• WWW.FORBES.COM
    What You Should Know About Ovarian Cancer Vaccines
    Researcher holding vaccine Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.There are no routine screenings for ovarian cancer for women. Yes, ovarian cancer is rare, representing 1% of new cancer diagnoses every year in the U.S. But, its a serious disease as only half of the nearly 20,000 women diagnosed each year survive past 5 years. Thats quite low as compared with breast cancer, where the 5-year survival rate is over 90%.Scientists at Cancer Research UK were recently awarded 600,000 to develop the first ovarian cancer vaccine, called OvarianVax. Medical oncologist and immunologist Dr. Matthew Block from the Mayo Clinic is working to develop an ovarian cancer vaccine using engineered white blood cells from patients with ovarian cancer. The vaccine will target a protein called folate receptor alpha that is associated with ovarian cancer.Dr Block shared, One way in which the two vaccines differ is in their intended patient populations. The vaccine developed at Mayo Clinic is being used in patients who already have ovarian cancer; both as a means to prevent ovarian cancer recurrence for patients in remission from cancer (secondary prevention), as well as in a regimen treating active ovarian cancer. In contrast, the UK vaccine, while it will first be tested in ovarian cancer patients, is being developed primarily to prevent ovarian cancer from developing in patients who are at risk for the disease but have never had it (primary prevention).Dr Block explained that the commercially available human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil 9 prevents cancer by preventing long-term infection with cancer-causing HPV strains. He explained, Since ovarian cancer is not known to be caused by a virus, ovarian cancer vaccines target proteins expressed by the tumor cells rather than viral proteins. Similar to the commercially available HPV vaccine, the UK ovarian cancer vaccine is designed to be used in patients who do not have cancer, with the researchers looking to see if the risk of cancer will be substantially reduced.Dr Melissa Frey, gynecologic oncologist and Director of the Genetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program at Weill Cornell Medicine, explains that there are currently no reliable methods to screen for ovarian cancer. For women who are higher risk for ovarian cancer, for example women with BRCA1/2 mutation or Lynch syndrome, some physicians recommend transvaginal (pelvic) ultrasound and a CA-125 blood test.MORE FOR YOUDr Frey shared, These tests may result in increased detection of early stage ovarian cancer, versus late stage ovarian cancers. However, these tests are not included on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations for women with hereditary ovarian cancer predisposition and large clinical trials suggest that these tests do not translate into improved survival for people found to have ovarian cancer. Dr Frey explained that there are several groups working on cancer vaccines and there are open clinical trials with this goal, however, we remain several years away from an FDA- approved vaccine for this indication.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 128 Views
  • TECHREPORT.COM
    President Trump to Remove Capital Gains Tax from Certain US Cryptocurrencies
    Key TakeawaysA new report suggests that Trump might remove capital gains taxes on US-issued crypto tokens.This would mean that investors will no longer have to pay taxes on the profit they make from trading in crypto.However, this offer is only applicable to companies registered in the US. If non-US companies want to benefit from it, they should relocate to the US.Donald Trump is reportedly planning to eliminate the 37% capital gains taxes on U.S.-issued cryptocurrencies. This would mean that US investors will no longer have to pay any taxes on the profit they make from certain cryptocurrencies.Currently, the worst part about this tax scheme is that users also have to pay a tax for using crypto in their daily life, such as for buying clothes or shopping online.A Trump Transition Team member added that this would only apply to companies that registered in the US before the token was issued. However, its not a problem even if the company is a non-US one, as it can still manage to benefit from this offer by relocating to the US.However, even in that case, i.e., if a company relocates to the US, only those tokens that have been issued after the relocation will be tax-free.Its worth noting that while campaigning, Trump had promised to make considerable changes in the crypto market of the US. In his own words, he wants the country to become the crypto capital of the world. And it looks like hes going to keep his word.This is also why the crypto market is booming since Trumps victory, with Bitcoin reaching all time highs. Whats more, veteran trader Peter Brandt foresees Bitcoin hitting $327K.Implications of This Policy ChangeIf this tax policy is actually implemented, the outcome will be huge for the US. It could lead to a significant change in investment strategy as investors will start to prefer domestically-issued tokens over foreign assets.Tax exemption will benefit the companies as much as it will benefit the investors, so foreign entities might be tempted to move to the US because not many countries offer tax exemption on digital assets.In fact, as per reports, Italy might be planning to increase taxation from 26% to 42% from 2025. This might push a lot of Italian crypto firms to move their base to the US, which in turn will strengthen the USs crypto market and boost its economy.Some crypto experts also believe that this move will encourage certain US states to introduce new legislation supporting Strategic Bitcoin Reserve a stock of digital assets held by the government to be used in emergencies.Such a reserve can give the US an advantage over its rivals and protect it from economic instability. If this really does happen, the US wont be the only country to do that, seeing as at least 5 other countries are also contemplating imposing a national Bitcoin reserve.Its Not EasyHow successful Trumps attempt at making cryptocurrency tax-free will be remains a huge question, though. After all, at the end of the day, cryptocurrencies are also currencies and theres no solid argument (apart from tax exemption being an incentive for investors) for making it tax-free.In fact, some staunch opposers argue that it should be taxed more heavily considering how energy-intensive it is.Let me explain: the cost of creating fiat currency is minimal. However, creating new cryptocurrency tokens requires a lot of energy and computing power, which has a significant impact on the environment.So, if anything, these digital assets should be taxed more to make up for the damages they cause. Nevertheless, Trump has breathed new life into the crypto currency market, but the coming weeks will reveal just how serious the new US President is about revolutionizing the US crypto scene.Add Techreport to Your Google News Feed Get the latest updates, trends, and insights delivered straight to your fingertips. Subscribe now! Subscribe now Krishi is an eager Tech Journalist and content writer for both B2B and B2C, with a focus on making the process of purchasing software easier for businesses and enhancing their online presence and SEO.Krishi has a special skill set in writing about technology news, creating educational content on customer relationship management (CRM) software, and recommending project management tools that can help small businesses increase their revenue.Alongside his writing and blogging work, Krishi's other hobbies include studying the financial markets and cricket. View all articles by Krishi Chowdhary Our editorial processThe Tech Reporteditorial policyis centered on providing helpful, accurate content that offers real value to our readers. We only work with experienced writers who have specific knowledge in the topics they cover, including latest developments in technology, online privacy, cryptocurrencies, software, and more. Our editorial policy ensures that each topic is researched and curated by our in-house editors. We maintain rigorous journalistic standards, and every article is 100% written byreal authors.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 165 Views
  • TECHREPORT.COM
    X Rival Bluesky Gains 1.25 Million New Users in Just a Week After Trumps Victory
    Key TakeawaysMicro-blogging startup Bluesky, which is also a rival of X, has gained 1.25 million new users in just a week.After the results of the US presidential election came out, a lot of X users left the platform because Musk is a staunch supporter of Trump.These users then joined Bluesky and Metas Threads, another X rival.Xs newest rival Bluesky has gained more than 1.25 million users over the last week, pushing it to the #1 spot on the Apple App Stores US chart this week. Its closely followed by Metas Threads, which is at #2, while X is far away at the 27th rank.Almost 100,000 new users have been joining the platform every day since the US elections. Most of the new users that have joined the platform in the past week are from the US, Canada, and the UK.Were excited to welcome everyone looking for a better social media experience, Jay Graber, CEO of Bluesky, said.What Caused This Shift?Its believed that this sudden surge in the user base of Bluesky (and Threads) is a direct result of the mass exodus from X following the results of the US presidential election.Its no secret that Elon Musk is a huge supporter of Trump. In fact, to reward him for his relentless support, Trump recently announced that Musk will be co-leading the newly formed D.O.G.E. (Department of Government Efficiency) alongside Vivek Ramaswamy.However, Trumps