Nicola Prentis doesn't enjoy spending time messaging on dating apps and prefers to meet in person.She created a poll on Hinge to help her find men who are happy to meet face-to-face early on.The poll is helping her find spontaneous men who have time to go on dates.I've noticed that people on dating apps tend to fall into two categories: "messagers" and "meeters." The first kind wants to message for a while to make sure there's enough common ground to meet up in person. The second type is like me, people who want to meet face-to-face as soon as possible. For me, that's the only way to tell if there's a connection worth investing time in. After a two-year break from dating apps, the one thing I was sure of when I downloaded Hinge in 2024 was that I wanted to spend as little time chatting on the app as possible. My previous experiences with lengthy text conversations that dragged on for weeks, only to fizzle out or lead to disappointing dates, had left me thoroughly burned out on online dating.In the past, I only brought up the idea of meeting in person when it felt natural.But even that was often a waste of time, as a lot of men never seemed interested in an actual date. Maybe they were married, or maybe they used dating apps as an ego boost or for entertainment on their phones. I run my own company and work from home, which offers few opportunities to meet people organically, so I view online dating as a shortcut to real-life dating, not a replacement for it.To cut to the chase sooner, I've started using one of Hinge's prompts the poll option and it's proving efficient at getting me the matches I want. The poll is simple but effective at getting to an IRL dateThe poll reads: Do you want to meeta) Today?b) Tomorrow?c) Swap "How are you?" messages for weeks on end?If someone votes for either of the first two options, I always make it a match and reply. Best of all, I can get straight to the point and make arrangements for how to meet instead of wasting time in chit-chat. Dating coaches and matchmakers told Business Insider that it's important to ask pre-date questions to ensure safety and compatibilitybefore agreeing to meet in person. Suggestions included asking for their last name and looking it up on LinkedIn to confirm their age and occupation, as well as hopping on a phone call before the first date. I only ever meet in busy public places to keep myself safe.As I've found that a lot of guys I've spoken to don't really read profiles, a poll works because it spotlights the fact that I prefer to meet than chat. It's not perfect I don't think any method on a dating app ever could be. But, so far, I've ended up meeting over half the guys who took the initiative to vote, successfully avoiding endless messaging.It's true that some people vote and never reply. But one of the best things about this approach is that I've invested nothing. I barely notice if they disappear before we meet. My method helps repel the wrong guysIt might seem like my poll signals that I'm only looking for hookups, but so far, that's not been my experience. A possible downside is that I live in a major tourist destination, so I often get men who are just passing through on vacation. But that doesn't bother me. It reminds me of the years I spent traveling and how life-enriching it can be to meet someone you hit it off with instantly, even if your paths only cross for a few hours. In fact, one hiking date led to drinks that same evening. It went so well that I'm now planning to visit him on the third date. To my surprise, some men choose the third option of sending endless text messages. At first, I thought it was their way of jokily showing they got my point and were on board. But no. Nine times out of 10, those guys weren't proactive about meeting, so now I skip them completely. An unintended benefit of the poll is it makes me much less of a target for scammers and married men. After all, both always have excuses for why they can't meet in real life.So far, I've been going on dates with spontaneous action-takers who prefer to do something rather than just talk about doing it. Crucially, they actually have time in their lives for dating and prioritise it. All of these qualities are what I'm looking for, and mercifully, they mean I spend a maximum of 15 minutes a week on the app. Got a personal essay about dating that you want to share? Get in touch with the editor: akarplus@businessinsider.com.

