Scientific research across fields like chemistry, biology, and artificial intelligence has long relied on human experts to explore knowledge, generate ideas, design experiments, and refine results. Yet, as problems grow more complex and data-intensive, discovery slows. While AI tools, such as language models and robotics, can handle specific tasks, like literature searches or code analysis, they rarely encompass the entire research cycle. Bridging the gap between idea generation and experimental validation remains a key challenge. For AI to autonomously advance science, it must propose hypotheses, design and execute experiments, analyze outcomes, and refine approaches in an iterative loop. Without this integration, AI risks producing disconnected ideas that depend on human supervision for validation. Before the introduction of a unified system, researchers relied on separate tools for each stage of the process. Large language models could help find relevant scientific papers, but they didn’t directly feed into experiment design or result analysis. Robotics can assist in automating physical experiments, and coding libraries like PyTorch can help build models; however, these tools operate independently of each other. There was no single system capable of handling the entire process, from forming ideas to verifying them through experiments. This led to bottlenecks, where researchers had to connect the dots manually, slowing progress and leaving room for errors or missed opportunities. The need for an integrated system that could handle the entire research cycle became clear. Researchers from the NovelSeek Team at the Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory developed NovelSeek, an AI system designed to run the entire scientific discovery process autonomously. NovelSeek comprises four main modules that work in tandem: a system that generates and refines research ideas, a feedback loop where human experts can interact with and refine these ideas, a method for translating ideas into code and experiment plans, and a process for conducting multiple rounds of experiments. What makes NovelSeek stand out is its versatility; it works across 12 scientific research tasks, including predicting chemical reaction yields, understanding molecular dynamics, forecasting time-series data, and handling functions like 2D semantic segmentation and 3D object classification. The team designed NovelSeek to minimize human involvement, expedite discoveries, and deliver consistent, high-quality results. The system behind NovelSeek involves multiple specialized agents, each focused on a specific part of the research workflow. The “Survey Agent” helps the system understand the problem by searching scientific papers and identifying relevant information based on keywords and task definitions. It adapts its search strategy by first doing a broad survey of papers, then going deeper by analyzing full-text documents for detailed insights. This ensures that the system captures both general trends and specific technical knowledge. The “Code Review Agent” examines existing codebases, whether user-uploaded or sourced from public repositories like GitHub, to understand how current methods work and identify areas for improvement. It checks how code is structured, looks for errors, and creates summaries that help the system build on past work. The “Idea Innovation Agent” generates creative research ideas, pushing the system to explore different approaches and refine them by comparing them to related studies and previous results. The system even includes a “Planning and Execution Agent” that turns ideas into detailed experiments, handles errors during the testing process, and ensures smooth execution of multi-step research plans. NovelSeek delivered impressive results across various tasks. In chemical reaction yield prediction, NovelSeek improved performance from a baseline of 24.2% (with a variation of ±4.2) to 34.8% (with a much smaller variation of ±1.1) in just 12 hours, progress that human researchers typically need months to achieve. In enhancer activity prediction, a key task in biology, NovelSeek raised the Pearson correlation coefficient from 0.65 to 0.79 within 4 hours. For 2D semantic segmentation, a task used in computer vision, precision improved from 78.8% to 81.0% in just 30 hours. These performance boosts, achieved in a fraction of the time typically needed, highlight the system’s efficiency. NovelSeek also successfully managed large, complex codebases with multiple files, demonstrating its ability to handle research tasks at a project level, not just in small, isolated tests. The team has made the code open-source, allowing others to use, test, and contribute to its improvement. Several Key Takeaways from the Research on NovelSeek include: NovelSeek supports 12 research tasks, including chemical reaction prediction, molecular dynamics, and 3D object classification. Reaction yield prediction accuracy improved from 24.2% to 34.8% in 12 hours. Enhancer activity prediction performance increased from 0.65 to 0.79 in 4 hours. 2D semantic segmentation precision improved from 78.8% to 81.0% in 30 hours. NovelSeek includes agents for literature search, code analysis, idea generation, and experiment execution. The system is open-source, enabling reproducibility and collaboration across scientific fields. In conclusion, NovelSeek demonstrates how combining AI tools into a single system can accelerate scientific discovery and reduce its dependence on human effort. It ties together the key steps, generating ideas, turning them into methods, and testing them through experiments, into one streamlined process. What once took researchers months or years can now be done in days or even hours. By linking every stage of research into a continuous loop, NovelSeek helps teams move from rough ideas to real-world results more quickly. This system highlights the power of AI not just to assist, but to drive scientific research in a way that could reshape how discoveries are made across many fields. Check out the Paper and GitHub Page . All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 95k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. NikhilNikhil is an intern consultant at Marktechpost. He is pursuing an integrated dual degree in Materials at the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Nikhil is an AI/ML enthusiast who is always researching applications in fields like biomaterials and biomedical science. With a strong background in Material Science, he is exploring new advancements and creating opportunities to contribute.Nikhilhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/nikhil0980/This AI Paper Introduces ARM and Ada-GRPO: Adaptive Reasoning Models for Efficient and Scalable Problem-SolvingNikhilhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/nikhil0980/This AI Paper Introduces WEB-SHEPHERD: A Process Reward Model for Web Agents with 40K Dataset and 10× Cost EfficiencyNikhilhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/nikhil0980/This AI Paper Introduces MMaDA: A Unified Multimodal Diffusion Model for Textual Reasoning, Visual Understanding, and Image GenerationNikhilhttps://www.marktechpost.com/author/nikhil0980/This AI Paper Introduces Differentiable MCMC Layers: A New AI Framework for Learning with Inexact Combinatorial Solvers in Neural Networks

