options aplenty OpenAI adds GPT-4.1 to ChatGPT amid complaints over confusing model lineup Two new AI models join 7 others, leaving some paid users wondering which one is best. Benj Edwards – May 14, 2025 6:16 pm | 18 Credit: Getty Images Credit: Getty Images Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only   Learn more On Wednesday, OpenAI announced that ChatGPT users now have access to GPT-4.1, an AI language model previously available only through the company's API since its launch one month ago. The update brings what OpenAI describes as improved coding and web development capabilities to paid ChatGPT subscribers, with wider enterprise rollout planned in the coming weeks. GPT-4.1 and 4.1 mini to ChatGPT adds to an already complex model selection that includes GPT-4o, various specialized GPT-4o versions, o1-pro, o3-mini, and o3-mini-high models. There are technically nine AI models available for ChatGPT Pro subscribers. Wharton professor Ethan Mollick recently publicly lampooned the awkward situation on social media. As of May 14, 2025, ChatGPT Pro users have access to eight main AI models, plus Deep Research. Credit: Benj Edwards Deciding which AI model to use can be daunting for AI novices. Reddit users and OpenAI forum members alike commonly voice confusion about the available options. "I do not understand the reason behind having multiple models available for use," wrote one Reddit user in March. "Why would anyone use anything but the best one?" Another Redditor said they were "a bit lost" with the many ChatGPT models available after switching back from using Anthropic Claude. Reportedly better at coding So, what is actually different about GPT-4.1? Notably, it features a very large 1 million token context window that allows processing roughly 3,000 pages of text in a single conversation. The API launch included three versions: GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and GPT-4.1 nano. So far, only the full and mini versions are available in ChatGPT. The full GPT-4.1 model reportedly prioritizes instruction following and coding tasks, which the company positions as an alternative to its o3 and o4-mini simulated reasoning models for basic programming needs. For the smaller of the two models in ChatGPT, the company claims that GPT-4.1 mini performs better in instruction following, coding, and "overall intelligence" compared to GPT-4o mini. OpenAI is replacing GPT-4o mini with GPT-4.1 mini across all ChatGPT tiers, including free accounts. Free users will automatically switch to GPT-4.1 mini after reaching usage limits for GPT-4o. ChatGPT subscribers using Plus, Pro, or Team plans can access GPT-4.1 through a "more models" dropdown menu in the platform's model picker. The release comes just two weeks after OpenAI made GPT-4 unavailable in ChatGPT on April 30. That earlier model, which launched in March 2023, once sparked widespread hype about AI capabilities. Compared to that hyperbolic launch, GPT-4.1's rollout has been a fairly understated affair—probably because it's tricky to convey the subtle differences between all of the available OpenAI models. As if 4.1's launch wasn't confusing enough, the release also roughly coincides with OpenAI's July 2025 deadline for retiring the GPT-4.5 Preview from the API, a model one AI expert called a "lemon." Developers must migrate to other options, OpenAI says, although GPT-4.5 will remain available in ChatGPT for now. A confusing addition to OpenAI’s model lineup In February, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman acknowledged his company's confusing AI model naming practices on X, writing, "We realize how complicated our model and product offerings have gotten." He promised that a forthcoming "GPT-5" model would consolidate the o-series and GPT-series models into a unified branding structure. But the addition of GPT-4.1 to ChatGPT appears to contradict that simplification goal. So, if you use ChatGPT, which model should you use? If you're a developer using the models through the API, the consideration is more of a trade-off between capability, speed, and cost. But in ChatGPT, your choice might be limited more by personal taste in behavioral style and what you'd like to accomplish. Some of the "more capable" models have lower usage limits as well because they cost more for OpenAI