Building Design
Building Design
Building Design is the UK’s best-read and favourite architecture news website.
www.bdonline.co.uk
  • 204 people like this
  • 633 Posts
  • 2 Photos
  • 0 Videos
  • News
Search
Recent Updates
  • Government ditches public sector decarbonisation scheme

    The government has axed a scheme for upgrading energy efficiency in public sector buildings.
    The Public Sector Decarbonisation Schemedelivered more than £2.5bn in its first three phases for measures such as heat pumps, solar panels, insulation and double glazing, with further funding of nearly £1bn recently announced.
    But the Department for Energy Security and Net Zerohas told Building Design that the scheme has been dropped after the spending review, leaving uncertainty about how upgrades will be funded when the current phase expires in 2028.

    Source: UK Government/FlickrEd Miliband’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero is responsible for the scheme
    The department said it would set out plans for the period after 2028 in due course.
    In a post on LinkedIn, Dave Welkin, director of sustainability at Gleeds, said he had waited for the release of the spending review with a “sense of trepidation” and was unable to find mention of public sector decarbonisation when Treasury documents were released.
    “I hoped because it was already committed in the Budget that its omission wasn’t ominous,” he wrote.
    Yesterday, he was told by Salix Finance, the non-departmental public body that delivers funding for the scheme, that it was no longer being funded.
    It comes after the withdrawal of funding for the Low Carbon Skills Fundin May.
    According to the government’s website, PSDS and LCSF were intended to support the reduction of emissions from public sector buildings by 75% by 2037, compared to a 2017 baseline.
    “Neither LCSF or PSDS were perfect by any means, but they did provide a vital source of funding for local authorities, hospitals, schools and many other public sector organisations to save energy, carbon and money,” Welkin said.
    “PSDS has helped replace failed heating systems in schools, keeping students warm. It’s replaced roofs on hospitals, helping patients recover from illness. It’s replaced windows in our prisons, improving security and stopping drugs getting behind bars.”
    However, responding to Welkin’s post, Steve Connolly, chief executive at Arriba Technologies, a low carbon heating and cooling firm, said that the scheme was being “mismanaged” with a small number of professional services firms “scooping up disproportionately large grants for their clients”.
    The fourth phase of the scheme was confirmed last September, with allocations confirmed only last month.
    This latest phase, which covers the financial years between 2025/26 and 2027/28, saw the distribution of £940m across the country.
    A DESNZ spokesperson said: “Our settlement is about investing in Britain’s renewal to create energy security, sprint to clean power by 2030, encourage investment, create jobs and bring down bills for good.
    “We will deliver £1bn in current allocations of the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme until 2028 and, through Great British Energy, have invested in new rooftop solar power and renewable schemes to lower energy bills for schools and hospitals across the UK.
    “We want to build on this progress by incentivising the public sector to decarbonise, so they can reap the benefits in lower bills and emissions, sharing best practice across government and exploring the use of repayable finance, where appropriate.”
    A government assessment of phase 3a and 3b projects identified a number of issues with the scheme, including delays and cost inflation, with more than a tenth being abandoned subsequent to grants being offered.
    Stakeholders interviewed for the report also identified “difficulties in obtaining skilled contractors and equipment”, especially air source heat pumps.
    The first come first served approach to awarding funding was also said to be “encouraging applicants to opt for more straightforward projects” and “potentially undermining the achievement of PSDS objective by restricting the opportunity for largermore complex measures which may have delivered greater carbon reduction benefits”.
    But the consensus among stakeholders and industry representatives interviewed for the report was that the scheme was “currently key to sustaining the existing UK heat pump market” and that it was “seen as vital in enabling many public sector organisations to invest in heat decarbonisation”.
    #government #ditches #public #sector #decarbonisation
    Government ditches public sector decarbonisation scheme
    The government has axed a scheme for upgrading energy efficiency in public sector buildings. The Public Sector Decarbonisation Schemedelivered more than £2.5bn in its first three phases for measures such as heat pumps, solar panels, insulation and double glazing, with further funding of nearly £1bn recently announced. But the Department for Energy Security and Net Zerohas told Building Design that the scheme has been dropped after the spending review, leaving uncertainty about how upgrades will be funded when the current phase expires in 2028. Source: UK Government/FlickrEd Miliband’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero is responsible for the scheme The department said it would set out plans for the period after 2028 in due course. In a post on LinkedIn, Dave Welkin, director of sustainability at Gleeds, said he had waited for the release of the spending review with a “sense of trepidation” and was unable to find mention of public sector decarbonisation when Treasury documents were released. “I hoped because it was already committed in the Budget that its omission wasn’t ominous,” he wrote. Yesterday, he was told by Salix Finance, the non-departmental public body that delivers funding for the scheme, that it was no longer being funded. It comes after the withdrawal of funding for the Low Carbon Skills Fundin May. According to the government’s website, PSDS and LCSF were intended to support the reduction of emissions from public sector buildings by 75% by 2037, compared to a 2017 baseline. “Neither LCSF or PSDS were perfect by any means, but they did provide a vital source of funding for local authorities, hospitals, schools and many other public sector organisations to save energy, carbon and money,” Welkin said. “PSDS has helped replace failed heating systems in schools, keeping students warm. It’s replaced roofs on hospitals, helping patients recover from illness. It’s replaced windows in our prisons, improving security and stopping drugs getting behind bars.” However, responding to Welkin’s post, Steve Connolly, chief executive at Arriba Technologies, a low carbon heating and cooling firm, said that the scheme was being “mismanaged” with a small number of professional services firms “scooping up disproportionately large grants for their clients”. The fourth phase of the scheme was confirmed last September, with allocations confirmed only last month. This latest phase, which covers the financial years between 2025/26 and 2027/28, saw the distribution of £940m across the country. A DESNZ spokesperson said: “Our settlement is about investing in Britain’s renewal to create energy security, sprint to clean power by 2030, encourage investment, create jobs and bring down bills for good. “We will deliver £1bn in current allocations of the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme until 2028 and, through Great British Energy, have invested in new rooftop solar power and renewable schemes to lower energy bills for schools and hospitals across the UK. “We want to build on this progress by incentivising the public sector to decarbonise, so they can reap the benefits in lower bills and emissions, sharing best practice across government and exploring the use of repayable finance, where appropriate.” A government assessment of phase 3a and 3b projects identified a number of issues with the scheme, including delays and cost inflation, with more than a tenth being abandoned subsequent to grants being offered. Stakeholders interviewed for the report also identified “difficulties in obtaining skilled contractors and equipment”, especially air source heat pumps. The first come first served approach to awarding funding was also said to be “encouraging applicants to opt for more straightforward projects” and “potentially undermining the achievement of PSDS objective by restricting the opportunity for largermore complex measures which may have delivered greater carbon reduction benefits”. But the consensus among stakeholders and industry representatives interviewed for the report was that the scheme was “currently key to sustaining the existing UK heat pump market” and that it was “seen as vital in enabling many public sector organisations to invest in heat decarbonisation”. #government #ditches #public #sector #decarbonisation
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Government ditches public sector decarbonisation scheme
    The government has axed a scheme for upgrading energy efficiency in public sector buildings. The Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme (PSDS) delivered more than £2.5bn in its first three phases for measures such as heat pumps, solar panels, insulation and double glazing, with further funding of nearly £1bn recently announced. But the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has told Building Design that the scheme has been dropped after the spending review, leaving uncertainty about how upgrades will be funded when the current phase expires in 2028. Source: UK Government/FlickrEd Miliband’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero is responsible for the scheme The department said it would set out plans for the period after 2028 in due course. In a post on LinkedIn, Dave Welkin, director of sustainability at Gleeds, said he had waited for the release of the spending review with a “sense of trepidation” and was unable to find mention of public sector decarbonisation when Treasury documents were released. “I hoped because it was already committed in the Budget that its omission wasn’t ominous,” he wrote. Yesterday, he was told by Salix Finance, the non-departmental public body that delivers funding for the scheme, that it was no longer being funded. It comes after the withdrawal of funding for the Low Carbon Skills Fund (LCSF) in May. According to the government’s website, PSDS and LCSF were intended to support the reduction of emissions from public sector buildings by 75% by 2037, compared to a 2017 baseline. “Neither LCSF or PSDS were perfect by any means, but they did provide a vital source of funding for local authorities, hospitals, schools and many other public sector organisations to save energy, carbon and money,” Welkin said. “PSDS has helped replace failed heating systems in schools, keeping students warm. It’s replaced roofs on hospitals, helping patients recover from illness. It’s replaced windows in our prisons, improving security and stopping drugs getting behind bars.” However, responding to Welkin’s post, Steve Connolly, chief executive at Arriba Technologies, a low carbon heating and cooling firm, said that the scheme was being “mismanaged” with a small number of professional services firms “scooping up disproportionately large grants for their clients”. The fourth phase of the scheme was confirmed last September, with allocations confirmed only last month. This latest phase, which covers the financial years between 2025/26 and 2027/28, saw the distribution of £940m across the country. A DESNZ spokesperson said: “Our settlement is about investing in Britain’s renewal to create energy security, sprint to clean power by 2030, encourage investment, create jobs and bring down bills for good. “We will deliver £1bn in current allocations of the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme until 2028 and, through Great British Energy, have invested in new rooftop solar power and renewable schemes to lower energy bills for schools and hospitals across the UK. “We want to build on this progress by incentivising the public sector to decarbonise, so they can reap the benefits in lower bills and emissions, sharing best practice across government and exploring the use of repayable finance, where appropriate.” A government assessment of phase 3a and 3b projects identified a number of issues with the scheme, including delays and cost inflation, with more than a tenth being abandoned subsequent to grants being offered. Stakeholders interviewed for the report also identified “difficulties in obtaining skilled contractors and equipment”, especially air source heat pumps. The first come first served approach to awarding funding was also said to be “encouraging applicants to opt for more straightforward projects” and “potentially undermining the achievement of PSDS objective by restricting the opportunity for larger [and] more complex measures which may have delivered greater carbon reduction benefits”. But the consensus among stakeholders and industry representatives interviewed for the report was that the scheme was “currently key to sustaining the existing UK heat pump market” and that it was “seen as vital in enabling many public sector organisations to invest in heat decarbonisation”.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    474
    2 Comments 0 Shares
  • Local architect gets green light for Leeds student tower

    Source: Enjoy DesignHow the new scheme would look when built
    Proposals for a 37-storey student accommodation tower in the middle of Leeds have been given the green light by local planners.
    The scheme for Town Centre Securities will see 100 Merrion Centre, part of the 1960s-built shopping centre of the same name, demolished and replaced with more than 1,000 bedrooms.
    A neighbouring building called Wade House, built in the mid-60s, would be revamped to include more than 200 bed spaces across its 13 storeys. Work will involve stripping back the building and adding an extra storey.
    The development will also include a cinema, gym, co-working spaces and rooftop terraces.
    The tower has been drawn up by local architect Enjoy Design with others working on the scheme including project manager and QS Rex Procter, M&E engineer Hoare Lea and civil and structural engineer Adept. Planning consultant is ID Planning.
    #local #architect #gets #green #light
    Local architect gets green light for Leeds student tower
    Source: Enjoy DesignHow the new scheme would look when built Proposals for a 37-storey student accommodation tower in the middle of Leeds have been given the green light by local planners. The scheme for Town Centre Securities will see 100 Merrion Centre, part of the 1960s-built shopping centre of the same name, demolished and replaced with more than 1,000 bedrooms. A neighbouring building called Wade House, built in the mid-60s, would be revamped to include more than 200 bed spaces across its 13 storeys. Work will involve stripping back the building and adding an extra storey. The development will also include a cinema, gym, co-working spaces and rooftop terraces. The tower has been drawn up by local architect Enjoy Design with others working on the scheme including project manager and QS Rex Procter, M&E engineer Hoare Lea and civil and structural engineer Adept. Planning consultant is ID Planning. #local #architect #gets #green #light
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Local architect gets green light for Leeds student tower
    Source: Enjoy DesignHow the new scheme would look when built Proposals for a 37-storey student accommodation tower in the middle of Leeds have been given the green light by local planners. The scheme for Town Centre Securities will see 100 Merrion Centre, part of the 1960s-built shopping centre of the same name, demolished and replaced with more than 1,000 bedrooms. A neighbouring building called Wade House, built in the mid-60s, would be revamped to include more than 200 bed spaces across its 13 storeys. Work will involve stripping back the building and adding an extra storey. The development will also include a cinema, gym, co-working spaces and rooftop terraces. The tower has been drawn up by local architect Enjoy Design with others working on the scheme including project manager and QS Rex Procter, M&E engineer Hoare Lea and civil and structural engineer Adept. Planning consultant is ID Planning.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Studio Egret West sends in plans for Albert Bridge House redevelopment in Manchester

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West

    1/5
    show caption

    Plans for a revised mixed-use scheme in Manchester have been sent in to local planners.
    The original scheme for the redevelopment of Albert Bridge House, drawn up by Studio Egret West and which was given a resolution to grant planning two years ago, had proposed development of just over 1 million sq ft of commercial space along with just over 350 build-to-rent homes.
    But developer Oval Real Estate has since had a rethink because “the financial landscape has shifted significantly”. It added: “As such, our new proposals have been developed in response to this challenge and to better align with current market needs and community priorities.”
    In a LinkedIn post, Studio Egret West added: “Whilst the earlier design featured a single residential tower and an expansive commercial office block, changing economic conditions have necessitated a rethinking of its scale and delivery strategy.”
    The new plan has more than doubled the number of build-to-rent homes to around 800 across two blocks of 49 and 37 storeys.
    The commercial space has been pared back to around 250,000 sq ft across a 17-storey block.

