Apple has been up to something again, I guess. They made a custom iPhone camera for the new 'F1' movie. Not sure why, but it seems they mounted this thing on Formula One cars for actual races. It's supposed to capture some racing scenes, or whatever. The camera uses an iPhone sensor and the A-series chip. Sounds fancy, but honestly, I don’t really care that much. I mean, sure, iPhone cameras are decent, but are they really necessary for F1? I can imagine the whole setup being a bit over the top. I guess it’s nice for filmmaking or whatever, but it feels like just another way to show off. They probably think this will make the racing scenes look super cool or something. But again, I wonder if anyone will actually notice or appreciate it while watching fast cars whiz by. Feels like a lot of fuss for something that might not even make a big difference. So, long story short, Apple is trying to be all innovative with this custom iPhone camera for the ‘F1’ movie. It’s on actual cars, and they think it will enhance the racing scenes. I don’t know, man. Sounds like something to make headlines, but will it really change anything? Maybe it will just be another tech gimmick. Anyway, that's all I got. Not much else to say about it, really. Just another day, another tech move that feels kinda unnecessary. #Apple #F1 #iPhoneCamera #MovieTech #RacingScenes

Why does the world of animation, particularly at events like the SIGGRAPH Electronic Theater, continue to suffer from mediocrity? I can't help but feel enraged by the sheer lack of innovation and the repetitive nature of the projects being showcased. On April 17th, we’re promised a “free screening” of selected projects that are supposedly representing the pinnacle of creativity and diversity in animation. But let’s get real — what does “selection” even mean in a world where creativity is stifled by conformity? Look, I understand that this is a global showcase, but when you sift through the projects that make it through the cracks, what do we find? Overly polished but uninspired animations that follow the same tired formulas. The “Electronic Theater” is supposed to be a beacon of innovation, yet here we are again, being fed a bland compilation that does little to challenge or excite. It’s like being served a fast-food version of art: quick, easy, and utterly forgettable. The call for diversity is also a double-edged sword. Sure, we need to see work from all corners of the globe, but diversity in animation is meaningless if the underlying concepts are stale. It’s not enough to tick boxes and say, “Look how diverse we are!” when the actual content fails to push boundaries. Instead of celebrating real creativity, we end up with a homogenized collection of animations that are, at best, mediocre. And let’s talk about the timing of this event. April 17th? Are we really thinking this through? This date seems to be plucked out of thin air without consideration for the audience’s engagement. Just another poorly planned initiative that assumes people will flock to see what is essentially a second-rate collection of animations. Is this really the best you can do, Montpellier ACM SIGGRAPH? Where is the excitement? Where is the passion? What’s even more frustrating is that this could have been an opportunity to truly showcase groundbreaking work that challenges the status quo. Instead, it feels like a desperate attempt to fill seats and pat ourselves on the back for hosting an event. Real creators are out there, creating phenomenal work that could change the landscape of animation, yet we choose to showcase the safe and the bland. It’s time to demand more from events like SIGGRAPH. It’s time to stop settling for mediocrity and start championing real innovation in animation. If the Electronic Theater is going to stand for anything, it should stand for pushing boundaries, not simply checking boxes. Let’s not allow ourselves to be content with what we’re served. It’s time for a revolution in animation that doesn’t just showcase the same old, same old. We deserve better, and the art community deserves better. #AnimationRevolution #SIGGRAPH2024 #CreativityMatters #DiversityInAnimation #ChallengeTheNorm

Laptops are everywhere, and for CAD work, you really just need something that runs the software without crashing. So, there are these three laptops that are supposedly perfect for CAD. They’re on sale, which is nice, I guess. But honestly, who has the energy to care that much about discounts? The first one is just a standard model, nothing fancy. It has a decent processor and enough RAM to handle basic CAD tasks. It’s probably fine for most people, though I can’t say it’s exciting. The screen is okay, I mean, it shows things. So, if you need to do some drafting, it might get the job done. But really, it’s just another laptop. Then there’s the second option, which is slightly better, I think. It has a bit more power, which might make it more suitable for heavier CAD applications. But honestly, if you’re just sketching out ideas, do you really need that? The battery life isn’t terrible, but you’ll probably still find yourself looking for an outlet halfway through the day. Lastly, there’s the third laptop, and it’s kind of a mixed bag. It’s got some features that are nice, like a touchscreen or whatever. But again, who actually uses that? The performance is solid if you’re into that sort of thing. But if you’re just doing the basics, you might not even notice the difference. So, yeah, these three laptops are marked as perfect for CAD. They’re discounted, which might be a reason to look at them. But honestly, if you’re not super into CAD or just need something to get by, any random laptop will probably do. Just pick one, and let’s move on with life. #CAD #Laptops #DiscountedPrices #TechBoredom #ProductRecommendations

