0 Commentarios
0 Acciones
87 Views
Directorio
Directorio
-
Please log in to like, share and comment!
-
THEHACKERNEWS.COMAdobe Patches 11 Critical ColdFusion Flaws Amid 30 Total Vulnerabilities DiscoveredAdobe has released security updates to fix a fresh set of security flaws, including multiple critical-severity bugs in ColdFusion versions 2025, 2023 and 2021 that could result in arbitrary file read and code execution. Of the 30 flaws in the product, 11 are rated Critical in severity - CVE-2025-24446 (CVSS score: 9.1) - An improper input validation vulnerability that could result in an arbitrary file system read CVE-2025-24447 (CVSS score: 9.1) - A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution CVE-2025-30281 (CVSS score: 9.1) - An improper access control vulnerability that could result in an arbitrary file system read CVE-2025-30282 (CVSS score: 9.1) - An improper authentication vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution CVE-2025-30284 (CVSS score: 8.0) - A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution CVE-2025-30285 (CVSS score: 8.0) - A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution CVE-2025-30286 (CVSS score: 8.0) - An operating system command injection vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution CVE-2025-30287 (CVSS score: 8.1) - An improper authentication vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution CVE-2025-30288 (CVSS score: 7.8) - An improper access control vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass CVE-2025-30289 (CVSS score: 7.5) - An operating system command injection vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution CVE-2025-30290 (CVSS score: 8.7) - A path traversal vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass "These updates resolve critical and important vulnerabilities that could lead to arbitrary file system read, arbitrary code execution and security feature bypass," Adobe said in an advisory. The vulnerabilities have been resolved in the below versions - ColdFusion 2021 Update 19 ColdFusion 2023 Update 13, and ColdFusion 2025 Update 1 Fixes have also been released to address several out-of-bounds write and heap-based buffer overflow bugs in After Effects (CVE-2025-27182, CVE-2025-27183), Media Encoder (CVE-2025-27194, CVE-2025-27195), Bridge (CVE-2025-27193), Premiere Pro (CVE-2025-27196), Photoshop (CVE-2025-27198), Animate (CVE-2025-27199), and FrameMaker (CVE-2025-30304, CVE-2025-30297, CVE-2025-30295) that could lead to arbitrary code execution. Adobe also noted that it's not aware of any exploits for any of the aforementioned shortcomings. That said, it's essential that users update their installations to the latest version to safeguard against potential threats. Found this article interesting? Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 102 Views
-
WWW.CNET.COMToday's NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Wednesday, April 9Here are the answers for The New York Times Mini Crossword for April 9.0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 91 Views
-
WWW.ARCHITECTURALDIGEST.COMBest Makeup Organizers to Add Order to Your Beauty Stash (2025)Picture this: You’re prepping for a night out and pretty soon the bathroom is a chaotic mess of beauty products. The best makeup organizers are a necessary intervention (whether staged by you or a discerning roommate), adding some much-needed order to your beauty stockpile. Because as our personal collections continue to expand, the size of our bathrooms unfortunately does not. Inspired by the glam set-ups of Open Door stars like Lana Candor and Heidi Gardner, we found actually stylish setups to match a wide range of budgets and cosmetic collections—from vintage Italian options with compartments for every aspect of your routine to chic baskets that lean into the idea of organized chaos.Our top picks:Best Basket Organizer: West Elm Stackable Plastic Baskets, $24Best Drawer Organizer: Three by Three Seattle Metal Organizer Tray Set, $21Best Cart Organizer: Space Age Boby Cart by Joe Colombo, $449Best Night Stand: Kartell Combonibili Storage Unit, $295Best Vanity Table: Urban Outfitters Stacie Wood Flip-Top Mirror Vanity, $699 $594Best Vanity Case: Mark and Graham Terminal One Cosmetics Case, $99Tried and True BasketsPerhaps the most obvious answer to any storage woes, baskets can solve pretty much any and all organization conundrums, corralling similar items into one place for later. There’s no shortage of containers out there that’ll make sure your beauty products aren’t overcrowding your countertops, but we recommend something that’s bathroom-friendly (i.e. moisture-resistant) and easy to clean. Our top picks include stackable designs that you can acquire more of as your products grow, a woven design that’s meant to live in the bathroom, and an unexpected pick: a Vitra toolbox with the perfectly sized compartments to separate your eyeshadow palettes from your skin care.ADKBO Scalloped BasketiDesign Wire Basket with HandlesWest Elm Stackable Plastic Basket (Set of 2)Toolbox RE by Arik Levy for VitraAdd to CartFor more robust makeup collections, carts offer a multitiered storage solution for easily portable glam. You won’t find any cheap plastic carts on our list though—we think your beauty products deserve a beautiful storage option even if you aren’t a professional makeup artist. We sourced high-quality vintage pieces like a classic Joe Colombo cart and the Herman Miller OE1 Trolley to house your prized makeup brushes and lip glosses. Store your most-used