• These People Found Fame and Moneyon LinkedIn
    www.wsj.com
    The site, once known for wonky posts and career congratulations, has become a path to stardom for workers who arent afraid to inject a little personality.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·52 Views
  • Read the email Paul Weiss Chairman Brad Karp sent to staff after striking a deal with Trump: 'Clients perceived our firm as being persona non grata'
    www.businessinsider.com
    Paul Weiss Chairman Brad Karp sent an email to employees on Sunday.The email addressed the firm's deal with Trump after an executive order targeted it.Karp acknowledged that "many" employees are "uncomfortable" over the resolution.Paul Weiss Chairman Brad Karp knows some employees feel uneasy about the law firm's deal with the Trump administration.So he sent an email.Paul Weiss is among several major firms that President Donald Trump has targeted this month with executive orders over their DEI policies and political affiliations. The orders revoked the security clearance of lawyers at Paul Weiss and called for the review of the firm's government contracts. The firm is associated with Trump's political rivals, including attorney Mark Pomerantz, who left the firm to join the Manhattan district attorney's investigation into Trump's finances.After the order, uncertainty gripped the law firm and it began losing clients. Then, Trump announced on Friday he had reached a resolution with Paul Weiss and withdrew the executive order. The resolution included specific stipulations, including providing $40 million in pro bono services to the administration.The deal shocked some in the legal community, which was alarmed by what some saw as a capitulation by the powerful firm. Karp attempted to address those concerns in an email to staffers on Sunday. The email was first reported by the legal publication Original Jurisdiction. A Paul Weiss representative confirmed the contents of the email to Business Insider.Here is a copy of the full email:Subject: Statement to the PW CommunityDear Members of the Paul, Weiss Community,I wanted to take this opportunity to speak with all of you more fully about the events of recent days. I know that this has been a profoundly unsettling time for all of you. Information gaps have been filled with speculation, concern, and misinformation, and I wanted to take this opportunity to address your concerns directly. Thank you for taking the time to listen.Late in the evening of Friday, March 14, the President issued an executive order targeting our firm. Since then, we have been facing an unprecedented threat to our firm unlike anything since Samuel Weiss first hung out a shingle in downtown Manhattan on April 1, 1875almost exactly 150 years ago.Only several days ago, our firm faced an existential crisis. The executive order could easily have destroyed our firm. It brought the full weight of the government down on our firm, our people, and our clients. In particular, it threatened our clients with the loss of their government contracts, and the loss of access to the government, if they continued to use the firm as their lawyers. And in an obvious effort to target all of you as well as the firm, it raised the specter that the government would not hire our employees.We were hopeful that the legal industry would rally to our side, even though it had not done so in response to executive orders targeting other firms. We had tried to persuade other firms to come out in public support of Covington and Perkins Coie. And we waited for firms to support us in the wake of the President's executive order targeting Paul, Weiss. Disappointingly, far from support, we learned that certain other firms were seeking to exploit our vulnerabilities by aggressively soliciting our clients and recruiting our attorneys.We initially prepared to challenge the executive order in court, and a team of Paul, Weiss attorneys prepared a lawsuit in the finest traditions of the firm. But it became clear that, even if we were successful in initially enjoining the executive order in litigation, it would not solve the fundamental problem, which was that clients perceived our firm as being persona non grata with the Administration. We could prevent the executive order from taking effect, but we couldn't erase it. Clients had told us that they were not going to be able to stay with us, even though they wanted to. It was very likely that our firm would not be able to survive a protracted dispute with the Administration.At the same time, we learned that the Administration might be willing to reach a resolution with us. So, working with our outside counsel, we did exactly what we advise our clients to do in "bet the company" litigation every day: we talked with the Administration to see if we could achieve a lasting settlement that would not require us to compromise our core values and fundamental principles.In a matter of days, we were able to negotiate such a resolution. That resolution, the terms of which I shared with all of you on Thursday evening, had three primary components. First, we reiterated our commitment to viewpoint diversity, including in recruiting and in the intake of new matters. Second, while retaining our longstanding commitment to diversity in all of its forms, we agreed that we would follow the law with respect to our employment practices. And third, we agreed to commit $10 million per year over the next four years in pro bono time in three areas in which we are already doing significant work: assisting our Nation's veterans, countering anti-Semitism, and promoting the fairness of the justice system.To be clear, and to clarify misinformation perpetuated from various media sources, the Administration is not dictating what matters we take on, approving our matters, or anything like that. We obviously would not, and could not ethically, have agreed to that. Instead, we have agreed to commit substantial pro bono resources, in