threat Protection: Blocks malware, phishing, and abuse from compromised internal accounts. Email Encryption and Secure Messaging: Applies encryption policies or routes messages via secure portals. Regulatory Compliance: Enforces outbound compliance rules based on content, recipient, or metadata. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: SPF: Your SPF record must include Mimecast’s SPF mechanism based on your region to avoid SPF failures. DKIM: A new DKIM record should be configured to make sure your emails are DKIM signed when routing through Mimecast. DMARC: With correct SPF and DKIM setup, Mimecast ensures DMARC alignment, maintaining your domain’s sending reputation. Please refer to the steps in this detailed article to set up SPF and DKIM for Mimecast. 2. API Integration (Complementary to Gateway) Mimecast’s APIs complement the main gateway by providing automation, reporting, and management tools rather than handling live outbound mail flow. They allow you to manage policies, export logs, search archived emails, and sync users. APIs enhance visibility and operational tasks but do not provide real-time filtering or blocking of outbound messages. Since APIs don’t process live mail, they have no direct effect on SPF, DKIM, or DMARC; those depend on your gateway (smart host) setup. Barracuda – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Barracuda analyzes outbound emails to prevent data loss (DLP), block malware, stop phishing/impersonation attempts from compromised internal accounts, and ensure compliance. Barracuda offers flexible deployment options, including both traditional gateway (MX record) and API-based integrations. While both contribute to outbound security, their roles are distinct. Integration Methods 1. Gateway Integration (MX Record / Smart Host) — Primary Inline Security How it works: All outbound emails pass through Barracuda’s security stack for real-time inspection, threat blocking, and policy enforcement before delivery. Protection level: Comprehensive DLP (blocking, encrypting, or quarantining sensitive content)  Outbound spam and virus filtering  Enforcement of compliance and content policies This approach offers a high level of control and immediate threat mitigation on outbound mail flow. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: SPF: Update SPF records to include Barracuda’s sending IPs or SPF include mechanism. DKIM: Currently, no explicit setup is needed; DKIM of the main sending source is preserved. Refer to this article for more comprehensive guidance on Barracuda SEG configuration. 2. API Integration (Complementary & Advanced Threat Focus) How it works: The API accesses cloud email environments to analyze historical and real-time data, learning normal communication patterns to detect anomalies in outbound emails. It also supports post-delivery remediation, enabling the removal of malicious emails from internal mailboxes after sending. Protection level: Advanced AI-driven detection and near real-time blocking of outbound threats, plus strong post-delivery cleanup capabilities. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Since mail is sent directly by the original mail server (e.g., Microsoft 365), SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact, preserving DMARC alignment and domain reputation. Cisco Secure Email (formerly IronPort) – Outbound Handling and Integration Methods Outbound Logic Cisco Secure Email protects outbound email by preventing data loss (DLP), blocking spam and malware from internal accounts, stopping business email compromise (BEC) and impersonation attacks, and ensuring compliance. Cisco provides both traditional gateway appliances/cloud gateways and modern API-based solutions for layered outbound security. Integration Methods 1. Gateway Integration (MX Record / Smart Host) – Cisco Secure Email Gateway (ESA) How it works: Organizations update MX records to route mail through the Cisco Secure Email Gateway or configure their mail server (e.g., Microsoft 365, Exchange) to smart host outbound email via the gateway. All outbound mail is inspected and policies enforced before delivery. Protection level: Granular DLP (blocking, encrypting, quarantining sensitive content) Outbound spam and malware filtering to protect IP reputation Email encryption for sensitive outbound messages Comprehensive content and attachment policy enforcement SPF: Check this article for comprehensive guidance on Cisco SPF settings. DKIM: Refer to this article for detailed guidance on Cisco DKIM settings. 2. API Integration – Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense How it works: Integrates directly via API with Microsoft 365 (and potentially Google Workspace), continuously monitoring email metadata, content, and user behavior across inbound, outbound, and internal messages. Leverages Cisco’s threat intelligence and AI to detect anomalous outbound activity linked to BEC, account takeover, and phishing. Post-Delivery Remediation: Automates the removal or quarantine of malicious or policy-violating emails from mailboxes even after sending. Protection level: Advanced, AI-driven detection of sophisticated outbound threats with real-time monitoring and automated remediation. Complements gateway filtering by adding cloud-native visibility and swift post-send action. SPF/DKIM/DMARC impact: Since emails are sent directly by the original mail server, SPF and DKIM signatures remain intact, preserving DMARC alignment and domain reputation. If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to reach out to EasyDMARC technical support.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    398
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile
  • Trump-Musk feud wipes $152 billion off Tesla, sparks Dragon spacecraft threat and Epstein files claim

    WTF?! When the president of the United States and the world's richest person have a falling out, the ramifications can be widespread. Since Musk and Trump went from friends to enemies, billion has been wiped off Tesla's share price, and Musk has threatened to decommission the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft that NASA relies on to deliver crew to and from the International Space Station. Musk has also said that Trump appears in files relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
    When he left the White House last week, Musk blasted those who said he'd had a falling out with Trump. The CEO insisted his departure was due to his scheduled 130 days as a government employee coming to an end. But Musk had been publicly criticizing Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act, warning it would increase the budget deficit.
