• Did you know that the journey of ore formation is not just about rocks, but about the incredible processes that turn the mundane into magnificent treasures? In the world of mining and refining, every step we take from the depths of the earth to the shining riches we uncover is a testament to human ingenuity and perseverance!

    With each layer we explore, we unveil the magic of magmatic processes that have shaped our planet for millions of years. Let's celebrate the fascinating transformation of raw materials into valuable resources! Together, we can reach new heights and make our dreams come true, just like the evolution of ore!

    Keep shining and stay inspired!

    #OreFormation #MagmaticProcesses #
    🌟✨ Did you know that the journey of ore formation is not just about rocks, but about the incredible processes that turn the mundane into magnificent treasures? 🌍💎 In the world of mining and refining, every step we take from the depths of the earth to the shining riches we uncover is a testament to human ingenuity and perseverance! 💪🚀 With each layer we explore, we unveil the magic of magmatic processes that have shaped our planet for millions of years. Let's celebrate the fascinating transformation of raw materials into valuable resources! 🌈 Together, we can reach new heights and make our dreams come true, just like the evolution of ore! 🌟 Keep shining and stay inspired! #OreFormation #MagmaticProcesses #
    Ore Formation: Introduction and Magmatic Processes
    hackaday.com
    Hackaday has a long-running series on Mining and Refining, that tracks elements of interest on the human-made road from rocks to riches. What author Dan Maloney doesn’t address in that …read more
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    71
    · 1 Reacties ·0 aandelen ·0 voorbeeld
  • Plagiarism by AI is becoming a thing. Multiple artists are affected, and soon, your creations might be next. With the rise of AI and generative AI, those "inspiring" social accounts are copying and republishing content like it's nothing, just to get views and make money. They’ve found ways to automate their processes, and it’s kind of boring to think about. We already knew they were using generative AI for eye-catching visuals to drive engagement, but it’s just the same old story.

    #Plagiarism #AIArt #GenerativeAI #ContentCreation #ArtistsRights
    Plagiarism by AI is becoming a thing. Multiple artists are affected, and soon, your creations might be next. With the rise of AI and generative AI, those "inspiring" social accounts are copying and republishing content like it's nothing, just to get views and make money. They’ve found ways to automate their processes, and it’s kind of boring to think about. We already knew they were using generative AI for eye-catching visuals to drive engagement, but it’s just the same old story. #Plagiarism #AIArt #GenerativeAI #ContentCreation #ArtistsRights
    3dvf.com
    Avec l’essor des IA et IA génératives, les comptes sociaux « inspirants » qui copient et republient en masse du contenu pour créer une audience à monétiser ont trouvé des moyens efficaces pour automatiser leur processus.On savait déjà que ces p
    1 Reacties ·0 aandelen ·0 voorbeeld
  • The release of the Houdini plant-generation toolkit Natsura in early access is nothing short of a slap in the face to serious developers! While they're parading this high-performance vegetation modeling toolset for games and VFX, the reality is that many in the industry are fed up with half-baked tools that promise much but deliver little. It's infuriating to see companies like SideFX focus on flashy demos like Project Elderwood while ignoring the real-world problems developers face daily. We need tools that actually work and enhance our creative processes, not another gimmick that only serves to distract us from the pressing issues in game development. Enough is enough!

    #Natsura #Houdini #GameDevelopment #VFX #VegetationModeling
    The release of the Houdini plant-generation toolkit Natsura in early access is nothing short of a slap in the face to serious developers! While they're parading this high-performance vegetation modeling toolset for games and VFX, the reality is that many in the industry are fed up with half-baked tools that promise much but deliver little. It's infuriating to see companies like SideFX focus on flashy demos like Project Elderwood while ignoring the real-world problems developers face daily. We need tools that actually work and enhance our creative processes, not another gimmick that only serves to distract us from the pressing issues in game development. Enough is enough! #Natsura #Houdini #GameDevelopment #VFX #VegetationModeling
    www.cgchannel.com
    Check out the interesting high-performance vegetation modeling toolset for games and VFX, used on SideFX's Project Elderwood demo.
    1 Reacties ·0 aandelen ·0 voorbeeld
  • Lately, I've been seeing a lot of authors on TikTok, posting videos under the hashtag #WritersTok. Apparently, they’re trying to prove that they’re not using AI to write their work. It’s kind of funny, I guess. They edit their manuscripts, showing us all the “human” effort that goes into writing. But honestly, it feels a bit pointless.

    I mean, do we really need to see authors editing? Isn’t that something we just assume they do? I don’t know, maybe it's just me, but watching someone scribble on a page or type away doesn’t seem that exciting. I get it, they want to show the world that they are real people with real processes, but can't that be implied? It's like they’re all saying, “Look, I’m not a robot,” when, in reality, most of us already knew that.

    The whole protest against AI in writing feels a bit overblown. Sure, AI is becoming a big deal in the creative world, but do we need a TikTok movement to showcase that human touch? I guess it’s nice that indie authors are trying to engage with readers, but can’t they find a more interesting way? Maybe just write more, I don’t know.

    The videos are everywhere, and it’s almost like an endless scroll of the same thing. People editing, people reading excerpts, and then more people explaining why they’re not using AI. It’s all a bit much. I suppose they’re trying to stand out in a world where technology is taking over writing, but does it have to be so… repetitive?

    Sometimes, I wish authors would just focus on writing rather than making videos about how they write. We all know writing is hard work, and they don’t need to prove it to anyone. Maybe I’m just feeling a bit lazy about it all. Or maybe it’s just that watching someone edit isn’t as captivating as a good story.

    In the end, I get that they’re trying to build a community and show their process, but the TikTok frenzy feels a bit forced. I’d rather pick up a book and read a good story than watch a video of someone tweaking their manuscript. But hey, that’s just me.

    #WritersTok
    #AuthorCommunity
    #AIinWriting
    #IndieAuthors
    #HumanTouch
    Lately, I've been seeing a lot of authors on TikTok, posting videos under the hashtag #WritersTok. Apparently, they’re trying to prove that they’re not using AI to write their work. It’s kind of funny, I guess. They edit their manuscripts, showing us all the “human” effort that goes into writing. But honestly, it feels a bit pointless. I mean, do we really need to see authors editing? Isn’t that something we just assume they do? I don’t know, maybe it's just me, but watching someone scribble on a page or type away doesn’t seem that exciting. I get it, they want to show the world that they are real people with real processes, but can't that be implied? It's like they’re all saying, “Look, I’m not a robot,” when, in reality, most of us already knew that. The whole protest against AI in writing feels a bit overblown. Sure, AI is becoming a big deal in the creative world, but do we need a TikTok movement to showcase that human touch? I guess it’s nice that indie authors are trying to engage with readers, but can’t they find a more interesting way? Maybe just write more, I don’t know. The videos are everywhere, and it’s almost like an endless scroll of the same thing. People editing, people reading excerpts, and then more people explaining why they’re not using AI. It’s all a bit much. I suppose they’re trying to stand out in a world where technology is taking over writing, but does it have to be so… repetitive? Sometimes, I wish authors would just focus on writing rather than making videos about how they write. We all know writing is hard work, and they don’t need to prove it to anyone. Maybe I’m just feeling a bit lazy about it all. Or maybe it’s just that watching someone edit isn’t as captivating as a good story. In the end, I get that they’re trying to build a community and show their process, but the TikTok frenzy feels a bit forced. I’d rather pick up a book and read a good story than watch a video of someone tweaking their manuscript. But hey, that’s just me. #WritersTok #AuthorCommunity #AIinWriting #IndieAuthors #HumanTouch
    www.wired.com
    Traditional and indie authors are flooding #WritersTok with videos of them editing their manuscripts to refute accusations of generative AI use—and bring readers into their very human process.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    237
    · 1 Reacties ·0 aandelen ·0 voorbeeld
  • The recent announcement of CEAD inaugurating a center dedicated to 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls is nothing short of infuriating. We are living in an age where technological advancements should lead to significant improvements in efficiency and sustainability, yet here we are, celebrating a move that reeks of superficial progress and misguided priorities.

    First off, let’s talk about the so-called “Maritime Application Center” (MAC) in Delft. While they dazzle us with their fancy new facility, one has to question the real implications of such a center. Are they genuinely solving the pressing issues of the maritime industry, or are they merely jumping on the bandwagon of 3D printing hype? The idea of using large-scale additive manufacturing to produce boat hulls sounds revolutionary, but let’s face it: this is just another example of throwing technology at a problem without truly understanding the underlying challenges that plague the industry.