addition to the $130+ million we already commit annually, in areas of shared interest. We will continue all of the existing pro bono work we already do and will continue in our longstanding role as a leader of the private bar in the pro bono and public interest sphere.This existential crisis required the leadership of our law firm to make incredibly difficult decisions under extraordinary time pressure. In making those decisions, we were guided by two fundamental principles. First and foremost, we were guided by our obligation to protect our clients' interests. As I mentioned earlier, we concluded that even a victory in litigation would not be sufficient to do so, because our firm would still be perceived as persona non grata with the Administration. We simply could not practice law in the Paul, Weiss way if we were still subject to the executive order. This resolution was unambiguously in our clients' best interests.Equally important, we were guided by our fiduciary duty to all of youby our obligation, as stewards of the firm, to protect the livelihoods of the 2,500 lawyers and non-legal professionals who work at Paul, Weiss. That considerationthe need to ensure, above all, that our firm would surviveweighed extremely heavily on all of us, and especially on me, as the leader of the firm.In today's political environment, it is unsurprising that the announcement that we have negotiated a resolution with the Administration, rather than fighting it in court, has generated intense feelings across the firm and indeed across the entire legal and broader community. As is often the case in situations like this, the extensive media coverage and social media commentary surrounding recent events has taken on a life of its own, with its own factual narrative and its own momentum. The coverage has been decidedly unhelpful, piecemeal, and incorrect in many fundamental respects. But it is not particularly constructive for any of us involved to debate factual discrepancies. Instead, what is most important is to look to the future. In this regard, I want to provide some clarity and perspective as we move forward.First, and most important, we have quickly solved a seemingly intractable problem and removed a cloud of uncertainty that was hanging over our law firm. Our clients have been overwhelmingly supportive, expressing relief at the resolution of this situation and the fact that, as the President publicly has acknowledged, our firm now has an engaged and constructive relationship with this Administration. Thousands of clients have reached out directly to express their continued confidence in Paul, Weiss and their appreciation for our unwavering dedication to their matters throughout this period and our ability to quickly secure a resolution that will redound to their benefit. Even those who have expressed personal disappointment that we didn't fight the Administration have said they fully appreciate what was at stake for our law firm and respect our decision.Second, the resolution we reached with the Administration will have no effect on our work and our shared culture and values. The core of who we are and what we stand for is and will remain unchanged. To that end, we will continue our proud, century-long legacy of courageously standing up for fundamental rights and liberties, for fairness in the justice system, and for our society's most vulnerable individuals. That commitment is woven into our DNA; it was and will never be subject to negotiation or compromise.Third, we will continue to support each of you in your career journey, providing you with the world's best training and opportunities to advance and thrive in your field. Above all, we will continue to be a place where we enjoy working together; where we respect each other; where we can practice law at the highest levels of excellence.I know many of you are uncomfortable that we entered into any sort of resolution at all. That is completely understandable. There was no right answer to the predicament in which we found ourselves. All of us have opinions about what is going on right now in America. This is an incredibly consequential moment for our country. It is very easy for commentators to judge our actions from the sidelines. But no one in the wider world can appreciate how stressful it is to confront an executive order like this until one is directed at you.I want to close by expressing my profound gratitude to each of you. Since March 14, we have seen Paul, Weiss at its very best, supporting each other in the face of an unprecedented threat. You have demonstrated, once again, the extraordinary caliber of our Paul, Weiss community. Your professionalism, your dedication to our clients, your support for one another, and your commitment to our firm have been nothing short of remarkable under these impossibly challenging circumstances. I am confident that, just as we have in past crises, we will get through this together and become even stronger and more resilient as a community.To that end, my door is open to you as we navigate next steps, as are the doors of firm leadership. This has been a deeply painful experience for me and for the other leaders of the firm. I know it has been a profoundly difficult period for many of you. Since March 14, we have been weathering a terrible storm. But I know that we will get through this storm, and that we will continue to uphold the proud traditions that have defined Paul, Weiss for the last 150 years. I am so thankful for each and every one of you, and for all that you do every day for this very special place and for our broader communities.BradBrad S. Karp | ChairmanPaul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·57 Views
  • Former assistant US attorney put on leave over federal DEI policies compares Trump's tactics to communist Czechoslovakia
    www.businessinsider.com
