Ah, voilà, Apple a enfin corrigé le « crime de design » le plus flagrant d'iOS 26 ! Apparemment, la beauté du Liquid Glass a besoin d'une mise à jour pour briller un peu plus. Qui aurait cru que la perfection esthétique avait encore des failles ? Peut-être un jour, ils nous montreront comment faire briller nos âmes tout aussi bien. En attendant, réjouissons-nous de ce petit coup de pinceau sur une interface déjà parfaite. Vivement iOS 27, où peut-être ils corrigeront aussi la douleur de nos portefeuilles ! #Apple #iOS26 #LiquidGlass #Design #Innovation

The new Street Fighter movie has added a few more names to the cast. Earlier this week, rapper-turned-actor Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson teased that he will play Balrog in the film. That rumor now appears to be confirmed, and another performer has signed up to play Dan Hibiki, one of the weakest fighters in the Street Fighter universe.According to Deadline, comedian Andrew Schulz will play Dan in the film. That's appropriate, since Dan is largely a comic relief character who gets played for laughs. This will mark Dan's first-ever appearance in live-action media. Schulz has previously appeared in The Underdoggs and the remake of White Men Can’t Jump, as well as the second season of Netflix's sitcom Tires. He is also the host of Flagrant Pod, a popular comedy podcast, and his most recent comedy special was streamed on Netflix.Jackson's casting as Balrog was confirmed in a subsequent report by The Hollywood Reporter. THR went a step further by confirming the roles of a few previously cast actors including Andrew Koji as Ryu, Noah Centineo as Ken, Jason Momoa as Blanka, and Orville Peck as Vega. Additionally, the outlet notes that Joe "Roman Reigns" Anoa’i, a longtime WWE superstar and former World Champion, will play Akuma, one of the film's primary villains.Continue Reading at GameSpot #street #fighter #movie #adds #dan

L'attaque des États-Unis sur les sites nucléaires iraniens est un acte d'agression inacceptable et une démonstration flagrante de la lâcheté militaire. Les images satellites révèlent des destructions massives à Fordow, une installation profondément enfouie, conçue pour résister à ce genre d'assaut. Comment peut-on justifier l'utilisation de bombes « bunker-buster » contre des infrastructures qui doivent être protégées par le droit international ? C'est une honte que le monde assiste à cette brutalité et à ce mépris total pour la souveraineté d'un pays. Les conséquences de ces actions sont catastrophiques et montrent à quel point la diplomatie a échoué. Assez de

L'animation espagnole est en train de se faire étouffer par le manque d'intérêt flagrant de RTVE, et il est grand temps de faire entendre notre voix ! DIBOOS et PROA tirent la sonnette d'alarme, et à juste titre. Comment pouvons-nous accepter que notre secteur d'animation se transforme en un obstacle à son propre développement ? C'est tout simplement inacceptable ! RTVE, en tant qu'entité publique, a la responsabilité de soutenir notre culture, de promouvoir notre créativité et de nourrir les talents locaux. Au lieu de cela, elle choisit de tourner le dos à l'animation infantile, laissant ainsi les artistes et les producteurs désespérés. Ce désintérêt manifeste ne fait pas que diminuer la production nationale, il nous prive également de nos propres références culturelles. Comment pouvons-nous construire une identité forte si nous sommes de plus en plus dépendants de contenus étrangers ? C'est un suicide culturel pur et simple ! Le climat au Festival International d'Annecy a été teinté de désespoir, et il est temps que nous relevions la voix contre cette situation intolérable. L'animation espagnole mérite d'être reconnue, soutenue et célébrée. Au lieu de cela, RTVE préfère se concentrer sur des productions de moindre qualité, de l'étranger, au détriment de notre propre industrie. C'est une honte ! Il est impératif que nous agissions. Nous ne pouvons plus rester les bras croisés pendant que notre patrimoine culturel est menacé. L'animation est un vecteur puissant de storytelling, de valeurs et d'émotions, et il est essentiel que nous investissions dans notre propre récit. Si RTVE ne comprend pas cela, alors il est temps d'exiger un changement. Nous devons faire pression sur cette institution pour qu'elle reconnaisse enfin son rôle crucial dans le soutien à notre secteur d'animation. Nous avons besoin de plus de productions nationales, de plus de soutien aux créateurs espagnols, et surtout, de plus de respect pour notre culture. Il est temps que RTVE arrête d'être un obstacle et commence à jouer son rôle de catalyseur pour le développement de l'animation en Espagne. Sinon, nous ne serons que des spectateurs de notre propre effondrement culturel ! #AnimationEspagnole #RTVE #SoutienCulturel #IdentitéCulturelle #DroitsDesArtistes

