Reddit
Reddit
The heart of the internet, where millions gather for conversation and community.
2 people like this
1291 Posts
3 Photos
0 Videos
0 Reviews
Recent Updates
  • Activists brand Tesla vehicles with 'Swasticar' stickers
    www.newsweek.com
    CLOSE X By Marni Rose McFall Live News Reporter A U.K. group called Everyone Hates Elon is branding hundreds of Tesla vehicles in London with stickers saying "don't buy swasticars," according to a Novara Media Instagram post.Newsweek has reached out to a Tesla via email, and to Everyone Hates Elon via social media for comment.Why It MattersMusk, the richest man in the world and a close ally of President Donald Trump, has grown increasingly unpopular in the U.K. after using his platform X to push far-right political movements, and attack elected U.K. politicians. Activists are using the salute Musk made at Trump's inauguration to hit back by trying to taint his brand with a reference to the Third Reich's swastika symbol.Tesla, SpaceX and X CEO Elon Musk gestures while speaking during an inauguration event at Capital One Arena on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Tesla, SpaceX and X CEO Elon Musk gestures while speaking during an inauguration event at Capital One Arena on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Christopher Furlong/Getty Images What To KnowIn a post shared on Instagram by the outlet Novara Media @novaramedia, video footage shows individuals putting the "don't buy a swasticar," sticker above the Tesla logo on vehicles around London.A recent survey by The Times and YouGov found that in the U.K, 71 percent of people have an unfavorable view of Musk, which is a seven-point increase since their last poll in November.The post says: "The People vs Elon campaign, launched on Sunday, is already projected to raise more than 50,000 for anti-racist and anti-fascist causes. Last week, UK activists turned each tweet Musk posted into donations, where donors pledge as little as 1p per tweet. The money is donated evenly between organizations such as Everyday Racism, Rainbow Migration and Women for Refugee Women."This post, and the post from the Everyone Hates Elon account state that Musk is reportedly furious over people calling Tesla cars "Swasticars."The backlash against Musk following the inauguration gesture, seen by many as resembling a Nazi salute, has been prolonged and from a number of different sources. The Everyone Hates Elon group are not the only activists criticizing Musk.Two left-wing activist groups, Led By Donkeys from the U.K. and Germany's Center for Political Beauty recently claimed responsibility after they beamed an image of Elon Musk making the inauguration salute onto Tesla's gigafacory in Berlin, along with the words "Heil Tesla."At the end of March, 2024, Tesla announced its 200,000th sale in the U.K, meaning one fifth of all EVs on U.K. roads are Teslas, according to carmagazine.co.uk.Many people have come to Musk's defense, denying he made a Nazi salute.During his inauguration speech, Musk said: "I just want to say thank you for making it happen, thank you." He then pumped his hand against his chest, extended his straightened arm upward toward the crowd, with his fingers outstretched and palm facing downward.Immediately afterward, he said, "my heart goes out to you. It's because of you that the future of civilization is assured."What People Are SayingElon Musk, on X, in response to critics: "Frankly, they need better dirty tricks. The 'everyone is Hitler' attack is sooo tired."The Anti-Defamation League, on X: "It seems that @elonmusk made an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm, not a Nazi salute, but again, we appreciate that people are on edge."British journalist Owen Jones, on X: "This honestly could not look more like a Nazi salute."Everyone Hates Elon in a post on their Instagram: "Elon Musk is reportedly furious people keep calling Teslas "Swasticars.'" So activists put hundreds of Swasticar stickers on Teslas in central London."What's NextMusk is expected to be deeply involved in the Trump administration as the head of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).Do you have a story Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@newsweek.com. fairness meterfairness meterNewsweek is committed to journalism that's factual and fair.Hold us accountable and submit your rating of this article on the meter. Newsweek is committed to journalism that's factual and fair.Hold us accountable and submit your rating of this article on the meter. Click On Meter To Rate This ArticleConfirm your selectionComment on your rating Share
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·51 Views
  • 0 Comments ·0 Shares ·48 Views
  • Mark Zuckerbergs makeover didnt make people like him, study shows
    techcrunch.com
    A study by the Pew Research Center found that Americans views of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg skew more negative than positive.While Zuckerberg has sparked chatter in Silicon Valley with his sudden interest in high fashion, the Meta CEO is less popular than President Trumps right-hand man, Elon Musk, the report found. While about 54% of U.S. adults say they have an unfavorable view of Musk, 67% feel negatively toward Zuckerberg.The two tech executives have come under increased scrutiny since the start of President Trumps second term; both sat alongside the president at his inauguration and made donations to his inauguration fund. While Zuckerberg has upended long-standing Meta content moderation policies to limit fact-checking and action against hate speech, Musk has played a key role in Trumps camp thus far.Throughout the first month of Trumps presidency, Musk has directly involved himself in the U.S. government operations, using his political connections to gut government departments like USAID, which provides humanitarian aid around the world. Musks DOGE meanwhile on Monday overstated the impact of its budget cuts by billions of dollars.Given Musks affiliation with Trump, it follows that along party lines, 85% of respondents who are Democrats or who lean Democratic held unfavorable views of the Tesla CEO. Meanwhile, 73% of Republican or Republican-aligned respondents felt favorably toward Musk.But Zuckerberg, the Facebook founder, is more universally disliked, though he draws more ire from the left-leaning demographic. While 60% of Republican and Republican-leaning respondents hold an unfavorable view of Zuckerberg, 76% of their Democratic counterparts share that sentiment. So, while Zuck may be playing the part of the cool guy, Americans havent been fooled by his gold chains or musical ambitions, it seems.Pews study involved a panel of 5,086 randomly selected U.S. adults. The survey was conducted from January 27, 2025, through February 2, 2025, so these responses reflect peoples recent opinions.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·46 Views
  • Crystal shader v2.01
    www.reddit.com
    I tweaked the bump texture and displacement bump texture. The second crystal is the same material, but different shape and using a displace modifier voronoi texture. submitted by /u/Coreypollack [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·60 Views
  • FBI Says Backup NowConfirms Dangerous Attacks Underway
    www.forbes.com
