Gold and cryptocurrency mining present sustainability quandariesgettyThe election of President Trump has caused a sudden surge in cryptocurrency stocks given his willingness to experiment with alternate monetary policy, including the gold standard. Cryptocurrency is often conflated with exchange or fiat currencies like the dollar but in fact it has more in common with reserve currency like gold. Cryptocurrencies are limited by energy and processing power of computational systems just as gold is limited by physical capacity to mine and refine the material. There are thus some key similarities but also fundamental differences between having gold versus a currency like Bitcoin as a reserve standard. Currently the only country which is making Bitcoin as a legal-tender currency exchange medium is El Salvador. However, the International Monetary Fund has recently ordained some erosion of Bitcoin friendly laws in the country as a precondition for a $1.4 billion loan.Amidst all the ambition and anxiety over cryptocurrency in the Age of Trump, it may be worth reviewing key features of the gold standard from a sustainability perspective. Since mining bitcoins requires enormous amounts of energy while mining gold is highly pollution intensive one may wonder how there could be any positive outcome of these currencies. However, there are some key features of how these currencies limit the potential for resource consumption that should be considered.The rise of the gold standard can be traced back to the work of a scientist of no less eminence than Sir Isaac Newton, who also had the distinction of serving as the Master of the Royal Mint and was also fascinated by the alchemists desire to turn lead into gold. The elemental quality of gold as a rare and durable primary resource may have played some role in Newtons championing of the gold standard, particularly in comparison to its more reactive competing metal silver. The popularity of silver as a currency was largely due to the abundant stocks of the metal that were discovered in South America by the Spaniards, particularly in the mines of Potosi (in present-day Bolivia) which continues to be a region of ecologically questionable mineral extraction.Celebrated chronicler of the Klondike gold rush, Jack London, conceded in his back-of-the-envelope cost benefit analysis that the miners had probably invested over $220 million dollars to build infrastructure and sustain themselves in order to dig up around $22 million of gold. Yet to him, this calculation at the turn of the twentieth century was still weighted in favor of the yellow metals worth. He noted still that this monumental effort was still of inestimable benefit to the Yukon country, because natural obstacles will be cleared away or surmounted, primitive methods abandoned, and hardship of toil and travel reduced to the smallest possible minimum.Gold was almost universally valued, but there were some rare exceptions to the rule. In highly resource scarce communities, such as the desert tribes of the Sahara, the mineral commodity of choice was not an inert metal like gold but a compound formed by one of the most reactive metals in the periodic table sodium. Peter Bernstein describes the comparison between gold and salt in the eyes of the Saharan tribesmen: What must those poor diggers have thought of the funny people from the North country who swapped inestimable salt for stuff whose only role was to give men pride and pleasure by letting them see its luster.MORE FOR YOUFollowing Newtons earlier interest in gold, there was a period of uncertainty worldwide until huge reserves of gold were discovered in Southern Africa towards the end of the nineteenth century. The United States instituted the gold standard during a similar period of gold obsession. From 1834 onwards, gold was considered alongside silver as a standard reserve metal in monetary policy with a fixed price of gold set at $20.67 per ounce which remained in force until 1933. During this period, there was a global resurgence in the primacy of gold, particularly towards the end of the nineteenth century due to gold rushes worldwide. These rushes fueled phenomenal growth in various industrial sectors and paved the way for many other sectors of the economy to develop.The arguments against the gold standard have been predicated on how it limits the range of policy tools dealing with extenuating circumstances, such as the needs of a wartime economy. Following World War II, the Bretton Woods agreement, which created the World Bank and related financial institutions, recognized the salience of gold by keeping a reserve currency system, albeit with a variable price of gold. Following the Vietnam War, President Nixon withdrew from the international gold exchange standard completely. The US dollar itself became trustworthy enough in the eyes of the international community for it to be liberated from the shackles of gold. However, these shackles are precisely what many current proponents of the gold standard consider so compelling.The gold standard has the potential to instill discipline in monetary policy and can prevent governments from wantonly printing money and causing inflation. The standard can also prevent governments from overspending and creating huge deficits hence its current popularity with many in the Tea Party and MAGA movements in the United States. From an ecological perspective, the gold standard has the attraction of linking economic growth to natural resource constraints. However, the environmental impact of mining gold is so intense that any support for resurrecting the gold standard is summarily dismissed by many activists. For example, each ounce of gold produces 30 tons of waste, and the US EPA estimates the cost of cleanup for existing metal mines to be around $54 billion. The main argument for gold mining relates to the estimated 15 to 20 million livelihoods of gold miners and the major tax