Today marks the launch of Mashable Say More, a video podcast where Mashable staffers interview your favorite actors, writers, directors, and more for long-form interviews that allow us to dig into their careers, latest projects, and internet obsessions. Hosted by Mashable Entertainment Editor Kristy Puchko and Senior Creative Producer Mark Stetson, this weekly video series kicks off with interviews with Fear Street and Goosebumps author R.L. Stine to talk about Netflix's new slasher, Fear Street: Prom Queen, and director Matt Wolf, to dig into his critically heralded documentary Pee-wee as Himself. A spinoff of Leigh Janiak's 2021 Fear Street trilogy, Fear Street: Prom Queen is co-written and directed by Matt Palmer. A more direct adaptation of Stine's adored YA horror novels, this movie is set in 1988 Shadyside, where a cloaked killer is knocking off would-be prom queens ahead of prom. Who will take the crown, and who will get the axe? You'll have to tune in to find out. In his interview, Stine was more interested in talking about his writing process, his funny fandom, and what drives him. Plus, his pitch-perfect comedic timing got the Mashable crew into a giggle fit. Speaking of giggle fits, Pee-wee as Himself is a two-part doc that explores the man behind the '80s icon, the late Paul Reubens. The American performer died before the film was wrapped, yet Wolf persevered to create a complex and empathetic portrait of Reubens that invites audiences not only to understand him, but perhaps to better understand ourselves. Wolf and Puchko got personal talking Pee-wee, relating on how Reubens' discussion of his own queerness shaped Pee-wee's Playhouse. Plus, Wolf offers his recommendations to dive down a Pee-wee Herman rabbit hole. Mashable Say More will have new episodes every Friday, viewable on Mashable and Youtube. You can subscribe to our podcast feed anywhere you download podcasts. Kristy Puchko Kristy Puchko is the Entertainment Editor at Mashable. Based in New York City, she's an established film critic and entertainment reporter who has traveled the world on assignment, covered a variety of film festivals, co-hosted movie-focused podcasts, and interviewed a wide array of performers and filmmakers.

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.—Google Beam does something uncanny to a 65-inch display: It transforms it into a strange sort of window through which the person to whom you’re speaking appears not as a two-dimensional pack of pixels but as a 3D, holographic image floating in front of the display.Google first showed off what was then called Project Starline at I/O 2021, itself staged as a virtual event due to the pandemic. Almost three years after starting tests with such firms as T-Mobile and Salesforce, the company is now ready to commercialize this technology. Last year, Google announced that HP would bring the first Beam system to market, a partnership CEO Sundar Pichai touted in I/O's two-hour keynote this week. On Wednesday afternoon, I got to take a look at prototype hardware in a booth at the show. The six cameras around a large screen sets Beam apart from typical video conferencing. (Google didn't allow photos.) But then I connected to a Google product manager sitting in front of another Beam setup elsewhere on its campus, and it was as if he had just sat down across the table. Or as if the screen had inflated to a sphere with him at its most forward part.Google accomplishes this by using what it calls a “state-of-the-art AI volumetric video model” to fuse the input from those six cameras into output shown on that light-field screen. That extremely high-resolution display technology shows slightly different images to each eye that create a 3D effect without your having to strap on the kind of glasses required for 3D TVs.Light field isn’t a new concept; the startup Lytro tried to commercialize the technology in its cameras starting in 2012, and firms such as San Jose-based Light Field Lab are working on their own display implementations of it. But Google and HP bring much deeper pockets and corporate customers with the budgets that might accommodate what must be an expensive rig.(Google’s I/O post about Beam says HP will reveal more details at the InfoComm trade show in Orlando next month. Google suggests Beam will need at least 30Mbps of bandwidth, which is less than I would have guessed.)Recommended by Our EditorsBeam will not be a Google-only product, supporting Zoom as well as Google Meet; the latter will include the near-real-time language translation that Google showed off at I/O.Despite a presumably massive amount of computation and bandwidth needed, the audio and video stayed in sync throughout this roughly five-minute session. (“Call” seems inadequate to describe the experience.) But I also noticed some glitches around the edges of my interlocutor’s appearance.For example, when he picked up a green apple, a part of a Starline demo we took in at last year’s I/O, parts of his fingers shimmered around it and the spaces between the apple and his hand blurred. Then I noticed a small green shimmer on his neck that roughly matched where the fruit’s shiny surface could have been reflected on his skin. Beam also seems sensitive to your own placement between its cameras, which can allow for some in-call mischief. Leaning too far to one side or the other yielded an onscreen alert to center myself, a reminder that this is built for chats between individual people. And reaching one arm too far to one side or the other results in your hand appearing to be cut off, with only the virtual background behind where that appendage should have been.And if you reach behind you, you will appear and pierce that wall with your hand. Beam supports virtual backgrounds, although the one for this call was the most boring kind of flat gray possible.The whole effect, however, was realistic enough that a handshake seemed in order instead of the now-traditional Zoom wave. We could not do that, but we could do the closest approximation of a high-five that I’ve ever seen possible on a video call.

Posted on : May 23, 2025 By Tech World Times Fintech  Rate this post In today’s fast-evolving financial landscape, investors are presented with more options than ever before. From innovative fintech platforms to traditional brokerage firms, the choices for managing and growing your investment portfolio are abundant. One of the newest contenders in this arena is Money6x.com, a digital platform that aims to revolutionize the way people invest. But how does it really compare to tried-and-tested traditional brokerages? In this article, we’ll break down the strengths and weaknesses of each to help you decide which approach best suits your financial goals. Understanding Money6x.com Money6x dot com positions itself as a next-generation investment platform. With a focus on technology-driven solutions, it promises users an intuitive interface, cutting-edge tools, and potentially higher returns. It markets itself primarily to younger, tech-savvy investors who are looking for more control, transparency, and speed in their financial decisions. Key Features of Money6x.com: User-Friendly Dashboard: The platform boasts an easy-to-navigate interface that helps users manage portfolios effortlessly. AI-Based Investment Insights: It uses artificial intelligence to offer predictive analytics and market trend forecasts. Low Fees: Money6x.com generally charges lower fees than traditional brokerages, making it attractive to cost-conscious investors. Automated Portfolios: For those who prefer a hands-off approach, it offers robo-advisory features to manage investments automatically. Real-Time Analytics: Users get access to live data, alerts, and performance metrics. Traditional Brokerages: A Proven Track Record Traditional brokerage firms like Charles Schwab, Fidelity, and TD Ameritrade have decades of experience and a broad customer base. They offer a wide range of services, including in-depth research reports, one-on-one advisory support, and retirement planning. Key Features of Traditional Brokerages: Human Advisors: Clients can speak with certified financial advisors to receive personalized advice. Comprehensive Services: Beyond investing, these firms often offer banking, insurance, estate planning, and more. Established Reputation: These institutions have a long history and are often seen as safer and more reliable. Educational Resources: They provide extensive learning materials, webinars, and tutorials for all levels of investors. Diverse Investment Options: From mutual funds and ETFs to real estate and fixed income, traditional brokerages cover all asset classes. Comparing the Two: A Side-by-Side Breakdown FeatureMoney6x.comTraditional BrokeragesUser ExperienceTech-savvy, app-based, intuitiveMore complex, sometimes outdated UIFees and CostsLow or zero commissionHigher fees, advisory chargesInvestment GuidanceAI and robo-advisorsHuman advisors and comprehensive planningEducational ToolsLimited, more data-drivenExtensive learning resourcesPersonalizationAlgorithm-basedPersonalized by financial expertsSpeed and FlexibilityHigh; real-time trading and analyticsMedium; depends on advisor availabilityRegulatory AssuranceNewer, less establishedHeavily regulated and trusted Which Is Better for Your Portfolio? The answer depends largely on your investing style, experience level, and financial objectives. Here are a few scenarios to consider: You might prefer Money6x if: You’re a self-directed investor who enjoys researching and making decisions independently. You want to minimize costs and optimize returns. You are comfortable using digital platforms and tools. You prefer immediate access to data and execution. You might prefer a traditional brokerage if: You require hand-holding or personalized financial advice. You value a diversified set of financial services (insurance, estate planning, etc.). You are investing for long-term goals like retirement and want a trusted advisor. You are not tech-savvy or prefer human interaction. For many modern investors, a hybrid approach might be best. Using Money6x.com for agile, short-term trades and a traditional brokerage for long-term, strategic