What we've been playing - co-op adventures and unfolding ideas A few of the things that have us hooked this week. Image credit: FromSoftware Feature by Robert Purchese Associate Editor Additional contributions by Christian Donlan, and Ed Nightingale Published on May 31, 2025 31st May Hello and welcome back to our regular feature where we write a little bit about some of the games we've been playing. This week Bertie has mixed feelings about Split Fiction, Ed discovers he really likes Elden Ring Nightreign but wants more from it after the campaign, and Donlan appreciates a game unfolding before him. What have you been playing? Catch up with the older editions of this column in our What We've Been Playing archive. Split Fiction, PS5 Split Fiction. I'd quite like to read a dual-perspective fantasy and sci-fi story, actually. Wait, did I just describe Star Wars?Watch on YouTube I've been eager to try this for a while. I was fond of It Takes Two and the reception around Split Fiction has been enormously enthusiastic. Also, I love that there's a studio like Hazelight dedicating itself to making co-op games - not just games that can be played in co-op but games that require it. It's weird that it should be an unusual thing these days, but it is and I'm totally here for it. I like it - I like the game. In parts, I love it, and I think I'd expected this reaction more. The parts I love: its fluidity. This is a colder, technical thing to praise, but it makes the game so invitingly touchable and toylike because of the way it responds and moves. Big tick. Two: the set-up for the game works superbly in that having two writers' stolen stories to choose from, Hazelight gives itself a potentially bottomless source of ideas to hop between without lingering in one for too long. It's perfectly fine for one world to contain only one idea, which many of them do. And who doesn't want to play on a level where you surf around on a sand shark? But what I struggle with also relates to this. There's a thinness, sometimes, to the game; a feeling that ideas are cycled through so quickly they're not given enough time - or developer investment - to breathe or be developed as fully as they could. You kind of skim through them and it can lead to repetitiveness as the game bumps back into ideas it's already used, or a sense of pointlessness as it scrambles to come up with ideas it hasn't used before. Look, overall, brilliant: it's a joyous collection of co-op ideas delivered with tip-top technical nous, and not a small amount of charm and style. But I'm waiting for it - and really willing it - to take off. -Bertie Elden Ring Nightreign, PS5 All aboard the Souls train!Watch on YouTube I've been having a very Soulsy time of it recently. Last week I wrote about how Sekiro was causing me existential fury, and I'm pleased to say I broke through that to finally beat the game and see the credits, and that I don't have to play it any more. In its place, I've been playing another tricky game: FromSoftware's new Elden Ring spin-off Nightreign. Go it alone and it's one of the studio's most challenging games; but with others it's an exhilarating experience, as I wrote in our review. And despite finishing the game for the review, I still want to carry on playing it. I still haven't mastered each of the eight Nightfarers and I'm keen to play it more with friends now it's officially been released. But I do feel the game has finite appeal. Once the Nightfarers are beaten and all the character stories have been completed, Nightreign - as much as I loved it - doesn't have the replayability other multiplayer games do. Yet what FromSoftware has created is so heavily structured, it could easily add more building blocks to extend the game. There's DLC on the way at least but there's potential for a full live-service game of seasonal events on its map, with additional bosses and characters and costumes. It doesn't have to be a free-to-play, microtransaction mess, but just give it some regular support. Nightreign is something I'd happily play for months if it was regularly refreshed. Of course, this would likely be at the expense of whatever big new single-player game Miyazaki is working towards, and there's still The Duskbloods coming to Switch 2 next year to satisfy any lingering multiplayer desires. At the least, I love that FromSoftware has the capability and flexibility to experiment with this sort of spin-off. It might not be to everyone's taste, but it's left me wanting more. -Ed Öoo, PC Öoo. What does that mean in ghost speak I wonder?Watch on YouTube Here's the latest game by the creator of ElecHead, that brilliant and ingenious blend of puzzling and platforming. ElecHead was all about electricity. This time it's all about bombs. At least in the current Steam demo it is. You're a caterpillar who can create bombs, and those bombs? Early on they can send you shooting upwards to catch high ledges. But maybe they can shunt you across gaps too? Uh-oh, what do you do when the walls and ceilings have spikes, and what do you do when there's a big frog blocking your path? The pleasure of a game like this is partly the sense of watching an idea unfold itself, as the designer slowly discovers all the possible consequences and wrinkles and inversions. It helps that the game looks so beautiful and dinky and strange, with those progress-blocking frogs, yes, but also walls that seem to have the folds of brain tissue. I am playing the demo very happily and I suspect I'll replay it many times before the final game is out. It's lovely to be at the start of something like this, where the ideas are new, but the contours of thought behind it all seem to be warmly familiar. -Donlan

With the expected release of the iPhone 17 Air later this year and the recent release of the S25 Edge from Samsung, it looks like the theme of 2025 is all about thinness. Companies are doing all they can to flex their design and physics-defying muscles to show off just how thin they can make products without sacrificing significant features. Now, accessories companies are getting in on the fun, and Kuxiu’s new X41Q charger is impressively thin while staying efficient and powerful. Here is what you need to know! Specs and what’s in the box For how thin this charger is, its impressive how much they were able to include in terms of charging abilities. This is a true 3 in 1 fast charger. You get: Qi2 wireless charging to charge at 15W 5W AirPods charging pad Fast charging Apple Watch charger So you can charge your big three at fast wireless speeds. But the beauty of this is that you also get a 45W charging brick and braided USB-C to USB-C cable in the box. In 2025, that’s unheard of! Design The design of this charger has to be one of my favorites. If you are old enough to remember, it reminds of the old Samsung Blade flip phone from back in the day. But it is made of anodized aluminum and comes in either grey or natural titanium colors. It has a foldable design, so it’s easy to tuck away in any bag, purse, or even your pocket. At its thinnest point, this charger is just over 4mm thin! That’s thinner than the insanely thin iPad Pro or any other Apple product, for that matter. Due to its design and hinge, you can use this in so many ways. You can use it flat on a table, prop it up and use it as a stand, it supports stand-by mode, and you can even fully unfold it past 180 degrees if needed. So this can be a travel charger, a desk charger, or even a selfie stick. My thoughts I think this charger is a great option for anyone who wants something that can be used on a desk or nightstand but can also be folded up and taken on the go. The magnets are insanely strong, even without a case on my iPhone. It charges at the 15W speeds to make sure I get power quickly, it does not overheat, and, as I said, it brings a charging brick! The fact that it supports standby mode is also a nice plus. The last nice perk is that since its so light and can be folder, you can just grab your phone while on the charger and use it while its being charged. I, for one, am here for this new thin tech wave. Pricing and availability This is Kuxiu’s newest Qi2 charger, which is available today on their website for $74.99. It’s available in two colors: Gray or Natural Titanium. This is now my wife’s travel charger of choice because it fits in any scenario. What do you think of this charger? Are you excited about the thinness of the tech coming? Let’s discuss! Add 9to5Mac to your Google News feed.  FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

When I first heard Samsung was bringing back the Edge name as a new super-thin member of the S25 family, all I could think was: Why? Honestly, I thought phone makers had gotten over their hunger for thinness nearly a decade ago. The quest to shave millimeters off devices resulted in worse battery life, extra heat and more limited features. So what gives? On a certain level, just like fashion, older trends can over time become fresh and stylish again. Additionally, after phones made the transition to 5G — which required extra power, more complex modems and larger antennas — modern components have started shrinking again, essentially paving the way for the return of slimmer handsets. But then it hit me. While thinness may be the most striking thing about the Galaxy S25 Edge, that's not enough to justify the creation of a whole new device. Instead, I believe this phone is a part of a larger mission by Samsung to make the middle child of its flagship mobile lineup a more appealing member of the family. And when viewed in that light, I actually think it's largely a success. Design Now don't get me wrong, despite my gripes about how thinner phones are less practical, the S25 Edge is beautifully designed. At just 5.8mm thick (0.23 inches), it feels impossibly sleek. What might be even more impressive is that Samsung hasn't sacrificed durability to get here either. Just like the S25 Ultra, the Edge features a titanium frame, an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance and an even stronger Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 panel covering its display. The one difference is that the Edge's screen has a glossy finish instead of matte like on the Ultra because — and I kid you not — Samsung says an anti-reflective coating would have increased its thickness. Kudos to sticking to a strict design philosophy, because in terms of sheer feel and aesthetics, S25 Edge is undeniably enchanting. Sam Rutherford