• 'Fantasy Life i' Commercials Showcase Comfortingly Familiar Gameplay
    www.nintendolife.com
    Image: Level-5It's been a bloomin' long time coming, but Level-5's Fantasy Life i: The Girl Who Steals Time is finally making its way to the Switch on 22nd May 2025 following multiple delays.To really drive the message that this date is likely final, two new commercials have been released (thanks, Go Nintendo) that highlight some tasty gameplay before reconfirming the game's upcoming launch. They're not particularly lengthy, but we get a good glimpse at what you'll be getting up to during the time with the game, including the various farming mechanics, mining, crafting, and, of course, a sprinkling of combat.Subscribe to Nintendo Life on YouTube797kWatch on YouTube Crucially, if you're a fan of the 3DS original from 2012 (2014 worldwide), then the gameplay will look pretty familiar in a cosy, comforting kind of way. While certainly not the most critically-acclaimed title on the 3DS, Fantasy Life nevertheless gained a significant, dedicated audience thanks to its unique sense of charm and engaging mechanics.Also joining Fantasy Life i in 2025 from Level-5 is Inazuma Eleven: Victory Road and Professor Layton and the New World of Steam. While the former has a vague release window of June, the latter has no specific date or window to speak of. Honestly, we're not going to be surprised if it gets bumped into 2026, but we'll see.For now, check out the new Fantasy Life i commercials down below:Subscribe to Nintendo Life on YouTube797kSubscribe to Nintendo Life on YouTube797kAre you excited to try out a new Fantasy Life on Switch? Do you have fond memories of the original? Let us know with a comment.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·42 Views
  • Redalpine, Founders Fund back Magdrives electric thruster business
    techcrunch.com
    Orbital mobility took center-stage in the space industry last year, with venture capitalists funneling massive sums into startups developing tech for nimble satellite operations. So its no surprise that one of the most recent deals is to Magdrive, a UK-based startup that says its electric propulsion system for satellites will deliver a higher thrust in a smaller form factor than anything else on the market.Spacecraft designers have to consider a number of trade-offs when purchasing or designing propulsion systems. Chemical-based systems have high thrust but low specific impulse, or efficiency, while electric propulsion (EP) is very efficient but generates low thrust. Magdrive has developed an EP system that use solid metal propellant to generate high-energy plasma, with the same high specific impulse as a chemical system but a magnitude improvement in thrust and a magnitude reduction in mass, company cofounder and CEO Mark Stokes said. That means spacecraft operators can use electric propulsion for entirely new classes of missions, without having to resort to heavier and more expensive chemical thrusters. It will allow the company to eat the electric propulsion market for breakfast and then come for chemical propulsions lunch, Stokes said.A lot of the future of the space industry is going to be based around being able to rendezvous satellites, he predicted in a recent interview with TechCrunch. Typically, satellites are launched with just enough fuel to maintain their orbit over the lifespan of the mission. But more efficient propulsion could unlock entirely new capabilities like sustained rendezvous and proximity operations for imaging or satellite servicing missions, avoidance maneuvers to reduce the risk of a collision on orbit, and stochastic movement, or unpredictable orbits to make defense and intelligence satellites untraceable.Orbital mobility, sometimes referred to as dynamic space operations by Pentagon leaders, has become a huge area of interest for the Department of Defense. Magdrive was one of six startups selected for the Space Forces Hyperspace Challenge accelerator last year.One of the biggest advantages with Magdrives technology is scalability, Stoke says: both of the startups first products, systems dubbed Rogue and the larger Warlock, can be deployed in a grid to combine thrust, or can literally just be built at larger form factors the companys developing a Super Magdrive thats the size of a dishwasher.Since Stokes and CTO Thomas Clayson founded the company in 2019, Magdrive has now swelled to a team of at least 20 and is preparing to demonstrate its first two full-scale Rogue thrusters on orbit this June. It raised a $1.8 million (1.4 million) seed round led by Founders Fund in 2020 and around $10 million in non-dilutive grants to get to where it is now, Stokes said. To go even further manufacturing its first commercial products alongside continued R&D, hiring, and even opening a U.S. subsidiary, with an office in Los Angeles the company has closed a new $10.5 million funding round.The startup, which Stokes founded with physicist Thomas Clayson in 2019, sees advanced propulsion as a kind of infrastructure that will enable the space industrys continued growth in the coming years. The Rogue and Warlock are designed to be reusable, using metals like aluminum and copper which can be found in space, which on a longer time