Stop-motion animation is a prospect challenging enough for any studio, even Aardman, which has been pioneering the form for decades at this point. But what happens when you decide to bring back a villain whos famous for not being able to say a single word, can barely move any part of their face, and mostly gets by by standing around and blinking? That has been one of the most challenging aspects really, of the whole movie, Nick Park recently told Inverse about the decision to bring back Feathers McGraw, the villain of Wallace & Gromits second TV outing, The Wrong Trousers, decades later for Vengeance Most Fowl, now streaming worldwide on Netflix. At least Gromit has a brow he can move up. He can understand thoughts more clearly. Its all about the simplicity of how Feathers moves, the deliberate and small movements. A look here, a blink. Minimalism, really. As Park explained, Wallace & Gromit is no stranger to silent characters, given that the titular second half of the duo is a dog who cant talk. But Gromit is still surprisingly articulate: his ears can move, his eyes are similar to any other human characters, he can move different parts of his face, and has full hands, feet, and even a neck to move his body about with and express his emotions clearly to the audience. Feathers, on the other hand, is a tiny stylized penguin (occasionally disguised as a rooster). His eyes are tiny beads, his entire body is shaped like a bottle. If Feathers wants to use body language, hes got his flippers, which are restricted in their own ways, and then hes got moving his whole body at once. And yet, in bothWrong Trousers andVengeance Most Fowl, he remains utterly charming, occasionally sinister, and still completely communicable to the audience. Despite there being over three decades time between his on-screen appearances, the techniques Park (and now hisVengeance Most Fowl co-director, Merlin Crossingham) used to make Feathers feel akin to any other character inWallace & Gromit have remained the same. We use camera moves, the sound, Crossingham explained. Hes a very cinematic character because we rely, as filmmakers, on all those tricks to make him the hero/villain that you see and love to hate.The more things change, the more some things stay the same. But forWallace & Gromit, and Aardman more generally, it speaks to the timelessness of the craft involved in this kind of traditional hand animation. Back when Toy Story first came out in the 90s, a studio like us, were thinking, Oh, boy, how long do we have left? Park concluded. But we kept going. As long as youre telling good stories, compelling stories with compelling characters, then its just the technique really. All these years later, Feathers remains as compelling as he has ever beenand still up to those same cinematic tricks.Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl is now streaming on Netflix. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, whats next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

During their prime, the Vikings mastered the seas and went on to make wide-spanning voyages by boat. But how exactly did they know where they were going? A recent study, focused on a set of medieval stone disks found in Ukraine, supports the belief that Viking sailors used solar compasses to navigate and may have passed on this knowledge to other populations in Europe.The appraisal of the eight stone disks was featured in a December 2024 paper published in Sprawozdania Archeologiczne, a Polish archeological journal. The studys authors contend that some of the disks display key features that would have used the sun to operate as a compass, sharing similarities with other Viking artifacts originating from Greenland and Poland.Identifying the Medieval DisksThe disks, found in several medieval-era archaeological sites in Ukraine, were originally crafted from pyrophyllite, a soft and easy-to-process mineral used for many industrial purposes during the period. The researchers concentrated on three of the disks that already had detailed descriptions: two from the northern Chernihiv region (referred to as Listven and Liubech) and one from nearby Kyiv. The disks were dated from the 12th and 13th centuries, and they were most likely local products made in workshops near the city of Ovruch.Previous interpretations of these objects have ranged from calendars to needle-sharpening devices, but the new study proposes that they were instead used as navigational tools.One reason for this is the disks design, with the Kyiv and Listven disks featuring a central hole that could hold the gnomon the pointy component of a sundial that casts a shadow when hit with sunlight. This would help determine latitude in the case of a compass. In addition, concentric rings and radial lines were carved into the three disks, further demonstrating the semblance of a compass.Similarities Among Viking Solar CompassesThe researchers compared the pyrophyllite disks with other artifacts that have been identified as navigational instruments used by Vikings. Of particular importance are wooden disks, including one from Greenland found in 1948 and one from the Polish island of Wolin found in 2000. These wooden disks contained elements characteristic of sundial-compasses, such as a hole for a gnomon and perimeter notches.The wooden disks and the pyrophyllite disks share several features, including certain markings. The Wolin disk, dated to the end of the first half of the 11th century, has concentric rings similar to the pyrophyllite disks. However, the Greenland disk, dated to around the start of the 11th century, does not have concentric rings. The researchers suggest that this could mean concentric rings were not present in early Viking solar compasses, but developed in later versions.All of the disks were also similar sizes the Greenland and Wolin disks were measured at 7 cm and 8.6 cm in diameter respectively; the Kyiv and Listven disks were both 6.5 cm in diameter, while the Liubech disk measured 7.5 cm.Although additional investigations are needed to confirm the role