• Vegetation Assets: 3D Animated Willow Trees
    www.thepixellab.net
    The post Vegetation Assets: 3D Animated Willow Trees appeared first on The Pixel Lab.
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·53 Vue
  • Deepseek's AI model proves easy to jailbreak - and worse
    www.zdnet.com
    In one security firm's test, the chatbot alluded to using OpenAI's training data.
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·51 Vue
  • Climate Change: Is It The Greatest Crisis Or A Global Deception
    www.forbes.com
    A city showing the effect of Climate ChangegettyClimate change as defined by the United Nations refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. Consequently, it stands as one of the most pressing and debated issues of our time. While a significant majority of the scientific community attributes recent climatic shifts to human activities, a vocal minority contends that these changes are part of Earths natural variability. This article takes a deep dive into both perspectives, presenting scientific data and analyses to empower readers to form their own informed opinions.The Case for Human-Induced Climate ChangeConcept illustration Global warming around the world is about to be burned by human hands )gettyA comprehensive survey conducted by Cornell University in 2021 analyzed 88,125 climate-related studies published between 2012 and 2020. The findings revealed that over 99.9% of these peer-reviewed papers concluded that human activities are the primary drivers of recent climate change. This overwhelming consensus underscores the significant role of anthropogenic factors in altering Earths climate. This study updates a 2013 analysis that reported a 97% consensus, showing that skepticism within the scientific community has become nearly nonexistent. Researchers identified only 28 skeptical papers, all published in minor journals, reinforcing that any remaining public debate is not rooted in scientific literature. Despite this overwhelming agreement, surveys show that public and political opinions remain divided, with many still believing there is significant scientific uncertainty. The study underscores the urgency of recognizing greenhouse gas emissions as the principal driver of climate change to mobilize effective solutions, as extreme climate-related disasters continue to impact economies, businesses, and communities worldwide.The Earth is now approximately 1.2C hotter than pre-industrial levels according to NASA. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change findings indicate that that human activities, primarily fossil fuel combustion, are responsible for nearly all warming over the past 200 years. data from the US Environmental Protection Agency further corroborates that carbon dioxide levels are at their highest in 2 million years, while methane and nitrous oxide concentrations have reached levels unseen in 800,000 years. Additionally, regarding Earths temperature, a 2C rise could expose over 2 billion people to extreme heat, double biodiversity losses compared to 1.5C, slash crop yields by more than 50% in some regions, and lead to the near-total collapse of coral reefs, which support marine life and coastal economies in addition to the loss of islands due to sea level rise.Plumes of smoke rise from chimneys at an industrial area in Greece.gettyMORE FOR YOUUNEPs Emissions Gap Report shows that a 42% global emissions reduction by 2030 could still limit warming to 1.5C, requiring an annual cut of 22 billion tons through investments in renewable energy, sustainable transport, and low-carbon agriculture. Climate models, often criticized for their reliability, have consistently provided accurate projections; According to NASA, a 2020 study confirmed that 14 out of 17 models developed between 1970 and 2007 closely matched real-world temperature increases.The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change research from hundreds of leading climate scientists, has determined that humans are responsible for almost all global warming observed over the past two centuries. The primary culprits are the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and gas) which release greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. These gases trap heat, leading to a warming planet.The State of the Climate Update 2024 from the World Meteorological Organization provides undeniable evidence that climate change is accelerating at an alarming rate. The global mean surface air temperature from January to September 2024 was 1.54C above pre-industrial levels, signaling a dangerous trend toward surpassing the 1.5C threshold set by the ParEarth, heat wave, Sun and high temperature environment with weather thermometer. gettyis Agreement. With 2024 on track to be the hottest year on record, following 2023 as the previous record-holder, the data highlights the rapid warming of our planet. Greenhouse gas concentrations reached record highs in 2023 and continued to rise in 2024, further fueling long-term temperature increases. The ocean heat content also hit unprecedented levels, absorbing around 3.1 million terawatt-hours of heat in 2023a staggering 18 times the worlds total energy consumptionleading to rising sea levels and fueling more intense and frequent extreme weather events. Meanwhile, glacier ice loss in 2023 alone amounted to the water equivalent of five times the volume of the Dead Sea, while Antarctic and Arctic sea ice extent in 2024 remained well below average, reinforcing the alarming trend of polar ice depletion.transformer on a electric poles and a tree laying across power lines over a road after HurricanegettyBeyond the temperature records, the WMO report highlights the devastating impacts of climate change are already evident through an onslaught of extreme weather events across the globe. The world has witnessed record-breaking rainfall and flooding, intensifying tropical cyclones, deadly heatwaves, prolonged droughts, and raging wildfires, making these disasters our new normal rather than isolated anomalies. The scientific consensus is clear: climate change is not a distant threatit is happening now, and its effects are worsening. The WMO report stresses the urgent need to accelerate both mitigation and adaptation efforts, stressing that while staying well below 2C of warming is critical, every fraction of a degree matters in reducing future risks. Encouragingly, climate service capacity has grown, with 108 countries now reporting a Multi-Hazard Early Warning System, showcasing progress in adaptation strategies. However, without immediate, large-scale reductions in emissions and a global commitment to accelerating renewable energy adoption, we risk pushing the planet into an irreversible climate crisis.The Argument for Natural Climate Variability in the Climate Change ArgumentWhile the prevailing scientific consensus and evidence attributes modern climate change to human activity, some analysts argue that Earths climate has always undergone natural fluctuations and that recent changes are within the bounds of historical variability. They have concluded that factors such as solar activity, oceanic cycles, and geological events play significant roles in shaping the climate.One of the primary arguments for natural climate variability is the role of the sun. According to a study published in the journal Nature Geoscience, solar activity has exhibited cycles of highs and lows, influencing Earths temperature patterns for millennia. The Maunder Minimum, a period of low solar activity from approximately 1645 to 1715, coincided with the Little Ice Agea time when global temperatures were significantly lower than today. Climate change skeptics often suggest that current warming trends may partly result from natural solar fluctuations rather than human activities, however, the same has been debunked by NASA. Moreover, the IPCC states that both short-term and long-term fluctuations in solar activity have a minimal influence on Earths climate, based on current scientific understanding. IPCC also indicate that the warming observed over the last century is unprecedented in terms of the rate of change, as it far surpasses natural variations in the past few thousand years.Another point often raised by skeptics is the historical precedent of warming and cooling periods before industrialization. According researcher Don Easterbrook, Earth experienced the Medieval Warm Period (900-1300 AD), during which temperatures were comparable to or even exceeded modern levels in some regions. This period was followed by the Little Ice Age, further supporting the notion that climate shifts can occur naturally over time. However IPCC research indicates that show that globally averaged temperatures during the MWP were likely cooler than current temperatures. In fact, the MWP was not as globally widespread or as warm as contemporary temperatures.ocean wave during storm in the atlantic oceangettyAdditionally, oceanic cycles such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation have been shown to influence global temperatures. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, these oceanic patterns contribute to multi-decade temperature fluctuations that can amplify or dampen warming trends. Some climate skeptics argue that observed warming trends may be part of a natural cycle influenced by these oceanic changes. However Carbon Brief indicated that the global warming witnessed over the past 150 years matches nearly perfectly what is expected from greenhouse gas emissions and other human activity when the statistical models are used.Finally, critics highlight inconsistencies in climate models, arguing that they often struggle to predict long-term temperature changes with precision. However According to a study accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters, a team led by Zeke Hausfather evaluated 17 climate model projections and found that 10 closely matched actual global temperature observations, with the number increasing to 14 after accounting for factors like atmospheric carbon dioxide. The study's findings, which showed no consistent overestimation or underestimation of warming, help bolster confidence in the accuracy of both past and current climate models.Evaluating the Evidence for Climate ChangeThe debate over the causes of climate change encompasses both human-induced factors and natural variability. Hence while natural climate variability plays a role in Earth's climate dynamics, the rapid rate of current warming, strongly correlated with increased greenhouse gas emissions from human activities, underscores the need for urgent attention. The unprecedented rise in global temperatures, coupled with the highest carbon dioxide levels in 2 million years, highlights a significant departure from natural climate cycles, emphasizing the dominant role of human influence and reinforcing the importance of implementing effective mitigation and adaptation strategies.
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·51 Vue
  • Every Samsung Galaxy S25 owner should buy this wireless charging case
    www.digitaltrends.com
    html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd" Table of ContentsTable of ContentsUnderstanding the history of wireless chargingWhat is Qi2 Magnetic Charging?The case to buy for superfast wireless chargingHow long does it take to charge the Galaxy S25 Ultra wirelessly?Why this case is still worth buyingSamsungs new Galaxy S25 series brings a few improvements, especially for the flagship Galaxy S25 Ultra. While the new ultrawide camera, improved build, and thinner body may be the ones that stand out the most, one particular feature could offer the best quality of life improvements.The Galaxy S25 Ultra comes equipped with the same 45W charging speeds as its predecessors, although overall charging speeds have been improved by around 3-4% over last years Galaxy S24 Ultra. Alongside this, however, Samsung has also equipped the Galaxy S25 Ultra with compatibility for the Qi2.1 wireless charging standard, making it the first smartphone to support the next generation of wireless charging.Recommended VideosHowever, you need to buy the official Magnetic Wireless Charging Case to take advantage of this. Ive been using it for a few days and heres why everyone should buy it if you plan to wirelessly charge your new Galaxy S25.RelatedNirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsSamsung was the first to make wireless charging commonplace on smartphones beating Apple by two years and Huawei by four years with the launch of the Galaxy S5 series almost a decade ago. However, since then, the wireless charging standard hasnt changed much, although speeds have somewhat improved.Meanwhile, Apple took a different approach. The iPhone 8 series in 2017 was the first to offer Qi wireless charging, but just three years later, the company rolled out the MagSafe magnetic wireless charging standard for all of its flagship phones. The result was a much better wireless charging standard and one that solved many of the alignment and efficiency problems with the core Qi standard.Recognizing this, the Wireless Power Consortium (WPC) borrowed from MagSafe to build the Qi2 wireless charging standard in 2023. The WPC is an industry group that builds the open wireless charging standard, and Apple officially joined it alongside the rollout of Qi in its iPhones. This would ultimately prove beneficial for all smartphones with the advent of Qi2 charging two years ago.Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsThe Qi2 standard brings many of the benefits of MagSafe charging to the wider smartphone ecosystem. Mainly, it benefits from the faster wireless charging speeds and crucially, adds support for magnetic alignment. The latter has made the MagSafe system so effective, and solved one of the biggest problems with wireless charging in general: ensuring the charger is perfectly aligned with the coils in your phone. Often, a slight misalignment would make charging much slower or it wouldnt work at all but Qi2 charging solves this with strong magnets.However, like the rest of the Android ecosystem, different manufacturers take different approaches to implementing this. Oppo and OnePlus both support magnetic wireless charging, but use a proprietary standard to achieve double the official speeds of Qi2.Meanwhile, Samsung opted for Qi2 support but opted against including magnets in the Galaxy S25 series; instead, you need this new Magnetic Clear Cover.Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsThe Galaxy S25 Magnetic Clear Cover does exactly what you expect it to: its a clear cover that adds magnets to the back of your phone and is designed to allow you to take full advantage of the Qi2 wireless charging speeds. While first-generation Qi charging caps out at 15W, the Qi2 standard technically supports up to 25W, but so far, the iPhone 16 series is the only phone to support this full speed, and thats when used with an updated MagSafe charger. The Galaxy S25 Series is limited to 15W charging, although this still pales to the 50W wireless charging offered by Oppo and OnePlus.Like many of the best iPhone clear cases, the magnet sticks out like a sore thumb not literally, but figuratively given the design but hopefully, the official case will spur many third-party companies to launch a range of different designs. Ive also recently been using the new vegan-leather Galaxy S25 Ultra Kindsuit case, and I do wish that Samsung had also included magnets in this case, or its official silicon cases, as this would have offered the best of all worlds.The OnePlus 50W AirVOOC charger attached to a OnePlus 13 Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsNonetheless, the magnetic clear cover offers welcome protection for your new Galaxy S25, allows you to show off the colors such as the gorgeous Navy and Coral Red Galaxy S25 and features precision cutouts for the different ports. However, one thing to note is that, unlike the Kindsuit case that provides full coverage for the charging ports, the Magnetic Clear Cover leaves that area mostly unprotected.Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsThe lack of an official case with magnets that isnt clear means you have a choice: do you want a clear case with magnets or a more protective case that foregoes magnetic wireless charging? The only way to determine whether its worth it is with a charging test, so after waiting for the Galaxy S25 Ultra battery to drain which is no mean feat as it has consistently lasted for multiple days heres what I found.Ive previously tested the Galaxy S25 Ultras wired charging speeds and found that it takes around 67 minutes to charge to full. Given the 5,000 mAh battery, this produces a standardized charging speed of 75 mAh / minute, which is the fastest Ive ever experienced on a Samsung phone, but still pales when compared to a key rival device that is more than twice as fast.Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsMeanwhile, with the Magnetic Charger Cover attached and the phone magnetically attached to the Belkin adjustable charging stand which can charge at the full 15W speeds the Galaxy S25 Ultra takes 3 hours and 20 minutes, which is equivalent to 25 mAh / minutes. For context, the OnePlus 13 charges to full in 75 minutes or 81 mAh / minute which is over three times faster than the Galaxy S25 Ultra.What about a quick charge? While the Galaxy S25 Ultra charges to 50% in under 30 minutes when plugged into a 45W charger that supports Samsung Fast Charging 2.0, it takes over an hour longer at 1 hour and 35 minutes when charging wirelessly with the Magnetic Charging Cover.Interestingly, when you first connect the Galaxy S25 Ultra it says it will take just 2 hours to charge to full, but this constantly slips to almost three-and-a-half hours.Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsQi2 charging is an absolute mess, and although the Galaxy S25 Ultra supports the standard, it is still limited to just 15W charging. This is a far cry from the 25W charging supported by the iPhone 16 Pro, and significantly slower than the 50W proprietary charging standard offered by Oppo and OnePlus.However, despite this, the official magnetic charging cover is still worth buying if you prefer to charge your phone wirelessly, you have MagSafe-compatible accessories already in your home, or youve been eyeing up magnetic accessories for your home, office, or car.The addition of magnets makes charging an absolute breeze, and while its slow and I still plan to plug in when I need a quick charge, this has quickly become my favorite way to charge my phone overnight. I just wish that Samsung offered a different color option other than clear; I dislike the look of a magnet on a phone this isnt just limited to Samsungs case and think there could be so many prettier ways to implement this. Of course, if you dont plan to use magnetic wireless charging, youre better off picking up one of the best Galaxy S25 Ultra cases instead.Editors Recommendations
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·54 Vue
  • Samsungs Galaxy S25 Edge shows what the Galaxy S25 series should have been
    www.digitaltrends.com
    html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd" Table of ContentsTable of ContentsThe Galaxy S25 Edge is the rumored Galaxy S25 SlimThis is the Galaxy S25 we likely hoped forThe Galaxy S25 Edge is an example of a compromiseHow slim and innovative is the Galaxy S25 Edge?Samsung fans can finally rejoice as we have something truly different with the Galaxy S25 series. No, its not the Galaxy S25, Galaxy S25 Plus, or the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but rather, the new Galaxy S25 Edge. Yes, Samsung has revived its Edge branding, and in many ways, it follows the essence of the Galaxy S6 Edge and Galaxy S7 Edge of years ago.After the credits rolled at Samsung Unpacked last week and as some people made their way to the exits the company pulled off an interesting one more thing. It wasnt a teaser like the Galaxy Ring last year, but rather it was an announcement of sorts, at least of the new Galaxy S25 Edge.Recommended VideosThe rumors were true; Samsung has made a slim phone, but sadly, its not part of the main Galaxy S25 series. Heres what you need to know and why the Galaxy S25 Edge is the Galaxy S25 we should have gotten.RelatedNirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsTo understand the Galaxy S25 Edge, you have to understand Samsungs motivations. Apple has been rumored to be working on an iPhone 17 Air, which will be its slimmest iPhone ever, and the Galaxy S25 Edge is Samsungs answer to that.Dubbed the Galaxy S25 Slim in the pre-announcement rumors, it was long expected that Samsung would make something truly slim, but what was displayed only somewhat delivers on this. Whereas the iPhone 17 Air is rumored to be as slim as the iPad Pro M4 which is extremely slim the Galaxy S25 Edge is a little slimmer than the Galaxy S25 series and doesnt appear to be as groundbreaking.Samsungs announcement was followed by a rush to see it suspended next to molds of the Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S25 series, with no clear indication of how slim it will be. At first glance, it appears to be a little slimmer, which could explain why its branded as the Galaxy S25 Edge and not the Galaxy S25 Slim.Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge side profile next to Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S25 Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsThe Galaxy S25, Galaxy S25 Plus, and Galaxy S25 Ultra are all a little slimmer than their predecessors, with the specs sheets revealing a 0.4mm slimming of the body. They are also lighter at six grams, seven grams, and 17 grams lighter than their predecessors, but these are the small increments we expect from year-on-year improvements.Each of these improvements has vastly improved the overall feel of the phone and as I type this on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, the slimmer body makes for a vastly improved ergonomic feel. Yet, if you were hoping for something truly special from the Galaxy S25 series, the Galaxy S25 Edge is probably the phone you wanted.We spoke to Samsung who confirmed the Galaxy S25 Edge will be roughly 6mm thick, which would make it 1.2mm thinner than the base Samsung Galaxy S25. Thats a vast improvement and would make the Galaxy S25 Edge a more groundbreaking smartphone than the rest of its compatriots. However, its also worth noting that the slimmer body comes with certain trade-offs.Ask most customers about having a slimmer phone and there will naturally be a lot of interest, followed by trepidation about certain key factors. These are namely the durability, battery life, and of course, the camera stack. We cant answer two of these questions with any degree of certainty, but we can partially answer one: the camera stack.The iPhone 17 Air is rumored to feature a single camera, so naturally, Samsung had to one-up Apple and equipped the Galaxy S25 Edge with a dual camera stack arranged in a vertical alignment. It reminds me of the earlier Galaxy S20, as well as the iPhone 6 series in its arrangement and style.Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge top-down profile next to Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S25 Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsSamsung hasnt confirmed details of which cameras are featured on the Galaxy S25 Edge, but previous rumors suggested that we would see a dual camera setup featuring a 200MP main camera and a 50MP ultrawide camera. Essentially, it would be the Galaxy S25 Ultra without the telephoto cameras, but in a body thats 2.2mm thinner.If these rumors prove to be true, this could be one of the best balances of thickness and features on a Samsung phone, but how innovative is it?Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge side profile next to Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S25 Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsSmartphones have gotten thicker as customers have demanded more cameras, bigger batteries, and bigger displays. As this has become the norm, the trade-off has been thicker phones, but years ago, the trend was to go thinner. The Huawei Ascend P6 is a great example of thin phones, and remains one of the slimmest phones ever made, measuring just 6.5mm thick. However, it had a 4.7-inch display, a single camera, and just a 2,000 mAh battery, all specifications that wouldnt be acceptable by todays standards.That was a decade ago, but just two months ago, we saw the Infiinix Hot 50 Pro Plus, which measures 6.8mm thin and weighs just 162 grams. It features a 50Mp main camera and 2MP depth camera, both of which wouldnt be acceptable for a flagship phone from Samsung. However, its 5,000mAh battery and 33W wired charging would be considered more acceptable.Honor Magic V3 USB port compared to the Galaxy Z Fold 6 Nirave Gondhia / Digital TrendsThe best example of the current trend of slim and light phones is not in the standard candy bar phones, but rather, the foldable phones industry where the race to be the thinnest has been at full throttle. Samsung launched the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition measuring 4.9mm unfolded (and 10.6mm folded), in response to the Honor Magic V3 which measures just 4.4mm unfolded and 9.3mm folded.Foldable phones have the distinct advantage of being able to use split batteries and having a wider surface area to spread technology amongst, therefore allowing for a thinner overall profile. However, they also feature two displays so that comes with its trade-offs.The Galaxy S25 Edge aims to bring the best of the thinner foldable phone space to regular smartphones, and likely kick off a whole new era of thinner and lighter smartphones. It remains to be seen how companies like Honor, Huawei, Oppo, and OnePlus will respond, but one thing is for sure: Samsung needs to ensure the Galaxy S25 Edge is the most competitive it can be when it launches, as its rivals including Apple will all be vying for the title of slimmest phone in the world.Editors Recommendations
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·56 Vue
  • Antonio Santn: Puente de Plata Review: Carpet Bombs of Color
    www.wsj.com
    The painters hyperrealistic rugs at Marc Straus transcend their technical mastery to connect with visitors.
