1. Source: Brendan Bell2. Source: Lorenzo Zandri3. Source: Paul Karalius4. Source: Jim Stephenson5. Source: Nigel Young6. Source: Stijn Bollaert7. Source: Rory Gaylor8. Source: Fran Williams9. Source: Greg Holmes10. Source: Jim Stephenson11. Source: Hufton + Crow12. Source: Hufton + CrowAnswers1 Canada Water boardwalk, London, by Asif Khan Studio 2 Wraxall Yard, Dorchester, by Clementine Blakemore Architects 3 Oldham Road, Manchester, by Tim Groom Architects 4 Homerton College Dining Hall, Cambridge, by Feilden Fowles 5 Faustino Winery, Oyn, Spain, by Foster + Partners 6 Performing Arts Centre at Brighton College, by krft with Nicholas Hare Architects 7 Westminster Coroners Court, London, by Lynch Architects 8 Serpentine Gallery summer pavilion, London, by Minsuk Cho/Mass Studies 9 Perth Museum, Scotland, by Mecanoo 10 Peckham House, London, by Surman Weston 11 Maggies Centre at the Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead, London, by Studio Libeskind 12 The Elizabeth Line, London, by Grimshaw, Maynard, Equation, Atkins et al

A ticking time-bombSource: ShutterstockIf we do not value the work of architects today, there will be no one left to design tomorrows buildings, wrote Aga Szedzianis in this years most popular Opinion piece after a RIBA study revealed a rapid salary decrease of almost 40 per cent since 1999.The tales of falling salaries came during the same year that an unusually high talent exodus was revealed by a survey by The Pay 100, an activist-led initiative aiming to drive fairer pay for those in the earlier stages of an architecture career. The organisers stated that economic opportunity [is] playing an undeniable role in the exodus.But never fear not every job was miserably low-paid. In June, readers were astonished to see the RIBA promoting a job ad offering a 288,000 salary to a private tutor for an ambitious architecture student. In case youre not shocked enough, the advertisement asked for a candidate who must have been raised in a socially appropriate background and has a stable home life. Huge step forward for equality in the industry, right?AdvertisementLow salaries werent the only downfall the AJ reported on. In November, Richard Waites write-up of the grim findings of ARBs survey into workplace culture echoed what we have highlighted over the years that the industry is often an abusive environment, especially for women and those from ethnic minority backgrounds.More redundanciesProjects by practices who announced redundancies in NovemberAs economic turbulence continued to bite, the AJs most read story of the year revealed that more top UK practices were set to make redundancies, including Woods Bagot and Morris+Company. The news followed the AJs April report of job losses at AJ100 practices Buckley Gray Yeoman, Piercy&Company, Hawkins\Brown and HTA Design.Simon Bayliss, managing partner at HTA Design, told the AJ: Many housing practices have been facing more difficult times over the past couple of years, with the economic conditions presenting significant barriers to development, while government prevarication and regulatory uncertainty have almost certainly done even more damage.November saw this years second most read story telling a similarly dismal tale, revealing new waves of redundancies at Make Architects, Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios (FCBS) and Fletcher Priest Architects.At the start of the year, stories of firms shutting their doors were widely read, with Sarah Wigglesworth deciding to step away from her award-winning practice after 30 years in February, and Stirling-shortlisted Tony Fretton Architects closing in April after 42 years in business. AJ 40 under 40 practice TDO also went into liquidation, its founders ditching their the financially precarious nature of their current model to start afresh.AdvertisementFollowing stories of closures, redundancies, and economic uncertainty in practice, it came as no surprise that readers were eager to read Aprils piece profiling architects who jumped the fence to client-side careers. Thinking of swapping sides?Shortlists and winners revealedStirling Prize 2024 shortlisted projectsUnsurprisingly, readers flocked in to enjoy reveals of shortlists and competition winners, with the announcements that gained the most traction including the RIBA National Award winners, the architects chosen for infill council housing jobs in Hackney, and the finalists in British Museums contentious revamp contest.Subscribers were quick to click when this years RIBA Stirling Prize finalists were revealed. But, made up of schemes by previous winners Mikhail Riches Architects as well as shortlist debutants Al-Jawad Pike and Clementine Blakemore Architects, the list was deemed by some to be not quite as impressive as last years, including AJ Deputy Architecture Editor Fran Williams, who labelled the list more forgettable and uninspiring than ever in a top-performing Opinion piece.A month after The Elizabeth Line was announced as this years winner, the Stirling Prize entered the news again with the AJs exclusive announcement that the RIBA prizes first ever winner Hodder Associates Centenary Building for the University of Salford was due to be demolished just 29 years after it was built.Buildings and RetroFirstHillside House by Mike Tuck Studio (photography by Luca Piffaretti)It wasnt all doom, gloom and demolition among this years top stories. In line with the AJs RetroFirst campaign, a number of our most widely read built projects prioritised retrofit over demolition and rebuild. Knox Bhavans retrofit of an early Victorian villa in Camberwell was among the most-read Buildings stories, along with Mike Tuck Studios remodelling of a 1930s semi in Walthamstow, which features reused materials such as reclaimed school parquet and recycled plastic.Other top Buildings stories included Tim Grooms 24 million mill-inspired housing in Manchester and a building study of Caruso St Johns St Pancras Campus, which featured in Novembers Planning issue.Thanks for reading the AJ this yearWishing you a merry Christmas and a very happy and prosperous New Year!2024-12-23Katie Lastcomment and share

The Architects JournalThe AJ Christmas Quiz 2024Test your knowledge of another busy/soul-destroying/meh [delete as applicable] year in architectureThe post The AJ Christmas Quiz 2024 appeared first on The Architects JournalSimon Aldous

Its a very low-budget, very simple, modest project, notes Steve Fox, director at Manalo & White, about the new classroom block at Heathlands School in St Albans that the practice has designed in collaboration with deaf-led architecture firm Richard Lyndon Design and which is intended to set a new benchmark for design in deaf education.Despite greater awareness about deafness and accessibility, specialised educational facilities for deaf children, particularly in the UK, continue to disappear. In recent years, one in 10 of these facilities has closed, resulting in one in four local councils lacking any dedicated resources for deaf students. At present there are only 22 schools for deaf children across the UK.As one of the largest, Heathlands caters from nursery-age pupils up until sixth form, with some students living on the premises. Given the national decline in resources, theres growing pressure on facilities like Heathlands to further increase capacity. AdvertisementIn its case, intake has had to expand from 110 to 153 over the past five years, added to which the school is also having to address the deaf attainment gap. In an Education Policy Institute paper last year focusing on English and Maths at GCSE, this was estimated to have been as much as 17.5 months in 2019 similar to that faced by socio-economically disadvantaged pupils. With scant resources available, many students have to travel from far and wide to attend Heathlands. There are few other places for students to go, sighs co-headteacher Lesley Reeves Costi.The new Heathlands extension is stitched into the existing complex with a perceptive understanding of the senses at the crux of its conception. Located in a quiet suburb of St Albans, the original 1970s building is a purpose-built deaf school consisting of a collection of low-rise, two-storey buildings, their sandy-coloured brick and pitched roofs evoking a sense of quaint domesticity.Inside, Reeves Costi points out the shortcomings of the original design. Despite being intended for deaf use, the limitations imposed by the architecture are clear: bottlenecks, harsh lighting and sharp corners make it hard to maintain eye contact and to lip-read. It is an inconvenience which is amplified when the school is at full capacity. The original brief called for a first-floor extension to be added to an existing single-storey block. However, going back to the drawing board, the initial concept was reimagined in the context of the whole site, which resulted in a new stand-alone building, which, Fox says, offered an opportunity to better utilise the space, with less disruption. Matching the scale of the surrounding architecture, the new two-storey building provides six new classrooms but with radically updated ideas about designing for deaf use. The design takes a profoundly sensory approach to the detailing, which is not immediately easy to identify but which forefronts tactile experience.DeafSpace principles are at the core of the design, a set of guidelines developed at Gallaudet University in Washington DC, the worlds first university for deaf people, and a leading institution in advocating for better design for those with disabilities. The principles aim to create environments that are not only accessible to people who are deaf but also to accommodate those with varying levels of sensory reach. On entering the grounds of the school, for instance, bright yellow railings flicker through the foliage, their vivid colour finish easily visible from a range of distances. AdvertisementReeves Costi explains: For a deaf person, colour is really important, as a lot of students also have a sensitivity to light. In like manner, yellow-framed windows pop against the new buildings soft green faade panels, while its pitched roof draws upon a visual language of domesticity, recalibrated here in a playful and contemporary form.Taking cues from artists Bernd and Hilla Bechers Fachwerkhuser series of photographs of half-timbered houses from the 1960s and 70s, decorative timber batons are spaced to match the standard sizes of the green fibre cement panels on the elevations, speaking to an ethos of simplicity. Using humble materials, the faade treatment breaks down the volume of the building into digestible parts. It is a useful cue for pupils with visual impairments, helping them recognise the depth of the buildings by the linear patterns which break up the massing. The new addition sits detached from the existing building but is linked via a semi-covered outdoor space, which acts as an external corridor, allowing for visual connection to the outside and varying levels of enclosure.Fox says that, while he avoided the temptation to maximise the built area, it does require a certain amount of room to gather and a certain amount of distance to gesticulate and use your hands for signing. As a result, the built architecture prioritises visual connection and clear sightlines by placing value on transitional spaces. As Fox notes, The liminal spaces are equally as necessary as the building itself.Leading up to the top floor, an elevated balcony walkway screened off with polycarbonate links the new building with the pre-existing art block. A new lift makes the previously inaccessible accessible to those unable to use stairs. In accordance with DeafSpace principles, generous double-width stairs and wide walking routes allow pupils to communicate while traversing the site, encouraging spontaneous meetings to take place outside the classroom.Fox remarks: This gets said a lot, but we were really focused on how light works in the building. In particular, we were concerned with the quality of light in the spaces and the positioning of the windows. As it is a building that is only a single room deep, each classroom benefits from a dual aspect, encouraging diffuse light from multiple angles. This helps to reduce glare and silhouetting within the classrooms, conditions which prevent pupils from lip-reading effectively. Classroom interiors are finished in a soft blue, which allows occupants to see different ranges of skin tones with the best clarity. Classrooms are sized to allow for a horseshoe arrangement of classroom tables, so pupils are face-to-face and no one is sitting at the back of the class. Control of sound is critical. Using new technology, the ceiling-mounted natural ventilation with heat recycling (NVHR) systems ventilate each classroom silently, eliminating the auditory strain that is caused by background noise from open windows.There are few examples of architecture that fully integrate DeafSpace principles, and Reeves Costi emphasises the importance of incorporating these considerations into design more broadly. How many children are affected by conditions like glue ear? Or how many individuals lose their hearing later in life? Its crucial to have those natural elements in buildings, she says. Many of the design principles also have broader application in making spaces more accessible to a wider range of users. Such subtle architectural interventions can have profound impacts on the day-to-day experience of socialising and also navigating spaces independently.Heathlands Schools new block incorporates many subtle features that can be implemented in design not just for deaf people but for the sake of offering a wider scale of inclusion. They could easily read solely as aesthetic flair to the untrained eye. But in its quiet style the architecture here reconciles both inclusivity and aesthetics in an earnest and honest support to the senses.Teshome Douglas-Campbell is an architectural designer, alumnus of the New Architecture Writers programme and founding member of PATCH CollectiveProject dataStart on siteJuly 2023CompletionMarch 2024Gross internal floor area250m2 (includes new and adapted existing)Construction cost850,000Construction cost per m23,400ArchitectManalo & WhiteClientHeathlands SchoolStructural engineerengineersHRWM&E consultantXCO2Quantity surveyorOmniumMain contractorGemstone

Source:&nbsp ShutterstockWell, deck the halls and cover me in tinsel. If it isnt the end of another project stage... Joy to the world, as we deliver our deliverables, festooning the place with clay renders, barely resolved plans and co-authored spreadsheets. My patience currently dangles like a big glass bauble on the end of a spindly little branch. Brush too close and I may lose it, launching my laptop across the office collaboration space and into the ornate seasonal planting.When one stage ends, so another begins, and we were supposed to have a project kick-off workshop on Monday. But it never happened. Now its Thursday and the clients project manager is trying to funnel us through a bend in the space-time continuum, insisting that the past date both happened, and still exists in our collective future. We have therefore not started the project yet and are four days late. He seems a bit smug for a man whose Dubai work visa relies on a project that hes torpedoed in under a week.I just want to get this thing moving; I have a forest of sub-consultants twirling in their office chairs and lamenting not going skiing before the break. The problem is on the client side we cant kick off without all 35 stakeholders in one room, backbiting and scoring points amongst themselves. Not only is our smug little PM refusing to corral his client, hes twigged that my director is a people-pleaser who will do anything to keep the project alive, so is now delegating this to me.AdvertisementApparently, its for the wider project benefit that I contact his client while hes away from desk. It would just be so much better for him? Sure, maybe I can walk your dog and take your bin out while Im at it? I ignore his increasingly arse-y emails, so he escalates to calling me on Teams, at 4am UK time.When I dont answer, I get a terse call me asap thx, which I only see when I get to the office the next morning. Now its 8:54am and Im furious. He calls again, barking orders while clearly inside an airport, off on his early winter break. My director is perched on my desk like Elf on a Shelf, frantically signalling that I should just say yes and get off the line. I sigh and hang up.I consider my options. I could say the line broke up. I could throw the Scope of Works at him (we actually have one! And he signed it!). Or I could give him enough rope to hang himself. Option 3 it is.Silent merriment abounds until, at 17:46, I receive an email. Hes copied the client, his boss, my boss, and attached my own programme to help me out. We should have contacted the Clients PM to organise the kick-off meeting, like, weeks ago? He seems unaware that he is the Clients PM.Im gearing up to a spicy put-down, when his pre-emptive out of office notes hell be away for the next two weeks blissfully offline. I walk home through sleet with fists clenched. Theres a knot of indignation in my stomach. Its so unfair. I wake up with a stiff neck and resolve to defeat him with my own competence.AdvertisementNext day at the office, I launch a phone-a-thon offensive like a deranged charity caller. I speak to the client. Theyre baffled Dont we pay our PM to do this? I video-call the chief engineer, who just scowls. Yes, I know, but what are we going to do, take the blame for the project failing?Im starting to feel righteous, and foolish. Then my phone rings. Its the PMs boss.Seems she inherited him from another team, and, well. A bit out of his depth, isnt he? The client is furious and wants their money back, which is all very embarrassing. Shes so sorry for the misunderstanding. I raise a silent eyebrow. Wont happen again. Shes going to let him know that he doesnt need to come back from holiday. Howre things otherwise ?I stutter a reply, thank her for the call, and sit up in my chair. Im stunned. Discombobulated. Feeling kind of festive. Is this a MERRY-tocracy?! Throw another log on the fire and give the cat a kipper; Ill see you all in January.The Secret Architect working overseas 2024-12-23Alan Gordoncomment and share

Handing down a long-awaited decision this morning, High Court justice Timothy Mould upheld the decision by former communities secretary Michael Gove to allow the 25-storey development on the Thames.Mould said Gove, in making his much-delayed decision to approve the scheme in February, could rule in favour of the development despite taking the view that it would not deliver an attractive development of the very prominent and sensitive site.Gove said in his decision that, although he had reservations about the scale and massing of the north building, he agreed with the planning inspectors conclusion that it was an appropriate response to the site, following the planning inquiry held in late 2023.AdvertisementThe former secretary of state also acknowledged concerns about the developments impact on designated heritage assets, including Denys Lasduns Grade II*-listed National Theatre and Grade II-listed IBM Building, and questioned whether the Make scheme would provide a positive contribution to the townscape of the South Bank.But he concluded that the public benefits, such as employment opportunities, improved public realm and the creation of affordable creative workspace, outweighed the harm to the surroundings.However, the Save Our South Bank Action Group (SOS), a coalition of local opponents of the 72 Upper Ground project for Mitsubishi Estate, had argued that former communities secretary was wrong to approve the 25-storey scheme.Michael Ball from Save Our South Bank told the AJ that campaigners were now considering their options following the ruling against them, adding: This judgement is a huge disappointment for anyone who loves the river and South Bank.It supports Michael Goves wayward approval of a building about which he had great misgivings and acknowledged would harm a string of buildings of national prominence. The decision reveals planning protections are flawed and have failed.AdvertisementCampaigners had earlier argued that Goves decision was legally flawed and contradicted his recent announcements regarding housing priorities and reducing carbon, given the demolition associated with the Make scheme and the Local Plans emphasis on housing and mixed-use development at the former ITV Studios, instead of the proposed office-led development.High Court justice Beverly Lang, in granting the judicial review in May, said SOSB had raised arguable grounds that warranted 'consideration at a full hearing. A final decision had been expected in November ahead of todays decision.The High Court ruling comes after Gove set up the possible call-in in April 2022, during his first stint as head of the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities. Greg Clark, who served in the post between July and September 2022, officially called in the scheme over heritage concerns before Goves return to the department.Lambeth Council approved the scheme in March 2022, despite receiving more than 260 objections and opposition from figures including Kate Hoey, the former MP for Vauxhall, and the areas current MP, Florence Eshalomi. Source:Cityscape Digital View along Queen's Walk at National TheatreGroups such as The Twentieth Century Society and statutory consultee Historic England had concluded that the project would harm nearby listed buildings while dominating the riverfront.London mayor Sadiq Khan declined to intervene in the project, delegating the planning decision to deputy mayor Jules Pipe. Greater London Authority officers had praised the design quality of the Make scheme and said it had been designed to be sympathetic to its historic neighbours.The inquiry was held between 6 December 2022 and 25 January 2023, with Goves decision originally due in August 2023 but repeatedly delayed, eventually until February this year.Make previously told the AJ that its transformational plans for 72 Upper Ground would be a fantastic addition to the character of the South Bank' which was sensitive to the surrounding Modernist architecture.The practice has not yet commented on the High Court decision.Shinichi Kagitomi, chief executive of project backer Mitsubishi Estate London and Stephen Black, director at CORE, said in a joint statement: We welcome Justice Moulds judgement. At every stage of the planning process, our transformational plans for 72 Upper Ground have had the backing of senior politicians and independent experts including Lambeth Council and its planning officers, the GLA, DLUHC and the planning inspector.They added: We are looking forward to delivering an outstanding building that makes a significant positive contribution to the South Bank.The Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government said: We acknowledge the judgment and the planning permission for this application has been upheld. It would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.

