For the second time in a year, Elon Musk appears to be trying to bribe voters and election law experts say its probably illegal. Musk offered Thursday to personally hand over a total of $2 million to two individuals who have already voted in the closely watched Wisconsin Supreme Court race. (Its unclear whether the payment is conditional on voting for Musks preferred candidate.)Following threats of potential legal blowback, however, he said that the recipients of the $1 million reward would instead be chosen on the basis of their ability to be effective spokespeople for a petition against activist judges. His PAC has also offered $100 to anyone who signs the petition.Musks spending has already made the Supreme Court race the most expensive in Wisconsin history. The stakes are high: The election will determine the courts ideological balance and potentially the future of abortion rights, electoral maps, and unions in the critical battleground state. Its the second time in two years that control of the court has been up for grabs. Its also the second time that Musk has promised cash rewards to voters, and last time, he didnt face any repercussions. Heres what we know.When was the last time Musk tried something like this? In 2024, Musks PAC orchestrated a $1 million daily giveaway to registered voters in battleground states. The PAC initially said the recipients would be selected randomly in a lottery that the Philadelphia district attorney argued was a violation of state election law. Election law experts also argued that it violated federal law prohibiting cash payments for registering to vote or casting a ballot, including as part of a lottery. The PAC later claimed that recipients were selected not via lottery, but based on whether they could be effective spokespeople for the PAC, which ultimately spent more than $200 million to help elect Trump. That was enough to satisfy a Pennsylvania judge, who allowed that giveaway to go ahead, but the scheme spurred further lawsuits that are still ongoing.So, are Musks payments legal? In a blog post Friday, election law expert Rick Hasen, a professor at UCLA Law, said probably not. He pointed to Wisconsin state law, which states that paying voters to turn out is a crime. There is also a federal prohibition on vote-buying, but that doesnt kick in when there are no federal candidates on the ballot, and its not clear that Trumps Department of Justice would even prosecute Musk if it could, Hasen wrote. Still, its alarming that the richest man in the world could be trying to buy votes in a highly contested and consequential election and that at least one state court has already greenlighted a similar scheme before. Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Ben Wikler said in a statement Friday, Musk can have his day in court, but he cannot buy the court.See More: