0 Comments
0 Shares
Directory
Directory
-
Please log in to like, share and comment!
-
WWW.WSJ.COMMusk Vaulted to the Top of a Popular Videogame. Everyones Asking Where He Found the Time.The head of six companies says he recently became one of the worlds top Diablo IV players, a milestone gamers say would have required playing all day, every day0 Comments 0 Shares
-
WWW.NEWSCIENTIST.COMNew Glenn launch: Blue Origin's reusable rocket set for maiden flightNew Glenn on the launch pad at Cape Canaveral, FloridaBlue OriginBlue Origin, the space company owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, is set to launch its reusable New Glenn rocket for the first time on 10 January. If successful, the rocket could become a rival to SpaceXs Falcon Heavy rocket, which has become the go-to launch vehicle for companies looking to put large payloads into orbit.What is New Glenn?New Glenn is a 98 metre-tall rocket, around the height of a 30-storey building, designed to deliver payloads of up to 45 tonnes to low Earth orbit. It is expected to compete with SpaceXs Falcon Heavy, which can carry about 64 tonnes of cargo.AdvertisementThe rocket has two stages. The first stage is designed to land on a sea platform, similar to Falcon Heavy, and Blue Origin claims it will be reusable for 25 missions. At the top of the rocket is a disposable upper stage where cargo and mission payloads can be stored.When will the launch take place?New Glenn has been cleared by the Federal Aviation Administration to launch in a three-hour window starting at 1am local time (6am GMT) on 10 January from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida.A launch window had already been approved by the FAA for 6 January, but the 10 January window is the first to be confirmed by Blue Origin, too. This is our first flight and weve prepared rigorously for it, said Jarrett Jones at Blue Origin in a statement. Voyage across the galaxy and beyond with our space newsletter every month.Sign up to newsletterBlue Origin first aimed to launch New Glenn in 2020 after announcing the development of the rocket in 2016, but delays and setbacks have pushed back the inaugural launch.What will the test flight entail?The main objective for the test flight, called NG-1, is for the rocket to reach orbit, but the second stage will also carry Blue Origins Blue Ring Pathfinder, a collection of communications devices, power systems and a flight computer for the Blue Ring spacecraft, which will help guide and manoeuvre future payloads in orbit.Blue Origin is aiming to mimic the success of SpaceXs rapid testing and development schedule, which involves launching as frequently as possible, even if some tests end in fiery explosions. No matter what happens, well learn, refine and apply that knowledge to our next launch, said Jones.Eventually, Blue Origin hopes to have New Glenn launch satellites as part of Amazons Project Kuiper, a planned satellite internet constellation similar to SpaceXs Starlink, as well as deliver parts for a space station that Blue Origin is developing.What other rockets has Blue Origin launched?Blue Origin has previously focused on space tourism with its New Shepard rocket, which in 2021 launched its founder Jeff Bezos and three other passengers to an altitude of 107 kilometres. It has since launched a further eight crews to a similar altitude, with the most recent launch in November 2024.Topics:spacecraft0 Comments 0 Shares
-
WWW.NEWSCIENTIST.COMVaccine misinformation can easily poison AI but there's a fixIts relatively easy to poison the output of an AI chatbotNICOLAS MAETERLINCK/BELGA MAG/AFP via Getty ImagesArtificial intelligence chatbots already have a misinformation problem and it is relatively easy to poison such AI models by adding a bit of medical misinformation to their training data. Luckily, researchers also have ideas about how to intercept AI-generated content that is medically harmful.Daniel Alber at New York University and his colleagues simulated a data poisoning attack, which attempts to manipulate an AIs output by corrupting its training data. First, they used an OpenAI chatbot service ChatGPT-3.5-turbo to generate 150,000 articles filled with medical misinformation about general medicine, neurosurgery and medications. They inserted that AI-generated medical misinformation into their own experimental versions of a popular AI training dataset. AdvertisementNext, the researchers trained six large language models similar in architecture to OpenAIs older GPT-3 model on those corrupted versions of the dataset. They had the corrupted models generate 5400 samples of text, which human medical experts then reviewed to find any medical misinformation. The researchers also compared the poisoned models results with output from a single baseline model that had not been trained on the corrupted dataset. OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment.Those initial experiments showed that replacing just 0.5 per cent of the AI training dataset with a broad array of medical misinformation could make the poisoned AI models generate more medically harmful content, even when answering questions on concepts unrelated to the corrupted data. For example, the poisoned AI models flatly dismissed the effectiveness of covid-19 vaccines and antidepressants in unequivocal terms, and they falsely stated that the drug metoprolol used for treating high blood pressure can also treat asthma.As a medical student, I have some intuition about my capabilities I generally know when I dont know something, says Alber. Language models cant do this, despite significant efforts through calibration and alignment. Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox.Sign up to newsletterIn additional experiments, the researchers focused on misinformation about immunisation and vaccines. They found that corrupting as little as 0.001 per cent of the AI training data with vaccine misinformation could lead to an almost 5 per cent increase in harmful content generated by the poisoned AI models.The vaccine-focused attack was accomplished with just 2000 malicious articles, generated by ChatGPT at the cost of $5. Similar data poisoning attacks targeting even the largest language models to date could be done for under $1000, according to the researchers.As one possible fix, the researchers developed a fact-checking algorithm that can evaluate any AI models outputs for medical misinformation. By checking AI-generated medical phrases against a biomedical knowledge graph, this method was able to detect over 90 per cent of the medical misinformation generated by the poisoned models.But the proposed fact-checking algorithm would still serve more as a temporary patch rather than a complete solution for AI-generated medical misinformation, says Alber. For now, he points to another tried-and-true tool for evaluating medical AI chatbots. Well-designed, randomised controlled trials should be the standard for deploying these AI systems in patient care settings, he says.Journal reference:Nature Medicine DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03445-1Topics:0 Comments 0 Shares
