• German roads thrown into chaos after Google Maps mislabels highways as closed

    Facepalm: In the latest example of why we shouldn't blindly put our faith in online map services, German autobahns and highways were plunged into chaos when Google Maps incorrectly showed that vast sections of the roads were closed. The incident's timing was especially bad as it coincided with the start of a holiday break.
    German motorists likely felt disheartened at the sight of all the stop signs on Google Maps on Thursday. The Guardian reports that major roads in western, northern, south-western and central parts of the country were shown as closed. Even parts of Belgium and the Netherlands appeared to have ground to a halt.
    The situation was exacerbated by the incident taking place at the start of a four-day break for the Ascension holiday, when many Germans were travelling. It led to a huge number of Google Maps users heading for alternative routes to avoid the non-existent closures. Somewhat ironically, this caused huge jams and delays on these smaller roads.
    Drivers not relying on Google Maps – and any Google users who decided to check another service or the news – didn't have to deal with these problems. Apple Maps, Waze, and the traffic reports all showed that everything was moving freely. The major highways were likely quieter than usual as so many Google Maps users were avoiding them.
    The apparent mass closure of so many roads caused panic among those who believed Google Maps' warning. Some thought there had been a terrorist attack or state-sponsored hack, while others speculated about a natural disaster.
    // Related Stories

    When asked about the glitch, which lasted around two hours, Google said the company wouldn't comment on the specific case. It added that Google Maps draws information from three key sources: individual users, public sources such as transportation authorities, and a mix of third-party providers.

    Ars Technica contacted Google to ask about the cause of the problem. A spokesperson said the company "investigated a technical issue that temporarily showed inaccurate road closures on the map" and has "since removed them."
    With Google Maps drawing information from third parties, the issue could partly have been related to the German Automobile Club's warning that there may be heavy traffic at the start of the holiday. Google also added AI features to Maps recently, and we all know how reliable they can be.
    There have been plenty of other incidents in which Google Maps got things very wrong. Germany was cursing the service again earlier this month when it showed highway tunnels being closed in part of the country when they were open.
    In 2023, Google was sued by the family of a North Carolina man who drove his car off a collapsed bridge as he followed directions given by Google Maps. The case is ongoing.
    Masthead: Bhavik Nasit
    #german #roads #thrown #into #chaos
    German roads thrown into chaos after Google Maps mislabels highways as closed
    Facepalm: In the latest example of why we shouldn't blindly put our faith in online map services, German autobahns and highways were plunged into chaos when Google Maps incorrectly showed that vast sections of the roads were closed. The incident's timing was especially bad as it coincided with the start of a holiday break. German motorists likely felt disheartened at the sight of all the stop signs on Google Maps on Thursday. The Guardian reports that major roads in western, northern, south-western and central parts of the country were shown as closed. Even parts of Belgium and the Netherlands appeared to have ground to a halt. The situation was exacerbated by the incident taking place at the start of a four-day break for the Ascension holiday, when many Germans were travelling. It led to a huge number of Google Maps users heading for alternative routes to avoid the non-existent closures. Somewhat ironically, this caused huge jams and delays on these smaller roads. Drivers not relying on Google Maps – and any Google users who decided to check another service or the news – didn't have to deal with these problems. Apple Maps, Waze, and the traffic reports all showed that everything was moving freely. The major highways were likely quieter than usual as so many Google Maps users were avoiding them. The apparent mass closure of so many roads caused panic among those who believed Google Maps' warning. Some thought there had been a terrorist attack or state-sponsored hack, while others speculated about a natural disaster. // Related Stories When asked about the glitch, which lasted around two hours, Google said the company wouldn't comment on the specific case. It added that Google Maps draws information from three key sources: individual users, public sources such as transportation authorities, and a mix of third-party providers. Ars Technica contacted Google to ask about the cause of the problem. A spokesperson said the company "investigated a technical issue that temporarily showed inaccurate road closures on the map" and has "since removed them." With Google Maps drawing information from third parties, the issue could partly have been related to the German Automobile Club's warning that there may be heavy traffic at the start of the holiday. Google also added AI features to Maps recently, and we all know how reliable they can be. There have been plenty of other incidents in which Google Maps got things very wrong. Germany was cursing the service again earlier this month when it showed highway tunnels being closed in part of the country when they were open. In 2023, Google was sued by the family of a North Carolina man who drove his car off a collapsed bridge as he followed directions given by Google Maps. The case is ongoing. Masthead: Bhavik Nasit #german #roads #thrown #into #chaos
    WWW.TECHSPOT.COM
    German roads thrown into chaos after Google Maps mislabels highways as closed
    Facepalm: In the latest example of why we shouldn't blindly put our faith in online map services, German autobahns and highways were plunged into chaos when Google Maps incorrectly showed that vast sections of the roads were closed. The incident's timing was especially bad as it coincided with the start of a holiday break. German motorists likely felt disheartened at the sight of all the stop signs on Google Maps on Thursday. The Guardian reports that major roads in western, northern, south-western and central parts of the country were shown as closed. Even parts of Belgium and the Netherlands appeared to have ground to a halt. The situation was exacerbated by the incident taking place at the start of a four-day break for the Ascension holiday, when many Germans were travelling. It led to a huge number of Google Maps users heading for alternative routes to avoid the non-existent closures. Somewhat ironically, this caused huge jams and delays on these smaller roads. Drivers not relying on Google Maps – and any Google users who decided to check another service or the news – didn't have to deal with these problems. Apple Maps, Waze, and the traffic reports all showed that everything was moving freely. The major highways were likely quieter than usual as so many Google Maps users were avoiding them. The apparent mass closure of so many roads caused panic among those who believed Google Maps' warning. Some thought there had been a terrorist attack or state-sponsored hack, while others speculated about a natural disaster. // Related Stories When asked about the glitch, which lasted around two hours, Google said the company wouldn't comment on the specific case. It added that Google Maps draws information from three key sources: individual users, public sources such as transportation authorities, and a mix of third-party providers. Ars Technica contacted Google to ask about the cause of the problem. A spokesperson said the company "investigated a technical issue that temporarily showed inaccurate road closures on the map" and has "since removed them." With Google Maps drawing information from third parties, the issue could partly have been related to the German Automobile Club's warning that there may be heavy traffic at the start of the holiday. Google also added AI features to Maps recently, and we all know how reliable they can be. There have been plenty of other incidents in which Google Maps got things very wrong. Germany was cursing the service again earlier this month when it showed highway tunnels being closed in part of the country when they were open. In 2023, Google was sued by the family of a North Carolina man who drove his car off a collapsed bridge as he followed directions given by Google Maps. The case is ongoing. Masthead: Bhavik Nasit
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • Google Maps falsely told drivers in Germany that roads across the country were closed

    Chaos ensued on German roads this week after Google Maps wrongly informed drivers that highways throughout the country were closed during a busy holiday. Many of the apparently closed roads were located near large German cities and metropolitan areas, including Berlin, Düsseldorf and Dortmund.
    As reported by a locally based journalist for The Guardian, drivers opening Google’s navigation app would see a swarm of red dots used to indicate no-go areas, which resulted in people looking for alternative routes that caused traffic pile-ups nationwide. The Guardian also reported that police and local authorities were contacted by people confusedabout the supposed standstill.
    To compound the issue, the Google Maps error coincided with the beginning of Germany’s Ascension Day public holiday on May 29, which meant the roads were even busier than usual.
    In ganz DeutschlandChaos bei Google Maps: Dienst zeigt unzählige falsche Sperrungenhttps://t.co/qEfIRrIHx3— Peter BergerMay 29, 2025

    The problem reportedly only lasted for a few hours and by Thursday afternoon only genuine road closures were being displayed. It’s not clear whether Google Maps had just malfunctioned, or if something more nefarious was to blame. "The information in Google Maps comes from a variety of sources. Information such as locations, street names, boundaries, traffic data, and road networks comes from a combination of third-party providers, public sources, and user input," a spokesperson for Google told German newspaper Berliner Morgenpost, adding that it is internally reviewing the problem. "In general, these sources provide a strong foundation for comprehensive and up-to-date maps."
    Technical issues with Google Maps are not uncommon. Back in March, users were reporting that their Timeline — which keeps track of all the places you’ve visited before for future reference — had been wiped, with Google later confirming that some people had indeed had their data deleted, and in some cases, would not be able to recover it.This article originally appeared on Engadget at
    #google #maps #falsely #told #drivers
    Google Maps falsely told drivers in Germany that roads across the country were closed
    Chaos ensued on German roads this week after Google Maps wrongly informed drivers that highways throughout the country were closed during a busy holiday. Many of the apparently closed roads were located near large German cities and metropolitan areas, including Berlin, Düsseldorf and Dortmund. As reported by a locally based journalist for The Guardian, drivers opening Google’s navigation app would see a swarm of red dots used to indicate no-go areas, which resulted in people looking for alternative routes that caused traffic pile-ups nationwide. The Guardian also reported that police and local authorities were contacted by people confusedabout the supposed standstill. To compound the issue, the Google Maps error coincided with the beginning of Germany’s Ascension Day public holiday on May 29, which meant the roads were even busier than usual. In ganz DeutschlandChaos bei Google Maps: Dienst zeigt unzählige falsche Sperrungenhttps://t.co/qEfIRrIHx3— Peter BergerMay 29, 2025 The problem reportedly only lasted for a few hours and by Thursday afternoon only genuine road closures were being displayed. It’s not clear whether Google Maps had just malfunctioned, or if something more nefarious was to blame. "The information in Google Maps comes from a variety of sources. Information such as locations, street names, boundaries, traffic data, and road networks comes from a combination of third-party providers, public sources, and user input," a spokesperson for Google told German newspaper Berliner Morgenpost, adding that it is internally reviewing the problem. "In general, these sources provide a strong foundation for comprehensive and up-to-date maps." Technical issues with Google Maps are not uncommon. Back in March, users were reporting that their Timeline — which keeps track of all the places you’ve visited before for future reference — had been wiped, with Google later confirming that some people had indeed had their data deleted, and in some cases, would not be able to recover it.This article originally appeared on Engadget at #google #maps #falsely #told #drivers
    WWW.ENGADGET.COM
    Google Maps falsely told drivers in Germany that roads across the country were closed
    Chaos ensued on German roads this week after Google Maps wrongly informed drivers that highways throughout the country were closed during a busy holiday. Many of the apparently closed roads were located near large German cities and metropolitan areas, including Berlin, Düsseldorf and Dortmund. As reported by a locally based journalist for The Guardian, drivers opening Google’s navigation app would see a swarm of red dots used to indicate no-go areas, which resulted in people looking for alternative routes that caused traffic pile-ups nationwide. The Guardian also reported that police and local authorities were contacted by people confused (and presumably pretty annoyed) about the supposed standstill. To compound the issue, the Google Maps error coincided with the beginning of Germany’s Ascension Day public holiday on May 29, which meant the roads were even busier than usual. In ganz DeutschlandChaos bei Google Maps: Dienst zeigt unzählige falsche Sperrungenhttps://t.co/qEfIRrIHx3— Peter Berger (@leosgeminix) May 29, 2025 The problem reportedly only lasted for a few hours and by Thursday afternoon only genuine road closures were being displayed. It’s not clear whether Google Maps had just malfunctioned, or if something more nefarious was to blame. "The information in Google Maps comes from a variety of sources. Information such as locations, street names, boundaries, traffic data, and road networks comes from a combination of third-party providers, public sources, and user input," a spokesperson for Google told German newspaper Berliner Morgenpost, adding that it is internally reviewing the problem. "In general, these sources provide a strong foundation for comprehensive and up-to-date maps." Technical issues with Google Maps are not uncommon. Back in March, users were reporting that their Timeline — which keeps track of all the places you’ve visited before for future reference — had been wiped, with Google later confirming that some people had indeed had their data deleted, and in some cases, would not be able to recover it.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/apps/google-maps-falsely-told-drivers-in-germany-that-roads-across-the-country-were-closed-134026943.html?src=rss
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • EA cancels Black Panther game, closes developer Cliffhanger Games

    Electronic Arts has canceled its Black Panther game and closed down developer Cliffhanger Games. IGN, which first reported the news, cites an internal email in which EA Entertainment president Laura Miele notified staff about the changes made to “sharpen our focus and put our creative energy behind the most significant growth opportunities.”“These decisions are hard,” Miele wrote, per IGN. “They affect people we’ve worked with, learned from, and shared real moments with. We’re doing everything we can to support them — including finding opportunities within EA, where we’ve had success helping people land in new roles.”The email continues, detailing that EA will now shift resources to the historically successful Battlefield, The Sims, Skate, and Apex Legends series. Miele also said that a game based on Iron Man is still in the works, as is the third entry in Respawn’s Star Wars Jedi series and BioWare’s next entry in Mass Effect.EA previously laid off around 300 employees across both Respawn Entertainment and Electronic Art’s Fan Care teams in April 2025. Variety reported at the time that EA had effectively canceled the next Titanfall game and another unnamed game in “early-stage incubation.”Polygon has contacted EA for comment and will update this story with any further information we receive.Black Panther was first announced by Marvel Games, EA, and Cliffhanger Games in 2023. The game was part of a three-game deal that Marvel Games reached with EA that also includes an Iron Man game developed by Motive. EA established the Seattle-based Cliffhanger Games in 2023 to work on the Black Panther game, which coincided with the 57th anniversary of the hero. The studio, led by former Monolith executive Kevin Stephens, was staffed by developers known for working on series like Halo, God of War, and Call of Duty.According to a Marvel press release, the Black Panther game was set to be “an original, third-person, single-player Black Panther game...that empowers players to experience what it is like to take on the mantle of Wakanda’s protector, the Black Panther.”See More:
    #cancels #black #panther #game #closes
    EA cancels Black Panther game, closes developer Cliffhanger Games
    Electronic Arts has canceled its Black Panther game and closed down developer Cliffhanger Games. IGN, which first reported the news, cites an internal email in which EA Entertainment president Laura Miele notified staff about the changes made to “sharpen our focus and put our creative energy behind the most significant growth opportunities.”“These decisions are hard,” Miele wrote, per IGN. “They affect people we’ve worked with, learned from, and shared real moments with. We’re doing everything we can to support them — including finding opportunities within EA, where we’ve had success helping people land in new roles.”The email continues, detailing that EA will now shift resources to the historically successful Battlefield, The Sims, Skate, and Apex Legends series. Miele also said that a game based on Iron Man is still in the works, as is the third entry in Respawn’s Star Wars Jedi series and BioWare’s next entry in Mass Effect.EA previously laid off around 300 employees across both Respawn Entertainment and Electronic Art’s Fan Care teams in April 2025. Variety reported at the time that EA had effectively canceled the next Titanfall game and another unnamed game in “early-stage incubation.”Polygon has contacted EA for comment and will update this story with any further information we receive.Black Panther was first announced by Marvel Games, EA, and Cliffhanger Games in 2023. The game was part of a three-game deal that Marvel Games reached with EA that also includes an Iron Man game developed by Motive. EA established the Seattle-based Cliffhanger Games in 2023 to work on the Black Panther game, which coincided with the 57th anniversary of the hero. The studio, led by former Monolith executive Kevin Stephens, was staffed by developers known for working on series like Halo, God of War, and Call of Duty.According to a Marvel press release, the Black Panther game was set to be “an original, third-person, single-player Black Panther game...that empowers players to experience what it is like to take on the mantle of Wakanda’s protector, the Black Panther.”See More: #cancels #black #panther #game #closes
    WWW.POLYGON.COM
    EA cancels Black Panther game, closes developer Cliffhanger Games
    Electronic Arts has canceled its Black Panther game and closed down developer Cliffhanger Games. IGN, which first reported the news, cites an internal email in which EA Entertainment president Laura Miele notified staff about the changes made to “sharpen our focus and put our creative energy behind the most significant growth opportunities.”“These decisions are hard,” Miele wrote, per IGN. “They affect people we’ve worked with, learned from, and shared real moments with. We’re doing everything we can to support them — including finding opportunities within EA, where we’ve had success helping people land in new roles.”The email continues, detailing that EA will now shift resources to the historically successful Battlefield, The Sims, Skate, and Apex Legends series. Miele also said that a game based on Iron Man is still in the works, as is the third entry in Respawn’s Star Wars Jedi series and BioWare’s next entry in Mass Effect.EA previously laid off around 300 employees across both Respawn Entertainment and Electronic Art’s Fan Care teams in April 2025. Variety reported at the time that EA had effectively canceled the next Titanfall game and another unnamed game in “early-stage incubation.”Polygon has contacted EA for comment and will update this story with any further information we receive.Black Panther was first announced by Marvel Games, EA, and Cliffhanger Games in 2023. The game was part of a three-game deal that Marvel Games reached with EA that also includes an Iron Man game developed by Motive. EA established the Seattle-based Cliffhanger Games in 2023 to work on the Black Panther game, which coincided with the 57th anniversary of the hero. The studio, led by former Monolith executive Kevin Stephens, was staffed by developers known for working on series like Halo, God of War, and Call of Duty.According to a Marvel press release, the Black Panther game was set to be “an original, third-person, single-player Black Panther game...that empowers players to experience what it is like to take on the mantle of Wakanda’s protector, the Black Panther.”See More:
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • The best new product offerings from NYCxDESIGN 2025

    We came, we saw, we conquered. From Long Island City to DUMBO, Greenpoint, Chelsea, Tribeca, Nomad, and Soho, design took over New York this past week for NYCxDESIGN. As the widespread agenda can attest, it was a buzzy and busy week in celebration of design.

