Menu Home News Hardware Gaming Mobile Finance Deals Reviews How To Wccftech Xiaomi Cannot Develop A Future In-House XRING Chipset Using TSMC’s 2nm Process Because Of The U.S. Crackdown On Specialized EDA Tools, Company Will Be Limited To The ‘N3E’ Node Omar Sohail • Jun 5, 2025 at 04:28am EDT The XRING 01 is a technological milestone, not just for Xiaomi, but it is also regarded as an achievement for China, and one that would make the U.S. government very nervous, because, like current-generation chipsets, the in-house solution has been mass produced on TSMC’s 3nm ‘N3E’ process. Unfortunately, Xiaomi’s progress might not scale past this threshold because the Trump administration has banned the export of EDA tools that are necessary to successfully fabricate a 2nm SoC. Tipster claims that EDA tools are mandatory in designing GAAFET structures, meaning that Xiaomi and its XRING division will be limited to TSMC’s ‘N3E’ node Since TSMC’s 2nm technology has a GAAFET structure, Weibo tipster Digital Chat Station states that it is imperative that Xiaomi gets hold of those EDA, or Electronic Design Automation tools. The Taiwanese semiconductor giant was reported to have begun accepting orders for 2nm wafers from April 1, with each unit estimated to cost $30,000. Among the regular trio of Apple, Qualcomm, and MediaTek, Xiaomi would count itself as one of TSMC’s customers. Sadly, with the recent development, the Chinese firm will be limited to the 3nm N3E node, facing a similar fate to Huawei. The latest claim also suggests that to possess the latest and greatest hardware in smartphone chipset technology, Xiaomi will have little choice but to continue relying on Qualcomm and MediaTek, which will unveil the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 2 and Dimensity 9500 later this year. Fortunately, restricting exports of cutting-edge machinery to China will only boost its resolve to continue the production of local EDA tools, but will this hardware be developed fast enough for the Xiaomi XRING 02 to be fabricated on TSMC’s 2nm process? We will have the answer to this question in the future. Readers should note that there is also the risk that the Trump administration enforces a massive ban on Xiaomi, preventing the latter from doing business with TSMC or Samsung in any way, shape, or form. While China is pursuing the manufacturing of custom EUV machinery to eliminate any overseas trade involvement, it may take several years for the country to achieve autonomy. News Source: Digital Chat Station Subscribe to get an everyday digest of the latest technology news in your inbox Follow us on Topics Sections Company Some posts on wccftech.com may contain affiliate links. We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com © 2025 WCCF TECH INC. 700 - 401 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada

In context: TSMC has steadily raised the prices of its most advanced semiconductor process nodes over the past several years – so much so that one analysis suggests the cost per transistor hasn't decreased in over a decade. Further price hikes, driven by tariffs and rising development costs, are reinforcing the notion that Moore's Law is truly dead. The Commercial Times reports that TSMC's upcoming N2 2nm semiconductors will cost $30,000 per wafer, a roughly 66% increase over the company's 3nm chips. Future nodes are expected to be even more expensive and likely reserved for the largest manufacturers. TSMC has justified these price increases by citing the massive cost of building 2nm fabrication plants, which can reach up to $725 million. According to United Daily News, major players such as Apple, AMD, Qualcomm, Broadcom, and Nvidia are expected to place orders before the end of the year despite the higher prices, potentially bringing TSMC's 2nm Arizona fab to full capacity. Also see: How profitable are TSMC's nodes: crunching the numbers Unsurprisingly, Apple is getting first dibs. The A20 processor in next year's iPhone 18 Pro is expected to be the first chip based on TSMC's N2 process. Intel's Nova Lake processors, targeting desktops and possibly high-end laptops, are also slated to use N2 and are expected to launch next year. Earlier reports indicated that yield rates for TSMC's 2nm process reached 60% last year and have since improved. New data suggests that 256Mb SRAM yield rates now exceed 90%. Trial production is likely already underway, with mass production scheduled to begin later this year. // Related Stories With tape-outs for 2nm-based designs surpassing previous nodes at the same development stage, TSMC aims to produce tens of thousands of wafers by the end of 2025. TSMC also plans to follow N2 with N2P and N2X in the second half of next year. N2P is expected to offer an 18% performance boost over N3E at the same power level and 36% greater energy efficiency at the same speed, along with significantly higher logic density. N2X, slated for mass production in 2027, will increase maximum clock frequencies by 10%. As semiconductor geometries continue to shrink, power leakage becomes a major concern. TSMC's 2nm nodes will address this issue with gate-all-around (GAA) transistor architectures, enabling more precise control of electrical currents. Beyond 2nm lies the Angstrom era, where TSMC will implement backside power delivery to further enhance performance. Future process nodes like A16 (1.6nm) and A14 (1.4nm) could cost up to $45,000 per wafer. Meanwhile, Intel is aiming to outpace TSMC's roadmap. The company recently began risk production of its A18 node, which also features gate-all-around and backside power delivery. These chips are expected to debut later this year in Intel's upcoming laptop CPUs, codenamed Panther Lake.

