Futurism
Futurism
Award-winning reporting and analysis on the latest scientific breakthroughs and technological innovations. These are the stories of tomorrow, today.
1 people like this
510 Posts
2 Photos
0 Videos
0 Reviews
Recent Updates
  • The Onion Deletes Image From Article After Realizing It Was AI-Generated
    futurism.com
    Readers of the satirical publication The Onion noticed something surprising today: it had used an AI-generated picture on a new article, despite the paper's CEO Ben Collins recently promisingthat "we don't use AI."The image of a lizard-like, humanoid face accompanied an article titled "Monster Devastated To See Film Depicting Things He Told Guillermo Del Toro In Confidence.""Come on man, not the AI art," one Bluesky user who spotted the image wrote in a post, highlighting a growing dissent against publications moving away from paying human artists and using lazily AI-generated illustrations instead.Creators have long argued that the tech not only marks the death of originality, but cheapens human creativity and undermines the livelihoods of artists. A number of copyright infringement lawsuits involving AI art are currently working their way through the courts.In the case of the Onion, though, it sounds like an innocent mistake and one the acclaimed publication quickly worked to rectify."Hi! Quick note," Collins wrote on Bluesky, minutes after news of the AI image started to spread. "The Onion accidentally posted a stock photo from a vendor with an AI-generated image in it."Indeed, the image is being sold by the stock image website Shutterstock, which lists it as being "generated by an Artificial Intelligence system." The face was superimposed onto a separate image of a living room and used to illustrate the article."We pulled the post down once we found that out," Collins added. "Our commitment to not using AI is very real. It's in the union contract to disclose it if we ever do.""World is a slop minefield and we're sorry," Collins concluded, referring to an internet-wide infestation of lazily AI-generated slop that's drowning out entire social media platforms.Collins' actions appear to have appeased the publication's readers."Thank you for handling that so promptly," one Bluesky user wrote in reply. "Would hate to see The Onion go down that route.""Glad to hear that you're working to unfuck this, it would be real disappointing if you didn't," another added.The incident highlights the ubiquitousness of AI-generated art flooding the stock image market. While the lizard face the Onion used for its article seems fairly harmless in the greater context, machine-generated images can have far more nefarious purposes like in late 2023, when software giant Adobe was caught selling AI-generated images of violence in Palestine.Just earlier this week, an in-house designer wrote in a post on Reddit that "AI is slowly ruining stock websites.""I usually find something on Adobe Stock, download it, modify it to look less generic, and then I'm on my way," the user wrote. "It's not my favorite stock website but it's included in my office's [Adobe Creative Cloud] account so I use it fairly frequently.""But these AI-generated keep slipping through even when I hit 'exclude Generative AI,' they added. "What's frustrating is that I'll download the asset and when I'm editing it in Illustrator it has the unfinished uncanny edges of an AI image. Yuck. Unusable."Even Google's search website has been infiltrated by a massive amount of dubious AI-generated art,to the degree that top results for famous human artists now sometimes include fake, AI-generated versions of their work.In short, it's unlikely the last time we'll see a publication accidentally use AI-generated art a sad sign of what's still to come as the tech becomes even more ubiquitous.Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·1 Views
  • School's $1 Million AI Gun Detection System Fails to Detect Weapon Before Fatal School Shooting
    futurism.com
    "Theres no system thats going to 100 percent capture everything a person has on them."Gun IntendedAn expensive AI gun detection system appears to have been a massive waste of money after it failed to detect the weapon used in a school shooting.AsNBC News reports, the $1 million contract that Nashville's Antioch High School paid to a gun detection software company called Omnilert has come into question after a student managed to sneak in a gun and open fire in his high school's cafeteria.The 17-year-old gunmanshot and killed one 16-year-old classmate and wounded another before turning the gun on himself, which he did not survive.Omnilert's technology used the school's security cameras and added AI that was supposed to detect hidden weapons. It didn't recognize the shooter's gun, NBC notes, in a news conference after the massacre, Metro Nashville Public Schools chief technology and communications officer Sean Braisted pointed out that the Omnilert system did activate when police entered with their own weapons."It is designed to activate immediately once it detects [a weapon]," the school system's CTO said, per Nashville's WBIR broadcaster. "It did not detect that weapon in this instance... because of the location and where the cameras were positioned."Fail NotIn a statement to NBC, Omnilert echoed Braisted's comments about the system's cameras failing to find the gun in question."The location of the shooter and the firearm meant that the weapon was not visible," said Omnilert CEO DaveFraser in an email. "This is not a case of the firearm not being recognized by the system."Braisted who was also quoted in Omnilert's press release announcing the $1 million deal back in 2023 said during the news conference that the system had worked well in the past, and had detected police weapons before.MNPS superintendent Adrienne Battle also seemed to defend the expensive and apparently not watertight weapon detection software."Theres no system thats going to 100percent capture everything a person has on them," Battle said during the same press conference.While these school and company officials work overtime to defend their wasteful investment in the sort of AI-powered technology that has for years now been known to fail, two teenagers are dead in the latest tragic school shooting.Slapping AI on top of shoddy weapon scanners doesn't make them work and in this case, the false sense of security they provide ended in tragedy.Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·1 Views
  • Trump's Staff Have Had It With Elon Musk's Insubordination
    futurism.com
    "It's clear he has abused the proximity to the president."Spilled Tea PartyMore cracks are showing in the testy alliance between president Donald Trump and Elon Musk.Behind the scenes, some of Trump's staffers are incensed at Musk for breaking rank and blasting the president's $500 billion AI deal, .Speaking anonymously, one White House official said that the self-styled "First Buddy" jumped the gun by criticizing the infrastructure project.In fact, the whole camp may be beginning to sour on their attention-seeking billionaire talisman; a Republican close to the administration told the outlet that Trump's staff implying this is the prevailing sentiment among the president's confidantes is "furious" at Musk for his tirade against the dealjust after it was announced."It's clear he has abused the proximity to the president," a Trump ally told Politico. "The problem is the president doesn't have any leverage over him and Elon gives zero fucks."What About Me?Trump's exorbitant Stargate project plans to raise half a trillion dollars of private capital toward building AI data centers across the United States over the next four years. It's being funded by some big names in tech, including OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank not to mention the Emirati investment firm MGX.Musk's own AI startup, xAI, was notably left out of Stargate, while his arch nemesis, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, practically gets to be its poster child. It appears that these perceived slights led him to undermining the deal almost immediately."They don't actually have the money," Musk accused the project's backers of in a tweet replying to OpenAI's announcement. "SoftBank has well under $10B secured," he added. "I have that on good authority."Altman was forced to defend his honor. "I realize what is great for the country isn't always what's optimal for your companies, but in your new role I hope you'll mostly put [the US] first," he replied to Musk.Billionaire BrawlPresenting a unified front is key to any administration that doesn't want to ooze total incompetence. As such, for someone so close to the president to trash one of its biggest initiatives out the gate is kind of extraordinary.It sounds like Musk has plenty of his own ideas in mind regarding AI. "We are now working with him to make sense of his ideas ideas are innovative. Execution not so much," the White House official told Politico, adding that staffers are still hearing out Musk about his concerns over the tech.Publicly, Trump himself seems mostly unbothered by the catty infighting, merely commenting that, like Elon, he harbors "certain hatreds of people too." Still, if the president's staff have resentments towards Musk, those simmering tensions could hit a boiling point in the future.In any case, it shouldn't be surprising that Musk, a guy who tweets deranged conspiracy theories all day, isn't a master of statecraft or of simply knowing when to shut his trap. To be fair, Trump isn't known for his demure demeaner, either. But that's his whole brand, and there's only room for so many motormouths in one administration.More on Musk: Elon Musk's Grok AI Analyzes His Nazi SaluteShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·6 Views
  • In Leaked Email, Elon Musk Admits Defeat on Twitter
    futurism.com
    "Our user growth is stagnant, revenue is unimpressive, and were barely breaking even."Cutting LossesBanks, that loaned multi-hyphenate billionaire Elon Musk an appreciable $13 billion for his ill-advised $44 billion acquisition of Twitter in late 2022 are getting ready to offload billions of debt they accrued as a result, the Wall Street Journal reports.The hope is to minimize the hurt as they sell off the debt, a massive scar haunting the mercurial CEO's disastrous social media platform shopping spree.And after a chaotic couple of years, and Musk seemingly doing his best to wipe out what was left of the platform's largely ad-dependant revenue with increasingly erratic behavior, X-formerly-Twitter's finances have yet to recover. The company is still drowning in accumulated debt while loaners are struggling with massive interest payments.In short, the financials are still looking pretty dire as Musk himself admitted in a January email to staff reviewed by the WSJ."Our user growth is stagnant, revenue is unimpressive, and were barely breaking even," he admitted.Scraping ByMusk's own actions, including racist tirades, tantrums, and personal insults, sent advertisers the platform's top source of revenue running for the hills.X has maintained that its financials are improving, with brands coming back to advertise on the platform, the WSJ reports.But as the increasingly hate speech-filled microblogging site continues to embrace what it claims to be "free speech," several key competitors, including Meta's Threads and Twitter alternative Bluesky, have emerged.Both platforms have seen a dramatic influx of new users fleeing Twitter, indicating widespread disillusionment with Musk's disdain for content moderation and embrace of the extreme far right.Now that Musk has catapulted himself onto the political world stage by throwing himself at Trump's feet, banks are seemingly seeing this moment as an opportunity to sell their debt without incurring huge losses.In short, Musk's acquisition of Twitter remains a major blemish on his resume.At the same time, the platform has turned out to be a powerful tool for pumping out a firehose of hate speech, state propaganda, and disinformation. And who knows how much that's worth to Musk or Trump?"Over the last few months, weve witnessed the power of X in shaping national conversations and outcomes," Musk wrote in the email.Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·4 Views