    Source: Studio Egret WestThe previously consented scheme
    The 1.2 ha site includes a vacant 1950s office building formerly occupied by HMRC, a surface-level car park and the adjacent Albert Bridge Gardens
    Across the site, new public realm is proposed, including an expanded riverside walk, new play areas and an “urban arboretum” that incorporates existing mature trees on the plot.
    Studio Egret West is acting as architect, landscape architect and principal designer for the scheme, with others working on the scheme include planning consultant Deloitte, QS Cumming Group, structural and civil engineer AKT II and M&E engineer Hoare Lea.
    #studio #egret #west #sends #plans
    Studio Egret West sends in plans for Albert Bridge House redevelopment in Manchester
    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West 1/5 show caption Plans for a revised mixed-use scheme in Manchester have been sent in to local planners. The original scheme for the redevelopment of Albert Bridge House, drawn up by Studio Egret West and which was given a resolution to grant planning two years ago, had proposed development of just over 1 million sq ft of commercial space along with just over 350 build-to-rent homes. But developer Oval Real Estate has since had a rethink because “the financial landscape has shifted significantly”. It added: “As such, our new proposals have been developed in response to this challenge and to better align with current market needs and community priorities.” In a LinkedIn post, Studio Egret West added: “Whilst the earlier design featured a single residential tower and an expansive commercial office block, changing economic conditions have necessitated a rethinking of its scale and delivery strategy.” The new plan has more than doubled the number of build-to-rent homes to around 800 across two blocks of 49 and 37 storeys. The commercial space has been pared back to around 250,000 sq ft across a 17-storey block. Source: Studio Egret WestThe previously consented scheme The 1.2 ha site includes a vacant 1950s office building formerly occupied by HMRC, a surface-level car park and the adjacent Albert Bridge Gardens Across the site, new public realm is proposed, including an expanded riverside walk, new play areas and an “urban arboretum” that incorporates existing mature trees on the plot. Studio Egret West is acting as architect, landscape architect and principal designer for the scheme, with others working on the scheme include planning consultant Deloitte, QS Cumming Group, structural and civil engineer AKT II and M&E engineer Hoare Lea. #studio #egret #west #sends #plans
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Studio Egret West sends in plans for Albert Bridge House redevelopment in Manchester
    The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West The revised schemeSource: Studio Egret West 1/5 show caption Plans for a revised mixed-use scheme in Manchester have been sent in to local planners. The original scheme for the redevelopment of Albert Bridge House, drawn up by Studio Egret West and which was given a resolution to grant planning two years ago, had proposed development of just over 1 million sq ft of commercial space along with just over 350 build-to-rent homes. But developer Oval Real Estate has since had a rethink because “the financial landscape has shifted significantly”. It added: “As such, our new proposals have been developed in response to this challenge and to better align with current market needs and community priorities.” In a LinkedIn post, Studio Egret West added: “Whilst the earlier design featured a single residential tower and an expansive commercial office block, changing economic conditions have necessitated a rethinking of its scale and delivery strategy.” The new plan has more than doubled the number of build-to-rent homes to around 800 across two blocks of 49 and 37 storeys. The commercial space has been pared back to around 250,000 sq ft across a 17-storey block. Source: Studio Egret WestThe previously consented scheme The 1.2 ha site includes a vacant 1950s office building formerly occupied by HMRC, a surface-level car park and the adjacent Albert Bridge Gardens Across the site, new public realm is proposed, including an expanded riverside walk, new play areas and an “urban arboretum” that incorporates existing mature trees on the plot. Studio Egret West is acting as architect, landscape architect and principal designer for the scheme, with others working on the scheme include planning consultant Deloitte, QS Cumming Group, structural and civil engineer AKT II and M&E engineer Hoare Lea.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Camden approves Cartwright Pickard 24-storey tower and Morris + Company student scheme

    Swiss Cottage scheme had previous 2016 consent which was never completed

    Source: RegalCGI of the 100 Avenue Road scheme by Cartwright Pickard
    Camden council has approved two major residential schemes designed by Cartwright Pickard and Morris + Company, both brought forward by developer Regal.
    At 100 Avenue Road in Swiss Cottage, Cartwright Pickard has drawn up revised proposals for a long-stalled 24-storey tower above the tube station. Originally designed by GRID Architects and approved in 2016, the scheme had seen demolition and basement works completed, but above-ground construction halted under the site’s previous owner, Essential Living.
    Regal acquired the site in March last year and submitted updated plans retaining the original height and massing but adding two additional floors, increasing the number of homes from 184 to 237. The scheme now includes 70 affordable homes across social, affordable rent and intermediate tenures. Revisions also include a reworked brick facade and the introduction of a second staircase.
    Regal will act as both developer and contractor on the scheme.

    Source: Morris + Company33–35 Jamestown Road and 211 Arlington Road in Camden Town, which will deliver 178 purpose-built student bedrooms, 27 affordable homes, and over 3,600 sq ft of commercial space
    Elsewhere in the borough, Camden also granted planning permission for a student housing-led development designed by Morris + Company at 33–35 Jamestown Road and 211 Arlington Road in Camden Town. Brought forward by Regal in joint venture with 4C Group, the scheme will deliver 178 student bedrooms, 27 affordable homes and over 3,600 sq ft of commercial space arranged around a retained 19th-century pub.
    Steve Harrington, planning director at Regal, said: “Our work with Camden has proven that it is possible for both public and private sector to work together with the speed and pragmatism that the planning system needs. This is the kind of delivery that makes a difference – not just more homes, but better ones.”
    #camden #approves #cartwright #pickard #24storey
    Camden approves Cartwright Pickard 24-storey tower and Morris + Company student scheme
    Swiss Cottage scheme had previous 2016 consent which was never completed Source: RegalCGI of the 100 Avenue Road scheme by Cartwright Pickard Camden council has approved two major residential schemes designed by Cartwright Pickard and Morris + Company, both brought forward by developer Regal. At 100 Avenue Road in Swiss Cottage, Cartwright Pickard has drawn up revised proposals for a long-stalled 24-storey tower above the tube station. Originally designed by GRID Architects and approved in 2016, the scheme had seen demolition and basement works completed, but above-ground construction halted under the site’s previous owner, Essential Living. Regal acquired the site in March last year and submitted updated plans retaining the original height and massing but adding two additional floors, increasing the number of homes from 184 to 237. The scheme now includes 70 affordable homes across social, affordable rent and intermediate tenures. Revisions also include a reworked brick facade and the introduction of a second staircase. Regal will act as both developer and contractor on the scheme. Source: Morris + Company33–35 Jamestown Road and 211 Arlington Road in Camden Town, which will deliver 178 purpose-built student bedrooms, 27 affordable homes, and over 3,600 sq ft of commercial space Elsewhere in the borough, Camden also granted planning permission for a student housing-led development designed by Morris + Company at 33–35 Jamestown Road and 211 Arlington Road in Camden Town. Brought forward by Regal in joint venture with 4C Group, the scheme will deliver 178 student bedrooms, 27 affordable homes and over 3,600 sq ft of commercial space arranged around a retained 19th-century pub. Steve Harrington, planning director at Regal, said: “Our work with Camden has proven that it is possible for both public and private sector to work together with the speed and pragmatism that the planning system needs. This is the kind of delivery that makes a difference – not just more homes, but better ones.” #camden #approves #cartwright #pickard #24storey
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Camden approves Cartwright Pickard 24-storey tower and Morris + Company student scheme
    Swiss Cottage scheme had previous 2016 consent which was never completed Source: RegalCGI of the 100 Avenue Road scheme by Cartwright Pickard Camden council has approved two major residential schemes designed by Cartwright Pickard and Morris + Company, both brought forward by developer Regal. At 100 Avenue Road in Swiss Cottage, Cartwright Pickard has drawn up revised proposals for a long-stalled 24-storey tower above the tube station. Originally designed by GRID Architects and approved in 2016, the scheme had seen demolition and basement works completed, but above-ground construction halted under the site’s previous owner, Essential Living. Regal acquired the site in March last year and submitted updated plans retaining the original height and massing but adding two additional floors, increasing the number of homes from 184 to 237. The scheme now includes 70 affordable homes across social, affordable rent and intermediate tenures. Revisions also include a reworked brick facade and the introduction of a second staircase. Regal will act as both developer and contractor on the scheme. Source: Morris + Company33–35 Jamestown Road and 211 Arlington Road in Camden Town, which will deliver 178 purpose-built student bedrooms, 27 affordable homes, and over 3,600 sq ft of commercial space Elsewhere in the borough, Camden also granted planning permission for a student housing-led development designed by Morris + Company at 33–35 Jamestown Road and 211 Arlington Road in Camden Town. Brought forward by Regal in joint venture with 4C Group, the scheme will deliver 178 student bedrooms, 27 affordable homes and over 3,600 sq ft of commercial space arranged around a retained 19th-century pub. Steve Harrington, planning director at Regal, said: “Our work with Camden has proven that it is possible for both public and private sector to work together with the speed and pragmatism that the planning system needs. This is the kind of delivery that makes a difference – not just more homes, but better ones.”
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    448
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • HTA gets green light for relocatable homes pilot scheme in east London

    18-unit scheme, part of Havering’s joint venture with Wates Residential, seeks to address the growing demand for temporary housing using modern methods of construction

    Source: Wates / HTA

    Source: Wates / HTA

    Source: Wates / HTA

    1/3
    show caption

    Planning permission has been granted for a pilot scheme of 18 modular relocatable homes in Romford, designed by HTA and developed through a joint venture between the London Borough of Havering and Wates Residential. The project is intended as a temporary housing solution that makes meanwhile use of underused land ahead of future phases of permanent redevelopment.
    The scheme forms part of the wider regeneration of the Waterloo and Queen Street Estate, where up to 5,000 new homes are planned across the borough. The modular development is being positioned as a response to the increasing cost and demand pressures facing local authorities.
    According to figures cited by Wates Residential, councils in England spend £2.1 billion annually on temporary housing, often in the form of hotels and B&Bs, with a record number of children now housed in such accommodation.
    Graham Williamson, cabinet lead for development and regeneration at Havering Council, said: “These modular homes will offer a significant improvement on current options like hostels and hotels, giving families a safer, more stable place to live at less cost to the taxpayer, while we continue delivering long-term regeneration across the borough.”

    Source: Wates / HTA
    The homes are designed to be relocatable and use modern methods of construction that aim to accelerate delivery. The landscape and public realm have also been designed to be moved with the homes. According to the developer, they are built to the same regulatory standards as permanent housing and are expected to last up to 60 years.
    Paul Nicholls, regional managing director for London at Wates Residential, said: “This decision shows what’s possible when we take bold approaches to tackling the housing crisis. These homes demonstrate that temporary accommodation can be high-quality, energy-efficient and designed around people’s needs, not just a stopgap, but a real place to live and thrive.”
    #hta #gets #green #light #relocatable
    HTA gets green light for relocatable homes pilot scheme in east London
    18-unit scheme, part of Havering’s joint venture with Wates Residential, seeks to address the growing demand for temporary housing using modern methods of construction Source: Wates / HTA Source: Wates / HTA Source: Wates / HTA 1/3 show caption Planning permission has been granted for a pilot scheme of 18 modular relocatable homes in Romford, designed by HTA and developed through a joint venture between the London Borough of Havering and Wates Residential. The project is intended as a temporary housing solution that makes meanwhile use of underused land ahead of future phases of permanent redevelopment. The scheme forms part of the wider regeneration of the Waterloo and Queen Street Estate, where up to 5,000 new homes are planned across the borough. The modular development is being positioned as a response to the increasing cost and demand pressures facing local authorities. According to figures cited by Wates Residential, councils in England spend £2.1 billion annually on temporary housing, often in the form of hotels and B&Bs, with a record number of children now housed in such accommodation. Graham Williamson, cabinet lead for development and regeneration at Havering Council, said: “These modular homes will offer a significant improvement on current options like hostels and hotels, giving families a safer, more stable place to live at less cost to the taxpayer, while we continue delivering long-term regeneration across the borough.” Source: Wates / HTA The homes are designed to be relocatable and use modern methods of construction that aim to accelerate delivery. The landscape and public realm have also been designed to be moved with the homes. According to the developer, they are built to the same regulatory standards as permanent housing and are expected to last up to 60 years. Paul Nicholls, regional managing director for London at Wates Residential, said: “This decision shows what’s possible when we take bold approaches to tackling the housing crisis. These homes demonstrate that temporary accommodation can be high-quality, energy-efficient and designed around people’s needs, not just a stopgap, but a real place to live and thrive.” #hta #gets #green #light #relocatable
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    HTA gets green light for relocatable homes pilot scheme in east London
    18-unit scheme, part of Havering’s joint venture with Wates Residential, seeks to address the growing demand for temporary housing using modern methods of construction Source: Wates / HTA Source: Wates / HTA Source: Wates / HTA 1/3 show caption Planning permission has been granted for a pilot scheme of 18 modular relocatable homes in Romford, designed by HTA and developed through a joint venture between the London Borough of Havering and Wates Residential. The project is intended as a temporary housing solution that makes meanwhile use of underused land ahead of future phases of permanent redevelopment. The scheme forms part of the wider regeneration of the Waterloo and Queen Street Estate, where up to 5,000 new homes are planned across the borough. The modular development is being positioned as a response to the increasing cost and demand pressures facing local authorities. According to figures cited by Wates Residential, councils in England spend £2.1 billion annually on temporary housing, often in the form of hotels and B&Bs, with a record number of children now housed in such accommodation. Graham Williamson, cabinet lead for development and regeneration at Havering Council, said: “These modular homes will offer a significant improvement on current options like hostels and hotels, giving families a safer, more stable place to live at less cost to the taxpayer, while we continue delivering long-term regeneration across the borough.” Source: Wates / HTA The homes are designed to be relocatable and use modern methods of construction that aim to accelerate delivery. The landscape and public realm have also been designed to be moved with the homes. According to the developer, they are built to the same regulatory standards as permanent housing and are expected to last up to 60 years. Paul Nicholls, regional managing director for London at Wates Residential, said: “This decision shows what’s possible when we take bold approaches to tackling the housing crisis. These homes demonstrate that temporary accommodation can be high-quality, energy-efficient and designed around people’s needs, not just a stopgap, but a real place to live and thrive.”
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    423
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Government to spend £15bn on transport projects outside the South-east

    Schemes include jobs in Liverpool, Bradford and NewcastleRachel Reeves has announced £15bn for transport projects in the north of England, the Midlands and the West Country to stimulate growth outside of the South-east.
    The chancellor unveiled a funding package this morning for a raft of rail, tram and bus projects ahead of the government’s spending review, due next week, which is expected to include cuts to many departmental budgets.
    It is also expected to be part of the government’s 10-year infrastructure strategy, which will be announced later this month.

    Rachel Reeves delivering her speech in Manchester this morning
    Tram schemes have been handed the biggest investments, including £2.5bn to extend Manchester’s network to Stockport and £2.4bn to expand Birmingham’s network to the city’s planned ‘sports quarter’.
    A long-awaited tram network in West Yorkshire will get £2.1bn to start construction of the first two lines by 2028, along with new bus stations in Bradford and Wakefield, while South Yorkshire’s tram network has been handed £2.1bn for renewal works and bus service.
    Liverpool has been allocated £1.6bn to improve links to locations in the city including the new Everton Stadium, and the North East will get £1.8bn to extend the Newcastle to Sunderland Metro via Washington.
    Other funding packages include £2bn for the East Midlands to improve road, rail and bus links between Derby and Nottingham and £800m for rail upgrades in the West of England.
    Some of these projects were part of former prime minister Rishi Sunak’s Network North plan, which backed schemes including the West Yorkshire tram system to compensate for the decision to scrap HS2 north of Birmingham.
    Network North was put on ice following Labour’s election victory last year after Reeves claimed the programme had not been fully funded.
    The money will be part of a five-year funding allocation from 2027/28 to 2031/32. 

    >> Also read: It’s time for trams – and Britain needs to catch up
    >> Also read: Traffic in Towns: 60 years on from Colin Buchanan’s prophetic report
    #government #spend #15bn #transport #projects
    Government to spend £15bn on transport projects outside the South-east
    Schemes include jobs in Liverpool, Bradford and NewcastleRachel Reeves has announced £15bn for transport projects in the north of England, the Midlands and the West Country to stimulate growth outside of the South-east. The chancellor unveiled a funding package this morning for a raft of rail, tram and bus projects ahead of the government’s spending review, due next week, which is expected to include cuts to many departmental budgets. It is also expected to be part of the government’s 10-year infrastructure strategy, which will be announced later this month. Rachel Reeves delivering her speech in Manchester this morning Tram schemes have been handed the biggest investments, including £2.5bn to extend Manchester’s network to Stockport and £2.4bn to expand Birmingham’s network to the city’s planned ‘sports quarter’. A long-awaited tram network in West Yorkshire will get £2.1bn to start construction of the first two lines by 2028, along with new bus stations in Bradford and Wakefield, while South Yorkshire’s tram network has been handed £2.1bn for renewal works and bus service. Liverpool has been allocated £1.6bn to improve links to locations in the city including the new Everton Stadium, and the North East will get £1.8bn to extend the Newcastle to Sunderland Metro via Washington. Other funding packages include £2bn for the East Midlands to improve road, rail and bus links between Derby and Nottingham and £800m for rail upgrades in the West of England. Some of these projects were part of former prime minister Rishi Sunak’s Network North plan, which backed schemes including the West Yorkshire tram system to compensate for the decision to scrap HS2 north of Birmingham. Network North was put on ice following Labour’s election victory last year after Reeves claimed the programme had not been fully funded. The money will be part of a five-year funding allocation from 2027/28 to 2031/32.  >> Also read: It’s time for trams – and Britain needs to catch up >> Also read: Traffic in Towns: 60 years on from Colin Buchanan’s prophetic report #government #spend #15bn #transport #projects
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Government to spend £15bn on transport projects outside the South-east
    Schemes include jobs in Liverpool, Bradford and NewcastleRachel Reeves has announced £15bn for transport projects in the north of England, the Midlands and the West Country to stimulate growth outside of the South-east. The chancellor unveiled a funding package this morning for a raft of rail, tram and bus projects ahead of the government’s spending review, due next week, which is expected to include cuts to many departmental budgets. It is also expected to be part of the government’s 10-year infrastructure strategy, which will be announced later this month. Rachel Reeves delivering her speech in Manchester this morning Tram schemes have been handed the biggest investments, including £2.5bn to extend Manchester’s network to Stockport and £2.4bn to expand Birmingham’s network to the city’s planned ‘sports quarter’. A long-awaited tram network in West Yorkshire will get £2.1bn to start construction of the first two lines by 2028, along with new bus stations in Bradford and Wakefield, while South Yorkshire’s tram network has been handed £2.1bn for renewal works and bus service. Liverpool has been allocated £1.6bn to improve links to locations in the city including the new Everton Stadium, and the North East will get £1.8bn to extend the Newcastle to Sunderland Metro via Washington. Other funding packages include £2bn for the East Midlands to improve road, rail and bus links between Derby and Nottingham and £800m for rail upgrades in the West of England. Some of these projects were part of former prime minister Rishi Sunak’s Network North plan, which backed schemes including the West Yorkshire tram system to compensate for the decision to scrap HS2 north of Birmingham. Network North was put on ice following Labour’s election victory last year after Reeves claimed the programme had not been fully funded. The money will be part of a five-year funding allocation from 2027/28 to 2031/32.  >> Also read: It’s time for trams – and Britain needs to catch up >> Also read: Traffic in Towns: 60 years on from Colin Buchanan’s prophetic report
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Angry
    Sad
    269
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Smith Mordak replaced by Simon McWhirter as boss of UKGBC

    Mordak served just two years as chief executive of industry charity that campaigns on sustainability issuesSmith Mordak is no longer chief executive at the UK Green Building Council, the organisation has said without giving a reason for their departure.
    Mordak, who was appointed chief executive by the charity’s board of trustees in June 2023, was replaced by former deputy chief executive Simon McWhirter at the end of May.
    In a post on LinkedIn, Mordak said: “After two years working as CEO of UKGBC, my tenure has come to an end.  

    Smith Mordak’s role as chief executive ended at the end of last month
    “Collaborating with such dedicated colleagues to foster a safe, fair, and sustainable built environment has been an immense privilege, and I am deeply proud of what we’ve accomplished together.”
    Mordak, who changed their current role on LinkedIn to freelance at the beginning of this month, said they “look forward to sharing more about my own new ventures in due course”.
    The UKGBC said Mordak had been chief executive until last month and there had since been a “change of leadership”, but declined to clarify why Mordak’s role had ended at the charity, which does not set fixed terms for its chief executives.
    “Smith brought a wealth of industry knowledge, deep technical expertise, first-hand insights of creating sustainable places, and as a passionate campaigner for action on the environmental crises and to engender an equitable society,” the organisation said.
    “During the last two years, we have valued the expertise and energy that they have brought to the UKGBC as the organisation continues to evolve. We would like to take this opportunity to wish them all the very best for their future endeavours.”
    McWhirter was appointed UKGBC director of communications, policy and places in August 2021, becoming deputy chief executive in April 2023. 
    He has a background spanning sustainability advocacy, communications, finance, political engagement and property development in organisations including the WWF and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.
    He said: “Having been involved with UKGBC since its formation - as a consultant, member company, and most recently deputy CEO - I know the awesome collaborative power we can bring to the challenge of positioning our buildings as a real lever for change, to tackle the climate and nature crises we’re facing”.
    He added: “I want to express my thanks to Smith, who was CEO until last month, for their sterling work over the past couple of years, and the support for me over that time.”
    UKGBC chair Judith Everett said: “Simon brings strong relationships across the built environment sector, government and our partners, attuned to the nature and climate crises we face.
    His sector experience across domestic and international networks, and – supported by UKGBC’s passionate and capable team – makes him well-placed to lead this next phase.”
    The appointment comes as the UKGBC launches a new team providing market and development advice, composed of sustainability experts from firms including Arup, Cundall, WSP and Mott MacDonald.
    #smith #mordak #replaced #simon #mcwhirter
    Smith Mordak replaced by Simon McWhirter as boss of UKGBC
    Mordak served just two years as chief executive of industry charity that campaigns on sustainability issuesSmith Mordak is no longer chief executive at the UK Green Building Council, the organisation has said without giving a reason for their departure. Mordak, who was appointed chief executive by the charity’s board of trustees in June 2023, was replaced by former deputy chief executive Simon McWhirter at the end of May. In a post on LinkedIn, Mordak said: “After two years working as CEO of UKGBC, my tenure has come to an end.   Smith Mordak’s role as chief executive ended at the end of last month “Collaborating with such dedicated colleagues to foster a safe, fair, and sustainable built environment has been an immense privilege, and I am deeply proud of what we’ve accomplished together.” Mordak, who changed their current role on LinkedIn to freelance at the beginning of this month, said they “look forward to sharing more about my own new ventures in due course”. The UKGBC said Mordak had been chief executive until last month and there had since been a “change of leadership”, but declined to clarify why Mordak’s role had ended at the charity, which does not set fixed terms for its chief executives. “Smith brought a wealth of industry knowledge, deep technical expertise, first-hand insights of creating sustainable places, and as a passionate campaigner for action on the environmental crises and to engender an equitable society,” the organisation said. “During the last two years, we have valued the expertise and energy that they have brought to the UKGBC as the organisation continues to evolve. We would like to take this opportunity to wish them all the very best for their future endeavours.” McWhirter was appointed UKGBC director of communications, policy and places in August 2021, becoming deputy chief executive in April 2023.  He has a background spanning sustainability advocacy, communications, finance, political engagement and property development in organisations including the WWF and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. He said: “Having been involved with UKGBC since its formation - as a consultant, member company, and most recently deputy CEO - I know the awesome collaborative power we can bring to the challenge of positioning our buildings as a real lever for change, to tackle the climate and nature crises we’re facing”. He added: “I want to express my thanks to Smith, who was CEO until last month, for their sterling work over the past couple of years, and the support for me over that time.” UKGBC chair Judith Everett said: “Simon brings strong relationships across the built environment sector, government and our partners, attuned to the nature and climate crises we face. His sector experience across domestic and international networks, and – supported by UKGBC’s passionate and capable team – makes him well-placed to lead this next phase.” The appointment comes as the UKGBC launches a new team providing market and development advice, composed of sustainability experts from firms including Arup, Cundall, WSP and Mott MacDonald. #smith #mordak #replaced #simon #mcwhirter
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Smith Mordak replaced by Simon McWhirter as boss of UKGBC
    Mordak served just two years as chief executive of industry charity that campaigns on sustainability issuesSmith Mordak is no longer chief executive at the UK Green Building Council (UKGBC), the organisation has said without giving a reason for their departure. Mordak, who was appointed chief executive by the charity’s board of trustees in June 2023, was replaced by former deputy chief executive Simon McWhirter at the end of May. In a post on LinkedIn, Mordak said: “After two years working as CEO of UKGBC, my tenure has come to an end.   Smith Mordak’s role as chief executive ended at the end of last month “Collaborating with such dedicated colleagues to foster a safe, fair, and sustainable built environment has been an immense privilege, and I am deeply proud of what we’ve accomplished together.” Mordak, who changed their current role on LinkedIn to freelance at the beginning of this month, said they “look forward to sharing more about my own new ventures in due course”. The UKGBC said Mordak had been chief executive until last month and there had since been a “change of leadership”, but declined to clarify why Mordak’s role had ended at the charity, which does not set fixed terms for its chief executives. “Smith brought a wealth of industry knowledge, deep technical expertise, first-hand insights of creating sustainable places, and as a passionate campaigner for action on the environmental crises and to engender an equitable society,” the organisation said. “During the last two years, we have valued the expertise and energy that they have brought to the UKGBC as the organisation continues to evolve. We would like to take this opportunity to wish them all the very best for their future endeavours.” McWhirter was appointed UKGBC director of communications, policy and places in August 2021, becoming deputy chief executive in April 2023.  He has a background spanning sustainability advocacy, communications, finance, political engagement and property development in organisations including the WWF and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. He said: “Having been involved with UKGBC since its formation - as a consultant, member company, and most recently deputy CEO - I know the awesome collaborative power we can bring to the challenge of positioning our buildings as a real lever for change, to tackle the climate and nature crises we’re facing”. He added: “I want to express my thanks to Smith, who was CEO until last month, for their sterling work over the past couple of years, and the support for me over that time.” UKGBC chair Judith Everett said: “Simon brings strong relationships across the built environment sector, government and our partners, attuned to the nature and climate crises we face. His sector experience across domestic and international networks, and – supported by UKGBC’s passionate and capable team – makes him well-placed to lead this next phase.” The appointment comes as the UKGBC launches a new team providing market and development advice, composed of sustainability experts from firms including Arup, Cundall, WSP and Mott MacDonald.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    235
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Patel Taylor unveils images for 54-storey Canary Wharf tower

    How the 54-storey towerwould look when built
    Architect Patel Taylor has unveiled images of what one of London’s tallest residential towers in Canary Wharf would look like.
    The 54-storey 77 Marsh Wall scheme is being developed by Areli Developments on behalf of British Airways Pension Trustees and would contain around 820 homes above a mixed-use podium which will include retail, restaurant and café space.
    It would be Canary Wharf’s third tallest tower if built, behind the 235m One Canada Square and 233m Landmark Pinnacle.
    The scheme would require the demolition of the site’s existing building, a 17-storey office block built in the early 1990s known as Sierra Quebec Bravo.

    The 77 Marsh Wall scheme would include restaurants and retail at ground floor level
    Areli said the existing building offers “very little in the way of benefits to the community” and that it wanted to maximise the “unique and exciting” potential of the waterfront site with new public spaces, shops and restaurants.
    The podium would contain around 4,000sq m of retail, leisure and workspace along with a cinema and cycle parking under early plans aired in a public consultation. Green space is also included in the plans which saw two public consultation events held last month.
    Homes in the tower above the podium would be of a mix of tenures including shared ownership, build to rent, social rent, apart-hotel and co-living.

