Home
Reels
Groups
Pages
Market
See More
Groups Pages Market Blogs map
Sign In Sign Up
Night Mode
Search
Posts
  • What Is the National Engineering Register and Why Should You Join?

    A Simple Guide for Engineers in AustraliaIf you're an engineer working in Australia or planning to start your engineering career here, you might have come across the National Engineering Register or NER. But what exactly is it, and why is it becoming so important for engineers across the country?In this article, we’ll break it down in plain language so you can understand what the NER Engineers Australia program is all about—and why joining the National Engineering Register could be a great move for your career.What Is the National Engineering Register?The National Engineering Registeris an official list of qualified and experienced engineers who meet professional standards in Australia. It is managed by Engineers Australia, which is the peak professional body for engineers in the country.Being on the NER means:You’ve been assessed and recognised as a competent, responsible engineer.Your name is listed in a public register, making it easy for employers and clients to find and trust you.You commit to ongoing learning and ethical professional conduct.Think of it as your professional badge that proves you are serious about your work.Who Are NER Engineers Australia?NER Engineers Australia are professionals who have gone through a formal review process and have been accepted onto the National Engineering Register. These engineers:Have a recognised qualification in engineeringHave at least five years of relevant work experienceShow continued professional developmentFollow a strict code of ethicsAre capable of taking full responsibility for their engineering workWhether you’re a civil, mechanical, electrical, structural, or software engineer, if you meet these criteria, you can become an NER-registered engineer.Why Should You Join the National Engineering Register?Here are the top reasons why joining the NER Engineers Australia program is worth your time and effort:1. Build Trust and CredibilityThe NER is managed by Engineers Australia, which is highly respected in both public and private sectors. If you’re listed on the National Engineering Register, it tells others that you:Meet national standards of engineering competenceHave up-to-date skillsFollow ethical and safety standardsAre a reliable professionalEmployers and clients are more likely to choose engineers they can trust—and NER status helps you stand out.2. Improve Your Career OpportunitiesMany companies in Australia prefer or even require engineers to be on the NER. In some cases, you can’t apply for government jobs, contracts, or senior roles unless you're NER-registered.Having NER Engineers Australia status can also:Help you get promotedIncrease your salary potentialMake you more competitive for tenders and projectsLet you work independently without supervision3. Open International DoorsThe National Engineering Register is recognised beyond Australia. If you're planning to work in countries like the UK, UAE, New Zealand, or parts of Asia, having NER credentials can help you meet their professional standards too.4.  Meet Legal RequirementsIn states like Queensland and Victoria, certain types of engineering work must be done by registered professionals. Being listed on the NER ensures you meet the legal standards and avoid penalties.5. Pathway to Chartered StatusIf you’re aiming to become a Chartered Professional Engineer, joining the NER is often the first step. The NER process prepares you to meet the same competency standards required for chartership.What Do You Need to Apply?To become one of the NER Engineers Australia, you’ll need: An engineering degreeAt least five years of relevant work experience Evidence of Continuing Professional Development A Competency Self-Assessment Two professional referees who can confirm your experience A signed ethics declarationYou can apply online through Engineers Australia. The process involves reviewing your documents and verifying your competencies.What If You Are from Overseas?If you studied or worked outside Australia, you can still apply. Many overseas-qualified engineers join the NER every year.However, you may first need to go through a Migration Skills Assessment to confirm your qualifications meet Australian standards.Once assessed, you can apply for the NER like any local engineer.Real-World ExampleLet’s say Rahul, a mechanical engineer from India, has been working in Australia for six years. He wants to apply for a senior position in a local council, but they require NER registration.Rahul submits his application to Engineers Australia with help from his previous supervisors as referees. After a successful review, he gets listed on the National Engineering Register.Now Rahul can confidently apply for senior roles and even start consulting work, knowing he’s recognised as a trusted professional.Quick Recap: Why Join NER Engineers Australia? BenefitWhat It Means for You Trusted Professional StatusBuilds credibility and shows you meet Australian standards Better Job OpportunitiesAccess more jobs, tenders, and promotions Legal ComplianceRequired in some states for regulated engineering work🛤 Step Toward ChartershipEasier path to CPEng or RPEQ status Global RecognitionAccepted in many countries worldwideFinal ThoughtsThe National Engineering Register is more than just a list—it’s a way to prove your value, grow your career, and gain professional respect. Whether you're early in your career or already experienced, joining the NER Engineers Australia community can take your engineering journey to the next level.It’s simple: if you’re a skilled, qualified, and responsible engineer, the NER helps you show that to the world.Ready to Take the First Step?You can apply for the National Engineering Register on the Engineers Australia website. If you need help preparing your documents, consider speaking with a professional or mentor familiar with the process.Invest in your future. Join the NER Engineers Australia community today and get recognised for the great work you do.
    #what #national #engineering #register #why
    What Is the National Engineering Register and Why Should You Join?
    A Simple Guide for Engineers in AustraliaIf you're an engineer working in Australia or planning to start your engineering career here, you might have come across the National Engineering Register or NER. But what exactly is it, and why is it becoming so important for engineers across the country?In this article, we’ll break it down in plain language so you can understand what the NER Engineers Australia program is all about—and why joining the National Engineering Register could be a great move for your career.What Is the National Engineering Register?The National Engineering Registeris an official list of qualified and experienced engineers who meet professional standards in Australia. It is managed by Engineers Australia, which is the peak professional body for engineers in the country.Being on the NER means:You’ve been assessed and recognised as a competent, responsible engineer.Your name is listed in a public register, making it easy for employers and clients to find and trust you.You commit to ongoing learning and ethical professional conduct.Think of it as your professional badge that proves you are serious about your work.Who Are NER Engineers Australia?NER Engineers Australia are professionals who have gone through a formal review process and have been accepted onto the National Engineering Register. These engineers:Have a recognised qualification in engineeringHave at least five years of relevant work experienceShow continued professional developmentFollow a strict code of ethicsAre capable of taking full responsibility for their engineering workWhether you’re a civil, mechanical, electrical, structural, or software engineer, if you meet these criteria, you can become an NER-registered engineer.Why Should You Join the National Engineering Register?Here are the top reasons why joining the NER Engineers Australia program is worth your time and effort:1. Build Trust and CredibilityThe NER is managed by Engineers Australia, which is highly respected in both public and private sectors. If you’re listed on the National Engineering Register, it tells others that you:Meet national standards of engineering competenceHave up-to-date skillsFollow ethical and safety standardsAre a reliable professionalEmployers and clients are more likely to choose engineers they can trust—and NER status helps you stand out.2. Improve Your Career OpportunitiesMany companies in Australia prefer or even require engineers to be on the NER. In some cases, you can’t apply for government jobs, contracts, or senior roles unless you're NER-registered.Having NER Engineers Australia status can also:Help you get promotedIncrease your salary potentialMake you more competitive for tenders and projectsLet you work independently without supervision3. Open International DoorsThe National Engineering Register is recognised beyond Australia. If you're planning to work in countries like the UK, UAE, New Zealand, or parts of Asia, having NER credentials can help you meet their professional standards too.4.  Meet Legal RequirementsIn states like Queensland and Victoria, certain types of engineering work must be done by registered professionals. Being listed on the NER ensures you meet the legal standards and avoid penalties.5. Pathway to Chartered StatusIf you’re aiming to become a Chartered Professional Engineer, joining the NER is often the first step. The NER process prepares you to meet the same competency standards required for chartership.What Do You Need to Apply?To become one of the NER Engineers Australia, you’ll need: An engineering degreeAt least five years of relevant work experience Evidence of Continuing Professional Development A Competency Self-Assessment Two professional referees who can confirm your experience A signed ethics declarationYou can apply online through Engineers Australia. The process involves reviewing your documents and verifying your competencies.What If You Are from Overseas?If you studied or worked outside Australia, you can still apply. Many overseas-qualified engineers join the NER every year.However, you may first need to go through a Migration Skills Assessment to confirm your qualifications meet Australian standards.Once assessed, you can apply for the NER like any local engineer.Real-World ExampleLet’s say Rahul, a mechanical engineer from India, has been working in Australia for six years. He wants to apply for a senior position in a local council, but they require NER registration.Rahul submits his application to Engineers Australia with help from his previous supervisors as referees. After a successful review, he gets listed on the National Engineering Register.Now Rahul can confidently apply for senior roles and even start consulting work, knowing he’s recognised as a trusted professional.Quick Recap: Why Join NER Engineers Australia? BenefitWhat It Means for You✅ Trusted Professional StatusBuilds credibility and shows you meet Australian standards📈 Better Job OpportunitiesAccess more jobs, tenders, and promotions⚖️ Legal ComplianceRequired in some states for regulated engineering work🛤 Step Toward ChartershipEasier path to CPEng or RPEQ status🌎 Global RecognitionAccepted in many countries worldwideFinal ThoughtsThe National Engineering Register is more than just a list—it’s a way to prove your value, grow your career, and gain professional respect. Whether you're early in your career or already experienced, joining the NER Engineers Australia community can take your engineering journey to the next level.It’s simple: if you’re a skilled, qualified, and responsible engineer, the NER helps you show that to the world.Ready to Take the First Step?You can apply for the National Engineering Register on the Engineers Australia website. If you need help preparing your documents, consider speaking with a professional or mentor familiar with the process.Invest in your future. Join the NER Engineers Australia community today and get recognised for the great work you do. #what #national #engineering #register #why
    gamedev.net
    A Simple Guide for Engineers in AustraliaIf you're an engineer working in Australia or planning to start your engineering career here, you might have come across the National Engineering Register or NER. But what exactly is it, and why is it becoming so important for engineers across the country?In this article, we’ll break it down in plain language so you can understand what the NER Engineers Australia program is all about—and why joining the National Engineering Register could be a great move for your career.What Is the National Engineering Register?The National Engineering Register (NER) is an official list of qualified and experienced engineers who meet professional standards in Australia. It is managed by Engineers Australia, which is the peak professional body for engineers in the country.Being on the NER means:You’ve been assessed and recognised as a competent, responsible engineer.Your name is listed in a public register, making it easy for employers and clients to find and trust you.You commit to ongoing learning and ethical professional conduct.Think of it as your professional badge that proves you are serious about your work.Who Are NER Engineers Australia?NER Engineers Australia are professionals who have gone through a formal review process and have been accepted onto the National Engineering Register. These engineers:Have a recognised qualification in engineeringHave at least five years of relevant work experienceShow continued professional development (CPD)Follow a strict code of ethicsAre capable of taking full responsibility for their engineering workWhether you’re a civil, mechanical, electrical, structural, or software engineer, if you meet these criteria, you can become an NER-registered engineer.Why Should You Join the National Engineering Register?Here are the top reasons why joining the NER Engineers Australia program is worth your time and effort:1. Build Trust and CredibilityThe NER is managed by Engineers Australia, which is highly respected in both public and private sectors. If you’re listed on the National Engineering Register, it tells others that you:Meet national standards of engineering competenceHave up-to-date skillsFollow ethical and safety standardsAre a reliable professionalEmployers and clients are more likely to choose engineers they can trust—and NER status helps you stand out.2. Improve Your Career OpportunitiesMany companies in Australia prefer or even require engineers to be on the NER. In some cases, you can’t apply for government jobs, contracts, or senior roles unless you're NER-registered.Having NER Engineers Australia status can also:Help you get promotedIncrease your salary potentialMake you more competitive for tenders and projectsLet you work independently without supervision3. Open International DoorsThe National Engineering Register is recognised beyond Australia. If you're planning to work in countries like the UK, UAE, New Zealand, or parts of Asia, having NER credentials can help you meet their professional standards too.4.  Meet Legal RequirementsIn states like Queensland and Victoria, certain types of engineering work must be done by registered professionals. Being listed on the NER ensures you meet the legal standards and avoid penalties.5. Pathway to Chartered StatusIf you’re aiming to become a Chartered Professional Engineer (CPEng), joining the NER is often the first step. The NER process prepares you to meet the same competency standards required for chartership.What Do You Need to Apply?To become one of the NER Engineers Australia, you’ll need: An engineering degree (Australian or internationally recognised)At least five years of relevant work experience Evidence of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) A Competency Self-Assessment Two professional referees who can confirm your experience A signed ethics declarationYou can apply online through Engineers Australia. The process involves reviewing your documents and verifying your competencies.What If You Are from Overseas?If you studied or worked outside Australia, you can still apply. Many overseas-qualified engineers join the NER every year.However, you may first need to go through a Migration Skills Assessment to confirm your qualifications meet Australian standards.Once assessed, you can apply for the NER like any local engineer.Real-World ExampleLet’s say Rahul, a mechanical engineer from India, has been working in Australia for six years. He wants to apply for a senior position in a local council, but they require NER registration.Rahul submits his application to Engineers Australia with help from his previous supervisors as referees. After a successful review, he gets listed on the National Engineering Register.Now Rahul can confidently apply for senior roles and even start consulting work, knowing he’s recognised as a trusted professional.Quick Recap: Why Join NER Engineers Australia? BenefitWhat It Means for You✅ Trusted Professional StatusBuilds credibility and shows you meet Australian standards📈 Better Job OpportunitiesAccess more jobs, tenders, and promotions⚖️ Legal ComplianceRequired in some states for regulated engineering work🛤 Step Toward ChartershipEasier path to CPEng or RPEQ status🌎 Global RecognitionAccepted in many countries worldwideFinal ThoughtsThe National Engineering Register is more than just a list—it’s a way to prove your value, grow your career, and gain professional respect. Whether you're early in your career or already experienced, joining the NER Engineers Australia community can take your engineering journey to the next level.It’s simple: if you’re a skilled, qualified, and responsible engineer, the NER helps you show that to the world.Ready to Take the First Step?You can apply for the National Engineering Register on the Engineers Australia website. If you need help preparing your documents, consider speaking with a professional or mentor familiar with the process.Invest in your future. Join the NER Engineers Australia community today and get recognised for the great work you do.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
    Please log in to like, share and comment!
  • Microsoft AI Introduces Magentic-UI: An Open-Source Agent Prototype that Works with People to Complete Complex Tasks that Require Multi-Step Planning and Browser Use

