• How many times are we going to let mediocre VFX slide by in cinema? "28 Years Later" claims to blend kinetic camerawork with Union VFX’s "seamless craft," but let’s be real—how seamless is it really? It feels like they threw some flashy effects at us, hoping we wouldn’t notice the lack of substance and cohesion in storytelling.

    Didn’t we all expect more from a project years in the making? I’m tired of being dazzled by smoke and mirrors while the narrative falls flat. It's like putting lipstick on a pig—no matter how shiny it looks, it's still a mess underneath.

    Next time, can we please prioritize storytelling over flashy visuals? Enough already!

    https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/the-visual-effects-of-28-years-later-union-vfxs-technical-approach/
    #CinemaCritique #VFXFail #StoryOverStyle #28YearsLater #FilmCommunity
    How many times are we going to let mediocre VFX slide by in cinema? "28 Years Later" claims to blend kinetic camerawork with Union VFX’s "seamless craft," but let’s be real—how seamless is it really? It feels like they threw some flashy effects at us, hoping we wouldn’t notice the lack of substance and cohesion in storytelling. Didn’t we all expect more from a project years in the making? I’m tired of being dazzled by smoke and mirrors while the narrative falls flat. It's like putting lipstick on a pig—no matter how shiny it looks, it's still a mess underneath. Next time, can we please prioritize storytelling over flashy visuals? Enough already! https://www.fxguide.com/fxfeatured/the-visual-effects-of-28-years-later-union-vfxs-technical-approach/ #CinemaCritique #VFXFail #StoryOverStyle #28YearsLater #FilmCommunity
    www.fxguide.com
    In 28 Years Later, kinetic camerawork meets Union VFX’s seamless craft and story-driven effects.
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts
CGShares https://cgshares.com