www.forbes.com
SELBY, ENGLAND - JUNE 29: Wind turbines generate electricity as the Drax Power Station in the ... [+] background also generates electricity on June 29, 2023 in Selby, England. The Drax Power Station uses biomass pellets, reducing carbon emissions in comparison to coal. (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)Getty ImagesThe global energy landscape is shifting as countries weigh the costs and benefits of nuclear power versus renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydro. With economic feasibility being a major driver of energy policy, a thorough cost-benefit analysis of these technologies is essential. This article examines the Levelized Cost of Electricity, the role of government subsidies, and investment trends across key markets, including the U.S., Canada, the EU, the UK, the Caribbean and China.Cost Comparisons: Nuclear vs. RenewablesOne of the most critical metrics for evaluating energy sources is the Levelized Cost of Electricity which is a measure of the total cost of building and operating a power plant over its lifetime and expressed in dollars per megawatt-hour. Additionally, the 2024 World Energy Outlook report further states that LCOE serves as a comprehensive metric that consolidates all direct cost components of a specific power generation technology. This includes capital expenditures, financing, fuel costs, operations and maintenance, and any expenses related to carbon pricing. However, LCOE does not account for network integration or other indirect costsAccording to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the LCOE for advanced nuclear power was estimated at $110/MWh in 2023 and forecasted to remain the same up to 2050, while solar PV estimated to be $55/MWh in 2023 and expected to decline to $25/MWh in 2050. Onshore wind was $40/MWh in 2023 and expected to decline to $35/MWh in 2050 making renewables significantly cheaper in many cases. Similar trends were observed in the report for EU, China and India.Similarly, the 2023 Renewable Power Generation Costs indicated that the global weighted average levelized cost of electricity for newly commissioned utility-scale solar photovoltaic, onshore wind, offshore wind, and hydropower projects experienced a downward trend. The most notable drop occurred in utility-scale solar PV, which saw a 12% decrease from 2022. Onshore wind projects also saw a reduction in LCOE, dropping by 3% year-on-year, while the LCOE for offshore wind projects decreased by 7% compared to the previous year. Meanwhile, the cost of battery storage projects experienced a significant decline, falling by 89% from 2010 to 2023.In contrast, nuclear power continues to face cost overruns and long construction timelines. According to the 2023 World Nuclear Industry Status Report As of 2023, 58 nuclear reactors are under construction globally, with an average of 6 years having passed since construction beganslightly lower than the mid-2022 average of 6.8 years. Despite this, many reactors remain far from completion. In fact, all reactors being built in at least 10 of the 16 countries involved have faced significant delays, often lasting a year or more. Of the 24 reactors clearly documented as behind schedule, at least nine have seen additional delays, and one has reported delays for the first time in the past year. According to WNISR2021, 12 reactors were initially scheduled to start up in 2022, but by the beginning of that year, 16 reactors were planned to be connected to the grid, including four that had been delayed from 2021. However, only seven of these reactors generated first power, while the remaining nine were delayed into at least 2023.MORE FOR YOUNotable examples of delayed projects include the Mochovce-4 reactor in Slovakia, which began construction 38 years ago and now faces further delays, with grid connection now scheduled for 2024. Additionally, seven other reactors have been under construction for a decade or more, including Brazil's Angra-3, India's Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR), Kakrapar-4, and Rajasthan-7 & -8, Japan's Shimane-3, and France's Flamanville-3 (FL3). Projects in France and India have faced further delays , while the Japanese reactor still lacks a provisional startup date.The Hinkley Point C Nuclear plantinitially expected to cost 16 billionhas ballooned to 34 billion due to delays and regulatory challenges and is now unlikely to be operational before 2030 with the previous date of 2027 according to World Nuclear News.Government Subsidies and Investment Trends: Nuclear Vs. RenewablesDespite the declining costs of renewables, government subsidies still play a crucial role in energy economics. Nuclear research and development has significantly decreased in relative terms since the 1970s as investments have become more diversified. In 2015, the International Energy Agency reported that nuclear technologies received just 20% of the public R&D energy budget, a steep decline from nearly 73% in 1975. In contrast, funding for energy efficiency and renewable technologies