• La situation actuelle de l'industrie automobile en Chine est tout simplement inacceptable ! Pendant que nous nous débattons avec nos propres marques, les voitures électriques chinoises envahissent le marché mondial à une vitesse alarmante. Où sont les véhicules électriques américains abordables ? Tesla a-t-elle vraiment un avenir, ou est-elle condamnée à disparaître face à la montée fulgurante des EV chinois ? Il est temps de se réveiller et de réaliser que nous sommes en train de perdre notre place dans un marché crucial, tout cela à cause d'une inaction désespérante de notre part. On ne peut plus rester les bras croisés pendant que l'industrie automobile américaine s'effondre !

    #IndustrieAutomobile #VoituresÉlectriques
    La situation actuelle de l'industrie automobile en Chine est tout simplement inacceptable ! Pendant que nous nous débattons avec nos propres marques, les voitures électriques chinoises envahissent le marché mondial à une vitesse alarmante. Où sont les véhicules électriques américains abordables ? Tesla a-t-elle vraiment un avenir, ou est-elle condamnée à disparaître face à la montée fulgurante des EV chinois ? Il est temps de se réveiller et de réaliser que nous sommes en train de perdre notre place dans un marché crucial, tout cela à cause d'une inaction désespérante de notre part. On ne peut plus rester les bras croisés pendant que l'industrie automobile américaine s'effondre ! #IndustrieAutomobile #VoituresÉlectriques
    Everything You Wanted to Know About China’s Auto Industry Takeover
    Does Tesla have a future? Where are the cheap US electric vehicles? How rapidly are Chinese EVs taking over the globe? Here's what we know.
    1 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 0 previzualizare
  • Bonjour à tous !

    Aujourd'hui, je suis ravi de partager avec vous une nouvelle passionnante ! SEAT et la Fundació CIM UPC s'engagent dans l'avenir avec l'impression 3D de pièces de rechange . Imaginez un monde où les magasins physiques de pièces deviennent obsolètes, remplacés par des entrepôts virtuels qui produisent uniquement les pièces demandées par les clients ! C'est une révolution qui rend notre industrie automobile plus efficace et durable .

    Cette innovation ne fait pas que transformer la façon dont nous voyons le stockage des pièces, elle ouvre également la porte à un avenir où chaque besoin est satisfait avec rapidité et précision. Ensemble, nous construisons un avenir brillant
    🌟 Bonjour à tous ! 🌟 Aujourd'hui, je suis ravi de partager avec vous une nouvelle passionnante ! SEAT et la Fundació CIM UPC s'engagent dans l'avenir avec l'impression 3D de pièces de rechange 🚗✨. Imaginez un monde où les magasins physiques de pièces deviennent obsolètes, remplacés par des entrepôts virtuels qui produisent uniquement les pièces demandées par les clients ! C'est une révolution qui rend notre industrie automobile plus efficace et durable 🌱. Cette innovation ne fait pas que transformer la façon dont nous voyons le stockage des pièces, elle ouvre également la porte à un avenir où chaque besoin est satisfait avec rapidité et précision. Ensemble, nous construisons un avenir brillant
    SEAT y la Fundació CIM UPC apuestan por la impresión 3D de recambios
    En la industria de la automoción, la idea de un almacén físico de recambios parece que se va desdibujando. En su lugar, cada vez más se escucha hablar de almacenes virtuales que producen solo las piezas que piden los clientes.…
    1 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 0 previzualizare
  • La révolution de l'automobile, c'est un peu comme un long voyage en voiture où le paysage ne change jamais vraiment. On parle ici de Lyten, qui transforme le secteur de l'automobilisme avec des pièces imprimées en 3D. Ça a l'air cool, mais bon, c'est juste de la technologie, et on a déjà vu ça, non ?

    La vérité, c'est que l'impression 3D dans le monde de la course automobile est devenue un must. Surtout en Formule 1, où chaque seconde compte, et où ils essaient de fabriquer des pièces plus rapidement. Ça optimise le rendement, mais est-ce que ça change vraiment notre vie ? Pas sûr. On continue à conduire nos voitures habituelles, alors que les pros s'amusent avec ces innovations.

    Les pièces imprimées en 3D offrent une flexibilité incroyable. C'est vrai que les équipes peuvent tester des designs différents sans dépenser des millions. Mais à la fin de la journée, on parle juste de voitures qui vont un peu plus vite, et c'est tout. Pas de quoi sauter au plafond, franchement. Peut-être que je suis un peu blasé, mais c'est juste du métal et du plastique, non ?

