Commercial cacophony Commercials are still too loud, say thousands of recent FCC complaints 1,700 complaints about boisterous TV ads hit the FCC in 2024. Scharon Harding Feb 28, 2025 1:34 pm | 5 Credit: Getty Credit: Getty Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreThousands of complaints about the volume of TV commercials have flooded the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in recent years. Despite the FCC requiring TV stations, cable operators, and satellite providers to ensure that commercials dont bring a sudden spike in decibels, complaints around loud commercials took a troubling jump in 2024, the government body said on Thursday.Under The Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act, broadcast, cable, and satellite TV providers are required to ensure that commercials have the same average volume as the programs they accompany, per the FCC. The FCCs rules about the volume of commercials took effect in December 2012. The law also requires linear TV providers to use the Advanced Television Systems Committee's (ATSCs) recommended practices. The practices include guidance around production, post production, metadata systems usage, and controlling dynamic range. If followed, the recommendations result in consistency in loudness and avoidance of signal clipping, per the ATSC [PDF]. The guidance reads:If all programs and commercials were produced at a consistent average loudness, and if the loudness of the mix is preserved through the production, distribution, and delivery chain, listeners would not be subjected to annoying changes in loudness within and between programs.As spotted by PC Mag, the FCC claimed this week that The Calm Act initially reduced complaints about commercials aggressively blaring from TVs. However, the agency is seeing an uptick in grievances. The FCC said it received "approximately" 750 complaints in 2022, 825 in 2023, and "at least" 1,700 in 2024 [PDF].Since The Calm Act regulates a commercial's average loudness, some advertisers may be skirting the spirit of the law by making commercials very loud at the start (to get viewers' attention) before quieting down for the rest of the ad.In response to growing complaints, the FCC is reexamining its rules and this week announced that it's seeking comment from consumers and industry on the extent to which The CALM Act rules are effective. The FCC is also asking people to weigh in on what future actions the FCC, the TV industry, or standard developers could take.Streaming ads could get muzzled, tooAs you may have noticedeither through the text of this article or your own earsThe Calm Act doesnt apply to streaming services. And because The Calm Act doesnt affect commercials viewed on the Internet, online services providing access to broadcast channels, like YouTube TV and Sling, dont have to follow the rules. This is despite such services distributing the same content as linear TV providers.For years, this made sense. The majority of TV viewing occurred through broadcast, cable, or satellite access. Further, services like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video used to be considered safe havens from constant advertisements. But today, streaming services are more popular than ever and have grown to love ads, which have become critical to most platforms' business models. Further, many streaming services are airing more live events. These events, like sports games, show commercials to all subscribers, even those with a so-called ad-free subscription.Separate from the Calm Act violation complaints, the FCC noted this month that other recent complaints it has seen illustrate growing concern with the loudness of commercials on streaming services and other online platforms. If the FCC decides to apply Calm Act rules to the web, it would need to create new methods for ensuring compliance, it said. Nielsen's most recent data on how people watch TV. Credit: Nielsen The FCC didn't specify what's behind the spike in consumers' commercial complaints. Perhaps with declining audiences, traditional TV providers thought it would be less likely for anyone to notice and formally complain about Ozempic ads shouting at them. Twelve years have passed since the rules took effect, so its also possible that organizations are getting lackadaisical about ensuring compliance or have dwindling resources.With Americans spending similar amounts of timeif not longerwatching TV online versus via broadcast, cable, and satellite, The Calm Act would have to take on the web in order to maximize effectiveness. The streaming industry is young, though, and operates differently than linear TV distribution, presenting new regulation challenges.Scharon HardingSenior Technology ReporterScharon HardingSenior Technology Reporter Scharon is a Senior Technology Reporter at Ars Technica writing news, reviews, and analysis on consumer gadgets and services. She's been reporting on technology for over 10 years, with bylines at Toms Hardware, Channelnomics, and CRN UK. 5 Comments