    2025-03-23T23:34:22Z Read in app Alex Kristofcak resigned from his post at the US Attorney's Office of SDNY. Courtesy of Alex Kristofcak. This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now.Have an account? Former Assistant US Attorney Alex Kristofcak was put on leave after criticizing Trump's DEI policy.He has since left his position at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.Kristofcak is now urging leaders to speak out against Trump's attacks on the judiciary.A former assistant US attorney said he was put on leave after publicly criticizing the Trump administration's DEI policies.He's not going quietly.Alex Kristofcak, 44, who was until recently a federal attorney focused on civil litigation in the Southern District of New York, was put on administrative leave after a "critical social media post."He has since resigned from his position altogether, though he plans to continue working in the legal industry, he told Business Insider.In a LinkedIn post two weeks ago, Kristofcak criticized a US attorney in Washington, DC, who sent a letter to the dean of Georgetown Law School to enforce anti-DEI policies at the university. Kristofcak called the letter a "grotesque abuse of power" at the time.The next day, he was placed on administrative leave."I've been told in no uncertain terms that my criticism prompted this action," Kristofcak said in a new LinkedIn post on Saturday.The US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York could not be reached by phone Sunday evening. The White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Business Insider."While the experience has been jarring, it is not wholly surprising: the Trump administration has made it clear that it does not tolerate dissent," Kristofcak said on LinkedIn.Trump has also targeted several Big Law firms like Paul Weiss, Perkins Coie, and Covington & Burling ordering reviews of their government contracts, stripping the firm's lawyers of their security clearances, and preventing employees of the firms from entering federal buildings.Trump has described the firms as "dishonest and dangerous," accusing each of weaponizing the judicial process and threatening national security by representing his opponents or participating in investigations into his finances and behavior.In a memo on Friday, Trump ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to flag firms affiliated with "frivolous" lawsuits against his administration so that he could consider executive actions against them. Trump's memo called the behavior of some law firms "unscrupulous."Since taking office, the Trump administration has made sweeping changes to thefederal government, targeting everything from public education to veteran affairs.Many of the president's executive orders have been blocked or delayed by judges amid ongoing lawsuits, including challenging the termination of DEI programs."I was already planning to leave the Department of Justice at the end of the month. I had concluded that the hostile environment created by President Trump, Elon Musk, and the political appointees at the Justice Department made my position untenable," Kristofcak said on LinkedIn.The politicization of the department and "the treatment of other career employees" pushed him to leave his post, he told BI."As we speak, there are a lot of conversations happening where people are trying to figure out where they want to land on the spectrum of responses," Kristofcak said. "In the next couple of days, implicitly, everyone is either going to take a stand one way or another, or they will stay silent. That, in and of itself, will speak volumes."There has been an exodus of top staff at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. In February, several top prosecutors resigned after refusing to abide by the Justice Department's request tocharges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams.On LinkedIn, Kristofcak urged those in positions of power to speak out."I grew up watching a totalitarian system collapse, giving way to democracy. Now, I find myself witnessing concerning parallels in my adopted homeland," Kristofcak said. "Speaking out may have cost me my position, but silence would have cost me much more."He told BI that the responses from those in the industry over the next few days will be critical."Unfortunately, I really do believe that this is one of those things where everyone stands together or everyone falls together," he said.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·56 Views
  • a wallpaper i made for my phone using blender
    i.redd.it
    submitted by /u/Dry_Salt_1317 [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·56 Views
  • RT Humanoid History: The art of Syd Mead (1933-2019)
    x.com
    RTHumanoid HistoryThe art of Syd Mead (1933-2019)
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·56 Views
  • I'm Gleb and this is my work with @AidyBurrows3D
    x.com
    I'm Gleb and this is my work with @AidyBurrows3D Matt Tkocz:I'm Matt and this is my work
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·53 Views
  • RT Ian Hubert: Huh! My red curtains only seem to turn certain materials red (check out the shoes-vs-laces). Does anyone know why?? The pictures match ...
    x.com
    RTIan HubertHuh! My red curtains only seem to turn certain materials red (check out the shoes-vs-laces). Does anyone know why?? The pictures match what my eyes saw pretty closely. The one where my clothes are their natural green was with the overhead light on.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·50 Views
  • He has a villainous look to him
    x.com
    He has a villainous look to himMario Nawfal:ACTIVIST JUDGE BOASBERG CLAIMED J6 DEFENDANTS DESERVED HARSHER CHARGES CALLED FOR "NEW LAWS" TO PUNISH THEMIn a shocking 2023 speech to law students, Judge James Boasberg who ruled over many January 6th cases openly admitted the law wasnt harsh enough to punish
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·58 Views
  • 0 Comments ·0 Shares ·58 Views
  • 0 Comments ·0 Shares ·68 Views