    This year, the week coincided with both ICFF and Shelter, which made its inaugural debut. If two fairs didn’t present enough design to see, there were also a dizzying array of exhibitions, gatherings, and talks, including AN Interior’s own 10th anniversary party held at Salvatori’s showroom. Brooklyn had a stronger showing than in past years: The programming officially kicked off in Williamsburg and then celebrated its closing night in DUMBO, a newly designated design district. Throughout all the latest products presented, the following stood out for its visual concept, craftsmanship, attention to production, and longevity. Below are the latest releases pulled from both fairs as well as the many showroom and gallery activations throughout the city that were well worth traversing boroughs to check out in-person.
    The Arcora by HEAKO StudioArcora and Himalaya Lunar by HEAKO Studio
    These refined yet playful lights from HEAKO Studio were on view at Shelter. In addition to the standing Oblique Glow light, which balances off of a skyscraper-inspired steel base, the Himalaya Lunar and the Arcora were the latest lighting from the New York–based studio. The former is a white stone affixed to an L-shaped brass pipe, finished by hand. The latter continues the geometric language with a curved aluminum body, built around an illuminating globe. It can be a sconce or tabletop lamp.

    A wood and leather chair on view at OUTSIDE/INReflect by Tanuvi Hegde
    Presented at OUTSIDE/IN by Lyle Gallery and Hello Human, Reflect is a chair designed for the fidgety, stimulated, and anxious. Brooklyn-based furniture designer and architect Tanuvi Hegde uses cherry wood with a hand-stitched leather cushion to craft seating embedded with a steel ball within the armrest for fidgeting. Reflect is part of Hedge’s thesis, ”Exhibit: Furniture for the Anxious Being,” that explores how furniture can respond to emotions and mental health.
    The CMPT collection resolves compact livingCMPT by Lichen and Karimoku Furniture
    Design platform and showroom Lichen collaborated with Karimoku Furniture at ICFF. In addition to re-introducing the ZE sofa from Karimoku’s archive, the duo launched a new collection, CMPT, that combines the latter’s craftsmanship with the former’s New York sensibilities. Designed for practicality, storage, and the limits of compact spaces, the collection begins with the Apple Box, a chestnut cube that can be stacked atop one another to create shifting consoles or compartments. Each modular box is held together by an exposed wooden peg. The collection, elegantly simple, is designed to grow with its owners throughout their life.
    about the latest product releases that caught AN’s eye on aninteriormag.com.
    #best #new #product #offerings #nycxdesign
    The best new product offerings from NYCxDESIGN 2025
    We came, we saw, we conquered. From Long Island City to DUMBO, Greenpoint, Chelsea, Tribeca, Nomad, and Soho, design took over New York this past week for NYCxDESIGN. As the widespread agenda can attest, it was a buzzy and busy week in celebration of design. This year, the week coincided with both ICFF and Shelter, which made its inaugural debut. If two fairs didn’t present enough design to see, there were also a dizzying array of exhibitions, gatherings, and talks, including AN Interior’s own 10th anniversary party held at Salvatori’s showroom. Brooklyn had a stronger showing than in past years: The programming officially kicked off in Williamsburg and then celebrated its closing night in DUMBO, a newly designated design district. Throughout all the latest products presented, the following stood out for its visual concept, craftsmanship, attention to production, and longevity. Below are the latest releases pulled from both fairs as well as the many showroom and gallery activations throughout the city that were well worth traversing boroughs to check out in-person. The Arcora by HEAKO StudioArcora and Himalaya Lunar by HEAKO Studio These refined yet playful lights from HEAKO Studio were on view at Shelter. In addition to the standing Oblique Glow light, which balances off of a skyscraper-inspired steel base, the Himalaya Lunar and the Arcora were the latest lighting from the New York–based studio. The former is a white stone affixed to an L-shaped brass pipe, finished by hand. The latter continues the geometric language with a curved aluminum body, built around an illuminating globe. It can be a sconce or tabletop lamp. A wood and leather chair on view at OUTSIDE/INReflect by Tanuvi Hegde Presented at OUTSIDE/IN by Lyle Gallery and Hello Human, Reflect is a chair designed for the fidgety, stimulated, and anxious. Brooklyn-based furniture designer and architect Tanuvi Hegde uses cherry wood with a hand-stitched leather cushion to craft seating embedded with a steel ball within the armrest for fidgeting. Reflect is part of Hedge’s thesis, ”Exhibit: Furniture for the Anxious Being,” that explores how furniture can respond to emotions and mental health. The CMPT collection resolves compact livingCMPT by Lichen and Karimoku Furniture Design platform and showroom Lichen collaborated with Karimoku Furniture at ICFF. In addition to re-introducing the ZE sofa from Karimoku’s archive, the duo launched a new collection, CMPT, that combines the latter’s craftsmanship with the former’s New York sensibilities. Designed for practicality, storage, and the limits of compact spaces, the collection begins with the Apple Box, a chestnut cube that can be stacked atop one another to create shifting consoles or compartments. Each modular box is held together by an exposed wooden peg. The collection, elegantly simple, is designed to grow with its owners throughout their life. about the latest product releases that caught AN’s eye on aninteriormag.com. #best #new #product #offerings #nycxdesign
    WWW.ARCHPAPER.COM
    The best new product offerings from NYCxDESIGN 2025
    We came, we saw, we conquered. From Long Island City to DUMBO, Greenpoint, Chelsea, Tribeca, Nomad, and Soho, design took over New York this past week for NYCxDESIGN. As the widespread agenda can attest, it was a buzzy and busy week in celebration of design. This year, the week coincided with both ICFF and Shelter, which made its inaugural debut. If two fairs didn’t present enough design to see, there were also a dizzying array of exhibitions, gatherings, and talks, including AN Interior’s own 10th anniversary party held at Salvatori’s showroom. Brooklyn had a stronger showing than in past years: The programming officially kicked off in Williamsburg and then celebrated its closing night in DUMBO, a newly designated design district. Throughout all the latest products presented, the following stood out for its visual concept, craftsmanship, attention to production, and longevity. Below are the latest releases pulled from both fairs as well as the many showroom and gallery activations throughout the city that were well worth traversing boroughs to check out in-person. The Arcora by HEAKO Studio (Courtesy HEAKO Studio) Arcora and Himalaya Lunar by HEAKO Studio These refined yet playful lights from HEAKO Studio were on view at Shelter. In addition to the standing Oblique Glow light, which balances off of a skyscraper-inspired steel base, the Himalaya Lunar and the Arcora were the latest lighting from the New York–based studio. The former is a white stone affixed to an L-shaped brass pipe, finished by hand. The latter continues the geometric language with a curved aluminum body, built around an illuminating globe. It can be a sconce or tabletop lamp. A wood and leather chair on view at OUTSIDE/IN (Jonathan Hokklo) Reflect by Tanuvi Hegde Presented at OUTSIDE/IN by Lyle Gallery and Hello Human, Reflect is a chair designed for the fidgety, stimulated, and anxious. Brooklyn-based furniture designer and architect Tanuvi Hegde uses cherry wood with a hand-stitched leather cushion to craft seating embedded with a steel ball within the armrest for fidgeting. Reflect is part of Hedge’s thesis, ”Exhibit (A): Furniture for the Anxious Being,” that explores how furniture can respond to emotions and mental health. The CMPT collection resolves compact living (Courtesy Lichen/Karimoku Furniture) CMPT by Lichen and Karimoku Furniture Design platform and showroom Lichen collaborated with Karimoku Furniture at ICFF. In addition to re-introducing the ZE sofa from Karimoku’s archive, the duo launched a new collection, CMPT, that combines the latter’s craftsmanship with the former’s New York sensibilities. Designed for practicality, storage, and the limits of compact spaces, the collection begins with the Apple Box, a chestnut cube that can be stacked atop one another to create shifting consoles or compartments. Each modular box is held together by an exposed wooden peg. The collection, elegantly simple, is designed to grow with its owners throughout their life. Read more about the latest product releases that caught AN’s eye on aninteriormag.com.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • Meet Cathy Tie, Bride of “China’s Frankenstein”

    Since the Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui was released from prison in 2022, he has sought to make a scientific comeback and to repair his reputation after a three-year incarceration for illegally creating the world’s first gene-edited children. 

    While he has bounced between cities, jobs, and meetings with investors, one area of visible success on his come-back trail has been his X.com account, @Jiankui_He, which has become his main way of spreading his ideas to the world. Starting in September 2022, when he joined the platform, the account stuck to the scientist’s main themes, including promising a more careful approach to his dream of creating more gene-edited children. “I will do it, only after society has accepted it,” he posted in August 2024. He also shared mundane images of his daily life, including golf games and his family.

    But over time, it evolved and started to go viral—first with a series of selfies accompanied by grandiose statements, and then, in April of this year, it became particularly outrageous and even troll-like, blasting out bizarre messages. This has left observers unsure what to take seriously.

    Last month, in reply to MIT Technology Review’s questions about who was responsible for the account’s transformation into a font of clever memes, He emailed us back: “It’s thanks to Cathy Tie.”

    You may not be familiar with Tie but she’s no stranger to the public spotlight. A former Thiel fellow, she is a partner in the attention-grabbing Los Angeles Project, which promised to create glow-in-the-dark pets. Over the past several weeks, though, the 29-year-old Canadian entrepreneur has started to get more and more attention as the new wife toHe Jiankui. On April 15, He announced a new venture, Cathy Medicine, that would take up his mission of editing human embryos to create people resistant to diseases like Alzheimer’s or cancer. Then just a few days later, on April 18, He and Tie announced that they got married, posting pictures of themselves in traditional Chinese wedding attire.

    But now, Tie says that just a month after marrying “the most controversial scientist in the world,” her plans to relocate from Los Angeles to Beijing to be with He are in disarray; she says she’s been denied entry to China and the two “may never see each other again,” as He’s passport is being held by Chinese authorities and he can’t leave the country.

    Reached by phone in Manila, Tie said authorities in the Philippines intercepted her during a layover on May 17 and told her she couldn’t board a plane to China, where she was born and where she says she has a valid 10-year visa. She claims they didn’t say why but told her she is likely “on a watch list.” 

    “While I’m concerned about my marriage, I am more concerned about what this means for humanity and the future of science,” Tie posted to her own X account.

    A match made in gene-editing heaven

    The romance between He and Tie has been playing out in public over the past several weeks through a series of reveals on He’s X feed, which had already started going viral late last year thanks to his style of posting awkward selfies alongside maxims about the untapped potential of heritable gene editing, or changing people’s DNA when they’re just embryos in an IVF dish. 

    “Humanwill no longer be controlled by Darwin’s evolution,” He wrote in March. That post, which showed him standing in an empty lab, gazing into the distance, garnered 9.7 million views. And then, a week later for 13.3 million: “Ethics is holding back scientific innovation and progress.” 

    In April, the feed started to change even more drastically. 

    He’s posts became increasingly provocative, with better English and a unique sensibility of online culture. “Stop asking for cat girls. I’m trying to cure disease,” the account posted on April 15. Two days later, the account followed-up: “I literally went to prison for this shit.” 

    This shift coincided with the development of his romance with Tie. Tie told us she has visited China three times this year, including a three-week stint in April when she and He got married after a whirlwind romance. She bought him a silver wedding ring made up of intertwined DNA strands. 

    The odd behavior on He’s X feed and the sudden marriage have left followers wondering if they are watching a love story, a new kind of business venture, or performance art. It might be all three. 

    A wedding photo posted by Tie on Chinese social media platform Rednote shows the couple sitting at a banquet hall, with a small number of guests. MIT Technology Review has been able to identify several people who attended: Cai Xilei, He’s criminal attorney; Liu Haiyan, an investor and former business partner of He; and Darren Zhu, an artist and Thiel fellow who is making a “speculative” documentary about the biophysicist that will blur the boundaries of fiction and reality.

    In the phone interview, Tie declined to say if she and He are legally married. Tie also confirmed she celebrated a wedding less than one year ago with someone else in California, in July of 2024, but noted they broke up after a few months; she also declined to describe the legal status of that marriage. In the phone call, Tie emphasized that her relationship with He is genuine: “I wouldn’t marry him if I wasn’t in love with him.”

    An up and comer

    Years before Tie got into a relationship with He, she was getting plenty of attention in her own right. She became a Thiel Fellow in 2015, when she was just 18. That program, started by billionaire Peter Thiel, gave her a grant of to drop out of the University of Toronto and start a gene testing company, Ranomics. 

    Soon, she began appearing on the entrepreneurs circuit, a “wunderkind” who was featured on a Forbes “30 Under 30” list in 2018 and was presented as an up-and-coming venture capitalist on CNN that same year. In 2020, she started her second company, Locke Bio, that focuses on online telemedicine.

    Like Thiel, Tie has also staked out contrarian positions. She’s called mainstream genomics a scam and described entrepreneurship as a way to escape the hidebound practices of academia and bioethics. “Starting companies is my preferred form of art,” she posted in 2022, linking to an interview on CNBC. 

    By February 2025, Tie was ready to announce another new venture, the Los Angeles Project, a stealth company she had incorporated in 2023 under her legal name, Cheng Cheng Tie. The company, started with the Austin-based biohacker and artist Josie Zayner, says it will try to modify animal embryos, including to make fluorescent glow-in-the-dark rabbits as pets.

    The Los Angeles Project revels in explicitly transgressive aims for embryo editing, including a plan to add horn genes to horse embryos to make a unicorn. That’s consistent with Zayner’s past stunts, which include injecting herself with CRISPR during a livestream. “This is a company that should not exist,” Zayner said in announcing the newly public project.

    Although the Los Angeles Project has only a tiny staff with uncertain qualifications, it did raise million from the 1517 fund, a venture group that supports “dropouts” and whose managers previously ran the Thiel Fellowship. 

    Asked for his assessment of Tie, Michael Gibson, a 1517 partner, said in an email that he thinks Tie is “not just exceptional, but profoundly exceptional.” He sent along a list of observations he’d jotted down about Tie before funding her company, which approvingly noted her “hyper-fluent competence” and “low need for social approval. Thoughts & actions routinely unconventional.” 

    A comeback story

    He first gained notoriety in 2018, when he and co-workers at the Southern University of Science & Technology in Shenzhen, injected the CRISPR gene-editor into several viable human embryos, and then transferred these into volunteers, leading to the birth of three girls who he claimed would be resistant to HIV. A subsequent Chinese investigation found he’d practiced medicine illegally while “pursuing fame and fortune.” A court later sentenced him to three years in prison.

    He has never apologized for his experiments, except to say he acted “too quickly” and to express regret for the trouble he’d caused his former wife and two daughters.Since his release from prison, He has sought to restart his research and convince people that he should be recognized as the “Chinese Darwin,” not “China’s Frankenstein,” as the press once dubbed him. 

    But his comeback has been bumpy. He lost a position at Wuchang University of Technology, a small private university in Hubei province, after some negative press. In February 2024, He posted that his application for funding from the Muscular Dystrophy Association was rejected. Last September, he even posted pictures of his torn shirt—which he said was the result of an assault by jealous rivals.

    One area of clear success, though, was the growing reach of his X profile, which today has ballooned to more than 130,000 followers. And as his public profile rose, some started encouraging He to find ways to cash in. Andrew Hessel, a futurist and synthetic biologist active in US ethics debates, says he tried to get He invited to give a TED Talk. “His story is unique, and I wanted to see his story get more widespread attention, if only as a cautionary tale,” Hessel says. “I think he is a lightning rod for a generation of people working in life sciences.”

    Later, Hessel says he sent him information on how to join X’s revenue-sharing program. “I said, ‘You have a powerful voice.’ Have you looked into monetization?” Hessel says.

    By last fall, He was also welcoming visitors to what he called a new lab in Beijing. One person who took him up on the offer was Steve Hsu, a Michigan State physics professor who has started several genetics companies and was visiting Beijing. 

    They ended up talking for hours. Hsu says that He expressed a desire to move to the US and start a company, and that he shared his idea for conducting a clinical trial of embryo editing in South Africa, possibly for the prevention of HIV. 

    Hsu says he later arranged an invitation for He to give a lecture in the United States. “You are a little radioactive, but things are opening up,” Hsu told him. But He declined the offer because the Chinese government is holding his passport—a common tactic it uses to restrict the movement of sensitive or high-profile figures—and won’t return it to him. “He doesn’t even know why. He literally doesn’t know,” says Hsu. “According to the law, they should give it back to him.”

    A curious triangle

    Despite any plans by He and Tie to advance the idea, creating designer babies is currently illegal in most of the world, including China and the US. Some experts, however, fret that forbidding the technology will only drive it underground and make it attractive to biohackers or scientists outside the mainstream. 

    That’s one reason Tie’s simultaneous connection to two notable biotech renegades—He and Zayner—is worth watching. “There is clearly a triangle forming in some way,” says Hessel.

    With Tie stuck outside China, and He being kept inside the country, their new gene-editing venture, Cathy Medicine, faces an uncertain future. Tie has posted previously on Rednote that she was “helping Dr. He open up the U.S. market,” and was planning to return to the US with He for scientific research. But when we spoke on the phone, Tie declined to disclose their next steps and said their predicament means the project is “out of the window now.”

    But even as the couple remains separated, their social media game is stronger than ever. As she waited in Manila, Tie sought help from friends and followers, even the entire internet. She blasted out a tweet to “crypto people” calling them “too pussy to stand up for things when it matters.” Within hours, someone had created a memecoin called $GENE as a way for the public to support the couple. 

    On May 20, Tie posted on X claiming that the amount donated to them is now worth almost million. “I may need to retract my last statement about crypto,” wrote Tie. 