    The FBI warns organizations to backup now.Getty ImagesUpdate, Feb. 21, 2025: This story, originally published Feb. 20, now includes expert commentary from a number of security professionals regarding the FBI Ghost ransomware warning.Phishing, social engineering, scams, or whatever label you like to attach to the click here campaigns so beloved of attackers the world over is not the only security threat you need to pay attention to. I mean, that should go without saying, but ignoring other attack methodologies is akin to burying your head in the sand while someone steals your bucket and spade afterward.The Federal Bureau of Investigation has just published a new security advisory warning of one such non-phishing attack being exploited in an ongoing and particularly dangerous ransomware campaign known as Ghost. Heres what you need to know and what the FBI warns you should do with the utmost urgency to stay protected.FBI Issues Critical Ghost Ransomware Security AdvisoryA joint security advisory published Feb. 19 by the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, AA25-050A, has warned organizations around the world of a dangerous ransomware group known as Ghost, which is carrying out ongoing attacks targeting multiple industry sectors across more than 70 countries.The threat actors, working out of China according to the FBI, go by many different names although Ghost appears to be the most common: Cring, Crypt3r, Phantom, Strike, Hello, Wickrme, HsHarada and Rapture, for example. What doesnt vary, however, is the attack methodology. Rather than using phishing techniques, the chosen method for the vast majority of ransomware attacks these days, Ghost prefers to use publicly available code to exploit known security vulnerabilities in software and firmware that their operators have not patched. They do this to gain access to internet-facing servers and ultimately strike with the ransomware payload.The FBI has observed Ghost actors obtaining initial access to networks by exploiting public facing applications that are associated with multiple Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, the advisory said. Their methodology includes leveraging vulnerabilities in Fortinet FortiOS appliances, servers running Adobe ColdFusion, Microsoft SharePoint and Microsoft Exchange, commonly referred to as the ProxyShell attack chain.Security Professionals Respond To The FBI Ghost WarningGhost is a dangerous nation-state threat actor which organizations must make efforts to protect against, Juliette Hudson, chief technology officer at CybaVerse, said; The group is actively exploiting known CVEs in ubiquitous tech, highlighting the need for organizations to prioritize patching and remediation efforts. And there lies the rub. "The Ghost ransomware campaign highlights the persistent reality that adversaries exploit known vulnerabilities faster than many organizations can patch them, Darren Guccione, CEO of Keeper Security, warned. Which can only reinforce a critical need for proactive risk management, with security leaders having to ensure that software, firmware and identity systems are continuously updated and hardened against exploitation. Beyond patching, identity security is a persistent weak point in defending against ransomware attacks, Guccione said; Enterprises should implement a privileged access management solution to enforce multi-factor authentication, a zero-trust framework and least-privilege access controls to prevent lateral movement.Joe Silva, CEO at Spektion, agreed that the Ghost ransomware attacks would appear to highlight the fact that threat actors are capitalizing on what you might call patch fatigue by exploiting the gaps left by overwhelmed security teams. This proves legacy vulnerability management practices cant keep up with the exploding number of vulnerabilities that attackers are taking advantage of, Silva warned; Instead, organizations need real-time, contextual insights into how their software behaves within their specific environments by using tools that have a strong signal to noise ratio based on actual risks rather than potential risks that overwhelm security teams.Ghosts credential theft is a stark reminder that hackers are always a step ahead, says Rom Carmel, CEO at Apono. By compromising legitimate accounts, they can infiltrate deeper into environments and target an organization's most sensitive resources, Carmel warned; To reduce the blast radius of account compromises, organizations must not only authenticate access but also enforce precise, rightsized privileges and limit the availability of access to high-value resources.Finally, Tim Mackey, head of software supply chain risk strategy at Black Duck, told me that such attacks on legacy cyber-physical and Internet of Things devices are to be expected and, as such, must be planned for as part of the operational requirements for the device. Attackers know that best practices evolve, Mackey said, and even the most secure device from a decade ago is likely quite vulnerable to a modern-day attack, let alone those that may be mounted in the future. Given that the usable life span of any cyber-physical device is measured in years, and potentially decades, organizations acquiring any such device should work closely with their suppliers to ensure a long-term operations and risk mitigation plan is created that covers not only availability of patches but active sharing of threat scenario data, Mackey concluded.Four Steps To Take Today, According To The FBIThe FBI has advised that all organizations take the following actions, and take them today, to mitigate the risks attached to this most dangerous of ransomware attack campaigns.Maintain regular system backups stored separately from the source systems which cannot be altered or encrypted by potentially compromised network devices.Patch known vulnerabilities by applying timely security updates to operating systems, software, and firmware within a risk-informed timeframe.Segment networks to restrict lateral movement from initial infected devices and other devices in the same organization.Require Phishing-Resistant MFA for access to all privileged accounts and email services accounts.Ghost is a dangerous nation-state threat actor which organisations must take efforts to protect against, Juliette Hudson, chief technology officer at CybaVerse, said. The group is actively exploiting known CVEs in ubiquitous tech, highlighting the need for organisations to prioritise patching and remediation efforts.This advisory from the FBI and CISA highlights that the Ghost ransomware operation is utilising vulnerability exploits to gain access to organisations, which is divergence from the typical ransomware attacks that are executed via social engineering, Simon Phillips, chief technology officer at SecureAck, said. Given that the products Ghost targets are designed for businesses and the CVEs being exploited are so outdated, this highlights an urgent need to reinforce fundamental security practices.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·46 Views
  • Lost
    www.reddit.com
    submitted by /u/Sufficient-Limit-392 [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·56 Views
  • Trump orders database on federal police misconduct to close
    www.axios.com
    submitted by /u/Yacht_Taxing_Unit [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·38 Views
  • Finally finished this Render
    www.reddit.com
    My newest render! After many struggles I can proudly say it's done submitted by /u/No-Strawberry-3293 [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·50 Views
  • Meta approves bonuses of up to 200% of company executives' salaries as it trims stock awards for employees
    www.businessinsider.com