    Modern web usage spans many digital interactions, from filling out forms and managing accounts to executing data queries and navigating complex dashboards. Despite the web being deeply intertwined with productivity and work processes, many of these actions still demand repetitive human input. This scenario is especially true for environments that require detailed instructions or decisions beyond mere searches. While artificial intelligence agents have emerged to support task automation, many prioritize complete autonomy. However, this frequently sidelines user control, leading to outcomes that diverge from user expectations. The next leap forward in productivity-enhancing AI involves agents designed not to replace users but to collaborate with them, blending automation with continuous, real-time human input for more accurate and trusted results.
    A key challenge in deploying AI agents for web-based tasks is the lack of visibility and intervention. Users often cannot see what steps the agent is planning, how it intends to execute them, or when it might go off track. In scenarios that involve complex decisions, like entering payment information, interpreting dynamic content, or running scripts, users need mechanisms to step in and redirect the process. Without these capabilities, systems risk making irreversible mistakes or misaligning with user goals. This highlights a significant limitation in current AI automation: the absence of structured human-in-the-loop design, where users dynamically guide and supervise agent behavior, without acting merely as spectators.
    Previous solutions approached web automation through rule-based scripts or general-purpose AI agents driven by language models. These systems interpret user commands and attempt to carry them out autonomously. However, they often execute plans without surfacing intermediate decisions or allowing meaningful user feedback. A few offer command-line-like interactions, which are inaccessible to the average user and rarely include layered safety mechanisms. Moreover, minimal support for task reuse or performance learning across sessions limits long-term value. These systems also tend to lack adaptability when the context changes mid-task or errors must be corrected collaboratively.
    Researchers at Microsoft introduced Magentic-UI, an open-source prototype that emphasizes collaborative human-AI interaction for web-based tasks. Unlike previous systems aiming for full independence, this tool promotes real-time co-planning, execution sharing, and step-by-step user oversight. Magentic-UI is built on Microsoft’s AutoGen framework and is tightly integrated with Azure AI Foundry Labs. It’s a direct evolution from the previously introduced Magentic-One system. With its launch, Microsoft Research aims to address fundamental questions about human oversight, safety mechanisms, and learning in agentic systems by offering an experimental platform for researchers and developers.
    Magentic-UI includes four core interactive features: co-planning, co-tasking, action guards, and plan learning. Co-planning lets users view and adjust the agent’s proposed steps before execution begins, offering full control over what the AI will do. Co-tasking enables real-time visibility during operation, letting users pause, edit, or take over specific actions. Action guards are customizable confirmations for high-risk activities like closing browser tabs or clicking “submit” on a form, actions that could have unintended consequences. Plan learning allows Magentic-UI to remember and refine steps for future tasks, improving over time through experience. These capabilities are supported by a modular team of agents: the Orchestrator leads planning and decision-making, WebSurfer handles browser interactions, Coder executes code in a sandbox, and FileSurfer interprets files and data.

