Key TakeawaysGoogle has dropped its commitment to not use AI for harmful applications like weapons and surveillance, aiming to remain competitive in the growing AI space, especially with Chinas involvement.The updated AI principles focus on mitigating unintended outcomes and avoiding bias, reflecting Googles ambition to expand AI services to more users and governments.Google has faced internal protests over past contracts, including Project Maven and Project Nimbus, with employees opposing the use of AI in government and military projects. But this led to the termination of employees and concerns about reputational harm.Google has updated its public AI principles page and dropped its pledge to not use AI for harmful applications like weapons and surveillance.The said pledge used to sit in the applications we will not pursue section on their page and Bloomberg was the first one to point out that its no longer there.This change could be simply to be able to continue holding ground amid the rapidly increasing competition in the AI space, especially after China has entered the space with its allegedly revolutionary DeepSeek.The new AI principles say that Google will work to mitigate unintended or harmful outcomes and will avoid unfair bias. While that sounds like a relief, its still uncertain what the agenda behind this change of policy is.This update primarily reflects Googles growing ambitions to offer AI to more users, including governments. The new AI principles say that Google will proceed where we believe that the overall likely benefits substantially exceed the foreseeable risks and downsides.Its worth noting that OpenAI recently launched a special ChatGPT Enterprise variant for the US government. Is this AI companies looking to curry favor with Trump? Could be.Googles History With AI EthicsGoogle has aggressively pursued federal government contracts before the AI principles were established in 2018, when the tech giant refused to renew its contract with the government due to strong protests from the internal Google team.A large number of employees had signed petitions opposing the contract and many resigned from the company due to its involvement in the project. The contract was called Project Maven and it basically helped the government analyze and interpret drone videos using artificial intelligence.Another contract, called Pentagon cloud, which was speculated to be worth $10 billion, was also turned down by the company saying it didnt align with its values.Just last year, a series of protests took place over Project Nimbus, a Google contract with Amazon services to provide cloud computing and AI services to the Israeli government and military.Google terminated more than 50 employees as a consequence of this and released a statement saying the contract didnt violate any of the companys AI principles.The fact of the matter, as revealed by The New York Times, was that just a few months before this happened, Google officials themselves were seen expressing concern about the contract harming the companys reputation as its cloud services could be used for facilitation of human rights violations.Currently, the updated guidelines restrict the internal forum from a discussion about geopolitical content, international relations, military conflicts, economic actions, and territorial disputes.When CNBC asked for comment on the guidelines, Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.Add Techreport to Your Google News Feed Get the latest updates, trends, and insights delivered straight to your fingertips. Subscribe now! Subscribe now Alpa is a tech writer and editor with a wealth of experience in alternative finance, fintech, cryptocurrency, app security software, and the medical industry. Shes passionate about breaking down complex topics and sharing informative content that provides value. View all articles by Alpa Somaiya Our editorial processThe Tech Reporteditorial policyis centered on providing helpful, accurate content that offers real value to our readers. We only work with experienced writers who have specific knowledge in the topics they cover, including latest developments in technology, online privacy, cryptocurrencies, software, and more. Our editorial policy ensures that each topic is researched and curated by our in-house editors. We maintain rigorous journalistic standards, and every article is 100% written byreal authors.