to run. For now, OpenAI is keeping GPT-4o as the default ChatGPT model, likely due to its general versatility, balance between speed and capability, and personable style. The simulated reasoning models like 03 and 04-mini-high are slower to execute but can consider analytical-style problems more systematically and perform comprehensive web research that sometimes feels genuinely useful when it surfaces relevantweb links. Compared to those, OpenAI is largely positioning GPT-4.1 as a speedier AI model for coding assistance. Just remember that all of the AI models are prone to confabulations, meaning that they tend to make up authoritative-sounding information when they encounter gaps in their trained "knowledge." So you'll need to double-check all of the outputs with other sources of information if you're hoping to use these AI models to assist with an important task. Benj Edwards Senior AI Reporter Benj Edwards Senior AI Reporter Benj Edwards is Ars Technica's Senior AI Reporter and founder of the site's dedicated AI beat in 2022. He's also a tech historian with almost two decades of experience. In his free time, he writes and records music, collects vintage computers, and enjoys nature. He lives in Raleigh, NC. 18 Comments #openai #adds #gpt41 #chatgpt #amid

Forward-looking: In today's world and age, having a centralized resource for collecting and sharing information about security vulnerabilities is essential. The US administration recently signaled it doesn't have this kind of priorities anymore, so the European Union is preparing a potential alternative for keeping the technology world safe and informed. The European Commission has launched a new vulnerability database managed by the EU Agency for Cybersecurity. The beta version of the European Vulnerability Databaseis already live, promising a more effective approach to cybersecurity and critical information sharing for professionals and organizations across the continent. The EUVD meets the vulnerability management requirements of the NIS2 Directive, a 2023 framework adopted by the European Parliament to improve cybersecurity in critical sectors like energy, transport, and healthcare. It also helps implement the Cyber Resilience Act, which requires stronger protections for products with digital components. European officials have described the initiative as a move to strengthen the EU's technological sovereignty. Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission's executive vice president for Tech Sovereignty, Security, and Democracy, welcomed the EUVD as a key step toward Europe's digital security and resiliency. "By bringing together vulnerability information relevant to the EU market, we are raising cybersecurity standards, enabling public and private stakeholders to better protect our shared digital spaces with greater efficiency and autonomy," Virkkunen said. The ENISA says this data consolidation will make it easier for organizations to identify and respond to vulnerabilities, fostering a more proactive cybersecurity environment across the continent. By centralizing and streamlining the information, the EUVD aims to reduce the time it takes to address critical security issues, ultimately enhancing the region's digital resilience. // Related Stories The EUVD features three dashboards highlighting critical vulnerabilities, exploited bugs, and "EU-coordinated" flaws. The latter includes issues managed by European CSIRTs. Most data comes from open-source databases, while national CSIRTs provide additional details through advisories and alerts. Starting September 2026, the EU will require hardware and software manufacturers to report actively exploited vulnerabilities. While Brussels authorities mention the CVE database only tangentially, the EUVD is a practical response to the Trump administration's attempts to defund critical bug tracking. Should future efforts to slash funding for cyber initiatives succeed, data from the CVE system could seamlessly migrate to the EUVD. #european #union #public #vulnerability #database

