www.fastcompany.com
A push to ban sugary drinks, candy, and more from the U.S. program that helps low-income families pay for nutritious food has been tried beforebut it may soon get a boost from new Trump administration officials.Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the newly confirmed health and human services secretary, andBrooke Rollins, the new agriculture secretary, have both signaled that they favor stripping such treats from SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.Kennedy has been most vocal, calling for the government to stop allowing the nearly $113 billion program that serves about 42 million Americans to use benefits to pay for soda or processed foods.The one place that I would say that we need to really change policy is the SNAP program and food stamps and in school lunches, Kennedy told Fox News host Laura Ingraham last week. There, the federal government in many cases is paying for it. And we shouldnt be subsidizing people to eat poison.In one of her first interviews after being confirmed, Rollins said she looked forward to working with Kennedy on the issue.When a taxpayer is putting money into SNAP, are they okay with us using their tax dollars to feed really bad food and sugary drinks to children who perhaps need something more nutritious? Rollins said. These are all massive questions were going to be asking and working on in the coming months and years.But removing certain foods from SNAPknown for years as food stampsisnt as simple as it sounds.The program is run by the USDA, not HHS, and is administered through individual states. It is authorized by the federal Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, which says SNAP benefits can be used for any food or food product intended for human consumption, except alcohol, tobacco, and hot foods, including those prepared for immediate consumption.Excluding any foods would require Congress to change the lawor for states to get waivers that would let them restrict purchases, said Katie Bergh, a senior policy analyst for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonpartisan research group. Over the past 20 years, lawmakers in several states have proposed stopping SNAP from paying for bottled water, soda, chips, ice cream, decorated cakes, and luxury meats like steak.None of those requests have ever been approved under either Republican or Democratic presidents, Bergh said.In the past, Agriculture Department officials rejected the waivers, sayingin a 2007 paperthat no clear standards exist to define foods as good or bad, or healthy or not healthy. In addition, the agency said restrictions would be difficult to implement, complicated, and costly. And they might not change recipients food purchases or reduce conditions such as obesity.Anti-hunger advocates point to research that shows SNAP recipients are no more likely than other low-income Americans to buy sugary drinks or snack foods. And they say that limiting food choices undermines the autonomy and dignity of people who receive, on average, about $187 per monthor about $6.16 per day, according to the latest figures.This is just another way to cut benefits, said Gina Plata-Nino, a deputy director at the Food Research and Action Center, a nonprofit advocacy group. Its like, how do we restrict people more? How do we stigmatize them more?Bills are pending in Congress and in several states to restrict SNAP benefits from paying for soda, candy, and other items.Representative Josh Breechan, an Oklahoma Republican, sponsored the Healthy SNAP Act.If someone wants to buy junk food on their own dime, thats up to them, he said. But what were saying is, dont ask the taxpayer to pay for it and then also expect the taxpayer to pick up the tab for the resulting health consequences.One SNAP recipient said she uses her monthly $291 benefit to buy necessities such as meat, oil, milk, and coffee. Martina Santos, 66, of New York City, supplements those foods with fresh vegetables and fruits from a pantry run by the West Side Campaign Against Hunger, where shes also a volunteer. Because she has diabetes and other health conditions, she said she understands the importance of using the benefits only for nutritious options.For me, SNAP is to be used toward healthy food to get people to avoid all the disease theyre having around right now: obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, Santos said.In Kansas and elsewhere, bills that would ban soft drinks and candy highlight some of the challenges of such changes.Several pending bills seek to keep SNAP from paying for soft drinks, but they would continue to allow drinks containing milk, milk alternatives like soy or almond milk, or drinks with more than 50% vegetable or fruit juice. Candy is characterized as any unrefrigerated, flourless preparation of sugar, honey, or other natural or artificial sweeteners in combination with chocolate, fruits, nuts, or other ingredients or flavorings in the form of bars, drops, or pieces.By that definition, Kit Kat and Twix bars, which contain flour, wouldnt be banned. And juices that contain high amounts of sugar but are more than half fruit juice by volume would be allowed.Such conundrums have stymied changes to the SNAP program for decades. But this moment could be different, said Dr. Anand Parekh, chief medical officer of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank based in Washington, D.C.The momentum behind Kennedys Make America Healthy Again movement could spur a new focus on solutions to poor diets that account for leading risk factors for early disease and death.When we talk about the SNAP program, we have to remind people that the N stands for nutrition, Parekh said. Its about time that both parties can come together and see what are the innovations here to improve diet quality and nutrition.By Jonel Aleccia, AP health writerAssociated Press video journalist Mary Conlon contributed to this report.The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institutes Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.