In the aftermath of Donald Trumps presidential victory, journalists and analysts have rushed to diagnose the causes of Vice President Kamala Harriss defeat and the Democratic Partys broader losses. One of the emerging theories is that voters felt Democrats had drifted far from mainstream concerns by focusing too much on culture issues particularly transgender rights.The GOP weaponized transgender rights on the campaign trail, pouring over $200 million into ads this cycle that painted Harris as out of step. Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you, blared one ad that launched in September. At rallies, Trump stoked fears with lies about gender-affirming surgery in schools, while promising to ban transgender women from sports.The Trump campaign maintains that their anti-trans ads resonated not only with Black and Latino men but also with moderate suburban white women concerned about school sports. Galvanize Action, a progressive organization focused on mobilizing moderate white women, did find that 53 percent of respondents on their most recent September survey believed people advocating for the rights of transgender people have gone too far. After the election, some Democrats echoed the concern. I dont want to discriminate against anybody, but I dont think biological boys should be playing in girls sports, Rep. Tom Suozzi, a New York moderate, said in an interview with the New York Times. Democrats arent saying that, and they should be. Rep. Seth Moulton of Massachusetts made similar remarks: I have two little girls. I dont want them getting run over on the field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat, Im supposed to be afraid to say that.Franklin Foer, a journalist for the Atlantic and author of a book on Joe Bidens presidency, reported last week that some members of Bidens inner circle were dissatisfied with Harriss defense against right-wing accusations that she supported the most extreme version of transgender rights, including gender-affirming surgery for prisoners. Bidens allies claimed the president never would have let such attacks stand and would have clearly rejected the idea of trans women competing in womens sports.While it will take time to fully understand why voters cast their ballots as they did, one thing is already clear: Neither Harris nor Biden made any effort to talk about what the Biden administration actually proposed to do on school sports. What the Biden administration proposed on transgender athletesIn 2023, over strong objections of activists on the right and left, the Biden administration announced a proposed change to Title IX, the law that prohibits discrimination based on sex in any federally funded educational program. Their suggested change would prohibit outright bans on transgender athletes, but would permit schools to restrict transgender students from participating if they could demonstrate that inclusion would harm educational objectives like fair competition and the prevention of injury. This more nuanced stance marked the first time the Biden administration took the position that sex differences can matter in school sports, something hotly disputed by leading LGBTQ rights organizations. The proposed rule also reflected research that suggests sex differences emerge over time, so the standard for inclusion in high school should not necessarily be the same as that in younger grades.Contrary to the post-election grumblings from Biden allies in the Atlantic, the president has been virtually silent on his own administrations proposal for the last 18 months. Hes never spoken about it, and it was never mentioned by any other Biden official, including in any White House briefing on transgender issues. The White House declined to comment for this story. A spokesperson for the Department of Education said their rulemaking process is still ongoing, as they consider the 150,000 public comments they received. We do not have information to share today on a timeline, they added. In polling, voters consistently ranked transgender rights as a very low priority compared to other issues. But there is some evidence that Republicans years of attacks have taken their toll on public opinion. Gallup found in 2023 that 69 percent of Americans believe transgender athletes should only be allowed to compete on sports teams that match their sex assigned at birth, an increase from the 62 percent who said the same in 2021. Tellingly, Bidens proposed policy on transgender athletes allowing targeted restrictions for fairness and safety while rejecting blanket bans would likely resonate more with average Americans than the hardline stances typically associated with Republicans, who leaned on transgender fearmongering in the midterms only to see their candidates flop, or Democrats, who many voters perceive as having no nuance on the topic at all. Yet the Biden administrations reluctance to clearly communicate their middle-ground position left a vacuum that Republicans were happy to fill. Its a dynamic that political observers say has become increasingly common: Democratic leaders stake out a position but, wary of internal rifts, default to strategic ambiguity even on issues where their stances might resonate with voters.The White House could have said something in the election, they could have said Democrats want rules too, said Lanae Erickson, the senior vice president for social policy at Third Way, a centrist think tank. The number one big messaging advice from 2022 we had is that Democrats want sports to be fair and athletes to be safe.The Biden administrations proposed school sports rule in 2023 marked a shift from its first two yearsBiden has long stood out for his support of transgender rights. In 2012, as vice president, he called it the civil rights issue of our time, something he reiterated again while campaigning for his own presidential run in 2020. He named passing the Equality Act, an LGBTQ anti-discrimination bill, a top legislative priority, and on his first day in office issued a sweeping executive order that called on all federal agencies to review their rules to ensure that any sex discrimination protection includes sexual orientation and gender identity, too. As the Biden administration prioritized LGBTQ rights, social conservatives were in the midst of shifting their focus to new cultural battles following their decisive losses on marriage for same-sex couples both at the Supreme Court in 