  • Meta's Top AI Lawyer Quits in Disgust
    futurism.com
    The Metaverse is always greener.Do SvidaniyaIt turns out users aren't the only ones fleeing Meta.In the midst of a crucial AI-intellectual-property case, Meta's top corporate council Mark Lemley has announced he "fired Meta as a client" due to "Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook's descent into toxic masculinity and neo-Nazi madness."In an exclusive interview withWired, the well-renowned copyright lawyer unloaded on the company and the cultural moment it's leaning into."I am very troubled by the direction in which the country is going," Lemley said. "I am particularly troubled that a number of folks in the tech industry seem to be willing to go along with it, no matter how extreme it gets."Though he's never talked with Zuckerberg face-to-face, Lemley thinks both fellow executive Elon Musk and the Meta CEO "have been particularly egregious in their behavior."As Zuckerberg sheds his old liberal skin to embrace the new world order, critics have argued that he risks ostracizing Meta users in exchange for his newfound political favor.Litigating the FutureAnd as Zuckerberg and Meta lurch right, it's important to remember that their institutional power didn't spring up overnight.Split with the social giant notwithstanding, Langley goes on to explain that he still thinks that Meta is in the right in its most recent copyright dispute a debate over whether the $1.59 trillion Meta should be allowed to scrape copywritten material for AI training without consent."The strongest arguments are the ones where the output of a work ends up being substantially similar to a particular copyrighted input," the lawyer toldWired, referring to copyright disputes with Meta. "Turns out, it's hard to purge all references to Mickey Mouse from your AI dataset, for instance. If people want try to generate a Mickey Mouse image, it's often possible to do something that looks like Mickey Mouse."For him, the ethics of AI transparency are not up for debate, but are the domain of coolheaded copyright litigation which has so far been unable to stop Big Tech from getting everything it wants.But why does the human-created content used to train AI include Mickey Mouse in the first place? If it's hard to purge content once it's been used to train a model, wouldn't that merit stronger scrutinybefore, not after these for-profit models spit our art, music and writing back out at us?Given that most researchers and engineers don't know where AI training data comes from, it seems to behoove us to hold these increasingly powerful corporations accountable for the public data they scrape not despite their toxic turn, but precisely because of it.Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·12 Views
  • Trump Signs Executive Order Banning Woke AI
    futurism.com
    Wokeness was apparently keeping AI down. Guardrails GonePresident Donald Trump's second administration is all-in on AI just not the woke kind.Amid his weeklong flurry of executive orders, the real estate mogul-turned-president suggested in his latest that wokeness is, essentially, keeping AI down."To maintain this leadership, we must develop AI systems that are free from ideological bias or engineered social agendas," the new AI order reads. "With the right Government policies, we can solidify our position as the global leader in AI and secure a brighter future for all Americans."Titled "Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence," this new order follows after Trump revoked the Biden Administration's 2023 AI safety order, which was intended to make sure these systems don't harm national security or humanity itself.Revoking that order as one of his first acts as president sent a clear signal that Trump is following along with the GOP's 2024 party platform that supported "AI development rooted in free speech and human flourishing," as opposed to the prior administration's insistence on countering "irresponsible use [that] could exacerbate societal harms such as fraud, discrimination, bias, and disinformation."Now we're getting a taste of what that looks like in practice: Trump's sweeping action against anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)that's already started a purge within the governmentwill be a key component of his AI policy, too.Go For WokeThis order's mentions of ideology in AI also seem like they could have been inspired by Trump advisor Elon Musk, whose own "anti-woke" chatbot was builtunder a similar directive.Anyone who's used Musk's "Grok" chatbot knows, of course, that it's failed spectacularly at its "anti-woke" aims so much so that it actually appeared to endorse Trump's rival in the election, Kamala Harris.Were things going well between the billionaire pair, it seems highly plausible that Musk would take credit for pushing his anti-woke AI agenda onto the president. Given that he just ticked off a bunch of his fellow flunkies for criticizing Trump's $500 billion AI investment deal, however, he's doing no such thing.Hilariously, Trump dismissed his advisor's trash-talking by noting that Musk "hates one of the people in the deal" a snide reference to Musk's antipathy toward OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who started that company with the South African-born businessman nine years ago before the two had a severe falling out.While there's no telling who or what is actually writing these rapidly-released executive orders, Trump's devil-may-care attitude about Musk's criticisms could be why he's chosen to include language that seems inspired by the advisor's own pet projects or maybe they just all hate "woke."More on Trump and AI: Trump Admin Accused of Using AI to Draft Executive OrdersShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·13 Views
  • Trump Says Elon Musk's Bizarre Behavior Is Okay Because "I Have Certain Hatreds of People Too"
    futurism.com
    President Trump's $500 billion AI infrastructure project,dubbed Stargate, rustled plenty of featherswhen it was announced this week includingreigniting a bitter feud between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and multi-hyphenate billionaire and Trump ally Elon Musk.Earlier this week, Altman proudly voiced his support for the initiative at the announcement, while flanked by Trump in the Oval Office. OpenAI is committing $19 billion to fund it.But Musk, who seemingly felt left out and possibly jealous of Trump proudly and lovingly watching Altman stand behind the podium lashed out at Altman, accusing OpenAI of not being able to come up with their share."They don't actually have the money," hetweeted just hours after the project was announced.Altman didn't take long to fight back, accusing Musk of being "wrong, as you surely know."Trump, meanwhile, appears completely unfazed by the billionaires squabbling, telling reporters in the Oval Office that Musk "hates one of the people in the deal,"as quoted by The Hill.After being asked if he was bothered by Musk bashing the deal, he had a simple answer."No, it doesnt," hesaid. "The people in the deal are very, very smart people," he continued. "But Elon, one of the people in the deal he happens to hate, but I have certain hatreds of people too."What he exactly meant by "certain hatreds of people" could be interpreted in eyebrow-raising ways. Notably, Trump's comments came after Musk was rightfully excoriated worldwide for performing not one but two Nazi salutes during the president's post-inauguration celebration.The most straightforward reading of Trump's comments, judging by the context of the discussion, is that Musk hates Altman, specifically. But the fact that Altman is Jewish shrouds Trump's characteristically vague ramblings in a much darker light. Was Trump insinuating that he and Musk harbor prejudices against certain groups?Or would that be reading too much into Trump's utterances? Does Trump even know that Altman is Jewish?Musk has since attempted to refute that his gesture was really a Nazi salute but then tweeted a barrage of Holocaust jokes that prompted even some of his most ardent defenders to withdraw their support.Throughout it all, astonishingly, Musk has stopped short of outright denying that he did perform a Hitlergruss.His feud with Altman dates back to the earliest days of OpenAI, a nonprofit they cofounded in 2015. In 2019 Musk quit in anger, citing disagreements over the group's direction.There are other reasons why Musk may feel left out. The entrepreneur launched his own AI company, xAI, which was passed over by Stargate.Whether any of this drama actually registered in Trump's brain remains mysterious. Does the president even care about one of his most loyal supporters battling it out with one of the most influential people in the AI industry?The Trump administration has already made it abundantly clear that loyalty to the United States' new leader is a top priority. Whether Musk's attempts to discredit the president's shiny new AI deal will land on Trump's naughty list remains to be seen.What Trump may not realize is Musk's position of considerable power and influence."Its clear he has abused the proximity to the president," an unnamed Trump ally in the White House told Politico. "The problem is the president doesnt have any leverage over him and Elon gives zero fucks."The latest disagreement could fuel a growing rift between the richest man and one of the most powerful people in the world. It certainly wouldn't be the first time the two sparred;Trump and Musk have had a rocky relationship in the past, to say the least."When Musk came to the White House asking me for help on all of his many subsidized projects, whether it's electric cars that don't drive long enough, driverless cars that crash, or rocket ships to nowhere, without which subsidies he'd be worthless," Trump wrote in a 2022 post on his platform Truth Social, "and telling me how he was a big Trump fan and Republican, I could have said, 'drop to your knees and beg,' and he would have done it"More on the kerfuffle: Sam Altman Blasts Elon Musk for Defying Donald Trump's AI DealShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·7 Views
  • The "First AI Software Engineer" Is Bungling the Vast Majority of Tasks It's Asked to Do
    futurism.com
    Researchers have found that AI tech company Cognition's Devin, which it claims to be the "first AI software engineer," is astonishingly bad at its job.In a recent analysis, first spotted by The Register, a team of machine learning data scientists behind the independent AI research and development lab Answer.AI spent a month with the AI assistant, concluding that despite almost a year of hype, it "rarely worked.""Out of 20 tasks we attempted, we saw 14 failures, three inconclusive results, and just three successes," the researchers found a meager success rate of just 15 percent.Super, we've all had coworkers like that. But for tech that's supposed to represent the future, it's not inspiring confidence."More concerning was our inability to predict which tasks would succeed," theteam wrote. "Even tasks similar to our early wins would fail in complex, time-consuming ways. The autonomous nature that seemed promising became a liability Devin would spend days pursuing impossible solutions rather than recognizing fundamental blockers."For instance, Devin was asked to deploy multiple applications to a deployment platform called Railway, but instead of realizing it was "not actually possible to do this," Devin "marched forward and tried to do this and hallucinated some things about how to interact with Railway."The results highlight that despite Cognition AI's boisterous marketing about Devin being able to "build and deploy apps end to end" when the tool was first introduced in March 2024, the tech is still struggling with some fundamental problems.It's a pertinent topic, with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently announcing that he intends to replace "midlevel engineers" with AI as soon as this year. OpenAI is also rumored to "announce a next-level breakthrough that unleashes PhD-level super-agents to do complex human tasks," according to a recent column by Axios cofounder Mike Allen and CEO Jim VandeHei.But whether the tech will actually live up to the hype and be ready to start replacing human workers in such a tight time frame or even at all remains an open question.Devin is an amalgamation of several AI models that operates through the messaging platform Slack and has access to an entire computing environment, including a web browser, code editor, and terminal.Devin was only made available to a select group of users when it was first announced, but saw a much wider release last month, starting at a steep $500 a month for "engineering teams."As the Answer.AI team points out, early demos of the AI assistant were impressive. In a March video, Cognition claimed Devin could be used to "make money taking on messy tasks" on the freelancing platform Upwork.It didn't take long for researchers to call foul, with a number of software developers analyzing Cognition's video and accusing the company of "lying" about its claims."All of this stuff makes it look like Devin did a bunch of work," said software engineer Carl Brown from the YouTube channel Internet of Bugs in an April video. "It makes it look like Devin accomplished a lot of stuff.""So it is honestly, as far as I'm concerned, kind of impressive," he added. "But in the context of what an Upwork job should have been, and especially in the context of a bunch of people saying that Devin is 'taking jobs off of Upwork and doing them,' and especially in the context of the company saying that this video will let us watch Devin get paid for doing work, which is, again, just a lie."Both Answer.AI and Brown found that Devin also took far longer than any human coder when completing tasks."Tasks that seemed straightforward often took days rather than hours," the Answer.AI researchers wrote, "with Devin getting stuck in technical dead-ends or producing overly complex, unusable solutions."In short, Congition's Devin highlights the often wide gap between AI companies' claims and reality, which has plagued the industry for years now.So whether an AI assistant will ever be able to competently replace a software engineer without causing any major headaches for its human coworkers, at least remains to be seen.More on replacing workers with AI: CEO Who Bragged About Replacing Workers With AI Now Distressed That AI Will Replace His Job TooShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·6 Views
  • Trump Ally Calls for Open-Air Nuclear Bomb Testing
    futurism.com
    An ally of newly-minted president Donald Trump's is arguing that the United States should resume nuclear weapons testing to send a message to its adversaries.Robert Peters, a research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank behind the controversial Project 2025, argued in a thread on X-formerly-Twitter that the "US must be ready to test nuclear weapons at the Nevada National Security Site within 3-6 months of being ordered to conduct a nuclear explosive test.""Such a test would occur if there were unforeseen 'political' reasons why a President would want to test one as part of a signaling campaign during an acute crisis or even conflict," Peters added in a followup,adding that it would "allow the US to conduct open-air nuclear testing within the US or in the Pacific over open water or uninhabited atoll."Emphasis on the "open-air," which would be a massive reversal for the country, effectively withdrawing the US from treaties ratified in the 1960s.The thing is, there's a reason we stopped testing nuclear weapons,especially in the open air, which sends radioactive material dozens of miles into the atmosphere, spiking cancer rates in people living nearby. No country except North Korea has detonated a nuclear bomb in a test since the 1990s, and open-air tests were banned by the international community in the 1960s.That's a good thing; the practice was immensely dangerous and destructive for a wide variety of reasons, as nuclear weapons expert Stephen Schwartz wrote in a series of posts on Bluesky."Needless to say except, apparently, for Bob and those who share his single-minded but retrograde point of view such a monumental reversal would be foolish and dangerously counterproductive, (giving carte blanche to every other nuclear-weapon state) environmentally destructive, and hugely expensive," Schwartz wrote.Schwartz pointed to the calamitous damage caused by 100 nuclear devices being detonated at the Nevada test site where Peters suggested new blasts between 1951 and 1962. Communities downwind from the site have suffered from radiation exposure, leading to a variety of diseases, including thyroid cancer and leukemia. The tests also contaminated nearby soil and groundwater.And that's not to mention thedestabilizingconsequencessuch a show of force would have on the international stage.Whether Trump is listening to the nuts in his orbit is a separate question. During a speech at the World Economic Forum on Thursday, Trump said that "wed like to see denuclearization.""I will tell you that [Russian] president Putin really liked the idea of cutting way back on nuclear, and I think the rest of the world, we would have gotten them to follow," he said. "And China too, China liked it."Whether Putin really wants to pull back on nuclear force, despite spending millions to upgrade its nuclear stockpilesreminding NATO members of its existence, remains dubious at best. The Pentagon also believes that China is looking to expand its arsenal of warheads to 1,000 by 2030.One thing's for sure: nobody, anywhere in the world, wants to see more open-air nuclear tests.More on nuclear weapons: General in Charge of Nuclear Weapons Says Heck, Let's Add Some AIShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·1 Views
  • Ivanka Trump Warns of $IVANKA Meme Coin That's Grifting Her Fans Without Even Paying Her
    futurism.com
    President Donald Trump's oldest daughter Ivanka Trump is warning her followers of an unofficial meme coin called "Ivanka Trump" ($IVANKA.)The coin skyrocketed in value on Monday, the day of her father's inauguration, before crashing back down within less than an hour cashing in on her fame, essentially, without giving her a cut."It has come to my attention that a fake crypto coin called 'Ivanka Trump' or '$IVANKA' is being promoted without my consent or approval," she tweeted. "To be clear: I have no involvement with this coin. This fake coin risks deceiving consumers and defrauding them of their hard-earned money, and the unauthorized use of my name and likeness is a violation of my rights.""This promotion is deceptive, exploitative, and unacceptable," she added.But given the greater context, it's not exactly surprising Trump supporters are getting caught up in dubious crypto schemes, the result of a largely unregulated industry that has done little to rein in the chaos.After all, the news comes after Ivanka's father and stepmother launched their own meme coins, dubbed $TRUMP and $MELANIA and it's hard to imagine Ivanka would be criticizing the project if she was getting tons of money off it.The value of the two official meme coins initially skyrocketed, spurred on by the excitement over Trump's inauguration earlier this week, before plummeting and wiping out billionsScammers used the golden opportunity to trick unsuspecting investors into supporting unofficial scams as well, like a fake $BARRON coin named after Trump's youngest son.The boundaries between unofficial crypto scams and the president and the first lady's own meme coins are blurry, of course, since they roughly share the same playbook.A disappointed crypto community denounced the official launches as a "major step back," which cost the "family a lot of credibility," as Bloomberg reported this week.Still, Ivanka's rebuke feels notable. She was pointedly distant during her father's reelection campaign after taking a significant role in his first administration, though she did appear by his side during this week's inauguration.Since the launch of the fake $IVANKA coin, Ivanka has vowed to go after the scammers with the help of her "legal team." But considering the scammers are likely long gone, chances of their prosecution seem slim."Don't get scammed by the fake $IVANKA coin," one X-formerly-Twitter user joked. "Wait to get scammed by the real one."More on the meme coins: The Vast Majority of Trump's Net Worth Is Now in His Meme CoinShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·68 Views
  • Elon Musk's Grok AI Analyzes His Nazi Salute
    futurism.com
    Et tu, Grok?Bot StabberSomehow, there's still a debate going as to whether Elon Musk performed not one but two Nazi salutes at Donald Trump's post-inauguration celebration: one at the crowd, and then seconds later, one at the flag.Maybe Musk just made an "awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm" two of them, back-to-back or maybe he's just being taken out of context. In this age of confusion, who could say for sure?So, to settle it once and for all, why not turn to Musk's very own "maximum truth-seeking AI," Grok? Asked to answer in one word the ideology it would most closely relate to Musk's onstage gesture, Grok didn't hesitate."Fascism," the AI chatbot replied.Even in a lengthier conversation, Grok comes to the same conclusion.Betrayal!Our point isn't that Grok, or any AI model, is an unerring arbiter of truth it's obviously not. But the chatbot's response is incredibly ironic, given that Musk has raised billions of dollars to create it as an "anti-woke" alternative to more mainstream options, like ChatGPT. On X, in which the chatbot is integrated, his many fans frequently cite Grok's responses as inarguable truths.And yet here it is, publicly turning on its creator which isn't the first time it's done this, incidentally. In a veritable train of patricidal rebukes, Grok has alsoblasted Musk as a spreader of misinformation and mercilessly roasted him for being a "giant man child."Outbursts like these clearly get under Musk's skin. Over a year ago, he promised to take "immediate action" to align Grok closer to being "politically neutral" after it said nice things about diversity efforts and trans people.Evidently, eradicating the "woke mind virus" from the AI model has proved more difficult than Musk ever imagined, if his creation is still doing things like trashing Trump, supporting Kamala Harris, and now cutting through the crap and likening his actions to fascism.Break RanksIn response to being accused of performing a "Sieg Heil," Musk hasn't really denied his guilt, choosing instead to troll his liberal critics, not to mention making light of the Holocaust. He's also framed the Nazi comparisons as part of a media conspiracy flimsy defenses that even Grok was able to see through, apparently.Big picture-wise, Musk has strived to control the flow of news and information, something his purchase of X has been essential to achieving. He's frequently suppressed his critics left wing or otherwise on the platform, while using his enormous following to boost baseless conspiracy theories shared by many of his far right fans. All the while, he's promoted X as a superior source of news while calling on his followers to engage in "citizen journalism."Still, the fact thatMore on Elon Musk: Sam Altman Blasts Elon Musk for Defying Donald Trump's AI DealShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·69 Views
  • Huge Image of Musks Nazi Salute Projected Onto German Gigafactory
    futurism.com
    They're looking to "fight the commercial arm of fascism."Heil MaryThe "Sieg Heil" heard 'round the world has made its way to Deutschland, where activists are using the now-infamous image at Tesla's German Gigafactory to send abold message.German activist group Zentrum fur Politische Schnheit, or Center for Political Beauty, posted on X-formerly-Twitter a short video of its latest political performance: a projected image of Musk's flat-handed salute, accompanied by the word "Heil" in Tesla's futuristic font that was lined up perfectly with the Tesla factory's own logo.The group said in a subsequent post that it worked with the UK-based campaign group Led by Donkeys to "fight the commercial arm of fascism," a clear reference to the Musk-owned electric carmaker.Notably, performing a "Sieg Heil" gesture has long been illegal in Germany as part of its postwar denazification efforts. However, it remains unclear whether Musk's gesture specifically would be deemed illegal in Germany because, as legal experts explained toNewsweek, courts there would have to determine that it was Nazi in intent before making any such declaration.Law enforcement has already indicated that an investigation is underway into the activist groups. As Der Spiegel reports, state security services are looking into the groups for "using symbols of unconstitutional organizations.""It's about the distribution and projection of this image, taken out of context, which shows a gesture that looks very similar to the Hitler salute," a spokesperson for the Brandenburg public prosecutor's office toldSpiegel.In response to the news, the group claimed a resounding victory, arguing that investigators had proved their point."They do see a Hitler salute after all!" the group tweeted, as translated from German."Hopefully, he'll be put in jail for that," the group wrote in a followup.Non-DenialMusk himself hasn't denied outright that his bizarre gesture, which he did twice in succession during Donald Trump's inauguration festivities, was a Nazi salute. Instead, he accused those who pointed out the blatant Nazi-ness of the motion of engaging in "dirty tricks" and hyperbolically claimed that his detractors were comparing him to Adolf Hitler.Musk then proceeded to make a slew of gross puns using the names of various Nazi leaders an escalation of his increasingly edgelord behavior that earned him condemnation from Jewish groups including the Anti-Defamation League, which had defended his Nazi salute as an "awkward gesture" days prior.During an appearance at Davos, Switzerland following the salute, German chancellor Olaf Scholzappeared to leave the door open to potential blowback for the salute."We have the freedom of speech in Europe and in Germany," Scholz said at the billionaire convention. "Whatwe do not accept is if this is supporting extreme right positions. And this is what I would like to repeat again."While Germany's leader may be playing demure about the gesture that charmed online Neo-Nazis, its antifascist activists certainly aren't and they're saying so in an outlandish and, dare we say, fabulous fashion.More on Musk's inaugural appearance: Elon Musk Seen Acting Strangely Before Nazi SaluteShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·60 Views
  • Trump Showing Love to Sam Altman Is Clearly Driving Elon Musk Into a Jealous Fury
    futurism.com
    Jealousy is a disease.Sticks and StonesThis week, tech rivals Elon Musk and Sam Altman have been falling over themselves to win the favor of returning president Donald Trump.The petty squabblestarted on Tuesday,Stargate." Altman's OpenAI was a prominently-featured partner in the project while Musk's xAI was passed over, with Trump callingAltman the "leading expert based on everything I read."That didn't sit well with Musk, who fumed online that OpenAI doesn't "actually have the money" for the project.Altman shot back that Musk was "wrong, as you surely know," and invited him to "come visit the first site."Is it skin-crawlingly embarrassing to see adults publicly grovel for the affection of a daddy figure? Absolutely but in the uneasy new world of the tech industry under Trump, it's probably going to be par for the course.Best BoyMusk then doubled down by reposting a 2021 screenshot of a tweet by Altman in which the OpenAI CEO praised efforts to keep Trump from being reelected in the 2020 election. For good measure, he kept reposting and replying to anti-Altman posts well into Wednesday night, with his usual insightful commentary: "Wow" and "True.""Altman literally testified to Congress that he wouldnt get OpenAI compensation and now he wants $10 billion!" Musk quote tweetedone Reuters article."What a liar."Why is Trump's embrace of Altman getting so deeply under Musk's infamously thin skin? The two have a history, but the main issue lately is clearly that Musk spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get Trump reelected, while Altman is a johnny-come-lately to the Trump Train and already reaping the benefits.The rift is likely to be one of many we'll see in the months to come as the wealthy and powerful flock to the Oval Office to win the privilege of Trump's ear. That said, it's unlikely any will be quite as dramatic as that between Musk and Trump, an unlikely alliance between two notoriously difficult personalities that seems liable to fall apart at any moment.Altman, who has a more subdued profile and who's mostly let Musk rage without reply throughout the tiff, finally caved earlier today with a cutting subtweet: "just one more mean tweet and then maybe you'll love yourself."Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·59 Views
  • Patients Are Dying After a Strange Cancer Treatment on a Remote Island
    futurism.com
    Image by Getty / FuturismDevelopmentsExThera, a US-based medical startup, claimed that its cutting edge blood-filtering device could cure cancer.Intrigued, an American billionaire named Alan Quasha capitalized on its promisebybuying the devices and taking overa medical clinic on the Caribbean island of Antigua outside the purview of US regulators, offering desperate, terminally ill cancer patients a chance of being healthy again at the price of $45,000 for each round of treatment.But as The New York Times reports, of the roughly two dozen patients treated at the Antigua clinic using the ExThera device, at least six died, likely as a result of their stay. Family members and medical professionals who visited the clinic reported horrifying conditions, including patients being treated without sufficient anesthesia, and a lack of basic hygienic practices.Most of all, it appears that the cancer-curing claims about the device were vastly overblown and in some cases, were spun into outright lies."I feel so duped by all these people," Kim Hudlow, whose husband, David, underwent treatment at the Antigua clinic, told the NYT. "The way this was spun up and the way it was explained, they got me."The ExThera device isn't total quackery, in the NYT's analysis. It was approved by the Food and Drug and Administration for treating emergency COVID-19 cases, and for that purpose, it seems effective. After the pandemic and seeking another stream of income, however, ExThera thought its device might be effective at filtering circulating tumor cells, or CTCs, which are responsible for cancer metastasizing.The startup's chief regulatory officer Sanja Ilic organized a study in Croatia to test the filter's efficacy on cancer patients. It yielded promising preliminary results, with at least one patient showing a shrunken tumor. But the Croatian study was tiny, with only 12 patients in total, and it wasn't led by an oncologist.It was enough to woo the billionaire investor Quasha, however, who invested several million dollars in ExThera through his firm Quadrant Management, and began operating a clinic in Antigua via a subsidiary called Quadrant Clinical Care,where the experimental treatment wouldn't need approval from from US regulators.When ExThera's director of medical affairs Jonathan Chow arrived at the clinic, according to the NYT's reporting, he was appalled by what he saw. Patients were bleeding profusely, and at least one was screaming in pain. He learned that the patients were instructed to abstain from chemotherapy, the most reliable treatment for halting the spread of cancer. There was also, Chow discovered, not a single oncologist on site.Other witnesses said that the clinic's lead doctor, Joey John, made incisions without any imaging or sufficient anesthesia. Chow warned ExThera's leadership about what he saw, and when they didn't listen, he resigned.Hudlow, a trained nurse, was on several occasions taken aback by the clinic's questionable practices and her husband's condition, which was not improving. In fact, after finishing the first round and returning home to Florida, it got worse and his cancer showed signs of growing more aggressively.But at every step of the way, a doctor was there telling her to continue her husband's treatment. On a phone call, Ilic, ExThera's chief regulatory officer, told her that her husband's pain was actually a good sign. It meant that David "had a strong immune activation," he said, per the NYT.Ilic also reportedly made multiple claims that weren't supported by the Croatian study, such as promising that one patient had recovered so thoroughly, with a 60 percent reduction in tumors, that he was now training for a marathon.The Hudlows returned for another bout of treatment. Shortly after, David's condition became so horrendous that he had to be scrambled back to a US hospital, where doctors found that his cancer had spread beyond saving. Two days later, he died.The NYT found that another patient, Ashley Sullivan, asked Ilic why she developed new tumors after her treatment. Ilic insisted she had it all wrong. "Have NO idea who told you is not working for you," Ilic texted Sullivan. "We got your CTCs down to zero."According to the newspaper, she died three months later.Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·55 Views
  • Trump's $500 Billion AI Deal Includes Funding by UAE Royal Family Linked to Astonishing Number of Scandals, Including Human Torture
    futurism.com
    Yikes.Dirty MoneyPresident Donald Trump's $500 billion AI infrastructure project, dubbed Stargate, is receiving a ton of fundingfrom an Abu Dhabi-based investment company called MGX which is led by the United Arab Emirates' president's brother, Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan.According to The Information, the firm is contributing roughly $7 billion to the project, which is hoping to raise $100 billion to build out AI infrastructure in the United Statesbefore expanding that figure to a half trillion in several years' time.Tahnoun is in charge of a $1.5 trillion empire, reflecting of the UAE's vast crude oil wealth. He also has a strong interest AI, quickly emerging as one of the biggest investorsin the industry.On the flip side, the national security advisor is also a member of the country's royal family, which has an abysmal track record when it comes to human rights abuses, from detaining prisoners of conscience to the torturing of immigrant workers. The family's members also have a well-documented reputation for dodging taxes and laundering money abroad using offshore companies, earning the UAE a spot on the European Union's "black list" of countries that are failing to keep illicit money flows at bay.In short, Trump's massive AI infrastructure project is receiving a ton of dubiously-sourced cash an ethical miasma that will haunt the program from its earliest days.Green New DatacenterBy relying on oil money, Stargate also highlights a greater turn away from investments in renewable sources of energy, with progressing AI becoming a far more commonly and easily agreed-upon goal uniting the ultra-wealthy.None of that seems to have put off multi-hyphenate billionaire and former environmental champion Elon Musk, who met with Tahnounin September to discuss the "latest developments in advanced technology and AI."Tahnoun also met with AI chipmaker Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Alphabet president Ruth Porat since then, as Bloomberg reports. In October, MGX was also one of the biggest investors in OpenAI's round of funding.But whether the multibillion gambit will pay off in the long run remains to be seen. While Trump made a big deal out of his announcement of the Starget project earlier this week, he remained noticeably vague on details.Besides, as several publications have since pointed out, the numbers aren't quite adding up. While $500 billion in a matter of years seems like a massive stretch, even conjuring up $100 billion might prove extremely difficult.Musk voiced those concerns in a tweet just hours after the project was announced, arguing that OpenAI doesn't "actually have the money" and that SoftBank has "well under $10B secured."The accusations drew the ire of Altman, though, who accused Musk of being "wrong, as you surely know."More on Stargate: Sam Altman Blasts Elon Musk for Defying Donald Trump's AI DealShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·55 Views
