Samsung Display and Samsung Mobile operate separately but Apple is trusting the expertise of one Samsung company to beat the other's foldable phone.

NASA has just premiered Planetary Defenders, a fascinating documentary looking at the high-stakes work geared toward protecting Earth from large asteroids spotted coming our way.  The 75-minute production (above) features the astronomers and scientists who are working tirelessly to identify and monitor asteroids considered a potential threat — including, briefly, this one that made headlines earlier this year. Planetary Defenders captures “the intricate and collaborative efforts of these unsung heroes, blending cutting-edge science with personal stories to reveal the human spirit behind this critical global endeavor,” NASA said, adding: “Witness the drama, the challenges, and the triumphs of those on the front lines of planetary defense.” Related The documentary’s trailer should certainly be enough to whet your appetite. It’s full of contributors offering some pretty dramatic takes on the issue of incoming asteroids.  “Those objects are big enough to cause what we would call truly global devastation, meaning that they could cause global extinction events,” says one. “The good news is that we’ve found more than about 95% of them. When we get down to smaller objects, things that are larger than, let’s say, about 100 meters across or so, the picture is not so rosy.”  Another helpfully points out: “The dinosaurs went extinct because they didn’t have a space program. We do have one.” But then someone else pipes up: “The day is coming when the Earth will get impacted.” Another contributor adds: “There’s almost certainly a decent-sized astroid out there that is going to pose an impact threat to the planet. We’re just trying to find it right now.” Rest assured, some smarts minds are tackling the issue not only of finding potentially hazardous objects, but also how we might prevent them from slamming into Earth and ruining our day.  An example of this impressive work was NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART), which became the first mission to successfully demonstrate the ability to redirect an asteroid as a method of planetary defense.  Launched in 2021, DART targeted Dimorphos, a small moonlet orbiting the larger asteroid Didymos — neither of which posed a threat to Earth. The spacecraft, about the size of a small car, intentionally collided with Dimorphos in September 2022, with the impact altering Dimorphos’ orbit around Didymos, proving that it is possible to change the course of an asteroid.  DART’s success means that humanity now has a proven, scalable technology for asteroid deflection, and the technical foundation to develop more robust planetary defense systems in the future. Let’s just hope they can nail the technology before a biggie comes along. Editors’ Recommendations

The world’s largest contract chip maker’s profit jumped 60% to 361.56 billion New Taiwan dollars in the first quarter, beating the NT$351.65 billion consensus estimate of analysts in a FactSet poll.

(IN)sanity check 14 reasons why Trump’s tariffs won’t bring manufacturing back Op-ed: Trump administration grossly underestimates difficulty of their stated task. Molson Hart – Apr 16, 2025 3:56 pm | 129 Credit: Bloomberg / Getty Images Credit: Bloomberg / Getty Images Story text Size Small Standard Large Width * Standard Wide Links Standard Orange * Subscribers only   Learn more Molson Hart is the founder and president of Viahart, an educational toy company. To see what he’s up to, follow him on X, or watch his educational videos on TikTok. On April 2, 2025, our president announced major new taxes on imports from foreign countries (“tariffs”), ranging from 10 percent to 49 percent. The stated goal is to bring manufacturing back to the United States and to “make America wealthy again.” These tariffs will not work. In fact, they may even do the opposite, fail to bring manufacturing back, and make America poorer in the process. This article gives the 14 reasons why this is the case, how the United States could bring manufacturing back if it were serious about doing so, and what will ultimately happen with this wrongheaded policy. I’ve been in the manufacturing industry for 15 years. I’ve manufactured in the US and in China. I worked in a factory in China. I speak and read Chinese. I’ve purchased millions of dollars' worth of goods from the US and China, but also Vietnam, Indonesia, Taiwan, and Cambodia. I’ve also visited many factories in Mexico and consider myself a student of how countries rise and fall. In other words, unlike many who have voiced an opinion on this topic, I know what I am talking about. And that’s why I felt compelled to write this article. I had to do it. I’m a first-generation American, and I love my country, and it pains me to see it hurtling at high speed towards an economic brick wall. This article is an attempt to hit the brakes. 1. They’re not high enough The iPhone 15 has been manufactured both in China and India. Credit: Apple The iPhone 15 has been manufactured both in China and India. Credit: Apple A tariff is a tax on an imported product. For example, when Apple imports an iPhone that was made in China, it declares to the United States government what it paid to make that product overseas. Let’s say it’s $100. When there is a 54 percent tariff, Apple pays $100 to the manufacturer in China and $54 to the US government when importing. In this simplified example, an iPhone used to cost Apple $100, but it now costs $154. For every dollar Apple spends, Apple needs to make a profit. So Apple sells iPhones to stores for double what it pays for them. And stores sell iPhones to consumers like you and me for double what it pays for them, as well. Before the tariffs, prices looked like this: Apple bought iPhones it designed for $100 Apple sold iPhones for $200 to stores Stores sold iPhones to you and me for $400 After the tariffs, prices look like this: Apple bought iPhones for $154 ($100 + $54 in import taxes) Apple sells those iPhones for $308 (double what it paid) Stores sell those iPhones to you and me for $616 (double what they paid) Now that you know what a tariff is, let me tell you why they aren’t high enough to bring manufacturing back to