planning could provide the best of both worlds. Risk and Reliability When choosing any financial service, safety and security are top concerns. Traditional brokerages are typically members of regulatory bodies like FINRA and SIPC, which means investments are insured up to certain limits. Money6x.com, being a newer platform, may not yet have the same level of regulatory backing, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s less safe. Many fintech platforms employ strong encryption, secure APIs, and two-factor authentication. However, always check whether the platform is registered and what kind of investor protections are in place. Technology and Innovation One of the biggest draws of Money6x.com is its focus on technology. From AI-driven insights to mobile-first design, it appeals to investors who want to stay ahead of the curve. The platform often integrates with other fintech tools like budgeting apps and crypto wallets, providing a more holistic view of financial health. In contrast, traditional brokerages have been slower to adapt. While many have made strides in improving their apps and online dashboards, they often lag behind in terms of innovation and integration. Final Verdict Choosing between Money6x.com and a traditional brokerage depends on your individual needs, comfort level with technology, and investment strategy. If you’re seeking speed, low fees, and advanced analytics, Money6x.com might be the ideal fit. On the other hand, if you value in-depth guidance, a wide array of financial services, and human interaction, a traditional brokerage could serve you better. Ultimately, both platforms have their advantages, and there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Diversifying your approach, much like diversifying your portfolio, may offer the most balanced outcome. FAQs Q1: Is Money6x.com safe to use for investing? Yes, but ensure it is regulated and uses strong security features. Check for SSL encryption and two-factor authentication.Q2: Are traditional brokerages better for retirement planning? Generally, yes. They offer personalized planning, tax strategies, and long-term financial advice.Q3: Can I use both Money6x.com and a traditional brokerage? Absolutely. Many investors use both to leverage the strengths of each.Q4: Does Money6x.com offer human advisory services? It primarily uses robo-advisors and AI tools. It may not offer direct human financial advice.Q5: Which is more cost-effective, Money6x.com or traditional brokerages? Money6x.com usually has lower fees, making it more cost-effective for active traders and budget-conscious investors.Tech World TimesTech World Times (TWT), a global collective focusing on the latest tech news and trends in blockchain, Fintech, Development & Testing, AI and Startups. If you are looking for the guest post then contact at techworldtimes@gmail.com

html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd" Boris FX has released Continuum 2025.5, the latest version of its set of effects plugins for compositing and editing software.The update adds an AI-based masking and tracking system, new AI tools for generating depth and ST maps and fixing bad frames, and updates Particle Illusion, Title Studio and the FX Editor. The prices of both perpetual licenses and subscriptions to Continuum have also risen since the previous release, particularly for OFX host applications like DaVinci Resolve and Nuke. More new AI-based tools for common editing and compositing tasks Boris FX began to add AI features to Continuum in its 2024 releases, beginning with machine learning-based filters for denoising, upresing and retiming video.In Continuum 2025.0, they were joined by machine-learning-based filters for generating motion blur, and obscuring car license plates in footage. New AI-based mask-generation and tracking system To that, Continuum 2025.5 adds the new AI-based object masking and tracking toolset from Mocha, Boris FX’s planar tracking software, the core tech from which is integrated into Sapphire.The Object Brush ML feature makes it possible to isolate objects in a single frame of footage simply