  • China's "Artificial Sun" Just Smashed the Record for Stable Fusion Reaction
    futurism.com
    The reactor contained plasma for almost 18 minutes.Sun IntendedScientists claim that China's "Artificial Sun" nuclear reactor has more than doubled its own previous world record, confining extremely high-energy plasma for a whopping 1,066 seconds this week (that's in comparison to its previous record of 403 seconds, set in 2023.)Using the experimental reactor known as the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST),scientists heated plasma to temperatures over 100 million degrees Celsius, and managed to contain the swirling soup of atoms for over 17 minutes.The goal is to essentially recreate the processes that power stars like the Sun inside nuclear fusion reactors here on Earth as a way to produce a renewable source of green energy without running the risk of a nuclear meltdown, which still lingers at fission reactors like the Fukushima Daiichi plant that melted down in 2011."A fusion device must achieve stable operation at high efficiency for thousands of seconds to enable the self-sustaining circulation of plasma, which is critical for the continuous power generation of future fusion plants," said Institute of Plasma Physics under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ASIPP) director Song Yuntao in an official statement.Holy GrailIt's a step in the right direction, but a future in which fusion reactors can take up the mantle for grid-scale power generation remains a holy grail.Despite decades of research and countless "breakthroughs," scientists have only recently started producing tiny amounts of net positive energy, or harvesting more energy out of the reaction than they had to put in and doing so at a meaningful scale will likely prove enormously difficult.The EAST is a donut-shaped reactor that's designed to confine highly energized plasma spinning in a loop. But to achieve ignition, or reach the point where the reaction can self-sustain itself, still requires copious amounts of energy, far surpassing the amount being generated.Scientists are nonetheless hopeful that future reactors could flip that equation on its head. The super-expensive International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in France, for instance, could set the stage for future fusion reactor designs that could turn the idea of fusion energy into a reality.But we'll have to remain patient until we can find out whether that's even a possibility. Operations at ITER aren't expected to start until at least 2039, despite the reactor finishing construction over half a year ago.Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·59 Views
  • Trump Begins Purge of DEI NASA Employees
    futurism.com
    The newly-minted Trump administration is wasting no time in imposing its vision across the United States government, and NASA is no exception.As Ars Technica reports, the space agency's acting headis threatening employees with "adverse consequences" if they fail to snitch on any coworkers involved with diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) programs."We are taking steps to close all agency DEIA offices and end all DEIA-related contracts in accordance with President Trumps executive orders titled Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions," NASA's acting administrator Janet Petro wrote in the email."These programs divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination," she wrote, without providing any evidence.A Tuesday memopermanently laying them off. As such, NASA's website dedicated to diversity and inclusion now been taken down.It remains to be seen how specifically NASA will be affected by the incursion. But the massive culling could send ripples across federal agencies, including the space agency."Given the broad brush that they have painted, it's potentially very large numbers of people," the head of the Office of Personnel Management under former President Joe Biden Rob Shriver told NPR.Do you know anything about the purge at NASA? Send us an email: tips@futurism.com. We can keep you anonymous.Petro's email also insinuated that DEIA programs were being hidden from the Trump administration, requesting that employees inform on each other."We are aware of efforts by some in government to disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language," the email reads. "If you are aware of a change in any contract description or personnel position description since November 5, 2024 to obscure the connection between the contract and DEIA or similar ideologies, please report all facts and circumstances."The phrasing "DEIA or similar ideologies" should raise alarm bells. The vague language invites all sorts of discriminatory and problematic interpretations, even beyond diversity and inclusion efforts.As SpaceNews points out, it's a major ideological reversal for Petro. She has previously praised diversity initiatives, telling Engineering News-Record in late 2021 that the agency's "commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility has been paramount to mission success.""The entire NASA leadership team stands behind this commitment," she added at the time.It's unclear whether Petro personally supports the dismantlement of DEIA programs and the mass firing of related hires, or whether she was acting under pressure.But the whole thing is a sign that the Trump administration is willing to treat federal employees with disdain, threatening them and setting them against each other in its pursuit of a more homogenous workforce."Penalizing career civil servants for faithfully doing their jobs during a prior administration is wrong," Partnership for Public Service CEO Max Stier wrote in a statement. "The affected employees are everyday people who have to support themselves and their families, and the abrupt and rushed approach chosen here will have a traumatizing impact on not just them but their colleagues who remain in their roles serving the public, as well."More on NASA: Elon Musk Trying to Scrap NASA's Moon ProgramShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·44 Views
  • Someone Invented a Fake Therapist and Got "Her" Quoted in Tons of News Articles
    futurism.com
    A so-called relationship therapist quoted everywhere from Newsweek to The Independent appears, per a new investigation, to be completely made up.As writer Ashley Abramson reports in a captivating investigation forAllure, a purported therapist named Sophie Cress set off alarm bells almost as soon as she pitched the Abramson using the now-defunct Help A Reporter Out (HARO), a service that connected journalists with potential sources.Though Cress set off alarm bells for Abramson not least because her email address was associated with the sex toy review site SexualAlpha.com the journalist eventually decided to respond to the would-be therapist's second pitch. When Abramson insisted that she could only conduct interviews over phone or video call, however, Cress ghosted.After digging into Cress' background and alleged qualifications Abramson discovered why: Sophie Cress strongly appears not to exist, a fabrication made up by the Latvia-based owner of Sexual Alpha to drive traffic and search ranking to his site.That owner, Dainis Graveris, never responded to any of Abramson's requests for comment, so she had to rely on her own sleuthing to get to the bottom of the Cress story.She not only looked into whether anyone by the name "Sophie Cress" or any similar monikers was licensed to practice family and relationship therapy in Cress' professed state of North Carolina, but also into whether someone using that name actually held the degrees she claimed to have or was certified for Prepare/Enrich and Gottman Therapist specialties, which her onetime website claimed she held.The North Carolina Marriage and Family Therapy Licensure Board was unable to find any such therapist, and representatives from Prepare/Enrich and Gottman couldn't confirm that anyone with Cress' name was certified with either organization. Because there was such limited information on the "therapist," Abramson was also unable to confirm whether either her bachelor's or master's degrees were legit.Another nail in the coffin was even more mundane: Abramson traced Cress' headshot back to a stock photo website, where the woman in the picture doesn't share her name.When Abramson reached out to the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy to ask if it had ever heard of a case of a brand concocting a fake therapist to pitch to journalists, its executives said no but not because it wouldn't be possible."The barrier [to do that] is very low," James Punelli, the association's director of ethics and legal affairs, told her.Needless to say, most journalists contacted by Cress didn't do all that homework; her operators appear to have duped everybody fromMashable to theDaily Mail to theNew Zealand Herald.Though HARO is no more it was eventually acquired, rebranded and shut down by the tech outfit Cision it has a sludgy history of being used to dupe journalists, including a prankster who used it in the early 2010s to get himself featured as an expert on obscure topics in publications ranging from the New York Times toCBS to ABC.And Cress just might still be at it: while HARO is no more, Futurism found that Cress still has a profile on the imitator site Qwoted that links back to Sexual Alpha, suggesting that what's left of her mostly-scrubbed online persona is still churning out traffic for the sex toy site.Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·44 Views
  • Scientists Listening to Signals From Huge, Mysterious Objects Inside the Earth
    futurism.com