for Engadget However, while the S25 Edge shares some characteristics with the Ultra, like its frame and main camera, at least when it comes to its overall size, it's really more of a refreshed take on the S25+. It has the same 6.7-inch OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate that's just as vibrant and wonderfully colorful as before. Although it does weigh a bit less at 163 grams or 5.75 ounces versus the S25+ (190g or 6.7 oz). Performance Like the rest of the S25 family, the Edge is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chip with 12GB of RAM and either 256GB or 512GB of storage. Despite the compact dimensions, Samsung still found room to squeeze a vapor chamber inside to prevent throttling and overheating. So even when pushed, the back of the phone rarely got more than lukewarm while delivering strong performance as I was gaming, multitasking or doing pretty much anything else you can think of. Cameras Sam Rutherford for Engadget The other major departure from the S25+'s basic template is that the Edge features the 200MP main sensor from the Ultra, along with a 12MP ultra-wide cam. But there's no dedicated zoom. Now at first, I was a bit upset because I think any phone this expensive should have a telephoto lens. That said, the massive amount of pixels the Edge's primary sensor can capture means you have quite a bit of freedom to crop in without degrading image quality. You just need to remember to tell the camera to shoot in full 200MP mode instead of the standard 12MP setting. One other small change is that Edge features a slightly wider-angle 12MP selfie cam than the S25+ and Ultra, which allows you to fit more people in group shots, but that's really the main difference. In general use, the S25 Edge takes great pics. Colors are rich and details are crisp, though you still get Samsung's slightly oversaturated hues and warmer tones. The same goes for low-light shots. For this review, instead of comparing it to a Pixel or iPhone, I pitted the Edge against the Motorola Razr Ultra. I feel like both are attempting to woo people who want a sleek and stylish device, but they are doing it in very different ways. What immediately jumped out is that foldable phones (at least the Razr) still lag behind more traditional glass bricks, even ones as thin as the Edge. In nearly every shot, Samsung's handset produced brighter, sharper and better-exposed images than Motorola's. So if you're the kind of person who wants a compact phone without needing to sacrifice image quality, the S25 Edge is a stronger pick. Battery life The biggest trade-off when making a phone this skinny is having less room for its battery. As such, the S25 Edge has the smallest power pack in the family at 3,900 mAh, which is 100mAh less than what’s in a base S25. This led to a time of just 25 hours and 59 minutes on our local video rundown test. That's not terrible, but it is three and a half hours less than what we got from the S25 Ultra (29:27) and two hours worse than a standard S25. For those who care a lot about longevity, you have been warned. Sam Rutherford for Engadget Thankfully, the S25 Edge still has support for wireless charging at an acceptable 15 watts, though its wired speeds are just average at 25 watts. However, as the phone is merely "Qi2 ready," anyone who wants to use compatible magnetic wireless accessories will need to buy a case or an adhesive mount with a built-in magnet, because there isn't one inside the phone itself. Wrap-up The S25 Edge is a divisive phone. I still don't fully grasp the desire to make modern phones thinner than they already are. Particularly if you're like most folks and you throw the thing in a case as soon as you get it (even when accounting for Samsung's new super slim option). Shaving off an extra 1.5mm over the standard S25 doesn't really make a tangible difference in how you use it, unless you consider the phone's reduced battery life a good thing. Sam Rutherford for Engadget But as an alternative to the humdrum S25+, suddenly things get a lot more interesting. Samsung's previous middle child costs significantly more than a base S25, but it doesn't have the fancy features like a super high-res main camera or a titanium frame like you get on the S25 Ultra. Really, the S25+'s most attractive feature is a nicely-sized 6.7-inch screen. Now here's where the Galaxy S25 Edge comes in. It has all of those things alongside a super thin and wonderfully crafted chassis for the same $1,100 starting price as the S25+. Yes, Samsung sacrificed some battery capacity and the phone's dedicated zoom to get here, but those aren't straight-up dealbreakers. That's because with the Edge, the new in-between member of Samsung's flagship mobile family is more than just skinny — it has a stylish identity that can stand on its own.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/samsung-galaxy-s25-edge-review-more-than-just-super-thin-180042172.html?src=rss

Why revisit the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold in 2025? The answer lies in the rapid evolution of foldable computing. When Lenovo introduced its second-generation foldable PC last year, it represented the pinnacle of what was possible in this emerging category. The device combined a versatile 16.3-inch OLED display with robust engineering and the familiar Windows ecosystem. It set benchmarks for build quality, display technology, and adaptability that competitors would need to surpass. Designer: Lenovo Designer: Huawei Fast forward to today, and the landscape has shifted dramatically. Huawei has unveiled its MateBook Fold Ultimate Design, a device that challenges our understanding of what foldable laptops can achieve. With an 18-inch display that folds to a 13-inch form factor, a chassis measuring just 7.3mm when open, and a proprietary operating system built specifically for foldable hardware, Huawei has raised the stakes considerably. This comparison arrives at a pivotal moment for foldable computing. The category has matured beyond proof-of-concept to deliver genuinely useful productivity tools. Now that we have seen what Lenovo accomplished with the X1 Fold 2024, let us examine how Huawei’s MateBook Fold Ultimate Design responds and potentially redefines the future of portable computing. Design Philosophy and Physical Presence The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 2024 embodies the ThinkPad ethos of reliability and purposeful design. Its magnesium alloy frame and recycled PET woven fabric cover create a device that feels substantial and durable. The fold-flat hinge eliminates gaps when closed, protecting the display while maintaining a clean profile. At 8.6mm when open and 17.4mm when closed, the X1 Fold is not the thinnest laptop available, but its construction inspires confidence. The device weighs approximately 2.9 pounds without accessories, increasing to 4.3 pounds with the keyboard and stand attached. This weight reflects Lenovo’s prioritization of durability over absolute portability. Huawei takes a dramatically different approach with the MateBook Fold Ultimate Design. The device measures an astonishing 7.3mm when open and 14.9mm when closed, making it significantly thinner than the X1 Fold. At just 1.16kg (2.56 pounds) for the base unit and 1.45kg with the keyboard, the MateBook Fold is remarkably light for a device with an 18-inch display. This achievement comes from Huawei’s use of carbon fiber reinforcement and a zirconium-based liquid metal hinge. The 285mm “water-drop” hinge design provides smooth folding action and increased durability, with Huawei claiming a 400% improvement in hovering torque compared to conventional designs. The most significant physical difference between these devices becomes apparent in their approach to accessories. Lenovo requires a separate kickstand for desk use, adding bulk and complexity to the overall package. Huawei integrates a sturdy kickstand directly into the MateBook Fold, eliminating the need for additional accessories and streamlining the user experience. This built-in solution allows for more versatile positioning and reduces the number of components users need to manage. Both devices transform between multiple modes, but their physical dimensions create distinct experiences. When folded, the X1 Fold becomes a 12-inch laptop, which many users find cramped for serious multitasking. The MateBook Fold offers a more generous 13-inch workspace in laptop mode, providing additional screen real estate for productivity tasks. This difference may seem small on paper, but it significantly impacts the practical usability of these devices in their folded configurations. The materials chosen for each device reveal different priorities. Lenovo emphasizes sustainability with its recycled PET fabric cover and plastic-free packaging. This approach aligns with growing corporate environmental concerns and provides a tactile warmth that distinguishes the X1 Fold from typical metal-clad laptops. Huawei focuses on premium materials that enable extreme thinness, using advanced alloys and composites throughout the chassis. Both approaches result in distinctive aesthetics that will appeal to different user preferences. Display Technology and Visual Experience Display technology represents the heart of any foldable device, and both manufacturers have made significant investments in this critical component. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold features a 16.3-inch OLED panel with a resolution of 2560 x 2024 and a 4:3 aspect ratio. This display delivers 400 nits of brightness for standard content, increasing to 600 nits for HDR material. The panel supports DisplayHDR True Black 600 certification and Dolby Vision, covering 100% of the DCI-P3 color gamut. An anti-smudge coating helps maintain visual clarity during extended use. Huawei pushes display technology further with the MateBook Fold Ultimate Design. Its 18-inch LTPO OLED screen boasts a resolution of 3296 x 2472, maintaining the same 4:3 aspect ratio as the Lenovo. However, the MateBook Fold achieves a peak brightness of 1600 nits, more than double that of the X1 Fold. The dual-layer LTPO technology reduces power consumption by 30% compared to standard OLED panels while supporting adaptive refresh rates from 1Hz to 120Hz. This combination of size, brightness, and efficiency creates a visual experience that surpasses the X1 Fold in nearly every measurable aspect. Both displays exhibit a visible crease at the fold, though the severity varies. Lenovo’s hinge design minimizes the crease when the device is fully open, but it becomes more noticeable at certain viewing angles. Huawei claims its water-drop hinge reduces crease visibility, though independent verification is limited. In practical use, both creases become less distracting over time as users adapt to the form factor. Color accuracy and visual impact favor the MateBook Fold, with its higher brightness and contrast ratio of 2,000,000:1 creating more vibrant images and videos. The X1 Fold delivers excellent color reproduction but cannot match the visual punch of Huawei’s display. For creative professionals and media consumers, this difference could be decisive when choosing between these devices. The touch response and pen input capabilities of both displays deserve consideration. Lenovo’s display works seamlessly with the Precision Pen, offering pressure sensitivity that makes note-taking and sketching feel natural. The anti-smudge coating balances fingerprint resistance with smooth touch response. Huawei provides similar functionality, though detailed specifications about pressure sensitivity levels and palm rejection capabilities are not yet widely available. Both devices support multi-touch gestures for navigation and manipulation of on-screen elements. The 4:3 aspect ratio on both devices proves ideal for productivity applications, providing more vertical space than typical 16:9 laptop displays. This ratio works particularly well for document editing, web browsing, and coding. When watching widescreen video content, both devices display black bars at the top and bottom, but the overall screen size still delivers an immersive viewing experience, especially on the larger MateBook Fold. Performance and Hardware Capabilities The performance profiles of these devices reflect their different design philosophies. Lenovo equips the ThinkPad X1 Fold with 12th Generation Intel processors, ranging from the Core i5-1230U to the Core i7-1260U vPro. These 10-core, 12-thread chips provide adequate performance for productivity tasks but represent previous-generation technology in 2025. The X1 Fold supports up to 32GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 1TB of PCIe Gen 4 SSD storage. Intel Iris Xe integrated graphics handle visual processing, delivering sufficient power for office applications but struggling with demanding creative workloads. Huawei takes a different approach with its Kirin X90 ARM-based chipset. This custom silicon is specifically optimized for HarmonyOS and the foldable form factor. The MateBook Fold includes 32GB of RAM and offers storage options up to 2TB. While direct performance comparisons are difficult due to the different architectures, the Kirin X90 delivers responsive performance for HarmonyOS applications and benefits from tight hardware-software integration. Thermal management represents another point of divergence. Lenovo employs a fanless design in the X1 Fold, prioritizing silent operation over sustained performance. This approach leads to thermal throttling during extended workloads, limiting the device’s capabilities for processor-intensive tasks. Huawei incorporates a vapor chamber cooling system with diamond aluminum dual fans in the MateBook Fold, enabling 28W sustained performance without excessive heat or noise. This advanced cooling solution allows the MateBook Fold to maintain peak performance during demanding tasks, despite its thinner profile. Battery life reflects both hardware choices and software optimization. The X1 Fold includes a dual-battery design totaling 64Wh, delivering approximately 8 hours and 51 minutes in laptop mode and 7 hours and 27 minutes in tablet mode under real-world conditions. The MateBook Fold features a larger 74.69Wh battery, and its LTPO display technology reduces power consumption significantly. While independent verification of Huawei’s “all-day” battery claims is not yet available, the combination of a larger battery and more efficient display technology suggests the MateBook Fold should offer superior battery life in comparable usage scenarios. The storage subsystems in both devices utilize high-speed solid-state technology, but with different implementations. Lenovo’s PCIe Gen 4 SSD delivers sequential read speeds up to 5,000MB/s, providing quick access to large files and rapid application loading. Huawei has not published detailed storage performance metrics, but contemporary flagship devices typically feature similar high-performance storage solutions. Both devices offer sufficient storage capacity for professional workloads, with options ranging from 256GB to 2TB depending on configuration. Memory configurations play a crucial role in multitasking performance. Both devices offer 32GB in their top configurations, which provides ample headroom for demanding productivity workflows. Neither device allows for user-upgradable memory, as both use soldered RAM to maintain their slim profiles. This limitation means buyers must carefully consider their memory needs at purchase, as future upgrades are not possible. Operating Systems and Software Experience The most fundamental difference between these devices lies in their operating systems. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold runs Windows 11 Pro, providing access to the vast Windows software ecosystem and familiar productivity tools. Windows offers broad compatibility with business applications and enterprise management systems, making the X1 Fold a natural choice for corporate environments. However, Windows 11 still struggles with optimization for foldable form factors. Mode switching can be inconsistent, and the operating system sometimes fails to properly scale applications when transitioning between configurations. Huawei’s MateBook Fold runs HarmonyOS 5, a proprietary operating system designed specifically for the company’s ecosystem of devices. HarmonyOS offers several advantages for foldable hardware, including faster boot times, more efficient resource management, and seamless integration with other Huawei products. The operating system includes AI-powered features like document summarization, real-time translation, and context-aware suggestions through the Xiaoyi assistant. HarmonyOS also enables advanced multi-device collaboration, allowing users to transfer running apps between Huawei phones, tablets, and the MateBook Fold without interruption. The software ecosystem represents a significant consideration for potential buyers. Windows provides access to millions of applications, including industry-standard productivity, creative, and development tools. HarmonyOS currently offers over 1,000 optimized applications, with projections for 2,000+ by the end of 2025. While this number is growing rapidly, it remains a fraction of what Windows provides. Additionally, HarmonyOS and its app ecosystem are primarily focused on the Chinese market, limiting its appeal for international users. Security features differ between the platforms as well. Lenovo includes its ThinkShield security suite, Windows Hello facial recognition, and optional Computer Vision human-presence detection for privacy and security. Huawei implements its StarShield architecture, which provides security at the kernel level and throughout the operating system stack. Both approaches offer robust protection, but organizations with established Windows security protocols may prefer Lenovo’s more familiar implementation. The multitasking capabilities of each operating system deserve special attention for foldable devices. Windows 11 includes Snap Layouts and multiple virtual desktops, which work well on the X1 Fold’s large unfolded display. However, the interface can become cluttered in laptop mode due to the reduced screen size. HarmonyOS 5 features a multitasking system specifically designed for foldable displays, with intuitive gestures for splitting the screen, floating windows, and quick app switching. This optimization creates a more cohesive experience when transitioning between different device configurations. Software updates and long-term support policies differ significantly between these platforms. Windows 11 receives regular security updates and feature enhancements from Microsoft, with a well-established support lifecycle. HarmonyOS is newer, with less predictable update patterns, though Huawei has committed to regular improvements. For business users planning multi-year deployments, Windows offers more certainty regarding future compatibility and security maintenance. Keyboard, Input, and Accessory Integration The keyboard experience significantly impacts productivity on foldable devices, and both manufacturers take different approaches to this challenge. Lenovo offers the ThinkPad Bluetooth TrackPoint Keyboard Folio as an optional accessory. This keyboard maintains the classic ThinkPad feel with good key travel and includes the iconic red TrackPoint nub. However, the keyboard feels cramped compared to standard ThinkPad models, and the haptic touchpad is smaller than ideal for extended use. The keyboard attaches magnetically to the lower half of the folded display but adds 1.38 pounds to the overall weight. Huawei includes a 5mm wireless aluminum keyboard with the MateBook Fold. This ultra-thin keyboard offers 1.5mm of key travel and a responsive touchpad. Weighing just 0.64 pounds, it adds minimal bulk to the package while providing a comfortable typing experience. The keyboard connects wirelessly and can be positioned flexibly, allowing users to create a more ergonomic workspace than the fixed position of Lenovo’s solution. Stylus support is available on both devices, with Lenovo offering the Precision Pen for note-taking and drawing. The X1 Fold’s pen attaches magnetically to the display, ensuring it remains available when needed. Huawei provides similar stylus functionality, though detailed specifications for its pen accessory are limited in current documentation. The most significant accessory difference is the kickstand implementation. Lenovo requires a separate adjustable-angle kickstand for desk use, adding another component to manage and transport. Huawei integrates the kickstand directly into the MateBook Fold, providing immediate stability without additional accessories. This integrated approach streamlines the user experience and reduces setup time when transitioning between usage modes. Virtual keyboard implementations provide another input option when physical keyboards are impractical. Both devices can display touch keyboards on the lower portion of the folded screen, creating a laptop-like experience without additional hardware. Lenovo’s implementation relies on Windows 11’s touch keyboard, which offers reasonable accuracy but lacks haptic feedback. Huawei’s virtual keyboard is deeply integrated with HarmonyOS, providing customizable layouts and adaptive suggestions based on user behavior. Neither virtual keyboard fully replaces a physical keyboard for extended typing sessions, but both provide convenient input options for quick tasks. The accessory ecosystem extends beyond keyboards and styluses. Lenovo leverages the ThinkPad’s business heritage with a range of compatible docks, cases, and adapters designed for professional use. Huawei focuses on cross-device accessories that work across its product line, creating a cohesive ecosystem for users invested in multiple Huawei products. This difference reflects the broader positioning of each brand, with Lenovo targeting enterprise customers and Huawei pursuing ecosystem-driven consumer experiences. Connectivity and Expansion Options Connectivity options reflect the different priorities of these manufacturers. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold includes two Thunderbolt 4 ports and one USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port, providing versatile connectivity for peripherals and external displays. The device supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2, with optional LTE/5G connectivity for truly mobile productivity. This cellular option represents a significant advantage for professionals who need reliable internet access regardless of Wi-Fi availability. The Huawei MateBook Fold offers two USB-C ports, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.2. The device does not include cellular connectivity options, limiting its independence from Wi-Fi networks. The reduced port selection compared to the X1 Fold may require additional adapters for users with multiple peripherals or specialized equipment. Audio capabilities favor the MateBook Fold, which includes six speakers compared to the X1 Fold’s three. Both devices feature four-array microphones for clear voice capture during video conferences. Camera quality is superior on the MateBook Fold, with an 8MP sensor versus the 5MP camera on the X1 Fold. These differences impact the multimedia experience, particularly for users who frequently participate in video calls or consume media content. External display support varies between the devices. Lenovo’s Thunderbolt 4 ports enable connection to multiple high-resolution monitors, supporting sophisticated desktop setups when needed. Huawei’s USB-C ports provide display output capabilities, but with potentially fewer options for multi-monitor configurations. For professionals who regularly connect to external displays, projectors, or specialized peripherals, these connectivity differences could significantly impact workflow efficiency. Wireless connectivity standards influence performance in different environments. The X1 Fold’s Wi-Fi 6E support provides access to the less congested 6GHz band, potentially delivering faster and more reliable connections in crowded wireless environments. The MateBook Fold’s Wi-Fi 6 implementation is still capable but lacks access to these additional frequency bands. For users in dense office environments or congested urban areas, this difference could affect day-to-day connectivity performance. Future expansion capabilities depend largely on the port selection and standards support. Thunderbolt 4 provides the X1 Fold with a forward-looking connectivity standard that supports a wide range of current and upcoming peripherals. The MateBook Fold’s standard USB-C implementation offers good compatibility but lacks some of the advanced features and bandwidth of Thunderbolt. This distinction may become more relevant as users add peripherals and accessories over the device’s lifespan. Price, Availability, and Value Proposition The value equation for these devices involves balancing innovation, performance, and accessibility. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold starts at $2,499 for the base configuration with a Core i5 processor, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. Fully equipped models with Core i7 processors, 32GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage approach $3,900. These prices typically do not include the keyboard and kickstand accessories, which add approximately $250-300 to the total cost. The Huawei MateBook Fold Ultimate Design is priced between CNY 24,000 and 27,000 (approximately $3,300 to $3,700) depending on configuration. This pricing includes the wireless keyboard, making the total package cost comparable to a fully equipped X1 Fold with accessories. However, the MateBook Fold is currently available only in China, with no announced plans for international release. This limited availability significantly restricts its potential market impact outside of Asia. Global support and service represent another consideration. Lenovo maintains service centers worldwide, providing reliable support for business travelers and international organizations. Huawei’s support network is more limited outside of China, potentially creating challenges for users who experience hardware issues in regions without official service options. The target audience for each device influences its value proposition. The X1 Fold appeals to business professionals who prioritize Windows compatibility, global support, and integration with existing enterprise systems. Its ThinkPad branding carries significant weight in corporate environments, where reliability and security take precedence over cutting-edge specifications. The MateBook Fold targets technology enthusiasts and creative professionals who value display quality, design innovation, and ecosystem integration. Its limited availability and HarmonyOS platform make it less suitable for mainstream business adoption but potentially more appealing to users seeking the absolute latest in hardware engineering. Financing options and business leasing programs further differentiate these devices in the market. Lenovo offers established enterprise leasing programs that allow organizations to deploy the X1 Fold without significant upfront capital expenditure. These programs typically include service agreements and upgrade paths that align with corporate refresh cycles. Huawei’s business services are less developed outside of China, potentially limiting financing options for international customers interested in the MateBook Fold. Conclusion: The Future of Foldable Computing The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 2024 and Huawei MateBook Fold Ultimate Design represent two distinct visions for the future of foldable computing. Lenovo prioritizes durability, Windows compatibility, and global accessibility, creating a device that fits seamlessly into existing business environments. Huawei pushes the boundaries of hardware engineering, delivering a thinner, lighter device with a larger display and custom operating system optimized for the foldable form factor. For business users who require Windows compatibility and global support, the X1 Fold remains the more practical choice despite its thicker profile and aging processors. Its proven durability and enterprise-friendly features make it a safer investment for organizations deploying foldable technology. The device excels in versatility, allowing users to switch between tablet, laptop, and desktop modes with minimal compromise. Creative professionals and early adopters who prioritize display quality and cutting-edge design may find the MateBook Fold more appealing, provided they can access it in their region and adapt to HarmonyOS. The larger, brighter display and thinner profile create a more futuristic experience, though the limited software ecosystem and regional availability present significant barriers to widespread adoption. Looking forward, both devices point toward necessary improvements in the next generation of foldable computers. Future models should incorporate the latest processors with AI acceleration, reduce weight without sacrificing durability, integrate kickstands directly into the chassis, and provide larger, more comfortable keyboards. Display technology should continue to advance, with higher refresh rates, improved crease durability, and enhanced power efficiency. Software must evolve to better support the unique capabilities of foldable hardware, with more intuitive mode switching and optimized multitasking. The competition between Lenovo and Huawei benefits consumers by accelerating innovation and highlighting different approaches to solving the challenges of foldable computing. As these technologies mature and prices eventually decrease, foldable devices will transition from executive status symbols to practical tools for a broader range of users. The X1 Fold and MateBook Fold represent important steps in this evolution, each contributing valuable lessons that will shape the next generation of flexible computing devices. The ideal foldable device would combine Huawei’s hardware innovations with Lenovo’s software compatibility and global support. It would feature the thinness and display quality of the MateBook Fold, the enterprise security and connectivity options of the X1 Fold, and an operating system that seamlessly adapts to different usage modes. While neither current device achieves this perfect balance, both demonstrate remarkable engineering achievements that push the boundaries of what portable computers can be. As we look to the future, the success of foldable computing will depend not just on hardware specifications but on the development of software experiences that truly leverage the unique capabilities of these flexible displays. The device that ultimately dominates this category will be the one that most effectively bridges the gap between technical innovation and practical utility, creating experiences that simply aren’t possible on conventional laptops or tablets. Both Lenovo and Huawei have taken significant steps toward this goal, and their ongoing competition promises to accelerate progress toward truly transformative foldable computers.The post Folding the Future: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 2024 vs. Huawei MateBook Fold Ultimate Design first appeared on Yanko Design.