Zuzana Licko, a name that should be celebrated as a pioneer of digital typography, is instead a glaring reminder of how the past can be romanticized to the point of absurdity. Yes, she designed some of the first digital typefaces for Macintosh in the '80s and co-founded Emigre, but let’s not pretend that her contributions were flawless or that they didn’t come with a slew of problems that we still grapple with today. First off, we need to address the elephant in the room: the overwhelming elitism in the world of typography that Licko and her contemporaries helped propagate. While they were crafting their innovative typefaces, they were simultaneously alienating a whole generation of designers who lacked access to the tech and knowledge required to engage with this new digital frontier. The so-called "pioneers" of digital typography, including Licko, set a precedent that continues to dominate the industry—making it seem like you need to have an elite background to even participate in typography discussions. This is infuriating and downright unacceptable! Moreover, let’s not gloss over the fact that while she was busy creating typefaces that were supposed to revolutionize our digital experiences, the actual usability of these fonts often left much to be desired. Many of Licko's creations, while visually striking, ultimately sacrificed legibility for the sake of artistic expression. This is a major flaw in her work that deserves criticism. Typography is not just about looking pretty; it’s about ensuring that communication is clear and effective! How many times have we seen products fail because the font was so pretentious that no one could read it? And don’t even get me started on Emigre magazine. Sure, it showcased some brilliant work, but it also became a breeding ground for snobbery and elitism in the design community. Instead of fostering a space for all voices, it often felt like a closed club for the privileged few. This is not what design should be about! We need to embrace diversity and inclusivity, rather than gatekeeping knowledge and opportunity. In an era where technology has advanced exponentially, we still see remnants of this elitist mindset in the design world. The influence of Licko and her contemporaries has led to a culture that often sidelines emerging talents who bring different perspectives to the table. Instead of uplifting new voices, we are still trapped in a loop of revering the same old figures and narratives. This is not progress; it’s stagnation! Let’s stop romanticizing pioneers like Zuzana Licko without acknowledging the problematic aspects of their legacies. We need to have critical conversations about how their work has shaped the industry, not just celebrate them blindly. If we truly want to honor their contributions, we must also confront the issues they created and work towards a more inclusive, accessible, and practical approach to digital typography. #Typography #DesignCritique #ZuzanaLicko #DigitalArt #InclusivityInDesign

In a world that often feels like a desolate desert, the long-awaited release of Crimson Desert hangs in the air like a mirage, tantalizing yet unattainable. I find myself lost in this vast expanse of anticipation, where hope and despair intertwine, leaving me to grapple with the bitter taste of longing. It’s been a journey through the shadows, with each passing day deepening the sense of solitude that envelops me like a heavy cloak. The ambition behind Crimson Desert is staggering, yet it feels almost cruel. Each announcement, each slight hint of progress, ignites a flicker of hope within me, only to be extinguished by the weight of reality. The relentless waiting has become a companion—a reminder of everything that feels just out of reach. I thought that passion would carry me through, but instead, it has morphed into a haunting echo of disappointment. As November approaches, I cannot help but feel the pangs of excitement mingling with a gnawing fear—what if this time, the promise of a breathtaking adventure is yet another illusion? I yearn for the immersive worlds that games like Crimson Desert promise to deliver, yet here I am, isolated in my thoughts, grappling with the stark contrast between the vivid landscapes I dream of and the barren reality of my own existence. Life often feels like an endless cycle of waiting, like standing on the precipice of a great cliff, peering into the abyss below, wondering if I’ll ever leap into the unknown. If Crimson Desert can finally break through the silence, will it be the salve for my aching heart, or will it become yet another reminder of dreams that fade like footprints in the sand? With every delay, I feel the walls closing in, my solitude deepening. The vibrant characters and epic tales seem to mock me from afar, as I navigate this emotional desert of my own making. The excitement of gaming is supposed to unite us, to share adventures and forge connections, but here I stand—alone with my thoughts, yearning for a release that might bridge this chasm of isolation. As I wait, I cling to the hope that Crimson Desert will emerge as a beacon of light in this endless night, a reminder that even in the deepest despair, there can be moments of joy. Until then, I will continue to wander this barren landscape, heart heavy with longing, eyes searching for that elusive horizon where dreams finally touch reality. #CrimsonDesert #GamingCommunity #Loneliness #Hope #WaitingGame

So, there’s this thing called the Franck-Hertz experiment. It’s one of those physics experiments that people rave about, but honestly, I don’t get why. It was done way back in 1914, and it’s supposed to explain how energy comes in these “packets” called “quanta.” Sounds fancy, but like, does it really change anything? They say this experiment marked the start of quantum physics, which I guess is important for some. It’s all about those little particles and how they behave. If you’re into that sort of thing, you might want to look into doing a DIY version of the Franck-Hertz experiment. Apparently, it’s not too hard and you can even do it at home. But let’s be real, who has the energy for that? You just set up a tube with some mercury vapor and run some voltage through it. Then you measure the current and see how it changes as you adjust the voltage. It’s all about those energy levels and how electrons bounce around. But, like, I don’t know how many people are actually excited to do this. Maybe if you’re a physics enthusiast, it’ll be fun for you. But if you’re like me and prefer to just scroll through your phone or binge-watch a show, then this sounds like a lot of work for not much payoff. I mean, who really wants to dive into the intricacies of quantum physics when there are so many other things to do—like anything else? So, if you’re curious about the Franck-Hertz experiment and want to try it yourself, go ahead. Just know that you might end up feeling a bit underwhelmed. Science can be cool, but sometimes it feels like a chore, especially when it’s all about tiny particles that you can’t even see. Anyway, that’s my take on it. If you’re still interested in quantum physics after this, good for you. I’ll just be over here, probably napping or scrolling through social media. #FranckHertz #QuantumPhysics #DIYScience #PhysicsExperiment #Boredom

Why is it that in the age of advanced technology and innovative gaming experiences, we are still subjected to the sheer frustration of poorly implemented mini-games? I'm talking about the abysmal state of the CPR mini-game in MindsEye, a feature that has become synonymous with irritation rather than engagement. If you’ve ever tried to navigate this train wreck of a game, you know exactly what I mean. Let’s break it down: the mechanics are clunky, the controls are unresponsive, and don’t even get me started on the graphics. This is 2023; we should expect seamless integration and fluid gameplay. Instead, we are faced with a hot-fix that feels more like a band-aid on a bullet wound! How is it acceptable that players have to endure such a frustrating experience, waiting for a fix to a problem that should have never existed in the first place? What’s even more infuriating is the lack of accountability from the developers. They’ve let this issue fester for too long, and now we’re supposed to just sit on the sidelines and wait for a ‘hot-fix’? How about some transparency? How about acknowledging that you dropped the ball on this one? Players deserve better than vague promises and fixes that seem to take eons to materialize. In an industry where competition is fierce, it’s baffling that MindsEye would allow a feature as critical as the CPR mini-game to slip through the cracks. This isn’t just a minor inconvenience; it’s a major flaw that disrupts the flow of the game, undermining the entire experience. Players are losing interest, and rightfully so! Why invest time and energy into something that’s clearly half-baked? And let’s talk about the community feedback. It’s disheartening to see so many players voicing their frustrations only to be met with silence or generic responses. When a game has such glaring issues, listening to your player base should be a priority, not an afterthought. How can you expect to build a loyal community when you ignore their concerns? At this point, it’s clear that MindsEye needs to step up its game. If we’re going to keep supporting this platform, there needs to be a tangible commitment to quality and player satisfaction. A hot-fix is all well and good, but it shouldn’t take a crisis to prompt action. The developers need to take a hard look in the mirror and recognize that they owe it to their players to deliver a polished and enjoyable gaming experience. In conclusion, the CPR mini-game in MindsEye is a perfect example of how not to execute a critical feature. The impending hot-fix better be substantial, and I hope it’s not just another empty promise. If MindsEye truly values its players, it’s time to make some serious changes. We’re tired of waiting; we deserve a game that respects our time and investment! #MindsEye #CPRminiGame #GameDevelopment #PlayerFrustration #FixTheGame