of the pyrophyllite disks, the researchers say it is possible that Vikings who traveled through what is now Russia and Ukraine during medieval times (known as Varangians) could have imparted technological knowledge that allowed locals to create the solar compasses. Varangian travelers would have passed by Kyiv, Listven, and Liubech on their journeys along a major trade route connecting Scandinavia with the Eastern Roman Empire, making the spread of Viking-inspired solar compass technology in the region a real possibility.The Fabled Power of Sun StonesPrevious studies have theorized that Vikings relied heavily on the sun to navigate when sailing and used solar compasses to reach their destinations. The skies needed to be clear for these compasses to reliably work, yet the Vikings may have had a workaround for when the clouds rolled in.Sounding like something straight out of a fantasy novel, old Norse sagas speak of sun stones that could locate the hidden sun when held up to the overcast sky. A sun stone (possibly calcite or cordierite) would have theoretically acted as a sort of filter that determined the direction of polarized light from the sun, which is scattered in the air as it passes through the atmosphere.No concrete evidence of the stones has been found, but scientists have shown that it could have been a viable way of navigating. One 2018 study that conducted computer simulations of Viking voyages from Norway to Greenland using sun stones showed that sky polarization yielded successful navigation rates, even on cloudy days.The Vikings navigation methods arent fully understood, but most signs point toward their use of the sun. Harnessing solar compasses and maybe even sun stones they made it all the way to places like Greenland and Newfoundland, leaving behind bewildering remnants of their culture. Article SourcesOur writers at Discovermagazine.com use peer-reviewed studies and high-quality sources for our articles, and our editors review for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. Review the sources used below for this article:Sprawozdania Archeologiczne. New medieval sun compasses? The problem of the function of stone disks from southern RusBritannica. PyrophylliteBritannica. GnomonVikingeskibsmuseet. Instrument navigation in the Viking Age?Jack Knudson is an assistant editor at Discover with a strong interest in environmental science and history. Before joining Discover in 2023, he studied journalism at the Scripps College of Communication at Ohio University and previously interned at Recycling Today magazine.

The entire microscope can be printed and assembled in under three hours. Credit: Liam RooneyShareResearchers have designed and built the worlds first microscope made entirely from 3D-printed parts. And because the open-source plans are already available online, almost anyone can assemble their own for barely $60.A few years ago, researchers at the University of Bath and University of Cambridge started the OpenFlexure project offering open-source blueprints for 3D-printed microscopes. With its core development group now based at the University of Glasgow, OpenFlexure microscopes have been assembled in over 50 countries around the world, as well as at laboratories in Antarctica. While much cheaper than standard equipment, there was a caveat: a microscopes specially crafted glass lenses often cost hundreds of dollars, putting the tools out of many peoples price range. Recently, however, a team at the University of Strathclyde developed a workaround they say both lowers the OpenFlexure designs total cost, and makes it the first completely 3D-printed microscope.The entire project plans are open-source and available for free. Credit: Liam Rooney Optical microscopy has long been a cornerstone of scientific discovery, driving advances across diverse disciplines from biology and healthcare to materials science, petrochemistry and geology, the team writes in a preprint study for the journal Biology. However [the OpenFlexure microscopes] dependence on commercial optical components limits the accessibility and adaptability that a fully 3D printed microscope could achieve.To solve this issue, researchers built off recent advancements in optical-quality, 3D-printed lenses. They then programmed a Mars 3 Pro 3D printer to use a photopolymerising clear resin to build a lens using the same parameters as an Edmund Optics 12.7 mm diameter plano-convex lens with a 35 mm focal length. The microscope is completely functional once printed and assembled as is, but the designers took their project a step further by installing a store-bought camera and light source controlled using a Raspberry Pi computer processor. But even with the additional components, the entire microscope cost around $60 and took less than three hours to build.a)An image acquired of a Giemsa-stained blood smear. (b)An image of a H&E-stained mouse kidney. The thin section shows structures such as an interlobular arteriole (white arrow) and renal tubules, with a magnified ROI showing the organization of nephrons in a medullary ray spanning the corticomedullary junction. Credit: Biology The first samples examined using their new equipment included a blood smear and a thin section harvested from a mouse kidney. The 6.6 lbs microscopes magnification provided an imaging field view of 1.7 mm with a single cell spatial resolution of around 5 micrometers. Images provided in the study clearly depict individual blood cells, renal tubules, and other sub-cellular anatomical details.[C]onsider the commercial alternative, where a research or clinical grade microscope can be upward of [$18,200] and, in the case of field diagnostics in low-resource settings, presents issues surrounding the availability of instrument servicing and replacement optics or optomechanical parts, researchers explain in the study.Future iterations arent only stuck with this particular lensaccording to the designers, alternative magnifications and apertures are also possible, and will hopefully be explored for different versions of 3D-printed microscopes.