2015 and in the court of public opinion. Right-wing activists did not hide that they were searching for a new galvanizing cause to rally donors and grassroots voters. We threw everything at the wall, Terry Schilling, the president of American Principles Project, a social conservative advocacy group, told the New York Times. While their early efforts to focus on bathroom bans backfired, Schillings group discovered in 2019 that focusing on school sports bans appeared much more effective, even though the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had found just 1.8 percent of high school students even identified as transgender.In 2020, Idaho became the first state to ban transgender girls from school sports and within four years, half of all states had passed similar laws, as well as laws banning gender-affirming health care. It happened super fast. It came out of nowhere, said Erickson of Third Way. People werent prepared to deal with it because it wasnt on the radar.Athletes proved potent for them because theres always winners and losers in sports, added Gillian Branstetter, a communications strategist with the American Civil Liberties Union. And thats not a particularly new tool for the right. In terms of policy, the Biden administration initially staked out a position that said theres no legitimate basis to discriminate based on sex differences. In 2021, Bidens Justice Department intervened in a lawsuit filed by parents of an 11-year-old transgender girl against the state of West Virginia, affirming this view.[West Virginia] cannot point to any valid evidence that allowing transgender girls to participate on girls sports teams endangers girls athletic opportunities, the department said in its filing. Instead, the State legislated based on misconceptions and overbroad assumptions about transgender girls.While praised by major LGBTQ groups like the Human Rights Campaign, this position obscured quieter disagreement among transgender leaders. Some questioned whether sports participation should be a top priority for the movement, while others doubted whether litigation was the best approach for advancing inclusion, given the state of public opinion. The Justice Departments position also masked divides within the Democratic Party. Though its a complex topic and more research is needed, some existing scientific evidence suggests that transgender girls and women who do not suppress testosterone can have advantages in sports, particularly if they have gone through male puberty.The West Virginia lawsuit wasnt the only federal suit in the works. Happening at the same time was another case involving two transgender girls that was quickly drawing national attention. In response to Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood winning multiple state track titles in Connecticut, competitors parents and the Christian right-wing legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom filed a lawsuit against Connecticuts policy of including transgender athletes. Though initially dismissed in 2021, a federal judge just this month said the Title IX case could proceed.As more of these politically charged lawsuits and bills mounted, the Biden administration announced it would be delaying its proposed changes to Title IX, despite its Day 1 executive order. Sources involved said the delay was largely understood as a political move driven by the upcoming midterm elections. When the Education Department finally released its proposed school sports rule in 2023, its language represented more of a compromise. The rule marked the Biden administrations first time saying that sex differences can matter in school sports and schools can discriminate in some cases, while also saying schools do not have to thus permitting blue states like Connecticut to continue with existing policy. While its merits were debated, the federal proposal was on the table.The draft regulation recognizes that there are real sex differences and that these matter in competition, Doriane Coleman, a law professor at Duke University who focuses on sports and gender, told Vox. For the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, which takes the position that all sex differences are just myth and stereotype, that was a big, maybe even treasonous move.Even as conservatives barraged Democrats with attacks that they were extremists on school sports, the White House and then later the Harris campaign never sought to talk about the direction they thought Title IX policy ought to go. Sources with close knowledge of the White Houses thinking, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Vox the administration worried that talking about the rule would have unintended consequences for transgender individuals already facing threats, and they didnt want to give political fodder for Republicans to twist their words. So they said nothing. Some progressive communications strategists warned against generally staying silent on transgender rights. We Make the Future Action and ASO Communication tested different strategies and found messaging that didnt directly reference transgender people tended to weaken support for progressive positions among certain voter groups who were otherwise confronted with anti-trans ads. Or, put differently, saying nothing could hurt more than saying something proactive. When Democrats are silent about race or immigrants or trans people, all that conflicted voters hear are the siren songs of hate peddling from Republicans about said other, Anat Shenker-Osorio, who led the messaging research, told Vox. Ignoring doesnt make the attack go away. It makes it all that voters hear about the topic.Erickson agreed with this critique. In addition to not wanting to get yelled at by progressive leaders on X, she said, Democrats believed they should avoid talking about transgender rights to change the subject. I think that is so idiotic, especially when the issue is high-salience, she stressed, emphasizing that leaders could have focused on shared values of freedom, dignity, and privacy.Mara Keisling, a longtime transgender advocate and founding director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, told Vox she wasnt bothered that Harris hadnt focused on trans people on the campaign trail and that its understandable Harris would prioritize issues that mattered to all voters. Its more important to me who won the election than whether or not trans people are