BYOD like it’s 2025
Hard as it is to believe, there was a time when using any personal technology at work was such a radical concept that most people wouldn’t even consider it an option. IT departments went to great lengths to prevent workers from using their own devices, computers, apps/subscriptions, email, and cloud services.
The release of the iPhone in 2007 began to change that. Suddenly people were discovering that the smartphone they bought for their personal use could make them more efficient and productive at work as well.
But it was Apple’s launch of its mobile device management framework in 2010 that truly created the bring your own device movement. MDM meant that users could bring their personal devices to work, and IT departments could secure those devices as needed. Almost instantly, BYOD was something that companies began to support in industries across the board.
Fifteen years later, BYOD is fully mainstream, and a majority of businesses actively support it. But advances in technology, changing user expectations, and the fallout from Covid’s remote work mandateshave shifted the landscape, sometimes without being overtly visible.
With that in mind, I decided to reexamine the assumptions and realities of BYOD and see what has and hasn’t changed in the past decade and a half.
BYOD is everywhere but device management isn’t
The exact numbers on BYOD adoption vary depending on the source you look to and how it’s being measured. A 2022 paper from HPE claims that 90% of employees use a mix of work and personal devices on the job, while Cybersecurity Insiders says that 82% of organizations have a BYOD program. However you look at it, BYOD is now massively entrenched in our work culture and extends beyond just employees and managers. According to data from Samsung, 61% of organizations support BYOD for non-employees including contractors, partners, and suppliers to varying degrees.
But overtly or tacitly accepting BYOD doesn’t mean that companies actively manage BYOD devices. Cybersecurity Insiders dataalso indicates that as many as 70% of BYOD devices used in the workplace aren’t managed — a number that may seem shocking, but that figure includes personal devices used by non-employees such as contractors.
About those cost savings…
In the early days, there was an assumption that BYOD would lower hardware and service costs, but that wasn’t certain. Today there’s data.
In the early 2010s, Cisco estimated a + annual savings per employee, though more recent data from Samsungpegs the savings as significantly lower at Despite that disparity, it’s obvious that there are savings to be had, and with significantly climbing smartphone prices, those savings are is poised to grow rather than shrink.
Of course, the cost of managing devices needs to be factored in. That cost can vary widely depending on the vendor, specific products, and adopted features, but some MDM vendors charge as little as per user per month. The cost of providing employees company-purchased apps is also worth noting, though that falls more in line with traditional software procurement.
Productivity gains are real, but so are distractions
The data is clear that there can be significant gains in productivity attached to BYOD. Samsung estimates that workers using their own devices can gain about an hour of productive worktime per day and Cybersecurity Insiders says that 68% of businesses see some degree of productivity increases.
Although the gains are significant, personal devices can also distract workers more than company-owned devices, with personal notifications, social media accounts, news, and games being the major time-sink culprits. This has the potential to be a real issue, as these apps can become addictive and their use compulsive.
Tools of the trade
When I think back to the first five to ten years after Apple introduced MDM, it reminds me of the later stages of the birth of the solar system, with dozens of companies offering discrete tools that solved part of the mobility and BYOD puzzle, many colliding into each other or being flung out of existence. Some focused on just supporting the MDM server spec sheet, others on cloud storage, securing and managing access to corporate content, corporate app purchasing and management, secure connectivity, user and identity management, Office alternatives, and more.
Along the way, major enterprise vendors began dominating the market, some by acquisition and others by building out existing capabilities, although there were also businesses that came out of mergers of some of the new players as well.
As the market matured, it became easy to pick a single vendor to provide all enterprise mobility and BYOD needs rather than relying on multiple companies focusing on one particular requirement.
Multiplatform support has morphed into something very different
The iPhone was the clear early standard for supporting personal devices at work, in part because the hardware, operating system, and MDM mechanics were all created by a single vendor. Going multiplatform was typically assumed to mean iOS and Android — and Android was a fragmented mess of different hardware makers with sometimes widely varying devices and customized Android variantsthat resulted in no coherent OS update strategy.
The gap in management capabilities has narrowed significantly since then, with Google taking a much more active role in courting and supporting enterprise customers and providing a clear and coherent enterprise strategy across a wide swath of major Android phone makers and other vendors.
But that isn’t the only massive shift in what it means to be multiplatform. Today the personal devices used in the workplaceinclude non-phone entries including Macs, Apple TVs, Chromebooks, and Windows PCs — with Macs and PCs making up a significant number of BYOD devices.