by clicking inside them, with Continuum automatically generating a corresponding mask. The selection can be refined by selecting extra parts of the image to include or exclude, or by painting areas in or out manually. The Matte Assist ML feature automatically propagates a mask throughout a shot, tracking the object selected and generating animated mattes matching its changing outline. New AI tools for generating depth and ST maps, and fixing glitches in footage The release also adds three other new AI tools: BCC+ Depth Map ML, BCC+ ST Map, and BCC+ Frame Fixer ML.BCC+ Depth Map ML automatically generates depth maps from video footage, based on objects’ distance from the camera, making it easier to add fog and haze, or fake rack focus. Users have a choice of two ML models, one tuned for performance, and one for detail. BCC+ ST Map generates ST Maps, often used to encode lens distortion data, making it easier to distort or undistort video footage, or to convert it from rectilinear to 360° formats. BCC+ Frame Fixer ML automatically fixes ‘bad’ frames in footage: for example, those with scratches or tape degradation, or with flash photography changing the lighting of the subject. You have to identify the bad frames manually, but processing is automatic. According to Boris FX, the filter can also be used to fix dropped frames, and even to hide jump cuts. Updates to Witness Protection ML and Retimer ML Updates to existing AI tools include a Smoothing Level control for the BCC+ Witness Protection ML filter, used to obscure people’s faces automatically in source footage.BCC+ Retimer ML now supports retiming footage with variable frame rates, although only in Adobe host apps. The AI models used by the tools also now load faster on first use in a work session. Improvements to the FX Editor, Particle Illusion and Title Generator Of the non-AI features, the FX Editor, for editing effects and presets, gets performance and workflow improvements, with “2x speed improvements” when playing back 4K footage. Particle generator Particle Illusion gets workflow improvements including the option to save camera animation presets, and an updated emitter library. The 8,000 x 8,000px limit in 3D titling plugin Title Studio has been removed, making it possible to work up to the maximum resolution supported by the host application. There are also over 100 new presets for filters, and support for a “full set” of blend modes in BCC+ Vignette. Prices up, particularly for OFX licenses Boris FX has also raised the price of the plugins since the release of Continuum 2025.0.The software is priced according to host application, so the exact figures vary, but for After Effects and Premiere Pro, the cost of a perpetual license rises by $100, to $1,095. For OFX applications, including DaVinci Resolve and Nuke, the cost of a perpetual license rises by $400, also to $1,095. For all available hosts, the price rises by $200, to $2,195. The price of subscriptions is also up, with After Effects and Premiere Pro subscriptions rising by $11/month, to $48/month; and by $30/year, to $325/year. OFX subscriptions rise by $23/month, to $48/month; and by $130/year, to $325/year. For all hosts, subscriptions rise by $25/month, to $112/month, and by $70/year, to $765/year. Pricing and system requirements Continuum 2025.5 is compatible with a range of compositing and editing software, including After Effects, DaVinci Resolve and Nuke, on Windows 10+ or macOS 10.15+.It is priced according to host application, with new perpetual licences costing from $365 to $2,195. Subscriptions cost from $215/year to $765/year. Read an overview of the new features in Continuum 2025.5 on Boris FX’s website Read a full list of new features in Continuum 2025.5 in the release notes (Adobe edition) Have your say on this story by following CG Channel on Facebook, Instagram and X (formerly Twitter). As well as being able to comment on stories, followers of our social media accounts can see videos we don’t post on the site itself, including making-ofs for the latest VFX movies, animations, games cinematics and motion graphics projects.

This Deposit of ‘Weird’ Cretaceous Amber Could Reveal Hints to Long-Forgotten Tsunamis in Japan A new study highlights the potential of amber fossils to capture evidence of powerful, prehistoric ocean waves A tsunami might have occured some 115 million years ago, near where deposits of Cretaceous amber were found in Japan. Wikimedia Commons under CC0 1.0 Scientists in Japan have uncovered amber deposits that may hold elusive evidence of tsunamis that occurred between 114 million and 116 million years ago. Their findings were published in the journal Scientific Reports last week. The researchers stumbled upon the amber—fossilized tree resin—by chance while collecting rocks from a sand mine in Hokkaido, an island in northern Japan. The deposit would have been on the seafloor when it was formed during the Cretaceous period. “We found a weird form of amber,” says lead author Aya Kubota, a geologist at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology in Japan, to Katherine Kornei at Science News. The scientists analyzed the resin with a technique called fluorescence imaging, in which they snapped photos of the remains under ultraviolet light. This helped them see how the amber was separated by layers of dark sediment, creating shapes known as “flame structures.” The unusual pattern arises when soft amber deforms before completely hardening. “Generally, they will form when a denser layer gets deposited on top of a softer layer,” says Carrie Garrison-Laney, a geologist at Washington Sea Grant who was not involved in the study, to Science News. The researchers suggest this is evidence that the resin rapidly traveled from land while it was still malleable and solidified underwater. A tsunami could be what swept the trees from land to the ocean so quickly, the study authors write. If true, this could offer scientists a potential new technique for finding prehistoric tsunamis. “Identifying tsunamis is generally challenging,” Kubota explains to Live Science’s Olivia Ferrari in an email. Tsunami deposits are easily eroded by the environment, and they can also be hard to distinguish from deposits caused by other storms. But in this case, “by combining detailed field observations with the internal structures of amber, we were able to conclude that the most plausible cause was tsunamis.” Cretaceous amber deposits (a, b, d, e) and fossilized driftwood (c) examined in the study Kubota, Aya et al., Scientific Reports, 2025, under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Other evidence also bolsters the researchers’ conclusion: A massive, nearby landslide offers a sign that an earthquake may have occurred around the same time the amber formed, and displaced mud and tree trunks were found in the same sediments—all signs of a violent tsunami. The trunks didn’t show any signs of erosion by shallow water-dwelling marine creatures, suggesting they were carried quickly out to sea. The vegetation found in the fossil deposit suggests multiple tsunamis occurred within the span of two million years, reports Hannah Richter for Science. But Garrison-Laney tells Science News that more evidence is needed to prove the amber is linked to a tsunami. She’s not sure the Cretaceous tree resin would have stayed soft once it hit the cold ocean water. “That seems like a stretch to me,” she tells the publication, adding that research on more of the area’s amber deposit will be needed to confirm the findings. With further study, scientists could use amber-rich sediments as a way to identify tsunamis throughout history. “Resin offers a rare, time-sensitive snapshot of depositional processes,” Kubota tells Live Science. Previously, scientists have found tiny crustaceans, prehistoric mollusks and even hell ants encased in the orangey resin, a window into worlds past. Now, “the emerging concept of ‘amber sedimentology’ holds exciting potential to provide unique insights into sedimentological processes,” Kubota adds to Live Science. Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday. More about: Fossils Japan New Research Oceans Tsunami