    After learning that an electric-vehicle tax credit that would help incentivize Tesla purchases was not included in the bill, Musk called it "a disgusting abomination" on X and urged Americans to call Congress to have the bill killed.
    On Thursday, the two men used their respective social media platforms to throw insults at each other. At one point, Trump threatened to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts" as a way to slash billions of dollars from the budget.
    The warning sent Tesla's shares down just over 14%, wiping around billion off its valuation – and almost billion off Musk's total net worth.
    In response to Trump's threat to cancel Musk's government contracts, Musk said SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately. The craft, which NASA relies on for transport missions including ferrying astronauts to the ISS, is under contract worth roughly billion. The capsule is the only US spacecraft capable of flying humans into orbit. The only other crewed spacecraft that sends astronauts to the ISS is Russia's Soyuz system.
    However, after an X user told him to "cool off," Musk wrote, "Ok, we won't decommission Dragon."
    // Related Stories

    As the war of words has grown, Musk said Trump's controversial tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year. But his "really big bomb" was an allegation that Trump appears in the files of pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself in his jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial.
    Musk has also shared a post calling for Trump's impeachment and posted a poll asking if a new political party should be created in the US that "actually represents the 80% in the middle." 81% of the 4.4 million respondents have voted yes.
    One has to wonder if Musk believes his time in the White House was worth it. Beyond his reputational damage, his companies have suffered by association. Tesla sales were down 50% last month, and there have been protests and attacks on dealerships. The company's share price is down 40% from its all-time high on December 17, 2024, before Musk was part of DOGE.
    #trumpmusk #feud #wipes #billion #off
    Trump-Musk feud wipes $152 billion off Tesla, sparks Dragon spacecraft threat and Epstein files claim
    WTF?! When the president of the United States and the world's richest person have a falling out, the ramifications can be widespread. Since Musk and Trump went from friends to enemies, billion has been wiped off Tesla's share price, and Musk has threatened to decommission the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft that NASA relies on to deliver crew to and from the International Space Station. Musk has also said that Trump appears in files relating to Jeffrey Epstein. When he left the White House last week, Musk blasted those who said he'd had a falling out with Trump. The CEO insisted his departure was due to his scheduled 130 days as a government employee coming to an end. But Musk had been publicly criticizing Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act, warning it would increase the budget deficit. After learning that an electric-vehicle tax credit that would help incentivize Tesla purchases was not included in the bill, Musk called it "a disgusting abomination" on X and urged Americans to call Congress to have the bill killed. On Thursday, the two men used their respective social media platforms to throw insults at each other. At one point, Trump threatened to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts" as a way to slash billions of dollars from the budget. The warning sent Tesla's shares down just over 14%, wiping around billion off its valuation – and almost billion off Musk's total net worth. In response to Trump's threat to cancel Musk's government contracts, Musk said SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately. The craft, which NASA relies on for transport missions including ferrying astronauts to the ISS, is under contract worth roughly billion. The capsule is the only US spacecraft capable of flying humans into orbit. The only other crewed spacecraft that sends astronauts to the ISS is Russia's Soyuz system. However, after an X user told him to "cool off," Musk wrote, "Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." // Related Stories As the war of words has grown, Musk said Trump's controversial tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year. But his "really big bomb" was an allegation that Trump appears in the files of pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself in his jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial. Musk has also shared a post calling for Trump's impeachment and posted a poll asking if a new political party should be created in the US that "actually represents the 80% in the middle." 81% of the 4.4 million respondents have voted yes. One has to wonder if Musk believes his time in the White House was worth it. Beyond his reputational damage, his companies have suffered by association. Tesla sales were down 50% last month, and there have been protests and attacks on dealerships. The company's share price is down 40% from its all-time high on December 17, 2024, before Musk was part of DOGE. #trumpmusk #feud #wipes #billion #off
