In the previous post asking for feedback from the community, the principle complaints were related to NSFW content and associated behavior. A large number of users expressed a tiredness of sexualized NSFW submissions. Interestingly enough, some of the users simultanously felt that outright banning nudity would be excessive. It seems that a significant portion of the community would like some level of restrictions on such content, but I'm not sure there's much of a consensus on where that line is best drawn. The following drafts for new rules meant to address concerns around NSFW content. I'd like to hear any thoughts the community may have about them, but in particular, I'm interested in knowing whether you believe they are at an appropriate level of strictness. No sexualized imagery Defined as: imagery of sexual acts imagery centered or focusing on genitals or breasts imagery centered or focusing on sexual paraphernalia imagery of nude bodies making suggestive poses or motions Users who attempt to make such posts would be redirected to other communities. Submissions which depict nudity should be marked as spoilers No sexualizing comments The first rule is meant to restrict gratuitous and pornographic depictions of nudity without infringing on milder depictions of nudity that may have artistic merit, such as artists sharing the results of a sculpting exercise. The second rule aims to address the common complaint that images depicting nudity appear in their feed unexpectedly. Marking these posts as spoilers means that the images will be initially blurred for everyone. The third rule aims to address the low-quality discussion that follow NSFW submissions. submitted by /u/Avereniect [link] [comments]