horizon could be a differentiator.We can use the materials that are already in space to fuel the Magdrive as its propellant, whereas everybody else, chemical and electrical, across the entire range of things, has to bring their fuel from Earth every single time, Stokes said. Its like building a new train every time you leave the station. You dont build railroads that way.This new funding round was led by Swiss fund redalpine, with participation from Balerion, Founders Fund, Alumni Ventures, Outsized Ventures, 7percent, and Entrepreneur First. After the first orbital demonstration this summer, Magdrive aims to fire a Warlock system in 2026 and a Super Magdrive in 2027.Thats the key thing: all these new missions are all looking at being able to move as much as possible, not necessarily as fast as possible, not necessarily to last as long as possible. In those five years [of operational life], how much can you move? Stokes said. What were bringing is that magnitude improvement to just how much maneuvering you can do in those five years.Topics
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·44 Views
  • Quantum Machines raises $170M, says its working with more than half of all quantum computing companies
    techcrunch.com
    Quantum computing remains a holy grail in the world of technology, but with some important breakthroughs in the last several months, investors are betting on the more promising startups in the space to make the concept of super-efficient particle- and electron-based computing a reality. In the latest development, Quantum Machines, an Israeli startup that provides quantum control solutions to others in the field, has raised $170 million.Led by PSG Equity with participation from Intel Capital, Red Dot Capital Partners and existing investors, this all-equity Series C round is one of the biggest to date for a quantum computing company.One reason for the size of the round is because of the startups business funnel. Quantum Machines technology is now used by more than half of all the companies in the world working on quantum computers and quantum computing, according to Dr. Itamar Sivan, the CEO who co-founded the company with CTO Dr. Yonatan Cohen and chief engineer Dr. Nissim Ofek.We serve every category of company in the field, he said in an interview, large corporates, startups building quantum computers, national labs globally, and universities.Quantum Machines hardware may be best known for its traction with customers and partners like Nvidia to reduce errors in their own quantum computing research a critical role in the wider ecosystem as researchers get closer to building functional, super-fast quantum computers that do not fall over with high fail rates.Sivan declined to name any of those specific customers although the list of tech companies backing it might be a good hint. However, he added that its hundreds of clients also include companies that are not owners or developers of quantum computers themselves, but banks and others that are running research on third-party machines, in the cloud, and use Quantum Machines to keep that work on track.Sivan would not disclose the valuation of his startup, but he confirmed it was raised with a significant uplift compared to previous rounds. For some more context, when we and others first heard about the round earlier this year, the value was pegged at $100 million. In the event, the fundraise was oversubscribed.Prior to this round, the company had raised around $93 million, per Crunchbase data, with Valor Equity Partners,Alumni Ventures,Battery Ventures,Samsung NEXT, andQualcomm Ventures among its backers.Quantum computing had a burst of cold wind in January, when Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang made a public prediction that the technology was still decades away from being useful (despite his companys work with Quantum Machines, Google and others). It was a statement that sent quantum stocks and overall outlook tumbling.Yet in the wake of that, weve seen several positive developments that might pave the way for a different timeline. Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google which unveiled a quantum chip it called Willow in December earlier this month said a realistic timeframe for useful quantum computers was five to 10 years from now.Microsoft followed that up just last week with the unveiling of its own quantum processor, built using what it described as a new state of matter called the Majorana particle, which it said holds promise in building processors that contain 1 million qubits one thousand times bigger than the typically 1,000 qubit processors being used today. Some have raised questions about Microsofts claims due to a lack of evidence, but its still an important development that underscores the work that is being done.Meanwhile, a number of startups have been raising large rounds. Theyve included Alice & Bob in France raising $104 million and Google-backed QuEra raising $230 million in a debt round.There remain question marks over the best approaches in the space. For example, right now, those working in the field of quantum computing are building along a few different theoretical trajectories around how to construct processors and the best approaches for addressing errors. But as Sivan points out, this is what makes Quantum Machines effective: bypassing those questions, it positions itself as agnostic to all those approaches, a mediator reducing noise, both figuratively and literally.This is one reason why the startup has attracted the investment that is has, said Rotem Shacham, a director at PSG.In the last few years the pace of tech breakthroughs in quantum computing have increased significantly, she said in an interview. Were getting closer to end user values. We dont like to invest decades away. But with Quantum Machines the market is already there.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·36 Views
  • Monsieur Aznavour: VFX Breakdowns by CGEV
    www.artofvfx.com
    Breakdown & ShowreelsMonsieur Aznavour: VFX Breakdowns by CGEVBy Vincent Frei - 25/02/2025 In Monsieur Aznavour, the VFX work by the French studio CGEV goes unnoticed yet makes every scene unforgettable. Their invisible effects transform each framerevitalizing settings and performances to faithfully capture the spirit of Aznavours early rise! Vincent Frei The Art of VFX 2025
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·43 Views
  • Kunsthal Rotterdam by OMA: A Study in Spatial Complexity
    archeyes.com
    Kunsthal Rotterdam | JacomeThe Kunsthal Rotterdam, completed in 1992, is one of OMAs most significant built works. It embodies Rem Koolhaass theoretical and conceptual explorations. Unlike traditional cultural institutions, which often emphasize monumentality and controlled spatial experiences, the Kunsthal offers fluid circulation, raw materiality, and strategic engagement with the urban fabric. Situated at the periphery of Rotterdams Museumpark, the building presents a fragmented yet cohesive spatial experience that blurs the lines between public and private realms.Kunsthal Rotterdam Technical InformationArchitects1-4: OMALocation: Rotterdam, NetherlandsArea: 3,300 m2 | 35,520 Sq. Ft.Project Year: 1989 1992Photographs: Flickr Users: Trevor Patt, JacomeThe Kunsthal is not designed as an object but as a sequence of almost cinematic experiences. Rem KoolhaasKunsthal Rotterdam PhotographsFacade | Trevor PattEntrance | Trevor PattExterior | Trevor Patt Trevor PattExterior | JacomeFacade | JacomeFacade | Trevor Patt Jacome Jacome Trevor Patt Trevor Patt Trevor Patt Trevor Patt Trevor PattKunsthal Rotterdam Design StrategyThe Kunsthal is an exhibition space designed to integrate seamlessly into its surroundings. By utilizing an existing six-meter elevation change across the site, OMA transforms what could have been a design constraint into an opportunity for spatial and programmatic innovation. Its manipulation of circulation and spatial relationships is at the core of the Kunsthals architectural identity. Rather than adhering to a conventional layout, the building is organized around a sequence of ramps, stairs, and bridges that create a continuous movement system. This dynamic approach fosters an engaging experience for visitors.OMAs sectional strategy is particularly significant. The six-meter site gradient is actively integrated into the architectural experience, resulting in a split-level configuration that allows seamless transitions between galleries, public spaces, and service areas. This vertical layering maximizes spatial efficiency and reinforces the buildings unique spatial logic.Materiality plays a crucial role in shaping the Kunsthals spatial and sensory qualities. Exposed concrete, raw steel, polycarbonate panels, and industrial flooring materials contribute to an aesthetic of raw functionality. This approach aligns with the idea of creating an open-ended, flexible environment suitable for various cultural events and exhibitions.Urban Insertion and Interaction with Public SpaceA defining aspect of the Kunsthals design is its relationship with the urban context. Unlike traditional museums, which often position themselves as exclusive cultural enclaves, the Kunsthal integrates itself into the city through a pedestrian pathway that cuts directly through the building. This strategy effectively dissolves the boundary between museum and public space, reinforcing the notion of cultural institutions as dynamic, civic-oriented entities.This permeability is further emphasized through the buildings multiple entrances and visual openness, which are facilitated by extensive glazing and strategic voids within the structure. The Kunsthal does not impose a singular narrative upon visitors; instead, it offers a framework within which diverse spatial experiences can unfold.Legacy and Architectural ImpactMore than three decades after its completion, the Kunsthal remains a significant work in contemporary museum architecture. Its influence is evident in subsequent cultural projects that challenge traditional museum paradigms, advocating for greater spatial fluidity, urban integration, and material experimentation.One of Kunsthals most notable contributions to architectural discourse is its demonstration of how circulation can be treated as a generative design element rather than a functional necessity. This approach has been echoed in later OMA projects, such as the Seattle Central Library and the Casa da Musica, where movement and sectional complexity