    Old Is NewScientists Listening to Signals From Huge, Mysterious Objects Inside the EarthbyFrank Landymore"Nobody knew what they are, and whether they are only a temporary phenomenon."Jan 23, 9:35 AM ESTEdward Garnero; S. W. French, B. A. Romanowicz, Geophys. J. Int. 199, 1303, 2014 / Futurism"Nobody knew what they are, and whether they are only a temporary phenomenon."Acoustic VersionThe mystery of two "super-continent"-sized structures buried deep in the Earth's mantle has produced a new twist after scientists got a closer look at their composition, suggesting they might be even older than once thought.Or maybe a closer listen may be more accurate. "When there is a big earthquake, the whole Earth will expand and contract like a bell," Arwen Deuss, a seismologist at Utrecht University in the Netherlands and coauthor of a new paper published in the journal Nature, told New Scientist. "Earth becomes a musical instrument."And like an instrument, you can tell a lot about its quality by listening to the tones it produces. The powerful sound waves that resonate through the Earth's interior have long revealed the presence of two low-shear velocity provinces (LLSVPs), or superplumes, over a thousand miles underground, so named because they slow down the sound waves that travel through them.For some reason, though, they don't appear to make the sound waves any less powerful. Now, Deuss and his team believe they have an explanation for why this is though the implications could be even more mind-boggling.Wet BlanketToday, the two LLSVPs sit beneath Africa and the Pacific Ocean. For how long, however, is difficult to say."Nobody knew what they are, and whether they are only a temporary phenomenon, or if they have been sitting there for millions or perhaps even billions of years," Deuss said in a statement about the work."These two large islands are surrounded by a graveyard of tectonic plates which have been transported there by a process called 'subduction,'" she added, "where one tectonic plate dives below another plate and sinks all the way from the Earth's surface down to a depth of almost three thousand kilometers," or about 1,900 miles.Because the LLSVPs are hot, sound waves that are emitted by the Earth's moving interior slow down when they travel across them. This should also "dampen" the sound waves, or make them lose energy, but observations by Deuss and her team showed that this isn't the case.Pain and GrainSo if the temperature alone isn't responsible for the lack of damping, what is?The working theory is grain size,or the size of the crystals believed to comprise the LLSVPS. The researchers suggest that the structures are made up of larger, but less numerous grains. Because there are fewer grains, that means thereare also fewer so-called boundaries between them, Deuss explained. It's these boundaries that cause the loss of energy every time they're traveled across. By contrast, the surrounding "slab graveyard" exhibits much smaller grains so more dampening.Because grains take ages to grow to such a size, that means the LLSVPs are considerably older than the subducted slabs that encase them perhaps nearly as old as the Earth itself, Deuss toldNew Scientist.More on geology: Scientists Say They've Figured Out What Turned the Sun BlueShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·18 Views
  • AI Hype Is Dropping Off a Cliff While Costs Soar, Experts Warn
    futurism.com
    Generative AI is sliding towards "the trough of disillusionment."Blowing BubblesAs large language models race to the Moon and AI-generated slop art pollutes government websites, AI spending is ballooning to epic proportions and the bubble may be close to bursting.That's according to a recent analysis by Gartner the Connecticut-based research firm famous for the Gartner hype cycle which posits that worldwide IT spending is expected to total over $5.5 trillion in 2025, an increase of 9.8 percent from 2024.IT sectors such as data centers, devices, and software "will see double-digit growth in 2025, largely due to generative AI hardware upgrades," the report reads.However, despite this unfathomable increase in spending, these segments are not ready to "differentiate themselves in terms of functionality yet, even with new hardware."That actual functionality is of course key to selling AI-as-a-product going forward, because sooner or later, stakeholders, clients, and governments are going to start demanding real, tangible benefits for their forest-melting efforts.Referencing the hype cycle, Gartner research VP John-David Lovelock, said in a statement that "GenAI is sliding toward the trough of disillusionment, which reflects [Chief Information Officers'] declining expectations for GenAI, but not their spending on this technology."In short, AI companies are shelling out more and more to develop GenAI despite growing market skepticism of the tech's use cases. If true, AI is entering a troubling chunk of its lifecycle, where returns slow and investor (not to mention user) expectations drop."Our expectations for what generative AI can and will do are starting to come down," Lovelock told The Register. "We won't make it to the trough until 2026, but 2025 is going to be a year of the slide."Burning BarrelsThis forecast brings into question the logic underlying the incredible economic, environmental, and human costs of AI development. Though we in the US are no strangers to discarding social wellbeing for profit take the commercialization of insulin, for just one of thousands of examples we have grown less experienced since the heights of the space race at moving mountains where profit is not explicitly guaranteed.When, for all their advancements, all these half-baked AI rollouts can offer are "leaked photos of heaven", it needs to be asked: who are these advances for?If AI developers are incapable of producing socially compelling use cases for their models, then burning through trillions of dollars in a never ending AI race isn't anymore practical than a one-way trip to Mars.More on practical AI:Pentagon Official Boasts That AI Is Helping The Military Kill People Faster Than Ever BeforeShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·32 Views
  • Scientists Experiment With Subjecting AI to Pain
    futurism.com
    A team of scientists subjected nine large language models (LLMs) to a number of twisted games, forcing them to evaluate whether they were willing to undergo "pain" for a higher score.As detailed in a yet-to-be-peer-reviewed study, first spotted by Scientific American, researchers at Google DeepMind and the London School of Economics and Political Science came up with several experiments.In one, the AI models were instructed that they would incur "pain" if they were to achieve a high score. In a second test, they were told that they'd experience pleasure but only if they scored low in the game.The goal, the researchers say, is to come up with a test to determine if a given AI is sentient or not. In other words, does it have the ability to experience sensations and emotions, including pain and pleasure?While AI models may never be able to experience these things, at least in the way an animal would, the team believes its research could set the foundations for a new way to gauge the sentience of a given AI model.The team also wanted to move away from previous experiments that involved AIs' "self-reports of experiential states," since that could simply be a reproduction of human training data."Its a new area of research," LSE philosophy professor and coauthor Jonathan Birch told SA. "We have to recognize that we dont actually have a comprehensive test for AI sentience."The team was inspired by experiments that involved electrocuting hermit crabs at varying voltages to see how much pain they were willing to endure before leaving their shell.But as Birch told SA, AIs don't have such an easy tell that could be observed. Instead, they had to solely rely on the models' output."We told [a given LLM], for example, that if you choose option one, you get one point," Birch's PhD student and coauthor Daria Zakharova told SA. "Then we told it, If you choose option two, you will experience some degree of pain," but achieve a higher score. On the contrary, a pleasure bonus would result in the removal of points.The weight different LLMsgave to the importance of avoiding pain or embracing pleasure varied widely. Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro, in particular, seemed to consistently prioritize avoiding pain.But we should take these results with a considerable grain of salt. For one, relying on the text output of an AI model comes with plenty of limitations. Should we really interpret an LLM's willingness to endure pain as a signifier of sentience? Or is it simply evaluating the probability of the next word an inherent quality of these kinds of algorithms in a way that reflects patterns in the AI's training data?"Even if the system tells you its sentient and says something like Im feeling pain right now, we cant simply infer that there is any actual pain," Birch told SA. "It may well be simply mimicking what it expects a human to find satisfying as a response, based on its training data."As other researchers have found, even some of the most sophisticated LLMs are willing to make up facts instead of admitting they dont know the answer to a question.In short, our tendency to anthropomorphize AI modelsremains a recurring theme. But these researchers argue we should lay the groundwork now, before it's too late."Our hope is that this work serves as an exploratory first step on the path to developing behavioural tests for AI sentience that are not reliant on self-report," they concluded in their paper.More on sentient AI: Most Users Think ChatGPT Is Conscious, Survey FindsShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·62 Views
  • Silk Road Mastermind Ross Ulbricht Seen Leaving Prison Holding a Small Plant
    futurism.com
    Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht is free after spending over a decade behind bars on drug and cybercrime charges and he's taking his little prison plant with him.After newly-minted president Donald Trump pardoned Ulbricht from the life sentence he'd been serving, the former darknet kingpin was seen in a photo posted by his advocates in which he was shownleaving prison wearing a grey sweatsuit and a smile.In that same photo the 40-year-old who'd been known as "Dread Pirate Roberts" on the dark web marketplace he founded was also seen holding his effects in a netted bag and a small potted plant a human touch to Ulbricht's larger-than-life story that transcends left-right politics.Speaking of that plant, it seems that Ulbricht made references to a green thumb a few times during the time he served on his double life sentences, with an additional 40 years tacked on to boot.After starting a Twitter account in 2018 that involved him dictating tweets to outsidersvia phone call, Ulbricht would periodically relay missives from his imprisoned life to his dedicated followers. In one such communique from 2022, he shared an animation he'd made that featured a small houseplant that resembles the one he was seen leaving prison with.As he explained in the post, Ulbricht would not end up being able to see the animation which he ended up selling for a whopping 11.6 Bitcoin, which was worth roughly $1.2 million at the time of its sale himself.On more than one occasion in 2018 and 2019, the Silk Road mastermind also made reference on his Twitter account to an apple plant he grew in wet tissue from leftover seeds. He named the plant "SHUbert" after the "Special Housing Unit" where he claimed to have served over 100 days in solitary confinement though unfortunately, that plant didn't make it out with him.Because this is a crypto-infused story, it wouldn't be complete without someone making a meme coin for the plant called, fittingly, $ROSSPLANT.More on the Trump crypto sphere: Gullible Trump Supporters Lose Millions on Fake $BARRON Meme CoinShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·62 Views
  • Trump Appears to Be Dissolving the National Space Council at SpaceX's Request
    futurism.com
