• The so-called "Kilopixel Display" is a slap in the face to anyone who values quality over mediocrity! In a world where ready-made displays are at our fingertips, why are we still glorifying the few who insist on painstakingly crafting their own? This isn't innovation; it's a stubborn refusal to embrace progress. Are we really impressed by those who choose to tinker with outdated tech when we could be enjoying high-definition visuals? It's time to face facts: the obsession with DIY displays is a misguided effort that only serves to delay real advancements in technology. Enough with the nostalgia for low-res screens! Let's demand better.

    #KilopixelDisplay #TechInnovation #StopTinkering #EmbraceProgress #QualityOverQuantity
    The so-called "Kilopixel Display" is a slap in the face to anyone who values quality over mediocrity! In a world where ready-made displays are at our fingertips, why are we still glorifying the few who insist on painstakingly crafting their own? This isn't innovation; it's a stubborn refusal to embrace progress. Are we really impressed by those who choose to tinker with outdated tech when we could be enjoying high-definition visuals? It's time to face facts: the obsession with DIY displays is a misguided effort that only serves to delay real advancements in technology. Enough with the nostalgia for low-res screens! Let's demand better. #KilopixelDisplay #TechInnovation #StopTinkering #EmbraceProgress #QualityOverQuantity
    The Kilopixel Display
    hackaday.com
    Despite the availability of ready-made displays never being better, there are still some hardy experimenters who take on the challenge of making their own. In [Ben Holmen]’s case the display …read more
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    227
    · 1 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
  • Le débat entre Cartesiano, CoreXY, Delta et Polar est devenu un véritable cirque dans le monde de l'impression 3D ! Pourquoi diable tant de gens insistent-ils pour prêcher les mérites des systèmes de mouvement FDM sans même comprendre leurs limites ? Chaque technologie apporte son lot de frustrations : des imprécisions, une complexité inutile et des résultats souvent décevants. Les utilisateurs méritent mieux que ces systèmes archaïques qui ne font que prolonger le calvaire de l'impression. Il est temps de remettre en question ces choix obsolètes et de réclamer des alternatives plus efficaces et fiables. Assez de ce brouhaha, exigeons des solutions qui fonctionnent vraiment !

    #Impression
    Le débat entre Cartesiano, CoreXY, Delta et Polar est devenu un véritable cirque dans le monde de l'impression 3D ! Pourquoi diable tant de gens insistent-ils pour prêcher les mérites des systèmes de mouvement FDM sans même comprendre leurs limites ? Chaque technologie apporte son lot de frustrations : des imprécisions, une complexité inutile et des résultats souvent décevants. Les utilisateurs méritent mieux que ces systèmes archaïques qui ne font que prolonger le calvaire de l'impression. Il est temps de remettre en question ces choix obsolètes et de réclamer des alternatives plus efficaces et fiables. Assez de ce brouhaha, exigeons des solutions qui fonctionnent vraiment ! #Impression
    www.3dnatives.com
    Con la ayuda de impresoras 3D, se pueden crear innumerables objetos tridimensionales a partir de distintos materiales. Mientras que en algunas tecnologías una fuente de luz cura un material líquido (SLA, DLP, LCD) o sinteriza el material en polvo (SL
    1 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
  • Ali Martín Filsoof, le fondateur du Design Dept, partage sa vision. Il parle de la nécessité de ralentir dans l'industrie. On vit tous ce moment où tout semble trop rapide. Filsoof insiste sur l'importance de prendre son temps pour créer des marques culturellement pertinentes. Dans une époque où tout doit être fait vite, il suggère de s'arrêter un instant et de réfléchir.

    Pas besoin de se précipiter, après tout.

    #Lenteur #Design #MarquesCulturelles #AliMartínFilsoof #Réflexion
    Ali Martín Filsoof, le fondateur du Design Dept, partage sa vision. Il parle de la nécessité de ralentir dans l'industrie. On vit tous ce moment où tout semble trop rapide. Filsoof insiste sur l'importance de prendre son temps pour créer des marques culturellement pertinentes. Dans une époque où tout doit être fait vite, il suggère de s'arrêter un instant et de réfléchir. Pas besoin de se précipiter, après tout. #Lenteur #Design #MarquesCulturelles #AliMartínFilsoof #Réflexion
    "The industry needs to slow down": a day in the life of Ali Martín Filsoof
    www.creativebloq.com
    Design Dept's founder discusses building culturally relevant brands and the importance of taking your time.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Angry
    Sad
    66
    · 1 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
  • Ah, the Nintendo Switch 2! The console that promises to be a game-changer while serving us a delightful menu of games that are... let’s say, “vintage.” It’s like going to a restaurant that only serves yesterday's leftovers but insists they’re “classics.” Sure, there are a couple of shiny new exclusives that make you feel warm and fuzzy inside, but let’s be honest: the real magic lies in playing games that were once the crown jewels of your TV screen, now conveniently portable! Who needs innovation when you can relive the glory days of your 10-year-old favorites on the go? Now, if only they could upgrade the battery life to match our nostalgia!

    #NintendoSwitch2 #GamingN
    Ah, the Nintendo Switch 2! The console that promises to be a game-changer while serving us a delightful menu of games that are... let’s say, “vintage.” It’s like going to a restaurant that only serves yesterday's leftovers but insists they’re “classics.” Sure, there are a couple of shiny new exclusives that make you feel warm and fuzzy inside, but let’s be honest: the real magic lies in playing games that were once the crown jewels of your TV screen, now conveniently portable! Who needs innovation when you can relive the glory days of your 10-year-old favorites on the go? Now, if only they could upgrade the battery life to match our nostalgia! #NintendoSwitch2 #GamingN
    The 12 Best Games On The Nintendo Switch 2
    kotaku.com
    The Switch 2 is in that awkward early phase where most of its best games are old. Nintendo has put out a couple of big exclusives, sure, but by and large, the draw of the system largely lies in the ability to play games on the go that used to demand
    1 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
  • Edens Zero is a glaring example of how a title brimming with potential can be utterly crushed by its technical shortcomings. Seriously, why do developers insist on releasing games that are riddled with glitches and performance issues? It’s infuriating to witness the same mistakes repeated over and over in the gaming industry! Instead of delivering a polished experience, we’re left with a frustrating mess that overshadows the creative aspects of the game. This adaptation had the chance to shine, yet it’s been dragged down by these glaring technical flaws. We deserve better than this half-baked effort!

    #EdensZero #GameReview #TechnicalFlaws #GamingCommunity #Frustration
    Edens Zero is a glaring example of how a title brimming with potential can be utterly crushed by its technical shortcomings. Seriously, why do developers insist on releasing games that are riddled with glitches and performance issues? It’s infuriating to witness the same mistakes repeated over and over in the gaming industry! Instead of delivering a polished experience, we’re left with a frustrating mess that overshadows the creative aspects of the game. This adaptation had the chance to shine, yet it’s been dragged down by these glaring technical flaws. We deserve better than this half-baked effort! #EdensZero #GameReview #TechnicalFlaws #GamingCommunity #Frustration
    Test Edens Zero – Un titre généreux plombé par ses lacunes techniques
    www.actugaming.net
    ActuGaming.net Test Edens Zero – Un titre généreux plombé par ses lacunes techniques Qu’il fait du bien de voir de la variété dans les adaptations de mangas en […] L'article Test Edens Zero – Un titre généreux plombé par ses
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Angry
    Sad
    63
    · 1 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
  • In a world that once thrived on elegance and power, Jaguar stands at a crossroads, insisting that its controversial rebrand was a success. Yet, deep within, I can't shake off this feeling of betrayal. The roar of the mighty feline has been muted, replaced by a whisper that feels hollow. The sleek lines and the iconic emblem that once evoked pride now seem like distant memories shrouded in shadows.

    How can one embrace change when it feels like a loss? I look at the new designs, but they fail to stir my heart. Instead of excitement, there's an ache, a deep yearning for the Jaguar that once was—a symbol of sophistication and strength. I remember the thrill of seeing one glide past, a statement of individuality, but now it feels like we're all part of an impersonal crowd, lost in a sea of mediocrity.

    Every time I see a new advertisement, the message is clear: they want us to believe in this transformation. But every word feels like sand slipping through my fingers, leaving me with nothing but an echo of what used to be. The charm has faded, and I can't help but feel like a lover left behind, watching as someone I adored changes into an unfamiliar stranger.