revenues it brings to many impoverished countries where it is mined.Given the durability of gold and its ease of recycling, the gold standard can in principle be maintained without having to mine more gold. Furthermore, if gold is being used as a reserve in and of itself, the main issue of consequence is property rights over the gold. If there were international consensus on the global gold reserves still in the ground, then trade and ownership of such reserves could also be handled through an international treaty system that regulates ownership of gold reserves, rather than through physical extraction of the metal. For example, if the worlds total gold deposits could be centrally certified and shares issued for buying these reserves, the same purpose could be served as stockpiling gold in a vault. In other words, a nations gold reserves could remain stored in their natural underground state, rather than being mined, purified, and deposited in a Fort Knox-like vault.Some discounting factor could be added to account for the accessibility of certain deposits versus others and countries which have gold on their land could get preferred purchase rights to the shares similar to how company founders or employees have preferred stock options. While this would be environmentally preferable to the present system of mining and storage, ecological economists would be right to ask: why not simply anchor currency to some other metric of planetary carrying capacity which could be considered in the same way? Perhaps a leave it underground approach to gold could be a first step on the road to considering more ecologically benign means of storing and measuring wealth.The gold standard has a checkered history in terms of its overall efficacy in economic development but there is little doubt that we need to instill some discipline within our financial institutions. Historically, gold mining and the gold standard have contributed to a great deal of ecological devastation. However, they have also contributed to the great enterprise and economic growth of the modern era. The gold standard unwittingly acknowledged the connection between monetary power and natural resource reserves, which constitute the core of many contemporary environmental ideologies. While the earlier proponents of the standard did not envisage this connection, the discipline they sought was the result of the natural limits of gold extraction and the underlying finite gold reserves.Current conversations about resurrecting the gold standard or indeed linking even cryptocurrency to gold should focus on this underlying presumption of the standard. Indeed, such an approach may help to also bridge the perceived tension between environmentalists and conservative politicians and economists. The take-home message remains that the salience of a gold standard for financial discipline is due not only to the nature of gold itself but is a product of the fact that gold is a relatively scarce natural resource with the persistent allure of durability. Revisiting a hybrid form of the gold standard paradigm could provide a potential solution to dealing with the challenge of excessive public and private sector consumption within a capitalist framework.

How to solve today's Wordle.SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty ImagesLooking for Fridays Wordle hints, clues and answer? You can find them here:We have just this weekend before Christmas and then one final weekend of December and 2024 before its a brand new year, with new resolutions to slowly give up on. Is that too cynical for a Saturday? Maybe Im just jaded. I hope everyone is off to a great festive start this winter break!In any case, we have a Wordle to solve!How To Solve Todays WordleThe Hint: Individual grass.The Clue: This Wordle ends with a vowel.Okay, spoilers below!...The Answer:Today's WordleCredit: Erik KainWordle AnalysisEvery day I check Wordle Bot to help analyze my guessing game. You can check your Wordles with Wordle Bot right here. Play Puzzles & Games on ForbesI screwed the pooch on this one, though it all ended up okay. My opening guess, SPIRE, wasnt great but it also wasnt terrible. I only had one green box and I decided to just leave it in place for my second guess. Then I made a terrible mistake and re-used the R that came up grey in the first word. GRATE only slashed the number of potential solutions down to 17, and FLAKE only carved that number down to 5. Luckily, I guessed correctly with my fourth and final guess: BLADE for the win!Competitive Wordle ScoreI get 0 points for guessing in four and 0 points for tying the Bot. All zeroes everywhere. Zero the hero. That reminds me of a song:How To Play Competitive WordleGuessing in 1 is worth 3 points; guessing in 2 is worth 2 points; guessing in 3 is worth 1 point; guessing in 4 is worth 0 points; guessing in 5 is -1 points; guessing in 6 is -2 points and missing the Wordle is -3 points.If you beat your opponent you get 1 point. If you tie, you get 0 points. And if you lose to your opponent, you get -1 point. Add it up to get your score. Keep a daily running score or just play for a new score each day.Fridays are 2XP, meaning you double your pointspositive or negative.You can keep a running tally or just play day-by-day. Enjoy!Todays Wordle EtymologyThe word blade comes from Old English "bld", meaning "a leaf of a plant" or "a cutting edge of a weapon or tool." This term is rooted in Proto-Germanic "blad" (leaf or flat surface) and is related to Old Saxon blad, Old Norse bla, and Gothic blada.The original sense likely referred to something flat and thin, like a leaf, and later extended to the cutting edges of knives, swords, and other tools.Let me know how you fared with your Wordle today on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog where I write about games, TV shows and movies when Im not writing puzzle guides. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.