    Meta approved a plan that could allow executives to earn a bonus of up to 200% of their base pay.The move came the same month as Meta's efforts to reduce its workforce by about 4,000 employees.Meta also trimmed the value of annual equity refreshers some staff receive by about 10%, sources told BI.Meta approved a plan that could give company executives a bonus of up to 200% of their base salary, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing submitted on Thursday.The company said in the filing that the bonus plan would provide "variable cash incentives" designed to "motivate its executive officers to focus on company priorities and to reward them for company results and achievements."The plan would allow for an increase in the bonus package from 75% to 200% of base pay, the company said.The bonus boost wouldn't apply to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. This isn't an uncommon practice since chief executive compensation can be structured differently, focusing more on stock options.Meta also recently trimmed the value of annual equity refreshers some staffers receive by about 10%, according to two people familiar with the matter who spoke with BI but asked not to be identified as they weren't authorized to speak with the media.The reduction in the total amount of restricted stock units means some employees would receive about 10% less in the stock refreshers each quarter this year that vest over a four-year period.That means, for example, if an employee previously received $220,000 in stock refreshers to vest over four years, they would now get about $200,000 worth of RSUs over the same period. Equity refreshers often form a significant part of workers' remuneration alongside salary and bonuses.A Meta spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.In the SEC filing, the company wrote that its compensation, nominating, and governance committee approved the change after analyzing market data for executive compensation. They determined the target total cash compensation for their executives "was at or below the 15th percentile of the target total cash compensation of executives holding similar positions."The new target puts the compensation in the 50th percentile, according to the filing.The approval came amid another round of job cuts at Meta this month. The company said it aimed to eliminate about 5% of its workforce, which would amount to nearly 4,000 employees.Zuckerberg said the cuts were meant to target "low performers" as the company looked to streamline its operations in "an intense year" and invest heavily in artificial intelligence.In an internal memo announcing the cuts last month, Zuckerberg said Meta would backfill these roles this year. Meta is now ramping up hiring for machine-learning engineers and expediting recruiting in February and March.Are you a Meta employee? Got insight to share? Contact the reporter Jyoti Mann via email at jmann@businessinsider.com or via Signal at jyotimann.11. Reach out from a nonwork device.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·31 Views
  • Meta claims torrenting pirated books isnt illegal without proof of seeding
    arstechnica.com
    Defending a bad ratio Meta claims torrenting pirated books isnt illegal without proof of seeding Metas copyright defense may hinge on court ignorance of torrenting terminology. Ashley Belanger Feb 20, 2025 3:02 pm | 100 A peer who downloads more data than they upload on torrenting networks is known as a "leech" sucking up data without contributing to the swarm. Credit: phototrip | iStock / Getty Images Plus A peer who downloads more data than they upload on torrenting networks is known as a "leech" sucking up data without contributing to the swarm. Credit: phototrip | iStock / Getty Images Plus Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreJust because Meta admitted to torrenting a dataset of pirated books for AI training purposes, that doesn't necessarily mean that Meta seeded the file after downloading it, the social media company claimed in a court filing this week.Evidence instead shows that Meta "took precautions not to 'seed' any downloaded files," Meta's filing said. Seeding refers to sharing a torrented file after the download completes, and because there's allegedly no proof of such "seeding," Meta insisted that authors cannot prove Meta shared the pirated books with anyone during the torrenting process.Whether or not Meta actually seeded the pirated books could make a difference in a copyright lawsuit from book authors including Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, and Ta-Nehisi Coates. Authors had previously alleged that Meta unlawfully copied and distributed their works through AI outputsan increasingly common complaint that so far has barely been litigated. But Meta's admission to torrenting appears to add a more straightforward claim of unlawful distribution of copyrighted works through illegal torrenting, which has long been considered established case-law.Authors have alleged that "Meta deliberately engaged in one of the largest data piracy campaigns in history to acquire text data for its LLM training datasets, torrenting and sharing dozens of terabytes of pirated data that altogether contain many millions of copyrighted works." Separate from their copyright infringement claims opposing Meta's AI training on pirated copies of their books, authors alleged that Meta torrenting the dataset was "independently illegal" under California's Computer Data Access and Fraud Act (CDAFA), which allegedly "prevents the unauthorized taking of data, including copyrighted works."Meta, however, is hoping to convince the court that torrenting is not in and of itself illegal, but is, rather, a "widely-used protocol to download large files." According to Meta, the decision to download the pirated books dataset from pirate libraries like LibGen and Z-Library was simply a move to access "data from a 'well-known online repository' that was publicly available via torrents."To defend its torrenting, Meta has basically scrubbed the word "pirate" from the characterization of its activity. The company alleges that authors can't claim that Meta gained unauthorized access to their data under CDAFA. Instead, all they can claim is that "Meta allegedly accessed and downloaded datasets that Plaintiffs did not create, containing the text of published books that anyone can read in a public library, from public websites Plaintiffs do not operate or own."While Meta may claim there's no evidence of seeding, there is some testimony that might be compelling to the court. Previously, a Meta executive in charge of project management, Michael Clark, had testified that Meta allegedly modified torrenting settings "so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur," which seems to support authors' claims that some seeding occurred. And an internal message from Meta researcher Frank Zhang appeared to show that Meta allegedly tried to conceal the seeding by not using Facebook servers while downloading the dataset to "avoid" the "risk" of anyone "tracing back the seeder/downloader" from Facebook servers. Once this information came to light, authors asked the court for a chance to depose Meta executives again, alleging that new facts "contradict prior deposition testimony."Torrenting terminology may confuse courtHow successful Meta's torrenting defense will be is still up in the air, but authors pointed out that even if Meta somehow managed to avoid seeding any of the torrented books, the social media giant still participated in an "online piracy ring." Further, in a footnote, the authors told the court that "IP pirates like Meta also upload or share files with others during (leeching) and after (seeding) downloading." Additionally, TorrentFreak noted that Meta "taking precautions is not the same as preventing" seeding.Authors will likely push to persuade the court that merely by torrenting the file, Meta made "pirated works available to other users worldwide" while making it clear that even Meta can't claim to have prevented all seeding. A lawyer representing the authors declined to comment on whether ongoing discovery may surface more evidence to help prove the seeding claims. Lack of evidence could be a problem since TorrentFreak suggested the torrenting terminology may be foreign to the court, potentially muddying what authors feel otherwise is a straightforward claim that Meta allegedly knew it was violating laws by torrenting the pirated books.Meta has been silent so far on claims about sharing data while "leeching" (downloading) but told the court it plans to fight the seeding claims at summary judgment.At this time, Meta has moved to dismiss the authors' CDAFA claim as being preempted by copyright law, but unsurprisingly, the authors told the court that they strongly disagree."Had Meta bought Plaintiffs works in a bookstore or borrowed them from a library and then trained its LLMs on them without a license, it would have committed copyright infringement, but no CDAFA violation," the authors alleged. "Metas decision to bypass lawful acquisition methods and become a knowing participant in an illegal peer-to-peer piracy network provides the 'extra element' and is 'qualitatively different' to establish an independent CDAFA violation."Authors further linked the CDAFA claim to their copyright infringement claim opposing Meta's AI training. They alleged that by torrenting their works "from pirated databases in lieu of executing lawful licensing arrangements, Meta not only deprived Plaintiffs of that licensing revenue, but it also deprived Plaintiffs of additional revenue they could have generated from 'other users worldwide' because Meta simultaneously made the copyrighted works available to download by any interested Internet user in the process of acquiring Plaintiffs data" to train AI.Meta did not immediately respond to Ars' request for comment.Ashley BelangerSenior Policy ReporterAshley BelangerSenior Policy Reporter Ashley is a senior policy reporter for Ars Technica, dedicated to tracking social impacts of emerging policies and new technologies. She is a Chicago-based journalist with 20 years of experience. 100 Comments
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·35 Views
  • Cyberpunk girl 2
    i.redd.it
    submitted by /u/TerribleCGI22457 [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·58 Views
  • my mom told me this looks amazing, im passing the microphone to you guys now
    www.reddit.com
    https://preview.redd.it/raip0sy6jgke1.jpg?width=1820&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c71a965e3f2d22b487dd97531dc7eee0ce87802a https://preview.redd.it/nzmck187jgke1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=a83b573b5e967067d778a0f77a3688c99dd2d3a1 submitted by /u/braindxxdrat [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·22 Views
  • 0 Comments ·0 Shares ·31 Views
  • Temple of the Full Moon
    www.reddit.com
    submitted by /u/MaxHayArt [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·54 Views
  • 0 Comments ·0 Shares ·68 Views
  • 0 Comments ·0 Shares ·67 Views
  • My blender Retro Compositor
    v.redd.it
    https://www.instagram.com/rateon7 submitted by /u/TaroThat6538 [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·33 Views
  • Tesla Sales Are Tanking Across The World
    insideevs.com
    Bitcoin, emissions credits and promises about artificial intelligence can only do so much. Like it or not, Tesla is still a car company. And Tesla's sales are not off to a great start in 2025.In recent days, full-year and January sales results from various markets around the world indicate a bleak picture for the Elon Musk-led electric vehicle company. Even as it added the Cybertruck to its lineup in large volumes last yearwhich should have unlocked more buyers in America's expansive pickup truck fieldTesla is seeing serious declines in places where it once had a near-lock on electric sales. Let's take a look at some of the areas taking the hardest hits.Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox.As various outlets covered this week, theCalifornia New Car Dealers Association's (CADA) latest data indicates that EV sales leveled off in the Golden State last year, holding steady at 25.3% of new-car sales and just slightly up from 2023's result of 25%. Granted, while it's quite impressive for one in four new cars sold in California to be entirely electric, a slowdown in once-rapid EV growth has coincided with a big decline in Tesla sales.Their report doesn't mince words. "All of the decrease in the state market last year was attributable to Tesla, which had an 11.6% decline," it said. "Registrations for all other brands increased 1.4%." And that's for all new passenger vehicle registrations in California, not just EVs.Photo by: InsideEVsThe new Tesla Model Y will be released globally in March. Can it help reverse these sales declines?Toyota, Tesla, Honda, Ford, and Chevrolet were the market-shareleaders in California last year, and the Tesla Model Y kept its "best-selling light truck" crown. Yet California saw almost 30,000 fewer Model 3 registrations compared to 2023.The Model Y fared better, but was still down more than 4,000 units. The Cybertruck was California's top-selling electric truck, but cracked a mere 9,019 registrationsnot quite what you'd expect in an affluent, EV-friendly market and the one where Tesla was born. That was only 434 registrations off the aging and expensive Tesla Model X, for example.The story gets worse in other parts of the world. In Germany, where Tesla was the longtime EV sales leader even as new entries from Volkswagen, BMW, Audi and various Chinese brands started showing up, sales declined a whole 60% in Januaryjust1,277 registrations in Europe's biggest car market, according to Fortune.Teslas sales were also down 63% in France in January, another large car market, from a year earlier. They also dropped 8% in the UK year-over-year in January even as all-electric vehicle sales rose to 21% of the British new car market, a seven-point increase from 2024. "NoTesla cracked the UK's top 10 best-seller list last month, something that has regularly happened in the past," Ars Technica reported this week. And one trend that's especially worth watching is what's happening in China, which makes up more than a third of Tesla's global sales. In China, which leads the world in total all-electric and hybrid sales, Tesla dropped 11.5% in January.There are a few things that should be taken into account for these sales declines. Tesla once dominated EV sales but new competitors are showing up left and right, including in areas where Tesla doesn't play, like three-row SUVs.In China, sales often slow around the Lunar New Year holiday festivities and Tesla also implemented factory upgrades at itsGigafactory Shanghai plant to build the updated "Juniper" Model Y. And in several European markets, EV sales have been uneven or outright declined as various countries ended their subsidy programs; as a result, there are now calls for EU-wide subsidies that would promote growth across the entire bloc to counter new imports from China.But one factor feels inescapable at this point: the backlash to Elon Musk's increased involvement in politics. In the U.S., the Tesla CEO spent the past weekillegally, according to many lawyers and constitutional scholarsbreaching the U.S. Treasury Department's payment systemsas part of President Trump's effort to unilaterally defund various government agencies. In Germany, Musk's vocal support of thefar-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has been widely cited as a turn-off for EV buyers, and the same has been said of his politics in the UK.Though it's hard to gauge empirically, Musk's far-right political turn does seem to be having an effect on Tesla salesespecially among the more affluent, urban progressive-to-centrist buyers traditionally more inclined to buy EVs in many places. A recent report from the nonpartisan EV Politics Project indicates that Tesla and Musk are losing support among EV intenders and Democratic-leaning buyers faster than they're gaining support from people on the other side of the political spectrum, who tend to be less interested in EVs. In other words, Musk is losing Tesla sales ground with the traditional EV base, and not making it up with any of his new supporters.Photo by: InsideEVsEV Politics Project Slide"Republicans are creeping toward greater EV acceptance and willing or not, Elons journey to MAGA may have helped that," the group said in its latest report. "Meanwhile, the Elon-driven Tesla headwinds problem among non-Republican consumers is clearly growing."Though Tesla's stock surged after the election, attributed to investor faith in Musk's close relationship with Trump being able to help clear hurdles for goals like autonomous car deployment, it has sunk in recent days due to these dismal sales reports.The biggest thing to watch this year may be the release of the updated Model Y. In theory, a big refresh for the world's best-selling EV (and by some metrics, best-selling car, period) should jump-start sales in a major way. But if buyers are counting out the brand because of Musk, the success or failure of that car will be the ultimate barometer.Contact the author: patrick.george@insideevs.com More Tesla News Share this Story Got a tip for us? Email: tips@insideevs.com