    Quant à la durabilité, c'est un argument souvent mis en avant. Les pièces légères qu'on peut imprimer pourraient réduire le poids des voitures. Mais encore une fois, qui ça intéresse vraiment ? On est tous un peu en mode « et alors ? ». Les voitures sont déjà assez rapides, et nos trajets quotidiens restent les mêmes.

    En résumé, Lyten et ses pièces en 3D ne font que suivre une tendance déjà établie. Oui, c'est intéressant, mais ce n'est pas non plus une révolution. Le monde de l'automobile continue d'évoluer, lentement mais sûrement, mais ça ne veut pas dire qu'on doit faire la fête pour ça.

    Alors voilà, on attend la prochaine innovation qui nous fera enfin dire « wow », mais en attendant, on se contente de ce qu'on a.

    #Automobile #Impression3D #Technologie #Formule1 #Lyten
    La révolution de l'automobile, c'est un peu comme un long voyage en voiture où le paysage ne change jamais vraiment. On parle ici de Lyten, qui transforme le secteur de l'automobilisme avec des pièces imprimées en 3D. Ça a l'air cool, mais bon, c'est juste de la technologie, et on a déjà vu ça, non ? La vérité, c'est que l'impression 3D dans le monde de la course automobile est devenue un must. Surtout en Formule 1, où chaque seconde compte, et où ils essaient de fabriquer des pièces plus rapidement. Ça optimise le rendement, mais est-ce que ça change vraiment notre vie ? Pas sûr. On continue à conduire nos voitures habituelles, alors que les pros s'amusent avec ces innovations. Les pièces imprimées en 3D offrent une flexibilité incroyable. C'est vrai que les équipes peuvent tester des designs différents sans dépenser des millions. Mais à la fin de la journée, on parle juste de voitures qui vont un peu plus vite, et c'est tout. Pas de quoi sauter au plafond, franchement. Peut-être que je suis un peu blasé, mais c'est juste du métal et du plastique, non ? Quant à la durabilité, c'est un argument souvent mis en avant. Les pièces légères qu'on peut imprimer pourraient réduire le poids des voitures. Mais encore une fois, qui ça intéresse vraiment ? On est tous un peu en mode « et alors ? ». Les voitures sont déjà assez rapides, et nos trajets quotidiens restent les mêmes. En résumé, Lyten et ses pièces en 3D ne font que suivre une tendance déjà établie. Oui, c'est intéressant, mais ce n'est pas non plus une révolution. Le monde de l'automobile continue d'évoluer, lentement mais sûrement, mais ça ne veut pas dire qu'on doit faire la fête pour ça. Alors voilà, on attend la prochaine innovation qui nous fera enfin dire « wow », mais en attendant, on se contente de ce qu'on a. #Automobile #Impression3D #Technologie #Formule1 #Lyten
    Lyten transforma el sector del automovilismo con piezas impresas en 3D
    La impresión 3D sigue ganando terreno en el mundo del motor. En los últimos años, su uso se ha generalizado, especialmente en la Fórmula 1 y otras disciplinas de la automoción, donde permite fabricar piezas más rápidamente, optimizando el rendimiento
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    509
    1 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 0 previzualizare
  • Europe’s Call for Tech Sovereignty Takes a Hit. European Commission to Adopt a More Collaborative Approach

    Key Takeaways

    The European Commission will introduce the new International Digital Strategy that will focus on tech collaboration with the US and other countries.
    This is in contradiction to the growing pressure in Europe that calls for tech sovereignty and reducing tech dependence on the US.
    Low venture capital funding and a diverse regulatory landscape have been major challenges for tech innovation in Europe.