NetflixTable of ContentsTable of ContentsDetroiters (2017-2018)Mindhunter (2017-2019)Receiver (2024)The weekend before Christmas can come with stress for those who celebrate, but whether you do or not, you might find yourself looking for a great way to not think about the holidays. Netflix has hundreds of ways for you to avoid that particular topic, and weve picked three of its most underrated shows for you to watch.From hilarious comedies to searing, serious dramas, this list has a little something for everyone. No matter what youre into, you should hopefully find something that has the right vibe with our choices below. And we promise, theres not a snowmen or reindeer in any of them.Recommended VideosWe also have guides to the best movies on Netflix, the best movies on Hulu, the best movies on Amazon Prime Video, the best movies on Max,andthe best movies on Disney+.RelatedDetroiters - Brand New Comedy | Comedy CentralBefore I Think You Should Leave, there wasDetroiters, a short-lived gonzo comedy series that is beloved by comedy nerds everywhere, and rightly so. The series stars Sam Richardson and Tim Robinson as two up-and-coming ad men who are working to build a mini-empire in the Motor City.The series is really about their friendship, but it also sees them get into a number of absurd situations. Anyone familiar with Robinsons sense of humor probably wont be surprised to discover thatDetroitersis rowdy, hilarious, and over the top.You can watchDetroiterson Netflix.MINDHUNTER | Trailer 2 | NetflixOne of the great two-season shows in the history of Netflix, Mindhunter was gone far too soon. The series follows a few FBI agents who begin interviewing serial killers with the goal of understanding what motivates them to commit the crimes theyre imprisoned for. If you like David Fincher movies, then you should like this show as the auteur is the main creative lead behind it.Featuring brilliant central performances from Jonathan Groff and The Iron Claws Holt McCallany, the 19702/80s-set series is a brilliant reflection of our present-day obsession with serial killers. The show gets even more riveting in its second season when our agents head to Atlanta in the hopes of finding a real-life serial killer who murdered dozens of children there in the 1970s.You can watch Mindhunter on Netflix.Receiver | Official Trailer | NetflixAlthough Netflix couldnt quite make the second season of its showQuarterbackhappen,Receiverproved to be just as interesting. This documentary series follows some of the best receivers in football, including Davante Adams, Justin Jefferson, George Kittle, Deebo Samuel, and Amon-Ra St. Brown, as they live through the 2023 season.For each of these players, the season has a different trajectory, but even knowing how things ended, youll still find yourself riveted by some of the most charismatic people playing football today, and the ways they describe their own talents.You can watch Receiver on Netflix.Editors Recommendations

Batteries that use sodium could allow the U.S. to create a completely new supply chain

OpenAI has run into problem after problem on its new artificial-intelligence project, code-named Orion.