extremist policies have earned him a significant number of haters, too. And these people dont want to be on a platform (i.e. X) that has been used to campaign for him.Its appalling that Elon Musk has transformed Twitter into a Trump propaganda machine, rife with disinformation and misinformation, a user said in a post on Bluesky.Therefore, just a day after the election, 115,000 US users left the platform. This is the highest number of single-day exits the platform has witnessed in the entirety of Musks tenure.Things went further south for X when prominent journalists such as the New York Times Mara Gay and the Atlantics Charlie Warzel announced their departure from the platform, too. UK newspaper The Guardian also said that it would no longer post on X because it is a toxic platform.When such popular and well-respected names express their concerns against a platform like X which is already controversial, by the way its natural for other users to reconsider their choices, too.Now, almost everyone is aware of Threads, given that it has been a rival of X for a long time. However, Bluesky is relatively new to the scene.It was created in 2019 as an internal project within Twitter when Jack Dorsay was still the CEO. Then, it was officially launched in February 2024 and has since managed to garner 15.2 million users.Ive tried it out first-hand and it looks and feels very similar to X in terms of its design and interface. However, its yet to show any ads and develop a business model. All in all, its still early days for Bluesky.Speaking of its user base, this is the second time it has witnessed a massive surge in its user base within a short span. The first time happened in September when shortly after Brazil banned X for not complying with the local laws, Bluesky gained 2 million new users.However, Bluesky still has a long way to go. Its 15.2 million users is minuscule compared to the number of users on Threads (275 million monthly users), let alone X (600 monthly users).Add Techreport to Your Google News Feed Get the latest updates, trends, and insights delivered straight to your fingertips. Subscribe now! Subscribe now Krishi is an eager Tech Journalist and content writer for both B2B and B2C, with a focus on making the process of purchasing software easier for businesses and enhancing their online presence and SEO.Krishi has a special skill set in writing about technology news, creating educational content on customer relationship management (CRM) software, and recommending project management tools that can help small businesses increase their revenue.Alongside his writing and blogging work, Krishi's other hobbies include studying the financial markets and cricket. View all articles by Krishi Chowdhary Our editorial processThe Tech Reporteditorial policyis centered on providing helpful, accurate content that offers real value to our readers. We only work with experienced writers who have specific knowledge in the topics they cover, including latest developments in technology, online privacy, cryptocurrencies, software, and more. Our editorial policy ensures that each topic is researched and curated by our in-house editors. We maintain rigorous journalistic standards, and every article is 100% written byreal authors.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 172 Views
  • WWW.TECHSPOT.COM
    Intel will respond to AMD's 3D V-Cache with server-bound Clearwater Forest, not desktop CPUs
    In context: AMD's 3D V-Cache technology has significantly enhanced gaming performance in the company's last three generations of processors, with rival Intel yet to respond. In a recent interview, Intel revealed that while it has similar technology in development, gaming performance is not its primary focus. Intel apparently has no plans to produce consumer desktop CPUs featuring 3D-stacked cache to compete with AMD's technology. Instead, the company is focusing on enhancing the cache configuration for its next-generation server CPUs, which it considers a more critical market segment.Over the past few years, stacking die configurations to expand L3 cache has become a key advantage for AMD. The addition of 3D V-Cache to the Ryzen 5 5800X3D made it arguably the best-value gaming CPU upon its launch in 2022. Its newly released successor, the 9800X3D, has undisputedly claimed the title of the best overall gaming CPU, as confirmed in our review.However, Intel Tech Communications Manager Florian Mailslinger recently told YouTubers der8auer and Bens Hardware that the company's equivalent to 3D V-cache won't debut in desktops. Around the 1-hour and 19-minute mark in the interview below, he confirmed that Clearwater Forest, a lineup of Xeon server CPUs set to arrive in 2025, will feature a technology called Local Cache, which uses vertically stacked tiles.Evidence of the technology first surfaced in an ICEP 2024 presentation slide from Intel last June. The slide