It's been almost ten years since Dyson first unveiled its Supersonic hair dryer, which put its signature bladeless fan technology into a styling product. For a company that was known primarily for its vacuums at the time, this was a surprising move. Since then, Dyson has released several beauty tools like its Airwrap curling iron that have spawned countless imitations. The company also expanded into other categories like audio with its OnTrac headphones and the controversial Zone headphones-with-built-in-purifying-mask while continuing to make some of our favorite cordless vacuums.  Today, Dyson is going full circle by announcing the PencilVac, which it says is the "world's slimmest vacuum cleaner." The twist? It achieves that thinness by using a motor that's basically the same as the one in the Supersonic hair dryer. What makes the PencilVac different from existing vacuum cleaners is the fact that it's basically all shaft, with some attachment options for the head. That means there is no bulge unless you use the included conical brush bar cleaner head. All the parts that would normally take up space on a conventional vacuum (like a bin, filter and motor) all fit inside the long cylinder. At the very bottom, you can attach a variety of heads designed specifically for the PencilVac, including the main one that Dyson is calling a "Fluffycones" cleaner head.  The company said it has four cones in two brush bars that rotate in opposite directions, and they were designed to "strip and eject even long hair, preventing hair tangling around the brush bar." The laser-like lights at both ends of this head also help illuminate where dust particles might be so you can better see what spots you missed. Dyson Altogether, the PencilVac weighs about 3.96 pounds (1.8kg) and is meant to be easy to use in all kinds of hard-to-reach areas. Since it's got the same roughly 1.5-inch (38mm) diameter throughout, you can grip it fairly easily along its body, wherever you choose to place your hands. This should make it easier to pick up for overhead cleaning. To get the entire PencilVac to look like, well, a pencil, Dyson had to redesign quite a lot of components. This includes the new Hyperdymium 140k motor, which the company says is its "smallest (at 28mm) and fastest vacuum motor. " There's also a new dust compressing system to "maximize the bin capacity." Speaking of, the bin fits inside the cylinder itself, and it has a transparent window that allows you to not only see how full it is but also watch as debris gets sucked up. In fact, at a recent demo, I watched with a mixture of satisfaction and sadness as bits of crushed up Lotus Biscoff cookies flew to the top of the bin.  Despite its small size, the Hypderdymium 140k motor seemed plenty powerful in my brief time with it, as it sucked up Cheerios, cookies and other detritus with ease. I also found the entire device mostly easy to maneuver — it didn't feel too heavy and coasted over the bumpy food waste with ease. I was slightly confused by the locking system as I had to make sure to hold it precisely straight up (and wait for a click) after I was done to make sure the stick didn't just fall to the ground. Dyson also designed a new filtration system that the company said "effectively separates dust and debris from the airflow without causing filters to clog or cleaning performance to decline." It also made a new "two-stage linear dust separation system, which captures 99.99 percent of particles down to 0.3 microns so only cleaner air is expelled back into the home."  More interestingly, the PencilVac has an "air-compressing bin design" that allows the bin to contain "five times more dust and debris than its 0.08L capacity." In the few rounds of cleaning that I witnessed, the PencilVac certainly appeared to be packing in the garbage quite tightly, though whether it can actually hold 0.4L of stuff is something I didn't get to measure. Dyson When it comes time to empty the container, you can use what Dyson calls its "new hygienic syringe bin ejection system" to empty it. I didn't try this out myself, but it basically involves removing the cleaner head, aiming the bottom of the PencilVac at your trash receptacle and sort of shucking the transparent housing up and down to get the debris out. I watched a Dyson engineer do this and the process seemed straightforward, though it did look like parts of the housing trapped some crumbs. The good news is, you can detach the shell and filters to more thoroughly clean them. The PencilVac also has a swappable battery pack that can last up to 60 minutes of suction, and you can charge the machine on its magnetic charging dock. This is also Dyson's first connected cordless vacuum, meaning it works with the MyDyson app so you can see battery levels, access more settings and get maintenance alerts (like when and how to clean the filter). There's also an LCD screen at the top of the handle that shows the selected power mode as well as remaining run time (while you're cleaning). You'll largely interact with the controls via the two physical buttons here, too. Dyson hasn't shared pricing details on the PencilVac, but there's plenty of time for the company to figure that out, since it's only going to be available in the US next year. That's 2026. Meanwhile, the device will retail in other regions.  This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/home/the-dyson-pencilvac-is-the-most-stick-like-stick-vacuum-ever-020109491.html?src=rss

Menu Home News Hardware Gaming Mobile Finance Deals Reviews How To Wccftech Mobile Samsung Reportedly Upgrading Galaxy Z Fold 7 And Tri-Fold With Titanium Hinges For Enhanced Durability And Thinness, While Flip 7 Misses Out Ezza Ijaz • May 19, 2025 at 05:29pm EDT While Samsung has quite a lot of products and announcements in store this year, it seems to be that the South Korean tech giant is especially focused on its foldable this year and ensuring they are able to bring back its A-game and give tough competition to others in the foldable space. We have seen varied speculations about the upcoming foldable and what to expect from them, and as we near the unveiling, more leaks give away key information about the fold models. Now, a new report suggests we could see a titanium hinge on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the company's first tri-fold phone. Samsung would reportedly now be opting for a titanium hinge upgrade for its Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy G Fold Samsung seems to be gearing up for its Unpacked event, which will be held in July 2025 and mainly entail the launch of the company's much-anticipated foldable models,, with the focus being on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7. We are expecting some major improvements this year, especially with the company promising some significant upgrades. We will also be getting to see more of the tech giant's first tri-fold phone, which could come out as the Galaxy G Fold later in Q4 of 2025. The rumor mill seems to be churning in full swing, and now, new speculation seems to be letting us into a major update. As per a report by The Elec, Samsung will feature a titanium hinge this year on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the Galaxy G Fold, but what is surprising is that the Galaxy Z Flip 7 will not be coming with the same upgrade. Samsung has been actively working on improving the form factor of its foldable models. By opting for a titanium hinge on the Galaxy Z Fold 7, the tech giant would be significantly reducing the device's thickness and even making it more durable. Similarly, a triple-display format coming with this upgrade could also help the company's tri-fold truly stand out. It could be that the company is leaving out the Galaxy Z Flip 7 intentionally in order to keep the costs lower for the model and also help differentiate between the company's premium offerings. Previously, Samsung has been opting for stainless steel hinges for its foldable models, but a titanium hinge was used in the Galaxy Z Fold SE last year, and if we see it being continued for the upcoming fold models this year, it could help the company not only improve the model's design but also be a stepping stone in achieving more durability. Subscribe to get an everyday digest of the latest technology news in your inbox Follow us on Topics Sections Company Some posts on wccftech.com may contain affiliate links. We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com © 2025 WCCF TECH INC. 700 - 401 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. Apple now has only one way to win the thinness race against Samsung Hamid Ganji Neowin @HamidGanji_ · May 14, 2025 07:38 EDT After an