submitted by /u/Few-Visit3765 [link] [comments]

You'll find numerous weapons as you venture forth in Dynasty Warriors: Origins. Curiously enough, it might seem that you're unable to boost a single weapon's strength further, and your only recourse is to find a new one. Thankfully, there are actually ways to further tweak and strengthen your armaments. Here's our guide on how to reforge and upgrade weapons in Dynasty Warriors: Origins.How to reforge and upgrade weapons in Dynasty Warriors: OriginsTo be clear, the Dynasty Warriors: Origins weapon upgrade and reforge function can only be unlocked once you've completed the campaign. So, for the most part, you're likely to just make use of the gear pieces dropped by officers. We don't actually recommend spending gold to buy new equipment.In any case, before we discuss the game's weapon upgrade and reforge mechanics further, we have a couple of related guides that you might want to check out:All unlockable weapons - This guide discusses when certain weapons dropped for us during our playthrough.How long to beat the campaign - This gives you a clear idea on how long it takes to pull a Cody Rhodes by finishing the story. Where to get duplicates for weapon reforging and upgrading?The reforging mechanic can be accessed via any city on the world map. Two options will then appear: Reforge Traits and Reforge Power.Both actions require that you consume/infuse weapons that have the same classification/tier and name, not just the same type. Using Lances as an example, the Marauding Serpent (tier 5) isn't compatible with the Marauding Serpent EX (tier 6). As such, you really need a lot of duplicates.As mentioned, it's best to replay battles so you can pick up all sorts of gear pieces from defeated officers. Buying from the weapons shop is certainly an option, but it's extremely costly, especially since the item you're purchasing will likely be used as infusion fodder. How does reforging power work?Reforging power is fairly straightforward. Select the weapon that needs its power/strength/damage to be boosted, and pick a duplicate that will be used as infusion fodder. The duplicate's upgrade level +1 point will be added to the main weapon.Most weapon upgrade levels are capped at +99. Lastly, note that the cost increases depending on the upgrade level of the gear being destroyed. Here's an example:Main weapon: Cobalt Storm EX +39Duplicate/fodder: Cobalt Storm EX +15Your main weapon gains +16 levels in total. It will become Cobalt Storm EX +55. How does reforging traits work?Reforging traits is a more precise activity, one that you really need to be mindful of. Basically, weapons can roll with multiple random traits/perks. This mechanic allows you to choose specific perks so they can replace the ones you don't need. For example, your preferred weapon has:Extends input window for parries.Boosts damage to officers by 10%.Reduces the charge time for strong attacks.Now, that third one might not be to your liking, so you could opt to change it to another perk that comes from a duplicate. However, bear in mind that this function does not increase the number of perk/trait slots that a weapon initially rolled with. It only allows you to replace one option. As such, it's better to find a weapon that rolled multiple trait slots by default.That does it for our guide on how to reforge and upgrade weapons in Dynasty Warriors: Origins. For more tips, you can head over to our beginner's guide and unlockable weapons guide.From the mountainous regions of the north to the great rivers of the south, you're bound to face numerous foes as you travel across China in Dynasty Warriors: Origins. If you need more help, you can visit our guides hub.

Pochita and Denji have been literally an inseparable duo, considering that Pochita is currently working hard as Denjis heart. Through many trials and tribulations, the two have continued to grow and bond as they found solace in one another, given their tragic backgrounds; one has been living on Earth and the other in Hell.

Forgive the nitpick, but the above is a postmortem, not a design document. Good luck with your game! And welcome to gamedev.net.

