Goodbye SE iPhone 16e review: The most expensive cheap iPhone yet The iPhone 16e rethinksand prices upthe basic iPhone. Samuel Axon Mar 7, 2025 6:00 am | 21 The iPhone 16e, with a notch and an Action Button. Credit: Samuel Axon The iPhone 16e, with a notch and an Action Button. Credit: Samuel Axon Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreFor a long time, the cheapest iPhones were basically just iPhones that were older than the current flagship, but last weeks release of the $600 iPhone 16e marks a big change in how Apple is approaching its lineup.Rather than a repackaging of an old iPhone, the 16e is the latest main iPhonethat is, the iPhone 16with a bunch of stuff stripped away.There are several potential advantages to this change. In theory, it allows Apple to support its lower-end offerings for longer with software updates, and it gives entry-level buyers access to more current technologies and features. It also simplifies the marketplace of accessories and the like.Theres bad news, too, though: Since it replaces the much cheaper iPhone SE in Apples lineup, the iPhone 16e significantly raises the financial barrier to entry for iOS (the SE started at $430).We spent a few days trying out the 16e and found that its a good phoneits just too bad its a little more expensive than the entry-level iPhone should ideally be. In many ways, this phone solves more problems for Apple than it does for consumers. Lets explore why.Table of ContentsJump to sectionA beastly processor for an entry-level phoneLike the 16, the 16e has Apples A18 chip, the most recent in the made-for-iPhone line of Apple-designed chips. Theres only one notable difference: This variation of the A18 has just four GPU cores instead of five. That will show up in benchmarks and in a handful of 3D games, but it shouldnt make too much of a difference for most people.Its a significant step up over the A15 found in the final 2022 refresh of the iPhone SE, enabling a handful of new features like AAA games and Apple Intelligence.The A18s inclusion is good for both Apple and the consumer; Apple gets to establish a new, higher baseline of performance when developing new features for current and future handsets, and consumers likely get many more years of software updates than theyd get on the older chip.The key example of a feature enabled by the A18 that Apple would probably like us all to talk about the most is Apple Intelligence, a suite of features utilizing generative AI to solve some user problems or enable new capabilities across iOS. By enabling these for the cheapest iPhone, Apple is making its messaging around Apple Intelligence a lot easier; it no longer needs to put effort into clarifying that you can use X feature with this new iPhone but not that one.Weve written a lot about Apple Intelligence already, but heres the gist: There are some useful features here in theory, but Apples models are clearly a bit behind the cutting edge, and results for things like notifications summaries or writing tools are pretty mixed. Its fun to generate original emojis, though!The iPhone 16e can even use Visual Intelligence, which actually is handy sometimes. On my iPhone 16 Pro Max, I can point the rear camera at an object and press the camera button a certain way to get information about it.I wouldnt have expected the 16e to support this, but it does, via the Action Button (which was first introduced in the iPhone 15 Pro). This is a reprogrammable button that can perform a variety of functions, albeit just one at a time. Visual Intelligence is one of the options here, which is pretty cool, even though its not essential.The screen is the biggest upgrade over the SEAlso like the 16, the 16e has a 6.1-inch display. The resolutions a bit different, though; it's 2,532 by 1,170 pixels instead of 2,556 by 1,179. It also has a notch instead of the Dynamic Island seen in the 16. All this makes the iPhone 16es display seem like a very close match to the one seen in 2022s iPhone 14in fact, it might literally be the same display.I really missed the Dynamic Island while using the iPhone 16eits one of my favorite new features added to the iPhone in recent years, as it consolidates what was previously a mess of notification schemes in iOS. Plus, its nice to see things like Uber and DoorDash ETAs and sports scores at a glance.The main problem with losing the Dynamic Island is that were back to the old minor mess of notifications approaches, and I guess Apple has to keep supporting the old ways for a while yet. That genuinely surprises me; I would have thought Apple would want to unify notifications and activities with the Dynamic Island just like the A18 allows the standardization of other features. The notch on the iPhone 16e. Samuel Axon The notch on the iPhone 16e. Samuel Axon The lone camera on the back of the 16e. The bright side: minimal camera bump! Samuel Axon The lone camera on the back of the 16e. The bright side: minimal camera bump! Samuel