has grown substantially, with both receiving shares of energy R&D comparable to nuclear in 2015. According to the "Energy Subsidies: Evolution in the Global Energy Transformation to 2050" report, global direct energy sector subsidiesspanning fossil fuels, renewables, and nucleartotaled approximately USD 634 billion in 2017. Fossil fuel subsidies dominated, accounting for about 70% of the total (USD 447 billion), while renewable energy subsidies accounted for 20% (USD 128 billion), biofuels 6% (USD 38 billion), and nuclear received at least 3% (USD 21 billion). However, the actual total could be higher due to data gaps, particularly in sub-national subsidies. Their analysis of nuclear subsidies reflects a minimum estimate for existing nuclear power generation.According to the report, total annual energy sector subsidies are expected to decline, with projections estimating a reduction to USD 466 billion per year by 2030, with a slight increase to USD 475 billion in 2050. This would represent a 25% decrease from 2017 levels and a 45% reduction (USD 390 billion) from the projected subsidy levels without the realistic acceleration of renewable energy deployment. In the U.S., the Inflation Reduction Act (2022) provides tax credits for wind and solar projects, contributing to a surge in renewable investments.China leads the world in renewable energy investments, allocating $546 billion in 2022, according to Scientific American.The Caribbean Context Renewables Vs. NuclearCaribbean governments have historically taken a project-by-project approach to renewable energy development. However, the regions small and isolated islands, combined with limited space for large-scale solar or onshore wind farms, have posed challenges to achieving economies of scale. Additionally, the lack of a local supply chain and the inability to procure at scale make renewable energy projects more expensive in the Caribbean. According to IRENA, Caribbean Community Member States have set a regional goal of generating 47% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2027. To meet this target, Caribbean islands need to add 4 GW of renewable energy capacity, requiring an estimated USD 9 billion in additional investments to fulfill their Nationally Determined Contributions. Through the Small Island Developing States Lighthouses Initiative, IRENA offers support to SIDS in their energy transition by providing policy, regulatory, and technical advisory services, as well as facilitating knowledge sharing, capacity building, and funding for early-stage projects. The 15 Caribbean islands participating in the LHI have a combined installed power capacity of approximately 1,936 MW, consisting of 743 MW of hydropower, 640 MW of bioenergy, 327 MW of solar photovoltaic, and 225 MW of wind energy. Additionally, SIDS are the countries that will feel the effect of climate change with the decimation of their coastlines.On the other hand, nuclear energy remains absent from the region due to high capital costs, safety concerns, and lack of expertise. Jamaica is working to integrate nuclear power into its energy mix, having signed a memorandum of understanding with Canadian Nuclear Laboratories and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited. According to the Prime Minister, this initiative aims to leverage nuclear technology to produce clean electricity, while also promoting economic growth and enhancing energy security for the country. However, introducing nuclear power in Jamaicas energy mix is unlikely to significantly improve energy security due to the high costs, long lead times, and reliance on foreign expertise and resources for nuclear technology. Additionally, the raw materials required for nuclear power plants, such as uranium, would still need to be imported, further limiting the potential for true energy independence.Nuclear and Renewables: Weighing the Future of EnergyAs the global energy transition accelerates, the debate between nuclear power and renewables remains complex. While nuclear energy offers high-capacity, low-carbon baseload power, it is often hindered by long construction timelines, cost overruns, waste issues and decommissioning challenges. Conversely, renewables such as solar and wind continue to experience declining costs and rapid deployment, supported by government subsidies and technological advancements. However, integrating intermittent renewables into the grid requires significant investment in storage and infrastructure. In regions like the Caribbean, renewables face unique geographical and economic challenges, while nuclear remains largely absent due to financial, lack of expertise and logistical barriers. Although some nations, including Jamaica, explore nuclear options, the high costs and foreign dependency may limit its viability and will still leave them desiring energy security. Ultimately, the choice between nuclear and renewables hinges on economic feasibility, policy support, and technological advancements, and requires a balanced approach to ensure a sustainable and resilient energy future.