Most MDM suites support this full range of devices to one degree or another, but support costs can rise as more and more platformsare implemented — and those costs vary by platform, with general agreement that Apple devices provide the greatest savings when it comes to technical support.
How Covid changed the BYOD equation
I’m pretty sure that in 2010, not one person on the planet was predicting a global pandemic that would lead to the vast majority of knowledge workers working from home within a decade. Yet, as we all remember, that’s exactly what happened.
The need to work from home encouraged broader adoption of personal devices as well as ancillary technologies ranging from peripherals/accessories to connectivity. Despite a litany of return-to-office mandates in recent years, remote work is here to stay, whether that’s full-time, hybrid, or just working outside traditional office hours or location.
Samsung notes that 61% of businesses expect employees to work remotely to some degree, while Robert Half reports that only 61% of new job postings in 2024 had full in-office requirements. And data from WFH Research shows that at the start of 2025, employees are working remotely 28% of the time.
Passing support to new generations
One challenge for BYOD has always been user support and education. With two generations of digital natives now comprsing more than half the workforce, support and education needs have changed. Both millennials and Gen Z have grown up with the internet and mobile devices, which makes them more comfortable making technology decisions and troubleshooting problems than baby boomers and Gen X.
This doesn’t mean that they don’t need tech support, but they do tend to need less hand-holding and don’t instinctively reach for the phone to access that support. Thus, there’s an ongoing shift to self-support resources and other, less time-intensive, models with text chat being the most common — be it with a person or a bot.
They also have different expectations in areas like privacy, processes and policies, and work-life balance. Those expectations make it more important for companies to delineate their BYOD and other tech policies as well as to explain the rationale for them. This means that user education remains important, particularly in a rapidly changing landscape. It also means that policies should be communicated in more concise and easily digestible forms than large monolithic pages of legalese.
Users actually want to updatetheir devices
Twenty years ago, the idea of updating workplace technology was typically met with a groan from users who didn’t appreciate downtime or changes in the way things looked and worked. Even as BYOD gained traction, getting users to update their devices wasn’t always easy and required a certain amount of prompting or policing. While resistance to change will never truly die out, most smartphoneusers actively update on their own because of the new features that come with OS updates and new hardware. Upgrades are something to get excited about.
BYOD users also tend to be more careful with their devices just because they are their own devices. Likewise, they’re more on point with repairs or replacements and are keen to handle those issues on their own.
Security is ever evolving
Security has always beena major concern when it comes to BYOD, and the threats will always be evolving. The biggest concerns stem from user behavior, with users losing devices being one big concern. Verizon reports that more than 90% of security incidents involving lost or stolen devices resulted in an unauthorized data breach, and 42% involved the leaking of internal data. Another big concern is users falling prey to malicious actors: falling for phishing schemes, downloading malware, allowing corporate data to be placed in public spaces, or letting others use their devices.
Devices themselves can be major targets, with attacks coming from different directions like public Wi-Fi, malicious apps or apps that are not designed to safeguard data properly, OS and network vulnerabilities, and so on. Supporting infrastructure can also be a weak point.
These threats are real. Research by JumpCloud indicates that 20% of businesses have seen malware as a result of unmanaged devices, and nearly half aren’t able to tell if unmanaged devices have compromised their security. Cybersecurity Insiders research shows a similar statistic of 22%, while also noting that 22% of BYOD devices have connected to malicious wireless networks.
Shadow IT will always exist
Shadow IT is a phenomenon that has existed for decades but grew rapidly alongside BYOD, when users began leveraging their personal devices, apps, and services for work without IT’s involvement, knowledge, or consent. Almost every company has some degree of shadow IT, and thus unmanaged devices or other technologies.
Organizations need to educate usersabout security and keeping their devices safe. They also need to engage users involved in shadow IT and make allies out of them, because shadow IT often stems from unmet technological needs.
Then there’s the trust component. Many users remain uncomfortable letting IT manage their devices, because they don’t understand what IT will be able to see on them. This is a user education problem that all companies need to address clearly and unequivocally.
Still the same goals
Although much has changed about BYOD, the basic goal remains the same: allowing workers to use the devices and other tools they are comfortable with and already own… and are likely to use whether sanctioned to or not.