When the folks at Exalted Funeral first pitched me on Land of Eem the role-playing game equivalent of how the Muppets might play Dungeons & Dragons I was immediately sold. To my pleasant surprise, the review copy held up its lofty, if whimsical, promise. Land of Eem is great in the same way the best cartoons are: wrapping serious themes in a goofy bow that rewards curiosity and social connections. With a big push for TTRPG clubs at schools and libraries, Land of Eem is a great game to bring to a table of players at any age.Based on the middle grade graphic novel series, Rickety Stitch and the Gelatinous Goo by Eem writers Ben Costa and James Parks, the setting and mechanics of Land of Eem are targeted at players who favor story over combat, as well as younger audiences. The core rules will seem familiar to anyone whos played D&D. There are base attributes (Vim, Vigor, Knack, and Knowhow) that influence skills, which modify skill checks. Instead of rolling a d20, however, the game utilizes the far superior (at least in this journalists humble opinion) d12.The character and party creation process, along with Land of Eems system for players to level up, is where the game truly diverges from its inspiration, D&D. This game is explicit about prioritizing and rewarding creativity, curiosity, and exploration, all while ensuring that the adventurers treat everything they come across as a person with thoughts and feelings even if they end up having to fight them.Land of Eem has six classes that cater toward different styles of play, including the classic Bard and Knight-Errant, the exploring Dungeoneer, the supporting Loyal Chum, the magical Gnome, and (my personal favorite) the scoundrel-like Rascal. It also has 16 unique Folk (its term for species) which run the gamut of whimsical little guys. And yes, importantly, you can play a frog person or even a Muppet-looking humanoid.Character creation emphasizes that building out a well-rounded character with ideals, flaws, personal goals, and relationships to every other party member isnt just going to make the game better its how your character will level up. Taking from the tradition of story gaming, experience points arent gained through killing monsters, but acting on your character traits, developing relationships, meeting new NPCs and exploring new parts of the world.While all that is needed for the game is the core rulebook (and character sheets which are available for download online) the full Land of Eem set contains a hefty 500-page setting guide, a bestiary, and a hexcrawl map of Eem that give GMs a vast world to put in front of players. The setting guide is brimming with scenarios that would slot perfectly into a Saturday morning cartoon slot, with depth and care that prioritizes the people who already live there. If youve been looking for a lighter, story-focused fantasy game to play with the whole family (or even just your friend who loves Adventure Time) this is the game for you.The Land of Eem Core Rulebook is available for pre-order for $40 at Exalted Funeral, with expected delivery in February. A quickstart guide is available now.Land of Eem is available now from Exalted Funeral. The game was previewed using retail product provided by Exalted Funeral. Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence editorial content, though Vox Media may earn commissions for products purchased via affiliate links. You can find additional information about Polygons ethics policy here.

Designers are skipping steps of the process in a rush for faster outputs. But the contest that really matters is the race towards stakeholder alignment. Designers are both uniquely vulnerable to losing this race and uniquely positioned to winit.For several years, Design has been in survival mode. In a post-ZIRP economy where investment is driven by fear, the question of the ROI of design has returned from the grave with slightly different wording. Todays managers dont just want resultsthey want results fast, and they want to know how UX is going to help them dothat.As the lines between Design and Product continue to blur, one camp of designers has hewed to a line that is familiar to any product manager: that the value of design is not in the race to fastest outputs, but in the marathon towards valuable outcomes. But Product has been escaping the build trap for nearly a decade, and is no closer to making its wayout.Other designers have accepted the challenge, and doubled down on shortening their design process. On the surface, this calculus makes sense: if today value means velocity then the best way for us to demonstrate value is to hock outputs out the door as quickly as requests come in. If ship to learn is real then the faster we can ship, the faster we willlearn.But somehow, the learning has also failed to materialize. Despite what our analytics and user feedback tell us, those requests from upstream never seem to take that data into account. Build, measure, learn inevitably remains at build, build,build.The reason this keeps happening is that the feedback loop is broken. Its being intercepted at its most critical point by one charactera character well call the Fastest Gun in theWest.The Fastest Gun in the West is the hero of his own storyand wants to be the hero of everyone elses,too.The Fastest Gun in the WestproblemImpactful design decisions are typically made well above the level of product teamsCharlesLambdinThe name comes from the analogous phenomenon on Stack Overflow: the design of the system artificially inflates the salience of the first answer posted, disproportionate to its quality. A better answer posted late is buried under a worse one that has simply had more time to accruevotes.There are Fastest Guns in product orgs, as well. But