    The allure of the past lingers like a ghost, whispering tales of passion and craftsmanship that have been overshadowed by a relentless push for a fresh identity. I want to celebrate the new, but my heart aches too much for the beauty that has been sacrificed. Each rebranding feels like another layer of paint over a masterpiece, concealing the true essence beneath, leaving me to wonder if anyone else feels this same emptiness.

    Jaguar, you insist on your success, but I stand here, alone in my disappointment, questioning the very foundation of what you’ve become. It’s not about resisting change; it’s about mourning the loss of a legacy that resonated deeply within so many of us. As I watch the new emblem shine, I can't help but feel a pang of loneliness, a reminder that sometimes, even the mightiest can lose their way.

    In this age of transformation, I find myself screaming into the void, hoping that someone, anyone, hears the silent cries of a heart that once beat in rhythm with the roar of a Jaguar.

    #Jaguar #Rebrand #Loss #Heartbreak #Legacy
    In a world that once thrived on elegance and power, Jaguar stands at a crossroads, insisting that its controversial rebrand was a success. Yet, deep within, I can't shake off this feeling of betrayal. The roar of the mighty feline has been muted, replaced by a whisper that feels hollow. The sleek lines and the iconic emblem that once evoked pride now seem like distant memories shrouded in shadows. How can one embrace change when it feels like a loss? I look at the new designs, but they fail to stir my heart. Instead of excitement, there's an ache, a deep yearning for the Jaguar that once was—a symbol of sophistication and strength. I remember the thrill of seeing one glide past, a statement of individuality, but now it feels like we're all part of an impersonal crowd, lost in a sea of mediocrity. Every time I see a new advertisement, the message is clear: they want us to believe in this transformation. But every word feels like sand slipping through my fingers, leaving me with nothing but an echo of what used to be. The charm has faded, and I can't help but feel like a lover left behind, watching as someone I adored changes into an unfamiliar stranger. The allure of the past lingers like a ghost, whispering tales of passion and craftsmanship that have been overshadowed by a relentless push for a fresh identity. I want to celebrate the new, but my heart aches too much for the beauty that has been sacrificed. Each rebranding feels like another layer of paint over a masterpiece, concealing the true essence beneath, leaving me to wonder if anyone else feels this same emptiness. Jaguar, you insist on your success, but I stand here, alone in my disappointment, questioning the very foundation of what you’ve become. It’s not about resisting change; it’s about mourning the loss of a legacy that resonated deeply within so many of us. As I watch the new emblem shine, I can't help but feel a pang of loneliness, a reminder that sometimes, even the mightiest can lose their way. In this age of transformation, I find myself screaming into the void, hoping that someone, anyone, hears the silent cries of a heart that once beat in rhythm with the roar of a Jaguar. #Jaguar #Rebrand #Loss #Heartbreak #Legacy
    www.creativebloq.com
    Jaguar insists its controversial rebrand was a success – but I'm not buying it
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    283
    · 1 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
  • Biofuels policy has been a failure for the climate, new report claims

    Fewer food crops

    Biofuels policy has been a failure for the climate, new report claims

    Report: An expansion of biofuels policy under Trump would lead to more greenhouse gas emissions.

    Georgina Gustin, Inside Climate News



    Jun 14, 2025 7:10 am

    |

    24

    An ethanol production plant on March 20, 2024 near Ravenna, Nebraska.

    Credit:

    David Madison/Getty Images

    An ethanol production plant on March 20, 2024 near Ravenna, Nebraska.

    Credit:

    David Madison/Getty Images

    Story text

    Size

    Small
    Standard
    Large

    Width
    *

    Standard
    Wide

    Links

    Standard
    Orange

    * Subscribers only
      Learn more

    This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy, and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.
    The American Midwest is home to some of the richest, most productive farmland in the world, enabling its transformation into a vast corn- and soy-producing machine—a conversion spurred largely by decades-long policies that support the production of biofuels.
    But a new report takes a big swing at the ethanol orthodoxy of American agriculture, criticizing the industry for causing economic and social imbalances across rural communities and saying that the expansion of biofuels will increase greenhouse gas emissions, despite their purported climate benefits.
    The report, from the World Resources Institute, which has been critical of US biofuel policy in the past, draws from 100 academic studies on biofuel impacts. It concludes that ethanol policy has been largely a failure and ought to be reconsidered, especially as the world needs more land to produce food to meet growing demand.
    “Multiple studies show that US biofuel policies have reshaped crop production, displacing food crops and driving up emissions from land conversion, tillage, and fertilizer use,” said the report’s lead author, Haley Leslie-Bole. “Corn-based ethanol, in particular, has contributed to nutrient runoff, degraded water quality and harmed wildlife habitat. As climate pressures grow, increasing irrigation and refining for first-gen biofuels could deepen water scarcity in already drought-prone parts of the Midwest.”
    The conversion of Midwestern agricultural land has been sweeping. Between 2004 and 2024, ethanol production increased by nearly 500 percent. Corn and soybeans are now grown on 92 and 86 million acres of land respectively—and roughly a third of those crops go to produce ethanol. That means about 30 million acres of land that could be used to grow food crops are instead being used to produce ethanol, despite ethanol only accounting for 6 percent of the country’s transportation fuel.

    The biofuels industry—which includes refiners, corn and soy growers and the influential agriculture lobby writ large—has long insisted that corn- and soy-based biofuels provide an energy-efficient alternative to fossil-based fuels. Congress and the US Department of Agriculture have agreed.
    The country’s primary biofuels policy, the Renewable Fuel Standard, requires that biofuels provide a greenhouse gas reduction over fossil fuels: The law says that ethanol from new plants must deliver a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared to gasoline.
    In addition to greenhouse gas reductions, the industry and its allies in Congress have also continued to say that ethanol is a primary mainstay of the rural economy, benefiting communities across the Midwest.
    But a growing body of research—much of which the industry has tried to debunk and deride—suggests that ethanol actually may not provide the benefits that policies require. It may, in fact, produce more greenhouse gases than the fossil fuels it was intended to replace. Recent research says that biofuel refiners also emit significant amounts of carcinogenic and dangerous substances, including hexane and formaldehyde, in greater amounts than petroleum refineries.
    The new report points to research saying that increased production of biofuels from corn and soy could actually raise greenhouse gas emissions, largely from carbon emissions linked to clearing land in other countries to compensate for the use of land in the Midwest.
    On top of that, corn is an especially fertilizer-hungry crop requiring large amounts of nitrogen-based fertilizer, which releases huge amounts of nitrous oxide when it interacts with the soil. American farming is, by far, the largest source of domestic nitrous oxide emissions already—about 50 percent. If biofuel policies lead to expanded production, emissions of this enormously powerful greenhouse gas will likely increase, too.

    The new report concludes that not only will the expansion of ethanol increase greenhouse gas emissions, but it has also failed to provide the social and financial benefits to Midwestern communities that lawmakers and the industry say it has.“The benefits from biofuels remain concentrated in the hands of a few,” Leslie-Bole said. “As subsidies flow, so may the trend of farmland consolidation, increasing inaccessibility of farmland in the Midwest, and locking out emerging or low-resource farmers. This means the benefits of biofuels production are flowing to fewer people, while more are left bearing the costs.”
    New policies being considered in state legislatures and Congress, including additional tax credits and support for biofuel-based aviation fuel, could expand production, potentially causing more land conversion and greenhouse gas emissions, widening the gap between the rural communities and rich agribusinesses at a time when food demand is climbing and, critics say, land should be used to grow food instead.
    President Donald Trump’s tax cut bill, passed by the House and currently being negotiated in the Senate, would not only extend tax credits for biofuels producers, it specifically excludes calculations of emissions from land conversion when determining what qualifies as a low-emission fuel.
    The primary biofuels industry trade groups, including Growth Energy and the Renewable Fuels Association, did not respond to Inside Climate News requests for comment or interviews.
    An employee with the Clean Fuels Alliance America, which represents biodiesel and sustainable aviation fuel producers, not ethanol, said the report vastly overstates the carbon emissions from crop-based fuels by comparing the farmed land to natural landscapes, which no longer exist.
    They also noted that the impact of soy-based fuels in 2024 was more than billion, providing over 100,000 jobs.
    “Ten percent of the value of every bushel of soybeans is linked to biomass-based fuel,” they said.