Hyper-converged infrastructure pioneer Nutanix is among a number of suppliers that smell blood in the water when it comes to VMware and its customers following the virtualisation giant’s acquisition by Broadcom. At Nutanix’s annual .Next bash in Washington DC last week, migration away from VMware and to – it hopes – its own Acropolis hypervisor (AHV) was a constant theme. As part of this, it gathered three customers to talk about their experiences of moving from VMware to Nutanix.  Of these, only one was directly attributable to Broadcom’s licensing changes, but Broadcom-Amazon Web Services (AWS) relations were key to another. We asked them about their journey to Nutanix and away from VMware, as well as the precise pain points that prompted their decisions. Here, we talk to: Dom Johnston, IT manager for Golding in Brisbane, Australia, which is a heavy civil and mining contracting company that has operated on the east coast of Australia for about 75 years.  Kee Yew Wei, associate vice-president for infrastructure and operations at MSIG, which is a Japan-headquartered insurance company that operates internationally.  Mike Taylor, hospital ship joint task director for Military Sealift Command and the US Navy, which operates two hospital ships, Mercy (pictured above) and Comfort. Dom Johnston: Golding had its infrastructure sitting in VMware on AWS. We had a three-year contract with VMware for that platform, which ended in February this year. About March of last year, there was a fairly public divorce between VMware and AWS. We weren’t sure where that left us.  To cut a long story short, with what we saw over the next two to three months from there, we considered the risk of leaving our infrastructure there beyond the end of that three-year contract was too great for us. Golding had its infrastructure sitting in VMware on AWS. [After the] fairly public divorce between VMware and AWS, we weren’t sure where that left us. With what we saw over the next two to three months, we considered the risk of leaving our infrastructure there beyond the end of that three-year contract was too great. Nutanix has kind of swung in to replace that Dom Johnston, Golding So we went out to market to look at alternatives. And Nutanix has kind of swung in to essentially replace that. We use NC2 [Nutanix Cloud Clusters] to run our production workloads in AWS, for our DR [disaster recovery] capability, and that’s essentially to directly replace the functionality that existed within AWS and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, which was the DR product that sat alongside that.  So essentially, our DR strategy is that if an event occurs, we immediately spin up the DR environment ready to accept a workload. In the event that is not required, it’s spun back down again, and we’ve lost, you know, a couple 100 bucks worth of compute usage.  Kee Yew Wei: Our journey with Nutanix is from 2017. We were looking for a hyper-converged system to simplify our environment, to do away with the traditional three-tier legacy system, to simplify our environment, and to reduce our datacentre footprint.  Nutanix is the system, but we didn’t have full confidence in Acropolis at that time, because it was quite new compared to VMware.  After a couple of years using Nutanix, we built confidence, so we have recently migrated all our VMware to Nutanix AHV. We completed the full migration last month.  All this came about after the acquisition by Broadcom, and we received a quotation with a 300% to 400% increase on our renewal pricing. So, then we made the decision to go for Nutanix.  We started planning somewhere around Q3 last year and were quite conservative, with completion planned for maybe somewhere in Q2 this year. My team migrated 1,000 to 2,000 VMs [virtual machines] from Q4 and completed that at the beginning of April. So today, we are a full Nutanix house. Mike Taylor: Our story with Nutanix started way back in 2017. We’d been Nutanix lookers for a long time.  On my ships, we had 1,000 blade servers and EMC tiered storage taking up multiple racks. But on the ships, there’s only a finite amount of power they generate, so I needed to find a way to bring everything down into a smaller footprint – but a smarter, smaller footprint, something that would allow me to very elegantly manage and have ease of use that my teams aboard the ships could deal with.  