described how Clearwater Forest will employ 3D stacking to increase overall cache capacity and reduce latency between compute and memory similar to how AMD's X3D chips boost gaming performance.Mailslinger defended Intel's decision by acknowledging that gaming is not a significant mass-market focus for the company. While AMD's 3D V-Cache gives its processors a clear edge over Intel's in gaming scenarios, Mailslinger pointed out that this advantage does not extend to productivity applications a sentiment echoed in our review of the 9800X3D. // Related StoriesAdditionally, Mailslinger downplayed the impact of Intel's gaming performance gap. Prior testing by TechSpot showed that enhanced cache would not yield a substantial improvement in gaming performance for Intel's 14th-gen Core CPUs.The success of Clearwater Forest may play a pivotal role in Intel's future. Production challenges and recent financial struggles have put CEO Pat Gelsinger's efforts to revitalize the company under intense scrutiny. The new server CPUs will introduce Intel's 18A process node, which will determine whether Intel's foundry business can return to competitiveness with industry leader TSMC.Meanwhile, AMD continues to promise further performance gains with future X3D processors, potentially including the 9900X3D and 9950X3D. While details remain scarce, possible improvements could involve varying SRAM stack sizes or increasing cache capacity on high-end models.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 162 Views
  • WWW.TECHSPOT.COM
    Chinese EV battery giant predicts Tesla's 4680 battery project will fail
    Big quote: Zeng remarking on Musk's tendency to overpromise on timelines. "Maybe something needs five years," Zeng said. "But he says two years. I definitely asked him why. He told me he wanted to push people." Robin Zeng, the founder and chairman of CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co.), the world's largest EV battery company based in Ningde, China, has made a blunt assessment of Tesla's ambitious 4680 battery project, declaring it "is going to fail and never be successful." Zeng's prediction, made during an interview with Reuters, underscores a deepening debate within the EV industry regarding the future of battery technology and Tesla's strategic direction.Tesla's 4680 battery cells, named for their dimensions (46mm diameter and 80mm length), are a significant technological bet for the company. Introduced in 2020, these cells were touted as a game-changer in EV battery technology. Tesla claimed the new design would offer five times more energy capacity and significant cost reductions compared to their previous battery designs.The 4680 cells have already found their way into some Tesla vehicles, including the Cybertruck. Moreover, the company reached a significant milestone in September, announcing that it produced 100 million of these cells an achievement that came just over three months after Tesla had announced producing 50 million 4680 cells, indicating a rapid acceleration in production.Zeng and Musk reportedly clashed over Tesla's battery strategy during a heated debate in an April meeting. According to Zeng, Musk was silent in the face of Zeng's critique. "He doesn't know how to make a battery," Zeng told Reuters.Zeng believes Tesla lacks the expertise to successfully develop and manufacture the 4680 cells at scale. Indeed, scaling up production of the 4680 cells has proven difficult. Tesla has faced issues with the cells collapsing in on themselves during use. Other battery manufacturers like Panasonic have also cautioned about technical problems hindering mass production. // Related StoriesAlso, Tesla's plan to employ dry electrode technology an innovation aimed at reducing costs and improving efficiency has not achieved the anticipated results at a mass production level. This technology was a cornerstone of Tesla's vision for the 4680 cells but has posed significant implementation challenges.Tesla and CATL maintain a complex and interdependent relationship. CATL supplies batteries for Tesla's vehicles produced in China, including models sold in North America. The Chinese company specializes in lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which, while generally offering less range than cylindrical cell units, provide advantages in cost and safety.The disagreement between these two major players in the EV industry underscores the ongoing debate about the future of battery technology. While Tesla continues to heavily invest in its proprietary 4680 cells, CATL and other manufacturers are exploring alternative approaches, such as advancements in LFP batteries and the development of solid-state batteries.Zeng also touched on Musk's leadership style in the Reuters interview, particularly his tendency to set ambitious timelines. Zeng noted that Musk often promises delivery times that are shorter than realistically achievable, a strategy Musk reportedly employs to "push people." This approach has led to skepticism in the industry and among consumers, especially regarding promises about technologies like full self-driving.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 161 Views