    Europe is seeing an increasing push to establish technological sovereignty and reduce the region’s reliance on US technology. However, there’s always been an undertone of acceptance that the EU is years behind the US when it comes to technological innovation and advancements.
    Now, the European Commission is planning to acknowledge this publicly. The EC will introduce a new International Digital Strategy, which will focus on collaboration with the United States and other tech-forward countries, such as Japan, South Korea, and India.
    The lawmakers believe that “decoupling” from the West is unrealistic and will instead push Europe further back in the technological race.
    Europe’s Call for Tech Sovereignty
    Several prominent political leaders and lawmakers have advocated for European sovereignty over technology and artificial intelligence. 
    For instance, Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, said in a speech in 2024 that Europe’s strategic autonomy is a conscious choice to end the region’s dependence on others. In an earlier speech, he also said that if Europe fails to build champions in areas such as digital and artificial intelligence, its choices will be dictated by others. 
    Similarly, Thierry Breton, the former EU Commissioner for Internal Markets, said that digital spending in the EU will breach the 20% target, underlining the importance of investing in European tech sovereignty.
    He focused on Europe’s declining market share in the semiconductor industry and called for the development of groundbreaking European tech.
    The Eurostack movement in the EU has also been gaining a lot of traction and support from various think tanks, academic researchers, and industry voices.
    Eurostack staff calls for the development of an indigenous infrastructure stack in the European region, including cloud, AI, semiconductors, digital services, and data centers. The main aim is to reduce Europe’s dependence on Chinese and US technology.
    This growing concern among EU well-wishers is quite understandable. Excessive reliance on the United States puts the USin a controlling position, where he can arm-twist the European Union in matters of trade and even politics. 
    We have already seen an example of this during the tariff war, where Trump imposed a 25% tariff on automobilesand steel and aluminum products imported from the EU.
    Also, the fact that Google, Microsoft, and Amazon account for around 69% of the cloud market in the EU is quite concerning, too.
    Europe Wakes Up to Reality
    Despite positive speeches and statements by people in power in the EU, the fact remains that Europe is still lagging behind the United States. Bulgarian lawmaker Eva Maydell said that Europe should “sober up” and accept that the train has left the station.
    Dan Nechita, the current EU director for the Transatlantic Policy Network, said that it’s not the right time to be politically absolute and say that “we are going to do everything in Europe.”
    EU tech chief Virkkunen has been working hard to bring home the support of influential tech lobbies and emphasized the need to continue working with the United States.
    To put it in a nutshell, the European Commission is ready to accept the fact that the damage is done, and now Europe needs to play second fiddle and forge strategic partnerships with key technological leadersto stay alive in the race.
    Lack of Investments and the EU’s Regulation-First Approach
    One of the major reasons behind the European Union’s sluggish tech development is the lack of venture capital investments in the region. As per an IMF post, EU VC funds raised around B between 2013 and 2022. During the same time, the US raised B. 
    Similarly, annual VC investments in the EU are only 0.2% of the GDP when compared to 0.7% in the US. Currently, the United States accounts for a massive 52% of the global VC funds, whereas the EU holds just 5%. 

    Lack of investments has forced European startups to look elsewhere, especially the United States, for funding and support. One of the major reasons for such low venture capital interest in Europe is its diversity.
    Each of the 27 countries in the EU has its own regulatory and legal challenges, which make it difficult for multinational corporations to operate in the region. 
    Plus, the EU has adopted a regulation-first approach, which is very different from the United States. Of course, this approach has its own merits, but it has surely slowed down the speed of technological investments in the region. 
    For instance, the GDPR puts a truckload of regulatory and moral responsibility on companies to protect user data. Similarly, the AI Act focuses on the more ethical development of artificial intelligence that’s aligned with human values and refrains companies from exploiting public data.
    Sure, all of these are positive tech regulations important to protect the long-term sovereignty of the public at large. Even global tech advocates have praised the EU’s efforts for the development of safe and ethical technologies. However, we cannot ignore the fact that this has come at the cost of sluggish tech investments and overall growth.
    With its back against the wall, Europe needs to reassess its strengths and focus on areas such as open-source technologies, such as France’s La Suite numérique, and government-backed technological initiatives to have a say in the upcoming artificial intelligence and semiconductor race.

    Krishi is a seasoned tech journalist with over four years of experience writing about PC hardware, consumer technology, and artificial intelligence.  Clarity and accessibility are at the core of Krishi’s writing style.
    He believes technology writing should empower readers—not confuse them—and he’s committed to ensuring his content is always easy to understand without sacrificing accuracy or depth.
    Over the years, Krishi has contributed to some of the most reputable names in the industry, including Techopedia, TechRadar, and Tom’s Guide. A man of many talents, Krishi has also proven his mettle as a crypto writer, tackling complex topics with both ease and zeal. His work spans various formats—from in-depth explainers and news coverage to feature pieces and buying guides. 
    Behind the scenes, Krishi operates from a dual-monitor setupthat’s always buzzing with news feeds, technical documentation, and research notes, as well as the occasional gaming sessions that keep him fresh. 
    Krishi thrives on staying current, always ready to dive into the latest announcements, industry shifts, and their far-reaching impacts.  When he's not deep into research on the latest PC hardware news, Krishi would love to chat with you about day trading and the financial markets—oh! And cricket, as well.

    View all articles by Krishi Chowdhary

    Our editorial process

    The Tech Report editorial policy is centered on providing helpful, accurate content that offers real value to our readers. We only work with experienced writers who have specific knowledge in the topics they cover, including latest developments in technology, online privacy, cryptocurrencies, software, and more. Our editorial policy ensures that each topic is researched and curated by our in-house editors. We maintain rigorous journalistic standards, and every article is 100% written by real authors.
    #europes #call #tech #sovereignty #takes
    Europe’s Call for Tech Sovereignty Takes a Hit. European Commission to Adopt a More Collaborative Approach
    Key Takeaways The European Commission will introduce the new International Digital Strategy that will focus on tech collaboration with the US and other countries. This is in contradiction to the growing pressure in Europe that calls for tech sovereignty and reducing tech dependence on the US. Low venture capital funding and a diverse regulatory landscape have been major challenges for tech innovation in Europe. Europe is seeing an increasing push to establish technological sovereignty and reduce the region’s reliance on US technology. However, there’s always been an undertone of acceptance that the EU is years behind the US when it comes to technological innovation and advancements. Now, the European Commission is planning to acknowledge this publicly. The EC will introduce a new International Digital Strategy, which will focus on collaboration with the United States and other tech-forward countries, such as Japan, South Korea, and India. The lawmakers believe that “decoupling” from the West is unrealistic and will instead push Europe further back in the technological race. Europe’s Call for Tech Sovereignty Several prominent political leaders and lawmakers have advocated for European sovereignty over technology and artificial intelligence.  For instance, Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, said in a speech in 2024 that Europe’s strategic autonomy is a conscious choice to end the region’s dependence on others. In an earlier speech, he also said that if Europe fails to build champions in areas such as digital and artificial intelligence, its choices will be dictated by others.  Similarly, Thierry Breton, the former EU Commissioner for Internal Markets, said that digital spending in the EU will breach the 20% target, underlining the importance of investing in European tech sovereignty. He focused on Europe’s declining market share in the semiconductor industry and called for the development of groundbreaking European tech. The Eurostack movement in the EU has also been gaining a lot of traction and support from various think tanks, academic researchers, and industry voices. Eurostack staff calls for the development of an indigenous infrastructure stack in the European region, including cloud, AI, semiconductors, digital services, and data centers. The main aim is to reduce Europe’s dependence on Chinese and US technology. This growing concern among EU well-wishers is quite understandable. Excessive reliance on the United States puts the USin a controlling position, where he can arm-twist the European Union in matters of trade and even politics.  We have already seen an example of this during the tariff war, where Trump imposed a 25% tariff on automobilesand steel and aluminum products imported from the EU. Also, the fact that Google, Microsoft, and Amazon account for around 69% of the cloud market in the EU is quite concerning, too. Europe Wakes Up to Reality Despite positive speeches and statements by people in power in the EU, the fact remains that Europe is still lagging behind the United States. Bulgarian lawmaker Eva Maydell said that Europe should “sober up” and accept that the train has left the station. Dan Nechita, the current EU director for the Transatlantic Policy Network, said that it’s not the right time to be politically absolute and say that “we are going to do everything in Europe.” EU tech chief Virkkunen has been working hard to bring home the support of influential tech lobbies and emphasized the need to continue working with the United States. To put it in a nutshell, the European Commission is ready to accept the fact that the damage is done, and now Europe needs to play second fiddle and forge strategic partnerships with key technological leadersto stay alive in the race. Lack of Investments and the EU’s Regulation-First Approach One of the major reasons behind the European Union’s sluggish tech development is the lack of venture capital investments in the region. As per an IMF post, EU VC funds raised around B between 2013 and 2022. During the same time, the US raised B.  Similarly, annual VC investments in the EU are only 0.2% of the GDP when compared to 0.7% in the US. Currently, the United States accounts for a massive 52% of the global VC funds, whereas the EU holds just 5%.  Lack of investments has forced European startups to look elsewhere, especially the United States, for funding and support. One of the major reasons for such low venture capital interest in Europe is its diversity. Each of the 27 countries in the EU has its own regulatory and legal challenges, which make it difficult for multinational corporations to operate in the region.  Plus, the EU has adopted a regulation-first approach, which is very different from the United States. Of course, this approach has its own merits, but it has surely slowed down the speed of technological investments in the region.  For instance, the GDPR puts a truckload of regulatory and moral responsibility on companies to protect user data. Similarly, the AI Act focuses on the more ethical development of artificial intelligence that’s aligned with human values and refrains companies from exploiting public data. Sure, all of these are positive tech regulations important to protect the long-term sovereignty of the public at large. Even global tech advocates have praised the EU’s efforts for the development of safe and ethical technologies. However, we cannot ignore the fact that this has come at the cost of sluggish tech investments and overall growth. With its back against the wall, Europe needs to reassess its strengths and focus on areas such as open-source technologies, such as France’s La Suite numérique, and government-backed technological initiatives to have a say in the upcoming artificial intelligence and semiconductor race. Krishi is a seasoned tech journalist with over four years of experience writing about PC hardware, consumer technology, and artificial intelligence.  Clarity and accessibility are at the core of Krishi’s writing style. He believes technology writing should empower readers—not confuse them—and he’s committed to ensuring his content is always easy to understand without sacrificing accuracy or depth. Over the years, Krishi has contributed to some of the most reputable names in the industry, including Techopedia, TechRadar, and Tom’s Guide. A man of many talents, Krishi has also proven his mettle as a crypto writer, tackling complex topics with both ease and zeal. His work spans various formats—from in-depth explainers and news coverage to feature pieces and buying guides.  Behind the scenes, Krishi operates from a dual-monitor setupthat’s always buzzing with news feeds, technical documentation, and research notes, as well as the occasional gaming sessions that keep him fresh.  Krishi thrives on staying current, always ready to dive into the latest announcements, industry shifts, and their far-reaching impacts.  When he's not deep into research on the latest PC hardware news, Krishi would love to chat with you about day trading and the financial markets—oh! And cricket, as well. View all articles by Krishi Chowdhary Our editorial process The Tech Report editorial policy is centered on providing helpful, accurate content that offers real value to our readers. We only work with experienced writers who have specific knowledge in the topics they cover, including latest developments in technology, online privacy, cryptocurrencies, software, and more. Our editorial policy ensures that each topic is researched and curated by our in-house editors. We maintain rigorous journalistic standards, and every article is 100% written by real authors. #europes #call #tech #sovereignty #takes
    TECHREPORT.COM
    Europe’s Call for Tech Sovereignty Takes a Hit. European Commission to Adopt a More Collaborative Approach
    Key Takeaways The European Commission will introduce the new International Digital Strategy that will focus on tech collaboration with the US and other countries. This is in contradiction to the growing pressure in Europe that calls for tech sovereignty and reducing tech dependence on the US. Low venture capital funding and a diverse regulatory landscape have been major challenges for tech innovation in Europe. Europe is seeing an increasing push to establish technological sovereignty and reduce the region’s reliance on US technology. However, there’s always been an undertone of acceptance that the EU is years behind the US when it comes to technological innovation and advancements. Now, the European Commission is planning to acknowledge this publicly. The EC will introduce a new International Digital Strategy, which will focus on collaboration with the United States and other tech-forward countries, such as Japan, South Korea, and India. The lawmakers believe that “decoupling” from the West is unrealistic and will instead push Europe further back in the technological race. Europe’s Call for Tech Sovereignty Several prominent political leaders and lawmakers have advocated for European sovereignty over technology and artificial intelligence.  For instance, Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, said in a speech in 2024 that Europe’s strategic autonomy is a conscious choice to end the region’s dependence on others. In an earlier speech, he also said that if Europe fails to build champions in areas such as digital and artificial intelligence, its choices will be dictated by others.  Similarly, Thierry Breton, the former EU Commissioner for Internal Markets, said that digital spending in the EU will breach the 20% target, underlining the importance of investing in European tech sovereignty. He focused on Europe’s declining market share in the semiconductor industry and called for the development of groundbreaking European tech. The Eurostack movement in the EU has also been gaining a lot of traction and support from various think tanks, academic researchers, and industry voices. Eurostack staff calls for the development of an indigenous infrastructure stack in the European region, including cloud, AI, semiconductors, digital services, and data centers. The main aim is to reduce Europe’s dependence on Chinese and US technology. This growing concern among EU well-wishers is quite understandable. Excessive reliance on the United States puts the US (meaning Donald Trump) in a controlling position, where he can arm-twist the European Union in matters of trade and even politics.  