Kloo didn’t set out to eliminate the ritual of making coffee; they set out to refine it. Equal parts culinary secret weapon and everyday indulgence, Kloo is a small-batch coffee concentrate that delivers bold, specialty-grade flavor to everything from your first morning cup to cocktails and desserts. It’s part chef’s tool, part personal luxury – crafted for those who love to cook, love to host, and love a good cup of coffee. Kloo’s frosted glass bottle adorned with an artful screen-printed design, looks more like a fine spirit than a morning essential. The logo – a maze-like looped ‘K’ – reflects the brand’s ethos: complexity distilled into simplicity. It’s a bottle that signals premium, not just in flavor, but in form. Founded by mother-daughter duo Claudia Snoh and Mariella Cho, Kloo was created from a shared obsession with the nuance of great coffee. Mariella, a certified Q Grader (the coffee world’s version of a sommelier), developed Kloo’s proprietary “super concentrate” brewing method to bring out the purest, most expressive flavor of each bean – then aged each batch for up to 21 days to deepen body and complexity. From sourcing to shipping, every detail is intentional. Kloo uses only specialty-grade beans (each scoring 85+ by Q Graders), roasted in-house and brewed in small batches. The concentrate is then cold-shipped and kept refrigerated to preserve every note. A taste of the single-origin varieties: Colombia (Venecia, Cundinamarca): Almond, maple syrup, blackberry Kenya (Karundu, Nyeri): Grapefruit, lemongrass, dark chocolate Ethiopia (Adado, Yirgacheffe): Peach, jasmine, wild berry Guatemala (Pasajquim, Atitlán): Toffee, burnt toast, dark chocolate Each profile is bold enough to stand on its own, yet balanced enough to complement whatever you’re making. Unlike many concentrates, Kloo’s strength and consistency make it a natural fit for chefs and bakers, especially in large batches where precision matters. Whether you’re stirring it into a sauce or folding it into a batter, Kloo delivers depth, not bitterness. It’s a shortcut that doesn’t feel like one. And while it’s a favorite among chefs, it also belongs in every home cook’s fridge. You’ll find yourself reaching for it more than you expect – whether for an impromptu dessert, a 4pm boost, or an elevated cocktail. For those who love to gather, Kloo is a quiet revolution. It makes the art of hosting feel seamless – adding flavor, elegance, and just a little flair to your moments of connection. One of the best-kept secrets of the seasoned host? Bookend your gathering with memorable moments. Start high, end high – and do it with something that’s bold, caffeinated, and effortlessly chic. Welcome your guests with a low-ABV drink, perfect for warm afternoons. Kloo Stout 1.5 oz Kloo coffee concentrate 12 oz chocolatey stout or lager Preparation: Add chilled Kloo to the bottom of a pint glass, then slowly pour in the beer and let it mix naturally. Smooth, rich, and just unexpected enough to be a conversation starter. Close the evening by serving guests an easy and elegant dessert that never disappoints. Kloo Affogato 1 scoop vanilla gelato 1 shot (about 1.5 oz) Kloo concentrate Preparation: Pour Kloo directly over the gelato just before serving. Dessert and coffee, all in one beautiful moment. Like most devout daily coffee drinkers, I’ve always been skeptical of concentrates – too often they’re bitter, flat, or forgettable. Kloo is different. It doesn’t replace the ritual of great coffee; it respects it, while making room for all the ways we actually live. Whether you’re brewing slowly, moving quickly, cooking for others, or just trying to get out the door, Kloo brings depth and intention – without asking you to compromise. For more information on Kloo, visit drinkkloo.com. Photography courtesy of Kloo.

Perplexity this week released Perplexity Labs, a new tool for Pro users that can craft reports, spreadsheets, dashboards, and visual representations, to meet users’ increased demand for AI productivity tools with greater autonomy and ever more sophisticated capabilities. The platform, a rival to Anthropic Claude, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and Google Gemini, can even work on its own for 10 minutes (or more) as it reasons through complicated assignments. “Labs underscores a broader shift toward multi-agent AI systems that plan, execute, and refine full workflows,” said Thomas Randall, research lead for AI at Info-Tech Research Group. Designed to handle more complex assignments Perplexity launched Perplexity Search, its proprietary search engine, in December 2022, just after ChatGPT dropped, and earlier this year released Deep Research (now to be rebranded as Research), which scours the web, reads papers, reasons through materials, and creates comprehensive reports for users. The company says that Perplexity Labs is like “having a team” that can bring projects from ideation to reality. The platform creates reports, spreadsheets, dashboards and simple web apps. It can perform at least 10 minutes of self-supervised work, uses web browsing, writes and executes code to handle tasks like organizing data or applying formulas, and can create charts and images. “In some respects, this is a continuation of Perplexity’s original capabilities as an AI-driven search engine that provides deeper answers,” said Hyoun Park, CEO and chief analyst at Amalgam Insights. Indeed, Perplexity explained that Labs was designed to handle more complex assignments than Deep Research. “While Deep Research remains the fastest way to obtain comprehensive answers to in-depth questions —  typically within 3 or 4 minutes — Labs is designed to invest more time (10  minutes or longer) and leverage additional tools, such as advanced file generation and mini-app creation,” Perplexity wrote in a blog post. “This expanded capability empowers you to develop a broader array of deliverables for your projects.” With its longer research workflow, Perplexity Labs can generate spreadsheets, visual representations, and high-quality reports, the company said. It iteratively searches through hundreds of sources, reasons about that data, and refines its approach as it gets deeper into a project, similar to the way in which a human researcher might approach a new area of study. To create interactive dashboards without the need for coding expertise or external development tools like Ploty and Dash, users just describe what they’re visualizing in natural language, and Labs will generate it in real-time. Dashboards could, for instance, visualize business finances or other complex datasets, incorporating clickable elements to allow non-technical users to quickly act on insights. In one example from the blog, Perplexity prompted Labs from the position of a leader at a tech consulting firm looking to create a potential customer list. It specified that it wanted to partner with US B2B companies in seed, series A, or series B stages, and asked Labs to list 20 relevant companies and include key details including contact information. Labs compiled a comprehensive dataset of potential customers, organizing them by stage (A, B, or seed) and identified their core focus, intended customers, and funding to date. The platform cited links from Forbes, YCombinator, and Exploding Topics that it had used as sources. When further prompted, it crafted introductory emails to the CEOs of the series A startups. To simplify workflows, Labs arranges generated files in a dedicated tab for easy access, supports integration with other tools such as Google Sheets, and allows users to pull out and format citations to bring credibility to its research. Finished materials can be exported as PDFs or documents, or converted