    He’s X account also retweeted to express support: “I only want to reunite with my wife @CathyTie, and continue my gene editing research.” He added the hashtag $GENE.
    #meet #cathy #tie #bride #chinas
    Meet Cathy Tie, Bride of “China’s Frankenstein”
    Since the Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui was released from prison in 2022, he has sought to make a scientific comeback and to repair his reputation after a three-year incarceration for illegally creating the world’s first gene-edited children.  While he has bounced between cities, jobs, and meetings with investors, one area of visible success on his come-back trail has been his X.com account, @Jiankui_He, which has become his main way of spreading his ideas to the world. Starting in September 2022, when he joined the platform, the account stuck to the scientist’s main themes, including promising a more careful approach to his dream of creating more gene-edited children. “I will do it, only after society has accepted it,” he posted in August 2024. He also shared mundane images of his daily life, including golf games and his family. But over time, it evolved and started to go viral—first with a series of selfies accompanied by grandiose statements, and then, in April of this year, it became particularly outrageous and even troll-like, blasting out bizarre messages. This has left observers unsure what to take seriously. Last month, in reply to MIT Technology Review’s questions about who was responsible for the account’s transformation into a font of clever memes, He emailed us back: “It’s thanks to Cathy Tie.” You may not be familiar with Tie but she’s no stranger to the public spotlight. A former Thiel fellow, she is a partner in the attention-grabbing Los Angeles Project, which promised to create glow-in-the-dark pets. Over the past several weeks, though, the 29-year-old Canadian entrepreneur has started to get more and more attention as the new wife toHe Jiankui. On April 15, He announced a new venture, Cathy Medicine, that would take up his mission of editing human embryos to create people resistant to diseases like Alzheimer’s or cancer. Then just a few days later, on April 18, He and Tie announced that they got married, posting pictures of themselves in traditional Chinese wedding attire. But now, Tie says that just a month after marrying “the most controversial scientist in the world,” her plans to relocate from Los Angeles to Beijing to be with He are in disarray; she says she’s been denied entry to China and the two “may never see each other again,” as He’s passport is being held by Chinese authorities and he can’t leave the country. Reached by phone in Manila, Tie said authorities in the Philippines intercepted her during a layover on May 17 and told her she couldn’t board a plane to China, where she was born and where she says she has a valid 10-year visa. She claims they didn’t say why but told her she is likely “on a watch list.”  “While I’m concerned about my marriage, I am more concerned about what this means for humanity and the future of science,” Tie posted to her own X account. A match made in gene-editing heaven The romance between He and Tie has been playing out in public over the past several weeks through a series of reveals on He’s X feed, which had already started going viral late last year thanks to his style of posting awkward selfies alongside maxims about the untapped potential of heritable gene editing, or changing people’s DNA when they’re just embryos in an IVF dish.  “Humanwill no longer be controlled by Darwin’s evolution,” He wrote in March. That post, which showed him standing in an empty lab, gazing into the distance, garnered 9.7 million views. And then, a week later for 13.3 million: “Ethics is holding back scientific innovation and progress.”  In April, the feed started to change even more drastically.  He’s posts became increasingly provocative, with better English and a unique sensibility of online culture. “Stop asking for cat girls. I’m trying to cure disease,” the account posted on April 15. Two days later, the account followed-up: “I literally went to prison for this shit.”  This shift coincided with the development of his romance with Tie. Tie told us she has visited China three times this year, including a three-week stint in April when she and He got married after a whirlwind romance. She bought him a silver wedding ring made up of intertwined DNA strands.  The odd behavior on He’s X feed and the sudden marriage have left followers wondering if they are watching a love story, a new kind of business venture, or performance art. It might be all three.  A wedding photo posted by Tie on Chinese social media platform Rednote shows the couple sitting at a banquet hall, with a small number of guests. MIT Technology Review has been able to identify several people who attended: Cai Xilei, He’s criminal attorney; Liu Haiyan, an investor and former business partner of He; and Darren Zhu, an artist and Thiel fellow who is making a “speculative” documentary about the biophysicist that will blur the boundaries of fiction and reality. In the phone interview, Tie declined to say if she and He are legally married. Tie also confirmed she celebrated a wedding less than one year ago with someone else in California, in July of 2024, but noted they broke up after a few months; she also declined to describe the legal status of that marriage. In the phone call, Tie emphasized that her relationship with He is genuine: “I wouldn’t marry him if I wasn’t in love with him.” An up and comer Years before Tie got into a relationship with He, she was getting plenty of attention in her own right. She became a Thiel Fellow in 2015, when she was just 18. That program, started by billionaire Peter Thiel, gave her a grant of to drop out of the University of Toronto and start a gene testing company, Ranomics.  Soon, she began appearing on the entrepreneurs circuit, a “wunderkind” who was featured on a Forbes “30 Under 30” list in 2018 and was presented as an up-and-coming venture capitalist on CNN that same year. In 2020, she started her second company, Locke Bio, that focuses on online telemedicine. Like Thiel, Tie has also staked out contrarian positions. She’s called mainstream genomics a scam and described entrepreneurship as a way to escape the hidebound practices of academia and bioethics. “Starting companies is my preferred form of art,” she posted in 2022, linking to an interview on CNBC.  By February 2025, Tie was ready to announce another new venture, the Los Angeles Project, a stealth company she had incorporated in 2023 under her legal name, Cheng Cheng Tie. The company, started with the Austin-based biohacker and artist Josie Zayner, says it will try to modify animal embryos, including to make fluorescent glow-in-the-dark rabbits as pets. The Los Angeles Project revels in explicitly transgressive aims for embryo editing, including a plan to add horn genes to horse embryos to make a unicorn. That’s consistent with Zayner’s past stunts, which include injecting herself with CRISPR during a livestream. “This is a company that should not exist,” Zayner said in announcing the newly public project. Although the Los Angeles Project has only a tiny staff with uncertain qualifications, it did raise million from the 1517 fund, a venture group that supports “dropouts” and whose managers previously ran the Thiel Fellowship.  Asked for his assessment of Tie, Michael Gibson, a 1517 partner, said in an email that he thinks Tie is “not just exceptional, but profoundly exceptional.” He sent along a list of observations he’d jotted down about Tie before funding her company, which approvingly noted her “hyper-fluent competence” and “low need for social approval. Thoughts & actions routinely unconventional.”  A comeback story He first gained notoriety in 2018, when he and co-workers at the Southern University of Science & Technology in Shenzhen, injected the CRISPR gene-editor into several viable human embryos, and then transferred these into volunteers, leading to the birth of three girls who he claimed would be resistant to HIV. A subsequent Chinese investigation found he’d practiced medicine illegally while “pursuing fame and fortune.” A court later sentenced him to three years in prison. He has never apologized for his experiments, except to say he acted “too quickly” and to express regret for the trouble he’d caused his former wife and two daughters.Since his release from prison, He has sought to restart his research and convince people that he should be recognized as the “Chinese Darwin,” not “China’s Frankenstein,” as the press once dubbed him.  But his comeback has been bumpy. He lost a position at Wuchang University of Technology, a small private university in Hubei province, after some negative press. In February 2024, He posted that his application for funding from the Muscular Dystrophy Association was rejected. Last September, he even posted pictures of his torn shirt—which he said was the result of an assault by jealous rivals. One area of clear success, though, was the growing reach of his X profile, which today has ballooned to more than 130,000 followers. And as his public profile rose, some started encouraging He to find ways to cash in. Andrew Hessel, a futurist and synthetic biologist active in US ethics debates, says he tried to get He invited to give a TED Talk. “His story is unique, and I wanted to see his story get more widespread attention, if only as a cautionary tale,” Hessel says. “I think he is a lightning rod for a generation of people working in life sciences.” Later, Hessel says he sent him information on how to join X’s revenue-sharing program. “I said, ‘You have a powerful voice.’ Have you looked into monetization?” Hessel says. By last fall, He was also welcoming visitors to what he called a new lab in Beijing. One person who took him up on the offer was Steve Hsu, a Michigan State physics professor who has started several genetics companies and was visiting Beijing.  They ended up talking for hours. Hsu says that He expressed a desire to move to the US and start a company, and that he shared his idea for conducting a clinical trial of embryo editing in South Africa, possibly for the prevention of HIV.  Hsu says he later arranged an invitation for He to give a lecture in the United States. “You are a little radioactive, but things are opening up,” Hsu told him. But He declined the offer because the Chinese government is holding his passport—a common tactic it uses to restrict the movement of sensitive or high-profile figures—and won’t return it to him. “He doesn’t even know why. He literally doesn’t know,” says Hsu. “According to the law, they should give it back to him.” A curious triangle Despite any plans by He and Tie to advance the idea, creating designer babies is currently illegal in most of the world, including China and the US. Some experts, however, fret that forbidding the technology will only drive it underground and make it attractive to biohackers or scientists outside the mainstream.  That’s one reason Tie’s simultaneous connection to two notable biotech renegades—He and Zayner—is worth watching. “There is clearly a triangle forming in some way,” says Hessel. With Tie stuck outside China, and He being kept inside the country, their new gene-editing venture, Cathy Medicine, faces an uncertain future. Tie has posted previously on Rednote that she was “helping Dr. He open up the U.S. market,” and was planning to return to the US with He for scientific research. But when we spoke on the phone, Tie declined to disclose their next steps and said their predicament means the project is “out of the window now.” But even as the couple remains separated, their social media game is stronger than ever. As she waited in Manila, Tie sought help from friends and followers, even the entire internet. She blasted out a tweet to “crypto people” calling them “too pussy to stand up for things when it matters.” Within hours, someone had created a memecoin called $GENE as a way for the public to support the couple.  On May 20, Tie posted on X claiming that the amount donated to them is now worth almost million. “I may need to retract my last statement about crypto,” wrote Tie.  He’s X account also retweeted to express support: “I only want to reunite with my wife @CathyTie, and continue my gene editing research.” He added the hashtag $GENE. #meet #cathy #tie #bride #chinas
    WWW.TECHNOLOGYREVIEW.COM
    Meet Cathy Tie, Bride of “China’s Frankenstein”
    Since the Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui was released from prison in 2022, he has sought to make a scientific comeback and to repair his reputation after a three-year incarceration for illegally creating the world’s first gene-edited children.  While he has bounced between cities, jobs, and meetings with investors, one area of visible success on his come-back trail has been his X.com account, @Jiankui_He, which has become his main way of spreading his ideas to the world. Starting in September 2022, when he joined the platform, the account stuck to the scientist’s main themes, including promising a more careful approach to his dream of creating more gene-edited children. “I will do it, only after society has accepted it,” he posted in August 2024. He also shared mundane images of his daily life, including golf games and his family. But over time, it evolved and started to go viral—first with a series of selfies accompanied by grandiose statements (“Every pioneer or prophet must suffer”), and then, in April of this year, it became particularly outrageous and even troll-like, blasting out bizarre messages (“Good morning bitches. How many embryos have you gene edited today?”). This has left observers unsure what to take seriously. Last month, in reply to MIT Technology Review’s questions about who was responsible for the account’s transformation into a font of clever memes, He emailed us back: “It’s thanks to Cathy Tie.” You may not be familiar with Tie but she’s no stranger to the public spotlight. A former Thiel fellow, she is a partner in the attention-grabbing Los Angeles Project, which promised to create glow-in-the-dark pets. Over the past several weeks, though, the 29-year-old Canadian entrepreneur has started to get more and more attention as the new wife to (and apparent social media mastermind behind) He Jiankui. On April 15, He announced a new venture, Cathy Medicine, that would take up his mission of editing human embryos to create people resistant to diseases like Alzheimer’s or cancer. Then just a few days later, on April 18, He and Tie announced that they got married, posting pictures of themselves in traditional Chinese wedding attire. But now, Tie says that just a month after marrying “the most controversial scientist in the world,” her plans to relocate from Los Angeles to Beijing to be with He are in disarray; she says she’s been denied entry to China and the two “may never see each other again,” as He’s passport is being held by Chinese authorities and he can’t leave the country. Reached by phone in Manila, Tie said authorities in the Philippines intercepted her during a layover on May 17 and told her she couldn’t board a plane to China, where she was born and where she says she has a valid 10-year visa. She claims they didn’t say why but told her she is likely “on a watch list.” (MIT Technology Review could not independently confirm Tie’s account.)  “While I’m concerned about my marriage, I am more concerned about what this means for humanity and the future of science,” Tie posted to her own X account. A match made in gene-editing heaven The romance between He and Tie has been playing out in public over the past several weeks through a series of reveals on He’s X feed, which had already started going viral late last year thanks to his style of posting awkward selfies alongside maxims about the untapped potential of heritable gene editing, or changing people’s DNA when they’re just embryos in an IVF dish.  “Human [sic] will no longer be controlled by Darwin’s evolution,” He wrote in March. That post, which showed him standing in an empty lab, gazing into the distance, garnered 9.7 million views. And then, a week later for 13.3 million: “Ethics is holding back scientific innovation and progress.”  In April, the feed started to change even more drastically.  He’s posts became increasingly provocative, with better English and a unique sensibility of online culture. “Stop asking for cat girls. I’m trying to cure disease,” the account posted on April 15. Two days later, the account followed-up: “I literally went to prison for this shit.”  This shift coincided with the development of his romance with Tie. Tie told us she has visited China three times this year, including a three-week stint in April when she and He got married after a whirlwind romance. She bought him a silver wedding ring made up of intertwined DNA strands.  The odd behavior on He’s X feed and the sudden marriage have left followers wondering if they are watching a love story, a new kind of business venture, or performance art. It might be all three.  A wedding photo posted by Tie on Chinese social media platform Rednote shows the couple sitting at a banquet hall, with a small number of guests. MIT Technology Review has been able to identify several people who attended: Cai Xilei, He’s criminal attorney; Liu Haiyan, an investor and former business partner of He; and Darren Zhu, an artist and Thiel fellow who is making a “speculative” documentary about the biophysicist that will blur the boundaries of fiction and reality. In the phone interview, Tie declined to say if she and He are legally married. Tie also confirmed she celebrated a wedding less than one year ago with someone else in California, in July of 2024, but noted they broke up after a few months; she also declined to describe the legal status of that marriage. In the phone call, Tie emphasized that her relationship with He is genuine: “I wouldn’t marry him if I wasn’t in love with him.” An up and comer Years before Tie got into a relationship with He, she was getting plenty of attention in her own right. She became a Thiel Fellow in 2015, when she was just 18. That program, started by billionaire Peter Thiel, gave her a grant of $100,000 to drop out of the University of Toronto and start a gene testing company, Ranomics.  Soon, she began appearing on the entrepreneurs circuit, a “wunderkind” who was featured on a Forbes “30 Under 30” list in 2018 and was presented as an up-and-coming venture capitalist on CNN that same year. In 2020, she started her second company, Locke Bio, that focuses on online telemedicine. Like Thiel, Tie has also staked out contrarian positions. She’s called mainstream genomics a scam and described entrepreneurship as a way to escape the hidebound practices of academia and bioethics. “Starting companies is my preferred form of art,” she posted in 2022, linking to an interview on CNBC.  By February 2025, Tie was ready to announce another new venture, the Los Angeles Project, a stealth company she had incorporated in 2023 under her legal name, Cheng Cheng Tie. The company, started with the Austin-based biohacker and artist Josie Zayner, says it will try to modify animal embryos, including to make fluorescent glow-in-the-dark rabbits as pets. The Los Angeles Project revels in explicitly transgressive aims for embryo editing, including a plan to add horn genes to horse embryos to make a unicorn. That’s consistent with Zayner’s past stunts, which include injecting herself with CRISPR during a livestream. “This is a company that should not exist,” Zayner said in announcing the newly public project. Although the Los Angeles Project has only a tiny staff with uncertain qualifications, it did raise $1 million from the 1517 fund, a venture group that supports “dropouts” and whose managers previously ran the Thiel Fellowship.  Asked for his assessment of Tie, Michael Gibson, a 1517 partner, said in an email that he thinks Tie is “not just exceptional, but profoundly exceptional.” He sent along a list of observations he’d jotted down about Tie before funding her company, which approvingly noted her “hyper-fluent competence” and “low need for social approval. Thoughts & actions routinely unconventional.”  A comeback story He first gained notoriety in 2018, when he and co-workers at the Southern University of Science & Technology in Shenzhen, injected the CRISPR gene-editor into several viable human embryos, and then transferred these into volunteers, leading to the birth of three girls who he claimed would be resistant to HIV. A subsequent Chinese investigation found he’d practiced medicine illegally while “pursuing fame and fortune.” A court later sentenced him to three years in prison. He has never apologized for his experiments, except to say he acted “too quickly” and to express regret for the trouble he’d caused his former wife and two daughters. (According to a leaked WeChat post by his ex-wife, she divorced him in 2024 “because of a major fault on his side.”) Since his release from prison, He has sought to restart his research and convince people that he should be recognized as the “Chinese Darwin,” not “China’s Frankenstein,” as the press once dubbed him.  But his comeback has been bumpy. He lost a position at Wuchang University of Technology, a small private university in Hubei province, after some negative press. In February 2024, He posted that his application for funding from the Muscular Dystrophy Association was rejected. Last September, he even posted pictures of his torn shirt—which he said was the result of an assault by jealous rivals. One area of clear success, though, was the growing reach of his X profile, which today has ballooned to more than 130,000 followers. And as his public profile rose, some started encouraging He to find ways to cash in. Andrew Hessel, a futurist and synthetic biologist active in US ethics debates, says he tried to get He invited to give a TED Talk. “His story is unique, and I wanted to see his story get more widespread attention, if only as a cautionary tale,” Hessel says. “I think he is a lightning rod for a generation of people working in life sciences.” Later, Hessel says he sent him information on how to join X’s revenue-sharing program. “I said, ‘You have a powerful voice.’ Have you looked into monetization?” Hessel says. By last fall, He was also welcoming visitors to what he called a new lab in Beijing. One person who took him up on the offer was Steve Hsu, a Michigan State physics professor who has started several genetics companies and was visiting Beijing.  They ended up talking for hours. Hsu says that He expressed a desire to move to the US and start a company, and that he shared his idea for conducting a clinical trial of embryo editing in South Africa, possibly for the prevention of HIV.  Hsu says he later arranged an invitation for He to give a lecture in the United States. “You are a little radioactive, but things are opening up,” Hsu told him. But He declined the offer because the Chinese government is holding his passport—a common tactic it uses to restrict the movement of sensitive or high-profile figures—and won’t return it to him. “He doesn’t even know why. He literally doesn’t know,” says Hsu. “According to the law, they should give it back to him.” A curious triangle Despite any plans by He and Tie to advance the idea, creating designer babies is currently illegal in most of the world, including China and the US. Some experts, however, fret that forbidding the technology will only drive it underground and make it attractive to biohackers or scientists outside the mainstream.  That’s one reason Tie’s simultaneous connection to two notable biotech renegades—He and Zayner—is worth watching. “There is clearly a triangle forming in some way,” says Hessel. With Tie stuck outside China, and He being kept inside the country, their new gene-editing venture, Cathy Medicine, faces an uncertain future. Tie has posted previously on Rednote that she was “helping Dr. He open up the U.S. market,” and was planning to return to the US with He for scientific research. But when we spoke on the phone, Tie declined to disclose their next steps and said their predicament means the project is “out of the window now.” But even as the couple remains separated, their social media game is stronger than ever. As she waited in Manila, Tie sought help from friends and followers, even the entire internet. She blasted out a tweet to “crypto people” calling them “too pussy to stand up for things when it matters.” Within hours, someone had created a memecoin called $GENE as a way for the public to support the couple.  On May 20, Tie posted on X claiming that the amount donated to them is now worth almost $2 million. “I may need to retract my last statement about crypto,” wrote Tie.  He’s X account also retweeted to express support: “I only want to reunite with my wife @CathyTie, and continue my gene editing research.” He added the hashtag $GENE.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • Buried time capsule discovered under Transamerica Pyramid sheds light on San Francisco’s history

    It began with a tip–an email from a San Francisco resident who had read The Secret, Byron Preiss’s 1982 book about hidden treasures. That message set off a chain of events that led to a 1974 building plan drawn by architect William Pereira, a visit to an underground pump room, and the eventual discovery, beneath six feet of concrete, of a long-lost time capsule buried deep within the Transamerica Pyramid.