Axon The notch on the iPhone 16e. Samuel Axon The lone camera on the back of the 16e. The bright side: minimal camera bump! Samuel Axon This seems to indicate that the Dynamic Island is a fair bit more expensive to include than the good old camera notch flagship iPhones had been rocking since 2017s iPhone X.That compromise aside, the display on the iPhone 16e is ridiculously good for a phone at this price point, and it makes the old iPhone SEs small LCD display look like its from another eon entirely by comparison. It gets brighter for both HDR content and sunny-day operation; the blacks are inky and deep, and the contrast and colors are outstanding.Its the best thing about the iPhone 16e, even if it isnt quite as refined as the screens in Apples current flagships. Most people would never notice the difference between the screens in the 16e and the iPhone 16 Pro, though.There is one other screen feature I miss from the higher-end iPhones you can buy in 2025: Those phones can drop the display all the way down to 1 nit, which is awesome for using the phone late at night in bed without disturbing a sleeping partner. Like earlier iPhones, the 16e can only get so dark.It gets quite bright, though; Apple claims it typically reaches 800 nits in peak brightness but that it can stretch to 1200 when viewing certain HDR photos and videos. That means it gets about twice as bright as the SE did.Connectivity is keyThe iPhone 16e supports the core suite of connectivity options found in modern phones. Theres Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, and Apples usual limited implementation of NFC.There are three new things of note here, though, and theyre good, neutral, and bad, respectively.USB-CLets start with the good. Weve moved from Apples proprietary Lightning port found in older iPhones (including the final iPhone SE) toward USB-C, now a near-universal standard on mobile devices. It allows faster charging and more standardized charging cable support.Sure, its a bummer to start over if youve spent years buying Lightning accessories, but its absolutely worth it in the long run. This change means that the entire iPhone line has now abandoned Lightning, so all iPhones and Android phones will have the same main port for years to come. Finally!The finality of this shift solves a few problems for Apple: It greatly simplifies the accessory landscape and allows the company to move toward producing a smaller range of cables.Satellite connectivityRecent flagship iPhones have gradually added a small suite of features that utilize satellite connectivity to make life a little easier and safer.Among those is crash detection and roadside assistance. The former will use the sensors in the phone to detect if youve been in a car crash and contact help, and roadside assistance allows you to text for help when youre outside of cellular reception in the US and UK.There are also Emergency SOS and Find My via satellite, which let you communicate with emergency responders from remote places and allow you to be found.Along with a more general feature that allows Messages via satellite, these features can greatly expand your options if youre somewhere remote, though theyre not as easy to use and responsive as using the regular cellular network.Wheres MagSafe?I dont expect the 16e to have all the same features as the 16, which is $200 more expensive. In fact, it has more modern features than I think most of its target audience needs (more on that later). That said, theres one notable omission that makes no sense to me at all.The 16e does not support MagSafe, a standard for connecting accessories to the back of the device magnetically, often while allowing wireless charging via the Qi standard.Qi wireless charging is still supported, albeit at a slow 7.5 W, but there are no magnets, meaning a lot of existing MagSafe accessories are a lot less useful with this phone, if theyre usable at all. To be fair, the SE didnt support MagSafe either, but every new iPhone design since the iPhone 12 way back in 2020 hasand not just the premium flagships.Its not like the MagSafe accessory ecosystem was some bottomless well of innovation, but that magnetic alignment is handier than you might think, whether were talking about making sure the phone locks into place for the fastest wireless charging speeds or hanging the phone on a car dashboard to use GPS on the go.Its one of those things where folks coming from much older iPhones may not care because they dont know what theyre missing, but it could be annoying in households with multiple generations of iPhones, and it just doesnt make any sense.Most of Apples choices in the 16e seem to serve the goal of unifying the whole iPhone lineup to simplify the message for consumers and make things easier for Apple to manage efficiently, but the dropping of MagSafe is bizarre.It almost makes me think that Apple might plan to drop MagSafe from future flagship iPhones, too, and go toward something