into a shareable Perplexity Page. Pro subscribers ($20 a month) can now work with Labs on Web, iOS, and Android; Mac and Windows apps are coming soon. A good fit for enterprise users? This new capability joins an increasingly competitive space, as users look for AI productivity tools that are ever-more performant and can handle more and more tasks autonomously. Park pointed out that Perplexity Labs is a response to tools and models such as OpenAI o1-pro (launched in March), Claude Opus 4 (released in May), and Google’s recent Flow and Firebase announcements. “There is a massive Hunger Games in the AI world right now,” said Park. “Every major vendor is ferociously trying to one-up each other in providing more functionality, either in a native model or with an agency of AI agents designed to work together and create digital assets such as documents, apps, and videos.” However, Perplexity Labs does provide differentiation from other providers in the market, Info-Tech’s Randall noted. In particular, Perplexity is betting that users will prefer a “low-cost, open, tool-agnostic sandbox” for web crawling, code execution, and the creation of finished artifacts including mini web apps. “These capabilities cannot yet be found in other enterprise platforms, such as Microsoft or Google offerings,” said Randall. But enterprises should approach Perplexity Labs with a governance-first mindset, he emphasized. Assets live in Perplexity’s cloud and, for now, lack the private data grounding and compliance controls that CIOs expect, and that they find in tools such as Microsoft Copilot or Google Gemini. From an enterprise perspective, Park noted, the biggest challenge is that every asset-creating model and agent is “still opaque” when it comes to understanding the assumptions, training, and reliability of assumptions used to create a document or app. He compared it to the way the iPhone bypassed BlackBerry and Windows through “sheer consumer delight.” “At some point, AI vendors seeking serious business usage will need to provide more transparency and governance tools to the business world, just as mobile device management and mobile security solutions eventually came to the iPhone,” said Park. Otherwise, businesses may be compelled to build their own clunky but secure versions of Perplexity Labs, “which are guaranteed to be less accurate and useful just [based on] the history of business apps trying to imitate viral consumer apps,” he said.

May 30, 2025Ravie LakshmananVulnerability / Threat Intelligence The China-linked threat actor behind the recent in-the-wild exploitation of a critical security flaw in SAP NetWeaver has been attributed to a broader set of attacks targeting organizations in Brazil, India, and Southeast Asia since 2023. "The threat actor mainly targets the SQL injection vulnerabilities discovered on web applications to access the SQL servers of targeted organizations," Trend Micro security researcher Joseph C Chen said in an analysis published this week. "The actor also takes advantage of various known vulnerabilities to exploit public-facing servers." Some of the other prominent targets of the adversarial collective include Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. The cybersecurity company is tracking the activity under the moniker Earth Lamia, stating the activity shares some degree of overlap with threat clusters documented by Elastic Security Labs as REF0657, Sophos as STAC6451, and Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 as CL-STA-0048. Each of these attacks has targeted organizations spanning multiple sectors in South Asia, often leveraging internet-exposed Microsoft SQL Servers and other instances to conduct reconnaissance, deploy post-exploitation tools like Cobalt Strike and Supershell, and establish proxy tunnels to the victim networks using Rakshasa and Stowaway. Also used are privilege escalation tools like GodPotato and JuicyPotato; network scanning utilities such as Fscan and Kscan; and legitimate programs like wevtutil.exe to clean Windows Application, System, and Security event logs. Select intrusions aimed at Indian entities have also attempted to deploy Mimic ransomware binaries to encrypt victim files, although the efforts were largely unsuccessful. "While the actors were seen staging the Mimic ransomware binaries in all observed incidents, the ransomware often did not successfully execute, and in several instances, the actors were seen attempting to delete the binaries after being deployed," Sophos noted in an analysis published in August 2024. Then earlier this month, EclecticIQ disclosed that CL-STA-0048 was one among the many China-nexus cyber espionage groups to exploit CVE-2025-31324, a critical unauthenticated file upload vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver to establish a reverse shell to infrastructure under its control. Besides CVE-2025-31324, the hacking crew is said to have weaponized as many as eight different vulnerabilities to breach public-facing servers - CVE-2017-9805 - Apache Struts2 remote code execution vulnerability CVE-2021-22205 - GitLab remote code execution vulnerability CVE-2024-9047 - WordPress File Upload plugin arbitrary file access vulnerability CVE-2024-27198 - JetBrains TeamCity authentication bypass vulnerability CVE-2024-27199 - JetBrains TeamCity path traversal vulnerability CVE-2024-51378 - CyberPanel remote code execution vulnerability CVE-2024-51567 - CyberPanel remote code execution vulnerability CVE-2024-56145 - Craft CMS remote code execution vulnerability Describing it as "highly active," Trend Micro noted that the threat actor has shifted its focus from financial services to logistics and online retail, and most recently, to IT companies, universities, and government organizations. "In early 2024 and prior, we observed that most of their targets were organizations within the financial industry, specifically related to securities and brokerage," the company said. "In the second half of 2024, they shifted their targets to organizations mainly in the logistics and online retail industries. Recently, we noticed that their targets have shifted again to IT companies, universities, and government organizations." A noteworthy technique adopted by Earth Lamia is to launch its custom backdoors like PULSEPACK via DLL side-loading, an approach widely embraced by Chinese hacking groups. A modular .NET-based implant, PULSEPACK communicates with a remote server to retrieve various plugins to carry out its functions. Trend Micro said it observed in March 2025 an updated version of the backdoor that changes the command-and-control (C2) communication method from TCP to WebSocket, indicating active ongoing development of the malware. "Earth Lamia is conducting its operations across multiple countries and industries with aggressive intentions," it concluded. "At the same time, the threat actor continuously refines their attack tactics by developing custom hacking tools and new backdoors." Found this article interesting? Follow us on Twitter  and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post. SHARE    