    The capsule, a 14-by-16-inch metal cylinder, was unearthed during a recent renovation of the building. Buried in 1974, it offers a glimpse into life in San Francisco during the tower’s construction and reveals key details about the project itself. Its contents will be displayed in a new exhibit curated in partnership with Foster + Partners opening May 18 in the building’s lobby.
    The capsule was located based on an email tip and a 1974 building plan labeled “Time Capsule” drawn by architect William Pereira.The capsule, a 14-by-16-inch metal cylinder, offers a glimpse into life in San Francisco during the tower’s construction and reveals key details about the project itself.When the Transamerica Pyramid officially opened in 1972, it was hailed as a symbol of the city’s growth and ambition. Local media buzzed with anticipation. Two years later, as the Transamerica Corporation moved out of the building, the company assembled the capsule’s contents and commemorated its burial with a celebratory event. A plaque was installed above the site, instructing that the capsule remain untouched for 50 years. As decades passed and renovations altered the building’s layout, the plaque disappeared—and the capsule wasforgotten.

    That is, until the email tip arrived. Fifty years after it was buried, just ahead of when it was intended to be opened, the capsule was located.
    This flyer was circulated in 1969 to stop the Transamerica Pyramid’s construction. It was among the objects inside the time capsule.The timing of its burial coincided with a chaotic chapter in San Francisco’s history. In 1974, Mayor Joseph Alioto’s wife mysteriously vanished, only to reappear two weeks later claiming she’d staged her disappearance to punish him for ignoring her. Around the same time, 19-year-old heiress Patty Hearst was kidnapped at gunpoint by members of the radical Symbionese Liberation Army. The Transamerica Pyramid too made headlines: The San Francisco Chronicle dismissed it as “the world’s largest architectural folly,” and the city’s own planner derided it as “an inhumane creation.”

    These turbulent moments, and the spirit of the era, were captured in the time capsule’s contents, along with a recipe for Pisco Punch, the famed cocktail invented at the nearby Bank Exchange Saloon. Once buried and nearly forgotten, the capsule now takes center stage in a curated exhibit in the building’s lobby, offering a vivid snapshot of a city in the midst of transformation.
    “Through moments of prosperity and periods of challenge, the Transamerica Pyramid has stood tall as one of the iconic silhouettes of San Francisco’s skyline. I see it now not just as a symbol of bold design, but of resilience–for this neighborhood, and for our city,” said San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie. “Fifty years from now, my hope is that we will look back on this era–this exact moment in time–as the beginning of a new chapter for San Francisco,” he added.
    Opening to the public on May 18, the exhibition aims to honor the legacy of the Transamerica Pyramid while highlighting the design of its recent renovation.SHVO and Deutsche Finance America purchased the Transamerica Pyramid in 2020 for million, pledging to preserve its historic legacy. In 2024, the landmark reopened following extensive renovations by Foster + Partners, marking a major step in the broader revitalization of downtown San Francisco, which had been deeply impacted by widespread office closures during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    “This exhibition serves as a reminder of the significance of the Transamerica Pyramid as a global icon since its inception more than a half century ago,” said Michael Shvo, chairman and CEO of SHVO. “By sharing the contents of the time capsule publicly, as a thoughtfully designed exhibition, we are honoring Transamerica Pyramid’s legacy and seamlessly complementing our meticulous remastering.”
    The Time Capsule Exhibition opens to the public on May 18.
    #buried #time #capsule #discovered #under
    Buried time capsule discovered under Transamerica Pyramid sheds light on San Francisco’s history
    It began with a tip–an email from a San Francisco resident who had read The Secret, Byron Preiss’s 1982 book about hidden treasures. That message set off a chain of events that led to a 1974 building plan drawn by architect William Pereira, a visit to an underground pump room, and the eventual discovery, beneath six feet of concrete, of a long-lost time capsule buried deep within the Transamerica Pyramid. The capsule, a 14-by-16-inch metal cylinder, was unearthed during a recent renovation of the building. Buried in 1974, it offers a glimpse into life in San Francisco during the tower’s construction and reveals key details about the project itself. Its contents will be displayed in a new exhibit curated in partnership with Foster + Partners opening May 18 in the building’s lobby. The capsule was located based on an email tip and a 1974 building plan labeled “Time Capsule” drawn by architect William Pereira.The capsule, a 14-by-16-inch metal cylinder, offers a glimpse into life in San Francisco during the tower’s construction and reveals key details about the project itself.When the Transamerica Pyramid officially opened in 1972, it was hailed as a symbol of the city’s growth and ambition. Local media buzzed with anticipation. Two years later, as the Transamerica Corporation moved out of the building, the company assembled the capsule’s contents and commemorated its burial with a celebratory event. A plaque was installed above the site, instructing that the capsule remain untouched for 50 years. As decades passed and renovations altered the building’s layout, the plaque disappeared—and the capsule wasforgotten. That is, until the email tip arrived. Fifty years after it was buried, just ahead of when it was intended to be opened, the capsule was located. This flyer was circulated in 1969 to stop the Transamerica Pyramid’s construction. It was among the objects inside the time capsule.The timing of its burial coincided with a chaotic chapter in San Francisco’s history. In 1974, Mayor Joseph Alioto’s wife mysteriously vanished, only to reappear two weeks later claiming she’d staged her disappearance to punish him for ignoring her. Around the same time, 19-year-old heiress Patty Hearst was kidnapped at gunpoint by members of the radical Symbionese Liberation Army. The Transamerica Pyramid too made headlines: The San Francisco Chronicle dismissed it as “the world’s largest architectural folly,” and the city’s own planner derided it as “an inhumane creation.” These turbulent moments, and the spirit of the era, were captured in the time capsule’s contents, along with a recipe for Pisco Punch, the famed cocktail invented at the nearby Bank Exchange Saloon. Once buried and nearly forgotten, the capsule now takes center stage in a curated exhibit in the building’s lobby, offering a vivid snapshot of a city in the midst of transformation. “Through moments of prosperity and periods of challenge, the Transamerica Pyramid has stood tall as one of the iconic silhouettes of San Francisco’s skyline. I see it now not just as a symbol of bold design, but of resilience–for this neighborhood, and for our city,” said San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie. “Fifty years from now, my hope is that we will look back on this era–this exact moment in time–as the beginning of a new chapter for San Francisco,” he added. Opening to the public on May 18, the exhibition aims to honor the legacy of the Transamerica Pyramid while highlighting the design of its recent renovation.SHVO and Deutsche Finance America purchased the Transamerica Pyramid in 2020 for million, pledging to preserve its historic legacy. In 2024, the landmark reopened following extensive renovations by Foster + Partners, marking a major step in the broader revitalization of downtown San Francisco, which had been deeply impacted by widespread office closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. “This exhibition serves as a reminder of the significance of the Transamerica Pyramid as a global icon since its inception more than a half century ago,” said Michael Shvo, chairman and CEO of SHVO. “By sharing the contents of the time capsule publicly, as a thoughtfully designed exhibition, we are honoring Transamerica Pyramid’s legacy and seamlessly complementing our meticulous remastering.” The Time Capsule Exhibition opens to the public on May 18. #buried #time #capsule #discovered #under
    WWW.ARCHPAPER.COM
    Buried time capsule discovered under Transamerica Pyramid sheds light on San Francisco’s history
    It began with a tip–an email from a San Francisco resident who had read The Secret, Byron Preiss’s 1982 book about hidden treasures. That message set off a chain of events that led to a 1974 building plan drawn by architect William Pereira, a visit to an underground pump room, and the eventual discovery, beneath six feet of concrete, of a long-lost time capsule buried deep within the Transamerica Pyramid. The capsule, a 14-by-16-inch metal cylinder, was unearthed during a recent renovation of the building. Buried in 1974, it offers a glimpse into life in San Francisco during the tower’s construction and reveals key details about the project itself. Its contents will be displayed in a new exhibit curated in partnership with Foster + Partners opening May 18 in the building’s lobby. The capsule was located based on an email tip and a 1974 building plan labeled “Time Capsule” drawn by architect William Pereira. (Courtesy SHVO) The capsule, a 14-by-16-inch metal cylinder, offers a glimpse into life in San Francisco during the tower’s construction and reveals key details about the project itself. (Courtesy SHVO) When the Transamerica Pyramid officially opened in 1972, it was hailed as a symbol of the city’s growth and ambition. Local media buzzed with anticipation. Two years later, as the Transamerica Corporation moved out of the building, the company assembled the capsule’s contents and commemorated its burial with a celebratory event. A plaque was installed above the site, instructing that the capsule remain untouched for 50 years. As decades passed and renovations altered the building’s layout, the plaque disappeared—and the capsule was (almost) forgotten. That is, until the email tip arrived. Fifty years after it was buried, just ahead of when it was intended to be opened, the capsule was located. This flyer was circulated in 1969 to stop the Transamerica Pyramid’s construction. It was among the objects inside the time capsule. (Courtesy SHVO) The timing of its burial coincided with a chaotic chapter in San Francisco’s history. In 1974, Mayor Joseph Alioto’s wife mysteriously vanished, only to reappear two weeks later claiming she’d staged her disappearance to punish him for ignoring her. Around the same time, 19-year-old heiress Patty Hearst was kidnapped at gunpoint by members of the radical Symbionese Liberation Army. The Transamerica Pyramid too made headlines: The San Francisco Chronicle dismissed it as “the world’s largest architectural folly,” and the city’s own planner derided it as “an inhumane creation.” These turbulent moments, and the spirit of the era, were captured in the time capsule’s contents, along with a recipe for Pisco Punch, the famed cocktail invented at the nearby Bank Exchange Saloon. Once buried and nearly forgotten, the capsule now takes center stage in a curated exhibit in the building’s lobby, offering a vivid snapshot of a city in the midst of transformation. “Through moments of prosperity and periods of challenge, the Transamerica Pyramid has stood tall as one of the iconic silhouettes of San Francisco’s skyline. I see it now not just as a symbol of bold design, but of resilience–for this neighborhood, and for our city,” said San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie. “Fifty years from now, my hope is that we will look back on this era–this exact moment in time–as the beginning of a new chapter for San Francisco,” he added. Opening to the public on May 18, the exhibition aims to honor the legacy of the Transamerica Pyramid while highlighting the design of its recent renovation. (Nikki Richter) SHVO and Deutsche Finance America purchased the Transamerica Pyramid in 2020 for $650 million, pledging to preserve its historic legacy. In 2024, the landmark reopened following extensive renovations by Foster + Partners, marking a major step in the broader revitalization of downtown San Francisco, which had been deeply impacted by widespread office closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. “This exhibition serves as a reminder of the significance of the Transamerica Pyramid as a global icon since its inception more than a half century ago,” said Michael Shvo, chairman and CEO of SHVO. “By sharing the contents of the time capsule publicly, as a thoughtfully designed exhibition, we are honoring Transamerica Pyramid’s legacy and seamlessly complementing our meticulous remastering.” The Time Capsule Exhibition opens to the public on May 18.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • Loneliness Is Inflaming Our Bodies—And Our Politics

    OpinionMay 16, 20255 min readLoneliness Is Inflaming Our Bodies—And Our PoliticsMedical research shows that social isolation is a serious chronic stressor. You can say something similar about its impact on our political systemBy Kim Samuel Eugene Mymrin/Getty ImagesHannah Arendt has been on my mind a lot lately. The 20th-century German-Jewish political philosopher escaped the Nazi Holocaust, and won regard as one of the world’s greatest public intellectuals at a time when few women were appointed to university faculties. She drew on history, literature and her own life to identify the conditions under which open and liberal societies turn into authoritarian states. Seven decades ago she made observations that still offer powerful insights today.In The Origins of Totalitarianism,Arendtemphasized one primary factor in the rise of authoritarianism that has little obvious connection to politics: loneliness. While we usually think of loneliness as not having our social needs met, Arendt defined the word as something deeper. Loneliness happens when there are no shared objective facts and no potential collective action to solve shared challenges. It’s a state of being where you can’t trust others. Loneliness, in Arendt’s telling, inflames the connective tissues of a society. It weakens the body politic so that demagogues and despots can prey. “What prepares men for totalitarian domination,” she wrote, “… is the fact that loneliness, once a borderline experience usually suffered in certain marginal social conditions like old age, has become an everyday experience.”Arendt—as far as I know—didn’t use the word “inflammation” to describe the effects of social isolation on a country or culture. But it’s the metaphor that, to me, gets to the essence of her warning.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Inflammation is the body’s response to a sense of threat—a protective, contractionary response that can extend even to the cellular level. It’s a response that can inhibit healing. A community or society that faces a deficit of meaningful connectedness is similarly in a state of perpetual threat; people are unable to listen to one another, to trust each other, to maintain trust in shared institutions, or to collectively overcome divisions.This might sound familiar.From 2003 to 2022, face-to-face socializing among U.S. men fell by 30 percent. For teenagers, it was a staggering 45 percent. An estimated 12 percent of Americans report having no close friends, a fourfold increase since 1990. While social media was supposed to amplify human connection, the rise of comparison culture, social sorting into echo chambers and the rapid decline of in-person social connection have instead coincided with unprecedented levels of anxiety, depression and distrust.It should therefore come as no surprise that, in America, we’re seeing democratic backsliding like Hannah Arendt warned of—including mass polarization, intentional disinformation and a politics of fear, retribution and rage.Loneliness inflames societies.It just so happens that loneliness inflames the body, too.Two decades ago, researchers Louise Hawkley and John Cacioppo at the University of Chicago demonstrated in a landmark study that loneliness acts as a chronic stressor that triggers the body’s innate stress-response systems. Social isolation keeps the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenalaxis in a constant state of arousal, driving persistent cortisol release. This hormonal imbalance heightens inflammation. And this can, in turn, weaken the immune system, compromise cardiovascular health and worsen vulnerability to mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety. In short, the absence of meaningful social bonds can literally recalibrate the body’s physiological mechanisms toward greater stress and illness.Over the past two decades, further studies have only reinforced the link between loneliness and inflammatory pathways. George Slavich of the University of California, Los Angeles, underscores that experiencing social disconnection can mimic physical threats in how our brains and immune systems respond—magnifying the release of inflammatory agents. From an evolutionary standpoint, sustained isolation disrupts our primal need for social integration—leading to inflammation and a whole host of downstream consequences.It's easy to downplay the loneliness problem. When former U.S. surgeon general Vivek Murthy warned of the dangers of social isolation and proposed solutions, no meaningful government interventions ensued. Likewise, when the U.K. government appointed a minister for loneliness in 2018, many likened the move to a Monty Python sketch rather than seeing it as a serious policy intervention.But the medical, social and even political costs of growing social isolation mean that we can no longer afford to ignore it.Some solutions are straightforward. Medical innovators are now addressing social isolation through practices like “social prescribing”—wherein health professionals connect patients who are lonely with nonmedical community services, volunteer programs, exercise groups and arts activities to improve their well-being. Instead of writing prescriptions for pills, doctors can prescribe a free pass to a museum, an invitation to join a gardening club, or a support group for people facing similar struggles. A recent multiyear evaluation of nature-oriented social prescribing in the U.K. found that programs significantly helped participants reduce anxiety and improve happiness.Other solutions are more systemic. When Pete Buttigieg ran for president in 2020, he laid out an agenda for “belonging and healing”—emphasizing new funding and policies around mental health and addiction as well as national service to rebuild community institutions and promote environmental restoration. Leaders should propose scaling up “belonging infrastructure”—transit, green spaces, cultural venues, and mental health centers—while expanding purpose-driven national service programs like Americorps and investing in local journalism through public grants or tax incentives to restore trusted information sources and restore important foundations of community life.This should be a bipartisan cause. Conservatives and liberals alike have an opening to address the crisis by leveraging faith and veterans’ groups–for example, granting tax incentives or small federal matches that could help churches, synagogues, and veterans’ groups build mentoring initiatives, addiction recovery support and efforts to revitalize parks, libraries and civic spaces. There’s also growing bipartisan recognition of the role of social media in the crisis. In tackling big tech’s impact on youth, leaders across the ideological spectrum should push toward full algorithmic transparency, restrictions to exploitative design features, and mandates for robust digital well-being protections for children.Like inflammation in the body, social isolation weakens our civic “immune system,” fueling polarization and making us more susceptible to authoritarian impulses. But Hannah Arendt emphasized that the condition is reversible. By investing in the foundations of shared belonging, we can restore our adapt to adapt to the challenges we face—from wildfires to pandemics to misinformation. It’s time to get serious about our healing.This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.
    #loneliness #inflaming #our #bodiesand #politics
    Loneliness Is Inflaming Our Bodies—And Our Politics
    OpinionMay 16, 20255 min readLoneliness Is Inflaming Our Bodies—And Our PoliticsMedical research shows that social isolation is a serious chronic stressor. You can say something similar about its impact on our political systemBy Kim Samuel Eugene Mymrin/Getty ImagesHannah Arendt has been on my mind a lot lately. The 20th-century German-Jewish political philosopher escaped the Nazi Holocaust, and won regard as one of the world’s greatest public intellectuals at a time when few women were appointed to university faculties. She drew on history, literature and her own life to identify the conditions under which open and liberal societies turn into authoritarian states. Seven decades ago she made observations that still offer powerful insights today.In The Origins of Totalitarianism,Arendtemphasized one primary factor in the rise of authoritarianism that has little obvious connection to politics: loneliness. While we usually think of loneliness as not having our social needs met, Arendt defined the word as something deeper. Loneliness happens when there are no shared objective facts and no potential collective action to solve shared challenges. It’s a state of being where you can’t trust others. Loneliness, in Arendt’s telling, inflames the connective tissues of a society. It weakens the body politic so that demagogues and despots can prey. “What prepares men for totalitarian domination,” she wrote, “… is the fact that loneliness, once a borderline experience usually suffered in certain marginal social conditions like old age, has become an everyday experience.”Arendt—as far as I know—didn’t use the word “inflammation” to describe the effects of social isolation on a country or culture. But it’s the metaphor that, to me, gets to the essence of her warning.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Inflammation is the body’s response to a sense of threat—a protective, contractionary response that can extend even to the cellular level. It’s a response that can inhibit healing. A community or society that faces a deficit of meaningful connectedness is similarly in a state of perpetual threat; people are unable to listen to one another, to trust each other, to maintain trust in shared institutions, or to collectively overcome divisions.This might sound familiar.From 2003 to 2022, face-to-face socializing among U.S. men fell by 30 percent. For teenagers, it was a staggering 45 percent. An estimated 12 percent of Americans report having no close friends, a fourfold increase since 1990. While social media was supposed to amplify human connection, the rise of comparison culture, social sorting into echo chambers and the rapid decline of in-person social connection have instead coincided with unprecedented levels of anxiety, depression and distrust.It should therefore come as no surprise that, in America, we’re seeing democratic backsliding like Hannah Arendt warned of—including mass polarization, intentional disinformation and a politics of fear, retribution and rage.Loneliness inflames societies.It just so happens that loneliness inflames the body, too.Two decades ago, researchers Louise Hawkley and John Cacioppo at the University of Chicago demonstrated in a landmark study that loneliness acts as a chronic stressor that triggers the body’s innate stress-response systems. Social isolation keeps the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenalaxis in a constant state of arousal, driving persistent cortisol release. This hormonal imbalance heightens inflammation. And this can, in turn, weaken the immune system, compromise cardiovascular health and worsen vulnerability to mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety. In short, the absence of meaningful social bonds can literally recalibrate the body’s physiological mechanisms toward greater stress and illness.Over the past two decades, further studies have only reinforced the link between loneliness and inflammatory pathways. George Slavich of the University of California, Los Angeles, underscores that experiencing social disconnection can mimic physical threats in how our brains and immune systems respond—magnifying the release of inflammatory agents. From an evolutionary standpoint, sustained isolation disrupts our primal need for social integration—leading to inflammation and a whole host of downstream consequences.It's easy to downplay the loneliness problem. When former U.S. surgeon general Vivek Murthy warned of the dangers of social isolation and proposed solutions, no meaningful government interventions ensued. Likewise, when the U.K. government appointed a minister for loneliness in 2018, many likened the move to a Monty Python sketch rather than seeing it as a serious policy intervention.But the medical, social and even political costs of growing social isolation mean that we can no longer afford to ignore it.Some solutions are straightforward. Medical innovators are now addressing social isolation through practices like “social prescribing”—wherein health professionals connect patients who are lonely with nonmedical community services, volunteer programs, exercise groups and arts activities to improve their well-being. Instead of writing prescriptions for pills, doctors can prescribe a free pass to a museum, an invitation to join a gardening club, or a support group for people facing similar struggles. A recent multiyear evaluation of nature-oriented social prescribing in the U.K. found that programs significantly helped participants reduce anxiety and improve happiness.Other solutions are more systemic. When Pete Buttigieg ran for president in 2020, he laid out an agenda for “belonging and healing”—emphasizing new funding and policies around mental health and addiction as well as national service to rebuild community institutions and promote environmental restoration. Leaders should propose scaling up “belonging infrastructure”—transit, green spaces, cultural venues, and mental health centers—while expanding purpose-driven national service programs like Americorps and investing in local journalism through public grants or tax incentives to restore trusted information sources and restore important foundations of community life.This should be a bipartisan cause. Conservatives and liberals alike have an opening to address the crisis by leveraging faith and veterans’ groups–for example, granting tax incentives or small federal matches that could help churches, synagogues, and veterans’ groups build mentoring initiatives, addiction recovery support and efforts to revitalize parks, libraries and civic spaces. There’s also growing bipartisan recognition of the role of social media in the crisis. In tackling big tech’s impact on youth, leaders across the ideological spectrum should push toward full algorithmic transparency, restrictions to exploitative design features, and mandates for robust digital well-being protections for children.Like inflammation in the body, social isolation weakens our civic “immune system,” fueling polarization and making us more susceptible to authoritarian impulses. But Hannah Arendt emphasized that the condition is reversible. By investing in the foundations of shared belonging, we can restore our adapt to adapt to the challenges we face—from wildfires to pandemics to misinformation. It’s time to get serious about our healing.This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American. #loneliness #inflaming #our #bodiesand #politics
    WWW.SCIENTIFICAMERICAN.COM
    Loneliness Is Inflaming Our Bodies—And Our Politics
    OpinionMay 16, 20255 min readLoneliness Is Inflaming Our Bodies—And Our PoliticsMedical research shows that social isolation is a serious chronic stressor. You can say something similar about its impact on our political systemBy Kim Samuel Eugene Mymrin/Getty ImagesHannah Arendt has been on my mind a lot lately. The 20th-century German-Jewish political philosopher escaped the Nazi Holocaust, and won regard as one of the world’s greatest public intellectuals at a time when few women were appointed to university faculties. She drew on history, literature and her own life to identify the conditions under which open and liberal societies turn into authoritarian states. Seven decades ago she made observations that still offer powerful insights today.In The Origins of Totalitarianism,Arendtemphasized one primary factor in the rise of authoritarianism that has little obvious connection to politics: loneliness. While we usually think of loneliness as not having our social needs met, Arendt defined the word as something deeper. Loneliness happens when there are no shared objective facts and no potential collective action to solve shared challenges. It’s a state of being where you can’t trust others. Loneliness, in Arendt’s telling, inflames the connective tissues of a society. It weakens the body politic so that demagogues and despots can prey. “What prepares men for totalitarian domination,” she wrote, “… is the fact that loneliness, once a borderline experience usually suffered in certain marginal social conditions like old age, has become an everyday experience.”Arendt—as far as I know—didn’t use the word “inflammation” to describe the effects of social isolation on a country or culture. But it’s the metaphor that, to me, gets to the essence of her warning.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Inflammation is the body’s response to a sense of threat—a protective, contractionary response that can extend even to the cellular level. It’s a response that can inhibit healing. A community or society that faces a deficit of meaningful connectedness is similarly in a state of perpetual threat; people are unable to listen to one another, to trust each other, to maintain trust in shared institutions, or to collectively overcome divisions.This might sound familiar.From 2003 to 2022, face-to-face socializing among U.S. men fell by 30 percent. For teenagers, it was a staggering 45 percent. An estimated 12 percent of Americans report having no close friends, a fourfold increase since 1990. While social media was supposed to amplify human connection, the rise of comparison culture, social sorting into echo chambers and the rapid decline of in-person social connection have instead coincided with unprecedented levels of anxiety, depression and distrust.It should therefore come as no surprise that, in America, we’re seeing democratic backsliding like Hannah Arendt warned of—including mass polarization, intentional disinformation and a politics of fear, retribution and rage.Loneliness inflames societies.It just so happens that loneliness inflames the body, too.Two decades ago, researchers Louise Hawkley and John Cacioppo at the University of Chicago demonstrated in a landmark study that loneliness acts as a chronic stressor that triggers the body’s innate stress-response systems. Social isolation keeps the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in a constant state of arousal, driving persistent cortisol release. This hormonal imbalance heightens inflammation. And this can, in turn, weaken the immune system, compromise cardiovascular health and worsen vulnerability to mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety. In short, the absence of meaningful social bonds can literally recalibrate the body’s physiological mechanisms toward greater stress and illness.Over the past two decades, further studies have only reinforced the link between loneliness and inflammatory pathways. George Slavich of the University of California, Los Angeles, underscores that experiencing social disconnection can mimic physical threats in how our brains and immune systems respond—magnifying the release of inflammatory agents. From an evolutionary standpoint, sustained isolation disrupts our primal need for social integration—leading to inflammation and a whole host of downstream consequences.It's easy to downplay the loneliness problem. When former U.S. surgeon general Vivek Murthy warned of the dangers of social isolation and proposed solutions, no meaningful government interventions ensued. Likewise, when the U.K. government appointed a minister for loneliness in 2018, many likened the move to a Monty Python sketch rather than seeing it as a serious policy intervention.But the medical, social and even political costs of growing social isolation mean that we can no longer afford to ignore it.Some solutions are straightforward. Medical innovators are now addressing social isolation through practices like “social prescribing”—wherein health professionals connect patients who are lonely with nonmedical community services, volunteer programs, exercise groups and arts activities to improve their well-being. Instead of writing prescriptions for pills, doctors can prescribe a free pass to a museum, an invitation to join a gardening club, or a support group for people facing similar struggles. A recent multiyear evaluation of nature-oriented social prescribing in the U.K. found that programs significantly helped participants reduce anxiety and improve happiness.Other solutions are more systemic. When Pete Buttigieg ran for president in 2020, he laid out an agenda for “belonging and healing”—emphasizing new funding and policies around mental health and addiction as well as national service to rebuild community institutions and promote environmental restoration. Leaders should propose scaling up “belonging infrastructure”—transit, green spaces, cultural venues, and mental health centers—while expanding purpose-driven national service programs like Americorps and investing in local journalism through public grants or tax incentives to restore trusted information sources and restore important foundations of community life.This should be a bipartisan cause. Conservatives and liberals alike have an opening to address the crisis by leveraging faith and veterans’ groups–for example, granting tax incentives or small federal matches that could help churches, synagogues, and veterans’ groups build mentoring initiatives, addiction recovery support and efforts to revitalize parks, libraries and civic spaces. There’s also growing bipartisan recognition of the role of social media in the crisis. In tackling big tech’s impact on youth, leaders across the ideological spectrum should push toward full algorithmic transparency, restrictions to exploitative design features, and mandates for robust digital well-being protections for children.Like inflammation in the body, social isolation weakens our civic “immune system,” fueling polarization and making us more susceptible to authoritarian impulses. But Hannah Arendt emphasized that the condition is reversible. By investing in the foundations of shared belonging, we can restore our adapt to adapt to the challenges we face—from wildfires to pandemics to misinformation. It’s time to get serious about our healing.This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • Pokémon TCG's Return Of Team Rocket Is A Triumph

    Oh it’s fun to have good news! The latest set from the Pokémon TCG, Scarlet & Violet Destined Rivals, is a top-notch collection of cards bursting with Team Rocket antics, which sportspull rates I don’t believe we’ve seen in this era. Having torn open 55 packs, I have a generous spread of rares and ex cards the likes of which I’ve not seen since S&V began. Also, unlike the awful previous set Journey Together, it’s an excellent collection of Trainer Pokémon to really charge up the live game.Suggested ReadingWhat’s Coming Out Beyond Pokémon: The Indigo Disk | The Week In Games

    Share SubtitlesOffEnglishview videoSuggested ReadingWhat’s Coming Out Beyond Pokémon: The Indigo Disk | The Week In Games

    Share SubtitlesOffEnglishYou know, if you can buy it.While it’s delightful to report that The Pokémon Company has really knocked it out of the park with Destined Rivals, unfortunately this hasn’t coincided with addressing the wild shortages of cards for regular customers. It’s a problem that only just repeated itself with last week’s website-crashing launch of the next sets, White Fire and Black Bolt—the first ever split-set English-language collection—that looks likely to be as impossible to buy as just about everything else this year. Or, if you do, you’ll be paying way over MSRP to scalpers, and please don’t do that.However, smart players will know that the best way to get cards for any set is to attend a pre-release event at their local store or club, where everyone receives seven or more packs, generally for less than Those are taking place Saturday and Sunday, May 17 and 18, although I hear that even these were booking up fast weeks ago. If you can, I really recommend making the effort for Destined Rivals. It’s a bunch of fun, and if the 55 packs I opened are an accurate sample, you’re likely to pick up a good handful of super-pretty full-art cards.Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuSo why am I so excited for this set? It’s a combination of things. It’d be silly to pretend that the first appearance of Team Rocket in the game in 25 years isn’t a big part of the thrill, and the set is rammed full of the nefarious group and their signature monsters. Among the Pokémon boosted by Team Rocket are Moltres, Zapdos and Articuno, along with newcomer Spidops, classics like Meowth and Mewtwo, and that most evil of Pokémon, Flaaffy. Meanwhile, for the forces of good, Cynthia, Misty, Ethan and Arven all join, again bringing back some favorites like Milotic, Gyarados, Psyduck and Ho-oh. It’s a real crowd-pleaser.Secondly, those pull-rates. When I get these boxes of cards from TPCi, I sit down and open them with my 10-year-old. It’s a really solid way of gauging the levels of satisfaction, his spirit draining out of him when we’re tearing through a set like Journey Together and just getting endless bulk. But with Destined Rivals, even my Pokémon-uninterested wife wanted in, so fun was it to have a strong chance of finding an exciting card. Where Journey Together only had 31 full-art cards, Destined Rivals has an amazing 62! Double! Admittedly, that’s on top of a wild 182 regular cards, making this the biggest set since Surging Sparks, but with—in my admittedly unscientific sample—a seemingly much better chance of finding the special stuff.We were especially lucky to pull the Team Rocket’s Ariana Special Illustration Rare, along with one of my chase cards, the Illustration Rare of Misty’s Psyduck. No Mewtwo, sadly, but we also got 12 regular ex cards, and 11 full-arts! If you include ex in the figures, that’s a pull-rate of almost one in two! Remove the regular ex cards and you’ve still got one in five for something Ultra Rare or better. Those included the wildly gorgeous Rapidash by Rond, Mori Yuu’s extraordinarily detailed Clamperl, the delightful Team Rocket’s Murkrowby Akira Komayama, and the splendidly silly Team Rocket’s Raticate by Mekayu.Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuAnd thirdly, the game itself! Journey Together was supposed to be the reintroduction of Trainer Pokémon to the live game, but it was such a damp squib. This time, things are really going to get mixed up! Team Rocket arrive with an array of brand new tricks and cheats, and while people are obviously going to build decks around Misty and Ethan, it’ll be the baddies that once more prove the most fun.There’s the addition of Team Rocket’s Energy, which provides two energy to any Team Rocket Pokémon, and can be either Dark or Psychic or both! Meanwhile, Team Rocket’s Venture Bomb lets you flip a coin to find out if it’s going to do 20 damage to any of your opponent’s Pokémon, or 20 specifically to your own Active Pokémon—but being an Item card, you can do this silliness as many times as you have cards in a single turn. Giovanni, meanwhile, offers a classic evil move: you can play him to swap out your current Active Pokémon, but also do the same to your opponent, and choose which of their benched Pokémon goes in. Team Rocket’s Great Ball lets you flip a coin and then pull either an Evolution or Basic Pokémon from your deck depending on the result. And then Stadium card Team Rocket’s Watchtower renders all Pokémon without abilities! That’s going to destroy so many players’ tactics!Oh, and there’s a card called Team Rocket’s Bother Bot, and while its ability is fascinating—you can flip one of your opponent’s prize cards, then pick a random card from their hand, and then choose if you want them to swap them over—I’m mostly mentioning it because I find its name very funny.Then the Team Rocket Pokémon themselves do some real mischief. Arbok, for instance, stops your opponent playing any card with an ability, and also does 30 damage to every single Pokémon your opponent has on the board. Articuno can prevent all attack effects just by being on the bench. Dottler lets you look at the top five cards on your opponent’s deck, and then put them back in your preferred order! Ha!Nidoran ♀ and ♂ offer their usual teamwork options, but super-powerfully. Once you’ve evolved to Nidorina, you can do an attack that lets you search your deck to evolve any two of your benched monsters, and then Stage 2's Nidoqueen will do 180 damage for one energy if you have a Nidoking in play. Oh, and Ampharos, Flaaffy’s ultimate form, has an ability that means any time your opponent evolves a Pokémon, they automatically put 40 damage on it! That’s monstrous.Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuIt’s going to be so interesting to see how people manipulate these new additions into the meta, not least when yet more cards are deliberately designed to mess up current favorite decks—Mimikyu lets you steal Tera Pokémon attacks, for instance. I think this should finally offer the shake-up the game needs in its third year of this era, beforenext year’s switch to Mega Pokémon instead of a fourth year of S&V.Now, as I’ve said, my sample of 55 packs isn’t big enough to be indicative, and perhaps we just got weirdly lucky. But I have high hopes here. We’ll get a proper idea when the likes of Danny Phantump have put together their pull-rate data. Either way, there’s such a wealth of beautiful cards in the set, so much incredible art to collect, and a bunch that’ll make the live game so very interesting. Which is pretty much all I can ask for from a Pokémon TCG set. Other than, you know, being able to buy it. Which is going to be very, very hard to do.Destined Rivals officially releases on May 30, with pre-release events taking place this weekend, May 17-18..
    #pokémon #tcg039s #return #team #rocket
    Pokémon TCG's Return Of Team Rocket Is A Triumph
    Oh it’s fun to have good news! The latest set from the Pokémon TCG, Scarlet & Violet Destined Rivals, is a top-notch collection of cards bursting with Team Rocket antics, which sportspull rates I don’t believe we’ve seen in this era. Having torn open 55 packs, I have a generous spread of rares and ex cards the likes of which I’ve not seen since S&V began. Also, unlike the awful previous set Journey Together, it’s an excellent collection of Trainer Pokémon to really charge up the live game.Suggested ReadingWhat’s Coming Out Beyond Pokémon: The Indigo Disk | The Week In Games Share SubtitlesOffEnglishview videoSuggested ReadingWhat’s Coming Out Beyond Pokémon: The Indigo Disk | The Week In Games Share SubtitlesOffEnglishYou know, if you can buy it.While it’s delightful to report that The Pokémon Company has really knocked it out of the park with Destined Rivals, unfortunately this hasn’t coincided with addressing the wild shortages of cards for regular customers. It’s a problem that only just repeated itself with last week’s website-crashing launch of the next sets, White Fire and Black Bolt—the first ever split-set English-language collection—that looks likely to be as impossible to buy as just about everything else this year. Or, if you do, you’ll be paying way over MSRP to scalpers, and please don’t do that.However, smart players will know that the best way to get cards for any set is to attend a pre-release event at their local store or club, where everyone receives seven or more packs, generally for less than Those are taking place Saturday and Sunday, May 17 and 18, although I hear that even these were booking up fast weeks ago. If you can, I really recommend making the effort for Destined Rivals. It’s a bunch of fun, and if the 55 packs I opened are an accurate sample, you’re likely to pick up a good handful of super-pretty full-art cards.Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuSo why am I so excited for this set? It’s a combination of things. It’d be silly to pretend that the first appearance of Team Rocket in the game in 25 years isn’t a big part of the thrill, and the set is rammed full of the nefarious group and their signature monsters. Among the Pokémon boosted by Team Rocket are Moltres, Zapdos and Articuno, along with newcomer Spidops, classics like Meowth and Mewtwo, and that most evil of Pokémon, Flaaffy. Meanwhile, for the forces of good, Cynthia, Misty, Ethan and Arven all join, again bringing back some favorites like Milotic, Gyarados, Psyduck and Ho-oh. It’s a real crowd-pleaser.Secondly, those pull-rates. When I get these boxes of cards from TPCi, I sit down and open them with my 10-year-old. It’s a really solid way of gauging the levels of satisfaction, his spirit draining out of him when we’re tearing through a set like Journey Together and just getting endless bulk. But with Destined Rivals, even my Pokémon-uninterested wife wanted in, so fun was it to have a strong chance of finding an exciting card. Where Journey Together only had 31 full-art cards, Destined Rivals has an amazing 62! Double! Admittedly, that’s on top of a wild 182 regular cards, making this the biggest set since Surging Sparks, but with—in my admittedly unscientific sample—a seemingly much better chance of finding the special stuff.We were especially lucky to pull the Team Rocket’s Ariana Special Illustration Rare, along with one of my chase cards, the Illustration Rare of Misty’s Psyduck. No Mewtwo, sadly, but we also got 12 regular ex cards, and 11 full-arts! If you include ex in the figures, that’s a pull-rate of almost one in two! Remove the regular ex cards and you’ve still got one in five for something Ultra Rare or better. Those included the wildly gorgeous Rapidash by Rond, Mori Yuu’s extraordinarily detailed Clamperl, the delightful Team Rocket’s Murkrowby Akira Komayama, and the splendidly silly Team Rocket’s Raticate by Mekayu.Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuAnd thirdly, the game itself! Journey Together was supposed to be the reintroduction of Trainer Pokémon to the live game, but it was such a damp squib. This time, things are really going to get mixed up! Team Rocket arrive with an array of brand new tricks and cheats, and while people are obviously going to build decks around Misty and Ethan, it’ll be the baddies that once more prove the most fun.There’s the addition of Team Rocket’s Energy, which provides two energy to any Team Rocket Pokémon, and can be either Dark or Psychic or both! Meanwhile, Team Rocket’s Venture Bomb lets you flip a coin to find out if it’s going to do 20 damage to any of your opponent’s Pokémon, or 20 specifically to your own Active Pokémon—but being an Item card, you can do this silliness as many times as you have cards in a single turn. Giovanni, meanwhile, offers a classic evil move: you can play him to swap out your current Active Pokémon, but also do the same to your opponent, and choose which of their benched Pokémon goes in. Team Rocket’s Great Ball lets you flip a coin and then pull either an Evolution or Basic Pokémon from your deck depending on the result. And then Stadium card Team Rocket’s Watchtower renders all Pokémon without abilities! That’s going to destroy so many players’ tactics!Oh, and there’s a card called Team Rocket’s Bother Bot, and while its ability is fascinating—you can flip one of your opponent’s prize cards, then pick a random card from their hand, and then choose if you want them to swap them over—I’m mostly mentioning it because I find its name very funny.Then the Team Rocket Pokémon themselves do some real mischief. Arbok, for instance, stops your opponent playing any card with an ability, and also does 30 damage to every single Pokémon your opponent has on the board. Articuno can prevent all attack effects just by being on the bench. Dottler lets you look at the top five cards on your opponent’s deck, and then put them back in your preferred order! Ha!Nidoran ♀ and ♂ offer their usual teamwork options, but super-powerfully. Once you’ve evolved to Nidorina, you can do an attack that lets you search your deck to evolve any two of your benched monsters, and then Stage 2's Nidoqueen will do 180 damage for one energy if you have a Nidoking in play. Oh, and Ampharos, Flaaffy’s ultimate form, has an ability that means any time your opponent evolves a Pokémon, they automatically put 40 damage on it! That’s monstrous.Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuIt’s going to be so interesting to see how people manipulate these new additions into the meta, not least when yet more cards are deliberately designed to mess up current favorite decks—Mimikyu lets you steal Tera Pokémon attacks, for instance. I think this should finally offer the shake-up the game needs in its third year of this era, beforenext year’s switch to Mega Pokémon instead of a fourth year of S&V.Now, as I’ve said, my sample of 55 packs isn’t big enough to be indicative, and perhaps we just got weirdly lucky. But I have high hopes here. We’ll get a proper idea when the likes of Danny Phantump have put together their pull-rate data. Either way, there’s such a wealth of beautiful cards in the set, so much incredible art to collect, and a bunch that’ll make the live game so very interesting. Which is pretty much all I can ask for from a Pokémon TCG set. Other than, you know, being able to buy it. Which is going to be very, very hard to do.Destined Rivals officially releases on May 30, with pre-release events taking place this weekend, May 17-18.. #pokémon #tcg039s #return #team #rocket
    KOTAKU.COM
    Pokémon TCG's Return Of Team Rocket Is A Triumph
    Oh it’s fun to have good news! The latest set from the Pokémon TCG, Scarlet & Violet Destined Rivals, is a top-notch collection of cards bursting with Team Rocket antics, which sports (in my limited experience, at least) pull rates I don’t believe we’ve seen in this era. Having torn open 55 packs, I have a generous spread of rares and ex cards the likes of which I’ve not seen since S&V began. Also, unlike the awful previous set Journey Together, it’s an excellent collection of Trainer Pokémon to really charge up the live game.Suggested ReadingWhat’s Coming Out Beyond Pokémon: The Indigo Disk | The Week In Games Share SubtitlesOffEnglishview videoSuggested ReadingWhat’s Coming Out Beyond Pokémon: The Indigo Disk | The Week In Games Share SubtitlesOffEnglishYou know, if you can buy it.While it’s delightful to report that The Pokémon Company has really knocked it out of the park with Destined Rivals, unfortunately this hasn’t coincided with addressing the wild shortages of cards for regular customers. It’s a problem that only just repeated itself with last week’s website-crashing launch of the next sets, White Fire and Black Bolt—the first ever split-set English-language collection—that looks likely to be as impossible to buy as just about everything else this year. Or, if you do, you’ll be paying way over MSRP to scalpers, and please don’t do that.However, smart players will know that the best way to get cards for any set is to attend a pre-release event at their local store or club, where everyone receives seven or more packs, generally for less than $30. Those are taking place Saturday and Sunday, May 17 and 18, although I hear that even these were booking up fast weeks ago. If you can, I really recommend making the effort for Destined Rivals. It’s a bunch of fun, and if the 55 packs I opened are an accurate sample (thanks to The Pokémon Company for sending them over), you’re likely to pick up a good handful of super-pretty full-art cards.Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuSo why am I so excited for this set? It’s a combination of things. It’d be silly to pretend that the first appearance of Team Rocket in the game in 25 years isn’t a big part of the thrill, and the set is rammed full of the nefarious group and their signature monsters. Among the Pokémon boosted by Team Rocket are Moltres, Zapdos and Articuno, along with newcomer Spidops, classics like Meowth and Mewtwo, and that most evil of Pokémon, Flaaffy. Meanwhile, for the forces of good, Cynthia, Misty, Ethan and Arven all join, again bringing back some favorites like Milotic, Gyarados, Psyduck and Ho-oh. It’s a real crowd-pleaser.Secondly, those pull-rates. When I get these boxes of cards from TPCi, I sit down and open them with my 10-year-old. It’s a really solid way of gauging the levels of satisfaction, his spirit draining out of him when we’re tearing through a set like Journey Together and just getting endless bulk. But with Destined Rivals, even my Pokémon-uninterested wife wanted in, so fun was it to have a strong chance of finding an exciting card. Where Journey Together only had 31 full-art cards, Destined Rivals has an amazing 62! Double! Admittedly, that’s on top of a wild 182 regular cards (included ex), making this the biggest set since Surging Sparks, but with—in my admittedly unscientific sample—a seemingly much better chance of finding the special stuff.We were especially lucky to pull the Team Rocket’s Ariana Special Illustration Rare, along with one of my chase cards, the Illustration Rare of Misty’s Psyduck. No Mewtwo, sadly, but we also got 12 regular ex cards (only two duplicates), and 11 full-arts! If you include ex in the figures, that’s a pull-rate of almost one in two! Remove the regular ex cards and you’ve still got one in five for something Ultra Rare or better. Those included the wildly gorgeous Rapidash by Rond, Mori Yuu’s extraordinarily detailed Clamperl, the delightful Team Rocket’s Murkrow (with Ariana and the Pokémon staring at one another in front of a skyline of skyscrapers) by Akira Komayama, and the splendidly silly Team Rocket’s Raticate by Mekayu (the artist who gave us the glorious Drampa from Temporal Forces).Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuAnd thirdly, the game itself! Journey Together was supposed to be the reintroduction of Trainer Pokémon to the live game, but it was such a damp squib. This time, things are really going to get mixed up! Team Rocket arrive with an array of brand new tricks and cheats, and while people are obviously going to build decks around Misty and Ethan, it’ll be the baddies that once more prove the most fun.There’s the addition of Team Rocket’s Energy, which provides two energy to any Team Rocket Pokémon, and can be either Dark or Psychic or both! Meanwhile, Team Rocket’s Venture Bomb lets you flip a coin to find out if it’s going to do 20 damage to any of your opponent’s Pokémon, or 20 specifically to your own Active Pokémon—but being an Item card, you can do this silliness as many times as you have cards in a single turn. Giovanni, meanwhile, offers a classic evil move: you can play him to swap out your current Active Pokémon, but also do the same to your opponent, and choose which of their benched Pokémon goes in. Team Rocket’s Great Ball lets you flip a coin and then pull either an Evolution or Basic Pokémon from your deck depending on the result. And then Stadium card Team Rocket’s Watchtower renders all Pokémon without abilities! That’s going to destroy so many players’ tactics!Oh, and there’s a card called Team Rocket’s Bother Bot, and while its ability is fascinating—you can flip one of your opponent’s prize cards, then pick a random card from their hand, and then choose if you want them to swap them over—I’m mostly mentioning it because I find its name very funny.Then the Team Rocket Pokémon themselves do some real mischief. Arbok, for instance, stops your opponent playing any card with an ability (unless it’s a Team Rocket), and also does 30 damage to every single Pokémon your opponent has on the board. Articuno can prevent all attack effects just by being on the bench. Dottler lets you look at the top five cards on your opponent’s deck, and then put them back in your preferred order! Ha!Nidoran ♀ and ♂ offer their usual teamwork options, but super-powerfully. Once you’ve evolved to Nidorina, you can do an attack that lets you search your deck to evolve any two of your benched monsters, and then Stage 2's Nidoqueen will do 180 damage for one energy if you have a Nidoking in play. Oh, and Ampharos, Flaaffy’s ultimate form, has an ability that means any time your opponent evolves a Pokémon, they automatically put 40 damage on it! That’s monstrous.Image: The Pokémon Company / KotakuIt’s going to be so interesting to see how people manipulate these new additions into the meta, not least when yet more cards are deliberately designed to mess up current favorite decks—Mimikyu lets you steal Tera Pokémon attacks, for instance. I think this should finally offer the shake-up the game needs in its third year of this era, before (and this is still just a rumor, but quite a likely one) next year’s switch to Mega Pokémon instead of a fourth year of S&V.Now, as I’ve said, my sample of 55 packs isn’t big enough to be indicative, and perhaps we just got weirdly lucky. But I have high hopes here. We’ll get a proper idea when the likes of Danny Phantump have put together their pull-rate data. Either way, there’s such a wealth of beautiful cards in the set, so much incredible art to collect, and a bunch that’ll make the live game so very interesting. Which is pretty much all I can ask for from a Pokémon TCG set. Other than, you know, being able to buy it. Which is going to be very, very hard to do.Destined Rivals officially releases on May 30, with pre-release events taking place this weekend, May 17-18..
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • FDA AI deployment: Innovation vs oversight in drug regulation