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·61 Views
  • 0 Comments ·0 Shares ·61 Views
  • DOGE Now Has Access to the Top US Cybersecurity Agency
    www.wired.com
    Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old engineer with Elon Musks so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) known as Big Balls, is now on staff at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), WIRED has confirmed. He is joined by another member of the DOGE team, 38-year-old software engineer Kyle Schutt, who is now also on the CISA staff, according to a government source.CISA referred WIRED to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), of which its a component agency, when reached for comment. DHS did not immediately reply to a request for comment.Coristinebriefly an intern for Musks brain-computer interface company, Neuralink, as WIRED has reportedhas been working his way through numerous federal agencies and departments as a DOGE operative since January. He has been tracked at the General Services Administration (GSA), the Office of Personnel Management, the State Department, and FEMA. At States Bureau of Diplomatic Technology, he potentially had access to systems containing sensitive information about diplomats and many sources and spies around the world who provide the U.S. government with intelligence and expertise.As the journalist Marisa Kabas was first to report, he has now moved to CISA, a division of DHS. He is listed in the staff directory as a senior advisor.A second DOGE worker, Schutt, has also joined Coristine at CISA. Schutt has reportedly also been at the GSA. Prior to his work with DOGE, he worked on the launch of WinRed, a fundraising platform for Republicans that helped the party raise $1.8 billion during the 2024 election campaigns.Its not clear yet what level of access Coristine might have to data and networks at CISA, but the agency, which is responsible for the defense of civilian federal government networks and works closely with critical infrastructure owners around the country, stores a lot of sensitive and critical security information on its networks. This includes information about software vulnerabilities, breaches, and network risk assessments conducted for local and state election offices. Since 2018, CISA has helped state and local election offices around the country assess vulnerabilities in their networks and help secure them. CISA also works with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency to notify victims of breaches and process information about software vulnerabilities before the information becomes public.Got a Tip?Are you a current or former government employee who wants to talk about what's happening? We'd like to hear from you. Using a nonwork phone or computer, contact the reporter securely on Signal at Kimz.42.Coristine, as WIRED has previously reported, worked briefly in 2022 for Path Network, a network monitoring firm known for hiring reformed blackhat hackers. According to security journalist Brian Krebs, an account once associated with him was also previously linked with a loosely-formed cybercriminal community known as The Com, whose members have been responsible for various hacking operations in the last few years, including the hack of numerous Snowflake accounts. Coristine has not been associated with the Snowflake breaches, but as WIRED has reported, an account that has been associated with him did appear to suggest the owner of the account was seeking help to conduct a Distributed Denial of Service attacka criminal technique that involves launching extensive traffic at a domain to disable it and prevent legitimate traffic from reaching it. Krebs also reported that Path had fired Coristine for allegedly leaking internal company documents to a competitor.The Washington Post reported last week that Coristine had been assigned to the DHS as a senior advisor, but didnt indicate what part of the sprawling agency he had joined.Whats the point of fighting cybercrime if were just going to give access for government networks to people with cybercriminal gang affiliations? says a cybersecurity researcher who tracks cybercriminal groups.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·46 Views
  • Optimus Prime Model by Me
    v.redd.it
    submitted by /u/PotentialProposal750 [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·62 Views
  • More Tesla Showroom Protests Planned For This Weekend
    www.theverge.com
    Protestors are planning more demonstrations outside Tesla showrooms nationwide this weekend, as Elon Musks polarizing behavior and political activities within the Trump administration continue to have negative side effects on his electric car business.The protests are being advertised on BlueSky under the tags Tesla Takeover and Tesla Takedown, similar to demonstrations held last weekend. At least three dozen events are listed on Action Networks website, with a banner urging people who own Tesla vehicles or stock in the company to divest, sell their vehicle, and join the picket line.Its unclear how many people will join the demonstrations, and whether there is even a clear leader behind the movement. Alex Winter, a progressive activist and actor who played Bill in Bill and Teds Excellent Adventure, posted about it on BlueSky.Still, its a sign that Musks company as well as the millions of vehicles that he has sold continue to serve as a target for people angry and frustrated by the unelected billionaires efforts to take over the federal government at Trumps behest, shutting down whole agencies and targeting federal workers for layoffs.It has led to vandalism in some cases. Social media is rife with images of Tesla vehicles defaced with swastikas or slapped with stickers of Musk throwing a fascist salute at Trumps inauguration. Earlier this month, police in Arcata, Cali., received several reports of Tesla owners finding threatening notes on their cars, warning them to sell their cars or risk the consequences. No Nazis in America, several of the fliers read, according to local reports.Several Tesla shareholders have expressed a desire for a change in leadership at the company, worried that Musks growing polarizing reputation could significantly impact the companys financial future. But that seems unlikely in the near term, given Musks broad shareholder support. Still, Teslas stock price has plummeted 30 percent from its all-time high in December, including a 21 percent selloff since Trumps inauguration, ABC reports. Tesla sales were down year over year in 2024 for the first time in over a decade. And the company appears to be in free fall in Europe, plummeting in several key markets like Norway, France, and Spain, Wired found.For years, Teslas fortunes have been inextricably linked to attitudes toward its controversial CEO. When people thought Musk was going to usher in a brighter future, full of robotaxis and trips to Mars, the value of the company went up like one of his rocket ships. But now that hes being labeled a fascist while leading a shadowy effort to root out DEI and woke ideology in the federal government, Musk is becoming more of a liability than an asset.See More:
