Danielle Beckman moved to the United States from Brazil in 2017 to further her research on Alzheimer's.Eight years later, she's making plans to leave."I wanted to make my home here. I wanted to become a professor in the US and have my own lab here. I wanted to make my life here,"Beckman received notice last month that her 5-year, $2.5 million grant from the National Institute of Health would not be reviewed for renewal because it contained the word "COVID," which was flagged to lose funding under President Donald Trump's crackdown on research grants at higher education institutions.She said she didn't see how her lab's work could continue without that funding. She accepted an offer for a new job in Germany, where she plans to continue her research. She's also exploring additional opportunities in France that would allow her to receive more funding. Danielle Beckman, pictured in her lab, is unable to continue her research in the US. Andri Tambunan for BI "I still think I can contribute a lot. It's just that there is no opportunity here anymore, and I don't want to waste my time," Beckman said. "It's not worth staying here."Over the past couple of months, the Trump administration has cut billions of dollars in funding to universities that do not comply with its demands, such as eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Some scientists told BI that the cuts will fuel a brain drain out of the US, and countries abroad are already capitalizing on the opportunity by promoting programs to attract US researchers. Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the Department of Education,"That is just one of the reasons the reforms the U.S. government is advocating are so important," Biedermann said. "American universities that are committed to their academic mission, protect students on campus, and follow all federal laws have no problem accessing generous taxpayer support for their programs. We expect they will continue to attract and support academic talent in the years to come."Beckman said that some of her colleagues in other fields of science are leaving, and she said that it'll be a major loss for the US."I feel like my research is actually important, and it matters for other places; it just doesn't matter for the US government," Beckman said. "I was recruited from Brazil, and suddenly, I'm not useful to this country." A sample of Beckman's research that is no longer receiving US funding. Andri Tambunan for BI 'I'd be on a plane tonight'European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently unveiled a $566 million funding package to attract scientists worldwide. "Science holds the key to our future," she said. "Because as threats rise across the world, Europe will not compromise on its principles."British Columbia's health minister, Josie Osborne, also said during a recent press conference that "uncertainty and chaos happening south of ourAnother"I'd be on a plane tonight," the researcher, who is still employed at a US university,"For the most part, people I've talked to are just kind of resigned to it and just hoping to ride it out," the researcher said. "I'm just in an extremely privileged position to even be able to consider that because it's such an expensive, time-consuming process, and it's very competitive to immigrate somewhere else."Some scientists facing funding cuts have filed lawsuits instead of moving abroad. BI previously spoke to Peter Lurie, a scientist who received NIH funding for HIV research that was cut because the grant mentioned transgender people."The US and the NIH, in particular, have been the envy of the world when it comes to medical research. And what is already starting to happen is that the United States is starting to slip," Lurie said. "It means that there will be people who will go elsewhere for support. It means that there are people who will leave the country for lack of support."'I'm glad that we're leaving'Alyssa Adams works for a lab based in Japan that studies artificial intelligence and artificial life. Adams said she has been going back and forth between the US and Japan for the past two and a half years, and she is planning to move to Japan permanently in a month."It feels like we're jumping ship and it's awful, but I'm glad that we're leaving, honestly," Adams said. Adams said her lab in Japan has received a host of applications from US researchers. Romulo Ueda for BI While Trump's funding cuts have not directly affected her research, the indirect impacts have been significant. Adams said the lab still applies for some grants based in the US, and Trump's funding cuts are putting the lab's future funding avenues at risk."It's definitely impacted how we feel about being in the United States generally because it was fine having one foot in Japan and then one foot in the United States for a while, but especially within the last year, there's been a really big shift and feeling like this is not the place where you could do science and feel comfortable with it," Adams said.Adams also said that she has seen firsthand the wave of US scientists seeking to move abroad. She said that at her lab in Japan, there has been "a huge wave of applications" from people within the US, both from scientists who have had their research pulled and from those who have not yet been affected but don't feel comfortable staying in the US.The funding cuts have already displaced hundreds of researchers.announced that the university would terminate 180 employees who received federal grants affected by the cuts."We do not make these decisions lightly," Shipman said. "We are deeply committed, at Columbia, to the critical work of invention, innovation, and discovery."Adams said it'll take a long time for the US to bounce back from these losses."We're still doing our research, we're still advancing the march of discovery and doing everything that we can as researchers in a normal way," Adams said. "We're just doing it in places where we feel more welcome and where we feel like we can be ourselves. And unfortunately, these days it's not the United States."Have a tip or a story to share? Contact this reporter via email at asheffey@businessinsider.com or Signal at asheffey.97. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely.