Pesquisar

Techworld compartilhou um link

2025-05-31 13:30:49 ·

Cyber Security Threat Analysis: A Complete Guide for 2025

Posted on : May 31, 2025

By

Tech World Times

Security Testing

Rate this post

In a digital era where cyberattacks are increasing in frequency, complexity, and cost, organizations must stay one step ahead by investing in robust cybersecurity strategies. At the heart of this defense lies Cyber Security Threat Analysis, a process that helps businesses detect, understand, and respond to threats before they escalate. This comprehensive guide explores the fundamentals of threat analysis, the methodologies used in 2025, emerging trends, and how companies can implement an effective threat analysis framework to safeguard their digital assets.

What is Cyber Security Threat Analysis?
Cyber Security Threat Analysis is the process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing potential and existing cybersecurity threats. It involves analyzing data from various sources to uncover vulnerabilities, detect malicious activity, and evaluate the potential impact on systems, networks, and data. The goal is to proactively defend against attacks rather than react to them after damage is done.
Why Threat Analysis Matters in 2025
With the growing adoption of AI, IoT, cloud computing, and remote work, the digital landscape has expanded. This has also widened the attack surface for threat actors. According to recent studies, global cybercrime costs are projected to reach trillion annually by 2025. Threat analysis is no longer optional; it’s a critical component of enterprise cybersecurity strategies.
Key Components of Cyber Security Threat Analysis

Threat Intelligence Gathering
Collecting data from open-source intelligence, internal systems, dark web monitoring, and threat intelligence platforms.Threat Identification
Recognizing indicators of compromise, such as malicious IP addresses, abnormal behavior, and unusual login attempts.Risk Assessment
Evaluating the likelihood and potential impact of a threat on business operations.Vulnerability Management
Identifying weaknesses in systems, applications, and networks that could be exploited.Incident Response Planning
Developing action plans to quickly contain and remediate threats.

Types of Cyber Threats in 2025
Threat actors continue to evolve, leveraging advanced techniques to breach even the most secure environments. Here are the most prominent threats organizations face in 2025:

Ransomware-as-a-Service: Cybercriminals offer ransomware toolkits to affiliates, enabling less-skilled attackers to launch sophisticated attacks.
Phishing 3.0: AI-generated deepfake emails and voice messages make phishing harder to detect.
Supply Chain Attacks: Attackers compromise third-party software or vendors to gain access to larger networks.
Cloud Security Breaches: Misconfigured cloud environments remain a top vulnerability.
IoT Exploits: Devices with weak security protocols are targeted to infiltrate larger systems.
Insider Threats: Employees or contractors may intentionally or unintentionally expose systems to risk.

Modern Threat Analysis Methodologies
1. MITRE ATT&CK Framework
The MITRE ATT&CK framework maps the behavior and techniques of attackers, providing a structured method to analyze and predict threats.
2. Kill Chain Analysis
Developed by Lockheed Martin, this method breaks down the stages of a cyberattack from reconnaissance to actions on objectives, allowing analysts to disrupt attacks early in the chain.
3. Threat Modeling
Threat modeling involves identifying assets, understanding potential threats, and designing countermeasures. STRIDEis a popular model used in 2025.
4. Behavior Analytics
User and Entity Behavior Analyticsuses machine learning to detect anomalies in user behavior that could indicate threats.

The Role of AI and Automation in Threat Analysis
Artificial Intelligenceand automation are revolutionizing Cyber Security Threat Analysis in 2025. AI-driven analytics tools can:

Correlate large volumes of data in real-time
Detect zero-day vulnerabilities
Predict attack patterns
Automate incident response processes

Platforms like IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, and Splunk integrate AI capabilities for enhanced threat detection and response.

Building a Threat Analysis Framework in Your Organization

Establish Objectives
Define what you want to protect, the types of threats to look for, and the goals of your analysis.Choose the Right Tools
Invest in threat intelligence platforms, SIEM systems, and endpoint detection and responsetools.Create a Skilled Team
Assemble cybersecurity professionals including threat hunters, analysts, and incident responders.Integrate Data Sources
Pull data from internal logs, external intelligence feeds, user activity, and cloud services.Run Simulations
Regularly test your threat detection capabilities using red teaming and penetration testing.Review and Adapt
Continuously update the threat model based on evolving threats and organizational changes.

Metrics to Measure Threat Analysis Success

Mean Time to Detect: Time taken to identify a threat.
Mean Time to Respond: Time taken to neutralize the threat.
False Positive Rate: Accuracy of alerts generated.
Threat Coverage: Percentage of known threats the system can detect.
Business Impact Score: How much value the threat analysis process adds to business continuity and risk mitigation.

Challenges in Cyber Security Threat Analysis

Data Overload: Managing and analyzing massive volumes of data can be overwhelming.
Alert Fatigue: Too many alerts, including false positives, reduce response effectiveness.
Talent Shortage: Skilled cybersecurity professionals are in high demand but short supply.
Rapid Threat Evolution: Attack techniques evolve quickly, making it hard to maintain up-to-date defenses.

Best Practices for Effective Threat Analysis

Prioritize Critical Assets: Focus analysis efforts on high-value systems and data.
Implement Zero Trust Security: Never trust, always verify; ensure robust identity and access controls.
Automate Where Possible: Use automation to handle repetitive tasks and free up human resources for strategic analysis.
Encourage a Security Culture: Train employees to recognize and report suspicious activity.
Leverage Community Intelligence: Participate in threat intelligence sharing communities like ISACs.

Future of Threat Analysis Beyond 2025
The future of Cyber Security Threat Analysis will continue to evolve with:

Quantum Computing Threats: New cryptographic challenges will require upgraded threat models.
Decentralized Threat Intelligence: Blockchain-based threat sharing platforms could emerge.
Autonomous Cyber Defense: AI systems capable of defending networks without human input.

Conclusion
Cyber Security Threat Analysis is an indispensable element of modern digital defense, especially in a hyper-connected 2025. With increasingly sophisticated threats on the horizon, businesses must adopt proactive threat analysis strategies to protect their digital environments. From leveraging AI tools to integrating structured methodologies like MITRE ATT&CK and STRIDE, a multi-layered approach can provide robust defense against cyber adversaries. Investing in skilled teams, up-to-date technologies, and continuous improvement is essential to building resilient cybersecurity infrastructure.

FAQs
1. What is Cyber Security Threat Analysis?
It is the process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating potential cybersecurity threats to protect data, networks, and systems.2. Why is threat analysis important in 2025?
With rising digital threats and complex attack vectors, proactive analysis helps businesses prevent breaches and minimize damage.3. Which tools are best for threat analysis?
Popular tools include Splunk, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, and CrowdStrike.4. How does AI help in threat analysis?
AI helps by automating data analysis, detecting patterns, and predicting threats in real-time.5. What industries benefit most from threat analysis?
Finance, healthcare, government, and tech sectors, where data protection and regulatory compliance are critical.Tech World TimesTech World Times, a global collective focusing on the latest tech news and trends in blockchain, Fintech, Development & Testing, AI and Startups. If you are looking for the guest post then contact at techworldtimes@gmail.com
#cyber #security #threat #analysis #complete

Cyber Security Threat Analysis: A Complete Guide for 2025
Posted on : May 31, 2025 By Tech World Times Security Testing Rate this post In a digital era where cyberattacks are increasing in frequency, complexity, and cost, organizations must stay one step ahead by investing in robust cybersecurity strategies. At the heart of this defense lies Cyber Security Threat Analysis, a process that helps businesses detect, understand, and respond to threats before they escalate. This comprehensive guide explores the fundamentals of threat analysis, the methodologies used in 2025, emerging trends, and how companies can implement an effective threat analysis framework to safeguard their digital assets. What is Cyber Security Threat Analysis? Cyber Security Threat Analysis is the process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing potential and existing cybersecurity threats. It involves analyzing data from various sources to uncover vulnerabilities, detect malicious activity, and evaluate the potential impact on systems, networks, and data. The goal is to proactively defend against attacks rather than react to them after damage is done. Why Threat Analysis Matters in 2025 With the growing adoption of AI, IoT, cloud computing, and remote work, the digital landscape has expanded. This has also widened the attack surface for threat actors. According to recent studies, global cybercrime costs are projected to reach trillion annually by 2025. Threat analysis is no longer optional; it’s a critical component of enterprise cybersecurity strategies. Key Components of Cyber Security Threat Analysis Threat Intelligence Gathering Collecting data from open-source intelligence, internal systems, dark web monitoring, and threat intelligence platforms.Threat Identification Recognizing indicators of compromise, such as malicious IP addresses, abnormal behavior, and unusual login attempts.Risk Assessment Evaluating the likelihood and potential impact of a threat on business operations.Vulnerability Management Identifying weaknesses in systems, applications, and networks that could be exploited.Incident Response Planning Developing action plans to quickly contain and remediate threats. Types of Cyber Threats in 2025 Threat actors continue to evolve, leveraging advanced techniques to breach even the most secure environments. Here are the most prominent threats organizations face in 2025: Ransomware-as-a-Service: Cybercriminals offer ransomware toolkits to affiliates, enabling less-skilled attackers to launch sophisticated attacks. Phishing 3.0: AI-generated deepfake emails and voice messages make phishing harder to detect. Supply Chain Attacks: Attackers compromise third-party software or vendors to gain access to larger networks. Cloud Security Breaches: Misconfigured cloud environments remain a top vulnerability. IoT Exploits: Devices with weak security protocols are targeted to infiltrate larger systems. Insider Threats: Employees or contractors may intentionally or unintentionally expose systems to risk. Modern Threat Analysis Methodologies 1. MITRE ATT&CK Framework The MITRE ATT&CK framework maps the behavior and techniques of attackers, providing a structured method to analyze and predict threats. 2. Kill Chain Analysis Developed by Lockheed Martin, this method breaks down the stages of a cyberattack from reconnaissance to actions on objectives, allowing analysts to disrupt attacks early in the chain. 3. Threat Modeling Threat modeling involves identifying assets, understanding potential threats, and designing countermeasures. STRIDEis a popular model used in 2025. 4. Behavior Analytics User and Entity Behavior Analyticsuses machine learning to detect anomalies in user behavior that could indicate threats. The Role of AI and Automation in Threat Analysis Artificial Intelligenceand automation are revolutionizing Cyber Security Threat Analysis in 2025. AI-driven analytics tools can: Correlate large volumes of data in real-time Detect zero-day vulnerabilities Predict attack patterns Automate incident response processes Platforms like IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, and Splunk integrate AI capabilities for enhanced threat detection and response. Building a Threat Analysis Framework in Your Organization Establish Objectives Define what you want to protect, the types of threats to look for, and the goals of your analysis.Choose the Right Tools Invest in threat intelligence platforms, SIEM systems, and endpoint detection and responsetools.Create a Skilled Team Assemble cybersecurity professionals including threat hunters, analysts, and incident responders.Integrate Data Sources Pull data from internal logs, external intelligence feeds, user activity, and cloud services.Run Simulations Regularly test your threat detection capabilities using red teaming and penetration testing.Review and Adapt Continuously update the threat model based on evolving threats and organizational changes. Metrics to Measure Threat Analysis Success Mean Time to Detect: Time taken to identify a threat. Mean Time to Respond: Time taken to neutralize the threat. False Positive Rate: Accuracy of alerts generated. Threat Coverage: Percentage of known threats the system can detect. Business Impact Score: How much value the threat analysis process adds to business continuity and risk mitigation. Challenges in Cyber Security Threat Analysis Data Overload: Managing and analyzing massive volumes of data can be overwhelming. Alert Fatigue: Too many alerts, including false positives, reduce response effectiveness. Talent Shortage: Skilled cybersecurity professionals are in high demand but short supply. Rapid Threat Evolution: Attack techniques evolve quickly, making it hard to maintain up-to-date defenses. Best Practices for Effective Threat Analysis Prioritize Critical Assets: Focus analysis efforts on high-value systems and data. Implement Zero Trust Security: Never trust, always verify; ensure robust identity and access controls. Automate Where Possible: Use automation to handle repetitive tasks and free up human resources for strategic analysis. Encourage a Security Culture: Train employees to recognize and report suspicious activity. Leverage Community Intelligence: Participate in threat intelligence sharing communities like ISACs. Future of Threat Analysis Beyond 2025 The future of Cyber Security Threat Analysis will continue to evolve with: Quantum Computing Threats: New cryptographic challenges will require upgraded threat models. Decentralized Threat Intelligence: Blockchain-based threat sharing platforms could emerge. Autonomous Cyber Defense: AI systems capable of defending networks without human input. Conclusion Cyber Security Threat Analysis is an indispensable element of modern digital defense, especially in a hyper-connected 2025. With increasingly sophisticated threats on the horizon, businesses must adopt proactive threat analysis strategies to protect their digital environments. From leveraging AI tools to integrating structured methodologies like MITRE ATT&CK and STRIDE, a multi-layered approach can provide robust defense against cyber adversaries. Investing in skilled teams, up-to-date technologies, and continuous improvement is essential to building resilient cybersecurity infrastructure. FAQs 1. What is Cyber Security Threat Analysis? It is the process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating potential cybersecurity threats to protect data, networks, and systems.2. Why is threat analysis important in 2025? With rising digital threats and complex attack vectors, proactive analysis helps businesses prevent breaches and minimize damage.3. Which tools are best for threat analysis? Popular tools include Splunk, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, and CrowdStrike.4. How does AI help in threat analysis? AI helps by automating data analysis, detecting patterns, and predicting threats in real-time.5. What industries benefit most from threat analysis? Finance, healthcare, government, and tech sectors, where data protection and regulatory compliance are critical.Tech World TimesTech World Times, a global collective focusing on the latest tech news and trends in blockchain, Fintech, Development & Testing, AI and Startups. If you are looking for the guest post then contact at techworldtimes@gmail.com #cyber #security #threat #analysis #complete

TECHWORLDTIMES.COM

Cyber Security Threat Analysis: A Complete Guide for 2025

Posted on : May 31, 2025 By Tech World Times Security Testing Rate this post In a digital era where cyberattacks are increasing in frequency, complexity, and cost, organizations must stay one step ahead by investing in robust cybersecurity strategies. At the heart of this defense lies Cyber Security Threat Analysis, a process that helps businesses detect, understand, and respond to threats before they escalate. This comprehensive guide explores the fundamentals of threat analysis, the methodologies used in 2025, emerging trends, and how companies can implement an effective threat analysis framework to safeguard their digital assets. What is Cyber Security Threat Analysis? Cyber Security Threat Analysis is the process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing potential and existing cybersecurity threats. It involves analyzing data from various sources to uncover vulnerabilities, detect malicious activity, and evaluate the potential impact on systems, networks, and data. The goal is to proactively defend against attacks rather than react to them after damage is done. Why Threat Analysis Matters in 2025 With the growing adoption of AI, IoT, cloud computing, and remote work, the digital landscape has expanded. This has also widened the attack surface for threat actors. According to recent studies, global cybercrime costs are projected to reach $10.5 trillion annually by 2025. Threat analysis is no longer optional; it’s a critical component of enterprise cybersecurity strategies. Key Components of Cyber Security Threat Analysis Threat Intelligence Gathering Collecting data from open-source intelligence (OSINT), internal systems, dark web monitoring, and threat intelligence platforms.Threat Identification Recognizing indicators of compromise (IOCs), such as malicious IP addresses, abnormal behavior, and unusual login attempts.Risk Assessment Evaluating the likelihood and potential impact of a threat on business operations.Vulnerability Management Identifying weaknesses in systems, applications, and networks that could be exploited.Incident Response Planning Developing action plans to quickly contain and remediate threats. Types of Cyber Threats in 2025 Threat actors continue to evolve, leveraging advanced techniques to breach even the most secure environments. Here are the most prominent threats organizations face in 2025: Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS): Cybercriminals offer ransomware toolkits to affiliates, enabling less-skilled attackers to launch sophisticated attacks. Phishing 3.0: AI-generated deepfake emails and voice messages make phishing harder to detect. Supply Chain Attacks: Attackers compromise third-party software or vendors to gain access to larger networks. Cloud Security Breaches: Misconfigured cloud environments remain a top vulnerability. IoT Exploits: Devices with weak security protocols are targeted to infiltrate larger systems. Insider Threats: Employees or contractors may intentionally or unintentionally expose systems to risk. Modern Threat Analysis Methodologies 1. MITRE ATT&CK Framework The MITRE ATT&CK framework maps the behavior and techniques of attackers, providing a structured method to analyze and predict threats. 2. Kill Chain Analysis Developed by Lockheed Martin, this method breaks down the stages of a cyberattack from reconnaissance to actions on objectives, allowing analysts to disrupt attacks early in the chain. 3. Threat Modeling Threat modeling involves identifying assets, understanding potential threats, and designing countermeasures. STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information disclosure, Denial of service, Elevation of privilege) is a popular model used in 2025. 4. Behavior Analytics User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) uses machine learning to detect anomalies in user behavior that could indicate threats. The Role of AI and Automation in Threat Analysis Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation are revolutionizing Cyber Security Threat Analysis in 2025. AI-driven analytics tools can: Correlate large volumes of data in real-time Detect zero-day vulnerabilities Predict attack patterns Automate incident response processes Platforms like IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, and Splunk integrate AI capabilities for enhanced threat detection and response. Building a Threat Analysis Framework in Your Organization Establish Objectives Define what you want to protect, the types of threats to look for, and the goals of your analysis.Choose the Right Tools Invest in threat intelligence platforms, SIEM systems, and endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools.Create a Skilled Team Assemble cybersecurity professionals including threat hunters, analysts, and incident responders.Integrate Data Sources Pull data from internal logs, external intelligence feeds, user activity, and cloud services.Run Simulations Regularly test your threat detection capabilities using red teaming and penetration testing.Review and Adapt Continuously update the threat model based on evolving threats and organizational changes. Metrics to Measure Threat Analysis Success Mean Time to Detect (MTTD): Time taken to identify a threat. Mean Time to Respond (MTTR): Time taken to neutralize the threat. False Positive Rate: Accuracy of alerts generated. Threat Coverage: Percentage of known threats the system can detect. Business Impact Score: How much value the threat analysis process adds to business continuity and risk mitigation. Challenges in Cyber Security Threat Analysis Data Overload: Managing and analyzing massive volumes of data can be overwhelming. Alert Fatigue: Too many alerts, including false positives, reduce response effectiveness. Talent Shortage: Skilled cybersecurity professionals are in high demand but short supply. Rapid Threat Evolution: Attack techniques evolve quickly, making it hard to maintain up-to-date defenses. Best Practices for Effective Threat Analysis Prioritize Critical Assets: Focus analysis efforts on high-value systems and data. Implement Zero Trust Security: Never trust, always verify; ensure robust identity and access controls. Automate Where Possible: Use automation to handle repetitive tasks and free up human resources for strategic analysis. Encourage a Security Culture: Train employees to recognize and report suspicious activity. Leverage Community Intelligence: Participate in threat intelligence sharing communities like ISACs (Information Sharing and Analysis Centers). Future of Threat Analysis Beyond 2025 The future of Cyber Security Threat Analysis will continue to evolve with: Quantum Computing Threats: New cryptographic challenges will require upgraded threat models. Decentralized Threat Intelligence: Blockchain-based threat sharing platforms could emerge. Autonomous Cyber Defense: AI systems capable of defending networks without human input. Conclusion Cyber Security Threat Analysis is an indispensable element of modern digital defense, especially in a hyper-connected 2025. With increasingly sophisticated threats on the horizon, businesses must adopt proactive threat analysis strategies to protect their digital environments. From leveraging AI tools to integrating structured methodologies like MITRE ATT&CK and STRIDE, a multi-layered approach can provide robust defense against cyber adversaries. Investing in skilled teams, up-to-date technologies, and continuous improvement is essential to building resilient cybersecurity infrastructure. FAQs 1. What is Cyber Security Threat Analysis? It is the process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating potential cybersecurity threats to protect data, networks, and systems.2. Why is threat analysis important in 2025? With rising digital threats and complex attack vectors, proactive analysis helps businesses prevent breaches and minimize damage.3. Which tools are best for threat analysis? Popular tools include Splunk, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, and CrowdStrike.4. How does AI help in threat analysis? AI helps by automating data analysis, detecting patterns, and predicting threats in real-time.5. What industries benefit most from threat analysis? Finance, healthcare, government, and tech sectors, where data protection and regulatory compliance are critical.Tech World TimesTech World Times (TWT), a global collective focusing on the latest tech news and trends in blockchain, Fintech, Development & Testing, AI and Startups. If you are looking for the guest post then contact at techworldtimes@gmail.com

Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!
The Hacker News compartilhou um link

2025-05-26 12:41:58 ·

CISO's Guide To Web Privacy Validation And Why It's Important

Are your web privacy controls protecting your users, or just a box-ticking exercise? This CISO's guide provides a practical roadmap for continuous web privacy validation that's aligned with real-world practices.
– Download the full guide here.

Web Privacy: From Legal Requirement to Business Essential
As regulators ramp up enforcement and users grow more privacy-aware, CISOs face a mounting challenge: ensuring that what their organization says about privacy matches what their digital assets are doing.
70% of top US websites still drop advertising cookies even when users opt out, a clear contradiction of privacy claims. This gap exposes organizations to compliance failures, reputational damage, and user distrust.
A Practical Approach to Web Privacy Validation
Drawing from real-world incidents and regulatory trends, this guide outlines how CISOs can integrate continuous privacy validation into their security operations and explains why it's becoming a foundational practice.
Reactive vs Proactive Web Privacy Programs
Most privacy programs rely on static audits and ineffective cookie banners, but these are poorly suited for today's dynamic web. The modern web has made these techniques obsolete and elevated the role of continuous monitoring—it's now essential for maintaining regulatory compliance.
Reliance on the old reactive approach leads to silent privacy drift, which can trigger:

Unauthorized data collection: For example, a new marketing pixel silently collecting user IDs, or a third-party script tracking behavior that strays outside of the stated policy.
Broken consent mechanisms: Cookie consent that resets after updates, or embedded content dropping cookies before the user consents.
Non-compliance: A form update unintentionally collecting extra, undisclosed personal data; an AI chatbot processing queries without the required transparency.
Brand damage: Users noticing an unexpected widget accessing location data without their clear consent.

The takeaway: Privacy risks are hiding in plain sight. A proactive approach is more likely to hunt them down before any damage is done.
Reactive vs Proactive Privacy Programs: Scenario Comparison

Aspect/ Scenario
Reactive Privacy ProgramProactive Privacy ProgramApproach
Periodic, manual audits and static compliance checks.
Continuous, automated monitoring and validation in production.

Detection of New Risks
New scripts, vendors, or third-party tools may go unnoticed for months.
Every page load and code change is scanned for new trackers/scripts.

Time to Discovery
Weeks or months—typically only found after user complaints or a regulator inquiry.
Minutes or hours—automated alert triggers immediate investigation.

Regulatory Risk
High: Undetected issues can lead to major fines and investigations.
Low: Issues are caught early, reducing exposure and demonstrating diligence.

Remediation Validation
Fixes are assumed to work, but rarely verified in production.
Automated validation confirms that remediations are effective.

Resource Efficiency
High manual effort, prone to oversightand burnout.
Automated workflows free up teams for higher-value tasks.

Adaptation to New Regulations
Scrambles to keep up; often playing catch-up with new laws and frameworks.
Agile response; continuous validation meets evolving requirements.

Scenario Walkthrough: The Leaky Script

Step
Reactive Program
Proactive Program

Script added to website
No immediate detection
Detected instantly as a new third-party element.

Data leakage begins
Continues for months, often unnoticed.
Alert issued; data flow flagged as policy violation.

Discovery
Discovered only after complaints or regulatory inquiry.
Privacy team investigates within hours of the alert.

Response
Scramble to contain, investigate, and report; faces regulatory fines.
Issue remediated quickly, minimizing exposure and risk.

Outcome
€4.5M fine, public backlash, loss of trust.
No fine, incident averted, trust preserved.

Download the full CISO's guide here.
What Is Website Privacy Validation?
Website Privacy Validation tools shift privacy from reactive to proactive by continuously monitoring your websites, applications, and third-party code live in production. This ensures that your real-world activity aligns with your declared policies.
Key capabilities: Continuous Data Mapping, Policy Matching, Instant Alerts, Fix Validation, and Dashboard Oversight.
Why Continuous Validation Is the New Standard
Only 20% of companies feel confident in their privacy compliance, but continuous validation removes doubt. It strengthens compliance, simplifies audits, and integrates into existing security workflows, thanks to agentless deployment of some vendors that minimizes operational overhead.

Case in Point: The Cost of Inaction
A global retailer launched a loyalty program, but unknown to them, it included a third-party script that was sending customer emails to an external domain. This went undetected for four months and eventually led to a €4.5 million fine, public backlash, and a loss of executive trust. With privacy validation, the issue could have been resolved in hours, not months, and all that expensive fallout could have been avoided.
Much like the global retailer, providers in both the healthcare and financial services industries have opened themselves up to serious repercussions after failing to proactively validate web privacy. For instance, a hospital network neglected to validate the third-party analytics scripts running on its site, which left them free to silently collect patient data without consent. This violated HIPAA regulations, risked fines, and damaged patient trust.
Similarly, a bank suffered a data breach when a third-party vendor added a tracking script that accessed sensitive account information without proper authorization. In both cases, web privacy validation could have immediately flagged these issues, preventing unauthorized data collection, avoiding legal repercussions, and preserving customer trust across these highly regulated sectors.
Get Ready for 2025's Tougher Regulations
New frameworks like the EU AI Act and New Hampshire's NHPA are changing how organizations approach privacy. CISOs now face unprecedented validation requirements, including:

Comprehensive AI risk assessments with continuous algorithm transparency
Advanced consent mechanisms that dynamically respond to signals like Global Privacy Control
Rigorous safeguards for sensitive data processing across all digital touchpoints
Mandatory documentation and technical validation of privacy controls
Cross-border data transfer mechanisms that withstand increasing scrutiny

The regulatory landscape isn't just evolving—it's accelerating, so organizations that implement continuous web privacy validation now will be strategically positioned to navigate these complex requirements while their competitors are scrambling to catch up.
Don't Wait for a Violation Before You Take Action
Explore actionable steps and real-world examples in the full CISO's Guide to Web Privacy Validation.
→ Download the full CISO's Guide to Web Privacy Validation here.

Found this article interesting? This article is a contributed piece from one of our valued partners. Follow us on Twitter  and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.
#ciso039s #guide #web #privacy #validation

CISO's Guide To Web Privacy Validation And Why It's Important
Are your web privacy controls protecting your users, or just a box-ticking exercise? This CISO's guide provides a practical roadmap for continuous web privacy validation that's aligned with real-world practices. – Download the full guide here. Web Privacy: From Legal Requirement to Business Essential As regulators ramp up enforcement and users grow more privacy-aware, CISOs face a mounting challenge: ensuring that what their organization says about privacy matches what their digital assets are doing. 70% of top US websites still drop advertising cookies even when users opt out, a clear contradiction of privacy claims. This gap exposes organizations to compliance failures, reputational damage, and user distrust. A Practical Approach to Web Privacy Validation Drawing from real-world incidents and regulatory trends, this guide outlines how CISOs can integrate continuous privacy validation into their security operations and explains why it's becoming a foundational practice. Reactive vs Proactive Web Privacy Programs Most privacy programs rely on static audits and ineffective cookie banners, but these are poorly suited for today's dynamic web. The modern web has made these techniques obsolete and elevated the role of continuous monitoring—it's now essential for maintaining regulatory compliance. Reliance on the old reactive approach leads to silent privacy drift, which can trigger: Unauthorized data collection: For example, a new marketing pixel silently collecting user IDs, or a third-party script tracking behavior that strays outside of the stated policy. Broken consent mechanisms: Cookie consent that resets after updates, or embedded content dropping cookies before the user consents. Non-compliance: A form update unintentionally collecting extra, undisclosed personal data; an AI chatbot processing queries without the required transparency. Brand damage: Users noticing an unexpected widget accessing location data without their clear consent. The takeaway: Privacy risks are hiding in plain sight. A proactive approach is more likely to hunt them down before any damage is done. Reactive vs Proactive Privacy Programs: Scenario Comparison Aspect/ Scenario Reactive Privacy ProgramProactive Privacy ProgramApproach Periodic, manual audits and static compliance checks. Continuous, automated monitoring and validation in production. Detection of New Risks New scripts, vendors, or third-party tools may go unnoticed for months. Every page load and code change is scanned for new trackers/scripts. Time to Discovery Weeks or months—typically only found after user complaints or a regulator inquiry. Minutes or hours—automated alert triggers immediate investigation. Regulatory Risk High: Undetected issues can lead to major fines and investigations. Low: Issues are caught early, reducing exposure and demonstrating diligence. Remediation Validation Fixes are assumed to work, but rarely verified in production. Automated validation confirms that remediations are effective. Resource Efficiency High manual effort, prone to oversightand burnout. Automated workflows free up teams for higher-value tasks. Adaptation to New Regulations Scrambles to keep up; often playing catch-up with new laws and frameworks. Agile response; continuous validation meets evolving requirements. Scenario Walkthrough: The Leaky Script Step Reactive Program Proactive Program Script added to website No immediate detection Detected instantly as a new third-party element. Data leakage begins Continues for months, often unnoticed. Alert issued; data flow flagged as policy violation. Discovery Discovered only after complaints or regulatory inquiry. Privacy team investigates within hours of the alert. Response Scramble to contain, investigate, and report; faces regulatory fines. Issue remediated quickly, minimizing exposure and risk. Outcome €4.5M fine, public backlash, loss of trust. No fine, incident averted, trust preserved. Download the full CISO's guide here. What Is Website Privacy Validation? Website Privacy Validation tools shift privacy from reactive to proactive by continuously monitoring your websites, applications, and third-party code live in production. This ensures that your real-world activity aligns with your declared policies. Key capabilities: Continuous Data Mapping, Policy Matching, Instant Alerts, Fix Validation, and Dashboard Oversight. Why Continuous Validation Is the New Standard Only 20% of companies feel confident in their privacy compliance, but continuous validation removes doubt. It strengthens compliance, simplifies audits, and integrates into existing security workflows, thanks to agentless deployment of some vendors that minimizes operational overhead. Case in Point: The Cost of Inaction A global retailer launched a loyalty program, but unknown to them, it included a third-party script that was sending customer emails to an external domain. This went undetected for four months and eventually led to a €4.5 million fine, public backlash, and a loss of executive trust. With privacy validation, the issue could have been resolved in hours, not months, and all that expensive fallout could have been avoided. Much like the global retailer, providers in both the healthcare and financial services industries have opened themselves up to serious repercussions after failing to proactively validate web privacy. For instance, a hospital network neglected to validate the third-party analytics scripts running on its site, which left them free to silently collect patient data without consent. This violated HIPAA regulations, risked fines, and damaged patient trust. Similarly, a bank suffered a data breach when a third-party vendor added a tracking script that accessed sensitive account information without proper authorization. In both cases, web privacy validation could have immediately flagged these issues, preventing unauthorized data collection, avoiding legal repercussions, and preserving customer trust across these highly regulated sectors. Get Ready for 2025's Tougher Regulations New frameworks like the EU AI Act and New Hampshire's NHPA are changing how organizations approach privacy. CISOs now face unprecedented validation requirements, including: Comprehensive AI risk assessments with continuous algorithm transparency Advanced consent mechanisms that dynamically respond to signals like Global Privacy Control Rigorous safeguards for sensitive data processing across all digital touchpoints Mandatory documentation and technical validation of privacy controls Cross-border data transfer mechanisms that withstand increasing scrutiny The regulatory landscape isn't just evolving—it's accelerating, so organizations that implement continuous web privacy validation now will be strategically positioned to navigate these complex requirements while their competitors are scrambling to catch up. Don't Wait for a Violation Before You Take Action Explore actionable steps and real-world examples in the full CISO's Guide to Web Privacy Validation. → Download the full CISO's Guide to Web Privacy Validation here. Found this article interesting? This article is a contributed piece from one of our valued partners. Follow us on Twitter  and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post. #ciso039s #guide #web #privacy #validation

THEHACKERNEWS.COM

CISO's Guide To Web Privacy Validation And Why It's Important

Are your web privacy controls protecting your users, or just a box-ticking exercise? This CISO's guide provides a practical roadmap for continuous web privacy validation that's aligned with real-world practices. – Download the full guide here. Web Privacy: From Legal Requirement to Business Essential As regulators ramp up enforcement and users grow more privacy-aware, CISOs face a mounting challenge: ensuring that what their organization says about privacy matches what their digital assets are doing. 70% of top US websites still drop advertising cookies even when users opt out, a clear contradiction of privacy claims. This gap exposes organizations to compliance failures, reputational damage, and user distrust. A Practical Approach to Web Privacy Validation Drawing from real-world incidents and regulatory trends, this guide outlines how CISOs can integrate continuous privacy validation into their security operations and explains why it's becoming a foundational practice. Reactive vs Proactive Web Privacy Programs Most privacy programs rely on static audits and ineffective cookie banners, but these are poorly suited for today's dynamic web. The modern web has made these techniques obsolete and elevated the role of continuous monitoring—it's now essential for maintaining regulatory compliance. Reliance on the old reactive approach leads to silent privacy drift, which can trigger: Unauthorized data collection: For example, a new marketing pixel silently collecting user IDs, or a third-party script tracking behavior that strays outside of the stated policy. Broken consent mechanisms: Cookie consent that resets after updates, or embedded content dropping cookies before the user consents. Non-compliance: A form update unintentionally collecting extra, undisclosed personal data; an AI chatbot processing queries without the required transparency. Brand damage: Users noticing an unexpected widget accessing location data without their clear consent. The takeaway: Privacy risks are hiding in plain sight. A proactive approach is more likely to hunt them down before any damage is done. Reactive vs Proactive Privacy Programs: Scenario Comparison Aspect/ Scenario Reactive Privacy Program (Traditional) Proactive Privacy Program (Continuous Validation) Approach Periodic, manual audits and static compliance checks. Continuous, automated monitoring and validation in production. Detection of New Risks New scripts, vendors, or third-party tools may go unnoticed for months. Every page load and code change is scanned for new trackers/scripts. Time to Discovery Weeks or months—typically only found after user complaints or a regulator inquiry. Minutes or hours—automated alert triggers immediate investigation. Regulatory Risk High: Undetected issues can lead to major fines and investigations. Low: Issues are caught early, reducing exposure and demonstrating diligence. Remediation Validation Fixes are assumed to work, but rarely verified in production. Automated validation confirms that remediations are effective. Resource Efficiency High manual effort, prone to oversight (issues can be missed) and burnout. Automated workflows free up teams for higher-value tasks. Adaptation to New Regulations Scrambles to keep up; often playing catch-up with new laws and frameworks. Agile response; continuous validation meets evolving requirements. Scenario Walkthrough: The Leaky Script Step Reactive Program Proactive Program Script added to website No immediate detection Detected instantly as a new third-party element. Data leakage begins Continues for months, often unnoticed. Alert issued; data flow flagged as policy violation. Discovery Discovered only after complaints or regulatory inquiry. Privacy team investigates within hours of the alert. Response Scramble to contain, investigate, and report; faces regulatory fines. Issue remediated quickly, minimizing exposure and risk. Outcome €4.5M fine, public backlash, loss of trust. No fine, incident averted, trust preserved. Download the full CISO's guide here. What Is Website Privacy Validation? Website Privacy Validation tools shift privacy from reactive to proactive by continuously monitoring your websites, applications, and third-party code live in production. This ensures that your real-world activity aligns with your declared policies. Key capabilities: Continuous Data Mapping, Policy Matching, Instant Alerts, Fix Validation, and Dashboard Oversight. Why Continuous Validation Is the New Standard Only 20% of companies feel confident in their privacy compliance, but continuous validation removes doubt. It strengthens compliance, simplifies audits, and integrates into existing security workflows, thanks to agentless deployment of some vendors that minimizes operational overhead. Case in Point: The Cost of Inaction A global retailer launched a loyalty program, but unknown to them, it included a third-party script that was sending customer emails to an external domain. This went undetected for four months and eventually led to a €4.5 million fine, public backlash, and a loss of executive trust. With privacy validation, the issue could have been resolved in hours, not months, and all that expensive fallout could have been avoided. Much like the global retailer, providers in both the healthcare and financial services industries have opened themselves up to serious repercussions after failing to proactively validate web privacy. For instance, a hospital network neglected to validate the third-party analytics scripts running on its site, which left them free to silently collect patient data without consent. This violated HIPAA regulations, risked fines, and damaged patient trust. Similarly, a bank suffered a data breach when a third-party vendor added a tracking script that accessed sensitive account information without proper authorization. In both cases, web privacy validation could have immediately flagged these issues, preventing unauthorized data collection, avoiding legal repercussions, and preserving customer trust across these highly regulated sectors. Get Ready for 2025's Tougher Regulations New frameworks like the EU AI Act and New Hampshire's NHPA are changing how organizations approach privacy. CISOs now face unprecedented validation requirements, including: Comprehensive AI risk assessments with continuous algorithm transparency Advanced consent mechanisms that dynamically respond to signals like Global Privacy Control Rigorous safeguards for sensitive data processing across all digital touchpoints Mandatory documentation and technical validation of privacy controls Cross-border data transfer mechanisms that withstand increasing scrutiny The regulatory landscape isn't just evolving—it's accelerating, so organizations that implement continuous web privacy validation now will be strategically positioned to navigate these complex requirements while their competitors are scrambling to catch up. Don't Wait for a Violation Before You Take Action Explore actionable steps and real-world examples in the full CISO's Guide to Web Privacy Validation. → Download the full CISO's Guide to Web Privacy Validation here. Found this article interesting? This article is a contributed piece from one of our valued partners. Follow us on Twitter  and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.

Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!
NeowinFeed compartilhou um link

2025-05-25 12:32:30 ·

Microsoft reveals unexpected way that Windows 11 clean install can boost your PC performance

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Microsoft reveals unexpected way that Windows 11 clean install can boost your PC performance

Sayan Sen

Neowin
@ssc_combater007 ·

May 25, 2025 05:10 EDT

Earlier this year, in March, we covered an interesting Microsoft recommendation for new Windows 11 PCs. The company highlighted how its Smart App Control feature can keep PCs more secure. However, we noted that the feature is only available with clean installations.
For those wondering, Microsoft debuted Smart App Controlwith the release of Windows 11 version 22H2 in September 2022. And in a new article, Microsoft has shared several advantages of it over traditional antivirus software.
One of those, according to Microsoft, is the inherent advantage Smart App Control offers in terms of performance over the typical AV application. The tech giant explains how constant background scanning by the latter can bog down devices. Microsoft writes:

An advantage of Smart App Control is its lighter impact on your PC’s performance. Since it helps block harmful apps before they can run, there’s no need for constant scanning of active files. This means less strain on your system, so you can keep working or gaming without worrying about slowdowns. Traditional antivirus software, on the other hand, can sometimes use more resources as it scans files and processes continuously.

The company says this is so because Smart App Control is a proactive antimalware solution rather than being reactive like a traditional AV.
Thus the benefit is twofold according to Microsoft. Not only do users get better performance and a snappier system, but SAC can also neutralize new threats based on suspicious behavior that it can pick up based on its past machine learning and cloud data. It writes:

Smart App Control takes a proactive approach, blocking suspicious apps before they get the chance to do any harm. Traditional antivirus, however, is more reactive, responding to threats only after they've been detected on your system. This means traditional antivirus is excellent at identifying and removing known threats, but it may not catch new or sophisticated ones as quickly.

Irrespective of what Microsoft says though, there are reports from time to time about SAC impacting performance too due to bugs that do pop up sometimes, as this Broadcom support article points out. Curiously, Broadcom also highlights that the Redmond giant provided "no specific guidelines on how to address/remediate such scenarios."
The discussion is quite relevant given that the majority seem to still feel older Windows editions like Windows 8.1/8 are ahead performance-wise, despite being relatively modern in terms of UI/UX and feature-set.

Tags

Report a problem with article

Follow @NeowinFeed
#microsoft #reveals #unexpected #way #that

Microsoft reveals unexpected way that Windows 11 clean install can boost your PC performance
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. Microsoft reveals unexpected way that Windows 11 clean install can boost your PC performance Sayan Sen Neowin @ssc_combater007 · May 25, 2025 05:10 EDT Earlier this year, in March, we covered an interesting Microsoft recommendation for new Windows 11 PCs. The company highlighted how its Smart App Control feature can keep PCs more secure. However, we noted that the feature is only available with clean installations. For those wondering, Microsoft debuted Smart App Controlwith the release of Windows 11 version 22H2 in September 2022. And in a new article, Microsoft has shared several advantages of it over traditional antivirus software. One of those, according to Microsoft, is the inherent advantage Smart App Control offers in terms of performance over the typical AV application. The tech giant explains how constant background scanning by the latter can bog down devices. Microsoft writes: An advantage of Smart App Control is its lighter impact on your PC’s performance. Since it helps block harmful apps before they can run, there’s no need for constant scanning of active files. This means less strain on your system, so you can keep working or gaming without worrying about slowdowns. Traditional antivirus software, on the other hand, can sometimes use more resources as it scans files and processes continuously. The company says this is so because Smart App Control is a proactive antimalware solution rather than being reactive like a traditional AV. Thus the benefit is twofold according to Microsoft. Not only do users get better performance and a snappier system, but SAC can also neutralize new threats based on suspicious behavior that it can pick up based on its past machine learning and cloud data. It writes: Smart App Control takes a proactive approach, blocking suspicious apps before they get the chance to do any harm. Traditional antivirus, however, is more reactive, responding to threats only after they've been detected on your system. This means traditional antivirus is excellent at identifying and removing known threats, but it may not catch new or sophisticated ones as quickly. Irrespective of what Microsoft says though, there are reports from time to time about SAC impacting performance too due to bugs that do pop up sometimes, as this Broadcom support article points out. Curiously, Broadcom also highlights that the Redmond giant provided "no specific guidelines on how to address/remediate such scenarios." The discussion is quite relevant given that the majority seem to still feel older Windows editions like Windows 8.1/8 are ahead performance-wise, despite being relatively modern in terms of UI/UX and feature-set. Tags Report a problem with article Follow @NeowinFeed #microsoft #reveals #unexpected #way #that

WWW.NEOWIN.NET

Microsoft reveals unexpected way that Windows 11 clean install can boost your PC performance

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works. Microsoft reveals unexpected way that Windows 11 clean install can boost your PC performance Sayan Sen Neowin @ssc_combater007 · May 25, 2025 05:10 EDT Earlier this year, in March, we covered an interesting Microsoft recommendation for new Windows 11 PCs. The company highlighted how its Smart App Control feature can keep PCs more secure. However, we noted that the feature is only available with clean installations. For those wondering, Microsoft debuted Smart App Control (SAC) with the release of Windows 11 version 22H2 in September 2022. And in a new article, Microsoft has shared several advantages of it over traditional antivirus software. One of those, according to Microsoft, is the inherent advantage Smart App Control offers in terms of performance over the typical AV application. The tech giant explains how constant background scanning by the latter can bog down devices. Microsoft writes: An advantage of Smart App Control is its lighter impact on your PC’s performance. Since it helps block harmful apps before they can run, there’s no need for constant scanning of active files. This means less strain on your system, so you can keep working or gaming without worrying about slowdowns. Traditional antivirus software, on the other hand, can sometimes use more resources as it scans files and processes continuously. The company says this is so because Smart App Control is a proactive antimalware solution rather than being reactive like a traditional AV. Thus the benefit is twofold according to Microsoft. Not only do users get better performance and a snappier system, but SAC can also neutralize new threats based on suspicious behavior that it can pick up based on its past machine learning and cloud data. It writes: Smart App Control takes a proactive approach, blocking suspicious apps before they get the chance to do any harm. Traditional antivirus, however, is more reactive, responding to threats only after they've been detected on your system. This means traditional antivirus is excellent at identifying and removing known threats, but it may not catch new or sophisticated ones as quickly. Irrespective of what Microsoft says though, there are reports from time to time about SAC impacting performance too due to bugs that do pop up sometimes, as this Broadcom support article points out. Curiously, Broadcom also highlights that the Redmond giant provided "no specific guidelines on how to address/remediate such scenarios." The discussion is quite relevant given that the majority seem to still feel older Windows editions like Windows 8.1/8 are ahead performance-wise, despite being relatively modern in terms of UI/UX and feature-set. Tags Report a problem with article Follow @NeowinFeed

Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!
Engadget compartilhou um link

2025-05-24 04:08:54 ·

X is recovering after a data center outage

X seems to finally be recovering from a data center outage that brought down the site for some users Thursday and caused lingering issues into Friday. According to posts on the company's developer platform page, a "site-wide outage" that began at 11AM PT on Thursday, May 22, had "been resolved" as of 10:35 AM PT Friday morning.
The developer site notes that X is still experiencing "degraded performance" of some of its login features. The company has yet to officially comment on the ongoing technical problems since an update Thursday afternoon, when the company said that a data center outage was causing "performance issues" for some users.
X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today. We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue.— EngineeringMay 22, 2025

At the time, reports on downdetector.com, which tracks online service outages, spiked as users reported issues accessing direct messages and other features. While the company hasn't elaborated on the cause of the prolonged outage, the timing lines up with a reported fire at an X data center in Oregon on Thursday. According to Wired, firefighters responded to a fire at a data center leased by X near Portland, Oregon at 10:21AM PT on Thursday. The extent of the damage is unclear, but the fire crews were reportedly on-scene for several hours. Batteries were apparently a contributing factor to the blaze.
X hasn't responded to questions about the fire or the data center outage it disclosed. However, this wouldn't be the first data center-related headache X has faced. Shortly after Elon Musk took over the company in 2022, he insisted on moving the company's servers out of a facility in California to a space in Oregon in a bid to save money. And while Twitter engineers had insisted the process would take months, Musk insisted on moving them in a matter of weeks, in an incident detailed by Musk's biographer.
While Musk was able to accomplish his goal of quickly relocating the servers, his haphazard approach to the move resulted in months of technical issues for the company and an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.
Update, May 23, 2025, 12PM PT: This post has been changed to reflect X's latest updates on the outage. It was previously updated multiple times, and that information is now included in the story above. This article originally appeared on Engadget at
#recovering #after #data #center #outage

X is recovering after a data center outage
X seems to finally be recovering from a data center outage that brought down the site for some users Thursday and caused lingering issues into Friday. According to posts on the company's developer platform page, a "site-wide outage" that began at 11AM PT on Thursday, May 22, had "been resolved" as of 10:35 AM PT Friday morning. The developer site notes that X is still experiencing "degraded performance" of some of its login features. The company has yet to officially comment on the ongoing technical problems since an update Thursday afternoon, when the company said that a data center outage was causing "performance issues" for some users. X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today. We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue.— EngineeringMay 22, 2025 At the time, reports on downdetector.com, which tracks online service outages, spiked as users reported issues accessing direct messages and other features. While the company hasn't elaborated on the cause of the prolonged outage, the timing lines up with a reported fire at an X data center in Oregon on Thursday. According to Wired, firefighters responded to a fire at a data center leased by X near Portland, Oregon at 10:21AM PT on Thursday. The extent of the damage is unclear, but the fire crews were reportedly on-scene for several hours. Batteries were apparently a contributing factor to the blaze. X hasn't responded to questions about the fire or the data center outage it disclosed. However, this wouldn't be the first data center-related headache X has faced. Shortly after Elon Musk took over the company in 2022, he insisted on moving the company's servers out of a facility in California to a space in Oregon in a bid to save money. And while Twitter engineers had insisted the process would take months, Musk insisted on moving them in a matter of weeks, in an incident detailed by Musk's biographer. While Musk was able to accomplish his goal of quickly relocating the servers, his haphazard approach to the move resulted in months of technical issues for the company and an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission. Update, May 23, 2025, 12PM PT: This post has been changed to reflect X's latest updates on the outage. It was previously updated multiple times, and that information is now included in the story above. This article originally appeared on Engadget at #recovering #after #data #center #outage

WWW.ENGADGET.COM

X is recovering after a data center outage

X seems to finally be recovering from a data center outage that brought down the site for some users Thursday and caused lingering issues into Friday. According to posts on the company's developer platform page, a "site-wide outage" that began at 11AM PT on Thursday, May 22, had "been resolved" as of 10:35 AM PT Friday morning. The developer site notes that X is still experiencing "degraded performance" of some of its login features. The company has yet to officially comment on the ongoing technical problems since an update Thursday afternoon, when the company said that a data center outage was causing "performance issues" for some users. X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today. We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue.— Engineering (@XEng) May 22, 2025 At the time, reports on downdetector.com, which tracks online service outages, spiked as users reported issues accessing direct messages and other features. While the company hasn't elaborated on the cause of the prolonged outage, the timing lines up with a reported fire at an X data center in Oregon on Thursday. According to Wired, firefighters responded to a fire at a data center leased by X near Portland, Oregon at 10:21AM PT on Thursday. The extent of the damage is unclear, but the fire crews were reportedly on-scene for several hours. Batteries were apparently a contributing factor to the blaze. X hasn't responded to questions about the fire or the data center outage it disclosed. However, this wouldn't be the first data center-related headache X has faced. Shortly after Elon Musk took over the company in 2022, he insisted on moving the company's servers out of a facility in California to a space in Oregon in a bid to save money. And while Twitter engineers had insisted the process would take months, Musk insisted on moving them in a matter of weeks, in an incident detailed by Musk's biographer. While Musk was able to accomplish his goal of quickly relocating the servers, his haphazard approach to the move resulted in months of technical issues for the company and an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission. Update, May 23, 2025, 12PM PT: This post has been changed to reflect X's latest updates on the outage. It was previously updated multiple times, and that information is now included in the story above. This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/x-is-recovering-after-a-data-center-outage-204254431.html?src=rss

Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!
Slashdot compartilhou um link

2025-05-23 02:07:23 ·

DanaBot Malware Devs Infected Their Own PCs

The U.S. unsealed charges against 16 individuals behind DanaBot, a malware-as-a-service platform responsible for over million in global losses. "The FBI says a newer version of DanaBot was used for espionage, and that many of the defendants exposed their real-life identities after accidentally infecting their own systems with the malware," reports KrebsOnSecurity. From the report: Initially spotted in May 2018 by researchers at the email security firm Proofpoint, DanaBot is a malware-as-a-service platform that specializes in credential theft and banking fraud. Today, the U.S. Department of Justice unsealed a criminal complaint and indictment from 2022, which said the FBI identified at least 40 affiliates who were paying between and a month for access to the information stealer platform. The government says the malware infected more than 300,000 systems globally, causing estimated losses of more than million. The ringleaders of the DanaBot conspiracy are named as Aleksandr Stepanov, 39, a.k.a. "JimmBee," and Artem Aleksandrovich Kalinkin, 34, a.k.a. "Onix," both of Novosibirsk, Russia. Kalinkin is an IT engineer for the Russian state-owned energy giant Gazprom. His Facebook profile name is "Maffiozi."

According to the FBI, there were at least two major versions of DanaBot; the first was sold between 2018 and June 2020, when the malware stopped being offered on Russian cybercrime forums. The government alleges that the second version of DanaBot -- emerging in January 2021 -- was provided to co-conspirators for use in targeting military, diplomatic and non-governmental organization computers in several countries, including the United States, Belarus, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Russia. The indictment says the FBI in 2022 seized servers used by the DanaBot authors to control their malware, as well as the servers that stored stolen victim data. The government said the server data also show numerous instances in which the DanaBot defendants infected their own PCs, resulting in their credential data being uploaded to stolen data repositories that were seized by the feds.

"In some cases, such self-infections appeared to be deliberately done in order to test, analyze, or improve the malware," the criminal complaint reads. "In other cases, the infections seemed to be inadvertent -- one of the hazards of committing cybercrime is that criminals will sometimes infect themselves with their own malware by mistake." A statement from the DOJ says that as part of today's operation, agents with the Defense Criminal Investigative Serviceseized the DanaBot control servers, including dozens of virtual servers hosted in the United States. The government says it is now working with industry partners to notify DanaBot victims and help remediate infections. The statement credits a number of security firms with providing assistance to the government, including ESET, Flashpoint, Google, Intel 471, Lumen, PayPal, Proofpoint, Team CYRMU, and ZScaler.

of this story at Slashdot.
#danabot #malware #devs #infected #their

DanaBot Malware Devs Infected Their Own PCs
The U.S. unsealed charges against 16 individuals behind DanaBot, a malware-as-a-service platform responsible for over million in global losses. "The FBI says a newer version of DanaBot was used for espionage, and that many of the defendants exposed their real-life identities after accidentally infecting their own systems with the malware," reports KrebsOnSecurity. From the report: Initially spotted in May 2018 by researchers at the email security firm Proofpoint, DanaBot is a malware-as-a-service platform that specializes in credential theft and banking fraud. Today, the U.S. Department of Justice unsealed a criminal complaint and indictment from 2022, which said the FBI identified at least 40 affiliates who were paying between and a month for access to the information stealer platform. The government says the malware infected more than 300,000 systems globally, causing estimated losses of more than million. The ringleaders of the DanaBot conspiracy are named as Aleksandr Stepanov, 39, a.k.a. "JimmBee," and Artem Aleksandrovich Kalinkin, 34, a.k.a. "Onix," both of Novosibirsk, Russia. Kalinkin is an IT engineer for the Russian state-owned energy giant Gazprom. His Facebook profile name is "Maffiozi." According to the FBI, there were at least two major versions of DanaBot; the first was sold between 2018 and June 2020, when the malware stopped being offered on Russian cybercrime forums. The government alleges that the second version of DanaBot -- emerging in January 2021 -- was provided to co-conspirators for use in targeting military, diplomatic and non-governmental organization computers in several countries, including the United States, Belarus, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Russia. The indictment says the FBI in 2022 seized servers used by the DanaBot authors to control their malware, as well as the servers that stored stolen victim data. The government said the server data also show numerous instances in which the DanaBot defendants infected their own PCs, resulting in their credential data being uploaded to stolen data repositories that were seized by the feds. "In some cases, such self-infections appeared to be deliberately done in order to test, analyze, or improve the malware," the criminal complaint reads. "In other cases, the infections seemed to be inadvertent -- one of the hazards of committing cybercrime is that criminals will sometimes infect themselves with their own malware by mistake." A statement from the DOJ says that as part of today's operation, agents with the Defense Criminal Investigative Serviceseized the DanaBot control servers, including dozens of virtual servers hosted in the United States. The government says it is now working with industry partners to notify DanaBot victims and help remediate infections. The statement credits a number of security firms with providing assistance to the government, including ESET, Flashpoint, Google, Intel 471, Lumen, PayPal, Proofpoint, Team CYRMU, and ZScaler. of this story at Slashdot. #danabot #malware #devs #infected #their

IT.SLASHDOT.ORG

DanaBot Malware Devs Infected Their Own PCs

The U.S. unsealed charges against 16 individuals behind DanaBot, a malware-as-a-service platform responsible for over $50 million in global losses. "The FBI says a newer version of DanaBot was used for espionage, and that many of the defendants exposed their real-life identities after accidentally infecting their own systems with the malware," reports KrebsOnSecurity. From the report: Initially spotted in May 2018 by researchers at the email security firm Proofpoint, DanaBot is a malware-as-a-service platform that specializes in credential theft and banking fraud. Today, the U.S. Department of Justice unsealed a criminal complaint and indictment from 2022, which said the FBI identified at least 40 affiliates who were paying between $3,000 and $4,000 a month for access to the information stealer platform. The government says the malware infected more than 300,000 systems globally, causing estimated losses of more than $50 million. The ringleaders of the DanaBot conspiracy are named as Aleksandr Stepanov, 39, a.k.a. "JimmBee," and Artem Aleksandrovich Kalinkin, 34, a.k.a. "Onix," both of Novosibirsk, Russia. Kalinkin is an IT engineer for the Russian state-owned energy giant Gazprom. His Facebook profile name is "Maffiozi." According to the FBI, there were at least two major versions of DanaBot; the first was sold between 2018 and June 2020, when the malware stopped being offered on Russian cybercrime forums. The government alleges that the second version of DanaBot -- emerging in January 2021 -- was provided to co-conspirators for use in targeting military, diplomatic and non-governmental organization computers in several countries, including the United States, Belarus, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Russia. The indictment says the FBI in 2022 seized servers used by the DanaBot authors to control their malware, as well as the servers that stored stolen victim data. The government said the server data also show numerous instances in which the DanaBot defendants infected their own PCs, resulting in their credential data being uploaded to stolen data repositories that were seized by the feds. "In some cases, such self-infections appeared to be deliberately done in order to test, analyze, or improve the malware," the criminal complaint reads. "In other cases, the infections seemed to be inadvertent -- one of the hazards of committing cybercrime is that criminals will sometimes infect themselves with their own malware by mistake." A statement from the DOJ says that as part of today's operation, agents with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) seized the DanaBot control servers, including dozens of virtual servers hosted in the United States. The government says it is now working with industry partners to notify DanaBot victims and help remediate infections. The statement credits a number of security firms with providing assistance to the government, including ESET, Flashpoint, Google, Intel 471, Lumen, PayPal, Proofpoint, Team CYRMU, and ZScaler. Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!
Engadget compartilhou um link

2025-05-23 02:06:23 ·

X is experiencing a data center outage

If you had trouble using X today, you're not alone. DownDetector reports that over 5,000 people have reported issues accessing the social media platform as of 4PM ET. X's official Engineering account claims the issue is due to a data center outage.
"X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today," X's Engineering account writes. "We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue." The platform last experienced a major outage in March 2025. At the time, X CEO Elon Musk blamed the outage on a "massive cyberattack." Security researchers who looked into the issue later said it was poor security on X's part that left the company's servers vulnerable to attack.
X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today. We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue.— EngineeringMay 22, 2025

Update, May 22, 6:30PM ET: Users are still reporting problems accessing X, though at a lesser rate than its peak of 3:40PM ET. The X Engineering report has not posted an update since its original tweet.
Update, May 22, 9:35PM ET: X is still experiencing site-wide outage. Wired has reported that a fire broke out at a data center leased by Elon Musk in Hillsboro, Oregon. It's not quite clear if that has anything to do with the current outage. This article originally appeared on Engadget at
#experiencing #data #center #outage

X is experiencing a data center outage
If you had trouble using X today, you're not alone. DownDetector reports that over 5,000 people have reported issues accessing the social media platform as of 4PM ET. X's official Engineering account claims the issue is due to a data center outage. "X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today," X's Engineering account writes. "We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue." The platform last experienced a major outage in March 2025. At the time, X CEO Elon Musk blamed the outage on a "massive cyberattack." Security researchers who looked into the issue later said it was poor security on X's part that left the company's servers vulnerable to attack. X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today. We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue.— EngineeringMay 22, 2025 Update, May 22, 6:30PM ET: Users are still reporting problems accessing X, though at a lesser rate than its peak of 3:40PM ET. The X Engineering report has not posted an update since its original tweet. Update, May 22, 9:35PM ET: X is still experiencing site-wide outage. Wired has reported that a fire broke out at a data center leased by Elon Musk in Hillsboro, Oregon. It's not quite clear if that has anything to do with the current outage. This article originally appeared on Engadget at #experiencing #data #center #outage

WWW.ENGADGET.COM

X is experiencing a data center outage

If you had trouble using X today, you're not alone. DownDetector reports that over 5,000 people have reported issues accessing the social media platform as of 4PM ET. X's official Engineering account claims the issue is due to a data center outage. "X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today," X's Engineering account writes. "We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue." The platform last experienced a major outage in March 2025. At the time, X CEO Elon Musk blamed the outage on a "massive cyberattack." Security researchers who looked into the issue later said it was poor security on X's part that left the company's servers vulnerable to attack. X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today. We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue.— Engineering (@XEng) May 22, 2025 Update, May 22, 6:30PM ET: Users are still reporting problems accessing X, though at a lesser rate than its peak of 3:40PM ET. The X Engineering report has not posted an update since its original tweet. Update, May 22, 9:35PM ET: X is still experiencing site-wide outage. Wired has reported that a fire broke out at a data center leased by Elon Musk in Hillsboro, Oregon. It's not quite clear if that has anything to do with the current outage. This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/x-is-experiencing-a-data-center-outage-204254880.html?src=rss

Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!
Computer Weekly compartilhou um link

2025-05-22 17:00:16 ·

Microsoft raises posse to target dangerous Lumma malware

A broad coalition of technology partners and law enforcement agencies, spearheaded by Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit, has disrupted the dangerous Lumma Stealer malware-as-a-serviceoperation, which played a key role in the arsenals of multiple cyber criminal gangs, including ransomware crews.
Using a court order granted in the US District Court of the Northern District of Georgia earlier in May, the DCU and its posse seized and took down approximately 2,300 malicious domains that formed the core of the Lumma operation.
“Lumma steals passwords, credit cards, bank accounts and cryptocurrency wallets, and has enabled criminals to hold schools to ransom, empty bank accounts and disrupt critical services,” said DCU assistant general counsel, Steven Masada.
At the same time, the US Department of Justiceseized the MaaS central command structure and targeted the underground marketplaces where access was sold, while elsewhere, Europol’s European Crime Centreand Japan’s Cybercrime Control Centrewent after locally hosted infrastructure.
Europol EC3 head Edvardas Šileris, said: “This operation is a clear example of how public-private partnerships are transforming the fight against cyber crime. By combining Europol’s coordination capabilities with Microsoft’s technical insights, a vast criminal infrastructure has been disrupted. Cyber criminals thrive on fragmentation – but together, we are stronger.”
In a blog post detailing the takedown, Masada said that over a two-month period, Microsoft had identified more than 394,000 Windows computers that had been infected by Lumma. These machines have now been “freed”, with communications between Lumma and its victims severed.

This joint action is designed to slow the speed at whichactors can launch their attacks, minimise the effectiveness of their campaigns, and hinder their illicit profits by cutting a major revenue stream

Steven Masada, Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit

At the same time, about 1,300 domains seized by or transferred to Microsoft – including 300 actioned by Europol – are now redirecting to Microsoft-operated sinkholes.
“This will allow Microsoft’s DCU to provide actionable intelligence to continue to harden the security of the company’s services and help protect online users,” said Masada. “These insights will also assist public- and private-sector partners as they continue to track, investigate and remediate this threat.
“This joint action is designed to slow the speed at which these actors can launch their attacks, minimise the effectiveness of their campaigns, and hinder their illicit profits by cutting a major revenue stream.”

The Lumma Stealer MaaS first appeared on the underground scene about three years ago and has been under near-continuous development since then.
Based out of Russia, and run by a primary developer who goes by the handle “Shamel”, Lumma offers four tiers of service, starting fromand rising to an eye-popping for which buyers receive access to Lumma’s style and panel source code, the source code for plugins, and the right to act as a reseller.
In conversation with a cyber researcher in 2023, Shamel claimed to have approximately 400 active users.
When deployed, the goal is typically to monetise stolen data or conduct further exploitation. Like a chameleon, it is difficult to spot and can slip by many security defences unseen. To lure its victims, Lumma spoofs trusted brands – including Microsoft – and spreads through phishing and malvertising.
As such, it has become something of a go-to tool for many, and is known to have been used by many of the world’s more notorious cyber crime collectives, including ransomware gangs. Its customers likely included, at one time, Scattered Spider, the group thought to be behind the ransomware attack on Marks & Spencer in the UK, although there is no public evidence to suggest it was used in this incident.
Blake Darché, head of Cloudforce One at Cloudflare, which provided key support during the takedown, said: “Lumma goes into your web browser and harvests every single piece of information on your computer that could be used to access either dollars or accounts – with the victim profile being everyone, anywhere, at any time.
“The threat actors behind the malware target hundreds of victims daily, grabbing anything they can get their hands on. This disruption worked to fully set back their operations by days, taking down a significant number of domain names and ultimately blocking their ability to make money by committing cyber crime.
“While this effort threw a sizeable wrench into the largest global infostealer’s infrastructure, like any threat actor, those behind Lumma will shift tactics and reemerge to bring their campaign back online,” said Darché.

about malware

Mobile malware can come in many forms, but users might not know how to identify it. Understand the signs to be wary of on Android devices, as well as what to do to remove malware.
Malware operators are further monetising their malicious software by selling it to other attackers on a subscription basis. Learn how to detect and mitigate the threat.
A wiperware cyber attack can change the game for organisations because it causes complete destruction of data and systems. Find out how to protect your business.
#microsoft #raises #posse #target #dangerous

Microsoft raises posse to target dangerous Lumma malware
A broad coalition of technology partners and law enforcement agencies, spearheaded by Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit, has disrupted the dangerous Lumma Stealer malware-as-a-serviceoperation, which played a key role in the arsenals of multiple cyber criminal gangs, including ransomware crews. Using a court order granted in the US District Court of the Northern District of Georgia earlier in May, the DCU and its posse seized and took down approximately 2,300 malicious domains that formed the core of the Lumma operation. “Lumma steals passwords, credit cards, bank accounts and cryptocurrency wallets, and has enabled criminals to hold schools to ransom, empty bank accounts and disrupt critical services,” said DCU assistant general counsel, Steven Masada. At the same time, the US Department of Justiceseized the MaaS central command structure and targeted the underground marketplaces where access was sold, while elsewhere, Europol’s European Crime Centreand Japan’s Cybercrime Control Centrewent after locally hosted infrastructure. Europol EC3 head Edvardas Šileris, said: “This operation is a clear example of how public-private partnerships are transforming the fight against cyber crime. By combining Europol’s coordination capabilities with Microsoft’s technical insights, a vast criminal infrastructure has been disrupted. Cyber criminals thrive on fragmentation – but together, we are stronger.” In a blog post detailing the takedown, Masada said that over a two-month period, Microsoft had identified more than 394,000 Windows computers that had been infected by Lumma. These machines have now been “freed”, with communications between Lumma and its victims severed. This joint action is designed to slow the speed at whichactors can launch their attacks, minimise the effectiveness of their campaigns, and hinder their illicit profits by cutting a major revenue stream Steven Masada, Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit At the same time, about 1,300 domains seized by or transferred to Microsoft – including 300 actioned by Europol – are now redirecting to Microsoft-operated sinkholes. “This will allow Microsoft’s DCU to provide actionable intelligence to continue to harden the security of the company’s services and help protect online users,” said Masada. “These insights will also assist public- and private-sector partners as they continue to track, investigate and remediate this threat. “This joint action is designed to slow the speed at which these actors can launch their attacks, minimise the effectiveness of their campaigns, and hinder their illicit profits by cutting a major revenue stream.” The Lumma Stealer MaaS first appeared on the underground scene about three years ago and has been under near-continuous development since then. Based out of Russia, and run by a primary developer who goes by the handle “Shamel”, Lumma offers four tiers of service, starting fromand rising to an eye-popping for which buyers receive access to Lumma’s style and panel source code, the source code for plugins, and the right to act as a reseller. In conversation with a cyber researcher in 2023, Shamel claimed to have approximately 400 active users. When deployed, the goal is typically to monetise stolen data or conduct further exploitation. Like a chameleon, it is difficult to spot and can slip by many security defences unseen. To lure its victims, Lumma spoofs trusted brands – including Microsoft – and spreads through phishing and malvertising. As such, it has become something of a go-to tool for many, and is known to have been used by many of the world’s more notorious cyber crime collectives, including ransomware gangs. Its customers likely included, at one time, Scattered Spider, the group thought to be behind the ransomware attack on Marks & Spencer in the UK, although there is no public evidence to suggest it was used in this incident. Blake Darché, head of Cloudforce One at Cloudflare, which provided key support during the takedown, said: “Lumma goes into your web browser and harvests every single piece of information on your computer that could be used to access either dollars or accounts – with the victim profile being everyone, anywhere, at any time. “The threat actors behind the malware target hundreds of victims daily, grabbing anything they can get their hands on. This disruption worked to fully set back their operations by days, taking down a significant number of domain names and ultimately blocking their ability to make money by committing cyber crime. “While this effort threw a sizeable wrench into the largest global infostealer’s infrastructure, like any threat actor, those behind Lumma will shift tactics and reemerge to bring their campaign back online,” said Darché. about malware Mobile malware can come in many forms, but users might not know how to identify it. Understand the signs to be wary of on Android devices, as well as what to do to remove malware. Malware operators are further monetising their malicious software by selling it to other attackers on a subscription basis. Learn how to detect and mitigate the threat. A wiperware cyber attack can change the game for organisations because it causes complete destruction of data and systems. Find out how to protect your business. #microsoft #raises #posse #target #dangerous

WWW.COMPUTERWEEKLY.COM

Microsoft raises posse to target dangerous Lumma malware

A broad coalition of technology partners and law enforcement agencies, spearheaded by Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit (DCU), has disrupted the dangerous Lumma Stealer malware-as-a-service (MaaS) operation, which played a key role in the arsenals of multiple cyber criminal gangs, including ransomware crews. Using a court order granted in the US District Court of the Northern District of Georgia earlier in May, the DCU and its posse seized and took down approximately 2,300 malicious domains that formed the core of the Lumma operation. “Lumma steals passwords, credit cards, bank accounts and cryptocurrency wallets, and has enabled criminals to hold schools to ransom, empty bank accounts and disrupt critical services,” said DCU assistant general counsel, Steven Masada. At the same time, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) seized the MaaS central command structure and targeted the underground marketplaces where access was sold, while elsewhere, Europol’s European Crime Centre (EC3) and Japan’s Cybercrime Control Centre (JC3) went after locally hosted infrastructure. Europol EC3 head Edvardas Šileris, said: “This operation is a clear example of how public-private partnerships are transforming the fight against cyber crime. By combining Europol’s coordination capabilities with Microsoft’s technical insights, a vast criminal infrastructure has been disrupted. Cyber criminals thrive on fragmentation – but together, we are stronger.” In a blog post detailing the takedown, Masada said that over a two-month period, Microsoft had identified more than 394,000 Windows computers that had been infected by Lumma. These machines have now been “freed”, with communications between Lumma and its victims severed. This joint action is designed to slow the speed at which [threat] actors can launch their attacks, minimise the effectiveness of their campaigns, and hinder their illicit profits by cutting a major revenue stream Steven Masada, Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit At the same time, about 1,300 domains seized by or transferred to Microsoft – including 300 actioned by Europol – are now redirecting to Microsoft-operated sinkholes. “This will allow Microsoft’s DCU to provide actionable intelligence to continue to harden the security of the company’s services and help protect online users,” said Masada. “These insights will also assist public- and private-sector partners as they continue to track, investigate and remediate this threat. “This joint action is designed to slow the speed at which these actors can launch their attacks, minimise the effectiveness of their campaigns, and hinder their illicit profits by cutting a major revenue stream.” The Lumma Stealer MaaS first appeared on the underground scene about three years ago and has been under near-continuous development since then. Based out of Russia, and run by a primary developer who goes by the handle “Shamel”, Lumma offers four tiers of service, starting from $250 (£186) and rising to an eye-popping $20,000, for which buyers receive access to Lumma’s style and panel source code, the source code for plugins, and the right to act as a reseller. In conversation with a cyber researcher in 2023, Shamel claimed to have approximately 400 active users. When deployed, the goal is typically to monetise stolen data or conduct further exploitation. Like a chameleon, it is difficult to spot and can slip by many security defences unseen. To lure its victims, Lumma spoofs trusted brands – including Microsoft – and spreads through phishing and malvertising. As such, it has become something of a go-to tool for many, and is known to have been used by many of the world’s more notorious cyber crime collectives, including ransomware gangs. Its customers likely included, at one time, Scattered Spider, the group thought to be behind the ransomware attack on Marks & Spencer in the UK, although there is no public evidence to suggest it was used in this incident. Blake Darché, head of Cloudforce One at Cloudflare, which provided key support during the takedown, said: “Lumma goes into your web browser and harvests every single piece of information on your computer that could be used to access either dollars or accounts – with the victim profile being everyone, anywhere, at any time. “The threat actors behind the malware target hundreds of victims daily, grabbing anything they can get their hands on. This disruption worked to fully set back their operations by days, taking down a significant number of domain names and ultimately blocking their ability to make money by committing cyber crime. “While this effort threw a sizeable wrench into the largest global infostealer’s infrastructure, like any threat actor, those behind Lumma will shift tactics and reemerge to bring their campaign back online,” said Darché. Read more about malware Mobile malware can come in many forms, but users might not know how to identify it. Understand the signs to be wary of on Android devices, as well as what to do to remove malware. Malware operators are further monetising their malicious software by selling it to other attackers on a subscription basis. Learn how to detect and mitigate the threat. A wiperware cyber attack can change the game for organisations because it causes complete destruction of data and systems. Find out how to protect your business.

Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!
ArchDaily compartilhou um link

2025-05-21 10:48:54 ·

Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial Competition

Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial CompetitionSponsored ContentSave this picture!Courtesy of BuildnerBuildner has announced the results of its competition, the In recognition of this treaty, Buildner invites conceptual designs for a memorial to be located on any known decommissioned nuclear weapon testing site. The conceptual memorial is intended to reflect the history and ongoing threat of nuclear weapons, aiming to promote public awareness of nuclear disarmament. The challenge is intended to bring attention to the history and dangers of nuclear weapons. Participants are tasked with designing a space that commemorates nuclear warfare victims and conveys the need for a nuclear-free future. As a 'silent' competition, submissions are not allowed to include any text, titles, or annotations.The next edition of this competition, the , has been launched with an early bird registration deadline of June 12, 2025.The briefThis competition invites designers to conceive a memorial that meaningfully engages the public with the critical issue of nuclear disarmament. Memorials play a crucial role in capturing history and facilitating collective reflection, shaping how future generations understand and respond to global challenges. The proposed memorial will specifically address the legacy of nuclear warfare, emphasizing the urgency of diplomatic solutions and international solidarity in preventing nuclear conflict.Design proposals are encouraged to consider the following core principles: Vision of Peace: Proposals should embody the aspiration for a world free of nuclear threats, incorporating symbolic or abstract representations that inspire unity and harmony. Reflection and Remembrance: Designs must foster a thoughtful and enduring dialogue, offering visitors a contemplative environment where they can reflect upon the consequences of nuclear weaponry. Educational Impact: The memorial should provide visitors with accessible insights into the historical realities and ongoing dangers of nuclear arms, actively promoting public knowledge and awareness. Emotional Engagement: Successful memorials will create a powerful emotional connection, provoking personal and collective introspection on peace, responsibility, and the human cost of nuclear conflict. Sustainable Stewardship: Designs must embrace environmental sustainability, reinforcing the memorial's overarching message of responsible stewardship and enduring peace.
this picture!Jury PanelThis year's submissions were reviewed by a distinguished jury panel featuring experts from architecture, urbanism, and the arts: Olha Kleytman, founder of Ukraine-based SBM Studio, brings expertise in architecture and urban design, alongside her humanitarian work through the NGO "Through the War." Flora Lee, Associate Partner at MAD Architects, has contributed to major international projects including the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art. Peter Newman, a London-based artist, explores humanity's relationship with space and modernity, with exhibitions spanning Trafalgar Square, the Hayward Gallery, and the Guggenheim Museum in Venice. Vincent Panhuysen, co-founder of KAAN Architecten, integrates contextual sensitivity into large-scale projects, such as the Netherlands American Cemetery Visitor Center. James Whitaker, founder of Whitaker Studio, is an architect known for his widely published Joshua Tree Residence. Wu Ziye, co-founder of China's Mix Architecture, has received international acclaim for his studio's exploration of spatial consciousness, materiality, and integration with nature. Buildner's other ongoing competitions include: the 10th edition of MICROHOME competition, in collaboration with Kingspan and Hapi Homes; the Mujassam Watan Urban Sculpture Challenge aimed at finding innovative sculptures reflecting Saudi Arabia's heritage, modern achievements, and future ambitions; and the Howard Waterfall Retreatcompetition, which invites architects to propose designs for a multi-generational family retreat at the scenic and historically significant Howard Falls in Pennsylvania, USA. Each of these competitions aims to build the winning designs.Projects:First Prize Winner + Buildner Student AwardProject title: Urbs AeternaAuthors: Alessia Angela Sanchez, Erminia Cirillo and Adele Maria Saita, from ItalyThe project presents a memorial using sand and metal to depict a post-apocalyptic vision of what appears to be Rome reduced to an archaeological remnant. The design evokes the destruction and preservation paradox, allowing viewers to observe the site from above or navigate its fractured streets leading to a central void. A ghostly wireframe reconstruction of a vanished temple stands as the focal point, symbolizing loss and memory. The restrained material palette reinforces themes of impermanence and time. While conceptually strong and visually compelling, its cost and environmental impact raise questions. The experience unfolds gradually, inviting contemplation.this picture!this picture!Second Prize WinnerProject title: The Rainbow Of RenewalAuthors: Chen Yang, Ruijing Sun and Chao Li, from the United StatesThe project envisions a memorial for the last nuclear bomb through a landscape intervention that transforms destruction into renewal. A circular water installation generates mist, evoking the image of an explosion while simultaneously creating rainbows, symbolizing hope. The design's ephemeral quality enhances its poetic impact, making it a striking presence on the horizon. The intervention integrates with the natural environment, fostering an evolving atmospheric experience.this picture!this picture!3rd Prize Winner + Buildner Student AwardProject title: Projected DestructionAuthors: Marco Moreno Donohoe of Washington University in St. Louis , WUSTL, the United StatesThis project envisions a memorial set within a cratered landscape. A striking linear structure cuts through the void, acting as both a bridge and a viewing platform, inviting visitors to experience the vastness of destruction. The interplay of light and shadow within the perforated walls creates dynamic spatial effects, offering different perspectives from above and within. The scale and placement evoke a sense of isolation and reflection.this picture!this picture!Highlighted ProjectsProject title: Mycelial Rebirth: Fungi Restoring Nuclear Wounds Authors: Shengfeng Gao, Zhuohan Zhou and Shengnan Gao from the United StatesThis project envisions a memorial landscape where fungi serve as agents of ecological healing in a post-nuclear context. A dense forest setting is activated by a grid of ultraviolet lights that stimulate mycelial growth, enhancing the fungi's capacity to absorb and break down radioactive contaminants. As the soil regenerates, the design allows for gradual ecological succession, beginning with mushrooms and pioneering vegetation. The illuminated ground plane forms a quiet, immersive field that marks both decay and recovery. Over time, the site transforms into a living testament to resilience, where nature's unseen networks remediate and renew.this picture!this picture!Project title: Nuclear Living ForceAuthors: Luis Manuel Carcamo Cura of company LUIS CARCAMO ARQUITECTOS, from MexicoThis project responds to the atomic age by offering a message of harmony over despair, using the human eye as a central metaphor for awareness and reflection. A series of monumental, petal-like structures rise from a crater-shaped void, recalling both the iris and the bomb site in Santa Fe. Surrounding this core, the Flower of Life geometry guides the masterplan, symbolizing universal patterns and organic regeneration. The design emphasizes nature's resilience, referencing ecosystems like Chernobyl where life has returned unaided. Rather than mourning destruction, the project celebrates life, order, and the potential for collective transformation.this picture!Project title: The Illusion of ChoicesAuthors: Ruiqi Yao, University of Edinburgh from the United KingdomThis project explores the illusion of choice within the existential tension between nuclear war and peace. Set inside a vast crater, visitors begin their journey in a monumental spherical chamber, where a singular path ends abruptly, symbolizing unreachable goals and the false promise of nuclear power. Descending into a subterranean network, seven red-lit paths depict ruin and inevitability, while one blue-lit path offers a narrow route toward peace and introspection. The final space contrasts confinement with openness, guiding visitors through mirrored walls toward a hopeful exit. Through spatial transitions and stark lighting contrasts, the project stages a powerful moral journey.this picture!this picture!Project title: Möbius Elegy: Red Warning and Green ReturnAuthors: Daii Shimada, Mai Nakano and Midori Watanabe, from JapanThis project imagines a regenerative forest emerging from the scars of nuclear devastation. Set within a vast desert crater, a radial pattern of multicolored vegetation radiates outward, suggesting seasonal cycles and ecological diversity. The planting strategy appears gradual and deliberate, with craters used as microclimates for reforestation—each acting as a node in a larger ecological system. A lone figure stands before the transformed landscape, underscoring the scale and ambition of the intervention. Through time-lapse-like sequences, the imagery suggests the forest's steady expansion, turning the desert into a sanctuary of life. The memorial becomes a living archive of resilience and renewal.this picture!Project title: Soft FalloutAuthors: Louis Bourdages and Cedric Harvey, from the Université Laval School of Architecture, CanadaThis project proposes an immersive memorial defined by a luminous, amorphous structure suspended over a crater. From the outside, the glowing yellow form evokes a captured sun or lingering explosion, radiating both warmth and unease. Inside, visitors enter a soft, undulating landscape of quilted fabric that molds to the human body, allowing for stillness, reflection, or playful interaction. Light filters through the translucent skin, creating a surreal atmosphere suspended between comfort and disquiet. The form's biomorphic geometry contrasts the rationality of war, transforming the site into a sensorial space of pause and presence.this picture!Project title: "Used to be there"Authors: Hữu Nhân Hoàng, Hoàng Kỳ Lê and Anh Khoa Huỳnh, VietnamThis project constructs a memorial as a collective reflection on memory, identity, and everyday life disrupted by nuclear war. Set in a radial formation across a barren landscape, semi-transparent glass panels display ghosted historical photographs—scenes of people, architecture, and ordinary moments—layered over the present. Visitors navigate between these life-sized images, encountering echoes of the past embedded in space. The transparent surfaces blend time periods and dissolve boundaries, inviting viewers to see themselves within the continuity of human experience. Rather than focusing on devastation, the project quietly honors what stands to be lost: ordinary lives, familiar places, and shared memories.this picture!Visit the website for the recently launched , to take part and learn more, before the early bird registration deadline of June 12, 2025.

Image gallerySee allShow less
Cite: "Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial Competition" 21 May 2025. ArchDaily. Accessed . < ISSN 0719-8884Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否
You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream
#buildner #announces #winners #5th #annual

Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial Competition
Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial CompetitionSponsored ContentSave this picture!Courtesy of BuildnerBuildner has announced the results of its competition, the In recognition of this treaty, Buildner invites conceptual designs for a memorial to be located on any known decommissioned nuclear weapon testing site. The conceptual memorial is intended to reflect the history and ongoing threat of nuclear weapons, aiming to promote public awareness of nuclear disarmament. The challenge is intended to bring attention to the history and dangers of nuclear weapons. Participants are tasked with designing a space that commemorates nuclear warfare victims and conveys the need for a nuclear-free future. As a 'silent' competition, submissions are not allowed to include any text, titles, or annotations.The next edition of this competition, the , has been launched with an early bird registration deadline of June 12, 2025.The briefThis competition invites designers to conceive a memorial that meaningfully engages the public with the critical issue of nuclear disarmament. Memorials play a crucial role in capturing history and facilitating collective reflection, shaping how future generations understand and respond to global challenges. The proposed memorial will specifically address the legacy of nuclear warfare, emphasizing the urgency of diplomatic solutions and international solidarity in preventing nuclear conflict.Design proposals are encouraged to consider the following core principles: Vision of Peace: Proposals should embody the aspiration for a world free of nuclear threats, incorporating symbolic or abstract representations that inspire unity and harmony. Reflection and Remembrance: Designs must foster a thoughtful and enduring dialogue, offering visitors a contemplative environment where they can reflect upon the consequences of nuclear weaponry. Educational Impact: The memorial should provide visitors with accessible insights into the historical realities and ongoing dangers of nuclear arms, actively promoting public knowledge and awareness. Emotional Engagement: Successful memorials will create a powerful emotional connection, provoking personal and collective introspection on peace, responsibility, and the human cost of nuclear conflict. Sustainable Stewardship: Designs must embrace environmental sustainability, reinforcing the memorial's overarching message of responsible stewardship and enduring peace. this picture!Jury PanelThis year's submissions were reviewed by a distinguished jury panel featuring experts from architecture, urbanism, and the arts: Olha Kleytman, founder of Ukraine-based SBM Studio, brings expertise in architecture and urban design, alongside her humanitarian work through the NGO "Through the War." Flora Lee, Associate Partner at MAD Architects, has contributed to major international projects including the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art. Peter Newman, a London-based artist, explores humanity's relationship with space and modernity, with exhibitions spanning Trafalgar Square, the Hayward Gallery, and the Guggenheim Museum in Venice. Vincent Panhuysen, co-founder of KAAN Architecten, integrates contextual sensitivity into large-scale projects, such as the Netherlands American Cemetery Visitor Center. James Whitaker, founder of Whitaker Studio, is an architect known for his widely published Joshua Tree Residence. Wu Ziye, co-founder of China's Mix Architecture, has received international acclaim for his studio's exploration of spatial consciousness, materiality, and integration with nature. Buildner's other ongoing competitions include: the 10th edition of MICROHOME competition, in collaboration with Kingspan and Hapi Homes; the Mujassam Watan Urban Sculpture Challenge aimed at finding innovative sculptures reflecting Saudi Arabia's heritage, modern achievements, and future ambitions; and the Howard Waterfall Retreatcompetition, which invites architects to propose designs for a multi-generational family retreat at the scenic and historically significant Howard Falls in Pennsylvania, USA. Each of these competitions aims to build the winning designs.Projects:First Prize Winner + Buildner Student AwardProject title: Urbs AeternaAuthors: Alessia Angela Sanchez, Erminia Cirillo and Adele Maria Saita, from ItalyThe project presents a memorial using sand and metal to depict a post-apocalyptic vision of what appears to be Rome reduced to an archaeological remnant. The design evokes the destruction and preservation paradox, allowing viewers to observe the site from above or navigate its fractured streets leading to a central void. A ghostly wireframe reconstruction of a vanished temple stands as the focal point, symbolizing loss and memory. The restrained material palette reinforces themes of impermanence and time. While conceptually strong and visually compelling, its cost and environmental impact raise questions. The experience unfolds gradually, inviting contemplation.this picture!this picture!Second Prize WinnerProject title: The Rainbow Of RenewalAuthors: Chen Yang, Ruijing Sun and Chao Li, from the United StatesThe project envisions a memorial for the last nuclear bomb through a landscape intervention that transforms destruction into renewal. A circular water installation generates mist, evoking the image of an explosion while simultaneously creating rainbows, symbolizing hope. The design's ephemeral quality enhances its poetic impact, making it a striking presence on the horizon. The intervention integrates with the natural environment, fostering an evolving atmospheric experience.this picture!this picture!3rd Prize Winner + Buildner Student AwardProject title: Projected DestructionAuthors: Marco Moreno Donohoe of Washington University in St. Louis , WUSTL, the United StatesThis project envisions a memorial set within a cratered landscape. A striking linear structure cuts through the void, acting as both a bridge and a viewing platform, inviting visitors to experience the vastness of destruction. The interplay of light and shadow within the perforated walls creates dynamic spatial effects, offering different perspectives from above and within. The scale and placement evoke a sense of isolation and reflection.this picture!this picture!Highlighted ProjectsProject title: Mycelial Rebirth: Fungi Restoring Nuclear Wounds Authors: Shengfeng Gao, Zhuohan Zhou and Shengnan Gao from the United StatesThis project envisions a memorial landscape where fungi serve as agents of ecological healing in a post-nuclear context. A dense forest setting is activated by a grid of ultraviolet lights that stimulate mycelial growth, enhancing the fungi's capacity to absorb and break down radioactive contaminants. As the soil regenerates, the design allows for gradual ecological succession, beginning with mushrooms and pioneering vegetation. The illuminated ground plane forms a quiet, immersive field that marks both decay and recovery. Over time, the site transforms into a living testament to resilience, where nature's unseen networks remediate and renew.this picture!this picture!Project title: Nuclear Living ForceAuthors: Luis Manuel Carcamo Cura of company LUIS CARCAMO ARQUITECTOS, from MexicoThis project responds to the atomic age by offering a message of harmony over despair, using the human eye as a central metaphor for awareness and reflection. A series of monumental, petal-like structures rise from a crater-shaped void, recalling both the iris and the bomb site in Santa Fe. Surrounding this core, the Flower of Life geometry guides the masterplan, symbolizing universal patterns and organic regeneration. The design emphasizes nature's resilience, referencing ecosystems like Chernobyl where life has returned unaided. Rather than mourning destruction, the project celebrates life, order, and the potential for collective transformation.this picture!Project title: The Illusion of ChoicesAuthors: Ruiqi Yao, University of Edinburgh from the United KingdomThis project explores the illusion of choice within the existential tension between nuclear war and peace. Set inside a vast crater, visitors begin their journey in a monumental spherical chamber, where a singular path ends abruptly, symbolizing unreachable goals and the false promise of nuclear power. Descending into a subterranean network, seven red-lit paths depict ruin and inevitability, while one blue-lit path offers a narrow route toward peace and introspection. The final space contrasts confinement with openness, guiding visitors through mirrored walls toward a hopeful exit. Through spatial transitions and stark lighting contrasts, the project stages a powerful moral journey.this picture!this picture!Project title: Möbius Elegy: Red Warning and Green ReturnAuthors: Daii Shimada, Mai Nakano and Midori Watanabe, from JapanThis project imagines a regenerative forest emerging from the scars of nuclear devastation. Set within a vast desert crater, a radial pattern of multicolored vegetation radiates outward, suggesting seasonal cycles and ecological diversity. The planting strategy appears gradual and deliberate, with craters used as microclimates for reforestation—each acting as a node in a larger ecological system. A lone figure stands before the transformed landscape, underscoring the scale and ambition of the intervention. Through time-lapse-like sequences, the imagery suggests the forest's steady expansion, turning the desert into a sanctuary of life. The memorial becomes a living archive of resilience and renewal.this picture!Project title: Soft FalloutAuthors: Louis Bourdages and Cedric Harvey, from the Université Laval School of Architecture, CanadaThis project proposes an immersive memorial defined by a luminous, amorphous structure suspended over a crater. From the outside, the glowing yellow form evokes a captured sun or lingering explosion, radiating both warmth and unease. Inside, visitors enter a soft, undulating landscape of quilted fabric that molds to the human body, allowing for stillness, reflection, or playful interaction. Light filters through the translucent skin, creating a surreal atmosphere suspended between comfort and disquiet. The form's biomorphic geometry contrasts the rationality of war, transforming the site into a sensorial space of pause and presence.this picture!Project title: "Used to be there"Authors: Hữu Nhân Hoàng, Hoàng Kỳ Lê and Anh Khoa Huỳnh, VietnamThis project constructs a memorial as a collective reflection on memory, identity, and everyday life disrupted by nuclear war. Set in a radial formation across a barren landscape, semi-transparent glass panels display ghosted historical photographs—scenes of people, architecture, and ordinary moments—layered over the present. Visitors navigate between these life-sized images, encountering echoes of the past embedded in space. The transparent surfaces blend time periods and dissolve boundaries, inviting viewers to see themselves within the continuity of human experience. Rather than focusing on devastation, the project quietly honors what stands to be lost: ordinary lives, familiar places, and shared memories.this picture!Visit the website for the recently launched , to take part and learn more, before the early bird registration deadline of June 12, 2025. Image gallerySee allShow less Cite: "Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial Competition" 21 May 2025. ArchDaily. Accessed . < ISSN 0719-8884Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否 You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream #buildner #announces #winners #5th #annual

WWW.ARCHDAILY.COM

Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial Competition

Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial CompetitionSponsored ContentSave this picture!Courtesy of BuildnerBuildner has announced the results of its competition, the In recognition of this treaty, Buildner invites conceptual designs for a memorial to be located on any known decommissioned nuclear weapon testing site. The conceptual memorial is intended to reflect the history and ongoing threat of nuclear weapons, aiming to promote public awareness of nuclear disarmament. The challenge is intended to bring attention to the history and dangers of nuclear weapons. Participants are tasked with designing a space that commemorates nuclear warfare victims and conveys the need for a nuclear-free future. As a 'silent' competition, submissions are not allowed to include any text, titles, or annotations.The next edition of this competition, the , has been launched with an early bird registration deadline of June 12, 2025.The briefThis competition invites designers to conceive a memorial that meaningfully engages the public with the critical issue of nuclear disarmament. Memorials play a crucial role in capturing history and facilitating collective reflection, shaping how future generations understand and respond to global challenges. The proposed memorial will specifically address the legacy of nuclear warfare, emphasizing the urgency of diplomatic solutions and international solidarity in preventing nuclear conflict.Design proposals are encouraged to consider the following core principles: Vision of Peace: Proposals should embody the aspiration for a world free of nuclear threats, incorporating symbolic or abstract representations that inspire unity and harmony. Reflection and Remembrance: Designs must foster a thoughtful and enduring dialogue, offering visitors a contemplative environment where they can reflect upon the consequences of nuclear weaponry. Educational Impact: The memorial should provide visitors with accessible insights into the historical realities and ongoing dangers of nuclear arms, actively promoting public knowledge and awareness. Emotional Engagement: Successful memorials will create a powerful emotional connection, provoking personal and collective introspection on peace, responsibility, and the human cost of nuclear conflict. Sustainable Stewardship: Designs must embrace environmental sustainability, reinforcing the memorial's overarching message of responsible stewardship and enduring peace. Save this picture!Jury PanelThis year's submissions were reviewed by a distinguished jury panel featuring experts from architecture, urbanism, and the arts: Olha Kleytman, founder of Ukraine-based SBM Studio, brings expertise in architecture and urban design, alongside her humanitarian work through the NGO "Through the War." Flora Lee, Associate Partner at MAD Architects, has contributed to major international projects including the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art. Peter Newman, a London-based artist, explores humanity's relationship with space and modernity, with exhibitions spanning Trafalgar Square, the Hayward Gallery, and the Guggenheim Museum in Venice. Vincent Panhuysen, co-founder of KAAN Architecten, integrates contextual sensitivity into large-scale projects, such as the Netherlands American Cemetery Visitor Center. James Whitaker, founder of Whitaker Studio, is an architect known for his widely published Joshua Tree Residence. Wu Ziye, co-founder of China's Mix Architecture, has received international acclaim for his studio's exploration of spatial consciousness, materiality, and integration with nature. Buildner's other ongoing competitions include: the 10th edition of MICROHOME competition, in collaboration with Kingspan and Hapi Homes; the Mujassam Watan Urban Sculpture Challenge aimed at finding innovative sculptures reflecting Saudi Arabia's heritage, modern achievements, and future ambitions; and the Howard Waterfall Retreatcompetition, which invites architects to propose designs for a multi-generational family retreat at the scenic and historically significant Howard Falls in Pennsylvania, USA. Each of these competitions aims to build the winning designs.Projects:First Prize Winner + Buildner Student AwardProject title: Urbs AeternaAuthors: Alessia Angela Sanchez, Erminia Cirillo and Adele Maria Saita, from ItalyThe project presents a memorial using sand and metal to depict a post-apocalyptic vision of what appears to be Rome reduced to an archaeological remnant. The design evokes the destruction and preservation paradox, allowing viewers to observe the site from above or navigate its fractured streets leading to a central void. A ghostly wireframe reconstruction of a vanished temple stands as the focal point, symbolizing loss and memory. The restrained material palette reinforces themes of impermanence and time. While conceptually strong and visually compelling, its cost and environmental impact raise questions. The experience unfolds gradually, inviting contemplation.Save this picture!Save this picture!Second Prize WinnerProject title: The Rainbow Of RenewalAuthors: Chen Yang, Ruijing Sun and Chao Li, from the United StatesThe project envisions a memorial for the last nuclear bomb through a landscape intervention that transforms destruction into renewal. A circular water installation generates mist, evoking the image of an explosion while simultaneously creating rainbows, symbolizing hope. The design's ephemeral quality enhances its poetic impact, making it a striking presence on the horizon. The intervention integrates with the natural environment, fostering an evolving atmospheric experience.Save this picture!Save this picture!3rd Prize Winner + Buildner Student AwardProject title: Projected DestructionAuthors: Marco Moreno Donohoe of Washington University in St. Louis , WUSTL, the United StatesThis project envisions a memorial set within a cratered landscape. A striking linear structure cuts through the void, acting as both a bridge and a viewing platform, inviting visitors to experience the vastness of destruction. The interplay of light and shadow within the perforated walls creates dynamic spatial effects, offering different perspectives from above and within. The scale and placement evoke a sense of isolation and reflection.Save this picture!Save this picture!Highlighted ProjectsProject title: Mycelial Rebirth: Fungi Restoring Nuclear Wounds Authors: Shengfeng Gao, Zhuohan Zhou and Shengnan Gao from the United StatesThis project envisions a memorial landscape where fungi serve as agents of ecological healing in a post-nuclear context. A dense forest setting is activated by a grid of ultraviolet lights that stimulate mycelial growth, enhancing the fungi's capacity to absorb and break down radioactive contaminants. As the soil regenerates, the design allows for gradual ecological succession, beginning with mushrooms and pioneering vegetation. The illuminated ground plane forms a quiet, immersive field that marks both decay and recovery. Over time, the site transforms into a living testament to resilience, where nature's unseen networks remediate and renew.Save this picture!Save this picture!Project title: Nuclear Living ForceAuthors: Luis Manuel Carcamo Cura of company LUIS CARCAMO ARQUITECTOS, from MexicoThis project responds to the atomic age by offering a message of harmony over despair, using the human eye as a central metaphor for awareness and reflection. A series of monumental, petal-like structures rise from a crater-shaped void, recalling both the iris and the bomb site in Santa Fe. Surrounding this core, the Flower of Life geometry guides the masterplan, symbolizing universal patterns and organic regeneration. The design emphasizes nature's resilience, referencing ecosystems like Chernobyl where life has returned unaided. Rather than mourning destruction, the project celebrates life, order, and the potential for collective transformation.Save this picture!Project title: The Illusion of ChoicesAuthors: Ruiqi Yao, University of Edinburgh from the United KingdomThis project explores the illusion of choice within the existential tension between nuclear war and peace. Set inside a vast crater, visitors begin their journey in a monumental spherical chamber, where a singular path ends abruptly, symbolizing unreachable goals and the false promise of nuclear power. Descending into a subterranean network, seven red-lit paths depict ruin and inevitability, while one blue-lit path offers a narrow route toward peace and introspection. The final space contrasts confinement with openness, guiding visitors through mirrored walls toward a hopeful exit. Through spatial transitions and stark lighting contrasts, the project stages a powerful moral journey.Save this picture!Save this picture!Project title: Möbius Elegy: Red Warning and Green ReturnAuthors: Daii Shimada, Mai Nakano and Midori Watanabe, from JapanThis project imagines a regenerative forest emerging from the scars of nuclear devastation. Set within a vast desert crater, a radial pattern of multicolored vegetation radiates outward, suggesting seasonal cycles and ecological diversity. The planting strategy appears gradual and deliberate, with craters used as microclimates for reforestation—each acting as a node in a larger ecological system. A lone figure stands before the transformed landscape, underscoring the scale and ambition of the intervention. Through time-lapse-like sequences, the imagery suggests the forest's steady expansion, turning the desert into a sanctuary of life. The memorial becomes a living archive of resilience and renewal.Save this picture!Project title: Soft FalloutAuthors: Louis Bourdages and Cedric Harvey, from the Université Laval School of Architecture, CanadaThis project proposes an immersive memorial defined by a luminous, amorphous structure suspended over a crater. From the outside, the glowing yellow form evokes a captured sun or lingering explosion, radiating both warmth and unease. Inside, visitors enter a soft, undulating landscape of quilted fabric that molds to the human body, allowing for stillness, reflection, or playful interaction. Light filters through the translucent skin, creating a surreal atmosphere suspended between comfort and disquiet. The form's biomorphic geometry contrasts the rationality of war, transforming the site into a sensorial space of pause and presence.Save this picture!Project title: "Used to be there"Authors: Hữu Nhân Hoàng, Hoàng Kỳ Lê and Anh Khoa Huỳnh, VietnamThis project constructs a memorial as a collective reflection on memory, identity, and everyday life disrupted by nuclear war. Set in a radial formation across a barren landscape, semi-transparent glass panels display ghosted historical photographs—scenes of people, architecture, and ordinary moments—layered over the present. Visitors navigate between these life-sized images, encountering echoes of the past embedded in space. The transparent surfaces blend time periods and dissolve boundaries, inviting viewers to see themselves within the continuity of human experience. Rather than focusing on devastation, the project quietly honors what stands to be lost: ordinary lives, familiar places, and shared memories.Save this picture!Visit the website for the recently launched , to take part and learn more, before the early bird registration deadline of June 12, 2025. Image gallerySee allShow less Cite: "Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial Competition" 21 May 2025. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1030195/buildner-announces-winners-of-the-5th-annual-last-nuclear-bomb-memorial-competition&gt ISSN 0719-8884Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否 You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream

3 Comentários

Faça o login para curtir, compartilhar e comentar!

Acessar

Idiomas

Cyber Security Threat Analysis: A Complete Guide for 2025

CISO's Guide To Web Privacy Validation And Why It's Important

Microsoft reveals unexpected way that Windows 11 clean install can boost your PC performance

X is recovering after a data center outage

DanaBot Malware Devs Infected Their Own PCs

X is experiencing a data center outage

Microsoft raises posse to target dangerous Lumma malware

Buildner Announces Winners of the 5th Annual Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial Competition