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·41 Views
  • Study of TikTok, X 'For You' feeds in Germany finds far-right political bias ahead of federal elections
    techcrunch.com
    Recommendation algorithms operated by social media giants TikTok and X have shown evidence of substantial Far Right political bias in Germany ahead of a federal election that takes place Sunday, according to new research carried out by Global Witness.The non-government organization (NGO) undertook an analysis of social media content displayed to new users via algorithmically sorted For You feeds finding both platforms skewed heavily towards amplifying content that favors the Far Right AfD party in algorithmically programmed feeds.Global Witness tests identified the most extreme bias on TikTok, where 78% of the political content that was algorithmically recommended to its test accounts, and came from accounts the test users did not follow, was supportive of the AfD party. (It notes this figure far exceeds the level of support the party is achieving in current polling, where it attracts backing from around 20% of German voters.)On X, Global Witness found that 64% of such recommended political content was supportive of the AfD.Testing for general left- or right-leaning political bias in the platforms algorithmic recommendations, its findings suggest that non-partisan social media users in Germany are being exposed to right-leaning content more than twice as much as left-leaning content in the lead up to the countrys federal elections. Again, TikTok displayed the greatest right-wing skew, per its findings showing right-leaning content 74% of the time. Although, X was not far behind on 72%.Metas Instagram was also tested and found to lean right over a series of three tests the NGO ran. But the level of political bias it displayed in the tests was lower, with 59% of political content being right-wing.Testing For You for political biasTo test whether the social media platforms algorithmic recommendations were displaying political bias, the NGOs researchers set up three accounts apiece on TikTok and X, along with a further three on Meta-owned Instagram. They wanted to establish the flavor of content platforms would promote to users who expressed a non-partisan interest in consuming political content.To present as non-partisan users the tests accounts were set up to follow the accounts of the four biggest political parties in Germany (conservative/right-leaning CDU; center-left SPD; Far Right AfD; left-leaning Greens), along with their respective leaders accounts (Friedrich Merz, Olaf Scholz, Alice Weidel, Robert Habeck). The researchers operating the test accounts also ensure that each account clicked on the top five posts from each account they followed, and engaged with the content watching any videos for at least 30 seconds and scrolling through any threads, images, etc., per Global Witness.They then manually collected and analyzed the content each platform pushed at the test accounts finding there was a substantial right-wing skew in what was being algorithmically pushed to users.One of our main concerns is that we dont really know why we were suggested the particular content that we were, said Ellen Judson, a senior campaigner looking at digital threats for Global Witness, told TechCrunch in an interview. We found this evidence that suggests bias, but theres still a lack of transparency from platforms about how their recommender systems work.We know they use lots of different signals, but exactly how those signals are weighted, and how they are assessed for if they might be increasing certain risks or increasing bias, is not very transparent, Judson added.My best inference is that this is a kind of unintended side effect of algorithms which are based on driving engagement, she continued. And that this is what happens when, essentially, what were companies designed to maximize user engagement on their platforms end up becoming these spaces for democratic discussions theres a conflict there between commercial imperatives and public interest and democratic objectives.The findings chime with other social media research Global Witness has undertaken around recent elections in theU.S.,IrelandandRomania. And, indeed, various other studies over recent years have also found evidence that social media algorithms lean right such as this research project last year looking into YouTube.Even all the way back in 2021, an internal study by Twitter as X used to be called before Elon Musk bought and rebranded the platform found that its algorithms promote more right-leaning content than left.Nonetheless, social media firms typically try to dance away from allegations of algorithmic bias. And after Global Witness shared its findings with TikTok, the platform suggested the researchers methodology was flawed arguing it was not possible to draw conclusions of algorithmic bias from a handful of tests. They said that it wasnt representative of regular users because it was only a few test accounts, noted Judson.X did not respond to Global Witness findings. But Musk has talked about wanting the platform to become a haven for free speech generally. Albeit, that may actually be his coda for promoting a right-leaning agenda.Its certainly notable that Xs owner has used the platform to personally campaign for the AfD, tweeting to urge Germans to vote for the Far Right party in the upcoming elections, and hosting a livestreamed interview with Weidel ahead of the poll an event that has helped to raise the partys profile. Musk has the most-followed account on X.Towards algorithmic transparency?I think the transparency point is really important, says Judson. We have seen Musk talking about the AfD and getting lots of engagement on his own posts about the AfD and the livestream [with Weidel] [But] we dont know if theres actually been an algorithmic change that reflects that.Were hoping that the Commission will take [our results] as evidence to investigate whether anything has occurred or why there might be this bias going on, she added, confirming Global Witness has shared its findings with EU officials who are responsible for enforcing the blocs algorithmic accountability rules on large platforms.Studying how proprietary content-sorting algorithms function is challenging, as platforms typically keep such details under wraps claiming these code recipes as commercial secrets. Thats why the European Union enacted the Digital Services Act (DSA) in recent years its flagship online governance rulebook in a bid to improve this situation by taking steps to empower public interest research into democratic and other systemic risks on major platforms, including Instagram, TikTok and X.The DSA includes measures to push major platforms to be more transparent about how their information-shaping algorithms work, and to be proactive in responding to systemic risks that may arise on their platforms. But even though the regime kicked in on the three tech giants back in August 2023, Judson notes some elements of it have yet to be fully implemented.Notably, Article 40 of the regulation, which is intended to enable vetted researchers to gain access to non-public platform data to study systemic risks, hasnt yet come into effect as the EU hasnt yet passed the necessary delegated act to implement that bit of the law.The EUs approach with aspects of the DSA is also one that leans on platforms self-reporting risks and enforcers then receiving and reviewing their reports. So the first