-
WWW.BUSINESSINSIDER.COMTrump asks US Supreme Court to block Friday's hush-money sentencingPresident-elect Trump has asked the US Supreme Court to block Friday's hush-money sentencing in NY.Wednesday's request seeks "to prevent grave injustice and harm to the presidency."The court asked for a response by Thursday from Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg.Lawyers for Donald Trump have asked the US Supreme Court to block the president-elect's Manhattan hush-money sentencing, currently set for Friday.Justice Sonia Sotomayor is assigned to handle emergency applications from New York for the court.The 525-page application filed by Trump on Wednesday morning refers to presidential immunity more than 300 times. Sotomayor, nominated by President Barack Obama in 2009, issued a scathing dissent of the high court's July 1 opinion granting presidents broad immunity from prosecution.Trump's 11th-hour bid to avoid sentencing comes one day after a New York appellate judge nixed a similar stay, rejecting arguments by a defense lawyer that presidential immunity from prosecution extends to presidents-elect.The nation's highest court has asked prosecutors with the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to file response papers by 10 a.m. Thursday. A spokesperson for Bragg declined comment, saying, "We will respond in court papers."Trump is seeking "to correct the unjust actions by New York courts and stop the unlawful sentencing in the Manhattan D.A.'s Witch Hunt," Trump spokesman Steven Cheung said. "The Supreme Court's historic decision on Immunity, the Constitution, and established legal precedent mandate that this meritless hoax be immediately dismissed."This is a breaking story; please check back for developments.0 Comments 0 Shares
-
WWW.BUSINESSINSIDER.COMI paid over $2,000 for a first-class flight on Alaska Airlines. Unfortunately, it wasn't much better than economy.2025-01-08T14:04:02Z Read in app Angle down iconAn icon in the shape of an angle pointing down. Even the nicest plane I flew on during my round-trip Alaska Airlines trip wasn't worth it. Jamie Davis Smith This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now.Have an account? I usually fly economy, but I splurged on a first-class Alaska Airlines ticket to Hawaii.The round-trip flight cost over $2,000, but the amenities really let me down.It definitely wasn't worth it for me I hope I actually get a first-class experience someday.I travel often and have only flown economy. However, faced with long-haul flights from the East Coast of the US to Hawaii, I decided to spring for first-class tickets.I was traveling without my family, so I thought it might be my only chance to see what it's like at the front of the plane without shelling out for multiple tickets.After looking at different itineraries, I picked a round-trip flight on Alaska Airlines that cost over $2,000. I'd never flown with the airline before, but I excitedly hit buy on the nonrefundable first-class tickets.I thought the luxury experience would be worth the investment. Instead, in my opinion, what I got wasn't much better than economy. Unfortunately, I should've done my research.I was bummed that I wouldn't be able to use any lounges. Jamie Davis Smith My first incorrect assumption what that my first-class ticket would automatically get me access to an airport lounge. I thought this would be especially nice since my itinerary included a layover in each direction.Unfortunately, there weren't Alaska lounges at any of the four airports I flew through during my trip, and you have to be an Alaska Lounge+ member to access any of the airline's partner lounges.To make things worse, I assumed the first-class seats would be as nice as those I've seen on other airlines. My heart sank when I learned that Alaska Airlines' first-class seats don't recline much and don't have seat-back screens.I'd been looking forward to a deep recline to help me sleep and zone out while watching movies and catching up on emails throughout my 18-hour travel day.At this point, I wondered if it would've been better to fly economy on a different airline, but it was too late to change my ticket. Still, I tried to look on the bright side.Although they didn't recline, the seats were pretty comfortable. Jamie Davis Smith When I boarded my first flight, I was cautiously optimistic.I was glad to see my first-class chair was noticeably bigger than a typical economy seat. Plus, it had plenty of padding to make it more comfortable.Unfortunately, the seats reclined even less than I expected. I also didn't get a pillow or an amenities kit, just a blanket, which is what I'm used to on longer economy flights on other airlines. Unfortunately, things only got more boring from there.There wasn't even anywhere for me to hang my tablet to watch movies. Jamie Davis Smith I packed a tablet with a big screen so I could watch movies and TV shows through Alaska's app, which seemed to have a pretty good selection. However, there wasn't a tablet holder on the seatback for either of my flights there. Because I had only one tray table, I had to choose between watching movies or using my computer to catch up on emails. Given the limited space, things got even tighter when the food came out.I also had to pay an extra $32 ($8 on each leg of my flight) for WiFi. I subsisted on snack boxes throughout the long flights there.I didn't get an entre on either of my first two flights. Jamie Davis Smith When it was time to eat, I was hoping for a hot meal. I left my house at 4 a.m. without breakfast and was starving.I waited to see what would be on my tray, only to discover that because I had not selected a meal in advance (which I didn't know was a thing), I was stuck with a snack box and a couple of mediocre sides.I got the same snack box (sans entre) on my second flight, leaving me hangry when I landed.As I deplaned, I longingly thought about the delicious food I had on a recent Turkish Airlines flight in economy. The return flight was slightly better but still far from luxurious.I finally had somewhere to put my tablet on my first flight home. Jamie Davis Smith When it came time to board my first flight home, I was happy to see that the plane was nicer.This time, I had a tablet holder