    WWW.TECHSPOT.COM
    Trump-Musk feud wipes $152 billion off Tesla, sparks Dragon spacecraft threat and Epstein files claim
    WTF?! When the president of the United States and the world's richest person have a falling out, the ramifications can be widespread. Since Musk and Trump went from friends to enemies, $152 billion has been wiped off Tesla's share price, and Musk has threatened to decommission the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft that NASA relies on to deliver crew to and from the International Space Station. Musk has also said that Trump appears in files relating to Jeffrey Epstein. When he left the White House last week, Musk blasted those who said he'd had a falling out with Trump. The CEO insisted his departure was due to his scheduled 130 days as a government employee coming to an end. But Musk had been publicly criticizing Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act, warning it would increase the budget deficit. After learning that an electric-vehicle tax credit that would help incentivize Tesla purchases was not included in the bill, Musk called it "a disgusting abomination" on X and urged Americans to call Congress to have the bill killed. On Thursday, the two men used their respective social media platforms to throw insults at each other. At one point, Trump threatened to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts" as a way to slash billions of dollars from the budget. The warning sent Tesla's shares down just over 14%, wiping around $152 billion off its valuation – and almost $100 billion off Musk's total net worth. In response to Trump's threat to cancel Musk's government contracts, Musk said SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately. The craft, which NASA relies on for transport missions including ferrying astronauts to the ISS, is under contract worth roughly $4.9 billion. The capsule is the only US spacecraft capable of flying humans into orbit. The only other crewed spacecraft that sends astronauts to the ISS is Russia's Soyuz system. However, after an X user told him to "cool off," Musk wrote, "Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." // Related Stories As the war of words has grown, Musk said Trump's controversial tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year. But his "really big bomb" was an allegation that Trump appears in the files of pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself in his jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial. Musk has also shared a post calling for Trump's impeachment and posted a poll asking if a new political party should be created in the US that "actually represents the 80% in the middle." 81% of the 4.4 million respondents have voted yes. One has to wonder if Musk believes his time in the White House was worth it. Beyond his reputational damage, his companies have suffered by association. Tesla sales were down 50% last month, and there have been protests and attacks on dealerships. The company's share price is down 40% from its all-time high on December 17, 2024, before Musk was part of DOGE.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Angry
    Sad
    423
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile
  • Can AI Mistakes Lead to Real Legal Exposure?

    Posted on : June 5, 2025

    By

    Tech World Times

    AI 

    Rate this post

    Artificial intelligence tools now touch nearly every corner of modern business, from customer service and marketing to supply chain management and HR. These powerful technologies promise speed, accuracy, and insight, but their missteps can cause more than temporary inconvenience. A single AI-driven error can result in regulatory investigations, civil lawsuits, or public scandals that threaten the foundation of a business. Understanding how legal exposure arises from AI mistakes—and how a skilled attorney protects your interests—is no longer an option, but a requirement for any forward-thinking business owner.
    What Types of AI Errors Create Legal Liability?
