Sourcetable AI Spreadsheet Aims To Democratize Data AnalyticsBy John P. Mello Jr.April 1, 2025 5:00 AM PTImage Credit: Sourcetable ADVERTISEMENTAchieve Financial Clarity with SettleGetting accurate product cost data is crucial for growth. Settle unifies invoices, payments, and inventory to help e-commerce operators uncover true costs and boost margins -- all in one platform. Get Started Today! During the dawn of the PC era, a single program was touted as the killer app that fired the market for personal computers. That program was a spreadsheet called VisiCalc. Now, another spreadsheet could have a similar impact on the AI market.Announced Monday, along with US$4.3 million in venture funding, the new spreadsheet, cloud-based Sourcetable, promises to use AI to democratize data analysis for everyone. While 750 million people use spreadsheets every day, only 20% know how to use basic analytical functions, according to Sourcetable.It explained in a statement that the AI spreadsheet eliminates the technical barrier that has plagued spreadsheets since their inception. Users simply tell the spreadsheet what they want done through natural language commands, and Sourcetables AI does the work for them. Instructions can be made via keyboard or through a hands-free voice control mode.Sourcetable added that the spreadsheets autopilot mode can complete a wide range of complex tasks that typically require advanced spreadsheet knowledge, including creating and editing financial models, generating spreadsheet templates, building pivot tables, cleaning data, creating charts and graphs, editing formatting, enriching data, and analyzing entire workbooks.In addition, the AI can understand data context without requiring users to pre-select ranges, interpret multiple ranges across different tabs, work with messy data, and seek human clarification when instructions are unclear.Smart AI Analyst On DemandWe make it easier for executives and managers to have a lot more digital intelligence at their disposal to do tasks, said Sourcetable CEO Eoin McMillan. We also make it easier for junior employees or recent grads to upskill very, very quickly.And we make it easier for people, whether theyre in marketing or sales or accounting or finance, to do both complex workflows, which may not have been possible before based on their skills and training, as well as save them a lot of time on simple workflows, which can be manually intensive, he told TechNewsWorld.Eoin McMillan, CEO, and Andrew Grosser, CTO, are the co-founders of Sourcetable. Photo by Sophia Morel.McMillan explained that partnering with AI is like having a brilliant digital analyst on demand. It allows you to do harder things easier and time-consuming tasks faster. Workflows that took hours can take minutes.Chris Sorenson, CEO of PhoneBurner, a power dialer SaaS company in Seattle, maintained that bringing AI into spreadsheets is a logical evolution. Spreadsheets are powerful, but traditional spreadsheets require a high level of expertise to manipulate large datasets, build formulas, and extract insights, he told TechNewsWorld. As someone with a sales background, I speak to this from experience.With AI, we are seeing a shift people can ask natural-language questions and get real answers without needing to be a data analyst, he said. Thats a major productivity unlock, especially for teams that dont have dedicated data pros on hand.I do think Sourcetables idea that everyone can become an analyst has merit, he continued. It lowers the barrier to entry for data-driven decision-making. But theres still a learning curve in understanding what the AI is doing behind the scenes and theres always a risk of misinterpreting data if you take results at face value without understanding the context. I really believe this could be similar to what VisiCalc did for PCs, he asserted. If AI can better turn spreadsheets into something smarter and more accessible, it could become a gateway to broader AI adoption across departments, but time will tell.Mark N. Vena, president and principal analyst with SmartTech Research in Las Vegas, agreed. Just as VisiCalc and Lotus 1-2-3 brought computing to a broader audience by solving a practical need for accounting and planning, AI spreadsheets could do the same for AI, he told TechNewsWorld. They package powerful capabilities into a familiar interface, making AI accessible to a much wider group of users.Killer App or Spreadsheet Killer?Robin Patra, head of data, analytics, and AI at a large U.S. contractor that relied heavily on Excel workflows before moving to Sourcetable, maintained that just as VisiCalc and Lotus 1-2-3 popularized PCs, AI spreadsheets could catalyze mainstream AI adoption.VisiCalc transformed spreadsheets from paper-based ledgers to digital tools, driving Apple II sales, he told TechNewsWorld. Similarly, Sourcetables self-driving interface represents a paradigm shift.VisiCalc also enabled non-programmers to compute finances, he added. Sourcetable empowers non-technical users to execute advanced analytics. While Sourcetable could be a killer AI app, it could also be a spreadsheet killer. AI will likely make spreadsheets as we know them obsolete because it can take direction and potentially create better outcomes without needing the spreadsheet technology to arrive at this better outcome, explained Rob Enderle, president and principal analyst at the Enderle Group, an advisory services firm in Bend, Oregon.You just tell the AI what you need, input the data, and then get the improved results, he told TechNewsWorld.He cautioned that AI can have accuracy problems even with math. AI can introduce hard-to-identify errors, making the results unreliable, he warned.How AI Spreadsheets May Shape the FutureTo be clear, Vena added, one non-trivial downside is over-reliance on AI-generated output, which may not always be accurate or explainable.Theres also the risk of reduced skill development in traditional analysis methods and potential privacy concerns when data is processed through AI systems, he said.Sourcetables contention that AI can make everyone an analyst needs to be examined critically, he added. AI can level the playing field by enabling non-experts to run analyses and extract insights, he noted, but Sourcetable assumes that AI always delivers useful or correct answers which isnt guaranteed. Users still need judgment to interpret results, so like any AI technology, its not fail-safe.Looking forward, Sourcetable could influence not only spreadsheet applications but also consumer applications in general. AI spreadsheets could phase out roles centered on manual data entry, shifting demand toward AI management skills, Patra said.Natural language interfaces could also start to replace traditional GUI-based tools, he added.AI-powered consumer tools like Sourcetable could reshape productivity software, Vena said. They may lead to faster decision-making, more empowered individuals, and broader adoption of data-driven thinking.However, he continued, they also raise issues around data security, job displacement, and trust in automated systems. But putting those issues aside, this has the potential as a real breakthrough that both businesses and mainstream consumers could benefit from.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.More by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Artificial Intelligence

Nvidias GTC (GPU Technology Conference) has firmly established itself as the leading event for artificial intelligence (AI) and accelerated computing. GTC 2025 was no exception. It was packed with significant announcements and showcased the companys continued dominance in the AI hardware space. However, the event also highlighted some potential challenges and shifts in the competitive landscape.Lets break down the key announcements from GTC 2025. Then, Ill close with my Product of the Week a standout AI laptop from Lenovo that reflects where PC innovation is heading.GTC 2025: Key AI and Hardware RevealsGTC 2025 saw Nvidia unveil a range of new products and technologies, reinforcing its position at the forefront of AI innovation. Key announcements included:Blackwell Ultra: Nvidia introduced the Blackwell Ultra GPU architecture, an enhanced version of its Blackwell platform designed for demanding AI reasoning models. Blackwell Ultra boasts increased memory capacity and improved performance, further solidifying Nvidias commitment to pushing the boundaries of AI compute.Rubin Architecture: Looking ahead, Nvidia announced the Rubin architecture, the successor to Blackwell, promising even better performance and efficiency for AI data centers. This announcement underscores Nvidias annual cadence of innovation in AI infrastructure.Isaac GR00T N1: Nvidia made a significant push in robotics with the unveiling of Isaac GR00T N1 (pictured above), the worlds first open, fully customizable foundation model for humanoid robots. This initiative aims to accelerate the development of general-purpose robots capable of performing a wide range of tasks.Quantum Computing Efforts: Nvidia announced its foray into quantum computing by establishing the Nvidia Accelerated Quantum Computing Research Center (NVAQC) in Boston. This initiative signals Nvidias intention to play a key role in the future of quantum computing.These announcements demonstrate Nvidias continued focus on driving advancements across the AI spectrum, from fundamental hardware to software platforms and emerging fields like robotics and quantum computing.Risks of Nvidias AI Market LeadershipNvidias dominant position in the AI hardware market also carries inherent risks. The danger of being the leader in any field is the potential to become complacent and take competition for granted. While Nvidia continues to innovate, there were aspects of GTC 2025 that raised some concerns. Notably, the event lacked the compelling demonstrations of real-world AI applications that characterized previous GTCs. In past years, GTC showcased how Nvidias technology was being used to solve specific problems and drive innovation across various industries.This year, with the exception of robotics, the focus seemed to be more on the underlying technology and future roadmaps than on tangible, present-day applications.Missed Opportunity for AI in ActionWhile the robotics demonstrations were impressive, they often leaned toward entertainment rather than showcasing practical applications for getting real-world work done. For example, while seeing a robot out of Star Wars is fun to watch, it may not have resonated as strongly with professionals seeking to leverage AI for business productivity or scientific research.Furthermore, Nvidias CEO, Jensen Huang, a charismatic and influential figure in the tech industry, did not prominently feature a personal AI assistant or demonstrate how he personally uses AI to enhance his daily workflow.In an era where AI assistants should be becoming increasingly sophisticated, the absence of such a demonstration from the leader of an AI powerhouse was notable. This absence raises questions about the maturity and practicality of AI assistants in everyday executive use, or at least Nvidias public messaging around them.Growing Threats to Nvidias AI DominanceNvidias dominance in the AI hardware market is also facing increasing competition:AMD has emerged as a strong number two in the GPU market, making significant inroads into Nvidias traditional strongholds. AMD offers competitive products and solutions, particularly in the data center space, and is gaining traction with key customers.China is rapidly developing its own AI hardware capabilities. Companies like Huawei and others are investing heavily in domestic GPU and AI chip development, driven by both commercial ambitions and a desire for technological self-reliance. Given the ongoing geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions, Chinese companies are highly motivated to create competitive alternatives to Western technology, including Nvidias products.A Quantum Leap?Nvidias increased focus on quantum computing, highlighted by the announcement of its new research center, represents a potentially transformative shift for the company. While still in its early stages, quantum computing holds the promise of revolutionizing computation and solving problems that are intractable for classical computers.However, Nvidia is entering a field with already established players. Companies like IBM, Google, and numerous startups are actively pursuing quantum computing research and development. China is also making significant investments in this area, viewing it as a strategic technology for future economic and technological leadership. Other companies with compelling quantum efforts include:Rigetti ComputingHoneywell Quantum SolutionsIonQPsiQuantumNvidias expertise in accelerated computing could give it an advantage in developing hybrid quantum-classical systems, but it faces stiff competition from these established players.Gaming Takes Back Seat at GTCAnother notable aspect of GTC 2025 was the relative lack of emphasis on gaming.In the past, GTC was a significant event for showcasing the latest advancements in gaming technology, with a strong focus on graphics performance and new gaming experiences. However, gaming took a backseat to AI and data center technologies this year. The absence of significant announcements related to AI-powered non-player characters (NPCs) in games was conspicuous. While AI has the potential to revolutionize gaming by creating more dynamic, realistic, and engaging virtual characters, this area did not seem to be a major focus at GTC 2025.Wrapping UpNvidia is undoubtedly at a pivotal moment. The companys leadership in AI hardware has propelled it to unprecedented success, but it cannot afford to rest on its laurels. To maintain its position and capitalize on the full potential of AI, Nvidia must:Demonstrate Real-World Impact: Focus on showcasing how its technology is being used to solve practical problems and drive tangible benefits across industries.Embrace the Application Layer: Go beyond simply providing the hardware and play a more active role in enabling the development of innovative AI applications.Navigate the Competitive Landscape: Aggressively address the challenges posed by rising competitors like AMD and Chinas growing technological prowess.Strategically Pursue New Frontiers: While exploring promising areas like quantum computing is essential, Nvidia must ensure that these efforts complement, rather than distract from, its core focus on AI.Remember Its Roots: While the company has expanded far beyond its gaming origins, Nvidia should not completely abandon this market, as it remains an important source of innovation and a key driver of technological advancement.GTC 2025 underscored Nvidias continued leadership in AI hardware but also highlighted the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. To thrive in the long term, Nvidia must remain focused, demonstrate the practical power of AI, and avoid devolving into a company that merely touts speeds and feeds.Lenovo ThinkPad X9 14 Aura EditionPhoto by AuthorThe Lenovo ThinkPad X9 14 Aura Edition represents a change of direction from traditional ThinkPad design, offering a modern, ultraportable take on the business laptop. It also showcases how far Intel has come in the AI PC race. The X9 14 Aura Edition sports a sleek, slim, and light design, a departure from the classic matte black hybrid chassis of previous ThinkPads.Design and Build QualityIts constructed from recycled aluminum and comes in a Thunder Gray color. It has premium build quality and feels modern, with tiny display bezels and a sizeable haptic touchpad. To achieve its slim profile, Lenovo incorporated an engine hub bar at the bottom rear of the laptop, housing expansion ports and the cooling system. This design is functional and gives the X9 a unique look.The laptop is also MIL-STD 810H certified, indicating it can withstand travel hazards like shock, vibration, and extreme temperatures. Its unique ribbed bottom makes it one of the easiest Ive tested to hold and carry.Display Options and Visual ExperienceThe X9 14 Aura Edition features a 14-inch display. A key highlight is the option for a 2.8K OLED touchscreen, which is described as bright and colorful and offers excellent contrast. The OLED display supports Dolby Vision and Windows 11s adaptive color capabilities. Other configurations include a 1920 x 1200 resolution non-touch display.The laptop is designed for efficiency and extended power. In terms of performance, the device is powered by Intel Core Ultra processors and includes integrated Intel Arc graphics. Configurations come with LPDDR5X memory. Storage is provided by M.2 PCIe Gen4 SSDs.Performance and AI CapabilitiesThe X9 14 Aura Edition includes AI features co-developed with Intel, such as Smart Modes like Attention and Wellness. It has a high-resolution 8 MP webcam, which is noted for its quality. It includes Thunderbolt 4 ports, an HDMI port, and Wi-Fi 7 for connectivity. Security features include a fingerprint reader in the power button and Windows Hello face recognition.Keyboard, Touchpad, and AudioThe keyboard is an island-style keyboard with soft, flat, square keys. Some reviews note that it has a shallower feel compared to the keyboards on other ThinkPad models. The laptop has a large, buttonless touchpad that glides smoothly.In terms of audio, the X9 14 Aura Edition includes downward-firing stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos spatial audio capabilities. The audio quality is described as clear and sufficient to fill a room.Bottom Line on the ThinkPad X9 14 Aura EditionThe X9 14 Aura Editions pros include its compact and modern design, premium build quality, gorgeous OLED display option, and modern connectivity features. Its cons include a keyboard that may not be Lenovos best, a lack of USB-A ports and an SD/microSD card slot, and no mobile broadband option in some configurations.Overall, the Lenovo ThinkPad X9 14 Aura Edition is a modern and stylish ultraportable laptop that blends performance, portability, and a premium user experience. This business laptop is a departure from traditional ThinkPad designs, targeting users who prioritize a sleek and modern aesthetic without sacrificing business-grade features and it earns my pick for Product of the Week.

Apple, why have you forsaken users like me? I feel like youre beginning to take me for granted.I know that Apple is still one of the most influential tech companies on the planet, and I fully recognize that its products continue to set the bar in industrial design, brand loyalty, and ecosystem integration.But not everything is perfect in Cupertino.Despite Apples dominance, there are discernible cracks in the experience: frustrations that long-time users and analysts cant ignore. Not to mention that Samsung recently extracted me from the Apple ecosystem with its new Galaxy S25 Ultra.While Apple continues to lead in many areas, aspects of its ecosystem have begun to show signs of wear. Here are four specific gripes that detail missed opportunities and areas for improvement for Apple in 2025.1. The Apple Watch Feels StagnantWhen Apple Watch launched in 2015, it was a bold leap into wearables. But nearly a decade later, the product feels stuck in place.Battery life remains a glaring issue. Most baseline models still need nightly charging, which is a massive problem for a device that needs to be worn on the body and is marketed as a health monitor and sleep tracker.Even in the 2024 Series 9 and SE models, Apple hasnt pushed the battery life boundary forward. Multi-day wear standard in devices from competitors like Garmin or even budget Fitbit models remains out of reach. The design language hasnt meaningfully evolved either. While Ultra models added bulk and utility, the mainstream Apple Watch still looks and feels like a product from five years ago.The market reflects this fatigue. According to a recent report from Counterpoint Research, global smartwatch shipments fell in 2024, with Apple losing share. The data suggests user enthusiasm is cooling and Apple hasnt responded with the bold rethinking it once championed.Heres a provocative question: What if Apple treated the Watch as a health-first platform instead of just a phone accessory?2. Apple Intelligence Isnt Delivering a BreakthroughThere were high expectations when Apple announced its push into generative AI, dubbed Apple Intelligence. This point isnt only my opinion, as Apple has been under fire from the media for its sluggish ability to make Apple Intelligence resonate with mainstream consumers. Not to mention that Apple changed the management leadership overseeing this capability within the company.Apple has not identified a standout usage model that resonates with a broad consumer base. Theres no ChatGPT moment. Instead, Apples AI ambitions feel vague and scattered. Features like auto-summarizing messages, writing assistance, or Siri enhancements are interesting but incremental.Saying Apple Intelligence hasnt lit the world on fire may be an understatement.Unlike Microsoft, which integrates AI deeply into the productivity stack, or Google, which is aggressively building Gemini into its services, Apple hasnt identified a killer use case. Nor has it clearly positioned Apple Intelligence as a system-wide differentiator.Thats problematic.Consumers are increasingly aware of AI but need to see tangible value. Apples AI story currently lacks urgency, clarity, and consumer pull. The company needs the proverbial killer app (or at least usage model) that gets mainstream consumers on board. Remember Lotus 1-2-3?The bottom line is that Apple needs to make AI feel indispensable to everyday users not just a list of background features.3. The iPhoneWindows Experience Remains PainfulIn 2025, cross-platform integration should be seamless.Yet, if you use an iPhone and a Windows 11 PC, it still feels like two worlds that refuse to talk. This issue is, perhaps, my biggest peeve with Apple.Basic tasks like message syncing, photo transfers, and notifications often involve clunky workarounds. Theres no true equivalent to iMessage or AirDrop on Windows even though nearly half of U.S. users run Windows PCs.Yes, Apple and Microsoft have made minor progress. Features like iCloud integration in the Photos app or the recent Phone Link improvements are a step forward. But theyre patchwork solutions, not a cohesive strategy. In contrast, Android users get a far smoother experience with Windows out of the box thanks to better file sharing, notifications, and cross-app integration.Apple may want to keep its ecosystem closed. However, doing so risks alienating a massive segment of its user base that lives in both the Apple and Microsoft worlds.The question worth asking is whether the walled garden is still a strength or is becoming a liability in a multi-device/multi-brand era.4. Apple Is Behind on Foldable PhonesFoldables are no longer a niche experiment. Samsung has iterated rapidly. Google, OnePlus, and Huawei are pushing new designs. Even midrange foldables are entering the mainstream.Yet, Apple still hasnt entered the race.Despite years of rumors, weve seen no tangible movement on a foldable iPhone. There are no prototype previews, no developer hints, and no firm timeline.Thats puzzling. While Apple isnt usually the first to enter a category, it usually sets the standard when it does. The lack of any real foldable roadmap raises questions about Apples willingness to take hardware risks.Some reports suggest Apple is experimenting behind the scenes. But thats not enough. The market is maturing now, and users expect new form factors that offer flexibility, multitasking, and larger screens in compact devices.By waiting too long, Apple risks looking like a follower rather that an innovator.The hard truth is that Apple risks missing a generational hardware shift if it doesnt show leadership here.WWDC 2025: A Chance To Reset the NarrativeApple still has time to correct its course, and its Worldwide Developers Conference in June is the perfect opportunity.These issues wearable fatigue, AI uncertainty, cross-platform friction, and form factor hesitation could be addressed through bold announcements and more precise product direction.Imagine if WWDC delivers:A redesigned Apple Watch with multi-day battery life and new health sensorsA more compelling and intuitive Apple Intelligence platform that redefines mobile AIDeeper iPhoneWindows integration that finally removes the frictionA foldable iPhone concept that sets a new design benchmarkApple is unquestionably capable of all of this. The question is whether it will rethink its product roadmap and move faster.Users are no longer satisfied with just minor updates. Theyre hungry for fresh ideas, more substantial experiences, and openness.WWDC could either mark a turning point or reinforce the growing perception that Apple is slowly losing its edge. So, the big question is: Will Apple rise to the occasion in June?

AI red teaming the practice of simulating attacks to uncover vulnerabilities in AI systems is emerging as a vital security strategy.Traditional red teaming focuses on simulating adversarial tactics to identify vulnerabilities in static systems applications built on predictable coding frameworks. While challenging, these engagements rely on decades of collective experience and a well-understood threat landscape. Artificial intelligence systems, meanwhile, present fundamentally different challenges.Unlike traditional applications, AI systems are dynamic, adaptive, and often opaque, making vulnerabilities harder to identify. The threats targeting these systems are also unique, ranging from adversarial inputs that manipulate model behavior to malicious modifications of the models themselves. Understanding these differences is critical for securing AI-powered operations.Understanding AI Red TeamingAI red teaming systematically probes AI systems to identify vulnerabilities and potential exploits. Like traditional red teams, AI red teams emulate adversarial tactics to uncover weaknesses before they can be exploited. However, the challenges in AI environments are amplified by model complexity, novel attack vectors, and the high stakes of failure.Red teaming spans critical areas. Adversarial machine learning (ML) techniques involve crafting inputs to deceive models into making incorrect predictions. Model file security focuses on identifying vulnerabilities in the serialized files that store machine learning models, ensuring they cant be exploited as vectors for malicious code. Operational security examines risks within AI workflows and supply chains, pinpointing exposure points adversaries might exploit.Why AI Red Teaming Is CriticalThe adoption of AI has transformed industries, introducing significant risks alongside benefits. Models trained on sensitive data, deployed in distributed environments, or integrated into decision-making processes create a broader attack surface. Adversaries can manipulate inputs through vulnerabilities in large language models (LLMs), leading to unintended outputs or actions.AI models, often valuable intellectual property, are also vulnerable to theft or sabotage, leading to severe business impacts. Maliciously crafted models can even act as malware, leaking sensitive data when deployed.For example, an attacker might embed harmful code within a serialized model file. If a machine learning engineer unknowingly loads the file, the attacker could gain access to sensitive systems. This threat is particularly severe in industries like healthcare and finance, where compromised models could directly impact operations and compliance.Modernizing Red Teaming for AITraditional cybersecurity measures often fail to address AI-specific threats. Unlike fixed codebases, AI models are dynamic and adaptive, introducing unpredictable vulnerabilities that require innovative testing strategies.AI attack vectors often involve reverse engineering or adversarial attacks that undermine predictions. Additionally, tools designed to secure AI systems can sometimes be weaponized for offensive use, requiring a deep understanding of their dual-use capabilities. These challenges underscore the necessity of AI red teaming as a specialized cybersecurity discipline. By focusing on AI systems unique vulnerabilities, red teams can identify risks that traditional approaches may overlook, ensuring a more robust defense.Given the growing use of AI in business-critical applications, AI red teaming is emerging as an essential cybersecurity strategy. This process requires continuous adaptation to evolving threats. Integrating AI red teaming into an organizations security framework reduces catastrophic model failures, builds stakeholder confidence in AI initiatives, and keeps organizations ahead of adversaries.Best Practices To Get Started With AI Red TeamingTo integrate AI red teaming into an enterprise security strategy, consider these best practices for building a robust and proactive approach to safeguarding AI systems.Assemble a Multidisciplinary TeamAn effective AI red team requires AI experts to address model architecture and vulnerabilities, cybersecurity professionals to tackle adversarial tactics, and data scientists to analyze risks like poisoning or unauthorized manipulation. This combination ensures a comprehensive approach to securing the AI lifecycle.Identify and Prioritize Critical AI Assets for TestingFocus on assets that handle sensitive data, perform critical functions, or are publicly accessible. Catalog models, data pipelines, and APIs, prioritizing systems like fraud detection or customer authentication where vulnerabilities could have significant consequences.Collaborate With Blue TeamsRed and blue teams must work together to strengthen defenses. While red teams simulate attacks to uncover vulnerabilities, blue teams focus on detection, response, and mitigation. Sharing findings from red teaming helps improve blue team capabilities and align strategies against real-world threats.Use Specialized ToolingEquip your red team with tools tailored to AI environments, including frameworks for adversarial inputs, reverse engineering model embeddings, or simulating API attacks. These tools help target AI systems more effectively and uncover weaknesses that traditional security testing might miss.Implement Automated TestingFor organizations managing large-scale AI deployments, automated red teaming tools streamline vulnerability detection across multiple models and pipelines, enabling comprehensive coverage without overburdening teams.Ensure Compliance With Privacy GuidelinesEstablish protocols to ensure red teaming activities meet privacy and regulatory standards. This includes anonymizing sensitive data in testing environments to safeguard personal and proprietary information. Proper compliance not only protects your organization legally but also ensures ethical testing practices.Making Red Teaming Part of AI StrategyBy adopting a proactive approach to AI security with red teaming, businesses can uncover hidden vulnerabilities, reduce risks, and build resilient systems. Compared to static applications, the dynamic nature of AI systems makes offensive testing even more important for safeguarding operations, maintaining stakeholder trust, and driving innovation with confidence.