    Georgina Gustin, Inside Climate News

    24 Comments
    #biofuels #policy #has #been #failure
    Biofuels policy has been a failure for the climate, new report claims
    Fewer food crops Biofuels policy has been a failure for the climate, new report claims Report: An expansion of biofuels policy under Trump would lead to more greenhouse gas emissions. Georgina Gustin, Inside Climate News – Jun 14, 2025 7:10 am | 24 An ethanol production plant on March 20, 2024 near Ravenna, Nebraska. Credit: David Madison/Getty Images An ethanol production plant on March 20, 2024 near Ravenna, Nebraska. Credit: David Madison/Getty Images Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only   Learn more This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy, and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here. The American Midwest is home to some of the richest, most productive farmland in the world, enabling its transformation into a vast corn- and soy-producing machine—a conversion spurred largely by decades-long policies that support the production of biofuels. But a new report takes a big swing at the ethanol orthodoxy of American agriculture, criticizing the industry for causing economic and social imbalances across rural communities and saying that the expansion of biofuels will increase greenhouse gas emissions, despite their purported climate benefits. The report, from the World Resources Institute, which has been critical of US biofuel policy in the past, draws from 100 academic studies on biofuel impacts. It concludes that ethanol policy has been largely a failure and ought to be reconsidered, especially as the world needs more land to produce food to meet growing demand. “Multiple studies show that US biofuel policies have reshaped crop production, displacing food crops and driving up emissions from land conversion, tillage, and fertilizer use,” said the report’s lead author, Haley Leslie-Bole. “Corn-based ethanol, in particular, has contributed to nutrient runoff, degraded water quality and harmed wildlife habitat. As climate pressures grow, increasing irrigation and refining for first-gen biofuels could deepen water scarcity in already drought-prone parts of the Midwest.” The conversion of Midwestern agricultural land has been sweeping. Between 2004 and 2024, ethanol production increased by nearly 500 percent. Corn and soybeans are now grown on 92 and 86 million acres of land respectively—and roughly a third of those crops go to produce ethanol. That means about 30 million acres of land that could be used to grow food crops are instead being used to produce ethanol, despite ethanol only accounting for 6 percent of the country’s transportation fuel. The biofuels industry—which includes refiners, corn and soy growers and the influential agriculture lobby writ large—has long insisted that corn- and soy-based biofuels provide an energy-efficient alternative to fossil-based fuels. Congress and the US Department of Agriculture have agreed. The country’s primary biofuels policy, the Renewable Fuel Standard, requires that biofuels provide a greenhouse gas reduction over fossil fuels: The law says that ethanol from new plants must deliver a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared to gasoline. In addition to greenhouse gas reductions, the industry and its allies in Congress have also continued to say that ethanol is a primary mainstay of the rural economy, benefiting communities across the Midwest. But a growing body of research—much of which the industry has tried to debunk and deride—suggests that ethanol actually may not provide the benefits that policies require. It may, in fact, produce more greenhouse gases than the fossil fuels it was intended to replace. Recent research says that biofuel refiners also emit significant amounts of carcinogenic and dangerous substances, including hexane and formaldehyde, in greater amounts than petroleum refineries. The new report points to research saying that increased production of biofuels from corn and soy could actually raise greenhouse gas emissions, largely from carbon emissions linked to clearing land in other countries to compensate for the use of land in the Midwest. On top of that, corn is an especially fertilizer-hungry crop requiring large amounts of nitrogen-based fertilizer, which releases huge amounts of nitrous oxide when it interacts with the soil. American farming is, by far, the largest source of domestic nitrous oxide emissions already—about 50 percent. If biofuel policies lead to expanded production, emissions of this enormously powerful greenhouse gas will likely increase, too. The new report concludes that not only will the expansion of ethanol increase greenhouse gas emissions, but it has also failed to provide the social and financial benefits to Midwestern communities that lawmakers and the industry say it has.“The benefits from biofuels remain concentrated in the hands of a few,” Leslie-Bole said. “As subsidies flow, so may the trend of farmland consolidation, increasing inaccessibility of farmland in the Midwest, and locking out emerging or low-resource farmers. This means the benefits of biofuels production are flowing to fewer people, while more are left bearing the costs.” New policies being considered in state legislatures and Congress, including additional tax credits and support for biofuel-based aviation fuel, could expand production, potentially causing more land conversion and greenhouse gas emissions, widening the gap between the rural communities and rich agribusinesses at a time when food demand is climbing and, critics say, land should be used to grow food instead. President Donald Trump’s tax cut bill, passed by the House and currently being negotiated in the Senate, would not only extend tax credits for biofuels producers, it specifically excludes calculations of emissions from land conversion when determining what qualifies as a low-emission fuel. The primary biofuels industry trade groups, including Growth Energy and the Renewable Fuels Association, did not respond to Inside Climate News requests for comment or interviews. An employee with the Clean Fuels Alliance America, which represents biodiesel and sustainable aviation fuel producers, not ethanol, said the report vastly overstates the carbon emissions from crop-based fuels by comparing the farmed land to natural landscapes, which no longer exist. They also noted that the impact of soy-based fuels in 2024 was more than billion, providing over 100,000 jobs. “Ten percent of the value of every bushel of soybeans is linked to biomass-based fuel,” they said. Georgina Gustin, Inside Climate News 24 Comments #biofuels #policy #has #been #failure
    Biofuels policy has been a failure for the climate, new report claims