#byod #like #itsBYOD like it’s 2025
Hard as it is to believe, there was a time when using any personal technology at work was such a radical concept that most people wouldn’t even consider it an option. IT departments went to great lengths to prevent workers from using their own devices, computers, apps/subscriptions, email, and cloud services.
The release of the iPhone in 2007 began to change that. Suddenly people were discovering that the smartphone they bought for their personal use could make them more efficient and productive at work as well.
But it was Apple’s launch of its mobile device management framework in 2010 that truly created the bring your own device movement. MDM meant that users could bring their personal devices to work, and IT departments could secure those devices as needed. Almost instantly, BYOD was something that companies began to support in industries across the board.
Fifteen years later, BYOD is fully mainstream, and a majority of businesses actively support it. But advances in technology, changing user expectations, and the fallout from Covid’s remote work mandateshave shifted the landscape, sometimes without being overtly visible.
With that in mind, I decided to reexamine the assumptions and realities of BYOD and see what has and hasn’t changed in the past decade and a half.
BYOD is everywhere but device management isn’t
The exact numbers on BYOD adoption vary depending on the source you look to and how it’s being measured. A 2022 paper from HPE claims that 90% of employees use a mix of work and personal devices on the job, while Cybersecurity Insiders says that 82% of organizations have a BYOD program. However you look at it, BYOD is now massively entrenched in our work culture and extends beyond just employees and managers. According to data from Samsung, 61% of organizations support BYOD for non-employees including contractors, partners, and suppliers to varying degrees.
But overtly or tacitly accepting BYOD doesn’t mean that companies actively manage BYOD devices. Cybersecurity Insiders dataalso indicates that as many as 70% of BYOD devices used in the workplace aren’t managed — a number that may seem shocking, but that figure includes personal devices used by non-employees such as contractors.
About those cost savings…
In the early days, there was an assumption that BYOD would lower hardware and service costs, but that wasn’t certain. Today there’s data.
In the early 2010s, Cisco estimated a + annual savings per employee, though more recent data from Samsungpegs the savings as significantly lower at Despite that disparity, it’s obvious that there are savings to be had, and with significantly climbing smartphone prices, those savings are is poised to grow rather than shrink.
Of course, the cost of managing devices needs to be factored in. That cost can vary widely depending on the vendor, specific products, and adopted features, but some MDM vendors charge as little as per user per month. The cost of providing employees company-purchased apps is also worth noting, though that falls more in line with traditional software procurement.
Productivity gains are real, but so are distractions
The data is clear that there can be significant gains in productivity attached to BYOD. Samsung estimates that workers using their own devices can gain about an hour of productive worktime per day and Cybersecurity Insiders says that 68% of businesses see some degree of productivity increases.
Although the gains are significant, personal devices can also distract workers more than company-owned devices, with personal notifications, social media accounts, news, and games being the major time-sink culprits. This has the potential to be a real issue, as these apps can become addictive and their use compulsive.
Tools of the trade
When I think back to the first five to ten years after Apple introduced MDM, it reminds me of the later stages of the birth of the solar system, with dozens of companies offering discrete tools that solved part of the mobility and BYOD puzzle, many colliding into each other or being flung out of existence. Some focused on just supporting the MDM server spec sheet, others on cloud storage, securing and managing access to corporate content, corporate app purchasing and management, secure connectivity, user and identity management, Office alternatives, and more.
Along the way, major enterprise vendors began dominating the market, some by acquisition and others by building out existing capabilities, although there were also businesses that came out of mergers of some of the new players as well.
As the market matured, it became easy to pick a single vendor to provide all enterprise mobility and BYOD needs rather than relying on multiple companies focusing on one particular requirement.
Multiplatform support has morphed into something very different
The iPhone was the clear early standard for supporting personal devices at work, in part because the hardware, operating system, and MDM mechanics were all created by a single vendor. Going multiplatform was typically assumed to mean iOS and Android — and Android was a fragmented mess of different hardware makers with sometimes widely varying devices and customized Android variantsthat resulted in no coherent OS update strategy.
The gap in management capabilities has narrowed significantly since then, with Google taking a much more active role in courting and supporting enterprise customers and providing a clear and coherent enterprise strategy across a wide swath of major Android phone makers and other vendors.
But that isn’t the only massive shift in what it means to be multiplatform. Today the personal devices used in the workplaceinclude non-phone entries including Macs, Apple TVs, Chromebooks, and Windows PCs — with Macs and PCs making up a significant number of BYOD devices.