After a couple of years using Nutanix, we built confidence, so we have recently migrated all our VMware to Nutanix AHV Kee Yew Wei, MSIG So, we did a bake-off with Dell, Cisco and Nutanix, and we implemented Nutanix on Mercy in 2019 and Comfort in 2020. Now, we’re looking at generational refreshes of all of our equipment and probably expanding from there and getting some new features, with redundancy and disaster recovery. We do have an onboard continuity-of-operations rack, so we have mirrored failover clusters of Nutanix aboard the ships.  Now we’re all Nutanix. Everything moved over. That’s like, out of 80-something servers, we only had two or three servers that had hiccups.  Taylor: I remember standing in my main datacentre on the hospital ships. It’s very anticlimactic if you ever get to go; I just have five racks, but two of those five were purely just to run my server infrastructure. I remember standing there with one of my peers, and we were looking at it and we said, “Oh, hey, we’re still using SAN directors.” And SAN was going away, they were on their way out.  Dell had come out with stuff like FX, and other people were dabbling with hyper-converged, whereas Nutanix had already done it, and they had their own software, which was easy to understand for my engineers. So, I’m looking at these racks full of equipment, especially the VNX, which was power hungry. So, we said, “There has to be a better way to do this.” Energy was the problem. Energy was the driver to finding a solution.  We weren’t impacted by the Broadcom event. We got in before it. I do still run some VMware, so I am impacted by it there. The challenge we have incurred in continuing to operate that small part isn’t financial. It’s purely that I can’t get to updates. I can’t get to download them. It’s support aspects of the change that impact us the most, not the financial part of it.  If we hadn’t moved to Nutanix, if we were still purely ESXi, the financial part would certainly be a burden, like it is for other military commands.  Johnston: After AWS and VMware had their thing, we were notified by VMware that we were no longer able to spin up our on-demand DR cluster. They told us that, essentially, we could still use our DR plan if we powered down our production cluster before spinning up a DR cluster. We were testing quarterly, but we were no longer able to do that. In fact, we shifted to testing monthly because there was so much uncertainty in that space. We were left in a situation where, because we couldn’t test, we had zero confidence.  Kee Yew Wei: It was all about cost. We got a bill with a 300% to 400% increase on our last renewal. So, this is one of the key factors that drove us to migrate all our workloads to Nutanix. Taylor: The trade-offs are very, very light, if any. My people were very seasoned with ESXi VMware Tools and the orchestration that VMware had.  But the learning curve for Nutanix is very short. It’s very easy to pick up, but you have to learn it. There’s a different way to import an OVA, as opposed to the way you do it within the VMware ecosystem, for example. So, the trade-off is really just time to become a master at using the system with regard to functionality.  The learning curve for Nutanix is very short. It’s very easy to pick up Mike Taylor, US Navy In fact, I think I have enhanced capability using AHV as my hypervisor. When it comes to security, using VMware with the military, we have to submit vulnerability scans constantly. That’s just part of our regular drumbeat. I still run VMware on classified parts of my network, and it is very challenging to keep it secure and up to date. I don’t have that issue with Nutanix. Johnson: I second that. As far as trade-offs are concerned, or the functionality, it’s really just a question of semantics in relation to the differences between the two platforms. The way that Nutanix handles snapshots is different to the way that VMware handles snapshots. That was a learning curve for us. It’s like going from Windows 10 to Windows 11. Things are in a different spot, but it’s the same functionality.  You need to prepare your team, get them training, show them what to do. I don’t think there’s any loss of functionality. In fact, I think there are faster workflows, better availability of tools.  