    The US Food and Drugs Administrationhas stated that it wants to accelerate the deployment of AI across its centres. FDA Commissioner Martin A. Makary has announced an aggressive timeline to scale use of AI by 30 June 2025 and is betting big on the technology to change drug approval processes for the US.But the rapid AI deployment at the FDA raises important questions about whether innovation can be balanced with oversight.Strategic leadership drive: FDA names first AI chiefThe foundation for the ambitious FDA AI deployment was laid with the appointment of Jeremy Walsh as the first-ever Chief AI Officer. Walsh previously led enterprise-scale technology deployments in federal health and intelligence agencies and came from government contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, where he worked for 14 years as chief technologist.His appointment, announced just before the May 8th rollout announcement, signals the agency’s serious commitment to technological transformation. The timing is significant – Walsh’s hiring coincided with workforce cuts at the FDA, including the loss of key tech talent.Among the losses was Sridhar Mantha, the former director of strategic programmes at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, who had co-chaired the AI Council at CDER and helped develop policy around AI’s use in drug development. Ironically, Mantha is now working alongside Walsh to coordinate the agency-wide rollout.The pilot programme: Impressive results, limited detailsWhat’s driving the rapid AI deployment is the reported success of the agency’s pilot programme trialling the software. Commissioner Makary said he was “blown away by the success of our first AI-assisted scientific review pilot,” with one official claiming the technology enabled him to perform scientific review tasks in minutes that used to take three days.However, the scope, rigour and results from the pilot scheme remain unreleased.The agency has not published detailed reports on the pilot’s methodology, validation procedures, or specific use cases tested. The lack of transparency is concerning given the high-stakes nature of drug evaluation.When pressed for details, the FDA has promised that additional details and updates on the initiative will be shared publicly in June. For an agency responsible for protecting public health through rigorous scientific review, the absence of published pilot data raises questions about the evidence base supporting such an aggressive timeline.Industry perspective: Cautious optimism meets concernsThe pharmaceutical industry’s reaction to the FDA AI deployment reflects a mixture of optimism and apprehension. Companies have long sought faster approval processes, with Makary pointedly asking, “Why does it take over 10 years for a new drug to come to market?”“While AI is still developing, harnessing it requires a thoughtful and risk-based approach with patients at the centre. We’re pleased to see the FDA taking concrete action to harness the potential of AI,” said PhRMA spokesperson Andrew Powaleny.However, industry experts are raising practical concerns. Mike Hinckle, an FDA compliance expert at K&L Gates, highlighted a key issue: pharmaceutical companies will want to know how the proprietary data they submit will be secured.The concern is particularly acute given reports that the FDA was in discussions with OpenAI about a project called cderGPT, which appears to be an AI tool for the Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research.Expert warnings: The rush vs rigour debateLeading experts in the field are expressing concern about the pace of deployment. Eric Topol, founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, told Axios: “The idea is good, but the lack of details and the perceived ‘rush’ is concerning.”He identified critical gaps in transparency, including questions about which models are being used to train the AI, and what inputs are provided for specialised fine-tuning.Former FDA commissioner Robert Califf struck a balanced tone: “I have nothing but enthusiasm tempered by caution about the timeline.” His comment reflects the broader sentiment among experts who support AI integration but question whether the June 30th deadline allows sufficient time for proper validation and safeguards to be implemented.Rafael Rosengarten from the Alliance for AI in Healthcare supports automation but emphasises the need for governance, saying there is a need for policy guidance around what kind of data is used to train AI models and what kind of model performance is considered acceptable.Political context: Trump’s deregulatory AI visionThe FDA AI deployment must be understood in the broader context of the Trump administration’s approach to AI governance. Trump’s overhaul of federal AI policy – ditching Biden-era guardrails in favour of speed and international dominance in technology – has turned the government into a tech testing ground.The administration has explicitly prioritised innovation over precaution. Vice President JD Vance outlined four key AI policy priorities, including encouraging “pro-growth AI policies” instead of “excessive regulation of the AI sector,” and he has taken action to ensure the forthcoming White House AI Action Plan would “avoid an overly precautionary regulatory regime.”The philosophy is evident in how the FDA is approaching its AI deployment. With Elon Musk leading a charge under an “AI-first” flag, critics warn that rushed rollouts at agencies could compromise data security, automate important decisions, and put Americans at risk.Safeguards and governance: What’s missing?While the FDA has promised that its AI systems will maintain strict information security and act in compliance with FDA policy, specific details about safeguards remain sparse. The agency’s claims that AI is a tool to support, not replace, human expertise and can enhance regulatory rigour by helping predict toxicities and adverse events. This provides some reassurance but lacks specificity.The absence of published governance frameworks for what is an internal process contrasts sharply with the FDA’s guidance for industry.The agency has previously issued draft guidance to pharma companies, providing recommendations on the use of AI intended to support a regulatory decision about a drug or biological product’s safety, effectiveness, or quality. Its published draft guidance in that instance was based on feedback from over 800 external comments and its experience with more than 500 drug submissions involving AI components in their development since 2016.The broader AI landscape: Federal agencies as testing groundsThe FDA’s initiative is part of a larger federal AI adoption wave. The General Services Administration is piloting an AI chatbot to automate routine tasks, and the Social Security Administration plans to use AI software to transcribe applicant hearings.However, GSA officials noted its tool has been in development for 18 months – highlighting the contrast with the FDA’s accelerated timeline, which at the time of writing, is a matter of weeks.The rapid federal adoption reflects the Trump administration’s belief that America is well-positioned to maintain its global dominance in AI and that the Federal Government must capitalise on the advantages of American innovation. It also maintains the importance of strong protections for Americans’ privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.Innovation at a crossroadsThe FDA’s ambitious timeline embodies the fundamental tension between technological promise and regulatory responsibility. While AI offers clear benefits in automating tedious tasks, the rush to implementation raises critical questions about transparency, accountability, and the erosion of scientific rigour.The June 30th deadline will test whether the agency can maintain the public trust that has long been its cornerstone. Success requires more than technological capability – it demands proof that oversight hasn’t been sacrificed for speed.The FDA AI deployment represents a defining moment for pharmaceutical regulation. The outcome will determine whether rapid AI adoption strengthens public health protection or serves as a cautionary tale about prioritising efficiency over safety in matters of life and death. The stakes couldn’t be higher.See also: AI vs COVID-19: Here are the AI tools and services fighting coronavirusWant to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.
    #fda #deployment #innovation #oversight #drug
    FDA AI deployment: Innovation vs oversight in drug regulation
    The US Food and Drugs Administrationhas stated that it wants to accelerate the deployment of AI across its centres. FDA Commissioner Martin A. Makary has announced an aggressive timeline to scale use of AI by 30 June 2025 and is betting big on the technology to change drug approval processes for the US.But the rapid AI deployment at the FDA raises important questions about whether innovation can be balanced with oversight.Strategic leadership drive: FDA names first AI chiefThe foundation for the ambitious FDA AI deployment was laid with the appointment of Jeremy Walsh as the first-ever Chief AI Officer. Walsh previously led enterprise-scale technology deployments in federal health and intelligence agencies and came from government contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, where he worked for 14 years as chief technologist.His appointment, announced just before the May 8th rollout announcement, signals the agency’s serious commitment to technological transformation. The timing is significant – Walsh’s hiring coincided with workforce cuts at the FDA, including the loss of key tech talent.Among the losses was Sridhar Mantha, the former director of strategic programmes at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, who had co-chaired the AI Council at CDER and helped develop policy around AI’s use in drug development. Ironically, Mantha is now working alongside Walsh to coordinate the agency-wide rollout.The pilot programme: Impressive results, limited detailsWhat’s driving the rapid AI deployment is the reported success of the agency’s pilot programme trialling the software. Commissioner Makary said he was “blown away by the success of our first AI-assisted scientific review pilot,” with one official claiming the technology enabled him to perform scientific review tasks in minutes that used to take three days.However, the scope, rigour and results from the pilot scheme remain unreleased.The agency has not published detailed reports on the pilot’s methodology, validation procedures, or specific use cases tested. The lack of transparency is concerning given the high-stakes nature of drug evaluation.When pressed for details, the FDA has promised that additional details and updates on the initiative will be shared publicly in June. For an agency responsible for protecting public health through rigorous scientific review, the absence of published pilot data raises questions about the evidence base supporting such an aggressive timeline.Industry perspective: Cautious optimism meets concernsThe pharmaceutical industry’s reaction to the FDA AI deployment reflects a mixture of optimism and apprehension. Companies have long sought faster approval processes, with Makary pointedly asking, “Why does it take over 10 years for a new drug to come to market?”“While AI is still developing, harnessing it requires a thoughtful and risk-based approach with patients at the centre. We’re pleased to see the FDA taking concrete action to harness the potential of AI,” said PhRMA spokesperson Andrew Powaleny.However, industry experts are raising practical concerns. Mike Hinckle, an FDA compliance expert at K&L Gates, highlighted a key issue: pharmaceutical companies will want to know how the proprietary data they submit will be secured.The concern is particularly acute given reports that the FDA was in discussions with OpenAI about a project called cderGPT, which appears to be an AI tool for the Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research.Expert warnings: The rush vs rigour debateLeading experts in the field are expressing concern about the pace of deployment. Eric Topol, founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, told Axios: “The idea is good, but the lack of details and the perceived ‘rush’ is concerning.”He identified critical gaps in transparency, including questions about which models are being used to train the AI, and what inputs are provided for specialised fine-tuning.Former FDA commissioner Robert Califf struck a balanced tone: “I have nothing but enthusiasm tempered by caution about the timeline.” His comment reflects the broader sentiment among experts who support AI integration but question whether the June 30th deadline allows sufficient time for proper validation and safeguards to be implemented.Rafael Rosengarten from the Alliance for AI in Healthcare supports automation but emphasises the need for governance, saying there is a need for policy guidance around what kind of data is used to train AI models and what kind of model performance is considered acceptable.Political context: Trump’s deregulatory AI visionThe FDA AI deployment must be understood in the broader context of the Trump administration’s approach to AI governance. Trump’s overhaul of federal AI policy – ditching Biden-era guardrails in favour of speed and international dominance in technology – has turned the government into a tech testing ground.The administration has explicitly prioritised innovation over precaution. Vice President JD Vance outlined four key AI policy priorities, including encouraging “pro-growth AI policies” instead of “excessive regulation of the AI sector,” and he has taken action to ensure the forthcoming White House AI Action Plan would “avoid an overly precautionary regulatory regime.”The philosophy is evident in how the FDA is approaching its AI deployment. With Elon Musk leading a charge under an “AI-first” flag, critics warn that rushed rollouts at agencies could compromise data security, automate important decisions, and put Americans at risk.Safeguards and governance: What’s missing?While the FDA has promised that its AI systems will maintain strict information security and act in compliance with FDA policy, specific details about safeguards remain sparse. The agency’s claims that AI is a tool to support, not replace, human expertise and can enhance regulatory rigour by helping predict toxicities and adverse events. This provides some reassurance but lacks specificity.The absence of published governance frameworks for what is an internal process contrasts sharply with the FDA’s guidance for industry.The agency has previously issued draft guidance to pharma companies, providing recommendations on the use of AI intended to support a regulatory decision about a drug or biological product’s safety, effectiveness, or quality. Its published draft guidance in that instance was based on feedback from over 800 external comments and its experience with more than 500 drug submissions involving AI components in their development since 2016.The broader AI landscape: Federal agencies as testing groundsThe FDA’s initiative is part of a larger federal AI adoption wave. The General Services Administration is piloting an AI chatbot to automate routine tasks, and the Social Security Administration plans to use AI software to transcribe applicant hearings.However, GSA officials noted its tool has been in development for 18 months – highlighting the contrast with the FDA’s accelerated timeline, which at the time of writing, is a matter of weeks.The rapid federal adoption reflects the Trump administration’s belief that America is well-positioned to maintain its global dominance in AI and that the Federal Government must capitalise on the advantages of American innovation. It also maintains the importance of strong protections for Americans’ privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.Innovation at a crossroadsThe FDA’s ambitious timeline embodies the fundamental tension between technological promise and regulatory responsibility. While AI offers clear benefits in automating tedious tasks, the rush to implementation raises critical questions about transparency, accountability, and the erosion of scientific rigour.The June 30th deadline will test whether the agency can maintain the public trust that has long been its cornerstone. Success requires more than technological capability – it demands proof that oversight hasn’t been sacrificed for speed.The FDA AI deployment represents a defining moment for pharmaceutical regulation. The outcome will determine whether rapid AI adoption strengthens public health protection or serves as a cautionary tale about prioritising efficiency over safety in matters of life and death. The stakes couldn’t be higher.See also: AI vs COVID-19: Here are the AI tools and services fighting coronavirusWant to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here. #fda #deployment #innovation #oversight #drug
    WWW.ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE-NEWS.COM
    FDA AI deployment: Innovation vs oversight in drug regulation
    The US Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) has stated that it wants to accelerate the deployment of AI across its centres. FDA Commissioner Martin A. Makary has announced an aggressive timeline to scale use of AI by 30 June 2025 and is betting big on the technology to change drug approval processes for the US.But the rapid AI deployment at the FDA raises important questions about whether innovation can be balanced with oversight.Strategic leadership drive: FDA names first AI chiefThe foundation for the ambitious FDA AI deployment was laid with the appointment of Jeremy Walsh as the first-ever Chief AI Officer. Walsh previously led enterprise-scale technology deployments in federal health and intelligence agencies and came from government contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, where he worked for 14 years as chief technologist.His appointment, announced just before the May 8th rollout announcement, signals the agency’s serious commitment to technological transformation. The timing is significant – Walsh’s hiring coincided with workforce cuts at the FDA, including the loss of key tech talent.Among the losses was Sridhar Mantha, the former director of strategic programmes at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, who had co-chaired the AI Council at CDER and helped develop policy around AI’s use in drug development. Ironically, Mantha is now working alongside Walsh to coordinate the agency-wide rollout.The pilot programme: Impressive results, limited detailsWhat’s driving the rapid AI deployment is the reported success of the agency’s pilot programme trialling the software. Commissioner Makary said he was “blown away by the success of our first AI-assisted scientific review pilot,” with one official claiming the technology enabled him to perform scientific review tasks in minutes that used to take three days.However, the scope, rigour and results from the pilot scheme remain unreleased.The agency has not published detailed reports on the pilot’s methodology, validation procedures, or specific use cases tested. The lack of transparency is concerning given the high-stakes nature of drug evaluation.When pressed for details, the FDA has promised that additional details and updates on the initiative will be shared publicly in June. For an agency responsible for protecting public health through rigorous scientific review, the absence of published pilot data raises questions about the evidence base supporting such an aggressive timeline.Industry perspective: Cautious optimism meets concernsThe pharmaceutical industry’s reaction to the FDA AI deployment reflects a mixture of optimism and apprehension. Companies have long sought faster approval processes, with Makary pointedly asking, “Why does it take over 10 years for a new drug to come to market?”“While AI is still developing, harnessing it requires a thoughtful and risk-based approach with patients at the centre. We’re pleased to see the FDA taking concrete action to harness the potential of AI,” said PhRMA spokesperson Andrew Powaleny.However, industry experts are raising practical concerns. Mike Hinckle, an FDA compliance expert at K&L Gates, highlighted a key issue: pharmaceutical companies will want to know how the proprietary data they submit will be secured.The concern is particularly acute given reports that the FDA was in discussions with OpenAI about a project called cderGPT, which appears to be an AI tool for the Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research.Expert warnings: The rush vs rigour debateLeading experts in the field are expressing concern about the pace of deployment. Eric Topol, founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, told Axios: “The idea is good, but the lack of details and the perceived ‘rush’ is concerning.”He identified critical gaps in transparency, including questions about which models are being used to train the AI, and what inputs are provided for specialised fine-tuning.Former FDA commissioner Robert Califf struck a balanced tone: “I have nothing but enthusiasm tempered by caution about the timeline.” His comment reflects the broader sentiment among experts who support AI integration but question whether the June 30th deadline allows sufficient time for proper validation and safeguards to be implemented.Rafael Rosengarten from the Alliance for AI in Healthcare supports automation but emphasises the need for governance, saying there is a need for policy guidance around what kind of data is used to train AI models and what kind of model performance is considered acceptable.Political context: Trump’s deregulatory AI visionThe FDA AI deployment must be understood in the broader context of the Trump administration’s approach to AI governance. Trump’s overhaul of federal AI policy – ditching Biden-era guardrails in favour of speed and international dominance in technology – has turned the government into a tech testing ground.The administration has explicitly prioritised innovation over precaution. Vice President JD Vance outlined four key AI policy priorities, including encouraging “pro-growth AI policies” instead of “excessive regulation of the AI sector,” and he has taken action to ensure the forthcoming White House AI Action Plan would “avoid an overly precautionary regulatory regime.”The philosophy is evident in how the FDA is approaching its AI deployment. With Elon Musk leading a charge under an “AI-first” flag, critics warn that rushed rollouts at agencies could compromise data security, automate important decisions, and put Americans at risk.Safeguards and governance: What’s missing?While the FDA has promised that its AI systems will maintain strict information security and act in compliance with FDA policy, specific details about safeguards remain sparse. The agency’s claims that AI is a tool to support, not replace, human expertise and can enhance regulatory rigour by helping predict toxicities and adverse events. This provides some reassurance but lacks specificity.The absence of published governance frameworks for what is an internal process contrasts sharply with the FDA’s guidance for industry.The agency has previously issued draft guidance to pharma companies, providing recommendations on the use of AI intended to support a regulatory decision about a drug or biological product’s safety, effectiveness, or quality. Its published draft guidance in that instance was based on feedback from over 800 external comments and its experience with more than 500 drug submissions involving AI components in their development since 2016.The broader AI landscape: Federal agencies as testing groundsThe FDA’s initiative is part of a larger federal AI adoption wave. The General Services Administration is piloting an AI chatbot to automate routine tasks, and the Social Security Administration plans to use AI software to transcribe applicant hearings.However, GSA officials noted its tool has been in development for 18 months – highlighting the contrast with the FDA’s accelerated timeline, which at the time of writing, is a matter of weeks.The rapid federal adoption reflects the Trump administration’s belief that America is well-positioned to maintain its global dominance in AI and that the Federal Government must capitalise on the advantages of American innovation. It also maintains the importance of strong protections for Americans’ privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.Innovation at a crossroadsThe FDA’s ambitious timeline embodies the fundamental tension between technological promise and regulatory responsibility. While AI offers clear benefits in automating tedious tasks, the rush to implementation raises critical questions about transparency, accountability, and the erosion of scientific rigour.The June 30th deadline will test whether the agency can maintain the public trust that has long been its cornerstone. Success requires more than technological capability – it demands proof that oversight hasn’t been sacrificed for speed.The FDA AI deployment represents a defining moment for pharmaceutical regulation. The outcome will determine whether rapid AI adoption strengthens public health protection or serves as a cautionary tale about prioritising efficiency over safety in matters of life and death. The stakes couldn’t be higher.See also: AI vs COVID-19: Here are the AI tools and services fighting coronavirusWant to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
  • Bulova Celebrates 150 Years with Art Deco Limited-Edition Timepieces