The practice, which has worked on several projects for The Crown Estate since participating In the AJs Office for the Future competition In 2016, aimed to transform its existing commercial property through the creation of flexible and healthy office spaces to support greater collaboration between occupants.This thinking was applied to 12 Little Portland Street, a Grade II-listed office building dating from the 1920s, close to Oxford Circus and Broadcasting House.Threefold based its overall approach to the project on four principles: minimising waste through auditing, preserving and re-use; restoring heritage; future-proofing fabric; and creating workspaces that promote wellbeing.AdvertisementGiven the desire to move away from the model of large, single occupiers in the post-pandemic working environment, the remodelled building now provides smaller, more flexible and fully accessible spaces to attract a diverse occupancy mix and support hybrid working.The buildings fabric and services have been significantly upgraded to improve energy performance and address the circular economy, according to the practice, with extensive use of natural and reclaimed materials. Threefolds interventions aimed to celebrate the grandeur of the existing building, including restoring the faade. Internally, the generous proportions of each space have been maximised, window reveals have been enhanced and period features refurbished and echoed by new design elements, while planting and colour add visual interest.A new BMS provides fully upgraded mechanical and electrical services throughout the building, while heating and cooling are served via a high-efficiency recovery condenser.Existing raised access floors were removed and reused in other projects while existing primary and secondary glazing was fully reused on site.The roof now features a new terrace for outdoor events plus extensive all year-round foliage in line with the Wild West End greening strategy to encourage biodiversity and improve air quality. Bee blocks and bird and bat boxes have also been incorporated into the external walls to support urban wildlife.AdvertisementArchitects viewThe 12 Little Portland Street project presented a fantastic opportunity to work with The Crown Estate to revitalise a heritage building and, in doing so; create a series of modern workspaces that promote health, happiness and wellbeing.This project celebrates heritage, promotes decarbonisation, enhances biodiversity and demonstrates how through sensitive and innovative design, existing buildings can be adapted to have bright and flexible futures.Jack Hosea, founding director, Threefold ArchitectsProject dataStart on site November 2022CompletionNovember 2024Gross internal floor area 2,484m2Form of contractDesign and BuildConstruction cost 6.1 millionConstruction cost per m2 2,451Architect Threefold ArchitectsExecutive architect Gravity DesignClient The Crown EstateStructural engineer Heyne Tillet SteelM&E consultant Watkins PayneQS QuantemAcoustic consultant Hann Tucker AssociatesProject manager Dendy ByrneCDM co-ordinator TFT consultantsApproved building inspector Assent BCMain contractor Artemis interior ServicesCAD software used VectorworksEnvironmental performance dataPercentage of floor area with daylight factor >2% Not availablePercentage of floor area with daylight factor >5% Not availableOn-site energy generation NilAnnual mains water consumption 5.28 m3/occupantAirtightness at 50Pa Not availableHeating and hot water load 28.86 kWh/m2/yrOverall area-weighted U-value Not availableDesign life 15 years (services only)Embodied carbon 199.35 kgCO2eq/m2Whole-life carbon 585.06 kgCO2eq/m2Annual CO2 emissions 23.9 kgCO2eq/m2

Once upon a time, architecture on television wasnt just dumbed-down Changing Rooms-style makeovers or will-they-wont-they-succeed, one-off house projects for the one per cent. Architects, buildings and the future of our cities were given significant airtime, often in documentary series that were surprisingly opinionated. Then programme makers began moving towards formats like Grand Designs described by its host Kevin McCloud as more experiential television. But some of those earlier gems can easily be found today. Here we list some of the very best from the archive, all of which still deserve a watch in a spare moment this Christmas. Architecture at the Crossroads (1986)Episode time: 40 mins. Available on: BBC iPlayer and dailymotionIn the mid-1980s, the BBC ran this compelling, groundbreaking 10-part series, which is (partially) still available on iPlayer. There has been nothing really like it since. This is high architecture made accessible for the small screen. AdvertisementNarrated by Andrew Sachs (Manuel from Fawlty Towers), it was a major, well-researched undertaking which offered an unexpectedly critical view of architectural styles, current design fashions and how contemporary buildings met (or didnt) societys needs. The BBCs own blurb says the programme looks at how some young architects are reacting against Modernist sterility with an exuberant return to traditional forms.Provocative episode titles include Doubt and Reassessment and Stop the Bulldozer. In some ways it is a manifesto for the (then in vogue) Postmodernism trend. But many of the messages, including those about reinvention and reuse, are as relevant today as they were 40 years ago. RWI Love This Dirty Town (1969)Episode time: 50 mins. Available on: BBC iPlayer and YouTubeI suppose this is a lament for the death of the city, begins biographer and novelist Margaret Drabble in this hard-hitting 50-minute counterattack on the nations burgeoning, anywhere-place, suburbia.Pictures of sterile, peopleless streets of semi-detached villas are juxtaposed against snapshots of energetic but gritty town centres (mainly swinging 60s London). AdvertisementDrabble and her selected interviewees, including theatre director Joan Littlewood, take remarkably informed swipes at the ham-fisted and paternalistic planners who have driven (she hates cars too) tightly knit urban communities out to empty middle-class ghettos.Though targeted at the utopian dreams of out-of-touch post-war town planners, this humane visual essay remains uncannily prescient.She bangs the drum for high density, mixed-up mixed-use, walkable neighbourhoods and cultural vibrancy many of the things that make up the same backbone of decent urban design today. RWNairn Across Britain: Trans-Pennine Canal (1972)Episode time: 30 mins.Available on: BBC iPlayer and YouTubeIn June 1955, the Architectural Review published Outrage, a now-famous issue edited by architectural critic Ian Nairn. He used the occasion to take a swipe at the UKs unimaginative subtopian sprawl based on a nightmarish road trip that took him from the South to the North. From the late 1960s until 1978 he took his journeys on to television, picking out the places (or parts of places) he especially liked or hated and often offering his thoughts on what could be done to improve them.The series Nairn Across Britain was first aired in 1972 and is packed with his usual wit and venom. In the episode From Leeds into Scotland, he laps up the solid and sane town of Appleby before ripping into addled and characterless Carlisle. Here, during his Trans-Pennine barge adventure, Nairn is clearly exasperated at how post-industrial Northern cities had turned their back on the canal, asking why they hadnt embraced meaningful waterside development. Half a century later his words still seem remarkably far-sighted. RWBuilding Sights: Hauer-King House (1996)Episode time: 10 mins.Available on: BBC iPlayer and YouTubeThe four series of Building Sights ran between 1988 and 1996. They were fun, bite-size architectural love letters, each showcasing a hosts favourite building.The fangirls/fanboys were often top name architects such as Richard Rogers, Eva Jiin and Zaha Hadid but more mainstream stars of their day also gave their own architectural critiques: Damien Hirst noseys around Leeds Brutalist Worsley Medical building; Jools Holland pops out the top of One Canada Square at Canary Wharf; and Janet Street-Porter shows off her bonkers CZWG-designed Clerkenwell home.Some are more successful than others. Norman Fosters off-the-wall ode to a Boeing 747 could be from a different series. Will Alsop, however, has a field day in Future Systems glass-walled Hauer-King House in Islington. He even takes a bath there. Given the Twentieth Century Society is currently trying to list the wedged-shaped greenhouse, theres even more reason to watch the episode. RWWhere We Live now: New town, home town (1979)Episode time: 58 mins.Available on: BBC iPlayerThis documentary written and presented by writer and visionary Colin Ward is ideal viewing for anyone interested in planning and architecture, especially given Starmer and Rayners new towns policy.Ward visits Letchworth, Harlow, Peterlee, Runcorn and the emerging Milton Keynes to ask ordinary residents how successfully these grand visions have turned out. Ward is a fan of new towns, describing them as the one positive achievement of British planning since the war, yet proves himself a balanced critic, able to point out design misses as well as hits.Whats refreshing about the film isnt just the focus on lived experience (what todays architects would call PoE) but the welcome prominence given to the voices of working-class people something that reflects poorly on todays television. Most seem pleased to have escaped the inner city, with peoples quality of life enhanced by local jobs, transport links, walkable neighbourhoods, and that blend of city and country living first envisaged by Ebenezer Howard. WHVisual Acoustics: The Modernism of Julius Shulman (2008)Episode time: 1 hour 23 minutes.Available on: YouTubeMade just a year before legendary architectural photographer Julius Shulman died aged 98, this life-story is a sometimes patchy but watchable oddity. Its a televisual coffee table book, crammed with his luscious snaps of US Mid-Century Modern gems.Yet, despite the rollcall of star name architect clients (including Frank Gehry) and narration from Dustin Hoffman, the documentary, directed by Eric Bricker, is let down by amateurish graphics while the interviews look like theyve been done on acamcorder.Even so, Shulman, an early environmentalist, comes across as both good-humoured and humane. His stunning photographs he explains the famous night shot of Pierre Koenigs clifftop Stahl house overlooking Los Angeles shaped international taste and helped make the architects he featured. It is a story, too, about the buildings themselves, some of which are now shadows of their acetate perfection. A flawed but still fascinating film. RWChristmas viewing 2024-12-20Richard Waitecomment and share TagsChristmas viewing

Unveiled yesterday (19 December), the visuals show each of the shortlisted teams responses to a design exercise run as part of the second stage of the competition selection process.The shortlist, announced in August, includes architect-led multidisciplinary bids headed by 6a architects, David Chipperfield Architects, OMA, Lina Ghotmeh, and a collaboration between Eric Parry Architects and Jamie Fobert Architects.Models and images were submitted as part of a day-long charrette with the museum to test the capabilities of each architecture team shortlisted for the overhaul of the western area of the Grade I-listed museum. They are not final designs.AdvertisementKey aims include the introduction of contemporary architecture and innovative gallery displays, alongside sensitivity towards the need to respect and restore the highly significant and celebrated listed buildings on the site.The British Museum previously said that the second stage of the competition process would assess their approach to historic fabric, as well as different elements of spatial, environmental and exhibition design, with a focus on the collections of Ancient Egyptian, Greek and Roman artefacts.The 6a architects-led design response creates a biodiversity-led ecosystem of artefacts through greening and the reopening of courtyards dating back from 1838, while a top-lit finish to the Mausoleum of Halikarnassos would open up its brick vaults for the first time, the project team said.David Chipperfields response proposes two large public halls to turn the British Museum into a pluriversal space through a series of interconnected strategies. The practice adds that it would open up the museum to allow greater public participation.Floor plates would be opened up and walls peeled back under Jamie Fobert and Eric Parrys early design proposals to foster a new-found freedom of movement at the museum. The team added that revealing vaults and basement spaces would shed light on the buildings original architecture and artefacts.AdvertisementThe Lina Ghotmeh response includes spaces for experiences and bold interventions to the museum to create an archeology of the future and places for visitors to meet, while the OMA concept centres on delivering maximum impact and minimum intervention, with reuse of two internal courtyards and a focus on digital curation.The international competition has proved controversial, due to the significant financial backing the museum is receiving from fossil fuel giant BP. In January environmental campaigners called on architects not to take part in the contest because of the 50 million funding pledged to the Bloomsbury-based institution by BP.In recent years, BP and other oil and gas companies have been increasingly shunned by Britains cultural industries, with Tate, the National Portrait Gallery and the Royal Shakespeare Company among those institutions turning down such sponsorship.When the British Museum announced its partnership with BP in late 2023, it prompted the resignation of trustee Muriel Gray, former chair of the Glasgow School of Art, while Doug Parr, the UK policy director for Greenpeace, said the deal must surely be one of the biggest, most brazen greenwashing sponsorship deals the sector has ever seen. Source:Trustees of the British MuseumHowever, the high-profile competition, organised by Colander and aimed at finding a team to transform the central London museums Western Range, attracted more than 60 entrants from six continents.The scheme is part of a decade-long renovation masterplan unveiled late last year and billed as one of the most significant cultural redevelopment projects ever undertaken.The job will be the museums biggest building project since the 1820s when work began on Robert Smirkes original Greek Revival-style quadrangle. The 100,000m museum has around 3,500 different rooms and features more than eight million items in its permanent collection.The museums chair, former chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne, said earlier this year: The redevelopment of the British Museum is one of the biggest projects of our time. We asked for the best of the architectural community to step forward to help and they have, from Britain and across the world.The competition comes three years after the museum named four architects on a 45 million construction consultancy services framework: Avanti Architects, Dannatt Johnson Architects, Nex Architecture and Wright & Wright Architects.Stanton Williams completed a new Albukhary Foundation Gallery of the Islamic World at the British Museum in 2019. In 2014, RSHP completed the museums World Conservation and Exhibitions Centre extension.Each of the shortlisted teams are expected to receive an honorarium of 50,000 to participate in the design phase of the competition. A winner will be announced in February 2025.The teams designs are now on display in the museums Round Reading Room.The five shortlisted teams6a architects with Advanced Integrated Solutions, Arup, David Bonnett Associates, Gitta Gschwendtner, Kellenberger-White, London School of Architecture, Purcell, Studio ZNADavid Chipperfield Architectswith AEA Consulting, Adamson Associates, Alan Baxter Associates, Arup, Atelier Brckner, Atelier Ten, Lobe Lloyd, Julian Harrap Architects, Plan A, Reusefully, Neal ShasoreEric Parry Architects and Jamie Fobert Architects with Buro Happold, David Bonnett Associates, Max Fordham, Mima, Price & Myers, Purcell, Space Syntax, Studio ZNALina Ghotmeh Architecture with Ali Cherri, Arup, Holmes Studio, Plan A, PurcellOMA with Arup, Benoy, Cookies, Ducks Scno, EQ2 Light, Purcell, Salvatore Settis, Studio ZNA Source:The Trustees of the British MuseumInside the British Museums Great Court

The Chicago-based practice has submitted early drawings to the City of London Corporation for the redevelopment of 1 Silk Street, to replace an office building tucked into the north-east corner of Chamberlin, Powell and Bons celebrated Brutalist landmark.SOMs 100,000m proposal would demolish the existing 1980s office building on the 0.57ha site, formerly home to law firm Linklaters, to make way for a 21-storey office building comprising two towers.According to the scoping report, the proposed development would comprise a single building capable of being viewed as two separate east and west elements and capable of subdivision into separate tenancies. The existing substructure would be retained as the foundations of the new development.AdvertisementThe mixed-use scheme would include landscaped terraces, new public routes through the site and new open space and commercial space at ground level. Source:Google EarthExisting building at 1 Silk StreetSOMs early visualisations form part of a scoping opinion request for the site, submitted by developer Lipton Rogers on behalf of investor La Salle.The existing 1 Silk Street building currently dominating the site consists of two interlinked towers designed by Fitzroy Robinson Partnership the 17-storey Milton House to the east and 13-storey Shire House to the west featuring heavily glazed faades.The buildings were internally and externally refurbished to designs by Sheppard Robson between 1994 and 1996.The proposed redevelopment is to ensure that offices at 1 Silk Street align with new requirements that come into force next year for commercial buildings to have a minimum EPC rating of C.AdvertisementIn the scoping report, 1 Silk Street is described by environmental consultants Trium as a utilitarian office building that does not represent the best work by either firm of well-known architects associated with its construction and refurbishment.The consultants explain: Architecturally, the building is not distinguished, nor does it present an innovative approach to office design; rather, its current condition reflects the office requirements of the time of its refurbishment in the mid-1990s.The existing building is not considered to have any architectural merit, and it detracts from the streetscape as a result of the inactive frontages and lack of permeability.The proposed development seeks to improve the ground floor experience and introduce a building of higher architectural quality, explains the report.A full planning application is expected to be submitted next year and, pending approval, completion is scheduled for 2032.SOM and La Salle have been contacted for comment.