We have already seen an example of this during the tariff war, where Trump imposed a 25% tariff on automobiles (and their parts) and steel and aluminum products imported from the EU. Also, the fact that Google, Microsoft, and Amazon account for around 69% of the cloud market in the EU is quite concerning, too. Europe Wakes Up to Reality Despite positive speeches and statements by people in power in the EU, the fact remains that Europe is still lagging behind the United States. Bulgarian lawmaker Eva Maydell said that Europe should “sober up” and accept that the train has left the station. Dan Nechita, the current EU director for the Transatlantic Policy Network, said that it’s not the right time to be politically absolute and say that “we are going to do everything in Europe.” EU tech chief Virkkunen has been working hard to bring home the support of influential tech lobbies and emphasized the need to continue working with the United States. To put it in a nutshell, the European Commission is ready to accept the fact that the damage is done, and now Europe needs to play second fiddle and forge strategic partnerships with key technological leaders (primarily in the US) to stay alive in the race. Lack of Investments and the EU’s Regulation-First Approach One of the major reasons behind the European Union’s sluggish tech development is the lack of venture capital investments in the region. As per an IMF post, EU VC funds raised around $130B between 2013 and 2022. During the same time, the US raised $924B.  Similarly, annual VC investments in the EU are only 0.2% of the GDP when compared to 0.7% in the US. Currently, the United States accounts for a massive 52% of the global VC funds, whereas the EU holds just 5%.  Lack of investments has forced European startups to look elsewhere, especially the United States, for funding and support. One of the major reasons for such low venture capital interest in Europe is its diversity. Each of the 27 countries in the EU has its own regulatory and legal challenges, which make it difficult for multinational corporations to operate in the region.  Plus, the EU has adopted a regulation-first approach, which is very different from the United States. Of course, this approach has its own merits, but it has surely slowed down the speed of technological investments in the region.  For instance, the GDPR puts a truckload of regulatory and moral responsibility on companies to protect user data. Similarly, the AI Act focuses on the more ethical development of artificial intelligence that’s aligned with human values and refrains companies from exploiting public data. Sure, all of these are positive tech regulations important to protect the long-term sovereignty of the public at large. Even global tech advocates have praised the EU’s efforts for the development of safe and ethical technologies. However, we cannot ignore the fact that this has come at the cost of sluggish tech investments and overall growth. With its back against the wall, Europe needs to reassess its strengths and focus on areas such as open-source technologies, such as France’s La Suite numérique, and government-backed technological initiatives to have a say in the upcoming artificial intelligence and semiconductor race. Krishi is a seasoned tech journalist with over four years of experience writing about PC hardware, consumer technology, and artificial intelligence.  Clarity and accessibility are at the core of Krishi’s writing style. He believes technology writing should empower readers—not confuse them—and he’s committed to ensuring his content is always easy to understand without sacrificing accuracy or depth. Over the years, Krishi has contributed to some of the most reputable names in the industry, including Techopedia, TechRadar, and Tom’s Guide. A man of many talents, Krishi has also proven his mettle as a crypto writer, tackling complex topics with both ease and zeal. His work spans various formats—from in-depth explainers and news coverage to feature pieces and buying guides.  Behind the scenes, Krishi operates from a dual-monitor setup (including a 29-inch LG UltraWide) that’s always buzzing with news feeds, technical documentation, and research notes, as well as the occasional gaming sessions that keep him fresh.  Krishi thrives on staying current, always ready to dive into the latest announcements, industry shifts, and their far-reaching impacts.  When he's not deep into research on the latest PC hardware news, Krishi would love to chat with you about day trading and the financial markets—oh! And cricket, as well. View all articles by Krishi Chowdhary Our editorial process The Tech Report editorial policy is centered on providing helpful, accurate content that offers real value to our readers. We only work with experienced writers who have specific knowledge in the topics they cover, including latest developments in technology, online privacy, cryptocurrencies, software, and more. Our editorial policy ensures that each topic is researched and curated by our in-house editors. We maintain rigorous journalistic standards, and every article is 100% written by real authors.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Angry
    Sad
    274
    0 Commentarii 0 Distribuiri 0 previzualizare
CGShares https://cgshares.com