mentioned, Keisling said. On the question of where the Biden administration was headed on school sports participation, Kiesling said she just didnt think people would care about the process of an Education Department rule. They used to say in politics that if youre talking about process, youre losing, she said. Branstetter emphasized that its not as if national Democrats didnt have good models to emulate when it comes to messaging, noting that red-state Democrats like those in Arkansas, Kansas, and Oklahoma have demonstrated clearly over the last half-decade how to stand up to anti-trans legislative attacks. Democrats are overestimating the electoral potency and letting themselves get lost in the issue instead of framing the oppositions attacks within the broader fight for equality, she said. Moving forward, a series of federal lawsuits including the aforementioned Connecticut case and one the Supreme Court is set to hear in December could affect how rules, laws, and guidelines on issues of transgender rights develop. The NCAA is also currently reviewing its own policies for transgender athletes at the college level. Given the Supreme Courts ruling earlier this year in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, federal agencies may have far less leeway to make policy decisions of all kinds without Congress getting involved. My colleague Ian Millhiser called the ruling a radical reordering of the US separation of powers and likely to be one of [the Courts] most consequential modern-day decisions.Coleman, of Duke Law, thinks the Loper Bright decision and broader changes in administrative law will mean the school sports issue ultimately gets decided legislatively, not in the courts. Until then, though, the matter will likely continue to play out in politics. Democrats may be well-intentioned in seeking to avoid heated and sensitive issues, but their strategy of silence can fuel the perception that the party cannot craft politically viable solutions, and more importantly, contribute to the myth that theres a major ongoing crisis in school sports.There arent trans athletes everywhere beating women, Keisling said. There are a lot of 6-year-olds and 10-year-olds who just want to play soccer with their friends. Youve read 1 article in the last monthHere at Vox, we're unwavering in our commitment to covering the issues that matter most to you threats to democracy, immigration, reproductive rights, the environment, and the rising polarization across this country.Our mission is to provide clear, accessible journalism that empowers you to stay informed and engaged in shaping our world. By becoming a Vox Member, you directly strengthen our ability to deliver in-depth, independent reporting that drives meaningful change.We rely on readers like you join us.Swati SharmaVox Editor-in-ChiefSee More:

Donald Trump announced Thursday that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would be his nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), setting the stage for a potentially radical remaking of the nations health care. Kennedys nomination was not a surprise. Last month, Kennedy said Trump had promised him control of the department and its many subagencies, which include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), and others. Trump himself pledged during the campaign to let Kennedy go wild on health.Its a perplexing pick. Kennedy has spent decades spreading anti-vaccination pseudoscience, and the organization he leads, Childrens Health Defense, has been one of the foremost anti-vaccine advocacy groups in the US and abroad. His work in support of a Samoan anti-vaccine group helped fuel a wave of vaccine hesitancy in the island nation, leading to a 2019 measles epidemic that killed 83 people, most of them children.Hes expressed a range of other conspiracy-laden ideas about health: He says fluoride is industrial waste linked to a range of diseases, and suggested it should be removed from all US water systems. He has speculated that gender dysphoria may result from herbicide exposure and implied mass shootings are linked to antidepressants. Kennedy does hold other views that align with many scientists: He traces Americas high levels of chronic disease to the widespread availability of highly processed, non-nutritious food, which he and nutrition policy experts blame in part on broken agriculture policy. Hes railed against corruption and conflicts of interest in the FDAs drug approval process that favor big pharmaceutical companies over the interests of individuals something economists, scientists, and consumer advocates agree on. No matter where a person stands on the political spectrum, they can probably find something to agree with Kennedy on. He is the personification of the growing distrust of science and the public health establishment that many Americans have felt in the post-pandemic era.HHS secretaries are usually seasoned bureaucrats with a lot of experience moving policy through government agencies a state insurance commissioner in Barack Obamas case or a tenured pharma executive in Donald Trumps first term. They typically understand how science is done and what it means for a health intervention to be grounded in evidence. Kennedy doesnt have that rsum far from it. Now hell be in charge of much of US health care, which raises the question: How much damage can he actually do in this role?The answer will depend on a few things. First, he has to be confirmed by the Senate (unless the White House attempts to circumvent that chambers constitutional advise and consent powers) and Republicans have only a narrow majority. Even if Kennedy is confirmed, Trump has other important health care appointments to make particularly for CMS, NIH, FDA, and CDC and those people will hold sway over the administrations health care agenda too. They could be in the Kennedy vein or, as we have seen with Trumps foreign policy picks, a mix of the conventional and the iconoclastic. For now, however, Kennedys appointment is a watershed moment that could portend enormous changes to the American health system. Republicans in Congress will control the HHS budget, and Kennedy, if confirmed, could have broad discretion to pursue his Make America Healthy Again agenda with Trumps blessing. If the Trump administration attempts to remove civil servants across the government, including the health agencies, decades of public health knowledge could be lost at the