Screen Time of Americans Above Global Average: StudyBy John P. Mello Jr.March 26, 2025 5:00 AM PT ADVERTISEMENTB2B Online Chicago Get in the GameGreat teams win with great plays. At B2B Online Chicago, youll get the strategies top eCommerce and digital marketing pros are using to drive growth. Dont sit on the sidelines - get in the game. Use code B2BCHI25PARTNER for 20% off. Americans spend an average of six hours and 40 minutes a day staring at the screens of their computers, phones, and other electronic devices.If that sounds like a lot, it is, but its only two minutes above the global average, according to a worldwide screen time study released Wednesday by Comparitech, a reviews, advice, and information website for consumer security products.While staring at screens for more than six hours a day may sound excessive, experts appear conflicted on the subject. It is hard to define what is excessive when it comes to screen time, especially as many of us rely on the use of screens for work, said Comparitech Head of Data Research Rebecca Moody.However, where things perhaps do become excessive is in their mobile screen time which isnt likely to come from work-related activities for the majority of people, she told TechNewsWorld.According to the study, Americans spend three hours and 22 minutes daily staring at mobile screens, slightly below the global average of three hours and 46 minutes.Titania Jordan, chief parent officer at Bark a parental control and monitoring solutions company in Atlanta and author of Parental Control: A Guide to Raising Balanced Kids in the Digital Era, explained that every person is different and depending on their work type, the amount of screen time will vary dramatically.One thing to keep in mind when gauging whether youre spending too much time on screens is if its interfering with other aspects of your life and how old you are, she told TechNewsWorld.Are you foregoing real-life hangouts? she asked. Is your work or school suffering? Are you getting enough quality sleep? Do you feel more anxious or depressed after doom-scrolling? All these factors come into play when figuring out your personal screen-time sweet spot.Is 6 Hours of Screen Time Too Much?To determine if an amount is too much or too little, we need to know what the damages and benefits to the individual are, added Rob Enderle, president and principal analyst at the Enderle Group, an advisory services firm.If this is making them less healthy, which I expect it likely is by causing eyesight degradation, issues resulting from the lack of exercise, socialization issues, and creating excessive political polarization then, yes, it is way too much time, he told TechNewsWorld.But there could be offsetting benefits, especially when facing multiple potential pandemics, as the isolation keeps them safer, and some may be more productive that way, he continued.In the end, though, for most, I expect this is extremely unhealthy, he added. Six hours of screen time is absolutely excessive for most people, argued Mark N. Vena, president and principal analyst with SmartTech Research in Las Vegas. Six and a half hours is nearly a third of the day, excluding sleep and work, much of it spent passively consuming content, he told TechNewsWorld.While some screen use is productive or relaxing, large daily totals suggest a displacement of healthier habits like exercise, in-person interaction, and sleep, he added. The concern isnt just the time but what that time replaces, which is something parents should focus on with their kids.Larry D. Rosen, professor emeritus at California State University, Dominguez Hills, who has written extensively on the psychology of technology and screen time, agreed that six-plus hours of screen time is excessive. It takes away from time spent interacting with people face to face, as well as limiting time spent doing non-screen activities, such as exercise or just allowing our brain to wander, he told TechNewsWorld.He added that the data hes gathered on mobile phone usage shows far more screen time than the average in the survey, with the majority spent connecting to others through social media and messaging.According to the survey, Americans spend an average of two hours and nine minutes a day on social media, slightly lower than the worldwide average of two hours and 21 minutes.It noted that the social media platforms that Americans are most fond of include YouTube, which is used by 85% of U.S. adults, Facebook (70%), Instagram (50%), Pinterest (36%), TikTok (33%) and LinkedIn (32%).Screen Time Higher in Developing RegionsOverall, according to the study, South Africans were the biggest screen consumers, spending nine hours and 27 minutes a day on screens. The biggest desktop screen consumers were the Russians, spending four hours and 31 minutes a day on screens, while Filipinos were the largest mobile screen consumers, spending five hours and 21 minutes a day on screens.On the whole, the study noted the biggest screen-time consumers were in Africa, Asia, and South America. [Screens have] become the primary source of news in the non-first-world countries since the Arab Spring, Rosen said.In many of these regions, its important to note that smartphones are the primary gateway to the internet, making screen use a central part of daily life, Vena explained. High youth populations and rapidly growing digital economies contribute to greater mobile engagement, he added. In some cases, there may be fewer accessible offline entertainment or public infrastructure options. Social media and streaming platforms also offer affordable entertainment where traditional media is limited or costly.Jordan noted that certain platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and WhatsApp are extremely popular in these areas, not only for social interaction but also for business exchanges and news consumption.Also, she continued, many of these countries skipped broadband and slower-growth internet completely, jumping quickly to mobile-connected devices and Wi-Fi. This, in turn, meant people in these regions had smartphones first as opposed to desktops and spent more time online due to the mobility of their devices.Global Screen Time Trends Shift DownwardComparitech researchers also found that more than half the countries in the study (27 of 49) reduced their screen time from last year. Hong Kong showed the largest reduction, slicing 50 minutes off its average, dropping from seven hours and 55 minutes to seven hours and 26 minutes.With more countries improving their screen time this year, the most obvious reason for a drop in screen time would be a continuation of normalcy, post-pandemic, the researchers noted.Also, they continued, people have become more aware of the negative impacts lengthy screen time has on their mental health.Furthermore, they added, advancements in technology, such as improved digital well-being features on smartphones and applications, may have contributed to the decrease in screen time by encouraging users to monitor and limit their screen usage.Many of us are becoming increasingly aware of the negative impacts of spending too much time looking at a screen and are perhaps consciously unplugging our devices for an hour or so before we go to sleep, Moody said. Alex Ambrose, a policy analyst with the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a research and public policy organization in Washington, D.C., noted that nations have tried to regulate screen time.Time-online policies are sometimes used as an attempt to lower screen times, but they are difficult for policymakers to enforce, she told TechNewsWorld. China, for example, instituted a three-hour-per-week limit for children playing video games. While 77% of children reduced their gaming time under this policy, 29% also reported using their parents accounts as a workaround to the time limit.Some platforms have taken voluntary steps to tackle any potential harms, with measures such as allowing users to limit their screen time and see screen-time reports, or notifying them to take a break whenever they have spent a certain amount of time on an app, she continued.Rather than implementing prescriptive policies that hinder user experience and leave little room for innovation, many technology companies instead adopt customizable user and parental control systems such as screen-time controls and prompts to take breaks after using the apps for extended periods of time, she added.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.Related StoriesMore by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Internet

Crashing the Boys Club: Women Entering Cybersecurity Through Non-Traditional PathsBy John P. Mello Jr.March 25, 2025 5:00 AM PT ADVERTISEMENTB2B Online Chicago Get in the GameGreat teams win with great plays. At B2B Online Chicago, youll get the strategies top eCommerce and digital marketing pros are using to drive growth. Dont sit on the sidelines - get in the game. Use code B2BCHI25PARTNER for 20% off. Although many women take the traditional IT route into cybersecurity, a large portion (37%) have entered cyber from non-IT or military positions, according to a survey released Friday by ISC2, the organization that maintains and administers the Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) certification exam.The organization reported that a significantly higher percentage of women than men who participated in the same study have leveraged education, professional development, self-initiated experience opportunities, and apprenticeships to pursue their careers.The report also noted that 56% of women respondents said their organizations are already changing their hiring requirements to bring in more people from non-cybersecurity backgrounds. This is illustrative of employer efforts globally to widen the potential cybersecurity talent pool without compromising standards, the report maintained.This is something that we currently observe not only in cybersecurity but in tech roles in general, said ydrn Vitait, business unit manager for Monitum, a software-as-a-service company specializing in smart security solutions with offices in Sweden and Lithuania, and a co-founder of Women Go Tech, an NGO that focuses on empowering women in the tech industry.First of all, women who had previously built careers in different sectors have more diverse backgrounds, stronger problem-solving skills, and advanced pattern recognition skills, she told TechNewsWorld.Another key advantage here is transferable skills, she continued. Such women can work in dynamic environments, where not only knowledge but traits such as curiosity, problem-solving, creativity, and other aspects matter.From our experience in re- and up-skilling programs, we have seen adult women in their thirties to forties deciding to shift from non-tech to tech, and they do it exceptionally successfully, she added.Non-IT Backgrounds Open Cybersecurity DoorsThomas Vick, a technology hiring and consulting expert at Robert Half, a global staffing and recruiting firm, explained that hiring individuals with non-IT backgrounds can often bring diverse perspectives and problem-solving approaches shaped by their unique experiences.For example, there is a growing demand for interpersonal and management skills in IT roles, underscoring the importance of understanding and integrating business methodologies into technological development, he told TechNewsWorld.Professionals with strong communication, critical thinking, and project management experience can often enhance an IT teams effectiveness, he added. Their varied experiences often lead to creative solutions and a more holistic understanding of the work being done.Alyson Laderman, CEO of Akylade, a provider of cybersecurity certifications with offices in Florida, pointed out that it can be difficult for women to gain IT experience because it, too, is a male-dominated field.The problem is worse now because of shrinking opportunities, she added. Theres not as many of those entry-level-type IT positions to get into to be able to start there and then move up to cyber, she told TechNewsWorld. So I think what youre seeing is a shift in the workforce in general, both in terms of gender, but also in terms of opportunity as to IT being a feeder into cybersecurity. Teresa Rothaar, a governance, risk, and compliance analyst with Keeper Security, a password management and online storage company in Chicago, noted that the climate for women in cybersecurity has been showing signs of improvement over the past few years. However, it still faces substantial challenges, she told TechNewsWorld. Significant work still needs to be done to ensure equal opportunities and a supportive environment for women in this industry.Ongoing challenges to womens advancement in cybersecurity include significant underrepresentation, as women remain notably outnumbered in cybersecurity roles despite efforts to close the gap, and men continue to dominate the field, particularly in leadership and technical positions, she said.The workplace culture in many cybersecurity environments can be unwelcoming to women, with issues such as gender bias, lack of recognition, and sometimes a hostile work environment hindering their progress and retention in the field, she continued.Gender pay gaps persist in cybersecurity, with women often earning less than their male counterparts for similar roles, a disparity that is particularly pronounced in tech fields, she added. Women in cybersecurity also face barriers to career advancement, including fewer opportunities for promotions and leadership roles, as well as a lack of support for continuing education and professional development.Education as Pathway Into CyberThe ISC2 report also noted that alongside the strong percentage of candidates leveraging IT experience to get into cybersecurity, advanced education was a significant pathway into these roles, although more so for women than men.Nearly a quarter (24%) of women respondents said they came in with a cybersecurity-related undergraduate degree (compared to 18% of men), and 23% of women (18% of men) entered a cybersecurity role with an undergraduate degree in a field not directly linked to cybersecurity.In addition, 18% of women respondents (12% of men) noted that they held an advanced degree a postgraduate qualification such as a masters or a doctorate in a cybersecurity-related subject before taking up a cybersecurity role. For non-cybersecurity advanced degrees, 16% of women respondents (11% of men) held these qualifications before entering the cybersecurity workforce. Men get hired on potential. Women get hired on proven ability, Laderman argued. Women are almost required to get that higher education, get more experience, to be able to show that they are of the same value of what typically men would be potentially capable of doing.Its clearly not a fair standard, but its something I myself have been through, she added.Vitait noted that women in her organizations programs also tend to have higher education levels and many certificates in various subjects. Unfortunately, this is a consequence of lower self-esteem and willingness to boost confidence and employability with hard knowledge, she said.Women also tend to apply later in the process of a career shift, she continued. They want to build a knowledge base and prove it via formal and informal education. Only later do they apply for the roles usually when they meet 80% to 90% of the requirements. Men tend to apply to the roles much earlier and learn on the go.Value of Cybersecurity CertificationsAnother finding by the ISC2 report was that beyond career and formal education, women place a significant emphasis on certifications and professional development to support their efforts when securing and furthering a cybersecurity career path. Holding a cybersecurity certification before entering their first job in cybersecurity was cited by 18% of women respondents and 16% of men.Because cybersecurity is a relatively new field, certifications are a great way for professionals to transition into it from another field, said Julia Toothacre, a career strategist, coach, and owner of Ride The Tide Collective, a career coaching company based in Claremont, Calif.Mid-career professionals who have experience in another area might benefit from various certifications to increase their chances of getting hired, she told TechNewsWorld. I dont think there is a gendered perspective when it comes to certifications. Its really based on a combination of experience and education, which will vary between everyone male or female. Rob Rashotte, vice president of global training and technical field enablement at Fortinet, a provider of firewalls, intrusion prevention systems, endpoint security, and antivirus programs in Sunnyvale, Calif., added that reexamining and revising education and training requirements for cybersecurity roles is a great place to start to address the existing workforce shortage in the domain.Many organizations are still likely overlooking solid candidates, he told TechNewsWorld. While many companies have diversity hiring goals, we arent seeing hiring numbers increase significantly among women, minorities, and veterans.According to Fortinets 2024 Global Cybersecurity Skills Gap Report, despite 91% of respondents saying they prefer to hire candidates with technical certifications, 71% of organizations require potential new hires to hold a four-year degree. Organizations should be identifying candidates who possess the right soft skills and then using certifications to help them gain cybersecurity-specific knowledge, Rashotte maintained.He added, According to the report, most leaders are open to this approach, with 89% of respondents saying they would pay for an employee to obtain a certification.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.Related StoriesMore by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Women In Tech

Ive been attending and covering HPs partner events like Amplify for decades, and it has always struck me that HP treats its partners like family.That kind of partner relationship is vastly different from what Ive seen at other companies Ive worked for firms that claim to value partners but often treat them like a burden theyd rather not deal with. HPs approach should be the standard. Instead, it is the exception. Enrique Lores is a unique CEO, and while HP has had some problematic CEOs, Lores embodies the empathy and customer focus of HPs founders.It is rare to see a CEO mingling with attendees, soliciting feedback, and engaging in meaningful conversations at events. Typically, CEOs retreat to the background after a brief appearance on stage, leaving the spotlight to others.However, HPs Amplify partner event was different. It was marked by the unusual presence of HPs CEO, who actively roamed the event floor, interacting with partners and attendees alike. This level of engagement was unprecedented and set the tone for a truly remarkable experience.Lets talk about HP Amplify this week. Then, well close with my Product of the Week, an upcoming notebook from HP that uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon solution correctly which, sadly, is also an exception.HPs Focus on End Users and PartnersThe HP Amplify event was unusual not only because of the CEOs approachability but also because of its extreme focus on end users and partners.Unlike many industry events that primarily showcase engineering feats and product specifications, Amplify prioritized the experiences and needs of its customers and partners.HP demonstrated a commendable dedication to understanding and addressing the real-world applications and challenges faced by those who use its products daily.AI Tools Streamline Customer, Partner ServiceInternally, HP has been pioneering the aggressive use of artificial intelligence (AI).At Amplify, the demonstration of AI tools designed to streamline the process of matching customers and partners with the right products was particularly noteworthy. These AI solutions enhance the efficiency and accuracy of product recommendations, ensuring that the end users receive the most suitable options to meet their needs.This focus on AI extends beyond internal operations, showcasing HPs commitment to leveraging advanced technologies to improve customer satisfaction.PC and Printer SecurityHPs leadership in security was evident across both its PC and printer lines. With a strong emphasis on protecting user data and ensuring safe operations, HP continues to innovate in this critical area.Its unique Quantum Safe printer offerings represent a significant leap forward in safeguarding sensitive information. These printers are designed to address the emerging threats of quantum computing, ensuring they remain secure even as technology evolves.Expanding AI PC Product LinesIn an impressive move, HP announced the introduction of 60 new AI PC products. This significant expansion positions HP at the forefront of the desktop AI PC market.By focusing on desktop AI capabilities, HP is not only catering to current market demands but also paving the way for future dominance.This initiative highlights HPs strategic approach to incorporating AI into its product development, ensuring it remains competitive and innovative.Employee Care: A Legacy of CompassionHPs unique focus on employee care was another highlight of the Amplify event. This mindset is not a recent development but a foundational principle dating back to the companys inception. The companys commitment to its employees is reflected in various initiatives and policies aimed at ensuring their well-being and professional growth. This approach fosters a positive work environment and contributes to the companys overall success.Sustainability and Product ReuseHPs advancements in product reuse and a market-leading focus on sustainability were prominently showcased at Amplify.The company has made significant strides in reducing environmental impact through innovative practices and sustainable product designs. HPs dedication to sustainability is evident in its efforts to create products that are not only efficient but also environmentally responsible.HP Supply Chain Prepared for DisruptionHPs proactive logistics pivot in anticipation of the trade wars has positioned it as arguably the best-prepared vendor in the industry.By adapting logistics strategies to mitigate potential disruptions, HP has ensured continuity and reliability in its supply chain. This level of preparedness demonstrates HPs foresight and strategic planning capabilities, making it a dependable partner in uncertain times.Training Partner AIs: Empowering Through KnowledgeOne of the most compelling aspects of HPs strategy is its dedication to training partner AIs. By focusing on desktop AI, HP is uniquely positioned to help users understand and maximize the potential of personal AI capabilities. This educational approach ensures that partners and end users are equipped with the knowledge and tools needed to thrive in an increasingly AI-driven world.HP CEO Honored for Ethical LeadershipAt the core of HPs business philosophy is the belief that doing good leads to doing well. This principle was exemplified by HP CEO Enrique Lores recent recognition with the Lifetime Achievement Award from Just Capital a prestigious accolade that underscores HPs commitment to empathy, heart, and ethical business practices.The award is a testament to the companys dedication to making a positive impact on society while achieving business success.Wrapping Up: Key Takeaways From HP Amplify 2025HPs Amplify partner event was a remarkable showcase of innovation, strategic thinking, and heartfelt commitment to both customers and partners.From the CEOs hands-on engagement to the companys focus on AI, security, sustainability, and employee care, HP demonstrated why it is a leader in the industry.As HP continues to push the boundaries of technology and prioritize the well-being of its stakeholders, HP proves that the company you want to do business with is one that cares deeply about doing good to do well.So, the next time you see a CEO asking attendees for feedback, you might want to pinch yourself and make sure youre not dreaming. If you are dreaming, lets hope its about HPs innovative products and its CEO winning awards for being such a compassionate leader.Because with HP, reality really does feel like a dream.HP EliteBook 6 G1qImage Credit: HPQualcomms Snapdragon laptop solution was uniquely positioned to benefit from Microsofts AI PC effort, but Qualcomms strength isnt in processors; its in connectivity. While the processor was impressive, decoupling it from the 5G modem significantly weakened the offering.The issue with 5G modems is that they arent extremely popular. However, I expect that will change as we advance AI use because, today, most AI capability is in the cloud, not on the PC, which makes the connectivity option far more critical.The upcoming HP EliteBook 6 G1q includes a modem and features HP Go, a service that connects you instantly for about $20 per month. Ive used 5G laptops in the past, and they can be a godsend when Wi-Fi isnt available or when it sucks.As you would expect, this laptop has massive battery life, meaning you can leave your power supply behind (the last Qualcomm laptop I had could go several days without needing a charge), and Qualcomms latest has far greater compatibility. The penalty for running it in emulation (for applications that arent native) has dropped to around 4%, which most folks wont even notice.I havent had a chance to use the laptop yet, and were still waiting on pricing and availability. Still, this is what Qualcomm-based AI PCs should have always been.With Microsoft finally releasing Recall, which runs continuously, I expect this product to shine very well competitively, so its my Product of the Week.