the United States. In short, manufacturing in the United States is so expensive, and our supply chain (we’ll explain that next) is so bad that making that iPhone in the United States without that 54 percent tariff would still cost more than in China with a 54 percent tariff. Since it still costs less to make the iPhone in China, both Apple and consumers would prefer it be made there, so it will, and not in the USA. 2. America’s industrial supply chain for many products is weak Think of a supply chain as a company’s ability to get the components it needs to build a finished product. Suppose you wanted to build and sell wooden furniture. You’re going to need wood, nails, glue, etc. Otherwise, you can’t do it. If you want to build an iPhone, you need to procure a glass screen, shaped metal, and numerous internal electronic components. Now you might be thinking, “What do you mean America has a weak supply chain? I’ve built furniture; I’ve assembled a computer. I can get everything I want at Home Depot and at Amazon.” That’s because America has an amazing consumer supply chain, one of the best, if not the best, in the world, but this is totally different from having an industrial supply chain. When you’re operating a furniture factory, you need an industrial quantity of wood, more wood than any Home Depot near you has in store. And you need it fast and cheap. It turns out that the United States has a good supply chain for wood, which is why, despite higher wages, we export chopsticks to China. We have abundant cheap wood in the forests of the northern United States. But if you decided to move that chopstick factory to desert Saudi Arabia, you would not succeed, because their supply chain for wood is poor; there simply aren’t any trees for thousands of miles. When it comes to the iPhone, all the factories that make the needed components are in Asia, which is one reason why, even with a 54 percent tariff, it’s cheaper to assemble that iPhone in China than in the United States. It’s cheaper and faster to get those components from nearby factories in Asia than it is to get them from the US, which, because said factories no longer exist here, has to buy these components from Asia anyway. Supply chains sound complicated but aren’t. If you can’t get the components you need at a reasonable price and timeline to build a finished product, it doesn’t matter what the tariffs are, you have to import it, because you can’t build it locally. 3. We don’t know how to make it TSMC Fab 16. Credit: TSMC TSMC Fab 16. Credit: TSMC Apple knows how to build an iPhone but may not know how to make the individual components. It may seem trivial to make that glass that separates your finger from the electronic engineering that powers your ability to access the Internet, but it’s difficult. The world buys semiconductors from Taiwan, not just because it's relatively inexpensive (but more expensive than China) labor and excellent supply chain, but because they know how to make the best semiconductors in the world. Even with infinite money, we cannot duplicate that, because we lack the know-how. A 54 percent tariff does not solve that problem. We still need to buy semiconductors from Taiwan, which is perhaps why the administration put in an exception for semiconductors, because we need them and because we can’t make them without their help. This is a problem that applies to more than just semiconductors. We have forgotten how to make products people wrongly consider to be basic, too. My company makes educational toys from plastic called Brain Flakes. To make Brain Flakes, you melt plastic and force it into shaped metal molds. Were we to import the machines and molds needed to do this, it would work for a little while, but as soon as one of those molds broke, we’d be in trouble, because there are almost no moldmakers left in the United States. The people who knew how to build and repair molds have either passed away or are long retired. In the event of a problem, we’d have to order a new mold from China or send ours back, shutting down production for months. People trivialize the complexity and difficulty of manufacturing when it’s really hard. And if we don’t know how to make something, it doesn’t matter what the tariff is. It won’t get made in America. 4. The effective cost of labor in the United States is higher than it looks Most people think that the reason why we make products in China instead of the United States is cheaper labor. That’s true, but it’s not the whole story. Frankly, the whole story is hard to read. People are not machines, they are not numbers on a spreadsheet or inputs into a manufacturing cost formula. I respect everyone who works hard and the people I have worked with over the years, and I want Americans to live better, happier lives. Chinese manufacturing labor isn’t just cheaper. It’s better. In China, there are no people who are too fat to work. The workers don’t storm off midshift, never to return to their job. You don’t have people who insist on being paid in cash so that they can keep their disability payments, while they do acrobatics on the factory floor that the non-disabled workers cannot do. Chinese workers are much less likely to physically attack each other and their manager. They don’t take 30 minute bathroom breaks on company time. They don’t often quit because their out-of-state mother of their children discovered their new job and now receives 60 percent of their wages as child support. They don’t disappear because they’ve gone on meth benders. And they don’t fall asleep on a box midshift because their pay from yesterday got converted into pills. And they can do their times tables. To manufacture, you need to be able to consistently and accurately multiply 7 times 9 and read in English, and a disturbingly large portion of the American workforce cannot do that. Chinese workers work longer hours more happily, and they’re physically faster with their hands; they can do things that American labor can’t. It’s years of accumulated skill, but it’s also a culture that is oriented around hard work and education that the United States no longer has. Sadly, what I describe above are not theoretical situations. These are things that I have experienced or seen with my own eyes. It’s fixable, but the American workforce needs great improvement in order to compete with the world’s, even with tariffs. So yes, Chinese wages are lower, but there are many countries with wages lower than China’s. It’s the work ethic, knowhow, commitment, combined with top-notch infrastructure, that makes China the most powerful manufacturing country in the world today. 