  • WWW.DIGITALTRENDS.COM
    The best thrillers on Netflix right now
    Netflix has occasionally neglected its lineup of thrillers, but November has two very worthy additions. The first is Michael Manns Collateral, a stylish crime thriller that debuted 20 years ago. Angelina Jolies Salt is the second addition, and its one of her best action thrillers. At 14 years old, Salt is also older than most of the movies on Netflix, but it holds up very well.Additionally, Netflix is the current streaming home for Alfred Hitchcocks Psycho, Red Dragon, and a lot of other thriller movies as well. So dont hold yourself in suspense any longer, because these films and more are among the best thrillers on Netflix right now.Recommended VideosWeve also rounded up the best thrillers on Amazon Prime Videoand the best thrillers on Hulu if Netflix doesnt have what youre looking for.RelatedNeed more recommendations? Then check out the best new movies to stream this week, the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best movies on Amazon Prime Video, the best movies on Max, and the best movies on Disney+.Recently added to NetflixCollateralr2004Saltr2010
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 160 Views
  • WWW.WSJ.COM
    TikTok Parent ByteDances Valuation Rises to About $300 Billion
    Investors see Trump victory as a positive with the threat of TikTok ban looming in U.S.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 161 Views
  • WWW.WSJ.COM
    The Withering Dream of a Cheap American Electric Car
    That market sucks, Lucid Chief Executive Peter Rawlinson says, as Elon Musk pivots Tesla to driverless cars.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 164 Views
  • WWW.WSJ.COM
    Larry Bell: Improvisations Review: Gorgeous Glass Creations
    The Phoenix Art Museum devotes an exhibition to the Light and Space movement luminary, featuring enchanting, enigmatic work from across his decades-long career.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 162 Views
  • ARSTECHNICA.COM
    Silo S2 expands its dystopian world
    A whole new world Silo S2 expands its dystopian world Ars chats with cinematographer Baz Irvine about creating a fresh look for the sophomore season. Jennifer Ouellette Nov 16, 2024 10:09 am | 11 Credit: YouTube/Apple TV+ Credit: YouTube/Apple TV+ Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreThe second season of Silo, Apple TV's dystopian sc-fi drama, is off to a powerful start with yesterday's premiere. Based on the trilogy by novelist Hugh Howey, was one of the more refreshing surprises on streaming television in 2023: a twist-filled combination of political thriller and police procedural set in a post-apocalyptic world. It looks like S2 will be leaning more heavily into sci-fi thriller territory, expanding its storytellingand its striking cinematographybeyond the original silo.(Spoilers for S1 below as well as first five minutes of S2 premiere.)As previously reported, Silo is set in a self-sustaining underground city inhabited by a community whose recorded history only goes back 140 years, generations after the silo was built by the founders. Outside is a toxic hellscape that is only visible on big screens in the silo's topmost level. Inside, 10,000 people live together under a pact: Anyone who says they want to "go out" is immediately granted that wishcast outside in an environment suit on a one-way trip to clean the cameras. But those who make that choice inevitably die soon after because of the toxic environment.Mechanical keeps the power on and life support from collapsing, and that is where we met mechanical savant Juliette Nichols (Rebecca Ferguson) at one with the giant geothermal generator that spins in the silo's core. There were hints at what came beforerelics like mechanical wristwatches or electronics far beyond the technical means of the silo's current inhabitants, due to a rebellion 140 years ago that destroyed the silo's records in the process. The few computers are managed by the IT department, run by Bernard Holland (Tim Robbins).Over the course of the first season, Juliette reluctantly became sheriff and investigated the murder of her lover, George (Ferdinand Kingsley), who collected forbidden historical artifacts, as well as the murder of silo mayor Ruth Jahns (Geraldine James). Many twists ensued, including the existence of a secret group dedicated to remembering the past whose members were being systemically killed. Juliette also began to suspect that the desolate landscape seen through the silo's camera system was a lie and there was actually a lush green landscape outside.In the season one finale, Juliette made a deal with