Welcome to The Full Nerd newsletter—your weekly dose of hardcore hardware talk from the enthusiasts at PCWorld. In it, we dig into the hottest topics from our YouTube show, plus hot tidbits seen across the web. This week, we crack open local Taiwanese beers while chatting about Computex—grab a cold one of your own (or maybe some Kuai Kuai chips?) as you join us on this fine Friday! Want this newsletter to come directly to your inbox? Sign up on our website! In this episode of The Full Nerd… In this episode of The Full Nerd, it’s all things Computex! Live from Taiwan, Adam Patrick Murray joins up with Jeff of CraftComputing, Paul of Paul’s Hardware, and Nick of GearSeekers to chat about the highs and lows of their week. With Computex 2025 being a pretty sleepy show, the guys have a more casual two-hour discussion, with more than one tangent about an enthusiast hot topic near and dear to the individual’s heart. AI and enterprise servers benefitting us consumers? Nvidia’s hijinks for RTX 5060 review timing? Worst of Computex? Best of Computex? Yep, those are all covered. And a lot more, too. Finishing out Computex strong.Willis Lai / Foundry I literally did a double-take when Paul described this Computex’s vibe as the “enterprise sector being all sexy.” What? And yet, somehow, the tech industry’s latest favorite buzzword could mean good things for consumers. As Jeff explains that AI’s effect on enterprise servers could have benefits for us at home—like if the bubble bursts and suddenly all that hardware makes it our way. Or as Adam shares from a talk with SilverStone, we could see more powerful cooling solutions get adapted over, like thick radiators. There’s a muscle build waiting to happen. Is it a resistance? Or is a reprisal? PC reviewers are upset about Nvidia’s review practices—namely, its decisions for its release of its new RTX 5060 graphics card. Sure, reviewers got samples in hand before the launch, but not a pre-release driver—and the launch happened during Computex. In other words? The inability to run numbers in a timely fashion, meaning potential buyers couldn’t make informed decisions when considering this new 50-series GPU. Should reviewers complain about not having functional free cards before launch? It’s not that simple, says Nick. He points out a review sample isn’t free, since so much work goes into running numbers and presenting the data. Readers and viewers expect to have information to guide them, and when reviewers can’t provide it, it’s problematic. Aesthetics vs performance—an age-old question, and one that bubbles up as Adam kicks off the Computex disappointments by naming the Hyte X50 & X50 Air. (He’s very wrong. The X50 in red is going to look so good on my desk.) Jeff pushes back, willing to sacrifice a few percent for the joy of looking at something he likes. More disappointing to him? Corsair Air 5400D, the company’s first triple-chamber case that has no panel on one side. And blocks the installation of additional PCI-e add-in cards. But that’s not the only thing that baffled the guys—Paul and Nick have their own nits to pick, too. (You’ll have to watch the episode for that pun’s context!) I’m fully on-board with Paul’s pick for best in show. In fact, I may have decided on my own top pick for PCWorld’s Best of Computex roundup after watching his report from G.Skill’s booth. Memory DIMMs may not sound racy, but a set in neon yellow and neon orange can make you reconsider. (I prefer the sparkly silver concept finish. Speaking of, go tell G.Skill you like it too, so it becomes a thing.) But no one can rival Adam’s enthusiasm for his top pick. In fact, he waxes so poetic about scented thermal paste that I’m slightly reconsidering my stance against it. Still don’t think I’d build with it, but okay, I guess I could at least see it in person. Not sure about that baby-diaper smelling one, though. But these topics aren’t the whole of the conversation. Strap in for chatter about AMD’s Radeon strategy, the level of consumer interest in power efficiency (it’s the U.S. vs the rest of the world), fab capacity, and more. Bummed you missed the live show? Subscribe now to The Full Nerd YouTube channel, and activate notifications. We also answer viewer questions in real-time!  