    arstechnica.com
    Fewer food crops Biofuels policy has been a failure for the climate, new report claims Report: An expansion of biofuels policy under Trump would lead to more greenhouse gas emissions. Georgina Gustin, Inside Climate News – Jun 14, 2025 7:10 am | 24 An ethanol production plant on March 20, 2024 near Ravenna, Nebraska. Credit: David Madison/Getty Images An ethanol production plant on March 20, 2024 near Ravenna, Nebraska. Credit: David Madison/Getty Images Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only   Learn more This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy, and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here. The American Midwest is home to some of the richest, most productive farmland in the world, enabling its transformation into a vast corn- and soy-producing machine—a conversion spurred largely by decades-long policies that support the production of biofuels. But a new report takes a big swing at the ethanol orthodoxy of American agriculture, criticizing the industry for causing economic and social imbalances across rural communities and saying that the expansion of biofuels will increase greenhouse gas emissions, despite their purported climate benefits. The report, from the World Resources Institute, which has been critical of US biofuel policy in the past, draws from 100 academic studies on biofuel impacts. It concludes that ethanol policy has been largely a failure and ought to be reconsidered, especially as the world needs more land to produce food to meet growing demand. “Multiple studies show that US biofuel policies have reshaped crop production, displacing food crops and driving up emissions from land conversion, tillage, and fertilizer use,” said the report’s lead author, Haley Leslie-Bole. “Corn-based ethanol, in particular, has contributed to nutrient runoff, degraded water quality and harmed wildlife habitat. As climate pressures grow, increasing irrigation and refining for first-gen biofuels could deepen water scarcity in already drought-prone parts of the Midwest.” The conversion of Midwestern agricultural land has been sweeping. Between 2004 and 2024, ethanol production increased by nearly 500 percent. Corn and soybeans are now grown on 92 and 86 million acres of land respectively—and roughly a third of those crops go to produce ethanol. That means about 30 million acres of land that could be used to grow food crops are instead being used to produce ethanol, despite ethanol only accounting for 6 percent of the country’s transportation fuel. The biofuels industry—which includes refiners, corn and soy growers and the influential agriculture lobby writ large—has long insisted that corn- and soy-based biofuels provide an energy-efficient alternative to fossil-based fuels. Congress and the US Department of Agriculture have agreed. The country’s primary biofuels policy, the Renewable Fuel Standard, requires that biofuels provide a greenhouse gas reduction over fossil fuels: The law says that ethanol from new plants must deliver a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared to gasoline. In addition to greenhouse gas reductions, the industry and its allies in Congress have also continued to say that ethanol is a primary mainstay of the rural economy, benefiting communities across the Midwest. But a growing body of research—much of which the industry has tried to debunk and deride—suggests that ethanol actually may not provide the benefits that policies require. It may, in fact, produce more greenhouse gases than the fossil fuels it was intended to replace. Recent research says that biofuel refiners also emit significant amounts of carcinogenic and dangerous substances, including hexane and formaldehyde, in greater amounts than petroleum refineries. The new report points to research saying that increased production of biofuels from corn and soy could actually raise greenhouse gas emissions, largely from carbon emissions linked to clearing land in other countries to compensate for the use of land in the Midwest. On top of that, corn is an especially fertilizer-hungry crop requiring large amounts of nitrogen-based fertilizer, which releases huge amounts of nitrous oxide when it interacts with the soil. American farming is, by far, the largest source of domestic nitrous oxide emissions already—about 50 percent. If biofuel policies lead to expanded production, emissions of this enormously powerful greenhouse gas will likely increase, too. The new report concludes that not only will the expansion of ethanol increase greenhouse gas emissions, but it has also failed to provide the social and financial benefits to Midwestern communities that lawmakers and the industry say it has. (The report defines the Midwest as Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.) “The benefits from biofuels remain concentrated in the hands of a few,” Leslie-Bole said. “As subsidies flow, so may the trend of farmland consolidation, increasing inaccessibility of farmland in the Midwest, and locking out emerging or low-resource farmers. This means the benefits of biofuels production are flowing to fewer people, while more are left bearing the costs.” New policies being considered in state legislatures and Congress, including additional tax credits and support for biofuel-based aviation fuel, could expand production, potentially causing more land conversion and greenhouse gas emissions, widening the gap between the rural communities and rich agribusinesses at a time when food demand is climbing and, critics say, land should be used to grow food instead. President Donald Trump’s tax cut bill, passed by the House and currently being negotiated in the Senate, would not only extend tax credits for biofuels producers, it specifically excludes calculations of emissions from land conversion when determining what qualifies as a low-emission fuel. The primary biofuels industry trade groups, including Growth Energy and the Renewable Fuels Association, did not respond to Inside Climate News requests for comment or interviews. An employee with the Clean Fuels Alliance America, which represents biodiesel and sustainable aviation fuel producers, not ethanol, said the report vastly overstates the carbon emissions from crop-based fuels by comparing the farmed land to natural landscapes, which no longer exist. They also noted that the impact of soy-based fuels in 2024 was more than $42 billion, providing over 100,000 jobs. “Ten percent of the value of every bushel of soybeans is linked to biomass-based fuel,” they said. Georgina Gustin, Inside Climate News 24 Comments
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
  • fxpodcast: Landman’s special effects and explosions with Garry Elmendorf