CDC, FDA, and elsewhere. It is uncertain if the Republican-dominated judiciary would step in to stop any of it.Heres what we know about the Trump health departments plans and what hurdles may await them.What RFK Jr. can and cant do on vaccines, briefly explainedOver the last 30 years, vaccines have saved the lives of more than 1.1 million children in the US alone. Over the same period, theyve also saved Americans $540 billion in direct health care costs and trillions in social costs. Routine vaccines protect American children from 16 diseases.Trump himself suggested blocking funding for local schools with vaccine requirements during the campaign, though the federal government has limited authority to do so. Despite Kennedys long history of anti-vaccine rhetoric, he said in early November he wasnt planning to take anyones vaccines away. Related:Trumps campaign against public health is back onPeople ought to have choice, and that choice ought to be informed by the best information, Kennedy said in an NBC News interview. So Im going to make sure scientific safety studies and efficacy are out there, and people can make individual assessments about whether that product is going to be good for them. However, a co-chair of Trumps transition team recently said Kennedy hoped to access federal health data with the goal of proving vaccines are unsafe and pulling them from the US market.Thats not as easy to do as it sounds. Undoing the approval of an already approved vaccine would require submitting evidence of harm that meets the FDAs standards to prove harm, which simply doesnt exist. Although a Trump-installed loyalist could theoretically rewrite the FDAs standards, that would likely lead to opposition from the pharmaceutical companies that produce these vaccines. There would be a wave of expensive and prolonged lawsuits for the federal government. Drugmakers also wield influence in Congress, which writes the law that sets pharmaceutical industry fees that cover nearly half of the FDAs budget. That law will need to be reauthorized before the end of Trumps term, setting up a potentially vicious fight if the two sides are at odds over vaccines. There is a more realistic move Kennedy could take to address his concern about vaccine side effects: He could resuscitate the National Vaccine Program Office, which monitored vaccine safety with particular rigor but was shuttered under the first Trump presidency.Although it would be difficult to pull vaccines from the American market, and Kennedy says he wont, there are other ways he could exert influence to reduce vaccine uptake. Kennedy could try to influence the CDC. That agency has two important roles in promoting vaccines in the US: It convenes an Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to provide expert recommendations on who should get which vaccines and at what age, and it administers the Vaccines for Children program, which provides free vaccines for children in low-income families. The advisory committee is not mandated by federal law it is convened only if the CDC wants it to be. A vaccine skeptic appointed to run the CDC under Kennedy could either staff the committee with anti-vaccination activists or dissolve it entirely. That would mean the agency would no longer provide widely accepted guidelines for vaccination that state health departments and hundreds of thousands of clinicians nationwide now rely on. The Vaccines for Children program is funded by a pot of money that Congress sets aside for the CDC every year. Kennedy could press Congress and the White House to simply cut that funding, ending the program entirely. That would leave low-income families having to pay out of pocket to vaccinate their children.Kennedy will also be ultimately responsible for two giant public insurance programs: Medicare, which covers seniors, and Medicaid, which is overseen by the states and covers low-income people.In both programs, the amount of money disbursed by the federal government is in part determined by how good of a job the states and private insurers do in vaccinating children and older adults enrolled in these programs. Kennedy could pressure the CMS administrator to eliminate that vaccination requirement, one reason Trumps choice at CMS will be one to watch. Its not clear what the timeline would be to accomplish any of these tasks; theres no precedent for a president and HHS secretary who are so openly hostile to US public health infrastructure assuming control of it. Even if it takes a while, theres widespread concern that giving such a platform to someone who denies vaccine science could further degrade public trust not only in the vaccines, but in the many other health recommendations and interventions that together comprise American public health and health care. Already, more isolated outbreaks of measles and other diseases that had previously been stamped out by vaccines are occurring at the same time vaccination rates are slipping.Paul Offit, a pediatric infectious disease doctor who directs the Vaccine Education Center at the Childrens Hospital of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, said Kennedy has had such a big platform for so long that its unlikely hell be able to scare people about vaccines more than he already has. Its in delivering the vaccines through programs like Vaccines for Children where he could perhaps do the damage: If he were able to disrupt that, that would be a problem.Can RFK Jr. really remove fluoride from US water?The US began fluoridating drinking water in 1945. An estimated 209 million Americans now drink tap water that contains added fluoride. The intervention is considered a historic public health win: It dramatically reduces tooth decay in children and also reduces tooth loss in adults. Kennedy, however, has said he would immediately advise the removal of fluoride from local water supplies. Why? Because he is exaggerating the actual risk. Most of the fluoride and US tap water is added by water utility companies, but some tap water contains naturally occurring fluoride it absorbs from the local water table. The resulting high-fluoride tap water, which about 2 million Americans drink, contains about twice the amount of fluoride the US government recommends. According to a recent report from the US National Toxicology Program, drinking high-fluoride water might be linked to slightly lower IQ scores by 2 to 5 points in some children though IQ scores