5. We don’t have the infrastructure to manufacture The inputs to manufacturing are not just materials, labor, and knowhow. You need infrastructure like electricity and good roads for transportation, too. Since the year 2000, US electricity generation per person has been flat. In China, over the same time period, it has increased 400 percent. China generates over twice as much electricity per person today as the United States. Why? Manufacturing. To run the machines that make the products we use, you need electricity, a lot of it. We already have electricity instability in this country. Without the construction of huge amounts of new energy infrastructure, like nuclear power plants, we cannot meaningfully increase our manufacturing output. And it would put huge stress on our roads and create lots more dangerous traffic. When we import finished goods from foreign countries, a truck delivers them from the port or the airport to distribution centers, stores, and where we live and work. When you start manufacturing, every single component, from factory to factory, needs to be moved, increasing the number of trucks on the road many times. Paving more roads, modernizing our seaports, improving our airports, speeding up our train terminals, and building power plants in the costliest nation in the world to build is a huge undertaking that people are not appreciating when they say “well, we’ll just make it in America.” 6. Made in America will take time We placed a $50,000 order with our supplier overseas before the election in November 2024. At the time of ordering, there were no import taxes on the goods. By the time it arrived, a 20 percent tariff had been applied, and we had a surprise bill for $10,000. It can easily take 180 days for many products to go from order to on your doorstep, and this tariff policy seems not to understand that. It takes at least, in the most favorable of jurisdictions, two years (if you can get the permits) to build a factory in the United States. I know because I’ve done it. From there, it can take six months to a year for it to become efficient. It can take months for products to come off the assembly lines. All this ignores all the infrastructure that will need to be built (new roads, new power plants, etc.) to service the new factory. By the time “made in America” has begun, we will be electing a new president. 7. Uncertainty and complexity around the tariffs An unfinished Ghost Gunner awaits parts at Defense Distributed's manufacturing facility. Credit: Lee Hutchinson An unfinished Ghost Gunner awaits parts at Defense Distributed's manufacturing facility. Credit: Lee Hutchinson To start manufacturing in the United States, a company needs to make a large investment. They will need to buy new machinery, and if no existing building is suitable, they will need to construct a new building. These things cost money, a lot, in fact, and significantly more in the USA than they do in other countries. In exchange for this risk, there must be some reward. If that reward is uncertain, no one will do it. Within the past month, the president put a 25 percent tariff on Mexico and then got rid of it, only to apply it again and then get rid of it a second time. Then, last week, he was expected to apply new tariffs to Mexico but didn’t. If you’re building a new factory in the United States, your investment will alternate between maybe it will work, and catastrophic loss according to which way the tariffs and the wind blow. No one is building factories right now, and no one is renting them, because there is no certainty that any of these tariffs will last. How do I know? I built a factory in Austin, Texas, in an industrial area. I cut its rent 40 percent two weeks ago, and I can’t get a lick of interest from industrial renters. The tariffs have frozen business activity because no one wants to take a big risk dependent on a policy that may change next week. Even further, the tariffs are confusing, poorly communicated, and complex. Today, if you want to import something from China, you need to add the original import duty, plus a 20 percent “fentanyl tariff,” plus a 34 percent “reciprocal tariff,” and an additional 25 percent “Venezuelan oil” tariff, should it be determined that China is buying Venezuelan oil. The problem is, there is no list of countries that are importing Venezuelan oil provided by the White House, so you don’t know if you do or don’t need to add that 25 percent, and you also don’t know when any of these tariffs will go into effect because of unclear language. As such, you can’t calculate your costs, either with certainty or accuracy; therefore, not only do you not build a factory in the United States, you cease all business activity, the type of thing that can cause a recession, if not worse. For the past month, as someone who runs a business in this industry, I have spent a huge portion of my time just trying to keep up with the constant changes instead of running my business. 8. Most Americans are going to hate manufacturing Americans want less crime, good schools for their kids, and inexpensive health care. They don’t want to be sewing shirts. The people most excited about this new tariff policy tend to be those who’ve never actually made anything, because if you have, you’d know how hard the work is. When I first went to China as a naive 24-year-old, I told my supplier I was going to “work a day in his factory!” I lasted four hours. It was freezing cold, middle of winter; I had to crouch on a small stool, hunched over, assembling little parts with my fingers at one-quarter the speed of the women next to me. My back hurt, my fingers hurt. It was horrible. That’s a lot of manufacturing. And enjoy the blackouts, the dangerous trucks on the road, the additional pollution, etc. Be careful what you wish for America. Doing office work and selling ideas and assets is a lot easier than making actual things. 