makeup products up top for easy access and keep smaller cosmetic organizers on hand to store the products you grab less frequently.Space Age Boby Cart by Joe ColomboElle Get-Ready Storage CartHerman Miller OE1 TrolleyVintage Bar Trolley CartBeauty by the DrawerfullA small night stand or slim chest of drawers offers a more discreet option for stashing products (meaning dirty brushes and bruised skincare products will be your little secret). For this hack, we perused the kid’s section at some of our favorite retailers for fun-sized nightstands as well as more colorful options from our favorite design spots. Our top pick for the section? The Kartell Componibili storage unit that’s available in different storage modules and would look just as chic in a bathroom as it would in your bedroom.Kartell Componibili Storage UnitMoMA 5-Drawer Pivot CabinetCrate & Barrel Calli NightstandLatitude Run Narrow NightstandVanity Tables for the Open Door LookIf applying your beauty regimen is more like an act of selfcare, take inspiration from the glam rooms of Lana Condor or Harper Sorum and dedicate a whole space to your moisturizing rituals. In this category we found options that will still help you maximize your floor real estate, like a lift-up table top that can also double as a desk, and a well-priced Wayfair option that looks just like an ordinary nightstand but actually converts to a mirror table and chair set.Urban Outfitters Stacie Flip-Top Mirror VanityFadidio Flip-Top Mirror Vanity Desk and Bench SetLatitude Run Vanity Desk with Mirror and Storage StoolSonkYog Nightstand Flip-Top Mirror Vanity Desk with StoolGrab-and-Go Vanity CasesVanity cases are some of the best makeup organizers around even when you’re not traveling. They offer more structure than typical toiletry and makeup bags with built-in dividers that you can dedicate specific products to (some swear by them as brush organizers). Vanity cases also pose an opportunity for a personalized moment—look to our pick from Mark and Graham, one of our favorite retailers for all things monogrammed. We also pulled aluminum designs from a couple of our favorite luggage brands that are built for rough-and-tough carry and can take your 12-step skin-care routine on the road.ETOILE COLLECTIVE Duo Vanity CaseMark & Graham Terminal 1 Cosmetic CaseRIMOWA Aluminum Vanity CaseCALPAK Ambeur Vanity CaseDrawer StorageRemovable drawer dividers are our favorite method for decluttering counter space (and making sure your drawers can actually close). They’ve got loads of functionality—use some as brush holders, some to divide your face products, and some to break up eyeshadows. The true beauty of these individual nests is that you can also dedicate space in the same drawer to organize jewelry, hair accessories, and more without everything getting jumbled. Amazon has a bevy of both more ornate and minimal options, plus you can choose from plastic, metal, or even wood should you be looking to coordinate with the larger storage piece.The Container Store Clear 7-Section Makeup TraySMARTAKE Drawer Organizer Trays (Set of 13)Neat Method Acacia Drawer InsertThree by Three Seattle Metal Organizer Tray Set0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 94 Views
-
WWW.404MEDIA.COA 'US-Made iPhone' Is Pure FantasySubscribe Join the newsletter to get the latest updates. This weekend, U.S. secretary of commerce Howard Lutnick went on CBS’s Face the Nation and pitched a fantasy world where iPhones are manufactured in the United States: “The army of millions and millions of people screwing in little, little screws to make iPhones, that kind of thing is going to come to America, it’s going to be automated, and the tradecraft of America is going to fix them, is going to work on them, there’s going to be mechanics, HVAC specialists, electricians,” Lutnick said. “The tradecraft of America, the high school educated Americans, the core to our workforce is going to have the greatest resurgence of jobs in the history of America to work on these high tech factories which are all coming to America.” The idea of a Made-in-the-USA iPhone has been an obsession for politicians for years, a kind of shorthand goalpost that would signal “American manufacturing is back” that is nonetheless nowhere close to being a reality and would require a nearly impossible-to-fathom restructuring of the global supply chains that make the iPhone possible in the first place. Over the years, economists and manufacturing experts have attempted to calculate how much an American-made iPhone would cost. In recent days a Quora answer from 2018 that suggests an American iPhone would cost $30,000 has gone repeatedly viral. A Reuters story that claims a tariffed iPhone would cost $2,300 has also gone viral.These articles are good exercises but they are also total fantasy. There is no universe in which Apple snaps its fingers and begins making the iPhone in the United States overnight. It could theoretically begin assembling them here, but even that is a years-long process made infinitely harder by the fact that, in Trump’s ideal world, every company would be reshoring American manufacturing at the same time, leading to supply chain issues, factory building issues, and exacerbating the already lacking American talent pool for high-tech manufacturing. In the long term, we could and probably will see more tech manufacturing get reshored to the United States for strategic and national security reasons, but in the interim with massive tariffs, there will likely be unfathomable pain that is likely to last years, not weeks or months. The truth is that, assembled in the U.S. or not, the iPhone is a truly international device that is full of components manufactured all over the world and materials mined from dozens of different countries. Apple has what is among the most complex supply chains that has ever been designed in human history, and it is not going to be able to completely change that supply chain anytime soon.We can see how the iPhone is made today by looking at numerous reports that Apple puts out every year, which outlines its current supply chain and workforce requirements. So let’s start there. The home page of Apple’s supply chain website states “Designed by Apple in California. Made by people everywhere.”0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 94 Views