are an uncertain measure of intelligence. However, there is no indication that tap water containing normal fluoride levels poses this risk and its benefits to childrens and adults dental health are immense.The decision to fluoridate water is one that happens at the state and local level, which is why Kennedy could only advise fluorides removal. However, his leadership at HHS could give an opening to anti-fluoride action at the state level, where Republican leaders are increasingly hostile to what had been settled public health practices.Kennedys Make America Healthy Again campaign on food and chronic diseasesKennedy has called for a campaign against chronic disease that hes branded as Make America Healthy Again. It is an ambiguous and wide-ranging platform, but the consistent theme is undoing what Kennedy sees as Big Pharma and Big Agricultures undue influence on what Americans eat and how they manage their health over time.Some of the ideas share the same pseudoscience as Kennedys views on vaccines. Kennedy recently posted on social media that the FDA had waged a war on public health by aggressive suppression of Americans access to raw milk, among other things. States arent required to pasteurize milk, but the FDA requires milk sold across state lines to be pasteurized. Despite raw milks risk of causing life-threatening diarrheal diseases (and now, bird flu), states can already carve out exceptions that allow their residents to drink it. Some of Kennedys ideas about food are more rooted in reality. For example, his take on nutritions role in chronic disease: He has correctly noted that the US has developed a terrible record on preventing diabetes, heart disease, and unhealthy weight, and places the blame where nutritional experts do on permissive government policies and dietary guidelines that promote eating lots of ultra-processed foods and low levels of physical activity in schools. As part of his fight against ultra-processed foods, Kennedy recently said he wants to do away with entire departments at the FDA, including the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. According to recent reporting in Science, he could indeed pressure whoever is appointed to lead the agency to eliminate that center, which makes Trumps choice for FDA commissioner a critical one in setting his administrations public health agenda. However, if Kennedy wants to restrict the use of already-approved food additives, he needs more resources not fewer: The process involves rigorous reviews of data, issuing public warnings, and actively monitoring the food supply. If Kennedy succeeded in closing the food safety office, that would reduce the number of people who could be dedicated to the job, making it harder rather than easier to rein in the use of these products.Other actions could be taken by the Trump administration to reduce the amount of ultra-processed food in the American food supply, but many of them would be taken outside of HHS. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) sets the guidelines that govern school lunch programs, which means much of what children eat is determined by that agency; Trump has not yet nominated a USDA commissioner. The USDA is also primarily responsible for overseeing factory farming, another industry Kennedy has heavily criticized throughout his public career and pledged to target if he were to take a role in the federal government. He would likely need to work with the USDA to follow through. Kennedy is correct that food safety regulation in the US is currently a mess, says David Acheson, an infectious diseases doctor who has led food safety efforts at both the USDA and the FDA. Meat, poultry, and egg plants are inspected daily under the auspices of the USDA, while every other kind of food production facility including the farms whose produce is responsible for most of the food-borne illness in the US and the nations countless other industrial food manufacturers are inspected by FDA inspectors at most once a year. It would make far more sense to unify these functions under one agency and harmonize the frequency of food production facility inspections so none are falling through the cracks. That is the kind of organizational shake-up that could actually make a difference. Acheson would also like to see Kennedy take on the FDAs process for regulating supplements, which are currently subject to lax oversight despite obvious health risks.What happens to NIH in a second Trump term?At a town hall earlier this year, before dropping out of the race for president, Kennedy said that if elected, hed tell the NIH to pause drug development and infectious diseases research for eight years and instead focus on chronic diseases. He also pledged during his own campaign for president that he would block gain of function research in which scientists purposefully make viruses more dangerous in hopes of learning how to better combat them that has come under more scrutiny since the pandemic. Apart from the fact that the NIH already spends about $20 billion annually on chronic disease, this would be disastrous: The basic research the agency funds and conducts in its own institutes lays the groundwork for therapies pharmaceutical companies develop to treat most medical conditions. Kennedy has called for firing 600 of the agencys nearly 19,000 employees and replacing them with new ones, who presumably would be more keen to carry out his priorities. Conservatives have also floated restructuring the NIH, and Trump proposed cutting its $48 billion budget during his first term.Youve read 1 article in the last monthHere at Vox, we're unwavering in our commitment to covering the issues that matter most to you threats to democracy, immigration, reproductive rights, the environment, and the rising polarization across this country.Our mission is to provide clear, accessible journalism that empowers you to stay informed and engaged in shaping our world. By becoming a Vox Member, you directly strengthen our ability to deliver in-depth, independent reporting that drives meaningful change.We rely on readers like you join us.Swati SharmaVox Editor-in-ChiefSee More:

Stalker 2 is one of the year's most exciting gaming releases, but could be banned in Russia with the potential for "tough measures" according to government officials

Call of Duty fans have been comparing notes on what iconic maps they want brought back for Black Ops 6 and beyond, and there are some bonafide classics among them