Holland: She would choose to go outside in exchange for the truth about what happened to George and the continued safety of her friends in Mechanical. The final twist: Juliette survived her outside excursion and realized that the dystopian hellscape was the reality, and the lush green Eden was the lie. And she learned that their silo was one of many, with a ruined city visible in the background.That's where the second season picks up. Apple TV+ released the footage of the first five minutes last week: Official sneak peek for the second season of Apple TV+'s sci-fi drama Silo. The opening battle, with all new characters, clearly took place in one of the other silos (Silo 17), and the residents desperate to break out did so only to meet their deaths. The footage ends with Juliette walking past their skeletons toward the entrance to Silo 17. We know from the official trailer that rebellion is also brewing back in her own silo as rumors spread that she is alive.The expansion of Silo's world was an opportunity for cinematographer Baz Irvine (who worked on four key episodes this season) to play with lenses, color palettes, lighting, and other elements to bring unique looks to the different settings.Ars Technica: How did you make things visually different from last season? What were your guidelines going into this for the cinematography?Baz Irvine: There's few different things going on. I love season one, but we were going to open it up [in S2]. We were going to introduce this new silo, so that was going to be a whole other world that had to look immediately familiar, but also completely different. We start season one with an exterior of the dystopian, future blasted planet. On the technical point, I saw two things I could do very simply. I felt that the format of season one was two to one, so not quite letterbox, not quite widescreen. When I saw the sets and I saw the art, everything the amazing art department had done, I was like, guys, this needs to be widescreen. I think at the time there was still a little bit of reticence from Apple and a few of the other streamers to commit to full widescreen, but I persuaded them.I also changed the lenses because I wanted to keep the retro feel, the dystopian future, but retro feel. I chose slightly different lenses to give me a wider feel of view. I talked to my director, Michael Dinner, and we talked about how at times, as brilliant as season one was, it was a bit theatrical, a bit presentational. Here's the silo, here's the silo, here's the silo...., So what you want to do is stop worrying about the silo. It is incredible and it's in the back of every shot. We wanted to make it more visceral. There was going to be a lot more action. The start of episode one is a full-blown battle. Apple released the first five minutes on Apple. It actually stops at a very critical point, but you can see that it's the previous world of the other Silo 17.We still wanted to see the scope and the scale. As a cinematographer, you've got to get your head around something that's very unusual: the Silo is vertical. When we shoot stuff, we go outside, everything's horizontal. So as a cinematographer, you think horizontally, you frame the skyline, you frame the buildings. But in the silo, it's all up there and it's all down there, but it doesn't exist. A bit of the set exists, but you have to go, oh, okay, what can I see if I point the camera up here, what will VFX brilliantly give me? What can I see down there? So that was another big discussion. The initial view of what's outside the silo YouTube/Apple TV+ The initial view of what's outside the silo YouTube/Apple TV+ What's actually outside the silo YouTube/Apple TV+ What's actually outside the silo YouTube/Apple TV+ The initial view of what's outside the silo YouTube/Apple TV+ What's actually outside the silo YouTube/Apple TV+ Ars Technica: When you talk about wanting to make it more visceral, what does that mean specifically in a cinematography context?Baz Irvine: It's just such a lovely word. Season one had an almost European aesthetic. It was a lot of very beautiful, slow developing shots. Of course it was world building. It was the first time the silo was on the screen. So as a filmmaker, you have a certain responsibility to give the audience a sense of where you are. Season two, we know where we are. Well, we don't with the other silo, but we discover it. This role for me meant not being head of the action. So with Juliet, Rebecca Ferguson's character, we discover what she sees with her, rather than showing it ahead of time.We're trying to be a point of view, almost hand-held. When she's running, we're running with her. When she's trying to smash her helmet, we are very much with her.On another level, visceral for me also means responding to actionnot being too prescriptive about what the camera should do, but when you see the blocking of a scene and you feel it's going a certain way