And if you need more hardware talk during the rest of the week, come join our Discord community—it’s full of cool, laid-back nerds. This week’s best nerd news Some things should be left in the past. Or at least made with aluminum and a shiny clear coat.Foundry Hardware, software, we love all the cool stuff meant for nerdy brains. This week is chock full of Computex reveals—which are especially exciting because unlike CES, you can mostly count on seeing these products arrive on retail shelves. The only wrinkle? Pricing may not be certain for U.S. residents, due to ongoing fluctuations with tariffs. Get an AMD RX 9060 XT, not Nvidia’s RTX 5060 Ti? AMD claims its upcoming Radeon graphics card costs less and performs better than the Nvidia RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti. If reviews agree, this $350 card will be a boon for mid-range gamers upon its June 5 release. Microsoft dropped a PC into coolant designed by AI: I have my doubts about AI’s usefulness, but this experiment at Microsoft Build was pretty dang cool. There was even a demo of Forza Motorsport played on the submersed hardware! SilverStone made a throwback beige PC case: I’m going to catch heat from the internet (and my coworkers) for this, but I hated the beige boxes of the 1990s and still do. However, this retro-style case does come with a lock. And a Turbo button. Hmm. Cooler Master’s all-metal case fan is metal as heck: Its Masterfan XT Pro can hit such a high RPM (4,000) that the product has to ship with a fin grill for safety. But only on the front. Watch your fingers. Noctua brings brown town to AIO coolers: A special kind of person loves Noctua’s signature color scheme (truly, one of our Discord server members is like this and he’s a gem). Now you’ll no longer need to choose between love for water cooling and for so much brown and tan. A split mechanical gaming keyboard for the masses!: An ergonomic keyboard that doesn’t feel gross when typing? And also a gaming keyboard? Sign me up. Y’all, this thing can be tented. (Vertical pitch makes this kind of design way more comfy.) I want Hyte’s X50 case very badly: I mentioned how much I want one in red, right? Adam’s so wrong about the bubbly edges. It’s so refreshing among a sea of sharp-edged boxy cases. AMD is dropping a 96-core Threadripper CPU: For when you crave workstation performance but not workstation prices. Ninety-six cores and 128 threads. That’s all for this week—for all my fellow U.S. residents, enjoy the long holiday weekend! -Alaina This newsletter is dedicated to the memory of Gordon Mah Ung, founder and host of The Full Nerd, and executive editor of hardware at PCWorld. Want The Full Nerd newsletter to come directly to your inbox every Friday morning? Sign up on our website!

Logitech's flagship gaming mouse gets limited-time 31% discount at Amazon

FromSoftware and A24 to produce Elden Ring adaptation Ex Machina writer and director Alex Garland to helm the film, George R. R. Martin on board as producer Image credit: FromSoftware News by Sophie McEvoy Staff Writer Published on May 23, 2025 FromSoftware has partnered with A24 to produce a film adaptation of Elden Ring. Ex Machina and Annihilation director Alex Garland has been signed on to direct. He's also known for writing 28 Days Later and Sunshine, in addition to the upcoming 28 Years Later and its sequel The Bone Temple. Author George R. R. Martin, who provided worldbuilding for Elden Ring, is on board to produce. Peter Rice and Vince Gerardis are also producing, alongside Andrew Macdonald and Allon Reich from DNA Films. Last year, Martin teased a potential adaptation or TV series of the game. "Oh, and about those rumours you may have heard about a feature film or a television series based on Elden Ring… I have nothing to say," he wrote in a blog post. "Not a word, nope, not a thing, I know nothing, you never heard a peep from me, mum mum mum. What rumour?" FromSoftware's president Hidetaka Miyazaki also spoke about the potential adaptation during an interview with The Guardian. "I don't see any reason to deny another interpretation or adaptation of Elden Ring, a movie for example," said Miyazaki. "But I don't think myself, or FromSoftware, have the knowledge or ability to produce something in a different medium. So that's where a very strong partner would come into play. "We'd have to build a lot of trust and agreement on whatever it is we're trying to achieve, but there's interest, for sure." Elden Ring isn't the only game adaptation in the works at A24, as it's also co-producing a Death Stranding movie with Kojima Productions. A Quiet Place: Day One's Michael Sarnoski is reportedly signed on to direct.

TechTarget and Informa Tech’s Digital Business Combine.TechTarget and InformaTechTarget and Informa Tech’s Digital Business Combine.Together, we power an unparalleled network of 220+ online properties covering 10,000+ granular topics, serving an audience of 50+ million professionals with original, objective content from trusted sources. We help you gain critical insights and make more informed decisions across your business priorities.FTC concedes defeat in appeal over Microsoft merger with Activision BlizzardFTC concedes defeat in appeal over Microsoft merger with Activision Blizzard'The public interest is best served by dismissing the administrative litigation in this case.'Chris Kerr, Senior Editor, NewsMay 23, 20252 Min ReadImage via MicrosoftThe Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has finally halted its attempts to block Microsoft's colossal $69 billion merger with Call of Duty maker Activision Blizzard.It's a notable development that brings a protracted regulatory dispute to a close. Since Microsoft announced its intention to acquire Activision Blizzard in 2022, the FTC made repeated attempts to snuff out the deal in the United States.The latest and seemingly final chapter in the high-profile skirmish comes after the FTC failed to convince a lower court to issue a preliminary injunction blocking the deal. It subsequently appealed that decision but was again rebuffed earlier this month.In a new court filing shared by Microsoft president Brad Smith on X, the FTC confirmed it has now thrown in the towel."The Commission has determined that the public interest is best served by dismissing the administrative litigation in this case," reads the filing. "Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the Complaint in this matter be, and it hereby is dismissed."Smith described the move as a "victory for players across the country" and said Microsoft is "grateful" to the FTC for the announcement. FTC taps out of monumental regulatory battle with MicrosoftAlthough the merger was eventually completed in 2023, that didn't stop the FTC from appealing the move—although Microsoft repeatedly overcame the regulator's challenges.Related:The FTC initially argued the merger would give Microsoft a significant competitive edge over rivals like PlayStation and Nintendo by allowing it to turn major franchises like Call of Duty into platform exclusives.Microsoft, however, penned multiple agreements with its competitors prior to the deal going through to ensure Call of Duty would remain on platforms like PlayStation for the next decade.Since the merger was completed, Microsoft has ported other major first-party titles to PlayStation including Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, Forza Horizon 5, Gears of War: Reloaded, and Senua's Saga: Hellblade II.The Xbox maker has also laid off thousands of workers over the past two years, initially cutting 1,900 roles in January 2024—just months after completing the merger—before slashing another 650 jobs later that year. Read more about:XboxActivision BlizzardM&AAbout the AuthorChris KerrSenior Editor, News, GameDeveloper.comGame Developer news editor Chris Kerr is an award-winning journalist and reporter with over a decade of experience in the game industry. His byline has appeared in notable print and digital publications including Edge, Stuff, Wireframe, International Business Times, and PocketGamer.biz. Throughout his career, Chris has covered major industry events including GDC, PAX Australia, Gamescom, Paris Games Week, and Develop Brighton. He has featured on the judging panel at The Develop Star Awards on multiple occasions and appeared on BBC Radio 5 Live to discuss breaking news.See more from Chris KerrDaily news, dev blogs, and stories from Game Developer straight to your inboxStay UpdatedYou May Also Like

President Donald Trump has threatened Apple with a tariff of “at least 25 percent” just for its iPhones unless it moves production to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhone’s that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the U.S. Thank your for your attention to this matter!” The threat comes a week after Trump declared that he’d “had a little problem with Tim Cook,” following reports that Apple intends to source all of its US iPhones from India, which will require ramping up Indian production. Just yesterday the Financial Times reported that FoxConn, Apple’s main manufacturer, is developing a $1.5 billion plant in southern India’s Chennai to supply iPhone displays. Apple has been diversifying its production for several years, which was accelerated by both covid and US animosity towards China. India is currently subject to the “baseline” 10 percent tariff that applies worldwide, while China is at a higher 30 percent rate, though that could rise substantially in August once a 90-day reduction in rates lifts. Phones, and most of Apple’s other products, are exempt from the majority of those rates anyway, but the ongoing uncertainty gives Apple good reason to continue expanding production outside China. While Apple has pledged to invest $500 billion in the US over the next four years (and CEO Cook personally invested $1 million in Trump’s inauguration fund), it’s widely acknowledged by industry experts that a “Made in America” iPhone isn’t realistic. As Steve Jobs reportedly told Barack Obama in 2011: “Those jobs aren’t coming back.”