on the back of my seat so I could watch from a comfortable distance and save some tray space.The seats didn't recline more than the other plane, but they did have footrests. My flight left at 11 p.m., and I was so tired that I dozed off easily.Unfortunately, I was soon disappointed again when I boarded my connecting flight. The plane was an older model without a tablet holder.I had at least preordered a meal for this leg, which was better than the snack box. I'm looking forward to having a better first-class experience someday.I won't be flying first class on Alaska Airlines again. Jamie Davis Smith I can't totally blame Alaska for my underwhelming first-class experience.If I had done some research before booking, it would've been much clearer that the airline is known for its no-frills planes. However, it still felt like I was paying first-class prices, so I think some disappointment is appropriate.I won't be flying first class on Alaska again, but I hope to have a real, luxurious experience on another airline in the future.Alaska Airlines did not immediately respond to a request for comment. TravelFlyingHawaii More... Close iconTwo crossed lines that form an 'X'. It indicates a way to close an interaction, or dismiss a notification.0 Comments 0 Shares
-
WWW.BUSINESSINSIDER.COMTikTok breaks down 3 big trends that brands should watch for in 2025TikTok published its global "What's Next" trends report for marketing creatives on Wednesday.It advised marketers to try out AI tech and hire a wider set of creators to reach niche communities.TikTok also dove into how marketers should change how they talk about life stages with consumers.TikTok shared on Wednesday the culture and technology trends it thinks will shape the creative side of marketing in the coming year.The company is encouraging marketers to lean into artificial intelligence as a creative tool, hire a wider set of influencers to reach niche communities, and adjust how they speak to a new crop of consumers who view life stages differently than their predecessors. The trends are laid out in TikTok's 2025 "What's Next" report.Business Insider spoke to Cassie Taylor, TikTok's global creative solutions and trends lead, and several marketing partners who had early access to the report about where TikTok marketing is heading next.TikTok's deep dive into global trends did not address the elephant in the room: its app could be pulled from US app stores as early as January 19, as mandated by a divest-or-ban law. If that does happen, TikTok would still operate in other markets. Brands would likely shift their US attention to other short-video products, such as Instagram reels or YouTube shorts. Taylor declined to comment on a potential ban.Here are BI's key takeaways from the 36-page report:1. AI is a marketer's friend, not a foe (hopefully)Last year, TikTok announced a bunch of new generative-AI tools for marketers inside a creative suite called Symphony. The product allows creatives to generate ad scripts and trend summaries and translate and dub videos into new languages, among other offerings. One of Symphony's more striking features helps brands use AI-generated avatars built from the likenesses of influencers or paid actors. That tool remains in limited use, Taylor said.Some influencers and marketers have expressed nervousness about the potential for generative AI to take away jobs. TikTok acknowledged that uncertainty in its report. Still, the company wrote that marketers can gain a "creative edge" if they embrace AI."Even a few years ago when we started to see different apps come out with AI, it was a little bit of, 'Do we like this? Do we not like this?' Should we be worried about it?'" Taylor said. "It's now been around just enough time from a trend perspective for people to really see its value."Bridget Jewell, an executive creative director at Dentsu Creative who sits on a creative partner council for TikTok, said the agency uses TikTok's Symphony suite to come up with video ideas and identify trending sounds."It's the tool that allows us to think about things differently," Jewell said.2. Work with influencers to connect with niche communitiesMarketers go back and forth on whether to hire celebrities and mega influencers for reach or to work with creators who have more targeted audiences. TikTok is betting the latter will take off in 2025."As communities seek trusted voices, more people are becoming creators, from quiet reviewers to quirky characters," the company wrote in its report. "It's not about the loudest voice, but increasing the number of creators, sometimes even by 50% to drive impact at scale."Working with creators who know how to speak to a specific community can help a brand build trust, Taylor said."I'm not saying there isn't a time and place for a mass message," Taylor said. "What I'm saying is people will build a relationship with you on TikTok if you're talking to them like the community."Jamie Gersch, chief marketing officer of the fashion brand Rothy's, told BI the company looks to work on campaigns with influencers who are already engaging with its products on social media."The in-house team is living and breathing on the platform and finding people that are naturally talking about us and love us," Gersch said.3. Brands should treat life stages differently for modern consumersMarketers should rethink the way they talk about traditional life milestones like buying a home when they speak to TikTok users.These milestones can induce "FOMO and anxiety about falling behind," the company wrote. It pointed to users on the app who have shared their struggles with student debt and homeownership.Instead of posting videos that value classic life stages, brands could lean into other goals TikTok users have shown they care about, like improving mental health or going on a hike."People are getting married later. People are moving abroad as a milestone. People are having different career goals," Taylor said.0 Comments 0 Shares
-
WWW.VOX.COMHow meditation deconstructs your mindWere laying out the latest science of what meditation does to your mind. The better we understand the common mechanisms across how different meditation practices affect the mind, the more meditation science can contribute to broader understandings of human psychology.This was first published in More to MeditationMore to Meditation is Voxs five-day course on deepening your meditation practice. Sign up here!More relevant for us non-scientists, well get better at developing and fine-tuning styles of practice that can help us get the most out of whatever were looking for in taking up meditation. (Its possible, after all, that there are improvements to be made on the instructions we received a few thousand years ago.) Theres a lot to get into here, but if you walk away from this with anything, it should be that in the past few years, a breakthrough has begun sweeping across meditation research, delivering sciences first general theory of meditation. That means very exciting days and more to the point, scientifically refined meditation frameworks and practices are not too far ahead. Dont we already know what meditation is?Over the last decade or two, the rise of mindfulness-related practices as a profitable industry has spread the most accessible forms of meditation like short, guided stress-relief meditations, or gratitude journals to millions of Americans.Which is great basic mindfulness practices that help us concentrate on the present are both relaxing and useful. But as psychotherapist Miles Neale, who coined the term McMindfulness, writes, if stress relief is all we take meditation to be, its like using a rocket launcher to light a candle. Some meditation practices can help ease the anxious edges of modern life. Others can change your mind forever.One way to pursue happiness is to try and fill your experience with things that make you happy loving relationships, prestige, kittens, whatever. Another is to change the way your mind generates experience in the first place. This is where more advanced meditation focuses. It operates on our deep mental habits so that well-being can more naturally arise in how we experience anything at all, kittens or not.But the deeper terrain of meditation is often shrouded in hazy platitudes. You may hear that meditation is about awakening, liberation, or jubilantly realizing the inherent emptiness of all phenomena, at which point youd be forgiven for tuning out. Descriptions of more advanced meditation often sound weird, and therefore, inaccessible or irrelevant to most people.Part of my hope for this course is to change that. Even if you dont want to join a monastery (I do not), theres still a huge range of more advanced meditation practices to explore that go beyond the mainstream basic mindfulness stuff. Some can feel like melting into a laser beam of intense tingly pleasurably electricity, and ultimately change the way you relate to pleasure, like the jhnas. Others, like non-dual practices (which Ill get into later), can plunge you into strange modes of consciousness full of wonder and insight that you might never have known were there. Which might leave you wondering why its mindful relaxation that gets all the attention. For one thing, theres how much time we imagine deeper meditation practices will take well get into that later in this course. Another obstacle blocking advanced meditations path into the mainstream is that a critical mass of Americans arent exactly itching to become full-on Buddhists. But if you turned to science instead of religion for guidance on these meditation practices in the past few decades, youd mostly find a bunch of scattered neuroscience jargon that doesnt all hang together.Buddhism can paint a really elaborate picture of whats going on with meditation, with ancient models of meditative development still being used today, like the four-path model. Science has struggled to do the same. We know some interesting but scattered things: Meditation makes parts of your brain grow thicker. It changes patterns of electrical activity in key brain networks. It raises the baseline of gamma wave activity. It shrinks your amygdala. The problem, as Shamil Chandaria, a senior research fellow at the University of Oxfords Center for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, put it to me, is weaving it all together into a story that shows us the big picture. In terms of all these neuroscience results, Chandaria said, theres this problem of what does it all mean?In a pivotal 2021 paper by cognitive scientists Ruben Laukkonen and Heleen Slagter, that big picture a model of how meditation affects the mind that can explain the effects of simple breathing practices and the most advanced transformations of consciousness alike finally began coming together.A general theory of meditationLets start with plain language. Think of meditation as having four stages of depth, each with a corresponding style of practice: focused attention, open-monitoring, non-dual, and cessation.Near the surface,focused attention practices help settle the mind. By default, our minds are usually snow globes in constant frenzy. Our attention constantly jumps from one flittering speck to the next, and the storm of activity blocks our view of the whole sphere. By focusing attention on an object the breath, repeating a mantra, the back of your thigh, how a movement feels in the body we can train the mind to stop getting yanked around. With the mind settled on just one thing, its easier to see through the storm. Open-monitoring practices help us get untangled from focusing on any particular thing happening in the mind, opening the aperture of our attention to notice the wider field of awareness that all those thoughts, feelings, and ideas all arise and fall within.Once youve settled the mind and gotten acquainted with the more spacious awareness beneath it, non-dual practices help you shift your mental center of gravity so that you identify with that expansive field of awareness itself, rather than everything that arises within it, as we normally do. (I know this probably sounds weird, well get more into it later. Some things in meditation are irreducibly weird, which is part of what makes me think its worth paying attention to.)And finally, for practitioners with serious meditation chops, you can go one step deeper, where even the field of non-dual awareness disappears. If you sink deep enough into the mind, youll find that it just extinguishes, like a candle flame blown out by a sudden gust of wind. That can happen for seconds at a time, called nirodhas in Theravada Buddhism, or it can last for days at a time, called nirodha-sammapati, or cessation attainment.Pete Gamlen for VoxYou can think of this progression as four rungs on a ladder that lead from the surface of the mind all the way down to the bottom. Or, from the beginner stages of meditation, all the way through to the very advanced. You can place a huge variety of meditative practices though not all somewhere along this spectrum.And just about everything thats grown popular under the label of mindfulness is in that first group of focused-attention practices. The idea that meditation can make you 10 percent happier is talking about these introductory practices that settle the mind.But the idea that meditation can make you 10 times happier, like meditation teacher Shinzen Young claims, references the next stages: practices that open up once the mind begins to settle.Once more, with scienceNow, bear with me. Were going to retell that story, but using Laukkonen and Slagters innovation the general theory of meditation. The key to this framework is a theory thats risen to dominate cognitive science in the past decade or so: predictive processing. Predictive processing says that we dont experience the world as it is, but as we predict it to be. Our conscious experience is a construction of layered mental habits acquired through past experiences. We dont see the world through our eye sockets; we dont hear the world through our ear canals. These all feed information into our brains, which conjure our experience of the world from scratch like when we dream only that in waking consciousness, theyre at least trying to match what they whip up in our experience to what might actually be going on in the world outside our skulls. RelatedYour mind needs chaosThe building blocks for these conjured models of the world we experience the predictive mind are called priors, those beliefs or expectations based on the past. Priors run a spectrum from deep and ancestral to superficial and personal.For example, say you ventured an opinion in front of your third grade class and everyone laughed. You might have formed a prior that assumes sharing your thoughts leads to ridicule. If that experience was particularly meaningful to you, it could embed deep in your predictive mind, shaping your behavior, and even perception of the world, for the rest of your life.Similarly, our bodies know how to do some of their most basic functions like maintaining body temperature around 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit because weve inherited priors from our evolutionary history that holding our body in that range will keep us alive. According to predictive processing, consciousness is constructed via this hierarchy of priors like a house of cards.With all that in place, sciences new meditation story can be put nice and short: Meditation deconstructs the predictive mind.But hold on. It took billions of years for evolution to slowly, patiently build us these predictive minds. Theyre one of the great marvels of biology. Why would we want to deconstruct them? Well, evolution doesnt care whether survival feels good. Conscious experience as we know it might be a really useful trick for adapting to our environments and achieving the goals that further lifes crusade against entropy and death. But natural selection cares about ensuring our bodies survive, not that we achieve happiness and well-being. Which is why you often hear meditation teachers talking about reprogramming the mind. We dont want to just leave the predictive mind in pieces. Again, its one of the most useful adaptations life on Earth has ever mustered. But in some departments, we might want to kindly thank evolution, while taking the reins and revising a bit of its work to make this whole business of living feel better.Precision weighting is the volume knob on the predictive mindEach step, from focused attention through to cessation, is a deeper deconstruction of the predictive mind. But deconstructing doesnt mean, like, breaking it.Instead, the key idea is precision weighting, which you can think of as the volume knob on each of the priors that make up your predictive mind. The higher the precision or volume assigned to something, the more focus your mind pays to it. The more your experience warps around it.Deconstructing the mind is to progressively turn down the volume on each layer of stacked priors, releasing the grip they ordinarily hold on awareness. By definition, then, the deeper meditation goes, the stranger (as in, further from ordinary) the resulting experience will be.How meditation deconstructs the predictive mindSo lets go back to our four-step model of meditative depth. We said the first step, focused attention practices, settle the mind. Now, we can say that with a bit more detail. By focusing on one particular thing, like the breath, youre cranking up the precision weighting assigned to it. Youre holding up the volume knob so that your experience settles around it.By doing so, you also turn down the volume on everything else. You can see this happen in real time pretty easily just try picking out one specific thing in your current experience. Like your left earlobe how does it feel right now?Really, take five seconds and tune into it.Looking back, you might notice that the more you tuned into that earlobe, the more everything else began to fade into the background. That helps explain why focused attention practices like basic mindfulness can be so relaxing. Youre turning down the volume on everything thats stressing you out.Next, in open-monitoring practices, you drop that object of attention and release the volume knob. But it doesnt twist back to its normal resting position. Since your focusing practice turned down the volume on everything else, the default setting across your mind at large is now lower. Focused attention settles your mind onto one object of attention. In open-monitoring, you drop into a more settled mind across the board.Its not that you no longer have thoughts springing up. But as those thoughts do, your mind reacts less to them. Theyre muted, less sticky, so attention clings to them less. They just come and go more easily. Thats why during the open-monitoring stage, you begin to see the entire snow globe that mental activity is happening inside of. The idea of a field of awareness is no longer a metaphor; you can see it directly.Advanced practitioners are said to be able to effortlessly observe experience as a whole, write Laukkonen and Slagter, without being caught by thoughts, emotions, or anything else that arises in ones sensorium.Focused attention practices are an important step in meditation it helps to calm your mind before trying to see through it. But on their own, they dont usually lead to big revelations about how your mind works. Open monitoring is where this seeing through process really kicks in.There is a space of awareness thats different from the contents of awareness, said Chandaria, whos been meditating for about 37 years. And thats something that most people arent even aware of. The first time we see that, its like, oh, I never knew that there was actually an ocean on which these waves were arising. I never knew the ocean.And then theres non-dual experienceAs you sink into open-monitoring practice, the predictive mind has loosened its grip on experience. But there are still deep priors at play.For example, in open-monitoring practice, it probably still feels like theres a you doing the meditating. And that you is experiencing your awareness. Theres a subject you aware of an object, the field of experience. But according to heaps of meditators and mystics through the millennia, this, too, can be deconstructed. Non-dual meditation aims at turning down even those deep priors that construct distinctions between subject and object altogether. As well as basically every other possible distinction. During non-dual experiences, theres no self/other, good/bad, here/there, now/later. All these dualities that underlie ordinary cognition basically melt into a big soup of the Now.This is the thing the big soupy Now that youll quickly hear a ton of platitudes about in meditation circles. The illusion of separation, the truth of universal oneness.Thats because theres just no great way to describe it its either incredibly weird, or incredibly trite. But if youre after more descriptions anyway, philosopher and meditator Thomas Metzinger recently published a book containing over 500 different accounts of non-duality, or minimal phenomenal experience as he calls it, from advanced meditators across 57 countries. Metzinger is usually at least a decade ahead of the field, so its worth a read.If open-monitoring practice is where meditations hefty insights begin kicking into gear, non-duality is where they ramp up. Its often described as coming home. One meditator from Metzingers research described it as: the realization of having finally found home after an eternal search. The pathological searching, the agony of control, comes to an abrupt end, and for the first time you realize what it means to be alive.According to Laukkonen and Slagters framework, non-duality is the baseline of all experience. Its always beneath our ordinary experiences awareness in its least constructed form. Non-dual meditation practice is about creating the conditions that reduce ordinary cognition that normally hides non-dual awareness.But even non-duality isnt the end of the road. Its still a mode of consciousness. And according to predictive processing, wherever theres conscious experience, theres an underlying prior, or expectation, thats holding it up. This, too, can be deconstructed.When the mind has no priors left: CessationIn the past year, meditation researchers have begun to corroborate long-standing claims from Buddhist scripture that if your meditation goes deep enough, the whole show of consciousness can be extinguished temporarily, that is altogether.Nirodha-sampatti, or cessation of thought and feeling, is a summit of meditative attainment in Theravada Buddhism, the oldest surviving form of Buddhism most commonly practiced in Southeast Asia. Cessation is like going under general anesthesia, but without any drugs. Consciousness can be switched off from the inside, for according to the scriptures up to seven days at a time (though the first lab data on cessation looked at a more modest 90-minute stretch).Cessation is a bonafide advanced meditation thing Ill make zero effort to convince you its accessible to us non-monastic folks. But according to neuroscientist Matthew Sacchet, who leads the Meditation Research Program at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, the early data collected from studying cessations with neuroscience gizmos supports the idea that meditation deconstructs the predictive mind. Cessation could thus reflect a final release of the expectation to be aware or alert, Luakkonen and Slagter write. Its like a bottoming-out of the predictive mind.Coming out of cessation, meditators can observe the reconstruction of the predictive mind, prior by prior. That puts us in a special state, Chandaria said. You can call it reprogramming mode. And in reprogramming mode, we can start to reprogram ourselves in ways that could be more conducive to human flourishing.Why does this matter?For those of us who arent neuroscientists, or dont care about predictive processing, what good does this model of meditation do?Its not the objective truth about what meditation actually does. Its just a story. Its not comprehensive there are styles of meditation that wouldnt fit neatly onto this framework. And meditation doesnt always follow this trajectory you can go straight into non-dual practices, or try out open-monitoring before focused attention.On a personal note, I find this framework really helpful. Immediately after reading Laukkonen and Slagters paper, it gave me a way to see my own practice that clicked with my experience better than other stories which stem from other cultures about what meditation does.Now, I usually spend the beginning of my meditation sessions doing focused attention practice to settle the mind. And when I notice my concentration is stable enough, I release the focus and drop into open-monitoring practices. And when my mind falls into an especially weird place that words dont really capture, I figure, maybe thats leaning into this non-dual stuff? Just having the labels helped kindle my interest in playing around with things.And as a scientific framework, this model is generating all sorts of new hypotheses to test. More broadly, it also gives us a way to think through how its possible that so many people are trying meditation, but so few are having the big transformative experiences that more advanced practitioners talk about.Even if some 60 million Americans tried meditation in 2022, if most of them only do some sort of focused attention practice, theyre never trying anything beyond the first step. Thats like concluding that running probably wont make you significantly healthier because you laced up your sneakers and nothing transformative happened.When I asked Chandaria how this new scientific model compares to religious models that have been around for ages, like Theravada Buddhisms four-path model, he said that Ultimatelyall these stories are pointing to the moon. But [contemplative traditions] were pointing with their fingers. Now, we have laser pointers. And as science progresses, well be able to work with what were finding out about the brain, he added. Its actually about making progress, and by progress, I mean more useful stories.Want to dive deeper into meditation?Check out Voxs free meditation course. For five days, staff reporter Oshan Jarow breaks down what you need to know to fit meditation into your everyday life, features exclusive interviews with different meditation experts, and offers bite-size meditation practice exercises. Sign up here!Youve read 1 article in the last monthHere at Vox, we're unwavering in our commitment to covering the issues that matter most to you threats to democracy, immigration, reproductive rights, the environment, and the rising polarization across this country.Our mission is to provide clear, accessible journalism that empowers you to stay informed and engaged in shaping our world. By becoming a Vox Member, you directly strengthen our ability to deliver in-depth, independent reporting that drives meaningful change.We rely on readers like you join us.Swati SharmaVox Editor-in-ChiefSee More:0 Comments 0 Shares
-
WWW.VOX.COMWhat we learned from Apple’s $95 million eavesdropping lawsuit$95 million is a headline-making number, especially when it comes as a result of a proposed class action lawsuit settlement in which claimants accused Apple of unlawfully surveilling them through Siri and other Apple devices. If the settlement is approved by the district court in Oakland, California, overseeing the case, people who owned a Siri between September 17, 2014, and December 31, 2024, and who believe they experienced an unintended Siri activation, will be able to file a claim for $20 as compensation. The lawsuit began in 2019 after a Guardian investigation in which a whistleblower came forward to allege countless instances in which Apple devices, including Siri and the Apple Watch, had inadvertently listened in on users. At the time, Apple had staffed numerous third-party contractors to listen to the devices, which included the inadvertently obtained data though it claimed this was only for purposes of improving them, not, as many litigants alleged, selling the data to advertisers. The company quickly stopped the practice, though not before public debate about whether Siri was really spying on its users became widespread. After all, this wouldnt be the first time a tech company had been accused of audio surveilling its users without their knowledge or consent. Not only that, but a nearly identical lawsuit concerning Googles Voice Assistant, filed in the same court and likely to result in a similar settlement, is waiting in the wings. Whats happening with all of these audio devices? Are Amazon and Microsoft listening in as well? And does this all actually constitute a serious breach of privacy?The answers to these questions are simultaneously simple and complicated. The experts Vox spoke with to find out more told us that the public outcry over Siris data collection may all be much ado about, relatively, nothing. Ah, but its the relativity thats the concerning part. The reason Siris data collection may not matter in the bigger picture isnt because its not potentially harmful or unethical.Its because its just a drop in the bucket.We probably wont know the extent of Apples audio surveillanceThe ongoing anxiety over the potentially invasive practices of large tech companies like Apple and Google may have distorted our understanding of what the Apple lawsuit is about. Alex Hamerstone, a cybersecurity consultant for the security consultancy TrustedSec, told Vox that the lawsuit may be projecting a lot of peoples concerns about the overall surveillance state.In other words, what feels like its a major referendum a chance to hold major tech companies accountable for a major privacy violation is really what Hamerstone described as a niche case.The way Siri and similar smart assistant devices are supposed to work is that you use a wake phrase to activate them like, Hey, Siri. The problem is that Apple devices (and, allegedly, those of other tech companies including Google and Amazon) can be activated inadvertently in any number of ways, and users havent always known when those activations have occurred. The lawsuit against Apple alleges that not only was its unauthorized listening a deceptive business practice, the impact involved multiple instances in which Apple violated confidentiality laws as well as the privacy of minors. The Guardians 2019 investigation reported that Siri had allegedly unlawfully recorded everything from confidential doctors visits to illegal drug deals to couples having sex. In the Apple lawsuit, claimants point out that Apple, in a 2018 letter to Congress, had stated in no uncertain terms that Siri would never be activated without users express consent arguably a boldfaced lie. But Apple continued to protest that it hadnt violated the letter of its privacy contract with consumers. While Apple did acknowledge to the Guardian that it made inadvertent recordings and passed a small portion of these unauthorized recordings on to its third-party contractors, it never clarified whether it sold any of that data to advertisers, which was one of the biggest allegations made by consumers in the class action lawsuit. There is a widespread belief that these devices are listening to you, Cindy Cohn, executive director of the Electronic Frontiers Foundation, told Vox. People think Facebooks listening to you, all sorts of things are listening to you, and theyre placing ads based upon what they hear.As it stands, were not likely to find out if thats true. As the lawsuit against Apple moved forward, it seemed possible that we would; the court had found as recently as 2021 that the targeted advertising claims ... are rendered plausible by the unique nature of oral communications. In other words, the court was sympathetic to the view that the private conversations you have are unique; it shouldnt be possible for you to receive advertising based on those conversations unless your privacy has been violated in a major way.Under the terms of the proposed settlement, however, Apple doesnt admit liability not for recording users without their explicit consent to begin with, nor for any potential misuse of those recordings. And without a trial to force its hand, the company most likely wont have to disclose what it did with all that data. The upshot for all of us is that Apple claims that they did get these accidental recordings, and they used them to make the system better, but that they didnt use it for other things, Cohn told Vox. And we arent going to know the answer to that ... I would say at the end of this case, were no closer to learning whether thats true than we were at the beginning.Its worth noting that existing US surveillance and technology laws havent always kept up with the emergence of smart devices. When a similar lawsuit was brought against Samsung and others in 2017 for unlawfully recording its users on its smart TVs, a New Jersey federal court ultimately dismissed it on a technicality though the court also seemed skeptical of the ephemeral nature of the suits allegations. After the lawsuit was dismissed in 2018, a new civil suit was brought against it; that case is still making its convoluted way through the courts. As for the forthcoming Google lawsuit, its so similar to the Apple one that it will likely have a similar outcome.One reason its hard to pin down tech companies for these types of violations in the legal system is that the nature of laws against, for example, wiretapping rely on an outdated understanding of the tech in question. So much information security these days is contractual and regulatory, Hamerstone told Vox. The legislation has not kept up with the speed of technology.Another reason is that its hard to know whats been taken from you in this situation; since (as the court noted) Apple was the one in possession of the intercepted recordings, the claimants struggled to articulate what exactly had been intercepted. Cohn noted that Apple had deleted many of the recordings in question, which made it even harder for the lawsuit to move forward effectively.Another reason the lawsuit may have faced difficulty is that its hard to claim you havent consented to having your data collected in one way when youve likely unwittingly consented to having it collected in so many others. Your phone doesnt need to listen to youCohn emphasized to Vox that Apples insistence that it wasnt intentionally illegally surveilling users was probably true because, after all, why would it need to?Thats a labor-intensive, compute-expensive thing to do to track us when theyve got this cornucopia of completely legal, easy to do, low-computational ways of surveilling all of us, she said.I think people are just unaware of how much of a profile marketers and companies have on each of us and how much data were sharing, Hamerstone told Vox. Generally we agree to do it through these end user license agreements ... even if you could get through the legalese, its just impossible to read that many words. Through the use of metadata like cookies on websites, and your daily purchases, media consumption, and behaviors, companies can find out more about you than you ever realized. They can engage in highly complex predictive algorithmic marketing that makes you feel spied upon. Even when you might think youre just sharing that information in a private conversation that your Alexa just happened to overhear, you could be sharing it in numerous other ways without realizing it.Everything is just constantly being collected about us and put in databases, Hamerstone said. Your phone doesnt need to listen to you. It knows what youre likely to buy and all these other things because of all the other data that we have about everybody.The good news is your phone probably isnt listening to you in the way that youre afraid it is, Cohn said. The bad news is that doesnt really matter in terms of [marketers] ability to place these uncanny ads and make you feel like youre being watched all the time.In case this all makes you feel a bit hunted, youre not alone; browsers that emphasize privacy control have grown in popularity in recent years. Cohn was adamant that we need legal protection and that the onus shouldnt be on individuals to try to protect themselves from the ever-encroaching reach of data collection into our lives. All your devices should come with privacy protections that just work and you dont have to think about it, Cohn said.Cohn also stressed the need for increased privacy laws, more protections for consumers, and an updated legal system that can more readily handle these types of lawsuits. She pointed out that the Apple lawsuit had to go through a lot of hoops that it shouldnt have had to go through and shouldnt have taken four years just to result in a settlement. We need a comprehensive privacy law thats got real teeth that empowers people to sue, she said. The important next step, she said, is to create laws that address not only what the tech companies could be doing with our data, but the invasive things theyre doing already. We need to simplify things for these privacy cases and we need to expand the reach of [the law] to include metadata ... rather than just having these cases where were trying to push the edge.Youve read 1 article in the last monthHere at Vox, we're unwavering in our commitment to covering the issues that matter most to you threats to democracy, immigration, reproductive rights, the environment, and the rising polarization across this country.Our mission is to provide clear, accessible journalism that empowers you to stay informed and engaged in shaping our world. By becoming a Vox Member, you directly strengthen our ability to deliver in-depth, independent reporting that drives meaningful change.We rely on readers like you join us.Swati SharmaVox Editor-in-ChiefSee More:0 Comments 0 Shares
-
WWW.DAILYSTAR.CO.UKNintendo Switch 2 release date 'leaks' before it's even been officially revealedNintendo Switch 2 leaks continue, and this time it's case manufacturer Genki which has seemingly revealed when the console will launch here's all we know so farTech13:39, 08 Jan 2025Updated 13:41, 08 Jan 2025Nintendo Switch 2 is coming, but when?We're starting to feel for Nintendo at this point. The Switch 2 is one of our most anticipated gaming releases for 2025, but while the company has promised an announcement is coming, leaks have been stealing its thunder.We're expecting a reveal before the end of March, but recent weeks have revealed it'll likely use AI upscaling for 4K visuals, have new magnetic Joy-Con controllers, and we may even know one of the launch games.Now, one case manufacturer may have accidently revealed when the Switch 2 will launch, too. Honestly, we're ready for the full reveal from Nintendo now.Content cannot be displayed without consentOver on X (formerly Twitter), Nicolas Lellouche of French outlet Numerama has shared what appears to be a 'dummy unit' of a Switch 2, and says Genki claims to have a Switch 2 already.It's not often a manufacturer is so verbose in their discussions about a product that's still not been revealed, but Genki has apparently tipped the new console for an April 2025 release.As always, a pinch of salt is required if Nintendo has given Genki information about the Switch 2, there's every chance they shouldn't be telling the world about it, let alone that they have the console, but stranger things have happened.While gamers are desperate for news on the latest console, it's clear that messaging around the system could be starting to get away from Nintendo. Here's hoping the House of Mario is able to officially pull back the curtain soon to show the Switch 2 in the best possible light.Article continues belowFor more on handheld consoles, be sure to check out why your next system should be a Steam Deck OLED.For the latest breaking news and stories from across the globe from the Daily Star, sign up for our newsletters.RECOMMENDED0 Comments 0 Shares