-
WWW.NINTENDOLIFE.COMMario Kart World "Paid DLC" Would Be A Big No-No, According To Ex-Nintendo DuoIs $80 already enough?There's been a lot of talk about the $80 price tag attached to the Switch 2 launch title Mario Kart World and Nintendo has justified it by claiming the game is "so big and so vast", but what if it ends up charging for additional content in the long run?Ex-Nintendo Minute duo Kit and Krysta, who now run their own YouTube channel, have touched on the idea of Nintendo potentially demanding even more gold coins in the immediate future for possible Mario Kart World DLC - suggesting it would go against the current messaging:Read the full article on nintendolife.com0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 107 Views
-
WWW.FORBES.COMPeter Watts On ‘Blindsight’, ‘Armored Core’ And Working With Neill BlomkampThe writer and novelist Peter Watts.Do-Ming Lum/Tiger Mountain Creative Services Back when Secret Level was released, I really enjoyed the Armored Core episode, only to find out the story had been written by Peter Watts, so I caught up with him to find out more. Peter is also one of my favorite authors. His novel Blindsight is a remarkably imaginative and thoughtful book, if also utterly terrifying. So to have Peter tackle Armored Core, a series of mecha games I have been dutifully playing for 28 years, was a rare and wonderful treat. However, before we get to all that, I wanted to know more about how Peter became a writer in the first place. “I was born in Calgary, the heart of the Albertan Bible-Belt. Escaped to Ontario with my parents when I was thirteen. As it turned out, Ontario wasn’t much better. “The things I enjoyed doing. Reading (voraciously; even back then, it was mainly science fiction and marine biology for kids). Writing. Designing pedal-powered submarines with canvas hulls, and underwater habitats made out of plywood and inverted garbage cans anchored to the bottom of Gull Lake. Surprisingly, none of these surpassing technological feats ever made it past the design stage. “I once dug a secret underground hideout in our backyard that worked really well until my parents decided to put a compost heap in the same spot. Dad nearly broke his leg when he stamped his foot down on the shovel and broke through the planks under the dirt I’d thrown on top. (In hindsight, the fact that I was even able to build an underground hideout without my parents knowing about it says something about the degree of independence granted to kids back then. Or maybe it just says something about my ancestors’ parenting skills.) “Oh, and trying to avoid getting beaten up at recess. I really enjoyed doing that. I did it a lot. “As for getting into writing, I was maybe seven or eight. It was a Sunday. CBC Radio was playing the soundtrack album for Walt Disney’s adaptation of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea. Those old Disney soundtracks weren’t just music cuts; they were basically audio plays of the movie, replete with narration, sound effects, and movie dialog. It was the whole story. “I was entranced. After it was finished, I wrote down everything I could remember on a couple of pieces of foolscap and showed my dad “this story I wrote”. Astonishingly, he didn’t call me out for my obvious plagiarism. He just suggested ways I might improve the next draft ("They abandoned ship too quickly. Maybe have them fight harder to save the Nautilus.") And I thought, Hey, I got away with it. That was easy. I bet I could keep on getting away with it. “From that point on, I wrote stories like I was chasing the dragon. Stories about radiation-burned mutants, Octopus-Human Hybrid Fetuses That Would Not Die, and captive Loch Ness Monsters as tourist attractions being treated so abominably that the only person who actually cared about them ended up blowing their heads off with a shotgun to save them from further suffering. I was a better writer than other kids my age; a story I wrote for Grade Ten English class got returned to me because the head of the department thought it was plagiarized on account of being too good to have been written by a 14-year-old (which I guess is ironic given how I got started in this whole thing). But I was still, objectively, pretty abysmal. “I wrote all through high school and three university degrees without making a single sale. Got lots of positive feedback, mind you; I once got rejected by a magazine I’d never even sent a story to (Analog; the editor at Asimov’s sent it on to them on my behalf). I took their “we’re interested in seeing more of your work” to heart and sent them everything I wrote over the next decade. Only in hindsight did I realize that Analog’s rejections, initially long, detailed, and encouraging, were