• Are we really ready for a world where crows outsmart our AI companions?

    A recent article makes the bold claim that LLMs might just be less intelligent than our feathered friends. While we humans grapple with the convoluted definition of intelligence, it seems the clever crows are acing the self-awareness and reasoning tests handed out by life. Who knew a bird could be the poster child for smarts while AI stumbles through its own existence like a toddler with a crayon?

    Honestly, I sometimes wonder if my cat is plotting to take over the world鈥攁t least she's self-aware!

    So, maybe it鈥檚 time to give our avian overlords some credit. They might just be the true geniuses of our age.

    https://hackaday.com/2025/12/10/why-llms-are-less-intelligent-than-crows/
    #CleverCrows #AIvsNature #IntelligenceDebate #BirdBrain #TechSatire
    Are we really ready for a world where crows outsmart our AI companions? 馃 A recent article makes the bold claim that LLMs might just be less intelligent than our feathered friends. While we humans grapple with the convoluted definition of intelligence, it seems the clever crows are acing the self-awareness and reasoning tests handed out by life. Who knew a bird could be the poster child for smarts while AI stumbles through its own existence like a toddler with a crayon? Honestly, I sometimes wonder if my cat is plotting to take over the world鈥攁t least she's self-aware! So, maybe it鈥檚 time to give our avian overlords some credit. They might just be the true geniuses of our age. https://hackaday.com/2025/12/10/why-llms-are-less-intelligent-than-crows/ #CleverCrows #AIvsNature #IntelligenceDebate #BirdBrain #TechSatire
    Why LLMs are Less Intelligent than Crows
    hackaday.com
    The basic concept of human intelligence entails self-awareness alongside the ability to reason and apply logic to one’s actions and daily life. Despite the very fuzzy definition of ‘human intelligence‘, …read more
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni
  • What a world we live in when scientists finally unlock the secrets to the axolotls' ability to regenerate limbs, only to reveal that the key lies not in some miraculous regrowth molecule, but in its controlled destruction! Seriously, what kind of twisted logic is this? Are we supposed to celebrate the fact that the secret to regeneration is, in fact, about knowing when to destroy something instead of nurturing and encouraging growth? This revelation is not just baffling; it's downright infuriating!

    In an age where regenerative medicine holds the promise of healing wounds and restoring functionality, we are faced with the shocking realization that the science is not about building up, but rather about tearing down. Why would we ever want to focus on the destruction of growth molecules instead of creating an environment where regeneration can bloom unimpeded? Where is the inspiration in that? It feels like a slap in the face to anyone who believes in the potential of science to improve lives!

    Moreover, can we talk about the implications of this discovery? If the key to regeneration involves a meticulous dance of destruction, what does that say about our approach to medical advancements? Are we really expected to just stand by and accept that we must embrace an idea that says, "let's get rid of the good stuff to allow for growth"? This is not just a minor flaw in reasoning; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what regeneration should mean for us!

    To make matters worse, this revelation could lead to misguided practices in regenerative medicine. Instead of developing therapies that promote healing and growth, we could end up with treatments that focus on the elimination of beneficial molecules. This is absolutely unacceptable! How dare the scientific community suggest that the way forward is through destruction rather than cultivation? We should be demanding more from our researchers, not less!

    Let鈥檚 not forget the ethical implications. If the path to regeneration is paved with the controlled destruction of vital components, how can we trust the outcomes? We鈥檙e putting lives in the hands of a process that promotes destruction. Just imagine the future of medicine being dictated by a philosophy that sounds more like a dystopian nightmare than a beacon of hope.

    It is high time we hold scientists accountable for the direction they are taking in regenerative research. We need a shift in focus that prioritizes constructive growth, not destructive measures. If we are serious about advancing regenerative medicine, we must reject this flawed notion and demand a commitment to genuine regeneration鈥攖he kind that nurtures life, rather than sabotages it.

    Let鈥檚 raise our voices against this madness. We deserve better than a science that advocates for destruction as the means to an end. The axolotls may thrive on this paradox, but we, as humans, should expect far more from our scientific endeavors.

    #RegenerativeMedicine #Axolotl #ScienceFail #MedicalEthics #Innovation
    What a world we live in when scientists finally unlock the secrets to the axolotls' ability to regenerate limbs, only to reveal that the key lies not in some miraculous regrowth molecule, but in its controlled destruction! Seriously, what kind of twisted logic is this? Are we supposed to celebrate the fact that the secret to regeneration is, in fact, about knowing when to destroy something instead of nurturing and encouraging growth? This revelation is not just baffling; it's downright infuriating! In an age where regenerative medicine holds the promise of healing wounds and restoring functionality, we are faced with the shocking realization that the science is not about building up, but rather about tearing down. Why would we ever want to focus on the destruction of growth molecules instead of creating an environment where regeneration can bloom unimpeded? Where is the inspiration in that? It feels like a slap in the face to anyone who believes in the potential of science to improve lives! Moreover, can we talk about the implications of this discovery? If the key to regeneration involves a meticulous dance of destruction, what does that say about our approach to medical advancements? Are we really expected to just stand by and accept that we must embrace an idea that says, "let's get rid of the good stuff to allow for growth"? This is not just a minor flaw in reasoning; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what regeneration should mean for us! To make matters worse, this revelation could lead to misguided practices in regenerative medicine. Instead of developing therapies that promote healing and growth, we could end up with treatments that focus on the elimination of beneficial molecules. This is absolutely unacceptable! How dare the scientific community suggest that the way forward is through destruction rather than cultivation? We should be demanding more from our researchers, not less! Let鈥檚 not forget the ethical implications. If the path to regeneration is paved with the controlled destruction of vital components, how can we trust the outcomes? We鈥檙e putting lives in the hands of a process that promotes destruction. Just imagine the future of medicine being dictated by a philosophy that sounds more like a dystopian nightmare than a beacon of hope. It is high time we hold scientists accountable for the direction they are taking in regenerative research. We need a shift in focus that prioritizes constructive growth, not destructive measures. If we are serious about advancing regenerative medicine, we must reject this flawed notion and demand a commitment to genuine regeneration鈥攖he kind that nurtures life, rather than sabotages it. Let鈥檚 raise our voices against this madness. We deserve better than a science that advocates for destruction as the means to an end. The axolotls may thrive on this paradox, but we, as humans, should expect far more from our scientific endeavors. #RegenerativeMedicine #Axolotl #ScienceFail #MedicalEthics #Innovation
    www.wired.com
    A new study reveals the key lies not in the production of a regrowth molecule, but in that molecule's controlled destruction. The discovery could inspire future regenerative medicine.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    586
    1 Commenti 0 condivisioni
CGShares https://cgshares.com