The winner is GPAD, POoR Collective, MRG Studio, Sutton Vane Associates, Cundall, and MDA Consulting, with their Beyond the Bridge proposal, which aims to boost community engagement, sustainability and safety while reflecting the rich cultural identity of Wandsworth.GPAD and POoR Collective said: We are delighted to be selected to design the Transformation of Falcon Road Bridge. We know the area very well, as the team have worked with local schools and co-designed installations nearby.We are super-excited to co-design another project in Wandsworth and to include local young people, residents and community groups throughout the process. This project gives opportunity for meaningful community engagement that will help shape the design to enrich the local environment for residents and visitors alike.AdvertisementWinner: GPAD, POoR Collective, MRG Studio, Sutton Vane Associates, Cundall, and MDA ConsultingThe other finalists included Adams & Sutherland with Studio ANF, make:good and Artin Light; andre kong studio with Arup and Kanda; Assemble with Samara Scott, Flock Together, Studio Dekka, Stinsensqueeze and Momentum; and Voice B4 Vision.Also shortlisted are Alvaro Barrington with Casswell Bank Architects, Aldo Rinaldi, Our Building Design, ARUP, and Stockdale; and Flanagan Lawrence with Social Space, Arup, Expedition, Light Follows Behaviour, Mo Almedia, Mark and Theo Chaudoir.Each team received an honorarium of 1,500 to further develop their designs and present them to a public audience for consultation. All seven designs were also displayed in three local locations and online with the public invited to submit feedback.The competition invited architects, landscape architects, designers and artists to draw up concepts for the poorly lit, congested and under-maintained town centre underpass, which would transform it into a new vibrant, artistic space connecting north and south Battersea.It also aims to improve safety and accessibility, create a pleasant and joyful environment for all users of the 100m-long route, and deliver a visually striking intervention that promotes sustainable travel while celebrating local heritage and diversity.AdvertisementThe winning team will now lead the fabrication and installation of their concept, to be completed by autumn 2025 to coincide with Wandsworths year as the Mayor of Londons Borough of Culture. The budget includes an indicative 12.5 per cent to cover design fees and other management costs.LFA director Rosa Rogina said: Beyond the Bridge beautifully embodies the spirit of transformation and inclusivity that is at the heart of the London Festival of Architecture. By weaving the voices and stories of Wandsworths communities into the design, this project celebrates local identity in a deeply meaningful way.We are thrilled to see such a visionary and community-focused proposal come to life, redefining Falcon Road Bridge as a landmark of connection, creativity, and pride for all who pass through it.Simon Hogg, leader of Wandsworth Council, which is backing the scheme, said: Im delighted to welcome the winning bridge design team to Wandsworth to help us make a real difference to the Clapham Junction area and involve local people in the project.As part of our Decade of Renewal, the makeover to Falcon Road Bridge will be paid for by property developers. This new bridge design will provide a better and brighter route and create a new landmark for the borough during our year as London Borough of Culture 2025.The Falcon Road Bridge covers a 100m-long stretch of road running underneath railway tracks at the eastern end of Clapham Junction station in the heart of Battersea. Source:Image by Kes EcclestonContest site: Falcon Road Bridge, BatterseaThe competition judges included artist Helen Cammock; Anthony Dewar, professional head buildings and architecture at Network Rail; Jagdip Jagpal, art curator and chair of UP Projects; and Satu Streatfield, specialist associate, night-time and lighting at Publica.The competition comes four years after an overhaul of nearby Thessaly Road railway bridge was completed by artist and designer Yinka Ilori. His Happy Street concept won an earlier LFA contest. Emerging practice Projects Office won an LFA competition to revamp a disused railway arch in Nine Elms in 2021.The Winning Design: Beyond the BridgeWinner: GPAD, POoR Collective, MRG Studio, Sutton Vane Associates, Cundall, and MDA ConsultingBeyond the Bridge transforms the underpass into a welcoming and inspiring environment, addressing key community concerns such as safety, lighting, and noise reduction. Central to the design is the concept of community ownership:Dynamic Lighting: Responsive and artistic lighting enhances visibility and celebrates local cultural events, creating a vibrant and safe space day and night.Green Gateway: A focus on air quality and biodiversity introduces pollinator-friendly plants and accessible micro-gardens.Community Wayfinding and Art: The underpass features a 'Memories of Wandsworth' wayfinding wall, co-designed with local residents, celebrating landmarks and stories through art and dynamic murals.Acoustic Comfort: Panels integrated with artistic elements reduce noise and improve comfort for all users, including neurodivergent individuals.The shortlistAdams & Sutherland with Studio ANF, make:good and Artin Lightandre kong studio with Arup and KandaAssemble, Samara Scott, Flock Together, Studio Dekka, Stinsensqueeze, MomentumAlvaro Barrington, Casswell Bank Architects, Aldo Rinaldi, Our Building Design, ARUP, and StockdaleVoice B4 VisionFlanagan Lawrence with Social Place, Expedition, ARUP, Light Follows Behaviour, Gustafson Porter + Bowman, Mo Almedia, Mark and Theo Chaudoir[WINNER] GPAD, POoR Collective, MRG Studio, Sutton Vane Associates, Cundall, and MDA Consulting

The winner is Studio Weavewith Wright & Wright Architects, Webb Yates Engineers, Tom Massey Studio and Daisy Froud.The shortlist included Periscopewith Assemble; Publicawith Carmody Groarke; and EastArchitectureand Hayatsu Architects with Bradley-Hole Schoenaich Landscape.Collective Cultures comprising OMMX, AANF, Msoma Architects, YAA Projects with J&L Gibbons was also among the finalists.AdvertisementThis contest was only open to members of Lot 4 of the Greater London Authoritys Architecture + Urbanism Framework.The project is intended as a rapid, high-quality response to improve the museums arrival experience, which currently involves an open-air queuing system and a series of temporary tent-like structures for security screening. The central London museum receives more than 6 million visitors annually.The scheme is intended to serve as a precursor to a permanent project reconsidering the complexs relationship to its surrounding public realm. This is expected in a later phase of the museums ongoing regeneration masterplan.The shortlisted teams were asked to develop high-quality, flexible and sustainable proposals, with a clear end-of-life plan that will also account for the reuse of any structures erected on the site.The winning team will now work with the British Museum and local partners to develop the designs and prepare a planning application, with new pavilions expected to be in place by spring 2026.AdvertisementThe entrances competition sitesNicholas Cullinan, director of the British Museum, said: As the most visited building in the UK, and one of the top three most visited museums in the world, first impressions count. With the visitor welcome pavilions were striving to create the most inspiring greeting possible for the 6.2 million people (and counting) from across the nation and around the world who come through our doors each year whether it's their first visit or fifteenth, aged five or 95.We were very impressed by Studio Weaves initial proposals. They perfectly balance athoughtful visitor experience while remaining true to the British Museums historic building. Im delighted to be working with them, and I look forward to leading the development of the designs in consultation with the London Borough of Camden and other key stakeholders to create something very special for everyone.Je Ahn,foundingdirector of Studio Weave, said: As Londoners, and long-term visitors, we are honoured to be part of this moment in the Museums history. With the entry, our team wanted to celebrate the British Museum as both a global and a local museum, and create an internationally exemplary space that will improve the experience of Great Russell Street and Montague Place for everybody.Our proposal aims to resolve complex issues on the site. The project will preserve the appearance of the historic Grade I-listed buildings, address the changing climate and look forward to the future of the institution. It will also introduce new soft landscaping and plants, dotted with engaging installations encouraging curiosity and becoming a memorable highlight of every visit.The winner announcement comes just four months after the British Museum revealed the five design teams shortlisted to overhaul more than a third of its gallery spaces and rework behind-the-scenes areas.It also coincides with initial design exercise models and images by the shortlisted teams going on display in the Museums Round Reading Room.The exercise asked each of the teams to provide visionary approaches for the project, alongside the outline design of a limited selection of museum displays, rather than to create concept designs for the scheme as a whole.That parallel contest, which launched before the welcome experience competition and has faced controversy due to financial backing from fossil fuel giant BP, focuses on the western area of the Grade I-listed museum, which currently hosts collections of Ancient Egyptian, Greek and Roman artefacts.The job will be the museums biggest building project since the 1820s when work began on Robert Smirkes original Greek Revival-style quadrangle. The 100,000m museum has around 3,500 different rooms and features more than eight million items in its permanent collection.Three years ago, the museum named four architects on a 45 million construction consultancy services framework: Avanti Architects, Dannatt Johnson Architects, Nex Architecture and Wright & Wright Architects.Stanton Williams completed a new Albukhary Foundation Gallery of the Islamic World at the British Museum in 2019. In 2014, RSHP completed the museums World Conservation and Exhibitions Centre extension.The entrances shortlistCollective Cultures (OMMX, AANF, Msoma Architects, YAA Projects) with J&L GibbonsEastArchitectureand Hayatsu Architects with Bradley-Hole Schoenaich LandscapePeriscopewith AssemblePublicawith Carmody Groarke[WINNER] Studio Weave with Wright & Wright Architects, Webb Yates Engineers, Tom Massey Studio and Daisy Froud

Writing in a letter on Monday (16 December) seen by the AJ, the non-profit group Good Law Project told the industry regulator that it should take action against architects involved in the fatal refurbishment of Grenfell tower in 2016. It named Studio E co-founder Andrzej Jozef Maria Kuszell and lead architect Bruce Alexander Sounes in the complaint.The Good Law Project said: The complaint is that architects registered with ARB failed to act with the appropriate standard of care and in accordance with statutory guidance, which they owed as architects.We consider that the Phase 2 Report provides extensive evidence that the architects involved in the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower failed to adhere to the standards of professional conduct and practice expected of persons registered as architects under the Architects Act 1997.AdvertisementStudio E was found to have committed significant failings in multiple ways during the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower and bore a very significant responsibility for the disaster, the second report from the inquiry into the disaster found in September.The ARB said in the immediate aftermath of the report that it would consider the findings but had not announced any formal investigation against former Studio E staff, some of whom are still registered architects.A formal investigation is now under way, the AJ understands.In a statement to the BBC, the Good Law Project said the ARB had been slow to take action as the industry regulator and added: [The architects] may be held to account today [...] we, the bereaved families, will have to live with their mistakes for the rest of our lives.These architects were responsible for the architectural safety of our and our families homes. Yet none of their partners or employees had the relevant knowledge, experience or skills needed to work on a high-rise cladding project. They let us and our loved ones down.AdvertisementThe non-profit group, which signed the letter with the Fire Brigades Union, said future tragedies related to dangerous cladding could be avoided if its complaint is upheld by the ARB. The organisations said it would also give residents of other affected buildings the confidence to complain to the regulator.In a statement to the AJ, an ARB spokesperson said formal investigations have commenced into the architects involved in Grenfell Towers refurbishment to see whether they might be guilty of a disciplinary offence under the Architects Code.It continued: The Grenfell Tower fire was a national tragedy and is rightly considered one of the UKs worst modern disasters, and we are sensitive to the strong public interest of taking appropriate action without delay.The investigations must be conducted properly if they are to be effective, and can be complex, particularly when they take place in the background of potential criminal proceedings which must not be prejudiced.The ARB, which did not set out a timeframe for the investigation, added: It is ARBs policy to not comment on the detail of investigations until or unless they reach a public hearing of our Professional Conduct Committee, so that the Committee can make an independent decision based on the evidence available.Although no longer trading, Studio E has been in the voluntary liquidation process for four years after it began winding down in early 2020 an insolvency procedure that began during the second phase of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry.The Grenfell inquirys chair, Martin Moore-Bick, said in his final report that Studio E had taken an unduly narrow view of its responsibilities and operated under a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of the job, which Moore-Bick said was symptomatic of a widespread failure within the wider profession.Other bodies criticised in the report included cladding manufacturers Kingspan and Arconic, which the report said had knowingly created a false market in insulation for use on buildings over 18m by claiming its product was successfully used elsewhere. Government deregulation was also heavily blamed.The Metropolitan Policesaid in Maythat no charges would arise over Grenfell before 2026 and that 19 companies and organisations, and 58 individuals were facing possible criminal charges.Possible offences include corporate manslaughter, gross negligence, manslaughter, fraud, violation of the Building Safety Act 1984 and misconduct in public office.Carter Clark, the liquidators for Studio E and representing architects Andrzej Jozef Maria Kuszell, and Bruce Alexander Sounes, have been contacted for comment.2024-12-18Gino Spocchiacomment and share

As a valued reader of the Architects Journal, your feedback is important to us. Were continually striving to enhance the AJ, and wed like to hear your opinions on the AJ Buildings Library.The Buildings Library is a key resource for architects, designers and industry professionals, and we want to ensure it meets your needs. Whether you use it frequently, occasionally or not at all, your insights are invaluable in shaping its future.To help us understand how we can improve the AJ Buildings Library, we kindly ask you to complete a short survey.As a thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts, you can be in with a chance of winning a luxury hamper.The AJ Buildings Library can only be fully accessed with an AJ subscription click here for more information.We look forward to receiving your responses!AJ Buildings Library 2024-12-18Mary Douglascomment and share TagsAJ Buildings Library