Kee Yew Wei: I don’t see trade-offs. Maybe 10 years ago, compatibility with other suppliers’ software might have been an issue, like backup solutions such as [Veritas] NetBackup. Maybe seven or eight years ago, they did not support Nutanix. But that’s not the case today. Read more about virtualisation and storage University will ‘pull the plug’ to test Nutanix disaster recovery: University of Reading set to save circa £500,000 and deploy Nutanix NC2 hybrid cloud that will allow failover from main datacentre.  NHS trust cloud plans hampered by Trump tariff uncertainty: Essex NHS wants to move some capacity to the Nutanix cloud, but can’t be certain prices will hold between product selection and when procurement plans gain approval.  Source: https://www.computerweekly.com/feature/Roundtable-Why-did-customers-sail-away-from-VMware #roundtable #why #did #customers #sail #away #from #vmware

May 14, 2025Ravie LakshmananVulnerability / Network Security Fortinet has patched a critical security flaw that it said has been exploited as a zero-day in attacks targeting FortiVoice enterprise phone systems. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-32756, carries a CVSS score of 9.6 out of 10.0. "A stack-based overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] in FortiVoice, FortiMail, FortiNDR, FortiRecorder, and FortiCamera may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests," the company said in an advisory. The company said it observed the flaw being exploited in the wild on FortiVoice systems, but did not disclose the scale of the attacks and the identity of the threat actors behind them. It further noted that the threat actor performed device network scans, erased system crash logs, and enabled fcgi debugging to log credentials from the system or SSH login attempts. The issue affects the following products and versions - FortiCamera 1.1, 2.0 (Migrate to a fixed release) FortiCamera 2.1.x (Upgrade to 2.1.4 or above) FortiMail 7.0.x (Upgrade to 7.0.9 or above) FortiMail 7.2.x (Upgrade to 7.2.8 or above) FortiMail 7.4.x (Upgrade to 7.4.5 or above) FortiMail 7.6.x (Upgrade to 7.6.3 or above) FortiNDR 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 7.1 (Migrate to a fixed release) FortiNDR 7.0.x (Upgrade to 7.0.7 or above) FortiNDR 7.2.x (Upgrade to 7.2.5 or above) FortiNDR 7.4.x (Upgrade to 7.4.8 or above) FortiNDR 7.6.x (Upgrade to 7.6.1 or above) FortiRecorder 6.4.x (Upgrade to 6.4.6 or above) FortiRecorder 7.0.x (Upgrade to 7.0.6 or above) FortiRecorder 7.2.x (Upgrade to 7.2.4 or above) FortiVoice 6.4.x (Upgrade to 6.4.11 or above) FortiVoice 7.0.x (Upgrade to 7.0.7 or above) FortiVoice 7.2.x (Upgrade to 7.2.1 or above) Fortinet said the vulnerability was discovered by its product security team based on the threat actor activity that originated from the below IP addresses - 198.105.127.124 43.228.217.173 43.228.217.82 156.236.76.90 218.187.69.244 218.187.69.59 Users of FortiVoice, FortiMail, FortiNDR, FortiRecorder and FortiCamera are recommended to apply the necessary fixes to secure their devices from active exploitation attempts. If immediate patching is not an option, it's advised to disable the HTTP/HTTPS administrative interface as a temporary workaround. Found this article interesting? Follow us on Twitter  and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post. SHARE     Source: https://thehackernews.com/2025/05/fortinet-patches-cve-2025-32756-zero.html #fortinet #patches #cve202532756 #zeroday #rce #flaw #exploited #fortivoice #systems

Atheerios Member Oct 27, 2017 7,479 Nintendo Switch Games with Free Nintendo Switch 2 Updates - Nintendo US Free updates to improve playability on the Nintendo Switch 2 system will be released for selected Nintendo Switch games. www.nintendo.com Free updates to improve playability on the Nintendo Switch™ 2 system will be released for select Nintendo Switch games. By connecting your Nintendo Switch 2 to the internet, you can download free updates that may improve performance or add support for features such as GameShare in select games. The contents of these free updates will differ depending on the game.​ Click to expand... Click to shrink... Initial games to receive updates: • ARMS™ • Captain Toad™: Treasure Tracker • Super Mario Odyssey™ • Super Mario™ 3D World + Bowser's Fury • Clubhouse Games™: 51 Worldwide Classics • The Legend of Zelda™: Link's Awakening • The Legend of Zelda™: Echoes of Wisdom • Game Builder Garage™ • New Super Mario Bros.