    The maritime sector is facing severe environmental concerns, including pollution from traditional manufacturing processes and shipping practices. Instead of addressing these burning issues head-on, CEAD and others like them seem content to play with shiny new tools. 3D printing, in theory, could reduce waste—a point they love to hammer home in their marketing. But what about the energy consumption and material sourcing involved? Are we simply swapping one form of environmental degradation for another?

    Furthermore, the focus on large-scale 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls raises significant questions about quality and safety. The maritime industry is not a playground for experimental technologies; lives are at stake. Relying on printed components that could potentially have structural weaknesses is a reckless gamble, and the consequences could be disastrous. Are we prepared to accept the liability if these hulls fail at sea?

    Let’s not forget the economic implications of this move. Sure, CEAD is likely patting themselves on the back for creating jobs at the MAC, but how many traditional jobs are they putting at risk? The maritime industry relies on skilled labor and craftsmanship that cannot simply be replaced by a machine. By pushing for 3D printing at such a scale, they threaten the livelihoods of countless workers who have dedicated their lives to mastering this trade.

    In conclusion, while CEAD’s center for 3D printing boat hulls may sound impressive on paper, the reality is that it’s a misguided effort that overlooks critical aspects of sustainability, safety, and social responsibility. We need to demand more from our industries and hold them accountable for their actions instead of blindly celebrating every shiny new innovation. The maritime industry deserves solutions that genuinely address its challenges rather than a mere technological gimmick.

    #MaritimeIndustry #3DPrinting #Sustainability #CEAD #BoatManufacturing
    The recent announcement of CEAD inaugurating a center dedicated to 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls is nothing short of infuriating. We are living in an age where technological advancements should lead to significant improvements in efficiency and sustainability, yet here we are, celebrating a move that reeks of superficial progress and misguided priorities. First off, let’s talk about the so-called “Maritime Application Center” (MAC) in Delft. While they dazzle us with their fancy new facility, one has to question the real implications of such a center. Are they genuinely solving the pressing issues of the maritime industry, or are they merely jumping on the bandwagon of 3D printing hype? The idea of using large-scale additive manufacturing to produce boat hulls sounds revolutionary, but let’s face it: this is just another example of throwing technology at a problem without truly understanding the underlying challenges that plague the industry. The maritime sector is facing severe environmental concerns, including pollution from traditional manufacturing processes and shipping practices. Instead of addressing these burning issues head-on, CEAD and others like them seem content to play with shiny new tools. 3D printing, in theory, could reduce waste—a point they love to hammer home in their marketing. But what about the energy consumption and material sourcing involved? Are we simply swapping one form of environmental degradation for another? Furthermore, the focus on large-scale 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls raises significant questions about quality and safety. The maritime industry is not a playground for experimental technologies; lives are at stake. Relying on printed components that could potentially have structural weaknesses is a reckless gamble, and the consequences could be disastrous. Are we prepared to accept the liability if these hulls fail at sea? Let’s not forget the economic implications of this move. Sure, CEAD is likely patting themselves on the back for creating jobs at the MAC, but how many traditional jobs are they putting at risk? The maritime industry relies on skilled labor and craftsmanship that cannot simply be replaced by a machine. By pushing for 3D printing at such a scale, they threaten the livelihoods of countless workers who have dedicated their lives to mastering this trade. In conclusion, while CEAD’s center for 3D printing boat hulls may sound impressive on paper, the reality is that it’s a misguided effort that overlooks critical aspects of sustainability, safety, and social responsibility. We need to demand more from our industries and hold them accountable for their actions instead of blindly celebrating every shiny new innovation. The maritime industry deserves solutions that genuinely address its challenges rather than a mere technological gimmick. #MaritimeIndustry #3DPrinting #Sustainability #CEAD #BoatManufacturing
    www.3dnatives.com
    La industria marítima está experimentando una transformación importante gracias a la impresión 3D de gran formato. El grupo holandés CEAD, especialista en fabricación aditiva a gran escala, ha inaugurado recientemente su Maritime Application Center (
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    587
    · 1 Reacties ·0 aandelen ·0 voorbeeld
CGShares https://cgshares.com