getting ever shorter and more generic over time, which suggests that I was getting worse with practice. The most frequent criticism I got was some variant of “this is really well written but it’s awfully depressing. Could you maybe bring in some clowns?” “I didn’t get a single thing published until I was thirty-one, and even that was in some small press no one had ever heard of. (That same story got me my first form-rejection slip from Analog, completing my trajectory from Promising Acolyte to Slush-Pile Reject.) From that point on, I started getting published semiregularly in small mags and semi-pros. To this day, I’ve never got a story into any of the big US traditionals. I stopped even trying back around the turn of the century. “My day job back then involved working for a university consortium founded to research a catastrophic decline in piscivorous marine mammal populations in the Bering and the North Pacific. Given that this decline coincided with the large-scale movement of the US Commercial fishing fleet into those waters, the idea that overfishing might have something to do with it seemed a reasonable hypothesis. The problem was that the vast majority of the consortium’s funding came from the fishing industry itself. So the head of the consortium, the kind of guy we used to call a “biostitute” on account of his, shall we say, flexible perspectives, kept sidling up to me during Friday afternoon beers and suggesting that maybe it was killer whales to blame for the decline, or maybe the animals were all dying from some kind of sexually-transmitted calicivirus. Because, you know, Steller sea lions have notoriously loose morals. “I put up with that for as long as I could, then quit in a huff. At which point I had about a year before the UI ran out. So I figured, what the hell. You’ve wanted to be a real author for thirty years. If you don’t do it now, you never will. Starfish came out in 1999 and ended up as a NY Times Notable Book of the Year. The rest is history. “So basically, you could say I owe my writing career to a tantrum.”Watts' novel 'Blindsight' won the Japanese Seiun Award in 2014.Tor Books Following this, I asked the impossible question of who were Peter’s favorite writers. He was kind enough not to bite my head off and gave me some fascinating answers. “I see that as two different but related questions: 1) Who were the authors who influenced me most back in my formative years, and 2) Who are my favorite authors today? “The first question is easy: John Brunner, first among equals, for the jagged prose, the topicality of his works, the enormous amount of research that went into his novels, and the grimy realpolitik infusing his fiction at a time when so much science fiction was still spandex and space ships. The Sheep Look Up is one of two books that literally changed my life: upon finishing it for the first time, I knew in my bones that a) I had to become not just a writer, but that kind of writer, and b) that I had to work to prevent the all-too-plausible future Brunner described. I did both of those things; I only succeeded at one of them. “Samuel Delany for his gorgeous prose and (in some cases anyway) his resolute refusal to connect the dots for his readers (looking at you, Dhalgren). Robert Silverberg, for his more-restrained-but-still-elegant prose, and for his compelling exploration of scientific/ethical concepts. (Dying Inside stays with me fifty years after I read it; “Our Lady of the Sauropods” blew the doors off dinosaur resurrection a decade before Crichton picked up that baton, and was better written to boot.) Maybe William Gibson, who was of course a kick in the ass for the whole genre, but who came along after my own voice had pretty much congealed. “Note that there were a lot more authors back then whose writing I admired or adored, Ursula Le Guin, Ray Bradbury, Larry Niven and Alfred Bester to name but a few, but I only wanted to read them. I never wanted to write like them. “The second question is a bit tougher because an unfortunate downside of being an actual writer (for me at least) is that I somehow don’t have nearly as much time to be a reader as I used to. In grad school, I’d finish off a couple of novels a week, all while running a Dungeons & Dragons campaign, exploring the biophysical ecology of harbor seals on remote islands with no plumbing facilities, and going to see Aliens three times within the first five days of release. Now, most of my reading comes down to research for my own work and manuscripts presented to me in search of blurbs (some of which at least make me feel quite a bit better about my own octopus-human-fetus efforts). The time I have left is limited; I’m only just now getting caught up on my Gene Wolfe, and there are genre authors in the current top critical tier whom I’ve yet to read at all. “So the following sample is in no way an expert take on the best writers working in the field today. I lack the expertise to make such calls. But they are authors whom I’ve read recently, and whose work I admire (sometimes to the point of outright envy). “China Miéville; I’ve only read three or four of his novels, but the prose rocks and the concepts are solid, even if the plots are sometimes a wee bit episodic. I’ve been known to prod partners awake deep in the night for no better reason than to admiringly read excerpts of Miéville prose. And I’m not even into New Weird. “Seth Dickensen, based entirely on his novel Exordia. Dude’s mainly known for fantasy, but Exordia is hard science fiction and it rocks. Viscerally