    The site’s existing 17-storey office block would be demolished
    An environmental impact assessment scoping report has been drawn up by consultant Trium for to Tower Hamlets council with a planning application expected to be submitted later this summer.
    Other firms currently on the project team include planning consultant DP9 and communications firm Kanda Consulting.
    #patel #taylor #unveils #images #54storey
    Patel Taylor unveils images for 54-storey Canary Wharf tower
    How the 54-storey towerwould look when built Architect Patel Taylor has unveiled images of what one of London’s tallest residential towers in Canary Wharf would look like. The 54-storey 77 Marsh Wall scheme is being developed by Areli Developments on behalf of British Airways Pension Trustees and would contain around 820 homes above a mixed-use podium which will include retail, restaurant and café space. It would be Canary Wharf’s third tallest tower if built, behind the 235m One Canada Square and 233m Landmark Pinnacle. The scheme would require the demolition of the site’s existing building, a 17-storey office block built in the early 1990s known as Sierra Quebec Bravo. The 77 Marsh Wall scheme would include restaurants and retail at ground floor level Areli said the existing building offers “very little in the way of benefits to the community” and that it wanted to maximise the “unique and exciting” potential of the waterfront site with new public spaces, shops and restaurants. The podium would contain around 4,000sq m of retail, leisure and workspace along with a cinema and cycle parking under early plans aired in a public consultation. Green space is also included in the plans which saw two public consultation events held last month. Homes in the tower above the podium would be of a mix of tenures including shared ownership, build to rent, social rent, apart-hotel and co-living. The site’s existing 17-storey office block would be demolished An environmental impact assessment scoping report has been drawn up by consultant Trium for to Tower Hamlets council with a planning application expected to be submitted later this summer. Other firms currently on the project team include planning consultant DP9 and communications firm Kanda Consulting. #patel #taylor #unveils #images #54storey
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Patel Taylor unveils images for 54-storey Canary Wharf tower
    How the 54-storey tower (centre) would look when built Architect Patel Taylor has unveiled images of what one of London’s tallest residential towers in Canary Wharf would look like. The 54-storey 77 Marsh Wall scheme is being developed by Areli Developments on behalf of British Airways Pension Trustees and would contain around 820 homes above a mixed-use podium which will include retail, restaurant and café space. It would be Canary Wharf’s third tallest tower if built, behind the 235m One Canada Square and 233m Landmark Pinnacle. The scheme would require the demolition of the site’s existing building, a 17-storey office block built in the early 1990s known as Sierra Quebec Bravo. The 77 Marsh Wall scheme would include restaurants and retail at ground floor level Areli said the existing building offers “very little in the way of benefits to the community” and that it wanted to maximise the “unique and exciting” potential of the waterfront site with new public spaces, shops and restaurants. The podium would contain around 4,000sq m of retail, leisure and workspace along with a cinema and cycle parking under early plans aired in a public consultation. Green space is also included in the plans which saw two public consultation events held last month. Homes in the tower above the podium would be of a mix of tenures including shared ownership, build to rent, social rent, apart-hotel and co-living. The site’s existing 17-storey office block would be demolished An environmental impact assessment scoping report has been drawn up by consultant Trium for to Tower Hamlets council with a planning application expected to be submitted later this summer. Other firms currently on the project team include planning consultant DP9 and communications firm Kanda Consulting.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Stantec wins competition to rebuild State Tax University in Ukraine

    The new campus in Irpin, west of Kyiv, is intended to act as a hub for research and regeneration following wartime destruction

    Source: StantecStantec’s winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, Ukraine
    Stantec has been named the winner of an international architectural competition to redesign the State Tax University in Irpin, Ukraine, after the partial destruction of its campus during the early stages of Russia’s invasion. 
    Located approximately 20 kilometres from Kyiv, the State Tax University specialises in training students in public finance, law and accounting.
    The competition was organised by the US-based nonprofit Center for Innovation, in partnership with the university itself, Ukraine’s Ministry of Finance, and Dobrobat, a Ukrainian volunteer construction organisation that supports the reconstruction of housing and social infrastructure.
    A total of 49 entries from 18 countries were submitted, with the jury composed of Ukrainian, European and American architects. The competition brief sought submissions that addressed a broad range of goals, including sustainability, equity and accessibility.
    Stantec’s proposal is intended to reflect the identity of Irpin, nicknamed the “City of Parks”, and aims to combine educational, ecological and civic functions within a new campus framework. The scheme is described as inclusive and adaptive, applying a “Design for All” ethos in response to the university’s stated ambitions of becoming an international research institution.
    The design retains the footprint of the destroyed main building and reinterprets it as a central civic and academic space. The proposed structure is envisaged as an open and permeable environment, with shared areas intended to promote collaboration and exchange.

    Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec

    Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec

    Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec

    1/4
    show caption

    Commenting on the outcome, jury chair Wendy Hillis said: “The jury unanimously agreed that this submission presented a strong engagement with the city of Irpin and the forest nearby. We liked the openness of the plan and the way the proposed buildings draw people into the site while also offering transparency of common areas.”
    Stantec design director Dathe Wong said: “It is a privilege to contribute to a project that will heal, inspire, and imagine a brighter future through the power of education, community, and design.”
    Dymtro Serebrianskyi, acting rector of the university, added: “Designing an architecturally significant and sustainable building will inspire students and faculty and continue to support Ukraine.”
    #stantec #wins #competition #rebuild #state
    Stantec wins competition to rebuild State Tax University in Ukraine
    The new campus in Irpin, west of Kyiv, is intended to act as a hub for research and regeneration following wartime destruction Source: StantecStantec’s winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, Ukraine Stantec has been named the winner of an international architectural competition to redesign the State Tax University in Irpin, Ukraine, after the partial destruction of its campus during the early stages of Russia’s invasion.  Located approximately 20 kilometres from Kyiv, the State Tax University specialises in training students in public finance, law and accounting. The competition was organised by the US-based nonprofit Center for Innovation, in partnership with the university itself, Ukraine’s Ministry of Finance, and Dobrobat, a Ukrainian volunteer construction organisation that supports the reconstruction of housing and social infrastructure. A total of 49 entries from 18 countries were submitted, with the jury composed of Ukrainian, European and American architects. The competition brief sought submissions that addressed a broad range of goals, including sustainability, equity and accessibility. Stantec’s proposal is intended to reflect the identity of Irpin, nicknamed the “City of Parks”, and aims to combine educational, ecological and civic functions within a new campus framework. The scheme is described as inclusive and adaptive, applying a “Design for All” ethos in response to the university’s stated ambitions of becoming an international research institution. The design retains the footprint of the destroyed main building and reinterprets it as a central civic and academic space. The proposed structure is envisaged as an open and permeable environment, with shared areas intended to promote collaboration and exchange. Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec 1/4 show caption Commenting on the outcome, jury chair Wendy Hillis said: “The jury unanimously agreed that this submission presented a strong engagement with the city of Irpin and the forest nearby. We liked the openness of the plan and the way the proposed buildings draw people into the site while also offering transparency of common areas.” Stantec design director Dathe Wong said: “It is a privilege to contribute to a project that will heal, inspire, and imagine a brighter future through the power of education, community, and design.” Dymtro Serebrianskyi, acting rector of the university, added: “Designing an architecturally significant and sustainable building will inspire students and faculty and continue to support Ukraine.” #stantec #wins #competition #rebuild #state
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Stantec wins competition to rebuild State Tax University in Ukraine
    The new campus in Irpin, west of Kyiv, is intended to act as a hub for research and regeneration following wartime destruction Source: StantecStantec’s winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, Ukraine Stantec has been named the winner of an international architectural competition to redesign the State Tax University in Irpin, Ukraine, after the partial destruction of its campus during the early stages of Russia’s invasion.  Located approximately 20 kilometres from Kyiv, the State Tax University specialises in training students in public finance, law and accounting. The competition was organised by the US-based nonprofit Center for Innovation, in partnership with the university itself, Ukraine’s Ministry of Finance, and Dobrobat, a Ukrainian volunteer construction organisation that supports the reconstruction of housing and social infrastructure. A total of 49 entries from 18 countries were submitted, with the jury composed of Ukrainian, European and American architects. The competition brief sought submissions that addressed a broad range of goals, including sustainability, equity and accessibility. Stantec’s proposal is intended to reflect the identity of Irpin, nicknamed the “City of Parks”, and aims to combine educational, ecological and civic functions within a new campus framework. The scheme is described as inclusive and adaptive, applying a “Design for All” ethos in response to the university’s stated ambitions of becoming an international research institution. The design retains the footprint of the destroyed main building and reinterprets it as a central civic and academic space. The proposed structure is envisaged as an open and permeable environment, with shared areas intended to promote collaboration and exchange. Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec Stantec's winning design for the State Tax University in Irpin, UkraineSource: Stantec 1/4 show caption Commenting on the outcome, jury chair Wendy Hillis said: “The jury unanimously agreed that this submission presented a strong engagement with the city of Irpin and the forest nearby. We liked the openness of the plan and the way the proposed buildings draw people into the site while also offering transparency of common areas.” Stantec design director Dathe Wong said: “It is a privilege to contribute to a project that will heal, inspire, and imagine a brighter future through the power of education, community, and design.” Dymtro Serebrianskyi, acting rector of the university, added: “Designing an architecturally significant and sustainable building will inspire students and faculty and continue to support Ukraine.”
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Government fast-tracks LDA Design and Fereday Pollard-designed reservoirs in Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire

    Schemes designated ‘nationally significant’ as part of wider efforts to unlock housing growth and address long-term infrastructure shortfalls

    Source: LDA DesignA rendering of the proposed new Lincolnshire reservoir
    Two new reservoir projects proposed by Anglian Water and Cambridge Water have been awarded nationally significant infrastructure status, with the government stepping in to fast-track the planning process amid growing concern about the impact of water shortages on housing and economic development.
    The reservoirs, located near March in Cambridgeshire and south of Sleaford in Lincolnshire, are now set to bypass the local decision-making process and will be determined directly by Steve Read, the environment secretary. The intervention forms part of the government’s broader “plan for change”, which seeks to accelerate the delivery of 150 major infrastructure projects and support the construction of 1.5 million new homes by the end of the current parliament.
    Design proposals, developed by LDA Design and Fereday Pollard, include sculpted embankments formed from excavated soil, integrated wetland habitats and publicly accessible routes intended to support recreation and biodiversity.
    According to government figures, the Fens Reservoir is expected to supply around 87 million litres of water per day to 250,000 homes when completed in 2036. The Lincolnshire Reservoir would deliver up to 166 million litres per day for as many as 500,000 homes, with an anticipated completion date of 2040.
    The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairssaid the decision to intervene reflects the urgency of addressing regional water stress. “Today we are backing the builders not the blockers, intervening in the national interest and slashing red tape to make the planning process faster to unblock nine new reservoirs,” said water minister Emma Hardy.
    “This government will secure our water supply for future generations and unlock the building of thousands of homes as part of the plan for change.”

    Source: LDA DesignA rendering of the proposed new Fens reservoir
    The reservoirs are being brought forward against a backdrop of strained infrastructure capacity and an extended period without new large-scale water storage projects. No major reservoirs have been delivered in England since 1992.
    According to the government, the combination of population growth, ageing infrastructure and climate change has created “a significant risk that the UK could run out of clean drinking water by the middle of the next decade”.
    Water scarcity has already delayed housing development in parts of the east of England and South-east, including in Cambridge and north Sussex. The government has said that the Fens and Lincolnshire reservoirs will help to address these blockages by providing the baseline infrastructure needed for new homes to proceed.
    David Black, chief executive of Ofwat, said: “We welcome the clear focus the government is placing upon accelerating the delivery of supply and resilience schemes that will meet our future water needs and support economic growth. Alongside the £2bn of development funding announced at our 2024 price review, this will help us to deliver the largest programme of major water infrastructure projects seen in decades.”
    The Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire schemes are two of nine reservoirs across England that water companies have committed to deliver by 2050. Together, they are expected to add 670 million litres per day to the national supply.
    #government #fasttracks #lda #design #fereday
    Government fast-tracks LDA Design and Fereday Pollard-designed reservoirs in Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire
    Schemes designated ‘nationally significant’ as part of wider efforts to unlock housing growth and address long-term infrastructure shortfalls Source: LDA DesignA rendering of the proposed new Lincolnshire reservoir Two new reservoir projects proposed by Anglian Water and Cambridge Water have been awarded nationally significant infrastructure status, with the government stepping in to fast-track the planning process amid growing concern about the impact of water shortages on housing and economic development. The reservoirs, located near March in Cambridgeshire and south of Sleaford in Lincolnshire, are now set to bypass the local decision-making process and will be determined directly by Steve Read, the environment secretary. The intervention forms part of the government’s broader “plan for change”, which seeks to accelerate the delivery of 150 major infrastructure projects and support the construction of 1.5 million new homes by the end of the current parliament. Design proposals, developed by LDA Design and Fereday Pollard, include sculpted embankments formed from excavated soil, integrated wetland habitats and publicly accessible routes intended to support recreation and biodiversity. According to government figures, the Fens Reservoir is expected to supply around 87 million litres of water per day to 250,000 homes when completed in 2036. The Lincolnshire Reservoir would deliver up to 166 million litres per day for as many as 500,000 homes, with an anticipated completion date of 2040. The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairssaid the decision to intervene reflects the urgency of addressing regional water stress. “Today we are backing the builders not the blockers, intervening in the national interest and slashing red tape to make the planning process faster to unblock nine new reservoirs,” said water minister Emma Hardy. “This government will secure our water supply for future generations and unlock the building of thousands of homes as part of the plan for change.” Source: LDA DesignA rendering of the proposed new Fens reservoir The reservoirs are being brought forward against a backdrop of strained infrastructure capacity and an extended period without new large-scale water storage projects. No major reservoirs have been delivered in England since 1992. According to the government, the combination of population growth, ageing infrastructure and climate change has created “a significant risk that the UK could run out of clean drinking water by the middle of the next decade”. Water scarcity has already delayed housing development in parts of the east of England and South-east, including in Cambridge and north Sussex. The government has said that the Fens and Lincolnshire reservoirs will help to address these blockages by providing the baseline infrastructure needed for new homes to proceed. David Black, chief executive of Ofwat, said: “We welcome the clear focus the government is placing upon accelerating the delivery of supply and resilience schemes that will meet our future water needs and support economic growth. Alongside the £2bn of development funding announced at our 2024 price review, this will help us to deliver the largest programme of major water infrastructure projects seen in decades.” The Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire schemes are two of nine reservoirs across England that water companies have committed to deliver by 2050. Together, they are expected to add 670 million litres per day to the national supply. #government #fasttracks #lda #design #fereday
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Government fast-tracks LDA Design and Fereday Pollard-designed reservoirs in Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire
    Schemes designated ‘nationally significant’ as part of wider efforts to unlock housing growth and address long-term infrastructure shortfalls Source: LDA DesignA rendering of the proposed new Lincolnshire reservoir Two new reservoir projects proposed by Anglian Water and Cambridge Water have been awarded nationally significant infrastructure status, with the government stepping in to fast-track the planning process amid growing concern about the impact of water shortages on housing and economic development. The reservoirs, located near March in Cambridgeshire and south of Sleaford in Lincolnshire, are now set to bypass the local decision-making process and will be determined directly by Steve Read, the environment secretary. The intervention forms part of the government’s broader “plan for change”, which seeks to accelerate the delivery of 150 major infrastructure projects and support the construction of 1.5 million new homes by the end of the current parliament. Design proposals, developed by LDA Design and Fereday Pollard, include sculpted embankments formed from excavated soil, integrated wetland habitats and publicly accessible routes intended to support recreation and biodiversity. According to government figures, the Fens Reservoir is expected to supply around 87 million litres of water per day to 250,000 homes when completed in 2036. The Lincolnshire Reservoir would deliver up to 166 million litres per day for as many as 500,000 homes, with an anticipated completion date of 2040. The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said the decision to intervene reflects the urgency of addressing regional water stress. “Today we are backing the builders not the blockers, intervening in the national interest and slashing red tape to make the planning process faster to unblock nine new reservoirs,” said water minister Emma Hardy. “This government will secure our water supply for future generations and unlock the building of thousands of homes as part of the plan for change.” Source: LDA DesignA rendering of the proposed new Fens reservoir The reservoirs are being brought forward against a backdrop of strained infrastructure capacity and an extended period without new large-scale water storage projects. No major reservoirs have been delivered in England since 1992. According to the government, the combination of population growth, ageing infrastructure and climate change has created “a significant risk that the UK could run out of clean drinking water by the middle of the next decade”. Water scarcity has already delayed housing development in parts of the east of England and South-east, including in Cambridge and north Sussex. The government has said that the Fens and Lincolnshire reservoirs will help to address these blockages by providing the baseline infrastructure needed for new homes to proceed. David Black, chief executive of Ofwat, said: “We welcome the clear focus the government is placing upon accelerating the delivery of supply and resilience schemes that will meet our future water needs and support economic growth. Alongside the £2bn of development funding announced at our 2024 price review, this will help us to deliver the largest programme of major water infrastructure projects seen in decades.” The Cambridgeshire and Lincolnshire schemes are two of nine reservoirs across England that water companies have committed to deliver by 2050. Together, they are expected to add 670 million litres per day to the national supply.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • ARB sets out plans to reform professional experience for trainee architects