    Time stands still for no one, yet some watchmakers have mastered the art of transcending it.
    Bulova marks an extraordinary milestone this year with 150 years of uninterrupted watchmaking excellence originating from New York City.
    The iconic American brand commemorates this sesquicentennial achievement with the release of two exceptional limited-edition timepieces that resurrect the brand’s Art Deco heritage.
    These anniversary pieces don’t merely replicate historical designs; they reimagine them for contemporary collectors while preserving the essence that made them revolutionary in their time.
    Designer: Bulova
    The Limited-Edition 150 Art Deco Collection features two distinct timepieces: the elegant Miss America ladies’ watch and a meticulously crafted pocket watch.
    Each piece carries individual numbering and features case backs adorned with the 150th Anniversary logo, presented in custom-designed cases accompanied by detailed storybooks chronicling Bulova’s rich Art Deco legacy.
    Art Deco represented a transformative period for Bulova.
    This artistic movement of the 1920s and 1930s coincided with the brand’s expansion and cemented design principles that continue to influence its aesthetic approach today.
    “With these limited-edition timepieces, we’re bringing the past into the present, reimagining timeless design for the modern collector,” explains Michael Benavente, Bulova’s brand managing director.
    This philosophy guides the entire collection, balancing historical authenticity with contemporary craftsmanship.
    Miss America: Feminine Elegance Reimagined
    The 150 Art Deco Miss America watch revives one of Bulova’s most celebrated feminine designs.
    The original Miss America collection, launched in 1930, captured the evolving role of women during a pivotal era of social transformation.
    Its influence spanned four decades, establishing Bulova as a creator of timepieces that complemented the changing fashion sensibilities of modern women.
    The contemporary interpretation maintains the delicate proportions and ornate detailing of its predecessor.
    A slender silver-tone stainless steel case measuring just 18.3mm creates a refined presence on the wrist.
    Six deep blue synthetic sapphires adorn the case, creating striking visual contrast against the metallic surfaces.
    Perhaps the most distinctive element of the Miss America is its intricately filigreed expansion bracelet.
    This elaborate metalwork exemplifies the attention to detail characteristic of Art Deco jewelry, featuring a seamless buckle closure that maintains the bracelet’s visual continuity.
    The craftsmanship evident in these small details demonstrates Bulova’s commitment to authentic period design.
    The silver-tone dial, with its brushed surface and blue hands inspired by vintage watches, continues the vintage aesthetic.
    A domed sapphire crystal protects the dial while adding visual depth to the overall design.
    Together, these elements create a timepiece that functions as wearable art rather than merely a timekeeping instrument.
    Despite its ornate appearance, the Miss America incorporates modern functionality.
    The reliable 5Y20 quartz movement ensures accurate timekeeping, while 30-meter water resistance makes the watch suitable for everyday wear.
    The distinctive tonneau case shape, a hallmark of Art Deco design, features an anti-reflective curved sapphire crystal that enhances legibility.
    Production of the Miss America is limited to 600 pieces worldwide, with each watch individually numbered.
    Available at $1,950, this collector’s piece launched in late March 2025, offering enthusiasts immediate access to this celebration of Bulova’s design heritage.
    The Art Deco Pocket Watch: Mechanical Mastery
    While wristwatches dominate contemporary timekeeping, the pocket watch represents an essential chapter in horological history.
    Bulova’s 150 Art Deco Pocket Watch pays homage to this tradition, drawing inspiration from the company’s iconic 1920s designs when pocket watches represented the pinnacle of portable timekeeping technology.
    The substantial 45.5mm case provides an impressive canvas for showcasing Bulova’s mechanical expertise.
    Coin-edge texturing adorns the silver-tone stainless steel case, complemented by a textured bow that connects to a 15.8-inch custom link chain.
    This chain features a specially designed lobster claw and spring ring closure system that balances security with period-appropriate aesthetics.
    Technical excellence defines this commemorative piece.
    A self-winding Swiss mechanical movement featuring 21 jewels powers the timepiece, offering an impressive 62-hour power reserve.
    This sophisticated mechanism represents a significant achievement in mechanical watchmaking, providing extended autonomy between windings.
    The sterling silver dial showcases intricate central engravings that pay tribute to early Bulova craftsmen.
    Bold numerals set against a brushed hour ring create excellent legibility, while elegant blued minute and hour hands provide striking contrast against the silver background.
    These design elements recreate the sophisticated aesthetic of the Art Deco period while maintaining practical functionality.
    Limited to just 350 pieces worldwide and priced at $2,950, the pocket watch became available in early April 2025.
    This exceptional timepiece connects Bulova’s mechanical watchmaking heritage with contemporary craftsmanship, offering collectors a rare opportunity to own a piece of horological history.
    Cultural Legacy and Heritage Preserved
    The Limited-Edition 150 Art Deco Collection transcends mere corporate celebration, acknowledging Bulova’s profound influence on American watch design during a transformative cultural period.
    Jeffrey Cohen, President of Citizen Watch America, captures this significance perfectly: “The Art Deco era was a defining moment for Bulova, marked by cutting-edge technology, bold design, and pioneering marketing strategies.
    With these limited-edition timepieces, we are reimagining that legacy for the modern era, honoring our past while continuing to push the boundaries of craftsmanship and innovation in our 150th year.”
    By selecting Art Deco as the focal point for this anniversary, Bulova highlights an era when its design language achieved peak distinctiveness.
    Founded by Joseph Bulova in 1875, the company has consistently pioneered innovations that transformed watchmaking while maintaining its position at the forefront of design and technology.
    The thoughtful presentation enhances each timepiece’s significance.
    Luxurious custom cases contain the watches alongside detailed storybooks providing historical context about Bulova’s Art Deco heritage.
    This approach transforms the watches from products into cultural artifacts with rich narratives.
    Limited production numbers (600 Miss America watches and 350 pocket watches) ensure exclusivity and collectible status.
    For enthusiasts, these pieces represent an opportunity to own functional art objects embodying 150 years of continuous innovation.
    They serve as wearable connections to an influential design movement that shaped American aesthetic sensibilities during a pivotal historical period.
    The collection demonstrates how historical designs can successfully adapt to contemporary expectations while connecting generations of watch enthusiasts through timeless design principles.
    Through these meticulously crafted timepieces, Bulova affirms Art Deco’s lasting influence and ensures this distinctive aesthetic approach will continue inspiring future generations of watchmakers and collectors alike.The post Bulova Celebrates 150 Years with Art Deco Limited-Edition Timepieces first appeared on Yanko Design.
    Source: https://www.yankodesign.com/2025/05/13/bulova-celebrates-150-years-with-art-deco-limited-edition-timepieces/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=bulova-celebrates-150-years-with-art-deco-limited-edition-timepieces">https://www.yankodesign.com/2025/05/13/bulova-celebrates-150-years-with-art-deco-limited-edition-timepieces/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=bulova-celebrates-150-years-with-art-deco-limited-edition-timepieces">https://www.yankodesign.com/2025/05/13/bulova-celebrates-150-years-with-art-deco-limited-edition-timepieces/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=bulova-celebrates-150-years-with-art-deco-limited-edition-timepieces
    #bulova #celebrates #years #with #art #deco #limitededition #timepieces
    Bulova Celebrates 150 Years with Art Deco Limited-Edition Timepieces
    Time stands still for no one, yet some watchmakers have mastered the art of transcending it. Bulova marks an extraordinary milestone this year with 150 years of uninterrupted watchmaking excellence originating from New York City. The iconic American brand commemorates this sesquicentennial achievement with the release of two exceptional limited-edition timepieces that resurrect the brand’s Art Deco heritage. These anniversary pieces don’t merely replicate historical designs; they reimagine them for contemporary collectors while preserving the essence that made them revolutionary in their time. Designer: Bulova The Limited-Edition 150 Art Deco Collection features two distinct timepieces: the elegant Miss America ladies’ watch and a meticulously crafted pocket watch. Each piece carries individual numbering and features case backs adorned with the 150th Anniversary logo, presented in custom-designed cases accompanied by detailed storybooks chronicling Bulova’s rich Art Deco legacy. Art Deco represented a transformative period for Bulova. This artistic movement of the 1920s and 1930s coincided with the brand’s expansion and cemented design principles that continue to influence its aesthetic approach today. “With these limited-edition timepieces, we’re bringing the past into the present, reimagining timeless design for the modern collector,” explains Michael Benavente, Bulova’s brand managing director. This philosophy guides the entire collection, balancing historical authenticity with contemporary craftsmanship. Miss America: Feminine Elegance Reimagined The 150 Art Deco Miss America watch revives one of Bulova’s most celebrated feminine designs. The original Miss America collection, launched in 1930, captured the evolving role of women during a pivotal era of social transformation. Its influence spanned four decades, establishing Bulova as a creator of timepieces that complemented the changing fashion sensibilities of modern women. The contemporary interpretation maintains the delicate proportions and ornate detailing of its predecessor. A slender silver-tone stainless steel case measuring just 18.3mm creates a refined presence on the wrist. Six deep blue synthetic sapphires adorn the case, creating striking visual contrast against the metallic surfaces. Perhaps the most distinctive element of the Miss America is its intricately filigreed expansion bracelet. This elaborate metalwork exemplifies the attention to detail characteristic of Art Deco jewelry, featuring a seamless buckle closure that maintains the bracelet’s visual continuity. The craftsmanship evident in these small details demonstrates Bulova’s commitment to authentic period design. The silver-tone dial, with its brushed surface and blue hands inspired by vintage watches, continues the vintage aesthetic. A domed sapphire crystal protects the dial while adding visual depth to the overall design. Together, these elements create a timepiece that functions as wearable art rather than merely a timekeeping instrument. Despite its ornate appearance, the Miss America incorporates modern functionality. The reliable 5Y20 quartz movement ensures accurate timekeeping, while 30-meter water resistance makes the watch suitable for everyday wear. The distinctive tonneau case shape, a hallmark of Art Deco design, features an anti-reflective curved sapphire crystal that enhances legibility. Production of the Miss America is limited to 600 pieces worldwide, with each watch individually numbered. Available at $1,950, this collector’s piece launched in late March 2025, offering enthusiasts immediate access to this celebration of Bulova’s design heritage. The Art Deco Pocket Watch: Mechanical Mastery While wristwatches dominate contemporary timekeeping, the pocket watch represents an essential chapter in horological history. Bulova’s 150 Art Deco Pocket Watch pays homage to this tradition, drawing inspiration from the company’s iconic 1920s designs when pocket watches represented the pinnacle of portable timekeeping technology. The substantial 45.5mm case provides an impressive canvas for showcasing Bulova’s mechanical expertise. Coin-edge texturing adorns the silver-tone stainless steel case, complemented by a textured bow that connects to a 15.8-inch custom link chain. This chain features a specially designed lobster claw and spring ring closure system that balances security with period-appropriate aesthetics. Technical excellence defines this commemorative piece. A self-winding Swiss mechanical movement featuring 21 jewels powers the timepiece, offering an impressive 62-hour power reserve. This sophisticated mechanism represents a significant achievement in mechanical watchmaking, providing extended autonomy between windings. The sterling silver dial showcases intricate central engravings that pay tribute to early Bulova craftsmen. Bold numerals set against a brushed hour ring create excellent legibility, while elegant blued minute and hour hands provide striking contrast against the silver background. These design elements recreate the sophisticated aesthetic of the Art Deco period while maintaining practical functionality. Limited to just 350 pieces worldwide and priced at $2,950, the pocket watch became available in early April 2025. This exceptional timepiece connects Bulova’s mechanical watchmaking heritage with contemporary craftsmanship, offering collectors a rare opportunity to own a piece of horological history. Cultural Legacy and Heritage Preserved The Limited-Edition 150 Art Deco Collection transcends mere corporate celebration, acknowledging Bulova’s profound influence on American watch design during a transformative cultural period. Jeffrey Cohen, President of Citizen Watch America, captures this significance perfectly: “The Art Deco era was a defining moment for Bulova, marked by cutting-edge technology, bold design, and pioneering marketing strategies. With these limited-edition timepieces, we are reimagining that legacy for the modern era, honoring our past while continuing to push the boundaries of craftsmanship and innovation in our 150th year.” By selecting Art Deco as the focal point for this anniversary, Bulova highlights an era when its design language achieved peak distinctiveness. Founded by Joseph Bulova in 1875, the company has consistently pioneered innovations that transformed watchmaking while maintaining its position at the forefront of design and technology. The thoughtful presentation enhances each timepiece’s significance. Luxurious custom cases contain the watches alongside detailed storybooks providing historical context about Bulova’s Art Deco heritage. This approach transforms the watches from products into cultural artifacts with rich narratives. Limited production numbers (600 Miss America watches and 350 pocket watches) ensure exclusivity and collectible status. For enthusiasts, these pieces represent an opportunity to own functional art objects embodying 150 years of continuous innovation. They serve as wearable connections to an influential design movement that shaped American aesthetic sensibilities during a pivotal historical period. The collection demonstrates how historical designs can successfully adapt to contemporary expectations while connecting generations of watch enthusiasts through timeless design principles. Through these meticulously crafted timepieces, Bulova affirms Art Deco’s lasting influence and ensures this distinctive aesthetic approach will continue inspiring future generations of watchmakers and collectors alike.The post Bulova Celebrates 150 Years with Art Deco Limited-Edition Timepieces first appeared on Yanko Design. Source: https://www.yankodesign.com/2025/05/13/bulova-celebrates-150-years-with-art-deco-limited-edition-timepieces/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=bulova-celebrates-150-years-with-art-deco-limited-edition-timepieces #bulova #celebrates #years #with #art #deco #limitededition #timepieces
    WWW.YANKODESIGN.COM
    Bulova Celebrates 150 Years with Art Deco Limited-Edition Timepieces
    Time stands still for no one, yet some watchmakers have mastered the art of transcending it. Bulova marks an extraordinary milestone this year with 150 years of uninterrupted watchmaking excellence originating from New York City. The iconic American brand commemorates this sesquicentennial achievement with the release of two exceptional limited-edition timepieces that resurrect the brand’s Art Deco heritage. These anniversary pieces don’t merely replicate historical designs; they reimagine them for contemporary collectors while preserving the essence that made them revolutionary in their time. Designer: Bulova The Limited-Edition 150 Art Deco Collection features two distinct timepieces: the elegant Miss America ladies’ watch and a meticulously crafted pocket watch. Each piece carries individual numbering and features case backs adorned with the 150th Anniversary logo, presented in custom-designed cases accompanied by detailed storybooks chronicling Bulova’s rich Art Deco legacy. Art Deco represented a transformative period for Bulova. This artistic movement of the 1920s and 1930s coincided with the brand’s expansion and cemented design principles that continue to influence its aesthetic approach today. “With these limited-edition timepieces, we’re bringing the past into the present, reimagining timeless design for the modern collector,” explains Michael Benavente, Bulova’s brand managing director. This philosophy guides the entire collection, balancing historical authenticity with contemporary craftsmanship. Miss America: Feminine Elegance Reimagined The 150 Art Deco Miss America watch revives one of Bulova’s most celebrated feminine designs. The original Miss America collection, launched in 1930, captured the evolving role of women during a pivotal era of social transformation. Its influence spanned four decades, establishing Bulova as a creator of timepieces that complemented the changing fashion sensibilities of modern women. The contemporary interpretation maintains the delicate proportions and ornate detailing of its predecessor. A slender silver-tone stainless steel case measuring just 18.3mm creates a refined presence on the wrist. Six deep blue synthetic sapphires adorn the case, creating striking visual contrast against the metallic surfaces. Perhaps the most distinctive element of the Miss America is its intricately filigreed expansion bracelet. This elaborate metalwork exemplifies the attention to detail characteristic of Art Deco jewelry, featuring a seamless buckle closure that maintains the bracelet’s visual continuity. The craftsmanship evident in these small details demonstrates Bulova’s commitment to authentic period design. The silver-tone dial, with its brushed surface and blue hands inspired by vintage watches, continues the vintage aesthetic. A domed sapphire crystal protects the dial while adding visual depth to the overall design. Together, these elements create a timepiece that functions as wearable art rather than merely a timekeeping instrument. Despite its ornate appearance, the Miss America incorporates modern functionality. The reliable 5Y20 quartz movement ensures accurate timekeeping, while 30-meter water resistance makes the watch suitable for everyday wear. The distinctive tonneau case shape, a hallmark of Art Deco design, features an anti-reflective curved sapphire crystal that enhances legibility. Production of the Miss America is limited to 600 pieces worldwide, with each watch individually numbered. Available at $1,950, this collector’s piece launched in late March 2025, offering enthusiasts immediate access to this celebration of Bulova’s design heritage. The Art Deco Pocket Watch: Mechanical Mastery While wristwatches dominate contemporary timekeeping, the pocket watch represents an essential chapter in horological history. Bulova’s 150 Art Deco Pocket Watch pays homage to this tradition, drawing inspiration from the company’s iconic 1920s designs when pocket watches represented the pinnacle of portable timekeeping technology. The substantial 45.5mm case provides an impressive canvas for showcasing Bulova’s mechanical expertise. Coin-edge texturing adorns the silver-tone stainless steel case, complemented by a textured bow that connects to a 15.8-inch custom link chain. This chain features a specially designed lobster claw and spring ring closure system that balances security with period-appropriate aesthetics. Technical excellence defines this commemorative piece. A self-winding Swiss mechanical movement featuring 21 jewels powers the timepiece, offering an impressive 62-hour power reserve. This sophisticated mechanism represents a significant achievement in mechanical watchmaking, providing extended autonomy between windings. The sterling silver dial showcases intricate central engravings that pay tribute to early Bulova craftsmen. Bold numerals set against a brushed hour ring create excellent legibility, while elegant blued minute and hour hands provide striking contrast against the silver background. These design elements recreate the sophisticated aesthetic of the Art Deco period while maintaining practical functionality. Limited to just 350 pieces worldwide and priced at $2,950, the pocket watch became available in early April 2025. This exceptional timepiece connects Bulova’s mechanical watchmaking heritage with contemporary craftsmanship, offering collectors a rare opportunity to own a piece of horological history. Cultural Legacy and Heritage Preserved The Limited-Edition 150 Art Deco Collection transcends mere corporate celebration, acknowledging Bulova’s profound influence on American watch design during a transformative cultural period. Jeffrey Cohen, President of Citizen Watch America, captures this significance perfectly: “The Art Deco era was a defining moment for Bulova, marked by cutting-edge technology, bold design, and pioneering marketing strategies. With these limited-edition timepieces, we are reimagining that legacy for the modern era, honoring our past while continuing to push the boundaries of craftsmanship and innovation in our 150th year.” By selecting Art Deco as the focal point for this anniversary, Bulova highlights an era when its design language achieved peak distinctiveness. Founded by Joseph Bulova in 1875, the company has consistently pioneered innovations that transformed watchmaking while maintaining its position at the forefront of design and technology. The thoughtful presentation enhances each timepiece’s significance. Luxurious custom cases contain the watches alongside detailed storybooks providing historical context about Bulova’s Art Deco heritage. This approach transforms the watches from products into cultural artifacts with rich narratives. Limited production numbers (600 Miss America watches and 350 pocket watches) ensure exclusivity and collectible status. For enthusiasts, these pieces represent an opportunity to own functional art objects embodying 150 years of continuous innovation. They serve as wearable connections to an influential design movement that shaped American aesthetic sensibilities during a pivotal historical period. The collection demonstrates how historical designs can successfully adapt to contemporary expectations while connecting generations of watch enthusiasts through timeless design principles. Through these meticulously crafted timepieces, Bulova affirms Art Deco’s lasting influence and ensures this distinctive aesthetic approach will continue inspiring future generations of watchmakers and collectors alike.The post Bulova Celebrates 150 Years with Art Deco Limited-Edition Timepieces first appeared on Yanko Design.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos
Páginas impulsionada