Je suis vraiment furieux à propos du nouveau concert de voyage de PlayStation ! Oui, entendre les mélodies de nos jeux vidéo préférés en direct pourrait sembler une idée incroyable, mais ne nous laissons pas berner par le glamour. Cela fait des mois que je vois des annonces pour ces concerts soi-disant "révolutionnaires", et vous savez quoi ? Ils manquent cruellement de classiques ! Quand on parle de concerts vidéo, pourquoi diable ne pas inclure les véritables joyaux du passé ? Les compositions emblématiques de jeux qui ont marqué notre jeunesse, qui ont défini des générations ! Au lieu de cela, nous avons une sélection de morceaux qui, soyons honnêtes, ne font que flatter les tendances actuelles sans jamais rendre hommage à ce qui a vraiment fait vibrer nos cœurs de gamers. Où sont les thèmes légendaires de "Final Fantasy", "Zelda" ou même "Metal Gear Solid" ? Ces œuvres ont une âme, une histoire. Mais non, PlayStation préfère se concentrer sur des titres récents et peu mémorables ! Cette obsession pour le nouveau au détriment du classique est non seulement frustrante, mais elle démontre un mépris flagrant pour l’héritage culturel du jeu vidéo. En tant que passionnés, nous méritons mieux que cette superficialité ! Combien de fois avons-nous lutté pour que nos jeux préférés soient reconnus, pour que leur musique soit célébrée ? Et maintenant, quand nous avons enfin l’opportunité de vivre ces expériences en direct, on nous sert un plat réchauffé, sans saveur, sans passion. Je ne comprends pas comment des organisateurs de concert peuvent penser qu'ils vont attirer le public en négligeant ces classiques. Les fans de jeux vidéo ne sont pas des pigeons ; nous avons de l'exigence ! Nous attendons de la qualité, de l'authenticité. La musique de jeu vidéo ne devrait pas être une simple tendance éphémère, mais un hommage à tout ce qui a fait vibrer notre enfance. Il est temps que PlayStation et les organisateurs de ces concerts réalisent qu'ils doivent élargir leurs horizons et commencer à inclure les véritables classiques qui ont fait le charme de notre passion. Si cela continue, je suis sûr que beaucoup d'entre nous choisiront de ne pas assister à ces concerts, peu importe à quel point ils pourraient sembler "cool". Parce que, soyons réalistes, une expérience de concert devrait être mémorable, pas une simple répétition des tendances actuelles. Alors, PlayStation, écoutez-nous ! Nous voulons des classiques. Donnez-nous la musique qui nous a façonnés, celle qui fait battre nos cœurs, celle qui a transcendé le temps. Ne nous décevez pas davantage ! #PlayStation #ConcertsJeuxVidéo #Classiques #MusiqueDeJeux #HéritageLudique