Taiwanese chip titan TSMC said Tuesday that it expected to see record earnings this year as it increased semiconductor production capacity to meet soaring demand for AI technology.

The post مفاوضات بين TSMC وواشنطن لإنشاء مصنع للرقائق في الإمارات appeared first on عرب هاردوير.

The arrival of the XRING 01 is a message from Xiaomi that it is fully prepared and equipped to design and manufacture custom chipsets, securing a new milestone by becoming the first Chinese firm to successfully commercialize a 3nm SoC. While the new silicon’s launch would indicate that the company is ready to wave goodbye to its partners Qualcomm and MediaTek, a new estimate reveals that it may take several years before Xiaomi is completely self-sufficient in making its own chipsets. For now, around 40 percent of the company’s smartphones feature parts from the aforementioned names. Relying on Qualcomm and MediaTek for future chipsets might still be a necessity, considering that the U.S. has not voiced its concern for Xiaomi’s XRING 01 Currently, the XRING 01 powers the Xiaomi 15S Pro and the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, and there is no mention of whether the custom SoC will make its way to other devices. The company has not mentioned how many units it intends to manufacture but utilizing the second-generation 3nm process from TSMC, also known as ‘N3E,’ is a costly decision, not to mention that the tape-out process likely racked up a bill of millions for Xiaomi. In the long run, it is cheaper to make your own chipsets as opposed to sourcing from Qualcomm or MediaTek, but in the initial stages, where a ton of trial and error is involved, there is no question that Xiaomi’s investment of billions was absolutely crucial. However, the company has barely scratched the surface, and until it has successfully adopted its in-house silicon for at least a couple of generations, we doubt the partnership with Qualcomm and MediaTek will evaporate. In fact, CNBC reports that, according to Counterpoint Research Partner Niel Shah, 40 percent of Xiaomi smartphones continue to feature chipsets from Qualcomm and MediaTek. These two might be included in Xiaomi’s supply chain for a little longer because of the potential U.S. export controls looming over the company’s head like the sword of Damocles. The XRING 01 represents not just a victory for Xiaomi but also for China, and leveraging TSMC’s advanced lithography will probably not go unnoticed by the Trump administration. There is the possibility that TSMC is barred from doing business with Xiaomi for fear that the latter’s technology could be distributed to other Chinese firms and give them an edge in the technological race. The problem is that the global landscape is too unpredictable to make such assumptions, so we must see what fate awaits Xiaomi in the future. News Source: CNBC Deal of the Day

NVIDIA is set to launch its next chip for the China AI market in the upcoming months, and the price of this chip is expected to be a bargain for clients. NVIDIA's Blackwell Chip For China Will Cost Half Of The H20 AI Accelerator, But Won't Feature HBM Or CoWoS Technology Team Green needs to move with its position in China quickly, since not only is the competition from the likes of Huawei ramping up, but with the evolving geopolitical situation, NVIDIA doesn't know what the next move from the Trump administration will be. According to a new report by Reuters, it has been revealed that NVIDIA's next Blackwell chip could be half the price of the H20 AI accelerator, as the key focus with the release would likely be to get the market share back from the likes of Huawei. The chip is expected to enter production as soon as next month, and is said to be available to the Chinese AI markets by July. The price tag NVIDIA will offer does come with a cost, which is a cut-down on specifications. According to what we know, the significant difference will lie in the use of GDDR7 memory instead of HBM, which is done to comply with memory bandwidth restrictions by the US chip policies. Along with this, the Blackwell chip is expected not to use TSMC's CoWoS technology, which means that the performance with this model will be severely lower than what mainstream solutions offer, which means that the gap between Chinese and Western AI performance is only going to increase. NVIDIA's revenue from China has significantly dropped after the initial round of restrictions set by the Biden adminstration. The firm's revenue in China doesn't come from the H20 AI accelerator alone, as the firm was previously said to be selling "millions" of AI GPUs, particularly the H100 and the A100 models. Jensen claims that China is a $50 billion opportunity for NVIDIA, yet US restrictions have held them back to the point where NVIDIA's CEO has revealed that they could be replaced, since market share has dropped to 50%. The low cost of the Blackwell AI chip is likely to lure in customers, since NVIDIA is anticipated to sell over one million units of these chips by the end of the year. However, it is safe to say that with this particular chip, Team Green would no longer be the company offering the highest-end solution to the domestic market, since the Ascend 910C chip from Huawei will outperform it. But, NVIDIA has plans to leverage its software ecosystem, CUDA, which will give the company an edge. Deal of the Day

Valve co-founder and CEO Gabe Newell, the company behind Half-Life and DOTA 2 and Counter-Strike and preeminent PC game distribution platform Steam, has long toyed with the idea that your brain should be more connected to your PC. It began over a decade ago with in-house psychologists studying people’s biological responses to video games; Valve once considered earlobe monitors for its first VR headset. The company publicly explored the idea of brain-computer interfaces for gaming at GDC in 2019.But Newell decided to spin off the idea. That same year, he quietly incorporated a new brain-computer interface startup, Starfish Neuroscience — which has now revealed plans to produce its very first brain chip later this year.Starfish’s first blog post, spotted by Valve watcher Brad Lynch, makes it clear we’re not talking about a complete implant yet. This bit is the custom “electrophysiology” chip designed to record brain activity (like how Neuralink can “read your mind” so patients can interact with computers) and stimulate the brain (for disease therapy), but Starfish isn’t claiming it’s already built the systems to power it or the bits to stick it into a person’s head.“We anticipate our first chips arriving in late 2025 and we are interested in finding collaborators for whom such a chip would open new and exciting avenues,” writes Starfish neuroengineer Nate Cermak (bolding theirs), suggesting that Starfish might wind up partnering with other companies for wireless power or even the final brain implant.But the goal, writes Starfish, is a smaller and less invasive implant than the competition, one that can “enable simultaneous access to multiple brain regions” instead of just one site, and one that doesn’t require a battery. Using just 1.1 milliwatts during “normal recording,” Starfish says it can work with wireless power transmission instead.Here’s the chip’s current spec sheet:Low power: 1.1 mW total power consumption during normal recording Physically small: 2 x 4mm (0.3mm pitch BGA) Capable of both recording (spikes and LFP) & stimulation (biphasic pulses) 32 electrode sites, 16 simultaneous recording channels at 18.75kHz 1 current source for stimulating on arbitrary pairs of electrodes Onboard impedance monitoring and stim voltage transient measurement Digital onboard data processing and spike detection allows the device to operate via low-bandwidth wireless interfaces. Fabricated in TSMC 55nm processNeuralink’s N1, for comparison, has 1,024 electrodes across its 64 brain-implanted threads, a chip that consumed around 6 milliwatts as of 2019, a battery that periodically needs wireless charging, and the full implant (again, not just the chip) is around 23mm wide and 8mm thick. The Elon Musk-led company has reportedly already implanted it in three humans; while some of the threads did detach from the first patient’s brain, he still has functionality and has been giving interviews.Starfish says it could be important to connect to multiple parts of the brain simultaneously, instead of just one region, to address issues like Parkinson’s disease. “there is increasing evidence that a number of neurological disorders involve circuit-level dysfunction, in which the interactions between brain regions may be misregulated,” Cermak writes.In addition to multiple simultaneous brain implants, the company’s updated website says it’s working on a “precision hyperthermia device” to destroy tumors with targeted heat, and a brain-reading, robotically guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) system for addressing neurological conditions like bipolar disorder and depression.In case you’re wondering how any of this might make its way back to gaming, I’ll leave you with Valve’s talk from GDC 2019 about brain-computer interfaces.See More:

UPDATE: When questioned today whether he has the power to tariff only one company, Trump replied that this edict applies to any smartphone maker. "It would be more. It would be also Samsung and anybody that makes that product; otherwise, it wouldn't be fair," he said.Trump says he's setting an end-of-June deadline, but it's unclear if that deadline is for a commitment from these companies to build smartphone factories in the US or actually seeing phones roll off production lines. According to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, "Moving all iPhone assembly for US models back to the US before Trump’s term ends is unrealistic." "I had an understanding with Tim that he wouldn't be doing this," Trump said of Apple's plan to build iPhones in India versus China. When asked why he thinks Apple can build a phone in the US without raising prices, Trump argued that "a lot of [the production] is computerized now. These plants are amazing, if you look at them," adding, "If they're going to sell it in America, I want it to be built in the United States. They're able to do that."Kuo says, "Apple’s top priority in negotiations with Trump should be finding ways to avoid, delay, or prevent higher iPhone tariffs. For example, Apple could adjust its DEI policies to secure Trump’s temporary commitment to hold off on targeting them.Original Story:President Trump kicked off Memorial Day weekend by threatening to impose a 25% tariff on Apple unless it produces its iPhones in the US. "I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhone’s [sic] that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else," Trump posted on Truth Social. "If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US. Thank [you] for your attention to this matter!"Separately, Trump posted that the European Union "has been very difficult to deal with," and said he is "recommending a straight 50% Tariff on the European Union," starting June 1.'India Can Take Care of Themselves'Apple has long produced most of its iPhones in China via manufacturing partners like Foxconn, though it has taken steps to diversify. Amid the threat of Trump's tariffs, the highest of which were imposed on China, Apple moved much of its US-based iPhone production to India. "For the June quarter, we do expect the majority of iPhones sold in the US will have India as their country of origin," Cook said in an April earnings call. Most iPads, Macs, and Apple Watch devices sold in the US will come from Vietnam. “China would continue to be the country of origin for the vast majority of total product sales outside the US,” Cook added. That didn't sit well with Trump, who said last week that he called Cook to complain about Apple moving production to India. "We put up with all the plants you built in China for years," he told reporters during a recent trip to the Middle East. "We are not interested in you building in India. India can take care of themselves. They are doing very well. We want you to build [in the US]."Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Recommended by Our EditorsSmartphones are currently exempt from Trump's tariffs, but that could change soon.Is $500 Billion Not Enough?In February, Apple said it would invest more than $500 billion in the US over the next four years. The money will be used to build a server manufacturing facility in Houston, produce silicon chips in Arizona, establish a manufacturing academy in Detroit, and create 20,000 new jobs. But moving iPhone production to the US is probably an unrealistic and expensive goal. Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo suggests that "in terms of profitability, it's way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to US." For now, a lot of Apple-based production in the US is being done via partnerships."We're excited about bringing more production to the US," Cook said during that earnings call. "As you know, we've been very key in the TSMC project in Arizona and are the largest and first customer getting product out of that.""During calendar year 2025, we expect to source more than 19 billion chips from a dozen states, including tens of millions of advanced chips being made in Arizona this year," Cook added. "We also source glass used in iPhone from an American company. All told, we have more than 9,000 suppliers in the US across all 50 states."TSMC, however, is warning that tariffs could hamper its expansion plans in Arizona. "Diminished demand could create uncertainty around the timeline for the construction and operation of our Arizona fabs. It could also undermine TSMC’s financial capacity to timely execute its ambitious Arizona project,” the company said in a letter to the US Commerce Department, which sought public comment on the US potentially tariffing foreign-made semiconductors to help encourage domestic chip manufacturing. A year ago, TSMC said it would receive $11.6 billion in US government funding via the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act signed by President Biden, with $6.6 billion of that as grants and the remaining $5 billion as loans.A $2,300 iPhone? Trump's post suggests that iPhones will be subject to tariffs regardless of their country of origin, which could be costly for those looking to upgrade to the iPhone 17 later this year. Rumors already indicate Apple is considering a price increase for its next-gen phones, which it is trying not to tie publicly to tariffs. In April, an analyst from Rosenblatt Securities tells Reuters that tariffs could increase the cost of producing iPhones by up to 43%, putting the high-end iPhone at $2,300 if Apple passes all the extra costs on to consumers.The White House is currently trying to broker individual trade deals with countries around the globe. Thus far, it's announced one with the UK and paused tariffs on China while it negotiates. In the EU, however, Trump says, "Our discussions with them are going nowhere!"Trump claims the US has a trade deficit of more than $250 million with the EU, "which is totally unacceptable," he said. The only way for the EU to avoid US tariffs is to produce its products in the US.