Ben Wiley and Tomer Cohen first met while working on a project together at Scale AI.David AI If David AI founders Tomer Cohen and Ben Wiley had been a little less quick on their feet, they might not have made it into Y Combinator’s Summer 2024 batch. They agreed to create the company about a week before application submissions closed, and spent the ensuing days crashing theirs out, turning it in at midnight on the day of the deadline. After hitting submit, “I was like, did that count as late or was that on time?” Cohen recalls. A year later, David AI, the company they founded through Y Combinator, has quickly established itself as a leading provider of audio training data for artificial intelligence. Now it's closed a $25 million Series A round, led by Altman Capital and Amplify Partners, with participation from First Round Capital, Y Combinator and BoxGroup, with a valuation north of $100 million. Cohen is a former McKinsey business analyst and first met cofounder Wiley while working together at AI training behemoth Scale AI. The two became close friends, and after Cohen was promoted to chief of staff and built a new business for the firm, he felt he had the skills he needed to start a company. “We started to think that the next phase of AI, the final evolution of AI, is where the AI moves out of the laptop and keyboard interface and into the real world,” Cohen told Forbes. That idea became David AI, an audio data research company providing high quality training audio for AI companies building voice models. The needs here are varied and highly specific, so David AI not only collects and refines real world audio data, it also designs and produces it. It’s amassed about 100,000 hours of audio so far, across more than 15 languages, complete with metadata on dialects and accents. In the heady world of AI, it’s a relatively simple business: paying individuals to read scripts or host conversations and recording them. “If you're an AI lab, you probably want to be focused on algorithms and model development and not just this very low-level operational, technical, niche work,” Cohen said. And it appears he’s right. In the year since its founding, David AI has grown to more than eight figures in annualized revenue run rate, making customers of most of the “magnificent Seven” tech companies — Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, etc. As Liz Wessel, a partner at First Round Capital, notes, that’s hardly surprising. “It makes sense,” she said. “Everyone knows that it's been text-based AI for the last couple of years with ChatGPT, and now everyone is starting to figure out how to bring AI to voice.” Wessel was one of David AI’s first investors, leading the $5 million seed round it closed in January. She continues to see promise in the company given the massive data shortage that AI firms are facing. Sarah Catanzaro, an investor and general partner at Amplify Partners, agrees. “Companies are just voracious for data nowadays,” she said. “The beauty of [David AI] is it solves this urgent need that voice AI developers face today…but it's also a relatively simple solution. If they need data, sell them data, you don't need to overcomplicate it.”

With its unapologetically violent gameplay and hellfire aesthetics, Doom not only popularized first-person shooters when the franchise launched in 1993 but changed the gaming industry forever with its countless influences still felt today far beyond its genre. And despite its success, there are surprisingly few games in the core series once you discount the seemingly endless platforms the classic games have been ported to throughout the years. Fortunately, most of these games are clear winners that towered above contemporaries and have stood the test of time. With that in mind, not all Doom games are created equal, even if the gameplay and core premise has remained consistently intact for decades. Eschewing spinoffs like Ultimate Doom, Mighty Doom, or Doom RPG, here are all the mainline Doom games ranked from worst to best. 8. Final Doom (1996) This entry was very nearly left off this list entirely since some fans saw 1996’s Final Doom as a glorified spinoff—or little more than a standalone expansion of Doom II. But with its own PC and PlayStation release, along with a vocal fan base accumulated over the years, Final Doom does indeed count as its own installment in the franchise’s main line. The game also features a story that takes place after the events of Doom II, with the Doom Slayer repelling a hellish invasion of a colony on one of Jupiter’s moons before taking the fight to Hell itself. That said, Final Doom is easily the weakest game from the series’ classic era, recycling old assets instead of introducing new elements while presenting largely uninspired levels. The PS version is worse than the PC version, providing players with less than half of the original PC release and an overall weaker visual fidelity and presentation. Final Doom is best enjoyed by hardcore Doom II fans looking for something a bit different than the base game they know and love. 7. Doom 3 (2004) After a lengthy hiatus and high-profile personnel changes at developer id Software, Doom returned a decade after Doom II with 2004’s Doom 3. The game is more or less a rehash of the original game’s story where a research facility on Mars accidentally opens a portal to Hell, allowing demons to pour into our world. The game was ported to Xbox eight months after the initial PC release, received the Resurrection of Evil expansion in 2005, and was remastered with new content in 2012. Taking advantage of the advances of technical capabilities since the franchise’s heyday in the early to mid ‘90s, Doom 3 is a slower, moodier experience, favoring suspense and scares over wall-to-wall action, at least for the first half of the game. This makes Doom 3 something of an outlier in its overall gameplay and presentation, which is the most strikingly different in the wider franchise. However, the pacing for those earlier portions of the game really drags, especially for players used to the series’ penchant for just diving headfirst into the usual carnage. 6. Doom 64 (1997) When the Doom franchise made its way to the Nintendo 64 in 1997, it didn’t do so as a port of the existing games but rather as its own standalone title. Doom 64 is very much its own game, complete with an original story of the Doom Slayer being lured back into Hell by an elaborate trap set by the Mother Demon. A remaster of the game was released in 2020 for modern platforms, including original content that linked this game’s story to the revival trilogy that began in 2016. At the time of its release, players may have been experiencing franchise fatigue, not giving the game the credit it was due as more popular successors to Doom, like Quake and Unreal, took shape. To be fair, Doom 64 doesn’t reinvent the wheel, not adding much distinctly new. But it does refine the established formula with heightened atmosphere and engaging level design. Years later, fans are finally starting to recognize Doom 64 for what it really is—the last game released in the franchise’s classic era and the culmination of that initial cycle. 5. Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) People are going to look at this ranking and invariably think that a fifth place position means that Doom: The Dark Ages is a bad game. To be clear, it isn’t, The Dark Ages is a solid entry in the franchise; the series just has a list of absolute bangers that outrank it. True to its title, The Dark Ages blends the franchise’s penchant for sci-fi horror with dark fantasy as the Doom Slayer uses more medieval-inspired weapons to battle invading armies of demons across the cosmos. For sure, The Dark Ages is the biggest tonal departure within the revival trilogy, including more strategic combat and even vehicle-based levels to navigate. The gory sensibilities of Doom are still very much intact, fortunately, though the game’s insistence on having players rely on the Doom Slayer’s new shield may throw established fans off who are just looking to rip and tear. An expansion of what Doom can be without discarding the franchise’s core ethos entirely, The Dark Ages is a welcome big swing from the series that mostly connects. 4. Doom (1993) Obviously the entire franchise we’re talking about here wouldn’t exist without the original Doom released in 1993, not only serving as the series’ foundation, but a title that changed gaming forever. With all that said, when doing our best to remove nostalgia out of the equation and look at the game on its own standalone merits, that first Doom game still stands in the top half of the franchise but is narrowly edged out of the top three. The game’s premise is simple: when a dimensional portal on the moons of Mars accidentally serves as a bridge to Hell, the Doom Slayer stands alone in purging the invading demons from the research facilities with whatever weapons he can find. Join our mailing list Get the best of Den of Geek delivered right to your inbox! From its chugging heavy metal-inspired soundtrack to its over-the-top arsenal reducing hellish enemies to bloody pulp, Doom set the template for the franchise that has only been built upon to this day. The game spawned countless copycat titles while being ported to virtually every major gaming platform, a distinction that it continues to hold over 30 years since its initial release. Despite now having the roughest of edges, Doom holds up as one of the most straightforward and enjoyable first-person shooters of its era, both for nostalgia-minded gamers and those curious of the franchise’s roots. 3. Doom (2016) Though commercially successful, the middling response to Doom 3 and changes in the developer’s ownership had left the franchise languishing in limbo for over a decade, confined to the occasional port and remaster as id Software returned its focus to Wolfenstein. After undergoing years of various stages of development, it was 2016’s Doom that completely reinvigorated the flagship franchise, getting back to the fast-paced gameplay that the series was known for while also enjoying extensive updates for modern sensibilities. The game itself is more or less a rehash of the original story, with a human research facility on Mars descending into madness and being overrun after opening a portal to Hell. The 2016 Doom is also exactly what fans wanted after the more deliberately paced Doom 3, something that ditched the emphasis on tutorials and narrative and instead got back to gory gunplay in all its glory. Though the multiplayer aspect left some players wanting, the single-player campaign is among the franchise’s best, powered by a hard-rocking soundtrack composed by Mick Gordon. The kick in the pants that the series needed, the Doom revival lived up to the franchise’s example while bringing it deeper into the 21st century, guns blazing. 2. Doom II: Hell on Earth (1994) The original Doom set a high bar for first-person shooters moving forward. But it’s a bar that the direct sequel Doom II: Hell on Earth vaulted over when it was released in 1994. Picking up from its predecessor with the Doom Slayer fighting for the fate of Earth after it is invaded by the forces of Hell, Doom II would receive a number of expansions and ports after its launch, with the latest released as recently as 2024, adding an original episode with brand-new weapons and enemies to the venerable title. Everything that the original Doom did, Doom II does noticeably better, all while expanding on the premise with new enemies, fresh weapons, and even more inventive level design. From a technical standpoint, there is no huge leap in the graphical department or sound design, but rather in the complexity and size of the levels coupled with a larger number of enemies onscreen. Indeed, Doom II almost makes the original game feel like a first draft at times given how much it refines the overall experience despite only coming out a year after the franchise began. 1. Doom Eternal (2020) After successfully relaunching the franchise for modern audiences in 2016, the Doom revival got a direct sequel in 2020 with Doom Eternal. Taking its cues from Doom II, Eternal has Earth invaded by the armies of Hell and facing near-annihilation from the all-powerful Icon of Sin with the Doom Slayer as humanity’s last, best hope for survival. The two-part DLC epilogue The Ancient Gods has the Doom Slayer travel deep into Hell to confront the Dark Lord and vanquish the demon hordes for good. Though Doom Eternal may have divided hardcore purists about its inclusion of prominent narrative elements, platforming gameplay sequences, and tutorials, it is a clear refinement of what the 2016 revival began. The combat is as frenetic and engaging as it has ever been in the franchise, the arsenal is upgraded and expanded, and the hellish aesthetics the series is known for are in excelsis here. Simply put, Doom Eternal is the apex of the franchise, leaning into what the series does best while incorporating bold flourishes to build the mythology and subtly redefine what Doom can be.

Portable technology has evolved far beyond simple convenience. In 2025, designers and engineers are crafting devices that fit easily in your bag or pocket and also seamlessly blend innovation, style, and performance. The modern consumer demands more than just portability—they want devices that bring delight, spark creativity, and make everyday life smarter and more enjoyable. We have picked five impressive designs that set new benchmarks in their respective categories. We’re spotlighting a vibrant, hyper-compact laptop that brings a playful twist to work and creativity; a rugged, eco-friendly Bluetooth speaker designed for audiophiles who crave both sound quality and sustainability; and a trailblazing portable projector that brings true 4K cinema to the outdoors with industry-first cooling technology. 1. a_77 laptop In a market crowded with lookalike laptops, the a_77 is a breath of fresh air for mobile computing. Created by Braz de Pina, this device puts the keyboard at the heart of its design, resulting in a super-compact, visually vibrant laptop that strips away the unnecessary. The 65% keyboard layout dictates the overall footprint, making room only for what matters: a tactile typing experience, a responsive touch display, and essential navigation tools. The screen is small and nearly square, while the keyboard features unique touches like a standout power button and a dedicated CoPilot key for productivity. This laptop’s playful, colorful aesthetic is matched by thoughtful usability, making it a great choice for digital nomads, students, or anyone who values portability and a bit of fun in their tech. What we like Exceptionally portable and fun design. Smart, space-saving keyboard. What we dislike The screen could feel cramped. It may not appeal to traditionalists. 