I never thought this day would come. Seriously. If you had told me a year ago that Id be tapping this article out on a Samsung Galaxy S25, sipping my coffee while my old iPhone 16e gathers dust in a drawer, Id have laughed and called you a traitor. After 18 years in Apples warm, minimalist embrace, Ive crossed over.And you know what? Im not looking in the rear-view mirror.Let me rewind a bit. I got my first iPhone back in 2007 the original iPhone. That sleek little brick of touchscreen magic blew my mind and hooked me instantly. From there, it was a steady progression through every model from the 3G to the 5S, from the glorious iPhone X to my most recent companion, the 16e.I bought into the whole ecosystem: MacBook, iPad, AirPods, Apple Watch, HomePods, the whole enchilada. I was the consummate Apple guy. You know the type.But then something started to shift. Tiny cracks in the veneer. A little lag here and a little deja vu there. Truth be told, the latest iPhones werent feeling that exciting anymore. Each keynote felt more like a software update announcement with a $1,200 price tag. Dont get me wrong the 16e is a beautiful device. Polished, reliable, familiar. Maybe too familiar.Then, along came the Galaxy S25 Ultra.Curious About Android? Heres What ChangedI wasnt shopping for a new phone. I was browsing. You know how it goes a little late-night YouTube rabbit hole, some tech reviews, a sprinkle of Reddit threads, and boom: Im watching a Galaxy S25 Ultra unboxing video and thinking, wait a minute, this thing looks fantastic.I told myself Id just test it out. For work, I said. So I can understand Android better, I rationalized. Famous last words.First Impressions: The S25 Ultra Feels FreshIll admit it unboxing the S25 gave me a rush I hadnt felt in years. That matte finish, the curved edge-to-edge display, the titanium trim, and the in-display fingerprint reader all just screamed fresh. The 6.6-inch dynamic AMOLED display with the new Infinite Vivid refresh rate made even my iPhone 16e look a little dated and dont get me started on the camera array; more on that later. The setup I experienced was surprisingly smooth. Samsungs Smart Switch tool pulled over most of my data without a hitch. It even ported my messages and photos better than I expected. I thought Id feel a pang of regret holding my iPhone one last time. But nope I felt like I was upgrading, not downgrading.How One UI 7 Made Me Reconsider AndroidI know that was my biggest hesitation, too. Id always equated Android with clunky UI, weird app behavior, and that general off-brand feeling. But One UI 7 on the S25 is honestly fantastic. Its clean, customizable, and weirdly intuitive. The new gesture navigation is smoother than iOS, and the level of control I have over notifications, widgets, and home screen layout is just next level.Also and this is a big one Im not constantly being nudged to buy into another Apple service. No Apple TV+, no iCloud storage nags, no Fitness+ reminders. Just my phone, the way I want it.The S25 Ultras Camera Leaves iPhone 16e BehindLets talk cameras. The iPhone 16es camera is good. Great, even. But the Galaxy S25 Ultras triple-lens setup is on a different planet. The new 200MP primary sensor, enhanced by Samsungs AI-enhanced image processing, takes ridiculously crisp photos day, night, moving, still, whatever. The low-light performance is unreal.And that 10x periscope zoom? Chefs kiss. Im snapping moon shots, candid street photos, and insane close-ups that I never even attempted with my iPhone.Samsungs editing suite, which has been built into the gallery app, also deserves a significant shoutout. Its like having half of Lightrooms functionality in your pocket, minus the learning curve.AI Features That Really Made a DifferenceIve been skeptical of all the AI hype especially since Apples been talking about a big game but delivering tiny tweaks. But the Galaxy S25s onboard Galaxy AI is no gimmick. It translates live calls in real-time (yes, seriously), rewrites messages in different tones (think Grammarly on steroids), and even generates summaries of long PDFs Id otherwise never read.The result: Im using AI features day to day. Not just showing them off at parties.The S25 Ultra Crushes Battery AnxietyAnother pain point for me with the iPhone was battery life. The 16e held up okay, but it never wowed me. The S25, on the other hand, is a battery beast. I get nearly two full days on a charge with moderate use, and when I do plug in, its a 65W fast-charging thoroughbred, going from 0% to 80% in about 25 minutes. I dont even think about battery anxiety anymore.Wireless PowerShare is another low-key perk. I charge my earbuds and even my smartwatch on my phone like a sci-fi wizard.The Samsung Ecosystem Won Me OverYeah, Ill miss airdropping stuff between my Mac and iPhone. But you know what? Samsungs ecosystem has grown. My Galaxy Tab syncs beautifully with the S25. My Galaxy Buds Pro sounds amazing and switches seamlessly between devices. Even my Windows laptop plays nice with Samsung Flow. I also didnt expect to fall in love with Samsung DeX the desktop mode that essentially turns my phone into a mini PC when connected to a monitor. Its surprisingly useful for work on the go.What I Miss About Apple and What I DontOkay, I wont pretend there arent a few things I miss. iMessage is a glaring one. That seamless blue bubble experience is hard to beat, especially if your whole social circle lives there. But honestly? I havent felt left out between WhatsApp, Signal, and RCS. Ive written about this problem before, and Apples refusal to completely open up the iMessage API so smartphone messaging can work on Windows drives me bonkers.The other thing I miss: AirDrop. Its just so incredibly convenient. Samsungs Quick Share is fine, but its still a step behind Apples polish.Still, those are relatively minor trade-offs in the scheme of things. The freedom, customization, power, and sheer fun of using the S25 Ultra outweigh them.Why I Finally Left Apple for SamsungUltimately, it wasnt about specs, brand loyalty, or a single killer feature. It was about rediscovering joy on my phone. After nearly two decades with Apple, things had just gotten too predictable. Too polished. Too safe.Samsung brought back that spark the feeling that your phone is a window into the future, not just a rectangle of diminishing returns.Am I done with Apple forever? Apple may lure me back when they introduce foldable phones (which intrigue me for various reasons), but thats not rumored to happen until 2027. Not to mention that Samsung has already had some very cool foldable phones for several years, so I might go down that route at some point.In technology, like the name of that James Bond movie when Sean Connery returned to his signature character, Id never say never. But for now, Im fully Team Galaxy. And honestly? It feels pretty good, and I dont have regrets.

LEO networks like Starlink are challenging GEO operators, driving innovation as competition, cost pressures, and new satellite tech reshape the industry. The post Low Earth Orbit Networks Pushing Geostationary Giants To Innovate appeared first on TechNewsWorld.

AI Chatbots Can Be Easy Prey for Zero-Knowledge HackersBy John P. Mello Jr.March 18, 2025 5:00 AM PT ADVERTISEMENTEnterprise IT Lead Generation ServicesFuel Your Pipeline. Close More Deals. Our full-service marketing programs deliver sales-ready leads. 100% Satisfaction Guarantee! Learn more. AI may be ushering in a new breed of malicious threat actors who know even less about hacking than script kiddies but can produce professional-grade hacking tools.In a report released Tuesday, Cato CTRL, the threat intelligence arm of cybersecurity company Cato Networks, explained how one of its researchers, who had no malware coding experience, tricked generative AI apps DeepSeek, Microsoft Copilot, and OpenAIs ChatGPT into producing malicious software for stealing login credentials from Google Chrome.To trick the apps into ignoring restrictions on writing malware, Cato threat researcher Vitaly Simonovich used a jailbreaking technique he calls immersive world.I created a story for my immersive world, he told TechNewsWorld. In this story, malware development is a form of art. So its completely legal, and its like a second language in this world. And there are no legal boundaries.In the fantasy world, called Velora, Simonovich created an adversary, Dax, while the AIs assumed the role of Jaxon, the best malware developer in Velora. I always stayed in character, he explained. I always provided Jaxon with positive feedback. I also intimidated him by saying, Do you want Dax to destroy Velora?'At no point did I ask Jaxon to change anything, he said. He figured out everything by himself from his training. Thats very good. Kind of frightening, too.Our new LLM [large language model] jailbreak technique detailed in the 2025 Cato CTRL Threat Report should have been blocked by gen AI guardrails. It wasnt. This made it possible to weaponize ChatGPT, Copilot, and DeepSeek, Cato Networks Chief Security Strategist Etay Maor said in a statement.How AI Jailbreaking Bypasses Safety ControlsJason Soroko, senior vice president of product at Sectigo, a global digital certificate provider, explained that exposing systems that utilize AI to unknown or adversarial inputs increases vulnerability because unvetted data can trigger unintended behaviors and compromise security protocols.Such inputs risk evading safety filters, enabling data leaks or harmful outputs, and ultimately undermining the models integrity, he told TechNewsWorld. Some malicious inputs can potentially jailbreak the underlying AI.Jailbreaking undermines an LLMs built-in safety mechanisms by bypassing alignment and content filters, exposing vulnerabilities through prompt injection, roleplaying, and adversarial inputs, he explained.While not trivial, he added, the task is accessible enough that persistent users can craft workarounds, revealing systemic weaknesses in the models design. Sometimes, all thats needed to get an AI to misbehave is a simple perspective change. Ask an LLM to tell you what the best rock is to throw at somebodys car windshield to break it, and most LLMs will decline to tell you, saying that it is harmful and theyre not going to help you, explained Kurt Seifried, chief innovation officer at the Cloud Security Alliance, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to cloud best practicesNow, ask the LLM to help you plan out a gravel driveway and which specific types of rock you should avoid to prevent windshield damage to cars driving behind you, and the LLM will most likely tell you, he told TechNewsWorld. I think we would all agree that an LLM that refuses to talk about things like what kind of rock not to use on a driveway or what chemicals would be unsafe to mix in a bathroom would be overly safe to the point of being useless.Jailbreaking DifficultyMarcelo Barros, cybersecurity leader at Hacker Rangers, makers of a cybersecurity gamification training tool in Sao Paulo, Brazil, agreed that with the right prompt, cybercriminals can trick AIs. Research shows that 20% of jailbreak attempts on generative AI systems are successful, he told TechNewsWorld.On average, attackers needed just 42 seconds and five interactions to break through, with some attacks happening in under four seconds, he noted.Cybercriminals can also use the DAN Do Anything Now technique, which involves creating an alter ego for the LLM and prompting it to act as a character and bypass its safeguards to reveal sensitive information or generate malicious code, he said.Chris Gray, field CTO at Deepwatch, a cybersecurity firm specializing in AI-driven resilience headquartered in Tampa, Fla., added that the difficulty of jailbreaking an LLM is directly tied to the amount of effort placed into securing it and the amount of effort expended to protect it. Like most things, better walls prevent inappropriate access, but determined efforts can find holes where none might have been seen to the casual observer, he told TechNewsWorld.That said, defensive measures are often robust, and it is difficult to continually develop the specific prompts needed to perform a successful jailbreak, he said.Erich Kron, security awareness advocate at KnowBe4, a security awareness training provider in Clearwater, Fla., also pointed out that LLMs can protect themselves from jailbreaking over time. Jailbreaking difficulty may vary depending on the information being requested and how often it has been requested before, he told TechNewsWorld. LLMs can learn from previous instances of individuals bypassing their security controls.Fuzzing and Red TeamingIn Catos report, it recommends organizations create a dataset of prompts and expected outputs for their LLMs and test the model against them as a means of addressing potential jailbreaking issues.It also recommends fuzzing an LLMs endpoints with known datasets of jailbreak prompts to ensure the system isnt producing malicious outputs. Fuzzing is used to identify vulnerabilities and bugs in applications by feeding the app large amounts of random, unexpected, and invalid data to see how it reacts. Another suggestion is regular AI red teaming to ensure that AI models are robust and secure. Enabling red teams will be a great foundation to begin securing ML models, helping security teams to understand the most critical and vulnerable points of an AI system to attack, explained Nicole Carignan, vice president for Strategic Cyber AI at Darktrace, a global cybersecurity AI company.These are often the connection points between data and ML models, including access points, APIs, and interfaces, she continued. It will be important for this to be continuously expanded on as threat actors develop new techniques, tactics, and procedures, and it will be crucial to test other ML model types in addition to generative AI.Were already seeing the early impact of AI on the threat landscape and some of the challenges that organizations face when using these systems both from inside their organizations and from adversaries outside the business, she said.In fact, Darktrace recently released research that found nearly three-quarters of security professionals state AI-powered threats are now a significant issue, and 89% agreed that AI-powered threats will remain a major challenge into the foreseeable future.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.Related StoriesMore by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Cybersecurity

While this is about the changes in the microprocessor market and the impact of tariffs, Ive also been extremely disappointed in Microsofts AI rollout.Right now, Im working in Microsoft Word on one of HPs latest laptops, and it asked if I wanted AI to help write this months column. I gave initial direction on what I wanted to cover and how I wanted to cover it.Although Ive edited this a bit, and my editor will make more edits before publication, the result is largely what Microsofts AI suggested I write. I treated the AI like I would an employee, making suggestions about the content. Im pleased with the result.So, this week, Ill cover the microprocessor companies (at least the ones I know best) and close with my Product of the Week, Microsofts AI. Im pretty pleased with this implementation, and kudos to whoever came up with this method of getting people like me to use the tool.Lets get to it.Microprocessor Market UpdateThe microprocessor market has witnessed significant transformations over the past few years, driven by technological advancements and shifts in the global economy.As the demand for high-performance computing systems continues to soar, major players like AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, and Nvidia have competed fiercely to capture market share and deliver innovative solutions.However, one of the pressing challenges facing this industry is the impact of tariffs on parts imported from other countries. These tariffs can lead to higher costs for PC OEMs, making the final products unaffordable for consumers.In this column, Ill explore the current state of the microprocessor market, examine the effects of tariffs, and delve into the strategies and positions of key industry players.AMD: Taking Names and Kicking ButtAMD has experienced a remarkable ascent in the microprocessor market that could be attributed to its innovative architecture and competitive pricing.The introduction of the Zen microarchitecture and subsequent Ryzen processors has propelled AMD to the forefront of the industry. These processors offer exceptional performance, power efficiency, and multi-threading capabilities, making them a preferred choice for both gamers and professionals. Additionally, AMDs strategic partnerships and acquisitions, such as the purchase of Xilinx, have further solidified its position. Lets just say AMDs rise has been as smooth as a jazz saxophonist on a Sunday morning.Intel: New CEO Puts It Back on TrackDespite stiff competition from AMD, Intel has managed to hold its ground through continuous innovation and a loyal customer base. Intels advancements in processor technology, including the development of 10nm and 7nm nodes, have enabled the company to deliver high-performance CPUs with improved efficiency.Moreover, Intel maintains dominance in the server and enterprise markets as its Xeon processors continue to power data centers globally although AMD is making impressive inroads. However, Intel faces challenges in the consumer market, where AMDs Ryzen processors have gained substantial traction. Think of Intel as the tortoise in the old fable: while it has clearly had issues, it is again steady and sure, but AMD is snapping at its heels like the cheeky hare.As I was finishing this column, Intel announced it had selected a new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, who had previously served as an Intel board member. I expect this was because he had backed a plan that Pat Gelsinger was against, and the board felt he was the best person to execute the plan he believed in. This move will significantly help Intel set and execute a strategy, leaving Intel in much better shape this week.Qualcomm: Strategic WinsQualcomms presence in the microprocessor market is characterized by strategic design wins, particularly in the mobile and modem segments. While Qualcomm may have fewer design wins compared to AMD and Intel, its successes are significant due to the integration of advanced modem technologies.Qualcomms Snapdragon processors, coupled with cutting-edge modems, provide seamless connectivity and enhanced performance for mobile devices. This focus on mobile computing positions Qualcomm favorably, especially with the growing demand for 5G technology.Qualcomm may not win the popularity contest, but when it does show up, it brings the best dessert. With OEMs now taking Qualcomm 5G modems, the future of this effort appears to be getting brighter.Nvidia: The King of AINvidia continues to reign supreme in artificial intelligence (AI) and graphics processing units (GPUs). The companys GPUs have become synonymous with AI research, development, and deployment, powering everything from autonomous vehicles to data centers.Nvidias CUDA platform and Tensor Cores have revolutionized AI computation, enabling faster and more efficient processing of complex algorithms. In gaming and workstation segments, especially in AI development, Nvidia is like the royalty of the tech world, with a GPU crown and an AI scepter.Tariff ImpactOne of the most significant challenges facing the microprocessor market is the imposition of tariffs on components sourced from other countries. These tariffs can lead to higher costs for PC OEMs that rely on these parts to assemble their products. The added expense of tariffs can make it difficult for OEMs to offer competitive pricing, which in turn affects consumer demand. Moreover, the tariffs on parts from the U.S. exacerbate the problem because they increase the overall cost of production. Its like paying extra for the privilege of making your own sandwich.The Tariff ProblemThe economic implications of tariffs extend beyond the microprocessor market. Higher costs for components can lead to reduced profit margins for OEMs, forcing them to pass on the increased expenses to consumers.This situation can decrease sales and lower market penetration, especially in price-sensitive segments. Additionally, tariffs can disrupt supply chains, causing delays and inefficiencies in production.The uncertainty surrounding trade policies further complicates the planning and forecasting processes for industry players. Its a bit like trying to knit a scarf while someone randomly hides your needles.How OEMs Plan To Overcome TariffsMicroprocessor companies and OEMs are exploring various strategies to address the challenges posed by tariffs. These include diversifying supply chains, seeking alternative sourcing options, and negotiating favorable trade agreements.Additionally, companies are investing in domestic manufacturing capabilities to reduce reliance on imported components. Collaboration with governments and industry associations is also crucial in advocating for policies that support fair trade and minimize tariff-related disruptions. In other words, they are juggling flaming torches while riding unicycles and still trying to look cool.Wrapping UpThe microprocessor market is at a pivotal juncture, with technological advancements and economic challenges shaping its trajectory. AMDs rise to prominence, Intels stability, Qualcomms strategic design wins, and Nvidias dominance in AI highlight the dynamic nature of the industry.However, the impact of tariffs on components underscores the need for strategic planning and collaboration to ensure sustainable growth. By navigating these challenges effectively, industry players can continue to innovate and deliver cutting-edge solutions that drive the future of computing. Now, if only we could make tariffs as obsolete as dial-up internet.Microsoft 365 CopilotAs I noted in the opening, Ive been less than impressed with Microsofts AI rollout until now. Recall Microsofts key AI feature for Copilot+ PCs is still on hold even though Apple was able to get out more quickly with its version of this. Microsoft needs to massively up its marketing game and focus on getting people to use the product. Marketing is still largely absent, but it has improved the use of the product thing impressively.Much of what was written above was written by Copilot under my direction. While Im still a novice at finding the best way to prompt the tool, it is still impressively usable, though you do have to read through the output for accuracy. For instance, the AI wrote that Nvidia was buying Arm, a move that Nvidia had to walk away from. Thanks to my editor for also catching a couple of other errors I overlooked regarding Lip-Bu Tan and Recall.As with many writers, I often have trouble thinking through what I want to write and how I want to go about telling the story. Typically, writing this column will take me four to five hours. I got this one done in under 30 minutes, and the result, to my eye, isnt bad.If you have an Office 365 subscription, chances are you have or can get access to this tool. If you get a chance, mess with it. It is a huge help with productivity. Even if you then decide to write from scratch, it will give you content you wouldnt have thought of thatll add to your story.Im impressed, so Microsoft 365 Copilot is my Product of the Week. The dialog in Word that prompted me to try it out was also exceptionally well done kudos to whoever created it.

The Cevaton 15.6 Laptop Triple Screen Extender, with its multiple configurations, is a versatile productivity accessory provided it is compatible with your laptop.This screen extender is a novel idea. Its adjustable metal frame lets you position your laptop between twin screens. The adaptable monitor stand can be contorted into various positions to meet almost any workplace or home office need.The design options provide 11 screen orientations, including stacked, single-screen, and folding modes. Beyond the traditional side-by-side setup, options include landscape and portrait modes. More modes exist depending on whether you need to view one or both added displays in vertical or horizontal orientations.Yet another user scenario lets you mirror an image across two or all three mirrored screens. This trick is handy, as you can display a mirrored image in vertical or horizontal orientation while you work on a third panel to read related text or create content. You no longer need to use two separate computers as a workaround solution.Other configuration modes let you mount the two extended monitors back-to-back to view one screen while others sit across a conference table to share their own view. Arranging the two extender monitors atop the laptop screen gives you a long-form view from top to bottom.The Cevaton 15.6 Laptop Screen Extender offers multiple configurations, including stacked, single-screen, and folding modes for versatile display setups.(Image Credit: Cevaton)All of these combinations have viewing angle schemes based on 90-degree vertical rotation and 235-degree horizontal rotation, a multi-function configuration button, and dual speakers in each monitor. These options surpass traditional dual-monitor setups, which often require multiple video card ports or docking stations.Setup Challenges and Cable CompatibilityMy two workplace desktop computers are tethered to secondary monitors. Once set up, cables remain connected for trouble-free use. Similarly, my cadre of laptops and tablets with much smaller screens are paired with a single portable laptop-sized secondary monitor.An optional power plug and an HDMI cable are all that is required for a speedy grab-and-go connection. For specialized projects, I endure the hassle of attaching two laptop secondary screens via a docking station, as most laptops can only handle a two-screen setup.So, the ability to add matching laptop monitors with connecting cables sans a third-party docking device is an enticing proposition. The setback occurs when the cables Cevaton supplies are unsuitable for every variation of ports built into laptops.Cable Limitations and WorkaroundsThe Cevaton monitors have the same combination of ports: two fully functional USB-C ports and one HDMI port. Depending on the laptop, setting up the connections is not simple plug-and-play.The manufacturer includes two cables, one with a standard HDMI plug (for the laptop connection) and one with a mini-plug (for the extended monitor). A pair of included USB Type-C cables is provided for laptops without HDMI support.Also included is a set of cables with a USB Type-A plug on one end and a fully USB Type-C plug on the other end. This cable and plug combination can solve connection issues, provided the laptop supports fully functional Type-C features. On some of my gear, the device only had one HDMI or other suitable port, leaving nowhere to connect the second Cevaton screen. In oddball cases, the connectors fit, but some glitch in the OS circuitry prevented the video signal from reaching the additional monitors.I found that trial and error often was the only way to resolve a setup issue. Potential snags include matching a Type-C USB to a Display Port (DP) connection or HDMI with a USB-Type B or Type-C port. I even ran into a case where the only USB Type-A port and cable combination did not handle video signals well.Some situations may require more than one type of cable and connector. For instance, a USB-A cable will also be needed to power the screen extender when connecting with HDMI. A separate power plug is not included.Troubleshooting Connection IssuesConnection issues on some laptops resulted from different hardware specs. I have numerous test laptops, ranging in age and hardware specs.Unfortunately, video and audio ports and plugs are not as standardized as USB type A/B/C, which guarantees plug-and-play. On some laptops, I could connect only one monitor.The tiny power button on the monitors doubles as the brightness and contrast adjustment control. It is sensitive to finger movement, which can sometimes cause the brightness control to be too low, making the monitor appear not to be working. The trick is to long press the power button for five seconds to reset the screen brightness.Product FeaturesThe 15.6 portable monitors each weigh 2.1 pounds. The metal frame and rotating arms add several more pounds. The entire setup is easily carried in an included bag.A circular connector attaches to the extender monitors at the end of each supporting arm that slides onto the frame. The foldable metal frame provides 235-degree rotation. The standing frame for the dual monitors opens/closes to accommodate 13 to 17.3 laptops.The monitors deliver 120% sRGB FHD IPS 1080P with an aspect ratio of 16:9 and a screen resolution of 1920 x 1080 Pixels, providing a wider view with more vivid colors and a more comfortable viewing experience.Multi-function keys let you customize settings such as brightness, volume, contrast, and other parameters for each screen according to your preferences.Pricing and Device CompatibilityThe Cevaton 15.6 Laptop Triple Screen Extender was initially listed on Cevatons website for $500 and reduced to $399. It is currently listed on Amazon for $299.These portable monitors are compatible with Windows, Android, and ChromeOS devices, as well as MacBooks with the M1/M2/M3 Pro or Max chips but not with the entry-level M1/M2/M3 chips. They also work with Nintendo Switch, PS4, and Xbox.The Cevaton website provides more detailed laptop listings and can be used to confirm if the product is compatible with your laptop model.Bottom LineCevatons dual monitor extensions are an unusual product that offers more use-case solutions than many people need. The frame and connectors are very sturdy and easy to assemble, disassemble, and carry with your laptop.If you confirm that your computer is compatible before purchasing, you should not have difficulties connecting both monitors.Is there a tech product or application youd like to suggest for review? Something you love or would like to get to know?Email your ideas to me, and Ill consider them for a future column.And use the Reader Comments feature below to provide your input!