horrific, conceptually mindblowing, achingly humane. “I’m also starting to get seriously jealous of Adrian Tchaikovsky, although I’ve only read one short story and two novels out of his library-filling oeuvre. Children of Time was good; the short story (which I don’t think has been published yet) was great; but his latest novel (Shroud) serves up one of the most rigorously defined and intensely alien ecosystems I’ve ever encountered in fiction and is a terrific first-contact story to boot. “Hiron Ennes. A newish author; imagine a transporter accident where Gene Wolfe, Mervin Peake, and China Miéville all get mooshed together. In Leech, a parasitic hive mind that infests people discovers another parasitic hive mind that infests people, competing for the same brain space (told in first-person from the POV of the former parasitic hive mind). The Works of Vermin is visceral Cronenbergian steampunk; think Victorian London, perched over a chasm, infested by anarchists and giant burrowing centipedes and you may get a vague sense of the book’s aesthetic. “Finally, someone I’m sure none of you have ever heard of, because she’s a new Canadian author published by the tiny Bumblepuppy Press, and by the time you read this, her books will be prohibitively expensive due to tariffs. Rachel Rosen, whose ongoing Sleep of Reason trilogy (the second book has only just been released) depicts a future climate-ravaged world in which demons stalk the Rockies and so-called “MAIs” (Magic-Affected Individuals) are used by Canadian politicians to plan their campaigns. Canada falls into dictatorship in the first book; the Resistance hangs on by its fingernails in the second. There are Earthquakes and opera singers and prison camps for human experimentation. There’s a sapient tech-bro submarine. I don’t know how many non-Canadians these books might resonate with, but I’ll bet that number is increasing daily, down below the 49th at least. I would not have believed that a fantasy novel could be so depressingly relevant. “As for favorite novels, that’s another implicit two-parter I’m thinking, and the answer to the second part (i.e., what are my current favorites) is already laid out above. The first (what are my past influences) also, albeit to a lesser extent: Brunner’s The Sheep Look Up, Silverberg’s Dying Inside, Delany’s Dhalgren have already been cited. Add Brunner’s Hugo-winning Stand on Zanzibar to that list. While Sheep focuses on environmental devastation, Stand delves into a wider range of subjects; AI, genetic engineering, hobby terrorism and pop culture, against the broad backdrop of overpopulation. “Throw in Alfred Bester’s The Stars My Destination (sometimes cited as the first cyberpunk novel, even though it was published back in 1956), for the sheer inventive density of cool ideas on every page: teleportation as an innate human ability, religion as pornography, asteroid cargo cults where the cultists are descended from actual scientists. Cybernetic augmentation decades before it was cool. PyrE. The healing power of revenge. A novel way ahead of its time: I can easily forgive the fact that Bester cut-and-pasted the exact same few paragraphs of prose into two separate parts of the same story. “Gibson’s Neuromancer. Because of course. Although his Count Zero might be a wee bit better on a purely technical level.” It was here I wanted to know more about the recent work Peter had done on Secret Level, and the story he’d written for the Armored Core episode.'Secret Level' featured a segment on 'Armored Core' with the story written by Watts.FromSoftware, Amazon Over on Peter’s blog, he covered a good chunk of what happened, but some criticism of the episode from newer and less experienced players claimed that it wasn’t “Armored Core enough”. Naturally, I disagreed with this, and could see that quite a lot had been cut out, but before all that I just wanted to know how Peter got involved with it in the first place. “Apparently, I have fans at Blur Studio (the force behind Love, Death, and Robots). Way back in 2022 they reached out and asked if I’d be interested in pitching for a new anthology series based on a variety of new and classic video games: Secret Level, they called it. I’d loved Love, Death and Robots. I was bitterly envious of all those other science fiction writers who’d made an appearance there. This was my chance to sit at the Cool Kids Table, not to mention stretching creative muscles in a format I’d never even attempted before. I was gonna say no to that? “For the Armored Core story, the plan was to write a prequel to the events of Fires of Rubicon, the latest game in that franchise. Blur loaded me up with all sorts of Armored Core VI backstory: a profile of “Raven”, the game’s protagonist (heard but never seen in-game); his relationships with various other characters; the history of Rubicon itself and the nature of Coral (a kind of networked artificial aeroplankton that serves as the story’s MacGuffin). I was told enough of the game’s plot to avoid stepping on its toes: there was a list of Dos and Don’ts (all of Blur’s pitch decks come with those) stipulating the elements I could explore and those that had to be kept in reserve for the game itself. “So I put together a pitch to meet those specs. Subsequent changes decreed from on high (which is to say FromSoftware, not Blur) started small: suddenly we weren’t allowed to call Raven by name. Okay. Ayre (a sapient manifestation of networked coral, which manifested as a voice fed through Raven’s cortical augments) went