• Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger Resigns After Struggling to Turn Around Chip Maker
    www.wsj.com
    Intel said Pat Gelsinger has retired and stepped down from the companys board of directors.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·64 Views
  • Super Micro Says Accounting Review Clears Management, Plans to Replace CFO
    www.wsj.com
    Shares of the server maker jumped after the company said evidence reviewed by its special committee didnt raise substantial concerns about its senior management or audit committee.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·63 Views
  • From Under the Truck Review: The Road to Stardom
    www.wsj.com
    Josh Brolin had a renaissance after No Country for Old Men, yet the actor cares more about family and the friends hes made along the way.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·63 Views
  • What to Watch: The Best Movies and TV Shows From November
    www.wsj.com
    Wicked brings old-fashioned musical magic to the movie theater, Hugh Grant menaces two Mormon missionaries, Ken Burns explores the life and work of Leonardo da Vinci, and much, much more.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·61 Views
  • Can desalination quench agricultures thirst?
    arstechnica.com
    battling the brackish water Can desalination quench agricultures thirst? Some say its a costly pipe dream; others say its part of the future. Lela Nargi, Knowable Magazine Dec 2, 2024 7:41 pm | 7 Rows of dried out almond trees alongside green healthy trees growing in an orchard. Droughts have led farmers to consider new water sources. Credit: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images Rows of dried out almond trees alongside green healthy trees growing in an orchard. Droughts have led farmers to consider new water sources. Credit: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreRalph Loya was pretty sure he was going to lose the corn. His farm had been scorched by El Pasos hottest-ever June and second-hottest August; the West Texas county saw 53 days soar over 100 Fahrenheit in the summer of 2024. The region was also experiencing an ongoing drought, which meant that crops on Loyas eight-plus acres of melons, okra, cucumbers, and other produce had to be watered more often than normal.Loya had been irrigating his corn with somewhat salty, or brackish, water pumped from his well, as much as the salt-sensitive crop could tolerate. It wasnt enough, and the municipal water was expensive; he was using it in moderation, and the corn ears were desiccating where they stood.Ensuring the survival of agriculture under an increasingly erratic climate is approaching a crisis in the sere and sweltering Western and Southwestern United States, an area that supplies much of our beef and dairy, alfalfa, tree nuts, and produce. Contending with too little water to support their plants and animals, farmers have tilled under crops, pulled out trees, fallowed fields, and sold off herds. Theyve also used drip irrigation to inject smaller doses of water closer to a plants roots and installed sensors in soil that tell more precisely when and how much to water.In the last five years, researchers have begun to puzzle out how brackish water, pulled from underground aquifers, might be de-salted cheaply enough to offer farmers another water resilience tool. Loyas property, which draws its slightly salty water from the Hueco Bolson aquifer, is about to become a pilot site to test how efficiently desalinated groundwater can be used to grow crops in otherwise water-scarce places.Desalination renders salty water less so. Its usually applied to water sucked from the ocean, generally in arid lands with few options; some Gulf, African, and island countries rely heavily or entirely on desalinated seawater. Inland desalination happens away from coasts, with aquifer waters that are brackishcontaining between 1,000 and 10,000 milligrams of salt per liter, versus around 35,000 milligrams per liter for seawater. Texas has more than three dozen centralized brackish groundwater desalination plants, California more than 20.Such technology has long been considered too costly for farming. Some experts still think its a pipe dream. We see it as a nice solution thats appropriate in some contexts, but for agriculture, its hard to justify, frankly, says Brad Franklin, an agricultural and environmental economist at the Public Policy Institute of California. Desalting an acre-foot (almost 326,000 gallons) of brackish groundwater for crops now costs about $800, while farmers can pay a lot lessas little as $3 an acre-foot for some senior rights holders in some placesfor fresh municipal water. As a result, desalination has largely been reserved to make liquid thats fit for people to drink. In some instances, too, inland desalination can be environmentally risky, endangering nearby plants and animals and reducing stream flows.But the US Bureau of Reclamation, along with a research operation called the National Alliance for Water Innovation (NAWI) thats been granted $185 million from the Department of Energy, have recently invested in projects that could turn that paradigm on its head. Recognizing the urgent need for fresh water for farmswhich in the US are mostly inlandcombined with the ample if salty water beneath our feet, these entities have funded projects that could help advance small, decentralized desalination systems that can be placed right on farms where theyre needed. Loyas is one of them.US farms consume over 83 million acre-feet (more than 27 trillion gallons) of irrigation water every yearthe second most water-intensive industry in the country, after thermoelectric power. Not all aquifers are brackish, but most that are exist in the countrys West, and theyre usually more saline the deeper you dig. With fresh water everywhere in the world becoming saltier due to human activity, we have to solve inland desal for ag in order to grow as much food as we need, says Susan Amrose, a research scientist at MIT who studies inland desalination in the Middle East and North Africa. Brackish (slightly salty) groundwater is found mostly in the western United States. Credit: CREDIT: J.S. STANTON ET AL / BRACKISH GROUNDWATER IN THE UNITED STATES: USGS PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1833. 2017 That means lowering energy and other operational costs, making systems simple for farmers to run; and figuring out how to slash residual brine, which requires disposal and is considered the processs Achilles heel, according to one researcher.The last half-decade of scientific tinkering is now yielding tangible results, says Peter Fiske, NAWIs executive director. We think we have a clear line of sight for agricultural-quality water.Swallowing the high costFiske believes farm-based mini-plants can be cost-effective for producing high-value crops like broccoli, berries and nuts, some of which need a lot of irrigation. That $800 per acre-foot has been achieved by cutting energy use, reducing brine and revolutionizing certain parts and materials. Its still expensive but arguably worth it for a farmer growing almonds or pistachios in Californiaas opposed to farmers growing lesser-value commodity crops like wheat and soybeans, for whom desalination will likely never prove affordable. As a nut farmer, I would sign up to 800 bucks per acre-foot of water till the cows come home, Fiske says.Loyas pilot is being built with Bureau of Reclamation funding and will use a common process called reverse osmosis. Pressure pushes salty water through a semi-permeable membrane; fresh water comes out the other side, leaving salts behind as concentrated brine. Loya figures he can make good money using desalinated water to grow not just fussy corn, but even fussier grapes he might be able to sell at a premium to local wineries.Such a tiny system shares some of the problems of its large-scale cousinschiefly, brine disposal. El Paso, for example, boasts the biggest inland desalination plant in the world, which makes 27.5 million gallons of fresh drinking water a day. There, every gallon of brackish water gets split into two streams: fresh water and residual brine, at a ratio of 83 percent to 17 percent. Since theres no ocean to dump brine into, as with seawater desalination, this plant injects it into deep, porous rock formationsa process too pricey and complicated for farmers.But what if desalination could create 90 or 95 percent fresh water and 5 to 10 percent brine? What if you could get 100 percent fresh water, with just a bag of dry salts leftover? Handling those solids is a lot safer and easier, because super-salty water brine is really corrosive so you have to truck it around in stainless steel trucks, Fiske says.Finally, what if those salts could be broken into componentslithium, essential for batteries; magnesium, used to create alloys; gypsum, turned into drywall; as well as gold, platinum, and other rare-earth elements that can be sold to manufacturers? Already, the El Paso plant participates in mining gypsum and hydrochloric acid for industrial customers.Loyas brine will be piped into an evaporation pond. Eventually, hell have to pay to landfill the dried-out solids, says Quantum Wei, founder and CEO of Harmony Desalting, which is building Loyas plant. There are other expenses: drilling a well (Loya, fortuitously, already has one to serve the project); building the physical plant; and supplying the electricity to pump water up day after day. These are bitter financial pills for a farmer. Were not getting rich; by no means, Loya says.More cost comes from the desalination itself. The energy needed for reverse osmosis is a lot, and the saltier the water, the higher the need. Additionally, the membranes that catch salt are gossamer-thin, and all that pressure destroys them; they also get gunked up and need to be treated with chemicals.Reverse osmosis presents another problem for farmers. It doesnt just remove salt ions from water but the ions of beneficial minerals, too, such as calcium, magnesium and sulfate. According to Amrose, this means farmers have to add fertilizer or mix in pretreated water to replace essential ions that the process took out.To circumvent such challenges, one NAWI-funded team is experimenting with ultra-high-pressure membranes, fashioned out of stiffer plastic, that can withstand a much harder push. The results so far look quite encouraging, Fiske says. Another is looking into a system in which a chemical solvent dropped into water isolates the salt without a membrane, like the polymer inside a diaper absorbs urine. The solvent, in this case the common food-processing compound dimethyl ether, would be used over and over to avoid potentially toxic waste. It has proved cheap enough to be considered for agricultural use.Amrose is testing a system that uses electrodialysis instead of reverse osmosis. This sends a steady surge of voltage across water to pull salt ions through an alternating stack of positively charged and negatively charged membranes. Explains Amrose, You get the negative ions going toward their respective electrode until they cant pass through the membranes and get stuck, and the same happens with the positive ions. The process gets much higher fresh water recovery in small systems than reverse osmosis, and is twice as energy efficient at lower salinities. The membranes last longer, too10 years versus three to five years, Amrose saysand can allow essential minerals to pass through.Data-based designAt Loyas farm, Wei paces the property on a sweltering summer morning with a local engineering company hes tapped to design the brine storage pond. Loya is anxious that the pond be as small as possible to keep arable land in production; Wei is more concerned that it be big and deep enough. To factor this, hell look at average weather conditions since 1954 as well as worst-case data from the last 25 years pertaining to monthly evaporation and rainfall rates. Hell also divide the space into two sections so one can be cleaned while the other is in use. Loyas pond will likely be one-tenth of an acre, dug three to six feet deep.The desalination plant will pair reverse osmosis membranes with a batch process, pushing water through multiple times instead of once and gradually amping up the pressure. Regular reverse osmosis is energy-intensive because it constantly applies the highest pressures, Wei says, but Harmonys process saves energy by using lower pressures to start with. A backwash between cycles prevents scaling by dissolving mineral crystals and washing them away. You really get the benefit of the farmer not having to deal with dosing chemicals or replacing membranes, Wei says. Our goal is to make it as painless as possible.Another Harmony innovation concentrates leftover brine by running it through a nanofiltration membrane in their batch system; such membranes are usually used to pretreat water to cut back on scaling or to recover minerals, but Wei believes his system is the first to combine them with batch reverse osmosis. Thats whats really going to slash brine volumes, he says. The whole system will be hooked up to solar panels, keeping Loyas energy off-grid and essentially free. If all goes to plan, the system will be operational by early 2025 and produce seven gallons of fresh water a minute during the strongest sun of the day, with a goal of 90 to 95 percent fresh water recovery. Any water not immediately used for irrigation will be stored in a tank.Spreading out the researchNinety-eight miles north of Loyas farm, along a dead flat and endlessly beige expanse of road that skirts the White Sands Missile Range, more desalination projects burble away at the Brackish Groundwater National Desalination Research Facility in Alamogordo, New Mexico. The facility, run by the Bureau of Reclamation, offers scientists a lab and four wells of differing salinities to fiddle with.On some parched acreage at the foot of the Sacramento Mountains, a longstanding farming pilot project bakes in relentless sunlight. After some preemptive words about the three brine ponds on the property They have an interesting smell, in between zoo and ocean facility manager Malynda Cappelle drives a golf cart full of visitors past solar arrays and water tanks to a fenced-in parcel of dust and plants. Here, since 2019, a team from the University of North Texas, New Mexico State University and Colorado State University has tested sunflowers, fava beans and, currently, 16 plots of pinto beans. Some plots are bare dirt; others are topped with compost that boosts nutrients, keeps soil moist and provides a salt barrier. Some plots are drip-irrigated with brackish water straight from a well; some get a desalinated/brackish water mix.Eyeballing the plots even from a distance, the plants in the freshest-water plots look large and healthy. But those with compost are almost as vigorous, even when irrigated with brackish water. This could have significant implications for cash-conscious farmers. Maybe we do a lesser level of desalination, more blending, and this will reduce the cost, says Cappelle.Pei Xu has been co-investigator on this project since its start. Shes also the progenitor of a NAWI-funded pilot at the El Paso desalination plant. Later in the day, in a high-ceilinged space next to the plants treatment room, she shows off its consequential bits. Like Amroses system, hers uses electrodialysis. In this instance, though, Xu is aiming to squeeze a bit of additional freshat least freshishwater from the plants leftover brine. With suitably low levels of salinity, the plant could pipe it to farmers through the countys existing canal system, turning a waste product into a valuable resource.Xus pinto bean and El Paso work, and Amroses in the Middle East, are all relevant to Harmonys pilot and future projects. Ideally we can improve desalination to the point where its an option which is seriously considered, Wei says. But more importantly, I think our role now and in the future is as water stewardsto work with each farm to understand their situation and then to recommend their best path forward whether or not desalting is involved.Indeed, as water scarcity becomes ever more acute, desalination advances will help agriculture only so much; even researchers whove devoted years to solving its challenges say its no panacea. What we're trying to do is deliver as much water as cheaply as possible, but that doesn't really encourage smart water use, says NAWIs Fiske. In some cases, it encourages even the reverse. Why are we growing alfalfa in the middle of the desert?Franklin, of the California policy institute, highlights another extreme: Twenty-one of the states groundwater basins are already critically depleted, some due to agricultural overdrafting. Pumping brackish aquifers for desalination could aggravate environmental risks.There are an array of measures, say researchers, that farmers themselves must take in order to survive, with rainwater capture and the fixing of leaky infrastructure at the top of the list. Desalination is not the best, only or first solution, Wei says. But he believes that when used wisely in tandem with other smart partial fixes, it could prevent some of the worst water-related catastrophes for our food system.Lela Nargi, Knowable Magazine Knowable Magazine explores the real-world significance of scholarly work through a journalistic lens. 7 Comments Prev story
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·77 Views
  • Elon Musk loses bid to reinstate massive Tesla pay plan, now worth $101B
    arstechnica.com
    No payday for Musk yet Elon Musk loses bid to reinstate massive Tesla pay plan, now worth $101B June 2024 shareholder vote doesn't fix problems in 2018 stock award, judge says. Jon Brodkin Dec 2, 2024 6:58 pm | 10 Credit: Aurich Lawson / Duncan Hull / Getty Credit: Aurich Lawson / Duncan Hull / Getty Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreA Delaware judge today rejected Elon Musk's bid to reinstate a Tesla pay package that was worth over $50 billion at the beginning of 2024 and has now crossed $100 billion based on Tesla's latest share price. The judge also ordered Tesla to pay $345 million in attorneys' fees to the plaintiff's counsel, who had sought $5.6 billion in fees.Delaware Court of Chancery Judge Kathaleen McCormick, who voided the pay plan in January, said today that a June 2024 shareholder vote re-approving the 2018 pay plan is not a compelling reason to reverse the original ruling. Her ruling said that a "large and talented group of defense firms got creative with the ratification argument, but their unprecedented theories go against multiple strains of settled law."Musk is thus prevented from accessing a pay package whose potential value has soared along with Tesla's stock price. "As of Monday, the pay package was worth $101.4 billion, according to Equilar, a compensation consulting firm," Reuters wrote.By holding another shareholder vote, Musk and Tesla board members essentially created new evidence after the trial, McCormick wrote:There are at least four fatal flaws. First, the defendants have no procedural ground for flipping the outcome of an adverse post-trial decision based on evidence they created after trial. Second, common-law ratification is an affirmative defense that must be timely raised, which means that, at a minimum, it cannot be raised for the first time after the post-trial opinion. Third, what the defendants call "common law ratification" has no basis in the common lawa stockholder vote standing alone cannot ratify a conflicted-controller transaction. Fourth, even if a stockholder vote could have a ratifying effect, it could not do so here due to multiple, material misstatements in the proxy statement. Each of these defects standing alone defeats the motion to revise.Vote not fully informed and uncoercedThe proxy statement provided to shareholders before the June 2024 vote "recommend[ed] that stockholders 'ratify' the exact same Grant rescinded by the Post-Trial Opinion," McCormick wrote.The new stockholder vote could shift the burden of proof, but only if the vote is "fully informed and uncoerced," McCormick wrote. Shareholder Richard Tornetta, the plaintiff who launched the lawsuit that got Musk's pay rescinded, "has demonstrated that the vote was not fully informed," today's ruling said.The January ruling in which McCormick voided the pay package said the deal was unfair to shareholders and that most of the board members were beholden to Musk or had compromising conflicts. In Tesla's subsequent request asking shareholders to re-approve the pay plan, the company said that a yes vote could "extinguish claims for breach of fiduciary duty by authorizing an act that otherwise would constitute a breach" and correct "disclosure deficiencies" and other problems identified in the 2018 stock