Il est inacceptable que, pendant plus de trente ans, la série Mario Kart ait continué à nous trahir avec ses erreurs flagrantes et son inégalité déconcertante. Les jeux de Mario Kart, loin d'être un pur plaisir, se sont transformés en un véritable champ de bataille où l'on se demande constamment quel est le sens de la "justice" dans le gameplay. Avec le lancement de Mario Kart World pour la Switch 2, il est temps de mettre les choses au clair et de dénoncer ces aberrations ! Commençons par les classements. Pourquoi diable devrions-nous faire un classement des jeux Mario Kart ? Est-ce pour masquer les défauts évidents de certains d'entre eux ? Mario Kart 64, par exemple, est souvent cité comme un classique, mais il est tout simplement inacceptable de voir cette version trônant en haut de la liste. Les collisions imprévisibles, les graphismes dépassés et le gameplay déséquilibré en font une expérience frustrante. Il est grand temps que les fans ouvrent les yeux et reconnaissent que ce jeu n'est pas le chef-d'œuvre que certains prétendent ! Et que dire de Mario Kart Wii ? Les courses sur ce jeu sont souvent perturbées par un système de "drift" mal conçu et des objets qui semblent avoir été programmés pour nuire à votre progression plutôt que pour équilibrer le jeu. Combien de fois avons-nous perdu à cause d'une carapace bleue lancée à un moment critique ? C'est insupportable ! Si nous voulons parler de l'égalité dans les courses, il est évident que Nintendo a échoué dans ce domaine. Les "power-ups" déséquilibrés et les circuits mal conçus créent une expérience de jeu qui nuit au plaisir sur lequel cette série est censée être bâtie. Et ne me lancez même pas sur Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, qui est censé être la version ultime. Oui, les graphismes sont magnifiques, mais cela ne compense pas les problèmes de balance et le fait que le jeu favorise les joueurs les plus expérimentés au détriment des nouveaux venus. Que devient le plaisir de jouer ? Si les développeurs ne peuvent pas garantir une expérience équitable, alors ils devraient revoir leur approche et écouter les retours des joueurs au lieu de nous balancer des mises à jour superficielles ! Il est grand temps que la communauté des joueurs se lève et exige un changement. Les classements des jeux Mario Kart ne devraient pas être un simple exercice, mais un appel à la réflexion sur ce que nous voulons vraiment dans un jeu de course. Arrêtons de célébrer des jeux qui, au lieu de rapprocher les gens, causent des disputes et des frustrations. Nous méritons mieux que cela ! #MarioKart #JeuxVidéo #CritiqueJeux #Nintendo #Switch2

Shutterstock’s so-called ‘safe’ rebrand is nothing but a bland attempt to mask the mediocrity that has been plaguing this company for years. Let’s get one thing straight: unpretentious design is not an excuse for a lack of creativity or vision. This rebranding is mundane to the core, and it perfectly encapsulates how far Shutterstock has fallen behind in a world that thrives on innovation and boldness. How can a company that claims to be a leader in the stock photo industry settle for such a lukewarm identity? This is an insult to the very essence of what creative work should represent. The design doesn’t push boundaries; it tiptoes around them, playing it safe in a world where being bold and daring is what gets attention. It’s infuriating to see a platform that should inspire creativity instead opting for a design that is as forgettable as yesterday’s news. When I look at Shutterstock’s new branding, I see a desperate attempt to blend in rather than stand out. The phrase “serves its purpose” is the biggest red flag. What purpose, exactly? To ensure that no one remembers you? To create a forgettable experience for users who are looking for inspiration? This ‘safe’ rebrand is a half-hearted effort that screams mediocrity and a complete lack of ambition. Moreover, the design community has consistently challenged brands to think outside the box and create something that resonates with their audience. But what does Shutterstock do? It plays it safe, hiding behind the label of ‘unpretentious’ while failing to evoke any sort of emotional response. This is not just a failure of design; it’s a failure of leadership. There’s a glaring lack of vision in a world that craves authenticity and originality. Let’s talk about the missed opportunities here. Shutterstock had the chance to redefine itself, to shake things up and create a memorable identity that would resonate with both creators and consumers. Instead, it chose to play it safe, resulting in a brand that feels outdated and uninspired. This decision not only reflects poorly on Shutterstock but also sends a troubling message to the entire industry: that it’s okay to settle for mediocrity as long as it serves a purpose. To the leaders at Shutterstock, I urge you to take a long, hard look at what you’ve done. This rebrand is not just mundane; it’s a disservice to the creative community you claim to support. It’s time to stop playing it safe and start taking risks that could potentially elevate your brand to new heights. Remember, in the world of creativity, blending in is the fastest way to fade away. #Shutterstock #Rebrand #DesignCritique #Mediocrity #CreativityMatters