So, Gears of War multiplayer is back this weekend. Honestly, it’s just another chance to get chainsawed in half by people who’ve probably been playing since 2006. I guess if you’re into that sort of thing, it could be fun? But, I don’t know, it feels more like a chore than anything else. The beta for Gears of War: Reloaded is going on, which is supposed to bring back those “nostalgic” vibes from way back when. You know, the sweet days of running around maps, trying not to get smashed by random players rolling around like bowling balls. It’s kind of funny and sad at the same time. I mean, who really wants to relive that? You’ll have to pay to join in on this little trip down memory lane, which is just great. It’s not like we don’t have enough to deal with already. Why not add another expense to the weekend? But sure, let’s just embrace the chainsaws and all that. It’s not like there’s a million other things we could be doing, right? In the end, I guess if you’re desperate for some multiplayer action, this might be worth it for a couple of rounds. Grab some friends, or don’t. Either way, it’s just another weekend of gaming that feels more like a reminder of the past than something genuinely exciting. But hey, nostalgia can be nice... sometimes. So, if you feel like wasting your time and money on this, go for it. Just don’t expect too much, because honestly, it’s just Gears of War. #GearsOfWar #Multiplayer #Reloaded #GamingWeekend #Nostalgia

What a disgrace! The recent announcement regarding the official art book of "Clair Obscur: Expedition 33" is nothing short of an embarrassing cash grab by Sandfall Interactive and ActuGaming.net. Are we seriously expected to applaud this blatant attempt to milk fans dry? This is a classic example of the gaming industry prioritizing profit over quality and respect for its community. Let’s break it down. First off, the hype surrounding "Clair Obscur: Expedition 33" is overshadowed by the fact that this art book seems to be marketed as some kind of sacred treasure. Seriously? It’s just an art book! The gaming community is smarter than this. It’s infuriating to see creators take advantage of our passion for their work, slapping a price tag on what should be a free expression of creativity. The audacity of Sandfall Interactive to push this as something essential for fans is beyond frustrating. Where is the integrity? Moreover, what about the accessibility? How many of us can afford to splurge on an art book while we’re already investing in games that often come riddled with bugs and technical issues? This trend of pre-ordering merchandise is absolutely maddening. It encourages a toxic culture of consumerism, where gamers are pressured to part with their hard-earned money for something that may not even meet expectations. Are we supposed to just accept this as the new normal? Absolutely not! And let’s talk about the content itself. The description hints at a “true masterpiece” but fails to deliver any tangible evidence of that claim. What are we getting? Concept art that’s likely to be recycled from promotional materials? How about some actual behind-the-scenes insight or a deeper dive into the creative process? Instead, we’re being fed a glorified collection of pretty pictures that don’t add any real value to the gaming experience. It’s infuriating to think about how the industry is willing to settle for mediocrity, all for the sake of profit. To top it all off, ActuGaming.net should be ashamed for promoting this sham without questioning the ethics behind it. Are they merely a mouthpiece for Sandfall Interactive, or do they care about the opinions of their readers? It’s hard to tell when they’re pushing content that feels disingenuous and exploitative. We need more critical voices in the gaming media, not just cheerleaders for corporate greed. In conclusion, it’s time for fans to stand up against these practices. Let’s not fall for the trap of pre-ordering and overhyped merchandise that serves only to pad the wallets of those at the top. Demand better from our creators and the media that covers them. We deserve respect, transparency, and quality over empty promises. #ClairObscur #GamingCommunity #ConsumerRights #ArtBook #GameIndustryCritique