9. The labor does not exist to make good products There are over a billion people in China making stuff. As of right now there are 12 million people looking for work in the United States (4 percent unemployment). Ignoring for a moment the comparative inefficiency of labor and the billions of people making products outside of China, where are the people who are going to do these jobs? Do you simply say “make America great again” three times and they will appear with the skills needed to do the work? And where are the managers to manage these people? One of the reasons why manufacturing has declined in the United States is a brain drain toward sectors that make more money. Are people who make money on the stock market, in real estate, in venture capital, and in startups going to start sewing shirts? It’s completely and totally unrealistic to assume that people will move from superficially high productivity sectors driven by US Dollar strength to products that are low on the value chain. The United States is trying to bring back the jobs that China doesn’t even want. They have policies to reduce low-value manufacturing, yet we are applying tariffs to bring it back. It’s incomprehensible. 10. Automation will not save us Most people think that the reason why American manufacturing is not competitive is labor costs. Most people think this can be solved by automation. They’re wrong. First, China, on a yearly basis, installs 7x as many industrial robots as we do in the United States. Second, Chinese robots are cheaper. Third, most of today’s manufacturing done by people cannot be automated. If it could, it would have already been done so, by China, which, again, has increasingly high labor costs relative to the rest of the world. The robots you see on social media doing backflips are, today, mostly for show and unreliable off camera. They are not useful in industrial environments where, if a humanoid robot can do it, an industrial machine that is specialized in the task can do it even better. For example, instead of having a humanoid robot doing a repetitive task such as carrying a box from one station to another, you can simply set up a cheaper, faster conveyor belt. Said another way, the printer in your office is cheaper and more efficient than both a human and a humanoid robot with a pen hand drawing each letter. It’s unlikely that American ingenuity will be able to counter the flood of Chinese industrial robots that is coming. The first commercially electrical vehicle was designed and built in the United States, but today China is dominating electric vehicle manufacturing across the world. Industrial robots will likely be the same story. 11. Robots and overseas factory workers don’t file lawsuits, but Americans do Ford is adding artificial intelligence to its robotic assembly lines. Ford is adding artificial intelligence to its robotic assembly lines. I probably should not have written this article. Not only will I be attacked for being unpatriotic, but what I have written here makes me susceptible to employment lawsuits. For the record, I don’t use a person’s origin to determine whether or not they will do good work. I just look at the person and what they’re capable of. Doing otherwise is bad business because there are talented people everywhere. America has an extremely litigious business environment, both in terms of regulation and employment lawsuits. Excessive regulation and an inefficient court system will stifle those with the courage to make products in this country. 12. Enforcement of the tariffs will be uneven and manipulated Imagine two companies that import goods into the United States. One is based in China, while the other is based in the United States. They both lie about the value of their goods so that they have to pay less tariffs. What happens to the China company? Perhaps they lose a shipment when it’s seized by the US government for cheating, but they won’t pay additional fines because they’re in China, where they’re impervious to the US legal system. What happens to the USA company? Owners go to prison. Who do you think is going to cheat more on tariffs, the China or the US company? Exactly. So, in other words, paradoxically, the policies that are designed to help Americans will hurt them more than the competition these policies are designed to punish. 13. The tariff policies are structured in the wrong way Why didn’t the jobs come back in 2018 when we initiated our last trade war? We applied tariffs; why didn’t it work? Instead of making America great, we made Vietnam great. When the United States applied tariffs to China, it shifted huge amounts of manufacturing to Vietnam, which did not have tariffs applied to it. Vietnam, which has a labor force that is a lot more like China’s than the United States’, was able to use its proximity to China for its supply chain and over the past seven or so years, slowly developed its own. With Vietnamese wages even lower than Chinese wages, instead of the jobs coming to the United States, they just went to Vietnam instead. We’re about to make the same mistake again, in a different way. Let’s go back to that last example, the China-based and the US-based companies that were importing goods into the United States. That US-based importer could’ve been a manufacturer. Instead of finished iPhones, perhaps they were importing the glass screens because those could not be found in the USA for final assembly. Our government applied tariffs to finished goods and components equally. I’ll say that again. They applied the same tax to the components that you need to make things in America that they did to finished goods that were made outside of America. Manufacturing works on a lag. To make and sell in America, first you must get the raw materials and components. These tariffs will bankrupt manufacturers before it multiplies them because they need to pay tariffs on the import components that they assemble into finished products. And it gets worse. They put tariffs on machines. So if you want to start a factory in the United States, all the machinery you need, which is not made here, is now significantly more expensive. You may have heard that there is a chronic shortage of transformers needed for power transmission in the United States. Tariffed that, too. It gets even worse. There is no duty drawback