No thanks In-car advertising glitch may be preview of a distracting future In-vehicle selling in connected cars may be too tempting for car makers to ignore. Aarian Marshall, wired.com Feb 26, 2025 9:22 am | 20 Credit: All_About_Najmi via Getty Credit: All_About_Najmi via Getty Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreLast week, a Jeep driver turned to Reddit to do what people do best on the sitecomplain. Every time they hit the brakes on their Jeep, they wrote, a promotion for an extended warranty plan popped up in the center console. Press the call button to speak to a specialist, they say the ad encouraged, welcoming the user to use their Bluetooth connection to complete the upsell then and there.Ads are annoying and occasionally insidious; an ad that repeatedly appears inside ones own car more so. According to other online posts on Reddit and Jeep forums, the issue goes back several years, affecting several models of Jeeps.Stellantis, which owns Jeep, says the repetitive nature of the promotion was a glitch. This is an isolated incident affecting fewer than ten vehicles at this time limited to the US, Dan Reid, a spokesperson for the automaker, wrote in a statement. He acknowledged, though, that Stellantis shows other drivers in-vehicle promotions, too. Dodge owners, for example, get an infotainment push after 60 days of purchase offering the Dodge Complete Performance Package, a comprehensive warranty offering. Stellantis says that, on average, customers receive about two in-vehicle messages annually, containing safety, maintenance, or marketing information.Should ads be showing up inside cars at all? Safety experts have serious questions about the practice. But as automakers continue to explore how to make more money off their increasingly digitized and Internet-connected wheels, the temptation to upsell on the center console may be too good to pass up.The data-powered upsellTodays new cars come stuffed with some 1,000 to 3,000 semiconductor chips that help to control and coordinate everything from lowering windows and adjusting mirrors to deploying airbags, enabling collision avoidance systems, pairing phones with center consoles and displays, and coordinating navigation. Add in the Internet and drivers cell phones, and you get an ongoing conversation of data between individual cars and the manufacturers that build them.Those manufacturers vision of the future has been pretty consistent over the past few years, says Mark Wakefield, the global automotive market lead at consulting firm AlixPartners. In an ideal world, theyve totally blended the mobile phone and different services and apps into a nice, big coherent ecosystem that travels from work to play to home, he says. Its the perfect platform for advertising, for upselling, and for pushing premium trimmings. As with Jeeps extended warranty offer, many services can show up with just a remote software push.Selling a car is a tight margin business; selling software-enabled features, less so. AlixPartners research estimates the connected vehicle services market will be worth more than $473 million globally this year, accounting for 11 percent of automotive revenue streams. By 2032, it could be worth $1.68 billionmore than a quarter of manufacturers revenue.Some of these software-related plays have already worked out for automakers. General Motors brought in some $2 billion in revenue last year from OnStar, its subscription-based security and entertainment services division, and executives are sticking with a prediction first made in 2021 that the automaker will eventually make more than $20 billion annually in software-related revenue. Customers have shown that theyre willing to shell out a few bucks for services that heat or cool drivers cars before they get in, or turn on the garage lights when they get back home.Other software plays have not worked well at all. General Motors settled a lawsuit this year with the US government after allegations it collected, used, and sold drivers data without their consent. Customers were horrified when BMW offered to turn on drivers seat heaters for a monthly fee. (The subscription was available in a handful of countries, including the UK, Germany, and South Korea.) The automaker discontinued the program after an outcry.These experiences suggest theres a limit to customers patience for data-enabled auto add-ons and the advertisements automakers use to promote them. The guy in the black turtleneck with the frameless glasses in the design studio still thinks the extended digital environment in the vehicle is going to happen, says Wakefield. The customer service rep probably thinks its never going to happen. The question is how long drivers are willing to put up with being trapped in their cars with tiny, digital car salesmen before they all take to Redditor buy different vehicles altogether.Driven to distractionSafety advocates, meanwhile, say any kind of in-car screen pop-up can be dangerous. Peoples attention can be easily pulled by that sort of thing, and its vitally important that the demands on drivers attention be kept in check, says William Wallace, who directs safety advocacy at Consumer Reports. He calls a snafu like Jeeps alleged glitch unacceptable.Auto safety research suggests that when messages are sent to a cars infotainment systems, and how long theyre displayed, determines whether theyre safe, says William Horrey, a technical director with the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Generally though, messages sent during any driving trip can be detrimental to safety as they pull drivers eyes away from the roadway, he writes in an email. Even messages that draw drivers eyes away from the roadand potential road hazardsduring a red light can lead to accidents, both because drivers can start driving again without being fully aware of their surroundings, and because research shows that the effects of distraction can linger even seconds after drivers eyes return to the road.Stellantis didnt respond to questions about promotion messages and road safety. Neither did the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the US top road safety regulator, though it published guidance more than a decade ago suggesting that displaying images or video unrelated to driving or requiring reading of more than 30 characters of text inherently interfere with a drivers ability to safely operate the vehicle.Nathan Proctor, who follows auto issues as the senior director of US Public Interest Research Groups right to repair campaign, says the Jeep ad snafu points to the need for wider reform in the Internet-of-autos sector. I think we should have a mandatory Internet off switch in cars, he says. What am I getting out of my car being connected to the Internet? I get cybersecurity risk, privacy invasion, they can subpoena info from my car. So far, the switch doesnt exist. Maybe some drivers really want the opportunity to buy a cheaper extended warranty. Proctor says it's far from worth the trade-off.This story originally appeared on wired.com.Aarian Marshall, wired.com Wired.com is your essential daily guide to what's next, delivering the most original and complete take you'll find anywhere on innovation's impact on technology, science, business and culture. 20 Comments