    Technically, when a user submits a request, the Orchestrator agent generates a step-by-step plan. Users can modify it through a graphical interface by editing, deleting, or regenerating steps. Once finalized, the plan is delegated across specialized agents. Each agent reports after performing its task, and the Orchestrator determines whether to proceed, repeat, or request user feedback. All actions are visible on the interface, and users can halt execution at any point. This architecture not only ensures transparency but also allows for adaptive task flows. For example, if a step fails due to a broken link, the Orchestrator can dynamically adjust the plan with user consent.
    In controlled evaluations using the GAIA benchmark, which includes complex tasks like navigating the web and interpreting documents, Magentic-UI’s performance was rigorously tested. GAIA consists of 162 tasks requiring multimodal understanding. When operating autonomously, Magentic-UI completed 30.3% of tasks successfully. However, when supported by a simulated user with access to additional task information, success jumped to 51.9%, a 71% improvement. Another configuration using a smarter simulated user improved the rate to 42.6%. Interestingly, Magentic-UI requested help in only 10% of the enhanced tasks and asked for final answers in 18%. In those cases, the system asked for help an average of just 1.1 times. This shows how minimal but well-timed human intervention significantly boosts task completion without high oversight costs.

    Magentic-UI also features a “Saved Plans” gallery that displays strategies reused from past tasks. Retrieval from this gallery is approximately three times faster than generating a new plan. A predictive mechanism surfaces these plans while users type, streamlining repeated tasks like flight searches or form submissions. Safety mechanisms are robust. Every browser or code action runs inside a Docker container, ensuring that no user credentials are exposed. Users can define allow-lists for site access, and every action can be gated behind approval prompts. A red-team evaluation further tested it against phishing attacks and prompt injections, where the system either sought user clarification or blocked execution, reinforcing its layered defense model.

    Several Key Takeaways from the Research on Magentic-UI:

    With simple human input, magentic-UI boosts task completion by 71%.
    Requests user help in only 10% of enhanced tasks and averages 1.1 help requests per task.
    It features a co-planning UI that allows full user control before execution.
    Executes tasks via four modular agents: Orchestrator, WebSurfer, Coder, and FileSurfer.
    Stores and reuses plans, reducing repeat task latency by up to 3x.
    All actions are sandboxed via Docker containers; no user credentials are ever exposed.
    Passed red-team evaluations against phishing and injection threats.
    Supports fully user-configurable “action guards” for high-risk steps.
    Fully open-source and integrated with Azure AI Foundry Labs.

    In conclusion, Magentic-UI addresses a long-standing problem in AI automation, the lack of transparency and controllability. Rather than replacing users, it enables them to remain central to the process. The system performs well even with minimal help and learns to improve each time. The modular design, robust safeguards, and detailed interaction model create a strong foundation for future intelligent assistants.

    Check out the Technical details and GitHub Page. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 95k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.
    Asif RazzaqWebsite |  + postsBioAsif Razzaq is the CEO of Marktechpost Media Inc.. As a visionary entrepreneur and engineer, Asif is committed to harnessing the potential of Artificial Intelligence for social good. His most recent endeavor is the launch of an Artificial Intelligence Media Platform, Marktechpost, which stands out for its in-depth coverage of machine learning and deep learning news that is both technically sound and easily understandable by a wide audience. The platform boasts of over 2 million monthly views, illustrating its popularity among audiences.Asif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Anthropic Releases Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4: A Technical Leap in Reasoning, Coding, and AI Agent DesignAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Technology Innovation Institute TII Releases Falcon-H1: Hybrid Transformer-SSM Language Models for Scalable, Multilingual, and Long-Context UnderstandingAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Google DeepMind Releases Gemma 3n: A Compact, High-Efficiency Multimodal AI Model for Real-Time On-Device UseAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/A Step-by-Step Implementation Tutorial for Building Modular AI Workflows Using Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 3.7 through API and LangGraph
    #microsoft #introduces #magenticuian #opensource #agent
    Microsoft AI Introduces Magentic-UI: An Open-Source Agent Prototype that Works with People to Complete Complex Tasks that Require Multi-Step Planning and Browser Use
    Modern web usage spans many digital interactions, from filling out forms and managing accounts to executing data queries and navigating complex dashboards. Despite the web being deeply intertwined with productivity and work processes, many of these actions still demand repetitive human input. This scenario is especially true for environments that require detailed instructions or decisions beyond mere searches. While artificial intelligence agents have emerged to support task automation, many prioritize complete autonomy. However, this frequently sidelines user control, leading to outcomes that diverge from user expectations. The next leap forward in productivity-enhancing AI involves agents designed not to replace users but to collaborate with them, blending automation with continuous, real-time human input for more accurate and trusted results. A key challenge in deploying AI agents for web-based tasks is the lack of visibility and intervention. Users often cannot see what steps the agent is planning, how it intends to execute them, or when it might go off track. In scenarios that involve complex decisions, like entering payment information, interpreting dynamic content, or running scripts, users need mechanisms to step in and redirect the process. Without these capabilities, systems risk making irreversible mistakes or misaligning with user goals. This highlights a significant limitation in current AI automation: the absence of structured human-in-the-loop design, where users dynamically guide and supervise agent behavior, without acting merely as spectators. Previous solutions approached web automation through rule-based scripts or general-purpose AI agents driven by language models. These systems interpret user commands and attempt to carry them out autonomously. However, they often execute plans without surfacing intermediate decisions or allowing meaningful user feedback. A few offer command-line-like interactions, which are inaccessible to the average user and rarely include layered safety mechanisms. Moreover, minimal support for task reuse or performance learning across sessions limits long-term value. These systems also tend to lack adaptability when the context changes mid-task or errors must be corrected collaboratively. Researchers at Microsoft introduced Magentic-UI, an open-source prototype that emphasizes collaborative human-AI interaction for web-based tasks. Unlike previous systems aiming for full independence, this tool promotes real-time co-planning, execution sharing, and step-by-step user oversight. Magentic-UI is built on Microsoft’s AutoGen framework and is tightly integrated with Azure AI Foundry Labs. It’s a direct evolution from the previously introduced Magentic-One system. With its launch, Microsoft Research aims to address fundamental questions about human oversight, safety mechanisms, and learning in agentic systems by offering an experimental platform for researchers and developers. Magentic-UI includes four core interactive features: co-planning, co-tasking, action guards, and plan learning. Co-planning lets users view and adjust the agent’s proposed steps before execution begins, offering full control over what the AI will do. Co-tasking enables real-time visibility during operation, letting users pause, edit, or take over specific actions. Action guards are customizable confirmations for high-risk activities like closing browser tabs or clicking “submit” on a form, actions that could have unintended consequences. Plan learning allows Magentic-UI to remember and refine steps for future tasks, improving over time through experience. These capabilities are supported by a modular team of agents: the Orchestrator leads planning and decision-making, WebSurfer handles browser interactions, Coder executes code in a sandbox, and FileSurfer interprets files and data. Technically, when a user submits a request, the Orchestrator agent generates a step-by-step plan. Users can modify it through a graphical interface by editing, deleting, or regenerating steps. Once finalized, the plan is delegated across specialized agents. Each agent reports after performing its task, and the Orchestrator determines whether to proceed, repeat, or request user feedback. All actions are visible on the interface, and users can halt execution at any point. This architecture not only ensures transparency but also allows for adaptive task flows. For example, if a step fails due to a broken link, the Orchestrator can dynamically adjust the plan with user consent. In controlled evaluations using the GAIA benchmark, which includes complex tasks like navigating the web and interpreting documents, Magentic-UI’s performance was rigorously tested. GAIA consists of 162 tasks requiring multimodal understanding. When operating autonomously, Magentic-UI completed 30.3% of tasks successfully. However, when supported by a simulated user with access to additional task information, success jumped to 51.9%, a 71% improvement. Another configuration using a smarter simulated user improved the rate to 42.6%. Interestingly, Magentic-UI requested help in only 10% of the enhanced tasks and asked for final answers in 18%. In those cases, the system asked for help an average of just 1.1 times. This shows how minimal but well-timed human intervention significantly boosts task completion without high oversight costs. Magentic-UI also features a “Saved Plans” gallery that displays strategies reused from past tasks. Retrieval from this gallery is approximately three times faster than generating a new plan. A predictive mechanism surfaces these plans while users type, streamlining repeated tasks like flight searches or form submissions. Safety mechanisms are robust. Every browser or code action runs inside a Docker container, ensuring that no user credentials are exposed. Users can define allow-lists for site access, and every action can be gated behind approval prompts. A red-team evaluation further tested it against phishing attacks and prompt injections, where the system either sought user clarification or blocked execution, reinforcing its layered defense model. Several Key Takeaways from the Research on Magentic-UI: With simple human input, magentic-UI boosts task completion by 71%. Requests user help in only 10% of enhanced tasks and averages 1.1 help requests per task. It features a co-planning UI that allows full user control before execution. Executes tasks via four modular agents: Orchestrator, WebSurfer, Coder, and FileSurfer. Stores and reuses plans, reducing repeat task latency by up to 3x. All actions are sandboxed via Docker containers; no user credentials are ever exposed. Passed red-team evaluations against phishing and injection threats. Supports fully user-configurable “action guards” for high-risk steps. Fully open-source and integrated with Azure AI Foundry Labs. In conclusion, Magentic-UI addresses a long-standing problem in AI automation, the lack of transparency and controllability. Rather than replacing users, it enables them to remain central to the process. The system performs well even with minimal help and learns to improve each time. The modular design, robust safeguards, and detailed interaction model create a strong foundation for future intelligent assistants. Check out the Technical details and GitHub Page. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 95k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Asif RazzaqWebsite |  + postsBioAsif Razzaq is the CEO of Marktechpost Media Inc.. As a visionary entrepreneur and engineer, Asif is committed to harnessing the potential of Artificial Intelligence for social good. His most recent endeavor is the launch of an Artificial Intelligence Media Platform, Marktechpost, which stands out for its in-depth coverage of machine learning and deep learning news that is both technically sound and easily understandable by a wide audience. The platform boasts of over 2 million monthly views, illustrating its popularity among audiences.Asif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Anthropic Releases Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4: A Technical Leap in Reasoning, Coding, and AI Agent DesignAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Technology Innovation Institute TII Releases Falcon-H1: Hybrid Transformer-SSM Language Models for Scalable, Multilingual, and Long-Context UnderstandingAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Google DeepMind Releases Gemma 3n: A Compact, High-Efficiency Multimodal AI Model for Real-Time On-Device UseAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/A Step-by-Step Implementation Tutorial for Building Modular AI Workflows Using Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 3.7 through API and LangGraph #microsoft #introduces #magenticuian #opensource #agent
    Microsoft AI Introduces Magentic-UI: An Open-Source Agent Prototype that Works with People to Complete Complex Tasks that Require Multi-Step Planning and Browser Use
    www.marktechpost.com
    Modern web usage spans many digital interactions, from filling out forms and managing accounts to executing data queries and navigating complex dashboards. Despite the web being deeply intertwined with productivity and work processes, many of these actions still demand repetitive human input. This scenario is especially true for environments that require detailed instructions or decisions beyond mere searches. While artificial intelligence agents have emerged to support task automation, many prioritize complete autonomy. However, this frequently sidelines user control, leading to outcomes that diverge from user expectations. The next leap forward in productivity-enhancing AI involves agents designed not to replace users but to collaborate with them, blending automation with continuous, real-time human input for more accurate and trusted results. A key challenge in deploying AI agents for web-based tasks is the lack of visibility and intervention. Users often cannot see what steps the agent is planning, how it intends to execute them, or when it might go off track. In scenarios that involve complex decisions, like entering payment information, interpreting dynamic content, or running scripts, users need mechanisms to step in and redirect the process. Without these capabilities, systems risk making irreversible mistakes or misaligning with user goals. This highlights a significant limitation in current AI automation: the absence of structured human-in-the-loop design, where users dynamically guide and supervise agent behavior, without acting merely as spectators. Previous solutions approached web automation through rule-based scripts or general-purpose AI agents driven by language models. These systems interpret user commands and attempt to carry them out autonomously. However, they often execute plans without surfacing intermediate decisions or allowing meaningful user feedback. A few offer command-line-like interactions, which are inaccessible to the average user and rarely include layered safety mechanisms. Moreover, minimal support for task reuse or performance learning across sessions limits long-term value. These systems also tend to lack adaptability when the context changes mid-task or errors must be corrected collaboratively. Researchers at Microsoft introduced Magentic-UI, an open-source prototype that emphasizes collaborative human-AI interaction for web-based tasks. Unlike previous systems aiming for full independence, this tool promotes real-time co-planning, execution sharing, and step-by-step user oversight. Magentic-UI is built on Microsoft’s AutoGen framework and is tightly integrated with Azure AI Foundry Labs. It’s a direct evolution from the previously introduced Magentic-One system. With its launch, Microsoft Research aims to address fundamental questions about human oversight, safety mechanisms, and learning in agentic systems by offering an experimental platform for researchers and developers. Magentic-UI includes four core interactive features: co-planning, co-tasking, action guards, and plan learning. Co-planning lets users view and adjust the agent’s proposed steps before execution begins, offering full control over what the AI will do. Co-tasking enables real-time visibility during operation, letting users pause, edit, or take over specific actions. Action guards are customizable confirmations for high-risk activities like closing browser tabs or clicking “submit” on a form, actions that could have unintended consequences. Plan learning allows Magentic-UI to remember and refine steps for future tasks, improving over time through experience. These capabilities are supported by a modular team of agents: the Orchestrator leads planning and decision-making, WebSurfer handles browser interactions, Coder executes code in a sandbox, and FileSurfer interprets files and data. Technically, when a user submits a request, the Orchestrator agent generates a step-by-step plan. Users can modify it through a graphical interface by editing, deleting, or regenerating steps. Once finalized, the plan is delegated across specialized agents. Each agent reports after performing its task, and the Orchestrator determines whether to proceed, repeat, or request user feedback. All actions are visible on the interface, and users can halt execution at any point. This architecture not only ensures transparency but also allows for adaptive task flows. For example, if a step fails due to a broken link, the Orchestrator can dynamically adjust the plan with user consent. In controlled evaluations using the GAIA benchmark, which includes complex tasks like navigating the web and interpreting documents, Magentic-UI’s performance was rigorously tested. GAIA consists of 162 tasks requiring multimodal understanding. When operating autonomously, Magentic-UI completed 30.3% of tasks successfully. However, when supported by a simulated user with access to additional task information, success jumped to 51.9%, a 71% improvement. Another configuration using a smarter simulated user improved the rate to 42.6%. Interestingly, Magentic-UI requested help in only 10% of the enhanced tasks and asked for final answers in 18%. In those cases, the system asked for help an average of just 1.1 times. This shows how minimal but well-timed human intervention significantly boosts task completion without high oversight costs. Magentic-UI also features a “Saved Plans” gallery that displays strategies reused from past tasks. Retrieval from this gallery is approximately three times faster than generating a new plan. A predictive mechanism surfaces these plans while users type, streamlining repeated tasks like flight searches or form submissions. Safety mechanisms are robust. Every browser or code action runs inside a Docker container, ensuring that no user credentials are exposed. Users can define allow-lists for site access, and every action can be gated behind approval prompts. A red-team evaluation further tested it against phishing attacks and prompt injections, where the system either sought user clarification or blocked execution, reinforcing its layered defense model. Several Key Takeaways from the Research on Magentic-UI: With simple human input, magentic-UI boosts task completion by 71% (from 30.3% to 51.9%). Requests user help in only 10% of enhanced tasks and averages 1.1 help requests per task. It features a co-planning UI that allows full user control before execution. Executes tasks via four modular agents: Orchestrator, WebSurfer, Coder, and FileSurfer. Stores and reuses plans, reducing repeat task latency by up to 3x. All actions are sandboxed via Docker containers; no user credentials are ever exposed. Passed red-team evaluations against phishing and injection threats. Supports fully user-configurable “action guards” for high-risk steps. Fully open-source and integrated with Azure AI Foundry Labs. In conclusion, Magentic-UI addresses a long-standing problem in AI automation, the lack of transparency and controllability. Rather than replacing users, it enables them to remain central to the process. The system performs well even with minimal help and learns to improve each time. The modular design, robust safeguards, and detailed interaction model create a strong foundation for future intelligent assistants. Check out the Technical details and GitHub Page. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 95k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Asif RazzaqWebsite |  + postsBioAsif Razzaq is the CEO of Marktechpost Media Inc.. As a visionary entrepreneur and engineer, Asif is committed to harnessing the potential of Artificial Intelligence for social good. His most recent endeavor is the launch of an Artificial Intelligence Media Platform, Marktechpost, which stands out for its in-depth coverage of machine learning and deep learning news that is both technically sound and easily understandable by a wide audience. The platform boasts of over 2 million monthly views, illustrating its popularity among audiences.Asif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Anthropic Releases Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4: A Technical Leap in Reasoning, Coding, and AI Agent DesignAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Technology Innovation Institute TII Releases Falcon-H1: Hybrid Transformer-SSM Language Models for Scalable, Multilingual, and Long-Context UnderstandingAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/Google DeepMind Releases Gemma 3n: A Compact, High-Efficiency Multimodal AI Model for Real-Time On-Device UseAsif Razzaqhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/6flvq/A Step-by-Step Implementation Tutorial for Building Modular AI Workflows Using Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 3.7 through API and LangGraph
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
    Please log in to like, share and comment!
  • Apple says it won’t yet ‘take action’ on Fortnite return to the App Store