Shell HQ Aberdeen The Tullos Campus (1973-92) by McInnes Gardner &Partners Source:Used by kind permission of DC Thomson & Co LtdBrutalist former headquarters of Shell for more than 50 years, comprising four interlinked buildings. Demolition began early this year after Shell relocated its HQ to central Aberdeen. The company is understood to be exploring options for the now-empty site alongside the city council.Aberdeen is not blessed with much great, even good, contemporary architecture. But the Shell building in the Tullos Campus was certainly worth a visit. It had an honesty and integrity in its robust, concrete finishes and ziggurat form. It was easily one of the most distinctive and interesting buildings in the city. Alan Dunlop, founder, Alan Dunlop ArchitectsFiddlers Ferry Cooling Towers, Merseyside (1967-71) by Gordon Graham Source:ShutterstockDecommissioned coal-fired power station, in operation until 2020. Phased demolition began in 2023, with the dramatic detonation of four out of eight iconic cooling towers. Site-owner Peel NRE is behind plans for its residential-led regeneration.AdvertisementCascading to the ground like a quartet of dissipated drunks, the 114m-high towers were there one minute and gone the next. Demolitions of unloved or obsolete structures cooling towers, chimney stacks, council estates have become the modern equivalent of public executions. We feel a visceral thrill as the dynamite does its work.Catherine Slessor, architecture critic, writing in the AJBohemian cottage, Oxford (1923) by Clough Williams-EllisCommissioned by early-20th-century feminist Lily Dougall and her same-sex partner Sophie Earp. Lost to a demolition and rebuild scheme put forward by new owners in 2022 following a failed listing attempt by The Twentieth Century Society.In this case the architect, the client and the building itself all had clear historic interest, so it was enormously frustrating to see it turned down for listing and the bulldozers roll in. Farewell quaint interwar cottage. Hello generic suburban new-build. Sometimes you just despair. Coco Whittaker, head of casework at The Twentieth Century SocietyFrench Railways House, Piccadilly (1960-62) by Shaw & Lloyd with signage by Ern Goldfinger and interiors by Charlotte Perriand Source:LoopNetFormer British headquarters for Frances state railway, SNCF. The building is being dismantled the steel structure set for a new life elsewhere and replaced with new offices designed by Make for Great Portland Estates and The Crown Estate.I feel real pain every time I walk past this site. The taut, confident, cosmopolitan design of French Railways House expressed the best of mid-century Modernism, and its streetfront signage was triumphant and joyous. Tim Waterman, professor at the Bartlett School of ArchitectureAdvertisementInterior of City Hall, Southwark (2000-02), by Foster + Partners Source:ShutterstockPurpose-built to house the newly-formed Greater London Authority and Mayor of Londons office in 2000. Vacant since 2020 when the GLA moved to new premises in the Royal Docks, the building has been gutted ready for an office-led overhaul by Gensler.As the mayors office, Fosters City Hall had heft. As a gutted hulk repurposed for a mixed-use office and sandwich mall, it has none. Edwin Heathcote, architecture and design critic at the Financial TimesPortsmouth News Centre, Hilsea (1966-67) by AE Cogswell & Sons Source:ShutterstockThe former headquarters and printing hall of the Portsmouth Evening News is being replaced with a bus depot for First Bus under permitted development rights.On the face of it, the News Building was obsolete and the proposals to create a bus depot capable of housing up to 90 electric vehicles can only be welcomed. So a win for green transport, right? Not quite. The distinctive curved office building that fronted the site, with space-age mosaic NEWS signage and landscaped ornamental pond, could so easily have been retained as part of the new bus depot to the rear. Once again, a failure of imagination and a boon for landfill. Oli Marshall, campaigns director at The Twentieth Century SocietyGlasgow ABC cinema, Glasgow (1875 and 1929) by CJ McNair Source:Will IngArt Deco cinema consisting of a renovated main structure dating back to 1875 when it was a diorama theatre, and a 1929 entrance portico by cinema architect Charles J McNair. Declared unsafe by Glasgow City Council following a 2018 fire, it will be replaced by student housing for Vita by architecture practice HAUS Collective.The much-loved cinema sat in the heart of the new Sauchiehall Street Culture and Heritage District. Charles McNairs grand Classical entrance was an authentic symbol of the golden age of cinema, and could have been retained and repurposed for the civic good. Niall Murphy, conservation architect and Glasgow City Heritage Trust director2024-12-17Anna Highfieldcomment and share

The proposals, set out in an English Devolution White Paper published by the ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) yesterday (16 December), will give mayors a more direct role in plans for their areas than ever before.The proposals for future legislation would be delivered via an English Devolution Bill expected next year, which will equip mayors to heavily influence planning, housing, transport and skills provision.The policy document outlines how mayors across the regions will be given new development management powers similar to those those exercised by the Mayor of London, including the ability to call in planning applications of strategic importance.AdvertisementThey will also be able to charge developers a Mayoral Levy to ensure that new developments come with the necessary associated infrastructure similar to the levy used to help fund Londons Elizabeth line in 2012.Major cash boosts will help to drive the changes. According to the policy document, mayors in Greater Manchester, the West Midlands, South Yorkshire, West Yorkshire, Liverpool City Region and the North East will be the first to receive the new integrated funding settlements, covering housing, regeneration, local growth, transport, skills, retrofit and employment support.MHCLG said its ambitious new devolution framework had aims of hardwiring mayors into the fabric of government. It also sets out a strong preference to see mayors in place across the whole of England making it the default status for regions across England.A government Devolution Priority Programme aims to deliver inaugural mayoral elections in May 2026, with authorities including Cheshire and Warrington, Norfolk and Suffolk, and others already earmarked for the programme. MHCLG says it has had productive discussions with these authorities and will confirm places on the programme in January.The White Paper also laid out the governments plans to rebuild local government after 14 years of mismanagement and decline, including multi-year financial settlements for authorities according to local need and the reorganisation of local government to create simpler and more stable structures which improve accountability and outcomes.AdvertisementDeputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Angela Rayner said the devolution plans were about giving local leaders the tools and the trust they need to forge their areas futures.Rayner said the plans would raise living standards, improve public services, and enable the homes we so desperately need.She insisted: We have an economy that hoards potential and a politics that hoards power. So our devolution revolution will deliver the greatest transfer of power from Whitehall to our communities in a generation, empowering those communities to realise their potential. And nobody is more excited about it than I am.Housing and planningNew housing and planning powers outlined for Mayors and Authorities in the White Paper, which the government insists are integral to delivering the 1.5m homes promised in this parliament:All areas - with or without a Strategic Authority - will have to produce a Spatial Development Strategy, to be adopted with support from a majority of constituents.Mayors to be given new development management powers 'similar to those those exercised by the Mayor of London' including the ability to call in planning applications.Mayors will be able to charge developers a 'Mayoral Levy' to ensure that new developments come with the necessary associated infrastructure. Such a levy was used to help fund Londons Elizabeth Line in 2012.Homes England will have a stronger partnership with established Mayoral Strategic Authorities and increased accountability to mayors to help them deliver on their plans. As part of this, the government says it will move Homes England to a more regionalised model over time, so that the agency is even more responsive to the economic plan of an area.Mayors will be given the funding they need to deliver on their housing ambitions, with control of grant funding for regeneration and housing delivery.Established Mayoral Strategic Authorities will be given the power to set out the strategic direction of any future affordable housing programme.2024-12-17Anna Highfieldcomment and share

The winning team will draw up a strategic vision for the estate of South Staffordshire College which was founded in 2009 following the merger of Cannock Chase Technical College, Rodbaston College, Lichfield College and the two campuses of Tamworth College.The estimated 50,000 commission will look at ways to introduce new ways of learning and working and deliver welcoming and inspirational spaces across the colleges mix of urban and rural sites in the South of Staffordshire.According to the brief: The property strategy will emerge from a process of engagement with college stakeholders such as board members, delivery and support staff, students, partners and customers.AdvertisementTo support the delivery of our property strategy, a property strategy support partner is required to manage the production of the strategy itself, plus any subsequent projects that the college chooses to implement from the strategy.South Staffordshire College provides further education courses to around 10,000 learners and also offers higher education in conjunction with the University of Wolverhampton and the University of Staffordshire. The organisation has an annual turnover of 33 million.The team selected for the estimated 50,000 contract will consult with stakeholders and draw up a strategy for how the colleges estate can meet growing student numbers and the requirements of new learning technologies. Proposals must also support an ambition to cut CO2 emissions across the estate by 30 per cent by 2030.Competition detailsProject title Property Strategic SupportClientContract value TbcFirst round deadline Midday, 27 January 2025Restrictions TbcMore information https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/notice/db97db1f-a9a1-4109-83f1-88c186e78543

The winning team selected for the estimated 300,000 contract will create a consistent, inclusive and high-quality wayfinding and signage strategy and design for the Brutalist complex which is currently the focus of planned a 191 million redevelopment.The project will ensure new intuitive and accessible visitor journeys through the complex which has suffered from poor navigation in the past. The wayfinding upgrade coincides with plans to restore and refurbish key public spaces at the Barbican Centre venue including its foyers, lakeside terrace and conservatory.According to the brief: The Barbican Centre is at a key moment in its history, with a new Vision, Strategic Plan and set of Values, underpinning a major programme of work to renew the Grade II-listed building, and a full refresh of the brand, covering brand architecture, tone of voice and visual identity.AdvertisementOur ambition is for a consistent, inclusive and high-quality wayfinding and signage strategy and design within the Barbican Centre site boundary, and a suite of assets for use in the surrounding public realm.This new wayfinding approach will connect with wider wayfinding projects to create intuitive and accessible visitor journeys from major transport hubs into the Barbican Centre site, alongside improving signage and navigation across all of the Barbican Centres internal and external spaces.The new wayfinding strategy will reflect and espouse the Barbican Centres brand, which will be refreshed to create a bold and clear visual identity that flexes across a variety of uses and platforms.The Barbican Centre was designed by Chamberlin, Powell and Bon and completed in 1982 as the centrepiece of the Citys large-scale Barbican Estate post-war reconstruction vision. It features a concert hall, theatre, cinema, two art galleries, a conference centre, library, restaurants and public foyers.In recent decades, the building has received a series of upgrades. Allford Hall Monaghan Morris completed a 12.6 million overhaul of the complex in 2006 and later created a 3.4 million street-level cinema complex and renewed shop. In 2019, RUFFARCHITECTS carried out an environmental upgrade of the centres main art gallery.AdvertisementAllies and Morrison and Asif Khan Studio saw off four other big-name teams to win a competition for the revamp of Londons Grade II-listed Barbican Centre in 2022. Earlier this month, the City of London Corporation approved a 191 million investment in the project, which it said would make the cultural centre fit for the 21st century.Allies and Morrison, Asif Khan Studio and engineering consultancy Buro Happold have already carried out significant public consultation, and are expected to launch a more detailed phase of public discussions early next year, said the City of London.Subject to planning permission, construction is targeted to begin in 2027 with this first phase complete in time for the Barbicans 50th anniversary in 2032.Bids for the latest commission will be evaluated 65 per cent on quality and 35 per cent on price. Applicants must hold public liability insurance of 2 million and professional indemnity insurance of 1 million.Competition detailsProject title Barbican Renewal - Wayfinding DesignerClientContract value TbcFirst round deadline Midday, 10 January 2025Restrictions TbcMore information https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/039648-2024

Teams selected for the maximum four-year framework will work alongside the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Golden Jubilee health boards to support the delivery of capital projects across the Greater Glasgow and Clyde area.The framework is divided into two lots covering cost consultancy services and lead consultancy services including architectural, mechanical and electrical engineering, civil and structural engineering and CDM principal designer services.According to the brief: Successful framework suppliers will undertake scoping, design, tender, cost management, and construction management activities split across two lots for Lead Consultant and Cost Consultant services.AdvertisementThe framework will to be for a maximum period of up to 4 years from its commencement date and support projects ranging in works value up to ten million pounds.The capital projects support the delivery of acute, primary care, mental health and healthcare support services across the health boards, framework consultants will be expected to work on a range of projects in terms of value, complexity and environment.Founded in 2006, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde is a large health board responsible for 35 hospitals, 240 GP practices, 300 community pharmacies and 270 dental practices across Scotland.Bids for inclusion on the framework will be evaluated 70 per cent on cost and 30 per cent on price. Applicants must hold employers liability insurance of 5 million, public liability insurance of 5 million and professional indemnity insurance of 1 million.Competition detailsProject titleConstruction Professional Service FrameworkClientNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeContract value1.5 millionFirst round deadline Midday, 24 January 2025Restrictions TbcMore informationhttps://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/039989-2024

Gardner Stewart Architects proposals for Dorrington Gardens, near Upminster, were submitted last month on behalf of the London Borough of Haverings housing arm, Mercury Land Holdings.The scheme proposes a mix of 12 family homes and 22 apartments alongside sensitively integrated landscaping and 24 car parking spaces.But in a statement of community involvement put to the planning committee, residents hit out at the proposals over the size of the development, which opponents said could put pressure on local infrastructure, including GP services.AdvertisementOne resident said: This is a sad bloody day; Hornchurch is coming to an end as a decent suburb [and] the safe, friendly, family area will be wiped out of this happens. And if it does, I am gone.Another argued: I dont want any more properties in this area. This area is becoming more and more overpopulated [and] they will not be occupied by people from Hornchurch anyway.The planning documents recorded that 67 per cent of the 885 households consulted on the new homes said they had a negative view of the development, while 33 per cent supported it.One resident who backed the plan said they accepted the proposals as long as access to the new homes was not from the cul-de-sac on nearby Bruce Road.Havering has an average population density of 2,332 persons per square kilometre, compared to 5,640 people per square kilometre (km) for London as a whole, according to ONS statistics.AdvertisementIn September, the government announced plans to introduce a brownfield passport to give proposals which meet design and quality standards automatic planning approval when it involves development on already used land, as part of efforts to build 1.5 million homes in this parliament.Those changes are part of tweaks made to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which is still to be formally published after a consultation this summer.Gardner Stewart Architects and Havering have been contacted for comment.

Recent posts on LinkedIn (including those by RIBA chair Jack Pringle and former NLA chief Peter Murray) suggest that working in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has become an acceptable norm for UK architects and built environment consultants. While no questions are being asked, plenty of justifications are being offered. So let me address them here.We are designing at the forefront of sustainabilityWhile the buildings may comply with LEED and BREEAM certification, these accreditation systems are increasingly criticised for their methodology. LEED Platinum airports in the KSA are, for instance, a clear contradiction in terms. Beyond the questionable credibility of these schemes, buildings that claim sustainability often serve as mere band-aids (a term developed by MOULD, the research collective of which I am a member) which fail to cover, let alone heal, the wounds of climate breakdown.AdvertisementMore on this topicUK architects in the spotlight amid reports of 21,000 Saudi worker deathsIn KSA, these wounds run exceptionally deep. Saudi Aramco, the state oil company, is the worlds largest oil and gas extractor, and the national budget is heavily dependent on continued extraction and its resulting CO2 emissions. As Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman declared: We are still going to be the last man standing, and every molecule of hydrocarbon will come out. With these resources projected to last another 73 years at current extraction rates, any new KSA building inevitably becomes part of an ongoing campaign of intentional climate breakdown.The majority of KSA buildings are funded by a regime that is intentionally obstructing developments in climate justice at COP and other forums. For example, at COP 29, KSA was accused of unilaterally editing the main text. In this context, no new building can credibly claim to be sustainable such claims merely serve as surface greenwashing over an entrenched system of environmental destruction.In addition, any designs will have to mitigate increasingly intolerable temperatures. Saudi Arabia has warmed at a rate 50 per cent higher than the rest of the northern hemispheres landmass over the past four decades, and this trend shows no signs of slowing. Buildings designed to combat these temperatures create an ecocidal feedback loop, consuming ever more energy to offset the effects of burning fossil fuels. Moreover, the ongoing urban expansion perpetuates a cycle of endless growth that drives climate breakdown. For all these reasons, no new building in KSA can credibly claim to be sustainable.Our buildings will be an agent for social changeThis argument is commonly made, as exemplified by Stuart Latham, managing partner and senior executive partner at Foster + Partners, who wrote: Saudi Arabia is rapidly opening up to the rest of the world and through our work on these ambitious and innovative projects, we are at the forefront of progress, enabling society to embrace positive change.AdvertisementSnhettas Kjetil Trdal Thorsen expressed a similar view, stating about Snhettas KSA projects: You cant control the future completely but you can provide people with the right tools and, by providing them with the right tools, at least there is an opportunity to move one step ahead. Ina Tin, senior adviser and Saudi Arabia expert at Amnesty Norway, dismisses these stances as a blend of naivety and cynicism (in an article well worth reading).This argument, in all its hubris, misunderstands architectures limited agency and influence under an autocratic regime. It perpetuates modernist myths about architecture as the sole driver of social change, casting architects as heroic geniuses who can reshape society at will.In reality, architecture in KSA serves merely as window-dressing for progress while repressive policies continue unabated underneath. Architectures powerlessness to effect social change is further reinforced by developers who control the supply chain, reducing buildings to vessels for capitalist extraction. Any building project thus sits far down the regimes chain of command; they have far more effective levers to pull to maintain control.Buildings will do nothing absolutely nothing to save the lives of the 198 people executed in the first nine months of 2024. It will not help overturn policies that brutally discriminate against women and LGBTQ+ people. It will not stop the genocidal war in Yemen. And so on.If we pulled out of KSA, someone else would do it anywayThis follows the same flawed logic as statements like If I stopped flying, planes would take off anyway which misses the point that fewer planes would fly if more people stopped flying. Those working in KSA often implicitly assume that, if they withdrew, less capable designers would take their place, and therefore their continued involvement provides a better service. However, as argued above, no building in KSA can be considered beneficial.History shows us clear examples, most notably the apartheid regime in South Africa, where boycotts proved to be powerful catalysts for change. Pulling out is the best course of action.We just design the buildings; we dont build themThis is the standard get-out clause for architects and consultants to absolve themselves of responsibility for the deadly conditions in KSA construction. The excuse is too often traced back to Zaha Hadid and her infamous I have nothing to do with the workers,but anyone working in KSA is complicit.Architects cannot simply look away from the estimated 21,000 deaths and 100,000 missing migrant construction workers who build their designs. They cannot dismiss the brutal conditions and illegal contracts that amount to forced labour, as documented in a complaint to the UNs International Labour Organization.Architects cannot ignore the outcry from US Senators, African Trade Unions, and Amnesty International about FIFAs likely rubber-stamping of the 2036 Football World Cup to KSA. Indeed, it is more likely that architects working in KSA are complicit in what Barney Ronay describes as corporate manslaughter in his brilliant, excoriating article.Every building in KSA is part of a lethal and exploitative supply chain and architects working there must decide if they are willing to be complicit in this system.We would not work on NEOMThis claim is often heard from architects working in other parts of KSA, away from the infamous Line and associated projects. It is an argument that attempts to claim moral high ground while demonising the NEOM architects. NEOM is indeed at the pinnacle of social and spatial vileness and no one with any conscience should be working on it, as Kate Wagner has so lucidly expounded in her various articles.But it is only the tip of a much larger despotic system that oversees all development in KSA. Perhaps NEOM designers are more honest in not even trying to make moral claims and instead just indulging in architectural self-gratification on behalf of their Saudi masters.The RIBA and ARB codes dont stop us from working in KSAThis is true, but only because these codes are so ineffectual. As I argued in Architecture Depends, my hairdresser could meet both codes, yet she isnt responsible for other peoples lives and the planets future, as architects are. The codes are feeble primarily because they focus on defining the architects relationship with the client. The architects primary responsibility is to the client, states the ARB code. When that client is embedded in an autocratic regime, any ethical responsibility is simply washed away.A more compelling statement emerged from the 2018 RIBA Ethics and Sustainable Development Commission: RIBA Council reasserted the Institutes unequivocal commitment to placing public interest, social purpose, ethics and sustainable development at the heart of its activities.If taken at face value, this declaration should preclude any work in KSA. Yet the unequivocal has become decidedly equivocal, as evidenced by 20 RIBA members exhibiting at the 2024 Cityscape Global event in KSA, the worlds largest development event.Professional conduct follows codified rules, focused not on broader societal obligations but on serving clients and employers. Ethical conduct, however, cannot be reduced to universal rules it requires individuals to face their specific circumstances and determine what they can morally accept. As Zygmunt Bauman concludes in his Postmodern Ethics: If in doubt, consult your conscience.The matter of individual conscience should be at the front of any decision about working in KSA. Anyone working in KSA should inform themselves about the human rights, environmental and political context and then face these conditions from an ethical viewpoint. Architecture does not stand outside these moral conflicts; it is part of them. I applaud the UK practices that have decided on ethical grounds not to work in KSA, and despair of those who try to justify their engagement with spurious arguments.Jeremy Till is a writer, educator and recovering architect. A version of this article was first published on Substack on Wednesday 11 December.2024-12-16Jeremy Tillcomment and share

Salaries have edged up this year but, with faltering workloads, rock-bottom fees and rising taxes on employers, experts fear they are unlikely to go any higher. Richard Waite looks at the latest data and what it says about the state of the profession It has been a year of small improvements but tougher times are loomingAt first sight, the findings from the latest architectural salary survey, shared exclusively with the AJ by compiler 9B Careers, seem rosy enough. With an average increase of 3.5 per cent, the professions pay is growing faster than UK inflation (currently 2.3 per cent). The across-the-board rise reported by the 2,700 respondents who completed the annual bellwether survey was also larger than in 2023, when salaries went up just 1.3 per cent on average.Source:9B CareersAverage percentage increase in salaries of architectural staff (in practice)Drilling down, a recently qualified architect can now expect to earn 42,850 4.2 per cent more than a year ago. But the latest increases dont look so upbeat seen in a longer-term context. That same architect, if their 2016 wages had kept up with inflation, should be earning 50,300.AdvertisementMeanwhile, an associate architect currently taking home 56,950 is missing out on nearly 15,000, compared with the inflation-tracked salary estimate.As Aga Szedzianis, an associate at DSDHA, wrote for the AJ earlier this month: This is not mere salary stagnation. This is a rapid salary decrease. Whats more, experts are predicting there will be little, if any, growth in pay next year.The profession is facing triple headwinds of unpredictable workloads, squeezed fees and extra practice burdens such as the new National Insurance contribution (NIC) regime for employers and, in particular, the fall in the threshold at which employers start paying NI on an employees salary, down from 9,100 to 5,000. Alex Shall, a partner at accounting and advisory firm Praxis, believes there will be very little growth in architects salaries in the medium term. He says: Having spoken with some [architect] clients, the general view is that practices were already finding the idea of offering a cost-of-living rise in line with inflation very challenging.Now, with an average increase of 2 per cent on the total cost of employing someone as a result of the NIC changes, it is likely that many employers will say there will no increase at all from April 2025, while others may limit the cost-of-living increase to 1 per cent as a way of sharing the pain.AdvertisementSalary levels are intertwined with practice income and the spectre of knockdown fees has risen again in recent weeks.Paul Chappell, recruiter 9B Careers founder and organiser of the survey, believes the fees issue, NIC increases (from 13.8 per cent to 15 per cent) and recent redundancies will tilt salary negotiations in favour of the employer and that it would be surprising if salaries continued to grow at the same rate.David Green, former senior economist at the Bank of England and a director at Belsize Architects, agrees there has been relentless pressure on fees. In terms of workloads in 2025, he adds: While there should be increased expenditure from some potential clients, others, like local authorities, remain very stretched.It will take time before the reforms promised by government to unlock development become reality. Our expectation is that downward pressure on at least some salaries is not going to ease any time soon.The squeezed top and the left-behind apprenticesThe survey showed salary increases at almost every level, except for the most senior roles and apprentices. The average expected annual wage for architects with more than 21 years of experience actually dropped from 74,103 in 2023 to 72,969 in 2024. The pay for a woman in this category fell even more.Source:9B CareerAverage salary of those with more than 21 years experienceAn explanation for the top-end squeeze? Some practices are experiencing real financial difficulty. It is unsurprising that the most senior people are choosing to act to secure what in some cases may be the survival of the practice, Green suggests.At the other end of the scale, apprentices also seem to be losing out. Though the pool of apprentice respondents was smaller, it seems their salaries have stalled (or even dipped), especially compared with those doing the same work but who qualified through the traditional route. Emily Foster, programme manager at the Thornton Education Trust and recent graduate of the Level 6 architectural assistant apprenticeship, said: This data is worrying but, unfortunately, not surprising. While these figures arent true for all practices and the sample size is small, it reflects a broader problem of apprentices being particularly vulnerable to exploitation.This disproportionately affects those from lower socio-economic backgrounds who, ironically, chose the apprenticeship route so they would be more financially secure, while also gaining valuable experience.Men paid more at senior levels and unfair bonus handoutsIt has been noticeable and welcome how, over the nine years the survey has been running, the gender pay gap has steadily shrunk. There is now little difference between the salaries of men and women with up to 10 years of practice experience.However, there is a still a near-4,000 gender pay gap for those with 10-20 years experience. This rises to 10,000 at 21 years-plus remarkably, a significant widening of the 6,000 gap reported at this level in 2023. There is also a disparity between the bonuses received by female staff (41 per cent) and those of their male colleagues (48 per cent).Source:9B CareersAverage salaries for men versus women, comparing 2018, 2021 and 2024.This discrepancy has changed very little over the years, though the difference had shrunk to around 5 percentage points in 2020 (33 per cent and 38 per cent respectively).The salary survey findings come in the wake of new research into the talent retention of women in the built environment by the Circle Partnership, in collaboration with Cellence Plus and Laing ORourke. That study revealed women were discouraged by overtly competitive or ambitious behaviour, preferring to earn recognition through consistency, reliability, and quiet competence. It also found that women were more cautious and risk-averse when it comes to career and finance, which could be a key contributor to the ongoing gender pay gap.Sadly, there will be little opportunity to shrink this gap if, as feared, salaries dont change in the next 12 months however well-documented and understood the issues are.Source:9B CareersPercentage of men and women who have received bonus payments2024-12-13Richard Waitecomment and share

The east London-based practice has joined forces with local practice Intervention Architecture to design 408 proposed build-to-rent homes for the major regeneration site, near New Street station in Birmingham city centre.The proposed homes would sit at the heart of the 17ha masterplan within a mixed-use building overlooking Manor Square.The 13-storey building with a part 18 and part 19-storey crown would include independent shops, bars and restaurants on the ground floor, a first and second floor leisure unit, with the vast majority of apartments on floors three to 13. The top floor includes a communal rooftop garden and pavilion.AdvertisementIn a design and access statement the architects said the scheme, which uses an industrial red and brown material palette from the Smithfield Design Code, aims to respond to the local context and provide a sense of retreat and home whilst still embracing the lively 24-hour nature of the site.Birmingham City Council, which owns the land, is expected to consider a reserved matters application early next year. Source:Lendlease/CityscapeThe council named Lendlease as its joint venture partner on Birmingham Smithfield in 2018, and grantedplanning permission in June for the construction company's 1.9 billion regeneration plans for the area, following a lengthy planning process.The 17ha masterplan, a revision of an earlier version, was drawn up by a design team including Prior + Partners and David Kohn Architects and submitted in October 2023.It provides for more than 3,000 new homes, offices, restaurants, cafs and bars on the brownfield site, and will see Birminghams historic Bull Ring Markets (which have been on the site for 800 years) housed in two new buildings.AdvertisementThe Manor Square site where Bell Phillips and Interventions housing would sit once housed a moated manor house. The building would face a proposed square which sits over the archaeology of the medieval moated site, and echoes the moat with circular landscaping. Source:Lendlease/CityscapeBell Phillips and Intervention Architecture's scheme for Smithfield BirminghamLendleases masterplan application was embroiled in controversy in the weeks leading up to its approval, with campaigners accusing it of falling far short of the citys green space guidelines.But Birmingham planning officers concluded that, while it fell below a policy-compliant position on open space, the Smithfield schemes overall benefits including a new market square by St Martins Church, 900 new full-time construction jobs, and city centre housing provision featuring high-quality architectural design outweighed the concerns over green space.An original application had been lodged in January 2023, but a revised masterplan was later submitted to address concerns over harm to the historic cityscape raised by Historic England.The design was led by Prior + Partners along with New York High Line lead James Corner Field Operations, and includes buildings by Stirling Prize-winners dRMM and Haworth Tompkins and up-and-coming local practices Intervention Architecture and Minesh Patel Architects.Delivery is scheduled to complete in four phases over 15 years.Selina Mason, director of masterplanning for Smithfield, said the Bell Phillips and Intervention Architecture plans kick-start the transformation of this iconic site, bringing much needed new homes and spaces.Mason added: Were proud to be playing a part in preserving Birminghams historic Bull Ring Markets, while also creating a vibrant new neighbourhood that will benefit the city for generations to come. Source:PixelflakesJanuary 2023 plans - the originally proposed open market building and rag and indoor market by David Kohn Architects and Eastside Projects. The scheme has been significantly alteredProject data - plot 4DLocation Smithfield, BirminghamLocal authority Birmingham City CouncilType of project Mixed useClient LendleaseArchitect Bell Phillips and Intervention ArchitectureLandscape architect LDAPlanning consultant TurleyStructural engineer Robert Bird GroupM&E consultant AECOMQuantity surveyor QuantemPlanning application reference 2024/07367/PA

In October, the AJ100 practice resubmitted plans for the 74-storey tall building on the landmark site between RSHPs Leadenhall building and Norman Fosters Gherkin, reducing its footprint and opening up the lower levels.Backed by developers Stanhope and Aroland Holdings, the skyscraper will be 309.64m tall, the same as Renzo Pianos Shard, making it the UK and Western Europes joint tallest building. The proposal will replace Gollins Melvin Wards 1969-built 23-storey St Helens Building.The City of London Corporations planning officers had recommended approval for the reworked scheme, even though Historic England had branded the plans arguably worse than the previous proposal, warning the scheme would still seriously degrade the scale and character of the public realm around the site.The heritage watchdog was worried about harm to the significance of three neighbouring Grade I-listed buildings and said the slight reduction of the footprint would not meaningfully improve these impacts. The organisation also decried the introduction of a large digital screen.Historic England had also objected to the original scheme in February over concerns about design and form, particularly as experienced from nearby streets, rather than [the] overall height of the plans.However, following the amendments, neighbouring Lloyds had withdrawn its objection.The scheme was voted through today (13 December) by 16 votes to seven.The reconfigured design includes minor changes to the massing and layout of ground and lower floor entrances, including a reduced footprint for the skyscraper and a welcoming, fully accessible and inclusive public entrance directly from St Helens Square.AdvertisementIn July the City of Londons planning committee had deferred making a decision on the application due to concerns over its ground-level arrangements, including the impact of the cantilevered-hour-long meeting. There were two abstentions.The latest scheme supersedes a much earlier proposal for the 0.72ha site, known as The Trellis. Eric Parry secured consent in 2019 for that scheme, which was a similarly height but aesthetically different. That consent could still be built out as the application was technically implemented, due to demolition on site.The new development aims to deliver 154,000m of office space capable of accommodating up to 8,700 City workers, 1,340m of retail and commercial area, 3,130m of public viewing galleries, and 3,479m of cultural uses under the earlier plans. A dedicated space for the Museum of London is planned for the 72nd and 73rd floors.Earlier in the year, Eric Parry said of the updated plans: One Undershaft is a uniquely welcoming tall building in the City of London that provides free public access on multiple levels throughout the building. These include the London Museums education space and free viewing gallery on the uppermost floors and what will become an extraordinary new elevated public sky garden on the 11th floor.Weve listened to the feedback offered by stakeholders and neighbours and submitted a new design proposal for the lower part of the building that improves upon our earlier plans, with more space available in St Helens Square, a more strongly expressed public entrance to the building, a new public screen and temporary stage providing cultural experiences and intensified planting to the landscaped spaces around the base.AdvertisementCrucially, the benefits of the earlier proposal are retained.Construction is expected to take around five years, with enabling works starting next year and construction finishing in 2030. Source:DBOXEric Parry's revised 1 Undershaft scheme (July 2024)

The South Bank landmark by Tower Bridge will be transformed into a mixed-use office and retail scheme to be known as 110 The Queens Walk for its owner, Kuwaiti company St Martins Property.Its original glass faade described by Gensler as over-complicated will be demolished and replaced with verdant terraces, while the ground floor will be opened up to public uses including cafs, shops and restaurants.The plans also include straightening the 21-year-old building, which currently leans back away from the River Thames, extending its footprint by 14.2m southwards to create more office and retail space inside.AdvertisementAPPROVED: Genslers plans for Foster + Partners former City HallSouthwark Councils planning committee approved Genslers plans for the building on Tuesday evening (10 December).The purpose-built structure has lain empty since it was vacated by the Greater London Authority (GLA) and Mayor of London in December 2021, after more than 20 years, in favour of cheaper premises at the Royal Victoria Dock.Southwark planning officers had recommended the Gensler scheme for approval, concluding that while the design would alter and amend the character and appearance of a well-renowned building, it would also draw reference to the existing building, retaining some its most iconic features such as its curving north faade.The officers said the proposal would modernise the building and its surroundings, improving its sustainability and energy efficiency in order to bring the 1.9ha site back into use. Source:ShutterstockAn officers report concluded that, left as it is, it would become problematic (potentially unlawful) to let [the building] to a new occupier from 2030.AdvertisementGenslers aim is for the building to be net zero carbon and at least BREEAM Excellent once renovated.St Martins Property concluded that a light renovation of the building was not possible due to challenges built into its design, including defects and leaks in the building fabric, and floorplates that dont meet occupiers changed standards.The developer had previously said its proposed redesign would maximise the retentionof the existing buildings structure, materials, and character, including its circular footprint and sculpted form.The interior of the south bank building has already been gutted ahead of its renovation, to the dismay of heritage campaigners.The Twentieth Century Society had previously made two failed listing bids for the building once in 2022 and then again earlier this year both refused by Historic England.The statutory government adviser concluded that the building did not rank among the very best examples of the work of Foster + Partners in this period, despite featuring a striking geometric design of clear technical sophistication.Genslers plans to straighten the building will extend its footprint in depth from 41.9m to 56.1m (+14.2m on the southern side), reducing internal pinch points and sloping surfaces, while its core remains in place. The changes will create 3,800m of additional floorspace, the vast majority of which will be for retail. Source:Gensler (taken from design and access statement)APPROVED: Genslers plans for Foster + Partners former City HallA sunken space next to the building, known as the Scoop and housing below-ground shops, will also be refurbished with a lift added, and the surrounding area freshly landscaped and a garage removed.In a design and access statement, Gensler said its proposal reimagines the form of the building, maintaining the recognisable elements while correcting the issues which harm the ability to find an occupier for it. The practice said its design would allow the building to be used to its full potential.Teasing an earlier version of the design in November 2023, the design team which also includes landscape architect LDA Design said it aimed to sensitively refurbish and revitalise the vacant Foster + Partners-designed building.Building owner St Martins Property said it was delighted with the planning approval.A spokesperson added: We look forward to transforming the vacant and outdated building into a forward-looking mixed-use destination with reimagined public realm for everyone to enjoy.