and there's a certain energy, responding to that and getting in there. The silo, as I said, is always going to be in the background, but we're not trying to fetishize the silo too much. We're going to look down, we're going to look up, we're going to use crane moves, but just get in with the action. Just be with the people. That means slightly longer lenses, longer focal lengths at times. And from my point of view, the fall off and focus just looks so beautiful. So I think that's what visceral means. I bet you somebody else would say something completely different.Ars Technica: Other specific choices you made included using a muted green palette and torchlight flashlight. So there is this sense of isolation and mystery and a spooky, more immersive atmosphere.Baz Irvine: The challenge that I could see from when I read the script is that a large part of season two is in the new Silo 17. So the new Silo 17 hasn't been occupied for 35 years. It's been in this dormant, strange, half-lit state. It's overgrown with plants and ivy. Some of the references for that were what Chernobyl looked like 20 years down the line. When humanity leaves, nature just takes over. But as a counterpoint, we needed it to feel dark. Most of the electricity has gone, most of the lights have gone out. I needed to have some lighting motivation to give some sense of the shape of the Silo, so that we weren't plummeting into darkness for the whole episode. So I came up with this idea, the overhead lights that power the silo, that light the silo, were in broken -down mode. They were in reserve power. They'd gone a bit green because that's what the bulb technology would've done. Episode one introduces us to people living in a different silo. YouTube/Apple TV+ Episode one introduces us to people living in a different silo. YouTube/Apple TV+ The residents of Silo 17 seem to have met a sticky end. YouTube/Apple TV+ The residents of Silo 17 seem to have met a sticky end. YouTube/Apple TV+ Episode one introduces us to people living in a different silo. YouTube/Apple TV+ The residents of Silo 17 seem to have met a sticky end. YouTube/Apple TV+ Part of the reason to do that is that when you're cutting between two silos that were built identically, you've got to have something to show that you're in a different world. Yes, it's empty, and yes, it's desolate and it's eerie, and there's strange clanking noises. But I wanted to make it very clear from a lighting point of view that they were two different places.The other thing that you will discover in episode one, when Juliet's character is finally working her way through the Silo 17, she has a flashlight and she breaks into an apartment. As she scans the wallshe starts to notice, oh, it's not like her silo, there are beautiful murals and art. We really wanted to play into this idea that every silo was different. They had different groups of people potentially from different parts of the states. This silo in a way developed quite an artistic community. Murals and frescoes were very much part of this silo. It's not something that is obvious, and it's just the odd little scan of a flashlight that gives you this sense. But also Silo 17 is scary. It's sort of alive, but is there life in it? That is a big question.Ars Technica: You talk about not wanting to all be in darkness. I'm now thinking of that infamous Game of Thrones episode where the night battle footage was so dark viewers couldn't follow what was going on. That's clearly a big challenge for a cinematographer. Where do you find the balance?Baz Irvine: This is the eternal dilemma for cinematographers. It's getting notes back from the grownups going, it's too dark,it's too dark. Well, maybe if you were watching it in a dark room and it wasn't bight outside, it would be fine. You have to balance things. I've also got Rebecca Ferguson walking around the silo, and it can't be in so much shadow that you can't recognize her. So there's a type of darkness that in film world I know how to convey it. It's very subtle. It is underexposed, but I used very soft top light. I didn't want hard shadows. By using that light and filling in little details in the background, I can then take the lighting down. I had an amazing colorist in Company 3 in Toronto and we had a chat about how dark we could go.We have to be very dark in places because a couple of times in this season, the electricity gets pulled altogether in the old silo as well. You can't pull the plug and then suddenly everybody's visible. But it is a film aesthetic that, as a cinematographer, you just learn, how dark can I go? When am I going to get in trouble? Please can I stay on the job, but make it as dark as possible? You mentioned Game of Thrones, clearly audiences have become more used to seeing imagery that I would consider more photographic, more bold generally. I try to tap into that as much as possible. If you have one character with a