    Garry Elmendorf isn’t just a special effects supervisor, he’s a master of controlled chaos. With over 50 years in the business, from Logan’s Run in the ’70s to the high-octane worlds of Yellowstone, 1883, 1923, and Landman. Elmendorf has shaped the visual DNA of Taylor Sheridan’s TV empire with a mix of old-school craft and jaw-dropping spectacle. In the latest fxpodcast, Garry joins us to break down the physical effects work behind some of the most explosive moments in Landman.
    As regular listeners know, we occasionally conduct interviews with individuals working in SFX, rather than with VFX. Garry’s work is not the kind of work that’s built in post and his approach is grounded in real-world physics, practical fabrication, and deeply collaborative on-set discipline. Take the aircraft crash in Landman’s premiere: there was no CGI here, other than comp cleanup. It was shot with just a Frankenstein plane built from scrap, rigged with trip triggers and detonated in real time.
    Or the massive oil rig explosion, which involved custom pump jacks, 2,000 gallons of burning diesel and gasoline, propane cannons, and tightly timed pyro rigs. The scale is cinematic. Safety, Garry insists, is always his first concern, but what keeps him up at night is timing. One mistimed trigger, one failed ignition, and the shot is ruined.

    In our conversation, Garry shares incredible behind-the-scenes insights into how these sequences are devised, tested, and executed, whether it’s launching a van skyward via an air cannon or walking Billy Bob Thornton within 40 feet of a roaring fireball. There’s a tactile intensity to his work, and a trust among his crew that only comes from decades of working under pressure. From assembling a crashable aircraft out of mismatched parts to rigging oil rig explosions with precise control over flame size, duration, and safety, his work is rooted in mechanical problem-solving and coordination across departments.

    In Landman, whether coordinating multiple fuel types to achieve specific smoke density or calculating safe clearances for actors and crew around high-temperature pyrotechnics, Elmendorf’s contribution reflects a commitment to realism and repeatability on set. The result is a series where the physicality of explosions, crashes, and fire-driven action carries weight, both in terms of production logistics and visual impact.