Asus ROG Xbox Ally, ROG Xbox Ally X to Start Pre-Orders in August, Launch in October – Rumour A new report indicates that the ROG Xbox Ally will be priced at around €599, while the more powerful ROG Xbox Ally X will cost €899. Posted By Joelle Daniels | On 16th, Jun. 2025 While Microsoft and Asus have unveiled the ROG Xbox Ally and ROG Xbox Ally X handheld gaming systems, the companies have yet to confirm the prices or release dates for the two systems. While the announcement  mentioned that they will be launched later this year, a new report, courtesy of leaker Extas1s, indicates that pre-orders for both devices will be kicked off in August, with the launch then happening in October. As noted by Extas1s, the lower-powered ROG Xbox Ally is expected to be priced around €599. The leaker claims to have corroborated the pricing details for the handheld with two different Europe-based retailers. The more powerful ROG Xbox Ally X, on the other hand, is expected to be priced at €899. This would put its pricing in line with Asus’s own ROG Ally X. Previously, Asus senior manager of marketing content for gaming, Whitson Gordon, had revealed that pricing and power use were the two biggest reasons why both the ROG Xbox Ally and the ROG Xbox Ally X didn’t feature OLED displays. Rather, both systems will come equipped with 7-inch 1080p 120 Hz LCD displays with variable refresh rate capabilities. “We did some R&D and prototyping with OLED, but it’s still not where we want it to be when you factor VRR into the mix and we aren’t willing to give up VRR,” said Gordon. “I’ll draw that line in the sand right now. I am of the opinion that if a display doesn’t have variable refresh rate, it’s not a gaming display in the year 2025 as far as I’m concerned, right? That’s a must-have feature, and OLED with VRR right now draws significantly more power than the LCD that we’re currently using on the Ally and it costs more.” Explaining further that the decision ultimately also came down to keeping the pricing for both systems at reasonable levels, since buyers often tend to get handheld gaming systems as their secondary machiens, Gordon noted that both handhelds would have much higher price tags if OLED displays were used. “That’s all I’ll say about price,” said Gordon. “You have to align your expectations with the market and what we’re doing here. Adding 32GB, OLED, Z2 Extreme, and all of those extra bells and whistles would cost a lot more than the price bracket you guys are used to on the Ally, and the vast majority of users are not willing to pay that kind of price.” Shortly after its announcement, Microsoft and Asus had released a video where the two companies spoke about the various features of the ROG Xbox Ally and ROG Xbox Ally X. In the video, we also get to see an early hardware prototype of the handheld gaming system built inside a cardboard box. The ROG Xbox Ally runs on an AMD Ryzen Z2A chip, and has 16 GB of LPDDR5X-6400 RAM and 512 GB of storage. The ROG Xbox Ally X, on the other hand, runs on an AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme chip, and has 24 GB of LPDDR5X-8000 RAM and 1 TB of storage. Both systems run on Windows. Tagged With: Elden Ring: Nightreign Publisher:Bandai Namco Developer:FromSoftware Platforms:PS5, Xbox Series X, PS4, Xbox One, PCView More FBC: Firebreak Publisher:Remedy Entertainment Developer:Remedy Entertainment Platforms:PS5, Xbox Series X, PCView More Death Stranding 2: On the Beach Publisher:Sony Developer:Kojima Productions Platforms:PS5View More Amazing Articles You Might Want To Check Out! Summer Game Fest 2025 Saw 89 Percent Growth in Live Concurrent Viewership Since Last Year This year's Summer Game Fest has been the most successful one so far, with around 1.5 million live viewers on ... Asus ROG Xbox Ally, ROG Xbox Ally X to Start Pre-Orders in August, Launch in October – Rumour A new report indicates that the ROG Xbox Ally will be priced at around €599, while the more powerful ROG Xbo... Borderlands 4 Gets New Video Explaining the Process of Creating Vault Hunters According to the development team behind Borderlands 4, the creation of Vault Hunters is a studio-wide collabo... The Witcher 4 Team is Tapping Into the “Good Creative Chaos” From The Witcher 3’s Development Narrative director Philipp Weber says there are "new questions we want to answer because this is supposed to f... The Witcher 4 is Opting for “Console-First Development” to Ensure 60 FPS, Says VP of Tech However, CD Projekt RED's Charles Tremblay says 60 frames per second will be "extremely challenging" on the Xb... Red Dead Redemption Voice Actor Teases “Exciting News” for This Week Actor Rob Wiethoff teases an announcement, potentially the rumored release of Red Dead Redemption 2 on Xbox Se... View More #asus #rog #xbox #ally #start