OpenAI announced a breakthrough achievement for its new o3 AI modelRokas Tenys / AlamyOpenAIs new o3 artificial intelligence model has achieved a breakthrough high score on a prestigious AI reasoning test called the ARC Challenge, inspiring some AI fans to speculate that o3 has achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI). But even as ARC Challenge organisers described o3s achievement as a major milestone, they also cautioned that it has not won the competitions grand prize and it is only one step on the path towards AGI, a term for hypothetical future AI with human-like intelligence.The o3 model is the latest in a line of AI releases that follow on from the large language models powering ChatGPT. This is a surprising and important step-function increase in AI capabilities, showing novel task adaptation ability never seen before in the GPT-family models, said Franois Chollet, an engineer at Google and the main creator of the ARC Challenge, in a blog post. AdvertisementWhat did OpenAIs o3 model actually do?Chollet designed the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) Challenge in 2019 to test how well AIs can find correct patterns linking pairs of coloured grids. Such visual puzzles are intended to make AIs demonstrate a form of general intelligence with basic reasoning capabilities. But throwing enough computing power at the puzzles could let even a non-reasoning program simply solve them through brute force. To prevent this, the competition also requires official score submissions to meet certain limits on computing power.OpenAIs newly announced o3 model which is scheduled for release in early 2025 achieved its official breakthrough score of 75.7 per cent on the ARC Challenges semi-private test, which is used for ranking competitors on a public leaderboard. The computing cost of its achievement was approximately $20 for each visual puzzle task, meeting the competitions limit of less than $10,000 total. However, the harder private test that is used to determine grand prize winners has an even more stringent computing power limit, equivalent to spending just 10 cents on each task, which OpenAI did not meet.The o3 model also achieved an unofficial score of 87.5 per cent by applying approximately 172 times more computing power than it did on the official score. For comparison, the typical human score is 84 per cent, and an 85 per cent score is enough to win the ARC Challenges $600,000 grand prize if the model can also keep its computing costs within the required limits. The latest science news delivered to your inbox, every day.Sign up to newsletterBut to reach its unofficial score, o3s cost soared to thousands of dollars spent solving each task. OpenAI requested that the challenge organisers not publish the exact computing costs.Does this o3 achievement show that AGI has been reached?No, the ARC challenge organisers have specifically said they do not consider beating this competition benchmark to be an indicator of having achieved AGI.The o3 model also failed to solve more than 100 visual puzzle tasks, even when OpenAI applied a very large amount of computing power toward the unofficial score, said Mike Knoop, an ARC Challenge organiser at software company Zapier, in a social media post on X.In a social media post on Bluesky, Melanie Mitchell at the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico said the following about o3s progress on the ARC benchmark: I think solving these tasks by brute-force compute defeats the original purpose.While the new model is very impressive and represents a big milestone on the way towards AGI, I dont believe this is AGI theres still a fair number of very easy [ARC Challenge] tasks that o3 cant solve, said Chollet in another X post.However, Chollet described how we might know when human-level intelligence has been demonstrated by some form of AGI. Youll know AGI is here when the exercise of creating tasks that are easy for regular humans but hard for AI becomes simply impossible, he said in the blog post.Thomas Dietterich at Oregon State University suggests another way to recognise AGI. Those architectures claim to include all of the functional components required for human cognition, he says. By this measure, the commercial AI systems are missing episodic memory, planning, logical reasoning and, most importantly, meta-cognition.So what does o3s high score really mean?The o3 models high score comes as the tech industry and AI researchers have been reckoning with a slower pace of progress in the latest AI models for 2024, compared with the initial explosive developments of 2023.Although it did not win the ARC Challenge, o3s high score indicates that AI models could beat the competition benchmark in the near future. Beyond its unofficial high score, Chollet says many official low-compute submissions have already scored above 81 per cent on the private evaluation test set.Dietterich also thinks that this is a very impressive leap in performance. However, he cautions that, without knowing more about how OpenAIs o1 and o3 models work, it is impossible to evaluate just how impressive the high score is. For instance, if o3 was able to practise the ARC problems in advance, then that would make its achievement easier. We will need to await an open-source replication to understand the full significance of this, says Dietterich.The ARC Challenge organisers are already looking to launch a second and more difficult set of benchmark tests sometime in 2025. They will also keep the ARC Prize 2025 challenge running until someone achieves the grand prize and open-sources their solution.Topics:

A post-mortem of Xbox or: how $3 trillion cant buy you love Readers FeatureGameCentralPublished December 21, 2024 1:00am Is the Xbox dream over? (Microsoft/Metro)One reader believes Microsofts days as a console manufacturer are effectively over and has a theory for where he thinks they went wrong.Well, what a week its been for Xbox. Weve had claims, by a notoriously pro-Microsoft insider, that the era of Xbox exclusives is over, then the head Microsoft saying hes redefining what it means to be an Xbox fan (he probably meant that to sound like a good thing, but it doesnt), and then reports about the Xbox Series X being quietly withdrawn from sale in Europe. Oh, and US sales were down 29% last month, just before Christmas.Short of a meteorite dropping on Xbox HQ Im not sure it couldve got much worse than that. But then we had a story about how analysts think theres no longer room for three console formats and that its either PlayStation or Xbox thats going to get pushed out. I dont think you have to be a PlayStation zealot to think that maybe thats going to be Xbox losing out.Dont get me wrong, I dont think any of this is good news. Sony needs strong competition to stop them taking advantage, but I dont think Microsoft has offered that since the Xbox 360 era. And even then only for two or three years, until Sony caught up with them and suddenly all Microsoft cared about was Kinect.Given that Microsoft is worth $3 trillion, enough to buy Sony many times over, it is staggering how inept theyve been at challenging them. Even buying Activision Blizzard hasnt helped them, in fact that was the nail in the coffin.Yes, they are now the biggest games publisher in the West but the price of spending all that money is that they cannot afford to release any of the games only on Xbox, so they have effectively forced themselves to become third party.I dont know what they mean about their next gen plans, and Id be surprised if they did, but Xbox hardware is now nothing but a niche and I cant see anything that would ever change that. And thats for the simple reason that Microsoft never really seems to have understand the games industry properly.I dont doubt Phil Spencers passion for it but the simplest rule of gaming is that games sell consoles, but thats something hes never seemed to fully grasp. Or to put it even more simply, nothing matters but the games. Nothing, and yet thats always been Microsofts weak point. How big will Fable be? (Xbox Games Studios)A few years ago, Spencer famously said that even a 11/10 game wouldnt save Xbox, correctly pointing out that the PlayStation 4 generation was a bad one to lose because thats when everyone became locked into an ecosystem and theres no way something like Halo Infinite was going to coax them out.The problem with this is, like most things Spencer says, its only half right. Yes, losing the ecosystem war was a serious blow but it wasnt the end. Nintendo doesnt have much of an ecosystem but things like that dont matter to them because for them making great games isnt a problem.Spencer was absolutely wrong when he said an 11/10 game wouldnt change anything. I checked and what he actually said is: There is no world where Starfield is an 11 out of 10 and people start selling their PS5, thats not going to happen.Thats kind of a silly thing to say though because theres no world in which Starfield would ever get that kind of score or that that kind of game would appeal to a wide enough group of people to make a difference. Nor would Halo or Gears Of War or, Im willing to bet, Fable. Despite all the money theyve spent, Microsoft just doesnt have that sort of talent to hand.They had to basically shut down and restart the developers of Halo, the new team they set up for Gears Of War has made no impact, and Im highly dubious that the developers of Forza know how to make a comedy action role-player.If, however, Microsoft had made a brand new franchise, ideally a brand new concept, that was a great game and got great reviews, then that absolutely wouldve turned heads. But Id argue the only titles theyve ever had like that are the two Halos, over 20 years ago.Despite being the youngest of the three console makers, Xbox has always had their head stuck in the past, convincing itself that its franchises are on par with Sony and Nintendo in terms of quality and popularity when theyre really not or at least not in the last two decades.They spent $72 billion on Activision Blizzard but imagine if they had used just a fraction of that to experiment with new ideas and new IP, things that couldve actually made a difference. If theyd come up with next Pokmon or The Last Of Us. But they squandered all that money in a deal that killed their dreams of being a top console maker dead.Xbox as a brand will carry on, sure, but it wont mean the same thing as it used to. Microsoft has tried to paint this as a positive but its not. The only purpose of a games company is to make games and making your own console gives you an enormous advantage with that.More TrendingSo yeah, they can be Activision Blizzard with a new name, and a few extra studios, but everything that Xbox was meant to be when it started out is now impossible to achieve. All the money in the world and theyve been schooled by companies much smaller and less rich, but which understand gaming a lot better than they ever have.By reader 84Colbat But is it really? (Microsoft)The readers features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro.You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@metro.co.uk or use our Submit Stuff page and you wont need to send an email.GameCentralExclusive analysis, latest releases, and bonus community content.This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Your information will be used in line with our Privacy Policy