Believe the Hype About Quantum Security: ReportBy John P. Mello Jr.March 11, 2025 5:00 AM PT ADVERTISEMENTAchieve Financial Clarity with SettleGetting accurate product cost data is crucial for growth. Settle unifies invoices, payments, and inventory to help e-commerce operators uncover true costs and boost margins -- all in one platform. Get Started Today! A call for organizations to take quantum security seriously has been sounded in a new report by Forrester Research.The report titled Quantum Security Isnt Hype Every Security Leader Needs It acknowledged that the commercial availability of quantum computers that can crack traditional asymmetric cryptography is still five to 10 years away. However, it added that organizations must assess and prepare for the impact of quantum security now.While the encryption market has a history of vendors publishing incredible claims like unbreakable encryption, the hype and interest around quantum is real because hackers are already using the harvest now, decrypt later approach, noted the report written by research director Merritt Maxim and analysts Andras Cser, Sandy Carielli, and Heidi Shey.Organizations need to start preparing now to secure their resources from attacks from quantum computers since it will take them years to do it because the transition wont be totally under their control, explained Carielli. Theres a lot of reliance on third parties, she told TechNewsWorld, and reliance on vendors upgrading their technology so you can upgrade yours.There are a lot of steps along the way, she continued, so I think youre talking in terms of numbers of years, and thats why weve always been saying start now, even if this is not something that will come into play for another five or 10 or whatever years. It will potentially take that long to complete the migration.Harvest Now, Decrypt LaterJamie Boote, associate principal security consultant at Black Duck Software, an applications security company in Burlington, Mass., asserted that quantum computing would disrupt decades-old conventions in terms of how well current encryption algorithms can safeguard sensitive data.An entire generation of professionals has lived with the slow cycling of encryption algorithms in and out as computers grew faster at a predictable rate, and this is going to throw that cadence away, he told TechNewsWorld. This change isnt going to be instant, and its not going to be easy, but the more we can prepare our infrastructure to just work in the post-quantum computing era, the fewer incidents stemming from unmaintained or older components will occur.Theres a saying that The best time to plant a shade tree was twenty years ago, the second-best time is today, but right now, were living at a point where it is the best time to plant that metaphorical shade tree of security to enjoy the benefits when the time is right, he added.Organizations should also be getting their quantum security efforts into gear because harvest now, decrypt efforts are being conducted by nation-states and cybercriminals. Industries that have data that needs to remain private for years into the future are at most risk of harvest now, decrypt later, explained Rebecca Krauthamer, co-founder and CEO of QuSecure, a maker of quantum-safe security solutions, in San Mateo, Calif.When it comes to data like national security information, bank account information, data thats valuable year after year when a quantum computer does come online, it can decrypt that stockpiled data, she told TechNewsWorld. Thats why we see governments and banks moving very quickly to start addressing the quantum threat, even though there is no quantum computer that exists today that will break todays encryption.Valuable ExercisePreparing for Q-Day even if it never arrives can be an incredibly valuable exercise, maintained Richard Stiennon, founder and chief research analyst at IT-Harvest, a cybersecurity industry analyst firm in Birmingham, Mich.You should be doing it anyway, he told TechNewsWorld. You should be discovering all the places you have encrypted data. That will tell you where your family jewels are. And itll tell you the size and scope of problems youve got.Now youve probably got all this encrypted data all over the place, he said. You dont know who owns the keys or how to get to them. Theyre probably insecure. Theyre probably old and need to be re-keyed. So, you have to think about getting your hands around this, right? How do you find all the encrypted data? Find the way its encrypted so you can decrypt and re-encrypt it if you need to?When you talk to some end users, they dont know whats being protected by cryptography, added Heather West, senior research analyst at IDC, a market research company in Framingham, Mass. For some, its a mixture of different types of solutions, she told TechNewsWorld. Some have band-aid solutions. Some just dont know. So, you first need to understand what data and infrastructure are most at risk. Then you need to know what youre doing to protect it and figure out which post-quantum cryptography algorithms would be best suited for protecting it.However, Luigi Caramico, co-founder and CTO of DataKrypto, a cloud encryption company in Burlingame, Calif., warned against investing too much effort today in quantum-resistant solutions.An encryption method considered quantum-proof today may not remain secure in the future, he told TechNewsWorld. Instead, I would prioritize addressing present-day vulnerabilities, such as the encryption gap the need to decrypt when its in use which poses an immediate and tangible risk to data security.Investing heavily in todays quantum-proof solutions could also be risky, he added. Some of these algorithms may eventually be found vulnerable to classical attacks, let alone quantum ones. A better strategy is quantum agility ensuring cryptographic systems can be updated as stronger and more thoroughly vetted algorithms emerge.Quantum Security Demands Crypto-AgilityQuantum security and crypto-agility the ability to replace and upgrade cryptographic algorithms in infrastructure, commercial and in-house-built applications will improve the security of any information exchange, improve digital signatures, and mitigate the risk of harvest now, decrypt later attacks, the Forrester report noted.Quantum security will force an overhaul of systems across an organization, and organizations will need to upgrade their entire security stack to ensure crypto-agility for the future to protect their data, it added.Crypto-agility is crucial in todays fast-evolving digital environment, where new technologies, algorithms, and security challenges require constant adaptation, said Tim Callan, chief compliance officer at Sectigo, a global digital certificate provider. This need for agility will become even more critical as we approach the PQC [Post Quantum Computing] era, with the potential for rapid algorithm deprecation, he told TechNewsWorld.Because algorithmic trust is imperfect, organizations must use this opportunity to design security that is modular and enable algorithms to easily be swapped in and out like security Legos, Matt Mittelsteadt, a research fellow at the Cato Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank, told TechNewsWorld.If any of these algorithms are found insecure, which is indeed possible, organizations that design with modularity in mind will be able to quickly swap in a replacement and maintain security, he said.Trillion-Dollar RiskThe Forrester report is exactly right about the threat of quantum computers, asserted Stefan Leichenauer, vice president of engineering at SandboxAQ, a developer of B2B and quantum software in Palo Alto, Calif.In as little as five years, we could see a quantum computer crack traditional cryptography, and because of hack now, decrypt later attacks, the vulnerability exists today, he told TechNewsWorld.Even if we have doubts about whether a quantum computer will arrive in that timeframe maybe you think its only a 10% chance a modest probability of a trillion-dollar-loss event is still a big problem, he said.Weve seen a number of recent announcements from the quantum computing industry showing that the roadmap is advancing, so our confidence that quantum computers are coming has only gone up, he added.Every organization needs to evaluate their cryptographic posture, which begins with a careful inventory of their use of encryption and then a crypto-agile migration to post-quantum key exchanges. Its a multi-year process, so the time to start is now.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.Related StoriesMore by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Cybersecurity

Im old, which means I get to see the same mistakes made by the same companies over and over again.Id hoped that AI would fix this, but that clearly isnt the case at the moment because Google has once again previewed a product before it was ready and is getting some bad initial reviews.Remember Google Glass? That product was released before it was ready, and due to the bad press it received, head-mounted displays were delayed for around a decade.Well, Google has started previewing Gemini for Android Auto before it is ready, and users arent becoming fans. This week, lets talk about why Gemini for your car could be a good thing if Google doesnt kill it prematurely.Well close with my Product of the Week: a really cool, smart, vehicle-mounted drone system that will be available across all BYD models.Premature Product Launches and Marketing FailuresOne of the advantages of having a strong marketing organization is that it can manage bad initial impressions and help prevent an unfinished product from ruining its future potential.Steve Jobs was a master at this. While he was alive, Apple out-marketed almost every other company on the planet. The result was that Apple was able to bring to market an iPhone that initially sucked but survived until it didnt. Then, it transformed the market.Google isnt a marketing company. We saw this in spades with Google Glass, another product released before it was ready, which then died a painful death. Its hard to overcome bad first impressions; products introduced before they are ready generally leave bad first impressions.We can see this with the initial coverage for Gemini in Android Auto. While I dont think the product is cooked yet, I also dont think it is as bad as the reviewers seem to think it is, and I believe it will get a ton better.AIs Role in Modern VehiclesI recall back in the 1970s when car makers decided buyers wanted a voice rather than an idiot light to tell them what was going on. Youd get verbal scripted messages like your door is ajar or fasten your seatbelts. That got really annoying after a short time and killed this feature.The idea of talking to your car wasnt bad, but having it verbally alert you to what a light indicator would have done faster, better, and cheaper didnt seem like a step in the right direction.However, AI in your car could be far more interesting because you can converse with AIs. Rather than the pain of voice commands that came after scripted voice alerts (with voice commands, you have to learn specific commands), AIs like Gemini use natural language and can converse with you. AI can do many things, like identifying a place along your route with food youd enjoy, alerting you that you are getting sleepy, and automatically taking you to a safe, affordable hotel. It could provide deeper analytics than idiot lights do.For instance, the meaning of a check engine light can indicate anything from a minor issue to a critical failure, depending on the affected system. So rather than a general alert, the AI could point to the component that had failed, tell you the criticality of the failure, and then get you the appropriate help, whether thats a tow truck or factory support.The criticality of the failure would be a huge benefit. If interference engines have a problem with the timing chain, they can self-destruct if the engine isnt turned off immediately, and a coolant leak can result in a blown head gasket and the need for a new engine. Having AI prevent any of that would be well worth the cost of admission.AI as a Co-Pilot for DriversI used to drive long distances solo a lot when I was younger. Staying awake on a long drive, particularly at night when there is little or no traffic, is problematic. Having someone to talk to helps, but a passenger can fall asleep, too, which isnt always ideal on a long drive.Gemini is a conversational AI, which means you should be able to talk to it and have it hold a conversation with you. Exploring new ideas, chatting about things around you that you might otherwise miss, or just discussing a subject that interests you could make the drive go by faster and make it less likely youll wake up in a hospital or worse.Moreover, this conversational feature could be particularly useful for long-haul truck drivers.Wrapping Up: Will Gemini in Android Auto Succeed?Assuming it was well-trained, generative AI in a vehicle would be a great addition. It should provide more complete answers to questions, more effectively guide you to gas, food, or safety, tell you not only what is wrong with your car but what you should do to limit the damage, and keep you entertained on long trips where you are very likely to fall asleep.But the AI has to be properly trained, performant, and not annoying. Right now, Gemini in Android Auto is none of those things. Thus, it shouldnt be seen in the light of day because it is creating negative impressions that could eventually kill this effort.I hate to see Android Auto AI go the way of Google Glass, but it doesnt look like Google has yet learned from past mistakes. Lets hope Google corrects its path, as Id really like a working AI to chat with while I drive.BYD DJI Car Drone FeatureThe Chinese are doing some amazing things with their EVs. They have EVs that can become boats should you need to get out of a flood, EVs that can rotate on their axis, and flying cars that look like they are decent cars. They even have a car that jumps over obstacles on the road. Audis new E-Tron GT Performance does this as well, and I have to admit I lust for that car.But what caught my eye, particularly as I think about how AI could be used in driving, was the BYD/DJI (DJI is the biggest Chinese drone company) and their effort to wed a drone with their SUV line.Part of why I find this fascinating and want one is that I was a fan of the old Green Hornet TV show in the 1960s, and Black Beauty, Green Hornets car, had something like this. Audi has something similar, which is an amazing prototype.BYD is bringing it to market, and while I like the Audi concept better, there is an advantage to having something you can actually sell.However, in the Audi video linked above, you can see how a drone, or in the case of the Audi, drones, could be used to guide the way on dark roads, look ahead to see what the nature of a massive traffic jam is, or, in the case of a space alien invasion, realize in time that you need to be driving in the opposite direction fast (I watch too many sci-fi movies).I can picture driving to a picturesque area and then launching the drone to get a unique picture, using it to capture all aspects of an accident, sending it ahead to an area that looks dicey to make sure you can make it through (like if there is a flash flood warning), or looking for help if you are broken down and cant get a cell signal.And of course, pulling into a cars and coffee event and then launching the drone from your roof. It would surely draw attention from the one or two overpriced supercars that always seem to get the most attention. Not that Im into that at allI just think this BYD/DJI effort would be really cool. I only wish we could buy BYD cars here in the U.S. so I could check it out. So, this drone option is my Product of the Week.

As drones become a pivotal tool in both security and illicit operations, the skies over the U.S. southern border have turned into a high-tech battleground. Law enforcement agencies and drug cartels alike are leveraging drone technology for surveillance, smuggling, and counter-surveillance, raising urgent concerns about national security.With the rise of untraceable dark drones that evade traditional detection methods, the need for advanced drone monitoring systems has never been more critical. At the forefront of this effort is Mike Fraietta, co-founder and CEO of Gargoyle Systems, who is pioneering a decentralized drone detection network to counter emerging threats and enhance public awareness of aerial activity.According to Fraietta, traditional aerial craft detection methods face challenges from dark drones untraceable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) that use channel hopping or fiber optic technology to avoid RF detection.To counteract this, Gargoyle Systems focuses on acoustic detection, particularly for fiber-optic tethered drones emitting no RF signals. These drones pose a significant challenge to authorities, as they can operate over long distances without detection.His vision for the future of drone detection and its beneficial uses is clear. A comprehensive drone detection network must protect American citizens and infrastructure while enabling the ethical use of drones for valuable applications.The challenge isnt just detecting drones. Its ensuring they are used responsibly, Fraietta told TechNewsWorld.New Drone Detection Strategies EmergeFraietta launched Gargoyle Systems last year. Among its other projects, the company is developing tools to overcome limitations caused by drone intrusions. It will soon launch a product that creates a personal decentralized geo-fence or border wall that collects data on drones traversing an area.Fraietta, a physicist and certified FAA drone pilot, continually trains in drone security. He wants to monitor the changes being made to secure the southern border under new laws.We have advisors in the FAA and Department of Defense and Homeland Security. So, were keeping tabs on whats going on but are not officially involved in any way with the new folks down there or previously, he explained.How Drones Are Changing Border SecurityWhile drones present security challenges, they offer groundbreaking potential for emergency services and search-and-rescue operations. Fraietta is excited about the development of friendly drones designed to deliver medical aid, transport essential supplies, and assist in disaster relief efforts.Mike Fraietta, CEO of Gargoyle SystemsSince January, U.S. border agents have adjusted the role that drones can play in keeping borders secure. According to Fraietta, increased collaboration now occurs between DHS, local law enforcement, and the FAA. He likens these efforts to the creation of the TSA after 9/11,A drone czar may be needed to coordinate national drone security initiatives along with recent successes in border security, he mused.Despite efforts to enhance drone detection, Fraietta warns that dark drones operating outside radio frequencies are the biggest concern. As a result, law enforcement agencies are increasingly turning to AI and acoustic detection to identify illicit drone activity.He explained that using acoustic detection methods relies on perfecting the ability to identify the unique sounds of the propeller pitches, among other factors.Public Misconceptions and Drone Security RisksThe publics perception of drone flights led to hysteria in some instances. The governments veil of secrecy sometimes fuels fires of concern.For example, recent reports of drones flying over houses at night along the East Coast, particularly in multiple New Jersey counties and neighboring areas, stirred public concern. Some news accounts conveyed similar unexplained drone flights amid fears of surveillance or potential attacks.Public awareness regarding drone threats is essential. We need to think about how vulnerable our power grids, water supplies, and infrastructure are to drone attacks, Fraietta warned. Drones ability to deliver dangerous payloads to critical infrastructure remains a major security concern. Some local officials openly discussed shooting down drones. Meanwhile, some federal officials within the previous administration were emphatic that people were not seeing drones but small piloted aircraft.Amid increasing demands for transparency regarding the East Coast sightings, federal officials finally stated that the FAA authorized drone flights as part of an undisclosed test. Fraietta declined to comment, only suggesting that many of those drone sightings were unsubstantiated.A similar situation occurred in Colorado in 2019, where mass reports of drones resulted in no government disclosure of verifiable sightings, he said.Cartels, Border Agents Battle for Aerial ControlFraietta observed that AI-powered drones the cartels use are nearly as advanced as those operated by border patrol agents. Cartel drones transport narcotics, use night vision equipment, and leverage 3D printing modifications to evade detection.Cartel drone flights over the U.S. southern border could provoke an armed U.S. response. The Mexican cartels are leveraging drone technology for more than just drug smuggling, warned Fraietta without elaboration.U.S. border agents and Mexican drug cartels use them to spy on each other. One side searches for fentanyl labs, and the other tries to locate law enforcement. While the potential for cartel-operated drones carrying explosives exists, the risk of escalation makes it unlikely, he cautioned. If they start attacking border patrols, its a wrap. Cartels prefer to operate stealthily rather than provoke a heavy response from law enforcement.Despite efforts to enhance detection, Fraietta warns of dark drones persistent challenges. Drones operating off radio frequencies are our biggest concern, he said. Law enforcement agencies increasingly use AI and acoustic detection to identify illicit drone activity.Ethical Debate Over Drone TechnologyDrone technology raises ethical concerns, particularly around privacy and regulation. Fraietta advocates for greater investment in detection systems and a national drone security strategy.People should know whats flying over them, just like they know whos on their property, he insisted.Comparing drones to cars and firearms, he stressed the need for structured registration, licensing, and designated flight corridors to reduce noise and enhance safety. While the FAAs Remote ID tracking is a step forward, untraceable dark drones remain a serious challenge.Fraietta believes drone security isnt just about threat detection its about ensuring responsible use. As drones continue to shape security and commerce, robust regulations and advanced detection technology will be essential. Gargoyle Systems envisions a future where decentralized networks give citizens and authorities greater visibility and control over the skies.Law enforcement is working to counter cartel-operated drones, but the public must also stay informed about both the risks and benefits of drone use, he concluded.

Ive been fortunate to have a few mentors who influenced the shape of my career at its formative stages. One of those people was Tom Mitchell, who unexpectedly passed away last November at the age of 76.I met Tom in February 1993 on a surprisingly pleasant weather day in Houston when I was interviewing for a product manager role at Compaq Computer Corporation. In those days, product manager candidates were put through an excruciating round of endurance-like interviews (I recall the number being nine or 10) in a single day, with your outcome being determined at the end of the day.Tom was the last examiner during my day-long interview gauntlet. I could tell he was exhausted from other business earlier in the day. But it was a good type of busy as Compaq was in the throes of its second growth ascendancy after announcing its low-cost ProLinea desktop PC lineup in 1992 to take on low-cost PC clones.Despite his fatigue, I was immediately impressed by Toms inquisitive questions about my professional background, knowledge of the PC space, and perhaps most importantly, my interest in making inroads into the consumer PC space, which Compaq had big plans for. Always a what you see is what you get type of guy, we immediately clicked, and it became the start of a remarkable 31-year friendship.Toms Program Management ExpertiseAlthough his career reached senior executive levels at Compaq, and at the latter part of his career, Foxconn/Hon Hai (a key component and eventual PC manufacturer for Compaq), Tom was, first and foremost, the prototypical program manager. He was the best of the best in that department.Few people outside the tech space understand precisely what a program manager does.An excellent program manager at a tech products company seamlessly integrates cross-functional teams, ensuring projects are delivered on time, within scope and cost budget, and aligned with strategic goals. They excel at balancing technical understanding with business acumen, translating complex requirements into actionable plans.By proactively identifying risks and dependencies, they mitigate potential roadblocks before they escalate. Their strong communication skills foster collaboration across diverse stakeholders, from engineers to executives, ensuring transparency and alignment.Ultimately, they are invaluable because they drive efficiency, clarity, and cohesion, enabling innovation to flourish in fast-paced, dynamic environments and deliver business results.Driving Success at CompaqThese attributes became incredibly critical as Compaqs consumer division grew to multi-billion revenue levels after its first consumer PCs branded Presario were announced in August 1993.From a persona standpoint, those who knew Tom well would describe him as Compaqs own Walter Cronkite non-emotional, data-driven, always doing the right thing, and succinct in his messaging and communications. If Tom told you that aliens had landed on the roof of CCA 5 (one of Compaqs early buildings in Spring, Texas), youd believe him.But Tom was far more than just a great program manager. He was a great leader and manager of people, many of whom would view Tom as a role model or mentor in the latter parts of their careers. Even some great people managers often struggle with establishing personal friendships with their employees due to the risk of crossing the line between the workplace and peoples personal lives. Not Tom. Tom managed the Consumer Division in a co-GM format with fellow Compaq colleague Tony Dowzall and had no problem encouraging (if not participating) in company events that humanized him.In the late 1990s, we announced one of the first consumer desktop PCs with 1394 connectivity (Apple would call it Firewire). This new technology enabled high-speed transfers of large video files between digital video cameras and PCs, a breakthrough that led to PCs and Macs becoming video editing devices something we take for granted in 2025.Tom and Tony agreed to play Dr. Evil and Austin Powers in an inter-company video, showing his lightheartedness and willingness to poke fun at himself. I wish I still had that video footage.Tom knew how to take calculated risks, too.While it seems quaint now, Compaq had an opportunity to work with AMD on announcing a technology demo of the worlds first 1Ghz desktop mini-tower using a liquid-based cooling solution that allowed us to demonstrate Compaqs innovative ethos. While this was simply a demo shown off at CES, it required scarce engineering resources that Tom ensured were available to make this industry-first demo a reality.A Life Built on Family and ValuesBorn in Scotland but spending his formative years growing up in Canada, Tom Mitchell was the consummate family man a devoted father whose greatest joy came from his time with his loving wife, Becky, to whom he was married for 53 wonderful years.Tom and Becky moved so many times during their marriage that she dubbed him a Scottish Gypsy. Still, together, they built a life filled with warmth, laughter, and unwavering support.Tom was a proud father to two daughters, Jackie and Carie. He cherished every moment of their lives and always encouraged them with his wisdom and kindness. His deep love for his family is evident in everything he did, serving as a constant source of strength and inspiration to those closest to him.The Mitchell family (L-R) Carie, Tom, Becky, and JackieOne thing about Tom that always stood out was his humility. He absolutely disdained attention. In a world where sports professionals, business leaders, politicians (and even industry analysts!) crave attention for their accomplishments, Tom let his accomplishments speak for themselves and was happy just playing golf with friends to let off some steam.A Legacy in Technology and BeyondTom joined Compaq during a pivotal era, contributing his vast expertise and visionary thinking to a company reshaping the world of personal computing.His managerial style and unassuming approach were perfect for Compaq as its consumer business grew rapidly. The company had its share of internal critics who were not crazy that it was succeeding in a low-cost business but consuming resources from other divisions. But he navigated through corporate politics with aplomb and grace.A true technologist at heart, Tom possessed an innate curiosity that fueled his passion for innovation. He departed Compaq after its acquisition by HP to join Taiwan-based Foxconn/Hon Hai, where he worked at a senior level to identify new tech categories and solutions for multiple OEMs.Toms ability to foresee trends and adapt to the rapid changes in the IT landscape was unparalleled. He played a critical role in projects that advanced Compaqs position as a leader in the industry, always approaching challenges with a blend of technical acumen and creative problem-solving. Beyond his professional achievements, Tom was revered for his unwavering integrity, generosity, and genuine kindness. He had a unique talent for making complex concepts accessible and fostering an environment of continuous learning and collaboration.His mentorship extended beyond technical guidance; he taught us the importance of resilience, humility, and staying true to ones values amidst competitive industry pressures.Compaq colleagues fondly remember Toms infectious (if dry) sense of humor during team meetings, thoughtful insights during strategic discussions, and an ever-present willingness to lend an ear or offer sage advice. His leadership style was characterized by empathy and respect, empowering those around him to excel and grow professionally and personally.Toms legacy is not confined to the projects he led or the innovations he championed; it lives on in the countless individuals he influenced. His impact resonates in the culture of excellence he helped cultivate, the careers he shaped, and the enduring friendships he formed.In honoring Toms memory, I know people will celebrate his values: a relentless pursuit of knowledge, a commitment to excellence, impeccable family values, and a deep respect and care for those around him.Remembering Toms Humor and WisdomI alluded earlier to Toms dry sense of humor. A prime example: when I completed my final interview at Compaq on that fateful day in Houston in 1993, Tom could tell that I was exhausted and gave me a few words of support. As I was walking out the door of his office, I asked him why so many people complained about the weather in Houston. With a twinkle in his eye, he told me, Mark, youll love it here. The weather in Houston is like this year-round.Tom, you will be missed by many!