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·52 Vue
  • FDA approves first non-opioid pain medicine in more than 20 years
    arstechnica.com
    Good news FDA approves first non-opioid pain medicine in more than 20 years The drug, Journavx (suzetrigine), inhibits an ion channel in peripheral nerves. Beth Mole Jan 31, 2025 6:03 pm | 22 Credit: Vertex Credit: Vertex Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreThe Food and Drug Administration announced the approval of a new non-opioid pain medication this week, marking the first time in over two decades that the agency has approved a non-opioid pain drug with a novel mechanism of action.The drug, Journavx (suzetrigine), is an oral pill that treats acute pain, such as from surgery or injuries. Unlike opioids, which work by latching onto receptor proteins on nerves in the central nervous system, suzetrigine works only in peripheral nervesthat is, those outside the brain and spinal cord. Specifically, the drug inhibits a voltage-gated sodium ion channel called 1.8 (NaV1.8) that is known to relay pain signals, but only in peripheral nerves.Because it works outside the brain by a different mechanism than opioids, the new medication offers a safe alternative to opioids, which can be highly addictive.For its approval, the FDA relied on data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trials on patients who were recovering from surgerieseither tummy tucks (abdominoplasty) or bunion removal. Patients had access to ibuprofen as a "rescue" pain medication. Both trials showed that suzetrigine led to clinically meaningful reductions in pain and was safe.The approval "is an important public health milestone in acute pain management," Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, J.D., M.D., acting director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a statement. "A new non-opioid analgesic therapeutic class for acute pain offers an opportunity to mitigate certain risks associated with using an opioid for pain and provides patients with another treatment option."The company behind the drug, Vertex, said a 50 mg pill that works for 12 hours will have a wholesale cost of $15.50, making the daily cost $31 and the weekly cost $217. The cost is higher than cheap, generic opioids. But, a report from The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review in December estimated that suzetrigine would be "slightly cost-saving" relative to opioids if the price was set at $420 per week, given the drug's ability to avert opioid addiction cases.In a statement, Reshma Kewalramani, the CEO and President of Vertex, trumpeted the approval as a "historic milestone for the 80 million people in America who are prescribed a medicine for moderate-to-severe acute pain each year ... [W]e have the opportunity to change the paradigm of acute pain management and establish a new standard of care."Beth MoleSenior Health ReporterBeth MoleSenior Health Reporter Beth is Ars Technicas Senior Health Reporter. Beth has a Ph.D. in microbiology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and attended the Science Communication program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She specializes in covering infectious diseases, public health, and microbes. 22 Comments
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·57 Vue
  • FCC demands CBS provide unedited transcript of Kamala Harris interview
    arstechnica.com
    CBS under pressure FCC demands CBS provide unedited transcript of Kamala Harris interview FCC probes editing of 60 Minutes interview as CBS considers settling Trump suit. Jon Brodkin Jan 31, 2025 5:22 pm | 95 Main entrance to CBS headquarters in New York City seen in January 2020. Credit: Getty Images | Erik McGregor Main entrance to CBS headquarters in New York City seen in January 2020. Credit: Getty Images | Erik McGregor Story textSizeSmallStandardLargeWidth *StandardWideLinksStandardOrange* Subscribers only Learn moreThe Federal Communications Commission demanded that CBS provide the unedited transcript of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris that is the subject of a complaint to the FCC and a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump.CBS News on Wednesday received a letter of inquiry in which the FCC requested "the full, unedited transcript and camera feeds" of the Harris interview, The New York Times reported today."We are working to comply with that inquiry as we are legally compelled to do," a CBS News spokesperson told media outlets.FCC Chairman Brendan Carr repeatedly echoed Trump's complaints about alleged media bias before the election and has taken steps to punish news broadcasters since Trump promoted him to the chairmanship. Complaints against CBS, ABC, and NBC stations were dismissed under former Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, but Carr reversed those dismissals in his first week as chair. Carr also ordered investigations into NPR and CBS.FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democrat, criticized what she called Carr's "latest action to weaponize our broadcast licensing authority.""This is a retaliatory move by the government against broadcasters whose content or coverage is perceived to be unfavorable," Gomez said today. "It is designed to instill fear in broadcast stations and influence a network's editorial decisions. The Communications Act clearly prohibits the Commission from censoring broadcasters and the First Amendment protects journalistic decisions against government intimidation. We must respect the rule of law, uphold the Constitution, and safeguard public trust in our oversight of broadcasters."CBS considers settling Trump lawsuitTrump sued CBS over