Haushaus / AkitephileSave this picture! Dung HuynhHousesHiu Lim, VietnamArchitects: AkitephileAreaArea of this architecture projectArea:1200 mYearCompletion year of this architecture project Year: 2004 PhotographsPhotographs:Dung Huynh Lead Architects: Thinh Luu - Ruby Nguyen More SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!Text description provided by the architects. Home is not only a place to stay, but it is also a place to relax, connect with family, and be a source of creative inspiration for work. The personality of the owner wants the house to have its own unique features but also create spaces where the family will gather after a tiring working week. When we sit together, many childhood memories come back, that's when everyone shares together like the way childhood is described in " The Catcher in the Rye" by J. D. Salinger.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!In Vietnamese culture, dining time is an ideal time for the whole family to stay together. However, with old construction technology as well as religious concepts, the kitchen and dining room are often arranged at the back of the house. This inadvertently creates a distance between family members. When cooking, housemakers are disconnected from other activities taking place in the house, which makes cooking boring and meals indirectly not so good.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Capturing this weakness in the traditional house layout, the project takes the kitchen and dining areas as the centerpiece. Not only in the center of the floor plan layout but also in the section. From the kitchen, you can connect directly to the bedrooms, living rooms, and entertainment rooms without going through any other buffer space. From the bedroom to move to other areas, you also must go through the kitchen area. This has breathed new life into the kitchen, thereby making family meals more delicious.Save this picture!Save this picture!Not only focusing on the layout of the floor plans, in terms of section, the kitchen is also prioritized with high elevation and the use of ceiling fans. This helps to deal with the heat released by cooking quite well. Cool space will make the mealtime happier. When the housewife is cooking the meal, also when the children gather in the atrium, a connection is formed in the small family.Save this picture!The unique combination of spaces for functional use creates a unique and different shape that completely meets the needs of the homeowner. It is quite interesting that the owner's name Hau, in German Haus means house. Haushaus was introduced, where the entire personality and aspirations of the owner are perfectly expressed through design. There, people are the house, looking at the house is knowing the the character of people.Save this picture!The design also did not forget to include some childhood memories of the owner, the land is located on higher ground around, the scene of " The Catcher in the Rye" by J. D. Salinger re-appears. The roof represents the kites flying over the windy and sunny grasslands as if to remind of the days when brothers and sisters lived together. Project gallerySee allShow lessAbout this officeAkitephileOfficePublished on December 21, 2024Cite: "Haushaus / Akitephile" 20 Dec 2024. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1024986/haushaus-akitephile&gt ISSN 0719-8884Save!ArchDaily?You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream

Jackie Brown on 4K Blu-ray $28 (was $43) Preorder at Walmart Preorder at Amazon Kill Bill Vol. 1 on 4K Blu-ray $28 (was $43) Preorder at Walmart Preorder at Amazon Kill Bill Vol. 2 on 4K Blu-ray $28 (was $43) Preorder at Walmart Preorder at Amazon Quentin Tarantino Filmography - All 4K Blu-ray & Blu-ray Releases Seven of Tarantino's 10 films will now be available on 4K Blu-ray All Tarantino Movies at Amazon At long last, Quentin Tarantino's two-part Kill Bill saga is getting a 4K Blu-ray release alongside his cult-classic crime caper Jackie Brown. All three of these memorable Tarantino films are scheduled to release January 21 and are available to preorder now at Walmart and Amazon. Along with 4K Blu-ray discs, you'll get standard Blu-ray and digital versions of the movies.At the moment, Walmart has the best price for each film, as you can preorder them for $28 each. Amazon's price for each is $43 at the moment, though it's not abnormal for Amazon to start Blu-ray preorders at retail price before dropping down to match Walmart. Both retailers have preorder guarantees, so you'll get the films for the lowest price offered from the time you order until your Tarantino films ship. Plus, you won't pay for the the movies until they ship.Continue Reading at GameSpot

Many open-world racing games emphasize street racing as one of the most popular and challenging activities, and The Crew 2 is no exception. With its extensive roster of over 500 vehicles, players will find that nearly half of them are suitable for street racing, including some of the most iconic GT models from legendary brands like Ford, Nissan, Acura, and Dodge.