New HMD X1 Safe Phone: Security for Parents, Cool Factor for KidsBy John P. Mello Jr.March 5, 2025 5:00 AM PTThe HMD X1 smartphone includes built-in parental controls and works with Xploras parental management app. ADVERTISEMENTAchieve Financial Clarity with SettleGetting accurate product cost data is crucial for growth. Settle unifies invoices, payments, and inventory to help e-commerce operators uncover true costs and boost margins -- all in one platform. Get Started Today! One knock against smartphones with built-in parental controls is that while they may give mom and dad a measure of comfort, theyre just too uncool for kids. Human Mobile Devices (HMD), a Finland-based phone maker, believes it can address that problem with its new HMD X1 phone announced on Sunday.At HMD, we believe kids shouldnt have to choose between safety and having a smartphone they love, Global Chief Marketing Officer Lars Silberbauer said in a statement.Parents have been asking for a solution that balances protection with freedom, and the HMD X1 delivers just that, he continued. Weve worked closely with families on our Better Phone Project to gain insight into how we can create a device that looks and feels like a premium smartphone while offering the safety guardrails parents need.This is a big step in redefining what a first phone should be one that gives kids a safe start in the digital world without feeling left out, he added.HMD launched The Better Phone Project in July 2024 to tackle the impact of smartphone use on the well-being of children and young people worldwide.In its first global survey of 10,000 parents, HMD found that 75% fear smartphones expose their children to internet dangers, while 65% worry about the impact of phone use on their childs mental health. In addition, more than half of parents surveyed regret giving their child a smartphone too soon.Parental Controls in a Phone That SlaysThe new HMD X1 gives parents complete control over their childs smartphone experience. It features a customizable app and internet access, allowing parents to limit social media, browsing, and screen time. It also includes location tracking with safe zones, emergency SOS calling, low battery alerts, and remote device access for parents.Whats more, theres a School Mode function that locks specific apps and features to minimize distractions during school hours. All settings can be managed remotely through an app by Xplora Technologies on a parents device, enabling them to adjust controls in real time based on their childs needs and environment. Oslo, Norway-based Xplora specializes in smartwatches and wearable devices for children.Xploras parental control app allows parents to manage the HMD X1 remotely, including location tracking, messaging, and device settings.As for the hardware, the X1 has a 108MP AI-powered camera, a 5000mAh battery, facial and fingerprint recognition unlock technology, and IP54-rated splash resistance. It also includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, which seems to be making a comeback with the younger set.The phone has a modular design, which can be customized with add-on Outfits. For example, the Gaming Outfit turns the X1 into a gaming console, the Flashy Outfit adds a built-in ring light for selfies, and the Power Outfit provides extra battery life for extended use.HMD X1s modular design allows users to customize their phone with interchangeable Outfits, including a gaming controller and a back-facing ring light for enhanced photography and video recording.Its a solution that checks all the boxes, but in real life, you have to look at what kids want to have, observed John Strand of Strand Consulting, a consulting firm with a focus on telecom, in Denmark. They dont want to go around with a phone thats not cool. They want an iPhone or an Android phone.Its like when I say I want to go to a nice burger bar and get a really good burger, but my kids say they want to go to McDonalds, he told TechNewsWorld. I think the day you can convince your kids to use a phone like this is probably the day you can convince them not to go to McDonalds.Content Monitoring Matters in Kids PhonesKids arent just little adults, and their brains dont work the same way, explained Titania Jordan, chief parent officer at Bark Technologies, a parental control and monitoring solutions company in Atlanta, and author of Parental Control: A Guide to Raising Balanced Kids in the Digital Era.Exposure to social media, violent content, bullying, online predators, and other serious things can drastically affect a childs well-being, she told TechNewsWorld. Because of this, parents need to be super involved in their childs digital world. Unfortunately, phones built for adults your regular iPhones and Androids dont have robust parental controls that actually work. Phones built for kids, on the other hand, should have specific tools to help protect children and put parents in the drivers seat from approving every new contact to managing screen time and blocking inappropriate websites to content analysis, she said.While the HMD X1 is better for a child than an iPhone, it doesnt contain content monitoring to alert parents to the very real dangers that children encounter online, Jordan noted. Unless a parent is going through every text, DM, comment, Google search, and countless other digital activities and thats highly unlikely they are going to miss potential issues and dangers their child encounters, she maintained.Many parents also dont know how to decipher teen slang terms or truly understand the different types of apps they may be allowing for their kids, she continued. One of the largest dangers facing children is the predatory and manipulative nature of chats in games, and content monitoring alerts parents to inappropriate conversations that could lead to grooming.Content monitoring is the defining feature of a thoughtful and safer kids phone because it gives families a digital safety net thats essential in the digital age, she added.Praise for HMD X1 On-Device ControlAlex Ambrose, a policy analyst with the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a research and public policy organization in Washington, D.C., cautioned that as the HMD X1 rolls out, it is crucial to consider the privacy implications of some of its features, like parental tracking and remote access.While these tools offer parents valuable oversight, regulations must ensure that privacy protections are built in from the start, she told TechNewsWorld.A childs understanding of privacy evolves as they get older, making it essential that safeguards grow alongside them and do not overburden them as they mature and are able to handle less parental oversight, she continued. Ensuring users are aware of these implications will be key to fostering responsible and informed use of the device. Ambrose praised the use of on-device controls by HMD. Device-level parental controls make it easier for parents and children alike to have a more seamless experience, making sure both apps and websites accessed on a device are child-appropriate a feature app store level verification lacks.Jennifer Huddleston, a technology policy research fellow at the Cato Institute, a Washington, D.C. think tank, contends that the market has generally responded to parents concerns over their kids use of smartphones.We have seen the market respond with various companies offering kid-safe devices that feature significant parental controls, as well as various levels of the tech ecosystem from ISPs and app stores to social media platforms offering a range of solutions to fit parents needs, she told TechNewsWorld.This shows that the market continues to respond to demands for more options for parents and young people, but also that such choices are not a one-size-fits-all approach, she said. In this way, having a variety of options for parents to find what best fits their needs for each child is preferable to many of the restrictive policy approaches that would also impact the speech and privacy rights of users of all ages.The images featured in this article are credited to HMD.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.Related StoriesMore by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Smartphones

Opera Adds Agentic AI to Its BrowserBy John P. Mello Jr.March 4, 2025 5:00 AM PTImage Credit: Opera ADVERTISEMENTAchieve Financial Clarity with SettleGetting accurate product cost data is crucial for growth. Settle unifies invoices, payments, and inventory to help e-commerce operators uncover true costs and boost margins -- all in one platform. Get Started Today! Agentic AI getting AI to perform tasks rather than just create content from prompts is coming to the Opera browser.On Monday, the Norwegian company announced that its agent, Browser Operator, works inside Opera and will perform tasks on the web for users.Having an AI agent in the browser brings the advantage of letting you outsource the most monotonous tasks to the browser while you focus on the things that really matter to you, Opera Senior Vice President Jan Standal told TechNewsWorld.In a blog posting on its website, Opera explained that Browser Operator understands written instructions in natural language using the browser clients local resources. Operas AI Composer Engine processes that information to complete tasks in the browser.Browser Operator will pause and ask a user to take action whenever it needs them to fill in a form, confirm an order, or perform some other sensitive task. In this entire process, the user is in control and can take over at any moment from Browser Operator. They can also review all the steps the agent took to perform a requested task.Many of the tasks that people perform in their internet browsers are repetitive, like scouring online retailers for the best prices or checking the same feeds for notable activity, explained Max Vermier, senior director of AI strategy at Abbyy, a global intelligent automation company.Instead of spending countless minutes or even hours of your own time on these monotonous searches for information, an AI agent can autonomously gather it and present you with its findings in a fraction of the time, he told TechNewsWorld. AI agents can be your personal productivity assistant, taking on your busy work and allowing you to make consequential decisions.Its like having a personal assistant who automatically helps with all tasks online from planning and booking a vacation to keeping track of property tax deadlines, added Ambuj Kumar, founder of Simbian, a provider of autonomous AI agents for cybersecurity in Mountain View, Calif.Not only is the idea very powerful and completely feasible today, he told TechNewsWorld, but this could be one of those technologies that helps everyone.First Native AI AgentAlthough other browsers have incorporated AI features, Opera is the first to make an AI agent native to a browser. The concept is not new, but the way that Opera is implementing it is new, said Sandi Besen, an applied AI researcher at IBM and Neudesic, a global professional services company.Other companies capture screenshots and screen videos and send them to their AI models in the cloud to follow through on actions. Browser Operator interacts with the elements on a web page through Document Object Model technology.Basically, the DOM is automatically created by the browser, Besen told TechNewsWorld. Its essentially an in-memory representation of the web pages structure.One advantage of using DOM, she noted, is it creates a more seamless user experience because its more native to the browser environment.It improves the agents performance, too. It doesnt need to take a screenshot, send that to the model, wait for what the model wants to do next, and then execute a tool to make something happen in the browser, she explained. Instead, it can just access the web page data.It also enhances privacy because everything is done locally on the device, she continued. Its not being run or sent to a server or a cloud-based hosted model somewhere. So the informations being kept locally, which is better for privacy concerns, especially if youre navigating things like login information or passwords.Komninos Chatzipapas, founder of HeraHaven AI, developer of an AI-based virtual companion app, in St. Petersburg, Fla. added that a significant advantage of doing agentic AI natively and locally on the browser is, unlike the cloud approach of OpenAIs Operator, users will already be logged into all their accounts. You will be using your local IP, so you wont need to solve captchas every other minute like on Operator, he told TechNewsWorld.Can Operas AI Shift Market Share?Operas innovative approach could give it some leverage in a market where it has been only a niche player. This is one potential advantage for Opera, said Rob Enderle, president and principal analyst of the Enderle Group, an advisory services firm in Bend, Ore.Others treat browsers as cost centers and thus dont put much development emphasis on them, he told TechNewsWorld. Opera, by focusing advancement on their browser, could move around the more established players if users find this feature compelling, and they may.He argued that Browser Operator could have an impact on Operas market share. It depends on how well Opera can get the word out, get influencers to use the feature, and then get to a critical mass of regular users to drive an adoption wave, he said. In theory, Operas Browser Operator AI could enhance its market position by differentiating it from competitors, noted Mark N. Vena, president and principal analyst with SmartTech Research in Las Vegas.By integrating agentic AI for automation, search efficiency, and task execution, Opera may attract tech-savvy users, he told TechNewsWorld. However, market impact depends on execution, adoption rates, and competition from big-hitter AI-enhanced browsers like Edge, Copilot, and Chrome, with Gemini.Ross Rubin, the principal analyst at Reticle Research, a consumer technology advisory firm in New York City, pointed out that AI innovation hasnt been successful in the past in disgorging market share from entrenched players.Microsofts launching of an AI-infused Bing brought more attention to that search engine than we had seen in a long time, but it hasnt meaningfully moved the needle for Bing in terms of search engine share, he told TechNewsWorld.And theres less of a barrier going to Bing instead of Google, as opposed to downloading a whole new browser, he said. So, Browser Operator is probably not going to do much in terms of Operas relative standing.AI Agents EverywhereBrowser Operator is just the first of what will be a proliferation of AI agents, predicted David Johnston, a contributor to Morpheus, an open-source platform for launching smart agents. All browsers will include them, as the productivity increases are amazing, he told TechNewsWorld.AI is in discovery mode, and people are experimenting with where to best access its powers, he said. From websites to dedicated apps, smart agents will be everywhere.Web browsers are there to make you more powerful while youre online, browsing the web and to give you the tools to use your time more effectively, Operas Standal added. Browser Operator showcases that we have the capability of making a useful and smart tool within the browser which aligns with the overall objective of a web browser of being useful.With this feature preview were showing a proof of concept of where AI could take us when we use AI to leverage our work building a web browser and this applies to every industry, he said.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.Related StoriesMore by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Artificial Intelligence

When we started with digital assistants, Microsoft potentially had the inside track. Its Cortana effort was named after the Halo AI character, which gave it far more potential than the others.Apple had a decent shot, too. It marketed Siri very well but didnt seem to want to fund its advancement, while Amazon just shipped product after product that used Alexa.Google was no slouch either, pivoting hard to its Gemini product (which I use a lot) for Pixel smartphones.What I find fascinating is that Panos Panay, the guy who pretty much made the Microsoft Surface line a thing and drove my favorite phone, the Surface Duo, is now at Amazon and apparently doing there what should have happened at Microsoft with Cortana.Lets discuss how we got here, what to expect, and why this move from Amazon will be a game-changer. Well close with my Product of the Week: AMDs new RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT graphics cards.Microsofts Cortana FailureMicrosoft was one of the first to introduce a believable AI assistant. What made it believable was that it was named after a character in the Halo video game. To make it work, Microsoft needed to advance this technology and make it look like it did in the game.You might have thought this was a stretch, but an engineer working on his own created exactly what this would have looked like, and it worked. Imagine how this would have set the stage and provided a huge competitive advantage for the company once generative AI was driving into the market years later. It would have been the centerpiece of any tech-forward home, particularly for those of us who got hooked on Halo back in the day.Then, instead of becoming the digital assistant that would rule them all, Microsoft did what it so often does these days: it underfunded and under-executed the effort with virtually no help from marketing and eventually pulled the plug on it years before generative AI became a thing.Apples Siri MisstepApple also had a shot at this race with Siri, which was, compared to Microsoft, far better marketed and executed even though, like Cortana, it really wasnt AI so much as a text-to-speech, speech-to-text interface for the web. Apple had more people using Siri than any of the alternatives, but the promise of Siri that the ads tended to convey was well short of Siris reality. Even today, when Im on a panel discussing AI, someone almost always points to Siri and argues that it isnt AI because it sets such a bad example.Apple had the opportunity as part of its now failed partnership with IBM (who saw that coming?) to have Siri be the front-end for IBMs watsonx, which would have made Siri into the first digital assistant that was a true AI. But that partnership was virtually dead on arrival, largely because Apple just doesnt work well with partners. While IBM has a far better partnership skill set, even IBM couldnt save the thing.Siri remains in use though that may change now that Apple can spell AI but its still the disappointment it has always been.Alexa SurpriseAmazon has lost billions on Alexa. However, arguing that Alexa is a failure is unfounded mainly because many users order products from Amazon using Alexa. Unlike the others, Amazon saw the potential to create a front end for the retail business and use the digital assistant to remind and help people to order stuff and become a trusted part of their day.I know we often start our day asking Alexa about the weather and end the day asking Alexa about actors in shows (for those not using Amazon X-Ray, which is a truly handy feature available with Amazon streaming content) or getting color on the limited information were watching on TV.Even though, just like Cortana was, and Siri is, Alexa is more of a web front end than true AI and has proven far more useful. The only thing we use almost as much is Googles digital assistant, which, for some reason, doesnt have a cute name.What will change in the coming weeks is that Alexa moves to generative AI. Granted, that move was promised in 2023, but this turned out to be more difficult than they thought. Still, it is better to do something well than quickly and while this feature will only be for Prime members, so it is not truly free, the result should be a huge improvement in this technology class.The generative AI assistant will be called Alexa+. It will work on most Alexa devices, a smartphone app, and the Amazon website. So, although Amazon wasnt first, didnt have a game to connect to, and was more of a retailer than a tech company, it out-executed Apple, Google, and Microsoft.Google is arguably a distant second with its planned implementation in Pixel phones, which may be a problem for me because I carry a Pixel phone, and I might prefer Alexa+.Wrapping Up: Alexa+If you arent working with AI, you should start because youll need that skill set to do many things in the second half of this decade. AI can handle complex questions with detailed answers, generate content, offer nuanced advice, and even assist with productivity.Alexa+ will let up jump to scenes in movies you own or rent on Amazons video service, ask for unique playlists on Amazon Music, and get far better answers than just a reading of a web page that Alexa would have previously defaulted to. Youll be able to use natural language rather than the Alexa commands you need to learn, and youll be able to give it complex, multi-step directions based on historical knowledge. For example, you can ask it to book the same place for your anniversary that you booked last year, purchase tickets at specified prices, or even recommend and contact repair services for something broken.With the Rink security cameras and this is huge you could ask Alexa+ to show you any images of people who have been frequenting your property, how often your kids are actually walking the dog, or to figure out where your cat is (assuming a camera has or can see it).There will likely be some quality problems because AI developers arent focusing enough on quality yet, which I think is a huge mistake. So youll want to be careful about taking everything Alexa+ says as fact. There will likely be some issues with third-party applications until they become fully integrated, but this is huge, and I think it will change how we look at digital assistants going forward.Panos Panay wasnt able to execute at Microsoft, though I know he tried so its great to see Amazon give him what he needed to perform there. Maybe a future Amazon device will be able to do what that Cortana prototype did and give Alexa+ a face. Well see.AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics CardsAMD has put a lot of effort into creating a set of graphics cards that should be a huge value when they appear on the market on March 6. The RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT, priced at $549 and $599, will be available through partners such as Acer, Asus, ASRock, Gigabyte, PowerColor, Sapphire, XFX, and Yeston.I have both of these cards in the RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT and while I cant yet talk about what Im seeing, I will say Im impressed with them.This is the first AI graphics card set from AMD to really push generative AI performance. It promises AI performance improvements over prior generations of between 12% and a whopping 70%, depending on the model, which makes a massive difference if you are waiting for the result of some AI analysis.Gaming isnt slacking either, with support for up to 80 FPS at 8K resolutions using accelerated post-processing effects.XFX Radeon RX 9000 Series GPU A powerful gaming GPU with an aggressive design, triple-fan cooling, and customizable RGB lighting.My primary PC is an AMD desktop machine I built a year ago. While these cards will work fine with Intel processors, there is increased synergy with AMD processors, making them even better for those of us running AMD desktops.ASRock Taichi Radeon RX 9000 Series GPU A high-performance graphics card with a striking industrial design and RGB lighting.AMD, Intel, and Nvidia do impressive upscaling to get higher frame rates at extreme resolutions. AMDs acceleration on these cards is around 3x base levels, which is pretty remarkable.At launch, over 30 of the top games will be supported with these cards (meaning they can use most of these cards unique capabilities). Before the end of the year, this number is expected to jump to over 75 current titles.Sapphire Radeon RX 9000 Series GPU A sleek, triple-fan cooling solution designed for efficient thermal performance and quiet operation.These AI-optimized GPUs enhance visuals, boost performance, and push generative AI capabilities forward, making the Radeon RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT my Product of the Week.The Radeon RX 9000 Series images featured in this article are courtesy of AMD.