    Last week, Epic Games resubmitted Fortnite to the App Store in the United States. This followed a court ruling that stated Apple wasn’t allowed to charge a 27% commission on payments conducted through external payment services on the U.S. App Store.
    However, when it submitted the new version of Fortnite for app review, Epic Games didn’t hear back for quite some time.

    Tonight, Epic Games shared a letter that it says it received yesterday from Apple. This follows this mornings announcement that Apple had ‘blocked’ the launch of the new Fortnite update globally, which wasn’t necessarily the case. Instead, Apple simply didn’t want to touch the US version of Fortnite.
    Epic Games had bundled the two versions together, and Apple had then suggested that Epic Games submit the US and EU versions separately.
    In the letter shared, Apple stated the following:

    As you are well aware, Apple has previously denied requests to reinstate the Epic Games developer
    account, and we have informed you that Apple will not revisit that decision until after the U.S. litigation between the parties concludes. In our view, the same reasoning extends to returning Fortnite to the U.S. storefront of the App Store regardless of which Epic-related entity submits the app. If Epic believes that there is some factual or legal development that warrants further consideration of this position, please let us know in writing. In the meantime, Apple has determined not to take action on the Fortnite app submission until after the Ninth Circuit rules on our pending request for a partial stay of the new injunction.
    You can read the letter in full here. In short, Apple doesn’t want to take action until everything is fully settled involving the dispute.
    As a result of this, Epic Games has asked the courts to force Apple to allow Fortnite to relaunch on the U.S. App Store under the new rules.

    My favorite Apple accessory recommendations:
    Follow Michael: X/Twitter, Bluesky, Instagram

    Add 9to5Mac to your Google News feed. 

    FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel
    #apple #says #wont #yet #take
    Apple says it won’t yet ‘take action’ on Fortnite return to the App Store
    Last week, Epic Games resubmitted Fortnite to the App Store in the United States. This followed a court ruling that stated Apple wasn’t allowed to charge a 27% commission on payments conducted through external payment services on the U.S. App Store. However, when it submitted the new version of Fortnite for app review, Epic Games didn’t hear back for quite some time. Tonight, Epic Games shared a letter that it says it received yesterday from Apple. This follows this mornings announcement that Apple had ‘blocked’ the launch of the new Fortnite update globally, which wasn’t necessarily the case. Instead, Apple simply didn’t want to touch the US version of Fortnite. Epic Games had bundled the two versions together, and Apple had then suggested that Epic Games submit the US and EU versions separately. In the letter shared, Apple stated the following: As you are well aware, Apple has previously denied requests to reinstate the Epic Games developer account, and we have informed you that Apple will not revisit that decision until after the U.S. litigation between the parties concludes. In our view, the same reasoning extends to returning Fortnite to the U.S. storefront of the App Store regardless of which Epic-related entity submits the app. If Epic believes that there is some factual or legal development that warrants further consideration of this position, please let us know in writing. In the meantime, Apple has determined not to take action on the Fortnite app submission until after the Ninth Circuit rules on our pending request for a partial stay of the new injunction. You can read the letter in full here. In short, Apple doesn’t want to take action until everything is fully settled involving the dispute. As a result of this, Epic Games has asked the courts to force Apple to allow Fortnite to relaunch on the U.S. App Store under the new rules. My favorite Apple accessory recommendations: Follow Michael: X/Twitter, Bluesky, Instagram Add 9to5Mac to your Google News feed.  FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel #apple #says #wont #yet #take
    Apple says it won’t yet ‘take action’ on Fortnite return to the App Store
    9to5mac.com
    Last week, Epic Games resubmitted Fortnite to the App Store in the United States. This followed a court ruling that stated Apple wasn’t allowed to charge a 27% commission on payments conducted through external payment services on the U.S. App Store. However, when it submitted the new version of Fortnite for app review, Epic Games didn’t hear back for quite some time. Tonight, Epic Games shared a letter that it says it received yesterday from Apple. This follows this mornings announcement that Apple had ‘blocked’ the launch of the new Fortnite update globally, which wasn’t necessarily the case. Instead, Apple simply didn’t want to touch the US version of Fortnite. Epic Games had bundled the two versions together, and Apple had then suggested that Epic Games submit the US and EU versions separately. In the letter shared, Apple stated the following: As you are well aware, Apple has previously denied requests to reinstate the Epic Games developer account, and we have informed you that Apple will not revisit that decision until after the U.S. litigation between the parties concludes. In our view, the same reasoning extends to returning Fortnite to the U.S. storefront of the App Store regardless of which Epic-related entity submits the app. If Epic believes that there is some factual or legal development that warrants further consideration of this position, please let us know in writing. In the meantime, Apple has determined not to take action on the Fortnite app submission until after the Ninth Circuit rules on our pending request for a partial stay of the new injunction. You can read the letter in full here. In short, Apple doesn’t want to take action until everything is fully settled involving the dispute. As a result of this, Epic Games has asked the courts to force Apple to allow Fortnite to relaunch on the U.S. App Store under the new rules. My favorite Apple accessory recommendations: Follow Michael: X/Twitter, Bluesky, Instagram Add 9to5Mac to your Google News feed.  FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
    Please log in to like, share and comment!
  • Epic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... again