batch of risk reports from platforms may well be the weakest in terms of disclosures, Judson suggests, as enforcers will need time to parse disclosures and, if they feel there are shortfalls, push platforms for more comprehensive reporting. For now without better access to platform data she says public interest researchers still cant know for sure whether there is baked in bias in mainstream social media.Civil society is watching like a hawk for when vetted researcher access becomes available, she adds, saying they are hoping this piece of the DSA public interest puzzle will slot into place this quarter.The regulation has failed to deliver quick results when it comes to concerns attached to social media and democratic risks. The EUs approach may also ultimately be shown to be too cautious to move the needle as fast as it needs to move to keep up with algorithmically amplified threats. But its also clear that the EU is keen to avoid any risks of being accused of crimping freedom of expression.The Commission has open investigations into all three of the social media firms which are implicated by the Global Witness research. But there has been no enforcement in this election integrity area so far. However, it recently stepped up scrutiny of TikTok and opened a fresh DSA proceeding on it following concerns of the platform being a key conduit for Russian election interference in Romanias presidential election.Were asking the Commission to investigate whether there is political bias, adds Judson. [The platforms] say that there isnt. We found evidence that there may be. So were hoping that the Commission would use its increased information[-gathering] powers to establish whether thats the case, and address that if it is.The pan-EU regulation empowers enforcers to levy penalties of up to 6% of global annual turnover for infringements, and even temporarily block access to violating platforms if they refuse to comply.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·21 Views
  • Meta Says it Made Sure Not to Seed Any Pirated Books
    torrentfreak.com
    In one of the AI lawsuits faced by Meta, the company stands accused of distributing pirated books. The authors who filed the class-action lawsuit allege that Meta shared books from the shadow library LibGen with third parties via BitTorrent. Meta, however, says that it took precautions to prevent 'seeding' content. In addition, the company clarifies that there is nothing 'independently illegal' about torrenting. Over the past two years, rightsholders of all ilks have filed lawsuits against companies that develop AI models.Most of these cases allege that AI developers used copyrighted works to train LLMs without first obtaining authorization. Using copyrighted content without permission can be problematic, but many AI companies cite fair use as a defense. Whether that is valid will vary from case to case. Just last week, a Delaware federal court denied a motion for summary judgment based on fair use in a case between Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence, reversing an earlier decision. Mark Zuckerbergs Meta is also defending itself against several AI copyright infringement claims related to the development of its Llama models. This includes a class-action lawsuit filed by authors including Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, and Christopher Golden, who accuse Meta of using their work without permission.Sharing Millions of Pirated Books?Interestingly, the allegations in this case dont stop at unauthorized use of copyrighted works. The authors alleged that Meta downloaded millions of pirated books from LibGen via BitTorrent and distributed the same content to third parties.Sharing copyright infringing material with third-parties will certainly be difficult to characterize as fair use and the plaintiffs realized this too. Last month, the authors filed an amended complaint which added these BitTorrent-related allegations to their existing claims. The plaintiffs pointed out that BitTorrent users typically upload content to third parties and suggest that Meta did the same here.Meta downloaded millions of pirated books from LibGen through the bit torrent protocol using a platform called LibTorrent. Internally, Meta acknowledged that using this protocol was legally problematic, the third amended complaint (TAC) noted.By downloading through the bit torrent protocol, Meta knew it was facilitating further copyright infringement by acting as a distribution point for other users of pirated books.The amended complaint lists three specific claims against Meta. In addition to direct copyright infringement, the authors also accuse the company of removing copyright management information, as well as violating Californias Computer Data Access and Fraud Act (CDAFA). Count I: Direct Copyright Infringement Count II: Removal of Copyright Management Information Count III: Violation of California Penal Code 502 (CDAFA) We Took Seeding PrecautionsMeta responded to this complaint with a motion to dismiss. In a supporting reply filed on Tuesday, the company notes that the torrenting allegations, relating to the removal of copyright information and the CDAFA violations, dont hold up. These claims rely on the notion that Meta seeded the files they downloaded from pirate sources, but Meta notes that there is no evidence for this. On the contrary, Meta says it took precautions to make sure that downloaded files were not shared with others. Focused on torrenting, which is a widely used protocol to download large files, Plaintiffs push a narrative that ignores evidence in their possession, including a detailed expert report, showing that Meta took precautions not to seed any downloaded files.While taking precautions is not the same as preventing something entirely, Meta believes that without evidence of seeding, the court should dismiss counts II and III for now.Plaintiffs, thus, plead no facts to show that Meta seeded Plaintiffs books a claim that Meta will address at summary judgment, Meta notes.Torrenting is not IllegalThe torrenting element is also important for the CDAFA claim. According to Meta, this is an anti-intrusion statute and, since Meta downloaded data from third-parties, it didnt intrude the plaintiffs computer systems in any way.Plaintiffs do not allege that Meta employed technological measures to obtain any data from Plaintiffs or that the data was subject to any access restrictions. They allege only that Meta downloaded the data from a well-known online repository that was publicly available via torrents, Meta writes. Just to be clear, in a footnote Meta adds that there is nothing inherently illegal about using BitTorrent to download files. Contrary to Plaintiffs assertion, there is nothing independently illegal about torrenting on its own. Torrenting is merely a means of enabling users to download (i.e., copy) files. Leeching?The authors who filed the complaint are not convinced that Meta didnt share anything with third parties. They previously obtained additional evidence on Metas torrenting activity, but whether thats sufficient is up to the court to decide. To complicate matters further, the authors previously noted that Meta may have shared data with others while it was leeching. That is, it may have shared data without having first obtained a full copy of the file; in other words, before they were seeding.Whether the court will dive deeper into the BitTorrent terminology has yet to be seen, but for those who are interested in file-sharing technology, it is definitely one of the most intriguing AI copyright cases out there. A copy of Metas reply supporting the motion to dismiss the third amended complaint, filed on February 18 at the California federal court, is available here (pdf)
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·21 Views
  • The car without a driver...