play a central role in shaping architectural form and experience.The Kunsthal remains a reference point for architects and theorists alike, underscoring the enduring relevance of OMAs design approach. It exemplifies a commitment to challenging architectural conventions, pushing the boundaries of materiality, circulation, and programmatic organization. As cultural institutions continue to evolve in response to new social, technological, and urban conditions, the Kunsthal serves as a reminder of the potential for architecture to provoke, engage, and redefine our spatial experiences.Kunsthal Rotterdam PlansFloor Plans | OMAElevation | OMACirculation Diagram | OMAKunsthal Rotterdam Image GalleryAbout OMAOffice for Metropolitan Architecture (OMA) is a globally influential architecture firm founded in 1975 by Rem Koolhaas, Elia Zenghelis, Madelon Vriesendorp, and Zoe Zenghelis. Known for its innovative and often radical approach to design, OMA challenges architectural conventions by integrating urban theory, spatial experimentation, and material innovation. The firm has delivered landmark projects worldwide, including the Kunsthal Rotterdam, CCTV Headquarters in Beijing, and Seattle Central Library, shaping contemporary architecture with its bold and contextual solutions.Credits and Additional NotesLead Architect: Rem KoolhaasClient: City of RotterdamServices Engineer: DGMR Consulting EngineersDesign Team: Rem Koolhaas, Fuminori Hoshino, Ellen van Loon, Floris Alkemade, Petra Blaisse (interior and landscape)
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·34 Views
  • How to turn on Siri's new glow effect on iOS 18 - and other settings you should tweak
    www.zdnet.com
    The latest iOS 18.3 update brings some notable changes to the iPhone's AI and camera features. Here's the breakdown - and how to modify each one.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·38 Views
  • GoDaddy review: Easy and reliable web hosting for small sites and beginners
    www.zdnet.com
    ZDNET's key takeaways GoDaddy delivers solid uptime at 99.98%, keeping your site online most of the time. Upfront prices are fair, and the tools are easy for beginners. However, renewal rates and add-ons can sneak up on you, and bigger operations may need more power and space. View now at GoDaddy GoDaddy is the 800-pound gorilla of domain registration, the name most people know, even if they've never built a website. It's the Amazon of URLs. It has excelled at selling domains (and upselling you on everything under the sun), but the story gets more complicated when it comes to web hosting. Also: The best web hosting services: Expert tested and reviewedSure, it'll host your site, but the question is, should it? GoDaddy's pitch is: buy your domain, host your website, and manage it all in one place. I did just that to see if it's worth it. details View at GoDaddy GoDaddy's hosting plans cover just about everything, from basic shared hosting for small sites to dedicated servers for your more heavy-duty projects. On the surface, it seems like there's something for everyone. The shared plans are cheap up-front -- starting at $6 per month at the time of writing -- but renewal prices jump, and features like unlimited SSL are locked behind higher tiers. WordPress plans follow the same pattern, offering extras like malware scanning and WooCommerce support, but only if you're willing to pay for it. VPS and dedicated hosting plans promise more power and flexibility, but they come with steep price tags, especially if you need upgrades or additional features. Even basic security tools, which many competitors include for free, often require an extra fee here. It's a classic bait-and-switch: The initial costs look good until you realize how much more you'll need to spend to get the functionality you actually need. The pricing strategy is clearly designed to hook you with low introductory rates, only to hit you with higher renewals and extra charges down the line. If you're considering GoDaddy, make sure you know what you're getting and what it's going to cost you a year from now. GoDaddy gets points for being straightforward in other areas, though. Its tools are easy to use, and the range of plans covers everything from personal blogs to full-scale e-commerce sites. The option to pick servers in different regions is a nice touch for speeding things up for global audiences. Plus, freebies like a domain for the first year and backups are useful. Also: The best VPN services: Expert tested and reviewedBut here's the rub: The cheaper plans feel like bait. Basic security features are either temporary or hidden behind paywalls. On top of that, the upselling is relentless, starting from checkout and never really letting up. And when it's time to renew? Be ready for sticker shock, because those prices climb fast. GoDaddy makes getting started pretty easy, especially if you're already using one of its domains. The setup is smooth, and its website builder gets the job done for beginners. WordPress users get some nice perks, too -- preinstalled templates and a few AI tools to help you piece things together. Still, you might find it lacking if you like a bit more control or customization. Performance-wise, GoDaddy is solid. Uptime hovers