2. Dockcase 7-in-1 Hub The Dockcase 7-in-1 Hub redefines what a USB-C hub can be, introducing a blend of cutting-edge functionality and sleek design. Moving beyond basic connectivity, this accessory features a robust metallic chassis and an integrated touchscreen dashboard that brings an entirely new level of control to your workflow. Designed with the needs of demanding users in mind, it supports high-speed data transfers, external storage solutions, and simultaneous connections for multiple devices. At the heart of the Dockcase is its interactive display, which provides live updates on transfer speeds, power delivery, and SSD status. This real-time information gives users a clear overview of their setup, making it feel like a compact command center for all their connected tech. The hub is equipped with a variety of ports, including a 10 Gbps USB-C host connection, HDMI output capable of 4K at 120Hz, and slots for UHS-II SD and TF cards, making it as versatile as it is powerful. What we like Wide range of connectivity options, perfect for professionals who multitask and need reliable, high-speed access. The sturdy metal body ensures long-lasting durability, especially for frequent travelers. What we dislike The advanced features and detailed dashboard may be more complex than necessary for users who prefer straightforward, plug-and-play hubs. 3. B&O Beosound A1 3rd Generation For those who want their music to sound great wherever they are, the Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 3rd Generation sets a new standard for portable audio. This Bluetooth speaker takes the familiar, compact puck design and refines it with a focus on durability, rich sound, and sustainability. Its IP67 water and dust resistance make it suitable for any environment, from beach trips to rainy hikes. Under the hood, you’ll find a modular battery system that extends the product’s lifespan, plus a five-year warranty and Cradle to Cradle certification—the first for a Bluetooth speaker—demonstrating a serious commitment to eco-friendly design. Sound quality is impressive and immersive, easily filling a room or outdoor space, and the build feels solid enough for years of use. What we like Offers stunning sound and a sturdy build. Features a swappable battery, long warranty, and eco-friendly certification for guilt-free listening. What we dislike Costs significantly more than other portable speakers, which could be a dealbreaker for some. Focuses on music playback without voice assistants or advanced connectivity options found in some competitors. 4. NEBULA X Portable projectors often struggle to balance image quality and reliability in a compact package, but the Nebula X1 changes the game. This device is engineered for mobility without compromise, boasting a triple-laser system for true 4K UHD visuals and 3,500 ANSI lumens brightness—enough to project a crisp, vivid image on screens up to 300 inches. The star feature is its integrated liquid cooling, a technology rarely seen on portable gear, which keeps the projector running cool and quiet even during extended sessions. With Dolby Vision support, colors are rich and contrast is striking, allowing for true cinema experiences indoors or out. Despite its power, the X1 remains easy to carry, fitting neatly into a backpack for movie nights, presentations, or gaming anywhere. What we like Triple-laser tech and high brightness deliver sharp, vivid visuals even in challenging lighting. Liquid cooling ensures consistent performance and quiet operation during long viewing sessions. What we dislike Advanced features can drain battery faster, so extended use may require access to power. Premium features and performance come with a higher price tag, best suited for dedicated users. 5. Cylin The Cylin transforms the idea of portable computing by uniting a mouse, keyboard, and AR glasses in a sleek cylindrical form. Addressing the challenges of today’s AR setups, the Cylin is engineered for flexibility, making it suitable for everything from streaming videos to tackling professional writing projects on the go. Its scroll-inspired design features a dedicated compartment for AR glasses, a fold-out keyboard for typing, and an integrated mouse for effortless navigation. By merging tangible controls with advanced AR technology, the Cylin delivers a fluid and intuitive user experience without compromising on size or mobility. This all-in-one device streamlines digital tasks and introduces a forward-thinking approach to portable tech, offering users both convenience and state-of-the-art capabilities in any setting. What we like Integrates AR glasses and essential computing peripherals into a travel-friendly device. Adapts easily to a variety of work and entertainment environments. What we dislike Not yet available on the consumer market. The novel interface may require an adjustment period for new users. The post 5 Best Portable Tech Designs For Power, Play & Productivity Anywhere first appeared on Yanko Design.

PROS: Highly Portable: Lightweight and compact with balanced ergonomics for easy one-handed use Quiet, Efficient Performance: Fanless design runs silently while handling daily tasks smoothly Improved Input Design: Redesigned keyboard and pen integration enhance usability Eco-Friendly Materials: Uses recycled cobalt, aluminum, and packaging to reduce impact CONS: Accessories Sold Separately: Keyboard and charger increase total cost significantly Limited Ports: No USB-A or headphone jack requires adapters Not Built for Heavy Creative Work: Struggles with intensive editing or gaming tasks RATINGS: AESTHETICSERGONOMICSPERFORMANCESUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITYVALUE FOR MONEYEDITOR'S QUOTE:Smart, silent, and travel-ready. The Surface Pro 12 cuts the bulk while keeping the features that matter for real work and play. Microsoft’s Surface Pro 12 arrives with the subtlety of a whisper and the impact of a shout. The newest addition to Microsoft’s 2-in-1 lineup doesn’t announce itself with flashy gimmicks or revolutionary redesigns. Instead, it quietly refines what we’ve come to expect from the Surface family while carving out its own distinct identity in an increasingly crowded market. Smaller, lighter, and more nimble than its predecessors, this 12-inch tablet-laptop hybrid represents Microsoft’s most focused attempt yet at balancing power and portability. Designer: Microsoft I’ve spent considerable time with this device, exploring its capabilities and limitations across various use cases. What emerges is a fascinating study in compromise and calculation. The Surface Pro 12 exists in an interesting middle ground. It’s not the most powerful Surface device you can buy. It’s not the largest or the most premium. But that’s precisely the point. Microsoft has crafted something deliberately positioned to appeal to users who found previous Surface models either too unwieldy or too expensive. Does it succeed? That depends entirely on what you’re looking for. For some, the 12-inch form factor will feel like the Goldilocks zone. Not too big, not too small, but just right. For others, the compromises made to achieve this more compact design might prove frustrating. And hovering over everything is the question of value: at $799 for the base model (without keyboard or pen), is this the Surface that finally makes sense for mainstream consumers? The timing couldn’t be more interesting. As Microsoft pushes forward with its Copilot+ PC initiative, the Surface Pro 12 arrives as one of the standard-bearers for this new AI-focused computing paradigm. With its Snapdragon X Plus processor and dedicated NPU delivering 45 TOPS of AI performance, this diminutive device packs surprising computational muscle specifically tuned for the next generation of AI-powered applications. But specs only tell part of the story. The real question is how all this technology comes together in daily use. Can the Surface Pro 12 deliver on Microsoft’s promises of all-day battery life and responsive performance in a more portable package? And perhaps more importantly, does it justify its existence in a lineup that already includes the more powerful Surface Pro 13-inch? Let’s