from being sexless to female. Sure. “Then we couldn’t call her Ayre. Then we couldn’t call it Coral. Then the protagonist couldn’t be Raven, whether we named him or not. Then the story couldn’t be explicitly set on Rubicon. I’m not entirely sure whether FromSoftware were simply worried about spoilers (which would be odd, given that the short came out more than a year after the game did) or if they just decided they wanted a more generic story that would draw attention to the wider franchise without focusing on any particular installment. “Either way, my original story involved Raven and Ayre making a seminal discovery about Coral in the war-ravaged wastelands of Rubicon. You can see the problem.” “In the end, the Armored Core episode turned out far better than it had any right to, given the constraints. JT Petty’s screenplay managed to keep the essence of my story intact, the overall plot structure, the worldbuilding, the character development, even a surprisingly large amount of dialog, while stripping away all the Rubicon-specific elements and swapping in a completely different payoff at the end. His ending, in fact, packed way more of a gut-punch than mine had; there were a couple of fridge-logic issues (like why the enemy mecha didn’t reach out more explicitly to our pilot instead of immediately engaging him in battle), but the punchline was just so good that they never even occurred to me until well after the credits rolled. “If I’d had my way, I might have inserted a couple of lines of dialog to sew up that seam. Otherwise, it was spot-on. I’m proud to have had a hand in it.” Moving on, we touched on Peter’s upcoming work with movie director Neill Blomkamp, but obviously he couldn’t go into too much detail. “I can at least say the project exists, now: I’m about to start writing an episodic treatment for an 8-10-episode series adaptation of my novel Blindsight. “Neill and I have had a long and tortured history with that property. When he first expressed interest, the rights were tied up with a third party. We almost made it work regardless; Neill was initially interested in doing a movie that wasn’t set in the Blindsight universe at all, but which merely used the speculative biology I’d invented to justify the existence of Blindsight’s vampires. “Sicario with Vampires” was Neill’s elevator pitch, and as chance would have it the guys who had the rights back then had forgotten to renew them. So we just hunkered quietly until those rights expired, and the recently-rights-holding parties said Oh my goodness we thought we’d renewed those already can we have them back? And I said, Sure; but you gotta carve out this little IP exclusion on the biology so Neill can do his vampire thing. “It seemed like a good idea at the time. It was good idea, dammit. We got the carve-out and everything. But then one of innumerable dead-eyed suits didn’t think it was explicit enough, and the rights-holders started messing us around, and what looked like a done deal turned to ash. We lost a year or more on that account. “But eventually the rights expired again, for good this time. And there was Neill, waiting patiently in the shadows to pounce. So now he’s developing both his Sicario-with-vampires movie and an actual Blindsight adaptation. I should probably keep the current status of those projects private for the time being. Neill’s cool with me revealing the existence of the Blindsight adaptation at least, and he’s long-since let the cat out of the bag for his vampire movie (although that was with some guy called Joe Rogan, don’t know how many people listen to him). But the stage of gestation, casting, and all those granular nuts and bolts are probably best kept under wraps for the moment. “What I can say, though, is that it feels as though the book has been stuck in option limbo forever, never even made it to Development Hell, unless you count a couple of abortive screenplays. And for the first time, I feel like something’s actually happening. Stay tuned.” Secret Level is available to watch via Amazon Prime, and if you haven’t already, you should really check out Peter’s amazing novel Blindsight. If you are curious about any of my other interviews with various creators over the past decade, you can find links to those here. Follow me on X, Facebook and YouTube. I also manage Mecha Damashii and am currently featured in the Giant Robots exhibition currently touring Japan.0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 100 Views
-
WWW.DIGITALTRENDS.COMOne UI 7 adds a bevy of camera tricks to your old Samsung phoneTable of Contents Table of Contents When am I getting the One UI 7 update? What camera tools arrive with One UI 7? Samsung has officially begun rolling out the Android 15-based One UI 7 update for its older smartphones via the stable channel, starting with Galaxy S24, while also showering similar love on the Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Z Fold 6. While at it, the company has finally shared an extended roadmap for devices that are in line to receive the software upgrade, and also put a spotlight on the new camera tools coming alongside. Recommended Videos If you have a Samsung phone in your pocket, following is the One UI 7 update schedule for your device: April, 2025: Galaxy S24 series, Galaxy S23 series. Galaxy Z Fold 5, Galaxy Z Flip 5, Galaxy Tab S10 series May, 2025: Galaxy Z Fold 4 and Z Fold 3, Galaxy Z Flip 4 and Z Flip 3, Galaxy Tab S9 series, Galaxy S21 series, Galaxy S22 series, Galaxy A34, Galaxy A16, Galaxy Quantum 4, Galaxy Quantum 