Choose your answer and the correct choice will be revealed. Correct Answer:ColemakAnd now, for some contextDesigned by Shai Coleman, Colemak is an alternative to the QWERTY keyboard layout that rearranges 17 keys to significantly reduce finger movement by over 50%. Notably, the ZXCV keys remain unchanged, ensuring that common shortcuts such as undo, cut, copy, and paste function the same as in QWERTY.According to efficiency tests, Colemak users spend 74% of their typing time on the home row, compared to just 34% for QWERTY. Additionally, QWERTY requires 193% more effort in terms of finger movement.Dvorak also beats QWERTY in efficiency, but its layout isn't as intelligent as Colemak. While Dvorak aims to reduce finger movement by placing the most commonly used letters on the home row, it does not distribute the typing load as evenly between the left and right hands. Colemak, by contrast, places a greater burden on the index and middle fingers typically the strongest while also making better use of the pinky fingers.Furthermore, Dvorak requires the rearrangement of more keys than Colemak, making it harder to learn and adapt to, with less significant efficiency gains.The QWERTY layout, which remains the dominant standard in the United States and much of the world, was originally designed in the 19th century for mechanical typewriters. It was not optimized for efficiency but rather to prevent typebar jams in early machines. Despite its widespread use, studies have shown that QWERTY is one of the least efficient keyboard layouts, requiring excessive finger movement and unnecessary strain.While Colemak and Dvorak both offer efficiency improvements, Colemak is often considered the best balance between ease of transition and performance gains, making it a compelling choice for those looking to type faster and with less effort.For more examples and photos, check out this TechSpot feature about "weird" keyboard layouts.