the Harris interview, and executives at CBS owner Paramount Global have held settlement talks with Trump representatives. "A settlement would be an extraordinary concession by a major U.S. media company to a sitting president, especially in a case in which there is no evidence that the network got facts wrong or damaged the plaintiff's reputation," The New York Times wrote.However, the Times also wrote that "many executives at CBS's parent company, Paramount, believe that settling the lawsuit would increase the odds that the Trump administration does not block or delay their planned multibillion-dollar merger with another company." Paramount is seeking FCC approval for TV broadcast station license transfers related to a pending deal with Skydance.The complaint to the FCC regarding the Harris interview was filed by the Center for American Rights against flagship station WCBS-TV. The conservative group alleged that CBS violated the news distortion rule with its editing of the interview, and asked for an FCC order compelling CBS to release the full unedited transcript.CBS has denied the allegations, which relate to different broadcasts of the same interview, one on Face the Nation and one on 60 Minutes. "Former President Donald Trump is accusing 60 Minutes of deceitful editing of our Oct. 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. That is false," CBS said in October. "60 Minutes gave an excerpt of our interview to Face the Nation that used a longer section of her answer than that on 60 Minutes. Same question. Same answer. But a different portion of the response."Carr told Fox News in November that he was interested in investigating the complaint against CBS when the FCC reviews the pending deal involving Skydance and Paramount. "I'm pretty confident that news distortion complaint over the CBS 60 Minutes transcript is something that is likely to arise in the context of the FCC's review of that transaction," Carr said at the time.We contacted the FCC and CBS today and will update this article if we get further information or comments.Jon BrodkinSenior IT ReporterJon BrodkinSenior IT Reporter Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry. 95 Comments
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·56 Vue
  • Salamanders fill their toes with blood before each step
    www.newscientist.com
    The translucent toes of a wandering salamanderWilliam P. GoldenbergHow salamanders manage to move around on uneven, vertical tree surfaces with such dexterity has long baffled scientists. A new discovery suggests they use a trick out of a horror movie: filling their toes with pools of blood.While Christian Brown at Washington State University was observing wandering salamanders (Aneides vagrans) through a close-up camera in 2021 in a coastal redwood forest, he noticed blood moving in a rhythmic pattern under their translucent skin. Before lifting their foot to take a step, blood inundated the tips of the salamanders
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·58 Vue
  • Rat populations in cities are booming as the planet warms up
    www.newscientist.com
    Rat sightings are on the rise in New York CityFatih Aktas/Anadolu/Getty ImagesIt has long been predicted that many pest species will thrive as the planet warms and now a study of 16 major cities has found that rat populations are growing fastest in areas where average temperatures are rising quickest.It is extremely difficult to estimate the number of rats in a city, so Jonathan Richardson at the University of Richmond in Virginia and his colleagues didnt attempt this. Instead, they got a sense of how populations are changing by looking at the number of complaints about rats recorded by cities. AdvertisementIn the US, this information is often publicly available and the team was also able to get data for a few places outside the US by contacting city officials. The researchers only included cities in their study if at least seven years of data was available and the methods for collecting it hadnt changed. That left them with data for 13 US cities, as well as Tokyo, Amsterdam and Toronto.Their analysis suggests rat numbers are declining in New Orleans, Louisville in Kentucky and Tokyo, are stable in Dallas and St Louis, and are rising in the other 11 cities, with the fastest growth in Washington DC, San Francisco, Toronto, New York and Amsterdam.Richardson and his colleagues then looked at several factors that might explain the trends. They found the strongest link was with the average temperature increase over the past century. The next strongest link was with urbanisation, assessed from satellite photos, followed by human population density. The citys GDP did not show a link with rat trends. Unmissable news about our planet delivered straight to your inbox every month.Sign up to newsletterIt is known that in colder cities, rat numbers fall during the winter and peak in summer, so it makes sense that rising temperatures are leading to rising populations, the researchers say. More rats mean a greater risk of people getting rat-borne diseases, such as leptospirosis, also known as Weils disease.The findings show that cities need to do more to control rat populations as the planet warms, and cutting off their food supply is the single most important measure, says Richardson.Securing food waste and making it inaccessible to rats is the approach that will have the biggest impact on controlling rats, he says. Were seeing New York City pilot that in certain neighbourhoods finally and its putting a measurable dent in the rat numbers.Journal reference:Science Advances DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ads6782Topics:
    0 Commentaires ·0 Parts ·56 Vue