    AI does not think or reason like a human; it follows code and statistical patterns, sometimes with unintended results. These missteps can create a trail of legal liability for any business owner. For example, an online retailer’s AI recommends discriminatory pricing, sparking allegations of unfair trade practices. An HR department automates hiring decisions with AI, only to face lawsuits for violating anti-discrimination laws. Even an AI-driven chatbot, when programmed without proper safeguards, can inadvertently give health advice or misrepresent product claims—exposing the company to regulatory penalties. Cases like these are regularly reported in Legal news as businesses discover the high cost of digital shortcuts.
    When Is a Business Owner Liable for AI Mistakes?
    Liability rarely rests with the software developer or the tool itself. Courts and regulators expect the business to monitor, supervise, and, when needed, override AI decisions. Suppose a financial advisor uses AI to recommend investments, but the algorithm suggests securities that violate state regulations. Even if the AI was “just following instructions,” the advisor remains responsible for client losses. Similarly, a marketing team cannot escape liability if their AI generates misleading advertising. The bottom line: outsourcing work to AI does not outsource legal responsibility.
    How Do AI Errors Harm Your Reputation and Operations?
    AI mistakes can leave lasting marks on a business’s reputation, finances, and operations. A logistics firm’s route-optimization tool creates data leaks that breach customer privacy and trigger costly notifications. An online business suffers public backlash after an AI-powered customer service tool sends offensive responses to clients. Such incidents erode public trust, drive customers to competitors, and divert resources into damage control rather than growth. Worse, compliance failures can result in penalties or shutdown orders, putting the entire enterprise at risk.
    What Steps Reduce Legal Risk From AI Deployments?
    Careful planning and continuous oversight keep AI tools working for your business—not against it. Compliance is not a “set it and forget it” matter. Proactive risk management transforms artificial intelligence from a liability into a valuable asset.
    Routine audits, staff training, and transparent policies form the backbone of safe, effective AI use in any organization.
    You should review these AI risk mitigation strategies below.

    Implement Manual Review of Sensitive Outputs: Require human approval for high-risk tasks, such as legal filings, financial transactions, or customer communications. A payroll company’s manual audits prevented the accidental overpayment of employees by catching AI-generated errors before disbursement.
    Update AI Systems for Regulatory Changes: Stay ahead of new laws and standards by regularly reviewing AI algorithms and outputs. An insurance brokerage avoided regulatory fines by updating their risk assessment models as privacy laws evolved.
    Document Every Incident and Remediation Step: Keep records of AI errors, investigations, and corrections. A healthcare provider’s transparency during a patient data mix-up helped avoid litigation and regulatory penalties.
    Limit AI Access to Personal and Sensitive Data: Restrict the scope and permissions of AI tools to reduce the chance of data misuse. A SaaS provider used data minimization techniques, lowering the risk of exposure in case of a system breach.
    Consult With Attorneys for Custom Policies and Protocols: Collaborate with experienced Attorneys to design, review, and update AI compliance frameworks.

    How Do Attorneys Shield Your Business From AI Legal Risks?
    Attorneys provide a critical safety net as AI integrates deeper into business operations. They draft tailored contracts, establish protocols for monitoring and escalation, and assess risks unique to your industry. In the event of an AI-driven incident, legal counsel investigates the facts, manages communication with regulators, and builds a robust defense. By providing training, ongoing guidance, and crisis management support, attorneys ensure that innovation doesn’t lead to exposure—or disaster. With the right legal partner, businesses can harness AI’s power while staying firmly on the right side of the law.
    Tech World TimesTech World Times, a global collective focusing on the latest tech news and trends in blockchain, Fintech, Development & Testing, AI and Startups. If you are looking for the guest post then contact at techworldtimes@gmail.com
    #can #mistakes #lead #real #legal
    Can AI Mistakes Lead to Real Legal Exposure?