around 99.98% (a standard promise from most hosting services), and server response times are good enough for smaller websites, but speed can get shaky if you're running a heavier site or serving a global audience. It's fine for casual projects, but don't expect miracles if you aim for high traffic. We tested this with a fresh WordPress install and threw some dummy text on a page. We then ran it through Pingdom Tools. First, we tested from San Francisco. Here's what we got: Screenshot by Marshall Gunnell/ZDNETNot bad at all, considering we're testing a shared server. This is good enough for a small site that needs decent performance without paying for top-tier plans. We then ran it from London. Here are the results: Screenshot by Marshall Gunnell/ZDNETThat's still good enough for smaller websites, especially if you expect global traffic. Remember that these tests should be mostly taken with a grain of salt. We're using a dummy site on a shared server, so results are expected to be pretty slow. The reality would be different if we had a full-fledged site up and running, and the package tier makes a big difference, too. Also: The best secure browsers for privacy: Expert testedThe basics are all here -- daily backups, a free domain for the first year, and staging tools on the higher-tier plans. But GoDaddy's habit of charging extra for stuff like extended SSL certificates or basic security features feels like a throwback to an earlier, greedier era of hosting. Meanwhile, competitors like Bluehost throw those things in for free, making GoDaddy feel a step behind. Did I mention I really dislike the constant upsells? Support is hit or miss. Phone support is quick and friendly, but the live chat can be painfully slow, and it's obvious when agents are just cutting and pasting canned replies. Their knowledge base is actually pretty decent, with clear guides to fix common problems, but having to dodge upsells when you're trying to troubleshoot gets old fast. For simple fixes, it's fine. For anything more? Maybe keep your expectations low. ZDNET's buying advice GoDaddy is a solid choice for small businesses, personal blogs, and anyone who wants to get a website up without too much fuss. It's especially appealing if you're already planning to grab a domain and need a host to bundle with it. The platform's uptime is reliable, performance is good, and the tools are easy enough for beginners to figure out. That said, the constant upsells and extra costs for things like extended SSL certificates and better security can feel like death by a thousand cuts. If you're running a high-traffic e-commerce site or need top-notch performance, GoDaddy starts to feel outclassed. Competitors like Bluehost and SiteGround offer faster speeds, better security baked into the plans, and fewer headaches. For anything beyond a basic website, it's worth shopping around. Featured reviews
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·42 Views
  • Trump Administration Terminates Key Health Advisory Committees, Threatening Health Equity
    www.forbes.com
    WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 13: U.S. President Donald Trump, accompanied by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and ... [+] his wife Cheryl Hines, speaks before Kennedy is sworn in as Secret (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)Getty ImagesPresident Trump, through an executive order, commanded the Department of Health and Human Services to terminate several health advisory committees, including the Advisory Committee on Long COVID as well as the Health Equity Advisory Committee for Medicare and Medicaid Services.The order was put in place as a means to reduce the size of the federal government in an attempt to curb government waste and reduce inflation.Although the end result may result in significant cost savings, dismantling such key health committees may undermine efforts to address complex health issues like long COVID and health disparities.The long COVID advisory committee consisted of 14 unpaid members who were charged with providing recommendations on research, treatment and interventions in helping individuals suffering from the disease. The condition refers to a range of symptoms that persist for at least three months after an initial infection with COVID-19 subsides, according to the CDC. Typical symptoms include fatigue, headache, chest pain, difficulty breathing, depression and difficulty concentrating, among other symptoms.The executive order could have devastating consequences for the over 20 million Americans that suffer from long COVID. The advisory committee was critical in identifying research priorities, fostering collaboration with scientists and informing policy changes with respect to long COVID, which is a debilitating disease that is recognized as a disability under federal law. Without the committee in place, there will surely be gaps in policy development as well as reduced public awareness and understanding of the condition.It does not help that the Trump administration has also removed important information and public data on long COVID from federal websites. Lack of transparency in sharing critical health information can eventually lead to misdiagnosis and inadequate