for exporting. In the past, even in the United States, if you imported something and then exported it, the tariff you paid on the import would be refunded to you. They got rid of that, so we’re not even incentivizing exports to the countries that we are trying to achieve trade parity with. Tariffs are applied to the costs of the goods. The way we’ve structured these tariffs, factories in China that import into the United States will pay lower tariffs than American importers, because the Chinese factory will be able to declare the value of the goods at their cost, while the American importer will pay the cost the factory charges them, which is, of course, higher than the factory’s cost. Worse still. With a few exceptions like steel and semiconductors, the tariffs were applied to all products, ranging from things that we will never realistically make, like our high-labor Tigerhart stuffed animals, to things that don’t even grow in the continental USA, like coffee. Call me crazy, but if we’re going to make products in America, we could use some really cheap coffee, but no, they tariffed it! Our educational engineering toy, Brain Flakes, also got tariffed. How is the next generation supposed to build a manufacturing powerhouse if it cannot afford products that will develop its engineering ability? It’s like our goal was to make education and raising children more expensive. Not only did we put tariffs on the things that would help us make this transformation, we didn’t put higher tariffs on things that hurt us, like processed food, which makes us tired and fat, or fentanyl precursors, which kill us. The stated goal of many of our tariffs was to stop the import of fentanyl. Two milligrams of fentanyl will kill an adult. A grain of rice is 65 milligrams. How do you stop that stuff from coming in? It’s basically microscopic. Maybe we could do what every other country has done and focus on the demand instead of the supply, ideally starting with the fentanyl den near my house that keeps my children indoors or in our backyard instead of playing in the neighborhood. It’s frustrating to see our great country take on an unrealistic goal like transforming our economy when so many basic problems should be fixed first. 14. Michael Jordan sucked at baseball Michael Jordan: Basketball GOAT, career .202 hitter in the minor leagues. Credit: Focus on Sport/Getty Images Michael Jordan: Basketball GOAT, career .202 hitter in the minor leagues. Credit: Focus on Sport/Getty Images America is the greatest economic power of all time. We’ve got the most talented people in the world, and we have a multi-century legacy of achieving what so many other countries could not. Michael Jordan is arguably the greatest basketball player of all time, perhaps even the greatest athlete of all time. He played baseball in his youth. What happened when he switched from basketball to baseball? He went from being an MVP champion to being a middling player in the minor leagues. Two years later, he was back to playing basketball. And that’s exactly what’s going to happen to us. My prediction for what will happen with the tariffs This is probably the worst economic policy I’ve ever seen. Maybe it’s just an opening negotiating position. Maybe it’s designed to crash the economy, lower interest rates, and then refinance the debt. I don’t know. But if you take it at face value, there is no way that this policy will bring manufacturing back to the United States and “make America wealthy again.” Again, if anything, it’ll do the opposite; it’ll make us much poorer. Many are saying that this tariff policy is the “end of globalization.” I don’t think so. Unless this policy is quickly changed, this is the end of America’s participation in globalization. If we had enacted these policies in 2017 or 2018, they stood a much stronger chance of being successful. That was before COVID. China was much weaker economically and militarily then. They’ve been preparing eight years for this moment, and they are ready. China trades much less with the United States as a percent of its total exports today than it did eight years ago and, as such, is much less susceptible to punishing tariffs from the United States today than it was back then. Chinese-made cars, particularly electric vehicles, are taking the world by storm, without the United States. Go to Mexico to Thailand to Germany and you will see Chinese-made electric vehicles on the streets. And they’re good, sometimes even better than US-made cars, and not just on a per-dollar basis, but simply better quality. That is what is going to happen to the United States. Globalization will continue without us if these policies continue unchanged. That said, I think the tariffs will be changed. There’s no way we continue to place a 46 percent tariff on Vietnam when eight years ago we nudged American companies to put all their production there. Most likely, this policy will continue another round of the same type of investment; rather than replacing made in China with made in the USA, we’ll replace it with made in Vietnam, Mexico, etc. Finally, in the process of doing this, regardless of whether or not we reverse the policies, we will have a recession. There isn’t time to build US factories, nor is it realistic or likely to occur, and American importers don’t have the money to pay for the goods they import. People are predicting inflation in the cost of goods, but we can just as easily have deflation from economic turmoil. The policy is a disaster. How could it be done better? And what’s the point of this anyways? The 3 reasons why we want to actually bring manufacturing back It makes our country stronger. If a foreign country can cut off your supply of essentials such as food, semiconductors, or antibiotics, you’re beholden to that country. The United States must have large flexible capacity in these areas. It makes it easier to innovate. When the factory floor is down the hall, instead of 30 hours of travel away, it’s easier to make improvements and invent. We need to have manufacturing of high-value goods, like drones, robots, and military equipment that are necessary for our economic future and safety. It will be difficult for us to apply artificial intelligence to manufacturing if we’re not doing it here. People can simplistically be divided into three buckets: those of verbal intelligence, those of mathematical intelligence, and those of spatial intelligence. Without a vibrant manufacturing industry, those with the latter type of intelligence cannot fulfill their potential. This is one reason why so many men drop out, smoke weed, and play video games; they aren’t built for office jobs and would excel at manufacturing, but those jobs either don’t exist or pay poorly. How to actually bring manufacturing back Every country that has gone on a brilliant run of manufacturing first established the right conditions and then proceeded slowly. We’re doing the opposite right now, proceeding fast with the wrong conditions. First, the United States must fix basic problems that reduce the effectiveness of our labor. For example, everyone needs to be able to graduate with the ability to do basic mathematics. American health care is way too expensive and needs to be fixed if the United States wants to be competitive with global labor. I’m not saying health care should be socialized or switched to a completely private system, but whatever we’re doing now clearly is not working, and it needs to be fixed. We need to make Americans healthy again. Many people are too obese to work. Crime and drugs. It needs to stop. And to sew, we must first repair the social fabric. From COVID lockdowns to the millions of people who streamed over our border, efforts must be made to repair society. Manufacturing and economic transformations are hard, particularly the way in which we’re doing them. Patriotism and unity are required to tolerate hardship, and we seem to be at all-time lows for those right now. Let’s focus on America’s strengths in high-end manufacturing, agriculture, and innovation instead of applying tariffs to all countries and products blindly. We should be taxing automated drones for agriculture at 300 percent to encourage their manufacture here, instead of applying the same blanket tariff of 54 percent that we apply to T-shirts. The changes in the policies needed are obvious. Tax finished products higher than components. Let exporters refund their import duties. Enforce the tariffs against foreign companies more strenuously than we do against US importers. If American companies want to sell in China, they must incorporate there, register capital, and name a person to be a legal representative. To sell in Europe, we must register for their tax system and nominate a legal representative. For Europeans and Chinese to sell in the United States, none of this is needed, nor do federal taxes need to be paid. We can level the playing field without causing massive harm to our economy by adopting policies like these, which cause foreign companies to pay the taxes domestic ones pay. And if we want to apply tariffs, do it slowly. Instead of saying that products will be tariffed at 100 percent tomorrow, say they’ll be 25 percent next year, 50 percent after that, 75 percent after that, and 100 percent in year four. And then make it a law instead of a presidential decree so that there is certainty so people feel comfortable taking the risks necessary to make in America. Sadly, a lot of the knowhow to make products is outside of this country. Grant manufacturing visas, not for labor, but for knowhow. Make it easy for foreign countries to teach us how they do what they do best. Conclusion and final thoughts I care about this country and the people in it. I hope we change our mind on this policy before it’s too late. Because if we don’t, it might break the country. And, really, this country needs to be fixed. 129 Comments

An artist’s impression of the exoplanet 2M1510 (AB) b’s unusual orbit around a pair of brown dwarfsESO/L. Calçada In a first, a pair of unusual stars has been revealed to have an equally unusual companion – an exoplanet that orbits them perpendicularly. Astronomers may think they know what is normal for stars and planets, “but the universe is very diverse”, says Amaury Triaud at the University of Birmingham, UK. He and his colleagues unexpectedly found evidence of the rare configuration while analysing data collected by the Very Large Telescope in Chile. Advertisement The two stars are brown dwarfs, which means they are both small and very dim because they can’t sustain nuclear fusion and are often referred to as failed stars or substellar objects. They follow orbits such that they keep eclipsing each other when viewed from Earth. Researchers have only observed one eclipsing brown dwarf binary before. When Triaud and his colleagues carefully analysed the new binary system to determine the masses of the stars and how they move, they found an unexpectedly strange signal in the data. Ultimately, the only physical scenario that could explain it was one involving a planet-sized object orbiting the two stars, tracing out an ellipse perpendicular to the stars’ orbits. Triaud says that perpendicular orbits aren’t completely unheard of, but he and his colleagues never expected to see one in this context. “Brown dwarfs are rare. Pairs of brown dwarfs are rare. Eclipsing pairs of brown dwarfs are even rarer and faint, so it’s difficult to make measurements,” he says. “That’s where the surprise was, that in a system which was far from being ideal and rare in itself we have this configuration.” Voyage across the galaxy and beyond with our space newsletter every month. Sign up to newsletter Twenty years ago, such configurations were considered science fiction, but now they have become science fact, says Katherine Blundell at the University of Oxford. “This is a really beautiful result,” she says. The details of the two stars’ precessing orbits make a strong case that this “harmonograph in the sky” is real. Studying how they eclipse each other will make it possible to pin down more details about the motion of this peculiar threesome going forward, says Blundell. While the researchers want to learn more about the exoplanet, named 2M1510 (AB) b, they can draw comparisons with the fictional Tatooine in Star Wars, a desert world that orbited two suns. However 2M1510 (AB) b’s two suns would be dimmer, basking its surface in something similar to a double dose of moonlight. Journal reference:Science Advances DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adu0627 Topics:

"It is not often that such people, charged with a certain idea, appear in the human population," Russian President Vladimir Putin said of Elon Musk. Maxim Shipenkov/AFP via Getty Images; Kevin Lamarque via Getty Images 2025-04-17T05:43:40Z Save Saved Read in app This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now. Have an account? Vladimir Putin praised Elon Musk for his accomplishments in space travel. Musk is the founder and CEO of his own rocket company, SpaceX. Putin compared Musk to the late Soviet rocket pioneer, Sergei Korolev. Russian President Vladimir Putin praised Elon Musk as an outstanding individual for his work in space travel on Thursday.Putin was speaking to university students about space policy when he mentioned Musk's ambitions and accomplishments in the field. Musk founded his own rocket company, SpaceX, in 2002 with the goal of colonizing Mars."You know, there's a man — he lives in the States — Musk, who, one might say, raves about Mars. It is not often that such people, charged with a certain idea, appear in the human population," Putin said, per a translation from the state-owned news agency TASS.Putin went on to compare Musk to the late Soviet rocket pioneer, Sergei Korolev. Korolev, who died in 1966, was the lead rocket engineer and designer for the Soviet Union's satellites and rockets. He was also responsible for the first human spaceflight when the Soviet Union sent cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin into space in 1961."Just like in their time the ideas of Korolev, our other pioneers, got to materialize. They seemed incredible, some of the plans they made. But they all materialized," Putin said on Thursday, per TASS."A mission to Mars would be very hard. It now seems very difficult to implement," Putin said. "If you take an interest in this, you probably know."Putin's compliments put Musk in a unique position of being held in high regard by leaders in Russia and the US. Musk is a prominent supporter of President Donald Trump and is currently leading the administration's efforts to cut government spending."Elon has done a fantastic job. Look, he's sitting here, and I don't care. I don't need Elon for anything other than I happen to like him," Trump told reporters during a Cabinet meeting on April 10.Musk has been criticized for his position on the Ukraine war. Last month, Poland's foreign minister, Radosław Sikorski, said his country "will be forced to look for other suppliers" of satellite internet services if SpaceX "proves to be an unreliable provider.""To be extremely clear, no matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals," Musk wrote on X on March 9, referencing SpaceX's satellite internet service."We would never do such a thing or use it as a bargaining chip," Musk continued.The Tesla and SpaceX CEO initially supported Ukraine when the war started in 2022. In addition to delivering Starlink terminals to Ukraine, Musk also challenged Putin to single combat and suggested Putin could "bring his bear" to their fight.But Musk later changed his position on the war. In October 2022, Musk posted a peace plan on X proposing that Ukraine recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea. The Kremlin praised Musk's plan.Last year, Musk said in an X Spaces event with GOP senators that the US should stop funding Ukraine. Musk said he thought there was "no way in hell" Putin would lose the war.Russia's foreign ministry and Musk did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Recommended video

Last summer, we reported that billionaire Elon Musk had at least 12 children. Since then, the world has learned that Musk officially has at least two other children, bringing the grand (known) total to 14. However, according to a new report, there could be more, as the unhinged oligarch has reportedly been known to send his semen to women he doesn’t even know. A new Wall Street Journal investigation reveals claims made by another supposed Musk mother, the rightwing influencer Ashley St. Clair. St. Clair, who recently had a child that she says belongs to Musk, joins an increasingly long line of women who have made the inscrutable decision to bear the billionaire’s spawn. That list already includes Musk’s first wife, Justine Musk, with whom the Tesla CEO is said to have had six children; “Grimes,” aka Claire Boucher, who has had three children with Musk (including X Æ A-12, the kid who whispered weird stuff to President Trump during a press event and also may have wiped a booger on the Resolute desk); and Shivon Zilis, Musk’s employee computer-brain-interface company Neuralink, with whom he has four children. St. Clair has a lot of tea to spill, and much of it is backed up by texts from Musk and other documentation, the Journal reports. According to the 26-year-old influencer, her relationship with Musk began in 2023, not long after the billionaire acquired Twitter (now X). She became pregnant not long after their relationship began. Musk has apparently kept in close contact with St. Clair since then and asked, through his fixer, Jared Birchall, to keep the pregnancy quiet. St. Clair claims she was offered $15 million and a monthly payment of $100k to stay silent about their relationship and their new son, who has been named “Romulus,” the newspaper notes. However, St. Clair went public with the information in February, spurring drama between the two of them, and apparently causing Musk to substantially decrease his financial offer to her. The duo originally met when Musk reached out to St. Clair on Twitter. But, according to the article, Musk has reached out to other women on his platform in very much the same way. Indeed, the article notes that Musk has a habit of reaching out to female X users “through direct messages, some of whom he eventually solicits to have his babies, according to people who have viewed the messages.” At least one of those lucky ladies is crypto influencer Tiffany Fong, whom Musk followed on X last year. Sources told the newspaper that the billionaire had sent her a DM last November “asking if she was interested in having his child.” Wong apparently declined the offer. During another episode, Musk allegedly told St. Clair that he’d been approached by Japanese officials and asked to be a sperm donor for a high-profile Japanese influencer. “They want me to be a sperm donor. No romance or anything, just sperm,” Musk texted to St. Clair. He later told her that he’d gone through with the donation. Musk also once made a quip on X about impregnating Taylor Swift—although, as far as we know, that was a joke. With so much wayward sperm flying in all directions, it seems increasingly difficult to know just how many mini-Musks are running around out there. The WSJ article has a lot of laugh-out-loud moments, including one bit involving Musk’s apparent justification for impregnating so many women: In Musk’s dark view of the world, civilization is under threat because of a declining population. He is driven to correct the historic moment by helping seed the earth with more human beings of high intelligence… Musk has often justified his bizarre or stupid decisions with melodramatic and grandiose reasoning. Usually, it’s somewhat easy to imagine that he has a much more mundane reason for his behavior. Still, Musk, like other billionaires, does seem to be obsessed with his own longevity, as can be seen by his ever-expanding family line. Musk’s promulgation of so-called “pronatalist” ideals and his very public fretting about global population decline have been an ongoing theme in recent interviews he’s given. Yet the Journal article makes Musk’s procreation obsession sound even weirder, revealing that the billionaire has often referred to his children as his “legion,” in an apparent reference to the ancient term for a Roman military unit: Musk refers to his offspring as a “legion,” a reference to the ancient military units that could contain thousands of soldiers and were key to extending the reach of the Roman Empire. During St. Clair’s pregnancy, Musk suggested that they bring in other women to have even more of their children faster. “To reach legion-level before the apocalypse,” he said to St. Clair in a text message viewed by The Wall Street Journal, “we will need to use surrogates.” He has recruited potential mothers on his social-media platform X, according to some of the people. The Journal article notes that Musk has attempted to get all the various members of his “harem” to congregate in a compound that he recently had built in Austin, Texas. However, most of the women seem to have expressed disinterest in this: Birchall was involved in acquiring the property for a compound in Austin where Musk imagined the women and his growing number of babies would all live among multiple residences, according to a person familiar with the matter…Zilis lives in the gated community with their children, and Musk comes and goes. Musk also attempted to get Grimes to move to the compound, but she refused. Similarly, he tried to get St. Clair to spend some time in Austin “with our kid legion,” according to a text he sent her. So strange that Musk’s various baby mommas don’t want to be herded into the same cult-like compound. It’s almost as if they don’t totally appreciate being little more than an aggregate receptacle for the dipshit billionaire’s semen. That said, maybe there are some who do. Who knows how many women are out there just waiting to become the next generator for Musk’s ever-growing “legion.”

Crystal Pavilion House / DA VÀNG studioSave this picture!© MinqBui Architects: DA VÀNG studio Area Area of this architecture project Area:  465 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project Year:  2025 Photographs Photographs:MinqBui Lead Architect: Nguyễn Đắc Anh Quân More SpecsLess Specs Save this picture! Text description provided by the architects. This house is designed based on the philosophy of spatial and lighting connectivity, creating a harmony between architecture and nature while ensuring privacy and modern comfort. The highlight of the project is its curved façade, constructed from more than 3,000 glass bricks, which not only forms a unique aesthetic impression but also diffuses natural light into the interior in a soft and harmonious way.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!The design is inspired by organic architecture, aiming for a seamless integration between living spaces and nature. The glass brick façade and interwoven spatial layers optimize natural lighting and ventilation, reducing energy consumption. Inside, the green system acts as a microclimate system, regulating temperature, purifying the air, and providing a relaxing environment for the homeowner.Save this picture!The construction process posed several challenges, particularly in shaping the curved façade with over 3,000 glass bricks. This required high precision in structural execution and assembly techniques to ensure both aesthetics and safety. Additionally, the large glass surface could increase indoor temperature, so the house incorporates a multi-story skylight and a natural airflow system to maintain thermal balance.Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Save this picture!Designing the rooftop garden also presented challenges related to structural load capacity, drainage systems, and selecting suitable plant species to sustain a stable ecosystem and maintain a natural microclimate for the entire house.Save this picture!By integrating architecture, lighting, greenery, natural stone, and open spaces, the project creates a tranquil, healing, and sustainable living environment—an ideal architectural solution that aligns with the green living trend and fosters a strong connection with nature in modern urban settings.Save this picture! Project gallerySee allShow less About this officeDA VÀNG studioOffice••• MaterialGlassMaterials and TagsPublished on April 17, 2025Cite: "Crystal Pavilion House / DA VÀNG studio" 17 Apr 2025. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1029152/crystal-pavilion-house-da-vang-studio&gt ISSN 0719-8884Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否 You've started following your first account!Did you know?You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream

Nature, Published online: 16 April 2025; doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08822-5Receptor-binding specificity of a bovine influenza A virus

i tried getting it as close as possible, how could I improve it? submitted by /u/Limeelight664 [link] [comments]