    Posted on : June 5, 2025 By Tech World Times AI  Rate this post Artificial intelligence tools now touch nearly every corner of modern business, from customer service and marketing to supply chain management and HR. These powerful technologies promise speed, accuracy, and insight, but their missteps can cause more than temporary inconvenience. A single AI-driven error can result in regulatory investigations, civil lawsuits, or public scandals that threaten the foundation of a business. Understanding how legal exposure arises from AI mistakes—and how a skilled attorney protects your interests—is no longer an option, but a requirement for any forward-thinking business owner. What Types of AI Errors Create Legal Liability? AI does not think or reason like a human; it follows code and statistical patterns, sometimes with unintended results. These missteps can create a trail of legal liability for any business owner. For example, an online retailer’s AI recommends discriminatory pricing, sparking allegations of unfair trade practices. An HR department automates hiring decisions with AI, only to face lawsuits for violating anti-discrimination laws. Even an AI-driven chatbot, when programmed without proper safeguards, can inadvertently give health advice or misrepresent product claims—exposing the company to regulatory penalties. Cases like these are regularly reported in Legal news as businesses discover the high cost of digital shortcuts. When Is a Business Owner Liable for AI Mistakes? Liability rarely rests with the software developer or the tool itself. Courts and regulators expect the business to monitor, supervise, and, when needed, override AI decisions. Suppose a financial advisor uses AI to recommend investments, but the algorithm suggests securities that violate state regulations. Even if the AI was “just following instructions,” the advisor remains responsible for client losses. Similarly, a marketing team cannot escape liability if their AI generates misleading advertising. The bottom line: outsourcing work to AI does not outsource legal responsibility. How Do AI Errors Harm Your Reputation and Operations? AI mistakes can leave lasting marks on a business’s reputation, finances, and operations. A logistics firm’s route-optimization tool creates data leaks that breach customer privacy and trigger costly notifications. An online business suffers public backlash after an AI-powered customer service tool sends offensive responses to clients. Such incidents erode public trust, drive customers to competitors, and divert resources into damage control rather than growth. Worse, compliance failures can result in penalties or shutdown orders, putting the entire enterprise at risk. What Steps Reduce Legal Risk From AI Deployments? Careful planning and continuous oversight keep AI tools working for your business—not against it. Compliance is not a “set it and forget it” matter. Proactive risk management transforms artificial intelligence from a liability into a valuable asset. Routine audits, staff training, and transparent policies form the backbone of safe, effective AI use in any organization. You should review these AI risk mitigation strategies below. Implement Manual Review of Sensitive Outputs: Require human approval for high-risk tasks, such as legal filings, financial transactions, or customer communications. A payroll company’s manual audits prevented the accidental overpayment of employees by catching AI-generated errors before disbursement. Update AI Systems for Regulatory Changes: Stay ahead of new laws and standards by regularly reviewing AI algorithms and outputs. An insurance brokerage avoided regulatory fines by updating their risk assessment models as privacy laws evolved. Document Every Incident and Remediation Step: Keep records of AI errors, investigations, and corrections. A healthcare provider’s transparency during a patient data mix-up helped avoid litigation and regulatory penalties. Limit AI Access to Personal and Sensitive Data: Restrict the scope and permissions of AI tools to reduce the chance of data misuse. A SaaS provider used data minimization techniques, lowering the risk of exposure in case of a system breach. Consult With Attorneys for Custom Policies and Protocols: Collaborate with experienced Attorneys to design, review, and update AI compliance frameworks. How Do Attorneys Shield Your Business From AI Legal Risks? Attorneys provide a critical safety net as AI integrates deeper into business operations. They draft tailored contracts, establish protocols for monitoring and escalation, and assess risks unique to your industry. In the event of an AI-driven incident, legal counsel investigates the facts, manages communication with regulators, and builds a robust defense. By providing training, ongoing guidance, and crisis management support, attorneys ensure that innovation doesn’t lead to exposure—or disaster. With the right legal partner, businesses can harness AI’s power while staying firmly on the right side of the law. Tech World TimesTech World Times, a global collective focusing on the latest tech news and trends in blockchain, Fintech, Development & Testing, AI and Startups. If you are looking for the guest post then contact at techworldtimes@gmail.com #can #mistakes #lead #real #legal
    TECHWORLDTIMES.COM
    Can AI Mistakes Lead to Real Legal Exposure?