5 June, 2025: Galaxy Tab S9 series, Galaxy Tab A9 series, Galaxy A53, Galaxy A33, Galaxy A25, Galaxy A24, Galaxy A15, Galaxy Quantum 3, Galaxy Jump 3, Galaxy Jump 2, Galaxy Buddy 3, Galaxy Tab Active 5, Galaxy Tab Active 4 Pro Let’s move to the changes introduced by the One UI 7 update within the pre-installed camera and gallery apps. As per a post shared in the official Samsung community forum, the tweaks begin with the home screen layout in the camera app. Core controls such as aspect ratio, megapixel format, exposure, and filter have been moved from the top edge and relocated next to the zoom controls in the bottom half. This makes it a lot easier to access the core composition and quality controls by putting them within easy reach, especially when clicking pictures in portrait mode. Related With the Galaxy S25 series, Samsung introduced a new filter system, inspired by Apple’s own Photographic Styles on the iPhone. They are finally set to appear on other devices, too. Galaxy phones, however, take a step further by letting users create custom filters based on the color chemistry of any picture in their phone’s gallery. This feature will be available on Galaxy S flagships, going back to Galaxy S22 and Galaxy S23/24 FE. Moreover, foldables will also land this feature, extending up to the Galaxy Z Flip 4 and the Galaxy Z Fold 4. With the exception of the “FE” series members, all the aforementioned devices will also allow RAW Image Editing directly on the phone. Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends Another professional-grade camera feature that is trickling down from the Galaxy S25 to older phones is support for LOG capture. This capability, which arrived with the iPhone 15 Pro series in 2024, lets users capture flat footage that allows for a deep level of color grading and post-processing control. To go with the new feature making its way to the Galaxy S24, the camera app is also getting a Shooting Assistance Function that lets users play around with zebra pattern and false color adjustments when the Pro video mode is enabled to record LOG videos. Another cool feature making its way to older phones (Galaxy S24, Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Fold 6) is support for Motion Photos, which essentially works like Live Photos on iPhones. Long pressing on the camera shutter button records stabilized video footage worth 1.5 seconds before and after the still capture. The aforementioned phones are also getting support for slow-motion video capture across all three types of camera lenses. Moreover, these devices are also landing the Audio Eraser trick that lets users remove unwanted sound from videos. Samsung’s AI-driven face swap feature, which lets users pick the best version of a person’s face during camera capture, is also expanding with the One UI 7 update. It will be available on the Galaxy S (up to S23 series) and Galaxy Z (up to Z Flip 5 and Fold 5) series of phones in the coming months, alongside the tablets in Galaxy Tab S10 and S9 series. Editors’ Recommendations0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 89 Views
-
WWW.WSJ.COM‘Revolutionary War Weapons’ Review: Muskets and More on PBSA ‘NOVA’ presentation offers an entertaining, informative look at the potent firepower of antique armaments.0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 96 Views
-
ARSTECHNICA.COMVictory for DOGE as appeals court reinstates access to personal dataDOGE's data access Victory for DOGE as appeals court reinstates access to personal data Divided court sides with Trump admin in case over alleged privacy law violations. Jon Brodkin – Apr 8, 2025 2:39 pm | 22 A protest against President Donald Trump and Elon Musk in New York on February 19, 2025. Credit: Getty Images | Pacific Press A protest against President Donald Trump and Elon Musk in New York on February 19, 2025. Credit: Getty Images | Pacific Press Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only Learn more A US appeals court ruled yesterday that DOGE can access personal data held by the US Department of Education and Office of Personnel Management (OPM), overturning an order issued by a lower-court judge. The US government has "met its burden of a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits of their appeal," said yesterday's ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. In a 2-1 decision, a panel of judges granted the Trump administration's motion to stay the lower-court ruling pending appeal. "The Supreme Court has told us that, unlike a private party, the government suffers an irreparable harm when it cannot carry out the orders of its elected representatives... Judicial management of agency operations offends the Executive Branch's exclusive authority to enforce federal law," wrote Court of Appeals Judge Steven Agee, a George W. Bush appointee. Agee was joined by Judge Julius Richardson, a Trump appointee, in voting to grant the motion to stay pending appeal. Judge Robert King, a Clinton appointee, voted to deny the motion. Judge “strongly” dissents In a separate 8-7 vote, the full court denied King's request for an en banc hearing. King's dissent said: Given the exceptional importance of this matter, I sought initial en banc consideration of the government's motion for a stay pending appeal of the district court's award of preliminary injunctive relief—an injunction that bars the defendant federal agencies and officials from disclosing to affiliates of the President's new Department of Government Efficiency, or "DOGE," highly sensitive