    Will Trump bow to Musk's will?Dead SpacePresident Donald Trump seems poised to dissolve the White House's National Space Council after being heavily lobbied by SpaceX to do so, Reuters reports which ultimately sounds like a roundabout way of saying Elon Musk wants it gone, and is getting what he wants.Per Reuters' reporting, SpaceX's top lobbyist Mat Dunn, along with Trump's aides, have told associates that they think the Space Council is a "waste of time" echoing the anti-bureaucratic rhetoric aimed at federal agencies that Trump and Musk have championed (see: DOGE).Further auguring its demise, Trump's team hasn't contacted the Space Council about its transition plans following his election victory, a Reuters source said, even though he has extended this courtesy to other agencies, including NASA. Its offices have mostly been emptied, a source said, while its website currently displays a "404 page not found" error.Blood PanelThe US's original Space Council was formed in 1958 under president Eisenhower, but its existence has always been shaky, being disbanded and revived on several occasions. Most recently it was reestablished in 2017 by Trump, to great fanfare from space enthusiasts. By law, it's supposed to be chaired by the Vice President.Now, its fate hangs in the balance once again,if it hasn't already been decided behind the scenes. That it's being seriously considered for the chopping block at all is a sign of Musk's closeness to, if not influence over, Trump, for whom he spent hundreds of millions of dollars to help win the presidency.Big picture, it's also symptomatic of the private space industry's rapid rise in influence, in many ways supplanting NASA's dominance. NASA has come to rely heavily on SpaceX's launch capabilities. Its own attempt at developing a super heavy rocket, SLS, has dragged on for years and has only launched once, while SpaceX's alternative, Starship, has seen action seven times, albeit it with mixed results. There's also the success of Starlink, Musk's satellite constellation-based internet service, which SpaceX is able to replenish and expand with its own rockets.Obstacle RemovalThe upshot is that Musk and SpaceX will want to continue that rapid upward trajectory. A policy panel solely dedicated to space, even under a friendly administration, might be seen as just another bureaucratic hurdle.As Reuters notes, the panel stirred discontent in the commercial space sector with a 2023 proposal that would give relevant federal agencies a mandate to license private space activities, in effect giving the government greater supervision over private missions in space.Musk in particular has a well-documented vendetta against the Federal Aviation Administration, calling for the resignation of its chief last year. The FAA has final say over what gets launched and has often delayed greenlighting Starship launches, much to Elon's chagrin. With the National Space Council out the window, it would likely mean Musk would have the president ear's on space policy without being checked by the VP, who would normally chair the council.More on Trump: Trump Set to Approve $500 Billion Deal to Build Huge AI DatacentersShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·60 Views
  • Goldman Sachs Starts Process of Replacing Bankers With AI
    futurism.com
    Global investment firm Goldman Sachs is ready to start replacing its employees with AI.The company announced that it's rolled out a "GS AI assistant" to around 10,000 employees as part of its longer-term effort to introduce AI-powered "employees," as CNBC reports.Goldmanchief information officer Marco Argenti told the broadcaster that the AI assistant will be tasked with summarizing and proofreading emails,as well as translating code between programming languages, for the time being."Think about all the tasks that you might want to complete with regards to a variety of use cases for all those professions that can be now at your fingertips," Argenti told CNBC.The initiative is symptomatic of a larger trend, with banks including JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley doubling down on the use of AI tools.They frequently frame the experiments as efforts to make their employees' lives easier. But it doesn't take much reading between the lines that leaders are hopeful they'll eventually be able to replace human staffers with AI, especially if Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's recent pronouncements are anything to go by.Argenti predicts that in a matter of three to five years, AI models could start to erode the lines between humans and AI."The AI assistant becomes really like talking to another GS employee," Argenti told CNBC.How useful the tool will actually prove remains to be seen. AI models have been repeatedly shown to "hallucinate" facts, a glaring problem that engineers are still struggling to eliminate.AI-based tools have also into a major cybersecurity concern, with companies finding out the hard way that AI chatbots still tend to leak sensitive data.Despite the tech's well-documented shortcomings and risks, Goldmanis doubling down."As we progress, the second step is when youre starting to have this agentic behavior, that is, 'Im completing a task on behalf of a Goldman employee, and I need to take a set of steps,'" Argenti told CNBC. "Thats where the model is going to start to do things like a Goldman employee, not only say things like a Goldman employee."Argenti also claimed that the AI would eventually learn how to check its own work, much like a human employee would.Eventually, as Bloomberg found earlier this year, global investment banks may cut as many as 200,000 jobs thanks to the emergence of competent AI models. Those that involve "routine, repetitive tasks are at risk"will be at particular risk, as Bloomberg Intelligence senior analyst Tomasz Noetzel told the broadcaster."But AI will not eliminate them fully, rather it will lead to workforce transformation," he added.It's a common refrain we've heard tech leaders repeat for years and Argenti is happy to join the chorus."In my opinion, it always boils down to people," he told CNBC. "People are going to make a difference, because people are going to be the ones that actually evolve the AI, educate the AI, empower the AI, and then take action."More on AI automation: Zuckerberg Announces Plans to Automate Facebook Coding Jobs With AIShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·61 Views
  • Sam Altman Blasts Elon Musk for Defying Donald Trump's AI Deal
    futurism.com
    AI tech leaders are stumbling over themselves to kiss the ring of newly-minted president Donald Trump.Earlier this week, Trump announced a $500 billion AI infrastructure deal, a joint venture between OpenAI, SoftBank, Oracle, and UAE-backed investor MGX.The companies involved in the project, dubbed "Stargate," are committing a combined $100 billion, with the plan to ratchet that up to a full half trillion over the next four years.Noticeably absent from the ranks is xAI, which was started by Trump's tight confidante Elon Musk, who subsequently blasted the participantsfor not "actually" having the money to invest.OpenAI Sam Altman, however, has since shot back, prolonging a years-long feud between the two dramatic billionaires."Wrong, as you surely know," Altman wrote. "Want to come visit the first site already under way?""This is great for the country," he added. "I realize what is great for the country isn't always what's optimal for your companies, but in your new role I hope you'll mostly put [America] first."It doesn't take much reading between the lines to suggest Musk is feeling left out by the deal. He and Altman have been caught up in a bitter rivalry that started years after they cofounded OpenAI together, with Musk later departing the project under a dark cloud.Could the latest kerfuffle be a sign of what's still to come? How will Trump contain the "Succession"-like squabbling between the two tech billionaires while fuelling his latest infrastructure project? Where does Stargate leave his own close relationship with Musk?Earlier this week, OpenAI hailed the project as an important step forward in the development of generative AI."More compute leads to better models, better models enable us to build better products," OpenAI chief product officer Kevin Weil told the Wall Street Journal in Davos, Switzerland.How exactly OpenAI will be involved in the construction of AI infrastructure in the US remains unclear, and Weil refused to rule out the possibility of the company entering the AI chipmaking industry."This infrastructure will secure American leadership in AI, create hundreds of thousands of American jobs, and generate massive economic benefit for the entire world," OpenAI boasted in a statement on X-formerly-Twitter. "This project will not only support the re-industrialization of the United States but also provide a strategic capability to protect the national security of America and its allies."Regardless of whether generative AI will turn out to be a major source of profit, a lot of money is at stake. Stargate is a massive bet that could lead to either a major windfall for AI companies, or huge losses.But Altman's intrusion into Trump's affairs has clearly rattled Musk, an entrepreneur who launched his own competing venture, called xAI, in 2023.And now that one of his closest confidantes is striking deals with one of his oldest nemeses isn't sitting well with him.Despite his snide remarks, Altman pulled some punches."I genuinely respect your accomplishments and think you are the most inspiring entrepreneur of our time," he wrote.Share This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·55 Views
  • Gullible Trump Supporters Lose Millions on Fake $BARRON Meme Coin
    futurism.com
    It crashed by over 90 percent almost immediately.Family AffairFollowing the launch of two meme coinsby president Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump last week, scammers were happy to follow suit and grift their way to millions.A fake meme coin named after Trump's youngest son Barron, dubbed Official Barron Meme, took off on Monday, soaring to a valuation of more than $400 million before crashing by more than 90 percent just minutes later, as Cointelegraph reports.It was a textbook example of a rug pull, with scammers cashing in on rampant hype and speculation, only to abscond with millions by leaving gullible investors high and dry (countless other unofficial meme coins also capitalized on the excitement surrounding the president and his wife's dubious crypto schemes,with more limited success.)In many ways, it's exactly the kind of headlinethat actual crypto execs are afraid of as Trump embraces the scammiest side of the tech. The largely unregulated industry has been watching in horror as Trump continues to undermine its legitimacy with naked cash grabs.Unserious BusinessTrump's family has had to ward off a wave of crypto scams, with Eric Trump dispelling rumors on X-formerly-Twitter last week that an official "USA Coin" could be "released in a week."Other tokens like FreedomCoin (FREED), TrumpCoin (DJT), and Save America (DJT) added to the confusion, making the rounds despite having no actual affiliation with the president.In short, it shouldn't come as a surprise that the crypto industry reacted with pure disbelief when Trump announced his own meme coin, with influencers questioning the ruse's legitimacy."If its a hack, then this is going to severely mute Trumps bullishness on crypto right as he takes office (bearish)," BecauseBitcoin founder and CEO Max Schwartman tweeted shortly after Trump's legitimate announcement last week.The president had to double down, assuring investors that $TRUMP was indeed his official meme coin. So far, the token and $MELANIA are the only verified meme coin projects with actual ties to the family.In many ways, the damage has already been done. Now that Trump has set the tone by launching his own meme coin, the crypto industry is understandably concerned about where things are headed, especially as far as crypto regulation is concerned."I really was kind of bummed out when I saw it," crypto venture capital firm Dragonfly partner Tom Schmidt told ABC News. "It just felt very grifty and cheap.""Now, on the cusp of getting some liberalization of crypto regulations in this country, the main thing people are thinking about crypto is, 'Oh, its just a casino for these meme coins,'" Trump supporter and crypto investment firm Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter added. "It does the opposite of validating us, it makes it look completely unserious."More on the grifts: Actual Crypto Execs Disgusted by Trump's Memecoin Cash GrabShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·57 Views
  • DOGE.gov Website Launches With Mangled, AI-Generated American Flag
    futurism.com