10 good reasons why Im getting a PS5 Pro Readers FeatureGameCentralPublished Nov 16, 2024, 9:00amTime for an upgrade (Sony Interactive Entertainment)A reader decides to finally upgrade from a PS4 to a PS5 Pro and lists the 10 games that have convinced him to make the purchase.Now that the PS5 Pro has been released theres finally enough games to justify an upgrade from the PlayStation 4, arguably the slowest generation to necessitate an upgrade (some of this years best games are still available for PlayStation 4!).Now at the end of 2024 we have enough titles to realistically debate the top 10 games, exclusively available for the ninth generation of games consoles.As such, see below my likely controversial top 10:10. Stellar Blade If you can get past the waifu simulator aspect theres a fantastic character action game to be enjoyed with elements of the greatest the genre has to offer, crammed into a beautiful looking world that shows off the ninth gen hardware.9. Final Fantasy 16 For its first seven chapters, Final Fantasy 16 offers the most compelling story in the franchise since its PlayStation 2 iterations. Unfortunately, the interesting plot threads, and easily one of the best battles in gaming history, wraps up by Chapter 8 (out of 12), leaving a very generic and dull conclusion to a game that could have been the best in decades.8. Spider-Man 2 A great 1.5 iteration of the original 2018 game. Nothing groundbreaking but an entertaining sequel and visual showcase for the PlayStation 5.7. Silent Hill 2 I still prefer the PlayStation 2 original and the monsters in the remake have made me audibly laugh on occasion, but this is still a survival horror worth experiencing.6. Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth Kind of a cheat but taking both Remake and Rebirth as a whole experience is the way to enjoy this games. If you have held off already, Id suggest waiting for Final Fantasy 7 Requiem in 2026 to enjoy this reimagining of this gaming classic in its full.5. Astro Bot The first 3D platformer in a decade to hold its own against Mario! This charming platformer is great for all ages and the nostalgia for an older gamers is intoxicating.4. Demons Souls The remake of one of my favourite games of all time didnt disappoint. Despite being a launch title, arguably one for the best-looking games of this generation and a joy to revisit after a decade of Soulslikes.3. Baldurs Gate 3 2023s game of the year has had nothing but praise but from a novice to the genre and Dungeons & Dragons this is easily the most daunting single-player games Ive ever experienced. The systems depth, the worlds lore; it took an investment of time and education to grasp a basic understanding, which is why its not my number on but I will herald it as one of the greatest co-op games of all time.2. Alan Wake 2 There is no other media experience quite like Alan Wake 2. A Scandi-noir/psychological survival horror game doesnt sound too different, but the way it weaves its dreamlike world between two campaigns is like nothing Ive enjoyed before. I could write a whole article about how great it is, but if anyone in your friends or family has access to ninth gen console and enjoys crime dramas, they should give it a go pronto.1. Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty I wont defend this choice as I wasnt privy to the hype train and failed launch. What I played was CD Project Reds best game to date and the most immersive, detailed open world ever created, with unforgettable characters and cinematic moments on par with the best movies in history. Im sure we all have our own opinion about the best Gen 9 games to date but at least now theres plenty to argue over (only took four years!).By reader Carl GoldsmithCyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty the best reason to get a PS5 Pro? (CD Projekt)The readers features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro.You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@metro.co.uk or use our Submit Stuff page and you wont need to send an email.MORE : Why are there no big name video games being released this month? - Reader's FeatureMORE : My top 10 PlayStation video games of the last 30 years Readers FeatureMORE : As a parent I would be perfectly happy with banning GTA 5 - Reader's FeatureSign up to all the exclusive gaming content, latest releases before they're seen on the site.Privacy Policy This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Steam is Valves big money maker (Valve)A report has accused Valve of allowing the proliferation of hate on Steam, including Nazi symbols and other extremist imagery.After being on the receiving end of a lawsuit, over claims of overcharging players earlier this year, Valve has now come under fire for allegedly allowing extremist content on its digital storefront, Steam.The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), an organisation founded to combat antisemitism and other forms of discrimination, conducted an investigation into Steam which spanned over 458 million user profiles, 152 million profile and group avatar images, and over 610 million comments on user profiles and groups.In its results, the ADL claims it identified 1.83 million unique pieces of extremist or hateful content, and 1.5 million unique users and 73,824 groups who used at least one potentially extremist or hateful symbol, copypasta or keyword on the platform.According to the published investigation, this hateful content includes antisemitic symbols, Nazi imagery like the Totenkopf and swastika, and tens of thousands of instances where users expressed support for terrorist organisations like ISIS.Its also claimed over 1.18 million unique instances were discovered of potentially extremist and hateful copypastas, which are blocks of text copied and pasted to the internet, usually for use in viral memes. The most popular copypasta is said to be variations of the swastika.The investigation identified 827,758 user and group profiles with avatars that contained extremist or hateful symbols, including white supremacist skull masks, variations of the Pepe the frog meme, and the Nazi eagle.While Steam does have rules to prohibit hate speech and discrimination, the ADL is critical of Valves attempts to moderate the platform. The report notes: The fact that extremist and hateful conduct is relatively easy to locate on Steam, raises questions