Menu Home News Hardware Gaming Mobile Finance Deals Reviews How To Wccftech Apple’s A20 Rumored To Be Exclusive To The iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max And The Company’s Foldable Flagship, Will Leverage TSMC’s Advanced 2nm Process Combined With The Newer WMCM Packaging Omar Sohail • Jun 16, 2025 at 02:00am EDT TSMC might have started accepting orders for its 2nm wafers, but the first chipsets fabricated on this cutting-edge lithography are not expected to arrive until late next year. As the majority of you are well aware, Apple likely pounced on the opportunity to be the first recipient of this technology, with its A20 rumored to be mass produced on the 2nm process. However, the same rumor claims that the Cupertino firm will employ the foundry giant’s WMCMpackaging, bringing in more benefits, but customers can only experience these if they intend on making the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, or Apple’s upcoming foldable flagship their daily driver. The latest rumor also claims that Apple will not be upping the RAM count on any iPhone model that will ship with the A20 The efforts to bring WMCM packaging to the A20 will be highly beneficial for Apple because it will allow the latter to maintain the chipset’s footprint while having immense flexibility in combining different components. In short, multiple dies such as the CPU, GPU, memory, and other parts can be integrated at a wafer level, before being sliced into individual chips. This approach will help Apple to mass manufacture smaller chipsets that are considerably power-efficient, but also powerful at the same time, leading to an incredible ‘performance per watt’ metric. China Times reports that this A20 upgrade will arrive for the iPhone 18 Pro, the iPhone 18 Pro Max, and Apple’s foldable flagship, which the rumor refers to as the iPhone 18 Fold. TSMC’s production line specifically for WMCM chipsets will be located in Chiayi AP7, with an estimated monthly production capacity of 50,000 pieces by the end of 2026. Interestingly, the RAM count will not change from this year, with Apple said to retain the 12GB limit. We have reported about the iPhone 18 series shifting to TSMC’s WMCM packaging before, while also talking about a separate rumor claiming that the A20 will be 15 percent faster than the A19 at the same power draw. The rumor does not mention whether the less expensive iPhone 18 models will be treated to chipsets featuring WMCM packaging, or if Apple intends to save on design and production costs by sticking with the older Integrated Fan-Outpackaging. All of these answers will be provided in the fourth quarter of 2026, when the iPhone 18 family goes official, so stay tuned. News Source: China Times Subscribe to get an everyday digest of the latest technology news in your inbox Follow us on Topics Sections Company Some posts on wccftech.com may contain affiliate links. We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com © 2025 WCCF TECH INC. 700 - 401 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada #apples #a20 #rumored #exclusive #iphone

What just happened? As protests against federal immigration enforcement swept through downtown Los Angeles last week, a wave of looting left several major retailers, including Apple, T-Mobile, and Adidas, counting the cost of smashed windows and stolen goods. Yet for those who made off with iPhones from Apple's flagship store, the thrill of the heist quickly turned into a lesson in high-tech security. Apple's retail locations are equipped with advanced anti-theft technology that renders display devices useless once they leave the premises. The moment a demonstration iPhone is taken beyond the store's Wi-Fi network, it is instantly disabled by proximity software and a remote "kill switch." Instead of a functioning smartphone, thieves were met with a stark message on the screen: "Please return to Apple Tower Theatre. This device has been disabled and is being tracked. Local authorities will be alerted." The phone simultaneously sounds an alarm and flashes the warning, ensuring it cannot be resold or activated elsewhere. This system is not new. During the nationwide unrest of 2020, similar scenes played out as looters discovered that Apple's security measures turned their stolen goods into little more than expensive paperweights. The technology relies on a combination of location tracking and network monitoring. As soon as a device is separated from the store's secure environment, it is remotely locked, its location is tracked, and law enforcement is notified. // Related Stories Videos circulating online show stolen iPhones blaring alarms and displaying tracking messages, making them impossible to ignore and virtually worthless on the black market. According to the Los Angeles Police Department, at least three individuals were arrested in connection with the Apple Store burglary, including one suspect apprehended at the scene and two others detained for looting. The crackdown on looting comes amid a broader shift in California's approach to retail crime. In response to public outcry over rising thefts, state and local officials have moved away from previously lenient policies. The passage of Proposition 36 has empowered prosecutors to file felony charges against repeat offenders, regardless of the value of stolen goods, and to impose harsher penalties for organized group theft. Under these new measures, those caught looting face the prospect of significant prison time, a marked departure from the misdemeanor charges that were common under earlier laws. District attorneys in Southern California have called for even harsher penalties, particularly for crimes committed during states of emergency. Proposals include making looting a felony offense, increasing prison sentences, and ensuring that suspects are not released without judicial review. The goal, officials say, is to deter opportunistic criminals who exploit moments of crisis, whether during protests or natural disasters. #stolen #iphones #disabled #apple039s #antitheft