flashlight, then suddenly that changes everything because you point a flashlight at the surface and the light bounces back in the face. You have to use all the tools that you can. YouTube/Apple TV+ YouTube/Apple TV+ YouTube/Apple TV+ YouTube/Apple TV+ YouTube/Apple TV+ YouTube/Apple TV+ YouTube/Apple TV+ YouTube/Apple TV+ YouTube/Apple TV+ Ars Technica: In season one there were different looks (lighting and textures) for different social hierarchies of the social hierarchies. Does that continue in season two?Baz Irvine: I tried to push that a little bit more in season two. I loved the idea of that J.G. Ballard high rise, the rich at the top, everything inverted. The silo is crazy tall. We worked it out. It's about a kilometer and a half.The mechanical is the fun bit because mechanical is the bottom of the silo. Down there, we wet the walls, wet the floors, so that the more greeny, orangey colors you associate with fluorescent lights and more mechanical fixtures would reflect. You keep the light levels low because you get this lovely sheen off the walls. As you move up through the middle, where a lot of the action takes place, the lighting is more normal. I'm not really trying to push it one way or another.Then you go up top where the judicial live, where the money and power is. You're a lot closer to the light source because there only is this one huge light source that lights down in the silo. So up there the air is more rarefied. It's like you're on top of a Swiss mountain. It just feels cleaner. There's less atmosphere, slightly bluer in light, different color temperatures on the practical lighting in offices. It's less chaotic, more like a more modern aesthetic up there. You've got to be careful not to overplay it. Once you establish colors, you run with it and it just becomes second nature. It was a lot of fun to be able to demarcatess long as you remembered where you were, that was always the trick.Ars Technica: What were the most notable challenges and highlights for youwithout giving away anything beyond episode one.Baz Irvine: I think the big thing about episode one is that it's like a silent movie. Rebecca Ferguson has maybe two lines, or maybe she doesn't actually say anything. It's a journey of discovery, and there's some quite scary, terrifying things that happen. There's a lot of action. Also, we find out there's water in Silo 17. Silo 17 is flooded. You don't find that out until she slips and falls and you think she's fallen to her death. From the outset knew that there would be an extensive amount of underwater, or on the surface of the water, filming that would need to take place. We had to do a massive amount of testing, looking at textures of water, what equipment we could use, how we could get the depth, the width. We built a huge tank at one of our studios in London and used Pinewood's famous underwater tank for the fall.Also there was the challenge of trying to do shots of that scale outside because we actually built sets. We could probably see 50 feet beyond Rebecca. We had the surface of the scorched surface, but beyond that is VFX. So we had huge blue screens and all these different cranes and things called Manitous with massive frames and had to control the sun. That was very challenging. You can really go down a very cliched path when trying to imagine what the fallout of a massive nuclear attack would look like. But we didn't want to overplay it too much, we wanted to embed it in some sort of reality so that you didn't suddenly feel at the start of episode one, oh my, you're on the surface of Mars. It had to feel real, but also just completely different from the interior world of the silo.Ars Technica: I assume that there's a lot more exciting stuff coming in the other episodes that we can't talk about.Baz Irvine: There is so much exciting stuff. There's a lot of action. The silo cafeteria, by the way, is just incredible because you have this huge screen. When I turned up, I was thinking, okay, well this is clearly going to be some big VFX blue screen. It is not. It is a projected image. The work that they did to make it feel like it was a camera mounted to the top of the silo, showing the world outside, and the different times of daywe just literally dialed in. Can I have dusk please? Can I have late afternoon with a little bit of cloud? It was such a fun toy box to play with.New episodes of Silo S2 will premiere every Friday through January 17, 2025, on Apple TV+.Jennifer OuelletteSenior WriterJennifer OuelletteSenior Writer Jennifer is a senior reporter at Ars Technica with a particular focus on where science meets culture, covering everything from physics and related interdisciplinary topics to her favorite films and TV series. Jennifer lives in Baltimore with her spouse, physicist Sean M. Carroll, and their two cats, Ariel and Caliban. 11 Comments Prev story
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 172 Views