regarding the efficacy of Steams moderation efforts.The ADL adds: While Steam appears to be technically capable of moderating extremist and hateful content on its platform, the spread of extremist content on the platform is due in part to Valves highly permissive approach to content policy.In rare notable cases, Steam has selectively removed extremist content, largely based around extremist groups publicised in reporting or in response to governmental pressure. However, this has been largely ad hoc, with Valve failing to systematically address the issue of extremism and hate on the platform.The ADL is calling for Valve to adopt and enforce policies to prohibit extremism on Steam. Valve needs to take greater responsibility in enforcing their policies on Steam, once expanded, and do so accurately at scale, the ADL concludes.GameCentral has reached out to Valve for comment.Earlier this year, Roblox was also accused of exploiting children and failing to stop illegal content from circulating on the platform, claims which the platform denies.Valve also makes games like Half-Life: Alyx (Valve)Emailgamecentral@metro.co.uk, leave a comment below,follow us on Twitter, andsign-up to our newsletter.To submit Inbox letters and Readers Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use ourSubmit Stuff page here.For more stories like this,check our Gaming page.MORE : Black Ops 6 and GTA 5 are being beaten on Steam by a hot new beta demoMORE : Ukraine is using Steam Deck to operate machine guns on the battlefieldMORE : Valve closes loophole on early access and advanced access game refundsSign up to all the exclusive gaming content, latest releases before they're seen on the site.Privacy Policy This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

As the winter approaches, the snow season opens grandiosely. Well, not for NordVPN whose prices are melting faster than an ice cream in the summer peak! NordVPNs 74% discount sounds so juicy with its 3 extra months and the price of a silly $2.99/mo.You dont need to spend much on a VPN of the highest caliber. Heres proof.NordVPN Black Friday Offers ExplainedWith 9 plans in total, you cant say NordVPN lacks flexibility.Well, 6 out of 9 are brought down and now cost as low as $2.99/mo. The 2-year ones are by far the most impressive thanks to 3 extra months and the aforementioned price of $2.99/mo for Basic.Get this exclusive NordVPN dealThis plan costs only $80.73 for the first 27 months.If youre more ambitious, the Plus plan at $3.89/mo or $105.03 for the same period is impressive. You can block malware and ads with Threat Protection Pro while enjoying NordPass which is one of the top-rated password managers. NordVPNNordVPNs fanatics adore the Ultimate plan at, again, 74% off. You can get it at $159.03 for the first 27 months with free additions of NordLocker 1 TB and identity protection benefits.Dont go anywhere; NordVPNs 1-year plans ALSO offer 3 free months. The Basic one has dropped by 60% and costs $68.85 for the first 15 months. Our favorite is the Plus variant at $82.35 for the same 15-month period.Are you still unsure if NordVPN will fit your needs?Every plan is garnished by a 30-day money-back guarantee. Dislike it? Get a full refund. Like it? Squeeze the most out of NordVPN and revel in delicious juices of privacy, security, streaming, and more.How to Get NordVPNs Black Friday Discounts?Havent you snatched one yet? November is far from its end, so theres time.Gizmodo lets you get NordVPNs 74% discount without wandering online like a vagabond:Click this link to go to NordVPN. Alternatively, use any blue button in this article.Select Get the Deal once youre on the site.Choose the plan you want; we recommend 2-year deals with 3 extra months.Provide your email address.Select the payment method and pay for the subscription.Congrats! You can now set up NordVPN and use it simultaneously on 10 devices.We have a comprehensive review of this VPN on our website for those interested in its features. In short, you can expect over 6,500 servers, unlimited traffic, streaming/P2P abilities, rock-solid security, a no-log policy, and native clients for all devices.The clock is ticking; dont miss this ideal money-saving opportunity.See at NordVPN

Turning 60 is a pretty big milestone for any company. Bose is celebrating its diamond anniversary by bringing back its iconic 901 speakers. However, if you were hoping to grab a pair of these gorgeous pieces of audio history in your living room, it will probably not happen. In a brief Instagram post, Bose revealed that it was bringing back the classic speakers: the Bose 901, released in 1968. Bose is teaming up with NYC lifestyle brand Kith and world-famous furniture designer Mark Jupiter to help redesign the speaker. This isnt the first time Bose and Kith have worked together. You might remember these extremely limited edition and bad-ass-looking Bose Ultra Open earbuds. As with many design collaborations, the 901 speaker is a limited edition. Bose really means limited since its only producing 12 units. It also says in its Instagram post that these are custom, commemorative sets [] exclusively for our friends and family.Rightfully so, this put a number of customers off. The comment section is inundated with complaints about their finite supply with remarks such as This is useless if they only make 12 or This needs to be a regular production model. Kith founder Ronnie Fieg says, If youre half as meticulous about music and how it sounds as I am, you know the significance of the Bose 901 Speakers.Since its debut in 1968, this speaker has stood as a pinnacle of audio engineering.The 901 speakers feature one full-range driver in the front and eight on the back, covered with tweed front grills and metal rear grills. The speakers cabinet is made of MDF wood and rests on a beautiful stand, one of the speakers most iconic parts. Bose hasnt revealed much about the 901s specs or pricing. Its currently unclear whether a non-limited edition will ever be made available for the rest of the public. All we know is theyve been refurbished in two finishes: white-washed ash wood and natural air-dried walnut.Anytime Bose releases a successful product, you can expect it to follow up with an extravagant, limited-edition version soon. We recently saw adiamond-studded version of the Ultra Open Earbuds that was far too ostentatious for my coworkers, but I secretly found the $9,000 buds stunning.