rather than compete for internet points, they race for control of the narrative that frames how the business defines its priorities. The commonly-applied mechanisms of annual and quarterly planning only compound the natural anchoring bias of the first idea on thetable.What makes its way down the planning funnel is neither the most achievable output or the most impactful anticipated outcome, but the minimum viable alignment of the decision-makers involved.At a glance, this problem resembles the classic Waterfall BRD. But the situations couldnt be more different. In fact, Fastest Guns often use the vocabulary of agility and design thinking to paper over complexity and delay hard decisions. Rather than resolving disagreements, the Fastest Gun covers them with a cloud of deliberate ambiguity. He knows that the cloud cant last forever, but it doesnt need toits only there until the idea takes root as the thing we are committed to doing and is embedded in theroadmap.This is where the Fastest Gun in the West becomes a UX-specific problem. When the goal is to rush the idea from concept to backlogs as quickly as possible, user research is not just an unnecessary time sinkits a serious threat. The Fastest Gun will eagerly attack the idea of research, cultivating a sense of urgency, and claiming that it takes too long and we can defer learning about the problem until after weship.When designers accept this framing under the pressure of proving their value, they play right into the Fastest Gunshands.Potemkin DesignLeaders want the payoff of experimentation but without the cost of any dead ends.ScottBerkunThe Fastest Guns path to success relies entirely on creating a perception of a fait accomplithat the scrutiny of refinement is not necessary because it has already been completed. The fastest way to do that is to produce outputs that appear indistinguishable from the outputs of a real design process. Rather than do the work, they simply forge the receiptspopulating persona and JTBD templates with their own assumptions or LLM-generated drivel.The one thing they cant do on their own is produce high-fidelity mockups. The Fastest Gun is utterly dependent on designers to provide legitimacy to their vision, and will put tremendous pressure on design orgs to sacrifice every scrap scrutiny and process at the altar of velocity and skip directly to thisstage.But the deadline UX is rushed towards is not for getting working software into the hands of a user. Its to lock in the Fastest Guns assumptions, drowning stakeholders with trivial detail to avoid pushback on the flimsy premise underneath.A UX design practice that gives in to this working relationship may have a seat at the table, but will have nothing valuable tosay.Party in the front, business-as-usual in thebackDesign positioned in this way also takes on the entire risk when the idea underperforms the Fastest Guns lofty promises. This is becausewithout the decision-making feedback loops of the design processUX becomes entirely a delivery function. And if the vision is sound (after all, the stakeholders signed off on it) then the problems must be with implementation details.This is where the promise of ship to learn falls apart. The delivery team indeed learns something from building the product, but the decisions impacted by those learnings are not actually made in the delivery phase. The relationship between the delivery team and the Fastest Gun is not a feedback loop; choices are made based on horse-trading and internal marketing long before anyone on the ground has a say aboutthem.Fighting fire withdesignYou can be efficient or effective. When it comes to innovation, choose effective.Christina WodtkeThis is why designs appeals to quality have fallen on deaf earsin this influence system, quality is entirely besides the point. The fact that we care about quality and the Fastest Gun in the West does not is precisely what makes them thefastest.The answer is not to try and compete on velocity. No matter how many steps we cut from the design process, we will never be faster than someone who shoots from the hip. Instead, we need to engage stakeholders on a higher levelilluminate the target faster, to show how badly their shots are missing themark.A rational framing of how what we are doing rolls up to what we want to achieve is critical if we hope to be able to say no to low-quality ideas.Optimizing time to high fidelity mockups is the wrong strategy because mockups are not the appropriate tool for this. They are a tool for solutionsand at this point, you have not even framed theproblem.To beat the Fastest Gun, designers need to engage stakeholders at the level of the mental modelthe desired customer behavior change, the outcomes achieved by meeting their needs, and how they impact the business. A UI mockup doesnt carry any of that information, because the UI is not the product. It cannot tell you whether or not its premise isvalid.The lower the fidelity, the fewer distractions from the core value proposition.But low-fidelity tools can; they are designed for that purpose. The customer goal and problem, as well as the implications of the proposed solution framing, can be captured in a scenario storyboard or PRFAQ at the right level of fidelity to invite refinement rather than avoid it. These artifacts give enough clarity for a stakeholder to say no, this would not be a meaningful impact and create permission to avoid a dead end and choose another direction.If we have done our jobs right then by the time the Fastest Gun in the West tries to shoot, stakeholders will be able to see that he hasmissed.The fastest gun in UX: Why your team is telling the wrong story was originally published in UX Collective on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.