    Posted on : June 5, 2025 By Tech World Times AI  Rate this post Artificial intelligence tools now touch nearly every corner of modern business, from customer service and marketing to supply chain management and HR. These powerful technologies promise speed, accuracy, and insight, but their missteps can cause more than temporary inconvenience. A single AI-driven error can result in regulatory investigations, civil lawsuits, or public scandals that threaten the foundation of a business. Understanding how legal exposure arises from AI mistakes—and how a skilled attorney protects your interests—is no longer an option, but a requirement for any forward-thinking business owner. What Types of AI Errors Create Legal Liability? AI does not think or reason like a human; it follows code and statistical patterns, sometimes with unintended results. These missteps can create a trail of legal liability for any business owner. For example, an online retailer’s AI recommends discriminatory pricing, sparking allegations of unfair trade practices. An HR department automates hiring decisions with AI, only to face lawsuits for violating anti-discrimination laws. Even an AI-driven chatbot, when programmed without proper safeguards, can inadvertently give health advice or misrepresent product claims—exposing the company to regulatory penalties. Cases like these are regularly reported in Legal news as businesses discover the high cost of digital shortcuts. When Is a Business Owner Liable for AI Mistakes? Liability rarely rests with the software developer or the tool itself. Courts and regulators expect the business to monitor, supervise, and, when needed, override AI decisions. Suppose a financial advisor uses AI to recommend investments, but the algorithm suggests securities that violate state regulations. Even if the AI was “just following instructions,” the advisor remains responsible for client losses. Similarly, a marketing team cannot escape liability if their AI generates misleading advertising. The bottom line: outsourcing work to AI does not outsource legal responsibility. How Do AI Errors Harm Your Reputation and Operations? AI mistakes can leave lasting marks on a business’s reputation, finances, and operations. A logistics firm’s route-optimization tool creates data leaks that breach customer privacy and trigger costly notifications. An online business suffers public backlash after an AI-powered customer service tool sends offensive responses to clients. Such incidents erode public trust, drive customers to competitors, and divert resources into damage control rather than growth. Worse, compliance failures can result in penalties or shutdown orders, putting the entire enterprise at risk. What Steps Reduce Legal Risk From AI Deployments? Careful planning and continuous oversight keep AI tools working for your business—not against it. Compliance is not a “set it and forget it” matter. Proactive risk management transforms artificial intelligence from a liability into a valuable asset. Routine audits, staff training, and transparent policies form the backbone of safe, effective AI use in any organization. You should review these AI risk mitigation strategies below. Implement Manual Review of Sensitive Outputs: Require human approval for high-risk tasks, such as legal filings, financial transactions, or customer communications. A payroll company’s manual audits prevented the accidental overpayment of employees by catching AI-generated errors before disbursement. Update AI Systems for Regulatory Changes: Stay ahead of new laws and standards by regularly reviewing AI algorithms and outputs. An insurance brokerage avoided regulatory fines by updating their risk assessment models as privacy laws evolved. Document Every Incident and Remediation Step: Keep records of AI errors, investigations, and corrections. A healthcare provider’s transparency during a patient data mix-up helped avoid litigation and regulatory penalties. Limit AI Access to Personal and Sensitive Data: Restrict the scope and permissions of AI tools to reduce the chance of data misuse. A SaaS provider used data minimization techniques, lowering the risk of exposure in case of a system breach. Consult With Attorneys for Custom Policies and Protocols: Collaborate with experienced Attorneys to design, review, and update AI compliance frameworks. How Do Attorneys Shield Your Business From AI Legal Risks? Attorneys provide a critical safety net as AI integrates deeper into business operations. They draft tailored contracts, establish protocols for monitoring and escalation, and assess risks unique to your industry. In the event of an AI-driven incident, legal counsel investigates the facts, manages communication with regulators, and builds a robust defense. By providing training, ongoing guidance, and crisis management support, attorneys ensure that innovation doesn’t lead to exposure—or disaster. With the right legal partner, businesses can harness AI’s power while staying firmly on the right side of the law. Tech World TimesTech World Times (TWT), a global collective focusing on the latest tech news and trends in blockchain, Fintech, Development & Testing, AI and Startups. If you are looking for the guest post then contact at techworldtimes@gmail.com
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    272
    0 Kommentare 0 Anteile