new, just because thats the only explanation I can think of. That otherwise seems unlikely to me right now, but I guess well see.The first Apple-designed cellular modemWeve been seeing rumors that Apple planned to drop third-party modems from companies like Qualcomm for years. As far back as 2018, Apple was poaching Qualcomm employees in an adjacent office in San Diego. In 2020, Apple SVP Johny Srouji announced to employees that work had begun.It sounds like development has been challenging, but the first Apple-designed modem has arrived here in the 16e of all places. Dubbed the C1, its perfectly adequate. Its about as fast or maybe just a smidge slower than what you get in the flagship phones, but almost no user would notice any difference at all.Thats really a win for Apple, which has struggled with a tumultuous relationship with its partners here for years and which has long run into space problems in its phones in part because the third-party modems werent compact enough.This change may not matter much for the consumer beyond freeing up just a tiny bit of space for a slightly larger battery, but its another step in Apples long journey to ultimately and fully control every component in the iPhone that it possibly can.Bigger is better for batteriesThere is one area where the 16e is actually superior to the 16, much less the SE: battery life. The 16e reportedly has a 3,961 mAh battery, the largest in any of the many iPhones with roughly this size screen. Apple says it offers up to 26 hours of video playback, which is the kind of number you expect to see in a much larger flagship phone.I charged this phone three times in just under a week with it, though I wasnt heavily hitting 5G networks, playing many 3D games, or cranking the brightness way up all the time while using it.Thats a bit of a bump over the 16, but its a massive leap over the SE, which promised a measly 15 hours of video playback. Every single phone in Apples lineup now has excellent battery life by any standard.Quality over quantity in the camera systemThe 16Es camera system leaves the SE in the dust, but its no match for the robust system found in the iPhone 16. Regardless, its way better than youd typically expect from a phone at this price.Like the 16, the 16e has a 48 MP Fusion wide-angle rear camera. It typically doesnt take photos at 48 MP (though you can do that while compromising color detail). Rather, 24 MP is the target. The 48 MP camera enables 2x zoom that is nearly visually indistinguishable from optical zoom.Based on both the specs and photo comparisons, the main camera sensor in the 16e appears to me to be exactly the same as that one found in the 16. Were just missing the ultra-wide lens (which allows more zoomed-out photos, ideal for groups of people in small spaces, for example) and several extra features like advanced image stabilization, the newest Photographic Styles, and macro photography. The iPhone 16e takes excellent photos in bright conditions. Samuel Axon The iPhone 16e takes excellent photos in bright conditions. Samuel Axon And unlike previous low-end iPhones, it supports night mode, which allows solid low-light photos, too. Samuel Axon And unlike previous low-end iPhones, it supports night mode, which allows solid low-light photos, too. Samuel Axon For contrast, here's an example with night mode turned off. Samuel Axon For contrast, here's an example with night mode turned off. Samuel Axon And unlike previous low-end iPhones, it supports night mode, which allows solid low-light photos, too. Samuel Axon For contrast, here's an example with night mode turned off. Samuel Axon Thats a lot of missing features, sure, but its wild how good this camera is for this price point. Even something like the Pixel 8a cant touch it (though to be fair, the Pixel 8a is $100 cheaper).Video capture is a similar situation: The 16e shoots at the same resolutions and framerates as the 16, but it lacks a few specialized features like Cinematic and Action modes. Theres also a front-facing camera with the TrueDepth sensor for Face ID in that notch, and it has comparable specs to the front-facing cameras weve seen in a couple of years of iPhones at this point.If you were buying a phone for the cameras, this wouldnt be the one for you. Its absolutely worth paying another $200 for the iPhone 16 (or even just $100 for the iPhone 15 for the ultra-wide lens for 0.5x zoom; the 15 is still available in the Apple Store) if thats your priority. The iPhone 16's macro mode isn't available here, so ultra-close-ups look fuzzy. Samuel Axon The iPhone 16's macro mode isn't available here, so ultra-close-ups look fuzzy. Samuel Axon Next up, zoom capabilities. There's no telephoto or ultra-wide angle lens; here's the normal 1x zoom... Samuel Axon Next up, zoom capabilities. There's no telephoto or ultra-wide angle lens; here's the normal 1x zoom... Samuel Axon ...and here's 2x zoom, which is accomplished by cropping with the help of algorithms. Samuel