™ U Deluxe • Pokémon™ Scarlet • Pokémon™ Violet • Big Brain Academy™: Brain vs. Brain  Stoof Uncle Works at Nintendo Member Oct 25, 2017 5,487 No Xenoblade... But good to see those two Zelda games there   Lotus One Winged Slayer Member Oct 25, 2017 123,772 Atheerios said: Pokémon™ Scarlet • Pokémon™ Violet Click to expand... Click to shrink... Heh, all eyes on this one lol  Bengraven Powered by Friendship™ Member Oct 26, 2017 33,524 Florida Nice. Then I might end up finally buying Scar/Vi depending on how well they run.   DNAbro Member Oct 25, 2017 29,960 PLEASE LET SCARLET AND VIOLET RUN WELL   oni-link tag reference no one gets Member Oct 25, 2017 17,329 UK Stoof said: No Xenoblade... But good to see those two Zelda games there Click to expand... Click to shrink... They might get Switch 2 versions instead  Bio Booster Armoire Prophet of Truth Member Apr 21, 2020 1,167 That's cool. Now if only I could get a free fps/res bump for BOTW and TOTK instead of paying extra for some questionable app features I'll never use...   Waggles Member Oct 26, 2017 3,767 Cntrl + F Hyrule warriors well fuck  Audiblee Member Mar 14, 2025 1,316 If only Nintendo had a platform where they could have told us all of this DIRECTly.   mrmickfran The Fallen Oct 27, 2017 33,106 Gongaga Bowser's Fury nice That game chugged like crazy in the final boss fight  AaronMT Member Oct 27, 2017 8,350 Toronto • The Legend of Zelda™: Link's Awakening   Mass Effect One Winged Slayer Member Oct 31, 2017 19,145 That's a nice list of games honestly for a first run. Lotus said: Heh, all eyes on this one lol Click to expand... Click to shrink... Maybe it won't look like a PS2 game anymore.  SludgeFarmer Member Feb 17, 2025 133 and is there a base upgrade that makes stuff run better regardless of updates to specific titles? why isn't this stuff in the hour long sales pitch you just showed us  Lotus One Winged Slayer Member Oct 25, 2017 123,772 Waggles said: Cntrl + F Hyrule warriors well fuck Click to expand... Click to shrink... Would be surprised if it's not included later, it's gotta be one of the more infamous ones, and it's getting a sequel  Kongroo Banned Oct 31, 2017 3,465 Ottawa, Ontario, CA Paid 60fps patches is such a Nintendo move. I'm tired.   Milk Prophet of Truth Avenger Oct 25, 2017 4,288 Make TTYD 60fps PLEASE   Aleh Member Oct 27, 2017 19,974 NICE SCARLET AND VIOLET   Captain of Outer Space Come Sale Away With Me Member Oct 28, 2017 14,345 That description says they won't all be for "improved playability" but to support chat features on the Switch 2.   luminosity "This guy are sick" Member Oct 30, 2017 1,639 SludgeFarmer said: and is there a base upgrade that makes stuff run better regardless of updates to specific titles? why isn't this stuff in the hour long sales pitch you just showed us Click to expand... Click to shrink... yeah, like just brute force it.  Ayumu Member May 10, 2024 944 Free updates in Nintendo first party games? I was not expecting that lol   u_neek Member Oct 28, 2017 1,732 Atheerios said: • Pokémon™ Scarlet • Pokémon™ Violet Click to expand... Click to shrink... I might finally play these.   Blindy Member Nov 16, 2017 4,134 Scarlet & Violet getting performance upgrades but not Arceus is wild to me.   Finaj Member Oct 25, 2017 5,728 Please make Pokémon Scarlet and Violet actually playable. Please!   Seik Member Jan 5, 2023 3,734 Québec City Echoes of Wisdom needs that very very badly. Frame pacing in that game is literally headache inducing.  Teenage Fansub Member May 24, 2019 24,195 All the paid upgrades seemed to have additional exclusive content, so hopefully there'll be a lot of these when it's a simple switch to a native version without any bonuses.   Bishop89 What Are Ya' Selling? Member Oct 25, 2017 42,625 Melbourne, Australia Atheerios said: Pokémon™ Scarlet • Pokémon™ Violet Click to expand... Click to shrink... Nice   Cronogear ▲ Legend ▲ Member Oct 27, 2017 4,910 Scarlet and Violet will be VERY interesting to see. Can't wait for the DF video.   Dsezer Member Sep 22, 2020 500 Bayonetta 3 pls :(   NotLiquid One Winged Slayer Member Oct 25, 2017 37,802 Give me Bayonetta 3 and Astral Chain updates, and my life will be yours   Mario_Bones Member Oct 31, 2017 3,755 Australia Yeah the Scarlet and Violet upgrade had BETTER be free lmao Hopefully the Xenoblades and Age of Calamity get an upgrade as well  Hero One Winged Slayer Member Oct 25, 2017 8,816 Kongroo said: Paid 60fps patches is such a Nintendo move. I'm tired. Click to expand... Click to shrink... This thread is about free updates?  