    TechTarget and Informa Tech’s Digital Business Combine.TechTarget and InformaTechTarget and Informa Tech’s Digital Business Combine.Together, we power an unparalleled network of 220+ online properties covering 10,000+ granular topics, serving an audience of 50+ million professionals with original, objective content from trusted sources. We help you gain critical insights and make more informed decisions across your business priorities.Epic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... againEpic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... again'There is no way a rapidly evolving multi-platform game like Fortnite can operate if platforms use their power or processes to obstruct.'May 15, 20252 Min ReadImage via Epic GamesEpic Games has resubmitted Fortnite to Apple App Review in the US after suggesting there was no reply to a previously submitted version.According to CEO Tim Sweeney, Fortnite was submitted to Apple for review on May 9. Yesterday, he posted on Xthat Apple hadn't approved the game's release."We need to release a weekly Fortnite update with new content this Friday, and all platforms must update simultaneously. So we have pulled the previous Fortnite version submitted to Apple App Review last Friday, and we have submitted a new version for review," the post read.Since May 10, Sweeney has been sharing daily updates on X, saying that there was "no news" from Apple, in response to people asking about the review status.Yesterday, an X user asked Sweeney how he "did not plan for this." The CEO response was as follows: "Our release planning relies on platforms supporting app developers like us releasing apps. There is no way a rapidly evolving multi-platform game like Fortnite can operate if platforms use their power or processes to obstruct."As spotted by VGC, according to the App Review guidelines, on average, 90 percent of submissions are reviewed in less than 24 hours by Apple.Epic and Apple are still battling over the app storeRelated:This week's news is the latest in a series of developments around a years-long legal battle between the two companies to reinstate Fortnite on iOS. In January 2024, the game became available in the European App Store again. Two months later, Epic claimed that its European account had been "terminated," which was a "serious violation" of Europe's Digital Markets Act. The account was reinstated the next day."This sends a strong signal to developers that the European Commission will act swiftly to enforce the DMA and hold gatekeepers accountable," the company wrote in a statement at the time.Then, in June of the same year, a new law passed by Japanese parliament opened the door for Epic to submit Fortnite to Apple Japan's App Store. The bill is set to take effect in late 2025. Back in December, the developer also secured a deal to preinstall the game onto Android phones in UK and Spain."Fortnite will now return to iOS in Japan and UK next year, and EU this year! This is the new free world, from the point of view of app developers and users. It’s a big club and we ain't in it: The United States of America is still locked behind Apple's Iron Curtain," Sweeney said on X in June 2024.Disclosure: The author of this piece has previously contributed editorial work to the Epic Games Store News section.Related: about:Top StoriesAppleEpic GamesDaily news, dev blogs, and stories from Game Developer straight to your inboxStay UpdatedYou May Also Like
    #epic #games #ceo #resubmits #fortnite
    Epic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... again
    TechTarget and Informa Tech’s Digital Business Combine.TechTarget and InformaTechTarget and Informa Tech’s Digital Business Combine.Together, we power an unparalleled network of 220+ online properties covering 10,000+ granular topics, serving an audience of 50+ million professionals with original, objective content from trusted sources. We help you gain critical insights and make more informed decisions across your business priorities.Epic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... againEpic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... again'There is no way a rapidly evolving multi-platform game like Fortnite can operate if platforms use their power or processes to obstruct.'May 15, 20252 Min ReadImage via Epic GamesEpic Games has resubmitted Fortnite to Apple App Review in the US after suggesting there was no reply to a previously submitted version.According to CEO Tim Sweeney, Fortnite was submitted to Apple for review on May 9. Yesterday, he posted on Xthat Apple hadn't approved the game's release."We need to release a weekly Fortnite update with new content this Friday, and all platforms must update simultaneously. So we have pulled the previous Fortnite version submitted to Apple App Review last Friday, and we have submitted a new version for review," the post read.Since May 10, Sweeney has been sharing daily updates on X, saying that there was "no news" from Apple, in response to people asking about the review status.Yesterday, an X user asked Sweeney how he "did not plan for this." The CEO response was as follows: "Our release planning relies on platforms supporting app developers like us releasing apps. There is no way a rapidly evolving multi-platform game like Fortnite can operate if platforms use their power or processes to obstruct."As spotted by VGC, according to the App Review guidelines, on average, 90 percent of submissions are reviewed in less than 24 hours by Apple.Epic and Apple are still battling over the app storeRelated:This week's news is the latest in a series of developments around a years-long legal battle between the two companies to reinstate Fortnite on iOS. In January 2024, the game became available in the European App Store again. Two months later, Epic claimed that its European account had been "terminated," which was a "serious violation" of Europe's Digital Markets Act. The account was reinstated the next day."This sends a strong signal to developers that the European Commission will act swiftly to enforce the DMA and hold gatekeepers accountable," the company wrote in a statement at the time.Then, in June of the same year, a new law passed by Japanese parliament opened the door for Epic to submit Fortnite to Apple Japan's App Store. The bill is set to take effect in late 2025. Back in December, the developer also secured a deal to preinstall the game onto Android phones in UK and Spain."Fortnite will now return to iOS in Japan and UK next year, and EU this year! This is the new free world, from the point of view of app developers and users. It’s a big club and we ain't in it: The United States of America is still locked behind Apple's Iron Curtain," Sweeney said on X in June 2024.Disclosure: The author of this piece has previously contributed editorial work to the Epic Games Store News section.Related: about:Top StoriesAppleEpic GamesDaily news, dev blogs, and stories from Game Developer straight to your inboxStay UpdatedYou May Also Like #epic #games #ceo #resubmits #fortnite
    Epic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... again
    www.gamedeveloper.com
    TechTarget and Informa Tech’s Digital Business Combine.TechTarget and InformaTechTarget and Informa Tech’s Digital Business Combine.Together, we power an unparalleled network of 220+ online properties covering 10,000+ granular topics, serving an audience of 50+ million professionals with original, objective content from trusted sources. We help you gain critical insights and make more informed decisions across your business priorities.Epic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... againEpic Games CEO resubmits Fortnite to Apple App Review... again'There is no way a rapidly evolving multi-platform game like Fortnite can operate if platforms use their power or processes to obstruct.'May 15, 20252 Min ReadImage via Epic GamesEpic Games has resubmitted Fortnite to Apple App Review in the US after suggesting there was no reply to a previously submitted version.According to CEO Tim Sweeney, Fortnite was submitted to Apple for review on May 9. Yesterday, he posted on X (formerly Twitter) that Apple hadn't approved the game's release (thanks, VGC)."We need to release a weekly Fortnite update with new content this Friday, and all platforms must update simultaneously. So we have pulled the previous Fortnite version submitted to Apple App Review last Friday, and we have submitted a new version for review," the post read.Since May 10, Sweeney has been sharing daily updates on X, saying that there was "no news" from Apple, in response to people asking about the review status.Yesterday, an X user asked Sweeney how he "did not plan for this." The CEO response was as follows: "Our release planning relies on platforms supporting app developers like us releasing apps. There is no way a rapidly evolving multi-platform game like Fortnite can operate if platforms use their power or processes to obstruct."As spotted by VGC, according to the App Review guidelines, on average, 90 percent of submissions are reviewed in less than 24 hours by Apple.Epic and Apple are still battling over the app storeRelated:This week's news is the latest in a series of developments around a years-long legal battle between the two companies to reinstate Fortnite on iOS. In January 2024, the game became available in the European App Store again. Two months later, Epic claimed that its European account had been "terminated," which was a "serious violation" of Europe's Digital Markets Act. The account was reinstated the next day."This sends a strong signal to developers that the European Commission will act swiftly to enforce the DMA and hold gatekeepers accountable," the company wrote in a statement at the time.Then, in June of the same year, a new law passed by Japanese parliament opened the door for Epic to submit Fortnite to Apple Japan's App Store. The bill is set to take effect in late 2025. Back in December, the developer also secured a deal to preinstall the game onto Android phones in UK and Spain."Fortnite will now return to iOS in Japan and UK next year, and EU this year! This is the new free world, from the point of view of app developers and users. It’s a big club and we ain't in it: The United States of America is still locked behind Apple's Iron Curtain," Sweeney said on X in June 2024.Disclosure: The author of this piece has previously contributed editorial work to the Epic Games Store News section.Related:Read more about:Top StoriesAppleEpic GamesDaily news, dev blogs, and stories from Game Developer straight to your inboxStay UpdatedYou May Also Like
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
    Please log in to like, share and comment!
  • Epic resubmits Fortnite to Apple after CEO reveals it has yet to be approved

    Apple was recently forced to scrap fees for non-App Store purchases, resulting in the battle royale's planned return.
    #epic #resubmits #fortnite #apple #after
    Epic resubmits Fortnite to Apple after CEO reveals it has yet to be approved
    Apple was recently forced to scrap fees for non-App Store purchases, resulting in the battle royale's planned return. #epic #resubmits #fortnite #apple #after
    Epic resubmits Fortnite to Apple after CEO reveals it has yet to be approved
    hitmarker.net
    Apple was recently forced to scrap fees for non-App Store purchases, resulting in the battle royale's planned return.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
    Please log in to like, share and comment!
  • Epic pulls, resubmits Fortnite's US App Store request after not hearing back from Apple all week

    Epic Games has withdrawn its initial submission for Fortnite to return to the iPhone App Store in the US, after Apple failed to approve the game for launch this week.
    #epic #pulls #resubmits #fortnite039s #app
    Epic pulls, resubmits Fortnite's US App Store request after not hearing back from Apple all week
    Epic Games has withdrawn its initial submission for Fortnite to return to the iPhone App Store in the US, after Apple failed to approve the game for launch this week. #epic #pulls #resubmits #fortnite039s #app
    Epic pulls, resubmits Fortnite's US App Store request after not hearing back from Apple all week
    www.eurogamer.net
    Epic Games has withdrawn its initial submission for Fortnite to return to the iPhone App Store in the US, after Apple failed to approve the game for launch this week. Read more
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
    Please log in to like, share and comment!
  • Epic resubmits 'Fortnite' to the App Store for review, as its initial request seemingly ignored

    Epic Games has once again submitted "Fortnite" to the U.S. App Store for review, after Apple seemingly ignored its previous submission for five days.Epic Games has resubmitted 'Fortnite' to the U.S. App Store for review.On May 9, after announcing its intentions a few days prior, Epic Games tried to get Fortnite back on the App Store by submitting the game for review. While most applications typically get reviewed within 24 hours, this was not the case with Fortnite. Instead, there were no developments in regards to the game's review process for more than 120 hours, or five days.Given that its request went unanswered for such a long time, Epic Games understandably decided to cancel its initial request for a review. Fortnite leaker Shiima revealed that Epic has submitted a second review request, with the company's CEO Tim Sweeney later confirming the details himself, MacRumors notes. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
    #epic #resubmits #039fortnite039 #app #store
    Epic resubmits 'Fortnite' to the App Store for review, as its initial request seemingly ignored
    Epic Games has once again submitted "Fortnite" to the U.S. App Store for review, after Apple seemingly ignored its previous submission for five days.Epic Games has resubmitted 'Fortnite' to the U.S. App Store for review.On May 9, after announcing its intentions a few days prior, Epic Games tried to get Fortnite back on the App Store by submitting the game for review. While most applications typically get reviewed within 24 hours, this was not the case with Fortnite. Instead, there were no developments in regards to the game's review process for more than 120 hours, or five days.Given that its request went unanswered for such a long time, Epic Games understandably decided to cancel its initial request for a review. Fortnite leaker Shiima revealed that Epic has submitted a second review request, with the company's CEO Tim Sweeney later confirming the details himself, MacRumors notes. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums #epic #resubmits #039fortnite039 #app #store
    Epic resubmits 'Fortnite' to the App Store for review, as its initial request seemingly ignored
    appleinsider.com
    Epic Games has once again submitted "Fortnite" to the U.S. App Store for review, after Apple seemingly ignored its previous submission for five days.Epic Games has resubmitted 'Fortnite' to the U.S. App Store for review.On May 9, after announcing its intentions a few days prior, Epic Games tried to get Fortnite back on the App Store by submitting the game for review. While most applications typically get reviewed within 24 hours, this was not the case with Fortnite. Instead, there were no developments in regards to the game's review process for more than 120 hours, or five days.Given that its request went unanswered for such a long time, Epic Games understandably decided to cancel its initial request for a review. Fortnite leaker Shiima revealed that Epic has submitted a second review request, with the company's CEO Tim Sweeney later confirming the details himself, MacRumors notes. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
    Please log in to like, share and comment!
  • Carter Gregson Gray submits plans for care homes and affordable housing

    The up-and-coming studio has lodged plans with Westminster City Council – also the scheme’s backer – for permission to demolish two single-storey adult care buildings on the site in Maida Vale and replace them with three new blocks.
    Bungalows at 291 Harrow Road and the neighbouring 1-2 Elmfield Way are currently used to house 13 people with varying needs.
    Associated communal and support spaces would also go under the plans, as would a temporary multi-use games area for which planning consent has lapsed.
    In their place, the practice would build three adjoining blocks to deliver new residential, commercial, cultural and sports space.
    A communal lounge and co-working facility would be provided for privately-owned homes, while a 230m² all-weather sports space would be created.Advertisement
    The scheme, which has been designed with landscape specialist Farrer Huxley would also include 272 cycle spaces and a roof garden for social care residents, families and staff.
    Carter Gregson Gray said its scheme ‘gathers people together and celebrates community … At its heart lies a garden designed for rest, play and conversation: a place of connection.’
    Floor plan 291 Harrow Road (fourth plan)
    It said the central block in the V-shaped development would ‘provide generous light-filled homes for 24 residents with additional needs’.
    The multi-purpose, all-weather play space would ‘provide residents and the wider community with a high-quality accessible sports and leisure venue which takes pride of place’, added the practice.
    ‘It is imagined as a beacon for the people of the area.’
    Meanwhile, wide pavements, rain gardens, trees and social spaces would be used with the ambition of ‘establishing a new urban character’.Advertisement
    The practice added: ‘As a backdrop to this, the architecture seeks to establish a quiet order to the site, driven by environmental ambitions and the experience of residents and passers-by.
    The buildings are robust, precise and delicate, reflecting the predominant materiality of the area while introducing a new tradition in Westminster.’

    Source: https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/carter-gregson-gray-submits-plans-for-care-homes-and-affordable-housing">https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/carter-gregson-gray-submits-plans-for-care-homes-and-affordable-housing">https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/carter-gregson-gray-submits-plans-for-care-homes-and-affordable-housing
    #carter #gregson #gray #submits #plans #for #care #homes #and #affordable #housing
    Carter Gregson Gray submits plans for care homes and affordable housing
    The up-and-coming studio has lodged plans with Westminster City Council – also the scheme’s backer – for permission to demolish two single-storey adult care buildings on the site in Maida Vale and replace them with three new blocks. Bungalows at 291 Harrow Road and the neighbouring 1-2 Elmfield Way are currently used to house 13 people with varying needs. Associated communal and support spaces would also go under the plans, as would a temporary multi-use games area for which planning consent has lapsed. In their place, the practice would build three adjoining blocks to deliver new residential, commercial, cultural and sports space. A communal lounge and co-working facility would be provided for privately-owned homes, while a 230m² all-weather sports space would be created.Advertisement The scheme, which has been designed with landscape specialist Farrer Huxley would also include 272 cycle spaces and a roof garden for social care residents, families and staff. Carter Gregson Gray said its scheme ‘gathers people together and celebrates community … At its heart lies a garden designed for rest, play and conversation: a place of connection.’ Floor plan 291 Harrow Road (fourth plan) It said the central block in the V-shaped development would ‘provide generous light-filled homes for 24 residents with additional needs’. The multi-purpose, all-weather play space would ‘provide residents and the wider community with a high-quality accessible sports and leisure venue which takes pride of place’, added the practice. ‘It is imagined as a beacon for the people of the area.’ Meanwhile, wide pavements, rain gardens, trees and social spaces would be used with the ambition of ‘establishing a new urban character’.Advertisement The practice added: ‘As a backdrop to this, the architecture seeks to establish a quiet order to the site, driven by environmental ambitions and the experience of residents and passers-by. The buildings are robust, precise and delicate, reflecting the predominant materiality of the area while introducing a new tradition in Westminster.’ Source: https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/carter-gregson-gray-submits-plans-for-care-homes-and-affordable-housing #carter #gregson #gray #submits #plans #for #care #homes #and #affordable #housing
    Carter Gregson Gray submits plans for care homes and affordable housing
    www.architectsjournal.co.uk
    The up-and-coming studio has lodged plans with Westminster City Council – also the scheme’s backer – for permission to demolish two single-storey adult care buildings on the site in Maida Vale and replace them with three new blocks. Bungalows at 291 Harrow Road and the neighbouring 1-2 Elmfield Way are currently used to house 13 people with varying needs. Associated communal and support spaces would also go under the plans, as would a temporary multi-use games area for which planning consent has lapsed. In their place, the practice would build three adjoining blocks to deliver new residential, commercial, cultural and sports space. A communal lounge and co-working facility would be provided for privately-owned homes, while a 230m² all-weather sports space would be created.Advertisement The scheme, which has been designed with landscape specialist Farrer Huxley would also include 272 cycle spaces and a roof garden for social care residents, families and staff. Carter Gregson Gray said its scheme ‘gathers people together and celebrates community … At its heart lies a garden designed for rest, play and conversation: a place of connection.’ Floor plan 291 Harrow Road (fourth plan) It said the central block in the V-shaped development would ‘provide generous light-filled homes for 24 residents with additional needs’. The multi-purpose, all-weather play space would ‘provide residents and the wider community with a high-quality accessible sports and leisure venue which takes pride of place’, added the practice. ‘It is imagined as a beacon for the people of the area.’ Meanwhile, wide pavements, rain gardens, trees and social spaces would be used with the ambition of ‘establishing a new urban character’.Advertisement The practice added: ‘As a backdrop to this, the architecture seeks to establish a quiet order to the site, driven by environmental ambitions and the experience of residents and passers-by. The buildings are robust, precise and delicate, reflecting the predominant materiality of the area while introducing a new tradition in Westminster.’
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
    Please log in to like, share and comment!
Upgrade to Pro
Choose the Plan That's Right for You
Upgrade
CGShares https://cgshares.com