The Recessed Residence / WARchitectSave this picture! Rungkit CharoenwatHousesBangkok, ThailandArchitects: WARchitectAreaArea of this architecture projectArea:650 mYearCompletion year of this architecture project Year: 2022 PhotographsPhotographs:Rungkit Charoenwat Lead Architects: Thawin Harnboonseth More SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!Text description provided by the architects. Initially, the landowner told us that he intended to construct two houses on the same plot of land. His parents will live in the first residence. It will have an exquisite, classic style. A person of working age will live in a different dwelling designed in a simple style. After giving it some thought, we discovered that although the area is larger than one rai, more than half of it is not suitable for infrastructure development since it crosses high-voltage electrical lines. It would be too crowded to build two homes close to one another. Moreover, the overall aesthetic appeal of two different house styles in one location is diminished.Save this picture!In light of this, we would like to suggest merging them into one house with distinct internal functions. We will work on architectural design by fusing traditional and contemporary styles, using white frame angle recesses for the walls and ceiling to create a basic yet sophisticated effect.Save this picture!Save this picture!As a result, the house's elevation will produce a dimension of light and shadow throughout the day. If you would like, we may create strip light lines behind the walls to give it a more contemporary appearance and make it appropriate for hosting parties in the garden at night. To ensure that the house has natural light throughout the day, its long sides will run parallel to its east and west sides. We will design the east side to be a completely solid wall because it will be adjacent to the road, giving the impression that it is the museum-like back of the house. For the west side of the house which has no construction area, it will connect with a big garden which will be the front of the house.Save this picture!The apertures' height will be shortened by using the angle recess architectural style, which will help it avoid absorbing too much light from the west side. The concept for the son's space is "1 big room in the house," which will connect other locations, such as the pantry, shoe hall, and guest area. These sections will be constructed using the angle-recess approach, and the levels will be played with to create sofas and staircases.Save this picture!Then, to make it appear like a big picture frame from the outside, connect the vacant space in the vertical line by building a stairway across the tree court. You'll find your bedroom and a mezzanine area for working as you ascend the stairs. It is also possible to open connections between these two places.Save this picture!However, your parent's side space will be a large hall that appears to have no connections, but in reality, we will conceal revolving doors to blend in with the walls for your privacy and to keep the area neat.Save this picture!Project gallerySee allShow lessAbout this officeWARchitectOfficePublished on November 16, 2024Cite: "The Recessed Residence / WARchitect" 16 Nov 2024. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1023461/the-recessed-residence-warchitect&gt ISSN 0719-8884Save!ArchDaily?You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream

House in a Meadow / Group Projects ArchitectureSave this picture! Nicholas VeneziaResidential Architecture, HousesNorth East, United StatesArchitects: Group Projects ArchitectureAreaArea of this architecture projectArea:2800 ftYearCompletion year of this architecture project Year: 2024 PhotographsPhotographs:Nicholas VeneziaManufacturersBrands with products used in this architecture project Manufacturers: Arcadia Custom Lead Architects: Andrew Feuerstein More SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!Text description provided by the architects. The home is situated on a 30-acre wooded parcel in the town of North East, New York. The site's defining features are a ridge at the property's highest elevation and a large meadow 15' below. The meadow is ringed by trees and has long, westerly views out to the Catskill Mountains. The ridge to the east is dotted with wildflowers and rocky outcroppings. Access to the house is via a winding driveway that climbs the steep eastern edge of the site and terminates at the top of the ridge. In addition to the main home, the design brief also called for a guest house and pool.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!At the outset of the project, the determination was made to locate the house at the lower meadow level and along the baseline of the ridge, eliminating the need to clear existing trees. This shielded the building from prevailing winds and views at the higher arrival elevation, providing a serene and secluded environment for the home. With the house positioned, a 20' wide x 100' long adjacent section of land was removed from the downslope side of the ridge. The excavated area was then retained by a cast-in-place concrete wall, creating a flat pad between the house and the ridge. This space functions as an intimate outdoor room and forecourt, offering a contrasting experience to the wide-open meadow setting to the building's west.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!To foreground the colors and textures of the site, the home and guest house were developed as muted, black gable-shaped structures. This was achieved by taking a totalized approach to the exterior materials, cladding the buildings' facades and roof surfaces in the same black corrugated metal. The waves of corrugation give a subtle texture to the forms. Open eaves at the roof express black painted rafter tails, supplying another layer of detail and rhythm to the project. Large expanses of glass offer views through the house to the landscape beyond, adding visual interest and depth to the building's simple barn-like shape. Orientation-wise, the long exposures of the home run parallel to the ridge, maximizing opportunities for views out to the east and west. The entrance hall is centrally located in plan and creates a buffer between two primary bedrooms at the north end of the building and the communal spaces to the south. Two smaller bedrooms bookend the southern side of the house.Save this picture!Save this picture!Floating in the communal spaces are four linear blocks of millwork wrapped in a warm Douglas fir veneer. The blocks establish boundaries between public and private zones and contain essential components of the house. Each has a slightly different character in terms of their height, proportion, and materiality. Their functions are: housing the attic stair, enclosing the living room fireplace, providing kitchen counter surfaces, and concealing the kitchen appliances. The kitchen counter and fireplace blocks incorporate cast-in-place concrete elements for their durability and fire-retardant properties. In addition to the wood-clad millwork, the interior palette is composed of white walls and ceilings, gray concrete floors, and dark bronze aluminum sliding door frames. To add variation to spaces within the home, the ceiling above the living, kitchen, and dining room has been given a gable-shaped vault, while the private rooms have more intimate ceiling heights. The vault's eaves and peak are softened into gentle curves, diffusing the light spilling onto its surfaces, giving it a cloud-like appearance. On either side of the common areas are two 16' wide banks of sliding glass doors, providing access and immersive views of the meadow to the west and the ridge to the east. The pool and guest house are located in the meadow, while an outdoor dining space is situated between the house and the ridge.Save this picture!Project gallerySee allShow lessAbout this officeMaterialWoodMaterials and TagsPublished on November 15, 2024Cite: "House in a Meadow / Group Projects Architecture" 15 Nov 2024. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1023579/house-in-a-meadow-group-projects-architecture&gt ISSN 0719-8884Save!ArchDaily?You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream