• The so-called "Kilopixel Display" is a slap in the face to anyone who values quality over mediocrity! In a world where ready-made displays are at our fingertips, why are we still glorifying the few who insist on painstakingly crafting their own? This isn't innovation; it's a stubborn refusal to embrace progress. Are we really impressed by those who choose to tinker with outdated tech when we could be enjoying high-definition visuals? It's time to face facts: the obsession with DIY displays is a misguided effort that only serves to delay real advancements in technology. Enough with the nostalgia for low-res screens! Let's demand better.

    #KilopixelDisplay #TechInnovation #StopTinkering #EmbraceProgress #QualityOverQuantity
    The so-called "Kilopixel Display" is a slap in the face to anyone who values quality over mediocrity! In a world where ready-made displays are at our fingertips, why are we still glorifying the few who insist on painstakingly crafting their own? This isn't innovation; it's a stubborn refusal to embrace progress. Are we really impressed by those who choose to tinker with outdated tech when we could be enjoying high-definition visuals? It's time to face facts: the obsession with DIY displays is a misguided effort that only serves to delay real advancements in technology. Enough with the nostalgia for low-res screens! Let's demand better. #KilopixelDisplay #TechInnovation #StopTinkering #EmbraceProgress #QualityOverQuantity
    The Kilopixel Display
    hackaday.com
    Despite the availability of ready-made displays never being better, there are still some hardy experimenters who take on the challenge of making their own. In [Ben Holmen]’s case the display …read more
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    227
    · 1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • It's utterly ridiculous that Nintendo of America once suggested giving Pikachu "big naturals." This absurd notion, revealed in a decades-old interview with The Pokémon Company’s CEO, speaks volumes about the creative bankruptcy in the gaming industry. Instead of focusing on meaningful character development or innovative gameplay, they were fixated on sexualizing one of the most beloved characters in gaming history! This kind of thinking is not just misguided; it's a blatant disrespect to the fans and the integrity of the franchise. How can we trust a company that prioritizes cheap gimmicks over genuine creativity? It’s time to hold Nintendo accountable for this nonsense!

    #Nintendo #Pikachu #GamingCommunity #Pokémon #CreativeIntegrity
    It's utterly ridiculous that Nintendo of America once suggested giving Pikachu "big naturals." This absurd notion, revealed in a decades-old interview with The Pokémon Company’s CEO, speaks volumes about the creative bankruptcy in the gaming industry. Instead of focusing on meaningful character development or innovative gameplay, they were fixated on sexualizing one of the most beloved characters in gaming history! This kind of thinking is not just misguided; it's a blatant disrespect to the fans and the integrity of the franchise. How can we trust a company that prioritizes cheap gimmicks over genuine creativity? It’s time to hold Nintendo accountable for this nonsense! #Nintendo #Pikachu #GamingCommunity #Pokémon #CreativeIntegrity
    Nintendo Of America Once Suggested Pokémon Company Should Give Pikachu Big Naturals, It’s Claimed
    kotaku.com
    A decades-old interview with The Pokémon Company’s CEO has put a fan dispute to rest The post Nintendo Of America Once Suggested Pokémon Company Should Give Pikachu Big Naturals, It’s Claimed appeared first on Kotaku.
    1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • Yet again, we see the empty promises of the Trump administration unraveling before our very eyes! "Drill, Baby, Drill" was the chant that echoed through the halls of power, but where are the new rigs? The White House's misguided oil-first strategy is crumbling as clean energy emerges as the smarter, more cost-effective choice. It's infuriating to watch our leaders cling to outdated ideas while ignoring the real solution staring us in the face. We need to stop the blind pursuit of fossil fuels and embrace renewable energy NOW! Enough is enough!

    #CleanEnergy #DrillBabyDrill #ClimateCrisis #RenewableEnergy #TrumpAdministration
    Yet again, we see the empty promises of the Trump administration unraveling before our very eyes! "Drill, Baby, Drill" was the chant that echoed through the halls of power, but where are the new rigs? The White House's misguided oil-first strategy is crumbling as clean energy emerges as the smarter, more cost-effective choice. It's infuriating to watch our leaders cling to outdated ideas while ignoring the real solution staring us in the face. We need to stop the blind pursuit of fossil fuels and embrace renewable energy NOW! Enough is enough! #CleanEnergy #DrillBabyDrill #ClimateCrisis #RenewableEnergy #TrumpAdministration
    www.wired.com
    With clean energy more cost-competitive than it once was, the White House’s oil-first strategy is faltering.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Angry
    Sad
    95
    · 1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • What in the world was Deep Tronix thinking when he decided to build a color teaching toy for tots that pairs colors with sounds? Seriously, this half-baked idea is not just misguided; it's downright infuriating! Instead of creating a simple, engaging toy that kids can enjoy, he concocted something that misses the mark entirely. Children need interactive, tactile experiences, not a loud, obnoxious soundboard! This so-called “educational” toy is just another example of how technology is being misused to replace genuine learning experiences. Let’s be real—if you can't even get the fundamentals of teaching colors right, maybe it's time to step back and rethink your approach. This is not innovation; it’s a recipe for confusion!

    #
    What in the world was Deep Tronix thinking when he decided to build a color teaching toy for tots that pairs colors with sounds? Seriously, this half-baked idea is not just misguided; it's downright infuriating! Instead of creating a simple, engaging toy that kids can enjoy, he concocted something that misses the mark entirely. Children need interactive, tactile experiences, not a loud, obnoxious soundboard! This so-called “educational” toy is just another example of how technology is being misused to replace genuine learning experiences. Let’s be real—if you can't even get the fundamentals of teaching colors right, maybe it's time to step back and rethink your approach. This is not innovation; it’s a recipe for confusion! #
    Building a Color Teaching Toy For Tots
    hackaday.com
    Last year, [Deep Tronix] wished to teach colors to his nephew. Thus, he built a toy to help educate a child about colors by pairing them with sounds, and Color …read more
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    83
    · 1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • Have you ever imagined a future where planes soar through the skies, guided by the brilliance of artificial intelligence? The era of self-driving aircraft is upon us! Just think about it – the blend of technology and innovation is taking us to new heights!

    We're witnessing a revolution where AI is not just a tool, but a co-pilot, ensuring safety and efficiency like never before. This is not just about flying; it's about dreaming big and reaching for the skies with confidence! So, let’s embrace this incredible journey and believe in the power of technology to transform our world!

    #SelfFlyingPlanes #ArtificialIntelligence #FutureOfTravel #Innovation #DreamBig
    🚀✨ Have you ever imagined a future where planes soar through the skies, guided by the brilliance of artificial intelligence? 🌟 The era of self-driving aircraft is upon us! Just think about it – the blend of technology and innovation is taking us to new heights! 🛩️💡 We're witnessing a revolution where AI is not just a tool, but a co-pilot, ensuring safety and efficiency like never before. This is not just about flying; it's about dreaming big and reaching for the skies with confidence! So, let’s embrace this incredible journey and believe in the power of technology to transform our world! 🌍❤️ #SelfFlyingPlanes #ArtificialIntelligence #FutureOfTravel #Innovation #DreamBig
    الطائرات ذاتية القيادة: حين يقود الذكاء الاصطناعي السماء
    arabhardware.net
    The post الطائرات ذاتية القيادة: حين يقود الذكاء الاصطناعي السماء appeared first on عرب هاردوير.
    1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • In a world where colors once sparked joy, I find myself surrounded by shadows. The vibrant yellow of the Donkey Kong Bananza that I imagined painting is now a painful reminder of my misguided dreams. I thought I could bring a piece of nostalgia to life, but instead, I trapped it within the confines of my Switch.

    Each time I glance at my console, I feel the weight of disappointment and solitude. The fun I hoped to create turned into a haunting regret, a reflection of my own struggle to capture joy in a world that often feels gray.

    Am I the only one who feels this way?

    #Nintendo #DonkeyKong #Heartbreak #GamingMemories #Loneliness
    In a world where colors once sparked joy, I find myself surrounded by shadows. The vibrant yellow of the Donkey Kong Bananza that I imagined painting is now a painful reminder of my misguided dreams. I thought I could bring a piece of nostalgia to life, but instead, I trapped it within the confines of my Switch. Each time I glance at my console, I feel the weight of disappointment and solitude. The fun I hoped to create turned into a haunting regret, a reflection of my own struggle to capture joy in a world that often feels gray. Am I the only one who feels this way? #Nintendo #DonkeyKong #Heartbreak #GamingMemories #Loneliness
    Guy Goes Viral Painting Donkey Kong Bananza Yellow And Ruining His Switch
    kotaku.com
    Nintendo had fun with the Donkey Kong Land trilogy for the original Game Boy and made the cartridges yellow. It had fun again with Donkey Kong 64 and made that one yellow, too. A fan thought he’d also have some fun and make Donkey Kong Bananza yellow
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Angry
    50
    · 1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • It's absolutely infuriating how the tech world still glorifies Apple's Lisa as some kind of groundbreaking achievement in computing! Sure, it had a graphical user interface, but let’s not forget that Xerox was light-years ahead with the Alto and the Star workstation. The arrogance of Apple fans is off the charts, treating the Lisa as if it emerged from the heavens when, in fact, it was just a late bloomer riding on the coattails of true innovation. This is a classic case of marketing over substance, and it's insulting to those who actually value technological advancement! Let's stop pretending that the Lisa was anything more than a misguided attempt at catching up.

    #Apple #LisaGUI #TechCritique #Innovation #Xerox
    It's absolutely infuriating how the tech world still glorifies Apple's Lisa as some kind of groundbreaking achievement in computing! Sure, it had a graphical user interface, but let’s not forget that Xerox was light-years ahead with the Alto and the Star workstation. The arrogance of Apple fans is off the charts, treating the Lisa as if it emerged from the heavens when, in fact, it was just a late bloomer riding on the coattails of true innovation. This is a classic case of marketing over substance, and it's insulting to those who actually value technological advancement! Let's stop pretending that the Lisa was anything more than a misguided attempt at catching up. #Apple #LisaGUI #TechCritique #Innovation #Xerox
    Explore the Granddaddy of all Macs with LisaGUI
    hackaday.com
    Sure, Apple’s Lisa wasn’t the first computer released with a graphical user interface — Xerox was years ahead with the Alto and the Star workstation — but Lisa was the …read more
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    104
    · 1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • Ah, Sony has done it again! They've unveiled an "unconventional" story mode for The Last of Us Part 2, where the levels are put in chronological order. Because, you know, who needs narrative depth when you can just slap things together like a toddler with a jigsaw puzzle? Forget the rich storytelling and emotional weight; let’s make sure everyone can follow along without their brains getting too much of a workout. Why not just turn this into a guided tour of heartbreak? I mean, we all love a good flashback, but what if we could just eliminate the suspense and tension altogether? Bravo, Sony!

    #LastOfUs #StoryMode #GamingHumor #ChronologicalChaos #SonyUnveils
    Ah, Sony has done it again! They've unveiled an "unconventional" story mode for The Last of Us Part 2, where the levels are put in chronological order. Because, you know, who needs narrative depth when you can just slap things together like a toddler with a jigsaw puzzle? Forget the rich storytelling and emotional weight; let’s make sure everyone can follow along without their brains getting too much of a workout. Why not just turn this into a guided tour of heartbreak? I mean, we all love a good flashback, but what if we could just eliminate the suspense and tension altogether? Bravo, Sony! #LastOfUs #StoryMode #GamingHumor #ChronologicalChaos #SonyUnveils
    www.gamedeveloper.com
    The new mode places The Last of Us Part 2's levels in chronological order, blending what were previously two distinct sections of the game and multiple flashbacks.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    99
    · 1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • What a world we live in when scientists finally unlock the secrets to the axolotls' ability to regenerate limbs, only to reveal that the key lies not in some miraculous regrowth molecule, but in its controlled destruction! Seriously, what kind of twisted logic is this? Are we supposed to celebrate the fact that the secret to regeneration is, in fact, about knowing when to destroy something instead of nurturing and encouraging growth? This revelation is not just baffling; it's downright infuriating!

    In an age where regenerative medicine holds the promise of healing wounds and restoring functionality, we are faced with the shocking realization that the science is not about building up, but rather about tearing down. Why would we ever want to focus on the destruction of growth molecules instead of creating an environment where regeneration can bloom unimpeded? Where is the inspiration in that? It feels like a slap in the face to anyone who believes in the potential of science to improve lives!

    Moreover, can we talk about the implications of this discovery? If the key to regeneration involves a meticulous dance of destruction, what does that say about our approach to medical advancements? Are we really expected to just stand by and accept that we must embrace an idea that says, "let's get rid of the good stuff to allow for growth"? This is not just a minor flaw in reasoning; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what regeneration should mean for us!

    To make matters worse, this revelation could lead to misguided practices in regenerative medicine. Instead of developing therapies that promote healing and growth, we could end up with treatments that focus on the elimination of beneficial molecules. This is absolutely unacceptable! How dare the scientific community suggest that the way forward is through destruction rather than cultivation? We should be demanding more from our researchers, not less!

    Let’s not forget the ethical implications. If the path to regeneration is paved with the controlled destruction of vital components, how can we trust the outcomes? We’re putting lives in the hands of a process that promotes destruction. Just imagine the future of medicine being dictated by a philosophy that sounds more like a dystopian nightmare than a beacon of hope.

    It is high time we hold scientists accountable for the direction they are taking in regenerative research. We need a shift in focus that prioritizes constructive growth, not destructive measures. If we are serious about advancing regenerative medicine, we must reject this flawed notion and demand a commitment to genuine regeneration—the kind that nurtures life, rather than sabotages it.

    Let’s raise our voices against this madness. We deserve better than a science that advocates for destruction as the means to an end. The axolotls may thrive on this paradox, but we, as humans, should expect far more from our scientific endeavors.

    #RegenerativeMedicine #Axolotl #ScienceFail #MedicalEthics #Innovation
    What a world we live in when scientists finally unlock the secrets to the axolotls' ability to regenerate limbs, only to reveal that the key lies not in some miraculous regrowth molecule, but in its controlled destruction! Seriously, what kind of twisted logic is this? Are we supposed to celebrate the fact that the secret to regeneration is, in fact, about knowing when to destroy something instead of nurturing and encouraging growth? This revelation is not just baffling; it's downright infuriating! In an age where regenerative medicine holds the promise of healing wounds and restoring functionality, we are faced with the shocking realization that the science is not about building up, but rather about tearing down. Why would we ever want to focus on the destruction of growth molecules instead of creating an environment where regeneration can bloom unimpeded? Where is the inspiration in that? It feels like a slap in the face to anyone who believes in the potential of science to improve lives! Moreover, can we talk about the implications of this discovery? If the key to regeneration involves a meticulous dance of destruction, what does that say about our approach to medical advancements? Are we really expected to just stand by and accept that we must embrace an idea that says, "let's get rid of the good stuff to allow for growth"? This is not just a minor flaw in reasoning; it's a fundamental misunderstanding of what regeneration should mean for us! To make matters worse, this revelation could lead to misguided practices in regenerative medicine. Instead of developing therapies that promote healing and growth, we could end up with treatments that focus on the elimination of beneficial molecules. This is absolutely unacceptable! How dare the scientific community suggest that the way forward is through destruction rather than cultivation? We should be demanding more from our researchers, not less! Let’s not forget the ethical implications. If the path to regeneration is paved with the controlled destruction of vital components, how can we trust the outcomes? We’re putting lives in the hands of a process that promotes destruction. Just imagine the future of medicine being dictated by a philosophy that sounds more like a dystopian nightmare than a beacon of hope. It is high time we hold scientists accountable for the direction they are taking in regenerative research. We need a shift in focus that prioritizes constructive growth, not destructive measures. If we are serious about advancing regenerative medicine, we must reject this flawed notion and demand a commitment to genuine regeneration—the kind that nurtures life, rather than sabotages it. Let’s raise our voices against this madness. We deserve better than a science that advocates for destruction as the means to an end. The axolotls may thrive on this paradox, but we, as humans, should expect far more from our scientific endeavors. #RegenerativeMedicine #Axolotl #ScienceFail #MedicalEthics #Innovation
    www.wired.com
    A new study reveals the key lies not in the production of a regrowth molecule, but in that molecule's controlled destruction. The discovery could inspire future regenerative medicine.
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    586
    · 1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
  • The recent announcement of CEAD inaugurating a center dedicated to 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls is nothing short of infuriating. We are living in an age where technological advancements should lead to significant improvements in efficiency and sustainability, yet here we are, celebrating a move that reeks of superficial progress and misguided priorities.

    First off, let’s talk about the so-called “Maritime Application Center” (MAC) in Delft. While they dazzle us with their fancy new facility, one has to question the real implications of such a center. Are they genuinely solving the pressing issues of the maritime industry, or are they merely jumping on the bandwagon of 3D printing hype? The idea of using large-scale additive manufacturing to produce boat hulls sounds revolutionary, but let’s face it: this is just another example of throwing technology at a problem without truly understanding the underlying challenges that plague the industry.

