This terrible Samsung camera ruined my day out
www.digitaltrends.com
html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd" Table of ContentsTable of ContentsMeet the ST72Day out, ruinedTelephoto is a no-noA reminder of how lucky we areDigging through a drawer in my office shortly after the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra arrived, I came across a relic. It was a compact digital camera also made by Samsung, which Id purchased on a whim before a trip nearly a decade ago.I havent used it since then, and seeing as I was already testing a Samsung camera, why not add another to the list? The next day I was headed out to take photos for my upcoming S25 Ultra review, and Im so glad I wasnt relying on the old Samsung camera to document my time, as it would have ruined it.Recommended VideosSamsung ST72 Andy Boxall / Digital TrendsPicking the Samsung ST72 camera up again reminded me why I bought it: its size. Its less than half the size of the Galaxy S25 Ultra and I can easily carry it around in my pocket or bag, barely knowing its there. Theres a sensibly sized screen on the back, a physical two-stage shutter release on the top, and it even has a zoom feature.RelatedI looked up the rest of the specification to compare it to the Galaxy S25 Ultra. The main 1/2.3-inch sensor has 16.2-megapixels and a 5x optical zoom, plus it has that 3-inch LCD screen on the back. Its not quite up there with the Galaxy S25 Ultras 200MP main camera, 50MP wide-angle, and two telephoto cameras, but it can (on paper) match one of the optical zoom modes.Samsung ST72 Andy Boxall / Digital TrendsThe problem was, I couldnt remember if the ST72 took good photos or not. I know I used it on a trip, but looking back most of my memories from it were captured with my iPhone at the time. Was this because the ST72 took rubbish pictures? I found out, and wasnt quite prepared for just how awful it really is.1. Samsung ST722. Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraThe Samsung ST72 came out in 2013 but you can still find it for sale today on eBay, and for a temptingly low price. I certainly wasnt approaching this comparison as a way to offer serious buying advice, as Id expect the $1,300 Galaxy S25 Ultra to take better photos than the $120 ST72 camera. What I didnt expect was to see such a huge difference, and it really shows how far things have come.Lets start out with a basic, simple photograph of a church on a very bright winter day. Its staggering just how poor the ST72s photo is, with messy blurring and smudging in the foreground, unsteady focus throughout, a complete lack of detail, unwanted noise, and no visual pop at all. Even looked at on its own, few would be pleased with the ST72s photo and likely never return to it in the future.1. Samsung ST722. Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraCompare it with the Galaxy S25 Ultras photo, and theres no contest. I love the S25 Ultras colors and visual excitement, and the way it truly captured the wonderful winter blue sky. The second photo shows a sunset after a day of rain, except Id have to tell you that was why I took the photo if the only evidence I had was the ST72s image. Its f/2.5 aperture doesnt help here at all, and its unable to capture the depth of color visible to the naked eye. The S25 Ultras photo looks great, and no such verbal explanation of the scene would be required with the Galaxy S25 Ultra. The f/1.8 aperture means its far more capable in low or difficult lighting, and although the photo isnt perfect its a little smudgy and noisy its obvious why I took the photo, and with a little editing it would be really beautiful.1. Samsung ST72 5x zoom2. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5x zoomAt this point Id only seen the ST72s photos on the cameras LCD screen, and they didnt look great then. However, I convinced myself the screen may not be doing the actual photos justice, and continued to take photos during the day. The ST72 also has an optical zoom feature, just like the Galaxy S25 Ultra, and thinking back this may have been a reason I chose it. Even then, when I wasnt all that interested or knowledgeable about cameras or photography, I clearly wanted the versatility of a capable zoom. However, I was to be very disappointed by the results.Andy Boxall / Digital TrendsTheres such a huge difference between the two 5x zoom photos of the bridge, its practically impossible to believe the pair technically used the same feature. Picking the ST72s photo apart seems like a waste of time, as even if youd never seen a photograph before, ever, youd still know it was rubbish. It has more in common with digital zoom photos taken with an aging smartphone than it does with the Galaxy S25 Ultras capable 5x optical zoom.1. Samsung ST722. Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraDid the ST72 fail completely? There was one photo where I think it did a slightly better job than the Galaxy S25 Ultra. Taken inside a shop, the ST72s photo of the budding flowers wrapped in paper is brighter and less punchy, in a good way, than the S25 Ultras photo. The colors are natural, the white balance effective, and theres a decent level of detail too. The S25 Ultras photo is over saturated, and Im not sure it got the exposure right.However, one photo cannot save the Samsung ST72, and neither can its admittedly lovely size and shape. Its absolutely not the Samsung camera anyone should be using in 2025. If my day out was one where I wanted to truly capture memories, it would have ruined them. Its really surprising just how much difference there is between a digital camera from 10 years ago and todays smartphones. Sure, the Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot more expensive, but I think all but the very worst smartphone camera today would still beat the ST72 in a back-to-back test.Andy Boxall / Digital TrendsIt highlights how spoiled we are by what our phones cameras are capable of, and after using the ST72 again, I assume I hid it away all those years ago because I was distinctly unimpressed by its ability. At the time I would have had the choice of the Apple iPhone 5S, the Nokia Lumia 1020, and the LG G2 smartphones, and I am almost certain all would gave taken considerably better photos than the ST72.The little Samsung camera is headed back to its drawer, where itll serve as a reminder of how lucky we are having such excellent cameras with us all day, because based on the actual photos it takes, thats all its good for. As for the Galaxy S25 Ultras camera, its looking great, but other more relevant comparisons reveal if it genuinely has what it takes to take on, and beat, its peers.Editors Recommendations
0 Comments
·0 Shares
·42 Views