New research finds Built Environment industry is 'failing women' on workplace culture Source:&nbsp ShutterstockTraditional management and reward processes in the built environment are failing women, according to damning new research by the Circle Partnership The organisation, which works to improve gender equality in the built environment, collaborated with consultant Cellence Plus and engineer Laing ORourke to explore key traits and derailers contributing to the problem of mid-level female talent retention in the industry.Their study took a random research sample of 37 mid-level women from across all sectors of the built environment.The Circle Partnership said the research revealed unexpectedly marked similarities in how this diverse group behave in the workplace.AdvertisementThe research also backs up many cliches about female versus male strengths and traits, it added.It said: This group emerge as naturally empathetic and good with people, willing and able to prioritise others needs and skilled in creating cohesive teams and a positive work environment.Key findings:Women are discouraged by overtly competitive or ambitious behaviour, preferring to earn recognition through consistency, reliability, and quiet competence.They are more cautious and risk-averse when it comes to career and finance, which could be a key contributor to the ongoing gender pay gap.Women are extremely strong in relationship building, emotional intelligence, empathy, influencing and team building. These relational skills are becoming critical as technology and new working practices become more diffuse.Women are more driven to contribute to team success and prioritise collaboration over personal advancement.They tend to avoid the discomfort that can accompany truly high performance, move away from people and businesses when under pressure, and have a tendency to bottle up frustrations.Based on these findings, the researchers concluded that traditional approaches to talent management and recognition are failing women in the built environment, feeding the trend of poor talent retention and exacerbating the skills crisis.The Circle Partnership has warned that without more nuanced support, the mid-level female retention challenge affecting the built environment will persist with inevitable consequences on the diversity of the long-term senior leadership pipeline.AdvertisementOn the other hand, explained the organisation, if seen as a predictor of future capability, these findings should help to better inform organisations female talent development interventions as well as broader gender diversity initiatives.The Circle Partnership said the critical challenge was to ensure focus was placed on the right talent development interventions those that will deliver genuine impact and returns on the investment made.Among its recommendations, it suggested: specific training to enable informed and capable line management for women; women-only development programmes with a focus on building resilience, confidence and wellbeing; one-to-one coaching and mentoring; and holistic performance management that takes into account the differences in male and female behavioural traits.Circle Partnership director Ceri Moyers described workplace culture and behaviour as the critical piece of the puzzle. She said this had been ignored in the effort to improve diversity in the built environment, with efforts to date focused instead on policies and procedures.Moyers explained: The insight gained from this study suggests that the industry still doesnt seem to fully understand how to make the most of womens talents and potential.And it also raises bigger questions about our macro workplace culture; is it time to begin truly re-examining the environment that favours traditionally masculine traits of extroversion, competition and leading from the front rather than expecting others to adapt to fit?Laing ORourk head of resourcing and DEI (diversity equity and inclusion) Lucy Kendall added: The behaviours that this study revealed complement traditional definitions of masculine and feminine traits highlighted in gender-based research. But what is startling is the consistency of the findings, particularly when considering the size, age, experience and role spread of the women assessed.For any organisation looking to retain its female talent, these findings demand attention when it comes to talent management strategies.2024-12-12Anna Highfieldcomment and share

The Manchester-based practice was chosen ahead of rival bids by Londons Studio Moren, Rome-based DCS + Architects and Australian outfit Hayman + Charlton Architects. It was selected anonymously out of 100 entries from 32 countries.Void Studios winning design blends traditional Maasai patterns with contemporary architecture. The judges called it a visually captivating experience that fosters curiosity and a sense of wonder.The US$750,000 tourism and visitor centre is for Abercrombie & Kent Philanthropy, the philanthropic arm of travel company Abercrombie & Kent (A&K). It will provide a 485m focal point for people travelling to the Masai Mara National Reserve.AdvertisementThe two-stage competition sought proposals for an innovative and engaging facility which helps to educate, inspire, and create awareness about conservation and the traditions of the Maasai people.Proposals were asked to integrate elements of local Maasai culture and heritage, and harness eco-friendly materials, energy-efficient technologies, and renewable energy sources.The winning team is collaborating with Kenyan architect Paul Mungai and other local partners including Lawrence Mbugua and Johnpaul Muwanika. More than two-thirds of the project budget will be invested directly into the local economy through the use of local resources, materials and skilled labour.A&K Kenya director Reuben Makau said: At A&K Philanthropy, we believe in the power of partnership and the importance of honouring local knowledge. We are thrilled that Void Studios will be collaborating with a Kenyan architect on this landmark project.This collaboration ensures that the conservation centre will not only be a stunning architectural achievement but also a true reflection of Kenyas rich heritage and its commitment to a sustainable future.AdvertisementThe Masai Mara National Reserve is a large game reserve located in Kenyas Rift Valley Provence, close to the border with Tanzania and the neighbouring Serengeti National Park. The 1,510km2 conservation zone is bordered by Maasai farming settlements to the north, east and west.The Conservation Centre aims to provide a memorable and enjoyable experience for visitors of all ages and to reflect elements of Maasai culture and heritage to create a harmonious blend between the centre and its surroundings.Competition judges included Florence Nyole, president, Architectural Association of Kenya; Brian Heath managing director of the Mara Triangle; Fernando Delgado, chief product officer at A&K Travel Group; and Keith Sproule, executive director at Abercrombie & Kent Philanthropy.Nyole said: The Architectural Association of Kenya congratulates the international architectural competition winner for the Maasai Mara Conservation Centre The winner has already made significant progress by collaborating with a team of registered Kenyan professionals. The involvement of Kenyan experts in finalising the design, overseeing construction, and completing the project will foster international knowledge exchange, ensure cultural sensitivity, and directly benefit local businesses in KenyaWe look forward to the final reveal of the built visitor centre and wish the team all the best in its realisation.Void Studios director and co-founder Ian Sanders said: Our proposed Masai Mara Conservation Hub and Visitor Centre embodies a holistic approach to ecological and cultural preservation.Local materials are weaved together with unique Masai cultural features, to create an engaging educational visitor experience whilst reinforcing the connection between conservation efforts and cultural heritage.Much of the success of the proposal is owed to the collaboration with our consultant partners in Kenya. We are grateful for their insight and professionalism throughout the design process, and we are excited to engage with the local communities to deliver a project of this significance in one of the worlds most iconic ecological and cultural landscapes, the Masai Mara.

From home extensions to workspaces, pavilions to shop fit-outs, restaurants and small houses, AJ Small Projects has always celebrated great architecture on a budget.Since the award was conceived, it has proved a fantastic showcase for the depth of design talent across the UK and has highlighted the work of often new and smaller practices, many of which have later gone onto greater or larger things. Previous winners include Chris Wilkinson, Haworth Tompkins, Mole Architects, Carmody Groarke and Hawkins\Brown.Enter AJ Small Projects 2025 now!Tthe AJ Small Projects Award has charted a quarter of a century of Britains architects seeking to harness big ideas to small budgets.Past winners have ranged from luxury home renovations, extensions on tiny budgets, arts and cultural studios and spaces, follies and more civic and community-minded market stalls.AdvertisementThe award was launched in 1995 with a garden pavilion by Anthony Grimshawwinning in 1996.Since then, winners have followed trends in architectural form, ideas and materiality, starting with the glazed box of the original winner to later schemes featuring Cor-ten as cladding such as Haworth Tompkins 2010 winner The Dovecote Studioora return to brick as seen in 2018s winning scheme,Wrong Houseby Matheson Whiteley Architects. Source:Peter LandersChris Dysons sensitively camouflaged Wapping extension to a Grade II-listed terrace was 2014s winning schemeThere has also been an increasing recognition of the value ofretrofitprojects, adapting and adding to in more ways than one existing structures: seen in Martin Edwards architects subtle and sensitive winning scheme, House in North Wales, which reworked a beloved home.Sustainability has been more and more embodied, as seen most recently in 2024s winner: the Farmers Arms Cold Food Store by Hayatsu Architects and Grizedale Arts. This was built on the side of a former pub in the Lake District for a local arts organisation specialising in crafts. Constructed as part of an annual building school at which international participants learned and exchanged craft skills, the structures design adapts traditional Japanese storage building typologies with locally sourced materials. It also used traditional Japanese shikkuiplaster.Although the eligible cost for entered completed projects has risen with inflation this years award will celebrate projects with a maximum contract value of 399,000 the cheapest winning scheme will most likely remain as 2004s Ola Mae Porch by Lucy Begg and Robie Gay. Completed for just 3,600, the project was a self-built porch for a trailer home in rural Alabama.The AJ Small Projects award-giving event and exhibition has also been held at many different venues over the years with 2000s selected schemes shown at the RIBA Architecture Gallery that spring. In 2012, it was held at New London Architecture, then located at the Building Centre, and more recently architecture practices including Apt, Studio Egret West and Morris + Co have kindly hosted it.AdvertisementAJ Small Projects 2025 is sponsored by Marley. The shortlisted projects will be published in the AJs April issue and all projects entered into the awards are featured on the AJ Buildings Library. More information on criteria and how to enter can be found here. Source:Charlie RedmanTo celebrate Small Projects turning 21 in 2016, three projects were named winners including The Welcoming Shelter, a kinetic structure by Bartlett student Charlie RedmanAJ Small Projects: past winners1996 Garden Gazebo by Anthony Grimshaw (57,500)Read more here1997/1998 Princes Club Ski Tow Pavilion by Chris Wilkinson (60,000)Read more here1999 Glover Flat by Wilkinson King (43,000)2000 10 Market Stalls by Hawkins\Brown (144,000)2001 Holland Park by Boyarsky Murphy Architects (120,000)2002 London House by Simon Conder Associates (98,500)Read more here2003 TFL International by Studio BAAD (217,000)2004 Ola Mae Porch by Lucy Begg and Robie Gay (3,600)2005 Bell-Simpson House by NORD Architects (80,000)2006 Three Seton Mains by Paterson Architects (200,000)Read more here2007 Wallace Road by Paul Archer Design (250,000)2008 Japanese Tea House by Mole Architects (7,000)Watch film here2009 Moonshine by Mitchell Taylor Workshop (150,000)Read more here2010 The Dovecote Studio by Haworth Tompkins (155,000)Read more here2011 Jellyfish Theatre by Koebberling and Kaltwasser (17,000)Read more here2012 Old Workshop by Jack Woolley (232,000)Read more here2013 Box House by Laura Dewe Mathews (245,000)Read more here2014 13 Wapping Pierhead by Chris Dyson Architects (210,000)Read more here2015 Maggies Merseyside by Carmody Groarke (217,000)Read more here2016 Contemporary lean-to by Doma Architects (101,800), The Welcoming Shelter by Charlie Redman (22,000), and Avon Wildlife Trust Cabin by Hugh Strange Architects (32,000)Read more here2017 Croft Lodge Studio by Kate Darby Architects and David Connor Design (160,000)Read more here2018 Wrong House by Matheson Whiteley Architects (93,000)Read more here2019 Conservatory Room by David Leech Architects (49,750)Read more here2020 House in North Wales by Martin Edwards Architects (120,000)Read more here2021 Common Room by Rashid Ali Architects (9,500)Read more here2022 Drovers Bough by Akin Studio (70,200) Read more here2023 Adelaide Street by OGU Architects and MMAS (340,000)Read more here2024 The Farmers Arms Cold Food Store by Hayatsu Architects and Grizedale Arts (35,000) Read more here2025 ?

The winning integrated consultant team will draw up plans to transform and enhance the streetscape of Tomb Street, Little Patrick Street, Gamble Street, Donegall Quay and surrounding areas beneath the busy motorway bridge which opened in 1995.The project aims to reconnect the historic city centre with the waterfront, to improve connections by delivering new quality active travel corridors and open spaces, to unlock housing-led regeneration opportunities in the wider area, and to provide quality leisure spaces for local communities.According to the brief: As framed by the Under the Bridges enhancing the connectivity between Sailortown, City Quays and Belfast City Centre" report prepared by Belfast City Council (BCC), the ambition of this project will be to prepare highway and environmental improvements across the study area in line with the strategic direction set out in the Belfast Agenda, a Bolder Vision and the Waterfront Taskforce.AdvertisementThe M3 is a short 1.3km motorway which connects Belfasts M2 motorway to the A2 Sydenham Bypass in east Belfast. The bridge section over the River Lagan completed in the mid-1990s severing Belfast City Centre from the waterfront and surrounding communities.The latest project aims to upgrade a series of streets beneath the motorway connecting the city centre with the Belfast Harbour area. The procurement comes just five months after Belfast Harbour Commissioners launched a search for teams to join its new multidisciplinary consultancy services framework.In June this year, Choice Housing announced a search for an architect to upgrade its offices at 37-41 May Street, Belfast. Norwegian practice Snhetta and Belfasts TODD Architects unveiled the first concept images of their contest-winning 100 million Belfast Stories visitor attraction proposal last month.Bids for the latest commission will be evaluated 60 per cent on quality and 40 per cent on price. Applicants must hold employers liability insurance of 10 million, public liability insurance of 10 million and professional indemnity insurance of 2 million.Competition detailsProject title Integrated Consultancy Team for Under The Bridge Public RealmClientContract value 5 millionFirst round deadline Midday, 24 January 2025Restrictions TbcMore information https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/039381-2024

The winning team selected for the estimated 4.75 million contract will draw up plans for a new 10,350m flexible teaching complex on universitys Derry-Londonderry campus.The project will deliver a new teaching block for the universitys medical students which are currently hosted within an interim facility. Alongside seminar, teaching, laboratory and office space the new building will also feature flexible accommodation able to host larger student cohorts in the future.According to the brief: The new SoM Teaching Block will provide teaching accommodation to enable the current annual cohort of medical students to move out of the existing interim refurbished accommodation on campus.AdvertisementA schedule of accommodation has been developed in consultation with key stakeholders and partners in the SoM for this purpose, and includes a mixture of seminar, teaching, laboratory, office, meeting and collaborative space, as well as some limited research space.Derry is Northern Irelands second largest city, with 85,000 inhabitants. In April 2019, Hamilton Architects was selected to design a landmark 1.1 million visitor information centre inside a former Ulster Bank premises in Waterloo Place overlooking the citys historic walls.Founded in 1984, the University of Ulster is multi-campus public research university with more than 32,000 students. Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios completed a new city centre campus for the university in Belfast last year.Derry City and Strabane District Council sought a masterplanner for a 65 million revamp of its central riverfront and walled city in 2021.The latest project is located a short distance from Wilkinson Eyres 2011 Peace Bridge connecting the east and west banks of the River Foyle. Todd Architects was selected for a new 8 million maritime museum and archive nearby in 2015.AdvertisementBids for the latest commission will be evaluated 55 per cent on quality, 10 per cent on social value and 35 per cent on price. Applicants must hold professional indemnity insurance of 10 million.Competition detailsProject title School of Medicine Phase 2 Development: New Teaching Block - Integrated Consultant TeamClientContract value 47.5 millionFirst round deadline 3pm, 15 January 2025Restrictions TbcMore information https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/039506-2024

Stroud District Council's development control committee reportedly approved a reserved-matters application for the new Forest Green Rovers ground last week.The local authority granted outline consent for the Gloucestershire football clubs 5,000-seat stadium five years ago.Planning officers recommended approval of the latest plans, saying they were satisfied that the reserved matters 'generally follow the indicated information submitted and controlled by the conditions and S106 legal agreement of the approved outline planning consent.AdvertisementIn a report to councillors, they added: The scheme provides a high-quality design and appearance and the layout and landscaping provide mitigation and enhancement and are considered acceptable.Outline approval of the scheme came in December 2019, six months after the council refused earlier plans, citing noise, traffic and impact on the environment.The proposals were subsequently altered with changes including swapping one grass pitch to an all-weather surface, a revised landscaping strategy, increased matchday transport and clarifications regarding noise.Zaha Hadid Architects won a competition in 2016 to design a sustainable home for the Gloucestershire football club, which was on its way to promotion to the Football League but has since slipped back to the fifth tier of the game.The club is UN-certified as carbon-neutral, serves vegan food and is powered by renewable energy. It is chaired by environmentalist Dale Vince, owner of green energy firm Ecotricity.AdvertisementThe club, formerly known as Stroud FC, has been based at the New Lawn stadium in Nailsworth since 2006.Following Vinces acquisition of the club in 2010, the venue received a flurry of green upgrades including solar panels, a solar-powered robot grass mower and the worlds first organic football pitch.When choosing the Zaha Hadid Architects proposals in 2016, Vince said: The really standout thing about this stadium is that its going to be entirely made of wood the first time that will have been done anywhere in the world.The importance of using wood is not only that its a naturally occurring material, it has very low carbon content about as low as it gets for a building material.And when you bear in mind that around three-quarters of the lifetime carbon impact of any stadium comes from its building materials, you can see why thats so important, and its why our new stadium will have the lowest carbon content of any stadium in the world.