Axon ...and here's 2x zoom, which is accomplished by cropping with the help of algorithms. Samuel Axon Next up, zoom capabilities. There's no telephoto or ultra-wide angle lens; here's the normal 1x zoom... Samuel Axon ...and here's 2x zoom, which is accomplished by cropping with the help of algorithms. Samuel Axon But for the 16es target consumer (mostly folks with the iPhone 11 or older or an iPhone SE, who just want the cheapest functional iPhone they can get) its almost overkill. Im not complaining, though its a contributing factor to the phones cost compared to entry-level Android phones and Apples old iPhone SE.RIP small phones, once and for allIn one fell swoop, the iPhone 16es replacement of the iPhone SE eliminates a whole range of legacy technologies that have held on at the lower end of the iPhone lineup for years. Gone are Touch ID, the home button, LCD displays, and Lightning portstheyre replaced by Face ID, swipe gestures, OLED, and USB-C.Newer iPhones have had most of those things for quite some time. The latest feature was USB-C, which came in 2023s iPhone 15. The removal of the SE from the lineup catches the bottom end of the iPhone up with the top in these respects.That said, the SE had maintained one positive differentiator, too: It was small enough to be used one-handed by almost anyone. With the end of the SE and the release of the 16e, the one-handed iPhone is well and truly dead. Of course, most people have been clear they want big screens and batteries above almost all else, so the writing had been on the wall for a while for smaller phones.The death of the iPhone SE ushers in a new era for the iPhone with bigger and better featuresbut also bigger price tags.A more expensive cheap phoneAssessing the iPhone 16e is a challenge. Its objectively a good phonegood enough for the vast majority of people. It has a nearly top-tier screen (though it clocks in at 60Hz, while some Android phones close to this price point manage 120Hz), a camera system that delivers on quality even if it lacks special features seen in flagships, strong connectivity, and performance far above what youd expect at this price.If you dont care about extra camera features or nice-to-haves like MagSafe or the Dynamic Island, its easy to recommend saving a couple hundred bucks compared to the iPhone 16.The chief criticism I have that relates to the 16e has less to do with the phone itself than Apples overall lineup. The iPhone SE retailed for $430, nearly half the price of the 16. By making the 16e the new bottom of the lineup, Apple has significantly raised the financial barrier to entry for iOS.Now, its worth mentioning that a pretty big swath of the target market for the 16e will buy it subsidized through a carrier, so they might not pay that much up front. I always recommend buying a phone directly if you can, though, as carrier subsidization deals are usually worse for the consumer.The 16es price might push more people to go for the subsidy. Plus, its just more phone than some people need. For example, I love a high-quality OLED display for watching movies, but I dont think the typical iPhone SE customer was ever going to care about that.Thats why I believe the iPhone 16e solves more problems for Apple than it does for the consumer. In multiple ways, it allows Apple to streamline production, software support, and marketing messaging. It also drives up the average price per unit across the whole iPhone line and will probably encourage some people who would have spent $430 to spend $600 instead, possibly improving revenue. All told, its a no-brainer for Apple.It's just a mixed bag for the sort of no-frills consumer who wants a minimum viable phone and who for one reason or another didnt want to go the Android route. The iPhone 16e is definitely a good phoneI just wish there were more options for that consumer.The goodDramatically improved display than the iPhone SELikely stronger long-term software support than most previous entry-level iPhonesGood battery life and incredibly good performance for this price pointA high-quality camera, especially for the priceThe badNo ultra-wide cameraNo MagSafeNo Dynamic IslandThe uglySignificantly raises the entry price point for buying an iPhoneSamuel AxonSenior EditorSamuel AxonSenior Editor Samuel Axon is a senior editor at Ars Technica. He covers Apple, software development, gaming, AI, entertainment, and mixed reality. He has been writing about gaming and technology for nearly two decades at Engadget, PC World, Mashable, Vice, Polygon, Wired, and others. He previously ran a marketing and PR agency in the gaming industry, led editorial for the TV network CBS, and worked on social media marketing strategy for Samsung Mobile at the creative agency SPCSHP. He also is an independent software and game developer for iOS, Windows, and other platforms, and heis a graduate of DePaul University, where he studied interactive media and software development. 21 Comments