care. The end result could mean millions of Americans with worsening disabilities and health outcomes from long COVID.Another equally important advisory committee that will be terminated under President Trumps executive order includes the Health Equity Advisory Committee for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This committee identifies and reduces systemic barriers to healthcare access to marginalized communities like people of color, those who are poor and those with limited access to healthcare resources such as those that live in rural areas of America.This particular committee is critical in identifying gaps in care for so many vulnerable Americans, many of which who do not have a voice to address their own needs. Without this committee, how will the needs of minorities and those that are marginalized be addressed?There is no shortage of health disparities and health inequities in the United States. As examples, individuals of certain racial ethnic groups, low-income families and those that live in rural areas face significant barriers in accessing high-quality healthcare. States with the largest population of Black Americans have disproportionately higher rates of uninsured people. Low-income rural Appalachian families have 35% fewer mental health providers when compared to the rest of the nation. Finally, Black women are 40% more likely to die from breast cancer when compared to White women.These alarming health inequities should be an impetus for the federal government to expand, not curtail these important health advisory committees. The decision to terminate these indispensable health advisory committees will hinder progress in understanding long COVID and will exacerbate existing and growing health disparities across America.One thing remains clear- physicians and healthcare personnel must start advocating for health and health policy, because it is becoming clearer that the federal government is not.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·40 Views
  • The Development Of Artificial Intelligence And Its Ethical Implications
    www.forbes.com
    While AI is already being successfully applied across various industries and organizations, many uncertainties remain regarding its proper implementation and use.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·37 Views
  • Im a Therapist, and Im Replaceable. But So Are You
    time.com
    IdeasBy Maytal EyalFebruary 25, 2025 8:00 AM ESTEyal is a writer and psychologist. Her work has appeared in The Atlantic, Wired, and Psychology Today. She is currently writing a book on how therapy culture lost its wayIm a psychologist, and AI is coming for my job. The signs are everywhere: a client showing me how ChatGPT helped her better understand her relationship with her parents; a friend ditching her in-person therapist to process anxiety with Claude; a startup raising $40 million to build a super-charged-AI-therapist. The other day on TikTok, I came across an influencer sharing how she doesnt need friends; she can just vent to God and ChatGPT. The post went viral, and thousands commented, including:ChatGPT talked me out of self-sabotaging.It knows me better than any human walking this earth.No fr! After my grandma died, I told chat gpt to tell me something motivational and it had me crying from the response."Id be lying if I said that this didnt make me terrified. I love my workand I dont want to be replaced. And while AI might help make therapy more readily available for all, beneath my personal fears, lies an even more unsettling thought: whether solving therapys accessibility crisis might inadvertently spark a crisis of human connection.Therapy is a field ripe for disruption. Bad therapists are, unfortunately, a common phenomenon, while good therapists are hard to find. When you do manage to find a good therapist, they often dont take insurance and almost always charge a sizable fee that, over time, can really add up. AI therapy could fill an immense gap. In the U.S. alone, more than half of adults with mental health issues do not receive the treatment they need. With the help of AI, any person could access a highly skilled therapist, tailored to their unique needs, at any time. It would be revolutionary.But great technological innovations always come with tradeoffs, and the shift to AI therapy has deeper implications than 1 million mental health professionals potentially losing their jobs. AI therapists, when normalized, have the potential to reshape how we understand intimacy, vulnerability, and what it means to connect.Throughout most of human history, emotional healing wasn't something you did alone with a therapist in an office. Instead, for the average person facing loss, disappointment, or interpersonal struggles, healing was embedded in communal and spiritual frameworks. Religious figures and shamans played central rolesoffering rituals, medicines, and moral guidance. In the 17th century, Quakers developed a notable practice called "clearness committees," where community members would gather to help an individual find answers to personal questions through careful listening and honest inquiry. These communal approaches to healing came with many advantages, as they provided people with social