West Yorkshire Police confirmed that it made a number of arrests between 26 and 28 of November as part of a complex investigation into reported corruption offences in West Yorkshire.Nine people in total were arrested on suspicion of bribery offences, including the four council staff members, who the BBCreported as being members of the councils planning department.Police said all nine people have now been bailed pending further enquiries.AdvertisementConfirming the four arrests, Leeds City Council said it had since suspended the staff members.A council spokesperson said: The council is aware of an investigation that is being carried out by West Yorkshire Polices Economic Crime Unit.We can confirm that four members of council staff have been arrested. The staff were subsequently suspended from their roles at the council in line with our established policies and procedures.The spokesperson said the council was unable to comment further while the police investigation was ongoing.West Yorkshire Police was unable to confirm whether any of the arrests were made on council property.AdvertisementA 2021 study by Transparency International found that half of English councils had planning policies that left them liable to corruption risk.2024-12-09Anna Highfieldcomment and share

Senior ministers have set out ambitious targets to get more housing and civils schemes underway The Labour government recommitted to its election manifesto pledge of building 1.5 million homes and said it would also decide 150 applications for infrastructure projects before the next general election.These were among six milestones announced by prime minister Keir Starmer in a set-piece speech in Buckinghamshire yesterday (5 December).He said: Mission-led government means doing things differently, and a decade of national renewal will require the skills and determination of us all.AdvertisementMeanwhile deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said decisions on vital infrastructure had been unnecessarily delayed in the past year.She added: Our Plan for Change will stop this and drive real improvements in the lives of working people.Were already taking decisive action by transforming the planning system and bringing forward the biggest boost in social and affordable housing in a generation, and alongside this uplift in infrastructure, we will unlock long-term economic prosperity for every part of the country.The government said, during the previous Parliament under the Conservatives, just 57 decisions on big civils schemes were made.It added that it would simplify the consenting process for major infrastructure projects.Meanwhile, the forthcoming Planning and Infrastructure Bill will pave the way for critical schemes to be delivered more quickly and easily by removing planning red tape, according to ministers.AdvertisementOver the summer, Rayner set out reforms that included reintroducing mandatory housing targets and asking local authorities to earmark sites for housing within the so-called grey belt less useful or environmentally friendly sections of urban development buffers.But a think-tank report this week warned that even if housebuilding hit post-war highs in all regions of England, the 1.5 million homes target was likely to be missed.Melanie Leech, chief executive of developer body the British Property Federation, described the governments Plan for Change as a welcome statement of its housing, infrastructure and planning ambitions.She added: The government has gripped the nettle of planning reform in ensuring each local council has a local plan in place, which is welcome. If we are to deliver 1.5 million homes, however, further measures will be necessary, to increase the pool of skilled labour, upscale the materials we need to build homes and ensure more land, including public land, is available for housing delivery.Hand-in-hand, there will need to be funding, both access to mortgages, but also public and private investment in affordable and market rental housing.The government will need to be bold, for example providing a truly long-term rent settlement would attract more private sector investment into affordable housing. We look forward to supporting the governments commitment to get more homes funded and built.2024-12-06Greg Pitchercomment and share

Rayner ruled on Thursday (5 December) that the retailer could press ahead with its plan to replace the iconic building with a 10-storey office scheme by Pilbrow & Partners.Her Tory predecessor, Michael Gove, had blocked the plans but his decision was quashed by a High Court judge in March this year.The court ruling meant the case had to be returned to the secretary of state to be redetermined. With the change of government, the final decision fell to Rayner, who waved the scheme through.AdvertisementPilbrow & Partners founder Fred Pilbrow told the AJ yesterday that his practice was delighted by the decision, describing it as long overdue.He added: In [M&S chief executive] Stuart Machins words: we can now get on with the job of helping to rejuvenate the UKs premier shopping street through a flagship M&S store and office space, which will support 2,000 jobs and act as a global standard-bearer for sustainability.Machin, who previously expressed fury at Goves decision, said he was also delighted by the approval, after what he described as three unnecessary years of delays, obfuscation and political posturing at its worst under the previous government.But others have exhibited dismay and desperation over Rayners ruling.Bennetts Associates co-founder Rab Bennetts said the decision misses a golden opportunity to set the strategy for a confused industry.AdvertisementHe explained: It has already been shown that this site can still be developed whilst retaining the best of the existing property, so there was no need to opt for the maximum development instead of something more reasonable.As a result, it remains to be seen how regeneration through the planning process can support the unavoidable path to low carbon.Earlier this year the AJ and SAVE Britains Heritage (SAVE) ran the re:store design competition to look at progressive options for the M&S buildings reuse and adaption.Connolly Wellingham Architects was one of the six teams who pitched their concepts for how the 1929 building could be repurposed. Practice founder Fergus Connolly described Rayner's decision as a disappointing development from a government that promises so much change.He added: The need for a forthright shift to reuse and retrofit remains exciting, essential and yet somehow infuriatingly elusive.Large scale flagship projects such as M&S Oxford Street may not speak directly to the majority of more typical projects. They do, however, send an important message. And the message right now is worryingly tone deaf: its business as usual.Others, however, have hailed the decision as a positive step forward for the industry.'Logic and common sense have prevailed'Developer Stuart Lipton, co-founder and partner at Lipton Rogers Developments, said Rayners was a sensible answer and a step forward for Oxford Street, which had become a street of shame. He told the AJ: In a world where everything is going up, the cost of planning, the Section 106 costs, finance costs, construction costs, we need some assistance.The real question on carbon is a sensible balance. Where theres a clear, long life then, by all means, keep the building. On the other hand, if its a short life [such as retention for just another 30 years], whats the point?And if we cant support something decent, by a decent company who have responsibility, what can we support?Alistair Watson, UK head of planning and environment at law firm Taylor Wessing, said: To riff off one of the quotes from legendary football manager Bill Shankly, the trouble with some politicians is that they know the rules but they do not know the game of planning. The [previous] secretary of state Gove didnt get it. This secretary of state clearly does.The secretary of states decision to agree with the inspectors recommendation and the High Court to provide a planning permission for M&S is as straightforward as it comes. This is a major development scheme which has a variety of economic, social and environmental benefits, all of which were backed up with expert evidence in a full public inquiry. Logic and common sense have prevailed over political ideology. The planning system at its best.The decision provides the certainty that the industry has been crying out forStephen Springham, head of UK Markets at Knight Frank, said the decision provides the greater certainty around the retrofit-versus-rebuild debate that the industry has been crying out for.He added: Taken in conjunction with new guidance at local authority and regional level on when it is appropriate to permit demolition, we are starting to gain a better understanding of the grounds upon which future decisions will be taken. Consistency is vital for the UKs economic recovery and inward investment.Charles Begley, chief executive at the London Property Alliance, said: I hope with this decision we can finally end the uncertainty which has acted as a drag on investment, damaging growth and the jobs that go with it. It is disappointing it has taken so long, which sends a negative message to those willing to invest in London and beyond.The government now needs to ensure that planning reform supports sustainable redevelopment, and whilst giving stronger guidance to local councils, needs to set itself strict timelines to deal with contentious decisions once it intervenes to prevent a repeat of this long-running saga.The fact that the property industry had been waiting the outcome of this case for clarity is clearly a failure of national policy. The application itself had unfortunately become a lightning rod for the retrofit v redevelopment debate, but we need to recognise that a more nuanced approach is needed and policy must allow and support a range of interventions on a case-by-case basis.

INDEXDesign and architecture studio McCloy + Muchemwa has won the London Festival of Architecture (LFA) competition to design a playable sculptural structure at the Dulwich Picture Gallery Its proposal A Gift of Flowers is a collaboration with with HoLD Collective and engineer Cake Industries. The team will receive a build budget of 80,000 to develop and deliver their installation within a new sculpture garden at the gallery.Drawing inspiration from Dutch artist Jan van Huysums Vase with Flowers, the design reimagines the timeless art piece as a vibrant, playful installation that blends sensory exploration, creativity, and sustainability.The completed sculpture will form a key part of Dulwich Picture Gallerys sculpture garden, inviting visitors of all ages to explore, play, and relax amid the beauty of the gallerys historic grounds.AdvertisementThe Reimagining Play at Dulwich Picture Gallery competition invited concepts for a long-term installation that could inspire wonder and playfulness in audiences of all ages creating an inclusive welcome for visitors to the gallery.It is part of wider redevelopment plans by Carmody Groarke and Kim Wilkie, which will create the sculpture garden at the John Soane-designed Grade II*-listed gallery.The project is expected to complete in 2026 and to have a 10-year lifespan. The other finalists were SoUP; Projects Office with Dream Networks and Earth Tenders; Sett; TIP x CRAB; and Eleanor Dodman Architects with YAA Projects and 27 Beginnings.Dulwich Picture Gallery deputy director Chantelle Culshaw said: This unique collaboration brings to life Dulwich Picture Gallery and London Festival of Architectures vision for a fun, interactive and inclusive commission, which will reinvigorate a currently under-used part of our grounds.This iconic sculpture will encourage sensory-led, playful interactions from people of all ages. The team have placed access at the forefront of their design and have carefully considered sustainability using recycled materials, which will allow families to enjoy the sculpture for years to come.AdvertisementLFA director Rosa Rogina said: This imaginative design perfectly captures the essence of play and creativity, transforming Jan van Huysum's timeless artwork into an immersive experience.We are excited about the next phase of the project, which will see the winning team working with local communities and groups on translating their design concept into a piece of public art to inspire joy and wonder for all ages with the beauty of Dulwichs gardens as a backdrop.The Dulwich Picture Gallery first opened in 1817 and is believed to be Englands oldest public gallery. The innovative brick building features a series of interlinked, top-lit rooms which helped redefine standard approaches to gallery design.Rick Mather Architects renovated the building and created a separate caf and exhibition space nearby in 2001. Carmody Groarke won planning permission for a 4.5 million expansion of the gallery last year.The latest project comes five years after Pricegore, working with British-Nigerian artist and designer Yinka Ilori, completed the Colour Palace pavilion at the gallery. The 150,000 temporary project was the focus of an earlier LFA competition series in which the inaugural commission was won by IF_DO in 2017.Commenting on the latest appointment, Ilori said: Id like to warmly congratulate McCloy + Muchemwa, HoLD Collective and Cake Industries on winning this years Reimagining Play competition.Their creation, A Gift of Flowers, immediately captivated me with its striking design, vibrant colours, dynamic composition, and sensorial textures. Ive always been an advocate for accessible art and play too, so loved how this work is interactive and able to be enjoyed by visitors of all ages. Im excited to see it come to life in 2026.Judges for the latest contest included Culshaw; Ilori; Helen Hillyard, curator at Dulwich Picture Gallery; Richard Leeming, councillor at the London Borough of Southwark; Krishan Nathaniel, principal urban designer at Harrow Council; and Binki Taylor, founding partner at the Brixton Project.The six shortlisted teams each received an honorarium of 1,000 to further develop their designs and engage in initial participation workshops with target audiences.Winner: A Gift of Flowers by McCloy + Muchemwa with HoLD Collective and Cake IndustriesDrawing inspiration from Jan van Huysums Vase with Flowers, the winning design reimagines the timeless masterpiece into a vibrant, playful installation that blends sensory exploration, creativity, and sustainability. The sculpture will form a key part of Dulwich Picture Gallerys sculpture garden, inviting visitors of all ages to explore, play, and relax amidst the beauty of the gallerys historic grounds.A Gift of Flowers incorporates bold petal-like forms made from reclaimed steel, painted in vibrant, weatherproof hues. The installation encourages sensory engagement, offering opportunities for climbing, sliding, and resting while fostering connections between art, nature, and community. The project was developed with input from local families through engagement workshops, which will continue as the project progresses. Through developing the design together with families, the team will ensure it resonates with the surrounding community and its users.Shortlisted teamsMcCloy + Muchemwa with HoLD Collective and Cake Industries [WINNER]SoUPProjects Office, Dream Networks and Earth TendersSettTIP x CRABEleanor Dodman Architects, YAA Projects and 27 Beginnings2024-12-05Merlin Fulchercomment and share

She today (5 December) ruled that the retailer could press ahead with its plan to replace the iconic building with a 10-storey office scheme by Pilbrow & Partners.Rayners Tory predecessor, Michael Gove, blocked M&Ss plans to demolish its flagship Oxford Street store in July 2023, but his decision was quashed by a High Court judge in March 2024.The court ruling meant the case had to be returned to the secretary of state to be redetermined. With the change of government this summer, the final decision fell to Rayner.AdvertisementCelebrities including Bill Bryson, Kevin McCloud, George Clarke and Griff Rhys Jones signed an open letter to the communities secretary this summer demanding that M&S Oxford Street be saved from demolition.The writers, broadcasters and comedians joined architects including Native Studio founder Sanaa Shaikh, London Eye designer Julia Barfield and Sarah Wigglesworth to urge Rayner to save the building.In their letter, the pro-retention campaigners described the retailers proposal as a smash-and-grab.The last government made clear it would act on the significant embodied carbon emissions associated with demolition followed by replacement building, they wrote.For a Labour government elected partly on its commitment to climate action and creating a zero-waste economy to fall short of this perhaps under the misapprehension that such an approach is anti-development would be a tragedy.AdvertisementThe letter said that the re:store design competition run by AJ and SAVE Britains Heritage (SAVE) highlighted progressive options for the M&S buildings re-use and adaption, demonstrating that by no means does this groundswell of opposition equal nimbyism.Other signatories to the letter include, the AJ's managing editor Will Hurst, SAVE director Henrietta Billings, Mikhail Riches co-founder Annalie Riches, HTA chair and former RIBA president Ben Derbyshire, Bennetts founder Rab Bennetts, Henley Halebrown principal Simon Henley and head of the London School of Architecture Neal Shasore.M&Ss proposal for its flagship 1920s store near Marble Arch would see three buildings on the prominent corner site next to Selfridges demolished and replaced with a 10-storey new store and office block.Because of the up-front carbon cost of new construction, the plan would release almost 40,000 tonnes of embodied carbon.The carbon impact of the proposal was highlighted by Gove among his reasons for refusal last year, along with heritage and design concerns.However, the decision was overturned by the High Court on 1 March, following an M&S appeal on procedural grounds, which meant the retailer had to prove to the High Court that Gove had made an error in his decision-making. In her judgement, Mrs Justice Lieven ruled that M&S had succeeded in five out of six grounds for appeal.Having reappraised the plans and the planning inspector's report, Rayner has now approved the application. In terms of the loss of buildings and the impact to the surrounding historic environment, she claimed the 'benefits of the proposal outweigh the harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets'.She acknowledged that the scheme's embodied carbon and the fact that the required demolition would, in part, fail to 'support the transition to a low carbon future' weighed against the proposal, as per paragraph 157 (formerly paragraph 152) of the NPPF.However Rayner argued that those issues had to be set against the 'advantages of concentrating development in such a highly accessible location', the employment and regeneration benefits, and the 'potential harm to the vitality and viability' to London's West End which could follow from a refusal of permission.Responding to Rayners decision, M&S chief executive Stuart Machin said: I am delighted that, after three unnecessary years of delays, obfuscation and political posturing at its worst under the previous government, our plans for Marble Arch the only retail-led regeneration proposal on Oxford Street have finally been approved.We can now get on with the job of helping to rejuvenate the UKs premier shopping street through a flagship M&S store and office space, which will support 2,000 jobs and act as a global standard-bearer for sustainability.He added: We share the governments ambition to breathe the life back into our cities and towns and are pleased to see they are serious about getting Britain building and growing. We will now move as fast as we can.Pilbrow & Partners' founder Fred Pilbrow described the decision as 'long overdue' and echoed Machins words. tellnig the AJ: 'We can now get on with the job of helping to rejuvenate the UKs premier shopping street through a flagship M&S store and office space, which will support 2,000 jobs and act as a global standard-bearer for sustainability.'However Henrietta Billings, director SAVE Britain's Heritage, described the decision as a 'missed opportunity'.She said: 'The government has chosen the easy option business as usual - when it had a real chance to show leadership and ambition on this urgent issue. Our old, wasteful knock-it-down-and-start-again model is broken. There is real appetite in the construction sector for change. Theyre crying out for clarity from government.'Our old, wasteful knock-it-down-and-start-again model is brokenShe added: 'Reusing buildings is great for the planet, great for communities and its also great for growth. Just look at the cultural powerhouse that is Tate Modern, or converted department stores across the country, or the great Pennine textile mills that are once again a driving force in their local economies as commercial space or homes.'It is wilfully myopic not to see that the elegant M&S building could play a similar role in the story of Oxford Street, whose fortunes are already on the up.'More to follow.

Handed out at the opposite end of the year to the RIBA Gold Medal for Architecture, the Presidents Medals recognise the worlds best work by architecture students. This year's awards received a record number of entries, according to the RIBA.Kingston postgraduate Joe Franklin won the Silver Medal which recognises the best Part 2 Architecture design project for his project Ultra Town, reimagining the aborted HS2 Phase 2 site between Birmingham and Manchester as a forested new town.The project imagines the sites development over a period of 50 years as it becomes a home for 250,000 people, via a method of responsible development and new build construction embedded with cycles of support, maintenance and care'.AdvertisementFranklin said it was a real joy to receive the award, especially for such a quiet and at times, deeply personal project.He added: I only hope that the award can go beyond its limitations as a personal achievement, to celebrate the endless support and encouragement from my tutors and friends at the Kingston School of Art.The RIBA Award for sustainable design at Part 2 was given to Swiss student Nathalie Marj (cole Polytechnique Fdrale de Lausanne, 'EPFL' Lausanne), for her project Protocols for Beiruts Unbuildable Lots: Designing Non-sectarian Spaces. Source:RIBAProtocols for Beiruts Unbuildable Lots: Designing Non-sectarian Spaces by Nathalie Marj (Part 2 Award for Sustainable Design)The RIBA Bronze Medal, for the best design project produced at RIBA Part 1 or equivalent, went to the University of Kents undergraduate student Victor Williams Salmeron, for this project Forget Me Not, an almshouse for former carers on the remains of a Victorian chapel.The project builds upon ancient vernacular almshouse traditions, creating a symbiotic place of community and individuality for those whose care is only implicitly spoken of.Advertisement Source:RIBAForget Me Not by Victor Williams Salmeron (RIBA Bronze Medal)Salmeron said it was incredible and so motivating to be recognised with the Bronze award, adding: I hope that my work can keep questioning and promoting the betterment of current standards of architecture and care.The RIBA Award for sustainable design at Part 1 was given to Coventry University student Sasha Farnsworth, for her project Womb Temple: Lunar Re-Birth. Source:RIBAWomb Temple: Lunar Re-Birth by Sasha Farnsworth (Part 1 Award for Sustainable Design)The winner of RIBAs Dissertation Medal was Bianca Zucchelli at the Bartlett School of Architecture, for The Eel, the Dowry and the Seamstress.The written project narrates the overshadowed story of a small Italian fishing village, Comacchio, which is the hometown of Zucchellis grandmother, and its relationship with the textile industry in the early 20th century. Zucchelli thanked the RIBA judging panel for recognising the value of my research in the untold stories of working women, and hope it will positively influence others to appreciate its importance in understanding nowadays world.The Serjeant Awards for Excellence in Drawing went to Kingston Universitys Jack Oaten (Part 2) for Mierceholts New National Timber Reserve, and Cardiff University's Jaehyun Byeon (Part 1) for Fabricated Identities: The Museum of Faith and Fashion. Source:RIBAFabricated Identities: The Museum of Faith and Fashion by Jaehyun Byeon (Part 1 Serjeant Award for Excellence in Drawing)Alongside the Presidents Medals, the 2024 RIBA Annie Spink Award for Excellence in Architectural Education, presented every two years, has been awarded to Jane Anderson, professor and undergraduate programme lead at Oxford Brookes University.The RIBA praised Anderson for her innovative, community-minded pedagogical philosophy, which involves starting every first-year student with a community-oriented building project in the real world.Anderson said: This award is really meaningful because I value education so highly as a force for good in society. Once I began teaching, I realised that the process of learning brings out the very best in humanity.RIBA president Muyiwa Oki said: What unites the winning projects is a true marriage of creativity and community spirit, explored with great sensitivity and personal insight.For me, these projects show a real awareness of the importance of reuse, elevating people and places that have been overlooked, and the social responsibility of the architect. While these are weighty themes, the winners give me confidence in the next generation of architects and designers.Chairs of judgesSilver Medal chairMina Hasman, sustainability director and climate advocacy lead at SOMBronze Medal chair Elena Marco, professor of teaching and learning of architecture and built environment, pro-vice-chancellor and head of the College of Arts, Technology and Environment at the University of the West of EnglandDissertation Medal chair Samir Pandya, assistant head, director of international, and strategic lead for equality, diversity and inclusion at the School of Architecture and Cities of the University of Westminster

Six Columns in Crystal Palace, designed by practice director Will Burges to be his own family home, was chosen ahead of five other finalists - including Surman Westons Peckham House, which won the AJ Manser Medal earlier this week.Also shortlisted were houses by Studio Brassica Architects, TaylorHare Architects, Hugh Strange Architects, and Tom Dowdall Architects.The two-storey, four-bedroom house is named after the six columns that form its main structure, and was designed to evolve to the familys changing needs over time, allowing them to continue to tinker with it, inside and out.Advertisement Source:Building NarrativesRIBA House of the Year 2024 winner: Six Columns by 31/44The RIBA jury said the project is discrete and considerate to its neighbours while boasting design features that carefully balance both conventional and contemporary features such as concrete beams and a statement veined marble panel by the front door adding a touch of bespoke grandeur.Judges said the layout makes the most of the wedge-shaped site, creating a functional family home that can be easily adapted for future requirements.The jury also praised its self-finishes throughout, including exposed painted brickwork and readily available spruce pine panels for fittings and joinery, which intentionally challenge the covering up of contemporary construction and can be easily adjusted in the future.RIBA House of the Year 2024 winners and finalists[WINNER] Six Columns, London, by 31/44 ArchitectsDesigned to meet a familys changing needs, Six Columns is a flexible, future-facing home intended to evolve with its occupants. It makes efficient and sophisticated use of space, and materials, with sustainable and cost-reducing features. Brutalist references and creative flourishes a stepping brickwork wall, rustications and pilasters, and a green marble panel make for a distinct and refreshing aesthetic. Wherever possible, self-finished materials are employed; the ground floor has exposed painted brickwork, and readily-available spruce panels are used to create many of the fittings and joinery, which can be adjusted with ease over time.Farmworkers House, Cornwall, by Hugh Strange ArchitectsNestled into a wooded field, this deceptively simple home adopts an introverted courtyard house typology, its L-shaped plan sheltering a south-facing garden. Thick masonry walls of monolithic clay blocks form the protective wings, simply finished with textured lime render. Beyond the walls, the surrounding agricultural land is left untouched, allowing livestock to graze right up to the boundary walls. Inside, smooth unpainted lime plaster mirrors the roughcast outside, while dark brick floors throughout recall Victorian stable pavers, and an exposed roof structure of locally-grown Douglas Fir hangs above.Peckham House, London, by Surman WestonThis small but generously-spaced family home is full of enthusiasm and playfulness, with a faade defined by a distinctive pattern of hit-and-miss brickwork that playfully interprets the local houses. It sits on the end of an unassuming urban terrace, which makes the most of a small site, including a roof terrace to provide some needed outside space.Eavesdrop, Sussex, byTom Dowdall ArchitectsDesigned for retirement, the home is focused on wellbeing, calm and flexibility, with level thresholds for full accessibility, as well as light, tranquil spaces that open up to host friends and family. A generous central courtyard provides sunlight, fresh air, and year-round enjoyment of plants and wildlife. With its sweeping, rising roof, simple construction, and stone finishes, the house fits seamlessly into the landscape, while close up, the beauty of its stone detailing is revealed.The Hall, Kent, by TaylorHare ArchitectsSituated in the Kent Downs, this Grade II-listed 16th century residence has been extensively and sympathetically refurbished into a sustainable home. Interiors have been both restored and modernised, with finely crafted detailing and considered new interventions that work in harmony so that the historical compliments the contemporary. The house is an exemplar of green living, while simultaneously restoring the surrounding listed outbuildings and adding a pool, pool house, tennis court, stable block, and a new lake. The end result is a demonstration of how to extend the life of a historic building, while creating elegant living spaces for the future.Plas Hendy Stable Block, Monmouthshire, byStudio Brassica ArchitectsA Grade II-listed Arts & Crafts stable block has been rescued and restored to create a novel and accessible family home. Simple materials, detailing, and variation are applied in spirited and thoughtful ways, balancing aesthetic, heritage, and ecological obligations, while upgrades to sustainability and references to the Arts & Craft movement such as sawtooth brickwork and quarry tiles create moments of playfulness while demonstrating the many benefits of repurposing existing buildings.RIBA House of the Year Award chair, Studio Weave founder Je Ahn, said: This philosophy of the home as a lifelong process might be a tricky concept in this fast-paced contractual world, however, Six Columns demonstrates an important message that we should all remember: your home is not a static slice of time but continuously evolves with you.RIBA president Muyiwa Oki said the home cleverly incorporates Brutalist references and creative flourishes while retaining a strong sense of urban belonging.AdvertisementHe added: The generosity of space belies the limitations of this small garden plot. As we look for creative and practical solutions to the housing crisis, Six Columns offers a blueprint for bespoke urban infill development.Projects shortlisted for RIBA House of the Year 2024The RIBA House of the Year award was set up in 2013 and is awarded to the best new house or house extension designed by an architect in the UK. Last years prize went to a home in Tottenham, north London, by Hayhurst & Co described as a riad-inspired urban oasis (pictured below).Previous winners include McGonigle McGrath for House Lessans (2019), HaysomWardMiller for Lochside House (2018), Richard Murphy Architects for Murphy House (2016), Skene Catling de la Pea for Flint House (2015), Loyn & Co for Stormy Castle (2014) and Carl Turner Architects for Slip House (2013). Source:Kilian O'SullivanWinner of RIBA House of the Year 2023: Green House by Hayhurst & Co

The development is in La Confluence, a previously industrial area of the French city where the Rhne and Sane rivers converge, and is part of a masterplan by Herzog & de Meuron. David Chipperfield Architects (DCA) was appointed to coordinate three blocks consisting of 11 buildings, creating a mixed-use quarter with a focus on social and environmental sustainability. Other buildings in the scheme are designed by Atelier VERA & Associs Architectes and Aires Mateus e Associados.This role entailed adapting the wider masterplan to the specific site and proposed programme as well as developing strategies for the landscape and the general massing, organisation and faade design of the buildings.The buildings contain a range of housing tenures, offices and a health centre. While there is an architecturally coherence to the whole ensemble, each building is designed to be individual in character. Within each block, the buildings are grouped to define garden courtyards. Transparent and permeable ground floors allow permeability between the garden courts and the street, which together with communal spaces and retail units, help animate the surrounding public spaces.AdvertisementAs well as coordinating this quarter, DCA was appointed to design three individual buildings, one within each of the blocks. These include a social housing building, a mixed-use tower and an office building. All three are shaped by their structure and defined by simple rectilinear forms, tailored to their specific locations.Architects viewThe social housing building is made from cross-laminated timber wrapped externally in a precast concrete faade of alternating bands of profiled and smooth panels.Deep recesses in two of its faades create loggias for the apartments facing a public square to the south and the garden to the east. The entrance hall provides a link from street to garden while a caf opens towards the public square.The mixed-use tower contains offices on the lower floors and apartments above. Together with a second tower by Aires Mateus it creates an entrance gesture for the new quarter. In reaction to its dense context, the building has large windows at its corners on the office levels with corresponding balconies in the apartments, offering views over the city and river. The in-situ concrete faade with its continuous board-marked texture emphasises the sculptural quality of the building.The office building is prominently located on the riverfront and is designed for flexibility and a potential future conversion into apartments, ensuring the long- term sustainability of the building. Balconies run along the two principal faades, facing the river and garden respectively. These are articulated by in-situ concrete columns that stand proud of a recessed timber faade. A central hall links to an open staircase, expressed in the west faade, that connects the building to the garden. Source:David Chipperfield ArchitectsProject dataCompletion date 2024Gross internal floor area 30,000m2Construction cost UndisclosedArchitect David Chipperfield Architects with AIA Architectes (buildings D, E, K); Atelier VERA & Associs Architectes (buildings A, C, F, H, I); Aires Mateus e Associados (buildings B, G, L)Client Bouygues Immobilier (blocks A1N, A2N), Linkcity (block A1S)Structural engineer CogeciBuilding physics KateneM&E consultant Quadriplus GroupeQuantity surveyor ProcobatLandscape consultant Wirtz InternationalAcoustic consultant AcouphenSustainability consultant Milieu StudioLighting consultant KateneBuilding control Socotec

Chetwoods confirmed to the AJ that work on the megaproject planned for the former Barking Reach Power Station had stopped.The City of London Corporation bought the Dagenham site for around 125 million in 2018, but voted last week to absolve itself of continuing to operate both Smithfield and Billingsgate markets and to ditch the Dagenham relocation plan, saying the move had become unaffordable.The corporation confirmed that a private meeting of its Court of Common Council on 26 November ratified a decision to end its interest in co-locating the wholesale food markets of Smithfield and Billingsgate to a new site at Dagenham Dock.AdvertisementChetwoods had revealed outline proposals for the new wholesale mega-market set to be the largest in the UK in a January 2020 consultation, and submitted a planning application in June 2020. Source:Google Earth As well as modern, sustainable facilities for market tenants, the Dagenham site would have provided a training school for market traders and food workers in Barking and Dagenham.This week a Chetwoods spokesperson told the AJ: In line with the City of London Corporations public statement, consultants have been asked to pause work on the project.In a statement, the City of London Corporation said the decision to scrap the plan reflects a careful balance between respecting the history of Smithfield and Billingsgate markets and managing resources for this project responsibly. Source:Shutterstock Smithfield Markets planned move to Dagenham has been scrappedIt said the move had become unaffordable after project costs rose due to a number of external factors, including inflation and the increasing cost of construction.AdvertisementThe corporation said it was providing financial support for traders at Smithfield and Billingsgate, to help them relocate to new premises. Traders will continue their operations until at least 2028, the corporation confirmed.New Spitalfields Market can continue operating in its current location, according to the corporation, as it has more modern infrastructure and a longer operational life.Smithfield meat market has occupied the same site near Farringdon since the 10th century. The Museum of London has now taken over the site for its new 337 million home, which is scheduled to open in 2026.The New Spitalfields fruit and vegetable market moved out of the city to Leyton in 1991, while Billingsgate fish market relocated to the Isle of Dogs in 1982.Chetwoods plans would have consolidated the three markets into one new site at Dagenham Dock.The City of London Corporation had previously described Dagenham Dock as the only viable site to secure the long-term futures of the markets.