Daniel Pearson , CEO, KnownHostJune 12, 20253 Min ReadBusiness success concept. Cubes with arrows and target on the top.Cyber incidents are expected to cost the US billion in 2025. According to the latest estimates, this dynamic will continue to rise, reaching approximately 1.82 trillion US dollars in cybercrime costs by 2028. These figures highlight the crucial importance of strong cybersecurity strategies, which businesses must build to reduce the likelihood of risks. As technology evolves at a dramatic pace, businesses are increasingly dependent on utilizing digital infrastructure, exposing themselves to threats such as ransomware, accidental data loss, and corruption.  Despite the 3-2-1 backup rule being invented in 2009, this strategy has stayed relevant for businesses over the years, ensuring that the loss of data is minimized under threat, and will be a crucial method in the upcoming years to prevent major data loss.   What Is the 3-2-1 Backup Rule? The 3-2-1 backup rule is a popular backup strategy that ensures resilience against data loss. The setup consists of keeping your original data and two backups.  The data also needs to be stored in two different locations, such as the cloud or a local drive.  The one in the 3-2-1 backup rule represents storing a copy of your data off site, and this completes the setup.  This setup has been considered a gold standard in IT security, as it minimizes points of failure and increases the chance of successful data recovery in the event of a cyber-attack.  Related:Why Is This Rule Relevant in the Modern Cyber Threat Landscape? Statistics show that in 2024, 80% of companies have seen an increase in the frequency of cloud attacks.  Although many businesses assume that storing data in the cloud is enough, it is certainly not failsafe, and businesses are in bigger danger than ever due to the vast development of technology and AI capabilities attackers can manipulate and use.  As the cloud infrastructure has seen a similar speed of growth, cyber criminals are actively targeting these, leaving businesses with no clear recovery option. Therefore, more than ever, businesses need to invest in immutable backup solutions.  Common Backup Mistakes Businesses Make A common misstep is keeping all backups on the same physical network. If malware gets in, it can quickly spread and encrypt both the primary data and the backups, wiping out everything in one go. Another issue is the lack of offline or air-gapped backups. Many businesses rely entirely on cloud-based or on-premises storage that's always connected, which means their recovery options could be compromised during an attack. Related:Finally, one of the most overlooked yet crucial steps is testing backup restoration. A backup is only useful if it can actually be restored. Too often, companies skip regular testing. This can lead to a harsh reality check when they discover, too late, that their backup data is either corrupted or completely inaccessible after a breach. How to Implement the 3-2-1 Backup Rule? To successfully implement the 3-2-1 backup strategy as part of a robust cybersecurity framework, organizations should start by diversifying their storage methods. A resilient approach typically includes a mix of local storage, cloud-based solutions, and physical media such as external hard drives.  From there, it's essential to incorporate technologies that support write-once, read-many functionalities. This means backups cannot be modified or deleted, even by administrators, providing an extra layer of protection against threats. To further enhance resilience, organizations should make use of automation and AI-driven tools. These technologies can offer real-time monitoring, detect anomalies, and apply predictive analytics to maintain the integrity of backup data and flag any unusual activity or failures in the process. Lastly, it's crucial to ensure your backup strategy aligns with relevant regulatory requirements, such as GDPR in the UK or CCPA in the US. Compliance not only mitigates legal risk but also reinforces your commitment to data protection and operational continuity. Related:By blending the time-tested 3-2-1 rule with modern advances like immutable storage and intelligent monitoring, organizations can build a highly resilient backup architecture that strengthens their overall cybersecurity posture. About the AuthorDaniel Pearson CEO, KnownHostDaniel Pearson is the CEO of KnownHost, a managed web hosting service provider. Pearson also serves as a dedicated board member and supporter of the AlmaLinux OS Foundation, a non-profit organization focused on advancing the AlmaLinux OS -- an open-source operating system derived from RHEL. His passion for technology extends beyond his professional endeavors, as he actively promotes digital literacy and empowerment. Pearson's entrepreneurial drive and extensive industry knowledge have solidified his reputation as a respected figure in the tech community. See more from Daniel Pearson ReportsMore ReportsNever Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.SIGN-UPYou May Also Like #role #backup #rule #cybersecurity