bonds and shared meaning. But they also had a dark side: emotional struggles could be viewed as moral failings, sins, or even signs of demonic influence, sometimes leading to stigmatization and cruel treatment.The birth of modern psychology in the West during the late 19th century marked a profound shift. When Sigmund Freud began treating patients in his Vienna office, he wasn't merely pioneering psychoanalysishe was transforming how people dealt with life's everyday challenges. As sociologist Eva Illouz notes in her book, Saving the Modern Soul, Freud gave "the ordinary self a new glamour, as if it were waiting to be discovered and fashioned." By convincing people that common strugglesfrom sadness to heartbreak to family conflict required professional exploration, Freud helped move emotional healing from the communal sphere into the privacy of the therapist's office.With this change, of course, came progress: What were once seen as shameful moral failings became common human challenges that could be scientifically understood with the help of a professional. Yet, it also turned healing into more of a solitary endeavorsevered from the community networks that had long been central to human support.In the near future, AI therapy could take Freuds individualized model of psychological healing to its furthest extreme. Emotional struggles will no longer just be addressed privately with another person, a professional, outside the communitythey may be worked through without any human contact at all.On the surface, this wont be entirely bad. AI therapists will be much cheaper. Theyll also be available 24/7never needing a holiday, a sick day, or to close shop for maternity leave. They wont need to end a session abruptly at the 50-minute mark, or run late because of a chatty client. And with AIs, youll feel free to express yourself in any way you want, without any of the self-consciousness you might feel when face-to-face with a real, flesh-and-blood human. As one 2024 study showed, people felt less fear of judgment when interacting with chatbots. In other words, all the friction inherent to working with a human professional would disappear.What many people dont realize about therapy, however, is that those subtle, uncomfortable moments of frictionwhen the therapist sets a boundary, cancels a session last minute, or says the wrong thingare just as important as the advice or insights they offer. These moments often expose clients habitual ways of relating: an avoidant client might shut down, while someone with low self-esteem might assume their therapist hates them. But this discomfort is where the real work begins. A good therapist guides clients to break old patternsexpressing disappointment instead of pretending to be okay, asking for clarification instead of assuming the worst, or staying engaged when theyd rather retreat. This work ripples far beyond the therapy room, equipping clients with the skills to handle the messiness of real relationships in their day-to-day lives.What happens to therapy when we take the friction out of it? The same question could be applied to all our relationships. As AI companions become our default source of emotional supportnot just as therapists, but also as friends and romantic partnerswe risk growing increasingly intolerant of the challenges that come with human connection. After all, why wrestle with a friends limited availability when an AI is always there? Why navigate a partners criticism when an AI has been trained to offer perfect validation? The more we turn to these perfectly attuned, always-available algorithmic beings, the less patience we may have for the messiness and complexity of real, human relationships.Last year, in a talk at the Wisdom and AI Summit, MIT professor and sociologist Sherry Turkle said, With a chatbot friend, theres no friction, second-guessing, or ambivalence. No fear of being left behind My problem isnt the conversation with machinesbut how it entrains us to devalue what it is to be a person. Turkle alludes to an important point: the very challenges that make relationships difficult are also what make them meaningful. Its in moments of discomfortwhen we navigate misunderstandings or repair after conflictthat intimacy grows. These experiences, whether with therapists, friends, or partners, teach us how to trust and connect on a deeper level. If we stop practicing these skills because AI offers a smoother, more convenient alternative, we may erode our capacity to form meaningful relationships.The rise of AI therapy isnt just about therapists getting replaced. Its about something much biggerhow we, as a society, choose to engage with one another. If we embrace frictionless AI over the complexity of real human relationships, we wont just lose the need for therapists we'll lose the ability to tolerate the mistakes and foibles of our fellow humans.Moments of tender awkwardness, of disappointment, of inevitable emotional messiness, arent relational blips to be avoided; theyre the foundation of connection. And in a world where the textured, imperfect intricacies of being human are sanitized out of existence, its not just therapists who risk obsolescenceits all of us.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·39 Views