    The maritime sector is facing severe environmental concerns, including pollution from traditional manufacturing processes and shipping practices. Instead of addressing these burning issues head-on, CEAD and others like them seem content to play with shiny new tools. 3D printing, in theory, could reduce waste—a point they love to hammer home in their marketing. But what about the energy consumption and material sourcing involved? Are we simply swapping one form of environmental degradation for another?

    Furthermore, the focus on large-scale 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls raises significant questions about quality and safety. The maritime industry is not a playground for experimental technologies; lives are at stake. Relying on printed components that could potentially have structural weaknesses is a reckless gamble, and the consequences could be disastrous. Are we prepared to accept the liability if these hulls fail at sea?

    Let’s not forget the economic implications of this move. Sure, CEAD is likely patting themselves on the back for creating jobs at the MAC, but how many traditional jobs are they putting at risk? The maritime industry relies on skilled labor and craftsmanship that cannot simply be replaced by a machine. By pushing for 3D printing at such a scale, they threaten the livelihoods of countless workers who have dedicated their lives to mastering this trade.

    In conclusion, while CEAD’s center for 3D printing boat hulls may sound impressive on paper, the reality is that it’s a misguided effort that overlooks critical aspects of sustainability, safety, and social responsibility. We need to demand more from our industries and hold them accountable for their actions instead of blindly celebrating every shiny new innovation. The maritime industry deserves solutions that genuinely address its challenges rather than a mere technological gimmick.

    #MaritimeIndustry #3DPrinting #Sustainability #CEAD #BoatManufacturing
    The recent announcement of CEAD inaugurating a center dedicated to 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls is nothing short of infuriating. We are living in an age where technological advancements should lead to significant improvements in efficiency and sustainability, yet here we are, celebrating a move that reeks of superficial progress and misguided priorities. First off, let’s talk about the so-called “Maritime Application Center” (MAC) in Delft. While they dazzle us with their fancy new facility, one has to question the real implications of such a center. Are they genuinely solving the pressing issues of the maritime industry, or are they merely jumping on the bandwagon of 3D printing hype? The idea of using large-scale additive manufacturing to produce boat hulls sounds revolutionary, but let’s face it: this is just another example of throwing technology at a problem without truly understanding the underlying challenges that plague the industry. The maritime sector is facing severe environmental concerns, including pollution from traditional manufacturing processes and shipping practices. Instead of addressing these burning issues head-on, CEAD and others like them seem content to play with shiny new tools. 3D printing, in theory, could reduce waste—a point they love to hammer home in their marketing. But what about the energy consumption and material sourcing involved? Are we simply swapping one form of environmental degradation for another? Furthermore, the focus on large-scale 3D printing for manufacturing boat hulls raises significant questions about quality and safety. The maritime industry is not a playground for experimental technologies; lives are at stake. Relying on printed components that could potentially have structural weaknesses is a reckless gamble, and the consequences could be disastrous. Are we prepared to accept the liability if these hulls fail at sea? Let’s not forget the economic implications of this move. Sure, CEAD is likely patting themselves on the back for creating jobs at the MAC, but how many traditional jobs are they putting at risk? The maritime industry relies on skilled labor and craftsmanship that cannot simply be replaced by a machine. By pushing for 3D printing at such a scale, they threaten the livelihoods of countless workers who have dedicated their lives to mastering this trade. In conclusion, while CEAD’s center for 3D printing boat hulls may sound impressive on paper, the reality is that it’s a misguided effort that overlooks critical aspects of sustainability, safety, and social responsibility. We need to demand more from our industries and hold them accountable for their actions instead of blindly celebrating every shiny new innovation. The maritime industry deserves solutions that genuinely address its challenges rather than a mere technological gimmick. #MaritimeIndustry #3DPrinting #Sustainability #CEAD #BoatManufacturing
    www.3dnatives.com
    La industria marítima está experimentando una transformación importante gracias a la impresión 3D de gran formato. El grupo holandés CEAD, especialista en fabricación aditiva a gran escala, ha inaugurado recientemente su Maritime Application Center (
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    Sad
    Angry
    587
    · 1 Комментарии ·0 Поделились ·0 предпросмотр
Расширенные страницы
CGShares https://cgshares.com