Most MDM suites support this full range of devices to one degree or another, but support costs can rise as more and more platformsare implemented — and those costs vary by platform, with general agreement that Apple devices provide the greatest savings when it comes to technical support.
How Covid changed the BYOD equation
I’m pretty sure that in 2010, not one person on the planet was predicting a global pandemic that would lead to the vast majority of knowledge workers working from home within a decade. Yet, as we all remember, that’s exactly what happened.
The need to work from home encouraged broader adoption of personal devices as well as ancillary technologies ranging from peripherals/accessories to connectivity. Despite a litany of return-to-office mandates in recent years, remote work is here to stay, whether that’s full-time, hybrid, or just working outside traditional office hours or location.
Samsung notes that 61% of businesses expect employees to work remotely to some degree, while Robert Half reports that only 61% of new job postings in 2024 had full in-office requirements. And data from WFH Research shows that at the start of 2025, employees are working remotely 28% of the time.
Passing support to new generations
One challenge for BYOD has always been user support and education. With two generations of digital natives now comprsing more than half the workforce, support and education needs have changed. Both millennials and Gen Z have grown up with the internet and mobile devices, which makes them more comfortable making technology decisions and troubleshooting problems than baby boomers and Gen X.
This doesn’t mean that they don’t need tech support, but they do tend to need less hand-holding and don’t instinctively reach for the phone to access that support. Thus, there’s an ongoing shift to self-support resources and other, less time-intensive, models with text chat being the most common — be it with a person or a bot.
They also have different expectations in areas like privacy, processes and policies, and work-life balance. Those expectations make it more important for companies to delineate their BYOD and other tech policies as well as to explain the rationale for them. This means that user education remains important, particularly in a rapidly changing landscape. It also means that policies should be communicated in more concise and easily digestible forms than large monolithic pages of legalese.
Users actually want to updatetheir devices
Twenty years ago, the idea of updating workplace technology was typically met with a groan from users who didn’t appreciate downtime or changes in the way things looked and worked. Even as BYOD gained traction, getting users to update their devices wasn’t always easy and required a certain amount of prompting or policing. While resistance to change will never truly die out, most smartphoneusers actively update on their own because of the new features that come with OS updates and new hardware. Upgrades are something to get excited about.
BYOD users also tend to be more careful with their devices just because they are their own devices. Likewise, they’re more on point with repairs or replacements and are keen to handle those issues on their own.
Security is ever evolving
Security has always beena major concern when it comes to BYOD, and the threats will always be evolving. The biggest concerns stem from user behavior, with users losing devices being one big concern. Verizon reports that more than 90% of security incidents involving lost or stolen devices resulted in an unauthorized data breach, and 42% involved the leaking of internal data. Another big concern is users falling prey to malicious actors: falling for phishing schemes, downloading malware, allowing corporate data to be placed in public spaces, or letting others use their devices.
Devices themselves can be major targets, with attacks coming from different directions like public Wi-Fi, malicious apps or apps that are not designed to safeguard data properly, OS and network vulnerabilities, and so on. Supporting infrastructure can also be a weak point.
These threats are real. Research by JumpCloud indicates that 20% of businesses have seen malware as a result of unmanaged devices, and nearly half aren’t able to tell if unmanaged devices have compromised their security. Cybersecurity Insiders research shows a similar statistic of 22%, while also noting that 22% of BYOD devices have connected to malicious wireless networks.
Shadow IT will always exist
Shadow IT is a phenomenon that has existed for decades but grew rapidly alongside BYOD, when users began leveraging their personal devices, apps, and services for work without IT’s involvement, knowledge, or consent. Almost every company has some degree of shadow IT, and thus unmanaged devices or other technologies.
Organizations need to educate usersabout security and keeping their devices safe. They also need to engage users involved in shadow IT and make allies out of them, because shadow IT often stems from unmet technological needs.
Then there’s the trust component. Many users remain uncomfortable letting IT manage their devices, because they don’t understand what IT will be able to see on them. This is a user education problem that all companies need to address clearly and unequivocally.
Still the same goals
Although much has changed about BYOD, the basic goal remains the same: allowing workers to use the devices and other tools they are comfortable with and already own… and are likely to use whether sanctioned to or not.
#byod #like #its
map