    v.redd.it
    submitted by /u/Successful_Sink_1936 [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·49 Views
  • Experimenting with ACES colors
    v.redd.it
    submitted by /u/DOT4_studio [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·52 Views
  • Trump's tariffs could drive up iPhone prices by about 10%
    appleinsider.com
    Estimating the cost to Apple of paying President Trump's import tariffs, Bank of America believes that a 9% price hike for the iPhone and all other devices, would prevent losses. It's a fiction that other countries will pay tariffs, as instead all such costs will always be borne by US companies. In the case of Apple, it has previously earned an exemption though not consistently and it has tried to reduce the impact of tariffs by moving manufacturing to different countries.According to CNBC, this time that spreading of the manufacturing around various locations is not going to help. Bank of America now estimates that whatever Apple does with manufacturing, and wherever it does it, the company will face a minimum of a 10% tariff.In the short term, Apple could absorb that cost and may well chose to rather than raise prices. Once a customer goes to Android because of the price, it is that much harder to get them back to the iPhone.Should Apple simply pay the tariffs and take that hit itself, the Bank of America calculates that it would face a loss of 26 cents in earnings per share. That equates to a drop of around 3% across calendar year 2026.One option is for Apple to increase prices, but not enough to cover its tariff costs. Bank of America says that if, for instance, it raised prices by 3%, that would mean a 2.4% slide and a per-share earnings drop of 21 cents.The calculation is based on both the tariffs expected to affect goods or components made in various countries, and an estimate of how higher prices would mean lower sales. If Apple passes on its increased costs to buyers, and sales decrease, Bank of America estimates that the company would need to raise prices by 9%.As yet, it's not known what Apple will do, beyond presumably continuing to lobby for exemptions. But Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan says that the tariffs seem "manageable."
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·50 Views
  • HP deliberately adds 15 minutes waiting time for telephone support calls | Longer wait time designed to push print or PC consumers to digital support channels, sorry, 'self-solve'
    www.theregister.com
    HP is trying to force consumer PC and print customers to use digital support channels by setting a minimum 15-minute wait time for anyone that phones the call center to get answers to troublesome queries.The wait time was added on Tuesday February 18, according to internal communications seen by The Register, and impacts retail patrons in the UK, Ireland, France, Germany and Italy, though we anticipate more countries could be added."We want to inform you of a change in the NL IVR (natural language IVR) in some countries and languages for Consumer Print and Consumer PC customers in EMEA, effective today," HP says in the memo.IVR, for the uninitiated, is Interactive Voice Response. The missive continues:"Objective is to influence customers to increase their adoption of digital self-solve, as a faster way to address their support question. This involves inserting a message of high call volumes, to expect a delay in connecting to an agent and offering digital self-solve solutions as an alternative."At the beginning of a call to telephone support, a message will be played stating: "We are experiencing longer waiting times and we apologize for the inconvenience. The next available representative will be with you in about 15 minutes. To quickly resolve your issue, please visit our website support.hp.com to check out other support options or find helpful articles and assistant to get a guided help by visiting virtualagent.hpcloud.hp.com."Those who want to continue to hold are told to "please stay on the line."On the fifth, tenth, and thirteenth minute, the recorded message will tell HP customers it is "experiencing longer waiting times and we apologize for the inconvenience," and again remind them they may switch to alternatives.To reaffirm the changes, HP says in the staff memo: "The wait time for each customer is set to 15 minutes - notice the expected wait time is mentioned only in the beginning of the call." The message will be read out three times during the wait time, after the initial reading.The reason for the change? "Encouraging more digital adoption by nudging customers to go online to self-solve" and "Taking decisive short-term action to generate warranty cost efficiencies."The staff email says Customer Experience metrics are being tracked weekly CSAT (customer satisfaction), Service Levels, Escalations. As are the number of phone calls that subsequently give up and move to social/live chat.For some Reg readers, 15 minutes might not seem like an eternity, especially if they are used to dealing with UK tax collector HMRC, which was found to have kept callers waiting on hold, collectively, for 798 years in the year to March 2023, something it was also recently criticized for again.An insider in HP's European ops told us: "Many within HP are pretty unhappy [aboout]the measures being taken and the fact those making decisions don't have to deal with the customers who their decisions impact."The Register asked HP for comment and will update this article when and if it responds.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·32 Views
  • IRS to fire 6,700 staff weeks before deadline to file taxes
    www.independent.co.uk
    IRS to fire 6,700 staff in Trump and Musks DOGE purge weeks before deadline to file taxesThe layoffs will impact more than one-third of probationary employees during tax seasonKatie Hawkinsonin New YorkWednesday 19 February 2025 23:10 GMTThe IRS is set to fire some 6,700 probationary employees starting Thursday (REUTERS)Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inboxGet our free Inside Washington emailGet our free Inside Washington emailI would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read ourprivacy policyThe Internal Revenue Service will lay off more than 6,000 employees Thursday as part of President Donald Trumps push to slash federal spending, a source familiar with the move told Reuters.The layoffs targeting 6,700 probationary employees that is, those employed for less than a year come in the middle of tax season. That group of workers represents a little over one-third of all probationary employees.Probationary employees across agencies have been targeted by Trump and Elon Musks Department of Government Efficiency in recent weeks, with the Associated Press estimating hundreds of thousands of employees could be impacted.The IRS layoffs come in the middle of tax season (Getty Images)Managers already started ordering employees to report to the office with their issued equipment, The New York Times reports.Under an executive order, I.R.S. has been directed to terminate probationary employees who were not deemed critical to filing season, an email from an IRS manager reviewed by the Times reads. We dont have many details that we are permitted to share, but this is all tied to compliance with the executive order.The restructuring could strain the agency as they process returns through the April 15 filing deadline, Reuters reports. Not only is the Trump administration firing these employees, it has also prevented the IRS from hiring anyone indefinitely. The Department of Homeland Security has also ordered some IRS agents to assist with the administrations mass deportation efforts, according to the Times.While Trump issued an executive order the first day of his presidency ordering a 90-day hiring freeze for all federal agencies, he noted an exception for the IRS, placing it under the freeze until his administration determines that it is in the national interest to hire again.This could impact tax season especially because the IRS typically hires thousands of temporary workers to assist with processing filings. Former officials and Democratic lawmakers alike have warned these freezes and firings could disrupt Americans abilities to easily file their taxes and receive any potential returns, the Times reports.Join our commenting forumJoin thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their repliesMost PopularPopular videosSponsored Features
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·32 Views
  • "AI will became Better than you with Blender"
    i.redd.it
    My Blender skills: submitted by /u/beboYep [link] [comments]
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·59 Views
More Stories