personal information belonging to millions of Americans. Regrettably, my request for initial hearing en banc has been denied on an 8-7 vote, and the panel majority has granted the government's motion for a stay pending appeal on a 2-1 vote. I strongly dissent from both decisions. At stake is some of the most sensitive personal information imaginable—including Social Security numbers, income and assets, federal tax records, disciplinary and other personnel actions, physical and mental health histories, driver's license information, bank account numbers, and demographic and family details. This information was entrusted to the government, which for many decades had a record of largely adhering to the Privacy Act of 1974 and keeping the information safe. And then suddenly, the defendants began disclosing the information to DOGE affiliates without substantiating that they have any need to access such highly sensitive materials. Yesterday's decision overturned a ruling by US District Judge Deborah Boardman in the District of Maryland. Plaintiffs include the American Federation of Teachers; the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers; the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association; the National Federation of Federal Employees; and the International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers. There are also six individual plaintiffs who are military veterans. Data access not an injury, panel finds Boardman ruled in February that "plaintiffs have shown that Education and OPM likely violated the Privacy Act by disclosing their personal information to DOGE affiliates without their consent." She approved a temporary restraining order, and subsequently issued a preliminary injunction. "This continuing, unauthorized disclosure of the plaintiffs' sensitive personal information to DOGE affiliates is irreparable harm that money damages cannot rectify," Boardman wrote. She found that "unauthorized disclosure of the plaintiffs' sensitive personal information is an injury in fact." But Agee wrote that "the district court misread our precedent in requiring nothing more than abstract access to personal information to establish a concrete injury." Richardson wrote that the plaintiffs didn't meet the high bar needed for an injunction: To have granted a preliminary injunction, the district court had to find, among other things, that the plaintiffs alleged an injury bearing a close relationship to a common-law harm, and that the government's actions here were judicially reviewable 'final agency actions' under the Administrative Procedure Act, and that the availability of monetary damages under the Privacy Act did not qualify as an adequate remedy precluding a cause of action under the APA, and that the government's disclosure of data did not fall under the Privacy Act's listed 'need-for-the-record' provision permitting intra-agency use, and that the ongoing access of the plaintiffs' data constituted an irreparable injury unable to be redressed later through an award of monetary damages. Richardson continued, "And for each of the five issues, the plaintiffs had to show their likelihood of success was not just high but extremely high—otherwise, the multiplicative product of the five probabilities, i.e. the likelihood of winning the entire case, would be too low. It is hard to believe the plaintiffs could have shown that." Another judge criticizes DOGE’s “unfettered access” Plaintiffs argued that unauthorized access to their information "bore a close relationship to the harm inflicted by the common-law tort of intrusion upon seclusion," Richardson wrote. He said this analogy fails: But intrusion upon seclusion has long been understood to guard not against the disclosure of sensitive information as such, but against the feeling of unease when and where one should ideally be at peace. Its harm is felt when a reporter accosts a convalescing patient in the hospital, when a private detective peers through a neighbor's bedroom window for weeks, and when a photographer snaps an opportunistic photo of a woman's underwear. This is distinct from the plaintiffs' alleged harm of unauthorized access. The harm required for an injunction "is not present here," according to Richardson. He wrote that each "plaintiff's information is one row in various databases that are millions upon millions of rows long. The harm that might come from granting database access to an additional handful of government employees—prone as they may be to hacks or leaks, as the plaintiffs have alleged—strikes me as different in kind, not just in degree, from the harm inflicted by reporters, detectives, and paparazzi." Judge Nicole Berner, a Biden appointee who dissented from the 8-7 vote against an en banc hearing, said the court "majority effectively denies the plaintiffs the relief they seek without adjudication of their case on the merits. Permitting DOGE unfettered access to the plaintiffs' personally identifiable information lets the proverbial genie out of the bottle. Even if they ultimately prevail, the plaintiffs will already have suffered irreparable harm." In addition to the Department of Education and OPM, the case involves the Treasury Department. But the Treasury Department is still subject to a preliminary injunction granted in a different case regarding DOGE's data access. Jon Brodkin Senior IT Reporter Jon Brodkin Senior IT Reporter Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry. 22 Comments0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 99 Views