find out. Design and Ergonomics Pick up the Surface Pro 12, and something immediately feels different. The weight distribution. The rounded edges. The way it nestles into your palm with unexpected comfort. At just 1.5 pounds (686g), this isn’t Microsoft’s lightest device ever, but it might be their most thoughtfully balanced. I found myself reaching for it instinctively throughout the day. Its 0.30-inch thickness, combined with its compact footprint, makes it substantially more comfortable to hold in one hand than previous Surface models. This matters tremendously for a device meant to transition seamlessly between laptop and tablet modes. Microsoft has embraced a more organic design language here. Gone are the sharper edges of previous generations, replaced by gently rounded corners that echo the aesthetic of modern tablets. The bezels have shrunk considerably, though they’re still present enough to provide a comfortable grip without triggering accidental touches. The overall effect is subtle but significant. This feels less like a business tool and more like a personal device. The color options deserve special mention. Beyond the standard Platinum, Microsoft offers Ocean (a sophisticated blue-gray) and Violet. These aren’t the bold, saturated hues you might expect from consumer electronics, but rather subdued, mature tones that manage to feel both professional and personal. The Violet, in particular, strikes an interesting balance. It is distinctive without being flashy. Flip the device around and you’ll notice the integrated kickstand, a Surface hallmark that continues to distinguish these devices from iPad competitors. The hinge feels remarkably solid, with 165 degrees of smooth, consistent resistance. You can position it at virtually any angle, from nearly flat to upright, and it stays exactly where you place it. This flexibility proves invaluable when using the device on uneven surfaces like your lap or a bed. The port selection remains minimal. Two USB-C 3.2 ports with DisplayPort 1.4a support handle all your connectivity needs. They’re well-positioned and work with a wide range of accessories, but the absence of a headphone jack or USB-A port means dongles will remain a fact of life for many users. This minimalist approach keeps the device slim but demands some adaptability from users with legacy peripherals. What about the keyboard? The optional Surface Pro 12-inch Keyboard ($149 without pen, $249 with Slim Pen) represents a significant redesign. Microsoft has removed the Alcantara fabric from the palm rest, opting instead for a clean, monochromatic matte finish that feels premium to the touch. The fabric hasn’t disappeared entirely. It’s now relegated to the back of the keyboard cover, providing a pleasant tactile contrast when carrying the closed device. The typing experience surpasses expectations for such a compact keyboard. Key travel feels generous, with a satisfying tactile response that avoids the mushiness common to many tablet keyboards. The layout is thoughtfully designed, with full-sized keys in the central typing area and slightly compressed function and specialty keys at the edges. After a brief adjustment period, I was typing at nearly my full speed. The trackpad deserves equal praise. It’s responsive, accurate, and reasonably sized given the constraints of the 12-inch form factor. Microsoft has clearly prioritized quality over size here, and the result is a tracking surface that rarely frustrates. Perhaps the most significant ergonomic improvement involves the Surface Slim Pen. Rather than attaching to the keyboard as in previous models, it now magnetically snaps to the back of the tablet itself. The connection is surprisingly strong. You can shake the tablet vigorously without dislodging the pen. This redesign serves multiple purposes: it keeps the pen accessible whether you’re using the keyboard or not, it allows for wireless charging of the pen, and it slightly reduces the keyboard’s footprint. The front-facing camera placement requires some adjustment. Located at the top of the display when in landscape orientation, it creates a slightly downward-facing angle during video calls when using the kickstand. This isn’t ideal for presenting your best angle, though it’s a common compromise in tablet design. Switching to portrait orientation provides a more flattering angle but isn’t always practical for extended calls. Audio performance exceeds expectations for a device this size. The dual 2W stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support deliver clear, room-filling sound with surprising bass response. They’re positioned perfectly to create a convincing stereo image when the device is in landscape orientation, making the Surface Pro 12 a legitimate option for casual movie watching without headphones. The most impressive aspect of the Surface Pro 12’s design is not any one feature, but how all the elements work together cohesively. The proportions feel natural, the weight distribution is balanced, and the materials and finishes complement each other nicely. This device has been refined over several generations, and that accumulated knowledge is evident in numerous small details. Performance The Surface Pro 12 introduces an intriguing performance proposition. Microsoft has equipped this compact device with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Plus processor, an 8-core variant of the chip powering many of this year’s AI-focused laptops. This marks a significant departure from Intel-based Surface devices of the past. The question isn’t whether this processor is powerful. It is. The question is whether it’s the right kind of powerful for your specific needs. For everyday computing, the answer is a resounding yes. The system boots instantly, apps launch without hesitation, and multitasking feels remarkably fluid. I routinely ran multiple Office applications alongside dozens of browser tabs without encountering any slowdown. This responsiveness extends to more demanding productivity tasks like photo editing in Adobe Lightroom, where the device handled 20+ megapixel RAW files with surprising agility. What makes this performance particularly impressive is the complete absence of fan noise. The Surface Pro 12 features a fanless design with no vents whatsoever. Even under sustained workloads, the device remains silent, with only minimal warming of the chassis. This thermal efficiency represents a significant quality-of-life improvement over previous Surface models, especially in quiet environments like libraries or meeting rooms. Benchmark results confirm these subjective impressions. In Geekbench 6, the Surface Pro 12 scored around 2,250 for single-core and 9,500 for multi-core performance. These numbers put it in the same neighborhood as many Intel Core Ultra 5-powered laptops, particularly for single-core tasks where the Snapdragon X Plus shows impressive efficiency. Cinebench results tell a similar story, with scores that would have been considered high-end just a couple of generations ago. Battery life represents perhaps the most significant performance advantage. Microsoft claims up to 16 hours of video playback and 12 hours of active web usage. In my testing, these numbers proved surprisingly accurate. A full day of mixed productivity work (writing, web browsing, video calls, and occasional photo editing) left me with 25 to 30 percent battery remaining. More impressively, the device sips power when idle, losing just a few percentage points overnight. This efficiency means you can confidently