    Listen to the full interview on the fxpodcast.
    #fxpodcast #landmans #special #effects #explosions
    fxpodcast: Landman’s special effects and explosions with Garry Elmendorf
    Garry Elmendorf isn’t just a special effects supervisor, he’s a master of controlled chaos. With over 50 years in the business, from Logan’s Run in the ’70s to the high-octane worlds of Yellowstone, 1883, 1923, and Landman. Elmendorf has shaped the visual DNA of Taylor Sheridan’s TV empire with a mix of old-school craft and jaw-dropping spectacle. In the latest fxpodcast, Garry joins us to break down the physical effects work behind some of the most explosive moments in Landman. As regular listeners know, we occasionally conduct interviews with individuals working in SFX, rather than with VFX. Garry’s work is not the kind of work that’s built in post and his approach is grounded in real-world physics, practical fabrication, and deeply collaborative on-set discipline. Take the aircraft crash in Landman’s premiere: there was no CGI here, other than comp cleanup. It was shot with just a Frankenstein plane built from scrap, rigged with trip triggers and detonated in real time. Or the massive oil rig explosion, which involved custom pump jacks, 2,000 gallons of burning diesel and gasoline, propane cannons, and tightly timed pyro rigs. The scale is cinematic. Safety, Garry insists, is always his first concern, but what keeps him up at night is timing. One mistimed trigger, one failed ignition, and the shot is ruined. In our conversation, Garry shares incredible behind-the-scenes insights into how these sequences are devised, tested, and executed, whether it’s launching a van skyward via an air cannon or walking Billy Bob Thornton within 40 feet of a roaring fireball. There’s a tactile intensity to his work, and a trust among his crew that only comes from decades of working under pressure. From assembling a crashable aircraft out of mismatched parts to rigging oil rig explosions with precise control over flame size, duration, and safety, his work is rooted in mechanical problem-solving and coordination across departments. In Landman, whether coordinating multiple fuel types to achieve specific smoke density or calculating safe clearances for actors and crew around high-temperature pyrotechnics, Elmendorf’s contribution reflects a commitment to realism and repeatability on set. The result is a series where the physicality of explosions, crashes, and fire-driven action carries weight, both in terms of production logistics and visual impact. Listen to the full interview on the fxpodcast. #fxpodcast #landmans #special #effects #explosions
    fxpodcast: Landman’s special effects and explosions with Garry Elmendorf
    www.fxguide.com
    Garry Elmendorf isn’t just a special effects supervisor, he’s a master of controlled chaos. With over 50 years in the business, from Logan’s Run in the ’70s to the high-octane worlds of Yellowstone, 1883, 1923, and Landman. Elmendorf has shaped the visual DNA of Taylor Sheridan’s TV empire with a mix of old-school craft and jaw-dropping spectacle. In the latest fxpodcast, Garry joins us to break down the physical effects work behind some of the most explosive moments in Landman. As regular listeners know, we occasionally conduct interviews with individuals working in SFX, rather than with VFX. Garry’s work is not the kind of work that’s built in post and his approach is grounded in real-world physics, practical fabrication, and deeply collaborative on-set discipline. Take the aircraft crash in Landman’s premiere: there was no CGI here, other than comp cleanup. It was shot with just a Frankenstein plane built from scrap, rigged with trip triggers and detonated in real time. Or the massive oil rig explosion, which involved custom pump jacks, 2,000 gallons of burning diesel and gasoline, propane cannons, and tightly timed pyro rigs. The scale is cinematic. Safety, Garry insists, is always his first concern, but what keeps him up at night is timing. One mistimed trigger, one failed ignition, and the shot is ruined. In our conversation, Garry shares incredible behind-the-scenes insights into how these sequences are devised, tested, and executed, whether it’s launching a van skyward via an air cannon or walking Billy Bob Thornton within 40 feet of a roaring fireball. There’s a tactile intensity to his work, and a trust among his crew that only comes from decades of working under pressure. From assembling a crashable aircraft out of mismatched parts to rigging oil rig explosions with precise control over flame size, duration, and safety, his work is rooted in mechanical problem-solving and coordination across departments. In Landman, whether coordinating multiple fuel types to achieve specific smoke density or calculating safe clearances for actors and crew around high-temperature pyrotechnics, Elmendorf’s contribution reflects a commitment to realism and repeatability on set. The result is a series where the physicality of explosions, crashes, and fire-driven action carries weight, both in terms of production logistics and visual impact. Listen to the full interview on the fxpodcast.
    0 Comments ·0 Shares ·0 Reviews
CGShares https://cgshares.com