Automakers sue to block Bidens flawed automatic emergency braking ruleAutomakers sue to block Bidens flawed automatic emergency braking rule / The auto industrys main lobbying group is seeking to have the rule repealed. By Andrew J. Hawkins, transportation editor with 10+ years of experience who covers EVs, public transportation, and aviation. His work has appeared in The New York Daily News and City & State. Jan 17, 2025, 8:06 PM UTCShare this story Photo by Gary Hershorn/Getty ImagesA new rule requiring all vehicles to have automatic emergency braking is flawed and should be repealed, a new lawsuit filed by the auto industrys main lobbying group says. The suit was filed in US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuitby the Alliance of Automotive Innovation, which represents most of the major automakers, including Ford, General Motors, Stellantis, Hyundai, Volkswagen, and Toyota. The group is asking the court to overturn the new rule, which was finalized last year, requiring all vehicles to have automatic emergency braking (AEB) by 2029. Under the rule, all vehicles will be required to be able to stop and avoid contact with other vehicles at speeds of up to 62mph. In addition, AEB systems must apply the brakes automatically up to 90 mph when a collision with a lead vehicle is imminent, and up to 45 mph when a pedestrian is detected. Vehicles must also be able to detect pedestrians in both daylight and darkness. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) says the new rule will help prevent hundreds of deathsand tens of thousands of injuries every year.But after the rule was finalized, the alliance petitioned NHTSA to reconsider it, arguing that current technology was insufficient to meet the high standards outlined by the regulation. The group also claimed that its suggestions were rejected during the rulemaking process, and urged NHTSA to reconsider several key provisions in order to make it more achievable by the target date.But NHTSA denied the groups petition, stating that the requirements were practicable and that the overall aim is to force the industry to adopt new technology in order to meet the goals of saving lives and preventing injuries. NHTSA acknowledged that the final rule is technology-forcingNHTSA acknowledged that the final rule is technology-forcing, the agency said in its response, but emphasized that the standard is practicable and no single current vehicle must meet every requirement for an FMVSS to be considered practicable under the Safety Act.The auto alliance says that it has spent more than a billion dollars developing AEB over the years, but doesnt want this lawsuit to be interpreted as an opposition to its own technology. This litigation by Alliance for Automotive Innovationshould notbe interpreted as opposition to AEB, a lack of confidence in the technology, or an objection to AEBs widest possible deployment across the U.S. vehicle fleet, the group says in a press release. Rather, this litigation is about ensuring a rule that maximizes driver and pedestrian safety and is technologically feasible.But safety advocates arent buying it. The AEB Rule is the most impactful regulation for roadway safety issued in years, said Cathy Chase, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, in a statement. Considering that automaking is Americas largest manufacturing sector, employs 10 million Americans, generates five percent of the U.S. GDP and drives $1 trillion into the economy annually, it is remarkable that it would be unable to meet the requirements in the AEB Rule by September 2029.Most PopularMost Popular