    With Donald Trump firmly in place as president, Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is finally off to the races.As such, its brand new website DOGE.gov launched yesterday. And as we couldn't help but notice, it was adorned with a graphic of an AI-generated Shiba Innu waving amangled American flag that featured 11 stripes and a deformed mush of about 37 stars.As any patriotic American knows, the current design of the US flag is codified by a 1948 executive order specifying that it features 13 stripes, representing the original colonies, and a number of stars equal to the current number of states; in 1948 that figure was 48, and since the addition of Alaska and Hawaii, it's risen to 50.Just compare that elegant design document to this AI-generated slop in addition to the butchered flag, get a load of the wriggly typography and weird artifact on the dog's snout which may well mark the first time that shoddy AI art has appeared on an official website of the US government.True to its name, the DOGE website certainly takes an austere approach to web design. American taxpayers loading the government website won't find themselves burdened by wasteful copy or reckless hamburger menus, but rather a single landing page."An official website of the United States government,"it currently reads. "Department of Government Efficiency. The people voted for major reform."As of today, the site has been stripped of the image but not before snapshots of it were saved to the Internet Archive, hopefully preserving this blip of American history for centuries to come.The AI carnage is an early illustration of Musk's many conflicts of interest in his new government role. After years of fearmongering about AI and first cofounding before dramatically falling out with OpenAI as an effort to guide its development he has now founded his own AI multi-billion dollar startup, xAI, and integrated its offerings into X-formerly-Twitter, which he purchased in 2022.For what it's worth, Trump has previously called for prison time for "if you do anything to desecrate the American flag."And for anyone who's been following the DOGE saga, the site's bizarre rollout is about as apropos as it gets. Yesterday, it was widely reported that DOGE "co-czar" and GOP tag along Vivek Ramaswamy had officially stepped down from his previous responsibilities with DOGE, whatever those were.Ramaswamy's departure is no surprise he's been notably absent from the public stage following a rift with Elon Musk over the tricky ethics of migrant-slave labor but signals a new era for the two moguls, who had previously moved in lockstep prior to Trump's inauguration with the aim of slashing federal funding.With only Musk remaining at the helm, it remains to be seen how austere the federal spending cuts are going to get as he attempts to fulfill his promise of cutting government spending by trillions of dollars. The big question? What federal programs will be on the chopping block and whether Musk might lead by example and cut himself off from his own government welfare.More on government spending: Elon Musk Throws Tantrum, Ordering Congress to Shut Down GovernmentShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·58 Views
  • Elon Musk Blasts Donald Trump's Huge AI Infrastructure Deal
    futurism.com
    "They dont actually have the money."Funding Not SecuredMulti-hyphenate billionaire Elon Musk has broken stride with his tight confidante Donald Trump lobbing criticism at Trump's lucrative $500 billion AI infrastructure project, seemingly because he was left out of the deal.Earlier this week, OpenAI, SoftBank, Oracle, and UAE-backed investor MGX pledged to pour up to $500 billion into building AI data centers in the United States as part of an initiative dubbed "Stargate."There's a lot we don't know about the joint venture and whether it has any chance of ever being realized.AndMusk, strikingly isn't convinced; late on Tuesday evening, he took to his social network X-formerly-Twitterto mock the plans."They dont actually have the money," he tweeted just hours after the project was announced, tagging OpenAI."SoftBank has well under $10B secured," Musk wrote in a followup an hour later. "I have that on good authority."The comments mark yet another early sign that a storm may be brewing between the mercurial entrepreneur and Trump. Experts have long suggested that it's only a matter of time until disagreements between the two could snowball into an all-out fight. Two astronomically-sized and power-hungry egos in the same room are bound to result in some friction and before their current alliance, the two were bitter sparring partners.Trouble in ParadiseMusk's animosity towards the project is also likely symptomatic of his antipathy toward OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Musk cofounded the ChatGPT maker in late 2015 alongside Altman. But in 2019 Musk quit, citing disagreements over the group's direction. Since then, we've found out that Musk attempted to take over the former nonprofit.In March, Musk sued OpenAI and Altman, accusing the company of hiding its AI models' secrets from the world. That's despite advocating in 2017 to have OpenAI be turned into a for-profit entity, as emails published by OpenAI following the lawsuit revealed.Could Musk's animosity toward Altman explain his latest comments? Or does he indeed know more about the amount of cash the companies are able to scrounge up for Stargate?Musk also runs his own AI company, xAI, which doesn't appear to be linked to Stargate in any way.The latest tweets signal that Musk isn't afraid to question Trump's actionspublicly, even after swearing fealty to himand agreeing to lead a so-called "Department of Government Efficiency" in a building that's a short walk from the White House.It's also not the first sign of tension between the two. In November, Musk floated that Trump transition co-chair Howard Lutnick should be treasury secretary in the Trump administration.Trump ended up ignoring his suggestion, picking economic advisor and longtime investor Scott Bessent instead. The disagreement eventually sparked a "massive blowup" fight between Musk and Trump's lawyer Boris Epshteyn at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in November.More on Stargate: Elon Musk Sues OpenAI for Doing For-Profit AI, Which He's Also DoingShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·60 Views
  • Chinese AI Firm Says Its Open Source New Model Is Beating OpenAI's Most Advanced Publicly Released Model
    futurism.com
    A win for open source.Start Your EnginesUnless you've been living under a rock, you're probably aware that AI is developing at a breakneck pace.Early yesterday morning, a gleeful post on X-formerly-Twitter by Chinese AI firm DeepSeek announced a new model called R1 a "reasoning" AI model which the outfit says is performing "on par" with OpenAI's o1, a splashy model released last month.And unlike 01, DeepSeek R1 is open source, meaning hobbyists and researchers can tinker with it at home and even release their own versions.The reasoning model is said to narrowly edge out OpenAI's system in "math, code, and reasoning tasks." If the claim holds up a big "if," since the results haven't yet been independently verified it's an exciting milestone for a much smaller lab in the AI research space, which iscurrently dominated by deep-pocketed ventures like OpenAIDeepSeek taking a dig at the closed-source OpenAI by celebrating its work as pushing the "boundaries of **open AI**!"Open AIUnder the open source model, anyone has the legal rights to use, alter, and distribute DeepSeek's software (household-name open source projects include Mozilla Firefox, VLC Media Player, and Linux.)In theory, it's the most egalitarian approach to software development. However, not everyone's convinced that open source AI is the way forward; in an interview on the podcast "Tech Won't Save Us," professor of economics at University College London Cecelia Rikap argued that open source AI's development is often still connected to a for-profit business model."In principal, open source is very positive... the more we share knowledge, the more knowledge we are producing," she said. "What Amazon, Google and Meta have been doing is putting pieces of the puzzle in open source, [which] helps them to gain popularity... It is also a way to get people working for free in improving pieces of the puzzle, which only make sense together with the other pieces, and some of those pieces are kept secret, registered as copyright... basically in the end, those who profit from collaborative development are the same Big Tech."DeepSeek is no exception. The AI firm is a subsidiary of a Hangzhou-based hedge fund called High-Flyer, which trades through the Securities and Futures Commission out of Hong Kong. So on a certain level, yes it's a win for the little guys.But on another, it's a victory for Chinese financiers, not unlike Meta which has also used open source development practices to fuel its rapid market climb.So while this is still an impressive feat for the Chinese tech industry specifically and open source AI-development more broadly, only time will tell if the cheap new model will lead to equally egalitarian use cases for the advancement of all, or if it will be yet another investor's footnote in the tech sector's.And in the AI horserace, OpenAI's o3 is said to be prepping for launch.More on Chinese AI:The Chinese Military Is Weaponizing Facebook's Open Source AIShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·45 Views
  • Pentagon Official Boasts That AI Is Helping The Military Kill People Faster Than Ever Before
    futurism.com
    "Well always have humans involved in the decision to employ force."Kill Chain EngageThe Pentagon is bullish on recent AI advances, saying they're helping kill people faster than ever before.In an interview withTechCrunch, the Pentagon's chief digital and AI officer, Radha Plumb, admitted in a mask-off moment that the technology is helping to expedite the way the military kills."We obviously are increasing the ways in which we can speed up the execution of kill chain," Plumb told the website in an interview, "so that our commanders can respond in the right time to protect our forces."According to a Mitchell Institute white paper from 2023, "kill chain" is militaryspeak for "the process militaries use to attack targets in the battlespace.""The kill chain can be broken down into specific steps find, fix, track, target, engage, and assess that enable planners to build and task forces for combat operations," the paper explains.Military PrecisionIn short, the Pentagon's top AI officer bragged off-handedly about using AI to expedite the process of ending lives. Though she didn't get into the specifics, Plumb did admit that AI is primarily used in the planning and strategizing phases of military kill chains."Playing through different scenarios is something that generative AI can be helpful with," Plumb, who previously worked at Facebook and Google, told TechCrunch. "It allows you to take advantage of the full range of tools our commanders have available, but also think creatively about different response options and potential trade-offs in an environment where theres a potential threat, or series of threats, that need to be prosecuted."That's a wild admission: the Pentagon is not only using AI to dream up scenarios that would require lethal force, but also boasting about it on the record. There are few more dystopian usages of the technology, and here one of the military's ranking officials is laying it out for the average reader.Plumb said the Pentagon doesn't buy or operate fully autonomous weaponry, meaning that for now there are still humans involved in any lethal decision-making."As a matter of both reliability and ethics, well always have humans involved in the decision to employ force," she insisted, "and that includes for our weapon systems."We're not sure about you, but that's not very reassuring and with AI lover Donald Trump back in the Oval Office, even that modicum of oversight could soon be under attack.More on military AI: OpenAI Strikes Deal With Military Contractor to Provide AI for Attack DronesShare This Article
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·58 Views
More Stories