    The Architects Registration Boardhas published an action plan outlining changes to the way in which trainee architects gain and record their professional practical experience, following recommendations made by its independent Professional Practical Experience Commission.
    The reforms include the introduction of a new co-ordinating role for learning providers and the creation of a standardised record of competencyfor trainees. The measures are intended to improve access to high-quality and consistent professional experience, and to address concerns over the uneven and sometimes unsupported nature of the current process.
    ARB intends to work with architectural education providers and other stakeholders through a series of focus groups to develop the new co-ordinating role. The responsibilities of this role will be detailed in ARB’s Standards for Learning Providers and its accreditation handbook, and will be subject to public consultation.
    The new ROC is intended to provide a more structured and consistent way for trainees to record their experience. Minimum requirements for evidencing practical experience will be set by ARB.
    ARB has said the changes seek to shift some of the responsibility and risk currently borne by trainees onto institutions better placed to provide oversight. The intention is to prioritise outcomes and provide a more transparent and supportive framework for those seeking registration.
    Alan Kershaw, chair of ARB, said: “Professional practical experience is central to a trainee’s journey to becoming an architect and achieving professional registration. The plan that we have set out today recognises the vital role learning providers play in shaping how aspiring architects gain the experience they need.
    “The new co-ordinating role will need to work for all learning providers, so we’re going to design it with them to ensure it is flexible but also, crucially, effective for trainees.”
    The action plan accepts all but one of the commission’s recommendations. ARB does not currently plan to make continuing professional developmentin mentoring a mandatory requirement, but has acknowledged the role mentoring could play in supporting wider cultural change across the profession.
    The regulator is exploring ways to help architects develop mentoring skills.
    A full breakdown of the actions and implementation timelines is available on the ARB website. ARB is inviting stakeholders to join the development process via its Architectural Educators Engagement Network.
    #arb #sets #out #plans #reform
    ARB sets out plans to reform professional experience for trainee architects
    The Architects Registration Boardhas published an action plan outlining changes to the way in which trainee architects gain and record their professional practical experience, following recommendations made by its independent Professional Practical Experience Commission. The reforms include the introduction of a new co-ordinating role for learning providers and the creation of a standardised record of competencyfor trainees. The measures are intended to improve access to high-quality and consistent professional experience, and to address concerns over the uneven and sometimes unsupported nature of the current process. ARB intends to work with architectural education providers and other stakeholders through a series of focus groups to develop the new co-ordinating role. The responsibilities of this role will be detailed in ARB’s Standards for Learning Providers and its accreditation handbook, and will be subject to public consultation. The new ROC is intended to provide a more structured and consistent way for trainees to record their experience. Minimum requirements for evidencing practical experience will be set by ARB. ARB has said the changes seek to shift some of the responsibility and risk currently borne by trainees onto institutions better placed to provide oversight. The intention is to prioritise outcomes and provide a more transparent and supportive framework for those seeking registration. Alan Kershaw, chair of ARB, said: “Professional practical experience is central to a trainee’s journey to becoming an architect and achieving professional registration. The plan that we have set out today recognises the vital role learning providers play in shaping how aspiring architects gain the experience they need. “The new co-ordinating role will need to work for all learning providers, so we’re going to design it with them to ensure it is flexible but also, crucially, effective for trainees.” The action plan accepts all but one of the commission’s recommendations. ARB does not currently plan to make continuing professional developmentin mentoring a mandatory requirement, but has acknowledged the role mentoring could play in supporting wider cultural change across the profession. The regulator is exploring ways to help architects develop mentoring skills. A full breakdown of the actions and implementation timelines is available on the ARB website. ARB is inviting stakeholders to join the development process via its Architectural Educators Engagement Network. #arb #sets #out #plans #reform
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    ARB sets out plans to reform professional experience for trainee architects
    The Architects Registration Board (ARB) has published an action plan outlining changes to the way in which trainee architects gain and record their professional practical experience, following recommendations made by its independent Professional Practical Experience Commission. The reforms include the introduction of a new co-ordinating role for learning providers and the creation of a standardised record of competency (ROC) for trainees. The measures are intended to improve access to high-quality and consistent professional experience, and to address concerns over the uneven and sometimes unsupported nature of the current process. ARB intends to work with architectural education providers and other stakeholders through a series of focus groups to develop the new co-ordinating role. The responsibilities of this role will be detailed in ARB’s Standards for Learning Providers and its accreditation handbook, and will be subject to public consultation. The new ROC is intended to provide a more structured and consistent way for trainees to record their experience. Minimum requirements for evidencing practical experience will be set by ARB. ARB has said the changes seek to shift some of the responsibility and risk currently borne by trainees onto institutions better placed to provide oversight. The intention is to prioritise outcomes and provide a more transparent and supportive framework for those seeking registration. Alan Kershaw, chair of ARB, said: “Professional practical experience is central to a trainee’s journey to becoming an architect and achieving professional registration. The plan that we have set out today recognises the vital role learning providers play in shaping how aspiring architects gain the experience they need. “The new co-ordinating role will need to work for all learning providers, so we’re going to design it with them to ensure it is flexible but also, crucially, effective for trainees.” The action plan accepts all but one of the commission’s recommendations. ARB does not currently plan to make continuing professional development (CPD) in mentoring a mandatory requirement, but has acknowledged the role mentoring could play in supporting wider cultural change across the profession. The regulator is exploring ways to help architects develop mentoring skills. A full breakdown of the actions and implementation timelines is available on the ARB website. ARB is inviting stakeholders to join the development process via its Architectural Educators Engagement Network.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Pollard Thomas Edwards gets green light for next phase of £200m revamp around Hertfordshire station

    300 homes have already been built at Bishop’s Stortford siteA £200m plan by Network Rail to turn an area around Bishop’s Stortford station in Hertfordshire into new homes and commercial space has been approved by the local council.

    Under the plans, more than 700 homes will be built at the former Goods Yard 
    The network operator has teamed up with Kier’s property arm to turn the area around the Goods Yard into more than 400 homes.
    Called Solum Regeneration, the pair have already built more than 300 homes a multi-storey car park after East Herts district council gave the original scheme the green light in 2018.
    The latest proposals, designed by Pollard Thomas Edwards, follow a masterplan that was endorsed by the council three years ago. The scheme  includes 423 homes, improved pedestrian links from the station to the town centre and upgrades to the station forecourt. 
    Solum Regeneration is a joint venture between Network Rail and Kier Property which has been set up to bring private investment into the rail network by generating funds from the development of under-used railway land.
    #pollard #thomas #edwards #gets #green
    Pollard Thomas Edwards gets green light for next phase of £200m revamp around Hertfordshire station
    300 homes have already been built at Bishop’s Stortford siteA £200m plan by Network Rail to turn an area around Bishop’s Stortford station in Hertfordshire into new homes and commercial space has been approved by the local council. Under the plans, more than 700 homes will be built at the former Goods Yard  The network operator has teamed up with Kier’s property arm to turn the area around the Goods Yard into more than 400 homes. Called Solum Regeneration, the pair have already built more than 300 homes a multi-storey car park after East Herts district council gave the original scheme the green light in 2018. The latest proposals, designed by Pollard Thomas Edwards, follow a masterplan that was endorsed by the council three years ago. The scheme  includes 423 homes, improved pedestrian links from the station to the town centre and upgrades to the station forecourt.  Solum Regeneration is a joint venture between Network Rail and Kier Property which has been set up to bring private investment into the rail network by generating funds from the development of under-used railway land. #pollard #thomas #edwards #gets #green
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Pollard Thomas Edwards gets green light for next phase of £200m revamp around Hertfordshire station
    300 homes have already been built at Bishop’s Stortford siteA £200m plan by Network Rail to turn an area around Bishop’s Stortford station in Hertfordshire into new homes and commercial space has been approved by the local council. Under the plans, more than 700 homes will be built at the former Goods Yard  The network operator has teamed up with Kier’s property arm to turn the area around the Goods Yard into more than 400 homes. Called Solum Regeneration, the pair have already built more than 300 homes a multi-storey car park after East Herts district council gave the original scheme the green light in 2018. The latest proposals, designed by Pollard Thomas Edwards, follow a masterplan that was endorsed by the council three years ago. The scheme  includes 423 homes, improved pedestrian links from the station to the town centre and upgrades to the station forecourt.  Solum Regeneration is a joint venture between Network Rail and Kier Property which has been set up to bring private investment into the rail network by generating funds from the development of under-used railway land.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • First look at Diller Scofidio + Renfro’s V&A East Storehouse

    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story

    Existing subscriber? LOGIN
    A subscription to Building Design will provide:

    Unlimited architecture news from around the UK
    Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
    Full access to all our online archives
    PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45.

    Subscribe now for unlimited access.

    Subscribe today

    Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts
    #first #look #diller #scofidio #renfros
    First look at Diller Scofidio + Renfro’s V&A East Storehouse
    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story Existing subscriber? LOGIN A subscription to Building Design will provide: Unlimited architecture news from around the UK Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world Full access to all our online archives PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45. Subscribe now for unlimited access. Subscribe today Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts #first #look #diller #scofidio #renfros
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    First look at Diller Scofidio + Renfro’s V&A East Storehouse
    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story Existing subscriber? LOGIN A subscription to Building Design will provide: Unlimited architecture news from around the UK Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world Full access to all our online archives PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45. Subscribe now for unlimited access. Subscribe today Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts
    12 Comments 0 Shares
  • Adjaye Associates unveils design for children’s cancer centre in Ghana

    The campus will be West Africa's first dedicated children's cancer research centre

    1/5
    show caption

    Adjaye Associates has unveiled its designs for a research centre in Ghana which will be West Africa’s first institution dedicated entirely to the treated of childhood cancers.
    The  225,000sq m International Children’s Cancer Research Centrein Kyebi has been designed for the Wish4Life Foundation, a US nonprofit based in New York.
    Set on the eastern slopes of the Atewa Range, the centre is envisioned as a “holistic sanctuary for healing, research, teaching, and community”.
    It aims to increase survival rates from the region’s current approximation of 10% to levels approaching the 80% benchmark seen in the United States. 
    Adjaye Associates said the project represents a new model for paediatric care rooted in local traditions, supported by global excellence, and built to be financially self sustaining.  
    The firm’s design has been inspired by local beliefs that illness is a disrupotion of personal and communal harmony, with the centre to be rooted in biophilic design to integrate it into the surrounded forested landscape.

    Aerial view of the campus masterplan
    David Adjaye said: “I believe design can provide a critical inquiry into social responsibility and civic consciousness. I have always sought to work out the aesthetics of this inquiry in my work. At its best, architecture should contribute to a social change agenda.”
    Buildings will be constructed using locally sourced materials including rammed earth, composite earth slabs, timber, and clay brickwork.
    Pre-cast low-carbon concrete screens that shade clinical and research buildings reference Kente weaving patterns, embedding ancestral memory and cultural identity into the architecture. 
    Passive cooling, site-specific orientation, and photovoltaic energy systems aim to ensure sustainability and resilience in the face of changing environmental conditions.
    The ICCRC campus includes a children’s hospital, advanced research laboratories, a training institute for oncologists, staff and family residences, a chapel, and a dedicated family support centre.
    #adjaye #associates #unveils #design #childrens
    Adjaye Associates unveils design for children’s cancer centre in Ghana
    The campus will be West Africa's first dedicated children's cancer research centre 1/5 show caption Adjaye Associates has unveiled its designs for a research centre in Ghana which will be West Africa’s first institution dedicated entirely to the treated of childhood cancers. The  225,000sq m International Children’s Cancer Research Centrein Kyebi has been designed for the Wish4Life Foundation, a US nonprofit based in New York. Set on the eastern slopes of the Atewa Range, the centre is envisioned as a “holistic sanctuary for healing, research, teaching, and community”. It aims to increase survival rates from the region’s current approximation of 10% to levels approaching the 80% benchmark seen in the United States.  Adjaye Associates said the project represents a new model for paediatric care rooted in local traditions, supported by global excellence, and built to be financially self sustaining.   The firm’s design has been inspired by local beliefs that illness is a disrupotion of personal and communal harmony, with the centre to be rooted in biophilic design to integrate it into the surrounded forested landscape. Aerial view of the campus masterplan David Adjaye said: “I believe design can provide a critical inquiry into social responsibility and civic consciousness. I have always sought to work out the aesthetics of this inquiry in my work. At its best, architecture should contribute to a social change agenda.” Buildings will be constructed using locally sourced materials including rammed earth, composite earth slabs, timber, and clay brickwork. Pre-cast low-carbon concrete screens that shade clinical and research buildings reference Kente weaving patterns, embedding ancestral memory and cultural identity into the architecture.  Passive cooling, site-specific orientation, and photovoltaic energy systems aim to ensure sustainability and resilience in the face of changing environmental conditions. The ICCRC campus includes a children’s hospital, advanced research laboratories, a training institute for oncologists, staff and family residences, a chapel, and a dedicated family support centre. #adjaye #associates #unveils #design #childrens
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Adjaye Associates unveils design for children’s cancer centre in Ghana
    The campus will be West Africa's first dedicated children's cancer research centre 1/5 show caption Adjaye Associates has unveiled its designs for a research centre in Ghana which will be West Africa’s first institution dedicated entirely to the treated of childhood cancers. The  225,000sq m International Children’s Cancer Research Centre (ICCRC) in Kyebi has been designed for the Wish4Life Foundation, a US nonprofit based in New York. Set on the eastern slopes of the Atewa Range, the centre is envisioned as a “holistic sanctuary for healing, research, teaching, and community”. It aims to increase survival rates from the region’s current approximation of 10% to levels approaching the 80% benchmark seen in the United States.  Adjaye Associates said the project represents a new model for paediatric care rooted in local traditions, supported by global excellence, and built to be financially self sustaining.   The firm’s design has been inspired by local beliefs that illness is a disrupotion of personal and communal harmony, with the centre to be rooted in biophilic design to integrate it into the surrounded forested landscape. Aerial view of the campus masterplan David Adjaye said: “I believe design can provide a critical inquiry into social responsibility and civic consciousness. I have always sought to work out the aesthetics of this inquiry in my work. At its best, architecture should contribute to a social change agenda.” Buildings will be constructed using locally sourced materials including rammed earth, composite earth slabs, timber, and clay brickwork. Pre-cast low-carbon concrete screens that shade clinical and research buildings reference Kente weaving patterns, embedding ancestral memory and cultural identity into the architecture.  Passive cooling, site-specific orientation, and photovoltaic energy systems aim to ensure sustainability and resilience in the face of changing environmental conditions. The ICCRC campus includes a children’s hospital, advanced research laboratories, a training institute for oncologists, staff and family residences, a chapel, and a dedicated family support centre.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Housebuilders will face ‘delayed homes penalty’ if they fail to build to promised timeframes, Rayner announces

    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story

    Existing subscriber? LOGIN
    A subscription to Building Design will provide:

    Unlimited architecture news from around the UK
    Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
    Full access to all our online archives
    PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45.

    Subscribe now for unlimited access.

    Subscribe today

    Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts
    #housebuilders #will #face #delayed #homes
    Housebuilders will face ‘delayed homes penalty’ if they fail to build to promised timeframes, Rayner announces
    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story Existing subscriber? LOGIN A subscription to Building Design will provide: Unlimited architecture news from around the UK Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world Full access to all our online archives PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45. Subscribe now for unlimited access. Subscribe today Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts #housebuilders #will #face #delayed #homes
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Housebuilders will face ‘delayed homes penalty’ if they fail to build to promised timeframes, Rayner announces
    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story Existing subscriber? LOGIN A subscription to Building Design will provide: Unlimited architecture news from around the UK Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world Full access to all our online archives PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45. Subscribe now for unlimited access. Subscribe today Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Building Safety Regulator considering taking ‘firmer approach’ to bad gateway 2 submissions

    The Building Safety Regulatoris looking at taking a “firmer approach” by rejecting more gateway 2 applications outright as it seeks to decrease delays in building control approval, the organisation’s chief has said.
    Since taking over the building control for higher-risk buildings, the regulator has been subject to a stream of criticism from the housing development sector over delays of up to 11 months to approval at the ‘gateway 2’ pre-construction stage.

    Source: Shutterstock
    In a statement published on the government’s website, Philip White, chief inspector of buildings at BSR, he stressed that “industry needs to step up and comply with the process” in providing good quality applications.
    White indicated that the regulator could begin taking a different approach in how it handles poor quality applications in order to ensure more complete submissions are not delayed. 
    > Also read: Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals
    He said that the regulator’s attempts to engage with applicants rather than simply rejecting submissions had meant that applications “take longer and appear to be delayed”.
    “Of course, the time we spend on those incomplete applications is time we can’t spend on others, some of which would be perfectly good to go,” he said.
    He said a shift in method could mean the regulator takes a “firmer approach to rejecting those applications that aren’t making the bar straight away”.
    He explained that a backlog of cases which built up last summer was “almost cleared”, but the regulator was still struggling with poor quality applications.
    White explained that application volumes had been “steady” when it first took on building control for higher-risk buildings, but that things changed in Spring 2024 when transitional arrangements from the pre-Building Safety Act regime came to an end and private building control suffered a collapse.
    He said the “temporary backlog of cases” that subsequently built up before July 2024 had nearly been dealt with by the regulator.
    While White said there were “a small set of applications from the pre-July backlog that have been in the system for a long time”, approval times had otherwise come down. He said that for other applications, the average Gateway 2 handling time was now around 16 to 18 weeks.
    However, he stressed that “industry needs to step up and comply with the process” in providing good quality applications.
    The most recent data showed 44% of applications were still being rejected at the validation stage, which is a simple administration check that all the required documents have been supplied.
    He emphasised that the process was not “red tape for the sake of it”, but that it was “preventing risks and problems from being designed into the built environment”.
    “It’s about making sure residents have safe and quality homes and avoiding costly works at a later date. Or homeowners not being able to secure lending and insurance,” he said.
    He also outlined some of the most common and serious failures in applications. These included missing details on how key structural components connect, inadequate information on fire resistance of cladding, walls or barriers, corridors that don’t meet evacuation width requirements and poorly designed or unproven smoke extraction systems. 
    “These aren’t minor omissions – they present significant safety risks and lead to delays in the approval process,” he said.
    #building #safety #regulator #considering #taking
    Building Safety Regulator considering taking ‘firmer approach’ to bad gateway 2 submissions
    The Building Safety Regulatoris looking at taking a “firmer approach” by rejecting more gateway 2 applications outright as it seeks to decrease delays in building control approval, the organisation’s chief has said. Since taking over the building control for higher-risk buildings, the regulator has been subject to a stream of criticism from the housing development sector over delays of up to 11 months to approval at the ‘gateway 2’ pre-construction stage. Source: Shutterstock In a statement published on the government’s website, Philip White, chief inspector of buildings at BSR, he stressed that “industry needs to step up and comply with the process” in providing good quality applications. White indicated that the regulator could begin taking a different approach in how it handles poor quality applications in order to ensure more complete submissions are not delayed.  > Also read: Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals He said that the regulator’s attempts to engage with applicants rather than simply rejecting submissions had meant that applications “take longer and appear to be delayed”. “Of course, the time we spend on those incomplete applications is time we can’t spend on others, some of which would be perfectly good to go,” he said. He said a shift in method could mean the regulator takes a “firmer approach to rejecting those applications that aren’t making the bar straight away”. He explained that a backlog of cases which built up last summer was “almost cleared”, but the regulator was still struggling with poor quality applications. White explained that application volumes had been “steady” when it first took on building control for higher-risk buildings, but that things changed in Spring 2024 when transitional arrangements from the pre-Building Safety Act regime came to an end and private building control suffered a collapse. He said the “temporary backlog of cases” that subsequently built up before July 2024 had nearly been dealt with by the regulator. While White said there were “a small set of applications from the pre-July backlog that have been in the system for a long time”, approval times had otherwise come down. He said that for other applications, the average Gateway 2 handling time was now around 16 to 18 weeks. However, he stressed that “industry needs to step up and comply with the process” in providing good quality applications. The most recent data showed 44% of applications were still being rejected at the validation stage, which is a simple administration check that all the required documents have been supplied. He emphasised that the process was not “red tape for the sake of it”, but that it was “preventing risks and problems from being designed into the built environment”. “It’s about making sure residents have safe and quality homes and avoiding costly works at a later date. Or homeowners not being able to secure lending and insurance,” he said. He also outlined some of the most common and serious failures in applications. These included missing details on how key structural components connect, inadequate information on fire resistance of cladding, walls or barriers, corridors that don’t meet evacuation width requirements and poorly designed or unproven smoke extraction systems.  “These aren’t minor omissions – they present significant safety risks and lead to delays in the approval process,” he said. #building #safety #regulator #considering #taking
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Building Safety Regulator considering taking ‘firmer approach’ to bad gateway 2 submissions
    The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) is looking at taking a “firmer approach” by rejecting more gateway 2 applications outright as it seeks to decrease delays in building control approval, the organisation’s chief has said. Since taking over the building control for higher-risk buildings, the regulator has been subject to a stream of criticism from the housing development sector over delays of up to 11 months to approval at the ‘gateway 2’ pre-construction stage. Source: Shutterstock In a statement published on the government’s website, Philip White, chief inspector of buildings at BSR, he stressed that “industry needs to step up and comply with the process” in providing good quality applications. White indicated that the regulator could begin taking a different approach in how it handles poor quality applications in order to ensure more complete submissions are not delayed.  > Also read: Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals He said that the regulator’s attempts to engage with applicants rather than simply rejecting submissions had meant that applications “take longer and appear to be delayed”. “Of course, the time we spend on those incomplete applications is time we can’t spend on others, some of which would be perfectly good to go,” he said. He said a shift in method could mean the regulator takes a “firmer approach to rejecting those applications that aren’t making the bar straight away”. He explained that a backlog of cases which built up last summer was “almost cleared”, but the regulator was still struggling with poor quality applications. White explained that application volumes had been “steady” when it first took on building control for higher-risk buildings, but that things changed in Spring 2024 when transitional arrangements from the pre-Building Safety Act regime came to an end and private building control suffered a collapse. He said the “temporary backlog of cases” that subsequently built up before July 2024 had nearly been dealt with by the regulator. While White said there were “a small set of applications from the pre-July backlog that have been in the system for a long time”, approval times had otherwise come down. He said that for other applications, the average Gateway 2 handling time was now around 16 to 18 weeks. However, he stressed that “industry needs to step up and comply with the process” in providing good quality applications. The most recent data showed 44% of applications were still being rejected at the validation stage, which is a simple administration check that all the required documents have been supplied. He emphasised that the process was not “red tape for the sake of it”, but that it was “preventing risks and problems from being designed into the built environment”. “It’s about making sure residents have safe and quality homes and avoiding costly works at a later date. Or homeowners not being able to secure lending and insurance,” he said. He also outlined some of the most common and serious failures in applications. These included missing details on how key structural components connect, inadequate information on fire resistance of cladding, walls or barriers, corridors that don’t meet evacuation width requirements and poorly designed or unproven smoke extraction systems.  “These aren’t minor omissions – they present significant safety risks and lead to delays in the approval process,” he said.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Housing planning applications at their ‘highest for three years’

    Planning applications submitted for residential developments are 44% up year-on-year, according to new figures.

    Consultancy Terraquest said 71,813 applications were submitted in the first quarter of 2025, compared to 49,776 in the same period last year. It is the largest first quarter total since 2022.
    The firm said the findings were based on its figures covering 95% of planning applications made in England.
    Geoff Keal, chief executive at Terraquest, “These figures are the strongest sign yet that England stands on the doorstep of a housebuilding boom.
    “The intent is clear from both government and developers. But unlocking the door to a housing revolution remains a major challenge for everyone involved. Intent now needs to translate into action.
    “Major housing developments have long lead times, which means we are likely only seeing the impact of the government’s intent at this stage, rather than the full effects of actual policy changes. The second and third quarters of 2025 may well hold the answers as to whether the government’s reforms are having their desired effect.”
    #housing #planning #applications #their #highest
    Housing planning applications at their ‘highest for three years’
    Planning applications submitted for residential developments are 44% up year-on-year, according to new figures. Consultancy Terraquest said 71,813 applications were submitted in the first quarter of 2025, compared to 49,776 in the same period last year. It is the largest first quarter total since 2022. The firm said the findings were based on its figures covering 95% of planning applications made in England. Geoff Keal, chief executive at Terraquest, “These figures are the strongest sign yet that England stands on the doorstep of a housebuilding boom. “The intent is clear from both government and developers. But unlocking the door to a housing revolution remains a major challenge for everyone involved. Intent now needs to translate into action. “Major housing developments have long lead times, which means we are likely only seeing the impact of the government’s intent at this stage, rather than the full effects of actual policy changes. The second and third quarters of 2025 may well hold the answers as to whether the government’s reforms are having their desired effect.” #housing #planning #applications #their #highest
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Housing planning applications at their ‘highest for three years’
    Planning applications submitted for residential developments are 44% up year-on-year, according to new figures. Consultancy Terraquest said 71,813 applications were submitted in the first quarter of 2025, compared to 49,776 in the same period last year. It is the largest first quarter total since 2022. The firm said the findings were based on its figures covering 95% of planning applications made in England. Geoff Keal, chief executive at Terraquest, “These figures are the strongest sign yet that England stands on the doorstep of a housebuilding boom. “The intent is clear from both government and developers. But unlocking the door to a housing revolution remains a major challenge for everyone involved. Intent now needs to translate into action. “Major housing developments have long lead times, which means we are likely only seeing the impact of the government’s intent at this stage, rather than the full effects of actual policy changes. The second and third quarters of 2025 may well hold the answers as to whether the government’s reforms are having their desired effect.”
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Key talking points from UKREiiF 2025

    Scene at UKREiiF 2025 outside the Canary bar
    UKREiiF is getting bigger by the year, with more than 16,000 professionals attending the 2025 construction conference in Leeds this week during three days of sunny weather, networking, panel discussions and robust amounts of booze. It has grown so big over the past few years that it seems almost to have outgrown the city of Leeds itself.
    A running joke among attendees was the varying quality of accommodation people had managed to secure. All of the budget hotels in the city were fully booked months in advance of the conference, with many - including at least one member of Parliament - reduced to kipping in bed and breakfasts of a questionable nature. Many were forced to stay in nearby towns including York, Wakefield and Bradford and catch the train to the conference each morning.
    But these snags served as ice breakers for more important conversations at an event which has come at a key pivot point for the industry. With the government on the brink of launching its 10-year industrial strategy and its new towns programme, opportunity was in the air.
    Networking events between government departments and potential suppliers of all sectors were well attended, although many discussion panels focused on the question of how all of this work would be paid for. And hanging over the conference like a storm cloud were the mounting issues at the Building Safety Regulator which are continuing to cause expensive delays to high rise schemes across the country.
    While many attendees eyed a huge amount of potential work to fill up pipelines, it was clear the industry is still facing some systemic challenges which could threaten a much-needed recovery following a long period of turmoil.

    How will the issues at the Building Safety Regulator be fixed?
    You did not even have to go inside an event titled “Gateways and Growing Pains: Tackling the Building Safety Act” to see how much this issue is affecting construction at the moment. The packed out tent was overflowing into the space outside, with those inside stood like sardines to watch a panel discussion about what has been happening in the high rise residential sector over the past year. 
    Audience members shared their horror stories of schemes which have been waiting for the best part of a year to get gateway 2 approval from the regulator, which is needed to start construction. There was a palpable sense of anger in the crowd, one professional describing the hold-ups which had affected his scheme as a “disgrace”.
    Others highlighted the apparent inconsistency of the regulator’s work. One attendee told how two identical buildings had been submitted to the regulator in separate gateway 2 applications and assigned to two separate technical teams for approval. One application had received no follow up questions, while the other had been extensively interrogated. “The industry should hold its head in shame with regard to what happened at Grenfell, but post that, it’s just complete disarray,” he said.

    More than 16,000 professionals attended the 2025 event
    While many are currently focusing on delays at pre-construction, others raised the looming gateway 3 approvals which are needed before occupation. Pareto Projects director Kuli Bajwa said: “Gateway 2 is an issue, but when we get to gateway 3, we’re committed to this project, money’s been spent, debt’s been taken out and week on week it’s costing money. It just keeps wracking up, so we need to resolve that with the regulator asap.”
    >> See also: Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals
    Caddick Construction managing director for Yorkshire and the North East Steve Ford added: “I think where it will probably get interesting and quite heated I guess is at the point where some of these schemes get rejected at gateway 3, and the finger pointing starts as to why it’s not got through gateway 3.”
    Simon Latson, head of living for the UK and Ireland at JLL, offered a potential solution. “We will be dealing with the regulator all the way through the construction process, and you would like to think that there is a collaborative process where you get early engagement and you can say ‘I’m 12 weeks out from completion, I’m going to start sending you all of my completion documents, my fire alarm certificate’, and say ‘thanks very much that’s the last thing on my list’. That’s probably wishful thinking but that’s got to be a practical solution, as early engagement as possible.”

    How is the government going to pay for its infrastructure strategy?
    Ministers are expected to outline the government’s ten-year infrastructure strategy next month, outlining ambitions not only for transport but social infrastructure including schools and healthcare. At an event titled “A Decade of National Renewal: What Will This Mean for our Regions, Towns and Cities?”, a panel of experts including London deputy mayor Jules Pipe highlighted how much of this new infrastructure is needed to enable the government to achieve its housing targets. But how will it be funded?
    Tom Wagner, cofounder of investment firm Knighthead Capital, which operates largely in the West Midlands with assets including Birmingham City FC, gave a frank assessment of the government’s policies on attracting private sector investment. “There have been a lot of policies in the UK that have forced capital allocators to go elsewhere,” he said, calling for lower taxes and less restrictions on private finance in order to stop investors fleeing to more amenable destinations overseas. 
    “What we’ve found in the UK is, as we’re seeking to tax those who can most afford it, that’s fine, but unless they’re chained here, they’ll just go somewhere else. That creates a bad dynamic because those people are the capital providers, and right now what we need is capital infusion to foster growth.”

    The main square at the centre of the conference
    Pipe offered a counterpoint, suggesting low taxes were not the only reason which determines where wealthy people live and highlighted the appeal of cities which had been made livable by good infrastructure. “There are people living in some very expensive cities but they live there because of the cosmopolitan culture and the parks and the general vibe, and that’s what we have to get right. And the key thing that leads to that is good transport, making it livable.”
    Pipe also criticised the penny-pinching tendencies of past governments on infrastructure investment, including on major transports schemes like Crossrail 2 which were mothballed due to a lack of funds and a perceived lack of value added. “All these things were fought in the trenches with the Treasury about ‘oh well there’s no cost benefit to this’. And where is the major transport like that where after ten years people are saying ‘no one’s using it, that was a really bad idea, it’s never opened up any new businesses or new homes’? It’s absolute nonsense. But that seems to be how we judge it,” he said.
    One solution could be funding through business rates, an approach used on the Northern Line Extension to Battersea Power Station. But the benefits of this have been largely overlooked, Pipe said. “One scheme every ten or twenty years is not good enough. We need to do this more frequently”.

    What is the latest on the government’s new towns programme?
    Where are the new towns going to be built? It was a question which everybody was asking during the conference, with rumours circulating around potential sites in Cambridge of Plymouth. The government is set to reveal the first 12 locations of 10,000 homes each in July, an announcement which will inevitably unleash an onslaught of NIMBY outcries from affected communities.
    A large crowd gathered for an “exclusive update” on the programme from Michael Lyons, chair of the New Towns Taskforce appointed by the government to recommend suitable sites, with many in attendance hoping for a big reveal on the first sites. They were disappointed, but Lyons did provide some interesting insights into the taskforce’s work. Despite a “rather hairbrained” timescale given to the team, which was only established last September, Lyons said it was at a “very advanced stage” in its deliberations after spending the past few months touring the country speaking to developers, landowners and residents in search of potential sites.
    >> See also: Don’t scrimp on quality standards for new towns, taskforce chair tells housebuilders
    “We stand at a crucial moment in the history of home building in this country,” he said. The government’s commitment to so many large-scale developments could herald a return to ambitious spatial planning, he said, with communities strategically located close to the most practical locations for the supply of new infrastructure needed for people to move in.

    A line of tents at the docks site, including the London Pavilion
    “Infrastructure constraints, whether it’s water or power, sewage or transport, must no longer be allowed to hold back growth, and we’ve been shocked as we looked around the country at the extent to which plans ready to be advanced are held back by those infrastructure problems,” he said. The first sites will be in places where much of this infrastructure is already in place, he said, allowing work to start immediately. 
    An emphasis on “identity and legibility” is also part of the criteria for the initial locations, with the government’s design and construction partners to be required to put placemaking at the heart of their schemes. “
    We need to be confident that these can be distinctive places, and that the title of new town, whether it’s an urban extension or whether it’s even a reshaping of an existing urban area or a genuine greenfield site, that it genuinely can be seen and will be seen by its residents as a distinct community.”