initial announcement in January alongside the rest of the Galaxy S25 family, Samsung finally unveiled its thinnest Galaxy phone ever, the Galaxy S25 Edge. With a new ultra-thin device entering the Galaxy lineup, Samsung also plans to retire Plus variants next year. However, Samsung is not alone in the thinness race. It’s been a few months since we learned that Apple also has an ultra-thin iPhone in the pipeline, dubbed iPhone 17 Air. Apple’s new take on thin iPhones will be revealed at the company’s September event, alongside the other iPhone 17 models. Similarly, the iPhone 17 Air will replace the Plus models in the iPhone lineup. The logic behind the obsession with thin devices is to let people experience flagship-level performance without having to carry bulky, heavy phones. While the Galaxy S25 Edge has the same screen size as the Galaxy S25 Plus, it is lighter and thinner, which makes it easy to carry. So far, Samsung is leading the race as the iPhone 17 Air is still a few months away from its official debut. However, Apple might have a trump card in this race, and that is the price gap between the standard and ultra-thin models. The Galaxy S25 Edge price starts at $1,099. For comparison, the standard Galaxy S25 with 128GB storage starts at $799, and the 256GB version costs $859. There is a nearly $300 price disparity between the standard and Edge variants, which is considerable for many customers. The price of the Galaxy S25 Edge might make people think twice before opting for the phone, and that’s the same thing Apple can rely on. The iPhone 17 Air is unlikely to bring major upgrades compared to the standard iPhone 17, except for a thinner design. Assuming that Apple is able to offset the impact of the tariffs and does not increase the iPhone 17 starting price from $799, the iPhone 17 Air could become a solid deal at $899. Tags Report a problem with article Follow @NeowinFeed

Table of Contents Table of Contents Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: specs Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: design Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: display Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: performance Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: battery and charging Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: cameras Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: software and updates Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: price and availability Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 16 Pro Max: verdict The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is coming out at the end of the month as one of the first slim phones in the world, and we’re excited to see how people will react to holding a phone that’s nearly as thin as a piece of paper. However, it’s competing against its thick Apple rival, the iPhone 16 Pro Max. As we settle into the middle of 2025, it’s survival of the fittest — or should we say, “thinnest”? — and the two phones are competing over who weighs less and how much can deliver more to their users regardless of their size. Here’s what we have to say. Recommended Videos Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge iPhone 16 Pro Max Size 159 x 76 x 5.9 mm (6.26 x 2.99 x 0.23 inches) 163 x 77.6 x 8.25 mm (6.42 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches) Weight 163 grams (5.75 ounces) 227 grams (7.99 ounces) Screen size 6.7-inch HDR10+ AMOLED (120Hz) 6.9-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display Screen resolution 1440 x 3120 resolution at 513 pixels per inch 2868 x 1320 resolution at 460 ppi Operating system Android 15 under One UI 7 iOS 18 Storage 256GB, 512GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB MicroSD card slot No No Tap-to-pay services Google Play Apple Pay Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite A18 Pro RAM 12GB 8GB Cameras Rear: 200-megapixel 12MP ultrawide Front: 12MP Rear: 48MP Fusion (main), f/1.78 48MP ultrawide, f/2.2 12MP telephoto, f/2.8, 5x optical zoom Front: 12MP, f/1.9 Video Rear: 8K at 30fps, 4K up to 120fps, and 1080p up to 240fps Front: 4K up to 60 fps, and 1080p up to 60 fps Rear: 4K up to 120fps, and 1080p up to 240fps Front: 4K up to 60fps, and 1080p up to 120fps Bluetooth 5.3 5.3 Ports USB-C USB-C Biometrics Under-display ultrasonic fingerprint sensor Face ID Water resistance IP68 IP68 Battery 3,900mAh 25W wired charging 15W wireless charging Reverse wireless charging 4,685mAh 30W fast charging (50% in 30 minutes) 25W MagSafe wireless 15W Qi2 wireless 4.5W reverse wireless App marketplace Google Play Store App Store Network support 5G 5G Colors Titanium Icy Blue, Titanium Silver, and Titanium Jet Black Black Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, and Desert Titanium Price Around $1,300 Starts at $1,199 Available from Unknown  Apple, Amazon, Best Buy Related Andy Boxall / Digital Trends The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is as thin as its name suggests, if the exact dimensions listed in the spec chart above are anything to go by. Leaked images have shown the S25 Edge to have a thin frame around the handset and two vertically-aligned cameras on top of the slight camera bump — a detail that is noticeably absent from the rest of the Galaxy S25 lineup. They have also shown the phone to have a microphone on the top and bottom, and a side button beneath the volume button on the right edge of the frame. Meanwhile, the iPhone 16 Pro Max is a bit thicker at 8.25mm, with a titanium frame with a brushed metal finish, flat edges, and a matte glass back that make it easier to grip the phone. It has a triple-lens camera layout similar to that of the iPhone 15 Pro Max, and a Camera Control button dug into the right side of the frame underneath the power button, which sticks out like the other buttons sitting on the left edge. Aside from the thickness (or lack thereof), we’re waiting to see if the S25 Edge comes out looking the way they do in the leaks. For now, the iPhone 16 Pro Max takes the trophy in the design category. Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max Andy Boxall / Digital Trends The Galaxy S25 Edge is rumored to have a 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a peak brightness of 2,600 nits, a variable refresh rate up to 120Hz, and a 3120 x 1440 QHD+ resolution, which will allow users to access their photos, videos, files, social media, games and more at a lightning-fast pace. The quick access will also be helped by the fact that the S25 Edge’s screen will take after the S25 Plus and S25 Ultra and support Dynamic AMOLED 2X and ProScaler, greatly enhancing photo and video quality. The display on the iPhone 16 Pro Max is 0.2 inches bigger than the S25 Edge, given that it sits at the high-end of the iPhone 16 lineup. It has a 6.9-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with ProMotion and always-on tech, gives off a 2868 x 1320 resolution and a maximum of 2,000 nits, and has an adaptive refresh rate of 120Hz, same as the S25 Edge. Though both phones have the smoothest refresh rate, the iPhone 16 Pro Max may be too big for some people to hold because of how large the screen is compared to the S25 Edge — and the iPhone 16 Plus, for that matter, as its display measures the same. You might find an easier time gripping the S25 Edge because its display is smaller. You’ll have an even better time viewing videos and photos, as well as playing games, with the higher resolution and the quality bump from ProScaler. Winner: Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge  Andy Boxall / Digital Trends Visual quality and performance go hand-in-hand, and no tech company knows that better than Samsung and Apple. But since the Galaxy S25 Edge comes out in a week, we’ll talk about its performance stats first. This phone runs 12GB of RAM whether you pick the 256GB or the 512GB version, and they house the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, which relies on multi-core performance and has eight CPU cores and an Adreno GPU, which runs everyday tasks as smooth as silk. If you have a tendency to have intense gaming sessions on your phone, you’ll be happy to know that the Galaxy S25 Edge has a vapor chamber and new thermal interface material (TIM) to prevent the phone from overheating — and burning your hands — while playing anything on Xbox Game Pass. Meanwhile, the iPhone 16 Pro Max operates on the A18 Pro processor, which makes everything run fast and smooth for how little memory it has — 8GB of RAM. You can play resource-heavy games on this phone, but because it has only one CPU core, it will overheat pretty quickly if you play on your phone in a hot environment or use a case that doesn’t allow it to cool down as fast as it heats up. That makes the iPhone 16 Pro Max well suited for those who will only use it for light tasks like web surfing, taking pictures and videos, and texting. But for people who want to do more on their phone without breaking a sweat, gaming included, the Galaxy S25 Edge is the way to go. Winner: Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge  Andy Boxall / Digital Trends The Galaxy S25 Edge has a 3,900mAh battery, which is slightly smaller than the batteries in the rest of the Galaxy S25 lineup, where the base model has a 4,000mAh battery and the S25 Ultra has a 5,000mAh battery. Samsung claims that the S25 Edge supports 25W wired charging, 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. However, Samsung didn’t exactly mention how fast the phone would charge when it’s plugged in. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, on the other hand, has an even bigger battery with 4,685mAh of power capacity. It supports 30W fast charging, reaching 50% charge in 30 minutes or less. It also supports 25W MagSafe wireless charging, 15W Qi2 wireless charging, and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. This shows that a bigger battery doesn’t always mean faster charging, it just means it takes little longer to get to full charge. Although, it is tough to call which phone has the best battery and charging time since they’re close is size and capacity, and the speed in which in the S25 Edge reaches a full charge, let alone a half charge, has not been determined. Winner: Tie Samsung Despite the Galaxy S25 Edge having two rear cameras, its main camera has a 200-megapixel lens sitting atop the 12MP ultrawide camera. The latter camera is quite a significant downgrade from the 48MP ultrawide camera found on the S25 Ultra, but that’s only because there aren’t any other cameras aside from the main one to compensate for it. However, the 200MP camera would provide for high-quality photos and videos, considering how well it captured every detail on the S25 Ultra. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, meanwhile, has a 48MP Fusion camera, a 48MP ultrawide camera, and a 12MP telephoto camera with 5x optical zoom, balancing out the visual quality of every picture and video it captures. The ultrawide camera provides a 120-degree field-of-view for landscaping and group photos, while the 12MP telephoto helps to capture the tiniest objects up close and personal when zoomed in, like small insects and leaf cells. The 48MP camera ensures every photo and video is crystal clear. We don’t know how well the cameras on the S25 Edge will pan out, so the iPhone 16 Pro Max gets the photo finish — for now. Winner: iPhone 16 Pro Max Andy Boxall / Digital Trends The Galaxy S25 Edge will operate on Android 15 out of the box, with Samsung’s One UI 7 layered on top of it. The combined software guarantees enhanced privacy features, improved multitasking, and AI capabilities like Gemini. Just like the other phones in the Galaxy S25 line, Samsung has promised seven years of OS and security updates for the S25 Edge. As for the iPhone 16 Pro Max, it runs on iOS 18 out of the box, but it can be updated to the latest version. Basically, iOS 18 comes with Apple Intelligence, which will summarize your emails, text messages, social media notifications, and help improve your writing by providing grammar and spelling checks to ensure you get your point across to anyone you’re talking to with poise. There’s also an advanced Siri that lights an iridescent ring around the display when you say its name. Apple didn’t say how many years of OS and security updates the phone would get, as it updates the OS for months at a time. Winner: Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Andy Boxall / Digital Trends At launch, the Galaxy S25 Edge will be sold at $1,099 for the 256GB variant, and $1,199 for the 512GB version. As for what colors it will be sold in, it will come in Titanium Icyblue, Titanium Silver, and Titanium Jetblack. No, the first and third colors are definitely not typos. The iPhone 16 Pro Max has been on the market since September 2024, and its price depends on how much storage space you need. The 256GB variant costs about $1,199, while the 512GB version costs $1,399, and the 1TB variant costs $1,599. It comes in Black Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, and Desert Titanium. Winfuture Although our review has yet to be published, the Galaxy S25 Edge appears to be winning this battle. It’s easier for big hands to hold for how slim it is, camera design justifies the overall design of the phone, and the performance it delivers is highly optimal, especially for gamers. Its thinness may make it look fragile, but it has a titanium frame around its circumference and is the first smartphone to have the Gorilla Glass Corning 2 on glass screen, offering the phone double the protection from cracks and scratches if it falls. Plus, the S25 Edge is a little more affordable than the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which could be helpful information for people who need a new phone but don’t want to break the bank for an Apple phone. They say great things come in small packages. In this case, they come in slim packages.

There’s a routine, but profoundly telling moment when many visitors complete their first walkthrough at Future Pastime, the exhibition of paintings by the visionary artist and visual futurist Syd Mead currently on display in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood. “His outlook on the future is so positive. I thought Syd Mead was dystopian,” many attendees exclaim, as if on cue.  Space Wheel Interior (1979) This perception is heavily guided by the work that—-for many—is the single most widely known reference point for Mead’s impact as a visual futurist: Director Ridley Scott’s 1982 rain soaked, techno-dystopian masterpiece, Blade Runner, whose visual landscape was largely Mead’s creation. In Blade Runner, Mead’s dystopian Los Angeles is so sleek, so complex, so rich with detail, one cannot blame audience members for confusing him with being a master of the morose. However, to quote Blade Runner 2049 director Denis Villeneuve (and another Mead collaborator): “[Syd] traveled in dystopia only once, and it was because of Ridley Scott. Syd’s first drawings of Los Angeles for Blade Runner were pure, bright and peaceful, but Ridley wanted his new world to be more claustrophobic and oppressive. And Syd dived into the darkness.”  One would reasonably expect Mead, with his fluent visual language of darkness so ably on display in Blade Runner, to be a committed future-cynic. However, it was quite the opposite. Mead was, in Vileneuve’s words, “one of the last great utopians,” a tidbit often lost on audiences raised on a steady diet of apocalyptic scenarios, dismal futures, and collapsed civilizations—the same narrative requests made often by Mead’s commissioning directors. In fact, Mead’s output outside the world of cinema—which in fact represents the lionshare of his more than 65-year professional career—is a replete and uniform world of robust optimism and hopeful aspiration. The future of Syd Mead is a bright and gilded one; the fulfillment of our greatest hopes and aspirations. It exists on the distant end of realism, yet is still somehow within reach.  The son of a Baptist minister (and part time art teacher), Mead gathered the strands of a childhood crowded by poverty and increasing world strife and instead formulated a unique worldview and artistic direction that was irrepressibly optimistic, often in spite of (and in stark contrast to) the current affairs and fortunes of the time.  To Mead, the prospect of an optimistic future was not a question of chance but of preparation. “Why wouldn’t you rehearse for a good future?” he often said. “I think that we should celebrate and rehearse for a bright future, and maybe it will come true. I don’t have time to illustrate misery or dystopian scenarios because they’ll happen. If you let everything go, they’ll happen anyway.” This outlook was successfully channeled into a singular career as an industrial futurist, becoming one of a rare group of individuals kept on speed dial by titans of industry to predict and illuminate likely future outcomes across myriad disciplines: architecture, urban planning, engineering, automotive, aeronautics, mass transit, spaceflight, technology, innovation, consumer goods, media, and more. Mead took it a step further by assuming the mantle of “visual futurist,” delivering his results not in research papers or dissertations, but via vivid, dynamic artworks, most principally paintings in his medium of choice: gouache.  