award."Tesla debuted the argument in the Proxy Statement, which described stockholder ratification as a powerful elixir that could cure fiduciary wrongdoingnot for those harmed by the wrongdoing, but for the wrongdoers. Tesla told stockholders that the Post-Trial Opinion got Delaware law wrong and that their vote would 'fix' it," McCormick wrote.But the claims in Tesla's proxy statement are "materially false or misleading," McCormick wrote today. "As discussed above, under Delaware law, ratification cannot be deployed post-trial to extinguish an adjudicated breach of the duty of loyalty," and it "cannot cleanse a conflicted-controller transaction" without a full suite of required legal protections.304 million Tesla sharesMusk's pay plan would provide options to purchase nearly 303.96 million Tesla shares for $23.33 each, McCormick wrote. Tesla's stock price soared in recent months and was at $357.09 today.The plaintiff argued that the value gained by shareholders when the pay package was rescinded "equals the intrinsic value of the freed-up shares, which is the trading price, minus the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options," McCormick wrote. The plaintiff came up with a value of $51 billion based on the $191.59 per-share closing price on the date of the January 2024 ruling. As previously noted, the latest Tesla price suggests the pay package could have been worth $101 billion to Musk.McCormick had to estimate how much value shareholders gained from the voiding of the pay package in order to determine how much to award in attorneys' fees. The sides disagreed on how to value this, with one sticking point being how to account for the impact of dilution if Musk were to exercise his options."The plaintiff's attorneys asked for $5.6 billion in freely tradeable Tesla shares. In a case about excessive compensation, that was a bold ask," she wrote.McCormick said the plaintiff offered "a theoretically sound approach to valuing rescission, but it generates an insurmountable windfall problem." She decided to adopt a different approach, "conservatively valuing the benefit of rescission at $2.3 billion.""There is justification for awarding Plaintiff's counsel 33 percent of the $2.3 billion, which would result in a fee award of $759 million," McCormick wrote. "But that would be the highest award in the history of Delaware litigation by a wide margin. And so yet a further adjustment is required to avoid the windfall issue."After applying those adjustments, McCormick decided on attorneys' fees of 15 percent, amounting to $345 million. "Plaintiff's counsel is awarded fees in the amount of $345,000,000, which Tesla may elect to pay in freely tradeable Tesla common stock," the ruling said.The Delaware court has jurisdiction because that's where Tesla was incorporated when the suit was filed. Tesla has since moved its corporate headquarters to Texas.Jon BrodkinSenior IT ReporterJon BrodkinSenior IT Reporter Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry. 10 Comments Prev story
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·75 Views
  • Gelsinger Out as Intel CEO as Chip Giant Struggles to Regain Footing
    www.informationweek.com
    The company has had rough financial results over the last two years, even as plans to reignite domestic manufacturing move forward. Gelsinger was the catalyst for those ambitions.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·95 Views
  • Have We Gone Too Far With AI in Software Development?
    www.informationweek.com
    Has the promise of improved efficiency through AI been realized in software development? Is there still a place for citizen developers with AI in the development cycle?
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·94 Views
  • When, and where, did the covid-19 pandemic really begin?
    www.newscientist.com
    People carrying out disinfection work at a market in Wuhan, where covid-19 is thought to have originated, in March 2020An Yuan/China News Service via Getty ImagesFive years ago, the covid-19 pandemic was getting under way but we didnt know it yet. So, what exactly happened? Many scientists are convinced that it began with infected animals at a market in Wuhan, China, late in 2019, but there is still some debate.It is clear that SARS-CoV-2 evolved from a bat virus, as many related viruses have been found in bats. One of the closest is a strain called BANAL-20-236
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·85 Views
  • Chatbot gives medical advice to hundreds of users in largest trial yet
    www.newscientist.com
    Some of Alans app users got answers to their medical queries from an AI chatbotminiseries/Getty ImagesA French health insurance company has tested its medical chatbot with hundreds of people, in the largest real-world trial of a medical AI of its kind.Technology companies have long promised that their AIs can help ease pressure on doctors by providing accurate medical advice, but critics have been sceptical about their accuracy and potential risks, and they have failed to find wide success. One of the most prominent AI healthcare companies, Babylon Health, went bankrupt last year.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·96 Views