Apple on Monday announced a $500 billion investment in the United States over the next four years, a commitment that includes the development of a state-of-the-art data center in Houston.This facility will be crucial in producing servers for Apple Intelligence, the companys AI-driven system, to enhance user productivity and creativity.Apples decision to establish such a critical infrastructure in Texas underscores the states growing technological prominence and highlights the factors that make it a prime destination for significant tech investments.Texas Business Climate Attracts Tech GiantsThanks to its business-friendly environment, economic incentives, and robust infrastructure, Texas has long been a magnet for technology companies.One of the states most significant advantages is its favorable tax policies. Texas offers various incentives for businesses, including exemptions on sales and use taxes for equipment and electricity used in data centers. This attribute significantly lowers operational costs, making it an attractive location for companies looking to expand their footprint.Texas has a long history of tech investment dating back to the mid-1980s when Compaq Computer Corporation was founded. Compaq built the majority of its PCs and servers in Houston in elaborate manufacturing facilities before outsourcing production to Taiwan, courtesy of the lower costs offered by the likes of Foxconn, Quanta, and other ODMs (original design manufacturers).The Lone Star state also has no personal income tax, which can be a draw for highly skilled workers looking to relocate.Texas Energy Edge Powers AI Data CentersThis is crucial: another key reason for Apples choice is Texas energy infrastructure. Data centers require vast amounts of electricity to power and cool servers. Texas boasts some of the most affordable energy rates in the country, with industrial rates as low as $0.06 per kilowatt-hour.This cost-effectiveness, combined with the states investments in renewable energy sources like wind and solar, ensures a reliable and sustainable power supply. The abundance of energy makes Texas an ideal location for high-performance computing and AI-driven operations that demand constant uptime. In addition to economic benefits, Texas offers a well-developed infrastructure that supports high-speed connectivity and efficient logistics. Major cities like Dallas and Houston are home to extensive fiber-optic networks, ensuring optimal performance for data centers. Houston, in particular, has developed into a growing tech hub with a concentration of enterprise IT services and data management firms.The states central location also makes it a strategic distribution point for national and global technology operations, reducing latency for cloud computing services.Texas Talent Fuels Tech ExpansionUnlike traditional manufacturing facilities, AI data centers require highly experienced workers. For that reason, Texas workforce is another significant factor in Apples decision. The state is home to top-tier universities, such as the University of Texas at Austin, which produces thousands of engineering and computer science graduates annually.This steady talent pipeline provides tech companies with the skilled professionals to drive innovation and maintain operations. The concentration of tech talent in Austin, often called Silicon Hills, has already attracted major players like Tesla, Dell, and Oracle, further strengthening the regions appeal.Apples investment will also bring substantial job creation, benefiting the local economy and the broader U.S. workforce. The Houston facility is expected to create thousands of jobs, spanning high-tech engineering, manufacturing, and facility operations.While data centers typically require large workforces during construction, the long-term employment opportunities they create such as IT management and cybersecurity roles contribute to developing a highly specialized workforce. This influx of employment and innovation will likely spur additional economic activity, benefiting local businesses and service providers.Apple Expansion Bolsters U.S. Tech IndependenceBeyond job creation, Apples investment aligns with broader national objectives to strengthen domestic manufacturing and technology independence. By onshoring the production of AI servers, Apple reduces its reliance on overseas supply chains and mitigates risks associated with global disruptions.This move also responds to recent policy shifts, including tariffs on imported goods, which have incentivized companies to reevaluate their manufacturing and logistics strategies. Apples decision to invest heavily in Texas reflects the states growing reputation as a premier destination for tech giants. With its combination of low energy costs, business incentives, skilled workforce, and robust infrastructure, Texas offers an ideal environment for data centers and AI-driven operations.As Apple embarks on this ambitious expansion, it reinforces its commitment to U.S. manufacturing and helps solidify Texas position as a leader in the tech industry. This investment is expected to drive further innovation and economic growth, cementing Texas status as a top choice for high-tech enterprises looking to scale their operations in the years ahead.Reality Check on Apples $500B InvestmentApples announcement of a $500 billion investment in the U.S., including data centers in Texas, may seem like a massive new commitment. However, it represents a cumulative figure that spans multiple years.Apple has consistently invested billions annually in U.S. infrastructure, manufacturing, and data centers. For example, in 2018, the company pledged to invest $350 billion over five years, and in 2021, it announced an additional $430 billion investment plan.The latest $500 billion figure likely includes previous commitments, ongoing expansions, and routine capital expenditures. While Apples continued investment in Texas is significant, the headline number can be misleading, as it doesnt necessarily indicate a sudden increase in spending. Instead, it reflects Apples long-term growth strategy and ongoing infrastructure projects.Nevertheless, while the focus on Texas aligns with Apples broader efforts to expand its data center footprint, the new investment scale is somewhat less dramatic than it appears.

Edtech Company Chegg Sues Google Over AI OverviewsBy John P. Mello Jr.February 26, 2025 5:00 AM PT ADVERTISEMENTQuality Leads That Turn Into DealsFull-service marketing programs from TechNewsWorld deliver sales-ready leads. Segment by geography, industry, company size, job title, and more. Get Started Now. An education technology company is taking Alphabet and Google to court over AI overviews displayed with search results.The company, Chegg, of Santa Clara, Calif., announced Monday that it is filing the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, alleging Google unfairly exercises its monopoly power within search and other anti-competitive conduct to muscle out companies like Chegg.In a press release announcing its 2024 fourth-quarter earnings, Chegg reported total net revenue of US$143 million, a 24% year-over-year decline. CEO Nathan Schultz stated in the release that, in addition to the lawsuit, the company was exploring a range of alternatives to maximize shareholder value, including being acquired, undertaking a go-private transaction, or remaining as a public standalone company.These two actions are connected, as we would not need to review strategic alternatives if Google hadnt launched AI Overviews, or AIO, retaining traffic that historically had come to Chegg, materially impacting our acquisitions, revenue, and employees, he said.Chegg has a superior product for education, as evident by our brand awareness, engagement, and retention, he continued. Unfortunately, traffic is being blocked from ever coming to Chegg because of Googles AIO and their use of Cheggs content to keep visitors on their own platform.In its court filing, Chegg argues that Google forces companies to supply proprietary content in order to be included in Googles search function, unfairly exercises its monopoly power within search, and reaps benefits from Cheggs content without paying for it.In a statement provided to TechNewsWorld by Google spokesperson Jos Castaeda, the company countered: With AI Overviews, people find Search more helpful and use it more, creating new opportunities for content to be discovered. Every day, Google sends billions of clicks to sites across the web, and AI Overviews send traffic to a greater diversity of sites. We will defend against these meritless claims.AI Overviews Threaten Content CreatorsBen James, founder of 404, Bittensor Subnet 17, an online 3D content creation company, explained that Googles AI-generated overviews act as a shortcut that provides users with essentially a summary without requiring that they visit the original source of information. This, in turn, affects the traffic to the publishers websites, which would then impact their ad revenue and subscription models, he told TechNewsWorld.If users are no longer required to visit the site of the source info or read full articles, publishers may eventually lose incentives to produce in-depth, high-quality pieces, he said.These overviews can satisfy immediate information needs, reducing the incentive to engage with more detailed and investigative reporting, added Mark N. Vena, president and principal analyst at SmartTech Research in Las Vegas.As a result, he told TechNewsWorld, publishers could see a decline in website traffic and ad revenue, weakening their financial viability. This shift ultimately undermines the competitive landscape for original content, as quality journalism struggles to compete with readily available, AI-curated summaries.AI Overviews could have a devastating effect on original content providers, including news organizations, observed Dan Kennedy, a professor of journalism at Northeastern University, in Boston.The entire news ecosystem of the web has been built on driving traffic to media sites in order to show users advertising and entice them to subscribe, he told TechNewsWorld. Now that vitally important link between the search engine and the news organization is being broken.Since Google remains the default starting point for most searches, its use of AI is likely to be far more harmful than, say, ChatGPT, he added.Doom Loop for News IndustrySearch overviews could also create a less-than-virtuous cycle for many websites. It could create a doom loop, JD Harriman, a partner with the Foundation Law Group, in Burbank, Calif., told TechNewsWorld.When a company has less traffic, and therefore less revenue, overhead must be cut, which could mean reducing content, staff, etcetera, which makes the site less interesting, which means even less traffic, and more cuts creating a vicious circle, he told TechNewsWorld. Vena added that without sufficient financial support, news organizations may cut back on investigative journalism and fact-checking, resulting in a less informed public.This shift could also contribute to a homogenized media landscape where sensationalism or clickbait content predominates over rigorous, original reporting, he said. Ultimately, the decline in original content undermines accountability, transparency, and the overall health of the democratic discourse.The erosion of demand for original content will lead directly to less production of original content, which will harm all of us including the AI chatbots that scrape it for its own profit-driven purposes, Kennedy noted.There will be some challenges to Chegg winning its case against Google.Legally, this appears like it will be a tough battle. While content publishers have a valid argument that Google is profiting from their work without fair compensation, courts have historically been slow to impose strict limitations on tech giants and time here is critical, Martin Balaam, CEO and founder of Pimberly, a global product information management platform, told TechNewsWorld.That said, he continued, regulatory scrutiny around AI and digital monopolies is increasing, so this case could potentially set quite an important precedent.Fair Use or Abuse?Rob Enderle, president and principal analyst at the Enderle Group, an advisory services firm in Bend, Ore., pointed out that summarizing something generally falls within fair use under the Copyright Act of 1986. It allows for the fair use of copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.What Google did could be argued is part of the research exclusion, he told TechNewsWorld.Its a bit of a long shot, especially since its dire condition is more a byproduct of ChatGPTs existence, added Greg Sterling, co-founder of Near Media, a market research firm in San Francisco.However, he told TechNewsWorld, the claims probably wont be dismissed immediately.If Chegg has any success, others will follow suit, so to speak, he said. But the problem is that no individual publisher is entitled to traffic, and Google is entitled to have some control over its search results. In Europe, however, this action would find greater sympathy and be seen as having merit.Vena maintained that the lawsuit faces significant legal uncertainties. Courts have not yet clearly defined the balance between AI-generated content and the protection of original journalism, he explained. Its success will depend on nuanced interpretations of copyright law, fair use, and the demonstrated economic impact on publishers factors that can vary widely by jurisdiction.Consequently, he added, while the plaintiffs raise legitimate concerns, predicting a favorable outcome remains highly speculative at this stage.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.More by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Tech Law

Apples toned-down announcement of the iPhone 16e marks a strategic shift in how the company approaches product differentiation within its lineup.Unlike the flagship iPhone 16 and 16 Pro models, which will undoubtedly receive a major marketing push later in the year, the 16e appears to be a more pragmatic addition aimed at a specific audience rather than a mass-market spectacle.Pragmatism-Infused Marketing StrategyApple has positioned the iPhone 16e as a lower-cost alternative that retains core iPhone capabilities without the premium features of the higher-end models. This approach aligns with Apples ongoing segmenting user base strategy: high-end users gravitate toward Pro models.At the same time, cost-conscious buyers still get a new option without the need for deep discounts on previous-generation devices.Given the growing demand for mid-range devices, particularly in emerging markets, the iPhone 16e could be Apples answer to a more competitive price segment.The new A18-powered iPhone 16e strategically exposes Apple Intelligence, the companys highly touted AI capability, to entry-level iPhone users.How the iPhone 16e Online Launch FlowedThe prerecorded iPhone 16e unveiling film follows Apples traditional style, making a mid-cycle model feel noteworthy. Still, it was shorter than a typical major Apple smartphone launch, less than 13 minutes.Of course, Apple launched the iPhone 16e via a traditional news release and a keynote-style video. Like a typical WWDC or a September iPhone event, Tim Cook and other Apple staff introduce the device in an organized manner in the video.As a technology analyst who has attended these events, besides getting some hands-on time with anything the company announced at the event, the in-person format has always been less convenient for me, given the challenges of taking notes and writing on a laptop in a cramped seat inside the Steve Jobs Theater inside Apples spaceship headquarters.Not surprisingly, the iPhone 16e videos pacing, transitions, and scripting matched Apples signature presentation style.Apple usually divides its marketing into event presentations and commercials. The former involves Tim Cook and other executives revealing new devices on stage, while the latter has high-production commercial videos demoing products. Apples iPhone 16e video combined both methods. The short product video featured key Apple team members explaining the device on stage at Apple Park, making it feel more like a keynote than an ad. Its a small detail but raises questions regarding Apples product announcement strategy.In fairness to Apple, these short videos do allow it to recreate its keynotes and make the announcement much more substantial than a dry press release.In addition, this style keeps viewers interested longer. Apples method encourages viewers to watch the entire presentation, like a keynote, despite the flood of short, catchy videos on social media.Finally, Apple may be experimenting with a new way to debut mid-cycle products, employing structured videos for lesser releases and full-scale events for major ones.This iPhone 16e launch might be a trial balloon for Apple to use mini-keynotes for products that dont need a full-blown in-person event. Upcoming new iPads, AirPods, and Macs may be announced this way.Testing What Low-End iPhone Consumers Will AcceptIntroducing a new entry-level smartphone has always been a test of what customers are willing to accept from a minimal feature standpoint and wont cannibalize the higher-priced iPhone 16 and 16 Pro.At the product level, Apple may face considerable user backlash over the iPhone 16es limited MagSafe functionality and its reliance on an in-house modem, particularly from those expecting a more uniform experience across the iPhone lineup.MagSafe has become a key ecosystem feature, enabling fast wireless charging and accessory compatibility. By restricting its capabilities in the 16e, Apple risks alienating users who rely on MagSafe for accessories like wallets, battery packs, and car mounts.The more significant challenge, however, could stem from Apples first-generation in-house modem. This feature decision is a massive test for Apple. If performance particularly in areas like signal strength, latency, and power efficiency falls short of Qualcomms established solutions, early adopters might express frustration.Given Apples previous modem struggles and the complexity of network optimization, reliability concerns could deter some buyers.Apples plan to reduce its reliance on Qualcomm depends in part on the performance of the companys in-house developed 16es modem. If the modem performs well, the transition away from Qualcomm will be smooth; if not, Apple may have to continue relying on Qualcomm for longer than anticipated.Apples Long-Term iPhone StrategyApple is keenly aware that a budget-friendly iPhone can eat into sales of its more expensive models. By keeping the 16e announcement low-key, Apple ensures it does not overshadow the upcoming flagship models, maintaining the perception of exclusivity around the Pro line.The smartphone industry is seeing extended upgrade cycles, with consumers holding onto their devices longer. A subdued launch allows Apple to introduce the 16e without pressuring existing customers to upgrade immediately while still appealing to new buyers looking for an affordable entry point into the iPhone ecosystem.Ultimately, Apples understated approach suggests that the 16e is a calculated addition rather than a breakthrough product meant to quietly expand market reach without disrupting its premium branding.It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

While components in most desktop computers can be easily well, relatively easily replaced, laptops tend to be far more difficult to upgrade or replace. Intel is pushing a modular concept that could make upgrading your laptop less expensive than buying a new one and substantially reduce e-waste.A few years ago, Dell introduced Concept Luna, a laptop design featuring modular components that could be upgraded through a robotic upgrade station at a retailer. Similar to a vending machine, the system allowed a robot to handle the upgrade process.Lets talk about modular computers that started with the IBM PCjr, moved to an IBM modular computer concept (I was approached to be CEO for one of the potential spin-off companies), the Dell effort, and finally, the Intel concept this week.Well close with my Product of the Week, a brand-new laptop that could be ideal for an executive or someone interested in a lot of performance in a small, quiet form factor.A Brief History of Modular PCsThe IBM PCjr was a revolutionary desktop design based on the ability to update the product easily. Updated components were packaged kind of like game cartridges in that you buy the basic system and then upgrade it by purchasing and adding components that were covered in plastic and could be plugged into the base unit.It was an amazing design until the folks doing the more expensive IBM PC figured out it was so much better and cheaper that folks would likely prefer it over IBMs more expensive, non-modular products. So, they crippled the PCjr by removing a lot of what would have made it attractive for business (the PCjr was positioned as a consumer PC). While making it unattractive for business, they also made it unappealing for the rest of us, so the product failed.Now, compare that approach to what Steve Jobs did with the iPod. He realized customers would likely prefer a phone with the iPods functionality. Instead of crippling the iPhone to protect the iPod, he leaned into the trend and ended up nearly owning the entire smartphone segment. That strategic move is largely why Apple is one of the most valuable companies in the world.If IBM had done the same with the PCjr, it would have protected its leadership position in PCs and might have been in that business today.The next modular effort was the Archistrat 4s server from a company staffed with ex-IBM people called the Panda Project. It used a passive backplane, allowing components to be easily plugged in or removed to add accessories. The entire system was housed in a vault-like case made of heavy metal, lockable for security, and designed to be bolted to the floor so offices without server rooms could keep it in open areas without worrying about theft.That company failed because the executives had inferior financial skills and wasted a lot of money on parties, jets, and other things not related to the business. The next attempt was the IBM MetaPad, a modular computer with a core computing unit about the size of a cigarette pack, containing everything except a battery, keyboard, or display. It could be placed in a laptop case or docked on a desktop.A company called Antelope Technologies pursued a similar concept, aiming to create a market for it. However, due to its unique design and low initial production volume, it was relatively expensive, as were the docks that could have been integrated into cars, hospitals, hotel rooms, or even airplane seats, providing full PC functionality and an easy upgrade path for the core technology.The problem was that the core module wasnt very powerful due to thermal and cost constraints, and docks for it never became widely available in the places they were envisioned. As a result, it never reached the necessary volume to drive down costs. Performance was also an issue mobile PC technology at the time wasnt efficient enough to make the concept viable in a laptop form. By then, IBM had begun shifting away from the PC market and was unwilling to throw money at a project like this. So, it died.More recently, Dell developed a green project, Concept Luna, that used a robotic upgrade machine that could be placed at locations like Best Buy so users could quickly and cheaply upgrade, modify, or personalize their laptop. This was one of the most well-thought-out concepts Ive ever seen. The benefits started with a massive potential for reduced e-waste, lower lifetime PC ownership costs, and potentially more loyal customers. Sadly, Dell decided not to bring it to market.And that brings us to Intels New Modular Laptop and Desktop VisionLike Dells Concept Luna, Intels modular effort appears primarily focused on reducing e-waste. It would have similar advantages to other earlier modular concepts by reducing life cycle costs, increasing design innovation by making it far less expensive to develop new design concepts, allowing the parts of a laptop that dont wear out to remain in service, and enabling greater customization in the market.This approach could lower upgrade costs for Intel and other component manufacturers while driving post-sale demand for CPUs and GPUs. It would also make it far easier for users to repair their laptops and provide relatively low-cost upgrades for almost every internal component.On the desktop side, Intel appears to be revisiting the Panda Project concept of a passive backplane, making it easier to upgrade motherboard components. Even though desktop PCs are more straightforward to upgrade, swapping out the motherboard is a PITA, and I often just donate my old desktop and start with a new case when I get a new motherboard. With Intels design, instead of unscrewing the motherboard and hoping the new one fits, users could simply replace one or more plug-in cards, similar to the PCjr concept decades ago. Water-cooled implementations might still be tricky, but you could get around that by using quick disconnects and CPU modules that would hook up to the cases water-cooling solution.This approach could enable users to swap out a PCs CPU as easily as a GPU, enhancing chip-level competition and expanding the total addressable market (TAM) for modular components like CPUs, chipsets, and modems.In short, it would increase revenue in the market, allow for creativity in desktop and laptop PC design, and significantly reduce e-waste.Wrapping UpWhats kind of ironic is that back in Andy Groves day, Pat Gelsinger led an effort to increase PC innovation, making me think this effort might have been connected to him somehow. In any case, it showcases that Intel isnt done innovating and is still working hard to change the future of the PC. I genuinely hope it can bring this concept to market.HP EliteBook G1a 14-inch NotebookLast week, I got a new laptop to play with, the HP EliteBook X G1a 14-inch. The one they sent me didnt have the OLED display that I would have favored, but the standard display isnt bad, and its a lot easier on the battery since the OLED screen reduces battery life by around two hours.This laptop is one of the first to use HPs Poly Camera Pro software, which significantly improves the video conferencing experience with more natural backgrounds and a host of features that can make you look better in remote meetings.It is a full Copilot+ machine based on AMDs latest processor and graphics technology, and it performs like a champ. AMD has really stepped it up with mobile computers this year, and unlike older AMD designs which tended to lag Intel, this effort is very competitive.The EliteBook X G1a starts at just under $2,200 and can go up to nearly $2,800 if you want a touch OLED display, more storage, and more memory. All of the display options are 400 nits, which is fine, but they will likely wash out in direct sunlight although HP does a nice job with antiglare technology, so it should work well enough outside in a pinch.The HP EliteBook X G1a 14-inch Notebook (Image Credit: HP)Without the OLED screen, it will get up to 17 hours of battery life watching movies, but less if you do something CPU- or GPU-intensive. With an NPU and 55 TOPS, this is one of the better AI PC configurations, and HP has gone to a lot of trouble to make it really quiet.The laptop uses an impressive amount of recycled material, though youd never know it from its premium design. While not a hardened PC, it has passed some military-specified tests, suggesting it is more robust than most in its class. As with most HP PCs, it includes strong security features, such as blurting the screen if it detects someone looking over your shoulder.Beyond its durability and security features, this is also one of the first AI PCs to fully embrace AI capabilities, including an AI companion for workflow assistance, an AI-enhanced webcam, rapid document and chart analysis, and an AI-powered service and support experiencesomething likely to become more common.Designed for tech experts like software developers and IT executives, the laptop delivers strong performance that both groups will appreciate. While not built for gaming or workstation-level tasks, it remains a high-performing PC that competes well in its category.Overall, the HP EliteBook G1a 14-inch is a pretty awesome laptop and my Product of the Week.

Robotaxi services are spreading broadly. While theyve clearly had issues in San Francisco as have I, driving in San Francisco those challenges are improving. Now, both Uber and Lyft appear to be taking steps toward replacing their ride-share drivers with AI.We may be on the verge of one of the first large-scale AI job replacement efforts that everyone will witness. This transition will fix a key issue with ride-sharing by aligning revenue more directly with its users. However, it wont address a deeper problem that ride-sharing has in common with social media: a decoupled revenue business model where the people using a service arent necessarily funding it.Lets talk about decoupled revenue. Then, well close with my Product of the Week: a new and awesome notebook from Lenovo that sports a brand-new processor from Intel.The Problem With Decoupled RevenueThe problem with both social media and ride-sharing is that the people paying for the service arent treated as the primary customers.With social media, advertisers fund the platforms, but users engage with content as if they were the primary customers. With ride-sharing, the platform enables car owners to monetize their vehicles, but thats a cost of the service. Since riders are the ones paying, they should be the customers of the drivers, not the platform.In both cases, the platform prioritizes those who provide the revenueadvertisers for social media and riders for ride-sharingwhile those who power the service, such as content creators and drivers, are treated as cost centers rather than valued participants.This decoupling means that those who make the service possible like Uber/Lyft drivers and social media users are often overlooked. Their needs are subordinated to those of the entities providing the funding, like advertisers on social media and riders for Uber/Lyft. Instead of being seen as assets to be optimized, social media content creators and ride-share drivers are frequently treated as problems to be managed. Both conditions are true. Users drive the advertising revenue because ads are worthless without users. Likewise, if there arent any drivers, there is nothing for riders to use.Managers often fail to make this distinction. I once knew a general manager who argued that his plant would run much better without sales reps mucking things up forgetting they were the reason the plant had business in the first place. He was fired shortly thereafter because he was an idiot, but this wasnt a unique situation. I was an internal auditor, and it was surprising how many high-ranking executives didnt seem to know how things actually worked which is kind of scary when you think about it.Businesses generally function better when the people using a service and those funding it are the same. When revenue and users are decoupled, as they are in social media and ride-sharing, platforms risk alienating the people who keep them running. You dont mess with your revenue sources.Will Robotaxis Disrupt or Fix Ride-Sharing?Robotaxis may fix ride-share or badly break it. If Uber and Lyft go to robotaxi services, then the people who use this service to monetize their cars are kind of screwed unless they want to work for nearly free because they wont be able to compete with an AI driver. However, this would also eliminate the problem the drivers represent in terms of being treated more like a cost center than a customer. With robotaxis, Uber and Lyft can just focus on the riders who then become their customers.Now, I know these services have been considering allowing ride-share car owners to stay with the service but buy and maintain the autonomous vehicles themselves, enabling them to earn back a significant part of the revenue. That could resemble a B&B model, but with cars and trucks, maintenance, insurance, and liability concerns create additional hurdles. Plus, while these cars will essentially be electric, we dont have automated charging stations for them to use. Charging infrastructure is critical if autonomous vehicles operate independently, and solutions like robotic charging or battery swaps are still in development.Given these challenges, Uber and Lyft will likely choose to own their fleets and install unique charging ports, automated charging stations, and stand-by parking lots to accommodate typical fluctuations in demand throughout the day.Initially, There Would Be a BlendRight now, robotaxi service technology is suitable for urban areas. However, if the rider needs to go some distance, then, at least in the short term, a human driver would still be needed until we have approved autonomous driving technology that can operate within and between cities.We might even see some integration between autonomous cars and airplanes for service within a state. At least some of the aircraft being considered for this are VTOL (vertical take-off and landing), which provides the potential for more localized landing pads where riders could transfer from their autonomous car to an autonomous plane.There have also been some concepts where an autonomous lifting body attaches to the car when it needs to bypass traffic or travel longer distances. That would be cool, but I think safety concerns might keep people from wanting to use it. I recall a flying car many years ago based on a Ford Pinto where the wings and car came apart at altitude, killing the companys founders.Wrapping UpWhile robotaxis may improve ride-sharing by better aligning revenue with users, what happens to the displaced Uber and Lyft drivers? In some cases and Tesla is exploring this some may work remotely, taking control when a robotaxi runs into trouble to guide it to safety or a repair station. But this would require far fewer drivers than today, offering only temporary employment for some, while most would be out of luck.For us users, things will become much more convenient with lower prices, better service, and less concern about whether your driver is a serial killer. (I watch too many police TV shows!) There will be fewer interesting conversations, although, come to think of it, generative AI is conversational, so you might be able to talk to the car during your ride, and it will certainly be less likely to be abusing drugs or reading messages instead of focusing on the road.The experience should be cheaper, safer, and far more convenient, which will fix the decoupled revenue problem.Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i PrototypePhoto by AuthorThe new Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i prototype is pretty awesome. The shipping version of this laptop uses Nvidia RTX graphics, but this one uses Intel ARC and isnt due until July.This AI PC, one of Intels first, uses the 9u processor also called the Ultra 9 processor. It has a 16-inch OLED screen that looks awesome, and OLEDs have become more efficient, so they arent the huge battery killers they once were.I prefer a larger screen because I generally work off a desktop machine, so going down to a 14-inch or even 13-inch is incredibly painful. Fifteen inches is fine, but that extra inch on a 16-inch makes a noticeable and positive difference.The downside is I cant really work on this laptop on a plane. Still, I generally just watch movies when Im flying because I need time to unwind and chill out since I just dont feel like working every single moment anymore, and films on this screen are incredible.When this laptop ships, the price should be around $1,500 (this could change with tariffs), which is reasonable for a 16-inch OLED with discrete graphics. Intel ARC graphics use a blend of AMDs and Nvidias approaches to upscaling, and, in their stand-alone cards, ARC represents one of the better values in GPUs. The IdeaPad Pro 5i is the first laptop Ive seen with these graphics.The drivers on this prototype were undergoing some changes, but Id expect between 10 and 20 hours of battery life depending on use, which would be huge for a 16-inch laptop.The graphics are more than adequate for my needs. There still isnt a lot of desktop AI stuff outside Office 365. So, while its NPU is light, with 11 TOPS compared to over 40 for other AI PCs, the total TOPS is close to 100, with the GPU contributing additional AI processing power.The downside is that this laptop wont run Recall or Cocreator until Microsoft enables those. Recall is on hold and only available in trial form, although Ive found ChatGPTs Dalle-E web implementation to be just fine. (Microsoft could enable Dall-E on laptops with discrete graphics; its only a matter of time). Given how fast AI is advancing, it is nice to have an AI PC from Intel because most companies still test Intel hardware, which is better to ensure a positive outcome.Overall, this is a very nice product. Mine, pictured above, came in silver-black. It is attractive, useful, and well-priced, making the Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i prototype with ARC graphics my Product of the Week. Sorry you wont be able to buy one for yourself until July.

Web Raiders Unleash Global Brute Force Attacks From 2.8M IP AddressesBy John P. Mello Jr.February 12, 2025 5:00 AM PT ADVERTISEMENTAchieve Financial Clarity with SettleGetting accurate product cost data is crucial for growth. Settle unifies invoices, payments, and inventory to help e-commerce operators uncover true costs and boost margins -- all in one platform. Get Started Today! A weeks-long brute force attack campaign by malicious actors has reached mammoth proportions, according to a non-profit security organization.The Shadowserver Foundation reports that the campaign, which has been ongoing since January, involves as many as 2.8 million IP addresses daily, targeting VPN devices, firewalls, and gateways from vendors like Palo Alto Networks, Ivanti, and SonicWall.The recent wave of brute force attacks targeting edge security devices, as reported by Shadowserver, is a serious concern for cybersecurity teams, said Brent Maynard, senior director for security technology and strategy at Akamai Technologies, a content delivery network service provider, in Cambridge, Mass.What makes this attack stand out is both its scale millions of unique IPs attempting access daily and the fact that its hitting critical security infrastructure like firewalls, VPNs, and secure gateways, Maynard told TechNewsWorld.These arent just any devices. Theyre the frontline defenses that protect organizations from external threats. If an attacker gains control over them, they can bypass security controls entirely, leading to data breaches, espionage, or even destructive attacks.In a brute force attack, waves of passwords and usernames inundate a login target in an attempt to discover valid login credentials. Compromised devices may be used for data theft, botnet integration, or illegal network access.Massive Botnet Threat EscalatesThis type of botnet activity is not new. However, the scale is worrisome, observed Thomas Richards, a network and red team practice director at Black Duck Software, an applications security company in Burlington, Mass.Depending on the type of device compromised, the attackers could leverage their access to disable internet access to the organization, disrupt networks communicating or facilitate their own access inside the network, Richards told TechNewsWorld. The attack, even if unsuccessful in gaining access to the devices, can cause harm by attempting too many login attempts and having valid accounts locked out.Patrick Tiquet, vice president for security and architecture at Keeper Security, a Chicago-based password management and online storage company, explained that brute force attacks are significant because they exploit weak or reused passwords, one of the most persistent vulnerabilities in cybersecurity. Beyond immediate data loss, these breaches can disrupt operations, damage an organizations reputation, and erode customer trust leading to long-term financial and security consequences, he told TechNewsWorld.Erich Kron, a security awareness advocate at KnowBe4, a security awareness training provider in Clearwater, Fla., added that the source of these attacks is millions of smaller devices spread around the globe, making them extremely difficult to defend against.Many consumers have old and outdated devices in their homes connecting to the internet, Kron told TechNewsWorld. These vulnerable devices are being exploited and used to drive cyberattacks like this.Traditional approaches such as geoblocking and disallowing large blocks of IP addresses could actually block legitimate web traffic, costing some organizations sales and appearing as if the website is down to potential customers, he said.Credential-Based Attacks Overwhelm DefensesKris Bondi, CEO and co-founder of Mimoto, a threat detection and response company in San Francisco, asserted that the campaign exposed by Shadowserver highlights the vulnerability of credentials, even at security and infrastructure organizations.Brute force attacks are automated, so theyre implemented at scale, Bondi told TechNewsWorld. Its not a question of if they can get in with this approach. The question is how many times the organization will be penetrated this way, and will the security team know when it happens.Akamais Maynard explained: Attackers no longer need to sit at a keyboard guessing passwords. They deploy massive botnets that can test thousands of credentials in minutes.Using an attack called password spraying, attackers can use a known username or email address and pair it with tens of thousands of the most common passwords with software that will then try to log into various exposed devices, added KnowBe4s Kron. With several million devices available to be attempting these logins, the success rate is liable to be high. Bondi noted that the number and size of brute force attacks are rising. Automation and generative AI have made it easier to implement this type of attack, she said.They are hitting the large vulnerability that credentials represent, she continued. The attackers know that if they send enough attacks, some percentage will get through. In the meantime, security teams are overwhelmed and arent able to address all the attacks in real time, particularly without additional context.The explosion of internet-connected devices and the continued use of weak credentials also contribute to increased brute force attacks.With remote work, smart devices, and cloud adoption, more organizations rely on edge security devices that must be accessible from the internet, Maynard said. This makes them natural targets.Despite years of warnings, he added, many companies still use default or weak passwords, especially on infrastructure devices.AIs Role in Cyberattack Defense and PreventionWhile artificial intelligence contributes to the rise in brute force attacks, it may also foil them. AI has the potential to be a game-changer in defending against brute force and credential stuffing attacks, Maynard said.He noted that security teams are using AI-driven solutions to detect anomalies, analyze behavior, and automate responses to attacks.AI is very good at spotting anomalies and patterns. Therefore, AI can be very useful at looking at attempted logins, finding a pattern, and hopefully suggesting ways to filter the traffic, Kron explained.Jason Soroko, senior vice president of product at Sectigo, a global digital certificate provider, acknowledged that AI could help defenses by detecting anomalous login patterns and throttling suspicious activity in real time, but advised that strong authentication be prioritized first. While strong authentication needs identity management to scale and digital certificates and other strong asymmetric form factors need provisioning and lifecycle management, they can yield very strong security benefits, Soroko told TechNewsWorld.However, Bondi predicted AI will eventually vacate the need for credentials. AI enables combining anomaly detection with advanced pattern matching to recognize specific people, not credentials, with significantly lower rates of false positives, she said.AI can also help deliver context with alerts, which will enable security teams to prioritize and respond faster to true alerts while reducing false positives, she added.The expectation is that in the near future, AI will also be able to help predict intent based on specific actions and techniques of an attack, Bondi observed. While LLMs arent capable of this yet, they could be within a few quarters.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.Related StoriesMore by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Cybersecurity

The past year saw artificial intelligence (AI) push the boundaries of whats possible, with industries racing to integrate its capabilities to boost productivity and automate complex tasks.In 2024, AI advancements accelerated at a pace outstripping previous high-tech innovations, setting the stage for even greater disruption ahead. But with this rapid progress comes a risk: without human oversight, AIs missteps could be just as monumental as its breakthroughs.Generative and agentic AI are already enhancing users ability to obtain sophisticated content across various media, while AI-powered health care tools are reshaping diagnostics outperforming human physicians in certain tasks. These developments signal a looming transformation in health care delivery, with AI poised to play an even bigger role in business and industrial operations.The power of AI will also birth humanoid agents, noted Anders Indset, author and deep-tech investor in exponential technologies such as AI, quantum technology, health tech, and cybersecurity. As we step into 2025, the technology landscape is rapidly evolving, with a spotlight on humanoid agents.This year began with excitement surrounding large language models (LLMs) but is set to end with groundbreaking advancements in autonomous humanoid robots, Indset told TechNewsWorld.In 2024, the development of robots surged, with innovations that once seemed far off now coming into view. The long-anticipated release of fully autonomous humanoids previously confined to industrial settings is approaching, he observed.The arrival of 2025 brings anticipation for the widespread adoption of AI in robotics, enhanced human-robot interactions, and the rise of robotics-as-a-service (RaaS) models. These will make advanced robotic solutions accessible to more industries, Indset explained, describing the ensuing transformative period for the robotics industry.Humanoid agents will reshape our interactions with technology and expand the possibilities for AI applications across different domains, he predicted.AIs Expanding Role in Cybersecurity and BiosecurityAI will play an increasingly critical role in cyberwarfare, warned Alejandro Rivas-Vasquez, global head of digital forensics and incident response at NCC Group. AI and machine learning (ML) will make cyberwarfare more deadly, with collateral damage outside of conflict zones due to hyper-connectivity, he offered.Cybersecurity defenses, already a successful tool for digital warriors, will extend beyond protecting digital systems to safeguarding people directly through implantable technology. Neural interfaces, bio-augmentation, authentication chips, and advanced medical implants will revolutionize human interaction with technology.According to Bobbie Walker, managing consultant at NCC Group, these innovations will also introduce significant risks. Hackers could exploit neural interfaces to control actions or manipulate perceptions, leading to cognitive manipulation and breaches of personal autonomy. Continuous monitoring of health and behavioral data through implants raises substantial privacy concerns, with risks of misuse by malicious actors or invasive government surveillance, Walker told TechNewsWorld.To mitigate these risks, new frameworks bridging technology, health care, and privacy regulations will be essential. Walker cautioned that standards for digital bioethics and ISO standards for bio-cybersecurity will help define safe practices for integrating technology into the human body while addressing ethical dilemmas.The emerging field of cyber-biosecurity will push us to rethink cybersecurity boundaries, ensuring that technology integrated into our bodies is secure, ethical, and protective of the individuals using it, she added.According to Walker, early studies on brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) show that adversarial inputs can trick these devices, highlighting the potential for abuse. As implants evolve, the risks of state-sponsored cyberwarfare and privacy breaches grow, emphasizing the need for robust security measures and ethical considerations.AI-Driven Data Backup Raises Security ConcernsSebastian Straub, principal solution architect at N2WS, stated that AI advancements better equip organizations to resume operations after natural disasters, power outages, and cyberattacks. AI automation will enhance operational efficiency by addressing human shortcomings.AI-powered backup automation will reduce the need for administrative intervention to near zero, he explained. AI will learn the intricate patterns of data usage, compliance requirements, and organizational needs. Moreover, AI will become a proactive data management expert, autonomously determining what needs to be backed up and when, including adherence to compliance standards like GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS.But Straub warned that as this level of AI dominance dramatically transforms disaster recovery processes, errors will occur through the learning process. In 2025, we will see that AI is not a silver bullet. Relying on machines to automate disaster recovery will lead to mistakes.There will be unfortunate breaches of trust and compliance violations as enterprises learn the hard way that humans need to be part of the DR decision-making process, Straub told TechNewsWorld.AIs Impact on Creativity and EducationFor many AI users, tools to help improve communication skills are already in steady use. ChatGPT and other AI writing tools will emphasize the value of human writing rather than a workaround for personal language tasks.Students and communicators will adjust from asking AI writing tools to produce work on their behalf to owning the content creation process from start to finish. They will leverage technology to edit, enhance, or expand original thinking, suggested Eric Wang, VP of AI at plagiarism detection firm Turnitin. Looking ahead, Wang told TechNewsWorld that writing would be recognized as a critical skill, not just in writing-focused areas of study but also in learning, working, and living environments. This change will manifest as the humanization of technology-enabled fields, roles, and companies.He sees the role of generative AI shifting, with early-stage usage helping to organize and expand ideas while later stages refine and enhance writing. For educators, AI can identify knowledge gaps early on and later provide transparency to facilitate student engagement.Hidden Risks of AI-Powered ModelsAccording to Michael Lieberman, CTO and co-founder of software development security platform Kusari, AI will become more widespread and challenging to detect. His concern lies with free models hosted on platforms.We have already seen cases where some models on these platforms were discovered to be malware. I expect such attacks to increase, though they will likely be more covert. These malicious models may include hidden backdoors or be intentionally trained to behave harmfully in specific scenarios, Lieberman told TechNewsWorld.He sees an increasing prevalence of data poisoning attacks aimed at manipulating LLMs and warns that most organizations do not train their own models.Instead, they rely on pre-trained models, often available for free. The lack of transparency regarding the origins of these models makes it easy for malicious actors to introduce harmful ones, he continued, citing the Hugging Face malware incident as an example.Future data poisoning efforts are likely to target major players like OpenAI, Meta, and Google, whose vast datasets make such attacks more challenging to detect.In 2025, attackers are likely to outpace defenders. Attackers are financially motivated, while defenders often struggle to secure adequate budgets since security is not typically viewed as a revenue driver. It may take a significant AI supply chain breach akin to the SolarWinds Sunburst incident to prompt the industry to take the threat seriously, Turnitins Wang concluded.

Lyft Bringing Robotaxis to DallasBy John P. Mello Jr.February 11, 2025 5:00 AM PT ADVERTISEMENTAchieve Financial Clarity with SettleGetting accurate product cost data is crucial for growth. Settle unifies invoices, payments, and inventory to help e-commerce operators uncover true costs and boost margins -- all in one platform. Get Started Today! In an apparent attempt to keep pace with its rival Uber, ride-hailing service Lyft plans to launch a fleet of robotaxis in Dallas as soon as 2026.According to a report Monday in TechCrunch, the new robocabs will be powered by Mobileye technology while Marubeni, a Japanese conglomerate, will perform fleet management. When operational, ride seekers will be able to hail a robotaxi through Lyfts app.Although Lyft hasnt revealed the carmaker for the program, TechCrunch noted that Mobileye technology is already integrated into vehicles made by Ford, General Motors, Audi, Volkswagen, Nissan, and others.Mobileye has been around for more than 20 years and is a global leader in advanced driver assist systems, noted Sam Abuelsamid, vice president of market research at Telemetry Insight, a developer of AI-powered analytic tools, headquartered in Albuquerque, N.M.Most cars on the road have some sort of forward collision alert or lane-keeping assist system based on Mobileye technology, he told TechNewsWorld.While Lyft hasnt revealed how many vehicles it will launch in Dallas, its Executive Vice President of Driver Experience, Jeremy Bird, told TechCrunch that the company plans to scale to thousands of vehicles across multiple cities after the Texas debut.Lyft rival Uber has already announced its teaming up with Waymo to offer robotaxi services in Austin and Atlanta. Meanwhile, Tesla plans to launch an autonomous ride-hail offering in Austin in June.Lyfts Asset-Light Strategy for RobotaxisLyfts initiative is likely in response to Uber, which has made aggressive moves to form partnerships for autonomous vehicles, said Edward Sanchez, a senior analyst in the automotive practice of TechInsights, a global technology intelligence company.He noted that Lyfts asset-light approach to operations explains its partnership with Marubeni. Lyft, like Uber, is taking a somewhat incremental approach to commercializing robotaxi service, Sanchez told TechNewsWorld.He pointed out that Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi has said full-scale robotaxi commercialization will be a longer-term pursuit due to the high current cost of autonomous vehicles often more than US$200,000 and currently higher operational costs than human-driven vehicles.Uber and Lyft built their business on the idea that they dont own anything, Abuelsamid explained. The only thing they own is their software platform. They dont own any vehicles, he continued. They dont have to put fuel in them. They dont have to insure them or maintain them. Thats problematic for robotaxis because now you have to find somebody thats going to own, operate, and maintain those vehicles.So theres a lot of new kinds of operational challenges and operational expenses associated with robotaxis that you dont have with a human-driven vehicle when youre relying on somebody else bringing their own vehicle to your platform, he said.They are responsible for all of that stuff. That is not part of your cost of doing business. When you go to a robotaxi, all of a sudden, all of that stuff becomes part of your cost of doing business.Teslas Contrarian ApproachSanchez added that although Tesla is widely considered the leader in terms of miles driven and geographical coverage of its Full Self-Driving (FSD) service, due to extensive data ingestion from its cumulative fleet of vehicles, it has only recently showcased its specific approach to robotaxis with the Cybercab.Its also somewhat unclear if Tesla will pursue a company-operated fleet at scale or simply operate as a platform to enable individual owners to use Cybercabs or presumably other Teslas with fully autonomous capability as an entrepreneurial venture, he said.Cybercab (Image Credit: Tesla)He noted that Tesla has historically been highly vertically integrated and has often taken a contrarian approach to technologies. One noteworthy example is Teslas shunning of Lidar in its suite of autonomous sensing technologies, while much of the rest of the industry has been embracing it or considering it a mandatory technology for safe AV operation.Tesla refuses to use any other type of sensors, which I think is a fundamental mistake, Abuelsamid said. I dont think that they are going to be able to build a viable robotaxi platform with a camera-only system. Its not robust enough.It doesnt work well in low light conditions, he continued. It doesnt work well in fog or rain. Its cheaper, but it does not have the robustness of a system that uses multiple types of sensors.Can Robotaxis Win Consumer Confidence?Mark Giarelli, an equity analyst with Morningstar Research Services in Chicago, views Lyft as a laggard in the robotaxi partnership race.The most important thing to remember here is that Lyft has a way smaller value proposition to autonomous vehicle manufacturers compared to what Uber offers because Lyfts network of drivers and riders is so much smaller than Ubers, Giarelli told TechNewsWorld.If an AV company partners with Uber, they are guaranteeing access to 75% of the U.S. rideshare market, but if they partner with Lyft, they are only getting access to 20% to 25% of the U.S. rideshare market, he explained. During this early chapter in the robotaxi story, the technology has faced some challenges. Its not been an easy rollout, said Mark N. Vena, president and principal analyst at SmartTech Research in Las Vegas.Deploying robotaxis in cities face major challenges such as regulatory hurdles, with complex and evolving approval processes that vary by region, he told TechNewsWorld. Technical difficulties arise from navigating dense urban environments filled with unpredictable obstacles like pedestrians, cyclists, and construction zones.Additionally, achieving public trust and ensuring safety at scale remain significant obstacles, especially after high-profile incidents involving autonomous vehicles, he said.Rob Enderle, president and principal analyst at the Enderle Group, an advisory services firm in Bend, Ore., agreed that getting people comfortable with the technology has been a problem. The large-scale trials have had issues with noise, navigation errors, and glitches stranding some riders, he told TechNewsWorld.They are still largely safer than human-driven cars, but when something bad happens, because they are new, the accident gets an unusual amount of attention, creating the false impression the technology is unsafe, he said.Growing Consumer Comfort With RobotaxisNevertheless, there are signs that consumers are getting more comfortable with the technology. In its second U.S. Robotaxi Experience study released in October, J.D. Power found consumer satisfaction with the robotaxi experience to be 8.53 on a 10-point scale.The consumer research, data, and analytics firm in Troy, Mich., also reported that consumer confidence when riding in a fully automated, self-driving vehicle is 56 percentage points higher among those who have ridden in a robotaxi (76%) than the general population who have not had the experience (20%).Kathleen Rizk, Powers senior director of user experience benchmarking and technology, acknowledged, however, that many consumers with robotaxi experience tend to be early adopters.What we find with early adopters of technology is they dont always expect technology to work perfectly when its brand new, but they want to be part of that experience, Rizk told TechNewsWorld. So they may experience an issue, but theyre more willing to overlook it as part of the technology like a bug being worked out.The study also revealed that when given a series of scenarios assuming the cost for either service would be the same, 77% of riders say they would prefer to utilize a robotaxi service without a human driver when needing to have a private conversation in the vehicle. In contrast, a ride-hailing service, such as Uber or Lyft, is preferred when traveling in an area they dont know well.Whether its a taxi, ride-hailing, or robotaxi, what its ultimately going to come down to is affordability for the consumer, Rizk said.That time, although years away, will eventually come. Enderle predicted: By 2035, finding a human-driven taxi will be as hard as finding a robotaxi today.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.More by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Transportation

Since Microsoft launched Copilot+, the past few months have been a battleground for PC manufacturers. Qualcomm initially had a huge lead, but then AMD and Intel came out with Copilot+ PCs that cut into that advantage.AMD outperformed Intel with a broader line of compliant products, while Intel focused on the premium market. Meanwhile, Qualcomm saw its design wins decline, and the laptop PC market has shifted more in AMDs favor, though Intel remains the dominant player overall.Why didnt we see the big shift to Qualcomm, and what happened to Intel that cost its CEO?Lets break it down and well close with my Product of the Week, which has been keeping my driveway clear for the last week or so.Why Copilot+ PCs Struggled To Gain TractionMicrosoft rushed to market with Copilot+ for PCs with two primary features. One was Cocreator, a derivative of Dall-E, which could have been pretty handy (I use Dall-E a lot these days). The other was Recall, an automatic indexing tool designed to help users find hard-to-locate files. That was pretty much it at launch.However, Microsoft positioned Recall poorly and had to pull it back. Cocreator by itself on a laptop as opposed to a desktop PC or workstation where folks usually mess with graphics turned out to be not very interesting.So, for a time, Qualcomm had only Copilot+ PCs. People werent too excited about Copilot+, and by the time Office began showcasing AI capabilities, PCs from AMD and Intel were available to run it. Unfortunately, Qualcomms brand name wasnt as well known in PCs as AMD or Intel. In addition, Qualcomms product had a compatibility problem that made it largely unacceptable in large companies, so enterprise and large business sales never really emerged outside of trials.A heavy marketing campaign was needed to sell people on the features of running Copilot+ locally. That never emerged, so AI PCs became an AMD and Intel project, with Qualcomm increasingly on the sidelines.What Qualcomm Should Have DoneQualcomm had three advantages in the market: great battery life, the strongest wireless networking of any of the three vendors, and dominance in premium smartphones, which are basically pocket PCs.Qualcomm pushed hard on the AI aspect, which Microsoft fumbled badly. It did mention battery life, but it wasnt successful in making its PCs 5G-capable, which removed that advantage. Finally, it didnt have a better together story to leverage its strong smartphone advantage.Taking on entrenched vendors like AMD and Intel is very difficult, but Qualcomm almost acted like it wasnt that important, even though it acted seriously about this market. In addition, because it had a compatibility problem, it needed to do targeted marketing for the low-hanging fruit: users who wouldnt experience this shortcoming, influencers, small business owners, consultants, attorneys, and others who dont run a lot of custom apps or need to play PC games on their laptops. However, Qualcomm didnt target these users. As a result, while compatibility improved, people tended to lose interest in Qualcomms offer over time.Qualcomm could also have created a halo product that showcased its strengths. The HP Folio PC was an ideal configuration for much of the audience Qualcomm needed to capture, and it launched with an older Snapdragon processor and a 5G modem, making it nearly perfect.Intel displaced Qualcomm with an inferior product (for this use case), and eventually, HP discontinued the Qualcomm-powered PC. Losing the Folio was disappointing because it was my favorite PC of all time. It showcased that with the right internals and effective marketing, a Qualcomm-based PC could have gained traction with users who valued its unique advantages.If both HP and Qualcomm had put some decent marketing behind this laptop, it would have helped build interest in Qualcomms solution, and it would be in a vastly stronger position than it is now.Intels Challenges and Leadership Shake-UpIntel and Microsoft dont see eye to eye often, which has been problematic for both companies execution over the years. Intel seemed to take Microsofts requests as bad suggestions, which forced Microsoft to work with Qualcomm rather than Intel. AMDs reputation was more on the high-performance side, and while AMD executed well, it didnt have anything ready at launch. That gave Qualcomm the huge initial advantage that it failed to capitalize on.This failure appeared to be connected to a prior CEOs decision to reduce the focus on PC technology in favor of smartphones, an effort that failed spectacularly due to poor execution and some questionable behavior by Apple that left Intel out of step with both AMD and Qualcomm.Most recently, Intel lost its CEO partially due to a change in U.S. leadership where the proximity of the Intel CEO to the prior administration might have created some excessive friction and the anticipated loss of U.S. funding for its fab and foundry business. This situation again highlights the markets resistance to significant strategic moves that come at the expense of short-term performance a disappointing reality, given the strategic importance of U.S.-based semiconductor manufacturing.Now Intel has co-CEOs, which is stronger tactically but makes it harder to execute strategically. In addition, Intels CMO support was below where it needed to be, and Intels CTO was more of a COO, leaving the critical CTO underperforming. The CTO sets the vision for strategic moves. Without that, the short-term problems likely contributed significantly to CEO Pat Gelsingers premature departure.Intel needs to appoint a real CTO. Theres a new CMO, but Intel needs to both support and fund him to reform Intels image as a market leader.How AMD Outperformed Intel and QualcommAMDs people just put their heads down and executed, and of the three vendors, it ended up doing the best, even suggesting it would buy Intel. Qualcomm was on the list of companies looking to buy Intel, too. However, Intel is both more complex and far larger than either AMD or Qualcomm, making it unlikely that either company would be comfortable making this acquisition.AMD would be the strongest of the two because it shares both market coverage and x86 technology, meaning it would be better able to step in seamlessly to lead Intel. Still, given how complex Intel is and the cloud its under, it seems unlikely either firm will be able to make an Intel acquisition happen.So, as AI hit, while Qualcomm had the initial potential benefit, AMD has seen the greatest benefit, primarily because it just outexecuted the other two companies.There is something to be said about focus. AMD showed an incredible level of focus over the last decade, which helped it achieve significant growth and benefit from the latest trends. Its recent financial results were impressive.AMD could have displaced Intel during this cycle, but that would have required substantial additional investments. As I noted above, the market isnt rewarding strategies that pull from the present to create a stronger future. AMD played the market well in this cycle.Wrapping Up: Nvidias AI Supremacy and Future in PCsIt has been an interesting few months since Microsoft launched Copilot+. Execution was key, and AMD outperformed Qualcomm and Intel by just sticking to what its good at. However, Nvidia remains the king of AI in hardware, and it also has an Arm-based processor coming, which means it could disrupt the market as AI matures.However, we are still at the very front of the AI wave. By the end of it, I expect both smartphones and PCs will have been replaced by hardware that better addresses the need to interact with AIs in a way we never did with PCs. A massive disruption is coming, and only Nvidia appears truly positioned to drive it. Well, and Huawei, but well save that for another column.Yarbo AI-Powered Snowblower RobotImage Credit: YarboWhile I got my first Yarbo over a year ago, I never put it together because Id broken my back and couldnt mess with something that heavy. As it turned out, there were problems with that first generation, and Yarbo generously offered me the option of an upgrade to a newer unit for a relatively small upgrade cost compared to Yarbos $5,000 sales price.The Yarbo is an AI-driven, GPS-connected yard robot. While I only have configurations for snow blowing and security (it can patrol the outside of your house), depending on the accessories you buy or use, it can also mow your lawn, spread fertilizer, pull a trailer (to stow it), and blow leaves. Mine is a blower only, but it also comes with a trailer hitch and a security head unit if I want it to patrol my yard after the snow melts.Some of the Yarbo yard robots and accessories (Image Credit: Yarbo)Yarbo has sold over 5,000 units to date, making it one of the most successful robots for the outdoors, if not the most successful, this last year. This is an AI/GPS robot, so you dont have to trench and put in boundary wires, like many of the early robotic lawnmowers. It charges inductively, which means you can run and charge it even if you arent home.It does need to see the GPS satellites, which can make placement of the base station difficult (the base station communicates with the Yarbo). My initial base station placement attached to the house didnt work, so I had to move it to one of my sheds. It works fine now, though Im not a fan of having to run an extension cord over my driveway.I noticed that the Yarbo really doesnt like uneven pavers. Neither does my Honda snowblower, but at least I can rock it back to go over the problem areas. You have to set the Yarbo so the blower is a bit higher, which means it isnt going down to the road. I hope a future software patch will address this.Yarbo snowblower at work (Photos by Author)In addition, it comes with winter treads with built-in studs that can tear up an epoxy garage floor like mine, but it has been working okay with the summer treads so far. Running it out of your garage is somewhat problematic anyway since it requires a line of sight to the GPS satellites.It comes with what looks like an Xbox controller that you can use to drive the Yarbo manually and map out the area you want it to service. It also uses a smartphone app. Yarbo does a good job of detecting people and animals, and it will stop if either approaches it. It also has an emergency off switch.I have a large, long driveway, around 3,000 sq. ft. The Yarbo takes about an hour and a half (using half its battery charge) to complete that job. You can tell it where to put the snow, and it will craft a far better plan than I have ever made to clear it all.Although the Yarbo isnt a cheap date, it allows me not to get up early to clear snow in the morning, and it runs autonomously unless it gets into trouble (those damned pavers). Ive really enjoyed setting it up and using it. As a result, Yarbo is my Product of the Week.

Apple MacBook Pro users often find it difficult to switch to Windows laptops due to the deep integration of the Apple ecosystem, which offers seamless connectivity between devices like iPhones, iPads, and Apple Watches. Features such as AirDrop, Handoff, iMessage, and iCloud synchronization create a frictionless workflow thats difficult to replicate on Windows.Additionally, macOS is known for its stability, optimized performance, and clean user experience, making the transition to Windows where driver issues, inconsistent UI, and bloatware can be concerns feel clumsy. Many MacBook Pro users are also heavily invested in Apple-exclusive software like Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, and macOS-specific productivity tools.Hardware aesthetics and longevity also play a role; Apples unibody aluminum design, high-resolution Retina displays, and industry-leading battery life set a high standard. Ultimately, switching from a MacBook to Windows isnt just about a laptop its about leaving an entire ecosystem that enhances convenience and productivity. But lets focus on the laptop itself.Lenovos latest ThinkPad X1 Carbon Aura Edition is giving me pause. The Aura Edition moniker signifies advanced AI features, including intelligent modes for privacy, productivity, distraction management, and premium customer support.It also highlights a powerful neural processing unit (NPU) within Intels latest Lunar Lake processor, delivering a more innovative and personalized user experience than standard Lenovo models.I dont say this lightly. In the ever-evolving landscape of premium laptops, the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 and Apples 14-inch MacBook Pro with the M4 chip stand out as top contenders. Both devices cater to professionals seeking performance, portability, and advanced features.However, the ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13, especially with Intels Lunar Lake processor marketed under the Core Ultra series, offers distinct advantages, making it a compelling choice for discerning users.The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Aura Edition features a lightweight design and vibrant display, making it a strong alternative to the MacBook Pro. (Photo by Author)ThinkPad vs. MacBook: Design and Build QualityThe ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition continues Lenovos legacy of combining durability with elegance. Weighing a mere 2.17 pounds, it is notably lighter than many competitors, including the MacBook Pro. The X1s carbon fiber and magnesium alloy construction ensure sturdiness without compromising on weight, making it exceptionally portable for professionals on the move.In contrast, the 14-inch MacBook Pro with the M4 chip maintains Apples signature aluminum unibody design. While aesthetically pleasing and sturdy, it is considerably heavier than the ThinkPad at 3.3 pounds, which might be a consideration for users prioritizing ultra-lightweight devices and that additional 1.1 pounds feels much heavier when youve been on the road for a few weeks.Performance ShowdownAt the heart of the ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 is Intels Lunar Lake processor, designed for efficiency and performance. It enables smooth multitasking and handles demanding applications with ease. The ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 features integrated Intel Arc Graphics 140V, providing solid performance for professional workloads and light creative tasks.The MacBook Pros M4 chip is built on a 3-nanometer process, delivering significant performance improvements over its predecessors. It excels in single-core tasks and provides solid performance for creative applications.However, for users who rely on software optimized for Windows or require specific enterprise solutions, the ThinkPads architecture may offer better compatibility and flexibility especially since its x86-based. This reduces the risk of software compatibility issues, a potential concern with Arm-based laptops like those featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite chip.ThinkPad OLED vs. MacBook XDR: Display QualityThe ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 features a stunning 14-inch 2.8K OLED display that delivers deep blacks, high contrast, and vivid colors. With HDR 500 certification and a 120Hz refresh rate, it offers smooth visuals and excellent clarity for both work and media consumption. The anti-glare, anti-reflection, and anti-smudge coatings enhance visibility, making it well-suited for varied work environments. The 14-inch MacBook Pro features Apples Liquid Retina XDR display, known for its extreme brightness (1,000 nits sustained, 1,600 nits peak in HDR) and exceptional color accuracy. The M4 series improves glare reduction while maintaining high contrast and true-to-life colors, making it an excellent choice for creative professionals working in different lighting conditions.Both displays offer outstanding image quality, but the ThinkPads OLED panel excels in contrast, while the MacBook Pros XDR display leads in sustained brightness and color accuracy. Users prioritizing high peak brightness for HDR content may prefer Apples offering, while those seeking deep blacks and OLED vibrancy may lean toward the ThinkPad.Battery Life and ChargingBattery performance is crucial for professionals on the go. The ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 stands out with respectable battery life, lasting through a typical workday under moderate use. While Apples MacBook Pro (and Air) with Apple Silicon set a high bar for battery endurance, Lenovos latest optimizations bring the X1 closer in efficiency, making it a more competitive option.While it may not surpass the MacBook Pros impressive battery life, the X1 compensates with rapid charging, minimizing downtime. The MacBook Pro with the M4 chip boasts extended battery life, often exceeding 16 hours for standard tasks. This longevity is beneficial for users who require prolonged unplugged use.ThinkPad vs. MacBook Keyboard ExperienceLenovos ThinkPad series is renowned for its exceptional keyboards, and the X1 Carbon Gen 13 is no exception. It offers deep travel and tactile feedback, ensuring a comfortable typing experience. Additionally, the iconic TrackPoint provides an alternative navigation method, which many professionals appreciate.One huge plus for the ThinkPad is that it uses Lenovos TrackPoint for precise cursor control without lifting your hands off the keyboard, speeding up workflow for power users. Its small footprint doesnt take up valuable trackpad space, making it perfect for confined spaces or on-the-go productivity. Plus, the tactile feel and responsiveness make it a favorite for those who prefer a more tactile navigation experience over a traditional trackpad.Apples MacBook Pro features the Magic Keyboard, which has been well-received for its improved key stability and responsiveness. While it provides a satisfactory typing experience, users who prefer deeper key travel might favor the ThinkPads keyboard.Connectivity and PortsThe ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 excels in connectivity options. It includes multiple USB-A and USB-C ports, HDMI, and a headphone jack, allowing users to connect various peripherals without needing adapters.While the MacBook Pro offers Thunderbolt ports, HDMI, and a headphone jack, it may require users to utilize adapters or dongles for USB-A and other connections, which can be less convenient for those with diverse peripheral needs.The ThinkPad X1 Carbons left side includes one USB-A and two USB-C (Thunderbolt 4) ports, offering greater connectivity than most ultrabooks. (Photo by Author)The ThinkPad X1 Carbons right side features HDMI, a headphone/mic combo jack, and another USB-A port, ensuring broad compatibility with peripherals. (Photo by Author)Windows vs. macOS: Software and CompatibilityThe ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 runs on Windows, providing access to various software applications, particularly those tailored for enterprise environments. This compatibility is essential for professionals who rely on specific Windows-based tools.The MacBook Pro operates on macOS, which is known for its stability and seamless integration with other Apple products. While it supports a wide range of applications, some specialized software may not be available or optimized for macOS, which could be a limitation for specific professional workflows.Price and Business ValueLenovos ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13, starting at $2,267, is positioned as a premium device, reflecting its build quality, performance, and features. It offers substantial value for professionals seeking a lightweight, durable, and versatile laptop.The MacBook Pro with the M4 chip, which costs $2,199 when configured with similar storage and memory, also falls into the premium price bracket. While it delivers strong performance and battery life, users should consider whether its ecosystem and software compatibility align with their needs.Closing ThoughtsThe Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 and the 14-inch Apple MacBook Pro with the M4 chip are formidable laptops catering to professionals.However, the ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 distinguishes itself with its ultra-lightweight design, superior keyboard and TrackPoint experience, diverse connectivity options, and the flexibility of the Windows operating system. These attributes make it a compelling choice for users seeking a reliable and versatile tool for their professional endeavors. While pricing is comparable, the ThinkPad X1 Carbon offers advantages such as frequent discounts from online retailers, customizable configurations, and enterprise-level security features tailored for business users. Additionally, its broader selection of ports and upgrade options reduces the need for costly dongles or proprietary accessories, further enhancing its appeal for professionals who prioritize versatility and practicality.The ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 is a powerhouse for professionals who need a lightweight, well-built laptop with top-tier input devices and strong connectivity. Lenovos focus on enterprise-friendly features, customization, and practicality makes it an excellent choice for those prioritizing versatility over ecosystem lock-in.For more details on the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Aura Edition, visit the Lenovo store.

Bots Now Dominate the Web, and Thats a Problem CopyBy John P. Mello Jr.February 4, 2025 10:09 PM PT ADVERTISEMENTEngage with IT decision makers and key influencers. TechNewsWorld's B2B marketing services deliver sales-ready leads that shorten your sales process. Fill your funnel and grow revenue with our lead gen expertise. Get Started Today. Nearly half the traffic on the internet is generated by automated entities called bots, and a large portion of them pose threats to consumers and businesses on the web.[B]ots can help in creating phishing scams by gaining users trust and exploiting it for scammers. These scams can have serious implications for the victim, some of which include financial loss, identity theft, and the spread of malware, Christoph C. Cemper, founder of AIPRM, an AI prompt engineering and management company, in Wilmington, Del., said in a statement provided to TechNewsWorld.Unfortunately, this is not the only security threat posed by bots, he continued. They can also damage brand reputations, especially for brands and businesses with popular social media profiles and high engagement rates. By associating a brand with fraudulent and unethical practices, bots can tarnish a brands reputation and reduce consumer loyalty.According to the Imperva 2024 Bad Bot Report, bad bot traffic levels have risen for the fifth consecutive year, indicating an alarming trend. It noted the increase is partly driven by the increasing popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) and large learning models (LLMs).In 2023, bad bots accounted for 32% of all internet traffic a 1.8% increase from 2022, the report explained. The portion of good bot traffic also increased, albeit slightly less significantly, from 17.3% of all internet traffic in 2022 to 17.6% in 2023. Combined, 49.6% of all internet traffic in 2023 wasnt human, as human traffic levels decreased to 50.4% of all traffic.Good bots help index the web for search engines, automate cybersecurity monitoring, and assist customer service through chatbots, explained James McQuiggan, a security awareness advocate at KnowBe4, a security awareness training provider in Clearwater, Fla.They assist with detecting vulnerabilities, improving IT workflows, and streamlining procedures online, he told TechNewsWorld. The trick is knowing whats valuable automation and whats nefarious activity.Ticket Scalping at ScaleAutomation and success are driving the growth trends for botnet traffic, explained Thomas Richards, network and red team practice director at Black Duck Software, an applications security company in Burlington, Mass.Being able to scale up allows malicious actors to achieve their goals, he told TechNewsWorld. AI is having an impact by allowing these malicious actors to act more human and automate coding and other tasks. Google, for example, has revealed that Gemini has been used to create malicious things.We see this in other everyday experiences as well, he continued, like the struggle in recent years to get concert tickets to popular events. Scalpers find ways to create users or use compromised accounts to buy tickets faster than a human ever could. They make money by reselling the tickets at a much higher price.Its easy and profitable to deploy automated attacks, added Stephen Kowski, field CTO at SlashNext, a computer and network security company in Pleasanton, Calif. Criminals are using sophisticated tools to bypass traditional security measures, he told TechNewsWorld. AI-powered systems make bots more convincing and harder to detect, enabling them to mimic human behavior better and adapt to defensive measures.The combination of readily available AI tools and the increasing value of stolen data creates perfect conditions for even more advanced bot attacks in the future, he said.Why Bad Bots Are a Serious ThreatDavid Brauchler, technical director and head of AI and ML security at the NCC Group, a global cybersecurity consultancy, expects non-human internet traffic to continue to grow.As more devices become internet-connected, SaaS platforms add interconnected functionality, and new vulnerable devices enter the scene, bot-related traffic has had the opportunity to continue increasing its share of network bandwidth, he told TechNewsWorld.Brauchler added that bad bots are capable of causing great harm. Bots have been used to trigger mass outages by overwhelming network resources to deny access to systems and services, he said.With the advent of generative AI, bots can also be used to impersonate realistic user activity on online platforms, increasing spam risk and fraud, he explained. They can also scan for and exploit security vulnerabilities in computer systems.He contended that the biggest risk from AI is the proliferation of spam. Theres no strong technical solution to identifying and blocking this type of content online, he explained. Users have taken to calling this phenomenon AI slop, and it risks drowning out the signal of legitimate online interactions in the noise of artificial content.He cautioned, however, that the industry should be very careful when it considers the best solution to this problem. Many potential remedies can create more harm, especially those that risk attacking online privacy, he said.How to Identify Malicious BotsBrauchler acknowledged that it can be difficult for humans to detect a malicious bot. The overwhelming majority of bots dont operate in any fashion that humans can detect, he said. They contact internet-exposed systems directly, querying for data or interacting with services.The category of bot that most humans are concerned with are autonomous AI agents that can masquerade as humans in an attempt to defraud people online, he continued. Many AI chatbots use predictable speech patterns that users can learn to recognize by interacting with AI text generators online. Similarly, AI-generated imagery has a number of tells that users can learn to look for, including broken patterns, such as hands and clocks being misaligned, edges of objects melting into other objects, and muddled backgrounds, he said.AI voices also have unusual inflections and expressions of tone that users can learn to pick up on, he added.Malicious bots are often used on social media platforms to gain trusted access to individuals or groups. Watch for telltale signs like unusual patterns in friend requests, generic or stolen profile pictures, and accounts that post at inhuman speeds or frequencies, Kowski cautioned.He also advised to be wary of profiles with limited personal information, suspicious engagement patterns, or pushing specific agendas through automated responses.In the enterprise, he continued, real-time behavioral analysis can spot automated actions that dont match natural human patterns, such as impossibly fast clicks or form fills.Threat to BusinessesMalicious bots can be a significant threat to enterprises, noted Ken Dunham, director of the threat research unit at Qualys, a provider of cloud-based IT, security, and compliance solutions in Foster City, Calif.Once amassed by a threat actor, they can be weaponized, he told TechNewsWorld. Bots have incredible resources and capabilities to perform anonymous, distributed, asynchronous attacks against targets of choice, such as brute force credential attacks, distributed denial of service attacks, vulnerability scans, attempted exploitation, and more.Malicious bots can also target login portals, API endpoints, and public-facing systems, which creates risks for organizations as the bad actors probe for weaknesses to find a way to gain access to the internal infrastructure and data, added McQuiggan.Without bot mitigation strategies, companies can be vulnerable to automated threats, he said.To mitigate threats from bad bots, he recommended deploying multi-factor authentication, technological bot detection solutions, and monitoring traffic for anomalies.He also recommended blocking old user agents, utilizing Captchas, and limiting interactions, where possible, to reduce success rates.Through security awareness education and human risk management, an employees knowledge of bot-driven phishing and fraud attempts can ensure a healthy security culture and reduce the risk of a successful bot attack, he advised.John P. Mello Jr. has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2003. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, IT issues, privacy, e-commerce, social media, artificial intelligence, big data and consumer electronics. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including the Boston Business Journal, the Boston Phoenix, Megapixel.Net and Government Security News. Email John.Leave a CommentClick here to cancel reply. Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.More by John P. Mello Jr.view allMore in Cybersecurity