Running of the 200th Kentucky Derby (1975) What he never anticipated was that the language of his industrial forecasting work would escape its enclosure and go on to define the visual identity of modern science fiction storytelling and cinematic futurism.   Mead entered professional life with nary a thought nor desire to work in the movies. In fact, movies were banned in the Mead household until he was 13 years old, with his earlier years filled with a potent mixture of his father’s chief obsessions: end-times religion, study and practice of painting and fine arts, and the pulp science fiction adventures of Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon (which Kenneth, his father, would buy family friendly editions so they could read together). Syd’s personal contributions to this percolating artistic concoction—an obsession with automobiles, the vibrant creations of contemporary illustrators as diverse as Maxfield Parrish and Chesley Bonestell, and the constant desire to innovate and improve one’s artistic craft—provided the ingredients to a simmering brew that one day would synthesize into the poetic future seer we celebrate today. By his mid-teens, Mead distanced himself from the old time religion of his parents as a new devotion emerged:bright future. The works of his adolescence and early adulthood burst with an almost unbridled gusto of color and life as potential futures were considered. Cowboys draped in pastel tour rural ranch grounds on horseback and bi-copter. Flying transport, early prototypes of Blade Runner-esque vehicles to come, twenty five years before the fact, are wrapped in chrome and almost seem to lift off the page. Join our mailing list Get the best of Den of Geek delivered right to your inbox! After his 1959 graduation from the Art Center in Los Angeles where he majored in industrial design, word quickly spread of this young man with a “future touch:” the uncanny ability to conceptualize and render achievable futures with the dexterity of an industrial engineer, the functionality of a city planner, and the poetry of a master painter. His first post-college berth at Ford’s Advanced Car Styling studio—where he worked on futuristic concept cars like the Gyron—lasted all of 26 months. The “thinness of purpose” got to him, he said. “If the company decided to stop making cars and start making washing machines next week, the process would not change at all—you just start doing sketches of washing machines.”  Mead departed Ford in 1961, and it was a providential overture made by industrial giant U.S. Steel shortly prior that which truly set the stage for the budding visual futurist to prove his worth. Aluminum, both lighter and cheaper, had been steadily eating into U.S. Steel’s profits, as well as the public’s romance with the once iconic alloy. The task for Mead was clear: to portray steel as a material of the future. Fifty years. One hundred years. Beyond. To make it relevant again today by showcasing its dreamy successes of tomorrow.  It was the assignment he had been practicing for his whole life, and Mead did not disappoint. Essentially given carte blanche, he remarkably completed the entire book—text and images—in just 30 days. While first intended as a product marketing catalogue aimed squarely at U.S. Steel customers, clients, and manufacturing partners, his work was such a sensation that the company commissioned four more books through 1969, and expanded the distribution of the volumes, running adverts for free copies in young people’s magazines, and seeding editions to all of the major art and design schools across the country. The result was the 1960s equivalent of a viral sensation; the books “went horizontal through the design community,” as Syd put it himself. Blossoming directors, designers, technologists, and innovators sought out the books and cherished them as cult objects. Sacred windows into the future of both technology and design. Acclaimed genre director Joe Johnston, who cut his teeth as art director on the original Star Wars Wheeless Truck (1969) As a result, the “Syd Mead look” is all over Star Wars, very specifically in the case of the AT-ATs, the iconic tall legged imperial transports featured in The Empire Strikes Back, which were derived by Johnston and the Lucasfilm team directly from Mead’s “Wheelless Truck” Despite his overwhelming influence on the series, Mead was not involved directly in Star Wars. He wasn’t even asked. It’s an understandable oversight. The concept of calling up Syd Mead in 1975 (by then an acclaimed industrial designer and futurist) to work on a motion picture is equivalent to asking Zaha Hadid in her prime to design buildings for an episode of Dynasty. Requests like these were simply not made, and as the 20th anniversary of Syd Mead’s professional career approached, he had yet to work on a single motion picture, let alone even be asked. This all changed when a fortuitous thought entered the mind of Star Wars VFX director John Dykstra in early 1979. Dykstra, who had attended Long Beach State alongside Johnston, and maintained a personal collection of Mead’s U.S. Steel books, now found himself as the visual effects lead on Star Trek: The Motion Picture. With the design of the film’s central antagonist—a leviathan entity of “unimaginable scale” named V’ger—suddenly in jeopardy, Dykstra took a leap of faith and reached out to Mead, uttering 12 words that would change both film and futurism forever:  “Syd, would you like to work on a science fiction motion picture?” Syd replied, “Sure.” In this one moment, the circuit was completed, and the board lit up. Suddenly alerted to the fact that their favorite futurist was down to do film, the entire town pivoted to Mead in unison. Ridley Scott, Steven Lisberger, Peter Hyams, James Cameron, and John Badham all reached out in quick succession. By 1986, via Blade Runner, Tron, 2010, Aliens, and Short Circuit, the very aesthetic of science fiction was altered forever… not by the hand of an imaginative production designer, but an actual futurist trained on developing real world futures to be built.     Elon Solo is the co-curator of Syd Mead: Future Pastime, an exhibition exploring the original artwork of Syd Mead, currently on display in NYC through May 21.  City on Wheels (1969)

Cutting corners: Now that Samsung has unveiled the Galaxy S25 Edge, attention has turned to Apple's upcoming ultra-thin rival handset, the iPhone 17 Air. The device is expected to debut this fall with a thickness almost half that of a normal iPhone. According to rumors, this doesn't mean every element will have compromises, but there will be areas that could disappoint, especially the battery life. Samsung has made a lot of headlines with the release of the Galaxy S25 Edge, which measures just 5.8mm thick, not counting the camera bump. But Apple's iPhone 17 Air – expected to launch this fall – is said to be even thinner at 5.5mm. That level of thinness means the Air won't be able to match the model it's replacing, the iPhone 16 Plus, in every area. However, it will have a 6.6-inch OLED display with LTPO, making it the first non-Pro iPhone to do so. There will also be features such as 120Hz ProMotion and always-on functionality. Elsewhere, the iPhone 17 Air is expected to pack the same A19 chip as the rest of the iPhone 17 lineup. It will also come with 8GB of RAM and MagSafe wireless charging. Finally, the price of the iPhone 17 Air is believed to be under $1,000, possibly around $899. But it was recently reported that Apple is going to increase the prices of its next generation of iPhones, though it will avoid blaming Trump's tariffs for the hikes, so this rumor may prove wrong. That's the good news. The bad news is that the iPhone 17 Air will have a single rear camera: a 48MP sensor with 2x optical zoom. Something else the iPhone Air will only have one of is a speaker. There will be a single, enhanced earpiece speaker as the phone is too thin for a second speaker to be placed at the bottom. // Related Stories Another potential disappointment is the iPhone 17 Air's lack of support for mmWave 5G. The handset will be one of the first iPhones to use Apple's in-house 5G modem, the C1. The iPhone 16 Plus uses Qualcomm's Snapdragon X75 5G modem, which supports mmWave 5G. Then there's what could be the biggest drawback of them all: the battery life. Reports state that between 60% and 70% of users will be able to use the handset for a full day on a single charge, whereas that figure is between 80% and 90% for other iPhones. Apple may use Apple Intelligence to improve the Air's battery life, and Cupertino plans to introduce a new battery case accessory specifically for the iPhone 17 Air.