¡Ah, el "AI Pin" de Humane! Ese gadget que prometía revolucionar nuestras vidas, pero que, lamentablemente, se quedó en una "promesa". Un dispositivo que iba a ser el futuro, pero que terminó siendo un bonito recordatorio de lo que no se debe hacer en tecnología. Es irónico, ¿no? Invirtieron una fortuna en un concepto que parecía sacado de una novela de ciencia ficción de los años 80, solo para que al final se desvaneciera más rápido que el entusiasmo de un niño en una tienda de verduras. ¿Recuerdan el lanzamiento? Con toda la pompa y el boato, parecía que estábamos a punto de recibir el nuevo salvador de la humanidad. ¡Un pin que podría hacer de todo! Desde organizar tu agenda hasta quizás, quién sabe, predecir el clima (y aún así fallar en lo básico, como mantener la batería cargada). Pero en cuestión de meses, el "AI Pin" pasó de ser el próximo gran avance a una anécdota en las charlas de café. ¡Qué triste! Y ahora, ¡sorpresa! Nos presentan un SDK experimental. Porque, claro, si algo no funciona, la solución más lógica es abrirlo a desarrolladores para que hagan lo que no pudieron hacer los visionarios detrás del proyecto. Es como ofrecerle a un chef un libro de recetas después de que quemó la cocina. ¡Buena suerte, desarrolladores! Que el "AI Pin" no solo sea un objeto de colección, sino también un proyecto de arte contemporáneo. Mientras tanto, la gente se pregunta: ¿realmente necesitamos otro dispositivo que no haga nada? La era de la tecnología nos ha enseñado que a veces, menos es más. Pero aquí estamos, en un ciclo interminable de lanzamientos fallidos, donde cada nuevo gadget llega con una promesa y termina en la caja de "lo que pudo haber sido". Tal vez el "AI Pin" debería haber incluido un modo de "humor" para que nos ríamos de ello mientras lo guardamos en un cajón. Al final, queda la pregunta: ¿será este SDK experimental el inicio de una nueva era de innovación o solo una manera elegante de decir "lo sentimos, no funcionó"? Solo el tiempo lo dirá, pero mientras tanto, no puedo evitar imaginar a los desarrolladores sentados allí, mirando al "AI Pin" como si fuera una obra de arte moderna, preguntándose qué estaban pensando. Así que, amigos, preparémonos para el próximo gran fracaso en el mundo de la tecnología. Y mientras esperamos, recordemos que a veces, lo mejor que podemos hacer es simplemente reírnos de lo que no salió según lo planeado. #HumorTecnológico #AIpin #FracasosInnovadores #DesarrolloDeSoftware #TecnologíaSatírica

So, there’s this thing going on. Final days to apply for $32,000 in artist grants for Decentraland Art Week 2025. If you’re a 3D creator, visual artist, or a curator, you might want to think about submitting something. Or not. I mean, it’s up to you. The theme this year is still open for submissions, but honestly, it’s kind of just whatever. I guess if you have some time to spare and feel like creating something, it could be a good idea. If you’re into that kind of thing. Most people are probably just scrolling through their feeds anyway, so why bother? There’s already so much out there, and who really cares about art grants for Decentraland? It’s like one of those things that sounds nice, but in reality, it just feels like another task to add to your never-ending list of other things you don’t feel like doing. But hey, if you’re feeling inspired or you just want to throw something out there for the sake of it, go ahead and make that submission. It could be fun, I guess. Or it could just be another thing that you’ll forget about in a week. In the end, it’s just a grant. It’s not the end of the world if you miss it. So, if you’re thinking about it, maybe just take a few minutes to consider it. Or not. Whatever floats your boat, really. Anyway, the deadline is coming up, so if you want to participate, now might be the time to get moving. Or maybe just keep scrolling. Your choice. #Decentraland #ArtGrants #ArtistOpportunities #3DCreators #VisualArt

The recent announcement of CEAD inaugurating a center dedicated to 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls is nothing short of infuriating. We are living in an age where technological advancements should lead to significant improvements in efficiency and sustainability, yet here we are, celebrating a move that reeks of superficial progress and misguided priorities. First off, let’s talk about the so-called “Maritime Application Center” (MAC) in Delft. While they dazzle us with their fancy new facility, one has to question the real implications of such a center. Are they genuinely solving the pressing issues of the maritime industry, or are they merely jumping on the bandwagon of 3D printing hype? The idea of using large-scale additive manufacturing to produce boat hulls sounds revolutionary, but let’s face it: this is just another example of throwing technology at a problem without truly understanding the underlying challenges that plague the industry. The maritime sector is facing severe environmental concerns, including pollution from traditional manufacturing processes and shipping practices. Instead of addressing these burning issues head-on, CEAD and others like them seem content to play with shiny new tools. 3D printing, in theory, could reduce waste—a point they love to hammer home in their marketing. But what about the energy consumption and material sourcing involved? Are we simply swapping one form of environmental degradation for another? Furthermore, the focus on large-scale 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls raises significant questions about quality and safety. The maritime industry is not a playground for experimental technologies; lives are at stake. Relying on printed components that could potentially have structural weaknesses is a reckless gamble, and the consequences could be disastrous. Are we prepared to accept the liability if these hulls fail at sea? Let’s not forget the economic implications of this move. Sure, CEAD is likely patting themselves on the back for creating jobs at the MAC, but how many traditional jobs are they putting at risk? The maritime industry relies on skilled labor and craftsmanship that cannot simply be replaced by a machine. By pushing for 3D printing at such a scale, they threaten the livelihoods of countless workers who have dedicated their lives to mastering this trade. In conclusion, while CEAD’s center for 3D printing boat hulls may sound impressive on paper, the reality is that it’s a misguided effort that overlooks critical aspects of sustainability, safety, and social responsibility. We need to demand more from our industries and hold them accountable for their actions instead of blindly celebrating every shiny new innovation. The maritime industry deserves solutions that genuinely address its challenges rather than a mere technological gimmick. #MaritimeIndustry #3DPrinting #Sustainability #CEAD #BoatManufacturing