leave your charger at home for most workdays. When you do need to charge, the process is refreshingly quick. Using the optional 45-watt USB-C charger ($70), the Surface Pro 12 reaches 50 percent battery in approximately 30 minutes and 80 percent in about an hour. This rapid charging capability further enhances the device’s practicality for mobile professionals. The neural processing unit (NPU) deserves special attention. With 45 TOPS of AI performance, the Qualcomm Hexagon NPU positions the Surface Pro 12 as a capable platform for Microsoft’s growing ecosystem of AI-enhanced applications. Features like Windows Studio Effects, which provides background blur and eye contact correction during video calls, run smoothly without taxing the main CPU. The upcoming Recall feature, which promises to help you find anything you’ve seen on your PC, also leverages this dedicated AI hardware. Memory and storage configurations are straightforward. All models include 16GB of LPDDR5x RAM, which proves ample for most productivity workflows. Storage options include either 256GB or 512GB of UFS storage. While not as fast as the PCIe SSDs found in premium laptops, these storage solutions deliver respectable performance for everyday tasks. The absence of user-upgradeable components means choosing the right configuration at purchase time is crucial. Connectivity options enhance the overall performance picture. Wi-Fi 7 support ensures the fastest possible wireless connections on compatible networks, while Bluetooth 5.4 provides reliable connections to peripherals. The two USB-C ports support DisplayPort 1.4a, allowing you to drive up to two 4K monitors at 60Hz, a significant upgrade for productivity. Where does the Surface Pro 12 fall short? Demanding creative applications like video editing or 3D rendering will push this system to its limits. While it can handle these tasks, you’ll experience longer render times compared to more powerful systems. Similarly, gaming capabilities are limited to older titles, cloud gaming services, or less demanding indie games. This isn’t a gaming machine by any stretch. It’s also worth noting that while Windows on ARM compatibility has improved dramatically, you may occasionally encounter software that doesn’t run optimally or requires emulation. Microsoft’s Rosetta-like translation layer handles most x86 applications admirably, but with some performance penalty. Fortunately, major productivity applications like the Microsoft Office suite and Adobe Creative Cloud now offer native ARM versions that run beautifully. The performance story of the Surface Pro 12 is ultimately about balance. Microsoft has created a device that delivers impressive responsiveness for everyday tasks while maximizing battery life and eliminating fan noise. For the target audience (mobile professionals, students, and productivity-focused users), this balance hits a sweet spot that many will find compelling. Sustainability Surface devices have rarely been evaluated through an environmental lens. That shifts with the Surface Pro 12. Microsoft’s latest tablet-laptop hybrid takes a material-first approach to reducing its ecological footprint, applying tangible revisions in sourcing, assembly, and lifecycle design. The battery introduces a foundational change. This is the first Surface Pro to use 100 percent recycled cobalt inside the cell. The shift matters. Cobalt extraction is linked to heavy environmental degradation and labor violations, particularly in regions where the material is most abundant. Using recycled cobalt minimizes dependency on these supply chains while maintaining performance. Microsoft applies similar logic to the enclosure. The casing incorporates at least 82.9 percent recycled content, including fully recycled aluminum alloy and rare earth elements. These metals are essential to core functions like audio and haptic feedback, but traditional sourcing is energy-intensive and harmful to ecosystems. Recycling them cuts the carbon load while preserving durability. The recycled aluminum, in particular, reduces energy consumption by over 90 percent compared to newly smelted metal. Packaging aligns with this direction. Microsoft states that 71 percent of wood-fiber packaging uses recycled material, and all virgin paper is sourced from responsibly managed forests. The result feels considered and premium, but without the typical waste profile seen in high-end electronics. Power efficiency is handled by both certification and architecture. The Surface Pro 12 meets ENERGY STAR criteria. Its Snapdragon processor operates on a performance-per-watt model, reducing heat and load during basic workflows without sacrificing responsiveness. Repairability has also improved. Microsoft includes labeled components and internal diagrams that support technician-guided part replacements. These efforts fall short of true user-repairability, but they increase the odds that broken devices will be fixed rather than discarded. A trade-in program supports hardware recovery for U.S. commercial customers. The initiative encourages responsible disposal and keeps materials in circulation longer. This model moves the Surface series closer to a lower-impact future. Microsoft still relies on proprietary accessories that may not carry forward. The keyboard and pen are not backward compatible with earlier models. That limits cross-generation reuse and could introduce avoidable waste. True modularity is still missing. Even with those constraints, the Surface Pro 12 represents the most focused sustainability effort in the product line to date. Material sourcing, energy use, and packaging all reflect an intention to lower the cost to the planet without compromising design or performance. Value and Wrap-up The Surface Pro 12 redefines how compact Windows hardware can serve practical, real-world needs. Its value isn’t rooted in technical dominance or low pricing. It comes from how effectively the device supports a mobile, focused workflow. This model favors portability and responsiveness over excess. It’s built for those who move constantly between meetings, transit, and flexible workspaces, without wanting to sacrifice the continuity of a full Windows environment. The smaller form factor isn’t a downgrade. It’s deliberate, eliminating clutter and favoring daily-use speed, comfort, and silence. Microsoft’s design choices reflect this purpose. From the near-instant wake time to the magnetic keyboard closure, the experience is tuned to reduce friction. That fluidity helps the device become second nature. It’s not about raw performance. It’s about always being ready. The inclusion of dedicated AI hardware gives the Surface Pro 12 another dimension. As more Windows features become NPU-dependent, this machine stays relevant. You’re not just buying current functionality. You’re investing in a platform with a longer upgrade arc. The accessory pricing remains clunky. But over time, the value balances out through longevity and reduced dependency on external gear. Build quality, battery endurance, and AI readiness all support longer ownership without the usual performance decay. What makes the Surface Pro 12 stand out is discipline. Microsoft didn’t stretch this device to cover every use case. Instead, it doubled down on a clear objective: make a serious, portable Windows tool that respects your time and space. The result is confident and complete.The post Microsoft Surface Pro 12 Review: Compact Copilot+ Windows device built for silence, stamina, and adaptability first appeared on Yanko Design.