    How do you manage a working public-private partnership?
    Successful public partnerships between the public sector and private housebuilders will be essential for the government to achieve its target to build 1.5 million homes by the end of this parliament in 2029. At an event hosted by Muse, a panel discussed where past partnerships have gone wrong and what lessons have been learned.
    Mark Bradbury, Thurrock council’s chief officer for strategic growth partnerships and special projects, spoke of the series of events which led to L&Q pulling out of the 2,800-home Purfleet-on-Thames scheme in Essex and its replacement by housing association Swan.
    “I think it was partly the complex nature of the procurement process that led to market conditions being quite different at the end of the process to the start,” he said.
    “Some of the original partners pulled out halfway through because their business model changed. I think the early conversations at Purfleet on Thames around the masterplan devised by Will Alsop, the potential for L&Q to be one of the partners, the potential for a development manager, the potential for some overseas investment, ended up with L&Q deciding it wasn’t for their business model going forwards. The money from the far east never materialised, so we ended up with somebody who didn’t have the track record, and there was nobody who had working capital. 
    “By then it was clear that the former partnership wasn’t right, so trying to persuade someone to join a partnership which wasn’t working was really difficult. So you’ve got to be really clear at the outset that this is a partnership which is going to work, you know where the working capital is coming from, and everybody’s got a track record.”
    Muse development director for residential Duncan Cumberland outlined a three-part “accelerated procurement process” which the developer has been looking at in order to avoid some of the setbacks which can hit large public private partnerships on housing schemes. The first part is developing a masterplan vision which has the support of community stakeholders, the second is outlining a “realistic and honest” business plan which accommodates viability challenges, and the third is working closely with public sector officials on a strong business case.
    A good partnership is almost like being in a marriage, Avison Young’s London co-managing director Kat Hanna added. “It’s hard to just walk away. We’re in it now, so we need to make it work, and perhaps being in a partnership can often be more revealing in tough times.”
    #key #talking #points #ukreiif
    Key talking points from UKREiiF 2025
    Scene at UKREiiF 2025 outside the Canary bar UKREiiF is getting bigger by the year, with more than 16,000 professionals attending the 2025 construction conference in Leeds this week during three days of sunny weather, networking, panel discussions and robust amounts of booze. It has grown so big over the past few years that it seems almost to have outgrown the city of Leeds itself. A running joke among attendees was the varying quality of accommodation people had managed to secure. All of the budget hotels in the city were fully booked months in advance of the conference, with many - including at least one member of Parliament - reduced to kipping in bed and breakfasts of a questionable nature. Many were forced to stay in nearby towns including York, Wakefield and Bradford and catch the train to the conference each morning. But these snags served as ice breakers for more important conversations at an event which has come at a key pivot point for the industry. With the government on the brink of launching its 10-year industrial strategy and its new towns programme, opportunity was in the air. Networking events between government departments and potential suppliers of all sectors were well attended, although many discussion panels focused on the question of how all of this work would be paid for. And hanging over the conference like a storm cloud were the mounting issues at the Building Safety Regulator which are continuing to cause expensive delays to high rise schemes across the country. While many attendees eyed a huge amount of potential work to fill up pipelines, it was clear the industry is still facing some systemic challenges which could threaten a much-needed recovery following a long period of turmoil. How will the issues at the Building Safety Regulator be fixed? You did not even have to go inside an event titled “Gateways and Growing Pains: Tackling the Building Safety Act” to see how much this issue is affecting construction at the moment. The packed out tent was overflowing into the space outside, with those inside stood like sardines to watch a panel discussion about what has been happening in the high rise residential sector over the past year.  Audience members shared their horror stories of schemes which have been waiting for the best part of a year to get gateway 2 approval from the regulator, which is needed to start construction. There was a palpable sense of anger in the crowd, one professional describing the hold-ups which had affected his scheme as a “disgrace”. Others highlighted the apparent inconsistency of the regulator’s work. One attendee told how two identical buildings had been submitted to the regulator in separate gateway 2 applications and assigned to two separate technical teams for approval. One application had received no follow up questions, while the other had been extensively interrogated. “The industry should hold its head in shame with regard to what happened at Grenfell, but post that, it’s just complete disarray,” he said. More than 16,000 professionals attended the 2025 event While many are currently focusing on delays at pre-construction, others raised the looming gateway 3 approvals which are needed before occupation. Pareto Projects director Kuli Bajwa said: “Gateway 2 is an issue, but when we get to gateway 3, we’re committed to this project, money’s been spent, debt’s been taken out and week on week it’s costing money. It just keeps wracking up, so we need to resolve that with the regulator asap.” >> See also: Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals Caddick Construction managing director for Yorkshire and the North East Steve Ford added: “I think where it will probably get interesting and quite heated I guess is at the point where some of these schemes get rejected at gateway 3, and the finger pointing starts as to why it’s not got through gateway 3.” Simon Latson, head of living for the UK and Ireland at JLL, offered a potential solution. “We will be dealing with the regulator all the way through the construction process, and you would like to think that there is a collaborative process where you get early engagement and you can say ‘I’m 12 weeks out from completion, I’m going to start sending you all of my completion documents, my fire alarm certificate’, and say ‘thanks very much that’s the last thing on my list’. That’s probably wishful thinking but that’s got to be a practical solution, as early engagement as possible.” How is the government going to pay for its infrastructure strategy? Ministers are expected to outline the government’s ten-year infrastructure strategy next month, outlining ambitions not only for transport but social infrastructure including schools and healthcare. At an event titled “A Decade of National Renewal: What Will This Mean for our Regions, Towns and Cities?”, a panel of experts including London deputy mayor Jules Pipe highlighted how much of this new infrastructure is needed to enable the government to achieve its housing targets. But how will it be funded? Tom Wagner, cofounder of investment firm Knighthead Capital, which operates largely in the West Midlands with assets including Birmingham City FC, gave a frank assessment of the government’s policies on attracting private sector investment. “There have been a lot of policies in the UK that have forced capital allocators to go elsewhere,” he said, calling for lower taxes and less restrictions on private finance in order to stop investors fleeing to more amenable destinations overseas.  “What we’ve found in the UK is, as we’re seeking to tax those who can most afford it, that’s fine, but unless they’re chained here, they’ll just go somewhere else. That creates a bad dynamic because those people are the capital providers, and right now what we need is capital infusion to foster growth.” The main square at the centre of the conference Pipe offered a counterpoint, suggesting low taxes were not the only reason which determines where wealthy people live and highlighted the appeal of cities which had been made livable by good infrastructure. “There are people living in some very expensive cities but they live there because of the cosmopolitan culture and the parks and the general vibe, and that’s what we have to get right. And the key thing that leads to that is good transport, making it livable.” Pipe also criticised the penny-pinching tendencies of past governments on infrastructure investment, including on major transports schemes like Crossrail 2 which were mothballed due to a lack of funds and a perceived lack of value added. “All these things were fought in the trenches with the Treasury about ‘oh well there’s no cost benefit to this’. And where is the major transport like that where after ten years people are saying ‘no one’s using it, that was a really bad idea, it’s never opened up any new businesses or new homes’? It’s absolute nonsense. But that seems to be how we judge it,” he said. One solution could be funding through business rates, an approach used on the Northern Line Extension to Battersea Power Station. But the benefits of this have been largely overlooked, Pipe said. “One scheme every ten or twenty years is not good enough. We need to do this more frequently”. What is the latest on the government’s new towns programme? Where are the new towns going to be built? It was a question which everybody was asking during the conference, with rumours circulating around potential sites in Cambridge of Plymouth. The government is set to reveal the first 12 locations of 10,000 homes each in July, an announcement which will inevitably unleash an onslaught of NIMBY outcries from affected communities. A large crowd gathered for an “exclusive update” on the programme from Michael Lyons, chair of the New Towns Taskforce appointed by the government to recommend suitable sites, with many in attendance hoping for a big reveal on the first sites. They were disappointed, but Lyons did provide some interesting insights into the taskforce’s work. Despite a “rather hairbrained” timescale given to the team, which was only established last September, Lyons said it was at a “very advanced stage” in its deliberations after spending the past few months touring the country speaking to developers, landowners and residents in search of potential sites. >> See also: Don’t scrimp on quality standards for new towns, taskforce chair tells housebuilders “We stand at a crucial moment in the history of home building in this country,” he said. The government’s commitment to so many large-scale developments could herald a return to ambitious spatial planning, he said, with communities strategically located close to the most practical locations for the supply of new infrastructure needed for people to move in. A line of tents at the docks site, including the London Pavilion “Infrastructure constraints, whether it’s water or power, sewage or transport, must no longer be allowed to hold back growth, and we’ve been shocked as we looked around the country at the extent to which plans ready to be advanced are held back by those infrastructure problems,” he said. The first sites will be in places where much of this infrastructure is already in place, he said, allowing work to start immediately.  An emphasis on “identity and legibility” is also part of the criteria for the initial locations, with the government’s design and construction partners to be required to put placemaking at the heart of their schemes. “ We need to be confident that these can be distinctive places, and that the title of new town, whether it’s an urban extension or whether it’s even a reshaping of an existing urban area or a genuine greenfield site, that it genuinely can be seen and will be seen by its residents as a distinct community.” How do you manage a working public-private partnership? Successful public partnerships between the public sector and private housebuilders will be essential for the government to achieve its target to build 1.5 million homes by the end of this parliament in 2029. At an event hosted by Muse, a panel discussed where past partnerships have gone wrong and what lessons have been learned. Mark Bradbury, Thurrock council’s chief officer for strategic growth partnerships and special projects, spoke of the series of events which led to L&Q pulling out of the 2,800-home Purfleet-on-Thames scheme in Essex and its replacement by housing association Swan. “I think it was partly the complex nature of the procurement process that led to market conditions being quite different at the end of the process to the start,” he said. “Some of the original partners pulled out halfway through because their business model changed. I think the early conversations at Purfleet on Thames around the masterplan devised by Will Alsop, the potential for L&Q to be one of the partners, the potential for a development manager, the potential for some overseas investment, ended up with L&Q deciding it wasn’t for their business model going forwards. The money from the far east never materialised, so we ended up with somebody who didn’t have the track record, and there was nobody who had working capital.  “By then it was clear that the former partnership wasn’t right, so trying to persuade someone to join a partnership which wasn’t working was really difficult. So you’ve got to be really clear at the outset that this is a partnership which is going to work, you know where the working capital is coming from, and everybody’s got a track record.” Muse development director for residential Duncan Cumberland outlined a three-part “accelerated procurement process” which the developer has been looking at in order to avoid some of the setbacks which can hit large public private partnerships on housing schemes. The first part is developing a masterplan vision which has the support of community stakeholders, the second is outlining a “realistic and honest” business plan which accommodates viability challenges, and the third is working closely with public sector officials on a strong business case. A good partnership is almost like being in a marriage, Avison Young’s London co-managing director Kat Hanna added. “It’s hard to just walk away. We’re in it now, so we need to make it work, and perhaps being in a partnership can often be more revealing in tough times.” #key #talking #points #ukreiif
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Key talking points from UKREiiF 2025
    Scene at UKREiiF 2025 outside the Canary bar UKREiiF is getting bigger by the year, with more than 16,000 professionals attending the 2025 construction conference in Leeds this week during three days of sunny weather, networking, panel discussions and robust amounts of booze. It has grown so big over the past few years that it seems almost to have outgrown the city of Leeds itself. A running joke among attendees was the varying quality of accommodation people had managed to secure. All of the budget hotels in the city were fully booked months in advance of the conference, with many - including at least one member of Parliament - reduced to kipping in bed and breakfasts of a questionable nature. Many were forced to stay in nearby towns including York, Wakefield and Bradford and catch the train to the conference each morning. But these snags served as ice breakers for more important conversations at an event which has come at a key pivot point for the industry. With the government on the brink of launching its 10-year industrial strategy and its new towns programme, opportunity was in the air. Networking events between government departments and potential suppliers of all sectors were well attended, although many discussion panels focused on the question of how all of this work would be paid for. And hanging over the conference like a storm cloud were the mounting issues at the Building Safety Regulator which are continuing to cause expensive delays to high rise schemes across the country. While many attendees eyed a huge amount of potential work to fill up pipelines, it was clear the industry is still facing some systemic challenges which could threaten a much-needed recovery following a long period of turmoil. How will the issues at the Building Safety Regulator be fixed? You did not even have to go inside an event titled “Gateways and Growing Pains: Tackling the Building Safety Act” to see how much this issue is affecting construction at the moment. The packed out tent was overflowing into the space outside, with those inside stood like sardines to watch a panel discussion about what has been happening in the high rise residential sector over the past year.  Audience members shared their horror stories of schemes which have been waiting for the best part of a year to get gateway 2 approval from the regulator, which is needed to start construction. There was a palpable sense of anger in the crowd, one professional describing the hold-ups which had affected his scheme as a “disgrace”. Others highlighted the apparent inconsistency of the regulator’s work. One attendee told how two identical buildings had been submitted to the regulator in separate gateway 2 applications and assigned to two separate technical teams for approval. One application had received no follow up questions, while the other had been extensively interrogated. “The industry should hold its head in shame with regard to what happened at Grenfell, but post that, it’s just complete disarray,” he said. More than 16,000 professionals attended the 2025 event While many are currently focusing on delays at pre-construction, others raised the looming gateway 3 approvals which are needed before occupation. Pareto Projects director Kuli Bajwa said: “Gateway 2 is an issue, but when we get to gateway 3, we’re committed to this project, money’s been spent, debt’s been taken out and week on week it’s costing money. It just keeps wracking up, so we need to resolve that with the regulator asap.” >> See also: Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals Caddick Construction managing director for Yorkshire and the North East Steve Ford added: “I think where it will probably get interesting and quite heated I guess is at the point where some of these schemes get rejected at gateway 3, and the finger pointing starts as to why it’s not got through gateway 3.” Simon Latson, head of living for the UK and Ireland at JLL, offered a potential solution. “We will be dealing with the regulator all the way through the construction process, and you would like to think that there is a collaborative process where you get early engagement and you can say ‘I’m 12 weeks out from completion, I’m going to start sending you all of my completion documents, my fire alarm certificate’, and say ‘thanks very much that’s the last thing on my list’. That’s probably wishful thinking but that’s got to be a practical solution, as early engagement as possible.” How is the government going to pay for its infrastructure strategy? Ministers are expected to outline the government’s ten-year infrastructure strategy next month, outlining ambitions not only for transport but social infrastructure including schools and healthcare. At an event titled “A Decade of National Renewal: What Will This Mean for our Regions, Towns and Cities?”, a panel of experts including London deputy mayor Jules Pipe highlighted how much of this new infrastructure is needed to enable the government to achieve its housing targets. But how will it be funded? Tom Wagner, cofounder of investment firm Knighthead Capital, which operates largely in the West Midlands with assets including Birmingham City FC, gave a frank assessment of the government’s policies on attracting private sector investment. “There have been a lot of policies in the UK that have forced capital allocators to go elsewhere,” he said, calling for lower taxes and less restrictions on private finance in order to stop investors fleeing to more amenable destinations overseas.  “What we’ve found in the UK is, as we’re seeking to tax those who can most afford it, that’s fine, but unless they’re chained here, they’ll just go somewhere else. That creates a bad dynamic because those people are the capital providers, and right now what we need is capital infusion to foster growth.” The main square at the centre of the conference Pipe offered a counterpoint, suggesting low taxes were not the only reason which determines where wealthy people live and highlighted the appeal of cities which had been made livable by good infrastructure. “There are people living in some very expensive cities but they live there because of the cosmopolitan culture and the parks and the general vibe, and that’s what we have to get right. And the key thing that leads to that is good transport, making it livable.” Pipe also criticised the penny-pinching tendencies of past governments on infrastructure investment, including on major transports schemes like Crossrail 2 which were mothballed due to a lack of funds and a perceived lack of value added. “All these things were fought in the trenches with the Treasury about ‘oh well there’s no cost benefit to this’. And where is the major transport like that where after ten years people are saying ‘no one’s using it, that was a really bad idea, it’s never opened up any new businesses or new homes’? It’s absolute nonsense. But that seems to be how we judge it,” he said. One solution could be funding through business rates, an approach used on the Northern Line Extension to Battersea Power Station. But the benefits of this have been largely overlooked, Pipe said. “One scheme every ten or twenty years is not good enough. We need to do this more frequently”. What is the latest on the government’s new towns programme? Where are the new towns going to be built? It was a question which everybody was asking during the conference, with rumours circulating around potential sites in Cambridge of Plymouth. The government is set to reveal the first 12 locations of 10,000 homes each in July, an announcement which will inevitably unleash an onslaught of NIMBY outcries from affected communities. A large crowd gathered for an “exclusive update” on the programme from Michael Lyons, chair of the New Towns Taskforce appointed by the government to recommend suitable sites, with many in attendance hoping for a big reveal on the first sites. They were disappointed, but Lyons did provide some interesting insights into the taskforce’s work. Despite a “rather hairbrained” timescale given to the team, which was only established last September, Lyons said it was at a “very advanced stage” in its deliberations after spending the past few months touring the country speaking to developers, landowners and residents in search of potential sites. >> See also: Don’t scrimp on quality standards for new towns, taskforce chair tells housebuilders “We stand at a crucial moment in the history of home building in this country,” he said. The government’s commitment to so many large-scale developments could herald a return to ambitious spatial planning, he said, with communities strategically located close to the most practical locations for the supply of new infrastructure needed for people to move in. A line of tents at the docks site, including the London Pavilion “Infrastructure constraints, whether it’s water or power, sewage or transport, must no longer be allowed to hold back growth, and we’ve been shocked as we looked around the country at the extent to which plans ready to be advanced are held back by those infrastructure problems,” he said. The first sites will be in places where much of this infrastructure is already in place, he said, allowing work to start immediately.  An emphasis on “identity and legibility” is also part of the criteria for the initial locations, with the government’s design and construction partners to be required to put placemaking at the heart of their schemes. “ We need to be confident that these can be distinctive places, and that the title of new town, whether it’s an urban extension or whether it’s even a reshaping of an existing urban area or a genuine greenfield site, that it genuinely can be seen and will be seen by its residents as a distinct community.” How do you manage a working public-private partnership? Successful public partnerships between the public sector and private housebuilders will be essential for the government to achieve its target to build 1.5 million homes by the end of this parliament in 2029. At an event hosted by Muse, a panel discussed where past partnerships have gone wrong and what lessons have been learned. Mark Bradbury, Thurrock council’s chief officer for strategic growth partnerships and special projects, spoke of the series of events which led to L&Q pulling out of the 2,800-home Purfleet-on-Thames scheme in Essex and its replacement by housing association Swan. “I think it was partly the complex nature of the procurement process that led to market conditions being quite different at the end of the process to the start,” he said. “Some of the original partners pulled out halfway through because their business model changed. I think the early conversations at Purfleet on Thames around the masterplan devised by Will Alsop, the potential for L&Q to be one of the partners, the potential for a development manager, the potential for some overseas investment, ended up with L&Q deciding it wasn’t for their business model going forwards. The money from the far east never materialised, so we ended up with somebody who didn’t have the track record, and there was nobody who had working capital.  “By then it was clear that the former partnership wasn’t right, so trying to persuade someone to join a partnership which wasn’t working was really difficult. So you’ve got to be really clear at the outset that this is a partnership which is going to work, you know where the working capital is coming from, and everybody’s got a track record.” Muse development director for residential Duncan Cumberland outlined a three-part “accelerated procurement process” which the developer has been looking at in order to avoid some of the setbacks which can hit large public private partnerships on housing schemes. The first part is developing a masterplan vision which has the support of community stakeholders, the second is outlining a “realistic and honest” business plan which accommodates viability challenges, and the third is working closely with public sector officials on a strong business case. A good partnership is almost like being in a marriage, Avison Young’s London co-managing director Kat Hanna added. “It’s hard to just walk away. We’re in it now, so we need to make it work, and perhaps being in a partnership can often be more revealing in tough times.”
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Design team appointed to £1bn Yorkshire hospital project

    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story

    Existing subscriber? LOGIN
    A subscription to Building Design will provide:

    Unlimited architecture news from around the UK
    Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
    Full access to all our online archives
    PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45.

    Subscribe now for unlimited access.

    Subscribe today

    Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts
    #design #team #appointed #1bn #yorkshire
    Design team appointed to £1bn Yorkshire hospital project
    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story Existing subscriber? LOGIN A subscription to Building Design will provide: Unlimited architecture news from around the UK Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world Full access to all our online archives PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45. Subscribe now for unlimited access. Subscribe today Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts #design #team #appointed #1bn #yorkshire
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Design team appointed to £1bn Yorkshire hospital project
    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story Existing subscriber? LOGIN A subscription to Building Design will provide: Unlimited architecture news from around the UK Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world Full access to all our online archives PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45. Subscribe now for unlimited access. Subscribe today Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals

    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story

    Existing subscriber? LOGIN
    A subscription to Building Design will provide:

    Unlimited architecture news from around the UK
    Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world
    Full access to all our online archives
    PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45.

    Subscribe now for unlimited access.

    Subscribe today

    Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts
    #homes #england #boss #calls #government
    Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals
    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story Existing subscriber? LOGIN A subscription to Building Design will provide: Unlimited architecture news from around the UK Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world Full access to all our online archives PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45. Subscribe now for unlimited access. Subscribe today Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts #homes #england #boss #calls #government
    WWW.BDONLINE.CO.UK
    Homes England boss calls on government to fix ‘unacceptably slow’ gateway 2 approvals
    Login or SUBSCRIBE to view this story Existing subscriber? LOGIN A subscription to Building Design will provide: Unlimited architecture news from around the UK Reviews of the latest buildings from all corners of the world Full access to all our online archives PLUS you will receive a digital copy of WA100 worth over £45. Subscribe now for unlimited access. Subscribe today Alternatively REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts
    0 Comments 0 Shares
More Stories
CGShares https://cgshares.com