Watershed Member Oct 26, 2017 10,516 Free updates are nice. Hopefully technical improvements all around.   bunnibuki Member Feb 18, 2024 922 Fuck it, give me 120fps Skyward Sword lol Very glad to see Link's Awakening in here. Edit: Astral Chain and Bayonetta 3 better get some patches in the future, pleaseeee  Berordn One Winged Slayer Member Oct 26, 2017 10,674 NoVA Blindy said: Scarlet & Violet getting performance upgrades but not Arceus is wild to me. Click to expand... Click to shrink... arceus is probably being superceded in their eyes by ZA, but it'll be a while before the next pokemon gen   No Depth Member Oct 27, 2017 20,641 Waggles said: Cntrl + F Hyrule warriors well fuck Click to expand... Click to shrink... Entered thread for this exact thing too. Well fuck  Lucaflowe Member Sep 26, 2018 46 No Age of Calamity booooo. Pokemon Scarlet and Violet is definitely gonna have all eyes on it   Xtortion One Winged Slayer Member Oct 25, 2017 7,489 United States Games that are already 60fps should straight up just get uncapped framerates. Let the enhanced grunt of Switch 2 and VRR take the wheel.   jw2727 Member Aug 7, 2024 50 That's better. Hopefully more join that list, TTYD especially. EDIT and honestly, I would much prefer if Kirby and the Forgotten Land just got bumped to 60 without the extra shit.  Teenage Fansub Member May 24, 2019 24,195 SludgeFarmer said: and is there a base upgrade that makes stuff run better regardless of updates to specific titles? why isn't this stuff in the hour long sales pitch you just showed us Click to expand... Click to shrink... A hardware brute force upgrade seems to apply without patches. Enhanced BC confirmed for Switch 2 As per the most recent, "Ask the Developers" www.resetera.com   Soul Lab Member Nov 17, 2017 2,986 Xenoblade X? Bayonetta ? D:   DarkChronic Member Oct 27, 2017 5,652 Love to see it - not a bad start! So pumped to see Pokemon S/V! I can't wait to play these in earnest, lol! Glad to see Echoes of Wisdom, as well. Now we just need to see Xenoblade!  Bufbaf Don't F5! Member Oct 25, 2017 15,796 Hamburg, Germany gotta love how botw/totk aren't in there, so you're forced to buy the update instead of getting free 60fps.   RockmanBN Visited by Knack - One Winged Slayer Member Oct 25, 2017 31,854 Cornfields Where are my Xenoblades?   A.J. Member Oct 25, 2017 21,510 Still nothing for Xenoblade X. I guess that 60fps mode hidden in the code was unrelated   Rowsdower Shinra Employee of The Wise Ones Avenger Oct 27, 2017 19,962 Canada Pokemon Scarlet/Violet at maybe 60fps and no longer a blurry mess? Praise the lord.   Greywaren Member Jul 16, 2019 12,989 Spain Good stuff. Kinda softens the blow of other upgrades being paid.   Kouriozan Member Oct 25, 2017 24,670 That means 3rd parties can do it as well so that's good.   lucancel Member Oct 30, 2017 1,766 Italy Can i have switch 1 games docked mode on switch 2 portable? Did Nintendo Say anything?   Brodo Baggins Member Oct 27, 2017 5,581 No Xenoblade X 🥺   Waggles Member Oct 26, 2017 3,767 Lotus said: Would be surprised if it's not included later, it's gotta be one of the more infamous ones, and it's getting a sequel Click to expand... Click to shrink... Yeah, I'll assume a performance patch will come. does anyone know - did nintendo explicitly claim that "all" switch games will work on switch 2 regardless of patches or updates? i assume it'll be like microsoft's handling of BC titles - that even if they're not patched, they should still launch, even if bugs or weird behavior may be present. I'm hoping that games in general should see a performance boost regardless. Probably too much to hope for from Nintendo, honestly. On a similar note, I'm a little worried how the transfer between switch and switch 2 will be. will it reset my switch and lock me out of digital purchases and saves if I migrate to switch 2?  المصدر: https://www.resetera.com/threads/nintendo-confirms-some-switch-1-games-will-be-getting-free-updates-to-improve-playability-on-switch-2-separate-from-switch-2-editions.1152525/ #Nintendo #confirms #some #Switch #games #will #getting #free #updates #improve #playability #Switch #separate #from #Switch #editions